NewsFollowUp.com Home

The Rise of Populism

9-11

foxnews contrived islamophobia iraq war neocon zionists
Go to Russiagate page....Rachel Maddow and Wolf Blitzer demonized Trump for nearly three years, then the truth hit...their ratings suffered greatly


amazon wordpress banned holocaust revisionist books new source
There's no principle difference between NeoNazism, Jewish Chosenness and White Supremacism...all forms of supremacism are wrong....

holocaust revisionism holohoax auschwitz ig farben hitler germany nuremberg
Amazon, WordPress and other have banned Holocaust revisionist books, but that doesn't mean they're not available...MORE

jfk rfk jfk-jr assassination johnson ben gurion israel
Amazon, WordPress and other have banned Holocaust revisionist books, but that doesn't mean they're not available...MORE

clinton obama bush death list
Clinton Bush Obama death lists...over 300 names suspicious deaths...Clintons by far the worst

cultural marxism frankfurt school jews destroy western culture marxism socialism communism
Cultural Marxist goal is to destroy Christian nationalist culture. LGBTQ is just one avenue...to disengenuously elevate LGBTQ above all other issues as a club against white males...all for Jewish megalomania

yellow vests france nonviolent protest 1 percent 99 percent midwest trump populism
The Yellow Vests movement in France has severely weakoned the (((globalist Jews))) despite government attempts to infiltrate groups with violent actors

newsfollowup link 9-11 jfk holocaust hoax cultural marxism to modern events
Go to original NewsFollowup.com home page

cultural marxism frankfurt school jews destroy western culture marxism socialism communism illegal immigration
Immigration drives are funded by deep state cultural marxists to advance the cause of socialism then Communism

cultural marxism frankfurt school jews destroy western culture marxism socialism communism illegal immigration
Communism is just Talmudism politicized.. both seek centralized power, abolish the family, state and Christian religion

9-11 truth israel nuked wtc silverstein netanyahu false flag war iraq afghanistan patriot act
9/11 was a false flag attack on America by a cabal consisting of Israel, US, Britain and Saudi Arabia...executed to start Iraq War

................................................

CONFIDENTIAL REPORT: Chinese State Reportedly Gave Hunter $6.5 billion to Invest
October 27, 2020 James Fetzer blog
The Government Rag
[Editor’s note: Christopher Balding, the author, is an associate professor at Fulbright University Vietnam in Ho Chi Minh City and author of “Sovereign Wealth Funds: The New Intersection of Money and Power.” Mr. Balding is a two time winner of Lifetime Achievement awards. Christopher released a 63-page report, titled “Project Time,” which was conducted by Typhoon Investigations. The report was initially researched for a client “who was concerned about financial risk” to his investments, originating from the overall political risks.]

———————–

A number of months ago, I was approached by an individual I had known for the better half of a decade. I had known this individually professionally and enjoyed their company and deep insight into our overlapping professional interests. Consequently, I would not infrequently seek out their professional opinion. They had written a research report for a client worried about political risk that involved background on the Biden’s in China. This individual believed that the information that had been discovered, and with the approval of the client, needed to make its way into the public domain.

They asked my help in putting the research report in the hands of press asking them just to use the information for their own professional purposes leaving the report anonymous. Knowing this individual and the quality of work they do, I agreed after reviewing in detail the report that was produced. There are a couple of key points about the report.

First, it is almost exclusively taken from public sources and documentation. Everything from Chinese news reports to corporate records. The report is immaculately cited so that anyone who wishes to replicate where a specific piece of information was found or see the underlying documentation can do so.

Second, the complexity of the overall story, attempts have been made to break down the key points about what happened, who was involved, with timelines and indexes.

Third, only three human sources are used in the report. Two human sources only confirmed top line information in the acknowledgement of an individual and no other information. The third human source was not consulted for the story but agreed to let the information be used for the story after the importance of the information became apparent.

For two months I have worked on behalf of my colleague to ensure that this report helped others report on the documented evidence of Biden activities with regards to China. I want to emphasize a couple of things about my own involvement.

First, I did not write the report and I am not responsible for the report. I have gone over the report with a fine tooth comb and can find nothing factually wrong with the report. Everything is cited and documented. Arguably the only weakness is that we do not have internal emails between Chinese players or the Chinese and Bidens that would make explicit what the links clearly imply.

Second, I will not be disclosing the individual who did write this report. They have very valid reasons to fear for both their personal safety and professional risks. Throughout the years that I have known this individual we never discussed politics. I have never heard them criticize any political party other than the CCP. They are not a Republican.

Third, it was my very real wish that the press would have reported on the documented evidence in this report and left me and the author entirely out of this situation. I did not vote for Trump in 2016 and will not vote for him in 2020. This information however is entirely valid public interest information that the press has simply refused to cover due to their own partisan wishes. I have serious policy differences with President Trump. I am pro-immigration. I would like to see more free trade efforts to shift trade away from China and into partner countries from Mexico to Vietnam and India. I believe that institution building in Asia is vital and America needs to take that lead. However, I cannot in good conscience allow documented evidence of the variety presented here go unreported by partisans who are simply choosing to hide information.

Finally, I will not be answering any questions about the report. I had no wish to be involved in Presidential politics. I do not want to be on the news. I will not be answer any questions about who wrote the report. We need to return the focus to the known documented facts.

The Official Report
Key Points of the Report:
Joe Biden’s compromising partnership with the Communist Party of China runs via Yang Jiechi (CPC’s Central Foreign Affairs Commission). YANG met frequently with BIDEN during his tenure at the Chinese embassy in Washington.

Hunter Biden’s 2013 Bohai Harvest Rosemont investment partnership was set-up by Ministry of Foreign Affairs institutions who are tasked with garnering influence with foreign leaders during YANG’s tenure as Foreign Minister.

HUNTER has a direct line to the Politburo, according to SOURCE A, a senior finance professional in China.

Michael Lin, a Taiwanese national now detained in China, brokered the BHR partnership and partners with MOFA foreign influence organizations.

LIN is a POI for his work on behalf of China, as confirmed by SOURCE B and SOURCE C (at two separate national intelligence agencies).

BHR is a state managed operation. Leading shareholder in BHR is a Bank of China which lists BHR as a subsidiary and BHR’s partners are SOEs that funnel revenue/assets to BHR.

HUNTER continues to hold 10% in BHR. He visited China in 2010 and met with major Chinese government financial companies that would later back BHR.

HUNTER’s BHR stake (purchased for $400,000) is now likely be worth approx. $50 million (fees and capital appreciation based on BHR’s $6.5 billion AUM as stated by Michael Lin).

HUNTER also did business with Chinese tycoons linked with the Chinese military and against the interests of US national security.

BIDEN’s foreign policy stance towards China (formerly hawkish), turned positive despite China’s country’s rising geopolitical assertiveness.

SUMMARY
Lost among the salacious revelations about laptop provenance is the more mundane reality of influence and money of major United States political figures. Ill informed accusations of Russian hacking and disinformation face the documented reality of a major Chinese state financial partnership with the children of major political figures. A report by an Asian research firm raises worrying questions about the financial links between China and Hunter Biden.

Beginning just before Joe Bidens ascendancy to the Vice Presidency, Hunter Biden was travelling to Beijing meeting with Chinese financial institutions and political figures would ultimately become his investors. Finalized in 2013, the investment partnership included money from the Chinese government, social security, and major state-owned banks a veritable who’s who of Chinese state finance.

It is not simply the state money that should cause concern but the structures and deals that took place. Most investment in specific projects came from state owned entities and flowed into state backed projects or enterprises. Even the deals speak to the worst of cronyism. The Hunter Biden investment firm share of a copper mine in the Congo was guaranteed with assets put at risk by the larger copper company to ensure deal flow to Hunter’s firm.

In another instance, Bank of China working on an IPO in Hong Kong gave its share allocation to the BHR investment partnership. They were able to do this because even though the Hunter Biden firm completed no notable work on the IPO, it is counted as a subsidiary of the Bank of China. The Hunter Biden Chinese investment partnership is literally invested in by the Chinese state and a subsidiary of the Bank of China owned by the Chinese Ministry of Finance.

The entire arrangement speaks to Chinese state interests. Meetings were held at locations that in China speak to the welcoming of foreign dignitaries or state to state relations. The Chinese organizations surrounding Hunter Biden are known intelligence and influence operatives to the United States government. The innocuous names like Chinese People’s Institute for Foreign Affairs exist to “…carry out government-directed policies and cooperative initiatives with influential foreigners without being perceived as a formal part of the Chinese government.”

Interestingly the CPIFA is under the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. When the investment partnership was struck in 2013, the Minister of Foreign Affairs was Yang Jiechi. Yang would have been very familiar with Hunter Biden from his days in Washington as the Chinese Ambassador to the United States from 2001 to 2005 during which he met regularly with Joe Biden chairing the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Today the same individual who oversaw institutions helping shepherd Hunter’s investment partnership as the Minister of Foreign Affairs is Xi Jinping’s right hand man on foreign affairs and member of the powerful Politburo.

Most worrying is the financial leverage this gives the Chinese state over a direct member of the Biden family. Despite the widely reported $1-1.5 billion of investment the reality is likely much higher. A co-founder of the investment firm reports the total assets under management as $6.5 billion. While this number cannot be completely replicated, given that two deal alone were worth in excess of $1.6 billion this number is not unrealistic at all. A 2% annual fee on assets under management would generate $130 million annually. Add in the 20% fee on capital gains the firm would recognize and it is not difficult to see Hunter’s stake being worth in excess of $50 million.

According to Hunter’s attorney, he did not invest his $400,000 in the company until 2017. Even assuming the veracity of this statement, this raises a major problem. Founded in 2013, the firm had large amounts of revenue and assets under management by 2017. In other words, his $400,000 stake would have already been worth far more than what he paid for it. This paltry $400,000 investment worth more than $50 million now would have realized a gain of more than 12,400% in three years.

The difficulty in eluding these concerns is their documentability by anyone who cares to look. There is no potential for hacking because it is all public record in China. Any journalist who wishes to look can go review IPO prospectuses, news reports, or corporate records. There is no secret method for discovering this data other than actually looking. There is simply no way to avoid the reality that Hunter Biden was granted a 10% stake worth far in excess of what he paid for a firm that is literally operated and owned by the Chinese state.

I did not vote for Donald Trump in 2016 and have significant concerns about his policies in areas like immigration. Having lived in China for nine years throughout the Xi regimes construction of concentration camps and having witnessed first hand their use of influence and intelligence operations, the Biden links worry me profoundly.

Whether Joe Biden personally knew the details, a very untenable position, it is simply political malpractice to not be aware of the details of these financial arrangements. These documentable financial links simply cannot be wished away.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Lude Media, Biden Family Corruption, Three Hard Drives

Lude Media Revealing Shocking Information About Three Hard Drives Involving the Chinese Communist Party, the Biden Family and More
By GM65 2020-10-14 02:56 6 7216
Oct 13, the media channel of the anti-CCP “Whistleblower Movement”, Lude Media, revealed some shocking information related to the Communist China and the U.S. politics.

According to Lude, three hard drives were secretly handed to the American government, as a result of the factional battles within the CCP. The contents of the drives are allegedly about the corruption, collusion and conspiracy between the Chinese Communist Party and members of the former U.S. governments, including the Biden family. In the Oct. 13 Evening Episode, Lude revealed some details of the hard drives.

Here are some takeaways from the discussions of Lude and his guest speakers.

The hard drives contain billion-dollar deals between Hunter Biden and the CCP, as well as photos and video footages of Hunter Biden himself involving drugs and sexual activities.

The hard drives were sent to United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and FBI a year ago, but was put on hold then, without any public awareness. Meanwhile, Biden defended his son for being innocent.

In about 2012, when Joe Biden was the Vice President of the Obama Administration, he allegedly leaked the information of 36 CIA agents deployed in China to the CCP, leading to their deaths.

The U.S. governments have long been the targets of the CCP’s infiltration, referred to by some insiders as the “Blue-Golden-Yellow Scheme”, which means using money and sex bribes to set up and control their target persons and organizations. The CCP’s operations have been secret and in depth, and are not without significant success.

For more than 70 years, the CCP have been enslaving and exploiting the Chinese people. The CCP cadres all transfer and hide the money they have stolen from the Chinese people, their children, legitimate and illegitimate, their assets for their families in the safe and advanced societies like the United States. Whoever controls the information of where their money is and who their children are, controls the CCP. This is especially critical to the factional struggles within the Party. That’s why the CCP factions, the core members, compete with each other in “networking” with the U.S. government. The winning part get protection from their U.S. collaborators and, in return, help them with the “donkey vs. elephant” races using the CCP malign operations like propaganda and cyber attacks.

It is said that the Biden family and Xi have trillion-dollar deals, because Biden had provided Xi with such information of Xi’s rivals. In return, Xi granted Biden tremendous benefits in China, which is probably a share of the “trophy” in the “anti-corruption actions” to take down their rivals. Also, according to Lude, Xi’s faction is doing Biden a favor in the 2020 Election.

The CCP’s goal is to take control of the world and rewrite the rules. If Biden wins the election, the CCP will probably have a big step forward towards their goal. The peoples, especially the Chinese people will be doomed.

The U.S. government and intelligence probably already have the full map of where the CCP is hiding their money and successors.

The CCP has also recruited some spies and former human rights activists using money and threats, planting them in the western societies for purposes of propaganda and persecution of real anti-CCP fighters. A big difference between the former and the latter is if the former are saying “anti-CCP” and the latter, are really taking down the CCP.

President Trump says he is not a politician. A lot of the “elites” don’t like him or Mr. Bannon.

In order to take down the CCP, there must be an insider who knows it very well, and at the same time, believes in justice and the welfare of humanity, to stand up and fight against it. This person also needs to confront the CCP collaborators and running-dogs in the west. The “Whistleblower Movement” is a group of Chinese people led by Mr. Miles Guo carrying out the life career of taking down the CCP and fighting for the deplorable. We have many American allies and friends, to whom we are very grateful.

The reason that the CCP can succeed this far is because they don’t play by rules, but at the same time, control a large country like China and a huge population like the Chinese people. They know human nature very well, especially the evil side. They are evil with excessive wealth and power. We must take down the CCP, or there’s no future of humanity.

Lude said more details about the hard drives will be released in the following live broadcasts. Also, Mr. Bannon will be joining him and talk about it. Please stay tuned!

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Joe Biden: In Israel's Service
Poster Boy for "Dual Loyalties"
JEFFREY BLANKFORT • JUNE 11, 2010 • 3,200 WORDS • LEAVE A COMMENT
Israel appears to be in more serious trouble diplomatically than at any time in its history following the botched attack by an “elite” commando squad on the Mavi Marmara in the early morning hours of June 1 that left at least nine dead and scores wounded. Thanks to Al-Jazeera and Iran’s PressTV, whose reporters were aboard the ship, much of the world was able to watch the attack unfold on its TV and computer screens and the result has been an avalanche of outrage and ongoing protests against the Jewish state. Within Israel this has led to finger-pointing and calls for resignations while its hasbara machinery has gone rapidly into damage-control and disinformation mode.

Lest we forget, the first U.S. official to give Israel’s bloody assault a thumbs up sign was Vice President Joe Biden. The former Delaware senator has been a key part of Israel’s hasbara branch, American section, since entering the Senate in 1973 and on the Wednesday following the Israeli attack, he appeared on the Charlie Rose Show where he showed no hesitation in defending Israel’s handling of the raid, something that President Obama had been reluctant to do.

On the following morning, Jerusalem Post Editor David Horvitz speaking for 45 minutes to Congressional staffers and AIPAC members on a conference call praised Biden’s performance. “It is not entirely clear in Israel where America stands,” he said, but “Israel was very pleased with what Joe Biden had to say.”

But isn’t that why Joe was picked for the job? Was it not to get the vote and the money from those Jews who were afraid that Barack Obama –who they suspected of being a closet Muslim—was no true friend of Israel?

Obama picked Biden “who is about as close to the pro-Israel community as any member of either house,” observed MJ Rosenberg, a former AIPAC staffer, on TPM Café, just after Biden’s selection. “Biden is rated 100 per cent by AIPAC … When he goes to the synagogues in Florida, he goes not as a visitor but as ‘mishpocha’ [family]. The Jews simply love the guy.”

“Bottom line,” concluded Rosenberg, “the Biden choice pretty much eliminated Obama’s ‘Jewish problem.’” That was then and now it doesn’t seem to matter what position Obama takes, Biden seems to answer to his real boss. And it ain’t Barack.

Appearing on the Charlie Rose show was but the latest assignment for Biden in his long career of serving Israel, the first 35 years of which he was drawing salary and gaining political clout as a US Senator for a state whose population is only slightly larger than that of San Francisco (783,600 to 776,733).

“Look,” Biden told Rose in a rambling monologue in which he confused Ehud Barak with Ariel Sharon, “you can argue whether Israel should have dropped people onto that ship or not … but the truth of the matter is, Israel has a right to know — they’re at war with Hamas — has a right to know whether or not arms are being smuggled in. And up to now, Charlie, what’s happened? They’ve said, ‘Here you go. You’re in the Mediterranean. This ship — if you divert slightly north you can unload it and we’ll get the stuff into Gaza.’ So what’s the big deal here? What’s the big deal of insisting it go straight to Gaza? Well, it’s legitimate for Israel to say, ‘I don’t know what’s on that ship. These guys are dropping eight — 3,000 rockets on my people.’ ”

No big deal, Joe, at least nine dead, or four less than the number of Israelis killed since the first Palestinian rocket was fired from Gaza. And notice how easily he says “my” and pretends that rockets are still being fired from Gaza.

That “my” was not a Freudian slip. Like scores of other US politicians who have traded their political souls for access to the seemingly bottomless checking accounts of Israel’s American supporters, Biden has become a poster boy for “dual loyalty.” Given that he has done this as a member of Congress and continues to do so while now a heartbeat from the White House should probably qualify him for a treason trial and a cell next to Jonathan Pollard.

Back in 2007, on one of his many visits to Israel, he told a Shalom TV interviewer that the Jewish state was “the single greatest strength America has in the Middle East.” Going beyond the standard AIPAC scripted boilerplate, Biden stated, “When I was a young senator, I used to say, ‘If I were a Jew I’d be a Zionist.’ I am a Zionist,” he said. “You don’t have to be a Jew to be a Zionist.”

Asked about his prospective cell neighbor, sentenced to life-imprisonment in 1985 for turning over mounds of top secret information to Israel, Biden spoke of leniency for Pollard but not a pardon.

“There’s a rationale, in my view, why Pollard should be given leniency, “said Biden. But there is not a rationale to say, ‘What happened did not happen and should be pardoned.'” In other words, should Biden become president, it is likely that Pollard would be freed.

Looking at Biden’s track record, it would seem that he has not just been a key cheerleader for Israel; he has aspired to be a member of its coaching staff.

Speaking to an AIPAC meeting in 1992, he was quoted by the organization’s Near East Report as saying that it was time to “tell the American people straight out that it’s in our naked self-interest to see to it that the moral commitment and political commitment is kept with regard to Israel and that Israel is not the cause of our problem, but the essence of the solution.” This was in response to President George H.W. Bush’s second refusal to support Israel’s demand for $10 billion in loan guarantees. Which of America’s problems Israel was able to solve Biden didn’t mention.

In December, 1995, two years after Oslo, he spoke at an AIPAC meeting in San Francisco and told a lunchtime audience that included most of the Bay Area’s public officials that they needed to spend more time educating new members of Congress about the wonders of Israel and its strategic value to the US:

“Be prepared to both convert and be prepared to deal with those who are not converted….

“Israel is taking more chances on her security today than any time in her history….Arabs make peace with Israel only when they realize that they can’t drive a wedge between the US and Israel. We cannot afford to publicly criticize Israel.” This past March, back in Israel on a “fence-mending” assignment, just before he was blindsided by the announcement of Israel’s plan to build 1600 new Jewish housing units in East Jerusalem, Biden had modified his “can’t drive a wedge” to read “there is no space between.”

At that time Biden gave his San Francisco speech, he had taken in over $100,000 from pro-Israel PACs which was small change compared to what he had received in individual donations. By far the largest of these came in 1988, when he made his first bid for the presidency. It was a $1.5 million gift from San Francisco financial real estate magnate Walter Shorenstein, who was, by no coincidence, AIPAC’s main man in California as well a major player in the state’s Democratic Party. It turned out to be a poor investment since that was the year that Biden was caught plagiarizing a speech by British Labor leader Neil Kinnock and had to withdraw from the race.

In 2007, true to form, Biden took the lead in the Senate in rejecting the Iraq Study Group’s conclusion that the United States would not be able to achieve its goals in Iraq unless it “deals directly with the Arab-Israeli conflict,” a view taken more recently by Gen. David Petraeus.

“I do not accept the notion of linkage between Iraq and the Arab-Israeli conflict,” Biden said during his opening remarks at a January 17, 2007, Senate hearing. “Arab-Israeli peace is worth pursuing vigorously on its own merits, but even if a peace treaty were signed tomorrow, it would not end the civil war in Iraq.” It was not that the study group said that it would but it was convenient straw man for Biden.

It was not his first comment on Iraq. It may be recalled that on May 1, 2006, Biden had co-authored an op-ed piece for the NY Times with his guru, Leslie Gelb, a former Times columnist and president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations, that called for Iraq to be divided into three confessional states. It was starkly similar to what had been written in a policy paper back in 1982 by Oded Yinon, a senior Israeli foreign affairs official, in which he wrote that, “To dissolve Iraq is even more important for us than dissolving Syria. In the short term, it’s Iraqi power that constitutes the greatest threat to Israel.” Gelb had first raised the issue in an op-ed in the Times in November, 2003.

During the 2008 election campaign Biden was outraged to find his loyalty to Israel being questioned by what he reportedly thought was AIPAC but which turned out to be the Republican Jewish Coalition. The RJC had accused him of not towing the AIPAC line on one or two occasions which caused Biden to defend his willingness to oppose AIPAC on some pieces of legislation.

In a 20-minute conference call with members of the Jewish media that September, Biden said it was up to the Israelis to make decisions about war and peace, including whether to launch a strike aimed at disrupting Iran’s nuclear program.

“This is not a question for us to tell the Israelis what they can and cannot do,” said the Democratic vice presidential candidate. “”Israel has the right to defend itself and it doesn’t have to ask, just as any other free and independent country. I have faith in the democracy of Israel. They will arrive at the right decision that they view as being in their own interests.” That as vice-president his job would be to protect US interests and not Israel’s and that an attack on Iran might jeopardize American interests either had not occurred to him or was of no concern.

In the interview, Biden tried to position himself as being even more pro-Israel than AIPAC, vigorously defending his record of occasionally breaking ranks with the pro-Israel lobby. “AIPAC does not speak for the entire American Jewish community,” he said. “There’s other organizations as strong and as consequential.”

Moreover, Biden insisted, “I will take a back seat to no one, and again, no one in AIPAC or any other organization, in terms of questioning my support of the State of Israel.”

“Insiders at the lobby were more bemused than offended by the outburst” wrote the Jewish Telegraphic Agency’s Ron Kampeas, “saying they regarded Biden as essentially pro-Israel. Sources familiar with the situation said the Obama camp’s explanation was that Biden had mistakenly thought it was AIPAC who had criticized him, as opposed to the RJC.”

Upset at the RJC’s questioning of Biden’s pro-Israel credentials The New Republic’s Marty Peretz, entered the lists in his behalf. Wrote Peretz in TNR and the Jerusalem Post in September,2008:

“If ever there was a true friend of Israel in the United States Senate it is Joe Biden. Oh yes, there were also Owen Brewster, Republican from Maine, and Guy Gillette, Democrat from Iowa. But that goes back to the very founding of the state.

“This is not hyperbole about Biden. It is true. And it is so not just on a philosophical basis but in deeds, too. Biden is a true friend on both a higher and a deeper level, and he has been that for three and a half decades. It is reckless for Jews to trifle with such allies. We have, as I’ve said, many friends. But what we do not have is many such allies – formidable, expert, truly passionate.”

Following the election and now, as vice-president, Biden continued to merit Peretz’s confidence. Speaking at AIPAC’s 2009 policy conference in Washington, he began by describing how he had been warmly welcomed on a visit to Israel in 1973 as a freshman senator by Prime Minister Golda Meir and befriended by Yitzhak Rabin. Then, to loud rounds of applause, he told his audience:

“[W]e have to pursue every opportunity for progress while standing up for one core principle: First, Israel’s security is non-negotiable. Period. Period. [sic]Our commitment is unshakeable. We will continue to provide Israel with the assistance that it needs. We will continue to defend Israel’s right to defend itself and make its own judgments about what it needs to do to defend itself.”

Toward the end of his speech, Biden timorously advanced a position that has long been official US policy. “You’re not going to like my saying this,” he said, but [do]not build more settlements, dismantle existing outposts, and allow the Palestinians freedom of movement.” There was no applause.

In 1994, Biden was a key player in one of the ugliest episodes in American political history and one that characterizes the subservience of Washington to Israel in its way much as did the cover-up of Israel ‘s attack on the USS Liberty 53 years ago on June 8th.

It featured a star chamber recantation before a confirmation hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, chaired by Biden, of Strobe Talbott, former Soviet affairs analyst for Time, of an article he had written, following his nomination as Deputy Secretary of State by Bill Clinton. Talbott was facing the inquisition as a result of a major article he had written for the magazine in 1981, “What to do about Israel” (9/7/81). In it, Talbott had advocated a new policy towards Israel-US relations that would “rescue that relationship… starting with the delusion that Israel is, or ever has been, primarily a strategic ally.”

While expressing the obligatory degree of affection for Israel, Talbott had not been equivocal. Referring to problems that had been created for the Reagan administration by Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, Talbott wrote in words, especially pertinent today, “His country does need the US for its survival, but the sad fact is that Israel is well on its way to becoming not just a dubious asset but an outright liability to American security interests, both in the Middle East and worldwide.”

Talbott was referring to Israel’s destruction of the Iraqi nuclear reactor at Osirak and a deadly bombing raid over Beirut that killed over 100 people and wounded 600 more, most of them civilians. Talbott had advised that, “If Israel continues to take international law into its own hands as violently—and as embarrassingly to the US—as it did in Baghdad and Beirut, then the next display of US displeasure ought to be more sustained and less symbolic. It might include severe cutbacks in American military aid, which is $1.2 billion for fiscal ’81 alone.[It is now officially $3 billion].

Pressed to recant, Talbott uttered the required response. As reported by the New York Times’ Steven Greenhouse,

“‘I do want to set the record straight on the question of my view of Israel as a strategic asset,’ he said, sounding chastened and contrite. ‘On that I have simply changed my opinion.’

“On the other hand, straining to reassure supporters of Israel, Mr. Talbott said, ‘I have always believed that the US-Israeli relationship is unshakable. Second, I have always believed that a strong Israel is in America’s interest because it serves the cause of peace and stability in the region…’

“During his 21 years at Time, Mr. Talbott often criticized Israel. Today he took a markedly different tone, portraying himself as a friend of Israel.”

In the article Talbott, had written that “Begin recognized that American Jews wield influence far beyond their numbers, but he also knew that there is considerable pent-up irritation in the US with the power of the pro-Israel lobby (which includes, of course, many non-Jews).” It was clearly his own opinion, as well.

Biden, according to the NY Times, jumped on that statement, calling it,“totally inappropriate,” to which Talbott, “asserting that no sight was intended,” noted that this “was simply a statement of fact,” and turned to Sen. Bernard Metzenbaum from his home state of Ohio for confirmation. Metzenbaum said that he was “satisfied” with Talbott’s remarks, but, “Maybe, in retrospect, he might have changed some phrases or some paragraphs.”

Mind you, Talbott had questioned Israel’s strategic value to the US in 1981, in the heart of the Cold War when he was considered one of the main stream media’s ranking Soviet experts. Before going before the Senate, he had become a senior advisor on the former Soviet Union to the Clinton White House. By 1994, with the Soviet bloc no longer in the picture, it was generally agreed, even in Tel Aviv, that Israel’s value to the US had been severely diminished.

Biden went on, citing the same article, noted that Talbott also had written: “Israel has been a credit to itself and its American backers.”

Playing the role of Torquemada, he asked Talbott, “Do you believe that?”

“Yes, senator, I do,” he obediently replied.

His “conversion” process having been completed, Talbott received the senator’s and subsequently the Senate’s approval.

The reader should not be left with the impression that Joe Biden’s prime passions are limited to the love of Israel.

While in the Senate, he was a key supporter of the credit card industry, much of which is based in Delaware thanks to its cozy industry friendly tax laws and he was a key beneficiary of its campaign contributions. In return, he became a leading supporter of the “Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005” which, despite its title, made it harder for consumers to get protection under bankruptcy.

Biden was one of the first Democratic supporters of the bill and voted for it four times until it finally passed in March, 2005. Twisting the truth, a spokesman for Sen. Obama told the NY Times, “Senator Biden took on entrenched interests and succeeded in improving the bill for low-income workers, women and children.”

But even the Times wasn’t buying that. Biden, the paper noted, was one of only five Democrats who voted against a proposal that would require credit card companies to provide more effective warnings to consumers about the consequences of paying only the minimum amount due each month. Obama had voted for it.

Biden differed with Obama again when he helped to defeat amendments which would have strengthened protections for people forced into bankruptcy who have large medical debts or are in the military. He was also one of four Democrats who sided with Republicans to defeat an effort, supported by Obama, to shift responsibility in certain cases from debtors to the predatory lenders who helped push them into bankruptcy.

So why did Obama pick Biden for his running mate? We already know the answer.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Kamala Harris, prominent Democrats listed as ‘key contacts’ for Biden family business venture projects
JANET ♦ 10/23/2020 ♦

A list of “key domestic contacts” for a joint venture involving Jim and Hunter Biden and now-bankrupt CEFC China Energy Co. included former Vice President Joe Biden‘s current running mate Sen. Kamala Harris, among other prominent Democrats, Fox News has learned.

An email exclusively obtained by Fox News, with the subject line “Phase one domestic contacts/ projects” and dated May 15, 2017, Biden’s brother, Jim Biden, shared a list of “key domestic contacts for phase one target projects.”

The email is unrelated to the laptop or hard drive purportedly belonging to Hunter Biden, the former vice president’s son.

The list, included Harris, D-Calif.; Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.; Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn.; Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.; Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y.; New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo; New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio; former Virginia Gov. Terry McCauliffe, among others.

It is unclear if any of the Democrats were ever contacted about the “target projects.”

The email was sent from Jim to Hunter Biden, Tony Bobulinski, Rob Walker and James Gilliar.

Bobulinksi was an institutional investor who was recruited by the Biden family to run their joint-venture with now-bankrupt CEFC China Energy Co.

Bobulinski is a former Lieutenant in the U.S. Navy, and served as the CEO of SinoHawk Holdings, which he said was the partnership between the CEFC/ Chairman Ye and the Biden family.

“I was brought into the company to be the CEO by James Gilliar and Hunter Biden,” Bobulinski said in a statement to Fox News. “The reference to “the Big Guy” in the much-publicized May 13, 2017 email is in fact a reference to Joe Biden. The other “JB” referenced in that email is Jim Biden, Joe’s brother.”

Bobulinski was referring to an email, Fox News obtained last week, dated May 13, 2017, which included a discussion of “remuneration packages” for six people in a business deal with a Chinese energy firm. The email appeared to identify Biden as “Chair / Vice Chair depending on agreement with CEFC,” in an apparent reference to now-bankrupt CEFC China Energy Co.

Fox News

The email includes a note that “Hunter has some office expectations he will elaborate.” A proposed equity split references “20” for “H” and “10 held by H for the big guy?” with no further details.

The Biden campaign has said it has released the former vice president’s tax documents and returns, which do not reflect any involvement with Chinese investments. The campaign declined to comment to Fox News Thursday morning, and Harris’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Bobulinski, in a statement to Fox News, said “Hunter Biden called his dad ‘the Big Guy’ or ‘my Chairman,’ and frequently referenced asking him for his sign-off or advice on various potential deals that we were discussing.”

“I’ve seen Vice President Biden saying he never talked to Hunter about his business,” Bobulinski said “I’ve seen firsthand that that’s not true, because it wasn’t just Hunter’s business, they said they were putting the Biden family name and its legacy on the line.”

Fox News

He added: “ I realized the Chinese were not really focused on a healthy financial ROI. They were looking at this as a political or influence investment.”

“Once I realized that Hunter wanted to use the company as his personal piggy bank by just taking money out of it as soon as it came from the Chinese, I took steps to prevent that from happening,” Bobulinski said, adding that he asks “the Biden family to address the American people and outline the facts so I can go back to being irrelevant — and so I am not put in a position to have to answer those questions for them.”

Bobulinski said he doesn’t “have a political ax to grind.”

“I just saw behind the Biden curtain and I grew concerned with what I saw,” he said. “The Biden family aggressively leveraged the Biden family name to make millions of dollars from foreign entities even though some were from communist-controlled China.”

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

China’s Communist Party is backing the left’s revolution, seeking our downfall and subjugation
By Norman Rogers, AmericanThinker


See also: Forget the Hunter Biden sex tapes. The real news is much bigger than that.

Communism is very much alive and well in China. The tactics of concentration camps and big lies sponsored by a corrupt nomenklatura killing each other for political power are the staples of communism. The tactic of embracing capitalism temporarily to save communism from its own incompetence was previewed by Lenin’s New Economic Policy in the 1920’s. The flocks of western intellectuals, academics and businessmen, that embraced Soviet communism in the 20th century have been replaced by a new generation, similarly duped, or compromised, except that the object of their affection is communist China rather than Russia.

The demonization of U.S. police as racists killing black people, is a tactic designed to defang the police and give free rein to marauding mobs. A breakdown of order serves the left’s attempts to gain power. It provides a crisis, something that must not be wasted according to Obama’s former chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel. Disorder scares the hell out of normal people and makes them vulnerable to accepting radical changes like abolishing the police, a move that would result in rule by leftist mobs. It’s pathetic how privileged youth fall for this lie about the police. They are products of our educational system, one of the institutions that the left has been marching through for decades. The Italian communist Antonio Gramsci and the German communist Rudi Dutschike are both credited with the idea of the left marching through institutions, like the schools and courts, as a means of stealthily imposing communism, probably renamed true democracy.

It is remarkable that the New York Times is embracing left revolution by ignoring and covering up the very obvious fact that Biden is bought and paid for by the Chinese communists.

In the 1930’s the Times was an apologist for Soviet Russia and Stalin. In 1932 the Times’ Moscow Bureau Chief, Walter Duranty, won a Pulitzer prize, apparently for his glorification of the Soviet Union, while famine raged in Ukraine, a famine deliberately imposed by Stalin.

Now a Pulitzer has been won for the vicious rewriting of American history featured by the New York Times, the 1619 Project. The first slave ships arrived in 1619. The left is busy turning the 1619 Project into a school curriculum. The object of the 1619 Project is to claim that America is all about racism and to destroy young people’s attachment to their country.

Promoting Biden as president serves the objective of the left. Since he is grossly corrupt, when the time comes to get rid of him, it will not be necessary to fabricate false charges. That he suffers from age related mental decline is all the better, making it easy to manipulate him.

The many refugees from Russia 90 years ago were largely ignored by the intelligentsia of the time. They saw the refugees as supporters of the Czar with heavy Russian accents. The Chinese diaspora suffers from problems similar to the Russian refuges from communism. Many Chinese in the West understand all too well the tactics of the communists. The Biden revelations have struck a chord with this immigrant community. Chinese anti-communist immigrants, who traditionally kept their distance from U.S. politics, are suddenly waking up and asking how to contribute money to Trump and even how to vote.

The Chinese billionaire, Guo Wengui (Miles Kowk), a refugee in the U.S., leads a movement of Chinese expatriates that aims to destroy the Chinese Communist Party. The anti-communist Chinese immigrant community has difficulty competing with the smooth and polished propaganda of the communist Chinese regime. Their children in theory could be more successful as anti-communist political activists, but the children are corrupted by the American educational system and the general ignorance of American youth. The Chinese kids lack the passion and life experience of their parents.

It is not far-fetched that the Chinese communist party, like the Russian party, could be brought down. Guo Wengui is the number one target of the communist regime because he presents a great danger to the communists. As a former insider he understands the regime as few do. They would kill him instantly, given the opportunity. It is not far-fetched to think that Biden could be persuaded to deport Guo to China if he becomes president.

Nothing illustrates the weakness of the CCP more than the fact that their members send their kids to college in the West and stash money in western banks. They try to obtain passports and citizenship from Canada or the U.S. They know that they could wake up tomorrow without property and possibly banished to a remote village or prison.

The communists compromise people with money, sex and intimidation. Rooms in hotels open to foreigners in China are wired for video and sound. Sexpionage uses women to target and blackmail foreigners. Taiwanese businessmen routinely push a sofa against hotel doors to prevent waking up with a woman in their bed. Chinese immigrants must always worry about their relatives back in China. Chinese intelligence vacuums data from the cellphones and computers of foreign visitors. In the Muslim region of Xinjiang knives have QR codes tying them to the owner. Huge numbers of these Muslims have been sent to prison camps.

It is unlikely that Biden is the only high U.S. official compromised by the Chinese regime. Kamala Harris’s husband works for a firm that represents Chinese communist interests. Senator Diane Feinstein’s husband is also tied to China. The Chinese don’t buy Americans with bags of cash. They use law firm fees, consulting contracts or business deals.

There is no doubt that public opinion and elite opinion is turning against China. The long romance between American intellectuals and Soviet Russia was marked by temporary breakups: the Moscow show trials, the Hitler-Stalin pact, the enslavement of Eastern Europe, the theft of the atomic bomb secrets, Khrushchev’s exposure of Stalin’s crimes, and the publication of the Solzhenitsyn’s The Gulag Archipelago. What is remarkable is the temporary nature of each disillusionment. The Western Communists have an amazing capacity to stick with communism, no matter how many terrible things are exposed. The Chinese record is not much different: Mao’s slaughter of landlords, the backyard blast furnaces, the great famine, the Cultural Revolution, Tiananmen Square, and the oppression of Hong Kong. The westerners that have been compromised with money or that have been blackmailed are paralyzed by fear of exposure. There needs to be a mechanism for these people to confess and receive absolution and redemption.

What is scary is the success of Chinese imperialism and subversion. Our best hope and the best hope for the Chinese people is the reelection of Donald Trump

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Mr. R. Hunter Biden is not a vagrant, he has a very high-paying job! Who do you work for? Who pays? Where does the money come from?Who is he with?
Oct. 26
Author: Rose sky

Who belongs to the White House office/who is monitoring and taking pictures? Who do you work for? What are they talking about? What to sell/get? Do the American people have the right until? Do the American people want to know?

Hunter Biden is said to be unemployed and has no expertise. At present, the gtv media exclusively broke the news, revealing the truth and the criminal group that has been committing crimes. Evidence shows that Hunter Biden works in a financial company in the Chinese Communist Party and holds a huge amount of shares. These stolen positions and wealth fully satisfy his fornication life, not only that, but also involve sex crimes and drugs. . . The revelation continues. . .

Who is lying? Who is deceiving everyone? Who is betraying the country?

Statistics show that not only is the Communist Party of China a thief of the country, the Biden family is also a thief of the United States. They betrayed their country and the interests of the United States and the American people. Use this switch to get dirty benefits and live a criminal life. Moreover, there has been no obstacle. Because many people in the United States are already in the same category! Including FBI and CIA are involved. This is a transnational criminal group! They are threatening the safety of the American people, the Chinese people and all mankind!

Director of Bohai Huamei (Shanghai) Equity Investment Fund Management Co., Ltd.

Career Information: Investor Analyst

Note: All the above data comes from Zero2IPO Private Equity

Introduction

Mr. R. Hunter Biden is currently the director of Bohai Huamei (Shanghai) Equity Investment Fund Management Co., Ltd. Managing partner of RSP and consultant of Boies Schiller Flexner LPP.

Mr. Biden is currently the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the World Food Program’s U.S. Program and a director of the non-profit National Policy Center, the Truman National Security Program, and the American Alliance. Mr. Biden is also a member of the Development Executive Committee of the Center for International Strategic Studies of the United States, the Chairman’s Advisory Committee of the National Institute of Democracy, and the Chairman’s Advisory Committee of the Catholic Charity Church in Washington, DC. From 2006 to 2009, Mr. Biden served as a director of Amtrak, and from 2007 to 2009, he served as the company’s vice chairman. Prior to this, Mr. Biden also participated in the founding of Oldaker Biden Belair LLP and was appointed by President Clinton. Mr. Biden also served as the executive director of the e-commerce policy coordination agency under the US Secretary of Commerce William Daley*.

Mr. Biden received a bachelor’s degree from Georgetown University and a doctorate in law from Yale University.

career experience

Working time status of the company position

Non-public director of Bohai Huamei (Shanghai) Equity Investment Fund Management Co., Ltd.

 

Hunter Biden’s(Joe Biden’s son) 2013 Bohai Harvest Rosemont investment(HUNTER hold 10% in BHR, is now likely worth approx. $50 million) partnership was set-up by Ministry of Foreign Affairs institutions of Chinese Communist Party.

BHR is a state managed operation, leading shareholder in BHR is Bank of China and BHR’s partners are SOEs that funnel revenue/assets to BHR.

Hunter Biden visited China in 2010 and met with major Chinese government owned financial companies that would later back BHR.

Obviously Joe Biden is the big guy behind his son Hunter Biden who is acting as the white gloves of his father. Joe Biden used his huge influence in American politics to make money for his son and himself from CCP by harming the national interests and security of the United States.

As Joe said he had a very close relationship with Chinese Communist Party leader Jinping Xi and he gained a lot of financial benefits in China through his son. We are now going to stand up and expose this liar, Joe Biden and Chinese Communist Party are not only the enemy of the American people but also the huge threats to the world. They try to control and dominate humanity through Economics, Politics, CCP virus and other means. Only by eliminating them can we maintain human justice and security。The whole world must unite to fight for justice and humanity to eliminate ccp。

Get rid of this evil Communist Party and eradicate Zhongnanhai. Let Chinese people have the freedom of religion, let Chinese people enjoy a real society under the rule of law; everyone can be equal, everyone can be safe, healthy, and live like human beings, no longer be brainwashed, no longer criticized, deceived, and bless us all Broke the news to the family of revolutionary comrades.

The Chinese Communist Party has such a blue and golden plan in the United States and many Western countries in Europe. We will have millions of videos and photos of relevant government officials, corrupters, traitors, and criminals who are collaborating with the Communist Party to rule the world.

No matter which country you come from, which ethnicity, color, or party, your daughter, your wife, or your sister may be the next person to be abused; therefore, there is no party-nation border on the issue of eliminating the Chinese Communist Party.

Let us get rid of this demonic group as soon as possible from the Chinese Communist Party and the criminal group organized by them to jointly transnational theft from their own country.

Let us eliminate as soon as possible the CCP and the criminal group organized by them that conspired to commit transnational theft from our country! This demon group!

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Blockbuster Report Reveals How Biden Family Was Compromised By China
October 25, 2020 James Fetzerblog
ZeroHedge
by Tyler Durden
In a day when half the US population remained transfixed by the ongoing revelations about the contents of Hunter Biden’s “laptop from hell” and the other half was doing everything in its power to ignore the news which the socials have conveniently been desperate to censor, a far less noticed but perhaps just as important investigative report authored by the unknown Typhoon Investigations, was released by Christopher Balding, Associate Professor at Peking University HSBC School of Business Shenzhen, China and also Bloomberg contributor (which is odd considering the clear anti-Trump bias of the Bloomberg media empire) exposing Biden activities in China which “the press has simply refused to cover”, and which reveals “how Biden was compromised by the Communist Party of China.”

In a series of tweets around noon on Thursday, Balding said that he had really “not wanted to do this but roughly 2 months ago I was handed a report about Biden activities in China the press has simply refused to cover. I want to strongly emphasize I did not write the report but I know who did.”

Some more background on the origins of the report from Balding’s website:

For two months I have worked on behalf of my colleague to ensure that this report helped others report on the documented evidence of Biden activities with regards to China. I want to emphasize a couple of things about my own involvement.

First, I did not write the report and I am not responsible for the report. I have gone over the report with a fine tooth comb and can find nothing factually wrong with the report. Everything is cited and documented. Arguably the only weakness is that we do not have internal emails between Chinese players or the Chinese and Bidens that would make explicit what the links clearly imply.
Second, I will not be disclosing the individual who did write this report. They have very valid reasons to fear for both their personal safety and professional risks. Throughout the years that I have known this individual we never discussed politics. I have never heard them criticize any political party other than the CCP. They are not a Republican.
Third, it was my very real wish that the press would have reported on the documented evidence in this report and left me and the author entirely out of this situation. I did not vote for Trump in 2016 and will not vote for him in 2020. This information however is entirely valid public interest information that the press has simply refused to cover due to their own partisan wishes. I have serious policy differences with President Trump. I am pro-immigration. I would like to see more free trade efforts to shift trade away from China and into partner countries from Mexico to Vietnam and India. I believe that institution building in Asia is vital and America needs to take that lead. However, I cannot in good conscience allow documented evidence of the variety presented here go unreported by partisans who are simply choosing to hide information.
Finally, I will not be answering any questions about the report. I had no wish to be involved in Presidential politics. I do not want to be on the news. I will not be answer any questions about who wrote the report. We need to return the focus to the known documented facts.
Upon review, this is how Balding summarized the report’s contents in his series of tweets:

Hunter Biden is partnered with the Chinese state. Entire investment partnership is Chinese state money from social security fund to China Development Bank. It is actually a subsidiary of the Bank of China. This is not remotely anything less than a Chinese state funded play.

Though the entire size of the fund cannot be reconstructed, the Taiwanese cofounder who is now detained in China, reports it to be NOT $1-1.5 billion but $6.5 billion. This would make Hunters stake worth at a minimum at least $50 million if he was to sell it.

Disturbingly, everyone on the Chinese side are clearly linked with influence and intelligence organizations. China uses very innocuous sounding organization names to hide PLA, United Front, or Ministry of Foreign Affairs influence/intelligence operations. This report cannot say Hunter was the target of such an operation or that China even targeted him. However, based upon the clear pattern of individuals and organizations surrounding him it is an entirely reasonable conclusion.

Finally, the believed Godfather in arranging everything is a gentleman named Yang Jiechi. He is currently the CCP Director of Foreign Affairs leading strategist for America, Politburo member one of the most powerful men in China, and Xi confidant. Why does this matter?

He met regularly with Joe Biden during his stint as Chinese ambassador the US when Biden chaired the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Later he was Minister of Foreign Affairs when the investment partnership was made official in 2013. Importantly, the Taiwanese national listed MOFA institutions as the key clients in helping to arrange everything. Yang would clearly have known the importance of Hunter Biden and undoubtedly would have been informed of any dealings. Given that he is now the point person in China for dealing with the US this raises major concerns about a Biden administration dealing impartially with an individual in this capacity. These are documented facts from Chinese corporate records like IPO prospectuses and media. They raise very valid concerns about Biden linkages to China.

Turning to the report itself, here is the 10-point summary of its findings:

Joe Biden’s compromising partnership with the Communist Party of China runs via Yang Jiechi (CPC’s Central Foreign Affairs Commission). YANG met frequently with BIDEN during his tenure at the Chinese embassy in Washington.

Hunter Biden’s 2013 Bohai Harvest Rosemont investment partnership was set-up by Ministry of Foreign Affairs institutions who are tasked with garnering influence with foreign leaders during YANG’s tenure as Foreign Minister.

HUNTER has a direct line to the Politburo, according to SOURCE A, a senior finance professional in China.

Michael Lin, a Taiwanese national now detained in China, brokered the BHR partnership and partners with MOFA foreign influence organizations.

LIN is a POI for his work on behalf of China, as confirmed by SOURCE B and SOURCE C (at two separate national intelligence agencies).

BHR is a state managed operation. Leading shareholder in BHR is a Bank of China which lists BHR as a subsidiary and BHR’s partners are SOEs that funnel revenue/assets to BHR.

HUNTER continues to hold 10% in BHR. He visited China in 2010 and met with major Chinese government financial companies that would later back BHR.

HUNTER’s BHR stake (purchased for $400,000) is now likely be worth approx. $50 million (fees and capital appreciation based on BHR’s $6.5 billion AUM as stated by Michael Lin).

HUNTER also did business with Chinese tycoons linked with the Chinese military and against the interests of US national security.

BIDEN’s foreign policy stance towards China (formerly hawkish), turned positive despite China’s country’s rising geopolitical assertiveness.

To simply the various opaque Chinese intermediaries, the report shows the transfer of Chinese state money to Hunter, via major Chinese financial SOEs.

 

The next chart shows how the Communist Party of China cultivated Hunter via Lian and multiple Chinese foreign influence organizations:

 

The third and final chart shows the relationships connecting US leaders with communist leaders in China and North Korea. While there is official state-to-state dialogue and relationships between US and Chinese leaders, just one or two levels below are connected business arrangements with their relatives and associates, who are always the personal recipients of Chinese state money.

 

The key section of the report begins on page 19, in which the anonymous author details how the Biden family was compromised by China:

 

The report also quotes from a 2019 National Review article detailing Hunter Biden’s financial links to China:

Late Summer 2006: Hunter Biden and his uncle, James Biden, purchase the hedge fund Paradigm Global Advisors. According to an unnamed executive quoted in Politico in August, James Biden declared to employees on his first day, “Don’t worry about investors. We’ve got people all around the world who want to invest in Joe Biden.” At this time, Joe Biden is months away from becoming chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and launching his second bid for president.

The unnamed executive who spoke to Politico charged that the purchase of the fund was designed to work around campaign-finance laws: “According to the executive, James Biden made it clear that he viewed the fund as a way to take money from rich foreigners who could not legally give money to his older brother or his campaign account. “We’ve got investors lined up in a line of 747s filled with cash ready to invest in this company,” the executive remembers James Biden saying.”

Incidentally, this same article also points out the following:

An outside audit of Paradigm by the firm of Briggs, Bunting & Dougherty finds a “failure to reconcile Investment Advisors reimbursement of fund expenses, failure to reconcile and review cash account on a timely basis, and failure to reconcile and review various other accounts on a timely basis.”

And while the National Review article does an exhaustive look into both Biden, Paradigm’s and Seneca Global Advisors, the real focus is on China, which concludes that its “research indicates the Biden family and associates went on to execute a string of business deals with China and the CPC for nearly a decade.”

 

Fast-forwarding through the report, we learn about a curious entity called Thornton consulting:

Shortly after BIDEN was named as Obama’s running mate in August, HUNTER founded Seneca Global Advisors and the Beijing government approved the incorporation of Thornton Beijing – Solebury Thornton(Beijing)Consulting Co Ltd.

On October 21, 2007 LIN, LAKIS and ARCHER visited HNA Group in Beijing, this time with ARCHER, acting as COO of Rosemont Solebury Capital, and had dinner with Chen. On the same day, the Thornton delegation also met with officials from PKU.

 

HNA, which was originally an airline carrier, is of course best known for becoming a major Chinese conglomerate which in 2015-2016 was the most acquisitive Chinese company involved in a flurry of multi-billion global M&A, including US electronics distributor Ingram Micro, CIT Group’s aircraft leasing business, a 25% stake in Hilton, a 5% stake in Deutsche Bank, and is widely regarded as backed by or ultimately owned by Wang Qishan, then former vice premier (2008 – 2013).

 

Wang is currently China’s Vice-President and a close aide of Xi. According to the report:

“HNA has allegedly used various methods to bribe targets in the past, including hosting parties and supplying targets with young women. It is unknown if Thornton representatives were targeted in this manner at Chen’s dinner, but if any nighttime entertainment was provided, it was probably recorded by HNA/Chinese intelligence (as is commonplace in China).”

The following day a Thornton/Rosemont Solebury/SLLF delegation, including LIN, ARCHER, and LAKIS, met with Peng Fang, Director General of the NPC’s Foreign Affairs Committee <FAC>, which is responsible for communicating with foreign affairs committees from other countries.74 The meeting was held in the Great Hall of the People, China’s most prestigious state building used to host legislative and ceremonial activities. In other words, the Thornton delegation met with a senior Chinese foreign affairs official at China’s most famous state building, in a meeting which would have been approved by or informed to China’s top leaders. This was clearly not a business meeting, but (at least in the eyes of the Chinese contingent), rather a nation to nation, state to state meeting.

Fast-forwarding to 2010 (the report has all the interim details), we read that between April 7-9, 2010, “HUNTER was introduced by LIN to China’s most powerful government controlled financial institutions.” Here the report notes that “while the English news item is no longer accessible on Thornton’s website, but the Chinese version remains.”

Only that’s no longer the case, because since the publication of this report, it appears that someone had a keen interest in quickly removing that particular URL as can be seen here. However, courtesy of the wayback machine, we can see what the Thornton consulting website, which was summarily taken down in the past 3-4 weeks, had to say as of this Sept 26 (after which the website just disappears) snapshot:

 

 

The report continues that according to Thornton’s news item, HUNTER was introduced as the chairman of Rosemont Seneca and the second son of the US Vice-President, and the purpose of his visit was to “deepen mutual understanding and explore the possibility of commercial cooperation”. LIN had delivered HUNTER to the Chinese for discussions on his pay-off.

Three days later, BIDEN met with then Chinese President Hu Jintao in Washington as part of the Nuclear Security Summit. At the time Hunter was just barely 40 years old.

The Secret Service protects, by statute, the president and vice president and their families.84 As the son of a sitting Vice-President, HUNTER will have had secret service protection during his business trip to China. Freedom of Information Act request records show that HUNTER visited China from April 6 to April 9, 2010. Unusually, for such a high-profile visit, there were no media reports in English or Chinese media. Therefore, his father BIDEN (even if unaware personally, which is unlikely given how close to each other they live and work), will have been aware of his son’s business trip to Beijing through official channels. Given the sensitive nature of US-China relations, HUNTER would have been closely watched by various Chinese securities agencies during the trip.

The report then pivots to dad Joe, who August 18, 2011 held talks with Xi, then Chinese Vice-President, during a five-day trip. At the meeting Biden said the US “fully understands that Taiwan and Tibet issues are China’s core interests, the U.S. will continue to resolutely pursue the one China policy, the U.S. does not support ‘Taiwan’s independence’, and the U.S. fully recognizes that Tibet is an inalienable part of the People’s Republic of China.” Biden’s words are verbatim from China’s official standpoint on Taiwan and Tibet. Additionally, Biden said he “has spent more time in private meetings with Xi than any other world leader, including 25 hours of private dinners with Xi and one interpreter.”

A few days later BIDEN delivered a speech at Sichuan University, where he said:

“China’s development and prosperity are in line with the interest of the U.S”, in comments on the university’s website. The Obama Whitehouse records published a transcript of the speech during which BIDEN said “Let me be clear — let me be clear: I believed in 1979 and said so and I believe now that a rising China is a positive development, not only for the people of China but for the United States and the world as a whole…In order to cement this robust partnership, we have to go beyond close ties between Washington and Beijing, which we’re working on every day, go beyond it to include all levels of government, go beyond it to include classrooms and laboratories, athletic fields and boardrooms.”

A few months after Biden’s Sichuan trip, Archer and Lin worked with a Sichuan Chemical, a large Sichuan state-owned company to set-up a major potash deal (that never materialized) for Prospect Global, a listed US company at the time, that soon delisted and no longer appears to be in business. According to the report, “it is unclear if the purpose of the deal was to just deliver Archer millions of dollars in compensation, to talk up the Prospect Global stock, or if it resulted in Sichuan Chemical transferring millions of US dollars to the US (either for capital flight purposes or to be directed to US politicians such as BIDEN and KERRY).”

The story only gets more interesting from here, and focuses on the arrival on the scene in 2013 of none other than John Kerry, who is intimately tied to Hunter (and thus Joe Biden) via Rosemont Seneca’s predecessor Rosemont Capital, established in 2005 by Chris Heinz and Devon Archer who were roommates at Yale University. The firm was named after a Heinz family farm, and the capital was from Heinz, heir to the Heinz food processing empire, and step-son of John Kerry, a former Yale graduate who at the time was the senator for Massachusetts. On June 25 2009, Hunter Biden co-founded Rosemont Seneca with Archer and Heinz; the company’s offices in Georgetown were located two miles from both Biden’s office in the White House and his residence at the Naval Observatory, and one mile from Kerry’s Georgetown mansion.

We will let readers do their own digging but we will highlight one section from the report, detailing how the Hunter Biden received Chinese state money…

 

… and it involved the creation of BHR, which served as the entity facilitating the bulk of Chinese fund flows into the Bidens, as Hunter’s initial BHR stake, purchased for just $400,000, is now likely be worth approximately $50 million. From the report:

On December 4, 2013 HUNTER accompanies BIDEN on his official trip to China.

HUNTER told the New Yorker that he met Li during the December 2013 trip but described it as social encounter. “How do I go to Beijing, halfway around the world, and not see them (Li) for a cup of coffee?” he said. HUNTER arranged a quick meeting in the lobby of the American delegation’s hotel in Beijing between BIDEN and Li, the BHR CEO. This was followed by a “social meeting” between HUNTER and Li, according to reports by the New Yorker.

The trip by HUNTER coincided with an official trip by the Ukranian President Viktor Yanukovych. Many business deals promoting trade and investment between China and Ukraine were signed during this trip. Some deals between Chinese and Ukranian firms have ties to firms HUNTER is known to be involved with such as the Bohai Commodity Exchange, owned by the same local governments that own a part of Bohai Industrial Investment.

On 16 December 2013, a week after the BIDEN and HUNTER visit to Beijing, BHR was incorporated in Shanghai, with its registered address in the Shanghai Free Trade Zone, according to State Market Regulatory Administration <SMRA> records.

HUNTER’s profile no longer appears on the BHR website. One archived version lists him as a director on November 16, 2015. BIDEN is referred to in the profile as a managing partner of Rosement Seneca Partners and a consultant at Boies Schiller Flexner LPP <Boies Schiller>. According to a statement by BIDEN’s lawyer George Mesires on October 13, 2019, BIDEN was of counsel with Boies Schiller and advising Ukraine-linked Burisma Holdings Limited on its corporate reform initiatives. He is also listed on Chinese PE websites where he is also referred to by the Chinese name ‘Hengte Baideng’ (亨特·拜登)

SMRA records show HUNTER purchased 10% of BHR on October 23, 2017 (via his investment vehicle Skaneateles LLC) and was a director until April 20, 2020. Previously he was invested via other holding companies.

BHR’s current shareholders are Bohai Capital (30%), Shanghai Ample Harvest Financial Services Group Co Ltd (上海丰实金融服务(集团)有限公司) (30%), Angju Investment (10%), Thornton (10%), Ulysses Diversified Inc (10%), Skaneateles LLC (10%). According to Chinese corporate records, the original owner of the US stake in BHR was Rosemont, Seneca Thornton, LLC with a 30% shareholding. This was split just under two years later into what is believed to be 20%/10% holding between Rosemont, Seneca, Bohai LLC and Thornton LLC. This was later changed again splitting Rosemont, Seneca, Bohai into Skanletes and Ulyssees. As Rosemont is the HEINZ KERRY vehicle and Seneca is the Biden vehicle, it is believed that the final split allowed HEINZ to exit the partnership divesting to ARCHER.

In summary, the Chinese government funded a business that it co-owned along with the son of a sitting US vice president and Secretary of State who was with high probability directly or indirectly invested in the holding company.

But if China funded a business, what was the value for Hunter? Here the report goes into detail calculating that the entity likely had $6.5BN in AUM, generating $100-$150MM in annual revenue, and if one day the business was sold, it could do so for ~$300 million (see page 14-15).

This returns the entire partnership to the fundamental problem: two sons of the Vice President of the United States and the Secretary of State willingly entered into a financial partnership with a government their fathers were supposed to deal with in an impartial manner.

Evidence indicates that the Secretary of State was directly or indirectly financially invested in his sons firms and benefitted from asset purchases made by firms directly linked to his son. HUNTER invested in a firm that by his own words has had almost nothing to do with, managed by state government with departments dedicated to elite capture, focusing on state enterprise deals in a foreign country, but has grown to manage $6.5 billion in assets and likely realize yearly revenue of $100-150 million. The ultimate sale price for his stake or the partnership would be whatever the Chinese Communist Party decides his partnership stake is worth.

And this is where the Typhoon Investigations report, the Biden presidential campaign, and Hunter’s “laptop from hell” all converge:

On May 2, 2019 BIDEN remarked, “They can’t figure out how they’re going to deal with the corruption that exists within the system. I mean, you know, they’re not bad folks, folks. But guess what, they’re not, they’re not competition for us.”

On May 3, it was reported that BHR [where Hunter was an investor] invested in Face++, a Chinese surveillance company which develops facial-recognition software for law enforcement in China, including targeting ethnic minority Muslims Xinjiang.

In September 2019, BIDEN said this of HUNTER’s business deals:

“I have never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings,”

Still, while Hunter benefiting monetarily from deals with China may be unethical, it’s hardly illegal (all else equal). Where things get dicey is if to curry favor with China, and continue the freeflow of China-sourced cash, Hunter or his father, is betraying his fellow Americans. Is this what happened? Read on and decide:

Hunter Cultivated by Chinese Intelligence

Our research shows that for more than decade, HUNTER has been personally targeted by China’s intelligence apparatus and its various ‘foreign relations agencies’. A U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs <HSGAC> published on September 23, 2020, details HUNTER’s recent payoffs from a PLA linked tycoon, Ye Jianming <YE>, chairman of Chinese energy company CEFC China Energy Company Limited <CEFC>.

YE’s first break came when he purchased a small piston factory that supplied the Chinese army, after which he was a proxy for PLA officials, based on a New York Times article, and our proprietary research of the PLA’s logistics network. In the early 2000s, YE was the deputy secretary of CAIFC, according to his CEFC biography. As explained, the CAIFC is a PLA front organization that has dual roles of intelligence collection and propaganda work, and worked with LIN and the SLLF a few years after YE left the organization. YE also knows Xu, who was a CAIFC special advisor, and arranged for LIN and HUNTER’s access to the highest levels of government.

In line with his intelligence role, YE arranged events that brought together retired American and Chinese military officers. In 2015, YE arranged for an aide to meet with HUNTER and in May 2017, YE met privately with HUNTER at a Miami hotel. The purpose of the meeting was for HUNTER to use his contacts to help “identify investment opportunities for Ye’s company CEFC China Energy,” and afterwards YE gave HUNTER a 2.8-carat diamond.

According to HSGAC’s Confidential Document 9, YE and his associate Dong Gongwen, applied to a bank and opened credit lines for a business named Hudson West III LLC, giving HUNTER, his brother James (and James’ wife Sarah Biden), credit cards which the Bidens used to buy extravagant items. The HSGAC report details a series of transfers and transactions worth millions of US dollars between CEFC, Hudson West and the Bidens. This – 11 years after HUNTER and James denied selling their political connections to foreigners for personal gain.

In March 2018, YE was detained and put under investigation on suspicion of economic crimes. CEFC was then declared bankrupt in March 2020 alleged to have faked deals and bribed foreign governments for oil rights. Some of these were facilitated by Patrick Ho <Ho>, CPPCC member and the former Hong Kong Secretary for Home Affairs in Tung’s administration. On November 18, 2017, Ho was arrested at the John F. Kennedy International Airport on bribery and money-laundering charges, and called HUNTER for legal assistance.132 HUNTER later told The New Yorker that he doesn’t see Ye as a “shady character at all,” and he characterized the outcome as “bad luck.”

The report’s conclusion:

Whether he understands it or not, it is apparent that HUNTER has been compromised by Chinese intelligence, who most likely have detailed files on HUNTER’s time spent in China, encompassing his personal meetings and any other activities. Furthermore, YE is associated with the PLA’s General Political Department, which directly opposes the US military in Asia, creating a serious conflict of interest for his father BIDEN.

Putting it all together, the report concludes that the Chinese influence operation targeting Biden and Heinz, the two most important people in US foreign policy under the Obama administration, and their children can now be tied between a small group of organizations and individuals.

“Dating back to Biden’s time in the Senate meeting with Yang, this was never from the Chinese perspective anything less than an official influence operation. Everything surrounding HUNTER took place with official Chinese organizations known to engage in and tasked with influence operations.

Of course, in exchange for funneling tens of millions to Hunter (and, indirectly according to recent allegations, his father), China also got something: this:

Over time BIDEN’s approach to China changed significantly. Under the Clinton and early part of the Bush administrations he could be considered moderately hawkish on China. However, during his time in the Obama administration as one of the key people tasked with China policy, his views became very dovish. Interestingly, BIDEN repeatedly is using preferred CCP language in describing approaches to relations or specific issues. The CCPIT specifically works with businessmen to convince their home governments it is in their best interest to avoid damaging measures such as sanctions to China. Other organizations mentioned work specifically to engage in elite capture or influence politicians or governments. The presence of all these institutions collectively strongly imply this was an influence operation by the Chinese state and whether directly or indirectly, BIDEN shifted his view from hawkish to dovish after HUNTER began receiving entrée into Chinese elite political and financial institutions.

Finally, going back to Chris Balding who originally published the report, here is his own brief summary of everything laid out in the 64 page report:

Beginning just before Joe Biden’s ascendancy to the Vice Presidency, Hunter Biden was travelling to Beijing meeting with Chinese financial institutions and political figures would ultimately become his investors. Finalized in 2013, the investment partnership included money from the Chinese government, social security, and major state-owned banks a veritable who’s who of Chinese state finance.

It is not simply the state money that should cause concern but the structures and deals that took place. Most investment in specific projects came from state owned entities and flowed into state backed projects or enterprises. Even the deals speak to the worst of cronyism. The Hunter Biden investment firm share of a copper mine in the Congo was guaranteed with assets put at risk by the larger copper company to ensure deal flow to Hunter’s firm.

In another instance, Bank of China working on an IPO in Hong Kong gave its share allocation to the BHR investment partnership. They were able to do this because even though the Hunter Biden firm completed no notable work on the IPO, it is counted as a subsidiary of the Bank of China. The Hunter Biden Chinese investment partnership is literally invested in by the Chinese state and a subsidiary of the Bank of China owned by the Chinese Ministry of Finance.

The entire arrangement speaks to Chinese state interests. Meetings were held at locations that in China speak to the welcoming of foreign dignitaries or state to state relations. The Chinese organizations surrounding Hunter Biden are known intelligence and influence operatives to the United States government. The innocuous names like Chinese People’s Institute for Foreign Affairs exist to “…carry out government-directed policies and cooperative initiatives with influential foreigners without being perceived as a formal part of the Chinese government.”

Interestingly the CPIFA is under the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. When the investment partnership was struck in 2013, the Minister of Foreign Affairs was Yang Jiechi. Yang would have been very familiar with Hunter Biden from his days in Washington as the Chinese Ambassador to the United States from 2001 to 2005 during which he met regularly with Joe Biden chairing the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Today the same individual who oversaw institutions helping shepherd Hunter’s investment partnership as the Minister of Foreign Affairs is Xi Jinping’s right hand man on foreign affairs and member of the powerful Politburo.

Most worrying is the financial leverage this gives the Chinese state over a direct member of the Biden family. Despite the widely reported $1-1.5 billion of investment the reality is likely much higher. A co-founder of the investment firm reports the total assets under management as $6.5 billion. While this number cannot be completely replicated, given that two deal alone were worth in excess of $1.6 billion this number is not unrealistic at all. A 2% annual fee on assets under management would generate $130 million annually. Add in the 20% fee on capital gains the firm would recognize and it is not difficult to see Hunter’s stake being worth in excess of $50 million.

According to Hunter’s attorney, he did not invest his $400,000 in the company until 2017. Even assuming the veracity of this statement, this raises a major problem. Founded in 2013, the firm had large amounts of revenue and assets under management by 2017. In other words, his $400,000 stake would have already been worth far more than what he paid for it. This paltry $400,000 investment worth more than $50 million now would have realized a gain of more than 12,400% in three years.

The difficulty in eluding these concerns is their documentability by anyone who cares to look. There is no potential for hacking because it is all public record in China. Any journalist who wishes to look can go review IPO prospectuses, news reports, or corporate records. There is no secret method for discovering this data other than actually looking. There is simply no way to avoid the reality that Hunter Biden was granted a 10% stake worth far in excess of what he paid for a firm that is literally operated and owned by the Chinese state.

I did not vote for Donald Trump in 2016 and have significant concerns about his policies in areas like immigration. Having lived in China for nine years throughout the Xi regimes construction of concentration camps and having witnessed first hand their use of influence and intelligence operations, the Biden links worry me profoundly.

Whether Joe Biden personally knew the details, a very untenable position, it is simply political malpractice to not be aware of the details of these financial arrangements. These documentable financial links simply cannot be wished away.

And this is why Beijing is desperate to get Joe Biden–whose son got extremely wealthy thanks to China’s influence peddling operation for the past a decade–into the White House.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Biden and Kerry Ukraine sucks up millions to sell out is America

GNews

On October 23, 2020, Mr. Wengui Guo, the founder of the Whistleblower Movement, uncovered emails on Hunter Biden’s hard drive and how he traded  for power, money and sex with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Revealed.In 2013 the evil Chinese Communist Party (CCP) colluded with the Biden and Kerry families through a Ukrainian energy company, and I have accessed some leaked documents to reveal the information.

Leaked documents show tens of millions of Ukrainian dollars paid to the Ker Biden Jr Fund, with cash transferred from a Ukrainian gas company to several funds run by leading Democrats. The funds were run by former Secretary of State John Kerry, John Kerry Jr. another Kerry family member and Hunter Biden.

“Leaked documents from the Office of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine indicate that foreign funds were complexly transferred under the control of “corrupt funds” owned and operated by Devon Archer, John Kerry Junior, Junior Heinz and Hunter Biden”.

“According to the Latvian Financial Monitoring Department (counter-intelligence), the following sums were obtained from Busima Holding Limited (Cyprus), which opened AS PrivatBank in Latvia.

“The amounts of USD 14,655,982 and EUR 366,015 were transferred from “Wirelogic Technology AS” and the amount of USD 1,964,375 was transferred from “Digitex Organization LLP”.

“In addition, a portion of said amount has been transferred to Alan Apter, Alexander Kwasniewski, Devon Archer and Hunter Biden.

” BURISMA HOLDINGS LIMITED made 45 remittances in the amount of $3.5 million through MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC between November 18, 2014, and November 16, 2015. The recipient, Rosemont Seneca Bohai LLC.

Rosemont Seneca Bohai LLC is owned and operated by Devon Archer and the Kerry Family, which includes John Kerry, John Kerry Junior, Heinz Jr. and Hunter Biden.

All of them are also partners of the Rosemont Seneca Foundation and other Rosemont Seneca affiliates.

Leaked transaction and bank records indicate that the Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings Limited made substantial payments to Rosemont Seneca Bohai LLC, which appear to be monthly payments of $83,333.33.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Biden Family — standing on the evil side with the CCP

GNews

As the Biden “hard drive gate” becomes a hot topic on the social media, we get more and more dark evidences of corrupt and compromised Biden family and their connections with the Chinese communist party (CCP). The real bombshell is that Joe Biden sold U.S CIA informants serving in china to XI Jinping. In this way, Biden helped Xi to gain more power in the Chinese political system, for the exchange of Xi covering Biden’s crimes and, and keep huge profit from china.

According to Lude media, during 2010-2014, CCP has almost eradicated all CIA’s informants in China. 36 CIA informants were massacred in the security bureau’s meeting room, right after Xi got the list from Biden. 17 of these secret freedom fighters are females. One of them named Ms Tong Baoguo who work as an executive secretary in top security department of CCP. She was killed along with her husband and her child. One informant killed in Xinjing was only ten days from child.

That is why Mr. Bannon condemned Biden for taking blood money from China. CCP has enslaved 1.4 billion Chinese people with the brutal tyranny for 70 years. It has built the fire wall to ban Chinese people from knowing the truth. It has blocked the western world from knowing the real truth about China. These unlimited power lead to absolute corruption: 500 top families in china own 99% of its wealth, in the meantime, 600 million Chinese people with monthly income under US$200.

People with strong sense of justice are seeking for changes in china. Like Mrs Tong Baoguo, they regard U.S as a leading country built on democracy and rule of law. So they joined CIA, worked as their informants helping western world to gather the criminal evidences of CCP. They never thought they would be betrayed by Joe Biden, the vice president of America!

It comes another bombshell! A video leaked from Hunter Biden’s laptop shows that he “played” with many underage girls when he was on drugs. All these poor girls are just sex toys to him. Most of these girls are Chinese. They were between 7-14 years old. They were young, they were little and they were poor. No one protects them, they were served as a treat by the CCP to their “best friend and business partner”!

Even the hard disk gate has been on fire for so many days. Big media outlets in the free world refused to provide any coverage for this breaking news. No media has chased Biden family for response. Worse than that, face book and twitter has even blocked the New York post ‘s news coverage regarding the hard disk.

Twitter has been busy blocking twitters account who tried to spread the news. Why? We, the people demand an answer. Why free media in the free world, which should be trustworthy, pursuing the truth, but choose to keep silent to this obvious crime? Are they on the same boat with CCP? THAT is so far the only reason we can figure out.

If you have walked away “Tiananmen massacre” in 1989, or if you have turned blind eyes to “Uighur concentration camp” in last 6 years, or if you refuse to acknowledge the brutal reality of “organ harvest” in China, please open your eyes and see whether you can find the political elites of your country in the hard drive. Have they been videotaped by the CCP? Have they sold any interest of your country to their CCP friend? Will they do the same crimes to your child one day and all journalists turn their blind eye such crime?

Taking down CCP is not urgent for Chinese people only, these global gangsters are in collusion with each other to take over the whole world. They are coming for everyone. The people in the free world have nowhere to run to. Fighting back is the only option. All the faithful and righteous people shall unite together to fight again the evil and claim back the world.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Was Joe Biden’s Son Part of a Chinese Spy Operation to Steal U.S. Nuclear Technology?

ANDMag
by Charles "Sam" Faddis July 31, 2020
Tweet Share Print Email Whatsapp Messenger 0
Shares
The China General Nuclear Power Corporation (CGN) is a state-owned firm and is part of the Chinese government. It is controlled by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). It has been implicated in the theft of highly sensitive American technology and the provision of that technology to the Chinese Communist Party. In fact, it appears that the General Nuclear Power Corporation was created for the sole purpose of stealing American nuclear secrets.

In 2017 Szuhsiung Ho, a consultant employed by CGN was charged by the U.S. Department of Justice with “assisting CGN in procuring U.S.-based nuclear engineers to assist with designing and manufacturing certain components for nuclear reactors.” Ho ultimately pled guilty, paid a fine of $20,000, and was sentenced to two years in prison.

CGN was formed in 2014. One of its cornerstone investors was the private equity firm BHR Partners, headed up by Vice-President Biden’s son, Hunter Biden. The company put $10 million into the initial public offering for CGN. BHR Partners was a joint venture between Rosemont Seneca Partners, an investment fund founded by Hunter Biden, Secretary of State John Kerry’s stepson in 2009, and the state-owned Bank of China.

This billion-dollar fund came into existence less than two weeks after Hunter Biden accompanied his father on a state visit to Beijing. The money to create the fund came from the Chinese government.

Ho was responsible for recruiting six nuclear engineers to provide information to CGN. The information was sometimes relayed through Ho and sometimes directly to CGN during trips there. Ho additionally operated a front company called Energy Technology International in Delaware. The engineers providing intelligence to Beijing were “hired” by CGN through this company. At least one of the engineers was an employee of the Tennessee Valley Authority.

The six engineers provided information on nuclear fuel materials including the plutonium used in MOX fuel, the U-233 used in the thorium fuel cycle, and conventional U-235 enriched nuclear fuel. The intelligence appears to have been used by the Chinese to advance their own work on new reactor types including the new ACPR small modular reactor.

China is competing – head to head – with American companies like Westinghouse for new nuclear reactor deals abroad. The information stolen from the United States may well provide China the necessary competitive advantage to land as many as thirty new reactor construction contracts. There have also been indications that some of the information stolen may pertain to the kinds of reactors used on American nuclear submarines. Even after the DOJ action and Ho’s conviction, Biden and BHR did not divest from CGN.

Biden and BHR were also involved in other joint ventures with the Chinese government targeting sensitive American technology and strategic materials. BHR and the Chinese state-owned military aviation contractor Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) bought the American “dual-use” part manufacturer Henniges in 2015. Henniges manufactures anti-vibration technology with military applications.

The year before Biden’s BHR teamed up with AVIC that company stole technology related to the F-35 fighter program from the United States.
BHR made another investment with a Chinese state-owned company in 2016. That company, China Molybdenum, acquires molybdenum, and other rare-earth minerals that have military and nuclear applications. The company is controlled by the Chinese government. In 2016 China Molybdenum announced it was buying more than half of the Tenke Fungurume copper mine in the Democratic Republic of Congo for $2.6 billion. A few months later, BHR announced it would buy another 24 percent stake in the mine for $1.5 billion. The mine provides metals crucial to transportation, communications, construction, computers, medical science, and emerging technologies.

Hunter Biden’s business dealings have been in the news for some time, and there seems little doubt that his ethics are questionable at best. Any objective assessment of his involvement with the Ukrainian firm Burisma, for instance, reveals that he was almost certainly paid to use his influence with his father, the Vice-President, and other U.S. officials to bring pressure to bear on the Ukrainian government to terminate the ongoing corruption investigation of Burisma and its leadership. Anyone who has watched the infamous video of Joe Biden bragging about leaning on the Ukrainians to fire the prosecutor conducting the investigation will likely conclude Hunter did exactly what he was paid to do, provide top cover.

Hunter’s involvement with CGN, though, is something qualitatively different. This was not simply a matter of a guy who had been tossed out of the Navy for cocaine use cashing in on his father’s position. This was a matter of climbing in bed with a hostile power and working as an agent of that government to the detriment of the citizens of the United States. This was not just corruption. This was espionage.

Was Joe Biden’s son part of a Chinese spy operation to steal U.S. nuclear technology? Sure smells that way.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Artificial coronavirus’ study linked to Steve Bannon and Chinese fugitive Guo Wengui
Guo-backed Rule of Law Foundation listed on non-peer-reviewed paper’s title page
Lead author of study is former University of Hong Kong postdoctoral researcher
Eduardo Baptista
Published: 10:00pm, 16 Sep, 2020
Chinese fugitive tycoon Guo Wengui (right) and former White House strategist Steve Bannon have appeared together in a number of videos attacking the Communist Party. Photo: Guo Wengui’s Twitter @KwokMilesChinese fugitive tycoon Guo Wengui (right) and former White House strategist Steve Bannon have appeared together in a number of videos attacking the Communist Party. Photo: Guo Wengui’s Twitter @KwokMiles
Chinese fugitive tycoon Guo Wengui (right) and former White House strategist Steve Bannon have appeared together in a number of videos attacking the Communist Party. Photo: Guo Wengui’s Twitter @KwokMiles
A foundation associated with fugitive Chinese tycoon Guo Wengui and former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon is linked to a non-peer-reviewed study that alleges the coronavirus is an artificial pathogen.
The Rule of Law Foundation’s name appears on the title page of the paper published on the Zenodo open-access research repository on Monday.
In the paper’s abstract, the researchers said the theory of a natural origin of the coronavirus “although widely accepted, lacks substantial support”.
“The alternative theory that the virus may have come from a research laboratory is, however, strictly censored on peer-reviewed scientific journals,” it said.

Coronavirus: A look inside China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology

The study’s first author is Yan Limeng, a former University of Hong Kong postdoctoral researcher who alleged in July that HKU silenced her when she claimed to have discovered early in the outbreak that the coronavirus could be transmitted between people.
Yan made the allegations on Fox News and claimed she made the discovery three weeks before the Chinese government confirmed human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus on January 20.
HKU has denied the allegations, saying that Yan did not conduct any research on the coronavirus in December or January.
The Rule of Law Foundation comprises two New York-based charities funded by a US$100 million donation from Guo in November 2018. According to Bannon, the foundation was created to help victims of Chinese government persecution.
Bannon has identified himself as chairman of the Rule of Law Society, one of the foundation’s constituent charities, which is also named on the paper’s title page.
China-US relations: Xi rejected Trump’s offers of help in early days of coronavirus outbreak, Woodward says
16 Sep 2020

Real estate tycoon Guo fled China in 2014 after learning an associate had been arrested on corruption charges. Based in New York, he has campaigned to topple the Chinese Communist Party, making a host of unverified allegations about party leaders.
Since leaving the White House in 2017, Bannon has appeared with Guo in dozens of videos attacking the party.
Last month, Bannon was arrested in Connecticut on Guo’s yacht on charges that he defrauded donors in a private fundraising effort.
Chinese respiratory disease expert on origins of Covid-19 and Wuhan virus lab conspiracy theoriesChinese respiratory disease expert on origins of Covid-19 and Wuhan virus lab conspiracy theories
03:21

Chinese respiratory disease expert on origins of Covid-19 and Wuhan virus lab conspiracy theories

Chinese respiratory disease expert on origins of Covid-19 and Wuhan virus lab conspiracy theories
On Monday, Yan said on Twitter that Zenodo was hacked after the paper was published. Yan’s Twitter account, which had almost 60,000 followers, was also suspended, although it is unclear why.
A Twitter spokesman said the company could not comment on individual cases.
Three other scientists were listed as co-authors on the paper but the South China Morning Post could not find previous work by the researchers, all of whom appear to have Chinese names.
The researchers’ credentials were not included in the study, and there was no explanation of their links to the foundation or their role in the study.
There was no response to a request for comment sent to an email address listed on the paper.
The Rule of Law Foundation and the Rule of Law Society did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
China and the United States have traded barbs over the origin of the coronavirus.
Chinese diplomat Zhao Lijian, now the foreign ministry spokesman, suggested on Twitter in March that the virus could have escaped from a US military lab and taken to the central Chinese city of Wuhan, where it was first detected.
Meanwhile US officials, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, have suggested that the pathogen could be traced back to a lab at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
There is no publicly available evidence to back either claim and scientists have dismissed these theories.
An analysis in the journal Nature said the virus had none of the hallmarks of genetic engineering.
Yan’s paper said the Nature article was mired by “conflicts of interest” but did not give evidence to support the claims.
It also said the “genomic sequence of Sars-CoV-2 is suspiciously similar to that of a bat coronavirus discovered by military laboratories in the Third Military Medical University (Chongqing, China) and the Research Institute for Medicine of Nanjing Command (Nanjing, China)”.
Donald Trump pushes murder conspiracy theory about TV host Joe Scarborough, prompting calls for Twitter to act from widower of Lori Klausutis
27 May 2020

Kristian Andersen, first co-author of the Nature article, said on Wednesday that many of the central claims in Yan’s paper were factually inaccurate.
Andersen said Sars-Cov-2, the official name of the coronavirus, was not “suspiciously similar” to the bat coronavirus Yan referred to.
“This simply can’t be true – there are more than 3,500 nucleotide differences between Sars-CoV-2 and these viruses,” he said.
Andersen also denied Yan’s allegation of conflicts of interest.
“My lab has never received funding from China and we have no collaborations with Chinese investigators. I have no financial interests in China. All our analyses are scientific and unbiased,” he wrote.
Yan has become a frequent guest on right-leaning broadcasters and platforms. On Tuesday, she repeated many of the central allegations in the study on Fox News show Tucker Carlson Tonight, one of the most popular current affairs programmes on US cable television.
Yan also frequently appears on Bannon’s podcast, War Room, and in reports published by a media outlet owned by Guo, repeating her allegations that the virus is engineered.
Guo and Bannon have been among the most outspoken advocates of the theory that the coronavirus was a biological weapon created in China’s first biosafety level 4 lab at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

What is The New Federal State Of China?
GM01 Jun. 22

On the 4th of June 2020 at 07:37 in the evening (UTC/GMT +08:00), the founder of the Whistleblower Movement Miles Kwok (also widely known as Miles Guo or Guo Wengui) inaugurates the founding of The New Federal State of China on his boat Lady May II, moored in front of the Statue of Liberty with five aircrafts flying the NFSC federal flag over New York Harbor in Manhattan, New York City, USA.

Under the rule of law, the citizens of the NFSC who actively exercise their citizenship while, at the same time, being permanently located or dispersed in many places around the world — a country in permanent diaspora, shall follow the Righteous Path, a people-oriented socio-political thought that gives absolute emphasis on the dignity, power, and freedom of all citizens as the beginning and end of a peaceful and prosperous statehood. Miles explains that it is all about giving respect to the human person; people get respect when people have power, and power comes both from material and spiritual sources. In other words, socio-political power emanates from people who, on the one hand, have privacy rights over their wealth and properties and, on the other hand, have free rights over their thoughts, words, and beliefs. With this statehood in mind, all citizens shall put an end to the centralized rule of the Communist Party of China (CCP).

Name of state

The official full name of the country in English is “The New Federal State of China”, which is first used as a term by Stephen Kevin Bannon, chair of the Rule of Law Society, on the 4th of June 2020 when he, with Miles Kwok on his side, read the English version of the Declaration of the New Federal State of China on Lady May II at New York Harbor.

The Chinese name of NFSC is 新中国联邦 (xīn-zhōng-guó-lián-bāng). The use of the term 新 (xīn) in its official name conveys a conviction to distinguish NFSC from the People’s Republic of China, commonly known as 中国 (zhōng-guó) by the international community, while 联邦 (lián-bāng) indicates its government system. In the beginning, other names such as “The Federal State of Huaxia” and “The United States of Huaxia” were considered, but on the 2nd of June 2020, “The New Federal State of China” was made official.

The federal flag

The flag of the New Federal State of China, featured above, is also known as “The 49 Stars Flag” or “The Himalayan Star Flag”. The aspect ratio of the NFSC flag is 3:2. It has two colors; ocean blue and solar gold. Precisely, it is an ocean blue rectangular flag with forty nine seven-pointed solar gold Himalayan stars forming a double ellipse with a star in the center symbolizing faith. It was first displayed on the 26th of May 2020, and first unfurled on the 4th of June 2020.

The flag of the New Federal State of China

The golden color is solar gold. It brightens heaven and earth, symbolizing wealth, peace, people’s will, people’s rights, preciousness, and joy. The blue color is ocean blue. It represents the source of life. It embodies eternity, vastness, nature, mystery, intimacy, and dreams. In the water and gold’s mutuality and through the gold and water’s compatibility, water and sunlight give birth to life. Blue for Yin and gold for Yang, from both, comes everything in the world. All these symbolize the holy spirit of the Himalaya and her everlasting luminance.

The joining together of forty nine stars as one double ellipse takes a shape that signifies the Chinese character 中 (zhōng) showing the balance between Yin and Yang brought about by the interaction between heaven and earth. Together, these constitute a symmetrical and stable space of cosmic energy. Every star is a symbol of life which represents human rights and the equality of all beings. The strength that brings the stars to come together is the unity of all in adhering to heaven’s call to fulfill all’s sacred mission.

The coming together of all forty nine stars signifies the heart of all stars — an eternal abundance of auspiciousness. Central to the common belief in the hearts of all NFSC citizens is the giving of reverence to heaven, earth, and all godly beings. This reverence is expressed in and through the establishment of a free and democratic society that abides by the rule of law which guarantees the care and respect for the elderly, women, and children. This reverence is also conveyed by the entire citizenry through their upholding of the Righteous Path, and bringing countries around the world to contribute to world peace and lasting friendship for generations to come. In this spirit, the NFSC aims to create a new world that is fair and just as it moves towards building a lasting civilization. And in carrying out this great human undertaking, it seeks the illumination of all godly beings of the universe upon the Divine Realm (China’s ancient name) at all times.

 

The federal anthem

喜马拉雅-自由之巅[7] (xǐmǎlāyǎ – zìyóu zhī diān) or “Himalaya – the Pinnacle of Freedom” in English is the federal anthem of the New Federal State of China.
Title: Himalaya, The Pinnacle of Freedom
Music: 唐平 (Reve Táng Píng)
Lyrics: 齐馥伟 (William Qí Fùwěi)
Song: 空中合唱团 (kōngzhōng héchàngtuán) also known as The Sky Shouters

Himalaya, the pinnacle of freedom
Our home of heavenly blessings
From here the unknown hero
Has started his spiritual awakening
Breaking through the darkness, he leads the way
The cry for equality and justice has never been at rest
Let’s pray sincerely for tomorrow
Raising our shields side by side
Holding the sword of truth
To cut off the evil and deceitful
Seven thousand warriors are here to
Defend our mother’s grace
Our youth are making sacrifices with great passion
May such a life never be forgotten
May all the sons and daughters
Of China gain a rebirth
Himalaya, the pinnacle of great love
Our beautiful home heavenly blessed
We will forever and ever
Defend our faith of freedom
With Himalaya staying in our heart and mind forever
We are fearless in facing all adversities
Himalaya, the pinnacle of freedom

Government and politics of the NFSC

By appropriating Western democratic rule of law and other relevant international laws, under the joint supervision of international institutions and the Himalaya Supervisory Organization, citizens of the New Federal State of China shall create a brand new government by way of a “one person, one vote” system.

The new federal government shall formulate a Constitution. The writing of the Constitution, the defining of other laws, the limiting of government powers and functions shall protect the rights and interests of its citizens. The formulation of the new Constitution and the making of laws will be based on Western laws that include the British common law and the US case law. The resulting proposals shall be decided upon by the entire electorate by way of a referendum. It shall be crafted to realize a commitment to safeguard citizens’ rights and freedoms from infringement; to guarantee the freedoms of religious belief, speech, assembly, association, and movement of all citizens; to take down the Great Firewall; to give citizens freedom of access to information; to be free from political interference and censorship in the creation and publication of media. The contents of the new Constitution include the following;

The national ideals on human rights, the rule of law, freedom of belief, freedom of speech, and on private property are sacred and inviolable.

The pursuit to permanent peace and common development with the people of the world.

The legislative guarantee of the basic rights of the people such as education, old-age care, and medical care are the ‘s livelihood and must be guaranteed by legislation. Expansion of investment in education, borrowing Western education to meet Chinese needs. Inculcate respect for teachers and give importance to education with the idea that all kinds of people can be educated.

The preservation, protection, and promotion of natural environment and animal ecology, pursuing harmony in all living things.

To ensure checks and balances of this government, its power shall be equally divided among three branches; executive, legislative, and judicial. Also, an electoral system and an impeachment system shall be established. These systems shall operate with high efficiency to avert substantial social turmoil and human disasters.

The government shall accept the joint supervision by its citizens, the Himalaya Supervisory Organization, and other legitimate international institutions. Its fiscal policy, decision-making, and other relevant information shall be open and transparent and subject to supervision. Officials shall disclose their assets, liabilities, and net worth.

By way of a “one person, one vote” system, all citizens of the New Federal State of China, without the influence of interest groups such as political parties and their leaders, shall establish a system of government. Citizens are free to form political parties. Any political party that gathers the support of at least one-third of the legitimate votes is eligible to participate in the national level elections.

The government shall take legal actions against the CCP. The aims of these legal actions shall be: firstly, the confiscation and recovery of assets plundered by the CCP, then return these assets to the people; secondly, the implementation of amnesty to prisoners, except for serious criminal offenders and those with crimes against humanity, after the establishment of the new government.

Sovereignty rights are reserved to the federal government, while full autonomy rights are enjoyed by local governments. The granting of special autonomy to Hong Kong, Macau, Tibet, and other regions shall be promulgated immediately and strictly enforced. Provided that Taiwan’s status quo is unchanged, expansion in trade, steady development, and common prosperity shall be sought for.

Recent history of the NFSC

The design process of the flag

In May 2020, Miles Kwok convened some members of the Whistleblower Movement from around the world to an online meeting to create a design team. The team is composed of eleven members each with a nom de guerre; Weizisunaiqige Wenxi, CCgerP, Wenfangsibao, Ms. L Talk, X-MEN, Mingyueqingfeng, Wenhua, Wenxi, Cunzaizhuyikafeiting, Wensibudong, Wenchengcheng, and Amber. Its task is to design the federal flag. In that meeting, Miles proposed the design ideas, spiritual meanings, and basic elements that the flag should contain: blue, gold and a concentration of stars reflecting the totality of the whole universe. Its composition should reflect the Big Dipper and the Chinese character 中 (zhōng) which represents the unity of the people, the world, and the creation of new life.

Initially, forty one design drafts were submitted. Out of which, the colors of the national flag and the basic elements of the seven-pointed star were selected and determined. After many revisions, the composition of the Chinese character based from forty nine heptagrams was finally ascertained. The final draft was composed of The Golden Star of Faith at the center with outer circles formed by a chain of forty eight gold heptagrams displaying four petals to reflect the 中 (zhōng) and with the blue background of the universe as the new Chinese federal flag. The entire design process took ten hours only.

In the live broadcast, Miles Kwok explains the reason for choosing the blue color. Blue represents justice, resoluteness, and perseverance. He adds that more importantly, the blue color portrays peacefulness and the Source of Life. It also incorporates the Sign of Water among the Chinese Five Elements. On the other hand, the golden color depicts the Sun. The sun and water together create life.

He further opines that “the red flag of the Communist Party is dyed, its fabric stained, with the blood of the people. In their hearts, the Communist Party members believe that power comes from blood, from death, from threats, and from domination. That to secure the state power permanently, there must be bloodshed. That the vitality of state power and authority must depend upon the fresh red color of blood. Stained in this redness, the four stars surround the star in the center – the star of the Communist Party. Now, we no longer need the blood of our people to make that piece of cloth red, and to nurture their power.”

Miles explains that the sign “Seven By Seven Reaching Forty Nine” is a big number in Buddhism and a symbiosis in Taoism. If one overcomes it, one becomes the world’s biggest victor who can overcome everything. But one has to go through many disasters and hardships along the way, one is always on the edge between life and death. Every success depends on one’s courage. The Forty Nine Stars and the Center of the Universe are from the Will of Heaven. And all these will be represented by the forty nine member states of the federation in the future.

Blue means eternity, intimacy, the source of life, health, and nature. When it merges with the Sun, the Forty Nine Stars emerge to form the 中 (zhōng) with faith as its core. As expressed in the flag, faith is the core of all Chinese people’s existence.

Wen Xi, who is a planner from the federal flag design team, adds that the Seven By Seven Reaching Forty Nine also means limitlessness. And that the forty nine seven-pointed stars represent equality among all human beings in the world, which is an expression of great love for the entire human race, not just for the Chinese, but for all the living in the entire universe. All these bring into full contrast with the five-star red flag of the Chinese Communist Party which represents narrow-mindedness and selfishness that leaves no room for the governed people.

The design was completed on the 26th of May 2020. It symbolizes the state’s mission from heaven. During the first display of the flag at Miles Kwok’s home in New York at 02:46 in the morning, Miles prayed for the 1.4 billion Chinese people. He uttered thanksgiving to God by saying, “Thank you, God, for giving us a holy and powerful insignia to open a new chapter in our history, to bring an end to the Chinese Communist Party, to restore the courage of the Chinese people, and to obtain the great wisdom of our Chinese civilization. Under the dome and the charming display of The Forty Nine Stars, all evil shall be destroyed! Let our Chinese people live again!”

The inauguration ceremony

From the morning of the 4th of June 2020 Beijing Time (evening on the 3rd of June 2020 US Eastern Time), the Himalaya Supervisory Organization composed of hundreds of millions of members held an inauguration ceremony in New York, officially proclaiming the establishment of the “New Federal State of China.” It was broadcasted live to the whole world through online media. The ceremony lasted eighteen hours. GTV media revealed that the online audience data showed up to 20 million people watched the ceremony.

The ceremony was chosen to be held in the morning on the 4th of June 2020 Beijing Time. At the time, it was still six o’clock in the evening on the 3rd of June 2020 US Eastern Time, when five aircrafts took off flying banners over New York City. These banners were designed with the NFSC flag on one side and with the words “Congratulations to the Federal State of New China!” printed in Chinese and English on the other side. A little later at 07:37 pm, the fleet reached the location of the Statue of Liberty and hovered around the sky above the Hudson River for several minutes. Then, the planes flew over to Manhattan circling over the central area.

While the above-mentioned was going on, the inaugural ceremony, which was covered live globally on a video broadcast, began with the founder of the Whistleblower Movement Guo Wengui and the chair of the Rule of Law Society Stephen Bannon as hosts, with two NFSC flags unfurled and fluttering in the wind at their backs and farther back in the distance was the superyacht Lady May floating steadily in front of the Statue of Liberty lending them a stunning background.

At the most auspicious moment on live broadcast, Miles declared the establishment of the new state — The New Federal State of China. Immediately right after, located in Spain, Hao Haidong, former Chinese national football star player announced The Declaration of The New Federal State of China in Chinese. Then right away, back in the USA, Stephen read The Declaration of The New Federal State of China in English. In closing the inaugural rite, Miles bit his right index finger to shed blood, marked the declaration document with his blood, and vowed to overthrow the Communist Party of China.
Signs from the sky

Before the ceremony started, thick clouds gathered over New York Harbor skies, peals of thunder and lightning followed. Then at the beginning of the ceremony, the clouds cleared away and the sky above the Statue of Liberty was suddenly sunny until the heavy rain came again after the declaration was read. Witnessed by hundreds of millions of his comrades, Guo Wengui bit his finger to shed blood, marked the declaration document with his own blood, and swore to overthrow the CCP regime. At the moment when he bit his finger, flashes of lightning and claps of thunder were seen at the location of the Statue of Liberty. All the pictures are recorded live by camera.

The timing of the celebration

The timing of the declaration was chosen to coincide with the commemoration of the 31st anniversary of the Tiananmen Square Massacre that happened in Beijing on the 4th of June 1989. It signified that the lives sacrificed by the heroes of democracy are not lost as the freedom loving people, marked by this declaration, march on towards achieving full freedom.
Afterwards, the couple Hao Haidong and Ye Zhaoying, the former Chinese national badminton world champion, gave an interview with Lu De and An Hong about their own journeys to joining the Whistleblower Movement. This was followed by the unfurling of the flag of the New Federal State of China. The hosts gave an account on the creation process of the national flag and the national anthem. Then, the hosts interviewed the members of the Whistleblower Movement from around the world. On the day of the ceremony, large-screen billboards and taxi billboards in Times Square in New York rolled up to display the adverts in Chinese and English saying “We Celebrate the Establishment of the New Federal State of China!

Culture of the NFSC

The NFSC shall follow the Righteous Path, a people-oriented socio-political thought introduced by Miles Kwok, that gives absolute emphasis on the dignity, power, and freedom of all citizens as the beginning and end of a peaceful and prosperous statehood.

Miles explores a new state concept that breaks away from traditional thinking. He is of the conviction that, based on the level of interconnectedness in today’s world marked by a reasonably easy access to ways of communication and fairly uncomplicated means to access information, the cohesion of a state’s citizens, which is the essential meaning of a country, has radically shifted from having a common land, authority, currency and other elements in the traditional sense to having a common “belief, security, trust, benefit, pleasure, outlook on life, and worldview.” So then, it is highly feasible for citizens of a country to be actively exercising their citizenship while, at the same time, being permanently located or dispersed in many places around the world — a country in permanent diaspora.

As clearly expressed in the symbolism of the federal flag, central to this concept and vision of statehood is faith. The NFSC citizens believe in all godly beings, take the Right Path as the cornerstone of culture, and promote the splendid knowledge and wisdom accumulated from China’s long history and rich culture.

The NFSC society shall advance universal values ​​such as “freedom, truth, kindness, justice, fairness, integrity, tolerance” and the traditional moral values ​​of the Chinese nation. Citizens are free to choose to become believers or agnostics; they can choose to belong to whatever religion, no interference in the change of belief; different religions and denominations shall not be categorized into different levels.

The New Federal State of China shall adopt the separation of church and state. Congress or the government shall never formulate laws to establish state religion, neither promulgate laws and orders to prohibit the free exercise of religious beliefs, nor corrupt religion to interfere with judicial and election processes and use religion to get into money laundering.

Education in the NFSC

Legislation shall give focus on education. A people-oriented education shall be independent from politics. The attitude of inclusivity and the diversity of ideas and culture shall be preserved and protected. It shall emphasize on science and technology, promote scientific and technological innovation. To ensure the steady development of education, the government shall protect intellectual property rights, and crackdown on various piracy and intellectual property violations.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

WikiLeaks Bombshell: ‘There Is No US Election’
THE WHISTLEBLOWING ORGANIZATION ALSO RELEASED BARACK OBAMA'S PERSONAL EMAILS, SHOWING THAT PRESIDENT BUSH ORGANIZED HIS TRANSITION TO THE HIGHEST OFFICE IN THE LAND BEFORE THE 2008 ELECTION.
October 21, 2016 Baxter Dmitry News, US 0 Comments
WikiLeaks say the US election for the President of the United States is rigged. According to Julian Assange Presidents are selected, not elected.
WikiLeaks couldn’t have made it clearer in a series of tweets on Thursday – the US election for the President of the United States is rigged. The establishment have selected their President and by hook or crook she will be “elected.”

Responding to allegations that WikiLeaks recent leaks have outed it as playing partisan politics, WikiLeaks fired back, “You are not a fan of publishing true information about corrupt ruling power factions who will take power on Jan 20?”

On the day WikiLeaks publicized the release of emails from Barack Obama’s personal account, their Twitter account then stated that the outcome of the election was planned from the outset: “What election? It has been clear from the beginning who is going to win. This is, in effect, a power consolidation exercise.”

Considering what we now know about the behind-the-scenes rigging of the Democratic primary, the collusion between the DNC establishment and mainstream media, and the fact Hillary Clinton pushed for Donald Trump’s GOP nomination, can you possibly disagree?

Are Presidents elected or selected?

WikiLeaks emails from Barack Obama’s personal email account reveal that the Bush administration contacted the future president multiple times before the election, secretly organizing the transition of power.

The 2008 transition had gone down in history as surprisingly smooth. Martha Joynt Kumar, in a book about the transition, said it “was the best in anyone’s memory, in part because 9/11 made everyone recognize that a transition is fragile time.”

Today’s revelations raise questions about why it was so smooth — suggestions Obama was selected by the shadow government, rather than elected by the people, are no longer tinfoil hat territory.

The most eye catching email in today’s leak contains a message from John Podesta about an invitation from President George W. Bush to the “President-Elect.”

Should that have read “President-Select?” Podesta sent the email to Obama before the election result was known.

But it gets even worse.

The emails show a transition plan was being worked on long before the 2008 election had taken place. According to an attached memo in one of the emails, Obama was already discussing his transition to office with members of the Bush Administration, including then-Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, prior to the election.

“As you have observed in your interactions with Secretary Paulson, he is apparently eager to involve you and your transition team extensively in his policy choices following the election.”

Are Presidents elected or selected?
Are Presidents elected or selected?
Another attached memo acknowledges that it was unusual to start the transition process so soon.

“We are now at the point of deciding how to staff economic policy during the transition, who should be the point of contact with Treasury and how to blend the transition and campaign economic policy talent.

Normally these decisions could be made after the election, and ideally after the selection of a National Economic Advisor, but, of course, these are not normal times.”

Not normal times? Perhaps not in 2008. But eight years later, it seems nothing has changed. What was “not normal” in 2008 has become very much the norm in 2016.

Thanks to WikiLeaks and the unprecedented peek behind the curtains of power they have granted us, the shadow government has been exposed to the light. 2008 wasn’t a smooth transition of power, it was silky smooth power consolidation.

WikiLeaks’ variety of journalism – cold, hard, pristine truth – has more than ruffled feathers. The entire henhouse has gone mad. The ruling party are slavering at the mouth, and mainstream media has never been so easy to see through.

Watch CNN’s Scott Cuomo, the same guy caught lying to Americans about their First Amendment rights, put himself in the running for a Razzie Award after the network pulled an interview with Rep. Chris Collins as soon as he mentioned WikiLeaks.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

President Trump’s June Tweet May Explain the Election Debacle

AmericaOutLoud

You may or may not remember that on Sept 12th, 2018, President Trump signed Executive Order number 13848, which protects Americans from tyranny by foreign and domestic terrorists, protecting us at this historical and defining moment in time.

Then on June 22, 2020, President Trump tweeted:

RIGGED 2020 ELECTION: MILLIONS OF MAIL-IN BALLOTS WILL BE PRINTED BY FOREIGN COUNTRIES AND OTHERS. IT WILL BE THE SCANDAL OF OUR TIMES!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 22, 2020

President Trump knew the high probability that a coup was in place so he countered their criminal mischief and actions of vandalizing and de-legitimizing the voices of the American people.

He ensured this by the enactment and installation of creating the secret weapon, which the Department of Homeland Security actually controlled in the form of patented “official ballots” production, this product contains a non-radioactive isotope watermark on these “official ballots.”

On Tuesday, November 3, 2020, Americans empowered their voices through the right of resounding votes during what is known as the most important election in the history of America, but the echoing replies reverberating back were not met with the same energy of love and light as projected, as there was a demonic interception somewhere within the system.

We were expecting to witness a surge of an incoming red wave but instead were slapped in the face by a series of blue shadowy debacles from the lying, cheating, co-conspirators, fake news media, corrupted democrat politicians and their criminal henchmen and tricksters at voting polls.

As patriots re-elected the greatest President in American history, Donald J. Trump, who represents hope and prosperity, freedom, peace, jobs, new and innovative technologies, a better education system, business, and unification on a united front with a healing future for our brothers and sisters around the world.

So it was felt like a personal assault when the morally bankrupt democrats attacked the people’s favorite candidate and blocked President Trump’s voice on social media while withholding truths of incoming votes from all 50 states throughout America.

All across America, it has been witnessed that Trump-supporting ballots are being questioned.

Pollsters in mostly liberal pockets of the states were defiant and biased towards voters, not following the neutral rules of their duty stations and wearing Biden/Harris face masks and shirts, at some polling places, sharpie markers were being provided to voters so their votes for the Republican candidates could not be read by the computers counting the votes, and ultimately discarded.

Let this information serve as some inspiration in what seems for many as bleak days and know we are moving forward in the most positive ways.

Let’s remember that our great President is a mastermind of the Art of War, and has always kept his enemies closer, he never reveals his hand, and always plans ahead.

Just maybe his “secret weapon” is the Fourteenth Amendment, which allows the President to strip Electoral College votes from states supporting censorship against voters; enables mass arrests of mayors, governors, and judges who support BLM, ANTIFA and other terrorists, foreign and domestic.

Keep in mind, the patented WATERMARK on “official election ballots” are registered on a QFS blockchain to prevent fraud, so knowing how evil the Democrat party is, this system was developed to protect American voters.

Currently, the National Guard has been deployed to 12 targeted states, Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Delaware, Illinois, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin.

Have the democrats fallen into the trap of a major sting operation?

To be sure, it will take days to sift through the wreckage, but in the meantime, lawsuits are being filed, and evidence gathered.

Soon arrests will be made and just in time for our new Supreme Court Justice, Amy Coney Barrett, who secures the legal ability to move forward against any further corruption and criminality.

Insurmountable and illegal actions have taken place by Anti-American individuals, these are federal crimes, many of these instigators believe they will escape the wrath of what is to come, but I assure you, cameras were rolling and witnesses are accessing the political damage, that if went unaccounted for, would have changed the direction of our country and even the world.

The punishment of these crimes will be severe, in the days and weeks to follow, these corrupt bandits within the bureaucratic government, judicial system, mainstream, and social media platforms, and their street minions will fall upon their own swords.

This is the final takedown of evil that ruled over us. They have overestimated themselves through power-monger forms of greed and weaponized the despair they unleashed on the American people, who they have clearly underestimated.

Our American votes may have temporarily been displaced and only for a moment in time, but the Democrats will never steal the heart and soul of a reunited nation and its most powerful leader, President Donald J. Trump because the power and protection by the almighty have already ordained and blessed this union through a spiritual alliance within the heavens, that no man can take away.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

It's possible that 2020's election fraud is way bigger than we thought

AmericanThinker
By Andrea Widburg
Two massive Twitter threads contend that serious computer fraud two years ago in Texas, which turned strong red districts blue, was essentially a trial run for what's been playing out across America in this election. This post summarizes the core claims in those threads, along with interlineations of information I found.

One Twitter thread comes from Roscoe B. Davis, the other from Bad Kitty.

Scytl is a Barcelona-based company that provides electronic voting systems worldwide, many of which have proven vulnerable to electronic manipulation. Scytl has (or had) Soros and Democrat party connections. Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen's Vulcan Capital has invested $40 million in Scytl.

In 2012, Scytl acquired all the assets of SOE Software, which was then America's largest voting machine and software vendor. Scytl also acquired the trade name "Clarity Elections" and rebranded its American operations as "Clarity," with a data process domain at clarityelections.com.

Everything on the Clarity site is unsecured on Amazon Web Services. By 2018, Scytl, using the Clarity network, supported elections in more than 12 states and 900+ jurisdictions, covering 70 million voters.

The electronic voting software in Dallas came from Electronic Software & Systems, Inc. (ES&S), the largest manufacturer of voting machines in the U.S. (4,500 localities in 42 states and two territories). ES&S maintains all its data as unsecured files on the clarityelections.com domain, which is processed through Scytl servers in Barcelona. General election voting records are automatically forwarded to DNS addresses that include ES&S, Scytl in Barcelona, Smartmatic12 in London, and a Russian server at South Ural State University in Chelyabinsk.

In Dallas County, Texas, a deep red county, there was a sudden, unexpected blue wave in 2018. The computer logs revealed that ES&S technicians repeatedly overrode thousands of error codes for "time stamp mismatch" and "votes exceed ballots." Essentially, they replaced votes. Then ES&S ignored the requirement that the data be saved for 22 months and destroyed everything.

Investigators also found an Excel spreadsheet file with Scytl algorithms projecting voting results on the NGP Van website. NGP Van does voter database and analytics for the DNC. It also works closely with ActBlue and Shared Blue.

While the real data manipulation in Dallas occurred at the electronic level, it's worth noting that the election was also plagued by obstructing poll-watchers, flash memory cards that showed up with new votes, and shuffled computer logs, among other things.

In 2019, the same anomalies in Dallas showed up in Kentucky, which was also using Clarity. The most notable was an instantaneous decrease of 560 votes for Bevin, a Republican, and an increase of 560 votes in favor of Beshear, a Democrat. This occurred at the Clarity level, which was funneled to, and played out on, CNN.

In-depth analyses show that Clarity's systems in Kentucky were a Spanish operation. Scytl, through Clarity, had the final control over vote-counting and reporting.

Since Scytl and Clarity ultimately provide the software and analytics for elections across America, this means that many American elections are run, counted, and controlled by an overseas company. Another company, SGO Smartmatic, headquartered in London, plays a role similar to Scytl's vis-à-vis American elections. There's more at the Bad Kitty thread, and you really should work your way through it.

What Roscoe B. Davis brings to the table is a claim from two cyber–forensic investigators. They told him that all the stuff we're talking about — the secretive poll-counting, the cemetery voters, the ballot dumps — is a distraction. The real issue is that the important changes are happening at the level of computer tabulation. The forensics investigators believe that these changes occur offshore, mostly at Scytl's headquarters in Barcelona, and maybe in Frankfurt, Germany.

As far as I can tell, what's important is that, across America, machines maintained by giant multinational corporations handle our elections and have already provably manipulated elections in Texas and Kentucky. These are the kind of systems that can be manipulated with Hammer and its Scorecard program or gamed (as they seem to have been in Texas) by employees overriding the people's will.

All of this is pure theorizing. But here's something for you to consider as to whether these theories are striking a nerve: I wrote about the Benford Anomalies in the election outcomes, as did many other sites, including GNews. Jim Hoft, of Gateway Pundit, tweeted out the GNews story. Gateway Pundit picks up the narrative:

Tonight we heard from several readers who were suspended after retweeting our tweet on Benford's law.

Facebook and Twitter flagged the tweets for sexual exploitation.

There's something rotten in Denmark — or Barcelona, London, Frankfurt, at least ten American states, and Silicon Valley. Trump is fighting not just for his presidency, but for the integrity of American politics. Support him in any way you can.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Clinton’s Malfeasance Led To The DNC Deaths
By Yoichi Shimatsu ... MillenniumReport

The unsolved mystery behind the deaths of DNC data expert Seth Conrad Rich and lawyer Shawn Lucas is deepening due to non-disclosure of forensic findings by the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department, whose chief Cathy Lanier is a member of the national intelligence establishment with a master’s degree in security studies from the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey.

Key evidence is being suppressed by an intelligence community that may well be involved in recent assassination incidents and acts of political terrorism, including the nighttime attempt to penetrate the Ecuadorean Embassy in London, sanctuary of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange. It was a reminder that Seth Rich was murdered under the cover of night.

With access to autopsy reports, independent journalists are left just one method for probing these cases, and that is a reexamination of the divisive issues associated with these deaths. The Rich and Lucas cases are very much linked to the political struggle between progressive reformers and the centrist establishment in the Democratic National Committee (DNC). The cover-up in the nation’s capital points toward the Obama White House and very possibly implicates the Executive Office in direct involvement in the death of those two whistle-blowers and probably more during this presidential election campaign. Nothing is sacrosanct in these troubled times, especially not an administration that authorized targeted killings of American citizens.

The denials from the Washington D.C. bureaus of the mainstream media has stripped away any pretense of press freedom, especially when ousted DNC chairwoman Deborah Wasserman Schultz and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton remain under widespread public suspicion despite the media blackout. The alternative online news, except for a few brave editors and commentators, has been increasingly manipulated by major search engines and the likes of Facebook and Twitter with censorship of conversations and the denigration of honest questioning as conspiracy theories. Why are the media so afraid of truth-seeking when it’s their constitutional duty to uncover the facts?

Lawsuit against the DNC

Despite the paucity of details about his death, the litigation context makes it somewhat easier to start with the loss of Shawn Lucas, found dead inside his bathtub on August 2, three weeks after the gunshot killing of Seth Rich.

Lucas’s background as an attorney remains obscure. His only notable media presence is the video showing him serving notice for a lawsuit at the DNC headquarters in Washington D.C.. The law case itself has been ignored by the mainstream press and the internet media, even though the legal briefs available online offer piercing insights into the grievances against the Clinton campaign, which presumably had a hand in his demise.

Pam and Russ Martens at the wallstreetparade.com blog have produced an informative essay series on the lawsuit against the DNC filed by the Miami-based Beck & Lee law firm. The plaintiff’s complaint Wilding v. DNC, filed on June 28 (before the Wikileaks release of DNC staff emails) in the federal court for the Southern District of Florida, can be downloaded from several websites.

The Martens duo explain: “Adding to the growing interest in the lawsuit, a 38-year-old process server, Shawn Lucas, who served the lawsuit on the DNC at their Washington, D.C. headquarters on July 1, was found dead last Tuesday in his bathroom of still-to-be-determined causes. The Lucas death came just nine days after an attorney for the Sanders’ plaintiffs, Jared Beck, released a YouTube video outlining the serious allegations it plans to make against Perkins Coie in court.”

Cynical Power Players

The kingmaker law firm Perkins Coie is headed by senior partner Marc Elias, who is described by Politico.com as one of the top “power players behind Hillary Clinton’s campaign” (a list well worth examining for prime suspects in other high crimes of state).

Chris Street for Breitbart adds “The WikiLeaks release of hacked emails appears to show that the huge Perkins Coie law firm, while representing both the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign, provided strategic advice to hurt Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign.”

The legal complaints against Wasserman Shultz include fraud, negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, and breech of fiduciary duty. The class action suit demands reimbursement of USD 228 million raised by the Sanders campaign along with a share of USD 128 million in contributions to the DNC. The heist by the Hillary Victory Fund, involving money transfers from DNC to state campaign offices and 100 percent kickbacks, is a transparent fraud involving grand larceny, punishable with a long prison term. The Sanders campaign has aptly characterized the hustle as “money laundering”.

Hillary on the Defense

Among the WikiLeaks emails released on July 22, one shows that Perkins Coie, which orchestrated the rearguard tactics for the DNC and its chair Wasserman Schultz, was simultaneously giving legal advice to the Hillary Clinton campaign. Marc Elias advised bluntly: “the DNC should push back directly at Sanders and say that what he is saying is false and harmful to the Democratic party.” Elias was unashamedly advocating perjury during the preparations for a courtroom defense against a Sanders lawsuit (since dropped due to his campaign being implicated in the VoteBuilder/NGP VAN intrusion affair, which looks to have been an entrapment scheme).

On the day after the Wikileaks dump, Wasserman-Schultz resigned, just 48 hours prior to the opening of the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, but the Florida-based lawsuit did not go away with her. Perkins Coie contrived a lame attempt to block Wilding v. DNC on the technicality that the DNC staffer was too low-ranking to accept the summons. Now that the notice server is dead, it’s her word versus Shawn Lucas. Cockroaches have been killed for better reasons than that. If the judge invalidates the serving of notice, the court case would be delayed until after the November 8 elections, thereby covering Hillary Clinton with immunity. Marc Elias is not just a lawyer, he is an diabolically clever operative and insider with far-reaching intelligence connections, which has defended the worst of Wall Street. In a 2010 press release, Perkins Coie boasted: “the political law practice at Perkins Coie LLP, recently took on possibly the biggest client in the world: President Barack Obama.”

Here it should be noted that Lucas died without an apparent struggle in a situation that resembled the similar demise of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, which this writer attributed to a time-release capsule disguised as medication. Scalia visited his physician before traveling on holiday to Texas. Whether Lucas was taking prescription medicine needs to be determined. The possible scenario that he lapsed into a coma before being inserted into the bath should also be considered.

Whatever the ambiguities due to the news blackout, the salient point is that the timing of Lucas’s death exactly coincided with hasty legal maneuvers by the DNC and the Clinton campaign. Until substantial convincing proof is presented to show otherwise, it would be irresponsible to discount the possibility of assassination as a possible cause of death.

The Clinton Pet Project

Seth Rich was assaulted and shot dead in the predawn hours of July 10, three weeks before Shawn Lucas’s death. Julian Assange later stated that Rich may have been the original source of the DNC emails, a suggestion that bears some credence, given the circumstances of his killing and his cyber-strategic position as data director for the all-important DNC Voter Expansion Project.

The malicious disinformation website Snopes.com gave away its pro-establishment servitude by stating: “Rich worked in voter expansion, a minor post in getting people to their right polling places. He was a low-level staffer who had only been employed since 2014, and thus unlikely to be near sensitive information.” First off, Rich was the director of data management and not a “low-level staffer.”

As to its perceived value, the voter information was sensitive enough to split the Democratic Party and nearly led to violent clashes between Sanders supporters and Hillary’s handmaidens. Willful ignorance is defined as the practice of ignoring any sensory input that appears to contradict one’s inner model of reality. The Snopes mindset, as uncovered in my article on the Glock-armed hitman who infiltrated Trump Tower, is based on tactics of denial developed by the Israeli Defense Force cyber-warfare command, whose front companies invested in the user-tracking adware secretly planted on unsuspecting visitors to that “myth-busting” website, which has always relied on computer-generated hits for ratings.

The Voter Expansion Project was initiated in person by Bill Clinton in a video timed for the DNC’s winter conference in February 2014. At that gathering NPR reported: “Underscoring the Clintons’ centrality to the new effort, the former president appeared in the DNC video announcing and unveiling the initiative.”

Obama basketball crony Pratt Wiley was named to head the DNC voter project in the role of a political commissar. For data-mining talent, the DNC turned to the Democrat-based pollster Greenberg, Quilan, Rosner (GQR). The research firm conducts surveys for electoral campaigns at home and aboard, including several Color Revolution parties, Tony Blair and Ehud Barak’s HaAvoda. GQR also provides tech services to the Democratic National Institute (a vehicle for the National Endowment for Democracy), USAID, the World Bank, corporations including Microsoft and Sun Microsystems, and liberal warhorses Open Society Institute, SEIU and HERE (Hotel Employees Union). The client list is practically identical to that of CIA-infiltrated civil-society groups.

GQR transferred to the DNC one of its brightest proteges, Seth Conrad Rich, to run data research for the Voter Expansion Project. Due to the sensitive task of handling personal data, for example, from county records, prisons, hospitals, ICE and Facebook users, Rich was not once mentioned in the Wikileaks emails and project communications were relegated to Wasserman-Schultz and Pratt Wiley. Far from holding a minor post, Seth Rich was a protected asset.

The Voter Expansion Project is funded by three major sources:

– Wyss Foundation: According to a Wikileaks release of Guccifer2.0 hacks, the nonprofit charity funded by Swiss medical technology tycoon Hansjorg Wyss (pronounced Weiss) has pledged USD 100 million to the Clinton Foundation for the DNC voter expansion. This donation stands in clear violation of IRS regulations against the use of charitable funds for political campaigns. Wyss made his fortune by developing therapeutic prostheses for trauma victims and sponsors a research institute at Harvard. His critics claim that Wyss’s association with the Clinton Foundation is motivated by his plans to block product-liability and medical malpractice lawsuits.

– George Soros/OSI: A few months after Bill Clinton launched the Voter Expansion Project, George Soros committed USD 5 million to the proposal, with the stipulation that non-citizens should be given the right to vote in U.S. elections. The Open Society Institute has adopted voter recruitment and lobbying for lax registration standards as one of its priorities, obviously to organize its next Color Revolution, a full-spectrum subversion of U.S. democracy in red, white, blue and purple.

– Paul Allen, co-founder of Microsoft connected with intelligence agencies, has invested USD 44 million in electronic voting technology tech provider Scytl (pronounced Sky Tel), a Barcelona-based corporation the purchased SOE, the largest American voting technology company. Scytl now provides cyber-registration and online voting equipment to more than 100 electoral districts in battleground states New York, Texas, Washington, California, Florida, Alabama, Missouri, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, New Mexico, Nebraska, West Virginia and Washington D.C. Other investors in Scytl include funds linked to the intelligence community, Balderton Capital (which has interlocking directors with Rothschild Continuation Holdings) and Nauta, whose U.S. CEO Dominic Endicott is a former executive with Booz Allen. For further detail on Scytl, see Gerry Bello’s series at freepress.org.

Setting Up Sanders for Sabotage

Contrary to the Snopes.com attempt to minimize the importance of data, the Sanders campaign complained bitterly about being locked out the VoteBuilder data trove. Soon thereafter the DNC voter database was famously compromised on Saturday, December 12, 2015, when software vendor NGP VAN installed a patch that temporarily disabled the firewall between the three campaigns. Sanders data programmer Josh Uretsky took advantage of the lapse to access the Clinton campaign’s voter information but was quickly caught and forced to admit culpability. Uretsky was fired from the Sanders team after other staffers accused him of being a plant in a publicity stunt organized by the Clinton team to force Sanders to drop his lawsuit against the Hillary Victory Fund.

In both camps, there was a hunt for moles and agents provocateur. Adding to the breakdown of trust was the bipolarity of SEIU and HERE unionists whose bureaucratic loyalties are out of kilter with their populist rhetoric. SEIU has become increasingly beholden to the intelligence operations run out of the National Democratic Institute (NDI), while the Hotel and Restaurant Employees are under the thumb of the remnant Cleveland mob, which run the union pension and medical plans. Inexperienced activists are easily swayed by fast-talking “radicals” in the service of the Clintons and the CIA

A major flaw in the Voter Expansion drive has been the temptation of voter fraud, for example, registration of dual surnames of divorced women or recently married brides; use of driver’s license ID without certification of citizenship allowing temporary residents and illegals to vote; electronic data-mining of residents who are dead but missing an obituary (as happened in Ohio), registration of felons and severe psychiatric patients, and financial incentives for registering friends. With millions of dollars in slush funds available to field staffers plying low-income neighborhoods in a dozen battleground states, there is really nothing that can prevent vote-buying, except rare honesty.

Resisting the Rot

The ever-widening factional distrust, along with pressures to facilitate voter fraud, must have ethically challenged Seth Rich, who remained in contact with his former employer GQR through his girlfriend, KM, who was still working there. Rich was born in Omaha, Nebraska, in the wake of the notorious Franklin boy’s sex scandal and attended Creighton University, where the department head of psychology had been a Jesuit priest implicated in the pimping of boys to U.S. senators and the Bush White House. The Rich family belongs to a conservative Jewish congregation and he attended the all-Jewish Ramah summer camp in Wisconsin and in Israel. At heart, he was a good Jewish lad. The blasphemous brawl over access, money and power inside the DNC, along with abuse of data, would have seemed to him flagrant misconduct verging into criminality.Judging from Rich’s emotional depression on the last night of his life, his high-minded political ideals had been shattered.

Was Seth Rich involved in taking down the computer system (that then necessitated the NGP VAN patch) to expose the Clinton campaign’s sustained effort to destroy the Sanders movement? As Voter Enlargement data director, with support from GQR, he certainly had the technical ability and only needed the motivation to expose the corruption at its weakest point.

Aside from the voter data breech, the hacks of the DNC email system began in late 2015 and continued through the end of January. Was Guccifer2.0 actually an inside job? The one man with the answer is dead.

The DNC hired the Crowdstrike cyber-security firm to investigate the December voter data breech and later the email hacks. In both cases, Crowdstrike resorted to its predictable scare tactic of blaming hacker teams in hostile foreign countries, in this case the Russians. Crowdstrike boss Dmitri Alperovitch uses the alarmist tactic of blaming security lapses on evil foreigners, as for example the Shady RAT operation supposedly involving a mysterious Chinese group housed in what turned out to be a dilapidated long-vacant building in Shantong Province. Eugene Kaspersky has slammed Alperovich: “Sophisticated threats, such as TDSS, Zeus, Conficker, Bredolab, Stuxnet, Sinowal and Rustock, pose a much greater risk to governments, corporations and nonprofit organizations than Shady RAT.” If there really is a rodent in the shade, it’s name just might be Dmitri.

Crowdstrike’s xenophobia perfectly matched Hillary’s denunciation of Donald Trump as a stooge of the Kremlin. Although unfounded, these sorts of accusations scare the daylights out of junior staffers and the news media. The Cold War-style red-baiting is absurd now that Russia has rediscovered its Orthodox Christian heritage, and when such accusations are coming from a Clinton clan whose head, then a Rhodes scholar at Oxford, attended youth rallies in Moscow in the 1960s as a guest of the KGB.

Shark Attack

If slipping an unconscious lawyer into a bathtub is the signature of a state-run black operation, then the roughing up of Seth Rich before his shooting is the handiwork of strong arms from the loan shark business.

There are several jarring points about Seth Rich’s last hours. His girlfriend KM, who was away from the East Coast on an extended Fourth of July visit to her family home, spoke with him over the cell phone twice that night, once in the early evening, when she apparently admonished him, and again at about 4:15 a.m. just before he was shot. She told the Mirror newspaper that Rich planned to meet for a drink with friends. The two phone calls would be time before and after the planned meeting with the people that Miss KM was leery about. Toward midnight, Rich entered Lou’s, a sports bar, where he was a regular recognized by the service staff. They noticed that he sat on his usual bar stool at the corner of the bar and drank alone.

Later, he walked alone to the nearby Wonderland Ballroom, whose previous incarnation as Nob Hill was “a legendary gay bar”, according to a D.C. tourism website. Due to the unspoken policy of discretion in gay-oriented drinking establishments in the capital, his presence went unnoticed. It was there, after 1:30 a.m. he must have met with his contacts and after last order the group possibly visited a nearby apartment for after-hours drinking session until Rich left for his apartment in the gentrified Bloomingdale district at about 4 p.m.

Who could these late-night acquaintances have been? At that very same moment, Seth Rich was preparing to leave his post at DNC for a new job with the Hillary Clinton campaign (which after all could pay higher salaries with all the money confiscated from Sanders and the state committees). Was he invited to meet for informal discussion of his new assignment with Hillary, only to be set up for the kill by her operatives? The culture of anonymity at a D.C. gay-oriented bar was the ideal rendezvous point for a planned hit. The D.C. press is trying to blame a three-person gang of robbers with a silver gun arrested for a robbery in the same vicinity, but the problem with that claim is that the actual assailants would never return to the murder scene when the rest of capital is up for grabs.

The physical beating and knockdown of Rich to the pavement, preliminary to two shots in the back from a low-caliber handgun, reflects the style of aggressive debt collectors. The usual purpose is to warn other deadbeats from delaying payment on loans. The Rich killing had a dual intention: To eliminate a suspected turncoat who might have leaked DNC documents to Sanders and to Wikileaks; and to sweat other staffers into keeping their mouths shut.

Now who would order such a down-market atrocity against an idealistic kid from the Midwest? Look no further than Broward County, Florida, home district of Wasserman Schultz and her dicey husband who runs an aquarium for loan sharks.

Paradise for Capone and Lansky

The congresswoman from Florida’s 23rd district, Rep. Deborah Wasserman-Schultz, is the champion of the PayDay Loan industry, as represented in her state by the Florida Community Financial Services Association. She’s been leading an uphill battle to gut congressional legislation imposing anti-usury rules that protect low-income borrowers.

Her gerrymandered district, which includes northern Miami Beach and Broward-Palm Beach, is recognized as the national center for innovative fraud, from credit-card scams by phony retailers to personal identity theft. Ever since Al Capone built a vacation home in Broward and Meyer Lansky used it as a base for running his Cuban casinos, the beach property with its corrupt police force has been a magnet for Italian crime families from the New York-Jersey region, Jewish financial criminals, Columbian drug lords, Russian mafiya, and Wall Street banksters.

Legalized usury is aimed at the working poor and welfare recipients in urgent need of medical treatment and on an underclass hooked on gambling, drug abuse, alcoholism, used car purchases and subprime mortgages. Fast Cash windows are by no means mom-and-pop curbside banks but are actually storefronts for Wall Street hedge funds and investment banks. The New York financial elite can borrow practically for free from the Federal Reserve, and then roll over the easy cash through the PayDay Loan shops at an average annual interest rate of a whopping 300 percent.

Due to the chronic plight of the poor, aggressive debt collection is the only guarantee of sure profitability, since mothers fail to understand at first that repayment comes before milk for their babies. The bloodsuckers get their fill from helpless debtors surrendering a pound of flesh.

Debbie Wasserman’s husband Steve Schultz is a real estate lender and vice president of the Community Bank of Broward. His resume includes stints with Skybridge Capital, Oppenheimer and Company, and the secretive Security Financial Services Corporation. Schultz is a former U.S. Air Force intelligence officer, which put him and his wife in good stead with the likes of Gen. Michael Hayden, former head of the NSA and CIA. Unbeknownst to Debbie’s constituents, the Schultzes keep a second home in the posh New Hampshire town of Newbury and a collection of expensive cars.

Deborah Wasserman Schultz was appointed to replace Sen. Tim Kaine (Virginia) as DNC chair because she is the third highest grossing Democrat of annual donations. Second on that illustrious list is Rahm Emanuel, whose lucre ultimately derives from connections with the Israeli mob and the Henry Crown organization, crooked defense contractors who are the traditional benefactor of the Rodham family. At the top of the donation heap is Rep. Nancy Pelosi, daughter and sister of two mayors surnamed d’Alessandro who ruled Baltimore at the behest of “Lord” Julius Salisbury, boss of the underworld. Under federal indictment, the Jewish arch-criminal eventually “disappeared”, apparently to Israel.

Truth in Policy

Progressive reformers should not succumb to an unprincipled compromise that allows Clinton’s gangster associates and their money-laundering molls to control Congress and the White House for another eight years. Instead bottom-up reform of the Democratic Party must remain the determining priority since these few years offer a rare chance to evict the Wall Street plutocrats and their criminal allies from the Democratic Party. The key is to elect reform candidates to Congress while withholding support for Hillary’s presidential bid and boycotting on Election Day.

High praise is therefore due to the reformers and grassroots activists in South Florida, including courageous candidate Tim Canova, the gang-busting law professor challenging the Wasserman Schultz machine in this week’s Florida primary, and to the legal eagles at Beck & Lee Law.

The alliance of organized crime and Wall Street’s hedge funds is a tough nut to crack, and it will take a bipartisan sustained populist insurgency by Sanders supporters and Donald Trump’s grassroots base to topple the arrogant insiders who use and abuse the American electorate. This election season has launched the long-overdue task of political realignment in both major parties along with the flourishing of minor parties. The outcome should not limited to a radical reordering of each party’s principles and platforms but also must be aimed at a fundamental restructuring of the electoral college from its two-party bias toward a more representative coalition-based formulation for governance.

For progressives to demonize Donald Trump is shortsighted and irresponsible when self-critical analysis and debate are the priorities for both parties. It’s not Trump who is killing and terrorizing young progressive activists. Conflict between left and right is certain suicide when the common enemy is so close at hand. Under Obama, Wall Street was too big to fail. Under the next president, the moneyed interests could prove too big to fall, unless the banksters are gang-tackled by parallel populist movements, left, right and center. A combined assault on criminal power can happen only if all sides refuse to fall prey to the elite strategy of divide-and-rule. After Wall Street is soundly trashed and the economy returns to real-world production rather than investment scams in intangibles like tech shares, everyone can go whichever way they want and do as they wish, but until then unity is essential for the revival of genuine democracy.

If there is one valid warning from the deaths of Seth Rich and Shawn Lucas, it is the need to be distrustful of the data-obsessed mindset, which prevails over the intelligence agencies and their array of research institutes, pollsters and academics that have come to dominate policy and governance. In stark contrast, democracy operates on the basis of real-world experience, individual opinion, shared culture and reasoned discussion condensed in political debate. Computer modeling is not and will never be an authentic reflection of society much less an accurate prediction of the future. There is no substitute for the time-honored role of philosophical rigor as the ultimate guide in honest rhetoric as opposed to slick sophistry. Every democracy since the Greek city-states had understood this principle, and the contemporary world must now return to those basics.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Shadow Gate documentary exposes Deep State surveillance network
The Joe de Vivre
Aug 21

Whistleblowers reveal disturbing extent of psychological operations
by Millie Weaver
In a new documentary by Millie Weaver, two whistleblowers warn the world of an illegal global surveillance network. In ShadowGate, Patrick Bergy (Cyber Security, ARMY, PSYOP Program Developer) and Tore (Linguist, NAVY, Intelligence Contractor) claim that there is a ‘shadow government’ in existence. The extensive network they allude to includes former intelligence officials from a whole host of countries, Big Tech CEO’s and ex-military personnel. Tore and Patrick describe the psychological weapons these people have at their disposal and instances in which they believe they have been used.
The documentary begins with Weaver asking ‘What if I were to tell you that a small group of government contractors were hired by government officials to frame the Trump campaign, and set him up for the Russia collusion investigation?’. Weaver is an unabashed MAGA girl and that’s probably why she made this film. That’s not what we should be focusing on. The reach and power of the ‘Shadow Government’ is a big cause for concern.
‘The ObamaGate scandal only scratches the surface’. Weaver claims that ‘Both parties are equally guilty of covering up an even bigger scandal… ShadowGate’, an ’International criminal enterprise, where blackmail is traded and people’s personal data is gold’. ObamaGate was supposedly just one operation in a sea of others.
Tore reveals that ‘Unlike what most people think, our intelligence doesn’t stay within our borders or ‘within Federal buildings’. Patrick Bergy worked for former Obama administration National Security Advisor General Jim Jones, although he answered to Jones’ son Jim. Bergy says he worked for them for 8 years, ’Managing the most malovolent operations you could imagine’.
Tore reminds us that, ‘The FISA amendment act of 2008, section 702, gave the United States Government permission to spy on citizens with a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The NSA data system collects everything, all metadata, via the ‘upstream’. ‘Everything is stored for 72 hours, then dumped’. ‘If one could twin this stream of data, then privatise it, imagine what they could do with that’. Tore says she worked for John Brennan (Former CIA Director) at the Analysis Corporation and Global Strategies Group. ‘Under Brennan’s directive, Snowden created a data bridge from NSA database into private servers controlled by intelligence and cyber security contractors’. Contractors included former ‘GCHQ, CIA, NSA, M16, M15, German Intelligence’ members. ‘You have to wonder, why are all these former heads heading up consulting firms’? ‘They were collecting everybody’s data, and privatising it’. Tore describes Global Strategies Group as a ‘hub for all information, ‘in and out’. The sharing of data between national intelligence agencies may not be illegal, but a ‘private company housing all of the data’ and making it available to private investors certainly is. Brennan wasn’t CIA director until March 5th 2013. Snowden went public June 5th that year because ‘In just four months, GSG, CGI and other private contractors allegedly had unauthorised access to the entire Five Eyes network, unfiltered, unrestricted, de-compartmentalized, outside any government regulation for oversight’.
Patrick and Tore describe ShadowNet, a commercial version of the IIA (Interactive Internet Activities) weapon. Patrick says that they ‘Kept the intellectual property rights’ of everyone’s data and ‘Rebranded it commercially’. He informs Weaver of how you can ‘select an individual, or a group target, an entire country if you wanted to’. ‘If you understand enough about someone, you can hack their shadow, you can use their fears, you can use their anxieties’ says Tore. ’With enough information, you can predictively determine how they’re going to react’. You could target ‘a certain religious group, a six block radius like Chaz, and you try and get in their mind, how they walk, how they talk, what they like, what pushes their buttons, what drives them nuts… then you use that to your advantage, to push whatever product or direction you want them to go. ’If I want to blackmail you and put you under my thumb, not only will I know everything, I will know your deepest darkest fears, I will know people I can get in contact with to find out more about you’.
Tore and Bergy suggest that these IIA weapons have been used against the American public. ‘These guys back here in America have been having a field day using the technology that we have been developing to alter the outcomes of our elections, in America’, says Bergy. General Jones’ son left his office at Dynology in 2010, a couple of months later that company received a contract from the Department of Defence for a ‘Congressional Knowledge Management System’. CKMS was given control of ‘all of the scheduling, addresses, documents, everything, for the Congress. ‘CKMS is going to give you access to unlimited information’. CKMS’ ‘Primary place of performance’ was listed as ‘Germany’ for ‘Data processing, hosting and related services’. Bergy says after he brought this issue up this in 2018, Dynology soon lost the contract they’d had since 2011 and it was given to a company that existed as ‘nothing more than a website and a maildrop’, a mile or so from Dynology’s Tampa office’. Bergy went on to explain how companies like ‘PsyGroup’ had the exact same product as Dynology and that the owner of Dynology (General James Jones) sits on the board of directors for PsyGroup. ‘It’s like owner of coke sitting on board of director for Pepsi’.
Former CIA head John Brennan was on board with The Analysis Corporation, Global Strategies Group and CGI. General James Jones and General Michael Hayden were involved with Dynology, Clear Force, Jones International Group and Atlantic Council. Clear Force was a ‘defence protection partnership between CGI and GCHQ who shared ‘threat intelligence’. Bergy worked on and named iPSY, the ‘relational database component of’ Clear Force. Screenshots reveal a program designed for ‘Clandestine Internet Network Monitoring’. iPSY could ‘Create personas and interact with online forums, blogs and chat services’ to ‘collect intelligence, perform counter intelligence and disseminate information in either a non-attributable or attributable manner’. You could also ‘see what you’re adversary is up to without them seeing you’. The idea was to create ‘COPs’ (a ‘Common Operational Picture’) of ‘assets’, which ‘could be a journalist’, ‘an entire news organisation’, ‘a podcast’, or it ‘could be an individual YouTube influencer’. ‘It could be anybody like that’. ‘You would either build them from scratch or contract them out, and bring them online’. Foreign partners had access to the NSA server and access was granted both ways. ‘How do you think we found, through facial recognition of the FBI, the Belgian bomber?’, Tore asks. ‘Why would we have their facial recognition data?’
The dirty finger prints of these people can be found all over American politics. During the Mueller investigation, $40 million taxpayer dollars were directed to Brennan affiliated CGI, a Canadian company, for ‘waste management’. The Mueller report also confirmed that Trump declined to work with PsyGroup. According to Tore, this is because he foresaw a ‘honey trap’. Weaver believes Trump’s surprise election ‘got in the way of the big game, contests between contractor and sub-contractors over who gets first dibs on national security and tech contracts’. Tore claims this is why we saw ‘Censoring’ and ‘Shadow banning’ in Clinton’s favour, and ‘bogus’ polls that gave her a 98% chance of winning. Bergy concurs. He says that ’75%’ of people testifying about Trump and the Russian Dossier were connected to Jones, Mccain and the Atlantic Council. Dmitri Alperovitch, Senior Advisor on the Atlantic Council, owns Crowdstrike — the company who originally investigated the DNC server and started the Russian Collusion conspiracy. Tore and Bergy both claim that Brennan was behind the DNC leaks, as well as the 2015 OPM hack. They believe these events were part of an IIA or Psychological Operation.
‘When we hijacked the Afghan elections, how did we do that? We had to understand how the Afghani’s think’, Tore tells us. She underlined the importance of understanding areas that were anti-taliban because they had become more militant and less political. In these areas they could ‘sway their thoughts’ ‘to vote for candidate X, Y, Z’. She went on two say that she helped to ‘train algorithms that could do that for you’
What would be stopping men like Brennan from deploying similar strategies and algorithms in America?
ShadowGate also reveals that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has partnered with General Jones and the Atlantic Council to ‘restore election integrity worldwide’. This happened just after Zuckerberg admitted in front of Congress that data was sold by a developer to Cambridge Analytica. General Jones is directly connected to Cambridge Analytica through PsyGroup and WikiStrat.
Trump has made some big changes. Tore highlights his policy of revoking clearances for retiring intelligence officials. ’Think of all the money they are going to lose in contracting’. Is this why Facebook has been removing Trump ads for ‘harmful misinformation’?
One of the boldest claims made in the documentary is the suggestion that these companies may even be able to influence things like jury selection. Roger Stone has been a long term friend of Donald Trump. Tore believes he is neither a ‘saint’ or a devil but because he ‘knows the swamp’ well, he has been targeted by the same people who went after Trump.
Roger Stone voices some alarming concerns about the make up of his jury. Tore suggests that through the use of ShadowNet, it could be ensured that the entire pool of people brought in to select jury members from, could all have a predisposition to say guilty or not guilty in a particular case. Stone says: ’I do know that based on statistics on the District of Columbia, the statistical possibility of my jury having a single Republican should be impossible, the statistical possibility of my jury having a single military veteran should be impossible, the statistical possibility of my jury having no jurors with less than a college education is impossible, but that was the case’.
Bergy says ‘Clear Force’ is the ‘next iteration of the ShadowNet’. They took ‘Personas and profile capabilities, they added real time criminal background, travel, financial, medical, added all these things in to create predictive behavioural profiles’, that can ‘determine whether or not you’re likely to steal or leak’. ‘Clear Force actually sells this to HR’.
Private companies, with access to the entire planet’s data through national intelligence databases, are executing psychological warfare programs on populations across the world. What’s really terrifying is what is being planned next.
In March 2017, a patent was issued for Jim Jones’ Clear Force for ‘Systems and Methods for electronically monitoring employees to determine potential risk’. Clear Force’s operation included the ‘International cooperative of law enforcement (e.g. INTERPOL, a private security force, and/or the like’ and would see that ‘local law enforcement and individual state databases’ were ‘fed into international justice and public safety networks’ for the ‘full integration of data’.
In March 2020, Atlantic Council issued a Policy Primer entitled ‘AI, Society and Governance’, it read: ’The United Nations Interregional and Justice Research Institute (UNICRI) and the International Criminal Police Organisation (INTERPOL) are the leading multilateral institutions at the global level that are looking into this nexus of issues, ’Autonomous patrol robots, computer vision software, tracking and tracing systems, forecasting tools (predictive policing, crime hot spot analytics and more’.
Many people will try and muddy the waters here with unnecessary conspiracies. The facts are enough. There is an international community of former intelligence and military personnel who are illegally trading the global population’s data and using to influence society in the most egregious and pervasive ways. The very same people who are running illegal data hoarding programs and psychological operations to influence elections, want to privatise international security. These people must be face justice.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

New Developments: Hammer And Scorecard, The Plot To Steal The Presidency
November 7, 2020 by Rose Taylor
What is Hammer and Scorecard?
In the tense aftermath of the 2020 presidential election, there are massive amounts of information circling around. One of the hot topics that people are talking about is the ‘Hammer and Scorecard’ software. What is this software? Where did it come from and why is it important?

Dennis Montgomery a former CIA/DOD/DHS/NSA/FBI contractor turned whistleblower designed and built the software called “The Hammer.” According to an article by The American Report in 2019, this software was designed as a “foreign surveillance tool” with many safeguards in place in order to prevent it from being used as a domestic spy tool. However, the “whistleblower tapes” leaked in 2015 cover 47 leaked hard drives and testimony that reveal this software was in fact used to spy and surveille U.S. citizens, namely President Donald Trump a “zillion times.”

This software is a CIA spy program designed to use on protected networks (like voting machines) without detection. It is important to note that Montgomery claims that in 2009, under then-President Barak Obama, this software was “commandeered and repurposed” by John Brenan and James Clapper into a “private and parallel domestic surveillance system.”

How Can This Software Effect Voting Machines?
While Hammer is the software that enables access to voting machines without being detected, the more important part of this equation is the software that works with Hammer to change vote tallies during the data transfer part of reporting the tabulation totals. Scorecard is designed to change only a 3% total of votes in order to go undetected during the transfer of totals.

Kirk Wiebe, a former senior analyst at the NSA from 1975-2001, explains that Scorecard is designed to change votes “on the fly.” He says that data is grabbed in real-time and changed in microseconds. It happens so quickly that no one notices the delay. Kirk mentioned Sydney Powell’s interview with Lou Dobbs regarding the current election.

Sydney Powell spoke on Lou Dobbs’ show and stated that they have some “excellent witnesses on the issue” regarding the 2020 election. There is forensic evidence showing what data was changed, where it came from, and where it was going to. A record is kept of the original data prior to the changes made by the software.

How This Effects the 2020 Presidential Election
Given all this information, and there is a lot to go through, the ramification concerning this election could be huge. As we saw in Michigan, there was a “glitch” that occurred. It was discovered that 6000 votes were incorrectly tabulated for Joe Biden that were cast for President Trump. Once the numbers were manually corrected, it flipped the county back in favor of the President. This was just one occurrence in one state.

In Spalding County Georgia, another “glitch” caused the voting systems to go offline for several hours on Election Day resulting in voting times being extended to 9:00 pm. Politico reports that Marcia Ridley, elections supervisor at Spalding County Board of Elections said that the problems with the machines were due to an “upload to the machines by one of their technicians overnight.” Ridley continued “That is something that they don’t ever do. I’ve never seen them update anything the day before the election” and that she “did not know what the upload contained.”

Could these “glitches” be a small look into what is possibly massive changes made to the voter tallies by the software Scorecard? Given that there is “forensic evidence” of changes occurring, we could be seeing one of the largest attempted coups in history. An attempted coup on the highest office in America.

Widespread Voter Fraud
It is largely touted by the Democrats that “widespread” voter fraud does not exist. However, combined with massive amounts of mail-in ballots which are uniquely susceptible to fraud, as reported by the New York Times in 2012 and the fact that according to an article by The Guardian in 2019 that “no matter who owns them, voting machines are more vulnerable to insider malfeasance than any other sector of the election industry” it is certainly a possibility.

The integrity of our elections is a cornerstone of this country. Without clear and transparent election results there will be massive civil unrest. No matter what the final results of the election are, the citizens of the United States of America deserve to know the truth.

New Developments Regarding Vote Switching
Since publishing this article, New Right Network has become aware of new evidence of potential use of CIA developed software Hammer and Scorecard in the 2020 presidential election.

In the above video, what you are seeing is CNN’s live election coverage. If you watch it happening live, there does not seem to be anything wrong. However, because the change happens so fast, they were not able to update the vote tallies on the banner fast enough to match what is shown in the left-hand corner of the screen. When the update to the vote tallies load, if you watch frame by frame, you see a 560 vote increase for Andy Beshear. By itself, there is nothing strange. What is odd is that at the exact same time, in microseconds, Matt Bevins vote total is decreased by exactly, you guessed it, 560 votes.

With what we have learned about Scorecard, it appears this could be the software working in real-time. Scorecard changes the vote tallies after they have been cast, in real-time, as they are sent out to be reported. It is during this transfer of data that we would see the changes occurring, as seen in the clip from CNN’s live coverage.

This vote tally change, increasing the total for one candidate while simultaneously decreasing the total for another candidate, is similar to what we saw in Michigan where 6000 votes cast for President Trump were incorrectly tabulated for Joe Biden.

More Voting Anomalies
In addition to the “glitches” and real-time tally inconsistencies, there are other reported “voting anomalies.” An anomaly is defined as “something that deviates from what is standard, normal, or expected.” What is increasingly strange is the number of ballots cast where the voter voted for the presidential race.

As the numbers are being more closely inspected, there are tens of thousands of ballots that did not vote for any race down-ballot. According to Sydney Powell, attorney for General Flynn, there have been reports of this happening in states like Pennsylvania (98,000), Georgia (80-90,000), Arizona (42,000), Michigan (up to 115,000), and Wisconsin (62,000). While this does happen at a very low percentage historically, in 2020 the margin of this occurring is huge.

One theory on this, combined with potential inference with the Hammer and Scorecard software, is that ballots were entered real-time to make up for the deficits in needed votes in real-time. Although this is just a theory, it is worth exploring. Could it be possible that an attempted coup was set in motion prior to election day with Scorecard, that changes only 3% of the vote in the favor of whatever it is programmed to change, only to realize that it was not enough?

Once it was realized that a 3% change would not overcome the sheer amount of votes cast for President Trump, could voting have been paused to regroup and then commit fraud in real-time? If so what could this look like? We have seen whistleblowers come forward alleging that the United States Postal Office was directing postal carriers to gather ballots and bring them back to the postal office to be hand stamped with the date needed for them to count for the elections. We have also heard reports of boxes of ballots showing up in the middle of the night to key locations post-election day.

While nothing is concrete right now, there is overwhelming evidence that election meddling has occurred. The President’s personal lawyer, Rudy Guiliani, announced in a press conference on Saturday that lawsuits are set to being on Monday, November 9. As a nation, we deserve an answer and confidence that this was a fair and free election.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The truth of deep state1:Staple Street Capital who owns Dominion Voting, involves a huge political background

GNews

In Michigan, after 6,000 votes were tabulated for Biden instead of Trump in Antrim County, Michigan Republican Party Chairwoman Laura Cox, said that 47 of Michigan’s 83 counties “used this same software in the same capacity”

The voting machines belonged to a company called Dominion Voting Systems. Dominion Software is used in 28 US states including all of the battleground states or swing states.

Who owns the Dominion Voting Systems?

July 16, 2018 Dominion Voting Systems (“Dominion Voting”) announces that it has been acquired by its management team and Staple Street Capital.

Staple Street Capital is a private equity firm founded in 2009 based in New York.The co-founders Stephen D. Owens and Hootan Yaghoobzadeh are veterans of The Carlyle Group and Cerberus Capital Management, also the Board members of Dominion Voting. The official website of Staple Street Capital has deleted the team introduction.

William E. Kennard is an Executive Board Member of Staple Street Capital, also worked for The Carlyle Group.

Kennard nominated as ambassador to the EU by Barack Obama in August 2009 and is a member of Secretary of State John Kerry’s Foreign Affairs Policy Board.He was a key force behind Obama’s decision in February 2013 to launch negotiations on the ambitious Transatlantic Trade.He was also chairman of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission after being appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1997.

Before nominated as ambassador to the EU by Barack Obama in 2009,Kennard was managing director of the Carlyle Group(2001-2009) where he led investments in the telecommunications and media sectors.

Staple Street Capital’s co-founders and Board members of Dominion Voting, Stephen D. Owens was a managing director of the Carlyle Group (1998 – 2009), Hootan Yaghoobzadeh worked for the Carlyle Group (2002 – 2003), Cerberus Capital Management (2003 – 2009).

About The Carlyle Group

The key person of Dominion Voting are all related to The Carlyle Group. The Carlyle Group is an American multinational private equity, alternative asset management and financial services corporation, with more than $203 billion in assets under management across 126 funds and 139 fund of funds vehicles.

In 2015, Carlyle was the world’s largest private equity firm by capital raised over the previous five years, according to the PEI 300 index, though by 2020 it had slipped into second place.

In April 2003, it was reported that the Carlyle Group is managed by a team of former US Government personnel including its president Frank Carlucci, former deputy director of the CIA before becoming Defence Secretary. His deputy is James Baker III, who was US Secretary of State under George Bush senior. The financial assets of the Saudi Binladen Corporation (SBC) are also managed by the Carlyle Group. The Bin Laden family liquidated its holdings in Carlyle’s funds in October 2001, just after the September 11 attacks, when the connection of their family name to the Carlyle Group’s name became impolitic.

Many influential characters have worked for or invested in the group, including John Major, former UK Prime Minister;Fidel Ramos, former Philippines President; Park Tae Joon, former South Korean Prime Minister; Saudi Prince Al-Walid; Colin Powell, former Secretary of State; James Baker III, former Secretary of State; Caspar Weinberger, former Defense Secretary; Richard Darman, former White House Budget Director; the billionaire George Soros, and some bin Laden family members. You can add Alice Albright, daughter of Madeleine Albright, former Secretary of State; Arthur Lewitt, former SEC head; William Kennard, former head of the FCC, to this list. Finally, add in the Europeans: Karl Otto Pöhl, former Bundesbank president; Henri Martre, former president of Aerospatiale; and Bilderberg steering committee member Etienne Davignon.

In 2011, Carlyle acquired AlpInvest, which is one of the largest private equity investment managers globally with over €38 billion under management, AlpInvest has historically been the exclusive manager of private equity investments for the investment managers of two of the world’s largest pension funds Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP and Stichting Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn.

Carlyle’s corporate private equity business has been one of the largest investors in leveraged buyout transactions over the decade 2004–2014 (or perhaps 2000–2010),Carlyle has invested in Accolade Wines, Booz Allen Hamilton, PA Consulting, Dex Media, Dunkin’ Brands, Supreme, Freescale Semiconductor, Getty Images, HCR ManorCare, Hertz, Kinder Morgan, Nielsen, United Defense, and other companies.

The Carlyle Group is known as Crony Capitalism and the Iron Triangle,the so-called iron-triangle refers to industry, govt and the military. The Carlyle Group is infamous for the number of ex-Govt and high-ranking political leaders who work for them.

Behind Dominion Voting is a huge swamp creature with tentacles all over the world, which is the reason behind election fraud and fake news. We can notice that in 2009, the former director of Carlyle founded Staple Street Capital, and William Kennard who is an Executive Board Member of Staple Street nominated as ambassador to the EU by Barack Obama in 2009. This may be related to Obama, and the Carlyle Group is accused of being related to the Bush family, which also reveals why Bush supports the Obama Biden administration.

Miles Guo mentioned in a live broadcast recently that the Bush family will support President Trump. I think maybe Obama’s business is messed up and the Deep State is splitting.

This is a systematic national-level crime chain ,involving many national political figures, business celebrities,media tycoons.The above is the first installment, the heavy weight is not yet finished.

Please reprint more to spread the truth, so more people can understand this “Trumen world”,the democratic world has been completely infiltrated and corrupted , most dangerously they was the achieve almost total influence over the media. in fact the world controlled by a small handful of global special interest .these exposed chain of interest are only the tip of the iceberg.we must be Together,for justice to expose them!!

Chinese:https://gnews.org/zh-hans/552604/

Source:

The Carlyle Group

https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Carlyle_Group

https://www.wikicorporates.org/wiki/Carlyle_Group_Inc

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Carlyle_Group

Dominion Voting

https://www.dominionvoting.com/dominion-voting-systems-acquired-by-its-management-team-and-staple-street-capital/

Staple Street Capital

https://wearethene.ws/notable/164392

https://2009-2017.state.gov/s/p/fapb/185588.htm

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Scytl has all the tools it needs for election fraud

ColumbusFreePress
by Gerry Bello, by Bob Fitrakis
NOVEMBER 7, 2014

Free Press readers may be familiar with Scytl, the promoter of online and mobile voting, and their apparent connections to the intelligence community. Renewed research into Scytl has revealed new connections to the intelligence community, new market positioning, and new opportunities for both personalized surveillance and electronic election fraud.

Scytl's 2012 entry into the American election market occurred through the purchase of SOE software, a Tampa based manufacturer of election management and reporting software known as the Clarity suite. Scytl initially maintained essentially a front address in Virginia while digesting SOE during the the 2012 election cycle. Since then there has been a pattern of SOE rebranding and reorganizing itself along with a merger and new set of strategic partnerships.

Through looking at Scytl's ownership and investors, we can see a more frightening pattern of investment and market synergy. In 2012 the Free Press broke the news of the connection between one Scytl's parent companies, Nauta Capital, and Carrier IQ, a maker of mobile phone applications with obvious spyware uses. Nauta's expansion into this market sector along with an expansion into mobile devices, voice bio-metrics, social network monitoring, online gaming, and cloud computing should raise an eyebrow.

SOE is no longer SOE. SOE is now calling itself “SOE, A Scytl Company.” There are no other Scytl companies in the US that have been identified at the time of this writing. It would appear from this rebranding that there is the intention of there being more “Scytl Companies” in the future. This rebranding may be PR deflection of Scytl's overseas origin and ownership, or it may have a dual purpose.

Representatives of the Ohio Green Party traveled to Tampa in order to meet with SOE and purchase custom software for tracking voter registrations and other election management tasks. SOE's name is not on the office building's marquee or directory and garnering face time with company officials proved difficult. During the eventual interview the SOE spokesperson said that the company only does “custom work for governments” and referred the party to “Scytl” for “specialized election work.”

SOE saw a period of management chaos after being purchased by Scytl. Reviews online of working there tell vague tales of revolving doors in some of the top offices combines with rapidly shifting project priorities. This chaotic pattern seems to have changed and there is now a clear management team in place. This management team has a number of principals that stand out.

Starting the list is Pere Valles, who came directly from Scytl. He is now CEO. He is Scytl's man running SOE. He is also on the board of Scytl by virtue of representing the interest of a key investor in Scytl, Balderton Capital. Balderton is a British not entirely spun-off spin-off of Benchmark Capital that has a history of investment in tech companies of interest to the intelligence community. For instance, Benchmark has invested in Nextdoor.com, which Vulcan Capital (Paul Allen's venture capital firm) also invested in. Vulcan Capital is also invested in Scytl. The Free Press has done previous reporting on Nextdoor as a nexus of investment for intelligence community related venture capital firms.

Valles was previously with three other companies. Prior to Balderton, he was Vice President and CFO of Globalnet, a telecom provider. He appears to have been brought in to effect the sale of that company to Titan L-3, a major defense and intelligence contractor. The sale of Globalnet, two years in the making, was finalized just as the Abu-Gharrib scandal broke in 2004. One of Titan's employees was a translator at the prison and was exposed in subsequent reports to have raped at least one juvenile prisoner. He was not fired.

Prior to Globalnet, Valles worked for the accounting firm KPMG and prior to that he was a principal at Diamond Cluster consulting, along with all of the founders of Nauta Capital.

Scytl's Vice President of Communications is Michelle Shafer, who is the quintessential voting machine industry shill. She has previously served in a similar capacity with Sequoia Voting Systems, Hart Intercivic and Calibre Systems. The last of the list is a defense industry firm that made a brief attempt to enter the election industry through the delivery of absentee ballots to armed forces personnel abroad.

Another SOE Vice President is Brian O'Connor. O'Connor came to SOE recently from Crossmatch Technologies. Crossmatch is a provider of biometric technologies to the defense department and department of homeland security. Four current executives at Crossmatch came from another biometric technology company, L-1 Identity Solutions. L-1 was founded by Robert LaPenta. LaPenta is also one of the founders of and still a major stockholder in L-3 Communications, the parent company of Titan L-3 communications.

Prior to working at Crossmatch, O'Connor worked for Sequoia Voting Systems and Global Elections Systems just prior to the latter's acquisition by Diebold. Diebold later spun Global Election Systems off as Premier Elections Systems. The later was then purchased by Election Systems and Software (ES & S). Federal anti-trust regulations forced ES & S to spin Premier off again. It was then purchased by Canada-based Dominion Voting Systems. A month later Dominion also purchased Sequoia.

SOE has expanded its market share through at least one merger. In 2013 SOE acquired Oklahoma based Maxim Consulting. Maxim has offices in Oklahoma City and Dallas and was an IT firm specializing in Oracle database management and integration. Their entry into the elections industry was voter registration management software. Their largest contract was with the Cherokee Nation. They executed this contract in partnership with Texas-based voting machine manufacturer Hart InterCivic.

The merger gives SOE a complete set of products from Registration, through ballot production and election management, to vote counting and tabulation and election night reporting. Although the relationship between Hart and SOE is not clear post merger, Michelle Shafer's former tenure there as well as her continued residence in Austin where Hart is based bodes well for the continuation of their relationship.

Scytl also has a strategic partnership with ES & S. Thus through only two executives and a strategic partnership, Scytl's management team has a relationship or an inner working knowledge of every major voting systems manufacturer active in the American market.

The Free Press's research into Scytl began with noting the ownership of Scytl by Nauta and Nauta's ownership of Carrier IQ, a cell phone spyware manufacturer. Carrier IQ is not the only mobile phone applications company that Nauta has invested in.

One of Nauta's a principals, Dominic Endicott, previously worked for Booz Allen Hamilton. Booz Allen is a major defense and intelligence contractor. They employed Edward Snowden and subcontracted him out to the NSA, for instance. Endicott's tenure at Booz Allen was in their mobile and wireless practice, interfacing with almost every major cellular manufacturer and service provider.

In addition to being Nauta's man on Carrier IQ board, Endicott is also Nauta's man on the board of Mobile Aware, another maker of cell phone applications. Mobile Aware's practice centers around customer care applications. These applications help a customer diagnose problems, contact technical support, pay their bills online, even give other subscribers minutes. The surveillance potential as well as the intrusion and spyware potential of such a set of applications is unparalleled in commercial products.

Nauta is also invested in GreatCall, which operates as Jitterbug. Jitterbug is a cell phone manufacturer specializing in making cell phones for Senior Citizens. The products feature louder speakers and larger buttons as well as improved customer diagnostics.

Scytl's technology is designed to allow a user to vote using a phone. Scytl's sister companies record the keystrokes made on the phone, provide customer care including billing and provide better access for seniors. These technologies together allow a persons’ cellular usage habits as well their metadata to be kept, and thus build a predictive user profile.

People talk on the phone. A person's voice is unique. A person's voice can be recorded. One of Nauta's investments also can use a person's unique voice as identification. Nauta is invested in a voice recognition software company called AGNITiO. AGNITiO, like Scytl was founded by a former professor in Spain. Nauta has two of its principals on AGNITiO's board, Carles Ferrer and Al Sisto. Carles Ferrer is also on the board of Scytl. His previous places of employment include TRW, now owned by defense contractor Northrup Grumman. Al Sistos was formerly chief operating officer of RSA Data Security, a major encryption software manufacturer. Another Nauta's guy on AGNITiO's board is Francis C. Harvey. Harvey served as secretary of the Army from 2004 to 2007 at the height of the Iraq War and during the Abu-Gharrib scandal. According to his biography Harvey also served on the board of three companies owned by the Bush family friendly Carlyle Group and held a vice-chairmen position at two of them. The Carlyle group had an ownership interest in Booz Allen Hamilton, where Nauta principal Dominic Endicott formerly worked.

In addition to voice and mobile data, Nauta is invested in social media gaming. They are an investor in Social Point Gaming, the third largest maker of games for facebook. These games and interaction give a gaming administrator deep insight into the habits and personalities of the players through monitoring their interactions and the associated chats. An earlier key investor in Social Point, Greylock Capital Partners, has strong ties to the intelligence community. Greylock's chairman, Howard Cox, also sits on the board of In-Q-Tel. In-Q-Tel is a non-profit venture capital firm run by the CIA. Greylock also invested in Nextdoor.com along with Benchmark Capital, the American sister firm of Scytl investor Balderton. Scytl investor Vulcan Capital is also invested in Nextdoor, which is a neighborhood based social networking platform.

Although Greylock is not invested in Scytl they do seem to have some interest in elections. During the most recent general election, a Greylock partner, Reid Hoffman, invested $500,000 in a State Assembly candidate David Chiu in San Francisco. This figure represents nearly $3 per voter in the district. The previous office holder in that district, Tom Ammiano, spent a little more than half as much in his entire previous campaign. Ammiano is not eligible to run again because of term limits.

Given all the data that Social Point, Carrier IQ, Nextdoor, Mobile Aware, AGNITO and Jitterbug could generate, a surveillance regime would need analysis tools. Fortuitously, Nauta is invested in BrandWatch. BrandWatch allows companies to follow their brand through multiple social media platforms to see what the public thinks about their products, what advertising and concepts resonate with the public, and who the opinion leaders are. The British television network SkyAtlantic uses Brandwatch to fine tune its marketing of Game of Thrones. Balderton Capital joined Nauta investing in Brandwatch and has a seat on its board.

Nauta is also invested in iJento, another marketing data analysis company that specializes in web analytics. Their web claims they provide “Multi-Channel Customer Intelligence.” Nauta is represented on their board by both Carles Ferrer and Al Sistos.

Scytl and Brandwatch are not the only places that Balderton and Nauta cross paths. In order to store and process the data generated by the sundry tools products and services offered by Scytl's many sister companies, an organization would be almost forced to seek a solution through cloud computing. Nauta and Balderton together have made a strategic investment that would handle such a contingency. That investment is in the Spanish cloud computing company Abiquo, where Nauta is again represented by both Carles Ferrer and Al Sistos.

The complete package of Social Point, Carrier IQ, Nextdoor, Mobile Aware, AGNITO and Jitterbug, iJento, Brandwatch, and Abiquo would give a malicious actor all they need to rig an election that used Scytl and SOE's software packages. CarrierIQ and Mobile Aware provide backdoors through Scytl's security. The rest can be used to build a set of predictive profile voters which can be used in deciding which votes to change.

Ballot tampering is a part of election rigging. Voter suppression is another critical component. SOE has an app for that.

SOE's flagship product before its acquisition by Scytl was the Clarity ePollbook. The Clarity Pollbook is an electronic pollbook built on the Android tablet platform. Its nearest competitor, one built by ES & S, is also running on an Android tablet. The security vulnerabilities in the ES & S product were documented by the Free Press in a previous article. For brevity, these tablets can be attacked via SD card, USB thumb drive, bluetooth, cellular network, backup subversion, internet and the cloud they perform additional backups too.

Both companies would likely defend their product by claiming that the secure socket layer (SSL) encryption would protect them from eavesdropping and thus a man in the middle attack. It is not known what version of Android ES & S is using, but many of SOE's Clarity devices are using Android 4.1.

Android 4.1 is vulnerable to a well publicized weakness in its SSL suite called HeartBleed. Although the Heartbleed attack was fixed on the server side, potentially millions of clients are still vulnerable without vigilant updates. Some 61% of all Android devices made run Android 4.1. A Forbes columnist said of the weakness "Some might argue that [Heartbleed] is the worst vulnerability found (at least in terms of its potential impact) since commercial traffic began to flow on the Internet." The USA Today reported that the NSA was aware of this weakness some two years before it was discovered by civilian researchers. It is not known how many Clarity devices remain unpatched and in circulation at various county boards of election around the nation.

Subverting the pollbooks would allow a malicious attacker to tamper with a voter registration to deny a vote. An attacker could also mark a voter as having turned in an absentee ballot and thus already voted, thus denying them a chance to actually vote at the polls.

Combining this voter suppression potential with the overlapping predictive capabilities of Nauta's other investments and you have the potential for a complete package of surveillance, suppression and fraud.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

National Election Fraud: Evidence of National Chicanery During America’s 2020 Presidential Election

LibertasBella
Written By Sam Jacobs — November 13, 2020
What Constitutes Evidence of Electoral Fraud?
The Glitch From Coast to Coast
The Turnout That Wasn’t
Vetting of Mail-In Ballots
Biden Outperformed Obama
Biden-Only Ballots
Who Counts the Votes? Irregularities In Counting Systems
Fight Back to Save America
Regardless of where one falls politically, the sanctity of the vote is a bedrock of a functioning representative democracy. Voters have to believe their vote matters. And that the vote is free, fair, and accurate.

The basic facts of the 2020 American Presidential election are concerning because mounting evidence indicates there’s been a concerted effort by state Democratic Parties to flip the election from President Donald Trump to former Vice President Joe Biden in a number of key swing states with the help of notoriously corrupt Democratic Party machines in at least five American cities — Detroit, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, Pittsburg, and Atlanta.

Here are the basic facts of the case: On Election Night when America went to bed, President Trump had a commanding lead in virtually every swing state, as well as Virginia, which no one expected him to win. However, when America woke up the next day, we found that he’d lost these leads, largely on the basis of mail-in ballots found in the middle of the night and out from under the watchful eye of legal election monitors.

What’s more, these massive caches of votes – almost all of which were for former Vice President Biden – came via large dumps primarily from the five aforementioned cities in states predominantly run by Democratic governors.

When one looks at the statistical likelihood of the reported turnout, the numbers are so improbable they’re more at home in a one-party state like Saddam Hussein’s Iraq or North Korea.

What’s more, Biden’s victory does not square with the results of the Republican Party nationally: Republicans won 28 of 29 competitive House seats and Democrats were unable to flip a single state legislature. Joe Biden secured a scant three of the so-called “Bellwether Districts” that almost always choose the winner, one of which was in Delaware. Judicial Watch found 353 counties in 29 different states who had higher than 100 percent turnout.

Anecdotally, swing states tend to follow Florida in terms of swinging left or right. This is particularly true in Michigan, which has voted in lockstep with Florida since 1968. Nearly three dozen states had counting machines connected to the Internet during the election, which is inherently insecure. Joe Biden’s lead among mail-in ballots was massive in two states — Michigan and Pennsylvania — while it was in the single digits in most states.

Evidence of chicanery, irregularities, and outright manipulation have poured in from a variety of states — Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Texas, New Jersey, Nevada, and Arizona. This evidence could easily be dismissed as simply weird if one is being generous or naive.

While much of this took place at the state level, there are also irregularities that are occurring across state lines and these are worthy of consideration. It’s not evidence per se, but there was a massive spike in the number of Google searches for “election fraud punishment” in swing states in the 30 days leading up to the election.

Below we explore the details and the data of what happened across the nation on Election Day, with flagrant and often sloppy irregularities occurring from coast to coast. Elsewhere we explore similar efforts in the key swing states of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Georgia.

All of the posts in this series will be updated as more credible information is uncovered.

The General Landscape of American Election Fraud
The media is trying to weave a narrative with ever-shifting goalposts. They began by saying that not only did voter fraud not happen, but that it’s impossible. Now, they have shifted their story to saying that there is always minor fraud, but that it never really matters much.

The Heritage Foundation has identified 1,200 elections where voter fraud made the difference in recent decades, long after the era of Jim Crow when election theft was de rigueur. Of these, fully 15 were thrown out specifically because of cheating by mail-in ballot.

Mail-in ballots are largely banned in Europe, where voter ID requirements are likewise the norm. Florida has been recognized specifically as an offender.

Another narrative in the controlled media is that illegal aliens and other non-citizens don’t vote. This is patently untrue. In fact, they vote at alarmingly high rates. A 2019 study found that approximately 2.2 percent of respondents admitted to voting illegally, which implies a little under a million ballots cast by non-citizens every year.

The counterargument is that respondents are either lying or misunderstood the question, but this is simply not true — those who conducted the study verified their votes.

So we can see that electoral fraud is not only impossible, it is common. It is not negligible, it has determined elections in living memory. With this as our backdrop, we will now investigate voter irregularities throughout the nation during the 2020 Presidential election.

What Constitutes Evidence of Electoral Fraud?
Before going further, it is worth discussing what constitutes evidence for electoral fraud. Well, the Carter Center has a set of standards that they use to determine whether or not there has been electoral fraud somewhere.

These are the standards used by globalists to determine whether or not elections they disapprove of have been conducted fraudulently. Several of them are present in the contested states:

Counting procedures should be verifiable.
Votes should be presented for independent review.
Elections should be subject to recounts.
Additionally, the Carter Center states that it is the right of dissidents to challenge and question the results of an election that they believe to be fraudulent. Harassing dissidents is considered evidence of chicanery in and of itself.

“Effective redress” is the term they use and it is considered by the Carter Center to be vital for establishing an election as legitimate. The resistance of the Democratic Party to recounts and audits should be a red flag in and of itself.

There are also mathematical anomalies that are worth looking into because, regardless of turnout and outcome, elections will follow certain patterns. One of these is that, because of mail sorting, mail-in ballots will consistently show the same ratio of support for each candidate. We did not see that, however — there is a significant spike in support for Biden and fall off in support for President Trump as Election Night dragged on.

Indeed, in Wisconsin, this anomaly became massive around 4 a.m., the same time that the massive ballot drops without supervision began. The same phenomenon occurred in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Georgia, all four of these states with copious amounts of electoral chicanery and irregularity. Virginia was another state with similar mathematical irregularities.

Benford’s Law is another area where we see mathematical irregularities. Put simply: When we have large datasets of numbers, there is a pattern we can find with regard to the final and penultimate digit of each number in this data set.

Benford’s Law analysis is one of the first things run by forensic accountants looking for financial malfeasance or tax cheating.

Many of the electoral tallies in disputed states violate Benford’s Law — but only for Joe Biden, whose distribution more closely resembles the curve when people type “random” numbers in. President Trump, Jo Jorgensen, Howie Hawkins, and Kanye West’s numbers do not violate this law, but former Vice President Biden’s do in disputed areas.

The Wikipedia article about Benford’s Law was altered and locked after several enterprising Twitter users began investigating this strand of the 2020 election theft.

The Glitch From Coast to Coast

One recurring theme throughout the 2020 election is the glitch. There have been a number of glitches, many detailed in our series on irregularities in different states. This, in and of itself might not be cause for concern — however, in every case, these so-called “software glitches” favor former Vice President Biden at the expense of President Donald Trump.

Again, we have detailed these in our state series article, but we will mention some here just to give you a general idea of what has been going on with these “glitches.”

One in Michigan sent 6,000 votes to Biden that were meant for Donald Trump. Another in Wisconsin, robbed Donald Trump of 19,500 votes. Another similar glitch in Georgia saw an unspecified number of votes go to Biden that were, once again, meant for the President.

There appears to be a pattern here. Were these all bona fide mistakes, we would likely find votes that were meant to go for Joe Biden going to Donald Trump before the situation was corrected. But we are unaware of any such error in favor of the President.

The common denominator? The voting software used to calculate the vote made by a company with deep connections to the DNC.

The Turnout That Wasn’t
The DNC’s victory in the 2020 Presidential election relies heavily upon a massively increased turnout, again centered around a handful of large cities controlled by the Democratic Party. One example of this is 90 percent turnout in the entire State of Wisconsin, which would not only be the highest level of turnout in American history, but also comes close to the 92 percent average in Australia where voting is mandatory. In the city of Milwaukee alone, the turnout was 84 percent.

Compare this turnout to Cleveland, a culturally comparable city not in a swing state, which had a comparatively scant 51 percent turnout. This is an important city to draw a contrast with because, while it is a Democratic stronghold, as are most large cities, and it has a similar minority population, it was not in a state that was considered in play this election. Democrats attempted to steal the election by fabricating astronomical turnout in urban areas they control in swing states.

The turnout gambit becomes even more laughable when one considers that Biden is one of the least invigorating Democratic candidates since John Kerry or Mike Dukakis. Yet somehow this candidate was able to increase his vote above what Barack Obama enjoyed, with some districts in Milwaukee putting up more votes than there are registered voters in the area.

A broad study conducted by Judicial Watch found that 353 counties across 29 states had turnout exceeding 100 percent of registered voters. Eight of these had turnout exceeding 100 percent across the entire state: Alaska, Colorado, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

Perhaps more damning, the study was limited to 37 states publishing their voter registration data. This means that, of the 37 states that Judicial Watch had access to, 78 percent of them had turnout exceeding 100 percent.

Vetting of Mail-In Ballots
The American public was warned for months in advance that mail-in balloting, illegal throughout most of Europe, is inherently insecure and lends itself to the kind of mass voter fraud that we are seeing in action right now.

But the mail-in ballots that we are seeing in this election are not just nonspecifically “suspect.” They are rife with irregularities and a lack of accountability that should cause them to be closely investigated, audited and, where appropriate, thrown out entirely.

Mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania are particularly questionable. This is a state where Biden enjoyed a 60.5 percent lead in mail-in voting. More damning is the fact that many of these ballots seem to have arrived before they were even sent, arrived the same day or arrived within one day of being sent. This is an abnormal amount of processing time, especially when we consider the surge in mail due to the election.

James O’Keefe found two whistleblowers at USPS, one of whom was willing to come forward, who told of backdating ballots. This whistleblower was intimidated by the feds and it was falsely reported that he recanted his report.

Vetting of mail-in ballots is particularly important because they are widely open to electoral fraud, as we have discussed above. So it is troubling that we have multiple reports, including in the form of sworn affidavits presented before the court, of poll watchers being thrown out, mocked, intimidated and even physically assaulted during the course of counting mail-in ballots.

Of special note is the strong resistance to poll workers in swing states to allow anyone to watch them. In Pennsylvania, poll workers were caught on video expelling poll watchers despite knowledge of a court order preventing them from doing so. Reports of expelled poll watchers were part of the lawsuit filed in Michigan and there were similar reports out of Georgia. This raises the obvious question — why don’t they want anyone watching them?

Biden Outperformed Obama
Biden’s turnout when compared with Barack Obama is another area warranting special investigation. It is worth noting that Biden was generally viewed as a less-than-ideal candidate in no small part because he generated very little enthusiasm among Democratic Party voters. In contrast, Obama was a rock star candidate who had just defeated the party’s presumptive nominee in a hard-fought primary. Biden, on the other hand, was largely foisted on the party through back room deals in an attempt to prevent Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders from obtaining the nomination for President.

Biden also barely campaigned throughout the primary season. Most of the campaign was characterized by the candidate calling “lids,” a term meaning that he was home for the day and would be doing no more press, with the occasional teleconference. Not only did he start with an unethusiastic base who would have preferred nearly anyone else, he did little to motivate his base throughout the course of the election.

Yet somehow, he outperformed Hillary Clinton who won a hard-fought primary against Senator Sanders and kept pace with numbers from Barack Obama’s 2008 and 2012 campaigns, being able to boast that he has received more votes than any other candidate for President in American history. In some cases — tellingly in areas crucial for winning the election — Biden was able to outperform Barack Obama.

For example, in Chester, Cumberland, and Montgomery Counties in Pennsylvania, he outperformed Obama by approximately 25 percent. In Montgomery County, he was able to double Barack Obama’s margin of victory. He increased the raw vote total there by fully 80,000 votes. The population of this county only increased by 22,000 in the years between Obama’s victory and Biden’s alleged one.

Not only should we be skeptical of the numbers, we should be skeptical of them because of where they came in from. Such dubious numbers were not coming in from places that we could assume were Democratic Party strongholds like New York, Chicago and Miami where Biden actually saw a decrease in voters relative to Hillary Clinton. So why is he putting up these high totals only in a handful of cities (Atlanta, Detroit, Milwaukee, Philadelphia) controlled by Democrats in swing states?

Biden-Only Ballots
Another area of suspicion are the Biden-only ballots. Tens or hundreds of thousands of voters marked their ballots only for Joe Biden, with presumably no interest in down ballot races. While it’s not unusual for people to take an outsized interest in the Presidential election, it is unusual for 450,000 people to have no interest in down ballot races and for this to be concentrated in a handful of swing states.

The strange dichotomy here is that people were far more likely to do this in alleged swing states with competitive Senate races like Georgia, while deep red states like Wyoming did not see a massive number of Biden-only ballots. In Georgia, there was only a difference of 818 votes between Trump and down ticket Senate races. Biden, on the other hand, received over 95,000 more votes than either Senate candidate on the ballot in Georgia. In Wyoming there were a mere 725 more votes for Biden than the Democratic Senate candidate in the state.

Raheem Kassam reports on five states with anomalous Biden-only voting, all of which keep coming up with various irregularities: Pennsylvania (98,000), Georgia (80-90,000), Arizona (42,000), Michigan (69-115,000) and Wisconsin (62,836).

All told, Republicans won 28 out of 29 competitive House races as of November 8 and flipped three state legislatures, but were somehow unable to deliver the White House to the President. So we are expected to believe that not only did Joe Biden receive more votes than Barack Obama and that these came largely on the back of massive inner-city turnout, but that this massive turnout for Joe Biden was unable to flip a single state legislature.

Biden-only ballots are a recurring theme in all of the states in question. While they are by no means a smoking gun, they do point toward significant irregularities that need to be investigated before Joe Biden can begin claiming victory.

Who Counts the Votes? Irregularities In Counting Systems
There is a quote often attributed to Joseph Stalin, but is probably apocryphal: It doesn’t who votes, it matters who counts the votes. It doesn’t really matter who, if anyone, actually said this. The point is that it doesn’t matter what votes actually say if the votes are ignored or altered by the person doing the counting.

In the 21st Century most of our vote counting is done by machines which use proprietary software. Most states used systems supplied by Dominion Voting Systems. What’s more, the irregularities in vote counting, in particular the “glitches” that universally favor Joe Biden, come from these voting systems.

First, we should note that there were 92 donations made by Dominion employees over the last year according to the FEC. Of these, 80 went to Democratic super PAC ActBlue, seven went to Senator Bernie Sanders, four to the Trump campaign and one went to the DNC. What’s more, Dominion Voting Systems has a partnership with the Clinton Global Initiative as well as former employees of the Clinton Growth Initiative on staff, according to One America News Network.

Rudy Giuliani claims that the legal campaign to protect the election has whistleblowers from Dominion ready to go on record.

A bit in the weeds, but worth mentioning, is the allegation that intelligence software was used to change vote counts. There is a video on this subject here. As we say, this is a bit in the weeds, but worth mentioning for those who wish to go down that rabbit hole.

NOQ Report has been kind enough to do a deep dive on the topic of Dominion’s role in the 2020 Presidential election. They found significant vote switching in Georgia (17,407, where Biden leads with 14,148 votes) and Pennsylvania (with over one million votes switched in favor of Joe Biden). The article is mostly just a list of switched votes and lost votes, but it bears reading because it sheds light on just how massive a role vote switching played in the 2020 election, further cementing the theory that Dominion played a role in the theft.

Fight Back to Save America

Don’t let any of this get you down, because the fight is far from over. Both President Trump and Congressional Republicans are working hard, both in the public sphere and in the courts to make sure that the 2020 election is fair and transparent.

So what can you do to join in the fight?

First, you should call your elected representatives. That means calling your state rep, your state senator, your House Rep and your U.S. Senator. You should do this be they friend or foe — either way, they need to know that you insist on having all legal votes counted. Insist on concrete steps to ensure the integrity of the vote. Do not settle for stock answers about the importance of democracy. A Twitter account has made what is actually a very good script for you to follow when you call in. Be firm, but polite.

If you want to take to the streets, there are opportunities. Stop The Steal is the movement dedicated to putting bodies in the streets of our nation’s state capitals to let our elected officials know that we are not going to stand for seeing our elections stolen in a manner befitting Zimbabwe. There are almost daily rallies at the state capitol building and the TFC Center in Detroit. What’s more, a nationwide rally in DC called the Million MAGA March is scheduled for November 14. The Democratic government of Washington, DC has responded with new COVID restrictions designed to cripple the march.
What can you do? Quite a lot. Nothing less than the future of the country is at stake. If they can steal this election, don’t expect another one to be free and fair. But do expect a lot of gun grabs and speech laws.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election

WhiteHouse.gov
Issued on: September 12, 2018
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,
I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the ability of persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States to interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections, including through the unauthorized accessing of election and campaign infrastructure or the covert distribution of propaganda and disinformation, constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. Although there has been no evidence of a foreign power altering the outcome or vote tabulation in any United States election, foreign powers have historically sought to exploit America’s free and open political system. In recent years, the proliferation of digital devices and internet-based communications has created significant vulnerabilities and magnified the scope and intensity of the threat of foreign interference, as illustrated in the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment. I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with this threat.
Accordingly, I hereby order:

Section 1. (a) Not later than 45 days after the conclusion of a United States election, the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate executive departments and agencies (agencies), shall conduct an assessment of any information indicating that a foreign government, or any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, has acted with the intent or purpose of interfering in that election. The assessment shall identify, to the maximum extent ascertainable, the nature of any foreign interference and any methods employed to execute it, the persons involved, and the foreign government or governments that authorized, directed, sponsored, or supported it. The Director of National Intelligence shall deliver this assessment and appropriate supporting information to the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security.

(b) Within 45 days of receiving the assessment and information described in section 1(a) of this order, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate agencies and, as appropriate, State and local officials, shall deliver to the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Defense a report evaluating, with respect to the United States election that is the subject of the assessment described in section 1(a):

(i) the extent to which any foreign interference that targeted election infrastructure materially affected the security or integrity of that infrastructure, the tabulation of votes, or the timely transmission of election results; and

(ii) if any foreign interference involved activities targeting the infrastructure of, or pertaining to, a political organization, campaign, or candidate, the extent to which such activities materially affected the security or integrity of that infrastructure, including by unauthorized access to, disclosure or threatened disclosure of, or alteration or falsification of, information or data.

The report shall identify any material issues of fact with respect to these matters that the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security are unable to evaluate or reach agreement on at the time the report is submitted. The report shall also include updates and recommendations, when appropriate, regarding remedial actions to be taken by the United States Government, other than the sanctions described in sections 2 and 3 of this order.

(c) Heads of all relevant agencies shall transmit to the Director of National Intelligence any information relevant to the execution of the Director’s duties pursuant to this order, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law. If relevant information emerges after the submission of the report mandated by section 1(a) of this order, the Director, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate agencies, shall amend the report, as appropriate, and the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall amend the report required by section 1(b), as appropriate.

(d) Nothing in this order shall prevent the head of any agency or any other appropriate official from tendering to the President, at any time through an appropriate channel, any analysis, information, assessment, or evaluation of foreign interference in a United States election.

(e) If information indicating that foreign interference in a State, tribal, or local election within the United States has occurred is identified, it may be included, as appropriate, in the assessment mandated by section 1(a) of this order or in the report mandated by section 1(b) of this order, or submitted to the President in an independent report.

(f) Not later than 30 days following the date of this order, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence shall develop a framework for the process that will be used to carry out their respective responsibilities pursuant to this order. The framework, which may be classified in whole or in part, shall focus on ensuring that agencies fulfill their responsibilities pursuant to this order in a manner that maintains methodological consistency; protects law enforcement or other sensitive information and intelligence sources and methods; maintains an appropriate separation between intelligence functions and policy and legal judgments; ensures that efforts to protect electoral processes and institutions are insulated from political bias; and respects the principles of free speech and open debate.

Sec. 2. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security:

(i) to have directly or indirectly engaged in, sponsored, concealed, or otherwise been complicit in foreign interference in a United States election;

(ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any activity described in subsection (a)(i) of this section or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(iii) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property or interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.

(b) Executive Order 13694 of April 1, 2015, as amended by Executive Order 13757 of December 28, 2016, remains in effect. This order is not intended to, and does not, serve to limit the Secretary of the Treasury’s discretion to exercise the authorities provided in Executive Order 13694. Where appropriate, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, may exercise the authorities described in Executive Order 13694 or other authorities in conjunction with the Secretary of the Treasury’s exercise of authorities provided in this order.

(c) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the date of this order.

Sec. 3. Following the transmission of the assessment mandated by section 1(a) and the report mandated by section 1(b):

(a) the Secretary of the Treasury shall review the assessment mandated by section 1(a) and the report mandated by section 1(b), and, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security, impose all appropriate sanctions pursuant to section 2(a) of this order and any appropriate sanctions described in section 2(b) of this order; and

(b) the Secretary of State and the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the heads of other appropriate agencies, shall jointly prepare a recommendation for the President as to whether additional sanctions against foreign persons may be appropriate in response to the identified foreign interference and in light of the evaluation in the report mandated by section 1(b) of this order, including, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, proposed sanctions with respect to the largest business entities licensed or domiciled in a country whose government authorized, directed, sponsored, or supported election interference, including at least one entity from each of the following sectors: financial services, defense, energy, technology, and transportation (or, if inapplicable to that country’s largest business entities, sectors of comparable strategic significance to that foreign government). The recommendation shall include an assessment of the effect of the recommended sanctions on the economic and national security interests of the United States and its allies. Any recommended sanctions shall be appropriately calibrated to the scope of the foreign interference identified, and may include one or more of the following with respect to each targeted foreign person:

(i) blocking and prohibiting all transactions in a person’s property and interests in property subject to United States jurisdiction;

(ii) export license restrictions under any statute or regulation that requires the prior review and approval of the United States Government as a condition for the export or re-export of goods or services;

(iii) prohibitions on United States financial institutions making loans or providing credit to a person;

(iv) restrictions on transactions in foreign exchange in which a person has any interest;

(v) prohibitions on transfers of credit or payments between financial institutions, or by, through, or to any financial institution, for the benefit of a person;

(vi) prohibitions on United States persons investing in or purchasing equity or debt of a person;

(vii) exclusion of a person’s alien corporate officers from the United States;

(viii) imposition on a person’s alien principal executive officers of any of the sanctions described in this section; or

(ix) any other measures authorized by law.

Sec. 4. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the type of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 2 of this order.

Sec. 5. The prohibitions in section 2 of this order include the following:

(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and

(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 6. I hereby find that the unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and I hereby suspend entry into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, of such persons. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions).

Sec. 7. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

Sec. 8. For the purposes of this order:

(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;

(b) the term “entity” means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization;

(c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person (including a foreign person) in the United States;

(d) the term “election infrastructure” means information and communications technology and systems used by or on behalf of the Federal Government or a State or local government in managing the election process, including voter registration databases, voting machines, voting tabulation equipment, and equipment for the secure transmission of election results;

(e) the term “United States election” means any election for Federal office held on, or after, the date of this order;

(f) the term “foreign interference,” with respect to an election, includes any covert, fraudulent, deceptive, or unlawful actions or attempted actions of a foreign government, or of any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, undertaken with the purpose or effect of influencing, undermining confidence in, or altering the result or reported result of, the election, or undermining public confidence in election processes or institutions;

(g) the term “foreign government” means any national, state, provincial, or other governing authority, any political party, or any official of any governing authority or political party, in each case of a country other than the United States;

(h) the term “covert,” with respect to an action or attempted action, means characterized by an intent or apparent intent that the role of a foreign government will not be apparent or acknowledged publicly; and

(i) the term “State” means the several States or any of the territories, dependencies, or possessions of the United States.

Sec. 9. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 2 of this order.

Sec. 10. Nothing in this order shall prohibit transactions for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.

Sec. 11. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including the promulgation of rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may re-delegate any of these functions to other officers within the Department of the Treasury consistent with applicable law. All agencies of the United States Government are hereby directed to take all appropriate measures within their authority to carry out the provisions of this order.

Sec. 12. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit the recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).

Sec. 13. This order shall be implemented consistent with 50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(1) and (3).

Sec. 14. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,

September 12, 2018.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Why 2020 US Election Votes Were Counted By A Bankrupted Spanish Company Scytl
November 13, 2020
Days after it was revealed how 2020 US Elections were rigged by Canadian Crown Agent Dominion Voting Systems through a so-called “glitch”, now GreatGameIndia has found involvement of another dubious foreign company in US Election meddling. The votes cast by Americans were counted by a bankrupted Spanish company Scytl in Spain. Like Dominion Voting Systems, Scytl has a long history of election fraud in various nations including injecting backdoors in its election software. The issue has prompted experts to question why the sensitive job of counting votes was outsourced to a foreign company? How could a bankrupted Spanish company count American votes in Spain? Due to such widespread fraud, the Chairman of the US Federal Election Commission Trey Trainor believes that the 2020 US Presidential Elections is illegitimate.

WITNESS AFFIDAVIT: How Smartmatic Voting Machines Were Designed To Steal US Elections

Contents [hide]

1 Scytl involvement in 2020 US Election
2 Scytl was declared Bankrupt in June 2020
3 Scytl is funded by Spanish Government
4 Cases of Scytl Voting Fraud
4.1 Australia
4.2 Ecuador
4.3 Norway
4.4 Switzerland
5 Were 2020 US Elections Rigged?
6 US Military raid Scytl servers in Germany
2020 US Election Votes Were Counted By A Bankrupted Spanish Company Scytl
2020 US Election Votes Were Counted By A Bankrupted Spanish Company Scytl
Scytl involvement in 2020 US Election
Many American states commissioned a foreign company based in Spain to provide various election services — including online voting — in the 2020 presidential election. Scytl, a Spanish company headquartered in Barcelona offering a suite of election services, has been used by various states and cities in several ways since 2008.

Forbes reported in 2017:

Founded in 2001 in Spain, Scytl organized 12 state-wide implementations, and its technologies were used in another 980 U.S. jurisdictions in 28 states, during the 2016 General Election. Specializing in online voting and elections solutions, the company’s products include online voter registration services, poll worker management, and electronic ballot delivery.

Its online voting services employ end-to-end encryption, vote return cords, and a bulletin board audit service. Scytl’s customers include France’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the European Green Party, the Parliament of the European Union and the Swiss Canton of Fribourg. In January 2012, the company bought SOE Software. Scytl also holds more than 40 patents and patent applications. In 2008, the company became the first online voting company to receive certification from the Florida Department of State.

Scytel’s website shares an overview of election services it provides to governmental clients in U.S.:

Scytl has successfully delivered election modernization projects in the US since 2008, and most recently for the 2018 Midterm Elections, when over 70M voters from more than 900 U.S. counties successfully leveraged Scytl’s technology. Also, during 2016 US Presidential Election Scytl’s technology provided over 53 million registered voters and thousands of election staff across 28 states the benefits of more efficient, scalable and accessible election processes, consolidating Scytl as the leading election modernization provider in the United States.

Scytl was declared Bankrupt in June 2020
What is interesting is that the Spanish firm Scytl was declared bankrupt in June this year. The company filed for bankruptcy as part of a broader analysis of security vulnerabilities associated with digital voting.

SUBSCRIBE TO GGI VIA EMAIL
Enter your email address to subscribe to GreatGameIndia and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Email Address
Email Address

Subscribe

India in Cognitive Dissonance Book by GreatGameIndia
On 11 May 2020, facing debts of over 75 million euro, Scytl initiated bankruptcy proceedings with a view to sell its business to the U.S. investment fund Sandton Capital. On 2 June 2020, a Spanish court declared Scytl bankrupt and started the process of auctioning off its assets.

Scytl is funded by Spanish Government
Scytl has been the center of controversy in the past for misuse of European Union funds and mishap with an election. Scytl received large amounts of research funds from the Spanish government which, reporting by Republik shows, was used in ways contrary to what had been stipulated.

Instead of spending it on cooperative work with universities, Scytl used it to stock up its product team and develop new prototypes for its customers. An injection of over 1.5 million euros from Spain’s Ministry for Industry was, according to an internal document seen by Republik, used for, among other things, a «product demo» for Neuchâtel. And 900’000 euros in EU funds were spent on the development of software modules for Ecuadorian election authorities.

Cases of Scytl Voting Fraud
Scytl’s products cover the entire election process, including election planning, online voter registration, poll worker management, electronic ballot delivery, online voting, results consolidation and election night reporting. In 2014, Scytl reported having customers in more than 35 countries. However, Scytl is involved in controversies wherever its products or services were used with allegations as severe as election voting fraud.

Australia
In 2018, the authorities of New South Wales selected Scytl to provide the software for the state’s “iVote” online voting system until 2022 for $1.9 million. The iVote system is an internet and telephone voting solution that allows persons with disabilities and voters with accessibility problems to vote remotely. During the 2015 election, researchers uncovered vulnerabilities in the iVote system which could be used to manipulate votes, violate ballot privacy and subvert the verification mechanism.

Ecuador
Scytl ran voting machines in several parts of Ecuador in 2014. They were supposed to produce results within 72 hours, but ran into a variety of problems and took over a month.

According to a report by the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR), «the system was unable to process the amount of scanned information». Although technology bloggers later argued that the system hadn’t been sufficiently tested in advance, Scytl, in turn, blamed Ecuador’s poor infrastructure.

Norway
Scytl deployed electronic voting in Norway in 2011 in partnership with the government. A flaw in their cryptography was discovered in 2013, and 0.75% of all voters managed to vote twice in 2013, once online and once in a polling station. In 2014 Norway abandoned Scytl’s Internet Voting project, due to security failures, lack of increase in turnout, and high costs.

Switzerland
In a joint venture with Swiss Post, Scytl provides its sVote e-voting system to several cantons that allow Swiss citizens who live abroad to take part in cantonal and federal elections and referenda electronically.

Scytl said its sVote system used in Switzerland is “universally verifiable”, but its system has been criticized as overly complex, difficult to audit and not sufficiently transparent. After Swiss authorities launched a public code review, a group of researchers of the University of Melbourne, Université catholique de Louvain, and the Open Privacy Research Society reported in March 2019 that they discovered a deficiency in the code that would allow the system’s operator to alter votes undetected. They found backdoors is Scytl software.

Because of the deficiencies, Swiss authorities disallowed the use of Scytl’s e-voting system in the Swiss referenda of 19 May 2019, and it has not been used since. Swiss Post purchased the rights to the software from Scytl in 2020 as the company faced bankruptcy.

Were 2020 US Elections Rigged?
A so-called computer “glitch” in the voting machines flipping votes during the 2020 US Elections has caused a major controversy. The source and ownership of the voting machines used in the elections has become an urgent issue because of real fears that hackers, whether foreign or domestic, might tamper with the mechanics of the voting system.

However, GreatGameIndia has found that the vendors and not hackers maybe behind the rigging. One of the vendors, a Denver-based Canadian Crown Agent company Dominion Voting Systems has a long history of allegation of election rigging and interference in elections of various nations, including census data theft in India and interference in US Elections of 2020.

The issue has prompted experts to question why the sensitive job of counting votes was outsourced to a foreign company? How could a bankrupted Spanish company count American votes in Spain? Due to such widespread fraud, the Chairman of the US Federal Election Commission Trey Trainor believes that the 2020 US Presidential Elections is illegitimate.

US Military raid Scytl servers in Germany
According to intelligence sources US Military raided voting machine company Scytl servers in Germany for evidence of manipulation in 2020 US Elections after it was exposed in vote switching scandal by GreatGameIndia.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

JINSA

Peter Neffenger, a retired vice commandant of the US Coast Guard and head of the TSA during Barack Obama’s last 18 months as president, visited Israel this month as part of a delegation of 10 former high-ranking US military officials with a group known as the Jewish Institute for National Security of America (JINSA). The retired admiral, for instance, started working as a senior fellow in the Washington-based Atlantic Council think tank earlier this year.
During the 10-day paid trip, he and the other retired generals met with the head of the Mossad, IDF generals, the deputy head of the Shin Bet security service and other Israeli officials in order to learn about the threats facing the Jewish state and what Israel is doing to tackle them. The retired vice admiral and the other three- and four-star American generals met with the head of Military Intelligence Maj. Gen. Herzl Halevi, the head of the IDF’s 210th Division in the Northern Command Brig. Gen. Yaniv Asor, the head of the Israeli Navy Maj. Gen. Eli Sharvit, and the head of the Israeli Air Force Maj. Gen. Amir Eshel. ... Posts on social media claim Peter Neffenger, who is a volunteer for Mr Biden's team, is chairman of a subsidiary of Dominion, Smartmatic. Mr Neffenger is chairman of Smartmatic - but it's a competitor - not a subsidiary - of Dominion.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Peter Neffenger of Soros-Linked Voting Software Firm Smartmatic on Biden Transition Team –
By James Tweedie – Sputnik – 15.11.2020

AlethoNews
Trump’s attorneys said the Smartmatic software used in the Dominion voting machines – which ‘flipped’ 6,000 votes cast for President Donald Trump to rival Joe Biden in one Michigan county alone – had ‘back doors’ allowing corrupt officials to rig elections.

US President Donald Trump’s legal team has named a retired US Navy admiral as the link between Joe Biden and the software for controversial e-voting machines.

Trump’s attorneys Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell alleged Smartmatic – whose chairman of the board, retired Admiral Peter Neffenger, is part of Joe Biden’s transition team – was at the heart of the vote-rigging in the November 3 election.

Smartmatic’s holding company is chaired by an associate of influential Hungarian-born billionaire George Soros. Neffenger is also a member of a think-tank that recently received funding from the Ukrainian firm that employed Biden’s son.

Giuliani told Fox News’ Mornings with Maria on Sunday that Smartmatic supplied the software for the Dominion Voting Systems machines that ‘glitched’ and transferred 6,000 votes cast for Trump to Democratic candidate Biden in one rural Michigan county alone.

Powell pointed out to host Maria Bartiromo that Neffenger is president of Smartmatic and also sits on its board of directors.

“It just so happens he’s on Mr Biden’s presidential transition team – which is going to be non-existent, because we’re fixing to overturn the results of the election in multiple states,” Powell said. “President Trump won by not just hundreds of thousands of votes, but by millions of votes that were shifted by this software that was designed expressly for that purpose.”

“We have sworn witness testimony of why the software was designed. It was designed to rig elections,” she added. The witness “was fully briefed on it, he saw it happen in other countries, it was exported internationally for profit by the people who are behind Smartmatic and Dominion.”

“They did this on purpose. It was calculated. They’ve done it before,” Powell said. “We have evidence from 2016 in California. We have so much evidence, I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose.”

Powell also claimed Smartmatic paid “kickbacks” to public servants in return for lucrative state contracts. She said several whistle-blowers had come forward to say “substantial sums of money were given to family members of state officials” who bought the software.

Dominion machines were used in 28 states, including the six key battlegrounds of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

“We’re talking hundred-million dollar packages for new voting machines, suddenly, in multiple states,” Powell said. The “benefits” to officials ranged from cash to “what I would call election insurance, because they know they can win the election if they are using that software.”

Powell said she was “livid” that successive governments had failed to act on many complaints about the hardware and software – including from senior Democrats Carolyn Maloney, Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar.

“Which makes me wonder how much the CIA has used it for its own benefit in different places,” Powell said. She added that it was incomprehensible that Central Intelligence Agency Director Gina Haspel was still in her post, asserting: “She should be fired immediately.”

Bartiromo quoted a “senior intelligence official” as saying Smartmatic’s software has a “back door” that allows it to be “mirrored and monitored” to give an “intervening party a real-time understanding of how many votes will be needed to gain an electoral advantage.”

“I can prove that they did it in Michigan, I can prove it with witnesses,” Giuliani said. “We’re investigating the rest. In every one of those states though, we have more than enough illegal ballots, already documented, to overturn the result in that state.”

“Yes there is a back door, and we actually have proof of some of the connections to it,” Giuliani said. “Right now our cases are most developed in Pennsylvania and Michigan.”

Asked if he needed the Dominion hardware or Smartmatic software to prove his case, Giuliani said he had witnesses who “can describe the hardware in great detail,” along with government employees and others who “were there at the creation of Smartmatic. They can describe it, they can draw it, they can show it.”

“Beyond this election, this whole thing has to be examined as a national security matter,” Giuliani stressed. “The governors who gave contracts to this company never bothered to do any due diligence.”

“I can’t imagine you would give a contract to a company if you went one step further and found out it’s really being run by people that are close to [Nicolas] Maduro and [Hugo] Chávez” – the current and former Socialist presidents of Venezuela.” (see below)

Neffenger was made a ‘distinguished fellow’ at the Atlantic Council think tank after he left the US government in 2017. In 2019, the Wall Street Journal reported that Ukrainian energy firm Burisma Holdings, which employed Biden’s son Hunter in controversial circumstances, donated $100,000 a year to the council from 2016 to 2018.

Smartmatic’s founder and CEO is Venezuelan Antonio Mugica, while Britain’s Lord Mark Malloch-Brown – a long-standing associate of Soros – is the chairman of Smartmatic’s London-based holding company SGO Corporation Limited.

Smartmatic equipment was used in the 2017 elections to the Venezuelan National Constituent Assembly, after which Mugica turned against Maduro – contrary to Giuliani’s claim that the two are in cahoots.

Mugica admitted his software could be hacked to rig an election when he told a press conference in London that Maduro’s government had inflated the turnout by around a million. But he revealed he had failed to inform the proper authorities in Venezuela before his press conference, claiming “I guess we probably thought that the authorities would not be sympathetic to what we had to say.”

Malloch Brown was a junior minister from 2007 to 2009 in former British PM Gordon Brown’s short-lived government and has several links to Soros. He was a member of the billionaire’s advisory committee on Bosnia from 1993-94. In 2002, while working as an administrator for the United Nations Development Fund, he suggested the agency work with Soros’ Open Society Institute. In May 2007, he was hired as vice-president of Soros’s Quantum Fund but quit four months later to join the UK government.

Open Society Institute legal counsel Kenneth Anderson has also been a council member of the Human Rights Foundation – whose founder and president Thor Halvorssen is the cousin of fugitive Venezuelan opposition leader Leopoldo Lopez. Lopez was jailed in 2015 for inciting violence in the deadly 2014 Guarimba riots aimed at overthrowing Maduro’s government.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Wisconsin & Dominion: The Whole Process Was Screwed Up ON PURPOSE!

JewWorldOrder
November 20th, 2020 Awake Goyim
AFI. (Nov. 20, 2020). Wisconsin approved Dominion voting system with a hodge podge of theatrical procedures – a joke. Americans for Innovation.
Fig. 1—Lord Mark Malloch-Brown, Knight Commander of the Order of Saint Michael & St. Gabriel, Privy Council, British Pilgrims Society (with Henry Kissinger, David Petraeus, Wesley Clark, Preetinder Baharara, Bill & Hillary Clinton, Bill & Melinda Gates, Eric Schmidt, John D. Podesta, James W. Breyer, George Tenet, Admiral Edmund P. Giambastiani Jr., Sir Nick Clegg (Facebook), Baron Richard B. Allan (Facebook), Sir Richard Dearlove (MI6-Five Eyes), Sir Robert Hannigan (GCHQ Five Eyes), (Title) Robert Mueller, III, (Title) James B. Comey, (Title) John G. Roberts, Jr., Knight of Malta, etc.).
The Wisconsin Election Commission used unskilled novices to evaluate Dominion and ES&S

Wisconsin’s procedures ignored bi-partisan, unbroken chain of custody

Wisconsin approved use of photocopied ballots, wireless remote access and last minute “de minimisdebugging code” to report to Dominion during the voting

Conclusion: Votes for Trump were shifted to Biden in massive, landslide quantities using secret “fraction magic” programs

Nov. 20, 2020—On Jun. 18, 2015, the State of Wisconsin purchased Dominion Election Systems (Dominion) for use in their 72 counties. On Sep. 11, 2014 they had already purchased Election Systems and Software (ES&S). See list of Wisconsin vendors approved for 2020. The list is misleading since Sequoia, ES&S and Premier are all controlled by Dominion.

We asked a senior Fortune 50 software engineering expert to review the Wisconsin Election Commission approval paperwork. That person’s overall conclusion was that the process was:

“Sorry to be so pedestrian, but the Wisconsin process is stupid, laughable, and sad.”

WISCONSIN’S DOMINION TESTING LACKED ANY SUBSTANCE

To be as kind as possible, the expert said: “Wisconsin’s Dominion testing and approval process was all show and no substance.”

“The Commission goes through the motions, but everything about their actions are those of rank amateurs, at best, and willful obfuscation, at worst.”

“Their process was evidently designed by bureaucrats and lawyers more interested in shifting the liability to many people, so that no one is accountable. They approved each other in a circular manner to avoid direct liability, it appears to me. That would never fly in a real testing sign-off process. In real engineering, named individuals are always held accountable. That is not so in this Wisconsin Dominion document. It’s a CYA document. Sadly though, the Voice of the Citizens in our Republic is the victim.”

“They did not use software and hardware engineering experts. Instead, they used their non-technical staff. These were essentially people off the streets who knew nothing about technology, engineering or systems testing.”

“In short, Wisconsin’s approval of Dominion and ES&S voting systems is grossly negligent, if not criminal. It made a mockery of valid testing principles and procedures that any engineer worth his or her salt knows. Such engineers were clearly not consulted in order to get Dominion approved.”

NO DOMINION TRANSPARENCY

For example, no access to the software engineering source code was made by Wisconsin technical experts in software systems engineering. Therefore, Dominion and ES&S provided no transparency into how the votes are processed inside their programs.

The Commission listed the compiled program modules, but that is meaningless for understanding how votes are processed inside the software. Essentially, compiled software takes the original human-readable source code and converts it into computer-readable (not human-readable) executable code. For example, “A+B=C” looks like “1Du’%3Ai3t%3” in machine code when compiled.

Knowing the names of the program modules may be of slight interest, but absolutely pointless as a testing tool. Every software engineer knows this, which is proof that no engineers were there, or if they turned a blind eye, then they were complicit in a testing fraud.

NO TESTING FOR THE NOTORIOUS “FRACTION MAGIC”

Without real experts being able to evaluate the Dominion source code, the testing would have no way to detect the presence of well know vote fraud techniques like “Fraction Magic” which are always embedded deep inside computer-readable code.

If the predetermined winner in a race is losing, fraction magic can shift votes from the candidate with more votes to the anointed one who is losing.

Fraction magic works like a highway patrolman who sees a car he wants to catch up with and get in front of. He hits his accelerator to catch up to the other car. The rate of catch up is a function of his gas consumption. With more gas, he catches up more quickly.

Fraction magic is instructed by third parties at Dominion how many votes and how fast those votes are to be shifted from the designated loser to the anointed winner to get the outcome they want. Vote totals have to be kept close so that these shifts are imperceptible.

Evidently, Trump’s lead was so great in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Nevada that Dominion needed to shut down their system in order to change the fraction magic numbers so that more Trump votes could be shifted to Biden. Biden began picking up magical votes at a steady, statistically impossible rate (and therefore a programmed, artificial rate).

Remarkably, the Wisconsin Election Commission approved Dominion with the ability to scan photocopied ballots. Their process allows poll workers to feed photocopies of ballots that have NO CHAIN OF CUSTODY & NO BI-PARTISAN EYES ON THE PROCESS.

Reminds us of the Lionel Richie song All Night Long.

PHOTOCOPIED BALLOTS ALLOWED IN WISCONSIN!Dominion Voting Systems. (Accessed Nov. 18, 2020). Approved Electronic Voting Systems from Dominion Voting Systems, Democracy Suite 4.14-D and 4.14-DS, approved on Jun. 18, 2015 by the Government Accountability Board, PDF p. 16, 17. Wisconsin Elections Commission.
Fig. 2—Dominion Voting Systems. (Accessed Nov. 18, 2020). Approved Electronic Voting Systems from Dominion Voting Systems, Democracy Suite 4.14-D and 4.14-DS, approved on Jun. 18, 2015 by the Government Accountability Board, PDF p. 16, 17. Wisconsin Elections Commission.
Source: Wisconsin Elections Commission.
A common lie among bureaucrats and politicians is that voting system are secure because they are not connected to the Internet. As we see here, Wisconsin’s voting machines are Internet-ready. With the last minute request by Dominion to inject “de minimis” debugging code into their software, then monitor it remotely on election night in real time, they totally exposed the Wisconsin vote to anyone with access to that “debugging code.”

Anyone in software development knows what a joke this approval was to the integrity of the system. Debugging code is like little trip wires embedded throughout a program which report to the mother ship when tripped. They can be anywhere. More specifically, they can be placed next to vote tallying to report those numbers in real time. It appears that Dominion did just this.

When President Trump was crushing the vote count, Dominion’s “debugging” code was reporting that in real time. Hence, the mysterious midnight counting shutdown. That gave Dominion time to change their fraction magic program to take more votes away from Trump and give them to Biden.

This could not happen unless Dominion was getting real time feedback from their machines.

WISCONSIN VOTING SYSTEMS ARE TIED TO THE INTERNET IN REAL TIMEDominion Voting Systems. (Accessed Nov. 18, 2020). Approved Electronic Voting Systems from Dominion Voting Systems, Democracy Suite 4.14-D and 4.14-DS, approved on Jun. 18, 2015 by the Government Accountability Board, PDF p. 16, 17. Wisconsin Elections Commission.
Dominion Voting Systems. (Accessed Nov. 18, 2020). Approved Electronic Voting Systems from Dominion Voting Systems, Democracy Suite 4.14-D and 4.14-DS, approved on Jun. 18, 2015 by the Government Accountability Board, PDF p. 16, 17. Wisconsin Elections Commission.
Fig. 3—Dominion Voting Systems. (Accessed Nov. 18, 2020). Approved Electronic Voting Systems from Dominion Voting Systems, Democracy Suite 4.14-D and 4.14-DS, approved on Jun. 18, 2015 by the Government Accountability Board, PDF p. 5, 13. Wisconsin Elections Commission.
Source: Wisconsin Elections Commission.
Bi-partisan We The People election judges are missing throughout the Wisconsin election process.

Dominion’s flow chart shows lots of eyes on the ballots, but few if any We The People eyes.

BI-PARTISAN EYES ON THE PROCESS ARE BLINDED IN WISCONSIN! UNBROKEN CHAIN OF CUSTODY IS BROKEN AT EVERY LINKDominion Voting Systems. (Accessed Nov. 18, 2020). Approved Electronic Voting Systems from Dominion Voting Systems, Democracy Suite 4.14-D and 4.14-DS, approved on Jun. 18, 2015 by the Government Accountability Board, PDF p. 16, 17. Wisconsin Elections Commission.
Fig. 4—Dominion Voting Systems. (Accessed Nov. 18, 2020). Approved Electronic Voting Systems from Dominion Voting Systems, Democracy Suite 4.14-D and 4.14-DS, approved on Jun. 18, 2015 by the Government Accountability Board, PDF p. 9. Wisconsin Elections Commission.
Source: Wisconsin Elections Commission.
Dominion’s contact person in Wisconsin is a Mr. Ian S. Piper, Director of Federal Certification.

Piper is a founder in the Election Technology Council (ETC)in Houston, TX that began operating independently on Jun. 1, 2007.

Piper appears to be one of Lord Mark Malloch-Brown’schief oligarchs pushing American voting “reform” since before 2007.

The founding members of ETC are all the voting systems swirling in the 2020 vote scamming vortex:

Advanced Voting Solutions (AVS) closed Nov. 28, 2007, curiously, just six months after helping found ETC.
Diebold Election Systems (Diebold), changed name to Premier Election Solutions (Premier) in Aug. 2007, acquired by Election Systems & Software (ES&S) on Sep. 03, 2009, then acquired by Dominion Election Systems (Dominion) in May 2010. In Jun. 2010, Dominion acquired Sequoia Voting Systems (Sequoia).
Election Systems and Software (ES&S), now Dominion
Hart InterCivic (C.I.A. Blackstone / Bain Capital-Mitt Romney)
Sequoia, now Dominion
Unilect (IBM / IBM Eclipse Foundation)
As you can see, Dominion has gobbled up all the allegedly competitive options.

The only companies left standing are all members of the British Pilgrims Society:

Dominion,
Hart InterCivic, and
Unilect (IBM).
These packages are bridged together with the original Optech software that Lord Mark Malloch-Brown and George Soros funded in Venezuela as they were beginning to implement their corporate shell games to rig elections across the planet.

CONCLUSION

Wisconsin’s 2020 election is founded on bogus (if not criminal) testing, fraud and at the very least administrative negligence.

Each ballot must be counted. The qualification is simple: Can an unbroken, bi-partisan chain of custody be shown for that ballot. If yes, then count it. If no, it cannot be counted.

Feeding votes into electronic scanners and they having total faith in the work of Billy Bob Dominion programmer does not qualify as an unbroken, bi-partisan chain of custody.

FIRE AWAY MR. PRESIDENT

We The People are with you, Mr. President, and we are praying with you. This is why we hired you. Ignore the naysayers. That is all they know how to do. Such “skill” cannot run a country, much less itself. Get these parasites off all of our backs.

We’ve already seen that you can do more in one day than Joe Biden has accomplished in 47 years.

It’s nut cutting time.

Traitors and seditionists must be dealt with. The death penalty is proscribed in the U.S. Code as the ultimate penalty for attempts to destroy our Republic.

(See 18 U.S. Code § 2381. Treason and 10 U.S. Code § 894 – Art. 94. Mutiny or sedition.)

* * *

Described above is abject immorality.

Morality must win the day.

“Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.”

The Gospel of St. Matthew 4:17.

Bookmark: #miller-act-notice | https://tinyurl.com/y27l24b9
Footnote

REMINDER RE. THE MILLER ACT NOTICE—THE PERPETRATORS OF THIS EPIC FRAUD MUST DISGORGE THEIR ILL-GOTTEN GAIN
Click image to open PDF of this and the next slide
How Leader Technologies' Miller Act Notice check will help create true Free Speech in our American Republic

Fig. 12—Mr. President: Turn the Tables on Censorship; Write the Miller Act Notice check immediately! By writing the check for the Leader Technologies’ Miller Act, and acquiring a global master license on social networking, President Trump, with the stroke of a pen, can turn the tables all Big Tech, Media, Bank and Pharma censorship and propaganda. It will initiate a second American Revolution to give the citizen control of the media for the first time since the early days of the American Republic, before the Rothschild Bank of England hooked its claws back in to the fledgling Republic. Click here to download the PDF (check your Downloads folder after clicking).
FEDERAL BRITISH-AMERICAN PATENT WEAPONIZATION THIEVES
James P. Chandler, III Andrew W. Marshall
James P. Chandler, III Andrew W. Marshall
Leader Technologies, Inc. sent their FIRST AMENDED MILLER ACT NOTICEto President Trump It is a contract demand for the U.S. Treasury to pay them for the federal government’s 18-year theft of their social networking inventions. These inventions were stolen by Major General James E. Freeze (US Army, ret.) and Leader’s patent attorney James P. Chandler, III, on behalf of Andrew W. Marshall and the Department of Defense Office of Net Assessment, and the Pilgrims Society who steal and weaponize inventions for continuous war making and enrichment of fascist insider military-industrial corporations.

Patriots are encouraged to help get this First Amended Miller Act Notice to President Trump and past the Praetorian Guard. See American Intelligence Media republish of the Leader Miller Act Notice.

Return to return to the beginning of this post.

___
https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2020/11/wisconsin-approved-dominion-voting.html

Hits: 19

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Dominion Voting Systems: Connecting the Dots

GatewayPundit
By Jim Hoft

Dominion Voting Systems Corporation is a company that sells electronic voting hardware and software, including voting machines and tabulators, in the United States and Canada. It is also in the headlines presently due to rumors going around of it’s involvement in election rigging claimed by the Trump Administration and his legal team, as the voting systems for the 2020 Presidential Election used their systems to tally votes. While the company itself, along with every other news source has denounced any irregularities or evidence of election rigging due to the voting systems, evidence to the contrary has started to present itself. Here is a brief history of Dominion Election Systems before they became Dominion.

2002.
Diebold Elections Systems Inc. is formed. Previously, DESI was run by Bob Urosevich, who worked in the election systems industry since 1976. In 1979, Mr. Urosevich founded American Information Systems. He served as the President of AIS, now known as Election Systems & Software, Inc. (ES&S), from 1979 through 1992. Bob’s brother, Todd Urosevich, is Vice President, Aftermarket Sales with ES&S, DESI’s chief competitor. In 1995, Bob Urosevich started I-Mark Systems, whose product was a touch screen voting system utilizing a smart card and biometric encryption authorization technology. Global Election Systems, Inc. (GES) acquired I-Mark in 1997, and on July 31, 2000 Mr. Urosevich was promoted from Vice President of Sales and Marketing and New Business Development to President and Chief Operating Officer. On January 22, 2002, Diebold announced the acquisition of GES, then a manufacturer and supplier of electronic voting terminals and solutions. Global Election Systems subsequently changed its name to Diebold Election Systems, Inc.

Fast forward to the election year that followed the creation of Diebold Election Systems. There had been known glitches within Diebold’s software that could alter an election in other candidates favor. Multiple News Outlets wrote articles pertaining to the threat of Election Rigging via E-Voting. Those same media outlets now in 2020, that claim e-voting to be safe and not subject to tampering/glitches even whilst saying the exact opposite 15 years prior. Michael Meacher from “The Guardian” wrote this back in 2005.

TRENDING: "We Would Love to See Any Evidence of Fraud - Nothing They Are Saying Is True" - Dominion Voting Systems' Hired Spokesman and Jeb Bush Lackey Refutes Fraud Claims (VIDEO)

“According to Harris, a manipulation technique she found in Diebold’s AccuVote central vote tabulator is able to read totals from an untraceable bogus vote set within its software. “By entering a two-digit code in a hidden location, a second set of votes is created; and this set of votes can be changed in a matter of seconds, so that it no longer matches the correct votes,” she has said. And she has demonstrated this live on television. Her conclusion is: “You can easily edit the election.”

While Diebold denounced these claims, email threads I acquired through digging indicate their knowledge of said bugs in some form or another in their systems and how circumventing was done to avoid detection including halting google searches on the company and the keyword bug, as to not increase the chances of those two keywords coming up in the registry upon searching the company.

Attached below are a few separate emails from various members of the company. (At the end of this article I will post the rest of the email threads I have currently, as to not be selective in only picking out certain conversations.) Pay attention to the name Ian Piper in the separate email below as well. Though he didn’t partake in the email thread below regarding the glitch, he was the Compliance Officer of Diebold Election Systems. This is important in many ways.

 

A compliance officer is an individual who ensures that a company complies with its outside regulatory and legal requirements as well as internal policies and bylaws. Compliance officers have a duty to their employer to work with management and staff to identify and manage regulatory risk. Now to me, those emails though not too descriptive in detail clearly show knowledge of a said glitch, and an attempt to keep it off the radar somehow. As a Compliance Officer, I don’t think I’d be too off the mark in saying he too had knowledge of a good amount of what was going on within the company.

Shortly following these emails that year and the years following, Diebold Voting Systems were having many widespread irregularities occur. Some as severe as taking votes away from one candidate and transferring them over in favor of the other party/doctoring votes as described in this April 2004 Vanity Fair article written by Michael Shnayerson.

In 2006, Diebold decided to remove its name from the front of the voting machines for strategic reasons. In 2007, it changed its name to Premier Solution Systems. Election Systems & Software (ES&S) acquired Premier Election Solutions on September 3, 2009.

According to Wikipedia, Following the acquisition, the Department of Justice and 14 individual states launched investigations into the transaction on antitrust grounds. In March 2010, the Department of Justice filed a civil antitrust lawsuit against ES&S, requiring it to divest voting equipment systems assets it acquired from Premier Election Solutions in order to restore competition. The company then sold the assets to Dominion Voting Systems.

Dominion Voting Systems acquired Premier on May 19, 2010.

“We are extremely pleased to conclude this transaction, which will restore much-needed competition to the American voting systems market and will allow Dominion to expand its capabilities and operational footprint to every corner of the United States,” said John Poulos, CEO of Dominion. The transaction was approved by the Department of Justice and nine state attorneys general.

Problem with this is Dominion Voting Systems too had its own “glitches” just like Diebold/Premier Solution Systems had dating all the way back as early as 2001. Essentially making it safe to assume that Diebold hadn’t so much as went away, as they travelled from name to name. Dominion was no different. In this March 2012 article from “The Palm Beach Post”, written by George Bennett where a supplier for Dominion Voting Systems blamed the problems on a software “shortcoming” as they put it which ended up transferring the votes of one candidate over to the other.

Now this is but speculation, but this same scenario is what I presume to have occurred with the recent 2020 Presidential Election in multiple states across the country seeing as Dominion Systems are used in more than 29 states in the nation.

As we continue down this rabbit hole, I’ll detail Dominion’s role in everything.
On a sidenote, for those who have recently heard of the company Smartmatic here’s something important you should know contrary to what the company states, when they denounced their affiliation with Dominion. Smartmatic acquired another multi-national technology company which developed advanced election systems, as well as voting machines. This company was called Sequoia Voting Systems. The acquisition occurred on March 8, 2005.

Why is this important?

Because Smartmatic, following a verdict by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), was ordered to sell Sequoia. Who did they sell it to? None other Dominion Voting Systems. So, while not directly related to Dominion, Smartmatic still retains a degree of indirect relationship to it based off the sale of said company.

So now we have Dominion in possession of not just one, but two subsidiaries. Sequoia and Diebold/Premier. If you recall earlier, I brought up Mr. Ian Piper, the Compliance Officer at Diebold. As fate would have it, would you guess who happens to be Director of Certification at Dominion.None other than the man himself.

Now while this may mean nothing to some, I find it odd that this same gentlemen who was employed with Diebold from the very start, the same company who also had claims of directly interfering with ballot results from leaked Diebold email servers. There are roughly 13,000 leaked emails floating out in the web somewhere, but here’s a link to quite a few. Ian Piper is mentioned/seen responding to messages in vast amounts of the emails, as I stated prior due to his employment being there at the time. So again, having knowledge whether directly or indirectly was safe to assume.

 

So, having worked for a company prior known to have widespread issues that lacked transparency, and therefore the trust of the American People due to irregularities with their systems in the election process dating back 20 years. So why would Dominion keep an employee on their payroll from those volatile times instead of hiring someone with the same qualifications but a more transparent personal and professional record? Because, as I stated earlier, it was never about fixing these errors so much as hiding them among different aliases. Take that as my opinion if you will, but it’s a hypothesis I stand firm on.

Attached below are various documents signed by or written by Ian Piper while employed by Dominion Voting Systems in order to verify the validity of my previous statements and accusations.

Fast forward to July 16, 2018.
Dominion makes the decision to sell to Staple Street Capital LLC. An investment firm based out of New York.

Upon further investigation, I noticed something odd about Staple Street and its members. Half of the executive team in some way or another, has ties to or has worked there prior to, an investment hedge fund corporation called “The Carlyle Group”. Though it’s a minor detail to some, a major detail that stuck out to me, is that George Soros donated $100 Million towards a smaller subsidiary of the group.
Washington Post Article Below:

Whether people choose to investigate further into him or not, you’ll find that wherever Soros is, trouble follows. Be it financial strain upon a country, or public discourse instead.
Focusing our attention back onto the members of Dominion, after glancing over the Executive Team and noticing those details, you’ll notice one even greater detail.
One of the Sitting Board Members of Staple Street:

A Google inquiry into Mr. Kennard being a Sitting Board Member of Staple Street LLC. will be a hit and miss. Staple Street has since taken down everything off their website including the Executive Members and Board Members links. The homepage is generic and lacks any other information besides an “About Us” excerpt. Digital footprints always remain in one form or another, so I managed to find more information including screenshots of the original website before it was erased. Ill attach them below this. Before I do, what I find odd as others should too, is how a Ranking Board Member of the Corporation that just bought out the company who manufactures the voting systems we are using for this year’s Presidential Election isn’t in some shape or form a conflict of interest given his affiliation with not just Bill Clinton and his Administration, but Barack Obama and his administration as well.
(To make it even weirder, Bloomberg took down Kennards biography which I screenshotted as well.)

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The link Between Dominion, Sequoia, Smartmatic, and the CCP
CCPElection fraud
gnews canada

FollowCN

Nov. 21
Toronto Maple Leaf Farm

Image Source: Verocommunique.com
In the 2020 U.S. presidential election, with public opinion, on election day November 3rd, overwhelmingly in favor of President Trump, the preliminary results from the mainstream media on the morning of November 4th showed Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden winning the Presidential contest over President Trump. While Biden’s team was celebrating, evidence of ballot fraud was emerging. The Dominion Voting Systems (DVS) ballot-counting system used in 28 states during the election contained Chinese-made hardware components as well as the Smartmatic ballot software. Voter data was illegally transmitted to foreign countries and this led to the seizure of a server by the U.S. military at the offices of Scytl in Frankfurt, Germany. Public discontent reached a climax and finally erupted on November 14 in Washington, D.C., when the Washington D.C. Voters’ Association held a rally. Hundreds of thousands of people rallied in front of the U.S. Supreme Court to demand electoral transparency, and to support Trump’s re-election.

The use of high-tech voting systems to process voting results in the U.S. is not new. The DVS machines use software from Smartmatic which describes itself as the global leader in secure, accessible, transparent election technology. Once one of the top-ranked voting systems in the U.S., Smartmatic has a complex background and continues to generate controversy. In the 2020 U.S. election it has been exposed as a real threat to U.S. national security.

Smartmatic Voting Systems in Venezuela

Founded in Venezuela in 1997 by a team of three engineers – Antonio Mugica, Alfredo José Anzola, and Roger Piñate, Smartmatic specializes in the design and end-to-end deployment of technology solutions for specific applications. The company’s niches are: electronic voting systems, smart city solutions (including public safety and public transportation), identity management systems for civil registration, and authentication products for government applications.

The company’s first U.S. entity was incorporated in Delaware in April 2000 and opened its headquarters in Boca Raton, Florida with seven employees in November of that year. The 2000 U.S. presidential election was marred by “hanging and dimpled chads” on the Florida ballot cards. After controversy erupted over the mis-counting of ballots, Smartmatic began to target the development of election voting systems.

In April 2003 in Caracas, Venezuela, Smartmatic officially unveiled its prototype for election automation. The testing of the prototype covered all the details of the process necessary for any type of election. During the tests, emphasis was placed on the system’s encryption capabilities, which are essential for the confidential storage and transmission of data, as well as the robustness of the software and hardware system’s components. The system passed all tests with no shortcomings, said a company spokesperson.

The voting system was developed entirely in-house by Smartmatic. That includes the integration of hardware and software systems from design stage to end-to-end deployment. Such a complex, purpose-built technical solution would require a strong, system-wide R&D capability that would not have been possible in Venezuela without massive technical and financial support. Although Smartmatric established a U.S. presence in 2000, almost all of its products were developed in Venezuela, a country where capital is scarce and scientific research and manufacturing are not sophisticated.

Key conclusion/question #1: where did the financing and R&D knowledge come from?

Smartmatric’s voting solution was first implemented in the August 2004 recall referendum against President Hugo Chávez in Venezuela, and was successful in helping Chávez secure 59% of the votes. This result was met with accusations of electoral fraud. At the time questions were only raised about the election process and patterns. Nobody focused on the Smartmatic voting system. The good people of Venezuela had no idea that an invisible hand was manipulating the referendum.

Smartmatic first established a presence in the United States in 2000 in Boca Raton, Florida, then moved its headquarters to Amsterdam, the Netherlands in 2004, and opened a new headquarters in London in 2012.

According to Wikipedia: “although Smartmatic has made different claims about whether they are American or Dutch, the U.S. State Department notes that the owners of the company remain hidden in a network of holding companies in the Netherlands and Barbados”. The New York Times notes that “the role of the young Venezuelan engineers who founded Smartmatic has become less obvious and that its organization is an elaborate network of offshore companies and foreign trusts.” BBC News noted that while Smartmatic says the company was founded in the U.S. and “its roots are firmly fixed in (Venezuela), the ownership structure is opaque.” Smartmatic maintains that holding companies in multiple countries are used for “tax efficiency.”

WikiLeaks provides some more detail, “…they have a list of about 30 anonymous investors …. the silent partners are mainly upper-class Venezuelans, …. then Defense Minister Jose Vicente Rangel …. the Vice President’s daughter Gisela Rangel Avalos, Chávez’s political mentor Luis Miquelina is also a shareholder in the company ….” The true identity of most of Smartmatic’s shareholders remains a mystery.

Key conclusion/question #2: who are the true owners of Smartmatic and where is the company resident for tax purposes?

Sequoia Voting Systems of the United States

Image Source: verifiedvoting.org
In 1984, Sequoia Pacific System Corporation purchased the voting machine business of AVM Corporation (the former Automatic Voting Machine Corporation) and reorganized it as Sequoia Voting Systems. By the time Sequoia bought the AVM voting business, the AVM Automatic Voting Computer (AVC) was ready for market. Under Sequoia’s ownership, AVC was certified for use in several states in 1986 and 1987, and it went to market as the ‘Sequoia AVC Advantage DRE voting machine’ in 1990.

In late 1997, benefiting from an antitrust action by the U.S. Department of Justice, Sequoia Voting System obtained the intellectual property rights of the Optech line of ballot scanners. It proceeded to manufacture scanning voting machines and developed a touch-screen. But the product underperformed after several years of losses. In March 2005, the company was acquired by Smartmatric, which had developed a range of advanced election systems, including voting machines. Since then, Smartmatic has assigned most of its development and management teams to work on retrofitting some of Sequoia’s old-fashioned, legacy voting machines and replacing their technology with proprietary features, resulting in new high-tech products. As a result, Sequoia sold many next-generation election products and experienced a healthy financial recovery in fiscal years 2006 and 2007. However, in the 2006 presidential election, Sequoia’s voting system was called into question.

1.Cook County, Illinois is the second most populous county in the United States. It had many problems using the Sequoia Voting System. Problems were suspected to be related to a software error of the voting system.

2.Florida replaced the punch card voting system with a touchscreen system after the 2000 election problems, but the touchscreen system purchased from Sequoia had some major problems.

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) opened an investigation into Sequoia only after Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), who chairs the subcommittee overseeing CFIUS and who co‐​authored the Foreign Investment and National Security Act 2007 (FINSA), wrote a letter to then‐​Treasury Secretary John Snow inquiring whether the Venezuelan government could use Sequoia to manipulate U.S. elections. Maloney cited the fact that the Venezuelan state had invested in Smartmatic’s affiliates, the company’s current ownership was buried in a labyrinth of offshore trusts, and revelations that Sequoia had flown 15 Venezuelan nationals to Chicago to tabulate votes in a local election. “There clearly remained doubt surrounding this company, and as long as those doubts lingered, many people would have legitimate questions about the integrity of these voting machines,” said Maloney. “When I first raised this case with Treasury, I thought that it was ripe for a CFIUS investigation, because the integrity of our voting machines is vital to national security. At that time, Smartmatic flatly refused to undergo a CFIUS review. But now it seems the company could not overcome the cloud of doubt surrounding this doubt – had they been able to, we would not be talking about a sale of Sequoia today. As I said in May, it seems that a CFIUS review was in fact the proper course.”

The company replaced its headquarters in Boca Raton in favor of a complex structure with offices in multiple locations. The U.S. State Department said its Venezuelan owners “remain hidden behind a network of holding companies in the Netherlands and Barbados”; its organization is “a complex network of offshore companies and foreign trusts.”

Key conclusion/question #3: why did Smartmatic reorganize from a transparent structure with a head office in Florida to an opaque structure with holding companies and trusts in the Netherlands and Barbados?

In November 2007 CFIUS issued a ruling ordering Smartmatic to sell all of its shares in Sequoia Voting Systems in exchange for CFIUS dropping its investigation of Smartmatic. But what followed was far from what one might expect. Following a ruling by the CFIUS, Smartmatic was ordered to sell to Sequoia’s management team- SVS Holdings Inc, (Sequoia Holdings). However, Smartmatic still retained some financial control over several aspects of Sequoia, ownership of the intellectual property rights of some of Sequoia’s election products deployed in the U.S., and the right to negotiate for overseas business.

It was only in April 2008 that these arrangements were revealed when Hart InterCivic, a competitor of Sequoia, attempted a “hostile takeover” of Sequoia Holdings. Through the discovery process made possible by the purchase offer it became evident that Smartmatic had not fully divested itself of Sequoia Holdings. The purchase contract showed several elements of permanent control over Sequoia Holdings.

Smartmatic still retained some financial control of Sequoia Holdings.
Smartmatic also retained ownership of intellectual property rights for some of Sequoia’s currently deployed election products in the United States.
Sequoia Holdings reserved the right to negotiate non-compete contracts overseas.
“The secrecy regarding CFIUS investigations is legendary: CFIUS was previously not allowed to tell Congress of the results–or even existence–of security reviews.” [1]

However, these arrangements were allegedly made with the review and approval of CFIUS. Sequoia Holdings faces substantial legal liability for infringement of intellectual property rights and repeated voting system failures.

Key conclusion/question #4: why did Smartmatic retain this control over finances, intellectual property, and non-compete clauses, and why did CFIUS approve this arrangement?

At the end of April 2008, a shocking event occurred: one of Smartmatic’s founders, who was also the founder of the American company, died in a plane crash in Venezuela, along with Smartmatic’s finance department and the plane’s pilot. The Venezuelan Minister of the Interior (said to be a relative of the founder) was the first to arrive at the hospital, along with Jorge Rodriguez, former President of the Venezuelan Electoral Council and former Vice President of Venezuela.

Sequoia Holdings orchestrated a turnaround in 2010 with the acquisition by Dominion Voting System. On June 4, 2010, Dominion Voting Systems, a previously little-known Canadian company which engaged in the manufacture of electronic voting hardware and optical scanners, acquired Sequoia Voting Systems Inc. Sequoia filed a bankruptcy petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in February 2014.”

It is worth taking a closer look at the Sequoia group of companies, Sequoia Capital, Sequoia Capital China, and their particularly their founder Neil Shen. This is the key to the connection with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

Image Source: Isfeed.com
Mr. Guo Wengui made comments about Sequoia and Neil Nanpeng Shen: “…Neil Shen is the major partner of Sequoia Capital, and the Shen family is one of the most powerful in the United States. Nine out of eleven families are his partners, and now it is about the White House, I can’t say his name anymore. Thomas, the boss of Silicon Valley, Eric Smith, the former CEO of Google, and Zuckerberg, the former CEO of FB, were all speechless when they met Neil Shen, including Hong Kong Superman and Rachel Lee, because Shen is the real godfather of the Internet. …… “

Neil Shen (born 1967) is an entrepreneur and investor based in the province of Zhejiang, China.
In 1985, Neil Shen attended Shanghai Jiaotong University in the first class of its newly established program which waived selected students from examination requirements. In 1989, he graduated with a Bachelor’s degree from Shanghai Jiao Tong University. In 1989 he travelled to the United States to study – initially majoring in Mathematics at Columbia University and later being accepted at Yale University. He received a Master’s Degree from Yale University in 1992.

Following graduation from Yale in 1992, Neil Shen accepted a position at Citibank in the United States. In 1994, he returned to China, joining Lehman Brothers, where he handled investment-banking projects in China. From 1996 to 1999, he served as a director at Deutsche Bank in Hong Kong, China, responsible for transactions involving China’s debt capital markets. In 1999, Neil Shen founded Ctrip, serving as chairman, president and chief financial officer. On December 9, 2003, Ctrip was listed on the NASDAQ. In 2002, he founded the Home Inns hotel chain where he served as the founder and co-chairman. On October 26, 2006, the Home Inns hotel chain was listed on NASDAQ. In 2003 and 2004, Shen personally became the angel investor and board director of E-House China and China Focus Media.

In 2005 Neil Shen established Sequoia Capital China (红杉资本中国基金) as an affiliate to the U.S. firm, with the support of Sequoia Capital’s Michael Moritz (Jew) and Douglas Leone. Sequoia Capital invests in both public and private companies. It specializes in incubation, seed stage, startup stage, early stage, and growth stage investments in private companies. Sequoia Capital has invested in over 1000 companies since 1972, including Apple, Google, Oracle, Nvidia, GitHub, PayPal, LinkedIn, Stripe, Bird, YouTube, Instagram, Yahoo!, PicsArt, Klarna and WhatsApp. The combined current public market value for these companies is over $1.4 trillion, equivalent to 22 percent of the Nasdaq. Its portfolio is mainly in financial services, healthcare, outsourcing, and technology. By 2017, Sequoia Capital had originated 68 initial public offerings and 203 acquisitions.

Following the economic crisis in 2009, Sequoia Capital China, led by Neil Shen, chose to invest in companies with high growth potential. Neil Shen has managed the IPOs of several companies on the NYSE, HKEx, and China A-Share Exchange. He facilitated the merger of Sina Real Estate Channel with E-House China, and successfully listed E-House China on NYSE on August 8, 2007. In December 2009, Neil Shen helped the Cao Guowei team lead the acquisition of the No.1 online portal Sina. Now Sequoia Capital China has offices in Hong Kong, Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Suzhou, and Shenzhen. Over the past ten years, Sequoia Capital China has built an impressive and diverse portfolio. This group of approximately 300 dynamic companies delivers high returns on investment using differentiated technologies and innovative business models. They include Alibaba, VIPshop, Sina.com, JD.com, Didi, Ourpalm, Qihoo 360, Jumei, Momo, SINNET, Dianping, Meituan, Meilishuo, Toutiaoto, Navi, Ganji.com, DJI, VanceInfo, Noah Private Wealth Management, Wanda Cinemas, Alibaba Pictures, Plateno Hotels Group, Deppon Logistics, ZTO Express, Beta Pharma, Snibe Diagnostic, BGI, WEGO, and Yuwell Medical.

In 2009, Neil Shen endowed the “Sequoia Xia An” professorship fund at his undergraduate alma mater Shanghai Jiao Tong University, as well as a scholarship program named “Zhiyuan College Outstanding Student Scholarship”. As a board member of the Education Development Foundation at Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Neil Shen has funded the summer exchange program between Shanghai Jiao Tong University and Yale University. He has also made several donations to Yale University. In October 2014 the Yale University China Center was unveiled in Beijing. He participated in the endowment of the Center with the largest donation ever from Yale China Alumni. He is the board chairman of the Yale Leadership Center in China. In November 2015, during COP 21 (United Nations Conference on Climate Change in Paris), the Breakthrough Energy Coalition was formed led by Bill Gates, Neil Shen, Jack Ma, Mark Zuckerberg and 28 other business leaders who committed to invest significant resources in the next five years to address climate change and clean energy issues. Neil Shen is Director and a long-time benefactor of the Teach For China program

Neil Shen is not only the founding and managing partner of Sequoia Capital China, he also serves as Global Steward of Sequoia Capital. Neil Shen is a Member of the 13th CPPCC National Committee. He is a Vice Chairman, China Securities Investment Fund Association, Venture Capital Fund Committee. He is Co-founder and Chairman of the Hong Kong X Technology Startup Platform. He is a Member of the Advisory Panel on Innovation and Strategic Development for the Chief Executive of the HKSAR.

As a director of the China Entrepreneurs Forum, Neil Shen served as the rotating chairman in 2015. He is the Vice-Chairman of the Venture Capital Committee for Asset Management Association of China. He is also a Trustee of the Asia Society. He is the founding board member and the 2016 rotating President of the Future Forum. He is also the Vice President of Beijing Private Equity Association, and the Vice Chairman of the Zhejiang Chamber of Commerce, Shanghai. Neil Shen was the top-ranked venture capitalist in China according to Forbes from 2010 to 2013. He topped the Forbes ranking of Top Venture Capitalists in China in 2014 and 2015. He was ranked at No.3 in 2014.The Asian Venture Capital Journal named him the Venture Capitalist of the Year in both 2010 and 2015, and also the Entrepreneur of the Year in 2004. In both 2014 and 2015, Neil Shen, as one of the few honored guests, attended the first and second China’s World Internet Conference. He is a member of High-level Advisory Council of the Secretariat of the World Internet Conference Organizing Committee. In September 2015, Neil Shen was received by Chinese President Xi Jinping at the China – U.S. Internet Industry Forum in Seattle, Washington, USA. In 2016, the New York Times reported that Neil Shen was ranked at #9 on the CB Insights listing of the world’s top venture capitalists.

Key conclusion/question #5: Neil Shen is the key connection between the CCP, Sequoia, and Dominion Voting Systems and their work in the US elections.

Dominion Voting Systems in Canada

Image Source: Rebelnews.com
Dominion Voting Systems, founded in 2002 in Toronto, is a company that sells electronic voting hardware and software in the United States and Canada. Dominion Voting Systems is one of the three major voting software products that was used in the 2020 U.S. election, along with systems from Election System & Software (ES&S) and Hart InterCivic.

Key individuals at Dominion are associated with the Carlyle Group, a U.S. multinational private equity, alternative asset management and financial services firm with more than $203 billion in assets under management.

Who is behind the Carlyle Group?

In April 2003, Carlyle Capital was managed by a team of former U.S. government personnel, including president Frank Carlucci (former Deputy Director of the CIA), former Secretary of Defense James Baker III (who served on George W. Bush’s Board of Governors), and James Baker III (who served on the Board of Directors of the National Security Agency).

The financial assets of the Saudi bin Laden Corporation (SBC) were also managed by the Carlyle Group before the 9/11 attack in New York. Many influential individuals have worked for or invested in the group, including John Major, former UK Prime Minister; Fidel Ramos, former Philippines President; Park Tae Joon, former South Korean Prime Minister; Saudi Prince Al-Walid; Colin Powell, former Secretary of State; James Baker III, former Secretary of State; Caspar Weinberger, former Defense Secretary; Richard Darman, former White House Budget Director; the billionaire George Soros; bin Laden family members; Alice Albright, daughter of Madeleine Albright, former Secretary of State; Arthur Lewitt, former SEC head; William Kennard, former head of the FCC; Karl Otto Pöhl, former Bundesbank president; Henri Martre, former president of Aerospatiale; and Bilderberg steering committee member Etienne Davignon.

Key conclusion/question #6: key individuals at Dominion are connected with Carlyle Group whose influential investors and employees are members of the swamp that Washington D.C. has been sinking into for over 30 years.

In May 2010, Dominion acquired Premier Election Solutions from Election System & Software; and in June 2010, acquired Sequoia Holdings, which at the time had multiple voting systems controlled by Smartmatic in 16 states and 300 jurisdictions of the U.S. As a result, Dominion grew rapidly and achieved the second largest market share for a voting system in the United States.

Key conclusion/question #7: who created and developed the software used in the voting machines sold by the merged Dominion/Sequoia entity? Who controls the code?

................................................

DHS cyber agency invests in election auditing tool to secure 2020 elections

TheHill
BY MAGGIE MILLER - 11/21/19 05:23 PM EST 56

DHS cyber agency invests in election auditing tool to secure 2020 elections
The Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) cybersecurity agency announced Thursday it would partner with election officials and private sector groups to develop an election auditing tool that can be used to help ensure the accuracy of votes in 2020.

DHS’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) is partnering with non-profit group VotingWorks on an open-source software tool known as Arlo, which is provided to state and local election officials for free.

According to CISA, Arlo conducts an audit of votes by selecting how many ballots and which ballots to audit and comparing the audited votes to the original count.

The tool has already been used to conduct post-election audits across the country, including during the recent 2019 elections. Election officials in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Virginia, Ohio and Georgia have signed on to partner with CISA on Arlo, with more officials expected to join.

“Heading into 2020, we’re exploring all possible ways that we can support state and local election officials while also ensuring that Americans across the country can confidently cast their votes,” CISA Director Christopher Krebs said in a statement.

Krebs added that “At a time when we know foreign actors are attempting to interfere and cast doubt on our democratic processes, it’s incredibly important elections are secure, resilient, and transparent.”

NATO secretary general 'warmly' welcomes Biden as president-elect
Graham vows Senate Judiciary will investigate 'voting irregularities'
Use of post-election audits have been widely recommended by experts as a major step to secure elections, particularly in the wake of attempted Russian interference in 2016.

The use of audits was a step recommended by the Senate Intelligence Committee to secure elections in volume one of its bipartisan report on Russian interference efforts in 2016.

“Statistically sound audits may be the simplest and most direct way to ensure confidence in the integrity of the vote,” the committee wrote. “States should begin to implement audits of election results.”

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Dominion Voting Systems

Wikipedia

Dominion Voting Systems Corporation is a company that sells electronic voting hardware and software, including voting machines and tabulators, in the U.S. and Canada.[1] The company's international headquarters are in Toronto, Canada, and its U.S. headquarters are in Denver, Colorado. As of September 2019, Dominion voting machines are used in 2,000 jurisdictions in 33 U.S. states and Puerto Rico.[citation needed] The company also has over 100 municipal customers in Canada and clients in other countries. The company carries out in-house software development for its customers in the U.S., Canada and Serbia.[2] Dominion Voting Systems Corporation ... Founded 2002; 18 years ago Founders James Hoover John Poulos Headquarters Toronto, Ontario, Canada Subsidiaries Premier Election Solutions Sequoia Voting Systems Website dominionvoting.com Contents Company A Dominion ImageCast precinct-count optical-scan voting machine, mounted on a collapsible ballot box made by ElectionSource. Dominion was founded in 2002 in Toronto, Canada, by John Poulos and James Hoover. [3] Acquisitions In May 2010, Dominion acquired Premier Election Solutions (formerly Diebold Election Systems) from Election Systems & Software (ES&S). ES&S had just acquired PES from Diebold and was required to sell off PES by the United States Department of Justice for anti-trust concerns.[4] In June 2010, Dominion acquired Sequoia Voting Systems.[5] United States Dominion is the second largest seller of voting machines in the United States.[6 In 2016 its machines served 70 million voters in 1,600 jurisdictions In 2019, the state of Georgia selected Dominion Voting Systems to provide its new statewide voting system for 2020 and beyond.[9] Canada Dominion Voting Systems is Canada’s largest election system provider, with deployments nationwide. Currently, Dominion provides optical scan paper ballot tabulation systems for provincial elections, including Ontario and New Brunswick. Dominion also provides ballot tabulation and voting systems for Canada's major party leadership elections, including the Liberal Party of Canada, the Conservative Party of Canada, and the PC Party of Ontario.Ontario was the first Canadian province to use Dominion's tabulator machines in the 2006 elections.[13] New Brunswick used Dominion's 763 tabulator machines in the 2014 provincial elections.[] There were some problems with the reporting of tabulator counts after the election, and at 10:45 p.m Elections New Brunswick officially suspended the results reporting count with 17 ridings still undeclared.[] The Progressive Conservatives and the People's Alliance of New Brunswick called for a hand count of all ballots. Recounts were held in 7 of 49 ridings and the results were upheld with variations of no more than 1 vote per candidate per riding.[16] This delay in results reporting was caused by an off-the-shelf software application unrelated to Dominion.[17] In June 2018, Elections Ontario used Dominion's tabulator machines for the provincial election and deployed them at 50 percent of polling stations.[] Officers Poulos, President and CEO of Dominion, has a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Toronto and an MBA from INSEAD, in Fontainebleau, France.[20] Hoover (Vice President) has an MS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Alberta.

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The Sting will Put Ballot Fraud Issue to Bed

Gnews

Just as both parties in the US are entering the judicial process over massive voter fraud, and just as people worry about whether the CCP’s 3F plan of bringing the US into chaos has succeeded, social media is exploding with a huge bombshell.

On November 5th, Mr. Owen Shroyer posted an exclusive video on his “War Room With Owen Shroyer” entitled: “Intelligence Insider: President Trump Setup Democrats In “Sting Operation” To Catch Them Stealing Election!”

Dr. Steve Pieczenik came on the interview and claimed that the official ballots across America were watermarked, and the Democrats would get caught if they attempt to cheat! A similar story had already caught on Twitter and in the Whistleblower circles earlier that same day but was not officially reported. Perhaps the news was too good to be credible.

Dr. Steve Pieczenik is by no means a nobody. He served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State in the Ford, Carter, Reagan, and Bush administrations.

In this video, Dr. Piechenick said he had just been allowed to speak out about it. It turns out that in 2016 President Trump and a group of honorable figures in the US military, intelligence community, and government understood exactly how corrupt the Democrats’ machinery is and their intention to steal the country back in the next election. In preparation for this, they have secretly arranged this undercover “Sting Operation.”

The Trump administration had the Department of Homeland Security printed an isotope watermark on all legitimate ballots. This technique is called radioactive QFS water chain inscription code. The technology stores records of unique signatures that are added to the watermark so they can verify the hash information written on the blockchain (master record). This watermark cannot be swapped, making it possible to track down each individual. The U.S. Postal Service filed a patent for the QFS blockchain voting system in August 2020. (www.pat2pdf.org)

Someone has put online a memo with a message from DHS claiming there will be undercover surveillance of the election. According to guerillastocktrading’s website, while they’re not sure if the memo is real or not, they do know that the watermarked ballots, which cannot be easily copied, have been prepared well before the 2020 Election.

The August 2 issue of Law & Justice, published by the White House, entitled “President Donald J. Trump is Strengthening the Security of Our Elections,” reported that the President made it clear that his administration would not tolerate foreign interference in our elections by any nation state or other malicious actors. Furthermore, on May 3 and July 27, President Trump chaired National Security Council meetings to receive updates and discuss whole-of-government approach to election security that is being implemented under his direction.

According to The Hill, back on August 22 of 2018, the DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen called on election officials in all 50 states to ensure that the ballots used during the 2020 presidential election are auditable. Nielsen wants “all state and local election officials to make certain that by the 2020 presidential election, every American vote on a verifiable and auditable ballot.” “Our systems must be resilient. We must be able to demonstrate that the votes count and that they are counted correctly,” she added. By “verifiable and auditable,” she could mean the ballots with a radioactive isotope watermark.

In the last few days, we have repeatedly heard the President refer to “illegal ballots” and “late ballots” as different forms of fraud. It’s reasonable to assume that when the President says “illegal ballots,” he’s referring to those fraudulent ballots. No wonder President Trump appeared confident and announced his victory as early as the first night of November 3. According to Sunzi’s the Art of War, as Mr. Piechenick further described, you pull back and allow the enemy to come out, manipulate the system, make all the mistakes they can make, and then you make the final kill.

It seems that this huge “Sting Operation” was not just a rumor. The whole legal proceedings with the Democrats were part of a giant fishing expedition in the swamp. It looks like the enemy can’t get away with it this time.

As the old Chinese proverb goes, “While mantis is hunting cicadas, a yellow sparrow is behind.”

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

What's the Quantum Financial System all about?
sadcorp (48)in #quantum • last year (edited)
"The QFS-system will cover the new global network for the transfer of gold or asset-backed money, initiated by Russia and China to replace the US-centrally-controlled Swift system.

This new Quantum Financial System – QFS runs on a quantum computer, based on an orbiting satellite, and is protected by Secret Space Programs to ensure that it cannot be hacked. The quantum technology was provided by benevolent extraterrestrial Galactics. The purpose of the new financial system is to put an end to Cabal corruption, usury, and manipulation within the banking world. The key is to implement limitations that will prevent corrupted banksters from gaining significant profits." IntotheLight News

"QFS stands for Quantum Financial System and according to Galactic Connection site, it’s an off-world monetary system which cannot be rigged, in contrast with the current financial system. As it cannot be compromised – despite the many attempts to do so by the cabal – the cabal’s corrupt central banking will collapse. The cabal will have no access to this system. This system will allow the transfer of the new asset-backed currencies after the Global Currency Reset which will replace the US-controlled Swift system with all its ills of usury and manipulation. The novelty about this system is that benevolent extraterrestrial Galactics provided the Alliance with this system which does not run on a conventional computer, but a quantum computer placed on a satellite. It is protected by SSPs to prevent it from being hacked." MassAwakening

“The New Quantum Financial System (QFS) is a super-advanced “out-of-this-world” technology that the Dark Cabal does not have. It has the capacity to map information sources throughout the multi-universe (time/space continuum and no time/space), and holds massive amounts of data in a compilation of materials the size of a grain of sand. Gone are the days of data server centers the size of football fields.” PathwaytoAscencion

"The Quantum Mapping System sometimes referred to as the Quantum Financial System is has long been used as a methodology to acquire legal possession of every asset on the planet." ProjectSpeak

"The Quantum System used by Kim was created by a Galactic race that is proficient in technology and were one of the races enslaved to build technology to assist Marduk to enslave and rob the planet of its resources."
https://projectspeak.net/18-july-2018-0941

"They instituted an Artificial Intelligence and computer program initiative with the full support of the banks. This so-called "Quantum Financial System" is in fact a re-hash of old binary filing system technology. The Quantum System existed long before I did, is using a technology which if humanity keeps going at it's current pace is about 1000 years ahead. Marduk did not create it, a fellow group of pirates did."
IntelDinarChronicles
Larry Eslinger
@sling63
Replying to
@realDonaldTrump
What about the #GlobalCurrencyReset ? The fiat system is getting ready to collapse. Banks are failing stress test world wide. If we don’t go to #quantumfinancialsystem now, the stock market will collapse. It’s not going up. The dollar value is going down ... Twitter

https://twitter.com/hashtag/quantumfinancialsystem?lang=en

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Realtime NYTimes election data analyzed proves fraud

TheDonald.win

Edit: the data we have has been directly linked to the footage of the news networks like CNN

BTW IF YOU CAN HELP DOWNLOAD EVERYTHING AND KEEP A LOCAL COPY.. IN THE CODE WHERE YOU CAN GET INFO FOR ALL THE STATES, DOWNLOAD FOR ALL THE STATES.

REMINDER: THIS DOESN'T TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ALL THE HUNDRED THOUSANDS OF TRUMP VOTES DESTROYED, BURNED AND RIPPED APART, THE THOUSANDS OF BALLOTS JUST MARKED FOR BIDEN. THIS IS THE EVIDENCE WE'VE FOUND SO FAR.

PEDES GET IN HERE. I saw the video on The Gateway Pundit [ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-huge-another-system-glitch-captured-live-cnn-election-night-20000-votes-swapped-trump-biden-video/ ] and I decided to do some digging of my own, into a more reputable source that can verify that the glitch was indeed real, and that it affected the votes, instead of it being just a display glitch on that news channel. So I went digging into the Edison data [ nyt ] and I found this damning evidence [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]. As can be seen in the image, only 54 votes were added, but the ratio changed in Biden's favor by a whole 0.6%! This is proof that not only did the glitch happen, but it doesn't seem to have been reverted at all.

EDIT : BIG UPDATE, I made a script to run through the data and gather all instances where votes switched from Trump to Biden, Lost Votes means that the total amount of votes counted decreased by that amount throughout the counting. I've only done states that use Dominion Voting Systems so far.

EDIT 2: Added ALL the states, and separated by voting systems, although no state uses exclusively one system as far as I know.

Edit 3: Re-ordered the states, first by switched votes, then by lost votes.

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨

Switched votes are votes that were taken from Trump and given to Biden.

Lost votes are voted that disappeared during the counting, from both candidates.

There might be a small overlap between Switched votes and Lost votes.

Dominion Voting Systems :

Pennsylvania : Switched : 220,883 Lost Votes : 941,248

New Jersey : Switched : 80,242 Lost Votes : 20

Florida : Switched : 21,422 Lost Votes : 456

Michigan : Switched : 20,213 Lost Votes : 21,882

New York : Switched : 18,124 Lost Votes : 623,213

Georgia : Switched : 17,407 Lost Votes : 33,574

Ohio : Switched : 14,965 Lost Votes : 5,102

Virginia : Switched : 12,163 Lost Votes : 789,023

California : Switched : 7,701 Lost Votes : 10,989

Arizona : Switched : 4,492 Lost Votes : 0

Minnesota : Switched : 2,766 Lost Votes : 195,650

Tennessee : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 0

Louisiana : Switched : 2,322 Lost Votes : 0

Illinois : Switched : 2,166 Lost Votes : 54,730

Wisconsin : Switched : 2,078 Lost Votes : 3,408

Colorado : Switched : 1,809 Lost Votes : 0

Utah : Switched : 1,627 Lost Votes : 0

New Hampshire : Switched : 973 Lost Votes : 116

Iowa : Switched : 938 Lost Votes : 477

New Mexico : Switched : 268 Lost Votes : 4,610

Missouri : Switched 0 : Lost Votes : 20,730

Nevada : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Alaska : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Washington : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Hawaii : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Kansas and Texas use Premier Election Solutions, owned by Dominion Voting Systems.

Texas : Switched : 14,954 Lost Votes : 30,557

Kansas : Switched : 1,674 Lost Votes : 2,154

Election Systems & Software :

Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50

Kentucky : Switched : 8,129 Lost Votes : 23,849

Arkansas : Switched : 3,664 Lost Votes : 20,748

South Carolina : Switched : 2,779 Lost Votes : 2,119

Montana : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 1,276

South Dakota : Switched : 1,347 Lost Votes : 1

North Dakota : Switched : 234 Lost Votes : 681

Maryland : Switched : 203 Lost Votes : 0

North Carolina : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 15

District of Columbia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Unknown Systems:

Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50

Connecticut : Switched : 3,834 Lost Votes : 272

Massachusetts : Switched : 3,613 Lost Votes : 51

Oregon : Switched 2,557 Lost Votes : 0

Alabama : Switched : 1,170 Lost Votes : 408

Mississippi : Switched : 355 Lost Votes : 0

Maine : Switched : 271 Lost Votes : 35

Rhode Island : Switched : 6 Lost Votes : 13

West Virginia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 78,300

Idaho : Switched 0 Lost Votes : 0

Oklahoma : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Indiana : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Delaware : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Vermont : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

NOTE : Lost votes are votes that disappeared, not only for Trump, but overall.

VERIFIED!!!!:

I went looking through the data I got from my script, trying to find if the moment the Antrim glitch happened in Michigan is there. And it is. Here is the Data. [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/michigan/president.json ]

And here is the specific part when the switch happened. [ https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png ]

You can see in that picture, that Trump lost 3,096 votes, those all went to Biden. BUT, Trump also lost 2,324 votes, that went nowhere.

EDIT: Those 2,324 were moved from Trump to Jorgensen.

Jorgensen votes = Total votes * (1 - Trump share - Biden share)

Nr.27 : 573,857 * (1 - 0.578 - 0.401) = 12,051

Nr.28 : 574,417 * (1 - 0.568 - 0.406) = 14,935

Jorgensen vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 14,935 - 12,051 = 2,884

Total vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 574,417 - 573,857 = 560

Jorgensen vote increase - Total vote increase = 2,884 - 560 = 2,324

SOURCES: Here is the data I used:

EDISON DATA: https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json

https://workupload.com/file/LVcwK7AAD8p

The data is from Edison Research, it is used for election coverage by at least ABC News, CBS News, CNN and NBC News. It is also used for the website of the NYT, and probably others as well.

I scraped the data from the NYT website, here [ NYT ] to check for other states, replace "pennsylvania" in the link with the state you want to check, for states that have spaces in their names, like new york, write new-york instead.

Take this picture for example. [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]

It's like this:

Nr.187 : 2,984,468(Total votes) * 0.566(Trump share of the votes) = 1,689,208.888

Nr.188 : 2,984,522 * 0.56 = 1,671,332.32

Do the same thing for Biden, and you'll see that he gained the votes that Trump lost.

I made a program that basically checks every single change in votes, does the above to check if votes were switched, then adds them all up to get the total amount of switched votes.

Here is the link to a rar file containing all the .json files for the states, and the fraudcatch.py file, you'd need to download python 3.8.2 to use it, click EDIT with idle, then in the window that pops up click Run, to check how many votes were switched from Trump to Biden in a state, you then type findfraud('hawaii') for example, replace hawaii with the name of the file of the state you want to check, the file for new hampshire is named newhamp for example, so findfraud('newhamp'), to check the total lost votes (For both candidates) do lostvotes('newhamp') for example. https://workupload.com/file/s7s8SARjjqh

[pede444wow] I took the json files that are included here, and wrote a python script to convert the critical data to one csv file, so you can analyze it in excel:

python script: https://pastebin.com/Q6nTP04N

result csv file: (download and save to csv file, then open in excel) https://pastebin.com/FQuxxTvK

[montag] Here's a GitHub repo of the same data source taken at incremental time periods. Github

[ComeAndTakeIt_Texas] Hey TrumanBlack, I crunched the 27/28 timestamp data you posted (specifically this - https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png), and uploaded a spreadsheet analysis here (https://i.maga.host/xbwnVuk.png). I do a worst-case and best-case rounding error to generate Max T Vote, Min T Vote, and Max B Vote and Min B Vote that shows if you have 0.578 share, the max number that would represent would be 0.57849999999, and the min number would be 0.5775. The specific pic highlighted here allows no possible way whatsoever that Trump did not lose votes. The smallest number of votes he could have lost assuming in 27 there is a worst case rounding error and in the 28 step there is a best case rounding error (extremely unlikely), Trump lost a 4846.353. In worst case, he lost 5994.627 votes. There is literally NO way anyone can explain this away. They can also not explain that away as an asynchronous issue, as the timestamp itself is later (1), and (2), the total vote count increased. This single time step is proof alone.

[warpigpede] Re: the data displayed in Maga

I calculated number of lost Trump votes as 5738.57, exactly 1% of the total number of votes (573857) at record 27:

votes 27: 573857

trump fraction: 0.578

trump votes: 331689.346

biden fraction: 0.401

biden votes: 230116.657

votes 28: 574417

trump fraction: 0.568

trump vote: 325950.776

biden vote: 232985.942

biden fraction: 0.406

votes change: +560

trump votes change: -5738.57

Exactly 1% is an awfully curious value. I wonder if it is consistent across the entire dataset

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Lord Malloch Brown Revealed: The British Hand Behind the Coup Shows Its Scales Again

Matthew Ehret

November 17, 2020
© Photo: Wikimedia
Throughout the four-year drama of Russiagate, the hand of British intelligence has revealed itself continuously.

From the obvious role of Sir Richard Dearlove and his former MI6 underlying Christopher Steele who together played a driving role in shaping the dodgy dossier, to their involvement with Oxford Rhodes Scholar Strobe Talbott in composing, promoting and marketing the fraudulent dossier to targeted members of Congress and media, to British Ambassador Sir Darroch caught “flooding the zone” with British intelligence assets to shape Trump’s perception of the world, to the array of British entrapment operations that targeted Michael Flynn as early as 2014 in London… wherever one looks, the hand of British intelligence seems to be everywhere.

While vast effort is made to downplay the British roots of the deep state by the media which tends to portray this problem from a partisan narrative of “democratic party corruption”, this sleight of hand misses the causal nexus and demands we believe that the tail truly wags the dog.

The uncomfortable truth which many are either too afraid, lazy or corrupt to admit is that since the moment John F Kennedy died on November 22, 1963, both the Democratic and Republican Parties have undergone an slow take-over by this foreign parasite. The thing that has come to be known as the “deep state” was never based on one party or another, and never emanated from anything native to the Constitutional traditions of the US government itself as I outlined in my previous article “Understanding the Trifold Nature of the Deep State”.

While the Republican party of George Bush was in power, this deep state had used its controls of computerized vote counting to rig elections in 2000 and 2004 in its favor as showcased brilliantly in the 2006 documentary Hacking Democracy. Later, when it was time for a controlled opposition to take power in 2008, it did the same thing under a different cast of characters.

While one side of the unipolar world government agenda was driven by a view that the USA should forever be the primary global police force governing a zero sum system of perpetual war, with an unelected elite managing the system from above, the other side believed that the USA should surrender its claims to sovereignty to an international global body with unelected technocrats and financiers at the top managing the zero sum system of perpetual war from above.

Notice the common denominator?

Election Theft as Russiagate 5.0

Now that it has become increasingly clear that mass election fraud has swept across the USA in an effort to accomplish what four years of Russiagate failed to achieve, yet another light has fallen upon the British hand behind Biden which aims to dissolve any nationalist spirit remaining in the embattled republic.

As I outlined in my last report, the largest private computer voting system in the USA which services 30 states and 70 million voters was shown to be at the heart of the current election theft. In that article, it was made clear that Dominion Voting Systems is a Canadian company which dominates the USA’s private computerized voting systems and is closely tied to another larger company called Smartmatic.

For those still out of the loop, Smartmatic furnishes voting machines and its software (backdoor codes and all) to governments all around the world and is highly enmeshed with the Clinton Foundation, Soros’ Open Society and Nancy Pelosi’s very own Chief of Staff.

Not only that, but the key figure controlling Smartmatic is none other than Lord Mark Malloch Brown, a former vice chairman of George Soros’ Investment Funds (2007), as well as Soros’ Open Society Institute and World Economic Forum, former Vice President at the World Bank (1995-1999), UN Administrator for Development (1999-2005), UN Deputy Secretary General and UK Minister of State for Africa, Asia and the UN (2007-2009). These are just a few hats he has worn in recent years which we will explore in greater detail.

Lord Malloch Brown: Not Your Typical British Agent

Through his lifelong affiliation with Soros, Lord Malloch Brown (Knight of the Order of St George and St Michael) played the role of color revolutionary godfather and key controller of such “technocrat friendly puppet leaders” as Corazon Aquino as well as her son Benigno Aquino III of the Philippines, Georgia’s George Saakashvili and even the hapless talking ego Barack Obama.

After working through an extended “apprenticeship” under the cover of UN aid worker, and marauding journalist for the London Economist, Malloch Brown found himself working for a Washington consulting firm named Sawyer Miller in 1985. It was at this time Malloch Brown was deployed to become the advisor and speech writer to Philippine opposition leader Corazon (Cory) Aquino under the supervision of then Secretary of State George Shultz. Corazon was a darling of the western establishment but had the nearly impossible task of challenging the popular nationalist President Ferdinand Marcos who had steered his country into economic sovereignty in opposition to international financiers for since his inauguration in 1965.

Applying all of the arts of perception management and marketing, Malloch Brown took control of Aquino’s campaign transforming it into the “People Power Revolution” that was in many ways the first successful color revolution of our modern times. Knowing that votes would likely favor the incumbent Markos, Malloch Brown wrote that he drafted Aquino’s victory speech before the elections and had her deliver it before votes were even finalized- and which accomplices in the media were all too happy to project publicly fueling the mythology that Corazon had won.

Describing these events years later, Malloch Brown said: “An outstanding accomplishment during the Cory campaign was to produce an exit poll that indicated that she had won. It landed on the front page of the Inquirer and had a profound impact as it planted the idea that Aquino had won over Marcos… Marcos did not really recover after that. It was a very exciting experience to watch.”

Malloch Brown failed to mention that the “polling station results” which produced the false perception that Corazon had won were manipulated by George Shultz’s local agents survey firms Social Weather Station, and Pulse Asia which have never been held accountable for their role in the anti-Marcos coup.

Shock Therapy

Soon after this “accomplishment”, Malloch Brown began working closely with George Soros on a number of projects that radically altered the world during the intense period of transition from a bi-polar to unipolar age.

In 1993, Soros had only recently carried out a speculative attack on the British pound sterling which resulted in $1 billion profit to the Hungarian speculator while providing the UK with a convenient excuse to avoid walking into the Euro trap which it had set for other European targets entering into the “post-nation state epoch”. In 1994, Soros announced a $50 million grant for “democracy building” operations in Macedonia and Bosnia which Malloch Brown was hired to administer as part of the Shatalin Shock therapy agenda.

From 1993-1994, Malloch Brown was part of the Soros Advisory Committee on Bosnia where advanced the Balkanization projects of the 1990s. In 1998, Malloch Brown also co-founded Soros’s International Criminal Court (ICC) after the duo had created the International Crisis Group (ICG) in 1994. These institutions served to 1) shape “international perception” of the causes and solutions to “crises”, real or fabricated and 2) advocate solutions that removed sovereignty in military and judicial affairs from sovereign nation states where they had been enshrined in the UN Charter, Nuremburg laws and UN Declaration of Human Rights, to supranational unelected organizations under the control of “experts”.

As Vice President of the World Bank from 1995-1999 he took credit for transforming its image to a more democratic organization, and from 1999-2005 led in the creation of the Millennium Development Goals which increasingly tied UN funding to George Soros’ Open Society operations internationally (during his time in New York, Malloch Brown lived on an estate owned by Soros).

R2P and More Color Revolution

During this period, Malloch Brown was among the earliest advocates of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and did more than anyone else to incorporate the doctrine into United Nations “post-Westphalian” governance outlook in 2005 as UN Deputy Secretary General (2005-2006).

Demonstrating his imperial outlook on March 2011, the self-proclaimed “pacifist” grew impatient of nations who were reticent to blow up Libya and wrote in the Financial Times: “declare victory and get on with ousting Gadhafi”.

As co-chair of the International Crisis Group (which was born of seed money from Soros and on whose board of trustees sit Larry Summers, Joe Biden’s advisor Jake Sullivan and both George and Alexander Soros) Malloch Brown supported the narco-terrorist linked Kosovo Liberation Army which was also propped up by both the CIA and NATO during the Bosnia crisis coordinating closely with his Rhodes Scholar colleague Strobe Talbott who referred to Soros in 1995 as “a national resource—indeed, a national treasure.”

Describing Talbott, Malloch Brown recently wrote: “Strobe Talbott, is a very old friend of mine and in some ways a similar sort of practitioner and theoretician of globalisation… As such he really understood the hidden back-story of modern politics, which always gets shoved out of view by the more familiar story of nation-states.”

After bankrolling Georgia’s Rose Revolution in 2003 that put Soros’ Saakashvili in power, the Georgian state was rendered ungovernable due to a mix of vast incompetence and corruption. Here, Soros and Malloch Brown again came to the rescue by organizing a January 2004 event in New York that garnered $1.5 million for Georgian government reform programs (75% from Soros’ Open Society and 25% from the UN Development Program headed by Brown). The UNDP report justified the expense that was to pay Saakashvili’s salary as well as top government officials, and security forces when it said: “Georgia lacked the skilled professionals needed to design and execute sweeping reforms”.

The fact that these actions led to the murder of 1,600 in South Ossetia (mostly Russians) in 2008 and nearly triggered WWIII should not be forgotten, nor should Saakashvili’s nefarious role as Governor of Odessa (2015-16) where the convicted felon protected neo Nazis of the Azov Battalion. Similarly, the strange rise in popularity of Saakashvili underway in Georgia should make anyone with half a brain more than a little concerned.

Handler of Team Obama

On February 24, 2008, Samantha Power, husband to Harvard behaviorist Cass Sunstein and soon-to-be Ambassador to the UN under Obama gave an interview to the London Times describing the Malloch Brown-Obama connection in glaring detail. In this interview, Power said: “The principal conduit between Britain and the Candidate [Obama] has been Lord Malloch Brown, the Junior Foreign Minister, whom Obama came to admire when he [Malloch Brown] was Deputy Secretary General of the United Nations, Obama was really taken with him. It’s a relationship that has persisted and they have talked a number of times since.”

Indeed, Obama’s political career, like Saakashvili’s and Aquino’s, was always a creation of higher powers with Soros even providing the first $60,000 for Obama’s 2004 Senate run and then organizing the earliest fundraising parties for Obama’s Presidential run in 2007.

Samantha Power herself attributed her career to Soros and Lord Brown saying in 2004: “My book and my research was utterly unsustainable on the free market. If I hadn’t been able to get a grant from George Soros and the Open Society Institute, there is no way I could have done the kind of investigative reporting I needed to do”.

The Case of Cass Sunstein

While Power spent her time in the UN fighting viciously to push a pre-emptive P2P humanitarian regime change on Libya and later Syria, her husband Cass Sunstein worked as an advisor to Obama from 2009-2012 and authored a paper addressing the dangerous rise of “conspiracy theories” which threaten his idea of good government. Sunstein wrote “the existence of both domestic and foreign conspiracy theories, we suggest, is no trivial matter, posing real risks” and recommended “a series of possible responses” which include cognitive infiltration of conspiracy groups by government agents.

Additionally five options are developed by Sunstein:

“(1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories. (3) Government might itself engage in counter speech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories. (4) Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in counter speech. (5) Government might engage in informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to help”

On August 24, 2020 Sunstein was tapped to chair the World Health Organization’s Technical Advisory Group mandated with modifying global behaviour in compliance with the new norms of the pandemic world order. The WHO chief stated “In the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, countries are using a range of tools to influence behavior: Information campaigns are one tool, but so are laws, regulations, guidelines and even fines…That’s why behavioral science is so important.”

Lord Brown in the Obama Era

In 2007, Malloch Brown left the UN to head up Soros’ Quantum Hedge Fund- a lucrative post which he soon left to join the British Foreign Office as Minister of State for Africa, Asia and the UN from 2007-2009.

After leaving his position in the UK government in 2009, Lord Malloch Brown went on to consult oil companies and steer his International Crisis Group. By this time, the ICG had a near monopoly on drafting anonymously published reports of international crisis hotspots priding itself on maintaining armies of “on the ground” specialists who could profile all disputing parties and release their assessments on the international market. These reports have been used by governments, NGOs, corporations, and international bodies like the UN and have played a major role in shaping global policy and perceptions of the causes and remedies to conflict.

Utilizing his expertise in vote fraud and perception management, it shouldn’t come as a surprise that Malloch Brown soon found himself at the helm of SGO Corporation Ltd in 2014 which serves as a holding company whose main asset is Smartmatic voting technologies. Smartmatic sells itself as having “handled more than 3.7 billion votes over the past 14 years in election projects on five continents” and while it denies having activities directly on US soil, a screenshot from the Way Back Machine demonstrates a very different story.

 

Since 2010 Smartmatic has been found to have been at the heart of election fraud in Mexico, Venezuela, the USA, and the Philippines where the first Presidential election using this system resulted in the victory of Corazon Aquino’s son Benigno Aquino. After mountains of evidence have come to light of Smartmatic’s role in systemic fraud, the IBON Foundation called out Lord Brown as “a foreigner who has made a career out of influencing elections”.

It is an irony of history that not only did Lord Malloch Brown install a second generation cardboard cut tout into power in the Philippines, but deployed his voting system to undermine the popular Ferdinand Marco Jr in favor of the Liberal Party’s Len Robredo during the 2016 elections. Luckily in the same year that Trump was to beat the system via his landslide popular victory in the USA, a similar victory occurred in opposition to all odds when nationalist President Duterte took office and later demanded the Philippines rid itself of Smartmatic tech.

Lord Malloch Brown’s Ultimate Obsession

Speaking to the World Government Summit of June 2020 alongside Cass Sunstein and an array of other Davos-creatures, Lord Malloch Brown expressed his disdain for the rise of the multipolar alliance led by Russia, China and Trump’s USA which has obviously endangered his life’s work. Malloch Brown hypocritically attacks China for being a regime which has no respect for individual rights and only a concern for “the many”, and then calls out the rise of authoritarian governments “Russia, China, India, Turkey, Hungary and the USA” which he believes must be stopped at all costs saying:

“In the wider world a more authoritarian form of government is the new majority. It is not China alone. This “new majority” embraces leaders who come to power by the ballot box and those who didn’t, but who all share a preference for a nationalist foreign policy, the weakening of domestic institutions and the rule of law”

Malloch Brown obviously felt very comfortable with his audience and assumed no one would think about the obvious hypocrisy of his admitting that these “new majority” nationalists often come to power “by the ballot box” and thus emblemize democratic principles, while his social engineering defense of individual liberties and freedom of choice always occurs outside of the democratic volition of the plebs who are obviously considered to dumb to know what is good for them and also at the expense of the many who must be sacrificed in wars, regime change and anarchy “for the greater good”.

These hypocrisies were made even more obvious in a more recent October 26, 2020 keynote speech on the topic of the UN at 75: Slow Death or New Direction? In this speech, Lord Brown calls for the creation of reformed United Nation to avoid its obsolescence by getting rid of the Security Council which has prevented necessary humanitarian actions due to the insufferable veto held by Russia and China. When asked how the veto may be abolished, Lord Brown admits that nations will never aquiesce and so “the only way you’re going to get these entrenched members to embark on this is to make them largely irrelevant… we have to work around the security council.”

How would anyone be expected to “work around the Security Council” you may ask?

Here Lord Brown answers by calling for the empowerment of “civil society clusters” and “civil society mosaic” that can harness energy coalition of non-state actors. Brown states: “Building variegated coalitions of state and non-state actors willing to be first movers on different parts of this agenda is not a new path to action in the UN. Now it needs to be turbo charged. The world won’t wait for the most plodding and resistant nations to sigh up to action”.

Calling the UN Human Rights Council “not fit for purpose” due to its “steady capture” by Russia, China and Cuba who won seats on the body this year, Lord Brown lamented the greatest threat to his vision for a post-national world: “the failures we all individually made pale compared to just the fact that nation states have ultimately- particularly the bigger and more powerful ones- resisted conceding power and sovereignty and decision making to this multilateral body.”

This is the British hand behind the current phase of Russiagate 5.0 which has come closer to its objectives of running an American coup than at any other moment during the past four years. This is the vision of a dystopic post-nation state world order managed by mis-anthropic technocrats who wish to lord over a technetronic feudal dark age in the 21st century and beyond. As much as it might disappoint you to hear this, but at this moment, the most important thing standing in the way of this anti-human world order and your future is the embattled President Trump who requires the serious support of an awakened, informed and active citizenry.

In a future segment we will look more closely at the figure of the late Maurice Strong and the self-induced destruction of western civilization over the past 50 years, and also the battle to resist a bankers’ coup in Britain over 300 years ago which holds peculiar lessons for our current age.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

George Soros and Lord Malloch Brown are deep agents of the British oligarchy

.LaRouchePac...President’s Legal Strike Force held a press conference. They outlined a variety of evidentiary claims concerning the theft of the election. They kept other aspects of what they have private, because both lawyers involved in the campaign’s lawsuits and witnesses have been threatened with death, and otherwise harassed, and intimidated. Apparently, the legal team is not yet privy to the fact that Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez was a British pawn from the beginning and that both George Soros and Lord Malloch Brown are deep agents of the British oligarchy. ... You probably don't know, because the media won't report it, that the computerized voting systems used in the U.S. have been banned in many countries—including the U.K., Switzerland, Austria, Sweden, Norway, and the State of Texas—because they are "fraud prone"! Well, now you do! The other topic for today, raised by many of you, is what is meant by the "Great Re-set?" What is it, who is pushing it, why is it being imposed, what is the goal? (Hint—to set up a global banker's dictatorship).... LaRouche exposes Lord Malloch-Brown, the chairman of the voting machine firm Smartmatic, as a key British operative, with ties to regime change fanatic George Soros, ... Is it a coincidence that those globalist "elites" from the City of London, Wall Street, Silicon Valley and the corporate media, who have been engaged in an attempted coup against President Trump, are also supporters of regime change coups and endless wars worldwide? Are trying to rush through a "financial regime change" to give more power to central banks, on behalf of a global Green New Deal?

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Dearlove notes

1999 Wikipedia ...Sir Richard Dearlove ...He joined MI6 in 1966 and was posted to Nairobi in 1968[5]. In 1984, he was appointed an OBE. After being posted to Prague, Paris and Geneva, he became head of Washington station in 1991,[5] director of personnel and administration in 1993 and director of operations in 1994] Dearlove became Chief in 1999. In 2001, he was appointed a KCMG. ... in his tenure...Service criticised for failing to establish and warn that Al-Qaeda was planning anything on the scale of the 11 September attacks.... July 2002, Dearlove privately told ministers that in the US "intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy" ...Sir Richard is a signatory of the neo-Conservative Henry Jackson Society principles.] He is also a "senior advisor" to the Monitor Group – a consultancy and private equity firm which has been implicated in undertaking PR work for Libya and Muammar Gaddafi. In April 2013, it was announced that Dearlove joined the advisory board of Ergo, an intelligence and advisory firm
2002 Sep Guardian... In a devastating finding, Chilcot said: “SIS did not inform No 10 or others that the source who had provided the reporting issued on 11 and 23 September 2002 about production of chemical and biological agent had been lying to SIS.” False allegations that Saddam could attack UK targets within “45 minutes” were not withdrawn until 28 September 2004. Bogus information by a source known as Curve Ball that also fed into the case for war was not withdrawn until the following day, 29 September 2004. The faulty intelligence from MI6 was compounded by Tony Blair who hardened up the information when he wrote the foreword to the so-called “dodgy dossier” in September 2002. Chilcot concluded that Blair presented the assessments of the spy agencies to parliament with a “certainty” not justified by available intelligence. ...MI6 chief Sir Richard Dearlove, head of the spy agency from 1999 to 2004, is also criticised throughout the report, taking the rap for MI6’s faulty intelligence.
2003 Mar EIR ... According to the story, Steele and his partner at Sterling Select Partners, LLC, Chris Burrows, went to Dearlove “for guidance,” as they claimed to be “rattled” by what they were discovering about Trump and Russia while compiling their “dodgy dossier.” It was Dearlove who was responsible for an earlier “dodgy dossier”—that is, the lying report on Iraq’s “weapons of mass destruction,” which was used by then-Prime Minister Tony Blair to bolster arguments, in collaboration with George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and the neocon unilateralists, for launching the second Iraq war, a war which toppled Saddam Hussein, devastated Iraq, and led to the creation of ISIS. Dearlove said “he advised Steele and Burrows to work discreetly with a top British government official to pass along information to the FBI.” He praised Steele, whose expertise he described as “superb.”
2003 Mar NewsFollowUp Rothschild page...Global Technology Partners to Rothschild North America. William Perry, Senior Partner Global ... Technology Partners and Gerald Rosenfeld, CEO... see PRNewsWire press release and William Perry was awarded the Knight Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire. He was intimately involved the the US government in the run-up to 9/11 see Tony Blair... sexed up evidence to invade Iraq. Global Technology Partners is an exclusive agent or Rothschild North America PRNewsWire. Richard Dearlove, Sir Andrew Wood

2003 Jun Telegraph...No 10 says sorry to MI6 for 'dodgy' Iraq dossier By Colin Brown and Francis Elliott12:01AM BST 08 Jun 2003 Tony Blair's closest adviser has written a personal letter apologising to Sir Richard Dearlove, the chief of the Secret Intelligence Service, for discrediting the service with the release to journalists last January of the so-called "dodgy dossier" on Iraq and weapons of mass destruction. The disclosure that Alastair Campbell, the Prime Minister's director of strategy and communications, apologised to the head of MI6 for the dossier, Iraq: Its Infrastructure of Concealment, Deception and Intimidation, will fuel claims that Downing Street was involved in "doctoring" intelligence reports before the war. The Telegraph has learnt that Mr Campbell put his apology in writing to end a potentially damaging row with the intelligence service over the dossier after it was revealed that parts were lifted via the internet from a 12-year-old thesis by an American student.

2004.. EIR ...Another sign of British intelligence involvement was a revealing article about Steele in the Feb. 7 Washington Post, titled “Hero or Hired Gun? How a Former British Spy Became a Flashpoint in the Russia Investigation.” Even though it is one of the leaders in the anti-Trump campaign, the Post revealed that Steele was guided by the former chief of MI-6, Sir Richard Dearlove, who headed MI-6 from 1999 to 2004. The article states that Dearlove and a former British Ambassador to Moscow and associate of Steele, Sir Andrew Wood, steered Steele to the FBI.
2005 Rense...Sir Richard Dearlove, who was made a scapegoat for the Iraq WMD foul-up ...U.S. media outlets strangely overlooked the revelation last week that John Scarlett, the newly appointed head of MI6, also known as the Secret Intelligence Service, had authorized the most sweeping reform the British Secret Service has known in at least 40 years to prevent its false assessment of intelligence on Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction from ever happening again.

“When it comes to the research, promotion, and distribution work, the linkage shows that a fair amount of ‘staging’ activity took place in both the US (in the pre dossier stages) and the UK and involved individuals such as, Stefan Halper, Jonathan Clarke, Richard Dearlove, Charles Crawford, Iain Lobban, and Alexander Downer.”...“The same type of staging and delivery took place in the US through the State department sources like Robert Otto and the political and PR work of Alexandra Chalupa, Natalie Budaeva, and Ilya Zaslavskiy and their pro-Ukraine ‘Free Russia Foundation’ NGOs. It is notable that a lot of this activity dates to first week of April-May 2016, almost 8 weeks before Steele’s official June 2016 contract with Fusion GPS. “This strongly suggests that there was a proto-dossier in place and that there was a wider coordinated effort between the US and UK teams with Orbis Business Intelligence likely acting as a front for Hakluyt & Co.” “Ohr’s and Baumgartner’s roles were likely to research specific Russian content and re-write the narrative in ‘Russian style’ in order to make it appear authentic.”

2016 May late EIR . in late May or early June of that year, that Halper invited Page to a mid-July symposium at Cambridge University, at which Halper’s close friend, former MI6 director Richard Dearlove, was a speaker, as was Halper. Thus, Page met Halper for the first time at that mid-July symposium. His round-trip fare to London was paid for by its organizers, the Center for Research in the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities (CRASSH), a Cambridge research institute. Halper and pal Dearlove also belonged to something called the Cambridge Intelligence Seminar, described by the Journal as “an academic forum for researchers and one-time practitioners of spycraft.” They resigned from it, with much fanfare, in 2016, claiming “unacceptable Russian influence on the group.”.

2016 July 11 Conservapedia...Stefan Halper invited Carter Page to attend a symposium held at Cambridge University in England regarding the upcoming election. The speaker list included: Madeleine Albright (former U.S. Secretary of State); Vin Weber (Republican Party strategist and former Congressman now with Mercury LLC)[149]; Ambassador Peter Ammon (German Ambassador to the UK); Sir Richard Dearlove (former head of MI6); Bridget Kendall (BBC diplomatic correspondent and the next Master of Peterhouse College); Sir Malcolm Rifkind (former Defence and Foreign Secretary). Carter Page attended the symposium four days after his Moscow trip. Carter Page met with Halper during the London visit. Halper stayed in contact with Carter Page for the next fourteen months. Halper stopped contact exactly as the Final FISA Warrant on Carter Page expired.

But what is clear, is that Steele, and presumably MI6 mentor Sir Richard Dearlove and others, considered Bruce Ohr crucial to avoid “disastrous” consequences for the British “Get Trump” drive.

2017 Apr 16 Telegraph...GCHQ tipped-off security services in the US about alleged meetings between Donald Trump’s presidential campaign team and potential Russian spies, it has been claimed. A source close to UK intelligence said that the listening post had become aware at the end of 2015 of possible “interactions” and that this information was then sent across the Atlantic. Separately, Sir Richard Dearlove, the former British spy chief, suggested that Mr Trump may have borrowed money from Russia in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.

2018 Mar 12 EIR...Skripal Poisoning a Desperate British Attempt to Resurrect Their American Coup by Barbara Boyd, barbara@lpac-organizers.com This statement explores the strategic significance of major events in the world starting in February of 2018. Our goal is to precisely situate Theresa May’s March 12–14 mad effort to manufacture a new “weapons of mass destruction” hoax using the same people (the MI6 intelligence grouping around Sir Richard Dearlove) and script (an intelligence fraud concerning weapons of mass destruction) which were used to draw the United States into the disastrous Iraq War. The Skripal poisoning fraud also directly involves British agent Christopher Steele, the central figure in the ongoing coup against Donald Trump. This time the British information warfare operation is aimed at directly provoking Russia while maintaining their targeting of the U.S. population and President Trump.

.Britain has a long history of helping Israel to develop nuclear weapons. In the 1950s and 1960s Conservative and Labour governments made hundreds of sales of nuclear materials to Israel, including plutonium and uranium....Former MI6 director Sir Richard Dearlove recently said that British intelligence did not always share information with Israel "because we could never guarantee how the intelligence might or would be used". But the Telegraph reports that the relationship between MI6 and Mossad has become closer in recent years with both concerned about nuclear proliferation in Iran. ...

2018 May .MarketsWork...Sir Richard Dearlove & UK Intelligence Ties...Stefan Halper played a role in the establishment of the Trump-Russia Investigation. But let’s be clear. Halper wasn’t “inside” the Trump Campaign. Halper used intentionally manufactured meetings and contacts with Papadopoulos and Page to create perceived associations with Russia. Ultimately, this appears to be a coordinated effort between British and U.S. Intelligence. Halper was just one of many pieces. Joseph Mifsud was likely a similar piece.

A very sketchy character, the Maltese Professor Joseph Mifsud, who has multiple connections to British intelligence, targeted Papadopoulos during this period, providing him with a job, telling him that the Russians had Hillary’s emails, and encouraging Papadopoulos to meet with various Russians introduced by Mifsud. Papadopoulos reported back to the Trump campaign what Mifsud told him, as well as what he was told by the Russian contacts to whom he was introduced, creating a documentary trail of fabricated “evidence.”...CIA-MI6 asset, Stefan Halper, a close friend of Sir Richard Dearlove, was recruited to repeatedly interrogate Carter Page and Papadopoulos about Russian “dirt” allegedly held by the Trump Campaign on Hillary Clinton based on collusion with the Russian government. The Australian High Commissioner to Britain, Alexander Downer, another player closely tied to Sir Richard Dearlove, Halper, Hakluyt, the MI6 associated intelligence agency, and the Clinton Foundation, was set loose to get Papadopoulos drunk and adduce confessions on the same topic, “Russian-generated dirt on Clinton” provided as a result of “collusion” with the Trump Campaign....Litvinenko worked for the Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky, who, after making millions of dollars looting Russia, fled to London and went to war against Putin on behalf of MI6. It is not a stretch to opine that Steele also ran Berezovsky’s operations. Litvinenko was characterized as Berezovsky's “bomb thrower” against Putin. While the British authorities originally charged former FSB officer Andrei Lugovoi with the poisoning, and demanded his extradition, they did not charge the Russian state in the 2006 proceedings. This was despite claims that Litvinenko made a death bed statement blaming Putin for his murder, a sensational statement circulated world-wide by the British propaganda and public relations apparat. That statement, it turns out, was drafted by another Berezovsky associate, Alex Goldfarb, a former employee of the infamous George Soros

2018 Sep 22 EIR...End Special Relationship with Britain petition... Obama’s CIA Director, John Brennan, convened an illegal intelligence task force at the CIA to launder and investigate fake dirt on Trump, produced by a British spy circle led by former MI6 chief Sir Richard Dearlove for purposes of destroying the Trump presidential campaign. Brennan did this because, he said, Donald Trump's election would jeopardize the "special relationship" between U.S. and British intelligence agencies. Dearlove played a key role in the faked intelligence which led the United States into the Iraq War.

Orbis connections: Chris Burrows (cofounder, MI6), Edward Baumgartner (Hakluyt, Prevezon, dossier), Christopher Steele (MI6, dossier, Ohrs, Dearlove, Hakluyt), Pablo Miller (MI6, Orbis contractor, Steele), Obis continued Adam Waldman (Deripaska, Lavrov connections), Oleg Deripaska (Putin, Manafort, Steele, Mueller), Sidney Blumenthal ( senior advisor, Shearer, dossier, Clintons), Daniel Jones (Penn Quarter Group, Feinstein staffer, dossier, Waldman, Warner, Deripaska), David Kramer ( Dep Sec State for Russia, McCain, Steele) ... UK intel connections: Robert Hannigan (GCHQ head, Brennan), Nigel Inkster ( MI6 dir, Steele, Burrows, Dearlove), Nicholas Fishwick ( PGI, MI6 officer, Steele, Burrows), Sir Andrew Wood ( Brit ambassador to Russia, Orbis, McCain, Dearlove), Sir Richard Dearlove ( Steele, Burrows, passed info to FBI, MI6, Halper, Hakluyt), ...... Hakluyt connections: Alexander Downer (Australia, Hakluyt, Papadopoulis, dossier, CGI, Huawei, Chinese communist party), Lord Paul Deighton (Hakluyt), Jonathon Clarke ( Halper, Ohr, Fritsch, Wilson Center), Louis Susman (Hakluyt, Obama, Clintons), Sir Iaian Lobban (GCHQ, Dearlove) ......Papadopolous/ Page spytraps: Stephan Halper (MI6, Dearlove, FBI), Joseph Mifsud ( London Academy of Diplomacy, Putin, dossier, Clinton, London Centre of International Law Practice, Boris Johnson), UK Foreign Office (Halper),

Operations against Lt. General Michael Flynn emanating from British and NATO intelligence began as early as a February 2014 dinner Flynn attended at the UK’s Cambridge Intelligence Seminar at the invitation of Sir Christopher Andrew, the official MI5 historian, and Sir Richard Dearlove, the former head of MI6. Dearlove and his nest of spies at the Jackson Society and Hakluyt & Co., are deeply implicated in operations against Trump and the all-out British attempt to swing the 2016 election to Hillary Clinton. ... Following the dinner, Dearlove, Andrew, and FBI/MI6 spy Stefan Halper invented the deranged and outrageously false claim that a 20-minute conversation Flynn held at the dinner with Russian intelligence historian Svetlana Lokhova constituted an affair and a compromise of Flynn by the Russian government. They spread this lie relentlessly throughout the Five Eyes intelligence community.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Did Crown Agent Dominion Voting Systems Rig The US Elections 2020

GreatGameIndia
November 9, 2020
A so-called computer “glitch” in the voting machines flipping votes during the 2020 US Elections has caused a major controversy. The source and ownership of the voting machines used in the elections has become an urgent issue because of real fears that hackers, whether foreign or domestic, might tamper with the mechanics of the voting system. However, GreatGameIndia has found that the vendors and not hackers maybe behind the rigging. One of the vendors, a Denver-based Canadian Crown Agent company Dominion Voting Systems has a long history of allegation of election rigging and interference in elections of various nations, including census data theft in India and interference in US Elections of 2020.

WITNESS AFFIDAVIT: How Smartmatic Voting Machines Were Designed To Steal US Elections
Contents [hide]

1 The Glitch
2 Dominion Voting Systems Under Scrutiny
2.1 Hidden Ownership
2.2 Chinese parts in Dominion Voting Machines
2.3 Clinton Foundation’s DELIAN Project
2.4 House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
3 Cases of Election Fraud
3.1 Smartmatic
3.2 Lord Mark Malloch Brown
3.3 Crown Agent De La Rue
3.4 Sequoia Voting Systems
4 2020 US Election Votes were counted by Bankrupted Spanish company Scytl
INVESTIGATION Did Crown Agent Dominion Voting Systems Rigged The US Elections 2020
The Glitch
Numerous allegations of a computer glitch switching votes has been raised in past few days. A so-called computer ‘glitch’ in one of Michigan’s counties has led to 6,000 votes switching from President Trump to Joe Biden. It was revealed in Georgia that the “glitch” was caused not by hackers but by the vendor itself uploading a piece of software at the last minute.

As reported by Politico:

A technology glitch that halted voting in two Georgia counties on Tuesday morning was caused by a vendor uploading an update to their election machines the night before, a county election supervisor said.

Voters were unable to cast machine ballots for a couple of hours in Morgan and Spalding counties after the electronic devices crashed, state officials said. In response to the delays, Superior Court Judge W. Fletcher Sams extended voting until 11 p.m.

The election software system in Michigan that switched 6,000 votes from Trump to Biden is called "Dominion."

It is used in 30 states including:

☑️Nevada
☑️Arizona
☑️Minnesota
☑️Michigan
☑️Wisconsin
☑️Georgia
☑️Pennsylvania

Every single major swing state. EVERY. SINGLE. ONE. pic.twitter.com/R6s2RnVmEF

— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) November 7, 2020

The machines belonged to a company called Dominion Voting Systems. Dominion Software is used in 47 US states including all of the battleground states or swing states. This has forced the Head of the Republican Party demanding an additional 47 counties be recounted after the fix since these 47 counties also use the same Dominion software.

Dominion Voting Systems Under Scrutiny
Hidden Ownership
The Dominion Voting Systems, which has been used in multiple states where fraud has been alleged in the 2020 U.S. Election, was rejected three times by data communications experts from the Texas Secretary of State and Attorney General’s Office for failing to meet basic security standards.

India in Cognitive Dissonance Book by GreatGameIndia
In Dec 2019, Dominion Voting Systems came under scrutiny for its suspicious operations and hidden ownership.

The source of the nation’s voting machines has become an urgent issue because of real fears that hackers, whether foreign or domestic, might tamper with the mechanics of the voting system.

That has led to calls for ES&S and its competitors, Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems and Austin, Texas-based Hart Intercivic, to reveal details about their ownership and the origins of the parts, some of which come from China, that make up their machines.

Chinese parts in Dominion Voting Machines
In January, U.S. lawmakers expressed concern about foreign involvement through these companies’ creation and oversight of U.S. election equipment. Top executives from the three major companies were grilled by both Democratic and Republican members of the U.S. House Committee on House Administration about the integrity of their systems. CEO of Dominion Voting Systems revealed that they rely heavily on Chinese parts because there is no alternative.

Dominion Voting Systems CEO John Poulos and Hart InterCivic President Julie Mathis said their companies use Chinese-made LCD screen components, chip capacitors and resistors, arguing that in some cases there’s no option for manufacturing those parts in the United States.

“We would welcome guidelines and best practices from the committee and from the federal government,” Poulos said. “This is not a problem that’s unique to the election industry.”

Clinton Foundation’s DELIAN Project
The Dominion Voting Systems is tied to the Clinton Global Initiative through the DELIAN Project. According to the Clinton Foundation website:

In 2014, Dominion Voting committed to providing emerging and post-conflict democracies with access to voting technology through its philanthropic support to the DELIAN Project, as many emerging democracies suffer from post-electoral violence due to the delay in the publishing of election results. Over the next three years, Dominion Voting will support election technology pilots with donated Automated Voting Machines (AVM), providing an improved electoral process, and therefore safer elections.

Further, in 2015 Washington Post reported that Dominion Voting Systems donated between $25,001 and $50,000 to the Clinton Foundation.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
There are also allegations that Dominion Voting Systems was involved in some sort of voter fraud because they had worked with persons connected to high-ranking Democrats, such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

What's the name of the company with all the voting machines that "glitch" to create more votes for Biden? Dominion Voting Systems.

Who is their DC lobbyist? Nancy Pelosi's aide.

— Emerald Robinson ✝️ (@EmeraldRobinson) November 7, 2020

In the aftermath of the 2016 election, intensified scrutiny was focused on America’s voting systems in general and Dominion Voting Systems in particular. So, Dominion Voting Systems hired lobbyists to assist with the company’s interactions with the U.S. Congress. They hired Nadeam Elshami, Nancy Pelosi’s former chief of staff as one of these lobbyists, as reported by Bloomberg.

Dominion Voting Systems — which commands more than a third of the voting-machine market without having Washington lobbyists — has hired its first, a high-powered firm that includes a longtime aide to Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
Cases of Election Fraud
Smartmatic
Dominion “got into trouble” with several subsidiaries it used over alleged cases of fraud. One subsidiary is Smartmatic, a company “that has played a significant role in the U.S. market over the last decade,” according to a report published by UK-based AccessWire.

Litigation over Smartmatic “glitches” alleges they impacted the 2010 and 2013 mid-term elections in the Philippines, raising questions of cheating and fraud. An independent review of the source codes used in the machines found multiple problems, which concluded, “The software inventory provided by Smartmatic is inadequate, … which brings into question the software credibility,” ABS-CBN reported.

Lord Mark Malloch Brown
Smartmatic Chairman Lord Mark Malloch Brown
Smartmatic’s chairman is a member of the British House of Lords, Mark Malloch Brown, a former vice-chairman of George Soros’ Investment Funds, former vice-president at the World Bank
Smartmatic’s chairman is a member of the British House of Lords, Mark Malloch Brown, a former vice-chairman of George Soros’ Investment Funds, former vice-president at the World Bank, lead international partner at Sawyer Miller, a political consulting firm, and former vice-chair of the World Economic Forum who “remains deeply involved in international affairs.” The company’s reported globalist ties have caused members of the media and government officials to raise questions about its involvement in the U.S. electoral process.

Crown Agent De La Rue
In June 2010, Dominion acquired Sequoia Voting Systems from Smartmatic after a major election fraud controversy in Venezuela. Following the 2004 Venezuelan recall election, Smartmatic acquired Sequoia Voting Systems, from the British company De La Rue in 2005. De la Rue was the official Crown Agent of the British Empire who still prints banknotes for the Bank of England. Crown Agents ran the day-today affairs of the Empire.

De La Rue is banned and blacklisted in India for supplying substandard paper for printing Indian currency notes and also for its involvement in the Fake Indian Currency Notes (FICN) with Pakistan, posing a threat to India. De La Rue’s role in printing Indian currency notes was exposed by GreatGameIndia in 2016 which became a major scandal in India.

Documents in possession of GreatGameIndia also revealed an insidious conspiracy by these companies to smuggle biometric and demographic data of Indians collected during a Pilot Project initiated under National Population Register to Taiwan. Such sensitive data in the wrong hands in a foreign country could not just result in identity theft but pose a threat to India’s National Security since the same companies are also manufacturers of election voting machines.

We need your support to carry on our independent and investigative research based journalism on the Deep State threats facing humanity. Your contribution however small helps us keep afloat. Kindly consider donating to GreatGameIndia.

Donate to GreatGameIndia
Sequoia Voting Systems
The acquisition by Smartmatic of Sequoia Voting Systems from De La Rue triggered a controversy in America for its “possible ties to the Venezuelan government”. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) of the U.S. Treasury Department, which had been investigating whether there were any ties between Sequoia, Smartmatic, and the government of Venezuela dropped the investigation when Smartmatic agreed to divest Sequoia, in a deal whereby all of Sequoia’s shares were sold off to SVS Holdings for an undisclosed price.

The Wall Street Journal wrote that “Smartmatic scrapped a simple corporate structure” of being based in Boca Raton “for a far more complex arrangement” of being located in multiple locations following the Sequoia incident. Both Smartmatic and Sequoia are mired with electoral related controversies in many countries.

2020 US Election Votes were counted by Bankrupted Spanish company Scytl
Days after it was revealed how 2020 US Elections were rigged by Canadian Crown Agent Dominion Voting Systems through a so-called “glitch”, now GreatGameIndia has found involvement of another dubious foreign company in US Election meddling. The votes cast by Americans were counted by a bankrupted Spanish company Scytl in Spain. Like Dominion Voting Systems, Scytl has a long history of election fraud in various nations including injecting backdoors in its election software. The issue has prompted experts to question why the sensitive job of counting votes was outsourced to a foreign company? How could a bankrupted Spanish company count American votes in Spain? Due to such widespread fraud, the Chairman of the US Federal Election Commission Trey Trainor believes that the 2020 US Presidential Elections is illegitimate.

What really happened in the 2020 US Election will only be revealed after a thorough forensic investigation is launched into these companies and the so-called “glitches”.

Send in your tips and submissions by filling out this form or write to us directly at the email provided. Join us on WhatsApp for more intel and updates.

GreatGameIndia is a journal on Geopolitics and International Relations. Get to know the Geopolitical threats India is facing in our exclusive book India in Cognitive Dissonance. Past magazine issues can be accessed from the Archives section.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

ICG International Crisis Group / board

President & CEO

Robert Malley
President & CEO
Co-Chairs

Lord (Mark) Malloch-Brown
Former UN Deputy Secretary-General and Administrator of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
Mark Malloch‐Brown has been engaged widely in government, international organisations, business and civil society during his career. He is currently a Senior Advisor at the Eurasia Group, addressing questions of political risk for its clients. He serves on several commercial boards of international businesses and on the…
READ MORE

Frank Giustra
Founder of The Giustra Foundation and Acceso
Frank Giustra is President and CEO of the Fiore Group, a private firm managing a broad portfolio of private equity investments and companies, specialising in food and lifestyle, art and entertainment, and natural resources. Mr. Giustra's entrepreneurial success includes founding Lionsgate Entertainment, and since then…
READ MORE
Trustees

Fola Adeola
Founder and Chairman, FATE Foundation

Hushang Ansary
Chairman, Parman Capital Group LLC; Former Iranian Ambassador to the U.S and Minister of Finance and Economic Affairs

Gérard Araud
Former Ambassador of France to the U.S.

Carl Bildt
Former Prime Minister and Foreign Minister of Sweden

Emma Bonino
Former Foreign Minister of Italy and European Commissioner for Humanitarian Aid

Cheryl Carolus
Former South African High Commissioner to the UK and Secretary General of the African National Congress (ANC)

Maria Livanos Cattaui
Former Secretary-General of the International Chamber of Commerce

Ahmed Charai
Chairman and CEO of Global Media Holding

Nathalie Delapalme
Executive Director and Board Member of the Mo Ibrahim Foundation

Hailemariam Desalegn
Former Prime Minister of Ethiopia and Chair of AGRA

Alexander Downer
Former Australian Minister of Foreign Affairs and High Commissioner to the United Kingdom

Sigmar Gabriel
Former Minister of Foreign Affairs and Vice Chancellor of Germany

Stephen Hadley
Former U.S. Assistant to President George W. Bush for National Security Affairs (2005-2009); Principal of RiceHadleyGates LLC

Hu Shuli
Editor-in-Chief of Caixin Media; Professor at Sun Yat-sen University

Mo Ibrahim
Founder and Chair, Mo Ibrahim Foundation; Founder, Celtel International

Ellen Johnson Sirleaf
Former President of Liberia

Wadah Khanfar
Co-Founder, Al Sharq Forum; Former Director General, Al Jazeera Network
Image
Nasser al-Kidwa
Chairman of the Yasser Arafat Foundation; Former League of Arab States Special Representative for Libya; Former Joint Deputy Representative for Syria; Former Minister of Foreign Affairs, Palestinian Authority; Former Permanent Observer of Palestine to UN

Bert Koenders
Former Dutch Minister of Foreign Affairs and Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations

Andrey Kortunov
Director General of the Russian International Affairs Council

Ivan Krastev
Chairman of the Centre for Liberal Strategies (Sofia); Founding board member of European Council on Foreign Relations

Tzipi Livni
Former Foreign Minister and Vice Prime Minister of Israel

Helge Lund
Former Chief Executive BG Group (UK) and Statoil (Norway)

Susana Malcorra
Former Foreign Minister of Argentina; Former Chef de Cabinet of the UN Secretary-General

William H. McRaven
Retired U.S. Navy Admiral who served as 9th Commander of the U.S. Special Operations Command

Shivshankar Menon
Former Foreign Secretary of India; Former National Security Advisor

Naz Modirzadeh
Director of the Harvard Law School Program on International Law and Armed Conflict

Federica Mogherini
Former Vice President of the European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy

Saad Mohseni
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MOBY Group

Marty Natalegawa
Former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Indonesia, Permanent Representative to the UN, and Ambassador to the UK

Ayo Obe
Chair of the Board of Gorée Institute (Senegal); Legal Practitioner (Nigeria)

Meghan O'Sullivan
Former U.S. Deputy National Security Adviser on Iraq and Afghanistan; Professor of Practice, Harvard University

Thomas R. Pickering
Former U.S. Under Secretary of State and Ambassador to the UN, Russia, India, Israel, Jordan, El Salvador and Nigeria

Ahmed Rashid
Author and Foreign Policy Journalist, Pakistan

Ghassan Salamé
Former UN Secretary-General’s Special Representative and Head of the UN Support Mission in Libya; Former Minister of Culture of Lebanon; Founding Dean of the Paris School of International Affairs, Sciences Po University

Juan Manuel Santos Calderón
Former President of Colombia; Nobel Peace Prize Laureate 2016

Wendy Sherman
Former U.S Under-Secretary of State for Political Affairs and Lead Negotiator for the Iran Nuclear Deal

George Soros
Founder, Open Society Foundations and Chair, Soros Fund Management

Alexander Soros
Deputy Chair of the Global Board, Open Society Foundations

Jonas Gahr Støre
Leader of the Labour Party and Labour Party Parliamentary Group; Former Foreign Minister of Norway

Jake Sullivan
Former Director of Policy Planning at the U.S. Department of State, Deputy Assistant to President Obama, and National Security Advisor to Vice President Biden

Lawrence H. Summers
Former Director of the US National Economic Council and Secretary of the U.S. Treasury; President Emeritus of Harvard University

Helle Thorning-Schmidt
Former CEO of Save the Children International; Former Prime Minister of Denmark

Wang Jisi
Member, Foreign Policy Advisory Committee of the Chinese Foreign Ministry; President, Institute of International and Strategic Studies, Peking University
Chairmen Emeriti
Image
Martti Ahtisaari
Former President of Finland
Image
George J. Mitchell
Former U.S. Senate Majority Leader
President Emeritus

Gareth Evans
Former Foreign Affairs Minister of Australia
Founder and Trustee Emeritus

Mort Abramowitz
Former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State and Ambassador to Turkey

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sidney Powell's Complaint, Georgia

Additionally, incontrovertible evidence Board of Elections records demonstrates that at least 96,600 absentee ballots were requested and counted but were never recorded as being returned to county election boards by the voter. Thus, at a minimum, 96,600 votes must be disregarded. (See Attached hereto, Exh. 9, R. Ramsland Aff.)

UPDATE — HERE IS WHAT POWELL IS ASKING FOR Pgs 100-102

For these reasons, Plaintiff asks this Court to enter a judgment in
their favor and provide the following emergency relief:
1. An order directing Governor Kemp, Secretary Raffensperger and the
Georgia State Board of Elections to de-certify the election results;
2. An order enjoining Governor Kemp from transmitting the currently
certified election results to the Electoral College;
3. An order requiring Governor Kemp to transmit certified election
results that state that President Donald Trump is the winner of the
election;

Pg. 101

4. An immediate order to impound all the voting machines and
software in Georgia for expert inspection by the Plaintiffs.
5. An order that no votes received or tabulated by machines that were
not certified as required by federal and state law be counted.
6. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia Secretary of State
Rule 183-1-14-0.9-.15 violates the Electors and Elections Clause,
U.S. CONST. art. I, § 4;
7. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia’s failed system of
signature verification violates the Electors and Elections Clause by
working a de facto abolition of the signature verification
requirement;
8. A declaratory judgment declaring that current certified election
results violates the Due Process Clause, U.S. CONST. Amend. XIV;
9. A declaratory judgment declaring that mail-in and absentee ballot
fraud must be remedied with a Full Manual Recount or statistically
valid sampling that properly verifies the signatures on absentee
ballot envelopes and that invalidates the certified results if the
recount or sampling analysis shows a sufficient number of ineligible
absentee ballots were counted;

Pg. 102

10. An emergency declaratory judgment that voting machines be
Seized and Impounded immediately for a forensic audit—by
plaintiffs’ expects;
11. A declaratory judgment declaring absentee ballot fraud occurred
in violation of Constitutional rights, Election laws and under state
law;
12. A permanent injunction prohibiting the Governor and Secretary
of State from transmitting the currently certified results to the
Electoral College based on the overwhelming evidence of election
tampering;
13. Immediate production of 36 hours of security camera recording of
all rooms used in the voting process at State Farm Arena in Fulton
County, GA from 12:00am to 3:00am until 6:00pm on November 3.
14. Plaintiffs further request the Court grant such other relief as is
just and proper, including but not limited to, the costs of this action
and their reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to 42
U.S.C. 1988.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

What Is the CIA’s Role in the 2020 Election?
2020 Presidential ElectionCIADominionscorecardVoter fraud

Dominion is the widely known software that was used in the 2020 presidential election to count ballots, and its credibility wavered when multiple software “glitches” were exposed. The mainstream media had been calling them glitches, yet much evidence point to those glitches were intentionally made to intervene the election. However, Dominion is not the only election software used in this presidential election.

The former federal prosecutor, Sidney Powell said during an interview on Newsmax that it’s impossible that the programs (Hammer and Scorecard) could be run around the world to affect elections without the CIA. She said that CIA Director Gina Haspel “should be fired” for not objecting to the use of election software that allowed Joe Biden to win through fraud.

So, what kind of programs are the Hammer and Scorecard?

The scorecard is an application on a powerful computer system called Hammer, and it was designed and built by a former employee in the CIA, who later became a whistleblower. This system was initially invented in 2003 to protect America after the 9/11 attack and is meant to be used only for foreign surveillance. Unfortunately, the original idea of the system only maintained for several years. On February 3, 2009, former President Obama overturned this powerful computer system to a completely different objective. On that day, former CIA Director John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper moved the Hammer to a secret CIA facility in Fort Washington, Maryland.

Since then, the Hammer has been used for illegal domestic. Despite it had intricate levels of safeguards that prevent anyone to use the Hammer for an illegal purpose, the Obama administration succeeded to gain access and manipulate it through an encrypted VPN (Virtual Private Network) in the White House to spy on many important figures such as Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, FISA Court Presiding Judge Reggie Walton, Members of Congress, Rudy Giuliani, General Michael Flynn, Donald Trump, and his family, etc.

Yet, domestic surveillance is only the beginning of the plan. During the 2012 presidential election, the application Scorecard was deployed to hack into the election system and steal votes in Florida for Barack Obama and Joe Biden. According to former General Thomas McInerney, author Mary Fanning, and former National Security Council official in the Trump administration Rich Higgins, Scorecard was utilized to manipulate votes at the transfer points of state election computer system and outside third-party election data tabulate.

Denis Lee Montgomery, a former CIA employee who first exposed the Hammer system and Scorecard. In 2015, Montgomery decided to unveil the illegal domestic surveillance, so he stole 47 hard drives containing 600 million pages of unlawfully obtained domestic surveillance data, including 10 000 pages of documents regarding Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden in illegal activities. But it was covered up by the FBI and Montgomery was forced to hand over all the hard drives after a failed attempt to obtain whistleblower protection.

During the 2020 presidential election, Scorecard was used alongside Dominion to calculate and switch votes for Biden in many battleground states, and it has intervened the election and made drastic changes. Sidney Powell explained on Lou Dobbs Fox News that the DOJ needs to investigate the likelihood which 3% of the vote was changed in the pre-election voting ballots that were collected digitally by using the Hammer and the software Scorecard. The program ran an algorithm to calculate votes that might need for Joe Biden to come up with in specific areas.

Sadly, the journalists from mainstream media never did single research to find out what actually happened in this election, nor did the FBI or the DOJ. Instead of exposing the massive voter fraud, the media rushed to announce Joe Biden is president-elect, though Biden has not yet been certified as president. The fact is, without the help of the CIA, Dominion, Big Tech, the mainstream media, or the Democratic Party, Joe Biden would have never “won” the election.

The CIA’s involvement in this electoral fraud is indeed a national shame, they not only failed to fulfill their obligations but also undermined the American Constitution. It explains also why the CIA was completely excluded from the recent operation by the US army in Germany, where the Dominion tied servers were seized.

Source:

2020 Stolen Election by Dominion Voter Systems – Hammer & Scorecard ... ConservativeBusinessJournal

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Don’t Believe Your Lying Eyes—or Joe Biden’s Big Mouth

TabletMag
In an ugly display of Big Tech’s monopoly power, Twitter and Facebook censor the White House, U.S. senators, and the ‘New York Post’ for saying things that were reported in ‘The New York Times’ five years ago—and that the Democratic candidate has publicly boasted about
BY
LEE SMITH
OCTOBER 18, 2020
Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images
The move by Facebook and Twitter to censor a New York Post story about Joe Biden was Silicon Valley’s version of an October surprise. Since publication of a story last week alleging that Hunter Biden was introducing foreign business colleagues to his father, Twitter has kept locked the account of the 200-year-old newspaper until it deletes its tweets about its Biden reporting. By removing the story from news feeds, locking the accounts of the Trump campaign and White House spokesperson Kayleigh McEnany, and prohibiting editors of the newspaper from sharing the piece even from their own accounts—actions taken without evidence anything in the story was false—the tech oligarchy signaled it was throwing its weight behind what it believes to be the coming Democratic order in Washington.

It also provided Americans with an authentically shocking snapshot of the type of “managed” society that we now inhabit. In the new American system, large Silicon Valley corporations use their government-sanctioned and immensely profitable monopoly status to routinely censor information and libel anyone they please at the behest of unelected partisan verticals that have colonized large segments of the federal bureaucracy and security agencies. As each corrupted interest rubber stamps each other’s actions, power is removed from public hands and public view.

The idea that the Post story about Hunter Biden’s apparent bribery, and cocaine and sexual habits, was some form of dangerous “Russian disinformation” was teed up nearly a year ago by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the press, and cybersecurity professionals. According to Biden aides and other surrogates, any implication that the 2020 Democratic presidential candidate—who took his son to Beijing for business meetings on his vice presidential airplane—was aware of Hunter’s business dealings in Ukraine was necessarily part of an evil Russian scheme to interfere in an American election, again. It was on that basis that the social media giants justified their actions, while a practiced political and intelligence infrastructure surfaced to protect its favored candidate.

Facebook and Twitter had at first blocked the Post’s Hunter Biden story because, they claimed, the emails it is sourced from may have been stolen or hacked. They were not. They come from a hard drive left at a computer repair shop in Delaware. The owner gave the hard drive to the FBI in December. He also provided a copy to a representative of Trump’s personal lawyer Rudolph Giuliani. It appears the Delaware man did not entirely trust FBI Director Christopher Wray, who has been sitting on mountains of documents exposing the bureau’s role in the anti-Trump operation designed to tilt the 2016 election to Hillary Clinton since he was confirmed in 2017.

Wray has now shown he’s not simply protecting the FBI’s reputation but is assisting a campaign against the president. As the hard drive was handed over, Trump was being impeached for allegedly strong-arming the Ukrainians into investigating Biden family corruption in Ukraine. Thus, the FBI held on to information that would have been useful in the president’s defense, evidence suggesting it would indeed be important to know what the Bidens were really up to in Ukraine. Instead, at around the same time the FBI began briefing congressional leadership on a potential plot to disseminate Russian disinformation regarding the Bidens and Ukraine through a pro-Russian Ukrainian parliamentarian. In other words, the FBI was preemptively clearing the Democratic candidate and teeing up the media response to Biden-Ukraine information already in its possession.

In January, according to a New York Times report, the Ukrainian company, Burisma, that employed Hunter Biden had been “hacked” by Russian military intelligence. However, this assessment was made only by a private cyber-security firm founded by a former employee of CrowdStrike, the one-time Hillary Clinton campaign contractor that claimed, without evidence, that Russian military intelligence had hacked Democratic National Committee emails in 2016. In other words, the same network that pushed the Russia collusion conspiracy theory—the FBI, the media, and DNC operatives—set the same machinery in motion to pre-emptively clear the Democratic candidate in the event the Biden-Ukraine information surfaced: It would be dismissed as “Russian disinformation.”

Thus, when Republican Sens. Ron Johnson and Chuck Grassley released a report in September based on U.S. Treasury Department information detailing Hunter Biden’s financial relationship with foreign officials—primarily Ukrainians, Chinese, and Russians, including the wife of the mayor of Moscow who wired him $3.5 million from her personal bank account—the media’s claims that it was all based on Russian disinformation had already been validated by the FBI and others.

Further, labeling it Russian disinformation serves to shift attention to those providing the information, putting them, instead of the Bidens, under suspicion. For instance, a Washington Post story from last week reports that U.S. intelligence agencies incidentally collected Giuliani’s communications while he was in contact with various Ukrainian figures in his efforts to defend his client, Trump. If the Washington Post story is true, it represents yet another felony leak of classified intelligence in a four-year-long series of leaks designed to destabilize the Trump White House.

To be clear, the charges against Hunter Biden are not Russian disinformation. The potentially dangerous ramifications of his work on behalf of an allegedly corrupt Ukrainian former official was first reported by The New York Times nearly five years ago. Joe Biden’s efforts to protect a foreign company employing his son that was under investigation by a foreign power were first reported by none other than Joe Biden when he boasted about it in front of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Indeed, the facts of the Bidens’ involvement in Ukraine are all matters of public record. Shortly after protesters forced Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych to flee Kyiv in February 2014, Vice President Biden was there on the ground. As the Obama administration’s point man on Ukraine, he was meeting with government officials, including the next president of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko, telling them they had to do more to root out corruption. In May, Hunter Biden was named to the board of Burisma, a natural gas company owned by Mykola Zlochevsky, a Ukrainian oligarch who’d served in the government of the previous, now exiled, president.

In August 2014, the Ukrainians opened an investigation of Burisma, and in January 2015 the owner of Burisma was put on Ukraine’s most wanted list. Those should have been signals for Hunter Biden to extricate himself from Burisma. Instead, the vice president of the United States began pushing President Poroshenko to fire the prosecutor, Victor Shokin, who was investigating the company that was paying his son more than $50,000 a month.

The 2020 Democratic candidate had previously claimed that he never spoke with Hunter about his foreign business. The New York Post article indicates that Biden’s claim is false.

The 49-year-old Hunter’s well-documented problems made him an obvious target for foreign intelligence services. Drawing money from a foreign company under investigation in a notoriously corrupt country made the son of the vice president of the United States a threat to compromise U.S. national security. At least two State Department officials raised their concerns with the Biden team (one went directly to Joe and Hunter Biden) and were ignored.

Ukrainian President Poroshenko naturally saw the Burisma investigation as leverage to be used against his political rivals. Sometimes he turned the heat up on his adversaries, and at other times he laid off. In September 2015, U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt upbraided the Ukrainians for not doing more to bring Burisma owner Zlochevsky to justice.

Biden media surrogates claim that the former vice president was part of this Obama administration-led international effort to oust the prosecutor for not doing enough to root out corruption. But the notion that Biden was demanding the Kyiv government investigate the company paying his son more than $50,000 a month for doing nothing is absurd. What Biden meant by corruption was different from what the State Department meant. State wanted a new prosecutor because he wasn’t investigating Burisma; Biden wanted Shokin fired because he was investigating the company that employed his son.

It was allegedly the Hillary Clinton campaign that first brought the divide between the State Department and the vice president over Burisma to light. According to a former senior intelligence official in the Obama administration, Clinton deputies were behind the Dec. 9, 2015, New York Times story about Hunter Biden’s work for Burisma, “Joe Biden, His Son and the Case Against a Ukrainian Oligarch.”

The article reads:

The credibility of the vice president’s anticorruption message may have been undermined by the association of his son, Hunter Biden, with one of Ukraine’s largest natural gas companies, Burisma Holdings, and with its owner, Mykola Zlochevsky, who was Ukraine’s ecology minister under former President Viktor F. Yanukovych before he was forced into exile.
The Times even included Ambassador Pyatt’s demands that Ukraine go after the Burisma owner. “In his speech,” the Times reported, “the ambassador did not mention Hunter Biden’s connection to Burisma.”

The purpose of the Times piece, says the former Obama official, was to ensure that Biden didn’t change his mind about entering the 2016 race. And so the Clinton campaign fired a shot across his bow to show him they could make life uncomfortable for him. The Times dropped the story just as the vice president was in Kyiv to demand the government root out corruption.

Biden didn’t flinch. The day the story published, he made his first public demand that the Ukrainians fire the prosecutor tasked to the Burisma case.

Contrary to the claim of Biden surrogates that there was no open investigation of Burisma when the vice president demanded Shokin’s firing, the Ukrainian prosecutor seized the Burisma owner’s property on Feb. 2, 2016. The investigation was too valuable for the Ukrainian president to just shut it down.

Biden called Poroshenko repeatedly, on Feb. 11, Feb. 12, Feb. 18, and Feb. 19— to talk about “corruption.” Poroshenko eventually relented. During the call on the 18th, Biden “commended” his decision to replace the prosecutor looking into Burisma.

Biden later garbled the story of how he got Shokin canned when he related it to an audience at the Council on Foreign Relations in January 2018. He boasted that he got Poroshenko to fire the prosecutor on the spot during a March 2016 visit, or else he’d leave without giving Kyiv a $1 billion loan guarantee the administration had promised. In fact, Biden had been riding the Ukrainians for months to get them to terminate Shokin. But the basic facts in Biden’s account were correct—he used American taxpayer dollars as leverage to get a foreign government to call off the investigation of a company that was currently employing his son.

In other words, it’s not “the Russians” who were responsible for the allegations about Joe Biden’s involvement in Hunter Biden’s seedy business in Ukraine—it’s Joe and Hunter Biden.


  • temp

     
     

 

 

© 2018 All Rights Reserved. All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. We are not responsible for content written by and hosted on third-party websites. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. We assume no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners. .......Tags: "israel nuked wtc" 9-11 Truth jfk assassination "cultural marxism" "holocaust hoax" "fake news" "fake history" fed censorship "mind control" tavistock holohoax auschwitz deep state kabbalah talmud bush obama clinton trump russiagate spygate israel britain saudi arabia middle east rothschild cold war comey brennan clapper yellow vests populism nuclear demolition communism marxism socialism pedophiliacontact: info@newsfollowup.com

  



9-11 9-11 vimeo