|
CCP-Connected Carter Center
Monitored Midterm Election
REVEALED… Natalie Winters: Arizona Was The “Main State”
Where CCP-Connected Carter Center Monitored Midterm
Election – Group Has Monitored Over 100 Elections in 39
Countries Including BRAZIL (VIDEO)
By Jordan Conradson Jan. 12, 2023 8:30 am182 Comments
TruthGettrGabTelegramShareTweet
Investigative reporter Natalie Winters joined Bannon’s War
Room Monday to discuss the Chinese Communist Party-funded
Carter Center’s involvement in a “globalist and a global
concerted effort” in the United States elections and
Brazil’s recent election.
The Gateway Pundit previously reported on the Carter
Center, who claim to be nonpartisan election observers,
and their potentially illegal involvement in Georgia.
“Arizona was their main state,” said Winters.
According to a report on the War Room website, “The Carter
Center has been conducting “election observation” missions
for over 100 elections across 39 countries.
Winters told Bannon that in Brazil, the Carter Center was
“given sole access to really vet these machines before
they were used.”
If this occurred in Maricopa County, one of the Carter
Center’s “primary targets,” that may explain the
catastrophe that occurred on Election Day.
In Maricopa County, over 50% of tabulators and printers
failed the moment that polls opened, causing voters to be
turned away from the polls and creating long wait times of
four hours or more. According to cybersecurity expert Clay
Parikh’s testimony, this was an intentional act aimed at
disenfranchising Republican voters who turned out 3:1 for
Trump-Endorsed candidates. County Elections officials
failed to give an adequate explanation of these failures
and seemingly lied under oath in Kari Lake’s recent trial.
This and other election catastrophes in Maricopa County
possibly stole the election from Kari Lake, Abe Hamadeh,
and other Republican candidates.
The Maricopa County Midterm Election disaster is currently
undergoing multiple legal challenges.
Read the latest updates on Kari Lake and Abe Hamadeh’s
historic election lawsuits!
While maintaining these compromising ties, one of the
primary operations of the Carter Center has been
conducting “election observation” missions for over 100
elections across 39 countries.
Since 2020, it has pledged to carry out similar operations
in the U.S.
“The Carter Center has been working to support elections
at home by providing objective information about the
election process and advancing good practices in
transparency,” outlines the center before noting “our
efforts have expanded in 2022 and will continue to grow in
the run-up to 2024.”
Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, Florida, and North Carolina
are the primary states of interest for the Carter Center.
Around the Web
Chicago, Illinois: Get Legal Thc Delivered to You
For example, the Carter Center was recently selected by
Georgia’s Fulton County Board of Elections and the
Performance Review Board to send “nonpartisan election
observers” to oversee the upcoming Nov. 8 midterms. Fulton
County, which includes the city of Atlanta, was reportedly
a hotbed of voter fraud during the 2020 election.
The Carter Center is also conducting operations in
Arizona, recently launching the Arizona Democracy
Resilience Network to suppress discussion of voter fraud
among candidates and combat election “misinformation.”
Among the group’s demands are that candidates “cooperate
with elections officials” and “avoid spreading
falsehoods.”
“When you have candidates talking about fraud when there’s
really been no evidence of fraud and fraud before an
election is even held, it presents the kind of atmosphere
out there that can lead to things down the road that you
just don’t want to see happen,” explained Arizona
Democracy Resilience Network co-director Don Henninger.
Trending: District Attorney Fani Willis Can Be Potentially
Removed or Disciplined Based on the Law Signed by Georgia
Governor Brian Kemp Three Months Ago
The Arizona Democracy Resilience Network has identified
Maricopa and Pima counties as its primary targets, both of
which were believed to have been plagued with extensive
voter fraud during the 2020 election.
In an effort to boost confidence in the security of
Arizona’s elections, which will be administered by
Democratic gubernatorial candidate Katie Hobbs, the Carter
Center’s group is sponsoring statewide events such as
“Follow the Ballot: Be Confident Your Vote Is Counted” to
undercut claims of voter fraud.
In addition to its Arizona and Georgia operations, the
Carter Center is also behind the North Carolina Network
for Fair, Safe, and Secure Elections, which is sponsoring
a state-wide “Trusted Elections” tour.
The group was also operating in Brazil’s election and are
reportedly involved in efforts to control the narrative
surrounding election fraud and the massive protests that
are occurring.
War Room reported,
The Carter Center – supposedly serving as “independent”
observers of Brazil’s recent presidential election – is
partnered with several Chinese Communist Party-funded
foreign influence groups, War Room can reveal.
The center, founded by its namesake, former president
Jimmy Carter, has also signed agreements with the Chinese
Communist Party’s (CCP) Ministry of Civil Affairs to
cooperate on the administration of notoriously corrupt
elections in China.
The Carter Center was dispatched to Brazil to engage in
“nonpartisan election observation,” as it has done for
over 100 elections in dozens of countries.
“The mission focused on issues related to the function and
transparency of the voting technology systems,
disinformation about the use of those systems, and the
legal framework governing the use of voting technology,”
explains a summary.
The group’s November 4th report on the integrity of
Brazil’s recent presidential election, however, makes no
mention of credible allegations of fraud or the massive
protests occurring as a result.
Instead, the report described these claims as “fake news”
This is not the only shady activity that Katie Hobbs, who
oversaw her own election as Secretary of State, is tied
to.
As The Gateway Pundit reported, Ponzi scheme
cryptocurrency exchange FTX appears to have played a role
in Arizona’s stolen midterm election after funneling
millions of dollars into Phoenix-based Protect Our Future
PAC to support Democrats like Katie Hobbs.
Additionally, Hobbs, whose election is still under
question and litigation, is also under fire after it was
revealed that she collected as much as $250,000 from
donors using a “dark money” operation with zero
disclosure.
Arizona State Senators and Senate leadership are now
looking into investigating Katie Hobbs for this possible
corruption.
Natalie Winters joined the War Room to discuss the Carter
Center’s involvement in Brazil and Arizona.
Winters: In terms of the election integrity battle here in
the United States, part of the reason that we haven’t
seen, I think, really any real inquiry or investigation
into the fraud that occurred in Brazil is because, if
people remember the nonpartisan group that was brought in
to be responsible for election observation in Brazil; It
was supposed to be nonpartisan, no conflicts of interest.
They were given sole access to really vet these machines
before they were used, was the Carter Center. Now we have
a report up on the War Room site talking about how this
group is intimately involved, including receiving money
from the Chinese Communist Party and their various foreign
influence groups. But you know where else the Carter
Center was heavily active and brought in as the
independent nonpartisan election observer? Swing states in
the United States Midterm Election.
Bannon: Aren’t they all over Arizona for instance, in the
Carter organization and Arizona is one of those swing
states ma’am?
Winters: Exactly, Arizona was their main state. The
funniest thing, there were two elections in all of 2022
that they put out post election statements about, saying
that no election fraud occurred and that people who say
otherwise are engaging in misinformation and
disinformation. Do you know what those two elections were?
Brazil and Arizona. So, this is an example of how there
really is both a globalist and a global concerted effort.
https://twitter.com/45Jbama/status/1612830628881534976
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Chinese Communist Party-Tied Group To Run Midterm
“Election Observer” Program In Swing States
Infowars....
EXCLUSIVE: Chinese Communist Party-Tied Group To Run
Midterm “Election Observer” Program In Swing States
By NATALIE WINTERS/WarRoom.Org
War Room Staff by War Room Staff August 16, 2023 in
China, Elections, Highlight, National Security, Politics
Reading Time: 7 mins read
Home China
The Carter Center will deploy “nonpartisan election
observers” in Fulton County, Georgia for the upcoming
midterms
The group is also combatting election “misinformation” in
states including Arizona, insisting there is “no evidence
of fraud”
It has a long track record of working with Chinese
Communist Party-funded influence groups
The Carter Center is partnered with the Chinese Communist
Party on election oversight in China
Other prominent partners of the Carter Center include
Pfizer Inc., The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and
George Soros’s Open Society Foundation
THE CARTER CENTER, which is partnered with several Chinese
Communist Party-funded foreign influence groups, is
dispatching “nonpartisan” election observers and
sponsoring initiatives to combat election “misinformation”
for the Nov. 8 midterms, War Room can reveal.
The center, founded by its namesake, former president
Jimmy Carter, has also signed agreements with the Chinese
Communist Party’s (CCP) Ministry of Civil Affairs to
cooperate on administering elections in China and has
invited CCP officials overseas to observe elections in the
U.S.
The Carter Center’s ample ties to Beijing have been
repeatedly flagged by U.S. lawmakers, as it has worked
with several groups operating under China’s “United
Front.”
A multi-billion-dollar political warfare operation, the
United Front has been described by former CCP Chairman Mao
Zedong as a “magic weapon” to ensure communism’s victory
over democracy. American officials have also identified
the effort as working to “co-opt and neutralize sources of
potential opposition” and “influence foreign governments
to take actions or adopt positions supportive of Beijing.”
ELECTION WARFARE
While maintaining these compromising ties, one of the
primary operations of the Carter Center has been
conducting “election observation” missions for over 100
elections across 39 countries.
Since 2020, it has pledged to carry out similar operations
in the U.S.
“The Carter Center has been working to support elections
at home by providing objective information about the
election process and advancing good practices in
transparency,” outlines the center before noting “our
efforts have expanded in 2022 and will continue to grow in
the run-up to 2024.”
Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, Florida, and North Carolina
are the primary states of interest for the Carter Center.
For example, the Carter Center was recently selected by
Georgia’s Fulton County Board of Elections and the
Performance Review Board to send “nonpartisan election
observers” to oversee the upcoming Nov. 8 midterms. Fulton
County, which includes the city of Atlanta, was reportedly
a hotbed of voter fraud during the 2020 election.
The Carter Center will be responsible for “absentee ballot
issuance and processing; early voting and election day
polling places; election day operations in the elections
office; and post-election procedures” in the controversial
county, according to a press release.
The Carter Center’s unearthed efforts to influence the
upcoming midterm elections follow the group playing a
leading role in monitoring the audit of Georgia’s election
results in 2020.
In 2020, the center worked on an election security task
force for Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s
office as the sole “nonpartisan” observer for the audit.
The Carter Center is also conducting operations in
Arizona, recently launching the Arizona Democracy
Resilience Network to suppress discussion of voter fraud
among candidates and combat election “misinformation.”
Among the group’s demands are that candidates “cooperate
with elections officials” and “avoid spreading
falsehoods.”
“When you have candidates talking about fraud when there’s
really been no evidence of fraud and fraud before an
election is even held, it presents the kind of atmosphere
out there that can lead to things down the road that you
just don’t want to see happen,” explained Arizona
Democracy Resilience Network co-director Don Henninger.
The Arizona Democracy Resilience Network has identified
Maricopa and Pima counties as its primary targets, both of
which were believed to have been plagued with extensive
voter fraud during the 2020 election.
In an effort to boost confidence in the security of
Arizona’s elections, which will be administered by
Democratic gubernatorial candidate Katie Hobbs, the Carter
Center’s group is sponsoring statewide events such as
“Follow the Ballot: Be Confident Your Vote Is Counted” to
undercut claims of voter fraud.
In addition to its Arizona and Georgia operations, the
Carter Center is also behind the North Carolina Network
for Fair, Safe, and Secure Elections, which is sponsoring
a state-wide “Trusted Elections” tour.
The group is also set to launch a similar campaign in
Florida and has pledged to deploy “non-partisan election
observers” in Michigan.
CCP SELLOUTS
The Carter Center’s newfound interest in influencing
American elections, however, follows decades of
collaboration with the CCP and its foreign influence
operations conducted through “United Front” groups.
Since 2012, the Carter Center has worked alongside the
China United States Exchange Foundation (CUSEF), which was
founded by the Vice-Chairman of the United Front’s
oversight department. CUSEF has previously sponsored trips
to China for American journalists and former congressmen
in exchange for “favorable coverage,” as revealed by
Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA) filings.
The Carter Center, which has accepted funds from CUSEF,
has sponsored a host of dialogues and events with the
controversial group, providing a platform to argue fo
increasing ties between America and the CCP.
The center also retains links to the Chinese People’s
Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries, which
has been dubbed the “public face” of the United Front and
flagged by the U.S. State Department for its campaigns to
“directly and malignly influence” American officials.
Other United Front groups that the Carter Center has
collaborated with include the Chinese People’s Association
for Peace and Disarmament, the Center for China and
Globalization, and the U.S.-China Heartland Association,
which explicitly targets American farmers and farmland.
The Carter Center has also hosted events alongside the
China Research Center (CRC), which is financially
supported by Confucius Institutes. Confucius Institutes
have been described by Chinese government officials as “an
important part of China’s overseas propaganda set-up” and
are notoriously rife with intellectual property theft and
espionage.
FOREIGN ELECTION INTERFERENCE?
The Carter Center’s ties to the CCP run deeper, as it
signed a memorandum of understanding with the regime’s
Ministry of Civil Affairs in 1998 to collaborate on
various election matters in China at the village and
township level.
The Carter Center, which was the first foreign
organization allowed to observe elections above the
village level in China, has published extensive reports on
the CCP’s elections, routinely failing to offer any harsh
criticism of the regime’s electoral manipulation and
intimidation.
“In those villages which we saw and heard about, the basic
norms of a democratic election have been conveyed and are
being implemented,” explained one report.
Under the memorandum, the Carter Center worked with the
CCP’s Ministry of Civil Affairs “to set up a computer
network system for election data gathering; to standardize
electoral procedures; to design and organize training
sessions of election officials; and to promote exchanges
between China and the United States on election
observations and researches on election-related topics,”
according to a synopsis of the agreement.
“All Carter Center programming is done in consultation
with Chinese government agencies and designed to deepen
reform measures on the government agenda,” it adds.
The memorandum also led to the Carter Center hosting
delegations of CCP officials visiting the U.S. to observe
elections in 1998, 2000, 2002, and 2006.
Déjà Vu Blue?
Beyond its Chinese Communist Party ties, the group’s
expansion into American elections has been met with
considerable pushback due to its apparent left-wing
political bias. Jimmy Carter, a Democrat, attacked
President Donald Trump ahead of the 2020 election,
insisting four more years of his presidency would be a
“disaster.”
Other partners of the Carter Center include Pfizer Inc.,
George Soros’s Open Society Foundation, the Bill &
Melinda Gates Foundation, and the World Health
Organization.
The news also follows controversy over hundreds of
millions of dollars flowing from left-wing donors, most
notably Mark Zuckerberg, into activist groups exploiting
vote-by-mail.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Major Election Fraud
Components: Albert Sensor system, Scytl and Edison, and
the Election Infrastructure Information Sharing and
Analysis Center (EI-ISAC).
BOMBSHELL EXCLUSIVE: NATIONWIDE CELLULAR NETWORK CONNECTS
ELECTION EQUIPMENT AND GIVES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ACCESS TO
ELECTION SYSTEMS AT THE PRECINCT LEVEL
August 14, 2023 by Joe Hoft
TruthTweetTelegramGettrGabShare
BOMBSHELL: NATIONWIDE CELLULAR NETWORK CONNECTS ELECTION
EQUIPMENT AND GIVES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ACCESS TO ELECTION
SYSTEMS AT THE PRECINCT LEVEL
Guest post by David and Erin Clements
A growing majority of Americans know the 2020 election was
fraudulent. Many analysts who have been studying election
integrity have concluded that there had to be a two-way
connection between local election electronics (electronic
poll pads, tabulators, election management systems, voter
databases, etc.) and a centralized data collection system
responsible for monitoring and manipulating the election.
Fingers have rightly been pointed at all-inclusive
election management software, the Albert Sensor system,
Scytl and Edison, and the Election Infrastructure
Information Sharing and Analysis Center (EI-ISAC).
This incestuous collaboration between the Department of
Homeland Security, the Election Assistance Commission,
leftist/globalist funding, foreign companies, and their
private partners, allowed for the real-time monitoring of
all election data, and more importantly, the ability to
change the results.
While experts could understand the functional capabilities
of how these programs manipulate elections at the county
and state levels, one area of mystery remained.
Experts could not fully explain how systems within
individual precincts which are supposedly “air-gapped”
were adding votes in real-time – such as KnowInk poll pads
in Texas that added hundreds of votes to the 2022 midterm
election after the polls had closed. To accomplish
election fraud at individual polling places, it is
necessary to have an air-interface with the supposedly
“air-gapped” equipment networked at the polling place.
A year-long research project led by an election integrity
investigator from Utah, Sophie Anderson, and
communications engineer, Dr. Charles Bernardin, has
uncovered the mechanism that is being used to connect our
election equipment at polling places across the
nation. Anderson and Bernardin met while working
together in several overlapping election integrity
efforts. After submitting a countless number of public
documents requests from multiple federal, state, and local
governments, and working with other grassroots
researchers, the team realized that the federal government
has indeed created a nationwide network that is capable of
collecting and changing real-time voting data at polling
places across the country from a central location. The
private network tool is called FirstNet, and like so many
things that have proven detrimental to American liberty –
it was sold as a tool to ensure public safety.
WHAT IS FIRSTNET?
The idea of a national cellular network dedicated to
public safety was hatched in the wake of 9/11 when
congested cell networks proved to be a bottleneck for
first responders. In 2012, Congress created the First
Responder Network Authority under the Department of
Commerce to oversee the build-out of “FirstNet.” The
original intent provided by its sponsors was that FirstNet
would serve police, fire, and EMT services. However,
the scope was soon expanded to include all “critical
infrastructure” – which included water, energy, and
transportation infrastructure.
(https://www.digi.com/solutions/by-technology/firstnet )
Curiously, just days before Barack Obama left office, his
administration’s Department of Homeland Security used the
specter of “Russian interference” in the 2016 election as
an excuse to declare election systems to be a part of that
critical infrastructure. As a result, the stage was
set to roll election systems into FirstNet.
The original plan to build FirstNet was to create a
separate network with nationwide coverage that used a
dedicated cellular band portion known as Band 14. Years
and billions of dollars later, AT&T had built out the
FirstNet Band 14 network with the coverage shown in the
map below.
AT&T’s FirstNet Band 14 Coverage
The obvious problem was that separate Band 14 coverage was
proving to be too slow and expensive to build, as only
pockets of the country had the service available – with
some states left completely without service. If Barack
Obama’s vision of using FirstNet to connect to all
election equipment was going to be realized before the
2020 election, the developers would need to speed things
up.
In 2017, AT&T offered the First Responder Network
Authority “preemption services” on its entire cellular
network. “Preemption” would give FirstNet customers
priority on AT&T’s network, ensuring they would always
have service on the AT&T network. Verizon, T-Mobile,
and Sprint soon followed suit in offering preemption
services, instantly expanding FirstNet service wherever
cellular service was available. These other providers gave
their preemption services names like “Frontline” and
“Connecting Heroes,” but for the purposes of simplicity
for this article we will refer to the preemption service
on all the providers as “FirstNet.”
Almost instantly, FirstNet’s coverage increased from
pockets of the country to cover most of the population and
its voting locations as shown in the map below. This
coverage assures electronic poll pads, election management
systems, and tabulators with internet connection
capabilities could be connected as “critical
infrastructure” to the FirstNet network and given priority
service, regardless of the presence or quality of local
wired internet service.
Areas where FirstNet has ability to preempt existing
cellular networks (source
(https://www.nperf.com/en/map/5g))
THE PUSH TO CONNECT ELECTION SYSTEMS TO FIRSTNET
Just because the FirstNet cellular network was now
available to be used for election systems, didn’t mean all
local jurisdictions would connect. Some of them would need
to be pushed. Coincidentally, public discussion of using
the Election Assistance Commission’s (EAC) influence to
push election jurisdictions nationwide to connect to
FirstNet took place at a two-day Election Assistance
Commission (EAC) Board of Advisers meeting in April 2019.
The full transcript of the meeting is here.
The Board of Advisors supposedly exists to assist the EAC
in setting standards and guidelines to help states comply
with the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) through their
certification program. Oddly enough, almost two years
prior to this meeting, the accreditations for both
election equipment testing labs, Pro V&V and SLI
Compliance, had lapsed. This lapse in accreditation
effectively shut down the ability of all states to legally
certify their election systems as required by HAVA. No
vendors, anyone in the EAC, or anyone on their Board of
Advisors appeared to have noticed this indefensible
oversight. As a result, most of the country’s
election systems were not legally “certified” for the 2020
election.
While a lapse of this magnitude defies reason, the Board
of Advisors had an inexplicable and prescient impulse to
meet before the manufactured Covid crisis of 2020.
To do what exactly? In April 2019, the Board met to
discuss “disaster management and recovery when elections
are disrupted by natural or manmade disasters.” And they
weren’t talking about dealing with a small, local disaster
during an election, but a national disaster that had the
ability to affect the presidential election itself.
Board member David Beirne said, “But you also look at it
in terms of the Presidential elections is you have one
shot at it. And I think that’s the real discussion that
needs to occur in terms of your continuity of operations,
your response plan, and the scalability impact that if you
have a shelter in place or on a Presidential election,
what does that really look like…for the State’ electoral
votes?”
The Board’s expectation of the need to deal with
unprecedented national shelter in place orders during a
presidential election amounts to an unbelievable prophetic
foresight of what would occur leading up to, and during
the 2020 election. A similarly dark prophetic
exercise called Event 201 was held by the Johns Hopkins
Center for Health and Security in partnership with the
World Economic Forum and the Gates Foundation where
bureaucrats practiced controlling narratives during a
“hypothetical” worldwide pandemic that would soon take
over the planet in reality.
While the EAC Board of Advisors discussed being prepared
for a national disaster during a presidential election, a
board member named Daniel Ivey-Soto chimed in to advocate
that FirstNet be used as the internet connection at
polling places across the country. (Ivey-Soto is a state
senator from New Mexico who has become well-known for his
ethical conflicts, his leadership role in the corruption
of the election franchise in that state, and accusations
of sexual misconduct.)
Ivey-Soto wanted the electronic poll pads (which have full
access to the voter registration database and voter
turnout) and the systems that transmit the election
results to be connected to the FirstNet network. Fellow
board member, Gema Howell, immediately latched on to
Ivey-Soto’s idea of using preemption privileges to connect
election equipment to the internet. The board lamented
their lack of authority to force jurisdictions to connect
to FirstNet. But they decided to use their leverage and
connections in the federal government to push the use of
the FirstNet cellular network for election systems.
EVIDENCE LOCAL JURISDICTIONS ARE CONNECTED TO FIRSTNET
There is a lot of hard evidence that the EAC Board of
Advisors successfully carried out Daniel Ivey-Soto’s
vision to connect the nation’s polling places to the
FirstNet cellular network.
DALLAS COUNTY
For example, there is the official network diagram for
election sites in Dallas County, Texas (shown below). The
diagram shows both the electronic pollbooks and the
tabulators connected to a cellular network with a two-way
connection between the router at the polling place and the
cellular network itself, which is connected to a central
county data center.
Network diagram from Dallas County public presentation
showing tabulators and pollbooks connected to a cellular
network
The priority cellular services provided by Verizon to the
Dallas County elections office was the subject of a May
2020 discussion hosted by Hans Olsen, former Department of
Homeland Security employee. The goal of the talk was to
explain how they “securely” connected election equipment
to the cellular network during the March 2020 Primary
election. They also heavily advertised Cradlepoint
modems which are used prolifically by public safety and
critical infrastructure customers to connect to FirstNet.
Slide from Dallas County public presentation on using
Cradlepoint modems to connect polling sites to cellular
networks
Lester Lewis, a Dallas County IT professional stated, “We
were able to use remote tools…to look and to see the
signal strength from the carriers… I was able to define
the issue right then [from the County Data Center], call
Verizon and they were able to make some changes there… on
voting night.” Then Gregory Brown, Solution Architect
Manager at Verizon stated, “Dallas County upgraded their
modems [to Cradlepoint] so that they could have that
real-time voter count and voting results sent back to the
data centers.” (emphasis added)
The researchers believe the priority cellular network
referenced in this talk is actually FirstNet. According to
Dr. Bernardin, “The environment for the Government’s
intrusion is partially determined by the IT people when
they configure the router at the voter center… the IT
manager sets up the private network with Wi-Fi protected
access and a firewall. The router can be set to randomize
the MAC address to keep the network from being identified,
but the randomization can be shared with trusted people.
The router provides a private, two-way connection between
the election equipment and the FirstNet cellular network.
Once this two-way connection is established, FirstNet can
monitor real-time data that is passing through the
election equipment – including who is turning out and how
they are voting. This data can be remotely changed by a
man-in-the-middle operating on the FirstNet network. In
fact, the election results can be entirely fabricated with
this clandestine configuration, and nobody would know.”
FLORIDA
Citizen researchers in St. Johns County, Florida
coordinated with each other to document the Wi-Fi networks
that were active at fifteen of the polling locations
across their county. They discovered that a single
cellular network that had been named “LetTheDogOut!” was
serving all 15 voting locations in St. Johns County during
the 2022 midterms.
Screenshot of Cellular Wi-Fi Network serving St. Johns
County, Florida
This evidence indicates that St. Johns County was using a
similar priority network setup as Dallas County, Texas,
and that service was part of the nationwide “public
safety” network.
CENSORSHIP ABOUT FIRSTNET
As Americans have learned since 2020, looking at what
information is being censored and ridiculed is often a
strong clue to discovering truth that is inconvenient for
the globalist narrative. Elon Musk’s “Twitter Files” and
recent congressional hearings have proven that the
government has gotten into an Orwellian habit of violating
American’s first amendment rights to suppress what they
call “malinformation.”
Malinformation is information which is true but will
undermine the agenda the government is trying to
accomplish.
It appears that actors who have popped up to support the
government narrative about the 2016 and 2020 elections
wanted to suppress discoveries of county-wide, cellular
networks being used to support election equipment:
Prior to the 2022 midterms, True the Vote put out a call
to action to their national audience asking citizens to
take screenshot documentation of the Wi-Fi networks that
were active at their polling places and report anything
that seemed suspicious.
This led the leftist coalition called Election Integrity
Partnership (EIP) to monitor how this call to action
spread on social media and they also likely helped censor
it on Twitter. At the conclusion of their “study,” they
released a barrage of tweets intimating that there is
nothing wrong with internet connections at polling sites
and shaming election integrity activists for looking into
it. (https://twitter.com/EI_Partnership)
Suspiciously, the EIP (Election Integrity Partnership) was
formed a mere 100 days before the 2020 election to monitor
“attempts to delegitimize election results” – an activity
that prior to 2020 was reserved for prominent democrats
and three letter agencies which was never taken seriously
by most Americans. The EIP’s work culminated in the
publication of a report called “The Long Fuse” that was
published in the Spring of 2021 and dismissed all claims
of election fraud in the 2020 election as baseless
conspiracy theories – a conclusion that a cursory review
of video evidence proves to be false.
A prominent member of the EIP is a former CIA employee and
anti-Trumper named Rene DiResta who was a primary
proponent of the “Russian interference” narrative that the
FBI and Hillary Clinton campaign tried to pin to the 2016
election to derail the Trump presidency. The narrative has
since been completely debunked by the investigation led by
special counsel, John Durham.
The EIP was also tied to the elaborate censorship scheme
to silence dissent over the 2020 election and the COVID
response exposed by the House Oversight Committee in March
2023.
Since publishing their report in Spring of 2021 condemning
everyone who questioned the 2020 election, the EIP was
largely silent on the hundreds of efforts that were
ongoing across the country to expose insecure and
fraudulent elections, until True the Vote asked people to
document Wi-Fi networks at polling places. Just the fact
that EIP was seeking to suppress citizens looking into
Wi-Fi connections at polling places suggests researchers
looking into FirstNet were on the right track.
SECRECY AND VULNERABILITY
It is difficult to obtain information on FirstNet because,
while it is taxpayer funded and supposedly for public
safety, it is the result of one of the many public-private
partnerships involved in our elections which are immune to
public records requests.
Shockingly, according to Senator Ron Wyden, FirstNet is
also exempt from congressional oversight. In a letter
published in April 2023, Wyden stated concerns about the
security of the FirstNet network and the likelihood that
it could be hacked by bad actors:
“…Cybersecurity experts have long warned that phone
networks are vulnerable to surveillance by hackers and
foreign spies…[who] can exploit flaws…to track mobile
users, intercept calls and tests, and even steal sensitive
information available on devices…all U.S. carriers are
vulnerable to these exploits, resulting in risks to
national security…”
Wyden went on to state that AT&T had apparently
conducted cybersecurity audits of the FirstNet system, but
that they were unavailable to anyone in the federal
government, including Congress, because of a
non-disclosure provision in the contract the Department of
Commerce had negotiated with AT&T. Therefore, no one
knows what was investigated in the audits, what the
results were, or whether any identified deficiencies were
fixed.
INFRASTRUCTURE TO STEAL ELECTIONS
The fact that the federal government has interfered in
foreign elections is an undisputed fact accepted by the
left, the right, and even fact checkers.
(https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-interfered-in-elections-of-at-least-85-countries-worldwide-since-1945/5601481)
Even the fact that AT&T has worked closely with the
federal government for spying operations isn’t much of a
secret. Multiple pieces of evidence were provided in
this article that AT&T has had a cozy relationship
with the federal government to carry out both
international and domestic spying operations going back
decades. In 1976, President Gerald Ford blocked a subpoena
from a congressional subcommittee because he said AT&T
“was and is an agent of the United States acting under
contract with the Executive Branch.”
Revelations from the Snowden documents suggest that
AT&T’s relationship with the federal government
continues with the installing of surveillance equipment
for the NSA in at least 59 domestic sites. Shortly after
the corrupt election system failed to deliver the
presidency to Hillary Clinton in 2016, even the Brennan
Center for Justice expressed concern that the NSA was too
cozy with our domestic communications infrastructure – a
topic they are silent on now.
Does infrastructure exist that could change election
results electronically in real-time without noticeable
delay? Yes – such a thing could be facilitated at the
national level by the FirstNet cellular network. All the
players surrounding the deployment of FirstNet into
elections are already on the suspect list of bad actors of
every election integrity researcher as well being part of
the group of people who were caught illegally censoring
Americans who know 2020 was not a legitimate election.
Dr. Bernardin describes in the following network diagram
how the FirstNet network could be misused to connect
precincts to county and state election offices in such a
way that all election data passes through a single network
where it could be intercepted and changed by the other
programs the DHS has set up to supposedly protect and
monitor our election infrastructure:
Network diagram showing how FirstNet could be misused to
interfere with election infrastructure
The idea that our own government would betray its people
in such a way was almost impossible to accept in the
immediate aftermath of the 2020 election. But after
the discovery of massive illegal censorship by the
government over discussion of the 2020 election, federal
agents planted to agitate the crowd on January 6th,
eternal gaslighting from the establishment, and the
weaponization of law enforcement to create a two-tiered
standard of justice against those claiming fraud occurred
– the conclusion that our own government was to blame for
the coup that occurred on November 3, 2020, seems obvious.
One last piece of evidence that supports Anderson and
Bernardin’s theory that FirstNet is a critical piece of
the election-stealing machine is the still unexplained
explosion that destroyed an AT&T’s data center in
downtown Nashville on Christmas Day, 2020. Very few
details ever came out about the perpetrator of the
explosion, and no one ever tried to explain why he did it.
Early articles did admit that “911 call centers,
hospitals, the Nashville airport, government offices” were
affected “from Georgia to Kentucky.” Police departments in
multiple states were unable to use their FirstNet phones
and had to communicate through radio or temporary burner
phones. It’s possible FirstNet was the target and
it’s possible that evidence of election interference
carried out using FirstNet needed to be destroyed.
................................................
DHS cyber agency invests in
election auditing tool to secure 2020 elections
TheHill
BY MAGGIE MILLER - 11/21/19 05:23 PM EST 56
DHS cyber agency invests in election auditing tool to
secure 2020 elections
The Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) cybersecurity
agency announced Thursday it would partner with election
officials and private sector groups to develop an election
auditing tool that can be used to help ensure the accuracy
of votes in 2020.
DHS’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
(CISA) is partnering with non-profit group VotingWorks on
an open-source software tool known as Arlo, which is
provided to state and local election officials for free.
According to CISA, Arlo conducts an audit of votes by
selecting how many ballots and which ballots to audit and
comparing the audited votes to the original count.
The tool has already been used to conduct post-election
audits across the country, including during the recent
2019 elections. Election officials in Pennsylvania,
Michigan, Virginia, Ohio and Georgia have signed on to
partner with CISA on Arlo, with more officials expected to
join.
“Heading into 2020, we’re exploring all possible ways
that we can support state and local election officials
while also ensuring that Americans across the country can
confidently cast their votes,” CISA Director Christopher
Krebs said in a statement.
Krebs added that “At a time when we know foreign actors
are attempting to interfere and cast doubt on our
democratic processes, it’s incredibly important elections
are secure, resilient, and transparent.”
NATO secretary general 'warmly' welcomes Biden as
president-elect
Graham vows Senate Judiciary will investigate 'voting
irregularities'
Use of post-election audits have been widely recommended
by experts as a major step to secure elections,
particularly in the wake of attempted Russian interference
in 2016.
The use of audits was a step recommended by the Senate
Intelligence Committee to secure elections in volume one
of its bipartisan report on Russian interference efforts
in 2016.
“Statistically sound audits may be the simplest and most
direct way to ensure confidence in the integrity of the
vote,” the committee wrote. “States should begin to
implement audits of election results.”
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dominion Voting Systems
Wikipedia
Dominion Voting Systems Corporation is a company that
sells electronic voting hardware and software, including
voting machines and tabulators, in the U.S. and Canada.[1]
The company's international headquarters are in Toronto,
Canada, and its U.S. headquarters are in Denver, Colorado.
As of September 2019, Dominion voting machines are used in
2,000 jurisdictions in 33 U.S. states and Puerto
Rico.[citation needed] The company also has over 100
municipal customers in Canada and clients in other
countries. The company carries out in-house software
development for its customers in the U.S., Canada and
Serbia.[2] Dominion Voting Systems Corporation ... Founded
2002; 18 years ago Founders James Hoover John Poulos
Headquarters Toronto, Ontario, Canada Subsidiaries Premier
Election Solutions Sequoia Voting Systems Website
dominionvoting.com Contents Company A Dominion ImageCast
precinct-count optical-scan voting machine, mounted on a
collapsible ballot box made by ElectionSource. Dominion
was founded in 2002 in Toronto, Canada, by John Poulos and
James Hoover. [3] Acquisitions In May 2010, Dominion
acquired Premier Election Solutions (formerly Diebold
Election Systems) from Election Systems & Software
(ES&S). ES&S had just acquired PES from Diebold
and was required to sell off PES by the United States
Department of Justice for anti-trust concerns.[4] In June
2010, Dominion acquired Sequoia Voting Systems.[5] United
States Dominion is the second largest seller of voting
machines in the United States.[6 In 2016 its machines
served 70 million voters in 1,600 jurisdictions In 2019,
the state of Georgia selected Dominion Voting Systems to
provide its new statewide voting system for 2020 and
beyond.[9] Canada Dominion Voting Systems is Canada’s
largest election system provider, with deployments
nationwide. Currently, Dominion provides optical scan
paper ballot tabulation systems for provincial elections,
including Ontario and New Brunswick. Dominion also
provides ballot tabulation and voting systems for Canada's
major party leadership elections, including the Liberal
Party of Canada, the Conservative Party of Canada, and the
PC Party of Ontario.Ontario was the first Canadian
province to use Dominion's tabulator machines in the 2006
elections.[13] New Brunswick used Dominion's 763 tabulator
machines in the 2014 provincial elections.[] There were
some problems with the reporting of tabulator counts after
the election, and at 10:45 p.m Elections New Brunswick
officially suspended the results reporting count with 17
ridings still undeclared.[] The Progressive Conservatives
and the People's Alliance of New Brunswick called for a
hand count of all ballots. Recounts were held in 7 of 49
ridings and the results were upheld with variations of no
more than 1 vote per candidate per riding.[16] This delay
in results reporting was caused by an off-the-shelf
software application unrelated to Dominion.[17] In June
2018, Elections Ontario used Dominion's tabulator machines
for the provincial election and deployed them at 50
percent of polling stations.[] Officers Poulos, President
and CEO of Dominion, has a B.S. in Electrical Engineering
from the University of Toronto and an MBA from INSEAD, in
Fontainebleau, France.[20] Hoover (Vice President) has an
MS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of
Alberta.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The Sting will Put Ballot Fraud Issue
to Bed
Gnews
Just as both parties in the US are entering the judicial
process over massive voter fraud, and just as people worry
about whether the CCP’s 3F plan of bringing the US into
chaos has succeeded, social media is exploding with a huge
bombshell.
On November 5th, Mr. Owen Shroyer posted an exclusive
video on his “War Room With Owen Shroyer” entitled:
“Intelligence Insider: President Trump Setup Democrats In
“Sting Operation” To Catch Them Stealing Election!”
Dr. Steve Pieczenik came on the interview and claimed
that the official ballots across America were watermarked,
and the Democrats would get caught if they attempt to
cheat! A similar story had already caught on Twitter and
in the Whistleblower circles earlier that same day but was
not officially reported. Perhaps the news was too good to
be credible.
Dr. Steve Pieczenik is by no means a nobody. He served as
Deputy Assistant Secretary of State in the Ford, Carter,
Reagan, and Bush administrations.
In this video, Dr. Piechenick said he had just been
allowed to speak out about it. It turns out that in 2016
President Trump and a group of honorable figures in the US
military, intelligence community, and government
understood exactly how corrupt the Democrats’ machinery is
and their intention to steal the country back in the next
election. In preparation for this, they have secretly
arranged this undercover “Sting Operation.”
The Trump administration had the Department of Homeland
Security printed an isotope watermark on all legitimate
ballots. This technique is called radioactive QFS water
chain inscription code. The technology stores records of
unique signatures that are added to the watermark so they
can verify the hash information written on the blockchain
(master record). This watermark cannot be swapped, making
it possible to track down each individual. The U.S. Postal
Service filed a patent for the QFS blockchain voting
system in August 2020. (www.pat2pdf.org)
Someone has put online a memo with a message from DHS
claiming there will be undercover surveillance of the
election. According to guerillastocktrading’s website,
while they’re not sure if the memo is real or not, they do
know that the watermarked ballots, which cannot be easily
copied, have been prepared well before the 2020 Election.
The August 2 issue of Law & Justice, published by the
White House, entitled “President Donald J. Trump is
Strengthening the Security of Our Elections,” reported
that the President made it clear that his administration
would not tolerate foreign interference in our elections
by any nation state or other malicious actors.
Furthermore, on May 3 and July 27, President Trump chaired
National Security Council meetings to receive updates and
discuss whole-of-government approach to election security
that is being implemented under his direction.
According to The Hill, back on August 22 of 2018, the DHS
Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen called on election officials in
all 50 states to ensure that the ballots used during the
2020 presidential election are auditable. Nielsen wants
“all state and local election officials to make certain
that by the 2020 presidential election, every American
vote on a verifiable and auditable ballot.” “Our systems
must be resilient. We must be able to demonstrate that the
votes count and that they are counted correctly,” she
added. By “verifiable and auditable,” she could mean the
ballots with a radioactive isotope watermark.
In the last few days, we have repeatedly heard the
President refer to “illegal ballots” and “late ballots” as
different forms of fraud. It’s reasonable to assume that
when the President says “illegal ballots,” he’s referring
to those fraudulent ballots. No wonder President Trump
appeared confident and announced his victory as early as
the first night of November 3. According to Sunzi’s the
Art of War, as Mr. Piechenick further described, you pull
back and allow the enemy to come out, manipulate the
system, make all the mistakes they can make, and then you
make the final kill.
It seems that this huge “Sting Operation” was not just a
rumor. The whole legal proceedings with the Democrats were
part of a giant fishing expedition in the swamp. It looks
like the enemy can’t get away with it this time.
As the old Chinese proverb goes, “While mantis is hunting
cicadas, a yellow sparrow is behind.”
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
What's the Quantum Financial System all about?
sadcorp (48)in #quantum • last year (edited)
"The QFS-system will cover the new global network for the
transfer of gold or asset-backed money, initiated by
Russia and China to replace the US-centrally-controlled
Swift system.
This new Quantum Financial System – QFS runs on a quantum
computer, based on an orbiting satellite, and is protected
by Secret Space Programs to ensure that it cannot be
hacked. The quantum technology was provided by benevolent
extraterrestrial Galactics. The purpose of the new
financial system is to put an end to Cabal corruption,
usury, and manipulation within the banking world. The key
is to implement limitations that will prevent corrupted
banksters from gaining significant profits." IntotheLight
News
"QFS stands for Quantum Financial System and according to
Galactic Connection site, it’s an off-world monetary
system which cannot be rigged, in contrast with the
current financial system. As it cannot be compromised –
despite the many attempts to do so by the cabal – the
cabal’s corrupt central banking will collapse. The cabal
will have no access to this system. This system will allow
the transfer of the new asset-backed currencies after the
Global Currency Reset which will replace the US-controlled
Swift system with all its ills of usury and manipulation.
The novelty about this system is that benevolent
extraterrestrial Galactics provided the Alliance with this
system which does not run on a conventional computer, but
a quantum computer placed on a satellite. It is protected
by SSPs to prevent it from being hacked." MassAwakening
“The New Quantum Financial System (QFS) is a
super-advanced “out-of-this-world” technology that the
Dark Cabal does not have. It has the capacity to map
information sources throughout the multi-universe
(time/space continuum and no time/space), and holds
massive amounts of data in a compilation of materials the
size of a grain of sand. Gone are the days of data server
centers the size of football fields.” PathwaytoAscencion
"The Quantum Mapping System sometimes referred to as the
Quantum Financial System is has long been used as a
methodology to acquire legal possession of every asset on
the planet." ProjectSpeak
"The Quantum System used by Kim was created by a Galactic
race that is proficient in technology and were one of the
races enslaved to build technology to assist Marduk to
enslave and rob the planet of its resources."
https://projectspeak.net/18-july-2018-0941
"They instituted an Artificial Intelligence and computer
program initiative with the full support of the banks.
This so-called "Quantum Financial System" is in fact a
re-hash of old binary filing system technology. The
Quantum System existed long before I did, is using a
technology which if humanity keeps going at it's current
pace is about 1000 years ahead. Marduk did not create it,
a fellow group of pirates did."
IntelDinarChronicles
Larry Eslinger
@sling63
Replying to
@realDonaldTrump
What about the #GlobalCurrencyReset ? The fiat system is
getting ready to collapse. Banks are failing stress test
world wide. If we don’t go to #quantumfinancialsystem now,
the stock market will collapse. It’s not going up. The
dollar value is going down ... Twitter
https://twitter.com/hashtag/quantumfinancialsystem?lang=en
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Realtime NYTimes election data
analyzed proves fraud
TheDonald.win
Edit: the data we have has been directly linked to the
footage of the news networks like CNN
BTW IF YOU CAN HELP DOWNLOAD EVERYTHING AND KEEP A LOCAL
COPY.. IN THE CODE WHERE YOU CAN GET INFO FOR ALL THE
STATES, DOWNLOAD FOR ALL THE STATES.
REMINDER: THIS DOESN'T TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ALL THE HUNDRED
THOUSANDS OF TRUMP VOTES DESTROYED, BURNED AND RIPPED
APART, THE THOUSANDS OF BALLOTS JUST MARKED FOR BIDEN.
THIS IS THE EVIDENCE WE'VE FOUND SO FAR.
PEDES GET IN HERE. I saw the video on The Gateway Pundit
[
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-huge-another-system-glitch-captured-live-cnn-election-night-20000-votes-swapped-trump-biden-video/
] and I decided to do some digging of my own, into a more
reputable source that can verify that the glitch was
indeed real, and that it affected the votes, instead of it
being just a display glitch on that news channel. So I
went digging into the Edison data [ nyt
] and I found this damning evidence [
https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]. As can be seen in the
image, only 54 votes were added, but the ratio changed in
Biden's favor by a whole 0.6%! This is proof that not only
did the glitch happen, but it doesn't seem to have been
reverted at all.
EDIT : BIG UPDATE, I made a script to run through the
data and gather all instances where votes switched from
Trump to Biden, Lost Votes means that the total amount of
votes counted decreased by that amount throughout the
counting. I've only done states that use Dominion Voting
Systems so far.
EDIT 2: Added ALL the states, and separated by voting
systems, although no state uses exclusively one system as
far as I know.
Edit 3: Re-ordered the states, first by switched votes,
then by lost votes.
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
Switched votes are votes that were taken from Trump and
given to Biden.
Lost votes are voted that disappeared during the
counting, from both candidates.
There might be a small overlap between Switched votes and
Lost votes.
Dominion Voting Systems :
Pennsylvania : Switched : 220,883 Lost Votes : 941,248
New Jersey : Switched : 80,242 Lost Votes : 20
Florida : Switched : 21,422 Lost Votes : 456
Michigan : Switched : 20,213 Lost Votes : 21,882
New York : Switched : 18,124 Lost Votes : 623,213
Georgia : Switched : 17,407 Lost Votes : 33,574
Ohio : Switched : 14,965 Lost Votes : 5,102
Virginia : Switched : 12,163 Lost Votes : 789,023
California : Switched : 7,701 Lost Votes : 10,989
Arizona : Switched : 4,492 Lost Votes : 0
Minnesota : Switched : 2,766 Lost Votes : 195,650
Tennessee : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 0
Louisiana : Switched : 2,322 Lost Votes : 0
Illinois : Switched : 2,166 Lost Votes : 54,730
Wisconsin : Switched : 2,078 Lost Votes : 3,408
Colorado : Switched : 1,809 Lost Votes : 0
Utah : Switched : 1,627 Lost Votes : 0
New Hampshire : Switched : 973 Lost Votes : 116
Iowa : Switched : 938 Lost Votes : 477
New Mexico : Switched : 268 Lost Votes : 4,610
Missouri : Switched 0 : Lost Votes : 20,730
Nevada : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Alaska : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Washington : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Hawaii : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Kansas and Texas use Premier Election Solutions, owned by
Dominion Voting Systems.
Texas : Switched : 14,954 Lost Votes : 30,557
Kansas : Switched : 1,674 Lost Votes : 2,154
Election Systems & Software :
Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50
Kentucky : Switched : 8,129 Lost Votes : 23,849
Arkansas : Switched : 3,664 Lost Votes : 20,748
South Carolina : Switched : 2,779 Lost Votes : 2,119
Montana : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 1,276
South Dakota : Switched : 1,347 Lost Votes : 1
North Dakota : Switched : 234 Lost Votes : 681
Maryland : Switched : 203 Lost Votes : 0
North Carolina : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 15
District of Columbia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Unknown Systems:
Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50
Connecticut : Switched : 3,834 Lost Votes : 272
Massachusetts : Switched : 3,613 Lost Votes : 51
Oregon : Switched 2,557 Lost Votes : 0
Alabama : Switched : 1,170 Lost Votes : 408
Mississippi : Switched : 355 Lost Votes : 0
Maine : Switched : 271 Lost Votes : 35
Rhode Island : Switched : 6 Lost Votes : 13
West Virginia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 78,300
Idaho : Switched 0 Lost Votes : 0
Oklahoma : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Indiana : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Delaware : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Vermont : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
NOTE : Lost votes are votes that disappeared, not only
for Trump, but overall.
VERIFIED!!!!:
I went looking through the data I got from my script,
trying to find if the moment the Antrim glitch happened in
Michigan is there. And it is. Here is the Data. [
https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/michigan/president.json
]
And here is the specific part when the switch happened. [
https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png ]
You can see in that picture, that Trump lost 3,096 votes,
those all went to Biden. BUT, Trump also lost 2,324 votes,
that went nowhere.
EDIT: Those 2,324 were moved from Trump to Jorgensen.
Jorgensen votes = Total votes * (1 - Trump share - Biden
share)
Nr.27 : 573,857 * (1 - 0.578 - 0.401) = 12,051
Nr.28 : 574,417 * (1 - 0.568 - 0.406) = 14,935
Jorgensen vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 14,935 -
12,051 = 2,884
Total vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 574,417 -
573,857 = 560
Jorgensen vote increase - Total vote increase = 2,884 -
560 = 2,324
SOURCES: Here is the data I used:
EDISON DATA:
https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json
https://workupload.com/file/LVcwK7AAD8p
The data is from Edison Research, it is used for election
coverage by at least ABC News, CBS News, CNN and NBC News.
It is also used for the website of the NYT, and probably
others as well.
I scraped the data from the NYT website, here [ NYT
] to check for other states, replace "pennsylvania" in the
link with the state you want to check, for states that
have spaces in their names, like new york, write new-york
instead.
Take this picture for example. [
https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]
It's like this:
Nr.187 : 2,984,468(Total votes) * 0.566(Trump share of
the votes) = 1,689,208.888
Nr.188 : 2,984,522 * 0.56 = 1,671,332.32
Do the same thing for Biden, and you'll see that he
gained the votes that Trump lost.
I made a program that basically checks every single
change in votes, does the above to check if votes were
switched, then adds them all up to get the total amount of
switched votes.
Here is the link to a rar file containing all the .json
files for the states, and the fraudcatch.py file, you'd
need to download python 3.8.2 to use it, click EDIT with
idle, then in the window that pops up click Run, to check
how many votes were switched from Trump to Biden in a
state, you then type findfraud('hawaii') for example,
replace hawaii with the name of the file of the state you
want to check, the file for new hampshire is named newhamp
for example, so findfraud('newhamp'), to check the total
lost votes (For both candidates) do lostvotes('newhamp')
for example. https://workupload.com/file/s7s8SARjjqh
[pede444wow] I took the json files that are included
here, and wrote a python script to convert the critical
data to one csv file, so you can analyze it in excel:
python script: https://pastebin.com/Q6nTP04N
result csv file: (download and save to csv file, then
open in excel) https://pastebin.com/FQuxxTvK
[montag] Here's a GitHub repo of the same data source
taken at incremental time periods. Github
[ComeAndTakeIt_Texas] Hey TrumanBlack, I crunched the
27/28 timestamp data you posted (specifically this -
https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png), and uploaded a
spreadsheet analysis here
(https://i.maga.host/xbwnVuk.png). I do a worst-case and
best-case rounding error to generate Max T Vote, Min T
Vote, and Max B Vote and Min B Vote that shows if you have
0.578 share, the max number that would represent would be
0.57849999999, and the min number would be 0.5775. The
specific pic highlighted here allows no possible way
whatsoever that Trump did not lose votes. The smallest
number of votes he could have lost assuming in 27 there is
a worst case rounding error and in the 28 step there is a
best case rounding error (extremely unlikely), Trump lost
a 4846.353. In worst case, he lost 5994.627 votes. There
is literally NO way anyone can explain this away. They can
also not explain that away as an asynchronous issue, as
the timestamp itself is later (1), and (2), the total vote
count increased. This single time step is proof alone.
[warpigpede] Re: the data displayed in Maga
I calculated number of lost Trump votes as 5738.57,
exactly 1% of the total number of votes (573857) at record
27:
votes 27: 573857
trump fraction: 0.578
trump votes: 331689.346
biden fraction: 0.401
biden votes: 230116.657
votes 28: 574417
trump fraction: 0.568
trump vote: 325950.776
biden vote: 232985.942
biden fraction: 0.406
votes change: +560
trump votes change: -5738.57
Exactly 1% is an awfully curious value. I wonder if it is
consistent across the entire dataset
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
GatewayPundit,
Wisconsin Voter fraud details list
Voter dump 120,000 for Biden day after November 3, 2020,
election
Racine County Sheriff requests election fraud charges for
massive nursing home abuse ignored by Republican DA –
click here –UPDATE: Racine County Sheriff Refers Criminal
Charges Against Five Top Wisconsin Elections Commissioners
in Nursing Home Voting Scam | The Gateway Pundit
Justice Gableman files election fraud report in March of
2022 asking for reclaiming Wisconsin’s 10 Electors due to
election fraud that affected the outcome of the 2020
Presidential Election supposedly decided 20,682 votes.
True the Vote estimates 137,551 illegal absentee ballots
being deposited into Zuckeberg illegal ballot drop boxes
in March of 2022
E.R.I.C. conveniently removes 200,000 names from Wisconsin
voter rolls 9 months after the 2020 Presidential Election
Republican Speaker Vos admits to “widespread election
fraud” in 2020 Presidential Election
Republican Speaker Vos admits to a “do-over” of
Presidential Election if election fraud that affected the
outcome of the election is proven in court of law
Military ballots being abused by City of Milwaukee
Assistant Election Director
Absentee ballots being sent to addresses where voters do
not reside at
Are phantom voters on Wisconsin’s voter rolls actually
voting?
|
