Summary
of Concepts to Consider
|
|
|
|
Victims |
- Where's the airliner? There's
no passenger jet in the CNN / Pentagon surveillance
tape, and only a few shiny, clean, isolated aircraft parts in Navy photos of the
attack.. The notion and eyewitness reports
that the jet 'vaporized'
is inconsistent with Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) victim
identification reports. 64 passengers,
- Titan Systems reported 'full
body scans of the victims, but this is inconsistent with fact that no
aircraft wreckage is found. If bodies were intact then airline parts
would have also survived. If the aircraft parts were 'pulverized' by
the building then so to would the bodies.
- Conflicting accounts: According to AFIP,
(Armed Forces Institute of Pathology) all but 5 of the 189 victims were
identified. But, this point is arguable considering Titan Systems report
(...in a steep dive...disappearing behind a tree line...going 400 mph....fully loaded with fuel...) .see conflicts
between Titan Systems / After-Action Report and ASCE (American Society of
Civil Engineers) report. (the
plane did not vaporize).
- CNN
passenger and crew list (no Arab names)
- 911
Commission completely ignores the 'no Arab names' issue. It just
assumes there were Muslim hijackers. How can this be reconciled and
shouldn't the 911 Commission have looked at it.
|
- It's virtually impossible that a Pentagon surveillance system could have missed
photographing a large passenger airliner only a few hundred feet from
its cameras. The surveillance images given to CNN are a comical
amateurish doctoring of evidence, The tapes do show what appears to be
a tail structure and exhaust from a small jet or missile. The American
Society of Civil Engineers identifies these structures
as indications of the attack aircraft
- No Arab names on the
Flight 77 passenger list. but
Titan Systems reports 5 hijackers on the flight.
- And the FBI gave
the American Society of Civil Engineers
very detailed information about the individual identities of the
hijackers, crew and passengers. They they include the hijackers
in a list of: 'Front-of-aircraft passenger fatalities'.
- No fatalities were found on the second floor (ASCE)
-
Links between Flight 77, Pentagon and Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse,
and Titan Systems International?
-
Search Flight 77 of the Bureau
of Transportation Statistics for airline flight information.
-
Pentagon Memorial
-
Rumsfeld
quote: "and I saw people on the grass, and we just, we tried
to put them in stretchers and then move them out across the grass towards
the road and lifted them over a jersey wall so the people on that side
could stick them into the ambulances. (no mention of this
in the 9/11 Commission report.) and see page 2
-
see Portland
Indymedia
-
|
Attack
Aircraft alphabetic
index |
- It is impossible for the
surveillance system to have missed the aircraft. Why is the Pentagon
not releasing the tapes?
- The Commission claimed that Vice President Cheney did not
arrive in the Presidential Emergency Operations Center until 9:58. That
claim was contradicted by the testimony of Norman Mineta, Secretary of
Transportation, who arrived at the PEOC around 9:20 where shortly thereafter
he witnessed Cheney confirm an order that is most logically interpreted as
an order not to shoot down an incoming object shortly before the Pentagon
was struck. Richard Clarke's account in his book, "Against All
Enemies," corroborates Mineta's timeline, which was evidently so
threatening to the official story that Mineta's testimony was deleted from
the 9/11 Commission video archives. Pakistan
Daily
- FBI confiscated tapes of nearby hotel and gas station surveillance
systems within minutes of the attack. See Flight77.info
for details on FOIA request for those tapes. Why won't the FBI release
these tapes?
- There are photos of the heliport just minutes after the
attack where no recognizable aircraft parts are seen,
Then subsequent photos within an hour of the attack show shiny
clean aircraft parts near the left side of the heliport that is hundreds of
feet from the impact site. see U.S. Navy
photos.
- Mysterious photo of men in
business clothes carrying plane wreckage
that appears in U.S. Navy photographs that still are present at the Navy's
website. And a study of the shadows and
surroundings helps to place these men at the scene and within an hour of the
attack.
- Extraordinary and unbelievable skill required for hijackers
to fly a passenger airliner parallel to the ground, clipping
many light poles, striking at the first floor level, and never actually hitting
the ground before entering the building.
- Very little damage to the 2nd floor prior to section
collapse. Only two windows damaged on the second floor. This is
shown in government photos prior to the collapse of the section. Collapse of section due to fire and not the impact of the
attack aircraft.
- See graphic of nose cone
damage by a bird strike and then consider the numerous publications that
claim the nose cone of the 757 penetrated three rings of the
Pentagon.
- No apparent damage from two 15 ton jet engines that would
have hit the building at 250-400 miles per hour. Just a single small
entry hole about the size of a garage
door. see AFCE report.
- A phone call by Ted Olsen's wife from Flight 77 has drawn
attention and doubt to it's authenticity.
- A C-130 cargo plane was seen by many witnesses at the time
of the attack.
- Dramatic,
extraordinary transformation of Pentagon crash site in only one
day....curious? Investigation? Destroyed evidence.
- Existence of War
Games on 9/11 admitted to by General Myers.
- The tail of a 757 is nearly 45 ft. high, but the visible
damage to the area where the tail presumably entered only reaches 25
ft. ASCE report
- The width
of the opening caused by the attack aircraft is only half of what would be
expected. There appears to be no damage from the wing tips.
Compare to WTC
wing tip damage
-
Dov Zakheim, Eglin AFB to MacDill AFB in Florida and Dov
Zakheim's work via SPC contracts, flight termination systems, remote
controlled aircraft systems ... more
-
|
- NORAD
failures. The Pentagon
is one of the most heavily guarded structures in the world? What is
role of war games being held that day?
- What is 'Operation
Vigilant Guardian'...and relation to war games on 9/11?
- The section of the Pentagon struck held personnel of the
Office of Naval Intelligence, who were responsible for monitoring
terrorist responses....???
- The evidence far better fits a scenario where a smaller
remote control aircraft entered the building at the first floor level.
Many eye witness accounts of a 'small commuter jet'.
- No damage to the lawn underneath the flight path of the
attack aircraft.
-
See shadow studies of the event to help analyze the
event. and see Men in business clothes carrying aircraft wreckage
to an isolated spot on the Pentagon lawn within
one hour of attack.
-
A streak
in the Pentagon lawn that is parallel to the flight path of the attack
aircraft. At both ends of the streak there are concrete pads, one
seemingly freshly poured. Is this streak related to a missile
guidance system
-
Why were there temporary antenna
systems on the roof of the Pentagon in the flight path of the attack
aircraft. . In CNN / Pentagon
surveillance tape, many see what they believe is the attack
aircraft.
-
If you agree with the idea that a remotely controlled
aircraft attacked the Pentagon, then certain equipment is required. These
pages detail possible components of that system.
-
Inconsistencies:
Black Boxes were recovered according to information given
to ASCE by the FBI? But FBI says they were not recovered.
-
Hijackers identities?
conflicts with No Arab
names on
Flight 77. see FOIA request.
-
The landing gear system of a Boeing 757 weighs nearly 2
tons. (3800 lbs) The landing gear mentioned by Titan
Systems reports and photos
from FEMA show a much smaller landing gear.
-
Image manipulation: Why were obviously doctored
images of the Pentagon attack released to CNN and why are they
manipulated?
-
Considering the angle of attack, the right wing tip would
have struck the building the same time as the nose, but ASCE
report says no evidence of outer third of right wing tip hitting building.
Comparisons to WTC show that there would have been evidence of damage by
the wing tips.
-
See Library of
Congress photo of attack.
-
Moussaoui
Trial exhibits
-
Recent Press coverage
-
Dissident
Voice "Stop Belittling the
Theories About September 11 ... An airliner almost certainly did not
hit the Pentagon.
-
Whole
Life Times
-
Citizens
for Legitimate Government 9/11 Chronology
-
-
Huffington
Post, Al Queda and flight 77, but Peter Lance confirms that Flight 77
hit the Pentagon????
-
Although the official 9/11 Commission Report (CR) said Vice
President Richard Cheney did not arrive at the Presidential Emergency
Operations Center(PEOC) under the White House until "shortly before
10 a.m." that tragic day, Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta
testified when he arrived in the room at 9:20 a.m. Cheney was already
there. (CR published no testimony from Mineta.) The timeline is
important because if Cheney arrived at 10 a.m. it would have been about 20
minutes after the Pentagon was allegedly struck by a hijacked airplane at
9:38 a.m., too late for him to authorize the Air Force to shoot it down.
Some 125 Pentagon employees perished in the attack. go
to page 22
|
Pentagon Building
alphabetic
index
|
|
- Dish antennas on the C Ring
of the Pentagon that don't appear in overhead views prior to 9/11. The
antennas are directly in the flight path of the attack jet. and page
15, ASCE report.
- The outer wall of the Pentagon
is not extraordinarily thick or impenetrable. There is evidence
that portions of the facade was faced with aluminum siding.
- The impact point
was the first and only place that had been recently renovated with blast
resistant windows and reinforcements. Only two second story windows
were broken by the initial attack. (ASCE
Report)
- In studying the damage to the generator
struck by the attack aircraft, no structure on the 757 could have
created the damage seen. And if the aircraft was tilted, as many
sources have reported, the right landing gear would not have caused
the fence pole damage
- There was no effort to preserve a 'crime scene' whatsoever
after the attack. Within 24 hours there were hundreds of tents and
other structures set up start reconstructing the damaged part of the
building. No effort to investigate.
|
Reports
alphabetic
subject index Reports
Index
|
- Report
Index
- Within minutes of the arrival of the FBI to the Pentagon,
an evacuation to a nearby underpass
of all responders was ordered. Four mysterious evacuations would occur in first 24
hours. see After-Action Report and
three more similar evacuation were ordered. Why?
- National Fire Protection
Assoc, first response issues, AFRR, why were Reagan International fire
fighting units responding to a 'traffic accident in front of the Pentagon
as the attack jet flew nearly overhead?
- There are eyewitness reports of both a large airliner and a
small commuter jet. And also many claims of multiple planes in the
area at low altitude.
- The FBI was the sole source of information on 3 or 4 more
high-jacked airplane threats after the initial attack. How much did
those threats contribute to the interruption
of fire fighting efforts and the subsequent collapse of the Pentagon section? The original fire was reported as being under control in 7 minutes.
National Fire Protection Association report.
|
- Politics: anyone who supports
Bush will think this is all bunk
- No governmental or private conservative publications show
any photos of the Pentagon after the attack but before the section
collapse.
-
Most Debunking sites
use eyewitnesses to support their theories. see GOPUSA's
Bobby Eberle statement. (dead link)?
-
Small jet engine turbo fan parts found and photographed by FEMA.
- Download Army, Navy
photos...none show any aircraft parts or aircraft wreckage other than
one hub and a landing gear shaft that looks to small to belong to a Boeing
757..
- Main U.S. government reports include: ACFD / Titan Systems
After-Action (Arlington County
Fire Department), USACE Pentagon Building Performance (US
Army Corps of Engineers), 911
Commission, JEMS,
NIST, NFPA National Fire Protection
Association, FEMA, (no NTSB
reports), American Society
of Civil Engineers
- Moussaoui
Trial exhibits
|
Secondary Points
alphabetic
index
|
- Official claims of replacing original
'granite slabs' exterior in reconstruction of Pentagon disputed.
- Motorist
finds part in back seat as jet passes overhead 9/11. That part is now in
National Museum of Natural history and much speculation has surrounded it.
It has been speculated that it is part of a Global Hawk aircraft.
- Washington Post article
mentions secondary explosions?
- Propaganda? Frank Probst saw engine vaporize, and article
says plane caused 75-100 foot gap in Pentagon. debunk
sites DCMilitary.com
- A U.S. Flag that stood in an
office on the second floor of the Pentagon and only about 30 ft away from
the impact site was not even knocked over. Out of hundreds of photos
of area, only one has this flag in it.?
- According to JEMS
a 2000 gallon fuel tank was ignited by the attack jet.
- No steel
girders on interior walls of Pentagon, just reinforced concrete pillars
- Comparisons between
WTC and
Pentagon structures and attack jet entry holes.
- Neither the 911 Commission Report
or Titan Systems (Arlington County After Action
Report mention downed light poles or parallel-to-the-ground flight path.
- The attack aircraft sliced into renovated
and non-renovated sections.
- The tail of a 757 is nearly 45 ft. high, but the visible
damage to the Pentagon where the tail presumably entered only reaches 25
ft. ASCE report, page 24
- Punchout hole could not have been caused by nose cone of
757.
- The FBI released
the names of the hijackers in only
three days, and is flawed. and see CNN
|
- Go to Mysterious
car switching photo sequence. Unexplainable disappearance and
reappearance of vehicle within 30 ft. of impact hole in
Pentagon. pic
- There are only a handful of paragraphs in the 911
Commission Report on Pentagon attack details. Nothing about the
hijackers on Flight 77.
- A van that is parked in the
grass along side the heliport is visible at the time of the attack. Is
it associated with the clean, shiny aircraft wreckage?
-
People who lived close to the Pentagon were completely used
to low flying aircraft because of Reagan
International Airport.
- If a Boeing 757 had flown over Interstate
395 at a level that would clip off the top of light poles, the jet wash
would have blown cars off the highway surface. see video and
experiment details.
- Michael Defina details
and Defrina and crews went inside ...... reported
seeing nose gear.
- The Pentagon
Building Performance Report from the American
Society of Civil engineers (ASCE) ....has overhead photos of Pentagon where
no dish antennas are seen on Ring C roof...lending evidence to the idea the
dish antennas were temporary.
- from
ASCE report: "...there are no discrete marks on the building
corresponding to the positions of the outer third of the right wing".
- ASCE did not
have access to the area when there was any aircraft wreckage inside, and the
information they had on fatalities was provided by the FBI.
- AMEC, GHWB, Shell offshore oil platforms
links?
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers debris
removal? Very little data
anywhere on the aircraft wreckage removal?
- Is this an insurance fraud scam? SUV
./ Minivan swap at the impact site of the attack jet.
|
page index 2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17 18
19 20
21 22 23
24 25
26 27 28
29 30
31 32
alpha index
page 1
|
page
2
|
page
3
|
page
4
|
page 5
|
|
Dov Zakheim, 9/11 mastermind? below
|
The surveillance cameras could not have
missed a commercial airliner
|
|
|
- Kucinich and Gravel question 9/11 Commission
Report
|
Page
6
|
Page
7
|
Page 8
|
Page 9
|
Page 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
page 11
|
page 12
|
page 13
|
page 14
|
page 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antennas?
|
page 16
|
page 17
|
page 18
|
page
19
|
page
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
page 21
|
page 22
|
page 23
|
page 24
|
page 25
|
|
|
|
|
|
page 26
|
page
27
|
page
28
|
page
29
|
Links
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- page 31
- Robert M. Bass Group, Bush Clinton business
ties
- Murdoch, Obama dirty tricks
|
Page 32 Remote
Controlled Aircraft, Dov Zakheim, and 9/11
|
|
TOP
HOME
|
|
|
|
|
9/11
Investigation NewsFollowUp pages index |
Plame
/ Wilson / Novak |
Pentagon
mole, AIPAC Spies |
Forged
Yellowcake docs |
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top of Page
Lear
Video "That's BS ...
could never happen in a million years" WTC,
Pentagon, Pennsylvania ... 911 |
FAA animation
OpEdNews
Nov 2008 The straw that breaks the back of the official
narrative of Flight 77 is the eyewitness testimony of Pentagon
police officer Roosevelt Roberts. Although Officer Roberts
recounted his story to The Library of Congress’ September 11,
2001 Documentary Project in November 2001,13 it took another six
years for the PentaCon’s Citizen Investigation Team to discover
him. ... Officer Roberts recounts being just
steps from the Pentagon’s loading dock when he heard an
explosion. He immediately ran to the center of the loading dock
and looked up. That’s when he caught sight of a large commercial
airliner, approximately one-hundred feet off the ground over the
Pentagon’s south parking lot. The airliner was banking as it
flew from his sight. ... Without knowing,
Officer Roberts has confirmed the fly-over hypothesis that many in
the 9/11 Truth Movement see as the only answer that fits the
evidence. Roberts explains away this airliner as a second
commercial airliner that was flying over the Pentagon reservation.
However the actual eyewitnesses who were outside and had a clear
field of view all attest that there was only one commercial
airliner that flew anywhere near the Pentagon.
|
New
York Magazine, Scoop
|
Dr.
Kevin Barrett, CNN, 9/11, Inside job YouTube
|
Common
Dreams "Pentagon's
version of 9/11 far from the truth"
Free
Market News
"Former Minnesota Governor, actor and wrestling star
Jesse Ventura has publicly questioned the official version of events
behind 9/11 and gone further than ever before in citing Operation
Northwoods and the Gulf of Tonkin as examples of how the government has
planned and carried out staged war provocations in the past. -Alex
Jones"
|
Major General Albert Stubblebine
Says Flight 77 Didn't Hit the Pentagon, go
to You Tube video
|
Alligator
Online, Real
Change News, Zogby
poll
|
PatriotsQuestion911.com
Senior Military,
Intelligence, Law Enforcement,
and Government Officials Question
the 9/11 Commission Report |
|
|
|
- LetsRollForums
"The Navy Command Center was the Target of the Attack “The US
Authorities have tried to make believe that the damage caused to the
Pentagon, on September 11, 2001 was caused by the crash of a hijacked Boeing
airliner on the building. This lie was meant to hide the fact that a bombing
attack was in fact carried out by a group of people who had authorized
access to the Pentagon and that the target was not the Department of
Defense in general but the new Navy Command Center.” ...
Why might someone want to target the Naval Command Center (NCC)? Most
people know of the NORAD “all seeing” defensive network, with radar and
satellite capabilities. But in their shadow, the NCC also was a very
formable command and control facility, with some overlapping capacities. The
site of the attack occurred on the first floor at the Naval Command Center
portion of the Pentagon. The facility was a powerhouse of information
gathering, command and control, and systems for monitoring “all warfare
mission areas.” ... Starting in 1996 the Navy was implementing
an upgrade; The Tactical Command System (TCS) upgrades the Navy’s Command
Control, Computer and Intelligence (C3I) systems and processes C3I
information for all warfare mission areas including planning, direction and
reconstruction of missions for peacetime, wartime and times of crises.
Included among these C3I systems are: the unified command centers of CINCPAC
and CINCLANT, the Navy Command Center…[i] ... The only U.S.
Navy Command Center survivor, Lieutenant Kevin Shaeffer, claimed: “Had the
Command Center not been destroyed it surely would have been able to provide
the highest levels of our Navy leadership with updates as to exactly what
was occurring.”[ii] ... If someone wanted to silence any evidence or
witnesses that had privy knowledge of what happened on 9/11 — there were
two choices; either they were with the perpetrators and cooperated, or they
weren’t and had to be destroyed. This might have made the NCC a prime
target if the Navy wasn’t in on the neocon’s Attack on America. However,
there is no evidence that the Navy was directly involved. The Office
of Naval Intelligence had its offices in the Naval Command Center."
- Security camera footage of the Pentagon attack, from the
nearby Doubletree Hotel. [Source: Public domain]In mid-September 2006, the
FBI releases never-before-seen footage from security cameras at a Citgo gas
station near the Pentagon, recorded on the morning of 9/11. Agents seized
the video just minutes after the attack on the Pentagon (see (After 9:37
a.m.) September 11, 2001). The FBI releases it in response to a Freedom of
Information Act request and related lawsuit by the public interest group
Judicial Watch. Many people believed the footage would show the strike on
the Pentagon. However, the video, depicting views from the gas station’s
six security cameras, shows that these cameras apparently did not capture
it. The footage has been partially obscured by the FBI, though, to protect
the privacy of individuals who were in the Citgo convenience store at the
time it was recorded. [Citgo, 9/11/2001; Federal Bureau of Investigation,
9/13/2006 ; CNS News, 9/15/2006; Judicial Watch, 9/15/2006] Early in
December, the FBI releases more security camera footage from the morning of
9/11, taken from atop the Doubletree Hotel in Arlington, Virginia, which it
also seized after the attacks. This is also in response to the Freedom of
Information Act lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch and others. The grainy video
does not show American Airlines 77 in flight, but does show the explosion
after the Pentagon was hit. According to Judicial Watch, this “seemingly
contradicts a sworn FBI affidavit in a related case claiming that the
Doubletree security recordings ‘did not show the impact of Flight 77 into
the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.’” [Doubletree Hotel, 9/11/2001; CNN,
12/2/2006; KWTX, 12/4/2006; Judicial Watch, 12/7/2006] In the weeks after
9/11, it was reported that FBI investigators confiscated footage of the
impact on the Pentagon from a hotel nearby (see September 21, 2001). Whether
the hotel referred to was the Doubletree is unknown. Judicial Watch is
trying to obtain 9/11 footage from cameras at the Sheraton National Hotel,
which is also near the Pentagon. [Leader-Telegram, 9/12/2001; Judicial
Watch, 5/16/2006; CNN, 5/17/2006] Entity Tags: US Department of Defense,
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Judicial Watch
|
|
|
|
Cossiga, 9/11, Bush,
Iraq, Afghanistan top
|
PROGRESSIVE |
REFERENCE |
CONSERVATIVE* |
- WMR
9/11
was an inside job, according to former
Italian President Francesco Cossiga, carried out by elements of the CIA
and Mossad ... and to be blamed on Arabic countries ... with Berlusconi
fake videos ... and links to Niger forged docs ... all to justify
attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq ... oil . more search terms: NATO,
western intelligence, Osama bin Laden, Mediasat TV, Palazzo Chigi,
Corriere della Serra, Gladio, PM Aldo Moro, Italian Red Brigades, the
Israeli connected SITE, Search for International Terrorist Entities
file
copy
- Patriots Question 9/11
Cossiga
|
|
- Air
Force Times B-52 story, Minot claims five missing, what's up?
- Air
Force Times "A security officer at Barksdale Air Force Base was
shot and slightly wounded Thursday at a hangar on the base." name
not released
- Army
Times, story on B-52,
- Iran
Press TV
print screen and text
..." Cheney ordered nuking Iran" Iran quotes Webster Tarpley a
- Bush, White House
- CaptainsQuatersBlog, bombing raid,
Israel sought American approval, prove WMD, Kim Jong-Il, Sun Myung Moon,
Osirak,
- Center for Defense Information, Philip
Coyle, crash would ignite high explosives, leak plutonium, detonation
not possible,
- Defense
News Emig, Lundell, assumed commands in June 2007, courts-martial,
pylon database,
|
- Patriots Question 9/11
Just a few of the signatories: Architects and
Engineers: Richard Gage, AIA, Architect H. Theodore Elden, Jr.,
B.Arch Frank A. DeMartini Eric Douglas Jack Keller, PhD, PE, F.ASCE Jörg
Schneider, Dr hc James R. Carr, PhD, PE David Leifer, BSc, BArch, M.Ed, PhD
David A. Johnson, B.Arch, Mario Fontana, Dr Sc CE Danny Jowenko Commander
Ted Muga, BS CE William Rice, BS CE, MS CE, PE Dennis Holloway, M.Arch
Anders Björkman, MSc Francisco A. Planes, B. Arch Basil Orechwa, PE
Howard Switzer Joseph M. Phelps, MS CE, PE Charles N. Pegelow,
BS CE Joseph Testa, PE David Heller, BS Physics, M.Arch Chester W. Gearhart,
BS CE, PE James Martin Tomlin, B.Arch Nelson L. Johnson, M.Arch, PE Andrew
McClure, B.Arch Larry Dodge, B.Arch John C. Link, M.Arch Thomas N. Burnham,
M.Arch David C. Avina, BS ME James W. Broadbent, M.Arch Steven Eugene
Ramsey, BS CE Douglas Claude Rhodes, BS Arch MORE BELOW
- Richard Gage, AIA, Architect H. Theodore
Elden, Jr., B.Arch Frank A. DeMartini Eric Douglas Jack Keller, PhD, PE,
F.ASCE Jörg Schneider, Dr hc James R. Carr, PhD, PE David Leifer, BSc,
BArch, M.Ed, PhD David A. Johnson, B.Arch, Mario Fontana, Dr Sc CE Danny
Jowenko Commander Ted Muga, BS CE William Rice, BS CE, MS CE, PE Dennis
Holloway, M.Arch Anders Björkman, MSc Francisco A. Planes, B. Arch Basil
Orechwa, PE Howard Switzer Joseph M. Phelps,
MS CE, PE Charles N. Pegelow, BS CE Joseph Testa, PE David Heller, BS
Physics, M.Arch Chester W. Gearhart, BS CE, PE James Martin Tomlin, B.Arch
Nelson L. Johnson, M.Arch, PE Andrew McClure, B.Arch Larry Dodge, B.Arch
John C. Link, M.Arch Thomas N. Burnham, M.Arch David C. Avina, BS ME James
W. Broadbent, M.Arch Steven Eugene Ramsey, BS CE Douglas Claude Rhodes, BS
Arch
|
TOP
HOME
Alphabetic
Subject Index
|
|
9/11
planning?
See Page 32 for in depth
research
Online
Journal: Following Zakheim and Pentagon trillions to Israel and 9-11
By Jerry Mazza Online Journal Associate Editor July 31, 2006
|
Think of this as part two of
Recherche du trillions perdu, my Online Journal article on Dov Zakheim,
former Bush appointee as Pentagon Comptroller from May 4, 2001 to March
10, 2004. At that time he was unable to explain the disappearance of $1
trillion dollars. Actually, nearly three years earlier, Donald Rumsfeld
announced on September 10, 2001 that an audit discovered $2.3 trillion was
also missing from the Pentagon books. That story, as I mentioned, was
buried under 9-11’s rubble. The two sums disappeared on Zakheim’s
watch.
Yet on May 6, 2004, Zakheim took a lucrative position at
Booz Allen Hamilton, one of the most prestigious strategy consulting firms
in the world. One of its clients then was Blessed Relief, a charity said
to be a front for Osama bin Laden. Booz, Allen & Hamilton (Woolsey,
VP- Booz Allen) then also worked closely with DARPA, the Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency, which is the research arm of the
Department of Defense. So the dark card was shifted to another part of the
deck.
See Page 32 for in depth
research
Judicial Inc’s bio of Dov (linked below) tells us
Zakheim was/is a dual Israeli/American citizen and an ordained rabbi and
had been tracking the halls of US government for 25 years, casting defense
policy and influence on Presidents Reagan, Clinton, Bush Sr. and Bush Jr.
He is, as I described him earlier, the bionic Zionist. In fact, Judicial
Inc points out that most of Israel’s armaments were gotten thanks to
him. Squads of US F-16 and F-15 were classified military surplus and sold
to Israel at a fraction of their value.
Judicial Inc also points out that Israel, a country of
4.8 million Russian and Polish Jewish émigrés, flies on one of the
biggest Air Forces in the world, thanks to Dov. Conflict of interest here?
Depends on what you’re interested in. That is, in 2001 Dov was CEO of
SPS International, part of System Planning Corporation, a defense
contractor majoring in electronic warfare technologies, including
remote-controlled aircraft systems, and the notorious Flight Termination
System (FTS) technology that could hijack even a hijacked plane and land
or crash it wherever.
More from the resume: Wikipedia points out that Zakheim
is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and in 2000 a
co-author of the Project for the New American Century’s position paper,
Rebuilding America’s Defenses, advocating the necessity for a
Pearl-Harbor-like incident to mobilize the country into war with its
enemies, mostly Middle Eastern Muslim nations.
As to Dov’s hell-raiser lineage, Judicial Inc points
out that Grandpa Zakheim was born in 1870, Julius Zakheim (Zhabinka), in
the Ukraine, a Russian rabbi who married a relative of Karl Marx. He was a
Menshevik/Bolshevik and played a leading role in the 1905 turmoil that
paved the way for the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution. The Bolshevik master plan
called for the state of Israel, which was chosen for its proximity to the
world's oil and an area of religious significance.
Dov’s Father, Rabbi Jacob I. Zakheim was born in 1910
and reared in Poland’s swarm of Zionist hard guys, read assassins and
bombers. His Polish town, near Bilaystok, also brought us Yitzhak Shir,
and family friends included Menachem Begin and Moshe Arens. Dov’s father
was an active member of Betar, formed in 1923 in Riga, Latvia. Its goal
was to control the Middle East (and its oil). It was known that the Jewish
people needed their own country and they chose Palestine and claimed it a
Jewish state “on both sides of the Jordan.”
Betar was in essence a terrorist organization formed
because Zionists were sick of being chased from and arrested in country
after country. They wanted both a place to escape and a base for their
power. Betar joined forces with the Haganah, Irgun, and Stern gangs. With
no prospect of a Jewish state in sight, they argued that armed struggle
against the British was the only way. Since Britain occupied Palestine and
was containing them they went on a blood feast of bombings that killed
hundreds of British soldiers. The British pulled out, but the Zionists
continue to maul the Arabs to this day.
For a concise history on the Formation of Israel in
1947, I suggest this link to theocracywatch.org.
For an interesting look at “The United States and the
Recognition of Israel: A Chronology” compiled from Harry S. Truman and
the Founding of Israel by Michael T. Benson, link above. For a rounded
look at Israel, see Wikipedia.
Returning to Dov: he was born in Brooklyn in 1943 and
attended exclusive Jewish schools, spent summers in Israel Zionist camps,
which trained the Zionists of the future. As to Dov’s formal education,
he graduated from Columbia University in 1970 and the University of Oxford
in 1972. From 1973 to 75, he attended the London school of Jewish studies,
described as a “Harry Potter” type cauldron; among the subjects Jewish
supremacy, Advanced Bible, Talmud, Jewish Mysticism, Holocaust, Anglo-Judaica,
and Zionism. After, he was ordained a Rabbi. From 1975 to 80, Zakheim was
an adjunct professor at the National War College, Yeshiva University,
Columbia University and Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut.
As he stepped into the Reagan administration, he talked
them into funding development of the Lavi Fighter at a cost of $3 billion.
The Lavi was a total flop and Israel dropped it, though it owed $450
million in contract fees that were cancelled. Israel, according to
Judicial Inc, also created a story that China was eager to buy the Lavi.
Zakheim convinced Reagan that China had to be sandbagged. Reagan gave
Israel $500 million for its lost contracts. Reagan then threw in a wing of
F-16’s as a bonus and sign of good will. Do we see a pattern here,
personal, familial, career-wise, of over-the-top Israeli advocacy?
Again, during Zakheim’s tenure as Pentagon controller
from May 4, 2001, to March 10, 2004, over $3 trillion dollars were
unaccounted for. Additionally, military Information was jeopardized and
military contractors billed the US for Israeli items: $50 million dollar
fighter jets were rated as surplus and the list rolls on. As the scandal
of the missing trillion dollars surfaced and Dov resigned, Israel was
handed the finest fighter jets in the US inventory while 15 percent of US
jets were grounded for lack of parts. In whose best interest was this?
But Dov is not alone. He is one of an elite group of
Jewish Americans/Israelis who inter-marry and enter government. They and
their Christian counterparts are called neocons and their sole purpose is
directing US policy. Most of them are dual citizens and few serve in the
US military. Think of Paul Wolfowitz, Elliot Abrams, Richard Perle, Ben
Wattenberg, to mention a few. Whether their motivation is anger at the
Muslim world, seen as a religious and territorial enemy, or a deep-rooted
reaction to the Holocaust, the culmination of European anti-Semitism,
their reactionary militarism becomes a world-threatening force unto
itself. Hence our concern.
Dov and the World Trade Center
Perhaps not coincidentally in May 2001, when Dov served
at the Pentagon, it was an SPS (his firm’s) subsidiary, Tridata
Corporation, that oversaw the investigation of the first “terrorist”
attack on the World Trade Center in 1993. This would have given them
intimate knowledge of the security systems and structural blueprints of
the World Trade Center. From the '90s through 2001, WTC Security was
handled by Securacom, a Kuwait-American firm, on whose board Marvin Bush,
the president’s brother, sat. After 9/11, Securacom was let go, changed
its name to Stratosec, and was delisted from the Stock Exchange in 2002.
According to Conspiracy News.net writers Shadow and ‘Pax’
in Dov Zakheim and the 9/11 Conspiracy, (and I suggest you look at this
link) “According to the SPC website (4), a recent customer at that time
was Eglin AFB, located in Florida. Eglin is very near another Air Force
base in Florida-MacDill AFB, where Dov Zakheim contracted to send at least
32 Boeing 767 aircraft, as part of the Boeing /Pentagon tanker lease
agreement. (5)
”As the events of September 11, 2001 occurred, little
was mentioned about these strange connections, and the possible motives
and proximity of Dov Zakheim and his group. Since there was little
physical evidence remaining after the events, investigators were left only
with photographic and anecdotal evidence.
“There is a photograph of the Flight Termination
System module, from their site.(5). Note it has a cylindrical shape, and
is consistent with the size and shape of the object observed under the
fuselage of flight 175. “The Boeing lease deal involved the
replacement of the aging KC-135 tanker fleet with these smaller, more
efficient Boeing 767s that were to be leased by Dov Zakheim's group. The
planes were to be refitted with refueling equipment, including lines and
nozzle assemblies.” (Remember both Flight
175, that hit the South Tower, and Flight 11, that hit the North Tower,
were Boeing 767s. Flights 77 and 93 were 757s.)
“In the enlargement of flight 175’s photo, we can
clearly see a cylindrical object under the fuselage, and a structure that
appears to be attached to the right underside of the rear fuselage
section. ”When seen in comparison, it is obvious that the plane
approaching the Trade Center has both of these structures-the FTS module
and the midair refueling equipment, as configured on the modified Boeing
767 tankers. Of particular interest is the long tube-like anomalous
structure under the rear fuselage area of flight 175-this structure runs
along the right rear bottom of the plane, as it also does on the Boeing
767 refueling tanker pictured.
”After considering this information, I [the author/s]
am convinced that flight 175, as pictured on the news media and official
reports, was in fact a refitted Boeing 767 tanker, with a Flight
Termination System attached. Use of this system would also explain the
expert handling of aircraft observed in both New York and Washington
investigations, which has been officially credited to inexperienced flight
school students.
“Since the refitted 767s were able to carry both
passengers and a fuel load, as shown in this photo, it is likely that the
plane designated Flight 175 was in fact a refitted 767 tanker, disguised
as a conventional commercial passenger plane.
“As shown in this photo of a 767 being serviced, the
FTS unit, when in position, would be small and unobtrusive enough to be
fairly innocuous (at least to casual observers, such as passengers). The
smallest circle indicates the size and position of the anomaly depicted in
the photos of Flight 175. The larger circle, which is the size of the
engine housing, shows the size of the anomaly in relation to the engine.
Note the size and position of the open hatches on the engine housing,
which would tend to discredit the widely held theory that the anomaly is
an open hatch or cargo door.
“As the . . . diagram shows, all flights involved in
the events traveled very near many military installations, and appear to
have traveled in a manner suggesting guidance and possible transfer of the
control of the planes among the bases.
”Since the evidence from the World Trade Center site
was quickly removed, there is little concrete evidence of the involvement
of Dov Zakheim, who has since left his position at the Pentagon. However,
the proximity of Eglin AFB to MacDill AFB in Florida and Dov Zakheim's
work via SPC contracts and the Pentagon leasing agreement on both of these
installations, combined with SPC's access to World Trade Center structural
and security information from their Tridata investigation in 1993, is
highly suspicious. Considering his access to Boeing 767 tankers, remote
control flight systems, and his published views in the PNAC document, it
seems very likely he is in fact a key figure in the alleged terrorist
attacks in New York City on September 11, 2001.”
EDITORIAL RESPONSE TO READERS' COMMENTS:
”In response to some of our readers who have
questioned our premise that it was Rabbi Dov Zakheim who 'called for' the
Pearl Harbor type of incident, we here at Conspiracy News Net acknowledge
that the PNAC document was written by the likes of William Kristol and
Donald Kagan, and therefore as the real brains behind the agenda they are
the ones calling for it in a literal sense. However, we do stand by our
assertion that the Rabbi called for it as well, insofar that he signed his
name onto this document. If he signed it he agrees with it and therefore
he is calling for it.
”Some of you have argued that we are singling out
Rabbi Zakheim because he is Jewish, implying that we are pushing some sort
of twisted anti-Semitic agenda while noting that he is not the only one
who signed the PNAC document and therefore wondering why our article is
about him and not the others. We do not mean to imply that the Rabbi acted
alone, our article simply points out that Rabbi Zakheim had access to
things like structural integrity, blueprints and any number of important
facets of information about the WTC through his work with TRIDATA
CORPORATION in the investigation of the bombing of the WTC in 1993.
“That he had access to REMOTE CONTROL Technology
through his work at System Planning Corporation (SPC). That he had access
to BOEING AIRCRAFT through a lease deal HE BROKERED while working at the
Pentagon. “ . . . Finally that he was part of a group of
politically radical Straussian Neo-Conservatives, who, through their
association with PNAC, called for restructuring of the Middle East, noting
that a Pearl Harbor type of event MAY BE NEEDED to foster the frame of
mind required for the American public to accept such a radical foreign
policy agenda. In light of all this information we here at Conspiracy News
Net stand by our statement that Mr. Zakheim not only called for the
slamming of the WTC Towers on 9-11, but he activity took part in their
demolition by providing the logistics necessary for such an attack to
occur.”
Coda, a Bitter Frosting on the
Cake Whether or not you agree in whole or in part
with these findings, here is an eye-opening article originally from the
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette by Milan Simonich. It is titled Army unit piecing
together accounts of Pentagon attack, and from it comes this striking
information in paragraph six . . ."One Army office in the Pentagon
lost 34 of its 65 employees in the attack. Most of those killed in the
office, called Resource Services Washington, were civilian accountants,
bookkeepers and budget analysts. They were at their desks when American
Airlines Flight 77 struck.”
Apart from the question of whether it was F 77 that
struck the Pentagon, it is more than ironic that accountants, bookkeepers
and budgets analysts, the very people who could pick up the financial
frauds were struck. Especially since the hit was directed supposedly at
the Office of Naval Intelligence. Nevertheless, Dov is busy at his
Booz Allen job, involved in Strategic Services and who knows what other
dark plans as we speak, even as the Middle East is under heavy fire once
again from Israel and its fervid ally, the US government.
Jerry Mazza is a freelance writer living in New York.
Reach him at gvmaz@verizon.net.
|
-
If the reality of the information on these pages turns out to
really be true, I offer my deepest condolences to the victims of this tragic
event. These pages are being created to help expose to the world
my belief that a Boeing 757 did not crash into the Pentagon on 9/11/01.
There is clear evidence on these pages that a small jet or missile did and
surveillance tapes that still can be accessed at CNN are a hoax.
-
New search terms: Defense Dept Inspector General,
military's testimony knowingly false, Lt. Col. Brian Maka, Transportation
Department, FAA, fighter jets scrambled timelines testimony timelines don't
match, NORAD tapes were the basis for an article in the new edition of Vanity
Fair magazine by Michael Bronner, an associate producer on the movie
"United 93". VP Cheney told officials to do nothing about Flight
77 as it was approaching Washington D.C.
-
From Killtown: more search terms: Dan Rather, CBS News,
fireballsize, Osama bin Laden medical treatment, Pakistan kidney dialysis,
Rawalpindi, Ahmed Arashid, Taliban, Captain Charles Burlingame, NORAD exercises
(Amalgam Virgo 01) of hijacked planes, Pentagon, commercial airliner, Ashcroft
stops flying, Military District of Washington, Raytheon marks pilot-less landing of
Boeing 727, British Operation Swift Sword in Afghanistan September 2001, Dept of
Transportation exercise August 2001, Israeli shipping company moves out of WTC,
Jeb Bush puts the Florida National Guard on alert September 2001, Marine
aviation group moves, Pentagon officials canceled plans Sept 10th, rookie takes
control of National Military Command, Fort Belvoir exercises, Israeli firm Odigo
gets 2 hour warning of WTC 9/11, White House staff given Cipro full month before
anthrax attacks, Rumsfeld predicts attack minutes before it happens, Larry
Silverstein absent from WTC, FEMA attack drill 9/11, Twin Towers asbestos
problem solved by attack, bomb-sniffing dogs removed days before 9/11, Fiduciary
Trust meeting questions, Ground Zero workers claim help FBI find black boxes WTC,
Pentagon emergency equipment out of storage for inventory check, medic studied
disaster plan hours before attack occurred, air traffic controllers thought
'flight 77' appeared as a military jet fighter, Hani Hanjour was a horrible
pilot and didn't have a seat assignment, could not rent Cessna, USA Today
reporter Richard Benedetto witness, renovation coordinator said aircraft sounded
like a missile, Space News editor Lon Rains 'convinced a missile' hit, also
Steve Patterson, and Joel Sucherman witness, Khavkin saw 'small commercial
aircraft', Engineer Steve DeChiaro saw only 'small hole', Army Captain Lincoln
Liebner "didn't see any of the plane". cordite, Michael Ledeen,
fascism, Don Perkal of the Office of Secretary of Defense said he heard two
explosions minutes apart and heard that a bomb had gone off,
- WhatReallyHappened
search terms: FAA say Hanjour obtained commercial pilot's license in April
1999, many questions about this. Baxter, Conner, Bernard, instructors
said he had trouble controlling a Cesna 172, see CRM Airline
Training Center, Scottsdale, Arizona. and Nawaf al Hazmi, Mesa, Ariz,.
White House protected air space known as P-56, the 270 degree maneuver
resembled military aircraft. Middleton heard a harsh whistling sound
from Arlington cemetery. Dryden Remotely Controlled Vehicle Facility,
Boeing 720,
|
The
right engine of a 757 could not have hit the top half of the generator
trailer and bent over the fence posts?. If
you return the trailer to its original position, you will see that the
bent over fence posts were directly under the portion of the trailer that
was struck
It is very curious and significant to identifying the
attack aircraft by studying which fence posts were left standing and which
were bent to the ground?
|
bravehost
Does the graphic below accurately
depict a 757 hitting the trailer and striking the Pentagon at the first
floor? see trajectory
info below
|
|
see Freedomfiles for
more
|
|
photos |
go to More
Panoramic views on page 16, and
page
17 |
go to Freedom
Files for
more info on this graphic. It illustrates the building after impact
but before collapse. Notice the lack of any major destruction of the
building. The angle of the jet represents the path of the object
that tore through three rings of the building, and that it entered the
building parallel to the ground.
TOP
HOME
and:
Summary of Attack
Concepts
|
|
Before
Impact, Heliport, pad....
|
|
|
Almost no wreckage, debris? and the
theory that it vaporized is silly, and also corroborated by Conservative
Republican researchers (see below). AP
Photo.
Boeing,
757 details 200 passengers, Rolls Royce RB211-535E4 engines, or Pratt
Whitney PW2037, PW2040, wingspan 124', tail height 45', Engine weight: 29200
lbs. Imagine the destruction that would be caused by two 15 ton
engines traveling at a minimum of 250 mph. CBS
said the plane was going 450 mph?
|
TOP
HOME |
below: from Cooperative
Research Flight 77 timeline,
|
Panoramic
views
After approximately 30 minutes the building
section collapsed. Notice the clean lines of the building
sides. (above)
see: Rense
and Pilotline
for more details and phots.(below) Can you believe that an aircraft jet
engine weighing 15 tons and traveling between 250 and 450 mph hit the
building at the left side of this gap?????
pole
damage info
|
|
go to More
Panoramic views on page 16, and page
17
|
This photo is from inside the Pentagon two
days after the crash. Its source is a website that supports the idea
that an airliner went into the Pentagon. This photo appears to
contradict the idea that the plane 'vaporized'. see also Global
Hawk
|
|
.Why
are these photos manipulated and what are some of the mistakes?
- Outlining of fireball
- Incorrect size and shape of heliport, and
outlining of heliport
- Incorrect size, shape and placement of a tree to
the left of heliport
- Incorrect outlining of Pentagon roofline
- Outlining of city skyline in background
- It's all very amateurish, even comical, except
many people were murdered that day.
- See real attack aircraft
|
|
|
CNN
/ Pentagon pic 4
heliport as painted in with graphics program.
real heliport (slanted window)
|
Below is a normal photo....it is difficult to see the
heliport. Is this why it was outlined? Also the buildings in
the background are outlined and a tree to the left of the heliport. Below: Navy photo and most likely what a real surveillance image
would appear as. Any aircraft would be clearly visible.
CNN
pic 5 see
Summary of Attack Concepts
CNN tape
alternate source & CNN images:
September 11 Pentagon crash ,
& :Original
CNN print screens top, bot
|
|
More
examples of manipulation below
|
|
|
na
real explosion close-up |
see
Summary of Attack Concepts |
TOP
HOME
|
Flight
77, Pentagon Event - 3rd Test. (to right) Detailed analysis of surveillance
tape to determine the size of the plane
see Boston.com
photos galleries. and go
to surveillance camera analysis
|
and
more below
|
TOP
HOME
|
Pentagon-Strike
the best video |
|
|
CBS
Report |
Photo
is of workman shoring up a floor. CBS seems to
have an amazing amount of detailed information about the crash, from it's
'sources'. And CBS and Ari Fleischer seem to be at odds over 'facts'
of the flight.
CBS claims to have 'eyewitnesses'
that saw the plane hit the ground before hitting the Pentagon.
Really. Why does CBS want to push this point?
Who were the 300 people 'looking for clues'?
How did Ari Fleischer know the plane was heading for the
Whitehouse? What was his motive?
|
From CBS
Report, Sept 21, 2001 Primary Target
"(CBS) New radar evidence obtained by CBS News
strongly suggests that the hijacked jetliner which crashed into the
Pentagon hit its intended target.
Top government officials have suggested that American Airlines Flight 77
was originally headed for the White House and possibly circled the Capitol
building. CBS News Transportation Correspondent Bob Orr reports
that's not what the recorded flight path shows.
Eight minutes before the crash, at 9:30 a.m. EDT, radar tracked the plane
as it closed to within 30 miles of Washington. Sources say the hijacked
jet continued east at a high speed toward the city, but flew several miles
south of the restricted airspace around the White House.
At 9:33 the plane crossed the Capitol Beltway and took aim on its military
target. But the jet, flying at more than 400 mph, was too fast and too
high when it neared the Pentagon at 9:35. The hijacker-pilots were then
forced to execute a difficult high-speed descending turn.
Radar shows Flight 77 did a downward spiral, turning almost a complete
circle and dropping the last 7,000 feet in two-and-a-half minutes.
The steep turn was so smooth, the sources say, it's clear there was no
fight for control going on. And the complex maneuver suggests the
hijackers had better flying skills than many investigators first believed.
The jetliner disappeared from radar at 9:37 and less than a minute later
it clipped the tops of street lights and plowed into the Pentagon at 460
mph.
Some eyewitnesses
believe the plane actually hit the ground at the base of the Pentagon
first, and then skidded into the building. Investigators say that's
a possibility, which if true, crash experts say may well have saved some
lives.
At the White House Friday, spokesman Ari Fleischer saw it a different way.
"That is not the radar data that we have seen," Fleischer said,
adding, "The plane was headed toward the White House."
Ten days after the hijacked airliner slammed into the Pentagon, leaving
189 people dead or missing including those on the plane, and gouging a
giant smoky slice out of the world's biggest office building, some 300
people were looking for clues.
Officials said no survivors had been taken out of the building since the
day of the crash and 104 people have been identified.
Rescue crews have turned over the operational control of the crash site to
the FBI. The transfer clears the way for the criminal investigation to
intensify.
Additional human remains are expected to be recovered during the criminal
investigation at the site, which could last for a month.
The fire chief in Arlington County, Va., says all areas of the Pentagon
(with the exception of the fourth- and fifth-floor corridors of the three
outer rings) have been released to the Department of Defense.
The last civilian urban search-and-rescue team was leaving the site
Friday.
Military engineers from the Army's Fort Belvoir completed their work
Friday morning" |
Nose
cone stories
- Many stories about nose cone penetrating three
rings of Pentagon?
- They ignore 30 tons of aircraft engine parts
entering building according to official reports
|
from: Airliners.net
copyright: Colin Abbot
|
Boeing
757
|
below:
Cone story from Disaster-Resource.com
|
|
Left:
"Aircraft landed after full emergency due to a bird
strike."
Obviously, the story on the right is total bunk.
It ignores the 30 tons of aircraft engines on a Boeing 757.
photo
legend link
|
|
Excerpt:
"American Airlines Flight 77 slammed into the western face of the
Pentagon, penetrating the first and second floors, just north of the
fourth corridor in Wedge 1, and traveled at a forty-five degree angle
through the building’s three outer-most rings, E, D and C, before
stopping just shy of the fifth corridor in Wedge 2. The
nose of
Flight 77 punched out into A-E Drive, a roadway between the B
and C rings. The
fireball and explosion that resulted upon impact was significant but was
impeded in Wedge 1 by a sprinkler system that was recently installed as
part of a building-wide renovation project first begun in 1993" article
copy
|
|
The tail structure
of a Boeing 757 is 44'6" high, or just at the bottom of the 4th floor
of the Pentagon. The area inside the yellow square is the
entry point of the attack aircraft.
And the center line of the engines is just about level with the top
of the first floor. But only two adjacent windows were even broken
on the second floor (ASCE report).
There's no way that a Boeing 757 crashed into this building.
|
above:
Boeing 757 aircraft engine: approximately weighing 15 tons.
|
And
see:The
Pentagon Building Performance Report (ASCE) American Society of Civil
Engineers.
|
Mystery
Man
|
Are
all these photos of the same man?
see page 10, and page
8 for more details the part in U.S. Navy photos
|
The aircraft part just in front of the policeman is the same part
that appears in U.S. Navy photos that claim a Boeing 757 crashed into the
Pentagon. Photo
from U.S. Navy
|
Patriots Question 9/11 |
Architects and Engineers, |
Haluk Akol; – ;Architect and
Structural Engineer Terry Allen; – ;Electronics Engineer John Philip
Anderson, BS Eng, MS Eng David Andresen, BSc Eng (Civil; – ;Civil
Engineer Roland Edward Angle, BS CE, PE; – ;Licensed Professional Civil
Engineer, State of California Jeff Arnold; – ;Architect Ronald F. Avery;
– ;Architect Avina">David C. Avina, BS ME; – ;Project
Construction Manager Ayres"> J. Marx Ayres, MS ME, PE; –
;Nationally recognized expert in building design Bachmann">Hugo
Bachmann, PhD; – ;Professor Emeritus, Structural Dynamics, Swiss Federal
Technology Institute Backus">Christopher Backus, BS ME; –;Senior
Engineer Badnarik">Michael Badnarik; –;Senior Software Engineer
and Systems Administrator Michael E. Balay;–; Architect Jim Bedinghaus;
– ;Architect Joe Bellows; – ;Architect Michael S. Benefield, BS ME,
PE; – ;Licensed Professional Mechanical Engineer, State of California
Gary Benner, BA Sc, PEng; – ;Professional Engineer, Licensed in the
Province of Ontario Richard Besco; –;Engineering Staff Steven Bishop, BS
Electrical and Computer Eng; –;Senior System Adminstrator Björkman">Anders
Björkman, MSc; –;Naval Architect and Marine Engineer Joe S. Blackett,
BS Marine Eng William José Blanch, BS Aerospace Eng; – ;Aerospace
Engineer Ryan A. Bolt, BS, MS Computer Eng; – ;IT Specialist Stephen A.
Bourne, B.Arch; – ;Licensed Architect, States of Washington and
California Bowman">Col. Robert Bowman, PhD; – ;Dept of
Aeronautical Engineering, U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology Steven
Craig Brantingham, BS ChemE, PE Gregg Brazel, BS CNE; – ;Construction
Engineering Paul Briggs, BS ME Broadbent">James W. Broadbent,
M.Arch; –;Project Manager and Designer James Brooks, BS CE; –;Engineering
Consultant Lydia A. Browne, M.Arch; –;Architectural Consultant, Strategy
Burnham">Thomas N. Burnham, M.Arch; –;Licensed Architect, State
of California Albert V. Burns, BS CE, PE (ret; –;Retired Professional
Civil Engineer, Licensed in the State of Arizona John L. Bursill; –
;Licensed Aircraft Maintenance Engineer Avionics Butterfield">Donal
Butterfield, B CE, M Urban Design, PE; – ;Licensed Architect, States of
New York and Connecticut Sebastian Canaday, BS Eng Carr">James R.
Carr, PhD, PE; – ;Professor of Geological Sciences and Engineering,
University of Nevada Arthur L. Carran, BS Aerospace Eng, PE; – ;Licensed
Professional Engineer, State of Ohio David E. Cassel, BS ME, PE; –
;Licensed Professional Engineer, State of Idaho Cerar">Timothy
Cerar; – ;Automation and Controls Engineer Cimino">Dennis Cimino;
– ;Systems Engineer. Commercial pilot Oscar Cisnero; –
;Architectural Professional Tim Clark; – ;Architectural Professional
Michael C. Coffey; –;AIA, Architect Ian J. Colburn, B.Arch John Cole;
– ;Architect Coleman">Kristen Kepner-Coleman, B.Arch; –
;Architect Victor Connor, MS EECS; – ;Retired IBM engineer David
Crawford; – ;Architect John J. Crawford, BS Engineering
Creech">Terri Creech, BS ME; – ;Mechanical Engineer William J.
Cundiff, BS CE, PE; –;Licensed Professional Civil Engineer, State of
Massachusetts Davis">Capt. Daniel Davis; –;Turbine Engineering
Specialist and Former U.S. Army Air Defense Officer Deets">Dwain
Deets, MS Physics, MS Eng; –;Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA
Dryden Center DeMartini">Frank A. DeMartini; – ;Architect and
WTC Construction Manager Dodge">Larry Dodge, B.Arch; – ;Licensed
Architect, State of California Michael T. Donly, BS CE, PE; – ;Licensed
Professional Engineer, State of New Jersey Douglas">Eric Douglas;
– ;Registered Architect in New York and California Sean Michael Drake;
– ;Electrical Engineer Duncan">Brian Duncan; – ;Fire
Protection Engineer David DuPaul, BS ME and Physics Jay Easwaran, PhD
(Metallurgy & Materials Sci.; – ;Metallurgical Engineer John
Eisenhart; – ;Architect Elden">H. Theodore Elden, Jr., B.Arch;
– ;Retired registered architect Brad Steven Epperson, BS EET; –;Test
Engineer Erk Erginer, MSc ME, PhD Metallurgy; –;Retired Manufacturing
Engineer Justin Feider; –;Intern Architect Firmage">Joseph
Firmage; – ;Chairman & CEO, ManyOne Networks. Former Chairman
& CEO of USWeb Corp Dennis M. Fischer, BS CE, MS CE; – ;Engineering
Consultant John Fisher; – ;Quantity surveyor /construction consultant
Keith E. Fleming, BS ME;–; Engineering Staff Fontana">Mario
Fontana, Dr Sc CE; – ;Professor of Structural Analysis, Swiss Federal
Institute of Technology William D. Freund, BS Arch; – ;Licensed
Architect, States of New Jersey and Arizona Shawn M. Fullington, BA Arch;
–;Designer Shawn M. Fullington, BA Arch; –;Designer
Gage">Richard Gage; –;AIA, Architect Patrick Gallagher, BS ME
Gearhart">Chester W. Gearhart, BS CE, PE; –;Retired Civil
Engineer Helmuth A. Geiser; – ;Architect Licensed in Germany Don
Gibbons; – ;Architect Alan S. Glassman, M.Arch;–; Associate AIA, CSI,
SA, Architectural Research Consultant Felix Goebel, Dipl. Ing (Architektur);–;
Designer Gregg">David Gregg, PhD; – ;Chemical Engineer
Griffin">Jason Griffin, BS CE; – ;Civil Engineer Andrew
Griffith, BS ChemE;–; Engineering Grisham">Andrea Walhof-Grisham,
BS Arch; – ;Architect Gemma Pérez Guerrero; – ;Telecom Engineer
Karlene Gullone; – ;Architectural Professional Jill Hacker, MS CE; –
;Former Licensed Professional Engineer, State of New York Hatzisavas">Alex
Hatzisavas, MS EE, MBA; – ;Electrical Engineer William H. Helbig, BS
Surveying, AS EE, LSIT; – ;Land Surveyor Heller">David Heller,
BS Physics, M.Arch; – ;Architectural Professional Peter Hendrickson; –
;Licensed Architect, State of California Henry">Bruce R. Henry,
PhD; – ;Former guidance systems engineer for Polaris and Trident
missiles Herbst">Rodger Herbst, BAAE; – ;Aeronautical and
Astronautical Engineer Heredia">Eric Heredia, BS EE; – ;Power
System Transmission Planner, US Department of Energy Hermanson">Eric
Hermanson, BS Engineering Physics, MS Nuclear Engineering; – ;Senior
Software Engineer Hirschhorn">Joel S. Hirschhorn, PhD; – ;Former
Professor, Metallurgical Engineering, University of Wisconsin Bill Hoff,
BS ME Hoffman">Jim Hoffman, MFA; –;Software Engineer and
Research Scientist Holloway">Dennis Holloway; –;Architect
Howells">Tim Howells, BA, MS, PhD; –;Computer
science. Medical researcher John Howland; – ;Architect Robert
Hulsart;–; Computer Engineer Ken Hutchinson; – ;Architectural
Professional Sonne R. Idelshon, B.Arch; – ;Retired Licensed Archtiect,
State of California Hadi Izadi, BS EE, MS EE, PhD; – ;Student
Jenkins">Ken Jenkins, BS Carnegie Mellon; – ;Electrical
Engineer. Documentary film maker. Jensen">Jon Jensen, BSc Physics;
– ;R&D Engineer, Aerospace Test Engineer, Manufacturing Engineer
Christine H. Johnson, MS EE Derek Johnson, BS ME, EIT, CWI DJohnson">David
A. Johnson, B.Arch, PhD, F.AICP; – ;Elected Fellow, American Institute
of Certified Planners Derek Johnson, BS ME, EIT, CWI James D. Johnson, MS
Chem, M Eng; – ;Chemist NJohnson">Nelson L. Johnson, M.Arch, PE;
– ;Licensed Architect and Licensed Professional Civil Engineer James
Jorgensen, B.Arch; – ;Licensed Architect, State of California Jowenko">Danny
Jowenko; – ;Proprietor, Jowenko Explosieve Demolitie, a European
demolition company Chris Jung; – ;Architectural Professional
Keller">Jack Keller, PhD PE; – ;Professor Emeritus, Civil and
Environmental Engineering, Utah State University Philip Kienholz, B.
Arch., NWTAA, PMP; – ;Architect King">Jeff King, MD, SB (MIT
Biology and Electrical Engineering; – ;Physician. Former Electrical
Engineer Dennis J. Kollar, PE; – ;Structural Engineer Roman Korol, B Eng
(Electrical; – ;Licensed Engineer in the Province of Quebec Greg Kramer;
– ;Lead Engineering Technician Kurttila">Heikki Kurttila, DSc;
– ;Safety Engineer, National Safety Technology Authority, Finland Steve
Labbe, B.Ing ME Latas">Lt. Col. Jeff Latas, U.S. Air Force (ret;
– ;Aerospace engineer. Former combat fighter pilot. Ron Paul
LeBlanc, PE; – ;Engineer Leifer">David Leifer, BSc, B.Arch, M.Ed,
PhD; – ;Coordinator, Graduate Programme in Facilities Management Leifer">;;;;;;;;;;;;University
of Sydney Jan Leits; – ;Architectural Professional Crystal Li; –
;Mechanical Engineer Link">John C. Link, M.Arch; – ;Licensed
Architect, State of California Lobdill">Jerry Lobdill, BS ChemE;
– ;Retired Physicist and Systems Engineer Longspaugh">G.W.
(Jerry) Longspaugh, MSc; – ;Retired Aerospace Engineer Luckman">Irwin
Luckman, B.Arch; – ;Retired Licensed Architect, State of California John
P. Machado, BS EE Douglas E. Mackenzie, BS EE; – ;Electrical Engineeer
Mike Maguire, MS ME, PE; – ;Licensed Professional Mechanical Engineer,
State of California Jon Marino, BS CE, EIT; – ;Design Engineer Charles
A. Marshall, MS CE, PE; – ;Licensed Professional Civil Engineer, State
of California Masdon"> |
David Masdon, BS EE; –
;Electrical Engineer Masud">Enver Masud, MS OR, PE; – ;Former
Chief, Strategic and Emergency Planning, U.S. Dept. of Energy Keenan May,
B.Arch; – ;Intern Architect Mayeaux">Brad Mayeaux; – ;Senior
RF Design Engineer Lawrence J. Mayka, BS EE Rich McCampbell, BS ChemE;–;
Engineer McClure">Andrew McClure, B.Arch Bob McGee; – ;Engineer
McHugh">Brian McHugh, IEng, ACIBSE, BSc PgD;–; Engineer Jack
Meagher, BS NE; – ;Nuclear Engineer Meserlian">Donald Meserlian,
MS ME, PE (ret; – ;Retired Professional Engineer, State of New Jersey
Mike Meyer;–; Mechanical Engineer Millea">Timothy A. Millea; –
;Former Lecturer, School of Systems Engineering, Reading University (UK)
Barry K. Miller, PE;–; Mechanical Engineer Ronald Miller, Sr., BS ED;
– ;U.S. Navy (ret) John Mizzi, B EE, PE; – ;Licensed Professional
Engineer, State of New York Morse">Peter D. Morse, PE; –
;Licensed Professional Mechanical Engineer, State of Arizona Moskin">Jeffrey
Moskin; – ;Retired Electronics Engineer Muga">Ted Muga, BS CE;
– ;Civil Engineer Christian Mungenast; – ; AIA, Architect Edward
Munyak, BS ME, PE; – ;Registered Mechanical and Fire Protection Engineer
Regine C. Naeckel; – ;Graduate Engineer for Landscape and Environmental
Fred Nguyen, MS ME, PE; – ;Licensed Professional Engineer, State of New
Jersey Robert Nielson, PLS; – ;Land Surveyor James R. Northrup, Sr.; –;Welding
Engineer and Journeyman Steamfitter Orechwa">Basil Orechwa, PE;
– ;Licensed Civil Engineer, State of Wisonsin Jeffrey S. Orling, B.Arch;
– ;Licensed Architect, State of New York Page">Scott Page,
M.Arch; – ;Designer Curtiss Lee Palin, MS Eng, PE; – ;Licensed
Professional Engineer, State of Colorado William Edward Parker; –
;Retired Engineer Parrott">Adam Parrott, BSc Chemical Engineering;
– ;Chemical Engineer in training Bradley Pattee; –;Engineering Staff
Tom Patteson, M.Arch; –;Intern Architect Pegelow">Charles N.
Pegelow, BS CE; –;Licensed Civil Engineer (Structural) Terry Petersen,
BSE; –;Electrical Engineer William W. Pettus, M.Arch, M Urban Design,
AIA – Licensed Architect, State of California Phelps">Joseph M.
Phelps, MS CE, PE; –;Professional Civil Engineer
Planes">Francisco A. Planes, B. Arch; –;Architectural
Consultant, Associate AIA Plumb">Doug Plumb, B.Eng; –
;Engineering graduate Robert Poltz, BSE, MSE; –;Reliablity Engineering
Consultant Mickey Propadovich; –;Architect Purcell">Oliver
William Purcell, B.Arch, AIA Emeritus; –;Retired Architect David Quinn,
M.Arch; – ;Intern Architect Warren J. Raftshol, MS CE; –;
Ramsey">Steven Eugene Ramsey, BS CE, BS Microbiology Amir A. Rana,
BS ME; –;Mechanical Engineer Rich Reed, BS Structural Engineering Reiner">Ken
Reiner; – ;Engineer, inventor, and entrepreneur Nicolas Reinke, BS Eng
Dave Reinmuth, BS CE; – ;Managing Consultant Steven Reiser; –
;Chemical Engineer Michael Reuter; – ;Architectural Professional John
Rexroat; – ;Manufacturing Engineer Rhodes">Douglas Claude
Rhodes, BS Arch; – ;Architect, Certified Member, NCARB
Rice">William Rice, BS CE, MS CE, PE; – ;Licensed Professional
Engineer, State of Vermont Bruce Richey; – ;AIA, Architect Fred
Robinson; – ;Licensed Architect, State of Texas Gene Robinson, BS IE;
– ;Engineer Dominique Roddier, PhD; – ;Naval Architect Juan Felipe
Rodríguez, BS ME; –;Licensed Engineer in Training, State of Texas Jeff
Rogers, MS ME; –;Engineer Tim Rohach, MS ME, PE;–; Mechanical Engineer
Michael A Rose, B Arch – Architect (Retired) Ross">Gordon Ross,
BSc ME, M.Eng; – ;Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineer Rosszay">Adam
Rosszay, BS Computer Engineering; – ;Software Quality Assurance Engineer
Joe Rowling; – ;Architectural staff Henry Rozumski;–; Aerospace
Engineer/ Analyst Russell">John Robert Russell, Grad. Dipl.; –
;Professor Emeritus, Landscape Architecture, Ball State University
Ryan">Kevin Ryan, BS Chem; – ;Certified Quality Engineer Mojgan
Saberi, BS Arch; – ;Designer Ronald Sabin, BS ChemE Schiavo">Mary
Schiavo, JD; – ;Former Professor, Aerospace Engineering and Aviation,
Ohio State University Schmidt">Michael Schmidt, BS GE; –
;Project Manager Schneider">Jörg Schneider, Dr hc; – ;Professor
Emeritus, Structural Dynamics, Swiss Federal Technology Institute
Shanahan">John F. Shanahan, PE; – ;Electrical
Engineer. Licensed Professional Engineer, State of California Shap">Frank
Shap, BS EE; – ;Former aerospace design engineer. Municipal Economic
Development Exec. Adam C. Sherman, BS ME Shieck">A.J. James Shieck;
–;Architectural Technologist John Shinn, PhD; –;Chemical Engineer
Werner Simbeck, B ME Reed Simpson, M.Arch, Associate AIA Wendy Sitler; –
;Designer Albert Skane, BS EE, MA Econ; – ;Systems Engineer Jim G.
Smith, MS CS; – ;Software Developer PSmith">Paul Smith; –
;Electronics Engineer, Indiana University Richard J. Snider, BS EE, PE
John Sotelo, BS ME, MD; – ;Mechanical Engineer John M. Sparnicht, PE;
– ;Licensed Civil Engineer, State of California Spellman">Thomas
Spellman, B.Arch; – ;Member, City Council, Lake Geneva, WI Mitchell
Scott Stein, MS CE, PE; – ;Licensed Professional Engineer, State of
Texas Steinhofer">Rob Steinhofer, MS ME; – ;Mechanical Engineer
Michael E. Stephens, PE, BS Geological Engineering Arthur Stopes; –
;Planner Strahl">Jeffrey G. Strahl, BS ME; – ;Mechanical
Engineer Chris Swigert; – ;Architect Switzer">Howard Switzer;
– ;Licensed Architect, State of Tennessee Szamboti">Anthony
Szamboti, BS ME; – ;Mechanical Engineering Professional Jeffrey Tam; –
;Architectural Professional Robert Tamaki, MA Sc, PE; – ;Civil Engineer
Amanda Lea Taylor, MS Eng/option> CTaylor">C. Matthew Taylor,
B.Arch; – ;Licensed Architect, State of South Carolina Edwin Michael
Taylor, EIT; – ;Engineering Consultant William D. Taylor, BS
Engineering, PE Robert Charles Terhune, BS EE Testa">Joseph Testa,
PE; – ;Civil Engineer Michel A. Thomet, PhD EE Jonathan Thompson, BS Eng
Tomlin">James Martin Tomlin, B, Arch; – ;Licensed Architect,
State of California Jasper Tomlinson, MA(Oxon) CEnv MCIWEM; –
;Environmental and Water Resources Engineer Henri Tso; – ;Architectural
Professional Twede">Roger Twede, BS EE, MS EE; – ;Master
Software Architect Urich">Gregory H. Urich, BS EECS, BA Music; –
;Senior Consultant, Software Engineering Osvaldo Valdes; – ;Architect
Arnold A. Valdez, M.Arch;–; Designer/Planner Travis Van Brasch;–;
Associate AIA, Design Principal Kees van der Bent, BSc CS; – ;Designer
Roger vanFrank; –;Architect Aaron M. Verhulst, B.Tech; –;Architectural
Technologist Walker">Arnold B. Walker, BS Tool & Manufacturing
Technology; –;Retired Design Engineer Christopher Wilder, BS ME; –;Mechanical
Design Engineer David Wilkins; –;Electrical Engineer
Williams">Grant Williams; –;Seismic and Structural Engineer
Wilson">Ron Wilson, BS EE; – ;Aerospace Engineer Winterton">Doyle
Winterton, B.ES (Engineering Science; – ;Retired Structural Engineer
Elwin Wong; – ;Architectural Professional Wood">Judy Wood, BS
CE, PhD; – ;Former Assistant Professor, Mechanical Engineering, Clemson
University Kurt Worthington; – ;Urban Planner Wrenn">Kenneth
Wrenn, BS CE, PE; – ;Licensed Civil Engineer, State of North Carolina
Brian Wright, BS ME; – ;Technical Consultant Todd C. Wurster, BS ME
Yee">Alan Yee, BS CS and Eng; – ;Programmer |
No
aircraft parts were near the heliport at the time of the attack. One
hour later an aircraft part was underneath the heliport window.
- No aircraft parts were seen outside of the
Pentagon building other than the clean shiny parts at the heliport.
- The heliport is hundreds of feet away from the
impact area.
|
Above: Notice how far away from the
impact site the heliport is and there doesn't appear to be any parts near
the left window of the first floor of the heliport?
below:
Now
the aircraft part is under the window
|
|
|
|
above: The shiny aircraft part is not by
the heliport.
TOP
HOME
Left:
Its difficult to see, but the part by the two firefighters is in front of
the heliport, that is hundreds of feet from the impact site.
|
Are these all the same
part? above- under the window and below?
Are
these the same parts? and The only red fire truck on the scene is near the
heliport. The part could
fit into the van. more on page 14
or page 10
|
|
The aircraft part
with the American
Airlines letter C
under the window in above picture does not appear in the photo with Rumsfeld?
The part had to have been placed there, and was not there as a result of the
aircraft attack. Notice the shadows and smoke.
|
TOP
HOME
|
|
Was
the van at the heliport at the moment of impact? Yes
- The van was at the heliport before any fire trucks
arrived
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National
Fire Protection Association
- Photos of initial smoke plume from attack.
- How is it that Reagan National fire fighters at
are within 2-3 minutes of the attack scene responding to a private
vehicle accident?
- The seven minute fire
- Reports on initial activities of all first
responders
- Additional reports
|
|
|
|
|
Below:
exerpt from NFPA article. Search:
Pentagon
full
article copy
|
|
THE
SEVEN MINUTE FIRE
|
TOP
HOME
|
"The ARFF foam units knocked
down the bulk of the fire in the first seven minutes after their arrival,
said Captain Michael Defina, who was the shift commander that day at
National" full
article copy: National Fire Protection Association.
|
|
. And from the After
Action Report in Response to September 11: "Damage, although
severe, was constrained in area and the fire was brought quickly under
control."
|
|
IN FRONT OF GROUND
ZERO
How the National ARFF crews found themselves in
front of ground zero on September 11 started with a motor vehicle accident
on the upper level of the airport's Terminal B.
While Captain Defina and his crews were watching the
World Trade Center attacks on television at the ARFF station, they were
dispatched to the motor vehicle accident. Although the airport, located in
Arlington, Virginia, was not on alert, Captain Defina said he had a
feeling Washington, D.C., could be another terrorist target.
"Normally, the shift commander doesn't respond to
motor vehicle accidents,'' he said. "But something didn't sound right
about it."
Captain Defina was the shift commander that day because
the battalion chief was across the river in Washington for a security
briefing on an upcoming meeting. Defina responded to the vehicle
accident in the battalion chief van, along with Rescue Engine 335, under
the command of Captain John Durrer, and a medic unit.
Unknown to Captain Defina and his crews, hijacked
American Airlines Flight 77, outbound from Washington Dulles International
Airport with 64 people on board, was only minutes away from slamming at
0938 hours into the Pentagon, about 3 miles (4.8 kilometers) from
National.
At the accident scene, where a driver with a diabetic
reaction had struck several vehicles, the firefighters were working with
their backs to the Pentagon.
"I heard a dull roar. The noise didn't belong with
the noise you were used to hearing within the airport," Captain
Defina said. "I turned and saw a smoke plume arise."
BioicAntBoy
|
- Reagan National's Aircraft Rescue Fire Fighters
(ARFF) were one of the first responders.
- Captain Defina, in command, "said he had a
feeling.....Washington D.C. would be next"
- Defina and crew heard impact of attack jet as they
responded to private vehicle accident within 2-3 minutes of Pentagon
- Ordered fire fighting units from Reagan International
to the Pentagon (Foam Unit 331 and Serv-329)
- Observed fire fighters from Fort Meyer (who manned
heliport) trying to distinguish blaze of unit 161 near heliport
- Arlington County's Engine and Truck 105 were seen and
their crews were entering the Pentagon.
|
- Reagan National crews called for more help
- More foam trucks were ordered in from Dulles.
- Defrina and crews went inside that afternoon, reported
seeing nose gear.
|
|
nfpa
report_1.pdf
nfpa
report_2.pdf
|
U.S.
Army Photo Library, or U.S. Navy
TOP
HOME |
9/11/2001 |
9/12/2001 |
|
|
9/14/2001
|
|
Defense Link Website Photos:
|
|
|
FEMA
Photo Library
|
|
|
U.S.
Army, Digital Visual Library, USACE
|
- 911-0008
low res
collapse, debris, guidance close
- 911-0010
low resx
collapse, spools
- 911-0013
low res
outer wall construction details
- 911-0019
low res
collapse, debris
- 911-0024
low res
collapse, people
- 911-0025
low res
collapse, reconstruction site
- 911-0026
tiff
collapse, guidance pad, close
- 911-0033
tiff
collapse, few tents, right side view
- 911-0078
low res
surveillance cam view
- 911-0078 tiff
- 911-0093
low res
collapse, VIPs
|
|
Images "Pentagon...photos"
|
Images
|
|
|
.Where's
the wreckage of a passenger airliner weighing over 250,000 lbs.
- There's no wreckage because there was no plane, it
was a small missile or similar aircraft.
- The wing span had to be at least 125 feet in order
to have knocked down the light poles, but there are military aircraft
that meet this standard.
|
below: Mysterious
car switching sequence
and Air
Disaster.com and Army
photos 1, 2 |
Notice undamaged lawn. Best
impact photos TOP
HOME
|
above:
Impact hole
|
above:
Impact hole and
see The
Pentagon Building Performance Report (ASCE)
Purdue University Simulations -September
11 Pentagon Attack Simulations Using LS-Dyna
|
|
The above graphic and the photo
on the right show entry point of an aircraft. Is it credible that a
Boeing 757 entered here. source: The
Pentagon Building Performance Report (ASCE) American Society of Civil
Engineers. page 13-16.
|
and below: see
Defend
America and
print screen
Can you really believe that a Boeing 757-200 weighing 1/4 of a million lbs
disappeared into the Pentagon here?
Titan Systems said the
plane was going 400
mph.
Purdue University Simulations -September
11 Pentagon Attack Simulations Using LS-Dyna
|
below:Pentagon.Spacelist.org
CNN
Video of the Pentagon Damage:
and Earth-Citizens
Defense Link photo and Geoff
Metcalf "Pentagon...photos"
TOP
HOME
|
Where's
the wreckage of a Boeing 757-200? and
see Spanish
media coverage and Air
Disaster.com, Geoff
Metcalf "Pentagon...photos", Killtown
on the generator and OCatch,
Pentagon Research
debris info.
|
Are
these small jet engine parts?
- FEMA photo of small jet engine parts
.
|
source FEMA
photo library and LINK
Boeing Jet info
Lycos
for more details.
|
|
source FEMA
photo library
and Lycos
for more details.
|
|
source FEMA
photo library
|
see
Summary of Attack Concepts
|
.
.
|
see Institute
for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
|
|
|
|
|
and see FEMA
pics: 4305,
4306,
4305
4525 search 9/11-9/15 Lycos
for more details.
|
see
Summary of Attack Concepts
|
|
Why
are there antennas on the roof of the Pentagon that are directly in the
flight path of the attack aircraft?
|
|
Pentagon
Stike site pics 1, 2,
3
George
Metcalf images
back to Page 11
& pic
|
Right: Red
Arrow is flight path of attack jet
|
The cluster of dishes and antennas are
parallel to the path the jet took through the building See
high resolution photo
And see large file:
compare the debris trail through the three rings of the Pentagon and the
alignment of the central antenna the group of 3 antennas on ring 2 and the
group of 3 dishes on ring 3. |
|
|
|
TOP
HOME
|
Passenger
lists?.....Autopsies?......Black Boxes?
- Passenger lists: There are no Arab names on
the passenger list. see CNN
- Autopsies, more on page
26 Operation Noble Eagle, victim ID
- Black Boxes and fatality data given to ASCE by FBI
(below)
|
Passenger
Lists
|
Autopsies
/ DNA and .. page
26
|
Black
Box and page 27
|
|
- Sierra
Times "I am an
ex Naval line officer and a psychiatrist in private practice in New
Orleans, a Christian and homeschool dad. It troubled me a great deal
that we rushed off to war on the flimsiest of evidence. I considered
various ways to provide a smoking gun of who and why Sept 11th
happened. Astute observers noticed right away that there were no
Arabic sounding names on any of the flight manifests of the planes
that “crashed” on that day.
- Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP)
- National
Museum of Health Medicine The National
Museum of Health and Medicine has unveiled an exhibit highlighting
efforts used by its parent organization, the Armed Forces Institute of
Pathology (AFIP), to identify the victims of the Sept. 11 terrorist
attacks at the Pentagon and the crash of United Airlines Flight 93 in
Somerset County, Pa. file
|
- Pentagon
Research "Over
the next few days, working the 3 p.m. to morning shift, she and
several other NTSB experts struggled to separate airplane parts from
office parts. Early on the morning of Sept.14, while Cushman was at
the site, the cockpit voice recorder, or CVR, was found. It was
quickly transported across the Potomac to the NTSB lab in Washington,
D.C., where Cushman works with three other analysts, and its data was
downloaded."
- Pentagon
Research search:
- Pentagon.Spacelist
- Black box map
ASCE, NFU page 27
- Black
box, and fatalities
info: FBI gave American
Society of Civil Engineers
location data on black box
page 16
|
|
|
|
Operation
Noble Eagle, Victim ID, FBI top
After-Action graphic
see Page 14
|
PROGRESSIVE |
REFERENCE |
CONSERVATIVE* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOP
HOME
|
FBI
gave Black
box and fatalities information to ASCE
(page 16)
|
|
|
and High
resolution version and original source: link to The
Pentagon Building Performance Report (ASCE) American Society of Civil
Engineers. and NFU copy
and below is legend for ASCE report: and
more on page
26
Hijackers are presumed to be
included in 'Front-of-aircraft' list?
|
Titan Systems quotation:
"This act of evil cost the lives of 189 persons in the
Pentagon attack, 184 innocent victims, and the 5 terrorist perpetrators of
the criminal attack"
After
Action Report in Response to September 11
|
TOP
HOME
|
|
Passenger list from Physics911
No Arab sounding names on the list.
Click to enlarge
The Truth Will Honor the Victims
|
enlarge
1 2
Geoff
Metcalf
"Pentagon...photos"
|
|
Column damage, 1st floor,
Does not reflect damage from 2 15,000 lb jet engines.
|
2nd floor column damage and fatalities location according to
FBI.
source: The
Pentagon Building Performance Report (ASCE) American Society of Civil
Engineers. and NFU copy
|
|
After
Action Report:
BELOW
|
Titan Corporation Report Quotation:
"At 9:37 a.m., .........., saw a large American Airlines aircraft in
a steep
dive and on a collision course with the
Pentagon.........
At 9:38 a.m., American Airlines Flight #77 crashed into the west side of
the Pentagon, just beyond the heliport. It
was traveling at a speed of about
400
miles per hour, accelerating with close
to its full complement of fuel at the time of impact. 400
miles per hour, accelerating with close
to its full complement of fuel at the time of impact.
The destruction caused by the attack was immediate and catastrophic. The
270,000 pounds of metal and jet fuel hurtling into the solid mass
of the
Pentagon is the equivalent in weight of a diesel train locomotive, except it
is traveling at more than 400 miles per hour. More than 600,000
airframe bolts and rivets and 60 miles of wire were instantly transformed
into white-hot shrapnel. The resulting impact, penetration, and burning fuel
had catastrophic effects to the five floors and three rings in and around
Pentagon Corridors 4 and 5. (See detailed graphics in Appendix 4.)
This act of evil cost the lives of 189 persons in the Pentagon attack,
184 innocent victims, and the 5 terrorist perpetrators of the criminal
attack."
Only two windows were damaged on the
second floor. This is completely inconsistent with the Titan
Corporation report. They describe the attack as a steep dive.
|
|
|
|
|
Where's the
wreckage? Can you really believe "270,000 pounds of metal and jet fuel hurtling into the solid mass
of the
Pentagon is the equivalent in weight of a diesel train locomotive, except it
is traveling at more than 400 miles per hour" crashed
into the building here? quotation
from Titan Systems report see page 27
|
|
|
|
Dramatic
transformation of Pentagon in 24 hours after attack?
- Satellite Views from Space Imaging.com
- Seemingly no effort to save investigation
scene integrity?
- Notice streak
in lawn to the left of the heliport that tracks the attack
trajectory.
|
|
Below
photo date 9/7/01
Space
Imaging for source on satellite images of Pentagon
Below
photo date 9/12/01 |
|
|
|
|
below: date
9/07/01 more here: streak
|
below: Streak
in Pentagon lawn 3 days before attack |
|
|
|
|
Emergency responders
- Arlington County Fire Department
- Fort Meyer Fire Department
- Metropolitan Airport Authority Fire Unit (Ronald
Reagan National Airport)
|
|
|
|
Evacuation details after arrival of FBI to attack scene
|
source: Institute
for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management
original report pages |
|
4.2.
Activation, Deployment and Initial On-Scene Response
Within
minutes of the crash on Pentagon at 9:43 AM, Battalion Chief
Robert Cornwall of the Arlington County Fire Department (ACFD),
diverted from a call to a fire in nearby Rosslyn, VA, and rushed to the
scene. Upon arrival, he assumed command of the Pentagon crash site. Assistant
ACFD Chief James Schwartz arrived
5 to 10 minutes after the crash. Chief Schwartz assumed Incident Command
(IC) from Chief Cornwall and assigned him to operational supervision of
rescue and evacuation. Approximately 5 minutes after Chief Schwartz
assumed IC, Chris Combs of the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force arrived on
scene and reported to Chief Schwartz (in accordance with the FRP). Chief
Schwartz and Agent Combs had an established professional relationship from
prior exercises and operations and quickly established a close working
relationship. Incident Command therefore knew very rapidly (about 30
minutes into the response) about the missing jetliner, and the safety
implications for the Pentagon rescue site (the fact that two jets had hit
the WTC complex was not lost on the incident managers at the Pentagon
site). In response, all staff was
evacuated to an area under a highway bridge adjacent to the Pentagon,
including any victims that could be moved (due to problems with
radio penetration of the Pentagon structure, several fire fighters that
were located inside the building and in the courtyard were not notified of
this initial evacuation). All
staff remained under the overpass for about 20 minutes, until it was
determined that the threat had passed (FBI liaisons conveyed the
information on the plane crash in Pennsylvania very quickly). Response
personnel returned to their activities, and the ACFD remained in position
and established the Incident Command Post (ICP) for the remainder of that
day underneath the overpass. Security for the ICP was maintained using
Arlington County SWAT team members. Other officers from the Arlington
County Police Force played a supportive role, assuming charge of traffic
around the Pentagon (in conjunction with Virginia State Police), ordering
the closure of roads surrounding it, helping evacuate the Pentagon and
helping the FBI and the other law enforcement agencies collect evidence
and search for bodies. Fairfax motorcycle officers also reported,
unrequested, outside Arlington police headquarters shortly
|
- Battalion Chief Robert Cornwall, ACFD assumes command
- Chief Schwartz, ACFD assumes Incident Command
- Chris Combs (FBI) arrived
- All were aware of WTC attack.
- All personnel were evacuated to an are under an
adjacent overpass within 30 minutes of the arrival of the
officers in command
- They remained there for about 20 minutes.
|
|
|
TOP
HOME |
Titan Corporation, Titan
Systems International, SEC Litigation Release 19107 and see San
Francisco EMS and CorpWatch |
|
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 19107 \ March 1, 2005 Accounting and
Auditing Enforcement Release No. 2204 \ March 1, 2005 SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. THE TITAN CORPORATION, Civil Action No. 05-0411 (D.D.C.)
(JR) (filed March 1, 2005) SEC SUES THE TITAN CORPORATION FOR PAYMENTS TO
ELECTION CAMPAIGN OF BENIN PRESIDENT TITAN SETTLES AND AGREES TO PAY A
TOTAL OF MORE THAN $28 MILLION TO SETTLE SEC ACTION AND RELATED CRIMINAL
ACTION TITAN PLEADS GUILTY IN RELATED CRIMINAL ACTION BROUGHT BY THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AND THE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FRAUD SECTION SEC ALSO ISSUES REPORT OF
INVESTIGATION TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE ON DISCLOSURE CONCERNING MATERIAL
PROVISIONS IN MERGER AND OTHER CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENTS The Securities and
Exchange Commission today announced the filing of a settled enforcement
action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
charging The Titan Corporation ("Titan"), a San Diego,
California-based military intelligence and communications company, with
violating the anti-bribery, internal controls and books and records
provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA").
Simultaneously with the filing of the Commission's complaint, and without
admitting or denying its allegations, Titan consented to the entry of a
final judgment permanently enjoining it from future violations of the FCPA
and requiring it (i) to pay $15.479 million in disgorgement and
prejudgment interest, (ii) to pay a $13 million penalty, which will be
deemed satisfied by Titan's payment of criminal fines of that amount in
parallel proceedings brought by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the
Southern District of California and the U.S. Department of Justice, Fraud
Section, and (iii) to retain an independent consultant to review the
company's FCPA compliance and procedures and to adopt and implement the
consultant's recommendations.
The Commission's complaint alleges that, from 1999 to
2001, Titan paid more than $3.5 million to its agent in Benin, Africa, who
was known at the time by Titan to be the President of Benin's business
advisor. Titan failed to conduct any meaningful due diligence into the
background of its agent either before his retention or thereafter and also
failed to ensure that the services alleged to be performed by the agent,
and described in his invoices, were in fact provided to Titan. The
complaint alleges, in 2001, at the direction of at least one former senior
Titan officer based in the United States, Titan funneled approximately $2
million, via its agent in Benin, towards the election campaign of Benin's
then-incumbent President. The complaint also alleges that some of these
funds were used to reimburse Titan's agent for the purchase to T-shirts
adorned with the President's picture and instructions to vote for him in
the upcoming election. According to the complaint, Titan made these
payments to assist the company in its development of a telecommunications
project in Benin and to obtain the Benin government's consent to an
increase in the percentage of Titan's project management fees for that
project. The complaint alleges that a former senior Titan officer directed
that these payments be falsely invoiced by the agent as consulting
services and that actual payment of the money be broken into smaller
increments and spread out over time. The complaint does not allege that
the then-incumbent President knew of the payments.
The Commission's complaint also alleges that, from 1999
to 2003, Titan improperly recorded payments in its books and records,
directed agents to falsify invoices submitted to Titan, and failed to
devise or maintain an effective system of internal controls to prevent or
detect other FCPA violations. Despite utilizing over 120 agents and
consultants in over 60 countries, Titan never had a formal company-wide
FCPA policy, failed to implement an FCPA compliance program, disregarded
or circumvented the limited FCPA policies and procedures in effect, failed
to maintain sufficient due diligence files on its foreign agents, and
failed to have meaningful oversight over its foreign agents.
According to the complaint, Titan falsified documents
that enabled its agents to under-report local commission payments in
Nepal, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka. In addition, the complaint alleges that
Titan falsified documents presented to the United States government by
under-reporting payments on equipment exported to Sri Lanka, France and
Japan. The complaint also alleges that Titan (i) paid a World Bank Group
analyst in cash to assist Titan in its project in Benin, and (ii) paid a
Benin government official approximately $14,000 in travel expenses from
1999 to 2001.
|
Without admitting or denying the
allegations in the complaint, Titan has consented to the entry of a final
judgment permanently enjoining it from future violations of Sections 30A,
13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(2)(B), and 13(b)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rule 13b2-1 thereunder. Titan also has
agreed to disgorge $12,620,000, and to pay prejudgment interest thereon in
the amount of $2,859,195.47. Under the terms of the final judgment, Titan
will also retain an independent consultant to review the company's FCPA
compliance and procedures and will adopt and implement the consultant's
recommendations.
Also today the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern
District of California and the U.S. Department of Justice, Fraud Section
filed criminal FCPA charges and a tax charge against Titan, who entered a
guilty plea before the Honorable Roger T. Benitez, United States District
Judge for the Southern District of California (United States of America v.
Titan Corporation, Case No.05cr0314-BEN (S.D. Cal.)). In particular, Titan
agreed to plead guilty to one felony count of violating the anti-bribery
provisions of the FCPA, one felony count for falsifying the books and
records of Titan, and one felony count for violating Title 26 U.S.C.
Section 7206(2) and to pay a criminal fine of $13 million.
Commission's Report Pursuant to Section 21(a) of the
Exchange Act The Commission also today issued a Report of Investigation
pursuant to Section 21(a) of the Exchange Act to provide guidance
concerning potential liability under the antifraud and proxy provisions of
the federal securities laws for publication of materially false or
misleading disclosures regarding provisions in merger and other
contractual agreements.
In its Report, the Commission stated that, on September
15, 2003, Titan became a party to a merger agreement with Lockheed Martin
Corporation ("Lockheed") in which Lockheed agreed to acquire
Titan, pending certain contingencies. Titan affirmatively represented in
that merger agreement that to the knowledge of Titan, neither the company
"nor any of its Subsidiaries, nor any director, officer, agent or
employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, has … taken any
action which would cause the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to be in
violation of the FCPA." This representation was publicly disclosed
and disseminated by Titan in two places. The proxy statement disclosed the
nature of the representation. The merger agreement containing the
representation was also appended to Titan's proxy statement, which was
filed with the Commission and sent to Titan's shareholders.
As the Report highlights, when an issuer makes a public
disclosure of information -- via filing a proxy statement or otherwise --
the issuer is required to consider whether additional disclosure is
necessary in order to put the information contained in, or otherwise
incorporated into that publication, into context so that such information
is not misleading. The issuer cannot avoid this disclosure obligation
simply because the information published was contained in an agreement or
other document not prepared as a disclosure document.
The Report is not intended to change the way issuers
engage in merger, or other contractual, negotiations or to alter existing
diligence obligations or to suggest, absent special circumstances (such as
provisions intended to create third party beneficiaries), that provisions
such as representations and covenants in such agreements are binding on or
intended to benefit persons other than parties thereto. Representations,
covenants, or other provisions of an agreement made by an issuer that are
not public or disclosed to shareholders are not covered by the scope of
this Report.
The Commission will consider bringing an enforcement
action under Sections 10(b) and 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5
and 14a-9 thereunder in the future if it determines that the subject
matter of representations or other contractual provisions is materially
misleading to shareholders because material facts necessary to make that
disclosure not misleading are omitted.
The Commission acknowledges the assistance in this
investigation from the Department of Justice, Fraud Section; the United
States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of California; the
Federal Bureau of Investigation, San Diego Division; the Internal Revenue
Service, Criminal Investigations; and the Department of Defense Inspector
General's Office, Defense Criminal Investigative Service.
The Commission's investigation is continuing.
SEC Complaint in this matter Report of Investigation
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr19107.htm
|
Warren Buffet, 9/11, WTC,
Omaha, Bush
|
- Killtown,
Warren Buffett Where Was Warren Buffet on
9/11? search terms: Omaha, Nebraska, watching TV, last annual golf
charity event, Ann Tatlock,
-
WMR:
Alberto Gonzales covered up torture by American contractors under DOJ
investigation, December 20, 2010 --
more below
|
- Buffet has endorsed Obama
- notes: New Jersey Governor Thomas Kean, on
911 Commission was director of Fiduciary Trust, replaced Kissinger as
nominee. Fiduciary Trust was a lease holder of the Port Authority of
New York and New Jersey,
- Howard
Huges Medical Institute
|
- Baker Botts, James Baker, and see
defense attorneys, Saudi Arabia, 911, lawsuits.
- Berkshire Hathaway
- Fiduciary Trust Co. International, ,
CEO, Ann Tatlock, South Tower offices WTC, Flight 175
impact. manages tens of billions, pension plans, endowments,
wealthy individuals,
- Franklin Resources,
- U. S. Strategic Air Command, Omaha,
Offutt Air Base, child molestation, pedophilia.
|
- 911Review.org
Susie Buffett, the event's organizer and Warren's
daughter..." ...also check this out: NNDB
Wife: Susan Thompson (nightclub singer, m. 1952; separated 1977, d.
29-Jul-2004 cancer) Daughter: Susie Buffett (housewife) Son: Howard
Buffett (photographer) Son: Peter Buffett (musician) Girlfriend: Astrid
Menks (ex-waitress) "...For nine years ending in 2001,
Buffett hosted an annual golf tournament for celebrities, professional
athletes, and CEOs, with all proceeds going to charity. It raised about
$9-million for four charities. The last such event was scheduled to be
held at Offutt Air Force Base near Omaha, on Sept. 11, 2001. They didn't
end up playing golf that day, but the event did save the lives of at
least a few CEOs who would have otherwise probably been at work in the
World Trade Center. It's also fueled some conspiracy theories,
because Offutt Air Force Base is the headquarters of the U.S. Strategic
Command, "responsible for both early warning of and defense against
missile attack and long-range conventional attacks."...
see "Omaha World Herald", September 11, 2001 and
... ". and see ..Classic guests who arrived early were treated to a
Monday dinner at the Joslyn Art Museum, where composer Marvin Hamlisch
performed, accompanied by vocalist Stephen Lehew.
|
Comparing
Titan Systems and AFCE attack reports
|
- Titan Systems lawsuit in Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse.
- see SourceWatch and Guardian,
- search internet: Titan Systems, lawsuit Abu Ghraib,
racketeering, CACI, see Guardian
|
Titan Systems description of attack inconsistent with ASCE
report. more building information, page 7
Below is
a screen print from the Arlington County After Action Report introduction
showing that Titan Systems Corporation created the report.
And....theTitan
Systems quotation of the description of the attack. That description
is completely inconsistent with the ASCE (American Society of Civil
Engineers) report of the attack.
|
Titan
Systems: description of attack and
Titan Corporation
|
|
Report Quotation:
"At 9:37 a.m., in Arlington County, Captain Steve McCoy
and the crew of ACFD Engine 101 were en route to a training session in
Crystal City, traveling north on Interstate 395. Their conversation about
the World Trade Center attack earlier that morning was interrupted by the
sight and sound of a commercial airliner in steep
descent, banking sharply to its right before disappearing beyond the horizon.
At the same time, ACPD Corporal Barry Foust and Officer Richard Cox, on
patrol in south Arlington County, saw a large American Airlines aircraft in
a steep
dive and on a collision course with the
Pentagon.
At 9:38 a.m., American Airlines Flight #77 crashed into the west side of
the Pentagon, just beyond the heliport. It
was traveling at a speed of about 400
miles per hour, accelerating with close
to its full complement of fuel at the time of impact.
The destruction caused by the attack was immediate and catastrophic. The
270,000 pounds of metal and jet fuel hurtling into the solid mass
of the
Pentagon is the equivalent in weight of a diesel train locomotive, except it
is traveling at more than 400 miles per hour. More than 600,000
airframe bolts and rivets and 60 miles of wire were instantly transformed
into white-hot shrapnel. The resulting impact, penetration, and burning fuel
had catastrophic effects to the five floors and three rings in and around
Pentagon Corridors 4 and 5. (See detailed graphics in Appendix 4.)
This act of evil cost the lives of 189 persons in the Pentagon attack,
184 innocent victims, and the 5 terrorist perpetrators of the criminal
attack."
|
Nothing mentioned above about light
pole damage, and What does "solid mass of the Pentagon"
mean? White hot shrapnel? and see 7
min fire detail and National Fire Protection Association and
perpetuation of "steep dive'
myth right:
|
and see Memorial Fund
|
Titan
Corporation info
|
|
WMR:
Alberto Gonzales covered up torture
by American contractors under DOJ investigation, December 20,
2010 -- |
A top U.S. military source involved with the
ostensibly-U.S. military run detention camps and prisons in post-U.S.
invasion and occupation Iraq has told WMR that a number of private
contractors who were responsible for ordering and committing abuse
of detainees at Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad and at other detention
facilities were former U.S. state and federal prison guards who were
under criminal investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice while
also working in Iraq. The contractors, many of whom used aliases
like "James Bond" and "007" were accused of abusing prisoners at
U.S. federal and state prisons while working as guards.
However, a deal was
worked out between then-White House Chief Counsel Alberto Gonzales
and Commander of Combined Joint Task Force 7 General Ricardo Sanchez
that resulted in all the pending criminal investigations of the
former U.S. prison guards dropped in return for their "service" in
Iraq. The deal to lift the pending Justice
Department investigations of the former U.S. prison guards was
worked out by the Prisons Department, which reported to Coalition
Provisional Authority head Paul "Jerry' Bremer.
WMR's Army source revealed that when asked by
military personnel about their assigned jobs at the Iraq prisons,
many of the civilian interrogators replied, "If I told you, I'd have
to kill you." WMR has also learned that many of the interrogation
contracts with companies like CACI and Titan were arranged through
the auspices of the CIA, not the Department of Defense.
Aside from some Israelis present at Abu Ghraib and
other prisons, none of the contractor interrogators spoke Arabic and
most were in Iraq on lucrative 90-day contracts. After the
expiration of their 90-day contracts, the civilian interrogators
were shipped to the Hilton Hotel in Kuwait where they re-negotiated
their original contracts at double and triple their original
salaries. The Hilton contract re-negotiation interlude was
punctuated by drinking parties and orgies with prostitutes,
according to our source.
WMR has learned of one such interrogation
contractor who was being paid by
CACI at the
same time he was working as a Naval Security Group reservist and
thus was being paid twice for doing the same job. The individual had
been assigned to Saudi Arabia as a signals intelligence operator
during the first Gulf War, Operation Desert Storm in the early 1990s
and re-appeared as a SIGINT operator at the U.S. embassy in Muscat,
Oman during Operation Iraqi Freedom. From Muscat, the SIGINT
operator ended up working at Bremer's headquarters in threw Green
Zone. There is a possibility that the contractor in question may
have had ties to Israeli intelligence, and, thus, represented an
Israeli penetration of National Security Agency (NSA) operations in
Saudi Arabia, Oman, and Iraq. No criminal charges for his
involvement in the abuse of prisoners at Avbu Ghraib, or possible
espionage, were ever brought against the contractor.
The bottom line at Abu Ghraib and some twenty
other detention facilities around Iraq was that there was no
military control and very little civilian control over the
activities of the civilian interrogators and detention operatives.
|
|
Information sources
|
|
|
|
.....Titan
Corporation info
ASCE
description of attack:
|
|
link to The
Pentagon Building Performance Report (ASCE) American Society of Civil
Engineers.
|
TOP
HOME
|
The site data indicate that the aircraft fuselage impacted the build-ing at
column line 14 at an angle of approximately 42 degrees to the normal to the face
of the building, at or slightly below the second-story slab. Eyewitness
accounts and photographs taken by a security camera suggest that the aircraft
was flying
on nearly a level path essentially at grade level for several hundred feet
immediately prior to impact.
Gashes in the facade above the second-floor slab between column lines 18 and 20
to the south of the collapse area suggest that the aircraft had rolled slightly
to the left as it entered the building. The right wing was below the
second-floor wingspan of the aircraft (figure 6.1). An examination of the area
encompassed by extending the line of travel of the aircraft to the face of the
building shows that there
are no discrete marks on the building corresponding to the positions of the
outer third of the right wing.
The size and position of the actual opening in the facade of the building (from
column line 8 to column line 18) indicate that no portion of the outer
two-thirds of the right wing and no portion of the outer one-third of the left
wing actually entered the building. It is possible that less of the right
wing than the left wing entered the building because the right wing struck the
facade
|
ASCE:
Column damage maps:
|
below: aircraft entry
graphics, ASCE
|
|
below: after debris
removed, ASCE
|
|
Column damage area is about 85', wide, Boeing wingspan is
125'. Considering the angle of attack the opening would be at least 177'
right see page
28 WTC comparison
|
|
- Titan map shows more columns as missing than ASCE.
- Titan does not mention the absence of any facade damage above
25'. Tail height of a Boeing 757 is
45'.
- The whole created by the aircraft was not large enough to allow all
the fuel to enter the building.
- The structural upgrades were not designed with aircraft impact in
mind, but for exterior blast protection.
- 2nd floor upgraded windows were not broken by the impact of the
attack jet, but by fire or fire extinguishing efforts.
-
|
|
ASCE column map legend
|
|
TOP
HOME
|
authorized
force, House, Iraq Senate
|
Although the official 9/11 Commission
Report(CR) said Vice President Richard Cheney did not arrive at the
Presidential Emergency Operations Center(PEOC) under the White House until
"shortly before 10 a.m." that tragic day, Transportation
Secretary Norman Mineta testified when he arrived in the room at 9:20 a.m.
Cheney was already there. (CR published no testimony from Mineta.)
911
Commission Report GPO Access and see ProLiberty
The timeline is important because if
Cheney arrived at 10 a.m. it would have been about 20 minutes after the
Pentagon was allegedly struck by a hijacked airplane at 9:38 a.m., too
late for him to authorize the Air Force to shoot it down. Some 125
Pentagon employees perished in the attack.
Mineta testified "during the time
that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a young man who
would come in and say to the Vice President, 'the plane is 50 miles out,
the plane is 30 miles out.' And when it got to 'the plane is 10 miles
out," the young man also said to the Vice President, 'Do the orders
still stand?' And the Vice President...said, 'Of course the orders still
stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"
Since the airplane was not intercepted and destroyed, even though the vice
president knew of it, "the orders" may have been to allow the
plane to hit the Pentagon. All of this, and more, is contained in the
March/April issue of "Tikkun" magazine, "a bimonthly Jewish
critique of Politics, Culture & Society." The piece was authored
by Dr. David Ray Griffin, a principal debunker of the accepted 9/11 dogma,
and published by Rabbi Michael Lerner on grounds, "if his view is
true, the position he articulates would provide adequate grounds for
impeachment of the president..."
In Griffin's view, "the strike on the Pentagon was orchestrated by
forces within our own government." If he's right, 9/11 was, indeed,
the crime of the century, and what has been called a false flag operation
involving the fabrication of evidence to make it appear the Taliban
government of Afghanistan was complicit, paving the road for invasion.
To begin with, there's even a question of whether American Airlines Flight
77 under control of Al-Qaeda hijacker Hani Hanjour struck the Pentagon. It
would require, Griffin charges, not only outfoxing military radar for over
an hour but the quite miraculous performance of descending 7,000 feet in
two minutes while executing a 270-degree banked turn and bashing into the
Pentagon without touching or damaging the lawn, a feat of aeronautical
magic.
Griffin, a professor of philosophy and theology at Claremont Graduate
University, Calif., says the impact of the strike, unlike those of the two
planes that struck the Twin Towers, did not create a dectactable seismic
signal. "Also, according to photographs and eyewitnesses, the kind of
damage and debris that would have been produced by the impact of a Boeing
757 was not evident in the aftermath of the strike on the Pentagon."
Karen Kwiatkowski, then an Air Force Lieutenant Colonel employed at the
Pentagon, writes of "a strange lack of visibile debris on the
Pentagon lawn, where I stood only moments after the impact." Another
witness was CNN's Jamie McIntyre, who reported live from the Pentagon that
day: "The only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you
pick up in your hand."
Griffin also quotes retired pilot Ralph Omholt, discussing the
photographic evidence, who said, "There is no hole big enough to
swallow a 757... There is no viable evidence of burning jet fuel... The
expected 'crash' damage doesn't exist...Even the Pentagon lawn was
undamaged!" So it may have been more than just a slip of the tongue
when Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld blurted about the
"missile" that hit the Pentagon.
The CR report alleged there was no warning of an unidentified aircraft
heading to Washington until 9:36 a.m., only "one or two minutes"
before the Pentagon was struck, yet Mineta said Cheney knew of it at least
10 minutes earlier, time to order an evacuation.
"By omitting Mineta's testimony and stating that Cheney did not enter
the PEOC until almost 10 a.m., the 9/11 Commission implied that Cheney
could not have given a stand-down order to allow an aircraft to strike the
Pentagon," Griffin writes.
The author goes on to say, CR's conclusion "contradicts Cheney's own
account, which can still be read on the White House Website. Speaking on
NBC's "Meet the Press" shortly after 9/11 Cheney said: '(A)fter
I talked to the president...I went down into...the Presidential Emergency
Operations Center...(W)hen I arrived there within a short order, we had
word the Pentagon's been hit.' So he got there, as Mineta said, some time
before the Pentagon was struck, not 20 minutes afterwards."
Griffin asserts the public has been fed three different yarns about why
Flight 77 was not intercepted before hitting the Pentagon. Initially,
military officials said no fighter jets were scrambled until after the
Pentagon was hit; next, they said fighters were scrambled but did not
arrive in time because of late FAA notification; finally, the CR found the
FAA did not notify NORAD until after the planes crashed.
Particularly curious is that the FBI "immediately confiscated videos
from security cameras on nearby buildings," and destroyed crash
evidence, Griffin said. "After the strike, officials picked up debris
in front of the impact site and carried it off. Shortly thereafter the
entire lawn was covered with dirt and gravel, so that any remaining
forensic evidence was literally covered up."
Griffin's views are akin to those published on Internet site
"Scholars for 9/11 Truth," which has joined with Judicial Watch
in calling for release of documents and physical evidence related to 9/11.
The group's cofounder, James Fetzer, McKnight Professor of Philosophy
Emeritus at the University of Minnesota, calls Mineta's estimony
"devastating."
"It pulls the plug on the Commission's contention there was no
advance warning that the Pentagon was going to be hit," Fetzer said.
"In fact, there are multiple witnesses who contradict the Vice
President's account, including Richard Clarke, Condoleeza Rice, and
several others. It had to have been a 'stand down' order, but the mere
fact that he knew the plane was coming in and did not warn the Pentagon is
proof this was an inside job," Fetzer said.
Philip J. Berg, former Pennsylvania deputy attorney general and member of
Scholars, added, "Those who made it happen were obviously in the
position to know that it was going to happen and therefore could have
sounded a warning alarm. The case against Cheney is more powerful than the
case against (Zacarias) Moussaoui(for willfully concealing advanced
knowledge of the forthcoming 9/11 attack). No one is more culpable than
the perpetrators. If Moussaoui deserves the death penalty, what does our
Vice President deserve?"
Fetzer said the government's case against the hijackers is counterfeit.
"A growing body of evidence supports the inference that these 19 men
were patsies for forces within the United States government,"
#
(Sherwood Ross is a Miami-based columnist, reporter, and publicist. Reach
him at sherwoodr1@yahoo.com).
Sherwood Ross has worked in the civil
rights movement and as a reporter for major dailies and wire services.
Contact
Author
Contact
Editor
View
Other Articles by Author
|
- ProLiberty
An explanation from Vice President Richard
Cheney regarding the "orders" described by Secretary of
Transportation Norman Mineta in his testimony before The 9/11
Commission. Secretary Mineta stated that while in an underground
bunker at the White House, he watched Vice President Cheney castigate
a young officer for asking, as a plane drew closer and closer to the
Pentagon, "Do the orders still stand?" The officer should be
identified and allowed to testify at a deposition under oath.
|
A suspicious cell in the
Pentagon linked to Air Force rival chain-of-command
September 19-21, 2008
WMR
|
A little-reported investigation of a small Department of Defense
agency from 2002 to 2004 appears to be linked to a major foreign
intelligence operation and security breach in the Pentagon. WMR has been
conducting an investigation of a Department of Defense Inspector General
probe of the Defense Technology Security Administration (DTSA), which
had been merged with the larger Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA)
on October 1, 1998. It was DTRA that in May 2008 flunked the 91st Bomb
Wing at Minot Air Force Base in its nuclear surety inspection of the
command for the security control of nuclear weapons after a number of
incidents, including the August 2007 unauthorized movement of six
nuclear-armed cruise missiles from Minot to Barksdale Air Force Base in
Louisiana for planned use in a military strike on Iran. The movement
involved a rival chain-of-command within the Air Force that bypassed the
Secretary of Defense and Joint Chiefs of Staff and led directly into the
office of Vice President Dick Cheney.
The placement of DTSA (called "Ditsa" by Pentagon insiders) within
DTRA (called "Deetra") began in 1998 when DTSA was merged into the
larger component. In July 2001, DTRA decided to move the Technology
Security Directorate, as DTSA became known as part of DTRA, from its
Arlington, Virginia location to Alexandria, Virginia. On July 10, 2002,
the Defense Hotline, a number for whistle blowers, received three
allegations forwarded from the General Accounting Office (GAO) that DTSA
exceeded a cap on moving expenses when it moved from Arlington to
Alexandria. However, it is clear that the Pentagon Inspector General
failed to prioritize the three complaints. It was not moving expenses
that were key to the complaint but that DTSA, according to a February
19, 2004 Inspector General report titled Defense Threat Reduction Agency
Relocation Costs, "obtained sensitive compartmented information
clearances for personnel who did not need such access, resulting in
excessive costs and a potential security risk."
The IG report provides some background on DTRA and DTSA: "DTRA was
established October 1, 1998, as a joint service defense agency tasked
with safeguarding America and its allies from weapons of mass
destruction by reducing the present threat and preparing for future
threats. DTRA was created by merging elements of the Office of the
Secretary of Defense, DTSA, the Defense Special Weapons Agency, and the
On-Site Inspection Agency. DTRA reports to the Assistant to the
Secretary of Defense (Nuclear and Chemical and Biological Defense
Programs). DTRA has an authorized staff of 2,141 military and civilian
personnel. The FY 2003 budget for DTRA was $2.6 billion. When DTSA was
merged into DTRA, the Directorate was named the Technology Security
Directorate. Subsequently, on August 31, 2001, DTSA was re-established
as a separate agency and reports to the Under Secretary of Defense for
Policy."
Just a mere ten days prior to the 9/11 attacks, on August 31, Deputy
Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz re-established DTSA as a separate
agency from DTRA and had its head, the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense
for Technology Security Policy and Counter proliferation, report
directly to Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith.
Stephen Younger was DTRA's director from September 1, 2001 to
February 27, 2004, a few days after the IG Report was issued that
absolved DTRA and DTSA of any major wrongdoing in losing classified
material and inflating the need for SCI clearances. DTSA's long-serving
director was David Tarbell, who served as director from August 1994 to
September 23, 2001. Tarbell was replaced by Lisa Bronson. Until 1997,
DTSA reported to the Assistant Secretary for International Security
Policy, a position replaced by the Assistant Secretary for Strategy and
Threat Reduction.
Although the IG Report concentrates on moving expense issues, it was
the exceedingly large number of Sensitive Compartmented Information
(SCI) clearances and the loss of classified information that is at the
heart of the matter. The office relocation costs serve as a diversionary
tactic. The IG Report discusses the problem with the SCI clearances:
"the decision by DTRA to grant SCI clearances to its DTSA staff was not
supported by the position description. Only five of the position
descriptions for 45 employees who were granted SCI clearances from
February 10, 2001, through July 31, 2002, indicated that a security
clearance beyond the secret level was required. During August through
September 2001, the DTRA security manager informed DTRA division chiefs
that they needed to review the position descriptions under their control
to ensure that the positions reflected the proper position sensitivity.
However, no procedures have been implemented to correct the deficiency."
The report continues by stating that only 5 of 56 SCI clearances were
correctly designated and that 45 to 51 SCI clearances had been granted
beginning on February 10, 2001, but were not justified: "Security
records show that 56 of the DTSA staff were granted SCI clearances from
February 10, 2001, through July 31, 2002. We examined position
descriptions for 45 of the 56 staff-members; 11 of the position
descriptions were unavailable because of employee departures or other
reasons. Of the 45 position descriptions examined, 5 were correctly
prepared (4 military personnel and 1 civilian employee). Seven of the 45
position descriptions had the correct position sensitivity designations
for an SCI clearance but the position description did not indicate that
an SCI clearance was required. The remaining 33 positions had erroneous
position sensitivity designations.
Although the DTRA security officer and his staff requested that DTRA
management determine the sensitivity for each position back in 2001, no
procedures have been implemented to correct the deficiency. On August
31, 2001, the Deputy Secretary of Defense reestablished DTSA as a
separate agency from DTRA. Accordingly, DTSA needs to take the
appropriate corrective action rather than the DTRA. DTSA needs to review
the position sensitivity level designated on Office of Personnel
Management Form 8 and ensure that the position levels are appropriate
and in accordance with 5 C.F.R. Section 732 (2003). Additionally, DTSA
needs to ensure that position sensitivity levels support the level of
security clearance provided to DTSA staff."
The IG Report addresses the loss of classified material by DTSA.
However, it says no further action was necessary because the classified
documents were duplicates and "no longer needed" by DTSA. Whether or not
classified information is duplicated, it must be disposed of properly
and recorded as such. The IG Report states: "On July 15, 2001, the
Inspector General, DTRA received an allegation on improper disposal of
classified information by DTRA personnel. That complaint was referred to
the DoD Deputy Inspector General for Investigations for review. The
evidence revealed that the disposed documents were duplicates of
documents retained by DTSA and other items no longer needed in carrying
out the DTSA mission. The DoD Deputy Inspector General for
Investigations did not substantiate the allegation. There were no audits
or evaluations relating to this subject during the last 5 years."
There were some published reports that documents on the sale by the
U.S. of dual-use technology to other countries, as well as top secret
intelligence reports on foreign weapons acquisition programs and foreign
front companies involved in the weapons trade were among the documents
unaccounted for.
The IG Report also describes "urgency" by DTSA in obtaining 56 SCI
clearance for personnel when they were only justified by 5 employees:
"Using an Office of Personnel Management price list for background
investigations, we estimate that DTRA spent about $110,000 to obtain SCI
clearances for the DTSA staff. We identified the type of investigation
performed for each of the 56 personnel and multiplied the number of
investigations by the current price for the specified urgency. Our
estimate may be slightly higher than DTRA actually paid because some of
the investigations were performed prior to January 1, 2002, the
effective date of the price list we used. The estimated cost of $110,000
does not include the costs that the Defense Intelligence Agency incurred
for the adjudication process; those costs are not billed to the
requesting agency."
The security problems at DTSA coincide with the Mossad's involvement
with two officials of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee
(AIPAC) and Air Force Reserve Colonel and Defense Intelligence Agency
(DIA) Soviet and Iran analyst Larry Franklin, who, while on active duty,
served tours at the U.S. embassy in Tel Aviv. Between 2003 and 2004,
Franklin admitted that he met with two AIPAC officials, Steven Rosen and
Keith Weissman and shared classified information, including SCI
intelligence with them. Franklin was discovered to have had in his
possession, 83 classified U.S. government documents discovered in a
search of of his Kearneysville, West Virginia home in June.
Rosen and Weissman later shared the classified intelligence with an
Israeli embassy official, Naor Gilon, believed to be a Mossad agent.
Another co-conspirator was identified as Uzi Arad, a former Israeli
intelligence agent. Franklin was also reportedly close to arch-neocon
Michael Ledeen and met with Ledeen's old friend, Iranian Jewish
agent-of-influence and Iran-contra figure Manucher Ghorbanifar in Rome
in December 2001. The FBI investigation of the Franklin-Israeli spy ring
was leaked to the media on August 27, 2004. Franklin was charged with
six criminal counts, including passing classified information to an
agent of a foreign government. However, he was only convicted of three
charges, not including the foreign intelligence count. Franklin was
convicted on January 20, 2006 and sentenced to 12 and 1/2 years in
prison and given a $10,000 fine. Franklin remains free pending the
often-delayed trial of Rosen and Weissman under the Espionage Act.
In what could prove embarrassing for Israel's intelligence hierarchy
in Israel and the United States, U.S. Judge T.S. Ellis has approved
defense requests for subpoenas of Wolfowitz and Feith, two key players
involved in the DTSA operations. But the clock is running out for
federal prosecutors and the possibility of a George Bush pardon for
Rosen and Weissman, which would also see Franklin absolved, is real.
Problems with Israeli spies and agents-of-influence in the Pentagon
have existed as a public issue ever since the term of General George
"Scratchy" Brown, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Air
Force Chief of Staff. In October 1974, General Brown, while serving as
Joint Chiefs Chairman under President Gerald Ford, was quoted in Time as
telling a seminar at Duke University Law School that he hoped the United
States would not use force against oil-producing nations in the Middle
East. General Brown said he could foresee a "Seven Days in May" scenario
in the United States if the American people began to suffer from an oil
embargo. He said, "You can conjure a situation where there is another
oil embargo and people in this country are not only inconvenienced and
uncomfortable, but suffer. They get tough-minded enough to set down the
Jewish influence in this country and break that lobby." General Brown
further described the influence of the Israel lobby: "It's so strong you
wouldn't believe now. We have the Israelis coming to us for equipment.
We say we can't possibly get the Congress to support that. They say,
'Don't worry about the Congress. We will take care of the Congress.' Now
this is somebody from another country, but they can do it." General
Brown did not stop there. He added, "They own, you know, the banks in
this country, the newspapers. Just look at where the Jewish money is."
Ford called General Brown into his office for a ten-minute reprimand.
Defense Secretary James Schlesinger, who recently completed a study of
the Air Force's nuclear security problems for Defense Secretary Robert
Gates, merely called Brown's comments "unfortunate." New York Republican
Senator Jacob Javits called for a full investigation of General Brown's
comments.
General Brown, in an interview with a reporter in 1976, repeated his
charge about Israel and called Israel a "burden" for the Defense
Department. Calls for General Brown's firing were repeated but he
remained as Joint Chiefs Chairman into President Jimmy Carter's term,
retiring on June 21, 1978. General Brown lived only another five months
-- he died at age 61 from cancer on December 5, 1978.
On December 9, 1980, investigative journalist Jack Anderson reported
that the CIA launched a probe of the Air Force for leaking high-tech
secrets to Israel. The joint development of cruise missiles by Israel,
South Africa, and Taiwan was thought to involve the leak of "long-range
nuclear delivery knowhow" by senior U.S. Air Force officers to Israel,
violating a U.S. ban on such technology transfer. Anderson wrote, "While
the Air Force has a long history of close ties with the Israelis, the
CIA has argued that Israeli intelligence activities in the United States
should be curtailed . . .What particularly worries the CIA is the
possibility that the KGB routinely includes its agents among the Soviet
Jews who are permitted to emigrate to Israel. Thus, the CIA fears, any
technology given to Israel may wind up in the Kremlin." Anderson later
reported that the CIA's agents and NSA's signals intercepts proved that
Israel had provided sensitive military technology to South Africa.
One person who publicly challenged Brown was Joseph Churba, the top
Middle East intelligence official in the Air Force who told a reporter
that Brown's comments were "dangerously irresponsible" and pointed to a
"tilt" against Israel within the Pentagon. Churba lost his clearance for
signals intelligence (SIGINT) and satellite intelligence
(Talent-Keyhole) and was fired for talking to the media. Churba, who
hailed from a family of Syrian Sephardic rabbis, later joined the Ronald
Reagan campaign as an adviser and was eventually appointed as an adviser
to the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency where he worked closely with
two alumni of Senator Henry "Scoop" Jackson's staff, Assistant Secretary
of Defense for International Security Policy Richard Perle and Senate
Armed Services Committee staffer Frank Gaffney, both of whom would
become neocon supporters of the Project for the New American Century and
other neocon contrivances. Churba later became president of the
International Security Council, a Washington "research group" linked to
the Reverend Sun Myung Moon's global propaganda empire. Churba died in
1996 from a heart attack. He was 62.
Churba, Perle, and others with a pro-Israeli bent would set out to
transform the Pentagon from a place where anti-Israelis like General
Brown could gain dominance and turn it into the most pro-Israeli of
federal departments. And these new Pentagon officials would have the
support of some high-level CIA officials who were fervently pro-Israeli,
including Reagan's CIA director William Casey and the former CIA
director of counter-intelligence James Jesus Angleton, who was fired by
CIA director William Colby in 1974. Angleton was the architect of close
CIA ties to the Mossad and he maintained those ties even after leaving
the CIA. Casey was also close to the Mossad and made a number of secret
trips to Israel as CIA director. It was during Casey's watch that U.S.
intelligence was damaged by the Jonathan Pollard espionage affair and
Israeli intelligence involvement in the Iran-contra affair.
They would be joined by others, including Stephen Bryen, who, in the
1970s, created the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs
(JINSA), along with Michael Ledeen, as a major Israel lobbying entity
targeting the Pentagon's top brass. Bryen became a top aide to Perle and
lobbied hard for the creation of DTSA in 1985. Bryen became DTSA's first
director. As such he was able to influence what U.S. military equipment
the U.S. sold to Israel and what sensitive technology could be shared
with Israel. Bryen's tenure at DTSA resulted in complaints by Customs
Service Commissioner William von Raab and Deputy Defense Secretary
Richard Armitage that sensitive U.S. military technology was going to
Israel and that some of it was being re-exported against the law.
Bryen had reportedly been under investigation for offering Defense
Department documents to Israeli government agents at a Washington
restaurant in 1987. Bryen was then a staffer for the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee, working for Senator Clifford Case (R-NJ). Philip
Heymann, the head of the Justice Department's Criminal Division, closed
the case with no action taken. Bryen later went on to work with
Gaffney's Center for Security Policy.
One of Bryen's chief assistants at DTSA was Norman D. Kass, the
Deputy Director of Licensing for the agency. Kass was an Army tactical
intelligence officer in South Vietnam and fluent in Russian and Hebrew.
Kass served in the DTSA position until 1992. He eventually became
Executive Secretary of the U.S./Russia Joint Commission on POWs/MIAs,
set up in 1992, in part, to investigate the fate of missing U.S.
military personnel from World War II, the Korean and Vietnam Wars, and
the Cold War. At one point, Kass' work on POW/MIA issues earned him the
wrath of conservative Republican New Hampshire Senator Bob Smith, who
charged that there was never any provision for an Executive Secretariat
at the U.S./Russia Joint Commission. On January 27, 1999, Smith, who
served as Chairman of the Vietnam Working Groups of the US/Russian Joint
Commission, wrote: "Nowhere in this plan is there reference to the
requirement for the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for POW/MIA
Affairs to ensure that his office provides an Executive Secretariat for
the U.S. Members of the U.S./Russian Joint Commission on POWs and MIAs."
Smith always believed that there was a cover-up of by the Pentagon of
the POW/MIA issue, particularly those from the Vietnam conflict.
In fact, Smith asked Attorney General Janet Reno to investigate Kass
and other Pentagon and Defense Intelligence Agency officers for perjury
before the Senate. Smith's charges were dismissed by both Senators John
Kerry (D-MA) and John McCain (R-AZ).
Kass is married to Dr. Ilana Dimant-Kass, a former major in the
Israeli Air Force. From 1982 to 1985, Dr. Kass, who now is known by the
name "Lani" Kass, served as the director of the Russian Research Center
at Booz Allen and Hamilton. Although the term Soviet was the common term
during the time period, the Russian term was used for the center to veer
away from the "Sovietologists" who rarely, if ever, considered Russian
history and culture in relation to the USSR. Kass worked in the Pentagon
under Defense Secretary Dick Cheney, as Special Assistant to the
Director, Strategic Plans and Policy Directorate (J-5) at the Joint
Staff. She also worked under Defense Secretaries William Cohen and
Donald Rumsfeld, as Senior Policy Adviser and Special Assistant for
Strategic Initiatives to the Director, Strategic Plans and Policy
Directorate and later as Special Assistant to the Chief of Staff, U.S.
Air Force, and Director of the Air Force Chief of Staff's Cyberspace
Task Force . From 1985 to 2005, Dr. Kass also taught at the National War
College in Washington, DC.
While at the war college, Dr. Kass was involved in teaching courses
that would have a dramatic impact on the news and media in wartime:
Military Thought and the Essence of War and Studies of Warning, Surprise
and Deception. Kass has also been involved in the Pentagon's Project
Checkmate, a restoration of the old group with the same name that
plotted the Desert Storm air war against Iraq and is now charged with
planning a war against Iran.
Kass is a graduate of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and in 1978
she and her husband wrote, for Hebrew University, a review for the
Slavic Review of two books, The Soviet Union and Black Africa, by
Christopher Stevens and Soviet and Chinese Influence in the Third World,
by Alvin Z. Rubinstein.
A paper written by Kass for the Air University Review in 1985 lists
the following resume items: "Senior Analyst with Systems Research and
Applications Corporation, Arlington, Virginia; an Adjunct Professor of
Soviet Military Studies at Georgetown University; and a frequent guest
lecturer at the National War College. Dr. Kass has been a senior analyst
with the Advanced International Studies Institute, Bethesda, Maryland,
and senior lecturer at the Israeli Defense Forces Staff College,
Jerusalem, Israel."
WMR has learned that the Russian Research Center of Booz Allen was
under the Advanced International Studies Institute (AISI). Upon the
collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 and the emergence of Russia as a
separate nation, there was no longer any need to continue to
differentiate between Soviet and Russian, and the center was closed.
However, the AISI still exists, according to phone records, but there is
no discernible address. One address is given as 5480 Wisconsin Avenue in
Bethesda, however, it turns out to be the address for the Highland
House, an apartment building that houses a number of doctor's offices
and private residences. The manager, who has been at Highland House for
nine years, said he never heard of or seen mail addressed to the
Advanced International Studies Institute.
No record of an AISI at Wisconsin Avenue address.
Kass has written a number of articles, including a few recent pieces
for the right-wing Human Events. At an Air Force conference in 2006 in
Washington, DC, Kass' biography on the speakers' list stated: "Dr. Kass
was a key participant in the development of the National Strategy for
Combating Terrorism, as well as the National Military Strategic Plan for
GWOT. She also has authored 2 books and over 20 scholarly articles. Dr.
Kass is a member of the Hermes Society--the DCI's Task Force on
countering hostile denial and deception--and a frequent guest lecturer
at a wide variety of governmental and civic fora."
There is very little information on the Hermes Society, however, the
former Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) ran a program, code named
FIRSTFRUITS, that collected intelligence on journalists, including this
editor. On May 10, 2005, WMR reported: "NSA maintains a database that
tracks unofficial and negative articles written about the agency. Code
named "FIRSTFRUITS," the database is operated by the Denial and
Deception (D&D) unit within SID [Signals Intelligence Division of NSA].
High priority is given to articles written as a result of possible leaks
from cleared personnel." WMR reported on January 13, 2006 that
FIRSTFRUITS' code name had been changed because of our revelations about
its existence. It continues to operate under a new code name.
It is clear that whatever the Hermes Society is, "denial and
deception," the main mission of NSA's FIRSTFRUITS and apparently, the
mysterious Hermes Society, received the blessing of CIA director Porter
Goss, who also served as DCI, and the National Intelligence Council.
Since WMR's revelations about FIRSTFRUITS and particularly after our
exposure of the rival nuclear chain-of-command from Cheney's office
through the Air Force to Air Force field nuclear activities, we have
been the subject of a major "denial and deception" campaign. [Related
story today]. This has included physical tails on myself and my
colleague, cell phone interference, and incessant e-mail problems.
The rival chain-of-command from Cheney's office around the Secretary
of Defense and Joint Chiefs and directly to military field commanders
has been confirmed in Bob Woodward's book, "The War Within." Cheney and
Bush used retired Army General Jack Keane to pass information to Iraq
commander General David Petraeus. Likewise, Cheney's office was using a
rival chain through the Air Force Chief of Staff and Secretary to create
the Air Force Cyber Command as an alternate chain, one that could have
had drastic consequences had not the movement in August 2007 of nuclear
cruise missiles from North Dakota and Louisiana for use in a pre-staged
attack on Iran been disclosed in a leak to the media by three
high-ranking Air Force officers.
The Pentagon's "denial and deception" program was always intended to
be used against an enemy. The neocons have decided that it is best used
against not only the press but the Secretary of Defense and the Joint
Chiefs of Staff. |
follow up, the
act of following up. 2. an action or thing that serves to increase the
effectiveness of a previous one, as a second or subsequent letter, phone
call, or visit. 3. Also called follow. Journalism. a. a news story
providing additional information on a story or article previously
published. b. Also called sidebar, supplementary story. a minor news story
used to supplement a related story of major importance. Compare feature
story (def. 1), human-interest story, shirttail. –adjective 4. designed
or serving to follow up, esp. to increase the effectiveness of a previous
action: a follow-up interview; a follow-up offer. 5. of or pertaining to
action that follows an initial treatment, course of study, etc.: follow-up
care for mental patients; a follow-up survey. fol·low –verb (used with
object) 1. to come after in sequence, order of time, etc.: The speech
follows the dinner. 2. to go or come after; move behind in the same
direction: Drive ahead, and I'll follow you. 3. to accept as a guide or
leader; accept the authority of or give allegiance to: Many Germans
followed Hitler. 4. to conform to, comply with, or act in accordance with;
obey: to follow orders; to follow advice. 5. to imitate or copy; use as an
exemplar: They follow the latest fads. 6. to move forward along (a road,
path, etc.): Follow this road for a mile. 7. to come after as a result or
consequence; result from: Reprisals often follow victory. 8. to go after
or along with (a person) as companion. 9. to go in pursuit of: to follow
an enemy. 10. to try for or attain to: to follow an ideal. 11. to engage
in or be concerned with as a pursuit: He followed the sea as his true
calling. 12. to watch the movements, progress, or course of: to follow a
bird in flight. 13. to watch the development of or keep up with: to follow
the news. 14. to keep up with and understand (an argument, story, etc.):
Do you follow me? –verb (used without object) 15. to come next after
something else in sequence, order of time, etc. 16. to happen or occur
after something else; come next as an event: After the defeat great
disorder followed. 17. to attend or serve. 18. to go or come after a
person or thing in motion. 19. to result as an effect; occur as a
consequence: It follows then that he must be innocent. –noun 20. the act
of following. 21. Billiards, Pool. follow shot (def. 2). 22. follow-up
(def. 3). —Verb phrases23. follow out, to carry to a conclusion;
execute: They followed out their orders to the letter. 24. follow through,
a. to carry out fully, as a stroke of a club in golf, a racket in tennis,
etc. b. to continue an effort, plan, proposal, policy, etc., to its
completion. 25. follow up, a. to pursue closely and tenaciously. b. to
increase the effectiveness of by further action or repetition. c. to
pursue to a solution or conclusion. —Idiom26. follow suit. suit (def.
13). fol·low·a·ble, adjective —Synonyms 3. obey. 4. heed, observe. 8.
accompany, attend. 9. pursue, chase; trail, track, trace. 19. arise,
proceed. Follow, ensue, result, succeed imply coming after something else,
in a natural sequence. Follow is the general word: We must wait to see
what follows. A detailed account follows. Ensue implies a logical
sequence, what might be expected normally to come after a given act,
cause, etc.: When the power lines were cut, a paralysis of transportation
ensued. Result emphasizes the connection between a cause or event and its
effect, consequence, or outcome: The accident resulted in injuries to
those involved. Succeed implies coming after in time, particularly coming
into a title, office, etc.: Formerly the oldest son succeeded to his
father's title. —Antonyms 1. precede. 2, 3. lead. 4. disregard. 9. flee.
news follow up |
NewsFollowUp.com guests:
August
2006 Amer Israel Public Affairs Com Chinanet Jiangsu Province Network)
Jiangsu, Jiangsu, China, fwbg2bibae01-vlan3501.woo (Wanadoo-portails-bagnolet)
France Uninet S.a. De C.v) Distrito Federal, Mexico, Mexico Arabian
Advanced Systems) Makkah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
ip-89-102-144-234.karneval.cz (Karneval Media Brno 3 - Public) Czech
Republic Ministerio De Defensa) Spain
CBL217-132-82-214.bb.netvision.net.il (Bb-hfa) Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv,
Israel Chinanet Shanghai Province Network) Shanghai, Shanghai, China
The John D & Catherine T. Macarthur Foundation) Illinois, Chicago
mrc210324.mtroyal.ca (Mount Royal College) Alberta, Calgary, Canada
gwanc00.legis.state.ak.us (State Of Alaska) Alaska, Anchorage
asoc11.soc.mil (Dod Network Information Center) North Carolina,
Fayetteville Boehringer Mannheim Gmbh Mannheim) Germany no-dns-yet.demon.co.uk
(Midlothian Council) England, London
89-138-110-210.bb.netvision.net.il (Netvision) Israel Camara Oficial
De Comercio E Industria Y Navegacion De Valencia) Puerto Plata, Puerto
Plata, Dominican Republic China United Telecommunications Corporation)
China Continental Teves Ag & Co.ohg) Germany Adamsmith College
Fife) United Kingdom biolantro.unipv.it (Universita' Degli Studi Di
Pavia) Lombardia, Pavia, Italy Salomon Inc) New York, New York Salomon
Inc) Booz Allen And Hamilton) Virginia, Oakton September 2006 Cncgroup Tianjin Province Network)
Guangdong, Tianjin, China 82-168-108-209.dsl.ip.tiscali.nl (Tiscali-tdsln)
Zuid-holland, The Hague, Netherlands mail.buecherhallen.de (Stiftung
Hamburger Oeffentliche Buecherhallen) Hamburg
216.49.181.128.ldschurch.org (The Church Of Jesus Christ Of Latter Day
Saints) Iowa, Ames mm525.acad.cai.cam.ac.uk (University Of Cambridge)
England, London sa82d3a79.dhs.state.tx.us (State Of Texas General
Services Commission) Texas, gw.reyrey.net (Reynolds And Reynolds)Ohio,
Dayton Beijing Language And Culture University) Beijing, Beijing,
China Lan Of Rockwell) Zuid-holland, The Hague, Netherlands U.s.
Immigration And Naturalization Service) District Of Columbia,
Washington Chinanet Jilin Province Network) Jilin, Jilin, China
Oriental Cable Network Co. Ltd) Jiangsu, Nanjing, China prm1.azg.nl (Academisch
Ziekenhuis Groningen) Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
res00.cip.uni-regensburg.de (Universitaet Regensburg; Rechenzentrum)
Bayern, Regensburg, Germany museum10.biol.ucl.ac.uk (University
College London) England, London N393DF N967BW N968BW N989BW N90AM N2275V
N85VM N196D N178D N313P N44765 N475LC N478GS N45PA N145CA N97SA auab-n.auab.aorcentaf.af.mil (Uscentaf/scm)
South Carolina, Shaw A F B Amdocs Inc) California, El Dorado Hills
cits-bc2.region1.ang.af.mil (Norton Air Force Base) Maryland, Andrews
Arlington County Government) Virginia, Falls Church
warlock.dstl.gov.uk (Royal Signals And Radar Establishment)England,
London sherman.state.gov (U.s. Department Of State) District Of
Columbia, Washington unknown (Preston Gates Ellis Llp) Washington,
Seattle Ny St. Div. Of Criminal Justice Services) New York, Albany
SG800-1830-2.polk.army.mil (Commander Army Information Systems
Command) Louisiana, Ft. Polk godzilla.hood.army.mil (1114th Signal
Battalion) Texas, Killeen ip12-156-194-3.ita.doc.gov
(Doc-international Trade Admin) District Of Columbia, Washington
cits-pr.nellis.af.mil (99th Communications Squadron)
proxy8.monmouth.army.mil (Usaisc-cecom) New Jersey, Lakewood
sgzero.llnl.gov (Lawrence Livermore Laboratory) California, San
Francisco citspr.tyndall.af.mil (325cs/scsn) Pennsylvania, West
Mifflin Red Del Ministerio De Fomento) Spain legion.dera.gov.uk (Uk
Defence Science And Technology Laboratory) United Kingdom net2.dss.mil
(Dod Network Information Center) United States techtrack.gov (Gray
Hawk Systems/doj-fbi) Virginia, Arlington, web-proxy.beale.af.mil (9th
Communications Squadron) California, Beale; U.s. Senate Sergeant At
Arms, District of Columbia; pr2.charleston.af.mil (437 Cs/sc) New
York, Glen Cove; October 2006: ce.ansbach.army.mil (Hq 5th Signal
Command), lak-proxy-02.lackland.af.mil (Air Force Logistics
Command), contentengine.eustis.army.mil (Directorate Of Information
Management), Rothschild-et-cie-banque Ile-de-france, Paris, asab-n.salem.af.mil
(Uscentaf/scm South Carolina, Shaw AFB June - Aug 2007: altaec233.nbcuni.com (Nbc Universal) New York, New York, sc215019.robins.af.mil
(78 Cs/scsc), dma-cs-proxy.dm.af.mil (355th
Communications Squadron,pomproxy.monterey.army.mil
(Presidio Of Monterey, wdcsun17.usdoj.gov
(Us Dept Of Justice), gao-ng.gao.gov
(U.s. General Accounting Office) Maryland, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, Potomac, cheetah.usafa.hpc.mil
(Dod Network Information Center)Ohio, Columbus, wdcsun24.usdoj.gov
(Us Dept Of Justice) Maryland, Potomac, The Washington
Post- Kaplan Inc)
ip68-13-155-193.om.om.cox.net (Cox Communications Inc) Nebraska, Boys
Town pc24-27.apg.army.mil
(Headquarters Usaaisc) Maryland, Aberdeen hqvf.centcom.mil
(U.s. Central Command (uscentcom)) Nebraska, Lincoln,
paddy.fnni.net
(First National Bank Of Omaha) Nebraska, Omaha, browser.nfib.org
(National Federation Of Independence) Tennessee, Brentwood, camac.ci.omaha.ne.us
(City Of Omaha - Mis Division) Nebraska, Omaha, wgtroy.hdp.com
(Harness Dickey & Pierce P.l.c) Michigan, Troy, wp1.mountainhome.af.mil
(366 Cs/scbb), Al Faisaliah Internet Services & Technology)
Saudi Arabia Idaho, Gidromachine.Moscow.Access.Comstar.ru
(Comstar United Telesystems) Russian Federation, 82-171-171-183.dsl.ip.tiscali.nl
(Wol) Zuid-holland, The Hague, Netherlands, Pu-er-si-ma-te-xue-qing-lu)
Beijing, Beijing, China, New York, relay1.ucia.gov
(Central Intelligence Agency) District of Columbia, esseop02.eop.gov
(Fema) Brooklyn, New York, blv-proxy-08.boeing.com
(The Boeing Company) Seattle, Washington, eagle1.mcrc.usmc.mil
(Usmc Network Operations Center) Georgia, Warner Robins, United States,
tiger.usafa.hpc.mil (Dod Network
Information Center) Ohio, Columbus, Neda Gostar Saba Data Transfer
Company Private Joint Stock) Iran, Islamic Republic of,
gate23-quantico.nmci.usmc.mil (Nctc), Viacom Inc, New York, (Carlyle
Group) District of Columbia, Radian Group Inc. Kfx Inc Denver
Colorado, wakko.whs.mil (The Pentagon) Maryland, Oxon Hill,
jacob-ext.edwards.af.mil (Air Force Flight Test Center) altaec232.nbcuni.com
(Nbc Universal) New York, 78.38.13.231 (Anaorumelm Avar Dade Orumieh
Co) Iran, Islamic Republic Of; bad-cits-pr01.barksdale.af.mil (754the
Electronic Systems Group)Montgomery, Alabama nfu
visitor sbcp1.dhs.gov (Dhs/bsl002a) Springfield, Virginia,
hncralghwc03.ngb.army.mil (Headquarters Usaisc) Fayetteville, North
Carolina, ncnc.northcom.mil (Norad-usspacecom/j6d) Colorado Springs |
Recent news articles:
|
April 26-28, 2010 -- The super-classified network that
served as command and control for the 9/11 false flag attack on
America
publication date: Apr 25, 2010
April 26-28, 2010 -- The
super-classified network that served as command and control
for the 9/11 false flag attack on America
Multiple U.S. intelligence sources have
reported to WMR that a super-classified network with only
some 70 terminals in select U.S. government locations
handled the parallel command-and-control activities that
permitted the 9/11 terrorist attacks to be successful.
The "above top secret" network bears the
acronym "PDAS." WMR has not yet discovered what the acronym
stands for, however, its is limited to only a few hundred
people with Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI)
Special Access Program (SAP) need-to-know access, in
addition to the President and Vice President.
On September 11, 2001, PDAS was used to
convey the information from the Air Force Chief of Staff to
the White House, CIA, and other select agencies that the Air
Force had successfully intercepted and downed a target over
Pennsylvania. It is believed that the "target" in question
was United flight 93, although there is no confirmation that
the aircraft was in fact the one downed by Air Force
interceptors.
The Air Force Chief of Staff on 9/11 was
General John Jumper, who had become the top Air Force
commander on September 6, 2001, just five days before the
9/11 attacks.
There is also reason to believe that the
PDAS terminal at the Presidential Emergency Operations
Center (PEOC) at the White House was used to coordinate the
activities related to the aerial attack on the Pentagon.
Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta claimed Vice
President Dick Cheney was present at the PEOC at 9:25 am on
the morning of 9/11, before the alleged impact of American
Airlines flight 77 on the building.
Mineta testified before the 9/11
Commission that Cheney was aware of special orders
concerning a plane heading toward Washington. Mineta said:
"During the time that the airplane was coming into the
Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to
the Vice President…the plane is 50 miles out…the plane is 30
miles out….and when it got down to the plane is 10 miles
out, the young man also said to the vice president 'do the
orders still stand?' And the Vice President turned and
whipped his neck around and said “Of course the orders still
stand, have you heard anything to the contrary?"
PDAS terminals are reportedly located at
the White House, on board Air Force One, the Pentagon, CIA
headquarters, the National Security Agency, the Boeing E-4
Advanced Airborne Command Post that was seen flying over
Washington, DC on 9/11 after the attacks, the Defense
Intelligence Agency at Bolling Air Force Base in Washington,
DC, and the Raven Rock Mountain Complex in Pennsylvania
where Cheney hid out after the 9/11 attacks.
Mineta later followed up with reporters
and stated "When I overheard something about 'the orders
still stand' and so, what I thought of was that they had
already made the decision to shoot something down."
It now appears that PDAS was used by
Cheney to implement on the morning of 9/11 a new policy
issued on June 1, 2001 that provided for a "stand down"
protocol that replaced a long-standing shootdown order for
hijacked and suspected hijacked planes. The new
order transferred the authority to shoot down aircraft from
Pentagon and NORAD military commanders to the President,
Vice President, or Secretary of Defense. MORE
keywords: super-classifed, terminals, SCI, Sensitive
Compartmented Information, Special Access Program,
need-to-know, downed flight 93, Gen. John Jumper, Sept 6,
PEOC, Norman Mineta,, 9:25, 9/11 Commission, 50 miles out,
"do the orders still stand", Boeing E-4 Advanced Airborne
Command Post, DIA, NORAD, COCOMM, STO, US Central Command,
SecDef, IJSTO, assassination, Milosevic, Habyarimana,
Ntaryamira, General Wesley Clark, SIPRnet, JWICS, NIPRnet,
Canada, Australia, UK, JSSG, SIGINT, IVY Bells, covert
technical operations, Balkans, Rwanda, September 11, 2001
|
9/11 REVISITED
AND QUESTIONED, Summarized from www.patriotsquestion911.com. |
Senator Max Cleland ~ Former member of the 9/11
Commission, resigned in December 2003 "I, as a member of the [9/11]
Commission, cannot look any American in the eye... It is a national
scandal... this White House wants to cover [9/11] up."
Senator Mark Dayton ~ Member, Senate Committee on Armed
Services and Homeland Security "[NORAD] lied to the American people,
they lied to Congress and they lied to your 9/11 Commission...the most
gross incompetence and dereliction of responsibility and negligence"
Congressman Ron Paul ~ Vice Chairman of the Oversight
and Investigations subcommittee "the [9/11] investigations that have
been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation"
Congressman Curt Weldon ~ "[9/11 Commission]
there's something very sinister going on here... something desperately
wrong... This involved what is right now the covering up of information
that led to the deaths of 3,000 people"
Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney ~ Member of the House
Armed Services Committee "the [9/11] Commission ran up against
obstruction by the administration and non-cooperation from government
agencies... the errors and omissions immediately jumped out at us"
Director of the FBI, Louis Freeh ~ "[9/11
Commission] findings--raises serious challenges to the commission's
credibility and, if the facts prove out, might just render the commission
historically insignificant itself"
Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, Paul Craig
Roberts, PhD ~ "Distinguished national and international scientists
and scholars present massive evidence that the 9/11 Commission Report is a
hoax and that the 9/11 "terrorist attack" has been manipulated
to serve a hegemonic agenda in the Middle East... We know that it is
strictly impossible for any building, much less steel columned buildings,
to "pancake" at free fall speed. Therefore, it is a
non-controversial fact that the official explanation of the collapse of
the WTC buildings is false"
Assistant Secretary of Housing, Catherine Austin Fitts ~
"Regarding 9/11 "The official story could not possibly have
happened... It's not possible. It's not operationally feasible... The
Commission was a whitewash. "
U.S. Army Intelligence officer, Federal Prosecutor,
Office of Special Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice, John Loftus
~ "The information provided by European intelligence services prior
to 9/11 was so extensive that it is no longer possible for either the CIA
or FBI to assert a defence of incompetence"
Foreign Service Officer, George Kenney ~ " I cannot
believe, much as I might like to, the standard account of 9/11"
Foreign Service Officer, J. Michael Springman ~
"Fifteen of the nineteen people who allegedly flew airplanes into
buildings in the United States got their visas from the same CIA Consulate
at Jeddah"
Deputy Attorney General, State of Pennsylvania, Philip
J. Berg, Esquire ~ "The official story of what actually took place on
0/11 is a lie. "
Major General U.S. Army, Commanding General of U.S. Army
Intelligence and Security Command, Albert Stubblebine ~ "I look at
the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was
supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, 'The plane does not fit in
that hole'. So what did hit the Pentagon?"
Col. Ronald D. Ray, U.S. Marine Corps ~ Deputy Assistant
Secretary of Defense, Deputy Director of Field Operations for the U.S.
Marine Corps Historical Center - "I'm astounded that the conspiracy
theory advanced by the administration could in fact be true and the
evidence does not seem to suggest that's accurate"
Col. Robert Bowman, U.S. Air Force, Director of Advanced
Space Programs, PhD Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering ~ " the
official 9/11 story is impossible .. There is a cover up .. high levels of
our government don't want us to know what happened .. highly placed
individuals in the administration .. Dick Cheney .. the very kindest thing
we can say about George W Bush .. is high treason and cospiracy to commit
murder "
Col. George Nelson, U.S. Air Force, aircraft accident
investigator ~ "I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss,
where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from
finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and
specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the
precise cause of the accident... The government alleges that four
wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting
in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard
aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify
any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all
potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from view .. with all the
evidence readilty available at the pentagon crash site, any unbiased
rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly
into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available
at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger
airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the
Boeing 757 as alleged .. the most heinous conspiracy in outr country's
history "
Major Douglas Rokke, PhD, U.S. Army ~ "Regarding
the impact at the Pentagon on 9/11/2001 "when you look at the damage,
it was obviously a missile."
Capt. Russ Wittenberg, U.S. Air Force, fighter pilot,
commercial pilot flying 707, 720, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, and 777 's. Had
previously flown Flight 93, which impacted in Pennsylvania, and Flight
175, the second plane to hit the WTC ~ "The government story they
handed us about 9/11 is total B.S. plain and simple...[Regarding Flight
77]"The airplane could not have flown at those speeds which they said
it did without going into what they call a high speed stall. The airplane
won't go that fast if you start pulling those high G maneuvers at those
bank angles... The vehicle that hit the Pentagon was not Flight 77"
Lt. Col. Karen U. Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force,
Office of the Secretary of Defense, staff of the Director of the National
Security Agency ~ "It is as a scientist that I have the most trouble
with the official government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not
satisfy the rules of probability or physics. The collapses of the World
Trade Center buildings clearly violate the laws of probability and
physics...There was a derth of visible debris on the relatively unmarked
Pentagon, where I stood only minutes after the impact. Beyond this strange
absence of airliner debris, there was no sign of the kind of damage one
would expect from the impact of a large airliner... this visible evidence
or lack thereof may also have been apparent to the Sec of Defense Donald
Rumsfeld, who in an unfortunate slip of the tongue referred to the
aircraft that slamed into the Pentagon as a ' missile ' ... I saw nothing
of significance at the point of contact ~ no airplane metal or cargo
debris was blowing on the lawn in front of the damaged building as smoke
billowed from within the Pentagon .. all of us staring at the Pentagon
that morning were indeed looking for such debris, but what we expected was
not evident .. the same is true with regard to the damage we expected ..
but I did not see this kind of damage. Rather, the facade had a rather
small hole, no larger than 20 feet in diameter. Although this facade later
collapsed, it remained standing for 30 0r 40 minutes, with the roof
remaining relatively straight .. The scene, in short, was not what I would
have expected from a strike by a large jetliner. It was, however, exactly
what one would have expected if a missile had struck the Pentagon "
Senior Military Affairs Journalist at the Naval Postgraduate School,
Barbara Honegger, MS ~ "The US military, not al Qaeda, had the
sustained access weeks before 9/11 to also plant controlled demolition
charges throughout the superstructures of WTC 1 and WTC 2, and in WTC 7,
which brought down all three buildings on 9/11...A US military plane, not
one piloted by al Qaeda, performed the highly skilled, high-speed
270-degree dive towards the Pentagon that Air Traffic Controllers on 9/11
were sure was a military plane as they watched it on their screens. Only a
military aircraft, not a civilian plane flown by al Qaeda, would have
given off the "Friendly" signal needed to disable the Pentagon's
anti-aircraft missile batteries as it approached the building...Only the
US military, not al Qaeda, had the ability to break all of its Standard
Operating Procedures to paralyze its own emergency response system"
Capt. Gregory M. Zeigler, PhD, U.S. Army, U.S. Army
Intelligence Officer ~ "I knew from September 18, 2001, that the
official story about 9/11 was false. ... [A]nomalies poured in rapidly:
the hijackers' names appearing in none of the published flight passenger
lists, BBC reports of stolen identities of the alleged hijackers or the
alleged hijackers being found alive, the obvious demolitions of WTC 1 and
2...and WTC7...not hit by an airplane...the lack of identifiable Boeing
757 wreckage at the Pentagon"
Capt. Eric H. May, U.S. Army, Intelligence officer ~
"I view the 911 event ...as a matter that implies either...A) passive
participation by the Bush White House through a deliberate stand-down or
B) active execution of a plot by rogue elements of government, starting
with the White House itself, in creating a spectacle of destruction that
would lead the United States into an invasion of the Middle East"
Former Chairman, National Intelligence Estimates, CIA,
responsible for preparing the President' Daily Brief, U.S. Army
Intelligence Officer, Raymond L. McGovern ~ " I think at simplest
terms, there's a cover-up. The 9/11 report is a joke...just as Hitler in
1933 cynically exploited the burning of the parliament building, the
Reichstag, this is exactly what our President did in exploiting
9/11...making a war of aggression on a country that he knew had nothing to
do with 9/11...that's certainly an impeachable offense...But compelling
evidence for an even more disturbing conclusion: that the 9/11 attacks
were themselves orchestrated by this administration precisely so they
could be thus exploited."
National Intelligence Officer and Director of the CIA's
Office of Regional and Political Analysis, William Christison ~
"there is persuasive evidence that the events of September did not
unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission would have us
believe. ... An airliner almost certainly did not hit The Pentagon. ...
The North and South Towers of the World Trade Center almost certainly did
not collapse and fall to earth because hijacked aircraft hit them...this
all was totally an inside job... I have since decided that....at least
some elements in this US government had contributed in some way or other
to causing 9/11 to happen or at least allowing it to happen... The reason
that the two towers in New York actually collapsed and fell all the way to
the ground was controlled explosions rather than just being hit by two
airplanes. ... All of the characteristics of these demolitions show that
they almost had to have been controlled explosions... I think you almost
have to look at the 9/11 Commission Report as a joke and not a serious
piece of analysis at all... It's a monstrous crime"
U.S. Marine Corps intelligence officer, case officer
CIA. Robert David Steele ~ "I am forced to conclude that there is
sufficient evidence to indict (not necessarily convict) Dick Cheney, Karl
Rove and others...This is, without question, the most important modern
reference on state-sponsored terrorism, and also the reference that most
pointedly suggests that select rogue elements within the US Government,
most likely led by Dick Cheney with the assistance of George Tenet, Buzzy
Kronguard, and others close to the Wall Street gangs, are the most guilty
of state-sponsored terrorism...I'm absolutely certain that WTC 7 was
brought down by controlled demolition and that as far as I'm concerned
means that this case has not been properly investigated. There's no way
that building could have come down without controlled demolition"
CIA Case Officer, Specialist in the Middle East,
Directorate of Operations, Awarded Career Intelligence Medal, Robert Baer
~ " Regarding the opinion there was an aspect of 'inside job' to 9/11
within the U.S. government, "There is that possibility, the evidence
points at it." Counter-terrorism expert in the Security Division of
the federal Aviation Administration. Team leader of the FAA's Red (
Terrorism ) Team in the Federal Air Marshall program, Coast Guard officer,
Bogdan Dzakovic ~ "At worst, I think the 9/11 Commission Report is
treasonous."
Minister of Justice, West Germany, Horst Ehmke, PhD -
"Terrorists could not have carried out such an operation with four
hijacked planes without the support of a secret service."
State Secretary, Federal Ministry of Defense, West
Germany, Andreas von Buelow, PhD - "The official story is so
inadequate and far-fetched that there must be another one...This is
unthinkable, without years-long support from secret apparatuses of the
state and industry."
President of Italy, Francesco Cossiga ~ "[9/11]
could not be accomplished without infiltrations in the radar and flight
security personnel."
General Leonid Ivashov, Chief of Staff, Russian armed
forces, Ministry of Defense ~ "Only secret services and their current
chiefs – or those retired but still having influence inside the state
organizations – have the ability to plan, organize and conduct an
operation [9/11] of such magnitude...Osama bin Laden and "Al Qaeda"
cannot be the organizers nor the performers of the September 11 attacks.
They do not have the necessary organization, resources or leaders."
Foreign Minister of Egypt, Mohamed Hassanein Heikal ~
"Bin Laden does not have the capabilities for an operation [9/11] of
this magnitude. When I hear Bush talking about al-Qaida as if it was Nazi
Germany or the communist party of the Soviet Union, I laugh because I know
what is there. Bin Laden has been under surveillance for years: every
telephone call was monitored and al-Qaida has been penetrated by American
intelligence, Pakistani intelligence, Saudi intelligence, Egyptian
intelligence. They could not have kept secret an operation that required
such a degree of organisation and sophistication."
Chief of Staff, Pakistani Army, General Mirza Aslam Beg
~ "The information which is now coming up, goes to prove that
involvement by the 'rogue elements' of the U.S. military and intelligence
organization is getting more obvious. Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda
definitely do not have the knowhow and the capability to launch such
operations involving such high precision coordination, based on
information and expertise."
European Parliament, Committee on Security and Defense,
Giulietto Chiesa ~ regarding 9-11 "Billions of people were given only
one explanation....which is entirely false....everyone who dares to
question it is treated as if he was a fool."
French Army Intelligence and artillery officer, Col.
Pierre-Henri Bunel, Expert in the effects of artillery weapons and
explosives ~ Regarding Department of Defense photos of the Pentagon on
9/11 "Image of the impact on the Pentagon is very instructive as to
the nature of the explosion. ... It corresponds to a detonation of an
explosive with high energetic power. The explosion does not correspond to
a deflagration of kerosene...suggests a single engine flying vehicle much
smaller in size than an airliner...resembles the effects of anti-concrete
hollow charges that I have been able to observe on a number of
battlefields...lead me therefore to think that the detonation that struck
the building was that of a high-powered hollow charge used to destroy
hardened buildings and carried by an aerial vehicle, a missile."
Safety Engineer and accident Analyst, National Safety
Technology Authority, Finland, Heikki Kurttila, PhD ~ " Conclusion:
The observed collapse time of WTC 7 was 6.5 seconds. That is only half a
second longer than it would have taken for the top of the building to fall
to the ground in a vacuum, and half a second shorter than the falling time
of an apple when air resistance is taken into account. ... The great speed
of the collapse and the low value of the resistance factor strongly
suggest controlled demolition."
Counter-Terrorism Officer, MI5 (Britain), David Shayler
~ regarding 9-11 "The available evidence indicates that people in key
positions in the FBI, the State Department, the CIA and so on were not
loyal to the Constitution; that they saw an opportunity in plans laid down
by genuine Islamic terrorists to carry out an operation that would shock
the world and would therefore justify U.S. adventurism in the middle East,
particularly in Afghanistan and Iraq."
Chairman, 9/11 Commission, Thomas H. Kean, Former
Governor of New Jersey ~ "FAA and NORAD officials advanced an account
of 9/11 that was untrue...We, to this day, don't know why NORAD told us
what they told us...It was just so far from the truth."
Vice Chairman, 9/11 Commission, Lee Hamilton, Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence, Homeland Security Advisory Council ~
"we got started late; we had a very short time frame...we did not
have enough money...We had a lot of people strongly opposed to what we
did. We had a lot of trouble getting access to documents and to people.
... So there were all kinds of reasons we thought we were set up to
fail"
9/11 Commissioner, Timothy J. Roemer, PhD, Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence ~ "that panel members so distrusted
testimony from Pentagon officials that they referred their concerns to the
Pentagon's inspector general...We were extremely frustrated with the false
statements we were getting"
Senior Counsel, 9/11 Commission, John J. Farmer, Jr.,
Former Attorney General, NJ, Former Commissioner of the State Commission
of Investigations ~ Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11
panel concluded that the Pentagon's initial story of how it reacted to the
2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to
mislead the commission and the public "I was shocked at how different
the truth was from the way it was described...The tapes told a radically
different story from what had been told to us and the public for two
years"
Take action -- click here to contact your local
newspaper or congress people: REOPEN 9/11 INVESTIGATION
Click here to see the most recent messages sent to
congressional reps and local newspapers
www.allenroland.com
Allen L Roland is a practicing psychotherapist, author
and lecturer who also shares a daily political and social commentary on
his weblog and website allenroland.com He also guest hosts a monthly
national radio show TRUTHTALK on Conscious talk radio
www.conscioustalk.net
Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author
|
|