|
A CHRISTIAN VIEW OF THE HOLOCAUST
Willard Hotel
Ladies and
gentlemen, you are about to hear a very frightening speech. This speech
is an explanation of the plans now being laid to throw the United States
into a third world war. It was made a short time ago before a large
group in the Congressional Room of the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C.
Both the speech and the question and answer period later so electrified
the audience that a group of patriots has transferred it to two
long-playing records which
you may buy to play for friends, clubs, and your church group in
your community. The speaker is Mr. Benjamin Freedman, noted authority on
Zionism and all of its schemes. Mr. Freedman is a former Jew, and I mean
a FORMER Jew. He has fought the Communist world conspiracy tooth and
nail, and stands today as a leading American patriot.
We now take you to the speaker's platform to present Benjamin Freedman.
(applause)
[Freedman's speech]
Benjamin H. Freedman
What I
intend to tell you tonight is something that you have never been able to
learn from any other source, and what I tell you now concerns not only
you, but your children and the survival of this country and
Christianity. I'm not here just to dish up a few facts to send up your
blood pressure, but I'm here to tell you things that will help you
preserve what you consider the most sacred things in the world: the
liberty, and the freedom, and the right to live as Christians, where you
have a little dignity, and a little right to pursue the things that your
conscience tells you are the right things, as Christians.
Now, first of all, I'd like to tell you that on August 25th 1960 — that
was shortly before elections — Senator Kennedy, who is now the President
of the United States, went to New York, and delivered an address to the
Zionist Organization of America. In that address, to reduce
it to its briefest form, he stated that he would use the armed forces of
the United States to preserve the existence of the regime set up in
Palestine by the Zionists who are now in occupation of that area.
In other words, Christian boys are going to be yanked out of their
homes, away from their families, and sent abroad to fight in Palestine
against the Christian and Moslem Arabs who merely want to return to
their homes. And these Christian boys are going to be asked to shoot to
kill these innocent [Arab Palestinians] people who only want to follow
out fifteen resolutions passed by the United Nations in the last twelve
years calling upon the Zionists to allow these people to return to their
homes.
Now, when United States troops appear
in the Middle East to fight with the Zionists as their allies to prevent
the return of these people who were evicted from their homes in the 1948
armed insurrection by the Zionists who were transplanted there from
Eastern Europe... when that happens, the United States will trigger
World War III.
You say, when will that take
place? The answer is, as soon as the difficulty between France and
Algeria has been settled, that will take place. As soon as France and
Algeria have been settled, that will take place. As soon as France and
Algeria have settled their difficulty, and the Arab world, or the Moslem
world, has no more war on their hands with France, they are going to
move these people back into their homes, and when they do that and
President kennedy sends your sons to fight over there to help the crooks
hold on to what they stole from innocent men, women and children, we
will trigger World War III; and when that starts you can be sure we
cannot emerge from that war a victor. We are going to lose that war
because there is not one nation in the world that will let one of their
sons fight with us for such a cause.
I know and
speak to these ambassadors in Washington and the United Nations — and of
the ninety-nine nations there, I've consulted with maybe seventy of them
— and when we go to war in Palestine to help the thieves retain
possession of what they have stolen from these innocent people we're not
going to have a man there to fight with us as our ally.
And
who will these people have supporting them, you ask. Well, four
days after President Kennedy — or he was then Senator Kennedy — made
that statement on August 28, 1960, the Arab nations called a meeting in
Lebanon and there they decided to resurrect, or reactivate, the
government of Palestine, which has been dormant more or less, since the
1948 armed insurrection by the Zionists.
Not
only that... they ordered the creation of the Palestine Army, and they
are now drilling maybe a half a million soldiers in that area of the
world to lead these people back to their homeland. With them, they
have as their allies all the nations of what is termed the Bandung
Conference Group. That includes the Soviet Union and every Soviet Union
satellite. It includes Red China; it includes every independent country
in Asia and Africa; or eighty percent of the world's total population.
Eighty percent of the world's population. Four out of five human
beings on the face of the earth will be our enemies at war with us. And
not alone are they four out of five human beings now on the face of this
earth, but they are the non-Christian population of the world and they
are the non-Caucasians... the non-white nations of the world, and that's
what we face.
And what is the reason? The reason is that here
in the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control
of our government. For many reasons too many and too complex to go into
here at this — time I'll be glad to answer questions, however, to
support that statement — the Zionists and their co-religionists rule
this United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this
country.
Now, you say, 'well, that's a very
broad statement to make', but let me show what happened while you were —
I don't want to wear that out — let me show what happened while WE were
all asleep. I'm including myself with you. We were all asleep. What
happened?
World War I broke out in the
summer of 1914. Nineteen-hundred and fourteen was the year in which
World War One broke out. There are few people here my age who remember
that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and
Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.
What happened?
Within two years Germany had
won that war: not alone won it nominally, but won it actually. The
German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the
convoys from the Atlantic Ocean, and Great Britain stood there without
ammunition for her soldiers, stood there with one week's food supply
facing her — and after that, starvation.
At
that time, the French army had mutinied. They lost 600,000 of the
flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The
Russian army was defecting. They were picking up their toys and going
home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar.
And the Italian army had collapsed.
Now Germany
— not a shot had been fired on the German soil. Not an enemy soldier
had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, here was Germany offering
England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what
the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: “Let's call the
war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started.”
Well, England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that. Seriously!
They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace
that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war
and being totally defeated.
While that was going on,
the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern
Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and — I am going to be brief
because this is a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any
statement that I make if anyone here is curious, or doesn't believe
what I'm saying is at all possible — the Zionists in London went to the
British war cabinet and they said: “Look here. You can yet win this
war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the
negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if
the United States will come in as your ally.”
The
United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were
young; we were rich; we were powerful. They [Zionists] told England:
“We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally,
to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after
you win the war.”
In other words, they made
this deal: “We will get the United States into this war as your ally.
The price you must pay us is Palestine after you have won the war and
defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.”
Now
England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United
States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever.
It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain — that never had any
connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine —
should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing
the United States into the war.
However,
they made that promise, in October of 1916. October,
nineteen hundred and sixteen. And shortly after that — I don't know how
many here remember it — the United States, which was almost totally
pro-German — totally pro-German — because the newspapers here were
controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass
communications in this country were controlled by Jews, and they were
pro-German because their people, in the majority of cases came from
Germany, and they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar.
The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this
war. So the German bankers — the German-Jews — Kuhn Loeb and the other
bigbanking firms
in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent
of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: “As long as
France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!” But they
poured money into Germany, they fought with Germany against Russia,
trying to lick the Czarist regime.
Now those same
Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, they went to
England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like
the traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers
had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the
difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially
and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good.
They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red
Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands. And they were no
good.
Well, shortly after that, Mr. Wilson
declared war on Germany.
The Zionists in London sent
these cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis: “Go to work on
President Wilson. We're getting from England what we want. Now you go
to work, and you go to work on President Wilson and get the United
States into the war." And that did happen. That's how the United States
got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right
to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this
room.
Now the war — World
War One — in which the United States participated had absolutely no
reason to be our war. We went in there — we were railroaded into it — if
I can be vulgar, we were suckered into — that war merely so that the
Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. Now, that is
something that the people in the United States have never been told.
They never knew why we went into World War One. Now, what happened?
After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they
said: “Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have
something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain
and give us Palestine after you win the war.” Because they
didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten
years. So they started to work out a receipt.
The receipt took the form of a letter, and it was worded in very cryptic
language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about.
And that was called the Balfour
Declaration.
The Balfour Declaration was
merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed
upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war.
So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just
as phony as a three dollar bill. And I don't think I could
make it more emphatic than that.
Now, that
is where all the trouble started. The United States went in the war.
The United States crushed Germany. We went in there, and it's history.
You know what happened. Now, when the war was ended, and the Germans
went to Paris, to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, there were 117
Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard
Baruch. I was there: I ought to know. Now what happened?
The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany
and parceling out Europe to all these nations that claimed a right to a
certain part of European territory, the Jews said, “How about Palestine
for us?” And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the
Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the
first time realized, “Oh, that was the game! That's why the United
States came into the war.” And the Germans for the first time realized
that they were defeated, they suffered this terrific reparation that was
slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and they were
determined to get it at any cost.
Now, that
brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized
this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never
been better off in any country in the world than they had been in
Germany.
You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was
maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance as
is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr. Balin, who
owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd's and the
Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for
the Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the
big merchant bankers — the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing
very well in Germany. No question about that. Now, the Germans felt:
“Well, that was quite a sellout.”
It was a sellout that I
can best compare — suppose the United States was at war today with the
Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union:
“Well, let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole
thing.” And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of
the Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought about our
defeat. A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man's
imagination cannot encompass.
Imagine, then,
after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this
country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we thought they were
loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union
and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war
against us. How would we feel, in the United States against Chinese? I
don't think that one of them would dare show his face on any street.
There wouldn't be lampposts enough, convenient, to take care of them.
Imagine how we would feel.
Well, that's how
the Germans felt towards these Jews. "We've been so nice to them"; and
from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and
the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And
Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here
they sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than they
wanted Palestine as a so-called “Jewish commonwealth.”
Now, Nahum Sokolow — all the great leaders, the big names that you read
about in connection with Zionism today — they, in 1919, 1920, '21, '22,
and '23, they wrote in all their papers — and the press was filled with
their statements — that "the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due
to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about
by our intercession and bringing the United States into the war against
them."
The Jews themselves admitted that. It
wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood
tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious
feeling. There was no sentiment against those people merely on account
of their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It
was anything but religious.
Nobody cared in
Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said “Shema'
Yisrael” or “Our Father.” No one cared in Germany any more than they do
in the United States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany
was due to one thing: that the Germans held the Jews responsible for
their crushing defeat, for no reason at all, because World War One was
started against Germany for no reason for which they [Germans] were
responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful.
They built up a big navy. They built up world trade.
You must remember, Germany, at the time of Napoleon, at the time of the
French Revolution, what was the German Reich consisted of 300 — three
hundred! — small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth.
Three hundred little separate political entities. And between that
time, between the period of. . . between Napoleon and Bismarck, they
were consolidated into one state. And within 50 years after that time
they became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was rivalling
Great Britain's, they were doing business all over the world, they could
undersell anybody and make better products. And what happened? What
happened as a result of that?
There was a
conspiracy between England, France, and Russia that: "We must slap down
Germany", because there isn't one historian in the world that can find a
valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the
map politically. Now, what happened after that?
When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat,
they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of
any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown
University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State
Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department
document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew who Cordell Hull sent to
Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political
prisoners. And he wrote back that he found them in very fine condition.
They were in excellent shape; everybody treated well. And they were
filled with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews
happened to be maybe 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that
time. And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor
leaders, Masons, and others who had international affiliations.
Now, the Jews sort of tried to keep the lid on this fact. They didn't
want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and
that the Germans resented that.
So they did take
appropriate action against them [against the Jews]. They. . . shall I
say, discriminated against them wherever they could? They shunned them.
The same as we would the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or
anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about
our defeat.
Now, after a while, the Jews of the
world didn't know what to do, so they called a meeting in Amsterdam.
Jews from every country in the world attended in July 1933. And they
said to Germany: “You fire Hitler! And you put every Jew back into his
former position, whether he was a Communist, no matter what he was. You
can't treat us that way! And we, the Jews of the world, are calling
upon you, and serving this ultimatum upon you.” Well, the Germans told
them. . . you can imagine. So what did they [the Jews] do?
They broke up, and Samuel Untermyer, if the name means anything to
people here. . . (You want to ask a question? —- Uh, there were no
Communists in Germany at that time. they were called 'Social
Democrats.)
Well, I don't want to go by what they
were called. We're now using English words, and what they were called
in Germany is not very material. . . but they were Communists, because
in 1917, the Communists took over Germany for a few days. Rosa
Luxembourg and Karl Liebknecht, and a group of Jews in Germany took over
the government for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war,
he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take
over Germany as they did Russia, and that he was going to meet the same
fate that the Czar did in Russia. So he left and went to Holland for
safety and for security.
Now, at that time, when the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, it
was quiet, the Jews were working, still trying to get back into their
former — their status — and the Germans fought them in every way they
could, without hurting a hair on anyone's head. The same as one group,
the Prohibitionists, fought the people who were interested in liquor,
and they didn't fight one another with pistols, they did it every way
they could.
Well, that's the way they were
fighting the Jews in Germany. And, at that time, mind you, there were
80 to 90 million Germans and there were only 460,000 Jews. . . less than
one half of one percent of Germany were Jews. And yet, they controlled
all of the press, they controlled most of the economy, because they had
come in and with cheap money —
you know the way the Mark was devalued — they bought up practically
everything.
Well, in 1933 when Germany refused to
surrender, mind you, to the World Conference of Jews in Amsterdam, they
broke up and Mr. Untermeyer came
back to the United States — who was the head of the American delegation
and the president of the whole conference — and he went from the
steamer to ABC and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States
in which he said:
"The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War
against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the
Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going
to use a world-wide boycott against them, that will destroy them because
they are dependent upon their export business."
And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be
imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they
exported. Their labor. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of
Germany's population would have to starve. There just was not enough
food for more than one third of the population.
Click to enlarge
Now in this declaration,
which I have here, it was printed on page — a whole page — in the New
York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated
that: “this economic boycott is our means of self-defense. President
Roosevelt has advocated its use in the NRA" . [National Recovery
Administration] — which some of you may remember, where everybody was
to be boycotted unless they followed the rules laid down by the New
Deal, which of course was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court
at that time.
Nevertheless, the Jews of the world
declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you
couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the
words "made in Germany" on it.
In fact, an
executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump
millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that
their stores were boycotted. If anyone came in and found a dish marked
"made in Germany," they were picketed with signs: "Hitler", "murderer",
and so forth, and like — something like these sit-ins that are taking
place in the South.
R. H. Macy, which is
controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews. . . a
woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "made in
Germany". Well, they were cotton stockings. They may have been there 20
years, because since I've been observing women's legs in the last twenty
years, I haven't seen a pair with cotton stockings on them. So Macy! I
saw Macy boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs
saying "MURDERS" and "HITLERITES", and so forth.
Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt
in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was
no murder, there was nothing.
Now, that. . .
naturally, the Germans said, "Why, who are these people to declare a
boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and our
industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?" They
naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned
by Jews.
Why should a German go in and give
their money to
a storekeeper who was part of a boycott who was going to starve Germany
into surrender into the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who
their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.
That continued for some time, and it wasn't until 1938, when a young
Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot one of
the officials [a German official] that the Germans really started to get
rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and
having street fights and so forth.
Now, for
anyone to say that — I don't like to use the word 'anti-Semitism'
because it's meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll
have to use it — the only reason that there was any feeling in Germany
against Jews was that they were responsible: number one, for World War
One; number two, for this world-wide boycott, and number three — did I
say for World War One, they were responsible? For the boycott — and also
for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was
absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to
see which one was going to survive.
In the
meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had
decided [that] Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no
in between. It's going to be Christian or it's going to be Communist.
And the Germans decided: "We're going to keep it Christian if possible".
And they started to re-arm.
And there intention
was — by that time the United States had recognized the Soviet Union,
which they did in November, 1933 — the Soviet Union was becoming very
powerful, and Germany realized: "Well, our turn is going to come soon,
unless we are strong." The same as we in this country are saying today,
"Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong."
And our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars of your money for
defense, they say. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little
Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways,
took over control of many other governments of the world.
Now, for this country to now be on the verge of a Third World War, from
which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my
imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of
megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT.
One million tons of TNT is a megaton. Now, our nuclear bombs have a
capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT. That was when they
were first developed five or six years ago. Now, the nuclear bombs that
are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how
many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.
So, what do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may
develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. And why will it take
place? It will take place because Act III. . . the curtain goes up on
Act III. Act I was World War I. Act II was World War II. Act III is
going to be World War III.
The Jews of the world,
the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that
they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently
retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. Now,
that is just as true as I am standing here, because not alone have I
read it, but many here have read it, and it's known all over the world.
Now, what are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's.
Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you you don't
know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made
a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe.
Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew
it. You weren't permitted to know it.
Who knew
it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other 's knew
it. Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I
was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when
President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office
there.
I was 'confidential man' to Henry
Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of theFinance Committee,
and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer. So I sat
in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and
all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson's brain the
graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and also
indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement.
Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two
fingers on this hand, and President Woodrow Wilson was just as
incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn
baby. And that's how they got us into World War I, while we all slept.
Now, at this moment... at this moment they may
be planning this World War III, in which we don't stand a chance even if
they don't use nuclear bombs. How can the United States — about five
percent of the world — go out and fight eighty to ninety percent of the
world on their home ground? How can we do it... send our boys over
there to be slaughtered? For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as
their 'commonwealth'? They've fooled you so much that you don't know
whether you're coming or going.
Now any judge,
when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness that you find has
told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony." That is
correct. I don't know from what state you come, but in New York state
that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness said one lie,
disregard his testimony.
Now, what are the facts
about the Jews?
The Jews — I call them Jews to
you, because they are known as Jews. I don't call them Jews. I refer to
them as so-called Jews, because I know what they are. If Jesus was a
Jew, there isn't a Jew in the world today, and if those people are Jews,
certainly our Lord and Savior was not one of them, and I can prove that.
Now what happened? The eastern European Jews,
who form 92 per cent of the world's population of those people who call
themselves Jews, were originally Khazars.
They
were a warlike tribe that lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they
were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into
eastern Europe — and to reduce this so you don't get too confused about
the history of Eastern Europe — they set up this big Khazar kingdom:
800,000 square miles. Only, there was no Russia, there were no other
countries, and the Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe
— so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to
war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That's how big and
powerful they were.
Now, they were
phallic worshippers, which is filthy. I don't want to go into the
details of that now. It was their religion the way it was the religion
of many other Pagans or Barbarians elsewhere in the world.
Now, the [Khazar] king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his
kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith — either
Christianity, Islam — the Moslem faith — or what is known today as
Judaism — really Talmudism. So, like spinning a top and calling out "eeny,
meeny, miney, moe," he picked out so-called Judaism. And that became
the state religion.
He sent down to the Talmudic
schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of these rabbis
with their teachings, and opened up synagogues and schools in his
kingdom of 800,000 people — 800,000 thousand square miles — and maybe
ten to twenty million people; and they became what we call Jews. There
wasn't one of them that had an ancestor that ever put a toe in the Holy
Land, not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of
time. Not one of them! And yet they come to the Christians and they
ask us to support their armed insurrection in Palestine by saying:
"Well, you want to certainly help repatriate God's chosen people to
their Promised Land, their ancestral homeland, It's your Christian
duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You now go
to church on Sunday, and kneel and you worship a Jew, and we're Jews."
Well, they were pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the
Irish [were converted]. And it's just as ridiculous to call them
"people of the Holy Land," as it would be. . . there are 54 million
Chinese Moslems. Fifty four million! And, Mohammed only died in 620
A.D., so in that time, 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their
religious belief.
Now imagine, in China, 2,000
miles away from Arabia, where the city of Mecca is located, where
Mohammed was born. . . imagine if the 54 million Chinese called
themselves 'Arabs'. Imagine! Why, you'd say they're lunatics. Anyone
who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy. All
they did was adopt as a religious faith; a belief that had its origin in
Mecca, in Arabia.
The same as the
Irish. When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the
ocean and imported from the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants that
were Christians. They weren't different people. They were the same
people, but they had accepted Christianity as a religious faith.
Now, these Pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns. . . they were a
Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. They
likewise, because their king took the faith — Talmudic faith — they had
no choice. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic,
everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain.
So everybody — they lived on the land just like the trees and the
bushes; a human being belonged to the land under their feudal system —
so they [Khazars] all became what we call today, Jews!
Now imagine how silly it was for the Christians. . . for the great
Christian countries of the world to say, "We're going to use our power,
our prestige to repatriate God's chosen people to their ancestral
homeland, their Promised Land."
Now, could there
be a bigger lie than that? Could there be a bigger lie than that?
And because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the
television, the book publishing business, they have the ministers in the
pulpit, they have the politicians on the soap boxes talking the same
language . . . so naturally you'd believe black is white if you heard it
often enough. You wouldn't call black black anymore — you'd start to
call black white. And nobody could blame you.
Now, that is one of the great lies. . . that is the foundation of all
the misery that has befallen the world. Because after two wars fought
in Europe — World War I and World War II — if it wasn't possible for
them to live in peace and harmony with the people in Europe, like their
brethren are living in the United States, what were the two wars fought
for? Did they have to — like you flush the toilet — because they
couldn't get along, did they have to say, "Well, we're going back to
our homeland and you Christians can help us"?
I
can't understand yet how the Christians in Europe could have been that
dumb because every theologian, every history teacher, knew the things
that I'm telling you. But, they naturally bribed them, shut them up
with money, stuffed their mouths with money, and now. . . I don't care
whether you know all this or not. It doesn't make any difference to me
whether you know all these facts or not, but it does make a difference
to me. I've got, in my family, boys that will have to be in the next
war, and I don't want them to go and fight and die... like they died in
Korea. Like they died in Japan. Like they've died all over the world.
For what?
To help crooks hold on to what they
stole from innocent people who had been in peaceful possession of that
land, those farms, those homes for hundreds and maybe thousands of
years? Is that why the United States must go to war? Because the
Democratic Party wants New York State — the electoral vote? Illinois,
the electoral vote? And Pennsylvania, the electoral vote?... which are
controlled by the Zionists and their co-religionists?. . . the balance
of power?
In New York City there are 400,000
members of the liberal party, all Zionists and their co-religionists.
And New York State went for Kennedy by 400,000 votes. Now, I don't
blame Mr. Kennedy. I'm fond of Mr. Kennedy. I think he's a great man.
I think he can really pull us out of this trouble if we get the facts
to him. And I believe he knows a great deal more than his appointments
indicate he knows. He's playing with the enemy. Like when you go
fishing, you've got to play with the fish. Let 'em out and pull 'em in.
Let 'em out and pull 'em in. But knowing Mr. Kennedy's father, and how
well informed he is on this whole subject, and how close Kennedy is to
his father, I don't think Mr. Kennedy is totally in the dark.
But I do think that it is the duty of every mother, every loyal
Christian , every person that regards the defense of this country as a
sacred right, that they communicate — not with their congressman, not
with their senator, but with President Kennedy. And tell him, "I do not
think you should send my boy, or our boys, wearing the uniform of the
United States of America, and under the flag that you see here, our red,
white and blue, to fight there to help keep in the hands of these that
which they have stolen". I think everyone should not alone write once,
but keep writing and get your friends to write.
Now, I could go on endlessly, and tell you these things to support what
I have just asked you to do. But I don't think it's necessary to do
that. You're above the average group in intelligence and I don't think
it's necessary to impress this any more.
But. . .
I want to tell you one more thing. You talk about... "Oh, the Jews.
Why the Jews? Christianity. Why, we got Christianity from the Jews
and the Jews gave us Jesus, and the Jews gave us our religion". But do
you know that on the day of atonement that you think is so sacred to
them, that on that day... and I was one of them! This is not hearsay.
I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser. I'm here to give you facts.
When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, the very
first prayer that you recite, you stand — and it's the only prayer for
which you stand — and you repeat three times a short prayer. The
Kol Nidre. In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God
Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next
twelve months — any oath, vow or pledge that you may take during the
next twelve months shall be null and void.
The
oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall
not be a pledge. They shall have no force and effect, and so forth and
so on.
And further than that, the Talmud teaches:
"Don't forget — whenever you take an oath, vow, and pledge — remember
the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and that
exempts you from fulfilling that".
How much can
you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much
as the Germans depended upon it in 1916.
And
we're going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the
same reason. You can't depend upon something as insecure as the
leadership that is not obliged to respect an oath, vow or pledge. Now I
could go on and recite many other things to you, but I would have a
little respect for your time, and you want to really, uh, get through
with all of this. Tomorrow's going to be a long day.
Now I want to say one thing. You ask me. . . well, you think to
yourself: "well how did this fellow get mixed up in this the way he got
mixed up in it." Well, I opened my mouth in 1945, and I took big pages
in newspapers and tried to tell the American people what I'm telling
you. And one newspaper after another refused the advertisement. And
when I couldn't find a newspaper to take them — I paid cash, not credit
— what happened? My lawyer told me, "There's an editor over in Jersey
with a paper who will take your announcement". So, I was brought
together with Mr. McGinley, and that's how I met him.
So somebody told me the lawyer who introduced me, who was the son of
the Dean of the Methodist Bishop, he said: "Well, I think he's a little
anti-Semitic. I don't know whether I can get him over here. So he
brought him over to my apartment and we hit it off wonderfully, and have
since then.
Now, I say this, and I say it without
any qualifications. I say it without any reservations. And I say it
without any hesitation. . . if it wasn't for the work that Mr. Conley
McGinley did with "Common Sense" — he's been sending out from 1,800,000
to 2,000,000 every year — if it wasn't for the work he's been doing
sending those out for fifteen years now, we would already be a communist
country. Nobody has done what he did to light fires. Many of the other
active persons in this fight learned all about if for the first time
through "Common Sense".
Now, I have been very
active in helping him all I could. I'm not as flush as I was. I cannot
go on spending the money. . . I'm not going to take up a collection.
Don't worry. I see five people getting up to leave. (laughter)
I haven't got the money that I used to spend. I used to print a quarter
of a million of them out of my own pocket and send them out. Mr.
McGinley, when I first met him, had maybe 5,000 printed and circulated
them locally. So I said, "With what you know and what I know, we can
really do a good job". So I started printing in outside shops of big
newspaper companies, a quarter of a million, and paid for them. Well,
there's always a bottom to the barrel. I suppose we've all reached that
at times.
I'm not so poor that I can't live
without working and that's what worries the Anti-Defamation League. I
can just get by without going and asking for a job or getting on the
bread line. But Mr. McGinley is working. He's sick and he's going at
this stronger than ever. And all I want to say is that they want to
close up "Common Sense" more than any other single thing in the whole
world, as a death-blow to the fight Christians are making to survive.
So I just want to tell you this. All they do is circulate rumors: "Mr.
Benjamin H. Freedman is the wealthy backer of 'Common Sense'." The
reason they do that is to discourage the people in the United States:
don't send any money to Common Sense. They don't need it. The've got
the wealthy Mr. Freedman as a backer. That all has strategy. They
don't want to advertise me so that people that have real estate or
securities to sell will come and call on me. They just want people to
lay off "Common Sense". And all I'm telling you is, I do try to help
him, but I haven't been able to. And I will be very honest. One thing I
won't do is lie. In the last year I've had so much sickness in my
family that I could not give him one dollar.
How he's managed to survive, I don't know. God alone knows. And he
must be in God's care because how he's pulled through his sickness and
with his financial troubles, I don't know. But that press is working. .
. and every two weeks about a hundred or a hundred-fifty-thousand of
"Common Sense" go out with a new message. And if that information could
be multiplied. . . if people that now get it could buy ten or twenty
five, or fifty, give them around. Plow that field. Sow those seeds,
you don't know which will take root, but for God's sake, this is our
last chance.
(Freedman then discusses the
importance of people forgoing unnecessary purchases to 'buy more stuff',
play golf, etc., and use the money to keep "Common Sense" going. He
explains that the paper is going in debt; could be closed down and he
(Freedman) no longer has the funds, having spent some $2,400,000 in his
attempt to bring the information to the American public and elected
officials. He then asks for questions from the audience.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[Question inaudible]
Freedman: All right, I'll comment on that. This is rather deep, but
you all have a very high degree of intelligence, so I'm going to make an
attempt. In the time of Bible history, there was a geographic area
known as Judea. Judea was a province of the Roman Empire. Now, a
person who lived in Judea was known as a Judean, and in Latin it was
Judaeus; in Greek it was Judaius. Those are the two words, in Greek and
Latin, for a Judean.
Now, in Latin and Greek
there is no such letter as 'j', and the first syllable of Judaeus and
Judaius starts 'ghu'. Now, when the Bible was written, it was first
written in Greek, Latin, Panantic, Syriac, Aramaic... all those
languages. Never Was the word Jew in any of them because the word
didn't exist. Judea was the country, and the people were Judeans, and
Jesus was referred to only as a Judean. I've seen those early... the
earliest scripts available.
In 1345, a man by
the name of Wycliffe in England thought that it was time to translate
the Bible into English. There was no English edition of the Bible
because who the Devil could read? It was only the educated church
people who could read Latin and Greek, Syriac, Aramaic and the other
languages. Anyhow, Wycliffe translated the Bible into English. But in
it, he had to look around for some words for Judaeas and Judaius.
There was no English word because Judea had passed out of existence.
There was no Judea. People had long ago forgotten that. So in the
first translation he used the word, in referring to Jesus, as 'gyu', "jew".
At the time, there was no printing press.
Then,
between 1345 and the 17th century, when the press came into use, that
word passed through so many changes... I have them all here. If you
want I can read them to you. I will. That word 'gyu' which was in the
Wycliffe Bible became. . . first it was ' gyu ', then ' giu ', then '
iu ' (because the ' i ' in Latin is pronounced like the ' j '.
Julius Caesar is ' Iul ' because there is no 'j' in Latin) then ' iuw
', then ' ieuu ', then ' ieuy ', then ' iwe ', then ' iow
', then ' iewe ', all in Bibles as time went on. Then ' ieue ', then
' iue ', then ' ive ', and then ' ivw ', and finally in the 18th
century... ' jew '. Jew.
All the corrupt and
contracted forms for Judaius, and Judaeas in Latin. Now, there was no
such thing as 'Jew', and any theologian — I've lectured in maybe 20 of
the most prominent theological seminaries in this country, and two in
Europe — there was no such word as Jew. There only was Judea, and Jesus
was a Judean and the first English use of a word in an English bible to
describe him was 'gyu' — Jew. A contracted and shortened form of
Judaeus, just the same as we call a laboratory a 'lab', and gasoline
'gas'... a tendency to short up.
So, in England
there were no public schools; people didn't know how to read; it looked
like a scrambled alphabet so they made a short word out of it.
Now for a theologian to say that you can't harm the Jews, is just
ridiculous. I'd like to know where in the scriptures it says that. I'd
like to know the text.
Look at what happened to
Germany for touching Jews. What would you, as a citizen of the United
States, do to people who did to you what the so-called Jews — the
Pollacks and Litvaks and Litzianers — they weren't Jews, as I just
explained to you. They were Eastern Europeans who'd been converted to
Talmudism. There was no such thing as Judaism. Judaism was a name
given in recent years to this religion known in Bible history as Torah
[inaudible]. No Jew or no educated person ever heard of Judaism. It
didn't exist. They pulled it out of the air. . . a
meaningless word.
Just like 'anti-Semitic'.
The Arab is a Semite. And the Christians talk about people who don't
like Jews as anti-Semites, and they call all the Arabs anti-Semites.
The only Semites in the world are the Arabs. There isn't one Jew who's
a Semite. They're all Turkothean Mongoloids. The Eastern european
Jews. So, they brainwashed the public, and if you will invite me to
meet this reverend who told you these things, I'll convince him and
it'll be one step in the right direction. I'll go wherever I have to go
to meet him.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, ma'am. Well... I can answer
that. First of all, your first premise is wrong. Your first premise
that all the Jews are loyal to each other is wrong. Because, the
Eastern European Jews outnumber all the rest by so many that they create
the impression that they are the Jewish 'race'; that they are the Jewish
nation; that they are the Jewish people. . . and the Christians swallow
it like a cream puff.
But in 1844 the German
rabbis called a conference of rabbis from all over the world for the
purpose of abolishing the Kol Nidre from the Day of Atonement religious
ceremony. In Brunswick, Germany, where that conference was held in
1844, there was almost a terrific riot. A civil war.
The Eastern Europeans said, "What the hell. We should give up Kol
Nidre? That gives us our grip on our people. We give them a franchise
so they can tell the Christians, 'Go to hell. We'll make any deal you
want', but they don't have to carry it out. That gives us our grip on
our people". So, they're not so united, and if you knew the feeling
that exists. . .
Now, I'll also show you from an
official document by the man responsible for. . . uh, who baptized this
race. Here is a paper that we obtained from the archives of the Zionist
organization in New York City, and in it is the manuscript by Sir James
A. Malcolm, who — on behalf of the British Cabinet — negotiated the deal
with these Zionists.
And in here he says that
all the jews in England were against it. The Jews who had been there
for years, the [inaudible - probably Sephardim], those who had
Portuguese and Spanish ad Dutch ancestry... who were monotheists and
believed in that religious belief. That was while the Eastern European
Jews were still running around in the heart of Asia and then came into
Europe. But they had no more to do with them than. . . can we talk about
a Christian 'race'? or a Christian religion?... or are the Christians
united?
So the same disunity is among the Jews.
And I'll show you in this same document that when they went to France
to try and get the French government to back that Zionist venture, there
was only one Jew in France who was for it. That was Rothschild, and
they did it because they were interested in the oil and the Suez Canal
————————————————————————
[Question inaudible] Freedman: You know
why? Because if they don't, they're decked up. They come around and
they tell you how much you must give, and if you don't . . . oh, you're
anti-Semitic. Then none of their friends will have anything to do with
them, and they start a smear campaign. . . and you have got to give.
In New York city, in the garment center, there are twelve manufacturers
in the building. And when the drive is on to sell Israel Bonds, the
United Jewish Drive, they put a big scoreboard with the names of the
firms and opposite them, as you make the amount they put you down for,
they put a gold star after the name. Then, the buyers are told, "When
you come into that building to call on someone and they haven't got a
gold star, tell them that you won't buy from them until they have the
gold star". BLACKMAIL. I don't know what else you can call it.
Then what do they do? They tell you it's for 'humanitarian purposes'
and they send maybe $8 billion dollars to Israel, tax exempt, tax
deductible. So if they hadn't sent that eight billion dollars to
Israel, seven billion of it would have gone into the U.S. Treasury as
income tax. So what happens? That seven billion dollars deficit — that
air pocket — the gullible Christians have to make up.
They put a bigger tax on gasor bread or corporation tax. Somebody
has to pay the housekeeping expenses for the government. So why do you
let these people send their money over there to buy guns to drive people
out of their ancient homeland? And you say, "Oh, well. The poor Jews.
They have no place to go and they've been persecuted all their lives".
They've never been persecuted for their religion. And I wish I had two
rows of Rabbis here to challenge me. Never once, in all of history,
have they been persecuted for their religion.
Do you know why the Jews were driven out of England? King Edward the
First in 1285 drove them out, and they never came back until the
Cromwell Revolution which was financed by the Rothschilds. For
four-hundred years there wasn't a Jew. But do you know why they were
driven out? Because in the Christian faith and the Moslem faith it's a
sin to charge 'rent' for the use of money. In other words - what we
call interest [usury] is a sin.
So the Jews had
a monopoly in England and they charged so much interest, and when the
Lords and Dukes couldn't pay, they [Jews] foreclosed. And they were
creating so much trouble that the king of England finally made himself
their partner, because when they they came to foreclose, some of these
dukes bumped off the Jews. . . the money-lenders. So the king finally
said — and this is all in history, look up Tianson [Tennyson?] or Rourke,
the History of the Jews in England; two books you can find in your
library. When the king found out what the trouble was all about, and
how much money they were making, he declared himself a fifty-percent
partner of the money lenders. Edward the First. And for many years,
one-third of the revenues of the British Treasury came from the
fifty-percent interest in money-lending by the Jews.
But it got worse and worse. So much worse that when the Lords and
Dukes kept killing the money-lenders, the King then said, "I declare
myself the heir of all the money-lenders. If they're killed you have to
pay me, because I'm his sole heir". That made so much trouble, because
the King had to go out and collect the money with an army, so he told
the Jews to get out. There were 15,000 of them, and they had to get
out, and they went across to Ireland, and that's how Ireland got to be
part of the United Kingdom.
When King Edward
found out what they were doing, he decided to take Ireland for himself
before someone else did. He sent Robert Southgard with a mercenary army
and conquered Ireland. So, show me one time where a Jew was persecuted
in any country because of his religion. It has never happened. It's
always their impact on the political, social, or economic customs and
traditions of the community in which they settle.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[Question inaudible] Freedman: Yes,
sir. Well, they say most of those things themselves. It was
unnecessary for Benjamin Franklin to say it. Most of those things they
say themselves. But Benjamin Franklin observed, and by hearsay
understood, what was happening in Europe.
When
Russia, in 920 was formed, and gradually surrounded the Khazar Kingdom,
and absorbed them, most of the well-to-do Khazars fled to Western Europe
and brought with them the very things to which you object and I object
and a lot of other people object. The customs, the habits, the
instincts with which they were endowed.
When
Benjamin Franklin referred to them as Jews because that's the name that
they went by, and when the Christians first heard that these people who
were fleeing from Russia — who they were — that they had practiced this
Talmudic faith — the Christians in Western Europe said, "They must be
the remnants of the lost ten tribes!"
And Mr.
Grutz, the greatest historian amongst the Jews, said that — and he's
probably as good an authority on that subject as there is. So when Ben
Franklin came to Europe in the 18th century, he already saw the results
of what these people had done after they left their homeland. And every
word of it is true... they say it themselves. I can give you half a
dozen books they've written in which they say the same thing: When they
have money they become tyrants. And when they become defeated, they
become ruthless. They're only barbarians. They're the descendants of
Asiatic Mongols and they will do anything to accomplish their purpose.
What right did they have to take over Russia the way they did? The
Czar had abdicated nine or ten months before that. There was no need
for them. . . they were going to have a constitutional monarchy. But
they didn't want that. When the constitutional monarchy was to assemble
in November, they mowed them all down and established the Soviet Union.
There was no need for that. But they thought, "Now is the time", and if
you you will look in the Encyclopedia Britannica under the word
'Bolshevism', you'll find the five laws there that Lenin put down for a
successful revolution. One of them is, "Wait for the right time, and
then give them everything you've got". It would pay you to read that.
You'd also find that Mr. Harold Blacktree, who wrote the article for
the Encyclopedia Britannica states that the Jews conceived and created
and cultivated the Communist movement. And that their energy made them
the spearhead of the movement. Harold Blacktree wrote it and no one
knew more about Communism than he. And the Encyclopedia Britannica for
25 years has been printing it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[Question
inaudible] Freedman: Well, I can't advocate that you do anything that's
criminal, but I can tell you this. You can start what I call an endless
chain. If you can get your friends to write, objectively, here is the
statement: Mr. Kennedy's office gave me this himself. Mr. Smith, who
succeeded Mr. Kennedy, took over his office — was in his office — and
gave me this. He delivered this on the 25th, and it says here:
"For
release to AM (that means morning papers), August 25th". "Israel is
here to stay. It is a national commitment, special obligation of the
Democratic Party. The White House must take the lead. American
intervention. We will act promptly and decisively against any nation in
the Middle East which attacks its neighbor. I propose that we make
clear to both Israel and the Arab states our guarantee that we will act
with whatever force and speed are necessary to halt any aggression by
any nation".
Well, do you call the return of
people to their homeland [the Arab Palestinians] aggression? Is Mr.
Kennedy going to do that? Suppose three million Mexicans came into
Texas and drove the six million Texans into the deserts of Arizona and
New Mexico. Suppose these Mexicans were slipped in there armed — the
Texans were disarmed — and one night they drove them all out of Texas
and declared themselves the Republic of the Alamo. What would the
United States say?
Would we say it's aggression
for these Texans to try to get their homes back from the Mexican
thieves? Suppose the Negroes in Alabama were secretly armed by the
Soviets and overnight they rose up and drove all the whites into the
swamps of Mississippi and Georgia and Florida. . . drove them out
completely, and declared themselves the Republic of Ham, or the Republic
of something-or-other. Would we call it aggression if these people, the
whites of Alabama, tried to go back to their homes?
Would we. . . what would we think if the soviet Union said, "No, those
Negroes now occupy them! Leave them there!", or "No, those Mexicans are
in Texas. they declared themselves a sovereign state. Leave them
there. You have plenty of room in Utah and Nevada. Settle somewhere
else".
Would we call it aggression if the
Alabama whites or the Texans wanted to go back to their homes? So now,
you've got to write to President Kennedy and say, "We do not consider it
aggression in the sense that you use the word, if these people want to
return to their homes as the United Nations — fifteen times in the last
twelve years — called upon the Zionists in occupation of Palestine to
allow the Arab Palestinians to return to their former homes and farms".
[End of transcript of Benjamin Freedman speech, given in 1961 at
the WillardHotel
in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic
newspaper of that time, Common Sense.]
|
Cheka At least 20 million
Christians killed by Russian Jews
The
"The Concordat effectively legitimized Hitler and the Nazi government
to the eyes of Catholicism, Christianity, and the world. ..."
Richard Quest, homophobe, hypocrisy notes: Richard Quest, Kinky News Network,
personality, Richard Quest, busted, Central Park, a rope around his neck
that was tied to his genitals, sex toy in his boot, spotted with another
man, early morning, 64th Street, search terms: methamphetamine, meth,
drug arrests, cop, "I've got some meth in my pocket", loitering,
criminal possession, but no lewdness charge, attorney Alan Abramson,
Manhattan Criminal Court, drug counseling in return for adjournment in
contemplation of dismissal, misdemeanor charges dropped, case sealed if he
stays out of trouble. Quest known for antics, stunts, on cable news
networks, turned down Al Jazeerah (Al Jazeera) job, 
Facebook
YouTube
"The Lavon Affair: Foreign Minister Golda Meir with former Minister of
Defense, Pinhas Lavon, 30.11.1959.
