Trump & the Jews... they got him by the b...

Trump & the Jewish/Russian Mafia

by Stephen Francis, founder of NewsFollowUp.com

One of the main efforts to pursue by this editor is the quest to find connections between 9/11 and modern political events in the context of keeping its investigation alive and relevant. The 9/11 Truth movement is now approaching its sixteenth anniversary and unfortunately seems to be going the way of the JFK assassination route, that being endless ruminations challenging the establishment's deliberate coverups but little or actually no progress in getting a new independent inquiry..

And, another area of inquiry could be added to this mix, that being Cultural Marxism. This is not an implausible stretch in that the unexpected election of Donald Trump to the POTUS was in part successful because of his attacks on Political Correctness which is an integral component of Cultural Marxism. The way to connect them is through adding it to the seemingly endless stream of psyops perpetrated on the citizens of the world. Depending on the time frame chosen they can stretch back to the beginning of the 20th century or even the late 19th century. They are Machiavellian / Hegelian lies by a Neocon / Jewish Zionist / philo-Semitic elite concocted to control the world's population of which they have been very successful. To name a few of the major instances, these hoaxes include the purposely calculated disaster of the Treaty of Versailles, Nuremberg trials, Pearl Harbor, the Cold War, the Vietnam War, JFK assassination, 9/11 and more recently a string of relatively minor psyops including Columbine, Sandy Hook, Boston Marathon and ISIS. Much more could be added to this list.

There has been anticipation by many of the supporters of Donald Trump that because he seems to not be a puppet of the elite that some progress could be made in exposing these hoaxes for what they are, but as his administration's actions unfold, that hope is being dashed. Trump seems to have abandoned the Alt Right, no longer talks about PC and has unfortunately caved-in to much of the elite's agenda. Whether this is by his choice or a product of blackmail is an open to question.

The most recent hoax has been an effort by the defeated Democrats in the 2016 election to establish a conspiracy theory that Clinton lost because of Russian intervention in the election. It is not gaining sufficient traction for a number of reasons, but the main one is that there's just no substantial evidence and even if there were, it's just not possible for this to occur.

So how does this relate to keeping 9/11 Truth alive? The answer to this question is Russia and specifically Trump's dealings with the Russian Jewish mafia over the last few decades. There is ample evidence that they helped support his real estate empire. This has been covered by the MSM (see USAToday,)but is not in the mainstream conversation. By the MSM starting to focus on Russia/election influence as a relevant component of US politics, it opens up into a rich history of that countries' criminal underbelly that unfolded with the breakup and looting by Jewish oligarchs of the Soviet Union. It has been said by credible sources that every major Russian mafia figure has an Israeli passport.

It is an assumption by many 9/11 Truthers that the WTC twin towers were brought down by mini-nukes, specifically, modified W-54s that were sourced from the Pantex nuclear facility in the late 1980s and that there were 350 missing. There are other related nuclear theories, but this one seems to be the most prevalent. It is just speculation that is not backed up by any substantial evidence but enjoys a plausible consensus. It has circumstantial links to a number of corroborating details that lend to its believability including the case of CIA contractor Roland Carnaby who was killed by Houston police officers in a car chase incident. He was known to have been carrying a briefcase that contained information on nuclear materials being moved through the Houston ship channel on Zim American cargo vessels. Zim American (Israeli company) mysteriously vacated its offices in the WTC just two weeks before 9/11. The CIA erected a memorial garden in his honor.

Within this W-54/Pantex theory is the accusation that the Bush 43 administration, or rather Cheney, spread these nukes throughout the world in backdoor negotiations for a plethora of machinations of the Neocon/Zionist agenda. Again, this is just speculation, but ties-in to all the facets (including most importantly, nuclear proliferation) of the issue called Plamegate which contains info on the outing of the CIA agent Valerie Plame, her work for Brewster Jennings, Sibel Edmonds, Marc Grossman, Scooter Libby.

sdfg

To relate this to 9/11 Truth requires going back a number of issues including the Russian Jewish mafia, Cheney, Libby and Marc Rich, the (now deceased) international arms smuggler (among other crimes) who was appallingly but predictably pardoned by Bill Clinton.

Marc Rich had significant ties to the Russian mafia (Operation Spiderweb) and Viktor Bout (international arms smuggler, WSJ). The speculation is that it is possible that a number of those Pantex nukes may have fallen into the hands of the Russian mafia and could possibly be related to the 9/11 WTC nukes. Wayne Madsen makes this link. Of course, there would be no paper trail to this and would require an international investigation by credible independent agencies, which does not exist. The question arises would the Russian mafia have the expertise to modify the nukes and many other related issues? The point here is that 9/11 was an inside job that was run by Zionists and that the predominately Jewish nature of the Russian mafia makes it a credible target in any investigation of 9/11.

Now enter Donald Trump and his dealings with the Russian Jewish mafia. The story first lands at the feet of Roy Cohn (Jewish) as a mentor of Trump in the 1970-80s. There is a mound of evidence surrounding the Trump / Cohn relationship that is undeniable and significant. Just for starters on his background, he was J. Edgar Hoover's alleged lover, his father was close to the infamous Dulles brothers, he was Joe McCarthy's right-hand man, he set up the Rosenbergs as fall guys in the 1950s nuclear spy ring...etc.. but most significantly, he was a Kosher Nostra kingpin in New York's Brighton Beach. He created Donald Trump, the businessman... NewsFollowup.com Trump/Mafia 9/11 page

To continue, Cohn aided Roger Stone in Ronald Reagan's presidential campaign in 1979-80 (Wikipedia). According to the Aangirfan website, Cohn was tied to the Omaha pederast ring (Franklin Scandal) and involved in a New York City sex-ring run out of one of Trump's Manhattan hotels, giving credence to all the stories surrounding Trump's modern dalliances with Jeffrey Epstein.

To tie Trump to the Russian mafia, refer to Felix Sater, a senior advisor to the Trump campaign. In 1998, (Wikipedia) Sater plead guilty to stock racketeering and fraud as part of a US and Russian mafia-connected $40 million stock pump and dump scheme. He worked with the CIA and FBI, offering information on a black market for Stinger missiles. Sater went on to become the managing director and later COO of Tevfik Arif's Bayrock Group that managed Trump's Soho project. According to WayneMadsonReports Arif was arrested in Turkey for running a prostitution ring. NewsFollowup.com ... or WMR

A marker for money laundering investigations is the cash purchases of high-end condos. Trump's organization is rife with this... more details forthcoming. A significant number of questionable characters live in Trump's real estate ventures.

And it gets juicier. Felix Sater's father was a crime boss for Semion Mogilevich (Jewish), the world's most notorious Russian mafia gangster according to the FBI. It is said that Mogilevich owns the Hungarian military. He is so powerful that he lives freely in Moscow because he is basically untouchable. In the context of 9/11, Wayne Madsen reports that Mogilevich is linked to the Marc Rich-Benex-Bank of New York money-laundering scandal and that some of those funds were likely used to fund part of the 9/11 attacks. Again, Marc Rich was a close associate of Scooter Libby, thus Dick Cheney, who was a kingpin for Israel in the nuclear demolition of the WTC. From Mogilevich to Sater to Trump to 9/11 is not an unreasonable stretch, but too far ahead of itself in terms of modern political discourse.

gsdf NewsFollowup.com Trump/Mafia 9/11 page

An original idea for this article was to surmise that Trump could use graymail as a defense in saving his presidency from the widespread attacks by Democrats. To explain, the MSM media will not pursue stories about Trump's Russia connections because it exposes the Jewish nature of the Russian mafia. Whether or not this could extend to 9/11 is probably far-fetched but an interesting idea.

It is more likely that Israel did possess and modify the W-54s (if this is true), kept them close and managed their implementation without the use of the Russian mafia, but the Cheney / Libby / Marc Rich / Viktor Bout connections could hold some clues.

Flynn’s Name Never ‘Masked’ in Call Transcripts Briefed to Obama, Records Indicate
BY PETR SVAB May 13, 2020 Updated: May 14, 2020

EpochTimes
The name of Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn wasn’t masked to protect his identity in transcripts of his calls with a Russian ambassador that were distributed or revealed to President Barack Obama and a number of top officials in his administration, recently released documents indicate.

Information about the calls, including Flynn’s name, was leaked to the media within days, setting off a series of events that cost the Army veteran his job, millions of dollars, and several years of his life.

In addition, Obama administration officials made dozens of unmasking requests for intelligence reports that involved Flynn’s identity between the 2016 election day and the first days of President Donald Trump’s administration, the documents (pdf) show.

The practice of masking refers to replacing the names of Americans in foreign intelligence reports with generic standins to protect their identity. Senior officials involved in intelligence and national security have the power to request that the National Security Agency (NSA) reveal the masked names for various reasons, such as when it’s necessary to understand the intelligence.

Richard Grenell, the acting director of national intelligence, released on May 13 a list of officials who made unmasking requests between Nov. 8, 2016 and Jan. 31, 2017, that may have revealed Flynn’s identity.

There were 49 such requests, but none of them happened between Dec. 29, 2016, and Jan. 4, 2017.

Those dates are important, because it was on Dec. 29, 2016, that Flynn spoke over the phone with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak and asked for Moscow to not escalate the situation after Obama imposed new sanctions on Russia.

Jan. 4 was the date the FBI was to shutter its counterintelligence investigation of Flynn because it established no “derogatory” information about him. Then-FBI head of counterintelligence operations Peter Strzok scrambled that day to keep the probe open, however. Then-FBI Director James Comey later told the House Intelligence Committee that the probe was kept open after the FBI obtained Flynn’s calls with Kislyak regarding the sanctions.

“Our people judged was appropriate, for reasons that I hope are obvious, to have Mr. Flynn’s name unmasked [in the transcripts],” he said (pdf).

Epoch Times Photo
Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser, leaves the E. Barrett Prettyman U.S. Courthouse in Washington on June 24, 2019. (Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images)
Comey said the calls were “turned up … at the end of December, beginning of January.”

Then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper requested copies from Comey and then briefed Obama, his Vice President Joe Biden, and Obama’s senior staff on the calls, Comey said.

Clapper, during a Congressional testimony, denied briefing Obama on the calls, but then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates told the FBI that Obama brought up the calls during a meeting on Jan. 5. She said she didn’t know at the time how Obama learned about the calls (pdf).

Since no unmasking requests involving Flynn were made between the time the Kislyak calls took place and FBI’s already having the transcripts with Flynn’s name unmasked, it appears his name was never masked to begin with.

That would align with Comey’s mention that “we did not disseminate this [redacted] in any finished intelligence.”

If no intelligence report was produced based on the Kislyak calls, it would suggest the FBI distributed the raw intercepts—likely in transcript form.

A congressional staffer discussed this matter during a Dec. 19, 2017, interview with then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.

The staffer quoted from the prior Comey testimony, “We did not disseminate this take in any finished intelligence” and added that Comey “was referring to those specific tech cuts.”

“So no transcript or summary of conversations with Kislyak that were ever masked, and therefore, there were no unmasking requests that could have been made for these nonexistent reports,” the staffer said while describing the issue.

McCabe described the origin of the transcripts as follows: “They came up—we found them through an effort—without getting into too long of an explanation—in an effort to respond to a tasking from [redacted] and so the results of what we found were communicated to the Agency, who I think had the pen on that response.”

Flynn was accused of lying to the FBI agents during a Jan. 24, 2017, interview. He pleaded guilty, but later disavowed the plea and asked the court to allow him to withdraw it. The Department of Justice moved to drop the case on May 7, saying the FBI interview wasn’t based on a properly predicated investigation and “seems to have been undertaken only to elicit those very false statements and thereby criminalize Mr. Flynn.

Unz
Totalitarianism for Dummies
FRED REED • MAY 12, 2020 • 1,300 WORDS • 103 COMMENTS • REPLY

The genius of America’s totalitarian system of government is that it is not totally total, and sometimes not very totalitarian at all. It is just total enough. Truly total government–“Your papers, citizen,” stop-and-frisk, permission needed to travel from city to city–might spark revolt. By contrast, a sufficiency of totalitarianism, but not an excess, keeps the populace in adequate torpidity. Thus done astutely, totalitarianism is hardly noticed.

The founder of this philosophy was that rascal, Abe Lincoln. As we have all heard in what has become almost a cliche, he said, “You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.” He wisely did not add, “…but you can fool enough of the people enough of the time.”

Lincoln’s Principle of Sufficiency is the First Pillar of Practical Totalitarianism. The Second Pillar is reliance on the private sector for effectuation. This gives the government plausible deniability. For example, Google has all your email for decades back, This is annoying but not truly alarming. If the federal government (openly) collected emails, conservatives would shriek about…totalitarianism. But Google isn’t the government–is it?

The Third pillar: A press not too noticeably controlled, with enough apparent difference of opinion to simulate savage debate of ideas–without touching on any important ones. For example, Rachel Maddow rattles that Trump is a Russian agent while Rush Limbaugh, the Rachel Maddow of the Right, demurs furiously. This allows people to be excited and engaged without endangering either Wall Street or the military budget.

Hermetic control of information isn’t needed, and would be noticed. Most people get most of their news from the lobotomy box. Anything that doesn’t appear on the flickering screen doesn’t exist for most, and these are enough. It is thus possible to suppress information not by suppressing it, but by ignoring it.

We have now listed the fundamentals of American government. Now let us examine the use and intersection of these principles here and abroad.

China is typically offered as practicing the blackest totalitarianism, the implicit contrast being with the enlightened democracy enjoyed by Americans. For example, we are told that In China, everything you say or do is monitored. Obviously China is a most terrible place. Who could doubt it?

By contrast, in America, cameras are everywhere, all email is recorded, every bank transaction, credit-card purchase, who you called by telephone and when, and of course criminal records. Depending on location, traffic lights photograph your license number if you run a light (and for all you know, if you don’t), license-plate readers check for stolen vehicles and (perhaps) delete legal plates. Cell towers know approximately where you and Google Maps knows to within a few feet. Locations can be cross-checked with those of other phones to see who you were with. Now face-recognition comes along.

Since little of this is directly done by the federal government, we do not live in a surveillance state. After all, none of the entities involved would share their information with the feds–would they?

In China,we are told, there is no freedom of expression. Well, actually there is, as long as you don’t say the wrong things about the wrong things. In America we have freedom of speech. It says so in the Constitution.

Well, we have freedom of speech as long as we don’t say the wrong things about the wrong things. We all know what we can’t say and who we can’t say it about. In many places, certainly in the media where you might influence others, you can lose your job for saying things that upset blacks, Jews, feminists, homosexuals, LBGQXYZs, Hispanics, or Muslims. In the media you cannot say anything if favor of the Second Amendment, against abortion, about black crime, against the military budget or the wars. You cannot doubt accounts of such events as the Trayvon Martin adventure. On the web, sites can be and increasingly are “deplatformed” by the social media.

But as these are not formally part of government, we have freedom of speech. See? No unelected dictator decides what we are permitted to know or say. Mark Zuckerberg does.

This is very different from China in that…in that…wait. I’ll think of something.

Here we come to the Fourth Pillar of Sufficient Totalitarianism: Repetition, repetition, repetition. In Mein Kampf (now removed from Amazon) Adolf said that propaganda should not be entrusted to.intellectuals They are, he said, easily bored, like sophisticated ideas, and constantly want to change the message.

Instead, he said, keep it simple enough for the masses to understand, and say it over and over and over, and they will come to believe it. More precisely, enough will come to believe it. The rest don’t matter. This is much cheaper than kicking in doors at three a.m. and doesn’t arouse potentially dangerous resentment

RussiaGateRussiaGateRussiaGateChinaDidItChinaDidItChinaDidItIranIsEvilIranIsEvilIranIsEvilGoYoBeginningAndRepeat

We are told, over and over and over, that America is a democracy and virtually choking on freedoms. We are told three times in a half hour during the Super Bowl, that we need to buy a sandwich from Subway. Same principle, exactly. It works.

Here we come to the Bicephalous Monoparty, the stage set of American democracy. In this production, actors called Republicans and Democrats feign combat. It is like professional wrestling but without the dignity. By Instinct or prearrangement they avoid mention of things that might produce restiveness among the electorate: Wall Street, the military budget, corruption, corporate price-fixing, or Epstein’s ability to hang himself from a bedstead two feet shorter than himself. It is prettily done. By engaging the glands of the multitude with shiny political baubles–transgender bathrooms, making America great again–the avoid endangering larceny as usual.

And so, unlike China where democracy does not exist and people have no influence, we have democracy but no influence. This is much slicker.

For example, if you oppose the interminable wars, what party do you vote for? There are neither antiwar parties nor serious candidates. Who do you vote for if you want to cut the goiterous military budget? If you are against torture? If you oppose a militarily aggressive foreign policy?

Can you influence what your children are taught in school, what is in their textbooks? If you are against the ongoing enstupidation of education, or against the pulling down of statues? Against affirmative action? The list could go on.

Thank God we don’t live in China. Their government works, ours doesn’t, but at least we have our freedoms.

Write Fred at jet.possum@gmail.com. Put the letters pdq anywhere in the subject line to avoid autodeletion.

NewsFollowUp.com home	Trump & the Jews	Timeline
Trump & the Jewish/Russian Mafia Flynn's Name Never Masked A Bicephalous Monoparty Trump / Biden	.	.
Trump & the Jewish/Russian Mafia by Stephen Francis, founder of NewsFollowUp.com One of the main efforts to pursue by this editor is the quest to find connections between 9/11 and modern political events in the context of keeping its investigation alive and relevant. The 9/11 Truth movement is now approaching its sixteenth anniversary and unfortunately seems to be going the way of the JFK assassination route, that being endless ruminations challenging the establishment's deliberate coverups but little or actually no progress in getting a new independent inquiry.. ...... NewsFollowup.com Trump/Mafia 9/11 page And, another area of inquiry could be added to this mix, that being Cultural Marxism. This is not an implausible stretch in that the unexpected election of Donald Trump to the POTUS was in part successful because of his attacks on Political Correctness which is an integral component of Cultural Marxism. The way to connect them is through adding it to the seemingly endless stream of psyops perpetrated on the citizens of the world. Depending on the time frame chosen they can stretch back to the beginning of the 20th century or even the late 19th century. They are Machiavellian / Hegelian lies by a Neocon / Jewish Zionist / philo-Semitic elite concocted to control the world's population of which they have been very successful. To name a few of the major instances, these hoaxes include the purposely calculated disaster of the Treaty of Versailles, Nuremberg trials, Pearl Harbor, the Cold War, the Vietnam War, JFK assassination, 9/11 and more recently a string of relatively minor psyops including Columbine, Sandy Hook, Boston Marathon and ISIS. Much more could be added to this list. There has been anticipation by many of the supporters of Donald Trump that because he seems to not be a puppet of the elite that some progress could be made in exposing these hoaxes for what they are, but as his administration's actions unfold, that hope is being dashed. Trump seems to have abandoned the Alt Right, no longer talks about PC and has unfortunately caved-in to much of the elite's agenda. Whether this is by his choice or a product of blackmail is an open to question. The most recent hoax has been an effort by the defeated Democrats in the 2016 election to establish a conspiracy theory that Clinton lost because of Russian intervention in the election. It is not gaining sufficient traction for a number of reasons, but the main one is that there's just no substantial evidence and even if there were, it's just not possible for this to occur. NewsFollowup.com Trump/Mafia 9/11 page So how does this relate to keeping 9/11 Truth alive? The answer to this question is Russia and specifically Trump's dealings with the Russian Jewish mafia over the last few decades. There is ample evidence that they helped support his real estate empire. This has been covered by the MSM (see USAToday,)but is not in the mainstream conversation. By the MSM starting to focus on Russia/election influence as a relevant component of US politics, it opens up into a rich history of that countries' criminal underbelly that unfolded with the breakup and looting by Jewish oligarchs of the Soviet Union. It has been said by credible sources that every major Russian mafia figure has an Israeli passport. W-54 mini-nuke ... and for more info see James Fetzer's book America was Nuked on 9/11 It is an assumption by many 9/11 Truthers that the WTC twin towers were brought down by mini-nukes, specifically, modified W-54s that were sourced from the Pantex nuclear facility in the late 1980s and that there were 350 missing. There are other related nuclear theories, but this one seems to be the most prevalent. It is just speculation that is not backed up by any substantial evidence but enjoys a plausible consensus. It has circumstantial links to a number of corroborating details that lend to its believability including the case of CIA contractor Roland Carnaby who was killed by Houston police officers in a car chase incident. He was known to have been carrying a briefcase that contained information on nuclear materials being moved through the Houston ship channel on Zim American cargo vessels. Zim American (Israeli company) mysteriously vacated its offices in the WTC just two weeks before 9/11. The CIA erected a memorial garden in his honor. ... ... and here is a pic of Carnaby's funeral casket being carried by George HW Bush, George Tenet and others. Within this W-54/Pantex theory is the accusation that the Bush 43 administration, or rather Cheney, spread these nukes throughout the world in backdoor negotiations for a plethora of machinations of the Neocon/Zionist agenda. Again, this is just speculation, but ties-in to all the facets (including most importantly, nuclear proliferation) of the issue called Plamegate which contains info on the outing of the CIA agent Valerie Plame, her work for Brewster Jennings, Sibel Edmonds, Marc Grossman, Scooter Libby. To relate this to 9/11 Truth requires going back a number of issues including the Russian Jewish mafia, Cheney, Libby and Marc Rich, the (now deceased) international arms smuggler (among other crimes) who was appallingly but predictably pardoned by Bill Clinton. Marc Rich had significant ties to the Russian mafia (Operation Spiderweb) and Viktor Bout (international arms smuggler, WSJ). The speculation is that it is possible that a number of those Pantex nukes may have fallen into the hands of the Russian mafia and could possibly be related to the 9/11 WTC nukes. Wayne Madsen makes this link. Of course, there would be no paper trail to this and would require an international investigation by credible independent agencies, which does not exist. The question arises would the Russian mafia have the expertise to modify the nukes and many other related issues? The point here is that 9/11 was an inside job that was run by Zionists and that the predominately Jewish nature of the Russian mafia makes it a credible target in any investigation of 9/11. Now enter Donald Trump and his dealings with the Russian Jewish mafia. The story first lands at the feet of Roy Cohn (Jewish) as a mentor of Trump in the 1970-80s. There is a mound of evidence surrounding the Trump / Cohn relationship that is undeniable and significant. Just for starters on his background, he was J. Edgar Hoover's alleged lover, his father was close to the infamous Dulles brothers, he was Joe McCarthy's right-hand man, he set up the Rosenbergs as fall guys in the 1950s nuclear spy ring...etc.. but most significantly, he was a Kosher Nostra kingpin in New York's Brighton Beach. He created Donald Trump, the businessman... NewsFollowup.com Trump/Mafia 9/11 page To continue, Cohn aided Roger Stone in Ronald Reagan's presidential campaign in 1979-80 (Wikipedia). According to the Aangirfan website, Cohn was tied to the Omaha pederast ring (Franklin Scandal) and involved in a New York City sex-ring run out of one of Trump's Manhattan hotels, giving credence to all the stories surrounding Trump's modern dalliances with Jeffrey Epstein. To tie Trump to the Russian mafia, refer to Felix Sater, a senior advisor to the Trump campaign. In 1998, (Wikipedia) Sater plead guilty to stock racketeering and fraud as part of a US and Russian mafia-connected $40 million stock pump and dump scheme. He worked with the CIA and FBI, offering information on a black market for Stinger missiles. Sater went on to become the managing director and later COO of Tevfik Arif's Bayrock Group that managed Trump's Soho project. According to WayneMadsonReports Arif was arrested in Turkey for running a prostitution ring. NewsFollowup.com ... or WMR A marker for money laundering investigations is the cash purchases of high-end condos. Trump's organization is rife with this... more details forthcoming. A significant number of questionable characters live in Trump's real estate ventures. And it gets juicier. Felix Sater's father was a crime boss for Semion Mogilevich (Jewish), the world's most notorious Russian mafia gangster according to the FBI. It is said that Mogilevich owns the Hungarian military. He is so powerful that he lives freely in Moscow because he is basically untouchable. In the context of 9/11, Wayne Madsen reports that Mogilevich is linked to the Marc Rich-Benex-Bank of New York money-laundering scandal and that some of those funds were likely used to fund part of the 9/11 attacks. Again, Marc Rich was a close associate of Scooter Libby, thus Dick Cheney, who was a kingpin for Israel in the nuclear demolition of the WTC. From Mogilevich to Sater to Trump to 9/11 is not an unreasonable stretch, but too far ahead of itself in terms of modern political discourse. NewsFollowup.com Trump/Mafia 9/11 page Interestingly, after all this investigation, this editor still would rather see Trump in the oval office than Hillary Clinton. Again, we are faced with a choice of lesser evils. An original idea for this article was to surmise that Trump could use graymail as a defense in saving his presidency from the widespread attacks by Democrats. To explain, the MSM media will not pursue stories about Trump's Russia connections because it exposes the Jewish nature of the Russian mafia. Whether or not this could extend to 9/11 is probably far-fetched but an interesting idea. It is more likely that Israel did possess and modify the W-54s (if this is true), kept them close and managed their implementation without the use of the Russian mafia, but the Cheney / Libby / Marc Rich / Viktor Bout connections could hold some clues. Stephen Francis, founder NewsFollowup.com contact: support@newsfollowup.com xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Flynn’s Name Never ‘Masked’ in Call Transcripts Briefed to Obama, Records Indicate BY PETR SVAB May 13, 2020 Updated: May 14, 2020 EpochTimes The name of Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn wasn’t masked to protect his identity in transcripts of his calls with a Russian ambassador that were distributed or revealed to President Barack Obama and a number of top officials in his administration, recently released documents indicate. Information about the calls, including Flynn’s name, was leaked to the media within days, setting off a series of events that cost the Army veteran his job, millions of dollars, and several years of his life. In addition, Obama administration officials made dozens of unmasking requests for intelligence reports that involved Flynn’s identity between the 2016 election day and the first days of President Donald Trump’s administration, the documents (pdf) show. The practice of masking refers to replacing the names of Americans in foreign intelligence reports with generic standins to protect their identity. Senior officials involved in intelligence and national security have the power to request that the National Security Agency (NSA) reveal the masked names for various reasons, such as when it’s necessary to understand the intelligence. Richard Grenell, the acting director of national intelligence, released on May 13 a list of officials who made unmasking requests between Nov. 8, 2016 and Jan. 31, 2017, that may have revealed Flynn’s identity. There were 49 such requests, but none of them happened between Dec. 29, 2016, and Jan. 4, 2017. Those dates are important, because it was on Dec. 29, 2016, that Flynn spoke over the phone with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak and asked for Moscow to not escalate the situation after Obama imposed new sanctions on Russia. Jan. 4 was the date the FBI was to shutter its counterintelligence investigation of Flynn because it established no “derogatory” information about him. Then-FBI head of counterintelligence operations Peter Strzok scrambled that day to keep the probe open, however. Then-FBI Director James Comey later told the House Intelligence Committee that the probe was kept open after the FBI obtained Flynn’s calls with Kislyak regarding the sanctions. “Our people judged was appropriate, for reasons that I hope are obvious, to have Mr. Flynn’s name unmasked [in the transcripts],” he said (pdf). Epoch Times Photo Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser, leaves the E. Barrett Prettyman U.S. Courthouse in Washington on June 24, 2019. (Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images) Comey said the calls were “turned up … at the end of December, beginning of January.” Then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper requested copies from Comey and then briefed Obama, his Vice President Joe Biden, and Obama’s senior staff on the calls, Comey said. Clapper, during a Congressional testimony, denied briefing Obama on the calls, but then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates told the FBI that Obama brought up the calls during a meeting on Jan. 5. She said she didn’t know at the time how Obama learned about the calls (pdf). Since no unmasking requests involving Flynn were made between the time the Kislyak calls took place and FBI’s already having the transcripts with Flynn’s name unmasked, it appears his name was never masked to begin with. That would align with Comey’s mention that “we did not disseminate this [redacted] in any finished intelligence.” If no intelligence report was produced based on the Kislyak calls, it would suggest the FBI distributed the raw intercepts—likely in transcript form. A congressional staffer discussed this matter during a Dec. 19, 2017, interview with then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. The staffer quoted from the prior Comey testimony, “We did not disseminate this take in any finished intelligence” and added that Comey “was referring to those specific tech cuts.” “So no transcript or summary of conversations with Kislyak that were ever masked, and therefore, there were no unmasking requests that could have been made for these nonexistent reports,” the staffer said while describing the issue. “I think your description is accurate,” McCabe ultimately responded. McCabe described the origin of the transcripts as follows: “They came up—we found them through an effort—without getting into too long of an explanation—in an effort to respond to a tasking from [redacted] and so the results of what we found were communicated to the Agency, who I think had the pen on that response.” Flynn was accused of lying to the FBI agents during a Jan. 24, 2017, interview. He pleaded guilty, but later disavowed the plea and asked the court to allow him to withdraw it. The Department of Justice moved to drop the case on May 7, saying the FBI interview wasn’t based on a properly predicated investigation and “seems to have been undertaken only to elicit those very false statements and thereby criminalize Mr. Flynn. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx A Bicephalous Monoparty and the Four Pillars Unz Totalitarianism for Dummies FRED REED • MAY 12, 2020 • 1,300 WORDS • 103 COMMENTS • REPLY The genius of America’s totalitarian system of government is that it is not totally total, and sometimes not very totalitarian at all. It is just total enough. Truly total government–“Your papers, citizen,” stop-and-frisk, permission needed to travel from city to city–might spark revolt. By contrast, a sufficiency of totalitarianism, but not an excess, keeps the populace in adequate torpidity. Thus done astutely, totalitarianism is hardly noticed. The founder of this philosophy was that rascal, Abe Lincoln. As we have all heard in what has become almost a cliche, he said, “You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.” He wisely did not add, “…but you can fool enough of the people enough of the time.” Lincoln’s Principle of Sufficiency is the First Pillar of Practical Totalitarianism. The Second Pillar is reliance on the private sector for effectuation. This gives the government plausible deniability. For example, Google has all your email for decades back, This is annoying but not truly alarming. If the federal government (openly) collected emails, conservatives would shriek about…totalitarianism. But Google isn’t the government–is it? The Third pillar: A press not too noticeably controlled, with enough apparent difference of opinion to simulate savage debate of ideas–without touching on any important ones. For example, Rachel Maddow rattles that Trump is a Russian agent while Rush Limbaugh, the Rachel Maddow of the Right, demurs furiously. This allows people to be excited and engaged without endangering either Wall Street or the military budget. Hermetic control of information isn’t needed, and would be noticed. Most people get most of their news from the lobotomy box. Anything that doesn’t appear on the flickering screen doesn’t exist for most, and these are enough. It is thus possible to suppress information not by suppressing it, but by ignoring it. We have now listed the fundamentals of American government. Now let us examine the use and intersection of these principles here and abroad. China is typically offered as practicing the blackest totalitarianism, the implicit contrast being with the enlightened democracy enjoyed by Americans. For example, we are told that In China, everything you say or do is monitored. Obviously China is a most terrible place. Who could doubt it? By contrast, in America, cameras are everywhere, all email is recorded, every bank transaction, credit-card purchase, who you called by telephone and when, and of course criminal records. Depending on location, traffic lights photograph your license number if you run a light (and for all you know, if you don’t), license-plate readers check for stolen vehicles and (perhaps) delete legal plates. Cell towers know approximately where you and Google Maps knows to within a few feet. Locations can be cross-checked with those of other phones to see who you were with. Now face-recognition comes along. Since little of this is directly done by the federal government, we do not live in a surveillance state. After all, none of the entities involved would share their information with the feds–would they? In China,we are told, there is no freedom of expression. Well, actually there is, as long as you don’t say the wrong things about the wrong things. In America we have freedom of speech. It says so in the Constitution. Well, we have freedom of speech as long as we don’t say the wrong things about the wrong things. We all know what we can’t say and who we can’t say it about. In many places, certainly in the media where you might influence others, you can lose your job for saying things that upset blacks, Jews, feminists, homosexuals, LBGQXYZs, Hispanics, or Muslims. In the media you cannot say anything if favor of the Second Amendment, against abortion, about black crime, against the military budget or the wars. You cannot doubt accounts of such events as the Trayvon Martin adventure. On the web, sites can be and increasingly are “deplatformed” by the social media. But as these are not formally part of government, we have freedom of speech. See? No unelected dictator decides what we are permitted to know or say. Mark Zuckerberg does. This is very different from China in that…in that…wait. I’ll think of something. Here we come to the Fourth Pillar of Sufficient Totalitarianism: Repetition, repetition, repetition. In Mein Kampf (now removed from Amazon) Adolf said that propaganda should not be entrusted to.intellectuals They are, he said, easily bored, like sophisticated ideas, and constantly want to change the message. Instead, he said, keep it simple enough for the masses to understand, and say it over and over and over, and they will come to believe it. More precisely, enough will come to believe it. The rest don’t matter. This is much cheaper than kicking in doors at three a.m. and doesn’t arouse potentially dangerous resentment RussiaGateRussiaGateRussiaGateChinaDidItChinaDidItChinaDidItIranIsEvilIranIsEvilIranIsEvilGoYoBeginningAndRepeat We are told, over and over and over, that America is a democracy and virtually choking on freedoms. We are told three times in a half hour during the Super Bowl, that we need to buy a sandwich from Subway. Same principle, exactly. It works. Here we come to the Bicephalous Monoparty, the stage set of American democracy. In this production, actors called Republicans and Democrats feign combat. It is like professional wrestling but without the dignity. By Instinct or prearrangement they avoid mention of things that might produce restiveness among the electorate: Wall Street, the military budget, corruption, corporate price-fixing, or Epstein’s ability to hang himself from a bedstead two feet shorter than himself. It is prettily done. By engaging the glands of the multitude with shiny political baubles–transgender bathrooms, making America great again–the avoid endangering larceny as usual. And so, unlike China where democracy does not exist and people have no influence, we have democracy but no influence. This is much slicker. For example, if you oppose the interminable wars, what party do you vote for? There are neither antiwar parties nor serious candidates. Who do you vote for if you want to cut the goiterous military budget? If you are against torture? If you oppose a militarily aggressive foreign policy? Can you influence what your children are taught in school, what is in their textbooks? If you are against the ongoing enstupidation of education, or against the pulling down of statues? Against affirmative action? The list could go on. Thank God we don’t live in China. Their government works, ours doesn’t, but at least we have our freedoms. Write Fred at jet.possum@gmail.com. Put the letters pdq anywhere in the subject line to avoid autodeletion.
Timeline
2017 May ...JustSecurity...Trump timeline Manafort / Stone 2017 May ...NaturalNews...High-rise building in the UAE (The 48-floor Abbco Tower) engulfed in flames, yet doesn’t collapse like WTC 7 because fires don’t collapse concrete buildings ... One of the largest skyscrapers in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates (UAE), burst into flames the other day and continued to burn well into the night, resulting in more than a dozen injuries and thankfully no deaths. But unlike the infamous World Trade Center Building 7, this residential tower did not collapse into its own footprint because steel and concrete high-rises remain standing during fires – unless they are detonated, of course. ... At least five other buildings in close proximity to the Abbco Tower had to be evacuated because the fire was so extreme, and its embers so hot, that the entire vicinity was at risk. And yet neither the Abbco Tower nor any other nearby tower collapsed in the slightest because fire doesn’t melt steel or concrete.

Trump & the Jews

Timeline