NewsFollowUp.com

news sources

econ charts

headlines

sitemap home
Corporate Fraud_4 page 1,    2,    3 Wachovia, SEC violations  
SEC  Litigation Releases   Corporate Name Changes
related topics   related topics   related topics  
Riggs Bank    top  more at: Latin America, Kissinger
PROGRESSIVE REFERENCE CONSERVATIVE*
Sinclair Broadcasting Group    top  
PROGRESSIVE REFERENCE CONSERVATIVE*
Southern Finacial Group    top     SEC LR-19060
PROGRESSIVE REFERENCE CONSERVATIVE*
  • Southern Financial Group Val Wheeler, served on Bush's Business Advisory Council.  SEC Litigation Release LR-19060, Richard M. Wooten, Charles Dennis McKittrick, Gerald F. Hunter
  • Bush Whitehouse Wheeler named him Oklahoma Business Man of the Year by Republican Congressional Committee's Business Advisory Council
Wachovia    top      SEC LR-18958
PROGRESSIVE REFERENCE CONSERVATIVE*
Wal-Mart    top
PROGRESSIVE REFERENCE CONSERVATIVE*
  • Corporate Crime Reporter, Top 100 Corporate Criminals of the 1990's
  • Mother Jones search
  • UFCW United Food and Commercial Workers International Union
  • Wal-mart Watch Center for Community and Corporate Ethics, . Low pay and benefits has forced tens of thousands of employees to seek Medicaid, food stamps and housing assistance.
  • Strategy: go to Wal-Mart to buy only there loss-leaders
  • Wal-Mart Day of Action consumer alerts, neighborhood protection, news
Worldcom, MCI    top    SEC LR-18789
PROGRESSIVE REFERENCE CONSERVATIVE*

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 18958 / November 4, 2004

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. WACHOVIA CORPORATION, Civil Action No. 04-1911 (D.D.C.)

SEC CHARGES WACHOVIA CORPORATION WITH PROXY DISCLOSURE AND OTHER REPORTING VIOLATIONS INVOLVING THE 2001 MERGER BETWEEN FIRST UNION CORPORATION AND OLD WACHOVIA CORPORATION

WACHOVIA AGREES TO AN INJUNCTION AND $37 MILLION PENALTY

The Securities and Exchange Commission today filed a settled civil action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against Wachovia Corporation ("Wachovia") for violations of proxy disclosure laws and other reporting rules involving the 2001 merger between First Union Corporation ("First Union") and Old Wachovia Corporation ("Old Wachovia"). The Complaint alleges that Old Wachovia and First Union failed to disclose in quarterly reports and in a joint proxy statement-prospectus filed in connection with the merger the total number of shares of First Union common stock ("FTU") that Old Wachovia intended to and did purchase during the period when First Union and SunTrust Corporation ("SunTrust") were engaged in a hostile takeover battle for Old Wachovia. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint, Wachovia consented to entry of a judgment enjoining it from violating the Sections 13(a) and 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 12b-20, 13a-13 and 14a-9 thereunder and to pay a civil penalty of $37 million.

The Commission's complaint alleges:

On April 16, 2001, First Union and Old Wachovia announced that they had signed a stock-for-stock merger proposal, which offered Old Wachovia shareholders two shares of First Union common stock (NYSE:FTU) for each share of Old Wachovia common stock (NYSE:WB) plus either a one-time special payment of $0.48 or two preferred shares with dividends.

On May 4, 2001, Old Wachovia began purchasing shares of FTU and continued to do so on numerous days until June 28, 2001, the day before a restrictive period, pursuant to Regulation M, commenced. During this time period, Old Wachovia purchased a total of 16,491,000 shares of FTU for a total purchase price of $551,281,036.

Almost all of Old Wachovia's purchases were made pursuant to a May 2, 2001 Old Wachovia authorization signed by its Investment Management Committee, which authorized the purchase of up to $500 million worth of FTU stock during the period when Old Wachovia was repurchasing its own stock. Because of its desire to consummate the merger with First Union, Old Wachovia had an interest in ensuring that First Union's stock did not become significantly less valuable in relation to Old Wachovia's stock as a result of Old Wachovia's repurchases of its own stock, because such a change would make the First Union offer appear less valuable. This interest intensified after SunTrust's made a hostile takeover bid for Old Wachovia on May 14, 2001, which initially offered a higher premium to Old Wachovia's shareholders relative to First Union's proposal.

On June 28, 2001, after the initial authorization had been exhausted, Old Wachovia's Investment Management Committee authorized the purchase of an additional $55 million worth of FTU stock, which Old Wachovia used to purchase additional FTU stock on June 28. First Union was aware of Old Wachovia's purchases at the time they were made.

Between May 2 and May 8, 2001, Old Wachovia bought approximately $18 million of FTU shares on the open market. Old Wachovia stopped buying on May 8 pending regulatory clearance of its purchases under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. On May 31, 2001, Old Wachovia resumed buying FTU shares. Between May 31 and June 28, 2001, Old Wachovia purchased approximately $537 million of FTU shares.

Old Wachovia knew that its First Union purchases during this period likely would have the effect of supporting the price of FTU, which in turn would support the value of First Union's merger proposal and make it appear more attractive to Old Wachovia shareholders. In fact, on June 25, 2001, Old Wachovia purchased 2.85 million shares of FTU, or 53% of the total trading volume for FTU on that day. The stock closed approximately $.50 higher on June 25 and the closing price on that day was included in the joint proxy statement sent to shareholders.

In connection with its FTU purchases, Old Wachovia instructed the broker executing the FTU purchases to do so in compliance with Rule 10b-18, a safe harbor provision applicable to a company purchasing its own securities or those of an affiliate, in this case First Union. In October 2003, the Commission adopted amendments to certain provision of Rule 10b-18. Release 34-48766 (Nov. 10, 2003), 68 FR 64952. The amendment clarified that the safe harbor is not available for purchases affected from the time of public announcement of a merger, acquisition, or similar transaction involving a recapitalization, until the earlier of the completion of such transaction or the completion of the vote by target shareholders, subject to certain exceptions. The safe harbor is not available once such a transaction is announced, because an issuer has considerable incentive to support or raise the market price of the stock in order to facilitate the merger or acquisition. 68 FR at 6495. The Commission also emphasized that "regardless of whether an issuer's repurchases technically satisfy the conditions of the Rule, the safe harbor is not available if the repurchases are fraudulent or manipulative, when viewed in the totality of the facts and circumstances surrounding the repurchases (i.e. facts and circumstances in addition to the volume, price, time, and manner of the repurchases)." 68 FR 64953. "To come within the safe harbor, however, an issuer's repurchases must satisfy (on a daily basis) each of the section's four conditions. Failure to meet any one of the four conditions will remove all of the issuer's repurchases from the safe harbor for the day." 17 240.10b-18 Preliminary Note 1.

With respect to these purchases, neither First Union nor Old Wachovia disclosed in their Forms 10-Q and 10-Q/A filed in May and June 2001, or in their joint proxy sent to over two hundred thousand shareholders on June 29, 2001, that: a) Old Wachovia authorized the purchase of FTU shares; b) subject to regulatory filings, Old Wachovia intended to purchase up to $500 million worth of FTU shares; and c) the total number of FTU shares that Old Wachovia purchased in May and June 2001. This material information was not disclosed until August 2001, after the shareholders voted on the merger. Old Wachovia should have publicly disclosed more detailed information about its purchases of FTU stock so that the market would be able to evaluate the effect of those purchases on FTU's stock price during that period. By failing to disclose this material information, First Union and Old Wachovia violated Sections 13(a) and 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

During the course of the SEC staff's investigation into this matter, Wachovia provided incomplete and untimely document productions and failed to ensure comprehensive and complete responses to requests made and subpoenas issued by the SEC staff. These production deficiencies and delays unnecessarily prolonged the SEC staff's investigation.

SEC Complaint in this matter

from BadCorp Corporate Name Changes

Who else is doing it?
According to Enterprise IG, 3,602 U.S. corporations adopted new names in 2001.
After a ValuJet plane crashed over the Florida Everglades in 1996, killing 110 people, the airline became AirTran Airways.
ChemLawn/Chemgreen, the nation's largest landscaping company, is becoming TruGreen LandCare.
Tricon Global Restaurants, owners of Taco Bell, KFC, and Pizza Hut is becoming Yum! Brands.
Binladin Telecommunications Group, a telecom equipment maker owned by Osama bin Laden's Saudi relatives is now Baud.
Agricultural Insecticide and Fungicide Association, a lobbying and trade association representing the nation's 78 pesticide manufacturers will hide behind the friendlier CropLife America.
Benton Oil and Gas Company, who drill for oil and gas in Russia and Venezuela, will be Harvest Natural Resources.
Nuclear Engineering, who dispose of toxic and radioactive waste, will distance themselves from the bad record of anything nuclear, with the name US Ecology. Yes, US Ecology will bury the toxic waste near your house now.
HomeShark, an online mortgage and real estate listings provider, is now the more empowering iOwn.
Dun & Bradstreet asked to be known as D&B, although it retained the full name officially.
Peptide Pharmaceuticals switched to Novar.
PricewaterhouseCoopers, became Monday, yes Monday.
Andersen Consulting renamed itself Accenture.
Monsanto Specialty Chemicals, a spin-off of Monsanto, who is destroying the entire planet, is now Solutia.
  And word is that Enron is looking for a new name. Imagine: after screwing millions of people out of billions of dollars, they are looking for a new name.

 

free hit counter javascript