search

Franklin Scandal Omaha

pictorial index

sitemap home

Academic Freedom Conference II - Are there Limits to Inquiry?

Should faculty be restrained from or even punished for investigating complex and controversial events of enormous political significance?

acf
The Academic Freedom Conference II was a smashing success.

View the conference videos

 

Conference Schedule Speaker Summary (see details at the 2016 conference page)
9:00-10:00 AM Stephen Francis
10:00-11:00 AM Francis Boyle
11:00-12:00 AM Film
12:00-1:00 PM Nicholas Kollerstrom
1:00-2:00 PM Leuren Moret
2:00-3:00 PM Darrel Hamamoto
3:00-4:00 PM Kevin McDonald
4:00-5:00 PM film
5:00-6:00 PM Preston James
7:00-8:00 PM Jim Fetzer
 
IBTimes 9/11 Conspiracy Theories: Inside The Lonely Lives Of Truthers

uofi169/11 Conspiracy Theories: Inside The Lonely Lives Of Truthers, Still Looking For Their Big Break
Fourteen years after 9/11, Truthers, as they’ve been pejoratively labeled since 2001, have not gone away. And odds are, you probably know one.
BY BRENDAN JAMES @DEEP_BEIGE ON 09/11/15 AT 5:48 AM
I didn’t know my local bartender was a 9/11 Truther. Boyishly handsome with dirty blond hair and wearing his T-shirt inside out, he appeared to be eavesdropping on me at a Brooklyn tavern last week as I told a friend that I was working on a piece about “Truthers” -- Americans who believe the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, in New York, Washington, D.C., and Pennsylvania were staged or executed not by terrorists but by the American government.“Inside job,” the bartender piped up, without making eye contact. I asked him if he was just making fun or if he was truly a believer himself.“Yeah, man, I’m a believer," he said, pouring me a drink.“Yeah, man, I’m a believer."Fourteen years after 9/11, Truthers, as they’ve been pejoratively labeled since 2001, have not gone away. Their conspiracy theories can be traced back to the first months after the attack, multiplying over the Internet through message boards, articles and, eventually, homemade documentaries such as the low-budget cult hit “Loose Change,” which racked up 10 million views and topped Google Video in 2006, an outstanding feat in the pre-YouTube era. Organizations like 911truth.org and Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth cropped up, bringing together like-minded skeptics of the official narrative that 19 Islamic extremists hijacked four commercial airplanes and carried out the most devastating terrorist attack in U.S. history.Continue Reading BelowThere are even conferences dedicated to discussing a broader strategy to push the movement’s narrative into the mainstream.Not that Trutherism has been confined to the bowels of the Internet: Celebrities from Mark Ruffalo to Rosie O’Donnell to America’s own TV president, Martin Sheen demand answers about “what really happened.” Activists staged multiple “Bush Did It” rallies in 2002. Last year, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth coordinated with the “Rethink 9/11” campaign to score a huge billboard in Times Square questioning the physics of WTC 7’s collapse. Just this week, staffers from the New York Times complained that the building across from them had been draped in Truther propaganda.And year after year, polls find that a percentage of Americans across the country suspect that the U.S. government has covered up its own role in the attacks.
9/11 Truth
Members of the "911 Truth" movement protest near the World Trade Center site and the 9/11 Memorial in New York on the 13th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, Sept. 11, 2014.
PHOTO: REUTERS/BRENDAN MCDERMID
In 2004, half of New York City residents and 41 percent of New York state citizens polled by Zogby said that some in the government "knew in advance that attacks were planned” and purposefully let them happen. In 2006, Zogby found that 42 percent of Americans nationally believed the U.S. “concealed or refused to investigate critical evidence that contradicts their official explanation of the September 11th attacks,” and that “there has been a cover-up.” In 2013, Public Policy Polling reported a much lower figure of 11 percent -- still more than people who said they believed in other theories such as chemtrails, or that the Apollo 11 moon landing was faked.Even taking the lower estimate, that still suggests there are millions of people in the U.S. who believe the official story of 9/11 is a false flag, and that the real truth has been covered up. That’s not a fringe group. It’s possible that you know a friend who’s a Truther. Or a dentist. Or a bartender. Maybe they just haven’t told you.‘It’s Really Lonely’My surprise-Truther bartender’s name was Bryan Ujueta. For the better part of an hour, with lounge music piping at the bar and glasses clinking around us, we had an impromptu interview discussing why he thought George W. Bush did 9/11.Ujueta was raised in New York, originally in a suburb on Long Island. He grew up working in a bunch of delis and living the life of what he called the “Italian-American middle class.” He’s 30 years old and has been tending bar for about 10 years, but his real passion is music.“I’ve traveled the world to play music,” he said between concocting drinks. “I’m a percussionist, I play piano and drums.” He was being modest: His band, Mr Twin Sister (originally just Twin Sister), is well known on the indie music scene. They’re a staff favorite at Pitchfork, making the site’s top 100 tracks of the year in 2010. Two years later, their song “Meet the Frownies” was sampled by rapper Kendrick Lamar.
Ujueta
Bryan Ujueta, left, and his band, Twin Sister.
PHOTO: VIMEO
Long before that, though, Ujueta was a high school freshman trying to make sense of the attack on the World Trade Center, where he lost someone he knew.“I ate dinner at Windows on the World, which was the sushi restaurant at the top of the World Trade Center [in the north tower] one month before it went down,” he said. “I went there for my cousin’s birthday. My dad used to go there; his best friend was a sushi chef. He made what we thought was the best sushi in New York.”“He died that day,” Ujueta said.Like many others, he eventually came across the literature of “9/11 Truth” online.“The first time I heard that ‘jet fuel cannot melt steel beams,’ which has become a joke almost, I began to dive into it,” he said, referencing the evolution of that phrase into an Internet gag in recent years. “And then, from jet fuel, it went to thermite, which shouldn’t be found where explosions like that happened, but it was [on 9/11]. And you basically fall down the rabbit hole.”Political scientist Michael Barkun, an expert on conspiracy theories, has explained their appeal as both endlessly fascinating and strangely comforting.“[C]onspiracy theories claim to explain what others can't,” he said in an interview with New Internationalist 11 years ago. “They appear to make sense out of a world that is otherwise confusing. Second, they do so in an appealingly simple way, by dividing the world sharply between the forces of light and the forces of darkness. They trace all evil back to a single source, the conspirators and their agents.”Ujueta describes himself as a progressive (he plans on voting for Bernie Sanders in 2016), a political orientation he inherited from his father. But his dad won’t have any talk of jet fuel and steel beams. “He is not down with 9/11 Truth,” Ujueta said. “My dad is very smart, he was a botanist, he’s a skeptic. My dad is a very educated man. He is almost militantly progressive.” His mother, meanwhile, isn’t very political and doesn’t like to argue about the attacks.He sighed and said no one in his family shared his understanding of 9/11, nor did any of his friends. “I basically can’t talk about it.”I asked what it’s like for him to be the only person he knows who thinks this way. He paused for a long time and began to tear up.“I would say it’s really lonely.”
Ujueta
Bryan Ujueta, in a music video for Twin Sister's "Bad Street."
PHOTO: VIMEO
Trump 2016 Writes ‘Historic’ Letter To TruthersRichard Gage is an architect of 25 years and a member of the American Institute of Architects. He takes dance classes and martial arts classes each week. Driving around his neighborhood in the San Francisco Bay Area, he listens to KPFA’s “Guns and Butter” radio show. He also is the founder and CEO of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.Unlike Ujueta, Gage didn’t know anyone who died in the attacks. But he was bitten by the Truth bug nonetheless, around 2006. Soon he wondered why other architects weren’t organizing around what he called the obvious evidence that the attack was a controlled demolition.“It just began to turn my world upside down,” he told me over the phone. “I felt like I was in the Twilight Zone.”Not long after he saw the light, Gage huddled with a handful of architects at the firm where he worked until they too converted and signed what would become his group’s petition demanding a new investigation of the attacks. Today, he said, more than 2,300 architects have signed on. He has left his practice behind in favor of leading his Truther group, boasting of 400 presentations around the world, in 37 countries and 85 American cities.Gage came from a very different part of the political spectrum from Ujueta, one example of the ideological diversity of the movement.“At the time [of 9/11] I was a Reagan Republican, if you will,” he said. “Very conservative. I was actually rooting for Colin Powell as he was making his indisputable case for weapons of mass destruction and that we needed to go into Iraq and get those bastards.” These days he simply identifies as a libertarian, disgusted with the political system and both major political parties.“We’ve given our DVD to every congressman, Democrat, Republican, and not one of them has seen fit to take any effective action whatsoever of the worst crime of the century,” he complained.But one politician recently made an impression: Donald Trump.According to Gage, Trump is the only presidential candidate or major public figure who has written the Truther group a custom letter after being sent their DVDs and literature. Trump's campaign, Gage said, thanked the members of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth for their “continued support.”“Thank you for your book and DVDs,” read the email, which Gage forwarded to me. “Our advisors will investigate the claims made by the architects and engineers more thoroughly and draw their own conclusions from there. We appreciate your continued support. Sincerely, The Trump Campaign.”Gage and his group were starstruck. “Someone actually acknowledged we took the time to send them something and said they would look at it,” Gage said. “That’s historic at this level of politics, a presidential candidate.”Trump’s campaign did not respond to a request for comment.
Richard Gage
Richard Gage, founder and CEO of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, speaks during a presentation.
PHOTO: RICHARD GAGE
Apart from his travels and speaking engagements, Gage’s crusade has changed his life profoundly: His wife left him several years ago. “I was married when I learned about the truth about 9/11,” he said. “It’s very unsettling to most people. My wife was one of those people. While she agreed with the evidence that I was providing, she had a hard time living with it continuously.”“It was certainly one of the most difficult personal tolls on my life, having that be the primary cause of our divorce,” he added. “So everyone around knows as well that I am completely dedicated over the last nine years now to this subject.”“If I form relationships,” he said, “those relationships are second place to my mission.”‘This Is How My Son Died’Bob Mcllvaine lost his son, Bobby, in the north tower of the World Trade Center. He lives in a suburb of Philadelphia. He used to teach history at a private school in Haverford, Pennsylvania, outside Philadelphia, educating children with dyslexia. That’s where he met his wife, a reading specialist.“I don’t get depressed -- although maybe I’m always depressed,” Mcllvaine quipped over the phone. He doesn’t vote anymore. “I have made a journey politically -- I would never think of voting. I would move from this country in a moment’s notice if I could.”
Poster 9/11 Truth
Bob Mcllvaine, whose son died in the north tower of the World Trade Center, appears in an ad for "Remember Building 7."
PHOTO: REMEMBERBUILDING7.ORG
Identifying with the left, Mcllvaine doesn’t share Richard Gage’s enthusiasm for Trump (“an idiot”), but doesn’t have any faith in Ujueta’s man, Sanders, either.Bobby was 26 when he died. He graduated from Princeton in 1997, majoring in English with a minor in African literature. He set out for New York City right after school, where Merrill Lynch offered him a job as VP of media relations and offered to pay for his graduate studies. Bobby was thinking either Harvard or Penn. He started at Merrill a couple weeks before 9/11, a rising star.“He was just a phenomenal writer,” Mcllvaine said. "He was working on a book."Merrill Lynch’s office was across the street from the towers, but there was a seminar happening on the 106th floor of the north tower on 9/11, which Bobby was supposed to attend. His father doesn’t believe he ever made it to that part of the building. The fact that Bobby was one of the few bodies recovered within the first few days of the attack, along with the nature of his injuries, suggested he was near the ground floor when the north tower was hit.To Mcllvaine, the nature of his injuries suggest a lot more. “Bobby didn’t get hit by a fireball,” he said, referencing the fire from the fallout of the plane’s collision with the tower. “That’s what I know. Bobby must have been hit by a bomb.”He didn’t come to this conclusion right away. But after 9/11, Mcllvaine became very involved in the anti-war movement.“I just couldn’t understand why we were going to war for a criminal act like this,” he said. “I went everywhere, I spoke a lot, at campuses, at conferences. Spoke about the blowback of our foreign policy. Bobby was a progressive, loved to talk politics and social issues.”Mcllvaine spoke and traveled up until 2005, in Indonesia, South Africa, Ireland, Israel and the Palestinian territories, attending conferences on violence. He joined a group called 9/11 Families for Peaceful Tomorrows, and ended up traveling to Japan where he prayed with Buddhists. Eventually, he helped lead a march of 250,000 anti-war protesters in New York.“I didn’t want to be a victim," he said. "I wanted to have change."The turning point came when he attended the 9/11 Commission hearings.“I felt then that this whole thing has been a big lie,” he said. “People just don’t want to talk about it. That, to me, simplifies my life. I don’t have to bicker or complain with other 9/11 family members -- I just say, this is how my son died.”His status as the father of a victim hasn’t protected him from critics of the Truther camp. Rush Limbaugh once came after him. He also appeared on Bill O’Reilly’s show on Fox News, noting he was careful to do it via satellite in case O’Reilly tried to beat him up. But he also says that after one Fox News segment a few years ago, presidential candidate Mike Huckabee and Fox host Geraldo Rivera both told him footage of WTC 7 looked like a controlled demolition to them.Mcllvaine also said he gets anonymous calls from the CIA or FBI encouraging him and saying they agree it was an inside job.“If you really decided to look into this, there’s no doubt in my mind you would become a so-called 9/11 Truther.”
9/11 Truth
An example of the many charts, memes and graphics put out by proponents of "9/11 Truth"; this image disputes the official account of how American Airlines Flight 77 crashes into the western side of the Pentagon Sept. 11, 2001.
PHOTO: COMBATREFORM.ORG
‘It's Like I’m A Leper’The common thread between these three believers, and others I spoke with, is the sense of isolation from regular social scenes and the reinforcement from the tightly knit 9/11 Truth community.“It’s brutal. I will never volunteer to talk about it,” Mcllvaine said. “In my circles, people ignore it. It’s like I’m a leper. I don’t see many people anymore.” He says his wife supports him, but doesn’t want to talk about how Bobby died. She says it doesn’t matter, even if his theories are true, because it won’t bring her son back. “If she started talking about that she wouldn’t have any friends.”When asked if most of his friends come from the movement these days, Mcllvaine said it was indeed a saving grace. “I know so many people through 9/11 Truth.” Richard Gage, too, said about half of his friends are 9/11 Truth activists. His colleague and fellow Truther, Steven Dusterwald, said his “regular” friends simply do not want to hear about it. “We’re out to bowl,” they say. “We don’t wanna hear your crazy theories.”But within the movement, they have a safe space. Carrying around the belief that your own government took the lives of 3,000 fellow citizens a few years back is a fair bit heavier than believing the moon landing was a Hollywood production. Some, like Bryan Ujueta the bartender, rely on the wealth of literature online, proof that it’s not just his own wild theory. Others more directly involved, like Gage, Dusterwald or Mcllvaine, belong to a community that understands and accepts them.What’s more, they all believe that community, thanks to the disaffected millennial generation, is only getting bigger. “I think it will take about another 20 years,” Ujueta said. “In about 20 years people will start to piece things together.” Gage is optimistic his group is on the cusp of finally getting some respect.“I keep wondering, hoping, that this is the year that we get the breakthrough,” he said.
Flowers are shown at the 9/11 Memorial in New York on Veterans Day, Nov. 11, 2014. The flowers were placed on the names of veterans killed on Sept. 11, 2001.
PHOTO: SPENCER PLATT/GETTY IMAGES

Polling does show that millennials are far less trusting of the government than their parents. A 2014 survey by Harvard found that young people’s “cynicism toward the political process” has never been higher. “There’s an erosion of trust in the individuals and institutions that make government work — and now we see the lowest level of interest in any election we’ve measured since 2000,” polling director John Della Volpe said at the time. This year, a second poll from Harvard showed more of the same, with 83 percent of millennials showing “no faith” in Congress.“This is a more cynical generation when it comes to political institutions,” Volpe repeated this time around.It’s unclear whether disillusionment with politics will send Trutherism into the mainstream: as Ujueta himself noted, and Gage admitted, the theory remains a widespread joke on and off the Internet these days among the younger generation. While some millennials may view the movement as relevant as it was in 2001, many view it as a punch line. That alone is yet another bad break for the ostracized community.Near the end of our conversation, even Gage confessed he misses his life before 9/11 Truth.“It is tiring after nine years, I have to say,” he said. “I am an architect, I’d rather be practicing architecture. I’ve been full time as a 9/11 Truth activist for five years and I’m looking forward to going back to architecture. I make more money, I have more fun.”He paused.“But my country’s at stake.”CORRECTION 4:21 p.m. EDT: An earlier version of this article reported that Ujueta's brother and cousin died while serving in the Army in the Iraq War. Ujueta later contacted IBT and retracted his claim.

WayneMadsenReport: Former Mossad chief admits to helping Al Qaeda branch in Syria
 alqueda

In an interview with the Qatar-based news network Al Jazeera, Efraim Halevy, the former head of Mossad confirmed what many in the Middle East and around the world already surmised: that Israel provided "tactical" assistance to Jabhat al-Nusra, the Syrian affiliate of Al Qaeda, throughout the Syrian civil war.

The fact that Halevy chose the Qatari government-funded Al Jazeera to make his revelation is even more noteworthy considering the fact that Qatar is also a major financial supporter of Jabhat al-Nusra and Al Qaeda in Syria.

Reports from UN observers in the Golan Heights confirmed regular contact between Israel Defense Force officers and armed Jabhat al-Nusra and Islamic State terrorists at the Syrian-Israeli border.

Halevy's admission blows wide open the real reason the Obama administration is opposed to the release of the 28 pages from the 2002 joint Congressional inquiry on the intelligence failures that led to the 9/11 attack on the United States. WMR has spoken to sources familiar with the report's content who have revealed that the footnotes, where the "devil is hiding in the details," adds Israel, Qatar, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates, in addition to the obvious guilty state party, Saudi Arabia, to the list of countries linked to facilitating the deadliest single foreign attack on U.S. soil in American history.


Former Mossad chief Efraim Halevy [left] admits to tactical alliance between Israel and Al Qaeda affiliate on Al Jazeera.

Halevy's comments add to what WMR previously reported about comments made in a private conversation by one of Halevy's predecessors in Mossad that funding for the 9/11 attack was handled by the six largest US. banks in New York. The clear inference by the former Mossad chief was that the funding was well known to the Bush administration before the attack was carried out. 

Halevy's admission of a tactical alliance between Israel and a Syrian branch of Al Qaeda also explains the similar alliance between Israel and the 9/11 plotters in the months prior to the 2001 attack. The presence of hundreds of Israeli "art students," "mall kiosk vendors," and "furniture movers," all of whom were Mossad agents, in close vicinity to the Arab airplane hijackers from 2000 to 2001 points to the Israeli-Al Qaeda tactical alliance being more enduring than it has been in Syria. 

The real reason why Senator Charles Schumer and House Speaker Paul Ryan, in addition to Barack Obama, have erected significant barriers to the 28 pages being released in full is that they fear that the details buried in the footnotes will expose Israel and other Gulf states as responsible parties in the 9/11 attack. And if the proposed Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA) became law, which it will not since Obama has promised to veto it, Israel and Saudi Arabia could find themselves stripped of sovereign immunity from lawsuits and facing thousands of plaintiffs in U.S. courts.

Halevy said it was "humane" for Israel to provide medical assistance to wounded Syrian terrorists but that such "humaneness" would never be extended to Shi'a Hezbollah fighters from Lebanon who have been fighting against the Sunni jihadist terrorists in Syria.  Israel's "humaneness" was also shown for all the world to see in Gaza, where it murdered hundreds of children, old men, and women in incessant bombing attacks on highly-populated areas. 

Postscript on Mossad's "humaneness" --

Mossad showed "humaneness" in the radiation poisoning death of Palestinian leader Yasir Arafat, and the more recent death of Western Sahara liberation leader Mohamed Abdelaziz who reportedly died in an Algerian hospital after battling cancer. Abdelaziz's family contends that the leader of the POLISARIO liberation front was poisoned by Moroccan intelligence agents. Western Sahara has been fighting a decades-long battle for independence against Morocco, which invaded the former Spanish Sahara in 1975. Cancer weapons are believed to have been perfected by Halevy's "humane" Mossad and may have been successfully used on Arafat, who died from a form of fast-acting leukemia; Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, who died from fast-acting pelvic cancer; and now, Abdelaziz, who died at the age of 68 from cancer. Mossad is a close partner of the Moroccan intelligence agency.
 
Dick Gregory
Bandar buying political support in US and Europe WayneMadsenReport
bandarSeptember 6-8, 2013 -- Bandar buying political support in US and Europe

WMR has learned from multiple intelligence sources in Washington, London, Beirut, and Paris that Saudi intelligence chief Prince Bandar bin Sultan has paid off key members of the U.S. Senate and House leadership, as well as key ministers of the French government, with "incentive cash" to support an American and French "shock and awe" military strike on not only Syria but Hezbollah positions in Lebanon.

Secretary of State John Kerry has ordered all U.S. diplomats out of Lebanon in preparation for a U.S. strike on targets mainly in south Beirut and south Lebanon. Bandar was also chiefly behind the shipment of weapons to Syrian rebels from arms caches seized by Islamist Salafist and Muslim Brotherhood guerrillas in Libya from Muammar Qaddafi's forces. That operation, which was botched by a series of circumstances, including the dissemination of an anti-Muslim video on YouTube and a failed covert operation conducted under the auspices of a classified President Finding signed by Barack Obama and implemented by then-National Security Adviser and current CIA director John Brennan. The ill-fated covert operation that saw Libyan weapons being bought from Libyan guerrillas for transfer to Syria resulted in the 9/11/12 murder of the U.S. ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens and three personnel assigned to the CIA annex in Benghazi, Libya.

Rival Libyan groups loyal to Saudi Arabia and Qatar, respectively, also contributed to the failure of the weapons buying operation in Benghazi. Pro-Saudi Salafists were upset that pro-Muslim Brotherhood rebels were reaping huge amounts of cash from Libyan weapons being shipped on Qatar Airways cargo flights from Benghazi to Turkey for later distribution to Syrian rebels. Afghanistan veterans of the Saudi-funded Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, which battled Qaddafi's forces for a number of years and were members of Al Qaeda, got their revenge on Qatar and the CIA by attacking the U.S. "diplomatic annex" in Benghazi. The Obama administration launched a cover-up to keep secret the nature of the CIA's weapons transfer operation from Libya to Syria.


Prince Bandar (Mr. 9/11) is buying up members of Congress to vote for the Syria War Resolution.

Much of the money Bandar is using to buy off members of Congress and the French National Assembly originates from a $2 billion slush fund amassed by Bandar as a result of bribes paid to him by the British defense firm BAE Systems for a Saudi oil-for-weapons deal made with Britain in the 1980s. Over more than two decades, the Bank of England transferred some $2 billion to the accounts of Bandar and other Saudi officials as a deal "sweetener." British Tornado and Typhoon Eurofighter aircraft were provided to Saudi Arabia, in addition to Tornado upgrades and missiles.

Republican and Democratic members of the Senate and House leadership, including Senators Harry Reid, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Barbara Boxer, and Robert Menendez, as well as House Speaker John Boehner, Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, House Intelligence Committee chairman Mike Rogers, New York's Peter King, Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, and others have seen their campaign chests grow substantially as a result of Bandar's financial largesse, according to our multiple sources.
Wayne Madsen Report: Planning and Decision Aid System (PDAS) NFU page

cheneyFurther details on command and control system used to coordinate 9/11 incident

Wayne Madsen
Online Journal
May 1, 2010

On April 26, 2010, WMR reported: “Multiple U.S. intelligence sources have reported to WMR that a super-classified network with only some 70 terminals in select U.S. government locations handled the parallel command-and-control activities that permitted the 9/11 terrorist attacks to be successful.

“The ‘above top secret’ network bears the acronym ‘PDAS.’ WMR has not yet discovered what the acronym stands for, however, the system is limited to only a few hundred people with Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) Special Access Program (SAP) need-to-know access, in addition to the President and Vice President.”

WMR has confirmed from multiple sources that PDAS is the Planning and Decision Aid System (PDAS) that is used to support the operational capabilities to the Joint Staff at the Pentagon and Combatant Commanders (COCOMs). The PDAS system is used to network Special Technical Operations (STO) elements located within the Joint Staff, COCOMs (with a significant presence within the US Central Command), military service information operations organizations, and the intelligence agencies (including the CIA, National Security Agency, and Defense Intelligence Agency).

The Department of Defense officially defines PDAS as “the Planning and Decision Aid System (PDAS) is an automated information system protected program under Secretary of Defense (SecDef). PDAS supports the planning and execution of Integrated Joint Special Technical Operations (IJSTO).”

WMR has been informed that IJSTO operations have also been used to target foreign leaders for assassination, including Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic (unsuccessful) and Rwandan President Juvenal Habyarimana and Burundian President Cyprien Ntaryamira (successful aerial assassination in 1994). One of the chief promoters of PDAS and Special Technical Operations during the Clinton administration was Supreme Allied Commander General Wesley Clark.

Access to the PDAS network is usually accompanied with access to other intelligence systems, including the Secret Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRnet) and the Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System (JWICS), as well as the Non-classified Internet Protocol Router Network (NIPRnet).

PDAS has, since 9/11, been extended to Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom.

PDAS special technical and information operations training for users is conducted at the 704th Military Intelligence Brigade at Fort Meade, Maryland. The unit, according to its website, conducts “Signals Intelligence and Network Warfare” on behalf of Army, Joint Command, and National requirements. 

PDAS was developed from a prototype system developed by Hughes for NSA’s Joint Special Studies Group (JSSG) in 1983 that eventually linked military commands and intelligence agencies to STOs responsible for, among other signals intelligence (SIGINT) activities, hacking into Soviet government and military communications networks and key nodes. One such program that tapped into Soviet submarine communication cables, but was compromised by a Soviet spy inside the NSA, was code-named IVY BELLS.

PDAS supposedly saw its funding yanked after the fall of the Soviet Union. However, based on information recently received by WMR, PDAS continued to function with a new mission: coordinating covert U.S. special technical operations against governments and individuals in the Balkans, Rwanda, and then, on September 11, 2001, the United States itself.

TruthSeeker Israel Discount Bank ... 9/11

idbWhen the massive Madoff rip-off emerged, I pointed out Madoff’s close business connections to Ezra Merkin and Sy Syms Merns [born Seymour Merinsky in Brooklyn, 1926], who was a director of the Israel Discount Bank, an institution well-known for money laundering:

The latest massive financial scandal is the giant $50 billion pyramid or ‘Ponzi’ scheme run by a New York Zionist Jew, Bernard Lawrence Madoff. Madoff was chairman of the Syms business school at Yeshiva University with his partner, Sy Merns, a.k.a. Sy Syms, who has been a director at Israel Discount Bank (IDB) since 1991. The IDB bank is well known for its money laundering business.Syms and the Israel discount bank.The IDB is the Israeli bank at the center of the 9-11 funding matrix connected to the Bronfman family and Israeli military intelligence. IDB is the Israeli financial institution at the center of the Zionist crimocracy. (See: The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Israeli Network Behind 9-11, especially the section on Joseph Ciechanover, the former chairman of IDB’s New York branch.)On January 31, 2006, a controlling interest in the Bank was acquired by an investor group led by Matthew Bronfman and Rubin Schron. The deal gave Bronfman ownership of IDB’s wholly owned subsidiary, the Israel Discount Bank of New York. Bronfman is a younger brother of Edgar Bronfman Jr., chairman and CEO of Warner Music Group Corp.See: “Who is Bernie Madoff, the man behind the $50 billion fraud?” by Christopher Bollyn, December 12, 2008
http://www.ety.com/HRP/jewishstudies/madoff.htmTo understand the long-standing relationship between Commander Barak, Bibi Netanyahu, Larry Silverstein, and Seymour Syms [Merinsky], I recommend reading the 2001 Haaretz article entitled “Up in Smoke”, by Sara Leibovich-Dar. It reveals that Netanyahu and Silverstein were very close and spoke every Sunday. Why would Benjamin Netanyahu need to speak with Larry Silverstein on a weekly basis – for years – prior to 9-11?Here a few key extracts from “Up in Smoke”:Shortly after the events of September 11, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon called Larry Silverstein, a Jewish real estate magnate in New York, the owner of the World Trade Center’s 110-story Twin Towers and a close friend, to ask how he was. Since then they have spoken a few more times. Two former prime ministers – Benjamin Netanyahu, who this week called Silverstein a “friend,” and Ehud Barak, whom Silverstein in the past offered a job as his representative in Israel – also called soon after the disaster…Silverstein is also a member of the joint American-Israeli commission for housing and community development, which was established by former president Bill Clinton. In the early 1990s, he was involved in projects to build housing for new immigrants. The Israeli political world got to know Silverstein when he tried to create a free-trade zone in the country. He became friendly with Yitzhak Rabin, Benjamin Netanyahu, Ehud Barak and Ariel Sharon…

BushStole04 ... The false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 and the multi-billion dollar financial scams of Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford are, like peas in a pod, three mega-scams that have been carried out by Israeli intelligence and high-level Zionist agents in the United States - against the American people. The people behind these crimes are from the same foreign criminal network described in greater detail in "The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Israeli Network Behind 9-11" (Chapter VII of Solving 9/11). Key individuals of this network are involved in all three mega-crimes, e.g. Joseph Ciechanover. The very same Israeli/Rothschild funding entities, such as Israel Discount Bank, the Challenge Fund, and the Catalyst Fund are involved in all three crimes. The cover-ups of all three crimes have been tightly controlled by Zionist investigators, trustees, and judges in order to protect their fellow Zionist Jews. Understanding the Zionist control of these crimes and cover-ups helps us understand the nature of the crimocracy that controls the United States. Joseph Ciechanover, 77, former chairman of the board of Israel Discount Bank and El Al Israel Airlines, is one of the key individuals connected to three Zionist mega-crimes in the United States: the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 and the financial scams of Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford. (Photo - Moti Kimche in Haaretz) The investigations of 9/11 and the huge financial scams of the past decade are strikingly similar in their appalling lack of success. To be honest, the government investigation of the terror attacks of 9/11 is more aptly defined as a "non-investigation" because the most crucial evidence from the crime scene was confiscated and destroyed by the officials who were responsible for leading the investigation. Likewise, the investigations of the immense financial scams of Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford have utterly failed to identify the key players involved in the scams or to locate where the missing billions went.
JamesFetzer.blogspot 2+2= Israel Nuked the WTC on 9/11 By Don Fox (with Jim Fetzer

By Don Fox (with Jim Fetzer

“[I]f New York was outsourced to the Mossad and if the Twin Towers were nuked, then the nukes that were used must have been Israeli….[N]o alternative explanation is reasonable.”–Jim Fetzer
How many wars is the US supposed to fight for Israel?  How many of our sons and daughters must die? How much of our national treasury and moral standing must be squandered to insure Israeli domination of the Middle East?
Does any serious analyst actually believe that the Syrian government–which has been routing the rebels for the past several months–would jeopardize its standing in the eyes of the world by launching a gas attack when it has no reason to do so?  
Does anyone believe that doing so on the eve of the arrival of a UN inspection team would be rational?  Are the American people so stupid and gullible that we are going to fall for the same “song and dance” from the nation’s leaders who so completely misled us about the massive surveillance being conducted by the NSA?
The lied to us about Iraq. They lied to us about Libya. They lied to us about Iran. And what could be more obvious than that they are lying to us again about Syria? The US is wreaking havoc in the Middle East for Israel. We have become Israeli liars, enforcers, stooges and dupes!
The absurdity of the American position by claiming that it needs to punish Bashar Assad for the violation of international law was apparent today when Charles Heyman, a former British officer who edits The Armed Forces of the UK, observed that attacking Syria without a mandate from the UN Security Council would itself be a gross violation of international law, rather like the claims made during the Vietnam war that “they had to destroy the village in order to save it”! Under Barack Obama, the US has become an international joke.

Some historical background

We know that 9/11 involved close collusion between the neo-cons in the Department of Defense and the Mossad to create a pretext for the US to invade the Middle East and deconstruct the modern Arab states by converting them into statelets to promote the domination of the Middle East by Israel. We know that New York City appears to have been outsourced to Israel and that the destruction of the Twin Towers, unlike WTC-7, can only be explained on the basis of sophisticated arrangements of mini or micro nukes. We have proven this again and again and again. It is beyond reasonable doubt.
The most powerful proof, ironically, comes from dust samples collected by the USGS, which substantiate the presence of elements that would not be present in this form had the destruction of the Twin Towers not been a nuclear event. Those include:
Barium and Strontium: Neither of these elements should ever appear in building debris in these quantities. The levels never fall below 400ppm for Barium and they never drop below 700ppm for Strontium and reach over 3000ppm for both in the dust sample taken at Broadway and John Streets.
Thorium and Uranium: These elements only exist in radioactive form. Thorium is a radioactive element formed from Uranium by decay. It’s very rare and should not be present in building rubble, ever. So once again we have verifiable evidence that a nuclear fission event has taken place.
Lithium: With the presence of lithium we have compelling evidence that this fission pathway of Uranium to Thorium and Helium, with subsequent decay of the Helium into Lithium has taken place.
Lanthanum: Lanthanum is the next element in the disintegration pathway of the element Barium.
Yttrium: The next decay element after Strontium, which further confirms the presence of Barium.
Chromium: The presence of Chromium is one more “tell tale” signature of a nuclear detonation.
Tritium: A very rare element and should not be found at concentrations 55 times normal the basement of WTC-6 no less than 11 days after 9/11, which is another “tell tale” sign of nukes.
But the proof also includes the dramatic incidence of cancers associated with nuclear events, where, as Jeff Prager has observed, (a) Multiple Myeloma in the general population at a rate of 3-9 incidents per 100,000 people, but the rate was 18 per 100,000 among first responders; (b) that other cancers relatively unusual cancers have appeared among the responders, including non-Hodgkins lymphoma, leukemia, thyroid, pancreatic, brain, prostate, esophageal and blood and plasma cancers; and (c) that, as of March 2011 no less than 1,003 first responders died from various cancers. Those familiar with the available evidence who continue to deny that 9/11 was a nuclear event would appear to be either cognitively impaired or deliberately deceptive.

How it was done

WTC-7 was destroyed by a classic controlled demolition, where all the floors fell at the same time, none of its floors were blown apart, and there was a stack of debris equal to 12% of the original height of the 47-story building (about 5.5 floors of debris). The Twin Towers, by contrast, were blow apart sequentially from the top down; they were converted into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust; each floor remained stationary until its turn came; and, when it was over, the buildings had been destroyed below ground level: there was no stack debris (which should have been around 12 floors high). They did not collapse. They were blown apart using mini or micro nukes, which too many have continued to deny for too long.

YouTube - Veterans Today -
Indeed, if we assume that it was done by blowing one ten-floor cube per second, then the time for the destruction of the 110-floor North Tower would have been approximately 11 seconds, which is the time estimate of NIST. And when we note that the top three floors of the South Tower had begun to tilt and were blown as one, then the time for its destruction would have been approximately 9 seconds, which is also in agreement withe the time estimate of NIST. This appears to have been roughly how it was done, where we will continue to fine-tune the sequence as we continue.
But what is most striking is that we know the Twin Towers were nuked and we know that New York appears to have been outsourced to the Mossad. What we have now realized–it is like adding “2” and “2”–is that, if New York was outsourced to the Mossad and if the Twin Towers were nuked, then the nukes that were used must have been Israeli. And that by itself may explain why New York was outsourced to the Mossad. Israel has refused to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Israel does not allow inspectors. Unlike the US, whose nuclear arsenal is tightly controlled, Israel could use its nukes–as it appears to have recently done in Syria–without having to answer to anyone and without any risk of detection. Indeed, we have now proven this beyond a reasonable doubt, because no alternative explanation is reasonable.
Muftah There Is a “Palestine Exception” to Academic Freedom

In August 2014, Palestinian-American Professor Steven Salaita received an email from Phyllis Wise, the chancellor of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). He had just accepted a tenure-track teaching position in the university’s American Indian Studies program, and was due to start teaching in a few weeks’ time. Wise’s email notified Salaita that he was being terminated, effective immediately.

Salaita had already resigned from his position at Virginia Tech University, relocated his family to Illinois, and was actively preparing for his fall courses. He had also been closely following Operation Protective Edge, Israel’s brutal assault on the besieged population of Gaza that summer, which killed over 2,000 Palestinians. On his Twitter feed, Salaita had actively expressed his outrage over the wanton massacre. His tweets were sometimes eloquent and meditative, sometimes laced with profanity, sometimes strongly worded, and always impassioned. They were also the reasons why he lost his job at UIUC.

Salaita’s tweets included:

This is not a conflict between #Israel and “Hamas.” It’s a struggle by an Indigenous people against a colonial power. #Gaza #FreePalestine

— Steven Salaita (@stevesalaita) July 17, 2014

 

Let’s cut to the chase: If you’re defending #Israel right now you’re an awful human being.

— Steven Salaita (@stevesalaita) July 9, 2014

 

If it’s “antisemitic” to deplore colonization, land theft, and child murder, then what choice does any person of conscience have? #Gaza

— Steven Salaita (@stevesalaita) July 20, 2014

 

I repeat: if you’re defending #Israel right now, then “hopelessly brainwashed” is your best prognosis. #Gaza #FreePalestine

— Steven Salaita (@stevesalaita) July 20, 2014

 

#Israel’s bombardment of #Gaza provides a necessary impetus to reflect on the genocides that accompanied the formation of the United States.

— Steven Salaita (@stevesalaita) July 20, 2014

Although some had (unfairly) accused Salaita of professing “anti-Semitic” views, the problem, according to Chancellor Wise, was his “uncivil” demeanor in discussing Israeli atrocities against Gazans. As explained on the Chancellor’s Blog, Wise argued that Salaita had expressed his viewpoints using “personal and disrespectful words or actions that demean and abuse either viewpoints themselves or those who express them.”

But, Salaita (and many others) believed the real reason for Wise’s decision was pressure from wealthy donors who could not abide having a pro-Palestinian professor on campus. As journalist Nadeen Shaker wrote for Muftah,

The donors – largely pro-Israeli sympathizers– sent emails to Phyllis M. Wise, chancellor of the Urbana-Champaign campus, who ultimately withheld Salaita’s appointment. The emails, only three of which [had] been released to the public according to Salaita, threatened to withdraw and deny future funding to the university should Salaita’s appointment be finalized.

Many of these emails were made public, as a result of litigation over Salaita’s termination. In response to Wise’s unjustified actions, Salaita filed two separate lawsuits against the university, one to reinstate his employment and the other to release documents pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

After Salaita’s termination, heated public debate erupted around issues of academic freedom, civil rights, freedom of speech, and the Israeli occupation of Palestine. In the midst of it all, both the chancellor and Provost Ilesanmi Adesida resigned.

Throughout it all, Salaita received substantial support at the university in the form of student walkouts and a vote of “no confidence” for the university’s administration by over a dozen academic departments. More broadly, lectures and events at the university were canceled as part of a far-reaching academic boycott of the university. Many prominent academic organizations, including the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), the Modern Language Association (MLA), the Society of American Law Teachers, and the American Studies Organization (ASA), issued public statements condemning the university’s treatment of Salaita.

Fuck Civility stickers and buttons to support Steven Salaita (Photo source: Flickr).

On Thursday, November 12, the saga between Salaita and UIUC finally came to a close, after Salaita agreed to settle his claims against the school. Pursuant to the settlement, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign agreed to give Salaita $600,000 and pay his legal fees, amounting to nearly $1 million in damages. The terms of the settlement stipulate that Salaita will not seek employment at the University of Illinois in the future and will drop all claims against the school.

After the settlement was announced, Salaita wrote on his Facebook page:

We settled the case against UIUC today, and I am deeply grateful for the support and solidarity from so many individuals and communities. Together, we sent a strong message to those who would silence Palestine activists and limit speech on campus. The activists, students, academics, and others who spoke up with petitions, demonstrations, and investigations proved that grassroots organizing can make a difference. This is an important victory, even if the bigger fight isn’t over. At this point I am ready to move beyond this particular matter and continue doing what I love—teaching, writing, organizing, and contributing in whatever way I can to struggles for justice.

Although Salaita describes the settlement as a positive development and wishes to put the ordeal behind him, many of his supporters consider it a pyrrhic victory.

After learning of the settlement, over eighty academics issued a statement expressing concern about its terms and implications for freedom of speech, academic freedom, and the proper functioning of an academic institution:

On account of the manner in which Professor Salaita was terminated the American Association of University Professors censured UIUC for its failure to conform to sound academic practices as established in AAUP principles. We feel strongly that the monetary settlement of Professor Salaita’s legal claim does not address the underlying breaches of academic freedom and widely accepted standards for the conduct of academic governance that formed the basis of the AAUP sanction in this matter. For this reason we urge the AAUP to not remove UIUC from its list of censured administrations until such time as UIUC adequately addresses the larger pall of uncertainty that has been cast over the manner in which academic freedom is understood and respected at UIUC.

In an essay for In These Times, writer and political activist Marilyn Katz noted some of the many questions that will remain unanswered now that the lawsuit is not going to trial, including the identity of those who reported Salaita’s tweets to the university and the extent and nature of the effort to unseat Salaita from his position. Most importantly, Katz wonders, “Was Salaita’s treatment the result of a zealous individual or part of a larger scheme that has tried to squelch the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement by trying to pass laws in state legislatures, city councils and elsewhere making divestment illegal?”

While much of the political debate about Salaita has centered around academic freedom and civil liberties, there has been little focus on the nexus between these issues and the Palestinian question, or, as the Center for Constitutional Rights describes it, the “Palestinian exception to free speech.” As writer and activist David Green wrote for Mondoweiss:

Usually lost in this discourse, however, is the question of Palestine. Legal discussions of administrative procedures and a broader discussion of academic freedom obviously have their places. But Salaita is targeted because of what he has said about Palestine. He is targeted because at a national level, the Israel Lobby is afraid that it’s losing its control of the narrative. He is targeted because the Board of Trustees and Phyllis Wise have shown themselves to be not only vulnerable to pressure but actively politically repressive, especially regarding Chris Kennedy (Chair of Board of Trustees) and his actions against Bill Ayers and Kilgore.

Salaita is targeted because he would represent the first voice of Palestinian background on this campus who has a record of substantial and articulate advocacy on this issue. He could have set a precedent and by his presence and voice begun to change the atmosphere on a campus that, other than Francis Boyle (International Law), has lacked a bold and persuasive advocate for Palestinian justice among its faculty, and has lacked scholars who forthrightly address Zionist colonialism, ethnic cleansing, and racism in their work. Salaita represents the return of the repressed and a harbinger of genuine openness, and on this basis he has been further and slanderously repressed.

Electronic Intifada Thesis on Zionism - Joseph Massad

I.

European Christians oppress European Jews. They then demand that the Palestinians must allow European Jews to oppress them in turn and that the Palestinians must ignore if not celebrate their own oppression, while condemning European Christian oppression of European Jews.

II.

European Jewish Zionists also demand that Palestinians celebrate the oppression inflicted on them by European Jews (and non-European Jews mobilized by Zionism) and marvel as to why the Palestinians resist the understanding that European Jews have the exceptional right to oppress them because as Jews, they were oppressed by European Christians.

III.

European Jewish Zionists are horrified that anyone would suggest that they should celebrate the oppression inflicted on them by European Christians. They are equally horrified that anyone should suggest that the Palestinians should not celebrate the oppression inflicted on them by European (and non-European) Jews.

IV.

European and Euro-American Christian Zionists and European Jewish Zionists insist on the exceptionalism of Europeans. European Jewish Zionists recognize that European and Euro-American Christians should have the right to oppress anyone they choose except for Jews, while European and Euro-American Christian Zionists recognize that European (and other) Jews have the right to oppress only the Palestinians, and a motley array of other Arabs and Muslims.

V.

European and Euro-American Zionists, Christians and Jews alike, do not consider it controversial when modern Egyptians claim descent from the ancient Egyptians and the Pharaohs, nor do they consider it controversial when modern Iraqis claim descent from the Babylonians; or when the Lebanese claim descent from the Phoenicians, or when the Jordanians claim descent from the Nabateans. The only controversy is over the Palestinians’ claim that they are descendants of the ancient Hebrews.

At the same time, it remains utterly uncontroversial that modern European Jews, who are descendants of European converts to Judaism who were and are foreign to Palestine’s geography, claim instead that they, not the native Palestinians, are the real descendants of the ancient Hebrews.

VI.

When some Zionists admit their war crimes against the Palestinians, the expulsion, the massacres, the destruction of Palestinian cities and towns, the theft of land and property, they claim that they had little choice, as they were persecuted in Europe and needed a refuge, even if at the expense of the Palestinians. When Palestinians insist on resisting these Zionist crimes and claims, the same Zionists accuse the Palestinians of lack of sympathy with their oppressors and of anti-Semitism.

VII.

Zionism bases itself on three claims: (1) that the ancient Hebrews possessed ancient Palestine and nobody else lived there; (2) that modern descendants of European converts to Judaism are the direct descendants of the Hebrews; and (3) that, based on these two claims, modern European Jews have the right to take Palestine from the Palestinians.

While the first two claims lack any historical validity as attested to by mounds of historical evidence, even were we to assume that they were valid, they do not lead to the acceptance of the third proposition. Otherwise all European white Aryans would be claiming northern India as their home (as they claim to have originated there) and would seek to displace all Indians (dark Aryans) living there today and take their land away from them.

VIII.

Religious and secular Zionists use the Jewish scriptures to assert that God promised the ancient Hebrews the land of Palestine and that the Hebrews went there and killed the native Canaanites and took their country. They add that this gives modern European Jews the right to repeat that very same crime today by killing the native Palestinians and by taking away their country.

IX.

Israel claims to be of Asian Hebrew origins, yet it insists that it is part of Europe and the West.

X.

Zionism claims to be an answer to the loss of Jewish cultures (on account of Jewish assimilation in the diaspora) and to the threat of anti-Semitism, which threatens Jewish lives in the diaspora.

Yet it is Israel which has played a major role in destroying all diaspora Jewish languages (including Yiddish, Ladino and Arabic) and cultures and substituted for Jews instead an assimilated European gentile Hebrew-speaking culture. As for safeguarding Jewish lives, today and for the last six and a half decades, Israel, rather than being the safest place for Jews, has been the most dangerous place for them.

XI.

Anti-Zionists have interpreted the Zionist project; the point however is to undo it.

Resist Zionism: Boycott — Divestment — Sanctions!

Joseph Massad is Associate Professor of Modern Arab Politics and Intellectual History at Columbia University.

Why Brexit .... The Chosenites

brexit

In the Land of Blind Dupes the one-eyed Jewish psychopath is King.

Next time you watch a WWII movie or documentary detailing the great British victories in The Battle Of Britain, El Alamain, or D-Day, just remember… This Is What They Fought For!

Two world wars for freedom and this is what men and women died for. They would turn in their graves. Hitler had the last laugh after all!

Many Americans and Europeans aren’t aware of the fact that Jews are responsible for multiculturalism, open borders, white privilege, feminism, the EU, Cultural Marxism, and other policies that are leading to the total destruction of Western world.

The schools and the mainstream media is full of Holohoaxianity so that White people would not dare to even think that Jews might be doing something unacceptable in their countries. Cultural subversion 101… Marxist is a euphemism for JEW.

Liberalism & multiculturalism are both Jewish creations and both have always been heavily promoted/advanced by Jews.

Cultural Marxism and political correctness (these are social engineering “tools” which came out of the Jewish think tank known as the Frankfurt School, the Tavistock Institute and the Fabian school after WW2.

( dailystormer.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Frankfurt-School-Jews-.jpg )http://antizionistleague.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/zionist-tree2.png

For further study on the topic of the subversive nature of Jewish movements in the US and Europe, I highly recommend Kevin McDonald’s, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements.

Read it here and/or download for free in PDF:

http://www.prometheism.net/library/CultureOfCritique.pdf

The idea that race doesn’t exist was opened pushed by an anthropologist named Franz Boas and a broad network of his fellow Jews.

All the modern ‘liberal’ catchphrases such as ‘melting pot’, ‘equality’, ‘liberation’, ‘racism’, ‘race doesn’t exist’, ‘repression’, ‘oppression’, ‘ White privilege’ and so on have a Jewish-Marxist origin. Note the conservatives have the same ideology.

It’s no coincidence how similar the U.S. progressive is to the British, Australian, French, German, Irish, Spanish, Greek, Swedish (et al.) western democratic liberal progressive. They all follow an ideology passed down by Jewish Marxist, multicultural nation wreckers.

Sovereignty is not compatible with “progressive” agendas. Nationalism is the rebuttal to this Jewish marxist cancer. Liberalism is a mental disorder. Jews hate Whites, but many Whites are too dumb to figure it out. Multiculturalism, Who’s really believed in the first place it would ever work?!

“The Revolution won’t happen with guns, rather it will happen incrementally, year by year, generation by generation. We will gradually infiltrate their educational institutions and their political offices, transforming them slowly into Marxist entities as we move towards universal egalitarianism.” ~ Max Horkheimer, Marxist Jew of the Frankfurt School

The American Jewish Committee has made it public that the Jews control Immigration policies in both America and Europe, but vow to keep Israel a completely Jewish state. Senator Jacob Javits said “The AJC has opened the gates of immigration to America and Europe.”

“For perhaps another generation, an optimistic forecast, the Jewish community will be in a position to divide and conquer and enter into selective coalitions to support our agendas.” ~ Stephen Steinlight, “The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography.” Center for Immigration Studies, October, 2001.

In the USA it has been exclusively Jews pushing for this Immigraton. Do a few “immigration” searches on the Jewish Daily Forward to see how much Jews support mass immigration to the States. The greatest wave of mass immigration in England came when a Jew was immigration minister for the Labour Party.

There are around 650 Members of Parliament in London. If Proportional Representation were allowed there would be 1/3 of one Jewish MP. There are around 40.

The Prime Minster is Jewish, the Leader of The Oposition is Jewish, the Speaker is Jewish and even the Minister who runs our Nuclear Arsenal is a self proclaimed Israeli Agent. 90 per cent of all MPS are signed up Committed Friends of Israel. The next Labour MP to come in is employed at present as an Israeli Lobbyist.

Here Are The Names Of The Jews Behind The US Open Immigraton Law of 1965:

  1. Senator Jacob Javits (NY) 2. Congressman Emanuel Celler (NY) 3. Leo Pfeffer (Former President of American Jewish Congress (AJC) 4. Norman Podhoretz (Writer and Member of The Council of Foreign Relations) http://balder.org/judea/Hate-Speech-Laws-Immigration-Jewish-Influence-USA.php

Jewish involvement in the promotion of ‘hate speech’ laws, multiculturalism, mass immigration, denationalization, subversion of traditional values, and related items.

(balder.org/judea/Hate-Speech-Laws-Immigration-Jewish-Influence-Britain.php)

The third world immigration into Western nations, Jews has been in power positions to craft and force through liberal immigration laws and are responsible for each and every Western nation’s liberal immigration policy/laws, as all were orchestrated by a consortium consisting of the World Jewish Congress, the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, and B’nai B’rith.

They own the media and the people follow the media, they have no critical thinking. They will do exactly what is shown to them by their media heroes. Whoever controls the media is capable of presenting anything to the populace as normal.

Racism is simply a pathologization of a very normal instinct, preference for your own kind. All biological life forms breeding in and out groups, all the way down to bacteria. It is a function of nature itself.

It’s also the Jews greatest strength, it’s what held them together as a people without a country for so long. But Jewish psychologists decided to undermine this instinct in the non-Jew goyim by creating the concept of ‘racism’. What was their greatest strength as a people, they would forbid in others.

It’s really nothing more than an old Commie scam, the word itself was even coined by notorious Jewish commie rat Leon Trotsky (aka Lev Bronstein).

Racism wouldn’t be an issue if ethnically homogeneous nations were not undermined by mass immigration. Racism is a symptom of the problem, the problem is multiculturalism and diversity. You can’t get rid of the symptom or cover it up and expect the illness to be cured. Humans are a tribal society.

“The fascists of the future will be called the anti-fascists” ~ Winston Churchil

When organized Jewry began pushing for massive 3rd World immigration into the USA, they knew that most Whites wouldn’t like it. So Jews came up with the doctrine of “Political Correctness”… ie. a means to browbeat American Whites into keeping their mouths shut about the 3rd World invasion for fear of being branded a “Racist” or “Bigot” or “Xenophobe”.

Further, “celebrate diversity” is a sly way to trick Whites into actually believing that 3rd World immigration is good for the USA. Multiculturalism is cultural communism, political correctness is the social platform to spread it and force people to accept it through shame and guilt.

The Jews with their traitorous shabbos goyim are responsible for flooding our borders with hostile Islamic immigrants that don’t share our Western values. They have opened the flood gates of hell for us to divide and weaken us.

The Jews has deliberately imported Islam and all those Muslims to Christian democratic nations knowing full well that Islam rejects democracy! Their Koran says to kill all non believers where ever you find them and demand Sharia Laws! Islam is incompatible with Liberty.

The Kalergi Plan lays out the Jewish Masonic Genocide of the European races around the world in order to create mongrelized races to rule over that are just like them. The EU was created by Kalergi, and financed by Warburg, Baruch and Rothschild.

Masonic websites have verified this and celebrate it as a victory for Freemasonry.

The EU is Jewish Freemason Union number two. USA being Number 1. They wrote the plan. They funded it. They are executing it.

Just read “practical idealism” by Count Richard Nikolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi the architect of the EU. In it he calls for Europeans to be mongrelized with Blacks and Arabs and to be ruled over by Jews.

This evil agenda was sponsored by the Rothschilds, and implemented by the Rothschild-Kalergi pan-European superstate known as the European Union. Their stated objective is to eliminate the White race by mass immigration and miscegenation, and replace it with an “Eurasian-Negroid” race with lower IQ.

This new and more docile race is to be ruled by the Jewish master race, which Kalergi dubbed “the new nobility” of Europe. Then look at the history of your country, and notice who has been pushing for open borders, inclusion and mass immigration.

The conspiracy against the White race is Judeo-Masonic and they want to see the White race irradiated or blended in with the darker races. Once all of Europe is blended and the original culture watered down it will be easier for them to create a formal European superstate with total central control in Brussels.

The resulting people will have no culture (or culture created for them) and lower IQs (as a whole studies show) which is desirable for the ruling class. As alot of immigrants to Europe are from the third World they will be happy to accept the lower living standards that will inevitably follow the decline of the European nations, once the Whites are bred out.

Jews are white but they hate the White people, they seek first to rule them and then to destroy them. Masons are mostly, but not always, White and they do whatever is demanded of them by their head Freemasons, which is controlled by World Jewry.

Caucasians are the subject of an ethnic cleansing and they the Caucasians don’t really care to be honest, Kalergi’s plan has come to fruition thanks to the Caucasians and Jews.

White people celebrate their own genocide. White people push for White people to be a minority in their own Continent, what a spineless, toothless, devolved race of people…

Every 3rd world coveting trash scum point to Europe on their little maps and laugh at how they f— your daughter, kill your brother, take your house and your job and everyone will support them in their endeavours, even White people, you couldn’t make it up.

“Western Civilization is the only civilization that blames itself, while it’s enemies are destroying it.” ~ Jacques Barzun

Mass Immigration And The New Tower Of Babel (revolutionharry.blogspot.no/2011/06/mass-immigration-and-new-tower-of-babel.html )

Meanwhile Jews meet once a year in the World Jewish Council to discuss nationalism for their people!

These people are beyond criticism, it’s just unbelievable, they whine about persecution and anti-Semitism (their own special word for racism) if you so much raise a peep about any of their misdeeds.

The word is getting out. A hell of a lot of people see their tricks now. They’ve got to be called out on their hypocrisy and the powerful Jewish elite that is represented in every Western government pushing mass-immigration.

Imagine the hypocrisy of Jews starting “white privilege” conferences when they own the media, and they have representation in government in each and every Western nation.

Ask yourself this, White man: why are Jews behind almost every single anti-White article, book, movie, TV show, organization, law, and ideology? Why do Jews label themselves “White” when it’s convenient for them, but then spew hatred against Whites by, for example, demanding that all Whites be banished from the universities that Jews run?

Why is the social justice warriors (SJW) movement dominated so heavily by Jews, even though Jews are such a small portion of the population? All of these things aren’t a coincidence, White man.

The Jewish parasite is a hivemind, and it’s a hivemind that is absolutely determined to destroy Whites (the only race intelligent enough to pose a threat to Jewish power) and enslave everyone else under the iron fist of Jewish Bolshevism.

The hook-nosed vermin control the media in all White nations, and they will continue to use their control of the media in order to push an increasingly anti-White agenda. That is, of course, unless Whites decide to rise up and finally expel the Jewish parasite once and for all.

Daniel Cohn Bendit, a Jewish politician in Germany and France, who proudly said he’s a pedophile in a book and on a French tv, publicly said years ago “we need to overflow Germany with immigration and give these immigrants the right to vote, in order to definitively destroy the German people”.

Seems like this plan is going on really well: Germans are slowly disappearing by lack of children and forced immigration, and Cohn Bendit is still a revered figure in European politics, being regularly seen on tv and heard on radio insulting the Europeans and advocating their total destruction.

This is why Jews have been hated throughout history. It was Jews like this who pushed the Immigration Act of 1965, bringing non-white immigration en masse deliberately to fracture White society because they saw (and see) it as a threat.

Jews at the ADL of B’nai B’rith and American Jewish Congress openly discussed the need to make America “multicultural” 70 years ago. Now the same f—-rs call you “racist” for being unhappy with, or merely acknowledging, what they have done to you.

Hitler should have exterminated all these devious sons of bitches. Everywhere they go they work to destroy the dominant culture, in the name of social justice, but really for the benefit of the Jewish tribe.

How would this Jews feel if Whites deliberately pushed Arab and African mass immigration into Israel, then called them “racist” for not politely grumbling about their ethnic and cultural annihilation? Do I even have to ask?

Hitler once stated: “Jews were responsible for bringing Negroes into the Rhineland, with the ultimate idea of bastardizing the White race which they hate and thus lowering its cultural and political level so that the Jew might dominate.”

“I think there is a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century.

“Jews are going to be at the centre of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our LEADING ROLE. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive”. ~ Barbara Lerner Spectre (born ca. 1942) is a US-born Jewess.

She is a hardline Zionist and supports Jewish chauvinism in occupied-Palestine, and is head of Paideia – The European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden, an organisation funded by the Swedish government and the Wallenberg Foundation to promote Jewish ideology.

Through an organisation called One Sweden, which she heads, she promotes multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) against Europeans in their own homeland.

Sweden’s number of reported rapes have increased 1500% since 1975 when the started an open immigration policy for the 3rd World and according to UN, Sweden will become a 3rd World country pretty soon in future.

“What is the goal. It’s going to be controversial. The goal is to meet the challenge of racial interbreeding. The challenge of racial interbreeding that face us in the 21st century.

“It’s not a choice, it’s an obligation. It’s imperative. We cannot do otherwise. We risk finding us confronted with major problems. We must change; therefore we will change.

“We are going to change all at the same time. In business, in administration, in education, in the political parties. And we will obligate ourselves as to results. If the voluntarism does not work for the Republic, then the State will move more coercive measures.” ~ Nicolas Sarkozy (Jew), Palaiseau; 17.12. 2008.

Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881-1965: A Historical Review ( csulb.edu/~kmacd/books-immigration.html )

“Islamization of Europe a good thing” ~ Rabbi Baruch Efrati (Israeli Ynet News) (ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4299673,00.html )

Racism, properly defined, is a good thing. Racism is a survival mechanism. I’ll even accept the hypothesis that it is genetic and that it gives those with a proper complement of racist genes a heightened sense of who and what they are and helps them avoid those unlike themselves and also to avoid miscegenation.

Racism is simply a pathologization of a very normal instinct, preference for your own kind. All biological life forms breeding in and out groups, all the way down to bacteria. It is a function of nature itself.

Intelligence involves, in part, being able to discern differences that the less intelligent don’t discern. For example, a lower consciousness organism might see a forest full of trees and mentally categorize as all being the same.

An intelligent person with higher consciousness would immediately see that there are many differences in the trees and he or she would then want to know why and how they’re different and which are harmful and which aren’t. This is the equivalent of a proper definition of racism.

The term “racism” has been constructed as a weapon to disarm any native/ethnic race of people to surrender and allow the genocide of their ethnicity/race via miscegenation…

They will use the term “racist” to shame and guilt those who wish to defend their peoples, lands, and cultures from foreign takeover. So if you march in an anti-immigration protest, they will brand you as being a racist person… Such devilish tactics!

There is nothing wrong in wanting to defend your country’s people, culture, lands from foreigners illegally entering and occupying your land and using up all your resources.

For some reason, the secret elites of the world hidden behind close door meetings have an agenda to mix all peoples of all races with the White people so that they will eventually lose their distinction, cultures, customs, and instead we’ll all become watered down washed down one race of brown people who have no culture and no history or heritage except the new “one race” of the world.

It’s easier to control and manipulate the population if everyone is the same (mixed) with lower IQ. The Jews see the White race as a threat to their plan at world domination.

If everyone is mixed, that means nobody will care about their roots, history, heritage, culture, and will basically become easy human cattle for the gov’t to control. They will give you a new identity and brand you as “corporate cattle” and no more ethnicities tied to historical culture and nationalities…

You’ll simply be citizens of the Jew World Order that will own you as a sub-human cattle, groom you to continue to be slaves to the Jews who rule the world… This is why they are trying desperate to flood all the poor lower IQ 3rd World people into Europe, North America, Australia and other White countries.

To mix all the races and destroy the White race and prepare the way for the one world race where every human being will become rootless and without identity desperately waiting for someone to come along and give them an identity.

The word “Nazi” or “Neo-Nazi” is a very often effect tool used by the establishment… when the Communists, Socialist and Zionists feel that they are threatened they label and harrass their opponents with words “Neo nazi, Racist, Fascists, KKK”.

Jews created the KKK/Skinhead, Hollywood Nazi caricature movies which gives the National Socialist Germans and us Europeans who follow National Socialist ideology a bad name. National Socialists did not act like that.

“Racist”, “Nazi” and “White supremacist” are just hate slurs hurled at White people to prevent them from opposing their genocide. Jews have the most hatred toward European peoples which is why many people who are not European hate us today because of the anti White edjewcation system…

The time will come one day when the European people’s reclaim the land they have a birthright to, when they realize they have been fooled by the “chosen” people.

When you were born, you were a National Socialist, because at the time of your birth you subjugated yourself to nature and were humble before it. Now you’ve come to a point through degeneration, a point when you feel that you have no goal in life, but only an empty life filled with material gain and comfort.

You’re simply a National Socialist who has suffered through decades of degeneration. You can feel that there is something wrong with the world. Do not confuse National Socialism with ‘Nazism’ which was created by the victors of WW2 to make true National Socialism look bad and steer people away from the truth.

“Hitler was right about almost everything” – Jewish Director Stanley Kubrick (authentic quote)

FitzInfo Brexit another Jewish dialectic?

brexitUnless they have been paying very scant attention indeed, they should have noticed that the Brexit movement is overwhelmingly dominated not just by common or garden Zionists, but by hard-core Zionist ultras of a particularly toxic variety. For example, Boris Johnson, the part-Jewish de facto frontman for Brexit, describes himself as “a passionate Zionist” and supports with an equal passion both the corrupt City of London and mass migration to Europe.

But compared to Michael Gove, the other leading Tory Brexit spokesman and senior British cabinet member, Boris is a veritable peacenik. Gove has long been the type of Zionist shill about whom it is fair to say he never saw a Zio-war he didn’t like. A former journalist with the Zionist London Times newspaper, he once penned the following excruciating line about war criminal Blair: “I can’t help myself! I love Tony!”.

It’s worth pointing out, by the way, that Johnson, and more especially Gove, are close personal friends of British Prime Minister David Cameron, which makes it, therefore, more than plausible to suggest that their dispute over Brexit is pure political theatre for the gullible masses and nothing more.

Chris Grayling, another senior Tory Brexiter, is a member of British Israel Communications and Research Centre (BICOM), a Zionist lobby group. When he was secretary of state for Justice and Lord Chancellor, Grayling declared war on “extremists”, the working definition of which, he made clear, amounted to anyone who criticised Israel or the War on Terror.

 

 

Academic Freedom Conference 2014

Are there Limits to Inquiry?

Speakers: Kevin Barrett, Ph.D., James Fetzer, Ph.D., Nicholas Kollerstrom, Ph.D, Winfield Abbe, Ph.D. & David Robinson, Ed.D. & Stephen Francis, B.A.

topics: Holocaust Revision, 9/11 Truth, JFK Assassination

location: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Illini Union - Room 314A ... was held: April 26, 2014

 Sponsored by Scholars for 9/11 Truth, Facilitator - Steve Francis

fb ... ....yt conference videos twitter

AcademicFreedom.tv ..........#911truthUIUC

 

afcmain

isis

dd
q

Kevin Barrett

Kevin Barrett received a Ph.D. in African languages and literature with a minor in folklore from the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 2004, focusing his dissertation on the topic of Moroccan legend. He has taught English, French, Arabic, American Civilization, Humanities, African Literature, Folklore, and Islam at colleges and universities in the San Francisco Bay area, Paris, and Madison, Wisconsin. He is the founder of the website Muslim Jewish Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth and has numerous radio shows.  It is clear he was pushed out of the University of Wisconsin for his views on all the subjects addressed by this conference.  see VeteransToday/Barrett, TruthJihad, TruthJihadRadio and MUJCA Muslim Christian Jewish Alliance for 9/11 Truth.

 "...the so-called War on Terror, the book concludes that this concept is an empty propaganda ploy that must be exposed and rejected."
 
fas 

James Fetzer

A former Marine Corps officer, Jim Fetzer has published widely on the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and evolution and mentality. McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, he has also conducted extensive research into the assassination of JFK, the events of 9/11, and the plane crash that killed Sen. Paul Wellstone.  The founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, his latest books include The Evolution of Intelligence (2005), The 9/11 Conspiracy (2007), Render Unto Darwin (2007), and The Place of Probability in Science (2010).  He devoted himself to dealing with the most complex and controversial events of recent history on "The Real Deal" and his articles on Veterans Today

fq
 
kc

Nicholas Kollerstrom

Nicholas Kollerstrom, PhD, has two history of science degrees, one from Cambridge 1968, plus a PhD from London, 1995. He was an honorary member of staff of UCL for 11 years. He co-edited The Case Against War (Spokesman, comprising the CND legal arguments against the Iraq war) and then co-organised the Belgrano Inqury in 1986, publishing The Unnecessary War as its proceedings in 1998. In 2008 he received widespread publicity and ethical damnation owing to his interest in studies of the residual cyanide levels found in walls of the World War Two labor-camps. His recent book Terror on the Tube is the sole comprehensive account of the 2005 London bombings. It endorses the hypothesis of Islamic innocence.

kj
 
fu

David W. Robinson, Ed.D.

David W. Robinson, Ed.D., received a B.A. from Lewis and Clark College in Portland, Oregon, went on to an M.A. in Teaching (Social Studies) from Lewis and Clark College, and an Ed.D. in Educational Foundations and Leadership from George Fox University in Newberg, Oregon. He has taught courses in history, the humanities, and the social sciences at both the undergraduate and graduate level, as well as graduate courses in higher educational teaching, course design, assessment, and administration. Additionally, he has served as Department Chair, Program Chair, Vice President of Information Technology, and Vice President of Academic Affairs at several colleges. This has made him well acquainted with the practical and complex issues of academic freedom in action. Currently, he serves as an adjunct professor on three different university faculties, teaching graduate courses in education, information technology and e-commerce, and doctoral course work in educational foundations and leadership. His scholarly writing includes books and articles on the history of higher education, specializing in academic industrialization in America, as well as Protestantism’s role in the history of universities and schools. As a long-time student of American history, David has a strong interest in academic freedom, liberty of conscience, open access to historical evidence, and the implications of America’s loss of free inquiry in national discourse. It is his conviction that our current national-security state civilization is the main by-product of the loss of the checking-and-balancing power of reasoned dialogue in academic life. David is looking forward to further exploration of these themes at the conference.

 

fa
 
abbega

Winfield Abbe, Ph.D.

Winfield Abbe received an A.B. degree in physics from the University of California Berkeley, M.S. in physics from California State University at Los Angeles and Ph.D. in physics from the University of California Riverside. His main areas of research are low temperature solid state physics and theoretical elementary particle physics. He has also spent some time working on the long standing problem of Fermat’s Last Theorem which was recently solved, but the esoteric solution is known and understood by only a handful of people in the world. Dr. Abbe was a faculty member at the University of Georgia, Athens and an Institute of Science and Technology Fellow at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. During his career in academe, he has observed gross abuses senior faculty have administered to junior and the deterioration of the practice of academic freedom, which he looks forward to addressing during the conference.

fermat
 
  • swastika
  • Reject NeoNazis and the use of the swastika in reference to anti Zionism. It reinforces the Holocaust lie whose central theme is to blame the German people for an event that never occured and lay an interminable guilt upon them in order to extract hundreds of millions in reparations. ... No Jews died in gas chambers in Auschwitz or anywhere else during WWII. Hundreds of thousands of Jews did die from typhus, starvation and disease due to the chaos of war and Allied terror bombing of Germany. 60 million people died due to the Jewish Bolshevik Revoltution, Holodomor ... Zionists are trying to rub out this historical fact by endless Holocaust propaganda. MORE

9-11 Truth Search Engine ... Link 9/11, JFK Assassination, the Holocaust & ISIS ...... home

No main stream media sites including Wikipedia are searched on this custom search page .... only websites (see below) dedicated to exposing the truth about 9/11. This may include 'gatekeeper' sites such as 911Truth.org, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.org, Chomsky etc....by 'gatekeeper' we mean 9/11 Truth websites who never mention Israel, UK or Saudi Arabia as complicit in the 'inside job' attack. These gatekeeper sites provide an abundance of accurate information (to maintain credibility) on 9/11 ... we just help with the details they purposefully exclude. Google restricts results to 10 pages (100 items)

 

MS Excel Sort & Filter 2000 rows, 12 columns ...

Yes to 'no planes' and Israel nuked the WTC

Interactive Spreadsheet-9/11, JFK & the Holocaust

 

Index of terms   top
  • 51 Documents, Leni Brenner, CounterPunch Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis
  • 6,000,000 hoax started in 1869, 1919 book
  • 7/7 London bombings, MI6, MI5, patsies, terror drills
  • 9/11 in the Academic Community and meet Director and Producer Zuberi, Adnan
  • 9/11, Saudi Arabia, Brennan, hijackers found alive
  • Academic boycott of Israel
  • Academic Freedom and the Plight of our Universities, Harry Crowe Foundation
  • American Association of University Professors, AAUP
  • American Studies Association Israel boycott, ASA
  • Anti-semitic is a highly disputed volatile term.
  • Antisemitism Metpedia and Semitic definition (Wiki)
  • App, Austin ... predictably smeared by Anti Defamation League.
  • Ashkenazi, Khazar, Polish Jews
  • Aspen Strategy Group, Libby, Deutch, Rice
  • Assimilation
  • Association for Asian American Studies boycott of Israeli Universities
  • Balfour Declaration, Rothschild, signing table in Haifa museum.
  • Bay of Pigs, Bush, Barbara, Sturgis, Hunt, Zapata
  • BDS
  • Berthold, Richard "Anybody who blows up the Pentagon gets my vote.”
  • Bnai Brith, Chicago, Obama, CBT, London, BCCI
  • Boitel, Pedro Luis, anti-communist revolutionary who opposed Batista dictatorship, exiled
  • Breivik, fascist far right support
  • Brenner, Leni antiwar activist,
  • Britton, Frank Britton Jewish origins of Communism and its spread and book excerpt
  • Bronfman,
  • Butz, Arthur ... Holocaust rtist
  • Chabad Lubovitch, Jewish supremacism "the soul-root of a Jew is higher than any other creation" video
  • Chomsky ... 9/11 not a significant political event.
  • CIA, FBI, SS, Dallas police in Kennedy assassination
  • CODOH Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust
  • Cold War Hoax, Oppenheimer,
  • Communism, Jewish Roots  Britton page   below
  • Council on Foreign Relations, Iraq War
  • Jonathan Frankel's and Dan Diner's Oxford University study: "Dark Times, Dire Consequences: Jews and Communism"
  • Dreyfus Affair, unjust anti-Semitism
  • Defense Policy Board
  • Deligitimization of Israel
  • Dimona, Ben Gurion, Kennedy
  • Disecting the Holocaust
  • Duke, Dr. David Duke
  • Dulles, Allen and John Foster, ... Hitler, JFK
  • Empire of the City, London, Washington DC, Vatican
  • English Defense League
  • Eretz Israel
  • False Flag, Johnson-USS Liberty, 9/11, Tonkin-JFK
  • Finkelstein, Holocaust Industry book
  • Foundation for Individual Rights in Education FIRE
  • Fourth, Third, Second International, Trotzkyists, Comintern
  • General Jewish Workers League, the Bund, Russia
  • FBI classified document: response to JFK public doubt of Warren Report
  • Federal Reserve Act of 1913, Wilson, Brandeis
  • Fetzer, Jim Part 2 of Midwest 9/11 Truth Conference
  • Fractals, literary ... Pollock
  • Freedman, Benjamin, 1961 Speech, Balfour
  • Gas chambers, impossible numbers
  • Genova, Nicholas De Genova
  • Global Technology Partners
  • Google
  • Greife, Dr. Herman Greife Jewish-run concentration camps in the Soviet Union
  • Gulag, Griefe
  • Harriman, Averall
  • Harry Crowe Foundation, Academic Freedom and the Plight of Our Universities
  • Hayward, Joel
  • Hergesheimer, 6,000,000 hoax, 1869
  • Himmler, Goring, Eichman, Goebbels, Hess
  • 'Hitler Created Israel' - Zionist/Nazi collaboration
  • Hitler, Wall Street financed
  • Holocaust rt associated with 9-11 Truth as Zionist propaganda weapon
  • Holodomor, Ukraine
  • hydrogen cyanide
  • In Defense of Christian Hungary/religion, nationalism and anti-semitism".  Paul Hanebrick, Cornell
  • Irving, David
  • Jewish Bolshevik Revolution, Wall Street financing
  • Jewish expulsions, over 100 since 250 A.D.
  • Jewish Genome Challenge
  • Jones, Steven Jones ... funding, AE911Truth? nanothermite
  • Judea Declares War on Germany, Fri. Mar 24, 1933.
  • Holocaust analogies
  • Hungarian revolution (1919) was run under almost complete Jewish control.  Bela Kun's
  • I. G. Farben, Otto Kahn, Alger Hiss, Colonel House
  • Kay, Jonathon attacks academic freedom, Blakeney, National Post, Globalization Studies, Hall
  • Kuhn, Fritz 'anti-semite'.
  • National Council of the American Studies Association boycott of Israeli universities.
  • Neo-Nazi section NeoNazi, white supremicism, ADL
  • Kollerstrom, Nicholas Jabotinsky / Stern rtism
  • Lansky, Meyer. Miami, JFK, Carlos Marcello
  • Larudee, Mehrene tenure case
  • Lukianoff, Greg FIRE president
  • Mack, John E. alien abduction, academic freedom struggles.
  • Madsen, Wayne ... WayneMadsenReport
  • Marxism and Zionism
  • Matzpen, Israeli Communist Party
  • Mizrachi Movement
  • Mob, Jewish, Mafia
  • McCloy, Zelikow - Warren Commission and 9/11 Commission controllers. McCloy, Israel restitution, Shilumin, Adenauer
  • McMurtry, John
  • Moore, Michael Moore .. Ari / Rahm Emanuel
  • Mullins, Eustace, The Secret Holocaust, Secrets of the Federal Reserve, 1952
  • Nelson, Cary Nelson 9/11 Truth gatekeeper
  • Netanyahu, 9/11 & 7/7, ICTS, Shoe bomber, Underwear bomber
  • Novick, Peter
  • Nuremberg Trials, Holocaust legitimization, Dresden, Nagasaki
  • Obama, war on whistleblowers
  • Oligarchs, Rothschild, Khordorkovsky, looters
  • Oded Yinon, Greater Israel
  • Oppenheimer, J. Robert Oppenheimer, probable guilt
  • Pale of Settlement, Cheka, 5 Yr Plan, GM, Dupont, forced labor
  • Peled, Miko The General's son, one state solution
  • Pentagon Flight 77, al Qaeda, Islamophobia
  • Permindex, Piper
  • Peterson-Overton, Kristopher
  • Peto, Jennifer ..Jewish lesbian anti-zionist
  • Pike, Herzl, Rhodes, London School of Economics, Zakheim
  • Piper, Michael Collins meltdown, Cass Sunstein
  • PNAC, Zionist dominated
  • Pritzker, General Dynamics, AMEC, BEA Systems, Blackstone
  • Professors, Why they (not all) can't tell you the truth
  • Rakah, Israeli Communist Party
  • Rancout, Denis UofO, invited Palestinian speaker, & much more
  • Reform Judaism
  • ReichsBank, Schacht, Fed Reserve Bank of NY, Bank of England, Union Bank Corp. Banque de France.
  • Rothschild, Rockefeller
  • Rudolph, Gemar
  • Russian Revolution, 60 million dead from Jewish / Bolsheviks and Stalin, never mentioned in MSM.
  • Ryan, Kevin 9/11 Whistleblower, fired from UL
  • Saad, Omar jailed violist consciencious objector, Israel
  • Sand, Schlomo  Invention of the Jewish People
  • Savonarola, martyr
  • Scholars for 9/11 Truth, Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice
  • Sheehan, Daniel Meyer Lansky, Miami National bank.
  • Sheldon, June protected speech, settlement
  • Siddique, Dr Kaukab Key-note speaker at various Islamic and Inter-faith Dialogue Sessions
  • Strax Affair
  • Skull & Bones, Freemasons, Pilgrim Society
  • Silverstein, Larry WTC, no planes, mini-nukes, USGS data
  • Solzhenitsen, forced labor camps
  • Sophocles, plays
  • Stern Gang, collaboration with Nazis, Jews emigration to Palestine
  • Soviet Birobidzhan project
  • Sutton, Anthony, The Best Enemy Money Can Buy
  • Terror on the Tube, Kollerstrom
  • TheRealNewsNetwork ...Is this a Holocaust Truth gatekeeper website?  Yes...search on holocaust and you only find articles assuming the MSM version of the holohoax.
  • Transfer Agreement, Haavara
  • Trotsky, Weizmann, Revusky
  • UCIMC Gehrig submission
  • Umbrella Man, Fetzer, VeteransToday
  • Union of Israeli Communist Youth
  • Vulcans, Zionist foreign policy group, runnup to 9/11, Ledeen
  • Walker, George Herbert, Bush
  • Wall Street funding of Hitler and Lenin, Trotsky
  • Walt Mearsheimer Report, AIPAC, JWC
  • Weizmann, Chaim Weizmann
  • Weizmann, Ezer, The Battle for Peace
  • Wiesel, Elie imposter
  • Wise, Stephen
  • Zuberi, Adnan Why Professors Can't Tell You the Truth about 9/11.
  • Zionist exploitation of anti-Semitism, Pontius Pilot
  • Zundel, Ernst
  • Zyklon-B
NFU: 9/11 is the Achilles Heal of the Zionists/001% plans to dominate the world. Emboldened by the seemingly enduring Holocaust Hoax and the equally daunting juggernaut of JFK assassination cover-up, they schemed that a new 'Pearl Harbor' would usher in a new more sinister era of war profits. But they underestimated the power of the internet to level the playing field and unleash the inevitable success of millions of researchers exposing their miscalculation. Tibor Rosenbaum JTA archive link Rothschild to Rosenbaum to JFK to 9/11

 

Research  top
Progressive 1%
  • 12160 Jewish Nazi Officers, 1200
  • 9/11 Zionists
  • Aangrifan Why Hitler hated the Jews
  • Aangirfan Oded Yinon Plan
  • Abundant Truth Zionist Illuminati
  • Adonis Were the Bolsheviks Khazars? 
  • AfroCubaWeb Lansky Bronfman JFK, Piper Final Judgement
  • American Studies Association  ASA National Council Votes Unanimously To Endorse Academic Boycott of Israel The Council voted for an academic boycott of Israeli institutions as an ethical stance, a form of material and symbolic action. It represents a principle of solidarity with scholars and students deprived of their academic freedom and an aspiration to enlarge that freedom for all, including Palestinians.
  • ArtofService Hitler finance
  • Bain, Kent S.K. Bain is the former art director of the Weekly Standard magazine, where heThe Most Dangerous Book in the World worked with William Kristol, Fred Barnes, David Brooks, Tucker Carlson and others for over five years. During part of that time, the Project for the New American Century shared offices with the publication, and next door was the Philanthropy Roundtable, where Bain also art directed for Philanthropy magazine. The Roundtable at that point was under the leadership of John P. Walters, who went on to become President George W. Bush’s Drug Czar. In the mid-nineties, Bain was art director for the Oxford American magazine when it was published by John Grisham and located in Oxford, MS. In 2009, Bain helped author portions of U.S. Public Law 111-11.
  • Barefoots Mullins FED chart 1914
  • Bavarian Soviet Republic, Jews, Communist
  • BDSMovement WHAT IS BDS? In 2005, Palestinian civil society issued a call for a campaign of boycotts, divestment and sanctions (BDS) against Israel until it complies with international law and Palestinian rights. A truly global movement against Israeli Apartheid is rapidly emerging in response to this call.
  • Behindthe Matrix Hitler
  • BibleBelievers, Jews expelled from 109 countries, starting 250 AD.
  • Bibliotecaplayedes Fed chart
  • Bibliotecaplayedes Hitler connection
  • Bollyn / Barrett 9/11 radio interview
  • Boyle, Francis Boyle, University of Illinois Law professor,  YouTube, Impeach Obama  ...  You've seen them all over the country. Overpasses full of signs and people calling for the Impeachment of President Obama. Some have even got arrested for expressing this action against America's Commander-in-Chief. Like presidents before him Obama is facing congress to engage yet another sovereign nation in acts of war. The last time Professor Francis Boyle joined us he had returned from convicting former president Bush of War Crimes at an international tribunal
  • CODOH Committee for an Open Debate on the Holocaust
  • notes: Communism ... Britton page... Communism as an organized movement began with the publishing of ISKRA (The Spark) in December of 1900. Three years later, in 1903, the "Iskrists" joined with the Polish Social Democrats, the Jewish Bund, and others, to form the Russian Social-Democratic Labor Party (which later changed its name to the Communist Party). ISKRA, like every other Communist publication which followed, was mainly edited and controlled by Jews.
  • Cook, Jonathan, Wikipedia Oded Yinon
  • CSUN.edu Nazism
  • Darkmoon quest for Jewish gene
  • David Icke, Zionism vs Bolshevism, Churchill
  • Griffin, David Ray Griffin
  • Dean Henderson, Saudi Oil McCloy, Aramco
  • Debate: Is the Holocaust 6 million a cover-up for the 60 million who died in the first Zionist / Wall Street / NWO experiment - The Russian Revolution.
  • rus
  • Educate-Yourself Khazars, Lilienthal
  • Elhaik, Jewish Genome Challenge
  • Eustace Mullins.us
  • EzraPoundSpeaks Italy radio broadcasts, treason
  • FailedMessiah  Jewish Geneology Challenge
  • FIRE Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, Greg Lukianoff ... The mission of FIRE is to defend and sustain individual rights at America's colleges and universities. These rights include freedom of speech, legal equality, due process, religious liberty, and sanctity of conscience — the essential qualities of individual liberty and dignity. FIRE's core mission is to protect the unprotected and to educate the public and communities of concerned Americans about the threats to these rights on our campuses and about the means to preserve them.
  • FirstLightForum Hitler
  • Freedman 61  54  47
  • Global Research  rr
  • Global Research Oded Yinon, Eretz Israel, British Mandate, Zionist Plan for the Middle East
  • HelpFreeTheEarth  Silverstein  and 9/11 Jews
  • Hitler the Jew faked WWII
  • Holodomor, CT about: To serve as a portal to information about the Holodomor: it’s tragic history and it’s great relevance to today’s world. • To describe the work of the Connecticut Holodomor Awareness Committee, and how we can help educators and civic organizations host an event as part of your human rights, current awareness, history, or other educational programming.
  • HolodomorInfo The Bolshevik has new clothes! ... On January 13, 2010, Kiev Appellate Court posthumously found the Jewish Cheka guard Lazar Kaganovich guilty of genocide against Ukrainians for his participation in the 1932-33 Holodomor. The importance of the case is its historical aspect that legally explains the particularity of that historical event.
  • IamtheWitness Frank Britton ... any deep-down discussion of Communism and Marxism involves the Jewish question. We cannot honestly discuss the subject without revealing—and commenting on—the fact that the founders of Russian Communism were Jewish. 
  • IHR Jewish Role in Russian Rev
  • IHR Freedman Balfour and Zionist history, Herzyl
  • IHR Behind the Balfour,  Weisenthal fraud
  • IM  Gaz ford truck gorky pic
  • InformationClearingHouse, Oded Yinon translation
  • Internet Archive Sabatean Frankist, McCloy
  • Jewish Virtual Library Billionaires list
  • JenniferLake Israel bomb Mccloy, JFK
  • Jewish Genome Challenge Eran Elhiak
  • JFK and the Unspeakable
  • JFKTruth LBJ did JFK synopsis, good
  • Khazar Conspiracy
  • LaRouchePub Smedly Butler 1934
  • Leuchter Report and Wikipedia Rebuttal
  • Lindsay, Robert He (Raul Hilberg) also thinks that Holocaust Denial should not be criminalized and doesn’t worry too much about it. He has previously said that Deniers do scholars some favors by raising a lot of important questions about the Holocaust that scholars need to get cracking on.
  • Levant, Eastern Mediterranean, Mashriq

 

Jewish Geonem Challenge

jgc 

  • Debate: Jewish Genome Challenge, Eran Elhaik, Ph.D.  Is there a Jewish gene?  more

  • LiveLeak Holocaust lies ..1. That Jews are the "Chosen People of God." 2. That Palestine is "The Promised Land from God" for Jews only (despite the fact that Christianity was born there). 3. That the "Promised Land for Jews extends from the Nile to the Euphrates." 4. That Jews have been "homeless" for the last 2,000 years until Israel was created for them in 1948. 5. That the creation of Israel in 1948 has been a "fulfillment of a Biblical prophecy." 6. That Arabs have "hated" Jews for the last 2,000 years (despite the fact that Arabs have always been composed of Muslims, Christians, and Jews). 7. That Palestine was "an empty land” that did not have any Arab inhabitants when the Western the Zionist Jews created Israel on its land in 1948. more
  • MichaelDuchaine Illuminati Bloodlines, Hitler was a Rothschild
  • Midwest 9/11 Truth Conference, Urbana Free Library, Sept 2013, 2014, see NewsGazette articles and comments, anti-Semitic accusations, Mark Gehrig
  • ModernHistoryProject Bolshevik financing  more
  • ModernHistoryProject Baruch-Meyer-Rothschild connection
  • Mondoweis Max Blumenthal
  • Mondoweis Since the American Studies Association (ASA) voted overwhelmingly to boycott Israeli academic institutions in December, more than one hundred and fifty US. Presidents of IU, Kerr College withdrawn membership from ASA, ... The Protect Academic Freedom Act, would strip fed funds from any institution that boycotts Israel, also New York, Maryland, punish individual academics for engaging in political boycotts, total silence on Palestinian human rights, Israeli occupation strips Palestinians of any academic freedom, negatively impacts working conditions, because of 'special relationship' with Israel, historical complicity of Israeli Universities and an illegal, militarized occupation, 1940 Roosevelt establisted NDRC, National Defense Research Committee, funded 30,000 chemists, mathematicians and engineers in WWII war effort, Vietnam war, MIT known as Pentagon on the Charles, also Columbia University worked with Institute for Defense Analyses, Title VI funding revealed relationship between campuses and the State Department., t. ..
  • November criminals
  • Mullins WWII hitler financed by Warburg, Oppenheimer
  • Pieczenik, Dr. Steve, Tom Clancy novels, State Dept, Dr. Steve Pieczenik is a critically acclaimed author of psycho-political thrillers and the co-creator of the New York Times best-selling "Tom Clancy's Op-Center" and "Tom Clancy's Net Force" book series. He is also one of the world's most experienced international crisis managers and hostage negotiators. His novels are based on his twenty years experience in resolving international crises for five U.S. administrations.       Dr. Pieczenik received his B.A. from Cornell University, trained in Psychiatry at Harvard and has both an M.D. from Cornell University Medical College and a Ph.D. in International Relations from M.I.T... 9/11 was an inside job
  • Puppet99 Rothschild RR  copy
  • ReformedTheology Hitler, who financed, both sides
  • Reformed Theology  Bolsheik revolution
  • Rense Rothschild  and  Hiroshima
  • ResistanceReport Holocaust
  • SlideShare Hitler
  • SocioEcon blog Barrett, Israel settlements
  • SoilandHealth The Marriage of I.G. and Standard Oil under Hitler
  • StormFront Jewish Crimes Against Humanity
  • StuartBramhall How Bankers Engineered WW, Bolshevish, Nazi, Great Depression
  • TruthJihad Radio Bollyn MP3
  • TruthinLife Rothschild Cartel, Morgan also had close relations with Italian fascist Benito Mussolini, while German Nazi Dr. Hjalmer Schacht was a Morgan Bank liaison during WWII.  After the war Morgan representatives met with Schacht at the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland.
  • MemoryHoleBlog Disinfowars pc Higdon
  • NN forum  Russian Revolution
  • Peled-Elhanan Palestinian Professor
  • PressTV Barrett, Israel mic Sephardic Jews, Yemenese
  • RealJewNews  How the Jews Prompted a German Backlash  more
  • Reformation  Wall street and world revolution
  • RenewAmerica Baruch 1913
  • Sand, Schlomo Invention of the Jewish people
  • SaveTheMales, Hitler, James Warburg, son of Paul Warburg pumped money into Nazis.  in exchange for aggressive foreign policy.
  • Scribd Baruch Plan, Wilson, sell the war, War Industries Board
  • Siddique quote: For the Jews, I would say, see what could happen to you if the Muslims wake up. And I say to the Muslims, dear brothers and sisters, unite and rise up against this hydra-headed monster which calls itself Zionism. … It is obvious to us that Zionism is racism. … It is obvious to us that Zionism is genocide. It is obvious to us that Zionism is terrorism. But somehow the man living in the White House does not seem to know that. His silence is grim and dismal.
  • Silverstein
  • Stormfront list jewish expulsions
  • Sutton, Wall Street  Bolshevik
  • TheDaysOfNoah Rothschilds WW1
  • TheSecretTruth George Butler .. interviewed James Tracy, Nov 2013
  • VeracityVoice Historian – ‘Did Hitler Have Reason To Hate The Jews?’
  • VeteransNewsNow nazi / jewish collaboration
  • VeteransToday, Jim Fetzer ... The War on Truth: Research on the Holocaust can End your Career
  • VeteransToday MEET THE SUPREMACIST JEWISH REBBE MEACHEM MENDEL SCHNEERSON
  • JewWatch Yagoda, Stalin
  • ZionCrimeFactory WWI reparations funded Palestine
  • ZionCrimeFactory Psychic Pronouncements of Jews
  • Whale Mullins, Monopoly capitalist support for the Bolsheviks
  • Whale Opium Lords JFK assassination
  • Whale Mullins $5 Trillion Cold War Hoax
  • Wernerchon Chomsky Noam Chomsky and the Holocaust Deniers
  • Wired Jewish Expulsions
  • WTC7 sec, cia,
  • YouTube gas chamber hoax, Leuchter Report, no seals on doors, windows existed, no ability to control temperature, explosion proof switches. and Wikipedia rebuttal attack Leuchter's credentials not the facts.
  • YouTube Ezra Pound speeches
  • YouTube Mullins Baruch, Oppenheim banks start WWII
  • YouTube Slave, Columbus
  • YouTube hate
  • Notes: Veterans Today ..Yukon Jack Israel is like a bigger version of Heaven’s Gate cult, “If I don’t get my way I will castrate myself and everyone else with my A-bombs!”.  When you live within a lie, the subconscious directs your actions, the preparation of the Samson Option is Israel telling everyone that they know they are pathological liars.  The situation is laughably insane, not only are the myths of Israel fictions, Israel is ruled by imposters.  All of Israel’s prime ministers have Polish origins.
  • notes: Wikipedia In 1983, according to one source, Sand “took part in a heated exchange over Zeev Sternhell’s Ni droite, ni gauche: l’idéologie fasciste en France, and later drew the ire of Claude Lanzmann with his 2002 book in Hebrew, Film as History, in which he not only passed scathing judgement on Lanzmann’s Shoah, but (Schlomo Sand) also revealed that the film had been secretly funded by the Israeli government
  • AAUP American Association of University Professors, 9/11 Truth, JFK assassination, Holocaust Truth gatekeepers.  ...   Northwestern News (Jan. 6, 1997) (NW). Professor Robert M. O'Neil points out the troubling issues raised by Professor Butz regarding "university involvement-facilitation and attribution": (1) "however little it may have 'cost' the institution, this [webpage] was and remains a resource of substantial value to the individual faculty member"; and (2) that unlike Butz's book, where he is identified as a Northwestern professor, "no one would believe on that basis that the university sponsors, or even condones, his views . . . . But when one encounters Holocaust-denial on a professor's Web page . . . there is at least an inference of attribution or complicity."
  • ABCNews   Holocaust Historian Returning Award to Hungary,   Holocaust survivor and historian Randolph L. Braham said Sunday he is returning a high state award to Hungary to protest what he says are government efforts to rewrite history and exonerate the country from its role in the Holocaust.  Braham said the memorial was "a cowardly attempt to detract attention from the Horthy regime's involvement in the destruction of the Jews and to homogenize the Holocaust with the 'suffering' of the Hungarians — a German occupation, as the record clearly shows, was not only unopposed but generally applauded."    more
  • Amerherst.edu McCloy papers
  • AmericanHistory
  • BBC WW1, Bolsheviks, Germany
  • blog wwI propoganda
  • Chabad Lubavitch Schneerson ... Here the Rebbe declares that: “The Jewish people and God are literally one” !!! “…the soul-root of a Jew is higher than any other creation” VeteransToday
  • Commentary Mag Opposition to BDS ... What is most remarkable about this letter is that it goes beyond what too often passes for level-headedness in academia, namely a ritual denunciation of Israel followed by the argument that although everyone agrees that Israel is an international criminal, academic freedom is too precious to sacrifice for the sake of denouncing international criminals.
  • Dealbook.NYTimes  Blankfein toasted, Judaism
  • Dissident Voice Kennedy's Corporatist and Imperialistic presidency
  • Encylopedia Jewish...  Zinoviev and Kamenev were Lenin's inseparable companions and Jewish  (Britton)
  • FacingHistory Weimar Republic, Germany
  • Gilbert, Martin Gilbert  Amazon
  • Heart Holocaust bs
  • Heritage CNN mistranslates Rouhani on holocaust   Farsnews "After distorting the statements of our country's president, now CNN must be banned and proper legal action needs to be taken in this regard," Chairman of the Iranian Parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Commission Alaeddin Boroujerdi stressed on Saturday. "This action by the CNN meant betrayal of trust and it can be pursued and protested at," Boroujerdi added. On Tuesday, September 24, CNN's Christiane Amanpour conducted an interview with President Rouhani on the sidelines of the 68th Session of the UN General Assembly in New York which was full of not just mistranslations, but fabrication and falsification of the president's remarks about the Holocaust. While the Iranian president did not recognize the Holocaust, the CNN aired a translation which contained several words and sentences which were not uttered by the Iranian President. For a full detail of discrepancies, mistranslations and fabrications click here, here and here.
  • Hilberg, Raul Hilberg Ph.D. acknowledged that there was no budget, plan or order by Hitler for a World War II program to exterminate Europe's Jews. ... Wikipedia: He was widely considered to be the world's preeminent scholar of the Holocaust
  • H-Net reparation German Israel
  • Huffington Post Holocaust Deniers  ...Ira Forman, former CEO of the National Jewish Democratic Council, was named special envoy as the State Department released its annual report on religious freedom around the world. Forman replaces Michael Kozak, who had served in an acting role after Hannah Rosenthal stepped down last year.
  • JewishVirtualLibrary Russia
  • JewFAQ
  • JTA McCloy award
  • JTA Archive Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson and VeteransToday
  • OilEmpire.US Holocaust Denial No Planes and No Gas Chambers: Holocaust Deniers pushed hoaxes that sabotaged 9/11 Truth
  • Silver Investor PILGRIMS rockefeller city bank
  • USA Today OSWIECIM, Poland (AP) — Auschwitz survivors and Israeli officials on Monday marked 69 years since the liberation of the Nazi death camp in a ceremony that included a large group of Israeli lawmakers. The ceremony at the Auschwitz-Birkenau memorial took place on International Holocaust Remembrance Day, established by the United Nations in memory of more than 6 million Holocaust victims, and includes 1.5 million mostly Jewish victims who died at Auschwitz. Survivors walked through the gate that bares the infamous "Arbeit Macht Frei" (Work Makes You Free) sign and laid a wreath at the former camp's Executions Wall, where the inmates, mainly Polish resistance members, were shot to death. NOW DO THE MATH:  Auschwitz was only in operation for one and a half years,... that's 18 months or about 540 days.  It takes a modern mortician using natural gas about  90 minutes to cremate a body... with coal it would take substantially longer.... It is physically impossible to put more than one body in the chamber at a time and there were only 15 chambers. So at Auschwitz assume that it would take at least 2 hours per person to gas, cremate and  dispose of a body.  So now we have 3 million hours tallied to kill and dispose all the victims.  So lets assume at least 500,000 were shot, but you still would have to dispose of the bodies which would take time.  So, very conservatively lets take it down to 2 million hours to kill and cremate 1 million people.  The city of Atlanta, Georgia has a population of  about 1/2 million.  So .... the math says that twice the amount of people in Atlanta were killed and disposed of  in about a year and a half using only 15 'ovens' all while the perpetrator was carrying on a war on two fronts....this is ridiculous.  To say 1.5 million people died at Auschwitz is a bald faced lie.  Using these figures it would take 150 years to accomplish this.
  • Wikipedia Academic Freedom at BYU ... Academic freedom at Brigham Young University has been the subject of several controversies regarding the school, mostly focusing on its religious nature. In 1992, BYU issued a statement limiting academic freedom in certain areas, including language that attacked The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, and language that violates the university's honor code.  search terms: gospel encompasses all truth, limitations, contradict church doctrine, deride church, ultimate responsibility lies with president and board of trustees, faculty accept spiritual and temporal expectations of wholehearted church membership, yearly endorsement,  and BYU's academic freedom controversy has not always been limited to religious matters. BYU placed physics professor Steven E. Jones on paid leave in connection with an internal investigation that a paper he authored on the causes finding that the World Trade Center towers fell on 9/11 because of pre-set explosives might not have met "scientific standards of peer review" and his failure of "appropriately distancing himself" from the University in his statements regarding his explosive theory.[18] Mr. Jones retired while the investigation was in its early stages.
  • VillageVoice 9/11 Truth gatekeeper Bulow, Andreas von   ... secretary of state in the German Federal Ministry of Defence .. says 9/11 was an inside job.    Andreas von Bülow: The World's Most Respectable 9/11 Conspiracy Nut 
  • Wikipedia USER Shift/Change /People  so-called 'antisemites'.

Jewish Genome Challenge, Eran Elhaik, Ph.D.   It has been suggested in the scientific and popular literature that Jewishness is a genetic trait found in our genes and that worldwide Jews comprise a genetically distinct group with some Jewish communities being described as “population isolates” (e.g., Atzmon et al. 2010; Behar et al. 2010; Ostrer 2012). For example, Atzmon et al. (2010) wrote that: "European/Syrian and Middle Eastern Jews represent a series of geographical isolates or clusters woven together by shared IBD genetic threads." Behar et al. (2010) wrote: "The most parsimonious explanation for these observations is a common genetic origin, which is consistent with an historical formulation of the Jewish people as descending from ancient Hebrew and Israelite residents of the Levant." The cover of the book "Legacy" says:"Ostrer shows that Jews from different Diaspora groups are linked by the genetic threads that provide a biological basis for Jewishness." However, none of these blury descriptions of "genetic threads" are substantiated by any particular genetic nucleotides, haplotypes, or genetic regions and even after decades of genetic research, these ideas remain controversial among geneticists as well as historians and social scientists (e.g., Sand 2009; Elhaik 2013; Venton 2013) with some proposing that these notions are driven by non-scientific ideologies (e.g., Kirsh 2003). It has been further suggested that traits such as intelligence are more strongly associated with Jews than with non-Jews (Ostrer 2012). Based on these notions, genetic testing companies now offer genetic tests that promise to accurately determine one’s Jewishness. Recently, A.B. Yehoshua an Israeli writer and scholar proposed that "A Jew is a Jew because he chose to be a Jew and not because he was forced - because of biology or by some external social force, to define himself as a Jew" dismisssing any genetic notion of Jewishness. We therefore propose to put to test the claims that Jewishness is the genes.  MORE  and Daily Mail  Hitler-descended-Jews-Africans-DNA-tests-reve

Oxford Journal abstract ... The question of Jewish ancestry has been the subject of controversy for over two centuries and has yet to be resolved. The “Rhineland Hypothesis” depicts Eastern European Jews as a „population isolate” that emerged from a small group of German Jews who migrated eastward and expanded rapidly. Alternatively, the „Khazarian Hypothesis” suggests that Eastern European Jew descended from the Khazars, an amalgam of Turkic clans that settled the Caucasus in the early centuries CE and converted to Judaism in the 8th century. Mesopotamian and Greco-Roman Jews continuously reinforced the Judaized Empire until the 13th century. Following the collapse of their empire, the Judeo-Khazars fled to Eastern Europe. The rise of European Jewry is therefore explained by the contribution of the Judeo-Khazars. Thus far, however, the Khazar's contribution has been estimated only empirically, as the absence of genome-wide data from Caucasus populations precluded testing the Khazarian Hypothesis. Recent sequencing of modern Caucasus populations prompted us to revisit the Khazarian Hypothesis and compare it with the Rhineland Hypothesis. We applied a wide range of population genetic analyses to compare these two hypotheses. Our findings support the Khazarian Hypothesis and portray the European Jewish genome as a mosaic of Caucasus, European, and Semitic ancestries, thereby consolidating previous contradictory reports of Jewish ancestry. We further describe major difference among Caucasus populations explained by early presence of Judeans in the Southern and Central Caucasus. Our results have important implications on the demographic forces that shaped the genetic diversity in the Caucasus and medical studies.

 
Holocaust Revi_sion top
k Nick Kollerstrom, a principle at Whatreallyhappened.info ... is based in the United Kingdom and devoted to free inquiry into historical events.  This site exists to promote an open scientific, evidenced-based approach to historical enquiry. We do not believe or reject anything, though naturally we do form opinions. However, they are just that: opinions based on our current understanding of the facts. We are not emotionally attached to them and we would have no problem with changing our current positions on any subject if the evidence suggested we should. We are mainly, though not exclusively, interested in the Second World War and the German treatment of Jews during that conflict, since this is the area where free enquiry is most actively and efficiently suppressed by force of law and imprisonment in some countries and by taboo in all. The topic is protected from any objective investigation by an electric fence of emotion and insult, with the result that few other than those with a political axe to grind dare question the received story. We have no such axe. We have looked at the orthodox story and at the arguments brought against it byrtists, and we find that, at the very least, thertists have raised questions  which so far have not been satisfactorily answered. They are met with insults and ad hominem accusations of political bias, which, even if they are true (they are in some cases but not in others) are irrelevant, since the historical facts of what happened in the 1940s cannot be influenced by anyone's views today on anything. The reality is that those who promote the orthodox story are themselves also largely driven by emotion and political bias. On the whole, whatever their motives, it is the rtists, not the proponents of orthodoxy, who have looked for material evidence and applied scientific methodology. Background: Zoominfo d
 
Holocaust Revision and Academic Freedom  (articles)   top
Progressive links
1%
  • 9/11Review  The association of challenges to the official myth of 9/11  with (rtists) of the Nazi Holocaust of Jews is one of the more potent weapons in the arsenal of the apologists for the official myth, although its use so far has been limited. In a column in Scientific American atattacking the 9/11 "conspiracy theories" Michael Shermer states: The mistaken belief that a handful of unexplained anomalies can undermine a well-established theory lies at the heart of all conspiratorial thinking (as well as creationism, Holocaust denial and the various crank theories of physics). denier
  • American Studies Association  ASA National Council Votes Unanimously To Endorse Academic Boycott of Israel The Council voted for an academic boycott of Israeli institutions as an ethical stance, a form of material and symbolic action. It represents a principle of solidarity with scholars and students deprived of their academic freedom and an aspiration to enlarge that freedom for all, including Palestinians.
  • notes: App, Austin ... was an English professor at the University of Scranton who had defended Germany during World War II. He claimed that Germany didn’t desire to “dominate” Europe but rather was legitimately attempting to get raw materials. Once the war ended, App energetically denied German atrocities   SPLC
  • Brenner, Leni Zionist abbreviations. Leni Brenner was a prominent civil rights activist and a prominent opponent of the Vietnam War. ... books: Zionism in the Age of the Dictators, The Iron Wall: Zionistrtism from Jabotinsky to Shamir, Jews in America Today, and The Lesser Evil, a study of the Democratic Party. His books have been widely translated
  • Brodkin, Karen How Jews Became White Folks & What That Says About Race in America
  • Butshikan.net Dr Kaukab Siddique Average of Five Presentations every year on Islamic Related Topics and/or Feminism in South Asian and Middle Eastern societies. Invited Speaker at prestigious universities such as Cornell, Duke, Milwaukee, Montreal, Waterloo, etc.; Frequent Key-note speaker at various Islamic and Inter-faith Dialogue Sessions throughout Maryland, Washington DC, Virginia, and North Carolina.
  • Butz, Arthur  Amazon ...Professor A. R. Butz was the first (and so far the only) writer to treat the entire Holocaust complex from the rtist perspective, in a precise scientific manner. This book exhibits the overwhelming force of historical and logical arguments whichrtism had accumulated by the middle of the 70s. This new edition comes with several supplements adding new information.
  • Dissecting the Holocaust Amazon ... The blockbuster anthology that struck Holocaust orthodoxy a body blow from which it has never recovered. Dissecting marshals the work of more than a dozen researchers to subject the conventional historiography of the "gas chambers", the "six million", the postwar trials, and other linchpins of the extermination story to careful, precise, methodical, and withering analysis. Germar Rudolf on how chemical analysis gravely weakens the case for gassing in the Auschwitz-Birkenau crematoria, Carlo Mattogno and Franco Deana on the crematory ovens of Auschwitz, Robert Faurisson, Manfred Köhler, and Claus Jordan on how testimony was coerced and convictions manufactured, Fritz Berg, Ingrid Weckert, Carlo Mattogno, and Arnulf Neumaier on the technical and evidentiary absurdities of gassing claims for German trucks in gas chambers and at Majdanek and Treblinka, Udo Walendy and John Ball on analysis of photos alleged to depict the crimes or their locations, Rudolf on the evidence for Jewish losses during WWII, Jürgen Graf on myths about the concentration camps, and more. Dissecting's handsome design and format lend themselves well to the numerous illustrations, charts, and diagrams with which these leading revisionists advance the wealth of evidence the book offers against the Holocaust myth. This is a book -- the book -- that every revisionist needs to own, and to read.
  • Elie Wiesel Cons the World Elie Wiesel has said under oath that he has one, and that it is number A7713  Where's the tattoo?
  • Human Sciences Research Council of South Africa (HSRC) released a study indicating that Israel is practicing both colonialism and apartheid in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.8  jp
  • Freedman, Benjamin 1961 Speech, Balfour Declaration, Treaty of Versailles, Hitler financed by Wall Street.
  • GlobalFire Kollerstrom ... Holocaust, the mother of all hoaxes If the arguments of the Holocaust rev-isionists were as false as claimed, rev-ision there wouldn’t be a necessity for systematically destroying and even imprisoning anyone who engages in 'denial'. And since when do the sensitivities of a tiny minority outweigh the freedom of expression of the rest? The motivation for the invention of the Holocaust, apart from humiliating a beaten enemy, was to destroy all resistance against the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine and the genocidal treatment of the Palestinian people. What interest did the ruling elite have in the Jewish state? Apart from the fact that many - if not most - members of the ruling elite have a Jewish background, the Zionist project was always about controlling the Middle-Eastern oil reserves.
  • Debate Auschwitz, air raid shelter, gas chambers, search terms: Zyklon-B, delousing chambers, blue residue impervious to weather, chimneys built after war ended, glass windows and wooden doors, keyholes, too close to crematorium considering explosive properties of HCN gas, Auschwitz chemical plant produced synthetic rubber, medical and armament supplies, it was a labor camp, Block 11, Stammlager, August 1941 until Dec 1942, 16 months tops, sites reconstructed after the war, Zyklon B is basically potassium cyanide, produces an indelible blue stain on walls, amount of stain depends on concentration, duration of exposure, surface nature, weathering.
  • IronLight
  • IamtheWitness Ashkenazis are not the descendants of the Ancient Israelites
  • Jewish Genome Challenge Eran Elhaik, Ph.D.  It has been suggested in the scientific and popular literature that Jewishness is a genetic trait found in our genes and that worldwide Jews comprise a genetically distinct group with some Jewish communities being described as “population isolates” (e.g., Atzmon et al. 2010; Behar et al. 2010; Ostrer 2012). ...  none of these blury descriptions of "genetic threads" are substantiated by any particular genetic nucleotides, haplotypes, or genetic regions and even after decades of genetic research, these ideas remain controversial among geneticists as well as historians and social scientists (e.g., Sand 2009; Elhaik 2013; Venton 2013) with some proposing that these notions are driven by non-scientific ideologies
  • Lopate, Phillip Lopate wrote “it almost seems that the Holocaust is a corporation headed by Elie Wiesel, who defends his patents with articles in the Arts and Leisure section of the Sunday New York Times.”
  • Mondoweis Peter Novick novick It is perhaps unlikely that an obituary in the paper of record would have appeared without his publication in 1999 of the book The Holocaust in American Life, which provoked great controversy. As the Times‘ obituary notes, “Dr. Novick’s book drew wide and varying reactions from reviewers and academicians.” The book was largely a critique of Jewish-American culture and institutions, rather than Jewish-American politics and its relationship to Israel and U.S. foreign policy. 
  • Notes: Malekafzali Professor Farhad Malekafzali teaches political science at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. .. He has told students at rallies that Zionist Jews only began moving to Israel in the 20th century  ..  said that before any negotiations take place, Israel must withdraw from all territories won in the 1967 Six Day War ..  “Compare and contrast in depth the arguments advanced in Mearsheimer and Walt, The Israel Lobby and Plitnick and Toensing, The “Israel Lobby” in Perspective.”  FrontpageMag
  • NormanFinkelstein  Norman Finkelstein Holocaust Industry  ... “Anti-Semitism from the far right is largely a thing of the past,” said Dershowitz, who is also the author of The Case for Israel. “But anti-Semitism from the far left is becoming a very, very, very serious thing.” Dershowitz, speaking with intense passion, said anti-Semitism has plagued the rhetoric of a number of prominent professors who question Israel’s treatment of its Palestinian population.
  • Peto, Jennifer  thesis  The Victimhood of the Powerful: White Jews, Zionism and the Racism of Hegemonic Holocaust Education
  • notes: Jennifer Peto ... Wrestling with Zion: progressive Jewish-American responses to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, edited by Tony Kushner and Alisa Solomon and Prophets Outcast: a century of dissident Jewish writing about Zionism and Israel edited by Adam Shatz   ...  Marc Ellis, Sara Roy and Ella Shohat whose academic work focuses on anti-Zionism, Israel and Palestine. Jewish and Israeli historians and political scientists, including Ilan Pappe, Norman Finkelstein, Uri Davis and Joel Kovel   ...  g Jeff Halper’s An Israeli in Palestine: Resisting Dispossession, Redeeming Israel and Mike Marqusee’s If I Am Not For Myself: Journey of an Anti-Zionist Jew.
  • Rehmat Chomsky is a Crypto-Zionist

Zionist financing of the leaders of the Russian Revolution inextricably linked to the financing of Hitler and the so-called 'Holocaust'.

  • Scribd  I was now “David Cole, theJewish ‘Holocaustrtist’who’d been ‘hiding’ as DavidStein.” The story of my “outing””  was carried by The HuffingtonPost, Yahoo News, AOL News,The Guardian, Gawker, MSN, The Washington Times, AmericanSpectator, and PJ Media

  • Sutton, Anthony ... Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, NFU Copy
  • RadioFetzer blog There's a difference between having honest investigators such as Nick Kollerstrom talk about this subject and having Hitler-loving Nazis do so. However, I can't blame negative public opinion for rejecting such research inasmuch as it wishes to condone itself on the grounds that there's a qualitative difference between murdering millions of innocent people by forced labor, torture, and starvation, and murdering them with gas. To confront the myths that are held and promoted by Zionists by rehabilitating the Third Reich undermines the struggle against the real enemy, which is the Jabotinsky/Stern rtism that has hijacked the nationalistic impulses of the world's Jews - ironically serving to promote the pro-Nazi (and formerly Hitler-allied) element within Zionism that today rules the State of Israel. The state and professional organizations shouldn't be in the business of stifling scientific research, to be sure. Post a link to any petition to re-instate Nick, and I'll sign it.
  • Rev-isionists  Austin J. App Predictably App was viciously smeared by the Zionist Anti-Defamation League and media figures such as Walter Winchell and Drew Pearson.  Throughout his life, he was a devout Roman Catholic and fervently anti-Communist
  • GemarRudolph website
  • Sand, Schlomo Sand, The Invention of the Jewish People Leon T. Hadar review: “Countering official Zionist historiography, Sand questions whether the Jewish People ever existed as a national group with a common origin in the Land of Israel/Palestine. He concludes that the Jews should be seen as a religious community comprising a mishmash of individuals and groups that had converted to the ancient monotheistic religion but do not have any historical right to establish an independent Jewish state in the Holy Land. In short, the Jewish People, according to Sand, are not really a “people” in the sense of having a common ethnic origin and national heritage. They certainly do not have a political claim over the territory that today constitutes Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories, including Jerusalem.”
  • Siddique, Kaukab notes That takes us to Kaukab Siddique, who teaches literature and mass communications at Lincoln University, in Pennsylvania. He has used public forums outside the classroom to declare the Holocaust a "hoax." He cites writers like David Irving and the white supremacist Mark Weber. Siddique maintains that, in promoting Holocaust denial, he is simply speaking for the "other side" of the issue. But there is no credible "other side." No respectable historian advocates Holocaust denial.
  • Notes Sublette, Lori   A Northwest Career and Technical Academy teacher is accused of denying the Holocaust happened and telling students that the Nazis lacked the technology to kill so many Jews, one senior said.  Sublette told students that history textbooks have inaccurate information and Holocaust photographs were doctored or distorted. She also said Sublette said in class that some Holocaust photographs were actually taken during an earlier time period in Russia.  ReviewJournal
  • Scribd 51 51 Documents Incredibly, Avraham Stern, the leader of the notorious "Stern Gang,"late in 1940, made a written proposal to Hitler, by which the Jewishmilitias in Palestine, would fight on "Germany's side," in the waragainst England, in exchange for the Nazis help in resolving the"Jewish Question" in Europe, and their assistance in creating an"historic Jewish state." By this date, German troops had alreadymarched into Prague, invaded Poland, and had built the firstconcentration camp at Auschwitz. The deranged Stern had further braggedabout how the Zionist organizations were "closely related to thetotalitarian movements of Europe in [their] ideology and structure."Stern's obscene proposal was found in the German embassy, in Turkey,after WWII.Finally, I think Brenner was right, when he wrote, "This book presents51 historic documents to indict Zionism for repeated attempts tocollaborate with Adolf Hitler. The evidence, not I, will convince youof the truth of this issue...Exposing the Zionist role in the Nazis erais part of the scrutiny of the past, required of historians."
  • The Guillotine At Work
  • The Holocaust Never Happened and the CIA Killed JFK .... American Free Press  book ... The critical information available in this book destroys the hoax of the 6 million Jewish victims of Nazi Germany and exposes the enormous cover-up involved in the Warren Commission Report on the assassination of the 35th President of the United States, John F. Kennedy.
  • The International Conference to Review the Global Vision of the Holocaust Wikipedia 
  • Theness Ward Churchill, 9/11, Tenure, and Academic Freedom vs Standards  ...  The purpose of tenure is to protect academics from being fired because of their political views or the nature of their research or other academic pursuits. Originally it was designed to protect them from influences outside the university – namely trustees or donors who would try to use their money or influence to block or fire academics they didn’t like or disagreed with.
  • Notes: James Keegstra, Malcolm Ross, and Paul Fromm ... so-called hate-speech, holocaust cases, educators. 
  • TheNewHampshire Online   Holocaust lecturer makes statement on academic freedom  ...   Kevin Barrett, for controversially teaching a course on Islam. He dedicated one week of the class to the study of 9/11, which he believes was fabricated by the Bush administration. Though many are outraged at Barrett's opinion, Koonz firmly believes that academic freedom is imperative for the well-being of our society.
  • TruthJihadRadio  Henry Herskovitz of Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends (JWPF), a long-time pro-Palestine activist from Ann Arbor, Michigan, isn't afraid of asking the hard questions...and confronting censorship from within the Palestinian solidarity movement.  and TruthJihad  Psychology professor demonstrates: “Conspiracy theorists” OK; government dupes clueless, humorless Coast to Coast Radio just canceled its plans to broadcast a show tonight on my widely-read Press TV article on research suggesting that “conspiracy theorists” are saner than government dupes.  VeteransToday
  • TruthJihadRadioBlogSpot Jim Marrs
  • VeteransToday In the past two weeks, Veterans Today has published three pieces on Holocaustrtism by Alan Hart, and one set of reflections by Jim Dean and Paul Eisen ... false, misleading ...
  • VeteransToday Jim Fetzer  The War on Truth: Research on the Holocaust can End your Career
  • VHO The World's largest website for Historicalrtism! Quick Search Holocaust Handbooks The Holocaust Controversy A Case for open Debate ... "Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed immaturity. Immaturity is the inability to make use of his understanding without direction from another to operate. Self-incurred is this tutelage when the cause is not the same due to lack of understanding but of resolution and courage to its without the guidance of another use.
  • WhatReallyHappened.info access the actual monthly inmate tables for Auschwitz, as compiled by the Bletchley Park anaylsts from daily message transmissions from the camp itself to their HQ.
  • WikiSpooks Germar Rudolf had completed his doctoral dissertation in chemistry while working at the renowned Max Planck Institute in Stuttgart, when publication of his forensic study of the alleged gas chambers of Auschwitz caused university authorities to forbid him from completing the doctorate. In 1995 Rudolf was sentenced to fourteen months in jail for authoring the Rudolf Report; in the same year all available copies of Grundlagen zur Zeitgeschichte, a collection of up-to-date research on the Holocaust problem, were seized and destroyed by court order (the English-language version, Dissecting the Holocaust, can be purchased from IHR). Rudolf edits thertist quarterly Vierteljahreshefte für freie Geschichtsforschung, and is currently seeking political asylum in the United States. He has submitted a lengthy affidavit in support of David Irving's appeal of the adverse ruling in the Lipstadt trial.
  • ADL  HoHolo­caust rtist Bradley Smith, founder of the Com­mit­tee for Open Debate on the Holo­caust (CODOH), has reached out to George­town Uni­ver­sity to “inform” them that the university’s Jan Karski Insti­tute for Holo­caust Edu­ca­tion is pro­mot­ing Holo­caust myths for finan­cial gain. denier.
  • AmericanThinker Richard Baehr ... About: The right to exist and the survival of the State of Israel are of great importance to us.
  • AmericanThinker Hitler's Long Shadow over Israel ... Why do so many Arabs sound like Nazis when they talk about Jews? The answer lay buried for decades in the archives of the Third Reich. Then a generation of younger German scholars expanded their attention beyond the death camps of Europe to Hitler's activities in the Middle East. What they discovered: it was Hitler who financed the modern jihadi movement. Nazi-Arab collaboration was crucial to the Final Solution. The Third Reich financed and trained the Muslim Brothers of Palestine and Egypt in terrorism and focused their anti-modernity rage on Jews. One of the first people Hitler told about his plans to kill Europe's Jews was the head of the Muslim Brotherhood in Palestine, the infamous mufti of Jerusalem, Yasser Arafat's cousin. Hitler and the mufti shook hands on a plan to exterminate all the Jews of the Middle East. The Reich preserved the memo, the minutes, and a photo of their famous handshake.
  • Antisemitism   list of non American holocaustrtists / deniers: Fred Uchter,  Ger Honsik,  Wolfgang Frolich, Herert Schaller, Gredrick Toben,      , Michael Hoffan II, Richard Kriege, Hohn Tuson Bennett, Leonardo Clerici, Sidgfried Verbeke, Bishop Richard Williamson, Lady Michele Renouf, Paul Fromm, Christian Lindtner, Rober Faurisson,  Serge Thion, Germar Rudolf, Ernst Zundel,  Ursula Haverbeck, Rigolf Henniq, Konstantinos Plevris, Alfonso Penqas, Carlo Mattoqno, Norman Lowell, Dariusz Ratajczak, Flavio Goncalves, Oleq Anatolyevich Platonov, Nadin Ravski, Pedro Varela, Ahmed Rami,  Ditlieb Felderer, Bernhard Schaub.  American: David Duke, Mark Weber
  • Carol Yeager.net White Supremicist, wants to revive white-only Europe..... Elie Wiesel imposter... New website to challenge Elie Wiesel on Auschwitz tattoo and identity
  • Florida Holocaust Museum board: Carolyn Bass Michael P. Brundage Eva Gerson Housh Ghovaee Steven Greenbaum Michael A. Igel Brian Katz Helen Levine, Ph.D. Walter Loebenberg Natarsha Nesbitt Suzy Peraza Toni Rinde Lisl Schick Michael Sobel Brian Taub Joyce Tawil Rachael Worthington
  • BBC  Relatives' fury   ....  The BBC has admitted paying Dr Kollerstrom expenses, including the fare from London to Luton, where bombers Mohammed Sidique Khan, Shehzad Tanweer, Jermaine Lindsay and Hasib Hussain caught a train to King's Cross before the 2005 attacks which killed 52 innocent people.
  • Cohn, Werner unaware that Chomsky is Israel gatekeeper.
  • JCPA Since 2001, anti-Zionist discourse has found its way into classrooms and academic events at the University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC). At an academic conference held on that campus in 2007, the speakers claimed that Zionism was an illegitimate ideology and argued for the elimination of the Jewish state.
  • Jerusalem Post 2013 Dec. Romanian state TV airs Christmas carol about burning Jews, celebrating Holocaust ... Song includes lyric: "This is what the kike is good for, to make kike smoke through the chimney on the street." ... TVR3 said it did not select the carol but only broadcast songs that were chosen and compiled by the Center for Preservation and Promotion of Traditional Culture, which belongs to the eastern county of Cluj.
  • notes: Socialist Revolutionaries (who made common cause with the Russian Zionists, exemplified by its founder Zhitlowsky
  • JSpace  German University Fires Professor for Holocaust Denial .. The University of Aachen in Germany fired historian Vladimir Iliescu for claiming the Holocaust never happened in Romania.
  • JTA Germany commits to additional $800 million for home care for Holocaust survivors ...   Some 56,000 survivors are now receiving home care through the Claims Conference. The announcement of new funding comes amid controversy for the Claims Conference over revelations related to bungled investigations in 2001 that failed to detect a broad fraud at the Holocaust restitution organization. A document obtained last week by JTA showed that top Claims Conference officials were involved in the botched probes, including then-executive vice president Gideon Taylor and Berman, who in 2001 served as outside counsel to the Claims Conference. Claims Conference employee Semen Domnitser, a director of two restitution funds who was at the center of the 2001 inquiries, was found guilty earlier this month in federal court of masterminding the scheme, which ran up more than $57 million in fraudulent claims from 1993 until 2009.   search Stuart Eizenstat, Greg Schneider, fraud
  • JTA 1924 Mizrachi Founds New Jewish Colony in Palestine ... The corner-stone of a new Jewish colony in Palestine was laid today by the Mizrachi Zionist Organization. The new colony will be named Kfar Ivre (Hebrew Village) and will be financed out of funds of a loan granted by the American Jew, David Schnur. Greetings from various parts of the world were read at the laying of the cornerstone. Speeches were delivered by Sir Gilbert Clayton, Civil Secretary of the Palestinian Government, Rabbi Meir Berlin, President of the Mizrachi World Organization and others.
  • LawDigitalCommons When Academic Freedom and Freedom of Speech Confront Holocaust Denial and Group Libel: Comparative Perspectives
  • NewVoices Arthur Butz  ... comment: Academic freedom is something that Jews believe only Jews should have, not anybody else!
  • PJMedia  What makes Siddique different are a series of discovered emails in which Siddique called the Holocaust a “hoax” and “invented,” and states that Jews have “taken over America” by “devious and immoral means.” Pennsylvania lawmakers registered their protest, and Lincoln University itself called Siddique’s views “offensive.” In an interview with InsideHighered.com Siddique was questioned about his statements. He fell back on academic freedom, saying: I’m not an expert on the Holocaust. If I deny or support it, it doesn’t mean anything. He added with respect to Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the firebombing of Dresden: We can’t just sit back in judgment and say those guys were bad and we were the good guys. … I always try to look at both sides. … That’s part of being a professor.
  • Scholars for Peace in the Middle East
  • SPLC Holocaust
  • University College, London, one of Europe's greatest bastions of academic integrity, whose founder, Jeremy Bentham, defended intellectual freedom with the stirring words: 'As to the evil which results from a censorship, it is impossible to measure it, for it is impossible to tell where it ends.' AdamHolland blog
  • UofI Senate ThThe Senate Executive Committee (SEC), 18 standing committees, and various ad hoc committees assist the Senate in carrying out its diverse legislative functions involving, among other things, academic freedom and tenure, admission policies, student conduct governance and discipline, public engagement, educational policy, equal opportunity, budget and faculty benefits, general University policy, honor­ary degrees, the Library, the Statutes, and Senate procedures.
  • WhatstheHarm This French professor of literature is a Holocaust denier. This is illegal in France. He was removed from his university chair, and later tried under this law and fined €7,500.  and Germar Rudolf, Nicholas Kollerstrom, Fredrick Töben, David Irving, Robert Faurisson  .... all European scholars.
  • Wikipedia William Robinson In 2009 Robinson forwarded an e-mail to his "Sociology of Globalization" course, to spur class discussion, that had photos of the 2008-9 Israeli assault on Gaza paralleling photos of the German occupation of the Warsaw Ghetto during the Second World War. The e-mail was widely circulated and became the subject of media controversy, after it was revealed that the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a conservative pro-Israel lobbyist organization, pressured university administrators to punish him.
  • Wikipedia Norman Finkelstein In 2007, after a highly publicized row between Finkelstein and a notable opponent of hisAlan Dershowitz, Finkelstein's tenure bid at DePaul was denied.[1] Finkelstein was placed on administrative leave for the 2007–2008 academic year, and on September 5, 2007, he announced his resignation after coming to a settlement with the university on generally undisclosed terms.[2][3] An official statement from DePaul strongly defended the decision to deny Finkelstein tenure, stated that outside influence played no role in the decision.[4]
  • Wikipedia Mizrachi Movement    from List of descendants of Meir Katzenellenbogen (Karl Marx) The Mizrachi, HaMizrahi, an acronym for Merkaz Ruhani lit. Religious centre) is the name of the religious Zionist organization founded in 1902 in Vilnius at a world conference of religious Zionists called by Rabbi Yitzchak Yaacov Reines. Bnei Akiva, which was founded in 1929, is the youth movement associated with Mizrachi. Both Mizrachi and the Bnei Akiva youth movement are still international movements. Major figures in the Religious Zionist Movement include Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook who became the Ashkenazi Jews Chief Rabbi of the British Mandate of Palestine in 1924 and tried to reconcile Zionism with Orthodox Judaism. see JewishGen Communists, But with the help of the so-called Peasant committees it was possible to prevent a pogrom on the Jews which had already been prepared. Thanks to the Peasant Committee no pogroms were committed in Rzeszow, Dombrowa, Dembica, Mielec, Ropczyce and Radomysl.
  • WW2History Judaism and Communism .... to what extent was it possible at the time for people in any sense to seek to ‘justify’ the link between Judaism and Communism?
JFK Assassination top
fetzerjfk  James Fetzer & JFK50 Santa Barbaraa> ... On 22 November 2013, the Oswald Innocence Campaign hosted the premiere event to commemorate the 50th observance of the JFK assassination in Santa Barbara, CA, at the Fess Parker Doubletree Hotel. Presenting cutting-edge research on the death of our 35th President, which holds the keys to understanding what took place, it featured some of the best authors on some the most important evidence that clarifies and illuminates that tragic event in Dallas on 22 November 1963. The research presented advanced extensive, detailed evidence establishing that the assassination of JFK was a “national security event”, which involved crucial elements of the most powerful institutions in the American government, including the CIA, the Joint Chiefs, the FBI and the Secret Service, who conspired with the Mafia, anti-Castro Cubans and Texas oil men to remove JFK from office and replace his policies with those of Lyndon Baines Johnson.
   
JFK and Academic Freedom   (a(articles)  top
Progressive links
1%
  • 911Blogger Former University ofof Wisconsin lecturer Kevin Barrett's new book, "Truth Jihad: My Epic Struggle Against the 9/11 Big Lie," is due out this month. The work, a culmination of Barrett's now infamous class and his personal journey hitherto, is the most recent reminder of a higher education sore spot: academic freedom.
  • eBooksFromSusan I want to address a recently reported decision made by the Coalition on Political Assassinations, or COPA. Listed among speakers for the upcoming November 22-25 Dallas conference, is Judyth Vary Baker. This author of Lee and Me, a well-documented account of her romance with Lee Harvey Oswald, has much to offer on the fiftieth anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. But Baker was told last week there is “no room” for her at the meeting.
  • HiddenMysteries The Bronfmans and the JFK Assassination
  • Indymedia.UK 9/11 in the Academic Community: How Professors Analyze 9/11 & "War on Terrorism
  • JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why it matters. Barnes & Noble James Douglass. Douglass presents a very compelling argument that Kennedy was killed by “unspeakable” (the Trappist monk Thomas Merton’s term) forces within the U.S. national security state because of his conversion from a cold warrior into a man of peace. He argues, using a wealth of newly uncovered information, that JFK had become a major threat to the burgeoning military-industrial complex and had to be eliminated through a conspiracy planned by the CIA – “the CIA’s fingerprints are all over the crime and the events leading up to it” – not by a crazed individual, the Mafia, or disgruntled anti-Castro Cubans, though some of these may have been used in the execution of the plot. Israel? Ben Gurion?
  • JohnFriend JFK50 Santa Barbara, comments
  • Killgallen, Dorothy, killed for knowing too much about JFK assassination, syndicated columnist, personality with tremendous media reach.
  • Kroth, Jerry Amazon Prof. Jerry Kroth's 50th anniversary edition presents the single, most plausible theory of the assassination. It is based on the admissions of grassy knoll gunman, James Files, the deathbed confession of CIA spymaster, E. Howard Hunt, and the most recent scholarship to appear in the last decade. Based also in part on his earlier work, Conspiracy in Camelot, Dr. Kroth proposes that Lyndon Johnson, the CIA, and Mafia, acting in concert, carried one of the greatest crimes in American history.
  • MemoryHole blog  James Tracy is a guest on the most recent edition of the weekly radio program The Secret Truth, hosted by George Butler and Charlotte Littlefield. The segment aired November 9, 2013.
  • MemoryHoleBlog  in 1974 and subsequent Congressional investigations into the US intelligence community thru the early 2000s, an overwhelming majority of the US public (75 to 80 percent) recognized serious flaws in the Warren Commission and mainstream media’s strongly imposed conspiracy theory that Lee Harvey Oswald was the sole assassin
  • Majestic 12 (or MJ-12) is alleged to have been the code name of a secret committee of scientists, military leaders, and government officials, formed in 1947 by an executive order by U.S. President Harry S. Truman. The purpose of the committee was stated in the Wilbert Smith memo (see below) to have been to investigate the slew of reports of "flying saucer" sightings that were then being received by U.S. military intelligence and in particular to look into the possible physics and technology of propulsion of the aerial objects that were being reported. The formation of the committed is, because of the timing, widely believed to have been precipitated by the recovery of a UFO north of Roswell, New Mexico during July 1947.
  • Nation (softball, left gatekeeper) JFK’s Presidential Courage—June 10, 1963 Fifty years ago, Kennedy made a historic speech that brought America and the Soviet Union back from the brink. ... He had, with the help of brother Robert in the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, avoided a nuclear conflict with the USSR. Kennedy was very aware of how close he had come to helplessness. He and Khruschev reached an agreement at the very last hour, each desperate to wrest control of the situation from their armed forces. The terms of the agreement were kept secret (an undertaking by Kennedy not to attack Cuba in return for the withdrawal of the Soviet missiles). In the US, the event was interpreted as an American triumph in a battle of wills.
  • Pravda Ward Churchill and Death of Academic Freedom (part I) ... Churchill was fired from his position at the University of Colorado (hereinafter CU) after writing a controversial essay shortly after the 9/11 attacks, comparing some of those killed in the World Trade Center to Nazi leader Adolf Eichmann. ... Blaming American foreign policy for spawning acts of terrorism automatically made Churchill a pariah in the eyes of the legal system, just as Malcolm X’s “chickens coming home to roost” statement in the wake of the John F. Kennedy assassination made him an outcast during the early 1960s.
  • ProjectCensored 9/11 Film Festival Oakland Grand Lake Theater It’s the 9th Annual Nine Eleven Film Festival, Wednesday, September 11th, One to Eleven PM at the Grand Lake Theatre, Oakland. This year’s theme: Fifty Years of Betrayal: From JFK to Today. Many short films on 9/11 and the assassinations of the ‘60s will be screened. New feature length films include Bill Still’s, Jekyll Island – The Truth Behind the Federal Reserve; Project Censored: The Movie; NATO’s Secret Army: Gladio; and the evening feature: 9/11 In the Academic Community.
  • Slideshare FBI Classified fbi document admits to jfk murder cover up
  • StormFront A retired University of Minnesota Duluth professor known for his conspiracy theories on John F. Kennedy’s assassination, the 9/11 attacks and the Paul Wellstone plane crash has found himself in the news again — this time for claiming the U.S. government was involved in the Newtown, Conn., school shootings.
  • (above video) JFK at 50: The Who, the How and the Why"
  • Truth and Shadows "The faking of the Zapruder film and where the magic bullet really came from" an interview with James Fetzer  ...  “That means all the years and years of toil based on the presumption that the Zapruder film is a reliable clock for the timing of the sequence of the shots has been largely unproductive, because so much of it has been removed,” he says. With current advances in imaging and computer technology, the Zapruder film, easily the most compelling, dramatic, and iconic artifact from the assassination, can now be analyzed and scrutinized like never before. And as a result, its authenticity is being questioned like never before.
  • VeteransToday Nix film contradicts Zapruder:  More proof of JFK film fakery
  • VirtualJFK In the era of nuclear confrontation, John F. Kennedy attempted to prevent war six times during his short tenure as president. He didn’t live to face a seventh. Virtual JFK: Vietnam If Kennedy Had Lived takes up one of America’s controversial “what if” scenarios, examining the question: Would the U.S. have escalated the war in Vietnam if Kennedy was not assassinated in 1963? With insight and erudition, the film traces JFK’s presidency Π a 1,000-day term plagued with tense political stand-offs through rare and previously-unseen archival footage, offering nuanced accounts of the former president’s political decisions and, by extension, his probable response to the escalating conflict in Vietnam. Featuring unprecedented access into the leadership style of one of the nation’s most important leaders, Virtual JFK sheds new light on the man who helped avoid war in six crises and did not live to save America from the devastating war in Vietnam. and Twitter JFKsBackBone
  • VoiceOfRussia US Jewish group: Hawking "delivered slap" in face of academic freedom Photo: EPA A US Jewish organization slammed British physicist Stephen Hawking for pulling out of an Israeli conference because of pressure from pro-Palestinian activists.
  • WanttoKnow  Kevin Barrett believes the U.S. government might have destroyed the World Trade Center.
  • dwest 9/11 Truth Conference was held at
  • YouTube Daniel Sheehan, The Truth about the Kennedy assassination

 

  • CBSNews Release Of Jackie Letters Blasted ... A priest's diary of private conversations with Jacqueline Kennedy after her husband's assassination should never again be seen in public, the head of Georgetown University's Jesuit community said Monday. ... It's not about academic freedom, it's about another value — the value of the relationship someone has with a priest."
  • InsideHigherEducation has the university simultaneously defending the right of students, under the principles of academic freedom, to organize the conference, and criticizing how they have done so. The Israeli press has featured articles with headlines such as "Harvard to Host Conference of Hate," and a conservative American website has labeled the conference "Harvard's academic pogrom."
  • Herald Sun It was a beautiful day, Oct. 12, 1961. Kennedy received an honorary degree and met with then-Governor Terry Sanford. Kennedy’s mother was in the crowd as he spoke of the history of Carolina and its academic freedoms during University Day.
  • Holocaust Controversies CODOH "is a strange world": The Fetzer Fiasco A few days ago, conspiracy guru James Fetzer visited the CODOH rtist forum, likely encouraged by his friend Nick Kollerstrom. Kollerstrom (aka 'astro3') had earlier discussed Fetzer's defense of open inquiry into the Holocaust in an academic journal. ...Fetzer: If the Holocaust was real, then research will sustain it; and if it was not, then we all deserve to know. ... Those who are rational with respect to their beliefs make appropriate changes in what they accept, reject, and hold in suspense when new hypotheses and new evidence becomes available to them.
  • OilEmpire.us Operation Paperclip smuggled thousands of Nazi criminals into the US to help with the space program and the CIA, others were helped to relocate to South America, where some destablized local governments and helped institute fascism (Chile, Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay).
  • PBS Obama, Clinton ... 'honor' JFK at gravesite, PBS NewsHour will live stream events surrounding the 50th anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, beginning with the presentation of the Presidential Medal of Freedom ... Michelle, Hillary, Arlington National Cemetery. .... Lyndon Johnson replaced Kennedy in bestowing the first of now more that 500 recipients of the medal.
  • Political Assassinations  Among the speakers were Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, JD, MD (our founding president), Mark Lane, Peter Dale Scott, and Dr. Ernst Titovets (Oswald’s best friend). Also: Dr. Gary Aguilar, Robert Groden, Abraham Bolden, Dick Russell, Russ Baker, Joan Mellen, John Armstrong, Daniel Sheehan, David Montague, PhD (ARRB staff), Rex Bradford, Dr. Joseph Palermo, David Starks, Jack Colhoun, Bill Simpich, Andrew Kiel, Chris Pike, Greg Burnham, Joseph McBride, Stan Weeber, Wayne Smith, Ben Rogers, Bill Holiday, Mel Barney, Randy Benson, John Judge, John Potash and others.
  • the word university is derived from the Latin universitas magistrorum et scholarium (community of masters and scholars)
  • USHistory John F. Kennedy backed the civil rights movement and supported James Meredith's enrollment in the University of Mississippi. Fear that violent opposition to his attendance could erupt at any moment led to Meredith's having to be escorted to class by U.S. marshals.
 
 
9/11 Truth top
kevin A Skeptic on 9/11 Prompts Questions on Academic Freedom
NYTimes MADISON, Wis., July 26, 2006— Sipping on a bottle of water and holding a book about the history and future of Islam, Kevin Barrett ticked off a few examples of what he saw as evidence that the Sept. 11 attacks had been an “inside job.” ... As children zoomed by on tricycles and shot basketballs at a community center near his home, Mr. Barrett, 47, described how some news organizations (the French daily newspaper Figaro and Radio France International, in fact) had reported that an agent from the Central Intelligence Agency visited with Osama bin Laden two months before the attacks. He also said fires could not have caused the collapse of the World Trade Center towers at free-fall speed, as reported by the special Sept. 11 commission. “The 9/11 report will be universally reviled as a sham and a cover-up very soon,” said Mr. Barrett, who has been a teacher’s assistant or lecturer on Islam, African literature and other subjects at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, since 1996. “The 9/11 commission has its conspiracy theory, and we have ours.” NYTimes
9/11 Truth and Academic Freedom   (articles)  top
Progressive links
1%
  • 9/11Review  The association of challenges to the official myth of 9/11 with deniers of the Nazi Holocaust of Jews is one of the more potent weapons in the arsenal of the apologists for the official myth, although its use so far has been limited.
  • 9/11Blogger Chomsky Confronted on 9/11; Admits LIHOP is "conceivable" James Corbett The Corbett Report 5 November, 2009 A 9/11 activist recently confronted Noam Chomsky on his previous, well-publicized disparaging+remarks+about+9/11+truth. After spending several minutes repeating his tired arguments about the impossibility of 9/11 as an inside job, Chomsky then concedes that the notion that the Bush Administration knew of an impending attack and let it happen on purpose is "conceivable." Watch footage of the confrontation in the video player below:
  • 911inAcademia FoFormer AAUP General Secretary Recommends “9/11 in the Academic Community” Academic freedom protects scholars who report inconvenient truths from the uninformed, but, as Adnan Zuberi reminds us, academic freedom is also the responsibility of scholars to pursue the truth.
  • AHabit Despite the fact that Buckley is one of America's most prolific writers, he has said next to nothing about this part of his life. The best evidence is never publicly exposed. While with the CIA he published "God and Man at Yale: The Superstitions of Academic Freedom." He also worked with Eudocio Ravines on "The Road to Yenan", a book about the communist conspiracy to obtain world domination. According to Buckley, he left the CIA after a few months, but many believe it was decided that he would be more useful to the agency as an "independent" journalist. In other words, he was to become a key figure in covert operations Operation Mockingbird: CIA Media Manipulation. it is quite clear that William F. Buckley Jr. was in fact the Umbrella man on November 22nd 1963, because his calm actions, after the shots were fired, are his precision trademark.
  • CanadianCharger Jonathan Kay attacks academic freedom ... “My objective is to evaluate the content, value and veracity of the body of literature that both supports and criticizes the government version of history used to justify the invasions and domestic transformations that make up the GWOT (Global War on Terror).” ... Now, after receiving a $7,714 scholarship to investigate 9/11, University of Lethbridge graduate student Joshua Blakeney has found himself in Mr. Kay's crosshairs.
  • CitizensInquest Why Professors CANNOT tell YOU the TRUTH About 911! Discover why our academic leaders are gagged when it comes to speaking the truth about historical events; from 911 to Syria. Attend this FREE session and you’ll know why they dare not rock the boat when it comes to true academic freedom! · View a screening of the award-winning documentary 9/11 in the Academic Community
  • DavidRayGriffin and Cognitive Infiltration Former Chicago and Harvard law professor Cass Sunstein, who in 2009 was appointed by President Barack Obama to direct an important executive branch office, had in 2008 co-authored an article containing a plan for the government to prevent the spread of anti-government “conspiracy theories.” Arguing that such theories are believed only by groups suffering from “informational isolation,” he advocated the use of anonymous government agents to engage in “cognitive infiltration” of these groups in order to introduce “cognitive diversity,” with the aim of breaking them up.
  • ElectronicIntifada Academic Freedom and Professional Responsibility after 9/11 ... Attempts to undermine professors’ abilities to teach and do research are increasingly directed at scholars who seek to provide a contextualized and critical view of recent international developments and their interaction with US foreign policies and practices. ... Academic freedom can be defined as the right of scholars to have their ideas judged according to how well those ideas stand up to debate, rather than according to the power of the scholar her or himself.
  • Global Research Coming this fall, “9/11 in the Academic Community,” a Winner of the University of Toronto Film Festival, is a unique film that documents academia’s treatment of critical perspectives on 9/11 by exploring the taboo that shields the American government’s narrative from scholarly examination. Through a powerful reflection on intellectual courage and the purpose of academia, the film aims at changing intellectual discourse on 9/11 and the War on Terror.
  • InsideHigherEd  The University of New Hampshire is refusing to fire a tenured professor whose views on 9/11 have led many politicians in the state to demand his dismissal. William Woodward, a professor of psychology, is among those academics who believe that U.S. leaders have lied about what they know about 9/11, and were involved in a conspiracy that led to the massive deaths on that day, setting the stage for the war with Iraq. The Union Leader, a New Hampshire newspaper, reported on Woodward's views on Sunday, and quoted him (accurately, he says) saying that he includes his views in some class sessions.
  • LinkedIn William Woodward  teaches: psychology and race, pioneers of psychology, intro to race, culture, & power; co-founder of academic minor about race, culture, & power; critical historian of psychology investigating the neocolonial heritage of Western psychology; historian of Gestalt psychology, scientific biographer of international female and male psychologists, authority on the life and work of a pivotal 19th c. German philosopher - Hermann Lotze; member of the Religious Society of Friends (Quaker), peace activist.
  • International Center for 9/11 Studies took place at Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada during September 8 – 11, 2011

Jim Fetzer, challenging the superthermite theory of how the twin towers were demolished, and proposing that mininukes may have been responsible and the characteristics of the destruction better fit the data.

  • MemoryHoleBlog Tag Archives: academic freedom December 14, 2013 The Sandy Hook School Massacre: A Compendium of Research and Analysis
  • Mujca  I would like to clarify my comments in the State Journal (June 30) concerning the case of Kevin Barrett at the UW. Whatever one thinks of Barretts' ideas concerning what happened on September 11 (and I strongly disagree with them), two things must be understood. First, Barrett's views are protected under the canons of academic freedom if they are relevant to the subject matter of the class and are presented in a way that does not discriminate against students or prevent them from disagreeing.
  • Mujca Professor Donald Downs has apparently reconsidered earlier remarks proposing 9/11 truth as the possible equivalent of Holocaust denial, and saying that Kevin Barrett's views on 9/11 are "absurd" and evidence of poor judgment that should be taken into consideration when Barrett applies for renewal of his semester-to-semester position. Professor Downs, after thinking the matter over, has produced an exemplary statement in support of academic freedom, and should be commended for it. He has stated in a private email that he is considering looking more carefully at the issues raised by 9/11 truth activists--though the motivation, at this point, would be to debate us. That's fine. Professor Downs is a reasonable man, as his letter below shows, who is capable of thinking things through and modifying his previous opinions, however strongly held. In this respect, we need more people like him. As the John Albanese film puts it, Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime!
  • ProgressivePress Truth Jihad: My Epic Struggle against the 9/11 Big Lie ... Kevin Barrett's Truth Jihad: My Epic Struggle against the 9/11 Big Lie. The first humorous book on 9/11, and outrageously so. Barrett sends critics like Sean Hannity, neo-con politicians and the Secret Service packing. Topics: 9/11, academic freedom (Kevin lost his university teaching position for 9/11 Truth), Islam, autobiography, humor, why people can't see 9/11 was an inside job, bigotry, media bias, and return to American ideals.
  • Scholars for 9/11 Truth, Jim Fetzer
  • Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice members
  • Scientists for 9/11 Truth Academics Weigh In.... John McMurtry, professor of philosophy at the University of Guelph, Canada who was attacked by colleagues and faculty alike but retained his position; and William Woodward of the University of New Hampshire, who was similarly attacked by colleagues and state officials but was defended and retained by the university as coming under the banner of academic freedom.
  • SXU After American Airlines Flight #77 flew into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, Richard Berthold, then professor of classical history at the University of New Mexico, told a class of approximately 100 students in his Western Civilization course, “Anybody who blows up the Pentagon gets my vote.” Although this was an in class articulation of an opinion, Professor Berthold was reprimanded and not allowed to offer any more classes of Western Civilization. He was essentially driven out of the university when he took early retirement the following academic year.
  • TheTruthSeeker Gilad Atzmon
  • TruthJihadRadio  Henry Herskovitz of Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends (JWPF), a long-time pro-Palestine activist from Ann Arbor, Michigan, isn't afraid of asking the hard questions...and confronting censorship from within the Palestinian solidarity movement.
  • Veterans Today Zionism – The Greatest Criminal Ruse of All Time ...   The launching of Israel at the end of history, a state based on archaic Bible myths, is proving to be mankind’s greatest folly.  The Old Testament is now married to high tech weapons.  The human specie is threatened with extinction because now the Jews have a state to carry out out their lunatic agenda of world domination. Academic Freedom Conference
  • VeteransToday Pete Carroll, Superbowl Seahawks coach is a 9/11 Truther, ... grilled four-star general, Peter Chiarelli, forced him to lie ... WeAreChange, Guliani ... article by Kevin Barrett.
  • VeteransToday  2 + 2 = Israel nuked the WTC on 9/11, The most powerful proof, ironically, comes from dust samples collected by the USGS, which substantiate the presence of elements that would not be present in this form had the destruction of the Twin Towers not been a nuclear event. Those include: Barium and Strontium: Neither of these elements should ever appear in building debris in these quantities. The levels never fall below 400ppm for Barium and they never drop below 700ppm for Strontium and reach over 3000ppm for both in the dust sample taken at Broadway and John Streets.
  • WanttoKnow 9/11 Commission Report Questioned by Over 100 Professors ... alphabetized list. ..on David Ray Griffin: Griffin refuses to throw out possibilities simply because they are outrageous, outlandish or shocking; he lets the evidence speak for itself. The results are deeply disturbing. With admirable academic objectivity, Griffin refuses to indict or endorse any specific hypothesis. Rather he presents a substantial body of very disturbing evidence.
  • WashingtonBlog Two professors of structural engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (Dr. Joerg Schneider and Dr. Hugo Bachmann) said that, on 9/11, World Trade Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition  Tagesanzeiger
  • AEI Public opinion on conspiracy theories ... Fifty years after President John F. Kennedy’s assassination, the belief that more than one person was involved in his assassination remains the most widely held conspiracy theory in America. In an April 2013 poll, 59 percent said others were involved.
  • Daniel Pipes, Middle East Forum ... Critiques of the global academic march to the left tend to focus on classroom antics, silly statements to the press, articles with incomprehensible titles, and efforts to punish students who have the temerity to disagree with their radical professors. But books are more important than all of this. Books make up the heart of the scholarly enterprise. Articles disappear, press analyses vaporize, and classroom lectures effervesce; books endure. They build the edifice of knowledge and potentially acquire an influence across the generations.
  • FreeRepublic David Horowitz to Debate Ward Churchill at Academic Freedom Conference
  • MacMillan Academic Freedom in a Post 9/11 World ... Academic freedom has been a principle that undergirds the university since 1915. Beyond this, it also protects a spirit of free inquiry essential to a democratic society. But in the post-9/11 present, the basic principles of academic freedom have been deeply challenged. There have been many startling instances where the rhetoric of national security and terror, corporate interests, and privatization have cast a pall over the terrain of academic freedom. In the post-9/11 university, professors face job loss or tenure denial for speaking against state power, while their students pay more tuition and fall deeper in debt. This timely collection features an impressive assembly of the nation’s leading intellectuals, addressing some of the most urgent issues facing higher education in the United States today. Spanning a wide array of disciplinary fields,Academic Freedom in the Post-9/11 Era seeks to intervene on the economic and political crises that are compromising the future of our educational institutions.
  • New York University ... Academic Freedom in the Age of Permanent Warfare .     Speakers included Yeshiva University Professor Ellen Schrecker, Ewen Center co-director Marilyn Young, and NYU President John Sexton. Roger Bowen, from the Woodrow Wilson Visiting Fellows Program, warned in his keynote address that the increasing number of untenured faculty hired by institutes of higher education was a threat to academic freedom. Professor Stuart Ewen of CUNY, chaired a panel that delved into academic freedom and its theory and practice. NYU Professor of Middle Eastern Studies Khaled Fahmy headed a panel that explored academic freedom and the question of Israel and Palestine. Professor David Montgomery of Yale University led a panel on labor and the corporate university, and NYU’s Mary Nolan chaired a panel on academic freedom and high schools. and Joan Scott, Institute of Advanced Study • David Hollinger, Professor of History, University of California at Berkeley • Zachary Lockman, NYU professor of Middle Eastern Studies • Rashid Khalidi, Edward Said Chair in Arab Studies, Director of the Middle East Institute, Columbia University • Sheila Slaughter, Professor of Higher Education, University of Georgia • Andrew Ross, Professor and Chair of the Department of Social and Cultural Analysis, New York University • Deborah Almontaser, Founding Principal of the Kahlil Gibran International Academy • Joel Westheimer, Professor, University Research Chair in Democracy; Education Director, Democratic Dialogue, ..University of Ottawa • Gary Anderson, Professor of Education, New York University • Barbara Bowen, President, Professional Staff Congress; Professor of English, Queens College, City ..University of New York. Midwest 9/11 Truth Conference, Urbana Free Library, Sept 2013.
  • ShermanDorn ... I think Barrett, Jones, and Woodward are dead wrong on 9/11, but I will defend their rights to academic due process.
  • VillageVoice 9/11 Truth gatekeeper Bulow, Andreas von   ... secretary of state in the German Federal Ministry of Defence .. says 9/11 was an inside job.    Andreas von Bülow: The World's Most Respectable 9/11 Conspiracy Nut 
  • Wikipedia  9/11 Truth ...In the same year, 61 legislators in the U.S. State of Wisconsin signed a petition calling for the dismissal of a University of Wisconsin lecturer Kevin Barrett, after he joined the group Scholars for 9/11 Truth. Citing academic freedom, the university provost declined to take action against Barrett
  • USNews BYU takes on a 9/11 conspiracy professor ... "BYU is literally the example we use of a university that does not promise strong free speech or academic freedom protections," says Greg Lukianoff, the president of the Foundation for Individual Rights on Campus. ... Jones's paid leave will only add to the conspiracy theorists' sense that the establishment is out to get them. James Fetzer, the cofounder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, noted that President Bush met with Gordon Hinckley, head of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints ... Wisconsin state Rep. Stephen Nass
  • Wikipedia Peter Beinart Beinart was a vocal supporter of the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq but by 2006 as he published his first book, he "had concluded that it had been a tragic mistake", according to George Packer in The New Yorker. His second book, The Icarus Syndrome: A History of American Hubris, published in 2010, in Packer's words, "look[ed] back at the past hundred years of U.S. foreign policy in the baleful light of recent events [and found] the ground littered with ... the remnants of large ideas and unearned confidence [as demonstrable in] a study of three needless wars", the First World War, Vietnam, and Iraq. Vietnam was presented in the context of ozio (indolence[14]) in the wake of the necessary and successful World War II. WWI, Vietnam and Iraq were presented as each "based on an oversimplifying ism—Progressivism, liberal anti-Communism, and neoconservativism—and ... respectively, the hubris of reason, the hubris of toughness, and the hubris of dominance.[8]

WashingtonBlog,   these prominent, highly trained engineers all question the official account of 9/11 and want a new investigation...  Alfred Lee Lopez, with 48 years of experience in all types of buildings: John D. Pryor, with more than 30 years experience: Robert F. Marceau, with over 30 years of structural engineering experience: Kamal S. Obeid, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering from UC Berkeley and 30 years of engineering experience Steven L. Faseler, structural engineer with over 20 years of experience in the design and construction industry: Ronald H. Brookman, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering from UC Graham John Inman Paul W. Mason notes: David Scott says: Nathan Lomba states: Edward E. Knesl writes: Antonio Artha,with 15+ years of experience in building design Steven Francis Dusterwald: John S. Lovrovich: Travis McCoy, M.S. in structural engineering James Milton Bruner, Major, U.S. Air Force, Christopher Michael Bradbury: David Anthony Dorau Russell T. Connors, designed many buildings and other types of structures Lester Jay Germanio, 20+ years experience Daniel Metz, 26+ years experience Jonathan Smolens, William Rice, P.E., Marshall Casey Pfeiffer Paul A. Thomas Steven Merritt Kers Clausen Dennis Kollar, Doyle Winterton, American structural engineer (retired) David Topete The former head of the Fire Science Division of the government agency which claims that the World Trade Centers collapsed due to fire (the National Institute of Standards and Technology), who is one of the world’s leading fire science researchers and safety engineers, a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering (Dr. James Quintiere), called for an independent review of the World Trade Center collapse investigation. “I wish that there would be a peer review of this,” he said, referring to the NIST investigation. “I think all the records that NIST has assembled should be archived. I would really like to see someone else take a look at what they’ve done; both structurally and from a fire point of view. … I think the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable. Harry G. Robinson, III – Professor and Dean Emeritus, School of Architecture and Design, Dr. David L. Griscom x

lenin 
“The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.”

 
 
   
The Media and Academic Freedom (articles)  top
Progressive links
1%
  • Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack The Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack is a unique inter-agency coalition formed in 2010 to address the problem of targeted attacks on education during armed conflict.
  • MemoryHole Blog The greatest challenge to that status quo might be waged once those on the “left” and “right” move beyond their politics of imagined opinion and allegiance toward a common understanding of the oppressive forces arrayed against them.
  • MemoryHoleBlog  in 1974 and subsequent Congressional investigations into the US intelligence community thru the early 2000s, an overwhelming majority of the US public (75 to 80 percent) recognized serious flaws in the Warren Commission and mainstream media’s strongly imposed conspiracy theory that Lee Harvey Oswald was the sole assassin
  • MemoryHoleBlog Tag Archives: academic freedom ... December 14, 2013 The Sandy Hook School Massacre: A Compendium of Research and Analysis ... Beginning in the late 1960s Operation Gladio and its corollary maneuvers proceeded throughout Europe, spanning over two decades. Researchers and even the testimony of public officials have since proven that the series of seemingly random orchestrated bombings and shootings was intended to cultivate the necessary degree of anxiety and “tension” that would keep the populace tethered to police state authority and supportive of the right wing regimes preferred by Western powers.
  • NevadaGovernor2014 National Boy Scout Jamboree, FEMA False Flag operation July 2013. Video David Lory Van der Beek
  • Peter Kirstein Accuracy in Academia Seeks Clarification of Review of No University is an Island  Accuracy in Academia is one of several conservative organisations that is disturbed by the alleged free-thinking, free-wheelin’ progressivism of academia. They believe that postsecondary education is too progressive and provides fertile territory for the avante-garde and criticism of all things America. Some of these policing groups are aggressively pursuing an agenda of ideological exclusivity such as Students for Academic Freedom; others are more bipartisan and less driven by ideology such as FIRE. Academic Freedom Conference 2014 Champaign Public Library.
  • Professor Griff ... Maniacz,  is an internationally renowned educator, writer, producer, musician, platinum recording/spoken word artist, lecturer and founding member of the pioneering and revolutionary hip hop group Public Enemy. Author of the popular music business guide: Musick Bizness R.I.P. (Resource Information Publication), Griff stands as a highly acclaimed, seasoned entertainment industry veteran and sought-after resource on all aspects of the music business. An activist within both the conscious and hip hop communities, Griff currently stands as a permanent fixture on the international lecture circuit with his riveting and powerful discourse/book, the Psychological Covert War on Hip Hop. 
  • Scholars at Risk Scholars at Risk is an international network of institutions and individuals working to promote academic freedom and to defend the human rights of scholars worldwide
  • Straight Dope
  • TruthJihad US, Zionists waging genocidal war against Muslims: Kevin Barrett ... Press TV has conducted an interview with Kevin Barrett, a founding member of the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance, from Wisconsin, to further discuss the issue. Barrett is joined by Joe Iosbaker, Stop FBI Repression, from Chicago, and Daniel Pipes, founder and director of the Middle East Forum, from Philadelphia. The following is a rough transcription of the interview. ... Barrett: If the government were going to shut down all the media outlets that are inciting criminality against people like me, I guess they would pretty much have to shut down the entire mainstream media, which has been on an Islamophobic crusade ever since the pro-Israel coup d’état on September 11th, 2001.
  •  CampusWatch Critic Assails NYU Academic Freedom Conference [incl. Zachary Lockman] In October, 2007, the University of Chicago hosted, "In Defense of Academic Freedom," an event whose unifying theme was "the notion that Jewish groups have degraded the quality and breadth of discussion in the media and in Washington." Hardly the stuff of self-described progressives, but such is the state of discourse in the corridors of academia today.
  • CodesRIA International Conference :Academic Freedom and the Social Responsibility of Academics and Researchers in Africa: What are the new challenges? ... The Academic Freedom and Human Rights Programme has been established in CODESRIA since the early ‘90s. The initiatives developed have enabled it to be at the forefront of the fights that are being conducted for nearly two decades now for the defence of academic freedom and the social responsibility of African academics and researchers. The starting point of this programme was the adoption, in November 1990, of the Kampala Declaration (Uganda) which states, among others, that “Every African intellectual has the right to pursue intellectual activity, including teaching, research and dissemination of research results, without let or hindrance subject only to universally recognised principles of scientific enquiry and ethical and professional standards”.
  • Cinamon Stillwell Campus Watch, MEForum
  • Discover the Networks Horowitz, Soros tracking,
  • MiddleEast Forum
 
Academic Freedom
   
 Academic Freedom   (articles)  top
Progressive links
1%
  •  9/11 in the Academic Community ACADEMIA'S TREATMENT OF CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON 9/11 – DOCUMENTARY ... Whatever else is done by the men and women who work in our universities, it is essential, I believe, that large numbers of them stand sufficiently outside society intellectually to see, understand, and interpret what is going on. I find it troubling that so few—there are credible exceptions—have seriously engaged with the question of what actually happened on 9/11 and why. There are so many holes and limitations in the official version that it calls out for rigorous intellectual fact-finding and analysis. Alvin A. Lee President Emeritus, McMaster University
  • Association for Asian-American Studies Resolution to Support the Boycott of Israeli Academic Institutions ... Whereas the Association for Asian American Studies is an organization dedicated to the preservation and support of academic freedom and of the right to education for students and scholars in the U.S. and globally; and Whereas Arab (West Asian) and Muslim American communities, students, and scholars have been subjected to profiling, surveillance, and civil rights violations that have circumscribed their freedom of political expression, particularly in relation to the issue of human rights in Palestine-Israel; and more
  • BabulaBlog Pedro Luis Boitel was born in Cuba to a family of modest means of French origin. He studied at the University of Havana while working as a radio technician. Opposing the dictatorship of Fulgencio Batista he joined the July 26 movement led by Fidel Castro. The majority of the movement's members like Pedro were anti-communists. Once Batista left for exile and Fidel Castro took control the anti-communist members of the July 26 movement became an obstacle to absolute power. Following the revolution, Boitel returned to University were his fellow students nominated to run for the presidency of the Federation of University Students in 1960. Fidel Castro personally intervened to remove him from the presidency. Pedro Luis Boitel's threat to the emerging communist regime was that he refused to betray the Federation of University Students and sought to maintain academic freedom and autonomy.
  • FIRE Foundation for Individual Rights in Education .. Defending individual rights in higher education
  • Eric.ed.gov Calling Academia to Account: Rights and Responsibilities.... Part 1 examines the values and assumptions of academic research and scholarship and accountability issues concerning investment to fund that work. Individual chapters address: values and the world of scholarship, academic freedom and professional ethics, value for money, and the public interest. Part 2 examines the various constituents that comprise a university and the issues of accountability within the institution. Chapters discuss structure and purpose of the university; institutional autonomy of both academics and managers; membership, employment, office; internal legislation; the rights of the subordinate and the insubordinate; and resolving disputes.

Denis Rancourt on Academic Freedom [Part 1, 2, 3]

  • Greg Lukianoff is the President of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE). He previously served as FIRE's first Director of Legal and Public Advocacy until he was appointed President in 2006.[1] A graduate of American University and Stanford Law School, he has described himself as a "pro-choice liberal."[2] Lukianoff has published articles in the Los Angeles Times, the Boston Globe, the Chronicle of Higher Education, Inside Higher Ed, and the New York Post. He is a blogger for the Huffington Post[3] and served as a regular columnist for the Daily Journal of Los Angeles and San Francisco. Along with Harvey A. Silverglate and David French, Lukianoff is a co-author of FIRE's Guide to Free Speech on Campus. He testified before the United States Congress on the state of free speech on college campuses. Wikipedia

 

  • Mondoweis Universities as first responders to ideological objectives of the US govt, thus ASA blowback, Title VI, cold war program to combat 'threat' from the Soviet Union, following colonial era of scholars follow in the wake of merchants in imperialistism, 9/11 saw an 20 million increase in Title VI funds, FLAS scholarships leapt, for Middle East, Central and South Asia, guided ideological direction of students, Homeland Security departments established, counterterrorism studies, SSE, and US complicity with Israel, creating conditions for colonialistic expansion, pariah. see Cornell and Technion weapons development, Roosevelt Island New York, Technion with Elbit Systems of Israel, built drones to attack Lebanon, developed remote controlled Caterpillar D-9 bulldozer to demolish Palestinian homes, some Israeli Telaviv university built on Palestinian land, IDF / INSS killed over 1100, increasing neoliberalism, Lawrence Summers (Harvard/Clinton and Obama Administrations) Robert Gates (CIA/Texas A & M), and Mitch Daniels (Bush Administration/Purdue), and women such as Condoleezza Rice (Stanford/Obama Secretary of State). Tithi Bhattacharya is Professor of Modern South Asian History at Purdue.
  • Muslims for 9/11 Truth Chemist Kevin Ryan was fired from his job at Underwriters Labs in 2004 for blowing the whistle on UL's participation in the cover-up of the explosive demolition of the three World Trade Center Skyscrapers. He has continued to expose the 9/11 inside job through research, publications, and talks. He recently spoke alongside Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth to an audience of more than 2000 people at the Nation of Islam's Saviour's Day event in Chicago.

f50
9/11: James Fetzer on Academic Freedom by BadKitty

  • PropagandistMag In the interest of historical rtism, imagine Howard Zinn as a Soviet dissident wishing to write a book on Soviet history from the perspective of Holodomor victims. There’s not a chance of it, and anyone who imagines otherwise is simply deluding themselves. Aleksandr Solzhhenitsyn had to defect to the west in order to safely write The Gulag Archipelago.
  • National Council of the American Studies Association ASA the Academic and Community Activism Caucus of the American Studies Association (ASA) asked the Executive Committee (EC) to consider a resolution to honor the call from Palestinian civil society to support the academic boycott of Israel. The EC forwarded the resolution to the National Council. Following the deliberative procedures detailed below, the Council unanimously decided to issue a revised version of the resolution, which we now recommend to members of the ASA. Please follow this link to read the resolution.
  • Sheehan, Daniel In 1994, Daniel served as Legal Counsel to John E. Mack, Chair of the Department of Clinical Psychology at Harvard Medical School. Dr. Mack was a Pulitzer-Prize winning biographer who, utilizing the scientific methods of medical psychology, conducted extensive research on the phenomenon of alien abduction. In 1994 the Dean of Harvard Medical School called Dr. Mack before a special committee to defend publication of his controversial book Abduction: Human Encounters with Aliens. A clear violation of his free speech rights and position as a tenured professor—and highly respected clinician—Sheehan represented Dr. Mack before the committee, successfully protecting his right to academic freedom. Wikipedia
  • Strax Affair, Inventing Academic Freedom In 1968, there was political ferment everywhere. In Paris, students were in the streets. In the U.S., civil rights, the Vietnam War, and protests against the draft brought out millions. In this atmosphere, a young Jewish-American professor in the quiet town of Fredericton, New Brunswick sparked a controversy that established the principles of academic freedom on Canadian campuses. Amazon
  • VeteransToday Kevin Barrett “Mainstream peace groups are wary of 9/11 truth.” A standing-room-only crowd turned out at 8:30 a.m. today to listen to 9/11 whistleblower Kevin Ryan and activist Klayt Morfoot cast aspersions on the official version of 9/11. Ryan, who was fired by Underwriters Labs for exposing UL’s lies about the steel used in the World Trade Center skyscrapers, recently published Another 19, which argues that the 9/11 Commission may have blamed the wrong nineteen guys. Morfoot, a veteran who has served repeatedly in Iraq and Afghanistan, has sparked controversy at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire by starting a student 9/11 truth group.
  • AAUP American Association of University Professors  The 1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure affirms that "teachers are entitled to freedom in the classroom in discussing their subject." This affirmation was meant to codify understandings of academic freedom commonly accepted in 1940. In recent years these understandings have become controversial. Private groups have sought to regulate classroom instruction, advocating the adoption of statutes that would prohibit teachers from challenging deeply held student beliefs or that would require professors to maintain "diversity" or "balance" in their teaching.
  • Chronicle 2013 Canceled Conference Revives Concerns About Academic Freedom in the Persian Gulf By Ursula Lindsey Cairo The London School of Economics and Political Science abruptly canceled an academic conference on the Arab Spring it planned to hold over the weekend at the American University of Sharjah, in the United Arab Emirates, citing "restrictions imposed on the intellectual content of the event that threatened academic freedom."
  • EvolutionNews Holocaust Denier Led the Charge Against Academic Freedom on Evolution in Alabama ... For the last three years, defenders of academic freedom and free speech on evolution have supported Alabama's Academic Freedom Bill. Although the bill has come close to final passage, it recently died again in the Alabama legislature. An outspoken opponent of the bill has been activist Larry Darby. Mr. Darby's vehement opposition to the Alabama Academic Freedom Bill was on full display at a House Education hearing back on April 29, 2004. According to reports I have received, committee chair, Rep. Yvonne Kennedy (D), did not allow citizens to testify for the bill. But for some reason she let Mr. Darby alone provide special commentary on it. Blasting the bill, Mr. Darby claimed that Alabama already had enough legislation filled with bible and race-based hatred. Yet Mr. Darby himself has recently gained attention for his own denial of the murderous events of the Holocaust.
  • International Studies Association .. Academic Freedom Committee .. Created by ISA’s Governing Council in 2009 and first assembled in 2010, the Academic Freedom Committee (AFC) is charged with documenting instances where scholars in all disciplines related to international studies are persecuted for their peaceful, non-partisan, professional or personal activities, particularly when engaged in activities related to scholarly research and teaching. .. Harvey Starr: "Some Theoretical and Analytical Perspectives on the Arab Spring," Keynote Address for the Annual Meeting of the Israel Association for International Studies," Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, June 10, 2013, Beer-Sheva.
  • MirrorOfJustice Garcia, "Academic Freedom and the Telos of the Catholic University" This book presents a theologically-grounded understanding of academic freedom that builds on, completes, and transforms the prevailing secular understanding. Academic freedom in the secular university, while rightly protecting scholars from external interference by ecclesiastical and political authorities, is constricting in practice because it tends to prohibit most scholars from exploring the relation of the finite world to the infinite, or God. In the Catholic university, true academic freedom means both the freedom of the scholar to pursue studies unencumbered by external interference, and freedom to pursue knowledge beyond the boundaries of specific academic disciplines toward an infinite horizon.
  • NewsGazette Instructor of Catholicism at UI claims loss of job violates academic freedom ... Kenneth Howell, taught courses in Catholocism, adjunct professor ... The decision came after a student complained about a discussion of homosexuality in the class in which Howell taught that the Catholic Church believes homosexual acts are morally wrong. ... Howell has been an adjunct lecturer in the department for nine years, during which he taught two courses, Introduction to Catholicism and Modern Catholic Thought. He was also director of the Institute of Catholic Thought, part of St. John's Catholic Newman Center on campus and the Catholic Diocese of Peoria. Funding for his salary came from the Institute of Catholic Thought. search Natural Moral Law, McKim.
  • Students for Academic Freedom Islamic Jihadists around the world have declared war on America, Israel and the West and have made clear that: The goal of the Islamo-Fascist jihad is world domination The Islamo-Fasacist Jihad demands the suppression of all Infidels The Islamo-Fascist Jihad is a war against Women The Islamo-Fascist Jihad is a war against Gays The Islamo-Fascist Jihad is a war against Christians The Islamo-Fascist Jihad is a war against Jews The Islamo-Fasacist Jihad is a war against non-religious people
  • Volokh Conspiracy Remarkable Take on JFK’s Assassination ... "The city of hate had, in fact, killed the President." ... Look, guys. Lee Harvey Oswald murdered JFK. Oswald was a Communist. Not a small c, “all we are saying is give peace a chance and let’s support Negro civil rights” kind of Communist, but someone so committed to the cause (and so blind to the nature of the USSR) that he actually went to live in the Soviet Union.
 

Neo Nazism

This website is opposed to discrimination in any form including Israel's apartheid policies toward the Palestinians or any other nationalist, white supremacist contrivance. The following sites are listed for informational purposes only. We may or may not agree with their contents.

Neo-Nazis, White Supremacists
 
  • American Nazi Party and Henry Ford's International Jew and Mein Kampf
  • NewsNow Residents in Small Nevada Town on Edge , Rachel, Nevada Area 51, UFO, alien ... Watchdog groups list JHM Church as a white supremacist outfit, in the same category with the KKK and racist skinheads. It's the same name Richard Bunck uses for his business as a licensed Nevada contractor. The initials JHM are believed to stand for John Hale Mcgee, a southern California minister affiliated with the American Nazi party and who preached the gospel of white supremacy. When Kenniston told Rachel residents what he had uncovered, he got a visit from Richard Bunck.
  • Facebook Since the ADL has declared war on the patriots of this country, including patriotic Jewish people--all people in fact who are patriots, who understand that the Constitution and the Bill of Rights are the only things that protect us from despotism, from the same kinds of things that happened to the Jews, to the gypsies, to the Poles, to the blacks, to the Catholics in Germany during World War II. And believe me, folks, the ADL is not Jews and it is not a representation of the Jewish people. They serve their British masters only. They manipulate the Jews through lies and deception; through that old bugaboo: anti-semitism; by painting swastikas on walls; and by taking out parade permits for the Nazi Party.
  • JewWatch The German-American Bund was a pro-Nazi political movement that started in 1935. Under the leadership of its "Führer," a notorious anti-Semite named Fritz Kuhn, the Bund at its height claimed about 15,000 members. A 1939 rally in New York City's Madison Square Garden attracted an audience of 20,000 (which oddly were mostly Jewish). The Bund's fortunes experienced a downturn in 1939, when Kuhn was sent to prison for embezzling funds. It turned out that the ADL was financing the whole thing.
  • breveikafBrevik more below from Wayne Madsen Report
  • NoGW BUSTED! SO-CALLED WHITE SUPREMICIST GROUP EXPOSED AS ISRAELI PROPAGANDA OPERATION. Every time the Israeli lobbyists in the United States demand more money or more special legal protections, they wave about these so-called "Neo-nazi" or "White Supremacist" groups like Stormfront and the American Nazi Party. AIPAC, ADL, JDL, and their ilk raise tons of money by waving these boogie-men around as a real imminent threat and danger! Yet no matter what laws get passed and no matter how many millions ADL, JDL, etc. raise, Stormfront and the American Nazi Party remain strangely unmolested by either criminal or civil actions.
  • The Crisis of Zionism Commentary Mag the new book by Peter Beinart, is a simple morality play. On one side there is the tradition of “liberal Zionism” in which Beinart was nurtured. That tradition, in his account, runs from Beinart’s hero, Stephen Wise, America’s leading reform rabbi in the Depression era and leader of the Zionist cause, through Israel’s socialist founders up to…Barack Obama. On the other side is the rtist Zionism of Vladimir Jabotinsky now represented by Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and backed by a craven Jewish establishment here in America. What’s at stake in this epic struggle, Beinart would have us believe, is nothing less than the future of Israel’s democracy.
  • TheForbiddenKnowledge
  • WhiteNationalism rtists agree with orthodox historians that the German National Socialist State singled out the Jewish people for special and cruel treatment. In addition to viewing Jews in the framework of traditional antiSemitism, the Nazis also saw them as being an influential force behind international communism. During the Second World War, Jews were considered to be enemies of the State and a potential danger to the war effort, much like the Japanese were viewed in this country. Consequently, Jews were stripped of their rights, forced to live in ghettos, conscripted for labor, deprived of their property, deported from the countries of their birth and otherwise mistreated. Many tragically perished in the maelstrom.

 

WayneMadsenReport WMR August 1-3, 2011 -- Israeli co-option of Europe's far-right political parties Norwegian terrorist killer Anders Behring Breivik has been regaling Norwegian law enforcement investigators with greater plans for conducting terrorist attacks and even a coup d'etat against the Norwegian government. However, when it comes to like-minded cells operating in Europe and elsewhere, Behring has been closed-mouth. Breivik resistance to spilling the beans on colleagues in countries he has previously visited -- from Belarus and Malta and the United States to Mexico -- coincides with a number of dubious statements from European law enforcement officials that insist that Breivik is a crazed "lone wolf." Breivik's terrorist connections to groups like the English Defense League (EDL) in Britain and Knights Templar organizations in Malta and Mexico suggest that Breivik is one cog in a larger operation that has re-adopted the past terrorist tactics of CIA "stay-behind" fascist cells in Europe, generically known as "Gladio" networks, that, during the 1970s and 80s, carried out terrorist attacks that were blamed on leftist groups. Although various media outlets, known to bend and succumb to the pressure applied by Israel and its global sympathizers, tried to downplay the connections between Breivik and his allies in Zionist circles in Israel and Europe, no less than the Jerusalem Post, an echo chamber for Zionist and neo-conservative interests, reported that Breivik was "motivated by Zionism" in carrying out his deadly attack in Norway.
 
 
 
AmericanThinker The Ron Paul Campaign and its Neo-Nazi Supporters ... When some in a crowd of anti-war activists meeting at Democrat National Committee HQ in June, 2005 suggested Israel was behind the 9-11 attacks, DNC Chair Howard Dean was quick to get behind the microphones and denounce them saying: "such statements are nothing but vile, anti-Semitic rhetoric." When KKK leader David Duke switched parties to run for Louisiana governor as a Republican in 1991, then-President George H W Bush responded sharply, saying, "When someone asserts the Holocaust never took place, then I don't believe that person ever deserves one iota of public trust. When someone has so recently endorsed Nazism, it is inconceivable that someone can reasonably aspire to a leadership role in a free society." Ron Paul is different. Rep Ron Paul (R-TX) is the only Republican candidate to demand immediate withdrawal from Iraq and blame US policy for creating Islamic terrorism. ... On October 26 nationally syndicated radio talk show host Michael Medved posted an "Open Letter to Rep. Ron Paul" on TownHall.com. It reads: Dear Congressman Paul: Your Presidential campaign has drawn the enthusiastic support of an imposing collection of Neo-Nazis, White Supremacists, Holocaust Deniers, 9/11 "Truthers" and other paranoid and discredited conspiracists. Do you welcome- or repudiate - the support of such factions? More specifically, your columns have been featured for several years in the American Free Press -a publication of the nation's leading Holocaust Denier and anti-Semitic agitator, Willis Carto. His book club even recommends works that glorify the Nazi SS, and glowingly describe the "comforts and amenities" provided for inmates of Auschwitz.
 

Neocon, Neo-Nazi, Chechen and Al Queda Terrorism Colaboration

Neo-Nazis are far more likely to be linked to Neocons than they are to holocaust revisionists.

March 5-6, 2014 -- WMR report on Sochi ruse operation picks up steam as more facts emerge

WMR's previous report that the CIA and Saudi-funded militants arranged for Russian-made weapons to be smuggled into the hands of Ukrainian opposition units while Russian and Ukrainian security forces were put on the alert for three veiled Muslim "black widow" suicide bombers targeting Sochi during the Winter Olympics is gaining traction.

Additional facts have emerged that point to Western intelligence agencies working with neo-Nazi groups in Ukraine and Chechen Islamist militants to successfully smuggle Russian-made weapons captured from Muammar Qaddafi's armories to Ukrainian irregular forces. 

A leaked phone call between Estonian Foreign Minister Urmas Paet and Catherine Ashton, the European Union's commissioner for foreign affairs, reveals that Paet was informed that Ukrainian protesters and policemen were shot by the same snipers. Paet visited Kiev on February 25 during violent clashes between protesters and government security forces on Maidan Square. 

Paet told Ashton that a Ukrainian female doctor showed the visiting Estonian official that the bullets that struck protesters and policemen all came from the same weapons and that the opposition was covering up for the snipers. Paet told Ashton about his conversation with the doctor, Olga Bogomolets: "So . . . she then also showed me some photos she said that as a medical doctor she can say that it is the same handwriting, the same type of bullets, and it’s really disturbing that now the new coalition, that they don’t want to investigate what exactly happened."

WMR previously reported that the neo-Nazi units in Kiev and elsewhere were armed with the Russian-made Libyan weapons to make it appear that it was Russian troops who were killing Ukrainians. These same Russian-made Libyan weapons may be used in future "false flag" attacks that will be blamed on the Russian government.

Just as in Syria, where Saudi and Israeli intelligence and military forces are assisting Al Qaeda-linked elements to overthrow President Bashar al Assad in a bloody civil war, Israeli Defense Force veterans in Kiev joined hands with Chechen Islamist guerrillas, in addition to neo-Nazi units to help overthrow the government of President Viktor Yanukovych. An Israeli Defense Force veteran codenamed "Delta" led a unit called the "Blue Helmets of Maidan" in battling Ukrainian security forces. "Delta" led a 40-man unit consisting of other ex-IDF members. Delta defended the main neo-Nazi political party, Svoboda, stating that claims that the party and its members are anti-Semitic are "exaggerated." Opposition fighters wounded in Kiev received medevaced to Israel, a clear sign that the Israeli government supported the coup against Yanukovych. 

The leader of the neo-Nazi Right Sector party, Dmitry Yarosh, coordinated support for the coup leaders in Ukraine from the Al Qaeda-linked Caucasus Emirate of Doku Umarov, the Chechen terrorist who is responsible for deadly attacks that have killed hundreds of people in Russia. Chechen government officials, including Chechen President Ramzan Kadyrov, confirmed that Yarosh was working with Umarov loyalists inside Ukraine. Chechen intelligence officers picked up on the coordination between Yarosh and the Caucasus Emirate by monitoring postings on the social networking site 
VKontakte.

chechan_neocon_al_queda_neonazi_complicity
Israeli Ukrainian opposition militia leader "Delta" worked hand-in-glove with neo-Nazis and Al Qaeda to overthrow Yanukovych government. This alliance has not been so active since their joint 9/11 attack on the United States. 

Although there are reports that Umarov was killed by Russian security forces, the United States and UN Security Council continue to list Umarov on their international terrorist lists.

It was through the Al Qaeda network that the Russian-made arms from Libya were smuggled into Ukraine. And it was the Chechen terror network that was behind the CIA's ruse operation that had Russian and Ukrainian security personnel on the alert for the three "black widow suicide bombers in Sochi, this diverting critical resources from surveillance of the Russian-Ukrainian border for illegal arms smuggling.

Rabbi Moshe Azman, a claimant to the title of chief rabbi of Ukraine, provided support to the Blue Helmet units, which was allied with a seemingly strange coalition of neo-Nazis and Islamist terrorists.

Volodymyr Groysman, the rebel government's deputy prime minister for regional policy, which includes responsibility for Russian-speaking Crimea and eastern Ukraine, is Jewish, a supporter of Israel, and is working closely with the neo-Nazi ministers for national security, defense, and justice.

Russian President Vladimir Putin provided more details of the Western operation to overthrow the Ukrainian government. Putin told a press conference that the key Ukrainian agitators received training in Poland and Lithuania. Putin said, "They underwent preparation in bases in Lithuanian and Polish border areas, and in Ukraine itself. Their instructors were ready for a lengthy time, you saw how they were prepared, like special forces, they were even divided up into squads." 

Poland and Lithuania are members of NATO.

Against the backdrop of the false flags and ruse operations used to overthrow the democratically-elected government of Ukraine and then justify the operation are the NSA- and British Government Communications Headquarters-led cyber operations now taking place with the corporate news media and on social media websites. Sock puppets are out in force. They are making wild accusations likening Putin to Adolf Hitler, even though it is the Ukrainian opposition government that has allotted one-third of the government ministries to neo-Nazis. There are wild and unfounded rumors coming from acting Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, a former World Bank official and George Soros ally, that Yanukovych and his aides stole $70 billion from Ukraine and moved the money into offshore accounts. With only Yatsenyuk's word, the corporate media is running with the story as fact. The truth is that Ukraine was broke due to International Monetary Fund and World Bank policies before the coup against Yanukovych and it is doubtful the country's treasury had one billion dollars at its disposal let alone $70 billion. The story is as fake as the other disinformation now being reported as factual news from Ukraine.
WMR Ukraine Neocons
The neocons are still alive and active as ever inside Secretary of State John Kerry's State Department. Kerry's Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, Victoria Nuland, who previously served as Hillary Clinton's State Department mouthpiece, has threatened sanctions against Ukraine. 

Ukraine, which resisted efforts by the European Union to integrate it into Europe's banker-led federation of austerity and poverty, came into the EU's cross hairs after it abandoned talks with Brussels and Berlin in favor of an economic union with Russia. That move triggered off what can be described as the "Second Orange Revolution," a mass street uprising in Kyiv's Maidan (Independence) Square that demanded the resignation of Ukraine's democratically-elected President and government.

The connections between the Kyiv uprising and the EU outside manipulators are so apparent, the Kyiv square that has become the "Tahrir Square" of Ukraine is called "Euromaidan." 

This "Orange Crush" was spearheaded by the same George Soros/National Endowment for Democracy/CIA provocateur guru Gene Sharp hydra that saw the overthrow of Ukraine's government in 2004 in the so-called Orange Revolution. This time, Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych is the target.

Nuland, who is married to the bloody-handed neocon archangel Robert Kagan, handed out snacks to protesters on Maidan Square. Imagine the reaction of the United States had a second-tier official of either the Russian or Chinese foreign ministry handed out food to Occupy Wall Street protesters in Washington and urged them to overthrow, by force if necessary, President Obama. Yet, that is exactly the scenario Nuland engaged in by supporting protesters in Maidan. Furthermore, she reprimanded Yanokovych for the heavy security presence in Maidan. Nuland and Kerry, who also upbraided Yanukovych, forgot the acts of police brutality committed by U.S. cops against occupy protesters, as well as a plan by the FBI to use snipers to assassinate the leaders of the group.

And Nuland and Kerry were very quiet when the Turkish government sicced riot police on peaceful protesters in Taksim Square in Istanbul earlier this year. After all, Turkey is a member of NATO and Ukraine, for the time being, is not. 

For Gene Sharp and his two NGO "babies," OTPOR and the Center for Applied Nonviolent Action and Strategies (CANVAS), vanguard organizations for organizing "rent-a-riot" anti-government protests around the globe, only nations resistant to the "New World Order" designs of Wall Street and the Pentagon are fair game for receiving cash, snacks, and other support from the United States. Recently, it was discovered, through leaked emails, that CANVAS founder Srdja Popovic was collaborating with the CIA- and Pentagon-linked intelligence firm STRATFOR, founded by George Friedman, whose ties to the U.S. and Israeli military-intelligence establishments are well known.

And as with all fake "themed" revolutions, an "embattled martyr" is needed to rally the "rent-a-mob" to action. For the Ukrainian demonstrator, the "Maiden of Maidan" is Yulia Tymoshenko, the former Prime Minister who was imprisoned for corruption.Tymoshenko, who is now held at a clinic in Kharkiv, has become the "Aung San Suu Kyi" of Ukraine. But for many Ukrainians, the former Prime Minister is a shameless attention seeker whose trademark braided hair coif is derided as a "bagel" on top of her head. The quip is a reference to Tymoshenko's support for Ukraine's leading Zionists and jailed Russian tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky, another darling of the Soros/Sharp/Nuland set.

neonazi2
Nuland, Kagan, Soros, Sharp crowd rally around Ukrainian protesters and the "Euromaidan Maiden," the lady with the "bagel" on her head, Yulia Tymoshenko.

One of the demands of the EU to agree to the pact with Ukraine was the release from prison and political rehabilitation of Tymoshenko. AndNuland and her neocon friends have made no secret of their desire to have Ukrainian ex-boxer and Udar Party leader Vitali Klitschko replace President Yanukovych in an undemocratic process brought about by the type of hooliganism that saw protesters topple a statue of Vladimir Lenin in central Kyiv.  Who really benefits from the destruction of a Lenin statue? The answer to that question can be found in the banking corridors of Frankfurt and London, as well as the political power corridors of Washington and Brussels.
Jewish Virtual Library ...pamphlets imply the neoconservatives are the real neo-Nazis..
. This interaction has created a dynamic in which antisemitic ideas and conspiracy theories once circulated almost exclusively by German Nazis and their neo-Nazi offspring entered popular culture, mainstream political debate, and even broadcast television series, especially in Islamic and Arab countries in the Middle East. These even included a revival of the false allegations from The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. These conspiracy allegations moved into more mainstream circles through bridging mechanisms that often mask the original overtly anti-Jewish claims by using coded rhetoric about "secret elites" or "Zionist cabals." The international organization run by Lyndon LaRouche is a major source of such masked antisemitic theories globally. In the U.S. the LaRouchites spread these conspiracy theories in an alliance with aides to Minister Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam. A series of LaRouchite pamphlets calls the neoconservative movement the "Children of Satan," which links Jewish neo-conservatives to the historic rhetoric of the blood libel. In a twisted irony, the pamphlets imply the neoconservatives are the real neo-Nazis.
Urban Dictionary Neo-Con-Nazi
Short for Neo-Conservative Nationalist-Socialist. Basically an American member of the Republican party who claims the conservative ideology of Ronald Reagan, but in practice acts like a Nazi in that they are pro-corporate, anti-<insert-current-scapegoat-here>, pro-military, anti-sharing, pro-self-serving, anti-abortion, pro-death-penalty, anti-tax, pro-greed, etc. Their intent is to establish a totalitarian-style state with the pretense of democracy and freedom cloaked in faux-patriotism, but controlled only by like-minded individuals. I don't know what an Islamo-Fascist is because they don't exist, but there definitely are Neo-Con-Nazi hordes running the Republican party. George W. Bush, Donal Rumsfeld, any of the PNAC aithors, Ann Coulter, Bill O'Reilly, etc.
TruthOut Neocons and the Ukraine Coup, (Truthout, left gatekeeper)

American neocons helped destabilize Ukraine and engineer the overthrow of its elected government, a “regime change” on Russia’s western border. But the coup – and the neo-Nazi militias at the forefront – also reveal divisions within the Obama administration, reports Robert Parry.

More than five years into his presidency, Barack Obama has failed to take full control over his foreign policy, allowing a bureaucracy shaped by long years of Republican control and spurred on by a neocon-dominated U.S. news media to frustrate many of his efforts to redirect America’s approach to the world in a more peaceful direction.

But Obama deserves a big dose of the blame for this predicament because he did little to neutralize the government holdovers and indeed played into their hands with his initial appointments to head the State and Defense departments, Hillary Clinton, a neocon-leaning Democrat, and Robert Gates, a Republican cold warrior, respectively.

Even now, key U.S. diplomats are more attuned to hard-line positions than to promoting peace. The latest example is Ukraine where U.S. diplomats, including Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs Victoria Nuland and U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt, are celebrating the overthrow of an elected pro-Russian government.

Occurring during the Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia, the coup in Ukraine dealt an embarrassing black eye to Russian President Vladimir Putin, who had offended neocon sensibilities by quietly cooperating with Obama to reduce tensions over Iran and Syria, where the neocons favored military options.

Over the past several weeks, Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych was undercut by a destabilization campaign encouraged by Nuland and Pyatt and then deposed in a coup spearheaded by neo-Nazi militias. Even after Yanukovych and the political opposition agreed to an orderly transition toward early elections, right-wing armed patrols shattered the agreement and took strategic positions around Kiev.

Despite these ominous signs, Ambassador Pyatt hailed the coup as “a day for the history books.” Most of the mainstream U.S. news media also sided with the coup, with commentators praising the overthrow of an elected government as “reform.” But a few dissonant reports have pierced the happy talk by noting that the armed militias are part of the Pravy Sektor, a right-wing nationalist group which is often compared to the Nazis. more

Wikipedia Svoboda ( neo-nazi organization)
The Social-National Party of Ukraine changed its name to the All-Ukrainian Union "Svoboda" in February 2004 with the arrival of Oleh Tyahnybok as party leader.[2] Tyahnybok made significant efforts to moderate the party's extremist image.[48] The party not only replaced its name, but also abandoned the "I + N" ("Idea Natsii" Ukrainian "idea of a nation") Wolfsangel logo (a symbol popular among neo-Nazi groups)[2][36] with a three-fingered hand reminiscent of the 'Tryzub' pro-independence gesture of the late 1980s.[36] Svoboda also pushed neo-Nazi and other radical groups out the party,[49] distancing itself from its neofascist past while retaining the support of extreme nationalists.[48] In 2004, Tyahnybok was expelled from the Our Ukraine parliamentary faction for a speech calling for Ukrainians to fight against a "Muscovite-Jewish mafia,"[50] and celebrated the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists for having fought "Moscovites, Germans, Jews and other scum who wanted to take away our Ukrainian state."[36] The speech was delivered at the grave-site of a commander of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army where Tyahnybok praised its struggle against "Moskaly", a derogatory term for either Russians[51] or pan-Russian nationalists;[52][53] Germans; and "Zhydy", an archaic but controversial term for Jews in Ukraine due to it being a slur when used in the Russian language.[54][55] In the 2006 local elections the party had obtained 4.2% of the votes and 4 seats in the Ternopil Oblast Council, 5.62% of the votes and 10 seats in the Lviv Oblast Council and 6.69% of the votes and 9 seats in the Lviv city council.[14] In the 2007 parliamentary elections, the party received 0.76% of the votes cast,[33] more than double their share during the 2006 parliamentary elections, when they received 0.36%.[33] It was ranked eighth out of 20 parties (in the 2007 elections) and the non-participation of the Congress of Ukrainian Nationalists made the party the only far-right party to participate in the 2007 parliamentary elections.[14] In the autumn of 2009, Svoboda joined the Alliance of European National Movements as the only organisation from outside the European Union.[2] That year the party claimed to have 15,000 members.[14]
GlobalResearch How and Why the U.S. Government Aided a Coup Led by Neo-Nazis in Ukraine

The people of the United States are being deliberately misled and misinformed about the leading role played by the U.S. State Department, intelligence agencies and neoconservative leaders in bringing neo-Nazis to power in Ukraine.

The same neoconservative politicians and strategists that drove the country to war against Iraq in 2003, against Libya in 2011 and nearly against Syria in 2013 have been neck-deep in a protracted regime change effort in Ukraine as part of a larger geo-strategic struggle against Russia. The fact that they have worked hand in glove with armed neo-Nazis in Ukraine—with Sen. John McCain and Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland literally joining the protests—speaks volumes about the political nature of the events.

The Maidan protest movement was launched in Kiev in November 2013 when Ukrainian President Yanukovych rejected a European Union economic plan that would have imposed a harsh austerity regime on Ukraine as the price for admission into the economic sphere dominated by German banks. The U.S. and E.U.-backed street protests, supported most fervently by neoconservative elements inside and outside the Obama administration, began when Yanukovych instead accepted a $15 billion loan from Russia and an economic plan that did not require austerity measures but did include discounted prices for Russian natural gas.

Oleh Tyahnybok, leader of the Neo-Nazi Svoboda party. Fascists now control key posts in the government, including over the armed forces

Another case of imperialist-backed regime change – this time with neo-Nazis

The U.S. government has engineered, financed and fully supported a classic coup d’état that overthrew a corrupt but democratically elected government in Ukraine. Joining in the destabilization of the Ukrainian government were Germany, France, Britain and other NATO powers.

The U.S. State Department funds an international network of non-governmental organizations and media outlets that are used to create political opposition and conduct regime change against targeted countries from Venezuela to Bolivia to Syria to Ukraine and other countries. A principal vehicle for these U.S. operations is the National Endowment for Democracy (NED).

A recent article by Robert Parry reports: “NED, a $100 million-a-year agency created by the Reagan administration in 1983 to promote political action and psychological warfare against targeted states, lists 65 projects that it supports financially inside Ukraine, including training activists, supporting ‘journalists’ and promoting business groups, effectively creating a full-service structure primed and ready to destabilize a government in the name of promoting ‘democracy.’”

The new coup-led government was selected by a rump session of the parliament when many elected members could not show up to vote for fear of physical attack. It is filled with fascist and semi-fascist forces, as well as powerful billionaire oligarchs. The fascist forces promote hatred toward Russians, Jews, Poles and other minorities.

7/7
Progressive
1%

  • TerrorOnTheTube
  • TerrorOnTheTube Me and Kieth
  • The TruthSeeker, Nicholas Kollerstrom Nick Kollerstrom academic, researcher and author of such varied titles as ‘Gardening and Planting by the Moon 2007: Higher Yields in Vegetables and Flowers’ and ‘Terror on the Tube: Behind the Veil of 7/7, an Investigation’.
  • Wikipedia 7/7 Bombings

Articles Menu  top
Holocaust & Academic Freedom Articles
Paul Eisen blog What happened to Joel Hayward and how long are we going to put up with this?  top

Thursday, 3 January 2013
What happened to Joel Hayward and how long are we going to put up with this?
A few weeks ago I posted The Hayward Thesis  and remarked that it was my favourite Holocaust rtist text. I also mentioned that, under pressure, Hayward recanted. 

I would no more believe Hayward saying, under pressure, that millions perished in gas chambers than I would have believed Galileo, also under pressure, saying that the sun went round the earth. I don't believe it and I don't believe Hayward (or Galileo for that matter) believed it either.
 
Still, this piece by Thomas Fudge describes and evaluates some of that pressure and, after you've read it, you can read what happened to Thomas Fudge.

This all happened over ten years ago but it's still happening now so, we might also ask ourselves, how long are people going to put up with this?
The Fate of Joel Hayward in New Zealand Hands:
from Holocaust Historian to Holocaust?
 
By Thomas A. Fudge
For the past three years, newspapers, national periodical publications and television programmes have intermittently provided coverage about the Joel Hayward affair: a story of a New Zealand student who wrote a controversial thesis. Contestable work and arguable conclusions are not uncommon in modern universities but Hayward's unpublished work as a student seems to remain, after ten years, a point of unusual and continuing interest. Late in 2002 the New Zealand Listener ran a "special report" on what is popularly termed holocaust denial.[1] Juxtaposed photographs of David Irving, Adolf Hitler and Joel Hayward on page 28 provide adequate summary of the article's focus. When asked why he was putting forth another piece on Hayward the author Philip Matthews replied that nothing had appeared for a while. The Listener article says little new or relevant and the questions of motivation might be raised. Is Canterbury University supportive of holocaust denial? The university answers no.[2] Is Hayward a denier? He claims he is not. Does his thesis constitute holocaust denial? His critics say yes (though some without having read it), while others (who have read it) answer in the negative.
The Story so far
In June 2002, Joel Hayward resigned from his position as senior lecturer in history at Massey University where he had been respected as an effective teacher and productive scholar. His departure generated applause from some quarters. Others lamented academe's loss. "[S]hame on the scholarly community for not rallying behind the universities' necessary freedoms."[3]What brought Hayward, a year and a half after the Hayward affair, still in the early stages of a potentially distinguished career, to this act of professional extinction? The protracted "facts" in the so-called Hayward affair may be distilled briefly.
In 1993 Hayward was awarded a Master of Arts degree with First Class Honours in History by the University of Canterbury for a thesis on the historiography of the holocaust. He later wrote a PhD thesis and in 1996 was appointed to a lectureship at Massey University. In late 1999 the MA thesis was publicly denounced. The New Zealand Jewish Council alleged that the work amounted to historical rtism constituting holocaust denial, and called on the University of Canterbury to revoke the degree.[4]
Hayward repeatedly apologized for any harm or distress his thesis might have caused, agreed to the extraordinary step of including an appendix to his thesis modifying his findings, cooperated with the subsequent investigating Working Party and appears to have made efforts to distance himself from holocaust denial.[5] Under pressure, the University appointed an independent Working Party to investigate the claims against the thesis.[6]This committee consisted of retired High Court judge Sir Ian Barker and academics Professor Ann Trotter and Professor Stuart Macintyre to look into the matter and make recommendations.[7] The lengthy report concluded the Hayward thesis was "seriously flawed" and that Hayward "should not have essayed a judgment in such a controversial area..."[8] The report did not recommend withdrawal of the thesis by the University and did not agree with the allegations that Hayward's argument was racist or motivated by malice. While the opinion that the thesis did not deserve the high marks it received was widely publicized in the media, no fewer than six serving or retired members of the History department persisted in their own judgment that it was a first-class effort.
Notwithstanding the apparent finality of the report and its qualified exoneration of Hayward, during 2000, 2001, and 2002 Hayward received hundreds of pieces of "hate" mail, abusive telephone calls, threats against himself, his wife and small children, harassment at Massey University and continued negative media attention.[9] Further attempts to publish as well as efforts at finding other employment have been unsuccessful. The issue therefore goes beyond the apparent concern over alleged flawed (but unpublished) research. Is this issue really about academic values and freedom?
Animosity towards Hayward arose not in 1999 but several years earlier.[10]The subject of Hayward's thesis was controversial before he wrote it and there were attempts to censure Hayward at the time.[11] Aware of these factors, Hayward embargoed the thesis for three years as soon as it was examined. When the embargo expired, he notified the University Library that the thesis could be made available to researchers. The library replied that it had decided to restrict the thesis so that it could be consulted only with Hayward's permission until January 1999.[12] Almost immediately allegations were published about his alleged "holocaust denial." That someone should have chanced upon the thesis so promptly seems an unlikely coincidence. Rather, events were to show that there were good reasons for the embargo on access. Was this because Hayward had written things that he knew to be reprehensible? The Barker enquiry found no evidence of malicious intent, dishonesty or deliberate efforts to circumvent the truth on Hayward's part. Is it possible that the outrage over the thesis itself was also a device for attacking Hayward?

Academic Values
 
One of the complexities of the Hayward affair is its apparent relation to issues of academic freedom and intellectual fashions. Hayward's detractors claim that he is wrong in terms of both. One of his critics stated that "academic freedom cannot exist without academic responsibility."[13] However, considered legal opinion concluded that the interpretation of academic freedom being applied in the Hayward affair permitted a "very limited right to academic freedom."[14]

Proponents of academic freedom insist that universities should be great storehouses of wisdom and learning, and students ought to be able to go there, learn and choose. Academic freedom implies there are no taboo subjects, no off-limits topics.[15] The fuss made about this obscure piece of work fits rather awkwardly with the position taken by New Zealand academic libraries. Official statements read, "No library materials should be excluded... because of the... views of their authors [and] no library materials should be censored, restricted or removed from libraries because of partisan or doctrinal disapproval or pressure."[16]
International intellectuals also defend the right of dissidents to say things they disagree with. Noam Chomsky defended the right of "holocaust denier" Robert Faurisson to say what he thought about "Zionist lies."[17] Raul Hilberg objected when St Martin's Press cancelled David Irving's contract for his book on Goebbels, saying, "If these people want to speak, let them... I am not for taboos and I am not for repression."[18] Universities and other institutions of higher learning are regarded as marketplaces for the exchange of ideas; as forums for discussion; as venues for critical thinking, honest enquiry and the challenging of status quo.[19] In this context, the Hayward thesis was a legitimate academic exercise. Others argue that Hayward was simply wrong, his judgements flawed, his conclusions erroneous, his methodology ill-conceived and his entire MA thesis a sustained exercise in egregious violation of scholarly procedure. Amid such extreme position, one might ask whether the significance of the Hayward matter is an issue of truth? Is it a crucial indictment of education in general? Does it have to do with accountability within institutions of higher education? Or, is it about the limits of toleration in New Zealand society?
Just as there is no such thing as a perfectly free market, similarly academic "freedom" operates within a framework partly determined by non-academic considerations. Senior academics within New Zealand universities are often sensitive to public opinion and political moods. They may actively discourage graduate students from investigating certain topics. There are other topics that although encouraged or permitted, are sometimes subject to constraints on arguments that may be employed, evidence that may be weighed and conclusions reached. This is especially the case in areas that touch on contemporary political or ethical concerns. Many people do not regard these strictures as problematic but rather praise them as virtuous.[20] The Jewish holocaust is one of those delicate topics about which certain beliefs have become so fashionable as to be unassailable regardless of intellectual considerations. The Hayward affair elicited the pronouncement "that at least in this country anyone wanting to... question received notions about the Holocaust is controlled by accepted truth standards."[21] The danger in this thinking lies in the ambiguity of the term "truth standards". Does it mean "standards for establishing truth" or "propositions proclaimed to be true"? Some insist that the religious significance of the holocaust is equal to the revelation on Mt. Sinai to Moses.[22] Is that a "truth standard"?

What Did Hayward Say?

The major issue appears to be the belief that Hayward rejected well-established facts about the holocaust.[23] His thesis examined the writings of some of those who question the holocaust industry which has reached significant political proportions in the past thirty years.[24] Setting aside the question of whether Hayward's conclusions were really so exceptional, is it not the duty of universities and researchers to challenge conventional understandings? Modern philosophy teaches that all theories worth defending must be continuously subjected to re-evaluation and retesting.

In his MA thesis titled "The Fate of Jews in German Hands: An Historical Enquiry into the Development and Significance of Holocaust rtism" Joel Hayward investigated holocaust historiography, especially that branch thereof regarded as rtist.[25] He concluded that some of the rtist literature was unworthy of sustained scholarly consideration.[26] Other approaches within the genre he found to be significant and worthy. He came to three principal conclusions from the historiography, the weight of historical evidence and his own discernment: first, that there is no unimpeachable evidence that Adolf Hitler personally ordered the physical extermination of Jews. Second, that it is impossible to know how many Jews were killed and third, that gas chambers were not used systematically to murder Jews in European concentration camps. Do these conclusions make Joel Hayward a "holocaust denier"?
This allegation that he is can be easily evaluated. First, there is no document which has yet come to light to prove that Hitler gave a "final solution" order. That Hitler was anti-Semitic is beyond denial. That Hitler wished for Jews to be subjugated is without argument. Hayward makes these points. That Hitler gave an order for Jews to be exterminated cannot be proven.[27] Second, Hayward agrees that millions of Jews perished during the ravages of the Second World War.[28] He regards the figure of 6,000,000 murdered as symbolic and impossible to actually prove on the basis of documentary evidence. There are no reliable or comprehensive records available to establish the exact number of those who perished during the Nazi era. Projections must be calculated guesses which necessarily have variation.[29]The traditional figure of 11 million killed by the Nazis (Jews and others combined) is essentially the invention of Simon Wiesenthal, the famous hunter of Nazi war criminals. This speculative figure has attained virtual canonical status in holocaust historiography.[30] In 1986 Shmuel Krakowski, then archives director of Yad Vashem, the international center for holocaust documentation in Jerusalem, told the Jerusalem Post that of the 20,000 testimonies he had on hand from alleged "survivors" of the holocaust most of them were untrustworthy, fraudulent, lacking support or in some way untruthful.[31] Although this statement is at least as "rtist" as anything Hayward wrote, Krakowski is not regarded as a holocaust denier. Wiesenthal admits that he manufactured figures but appears to have escaped censure; Hayward merely questioned other suggested figures and was denounced for it.



Third, it was once held that concentration camps in Germany were used to gas Jews en masse. That hypothesis has now been abandoned by most historians of the Second World War without this being condemned as holocaust denial.br /> [32] (See map, and the distinction made on it between "death [extermination] camps" and "concentration camps".) There is stronger evidence for the use of gas chambers in Polish camps. Hayward relied upon certain studies (now regarded as highly controversial or discredited) to question the extent of the use of Polish gas chambers and for his skepticism was labeled a "holocaust denier" although he unequivocally states that millions of Jews perished under the Nazi regime through various means.[33] He wondered merely what contribution gas chambers made to these results. Some of his detractors, however, claimed that he denied the existence of gas chambers altogether.[34]
That the historic Jewish community has been subjected to various measures of discrimination and persecution must be acknowledged, but that does not mean that there might not be new understandings of that experience. It does not therefore provide that same community or any of its representatives with immunity to investigation. Nor is it true that what happened to Jews historically is fundamentally different from atrocities perpetrated against native Americans, Africans, Gypsies, the victims of the witch hunts in early modern Europe, those trapped in the Stalinist purges in Russian lands, the fate of Iraqis in the hands of Saddam Hussein, heretics hunted by crusaders, and indigenous peoples around the world throughout human history, in which large numbers of people have been subjected to campaigns of mass extermination. There is a great difference between anti-Semitism and arriving at research-based conclusions which do not support or conform to values, ideas and interpretations held by Semitic peoples and cultures.                                  

Diversity of interpretation is not the same thing as discrimination. To contest common opinion is not racism. To argue against or disagree with conventional wisdom, regardless of the subject, cannot, ipso facto, be characterized as cultural or religious insensitivity. Even Jewish communities cannot stand detached from intolerance, violence and destruction against others. The conquests recorded in the Hebrew Bible are one example. To argue that the holocaust is in some way culturally specific or historically significant in unique ways on a universal level is opinion, neither binding, necessarily persuasive, nor intellectually obligatory. To insist that it is amounts to "intellectual terrorism".[35] A holocaust of those dimensions is less about history and more about myth. To say so does not constitute a "total betrayal of Jewish history."[36] Whether Nazis were engaged in the "banality of evil" or in displaying collective consciousness is a matter to be investigated not legislated.[37] There may be good reasons for preferring Stanley Milgram over Daniel Goldhagen.[38] The Working Party found that Hayward was not guilty of racism or anti-Semitism, or of deliberately falsifying data. Nevertheless, the report was critical of the quality of Hayward's work, and dissented from the grade that it was awarded. 

concentration
... widely used map of Germany and Poland during World War II
depicting National Socialist concentration and (alleged) extermination camps.
Hayward's novice research exercise however, became widely regarded by academics, university administrators, news media persons and members of the general population, as the product of a contemptible scoundrel, a man lacking in probity, unfit to influence impressionable minds, and indeed unworthy of being employed even in non academic circles and whose writings, even though he has written nothing on the holocaust since his MA thesis, should be suppressed.[39] It should be borne in mind that unlike many ambitious young academics, Hayward made no attempt to publish any aspect of his MA thesis.[40] Nor was it the basis of his employment as an academic. Its only role in his career was to qualify him to proceed to the PhD degree, for which he undertook research on an unrelated topic.
Judging from the essays in The New Zealand Jewish Chronicle, the report issued by the Working Party in December 2000 and the articles appearing in the New Zealand news media, the Hayward affair might seem to be a rather straightforward case of incompetent research and defective supervision.[41]TThere are other details which have been less publicised if at all. While some voices have condemned the lack of balance in the Hayward affair,[42] others have dismissed it all as a "hysterical diatribe."[43] Continuing publicity indicates that important parts of the story are not known.
 
The Working Party Report and the Reaction
In December 2000 the Working Party established by the University of Canterbury in April that year, to investigate the Hayward thesis released its report totalling 296 pages including supporting materials.[44] This report was received by the administration, adopted by the University council on 18 December and no public contest was offered to its findings.[45] However, the report was not accepted unanimously. Several senior Canterbury University historians took the view that their institution had been far too apologetic.[46]Vincent Orange, Hayward's thesis supervisor, contested a great deal in the report by the Working Party and that of Richard Evans (see below).[47]Professor John Jensen of Waikato University likewise did not accept these reports as fundamentally accurate.[48]
Other academics considered the report's verdict to have been "pre-determined", to have exceeded its own legal advice, and upon which the University of Canterbury assumed an official position "on a matter that seems to be the province of individual academics."[49]
In February 2001, the History Department at Canterbury took the report under consideration and concluded its deliberations by affirming that it "supports the broad thrust of the recommendations of the Barker inquiry..."[50] The vote was overwhelmingly in favor of this ambivalent motion but not unanimous. Three members of the department (besides Orange) put forward arguments in opposition to the report and to the nature of the enquiry. One member of the department insisted on being named in the minutes of the meeting as opposing both the report and the departmental support for it.[51]Among those who supported the motion were some who admitted having read neither the report nor the thesis. One senior member argued that the department should not be seen as being in opposition to the university.[52]
Vincent Orange, who absented himself from the February meeting submitted to the department for consideration a dossier consisting of thirty-one documents titled "A Case for the Defence of Dr. Joel Hayward."[53] The dossier included submissions from academics who had read Hayward's thesis, documents presenting another side of the matter and related materials. These materials had been submitted to the Working Party but appear to have had no significant influence on the ultimate report.[54]
The dossier was prepared for three reasons: first, for consideration by the Working Party, second, that it might be attached to the Working Party report as an extended appendix (to provide balance) and, third, so that it might be placed in the university library where scholars or students in the future considering this matter might have access to both sides of the story. The Working Party Report did not respond to the contents of the dossier. Efforts to have the dossier appended to the report itself were unsuccessful, and the other objectives were not attained. This casts doubt on the statement of the Working Party that it had "fully and properly considered the matters at issue" and on the corroborating comment by Vice-Chancellor Daryl LeGrew that the report submitted by the Working Party was "an open and thorough academic review."[55]
Why was this body of material not made more widely available to those actively involved or interested in the Hayward affair?[56] Vincent Orange or other members of the History Department opposing the submissions of the New Zealand Jewish Council could very well have distributed the dossier on their own. The apparent reason that they did not do so appears to be that they agreed to acquiesce in repeated requests by university officials that no comment be made to the media and that the university administration be responsible for comment on the Hayward affair.[57] The university administration, though aware of the dossier, elected not to publicize it.
For this reason, the public has not been able to form a balanced judgment informed by testimony on both sides.
The Barker committee, however, did rely heavily on a report, noted above, by Cambridge University Professor Richard J. Evans who was engaged by the New Zealand Jewish Council (NZJC) to provide comment on Hayward's thesis.[58] The NZJC originally presented a fourteen page submission to the Working Party on the Hayward thesis which summarized their concerns and specified their wishes about the enquiry.[59] It submitted that the thesis was dishonest, the award of Hayward's MA should be revoked, and all University of Canterbury endorsement of Hayward's work towards the MA be withdrawn and by implication that the Hayward thesis be removed from the university library.[60]
Fresh from his very public victory over David Irving (a controversial figure in the German historiography of the 1930s and 1940s) in a high profile London court case in April 2000 wherein Irving was found to have falsified historical evidence, Evans submitted a 71 page report trenchantly condemning the thesis. Professor Gerald Orchard, one of New Zealand's most highly regarded lawyers, in turn denounced this report to the Working Party as "adversarial", the work of a "partisan advocate," and not an "objective expert", who engaged in exaggeration, omission of material and misrepresentation, and whose opinions in the Hayward case could not be relied on.[61] The Working Party acknowledged that Evans "appeared to diminish the objectivity required of an expert witness", submitted unwarranted allegations, and was "highly antagonistic." It professed to have "made every effort to discount Professor Evans' tendency to intemperate expression" but accepted the report as authoritative and seems not to have been influenced markedly by the sustained responses to Evans' report included in the "Dossier for the Defence".[62] But faced with the profound disagreement on the merits of Hayward's thesis between its official examiners (Orange and Jensen) and Evans, the Working Party had received legal counsel that preference for one perspective over the other was "a question for appropriate expert historians."[63] Macintyre and Trotter were historians but not "appropriate expert historians". No "appropriate expert historians" were approached. Why, on such a critical point supported by legal advice, did the Working Party not take this step? Vincent Orange and Joel Hayward made a strategic error in not also contracting an expert on holocaust historiography to review the Hayward thesis and submit a report. This step apparently did not occur to them at the time and the faux pas proved costly and monumental in its eventual implications. The willingness of the Working Party to accept a partisan opinion commissioned by an interested caucus is curious and places the enquiry itself in a troubling light.
Notwithstanding the Working Party's remarks on Evans's intemperate language and lack of objectivity, he appeared both to the Jewish Council and the Working Party as a witness otherwise above reproach. Evans is an excellent scholar but published reviews of his own books accuse him of sometimes "going over the top in ways that are unnecessary to his argument"; of engaging in "gratuitous speculation"; in certain cases of not having "studied the primary sources... under discussion"; elsewhere that he often misses the point, resorts to intemperate attack and is often confused.[64] In other words, in the opinion of some of his peers even Richard Evans violates many of the sound principles of historical method that he considered defectively employed in Hayward's thesis.
Evans is also curiously inconsistent in his attitude to scholars who have erred. In the 1980s a scandal arose over a book written by a young political scientist, David Abraham, and which Evans had reviewed favourably. When it was revealed that Abraham was guilty of egregious errors he was hounded out of the academic profession. Evans writes of how unfair this was even though, as he points out "the book was so riddled with errors" that Abraham was sometimes contradicting his own thesis. "My own view is that while Abraham did not deliberately falsify evidence, he was extremely careless with it, far more than is permissible in a work of serious historical scholarship." Nevertheless, he concluded, "To deny Abraham the... chance of making amends... was surely wrong."[65] In support of this conclusion Evans cites the case of Lawrence Stone whose early published work was exposed as fundamentally flawed and yet he subsequently spent a long and productive career engaged in highly regarded scholarship. His early work is barely recalled. Abraham's work was on the Weimar Republic, Stone's on early modern England. Hayward's alleged shortcomings were not of the same order as Abraham's, and were not published as Abraham's were, but Evans's report makes no reference to extenuating circumstances, qualifications about the nature of Hayward's preliminary research exercise go unnoted and Hayward is treated as though the thesis in question was the culminating work of a long career rather than an inaugural effort. Why? At the same time as Evans was recommending Hayward's censure and the revocation of his MA degree, he was also reflecting again on Abraham's situation with the comment, "this fate is also thankfully extremely rare."[66]
 


Continued Dissent
The Working Party Report satisfied neither of the protagonists. It appears to have been intended to soothe by offering a compromise solution: it agreed with the Jewish Council and Richard Evans that there were serious flaws in the Hayward thesis, but not that it was either dishonest or fraudulent, or that it was unworthy of being awarded a master's degree, or that the degree should be withdrawn or that the thesis itself should be removed from library collections.[67] On the other hand, the report was not the exoneration of the thesis that Hayward and Orange had hoped for, and the university's examination procedures were severely criticised. Consequently both parties were embittered; neither could claim victory, and indeed, everyone seemed discredited by the whole affair: the academics felt betrayed and the NZJC felt that its cause had been frustrated. The official Jewish view was that the outcome of the enquiry was unacceptable.[68] David Zwartz told a newspaper, "We must take it further."[69]
However, the University of Canterbury was unprepared to invest further time or financial resources on the Hayward affair which it considered resolved.[70]Since the university clearly was not going to revoke Hayward's degree, excoriate him any further, censure Vincent Orange (the thesis supervisor whom some regarded as ultimately responsible for Hayward's work) or keep the matter at the forefront, one might have expected that the Hayward affair had run its course. Hayward continued with his duties at Massey University and press releases seemed to indicate that his tenure there was secure and the university had no intention of withdrawing support.[71] The affair was closed at last.
It did not, however, end. There were people whose passions had evidently been aroused by the affair and the extensive publicity it had received, and these had recourse to informal and sinister methods of expressing their anger. In early 2001 Hayward began to receive even more vitriolic hate mail along with obscene and disturbing telephone calls. More than a year after the report by the Working Party became public, Hayward received death threats directed at his children. He continued occasionally to issue apologies for any unintended consequences created by his MA work and tried to get on with his life and career. Feeling ridiculed and harassed, and believing that even among his colleagues at Massey sentiment had turned against him, Hayward suffered an emotional breakdown. He spent over two years under medical care.[72]
More than that he became disenchanted with the world of higher education. He no longer believed universities (at least in New Zealand) were places for the free exchange of ideas. He had come to regard the exalted virtue of academic freedom as an illusion now sold out to considerations of expediency. He became convinced the ideals he had been taught by his professors and lecturers at Canterbury were simply rhetorical. He no longer believed in the alleged ideals of the academy. In brief, he no longer wished to be an academic. He regarded higher education irreparably soiled by "indifference and moral cowardice."[73] In December 2001, in deep depression, Hayward tendered his resignation from Massey University effective in June 2002. Massey appears to have made no effort to assess Hayward's condition or provide support of the kind usually available to distressed employees.
With Hayward out of Massey and his academic career at an end was the Hayward affair now truly over and done with? Efforts were made to link another Canterbury thesis to holocaust denial and to Hayward but came to naught,[74] but for Hayward there was more to come. In early December 2002 he was informed by HarperCollins, a major international publisher, through their Auckland office, that they wished to withdraw from publishing a book of which Hayward was co-editor. The volume in question was a collection of essays about New Zealand airmen.[75] The book was fully prepared and ready for printing. Hayward was shocked at the news and pressed for an explanation. A volume of essays about New Zealand airmen seems innocuous enough. HarperCollins was reluctant to provide Hayward with an explanation for their eleventh-hour decision apart from saying they had been put under considerable pressure not to associate with Hayward on account of the negative publicity surrounding him.[76] Somehow, the matter had been taken far beyond the question of whether a thesis had been honest.
Nor is HarperCollins alone in shunning Hayward. People fear being seen in a café with him. Others are afraid that emails might be monitored and association with him might have serious consequences for their own careers. They no longer converse with him for fear of being linked to him. Some of his former associates suspect their own work has been scoured for traces of "heretical" thinking about topics on which freedom of thought and independence of expression are unwelcome. Was this a consequence that could have been imagined when the Working Party submitted its report a year earlier?
Shortly after the HarperCollins shock, Hayward was hired by Fonterra, the large dairy and meat company as Communications Coordinator with responsibilities for writing the company's internal communications, information and training documents.[77] His employment with Fonterra, however, ended the day he began when the company decided to terminate the position having been advised that employing him was a very risky proposition.[78] Was this commensurate with what Hayward was alleged to have done ten years before?
 


Why Won't the Hayward Affair Come to an End?
Apologies have availed nothing. Resignation has been for naught. Passivity has been unproductive and the Hayward affair continues. One feature which has been entirely overlooked in all the publicity is why an unpublished, embargoed, research-training exercise should have been given such notorious publicity. Do the alleged (but contested) deficiencies of the thesis justify the chain of events from the unauthorised copying of a thesis, to a highly publicised but not public inquiry, to nation-wide ridicule and humiliation, personal threats, isolation and termination of a career? What good was it thought was being served by this action? Relatively early in the story, some senior New Zealand academics wanted to know why the issue was pursued, and called for an enquiry into the "motives for such activities."[79]On the most recent publicity, even a senior Canterbury University official wondered what the motivation could be in keeping the Hayward affair at issue.[80] Another opinion was blunt: "There seems to be a determination both to break Joel's career and to silence enquiry into the facts about the Holocaust."[81] On the latter, the implications are precipitous. Dogmatic emphases on the holocaust only "reinforces and legitimates closedmindedness, unrealistic foreign policies and barbaric behaviour."[82]
Further, why has Joel Hayward been frustrated in attempting to publish or work even in fields totally unrelated to his MA research exercise? These are questions the media have not asked. Do they deserve an answer? What specifically constitutes denial of the holocaust? Is it as simple as questioning whether less than 6,000,000 Jews died? Does it extend to expressing sympathy for Germans in Dresden in 1945? Questioning testimonies of survivors? Alleging that countries other than Germany committed war crimes? Denying that Jewish suffering during the Second World War was somehow unique?[83] Is it anti-Semitic to try to remove the element of "sacred myth" from 1940s Jewish history? Is it really so intolerable to deny that the holocaust "transcends history", that it is "the ultimate event" or the "ultimate mystery"? Is it truly obligatory to acquiesce in the view that "any survivor has more to say than all the historians combined about what happened?"[84] Alternatively, to express sympathy with the Palestinian cause in the contemporary Middle East in some quarters suggests hostility to the Jews and to argue that Palestinians perhaps should be accorded their own autonomous territory free from Israeli oppression is regarded as anti-Semitic. Such arguments are as specious as they are jejune but the shackles of a new orthodoxy suggests universities can not allow certain assumptions to bear the weight of enquiry. Can morality be that flexible?
There is nothing redemptive about the holocaust and arguably less redemptive value in the pursuit of Joel Hayward along a journey from holocaust historian to the fate of personal holocaust. A consideration of the larger story suggests quite clearly that the Hayward affair is not just "a storm in a teacup."
What is the motivation for keeping Hayward on the front burner? Justified comeuppance? Malice? Witch hunting? Witch hunters in early modern Europe were renowned for tenacity, success and ruthless application of their programme. Would their successors be any less vigilant? Are there "witch-finder generals" in New Zealand? Has the ghost of Joseph McCarthy appeared again? Is Joel Hayward a victim of outlooks analogous to these? If so, how should New Zealand society respond?[85]
 






PETITION: TO THE UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY


 




In relation to the master's thesis of Joel Hayward at the University of Canterbury, we note the following events, of which the first five are detailed on the University's own website: 1. Joel Hayward was awarded a Masters degree by thesis, with first class honours, by the University of Canterbury in 1993, in accordance with the procedures that the University employed at the time. 2. It was subsequently argued by an external party that the degree should be revoked. 3. The University of Canterbury established a Working Party in 2000 to examine this claim. 4. The Working Party concluded that the thesis was not dishonest, and therefore could not be "amended, removed, downgraded or altered". It further concluded that the thesis was flawed and did not deserve the award of first class honours. 5. The University accepted these conclusions, apologised to those who were offended by the thesis, and stated that it did not support holocaust rtism. 6. Dr Hayward resigned from his position at Massey University in 2002, apparently as a result of the ongoing hostility towards him arising from the previous events. 7. Recently, Dr Thomas Fudge of Canterbury's History Department wrote a review of these events, for inclusion in the University's journal 'History Now'. Although the journal was printed with this article, the Head of the University's History Department (Professor Peter Hempenstall) destroyed copies of the journal, with the concurrence of the University's Vice-Chancellor (Professor Roy Sharp). As a result of this action by the University, the editor (Associate Professor Ian Campbell) has now left that position, and Dr Fudge has indicated his intention to resign from the University. Our views on these events are as follows. Notwithstanding any personal misgivings or objections that individual signatories may have as to the content of the thesis, we believe that certain fundamental principles have been breached by the University. First, we accept that a University has both the right and the obligation to revoke any thesis on the grounds of proven dishonesty. However, in the event of it not revoking a thesis on those grounds, we believe that it is totally inappropriate for any university administrator or sponsored body to issue negative public judgements about it, or to apologise to anyone who may be offended by it. No student should be subject to a de facto second round of assessment as to the quality (as opposed to the honesty) of their thesis, particularly after having just been exonerated of the charge of dishonesty. Secondly, we believe that the Working Party's actions in criticising the quality of the thesis, and the University's public reiteration of that, constitutes the very 'downgrade' that the Working Party asserted to be unwarranted. We consider it inconceivable that the University and the Working Party did not understand the contradiction involved here. Thirdly, we do not believe that it is the business of any university administrator to issue public pronouncements upon any historical issues that are unrelated to the University. This is a matter for individual academics in the relevant area, in the normal exercise of their professional duties. Finally, whilst there may be a range of opinions concerning the University's action in destroying copies of 'History Now', we view the destruction of any published academic work with considerable concern. These concerns are not ameliorated by the University's earlier and clear breaches of the fundamental rights of a thesis student, of its own judgement that the thesis could not be downgraded, and of the proper boundary between academics and administrators in the issuing of public statements. We further consider that the effect of the University's actions has been to send a clear signal to potential students and other researchers at the University as to the acceptable conclusions to be reached in a particular area of enquiry, and this is antithetical to the proper function of any university. Furthermore, the effect of the University's actions is likely to have contributed to the general climate of hostility towards Dr Hayward, and therefore to his subsequent resignation from Massey University. These University actions are improper, and place an obligation upon the University of Canterbury to acknowledge its errors and to offer appropriate remedies to Dr Hayward. Signatories Martin Lally, Associate Professor of Finance, Victoria University, PhD (Victoria University) Glenn Boyle, Professor of Finance, University of Otago, MA (Canterbury), PhD (University of Texas, Austin) Beverley McNally, MBA (Henley), PhD student Tim Beal, Senior Lecturer in Marketing, Victoria University, DBA, PhD (Edinburgh) Benoit Julien, Assistant Professor in Economics, University of Miami, PhD (Western Ontario) Vincent Orange, Reader in History (ret), Canterbury University, PhD (Hull) Stephen Brewster, Accountant, Ministry of Economic Development, CA, BCA MBA (Victoria University), MTax student Scott Chaput, Lecturer in Finance, University of Otago, MBA (UIC), PhD (Oklahoma) Robert Mann, Senior Lecturer in Environmental Studies (ret), University of Auckland, PhD (University of California, Berkeley) Geoff Bertram, Senior Lecturer in Economics, Victoria University, D Phil (Oxford) Bryce Wilkinson, Capital Economics, BSc Hons, MCom, PhD (Canterbury) Rodney Hide, Member of Parliament, MSc (Canterbury and Lincoln), MSc (Montana State) Richard Marriott, Managing Director, Altair Financial Consulting Pty Ltd, formerly Senior Lecturer in Finance at Victoria University, MCom, MBA, B.Eng (elec) Alan Wilkinson, Company Director, BSc Hons, PhD (Canterbury)






Richard Martin, Lecturer in Economics, Victoria University, PhD (Simon Fraser University) Stephen Burnell, Senior Lecturer in Economics, Head of School of Economics and Finance, Victoria University, PhD (Cambridge) Clare Gardner, Lecturer in Accountancy, University of Otago, MCom Arie Brand, Associate Professor, Dept of Sociology and Anthropology (ret), University of Newcastle (NSW), MA, PhD (Leiden) Charles Corrado, Professor of Finance, University of Auckland, PhD (University of Arizona) Anna Carr, Lecturer in Tourism. University of Otago, Postgraduate Diploma in Tourism Studies, PhD student Bryan Sinclair, Strategic Adviser, LLB, BMS Jerry Bowman, Professor of Finance, University of Auckland, PhD (Stanford) Michael Naylor, Lecturer in Finance, Massey University, MSc (University of London) Matthew Ryan, Senior Lecturer in Economics, University of Auckland, PhD (Yale) Andrey Ivanov, Research Assistant, Dept of Economics, University of Auckland, BCom Hons, PhD student Roger Kerr, MA (Canterbury) Rhema Vaithianathan, Lecturer in Economics, University of Auckland, PhD (University of Auckland) Stephen Poletti, Senior Tutor, Dept of Economics, University of Auckland, PhD (University of Newcastle, England) Maureen Coulter, Teacher, MA, PhD student in English and French Tony Chad, Musician/Poet/Editor John Randal, Lecturer in Finance, Victoria University, MSc PhD (Victoria University) Katie Drake, Postgraduate Diploma in International Relations and Security Studies, MA student Andrea Bennett, Lecturer in Finance, Massey University, BSc Hons (Canterbury), MBS Hons (Massey) John Jensen, Professor in History (ret), University of Waikato, MA, PhD (University of Pennsylvania) Francis Jensen, BEd (University of Waikato) Trevor Reeves, writer/publisher, Dunedin Christopher Milne, BComm LLB (University of Otago), CA Jeff Sluka, Associate Professor, Social Anthropology Programme, Massey University, PhD (University of California, Berkeley) Tania Hinehou Butcher, Poet, GradCert ResAn, BA, PGmd Cert Def Start Studs Mary Beth Taylor, Language Education Consultant, MA (University of Washington) Rick Boebel, Senior Lecturer in Finance, University of Otago, MBA (Chicago), PhD (University of North Carolina) Blair Simpson, Student Teacher, BA (Massey University) John Ross, Hon Research Fellow in English, Massey University, MA (VUW), PhD (University of London) Joseph Tanner, Engineer, MA in Philosophy John Irvine, Poet, Writer and Editor, Coromandel Adrian Phillips, Director, Kanuka Grove Educational Resource Centre, Massey University Carl Bradley, Masters student in Defence Studies, Massey University Emma Hamilton, BSLT, Masters student in Speech and Language Therapy, University of Canterbury. Doreen D'Cruz, Senior Lecturer in English and Media Studies, Massey University, PhD (University of Michigan) Brendan Judd, Engineer, BA Hons, MA (Massey University) Ananish Chaudhuri, Senior Lecturer in Economics, University of Auckland, PhD (Rutgers) Roger Openshaw, Professor of Social and Policy Studies in Education, Massey University College of Education, MA, D.Phil (University of Waikato) Cary Nederman, Professor of Political Science, Texas A&M University, formerly lecturer in Political Science at Canterbury, MA, PhD (York University, Canada) James Corum, Professor of Comparative Military Studies, School of Advanced Air and Space Studies, MA (Brown), M.LITT (Oxon), PhD (Queen's University) Simonne Walmsley, Legal Secretary, BA (History) student Alan Papprill, Teacher, Auckland, BA, Dip TCh Kris Vette, General Manager in the National Health Service, UK, BSc, Dip Bus, Dip Bus. Admin, MPhil (Massey University) Lazar Drazeta, PhD (Massey University) Garth Martin, Manager, Rotorua Paul Dunmore, Associate Professor of Accounting, Victoria University, BSc Hons, PhD MBA (McMaster University, Ontario) Judith Lawrence, Copy Editor, formerly librarian at Massey University, MA Hons in English (Massey University) Tania Lamb, Counsellor, B.Ed, MPhil, M.Management Philip Meguire, Senior Lecturer in Economics, University of Canterbury, MBA PhD (University of Chicago) Petition Organiser:
Martin Lally, Associate Professor, School of Economics and Finance, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington (martin.lallyt@vuw.ac.nz). Further signatories are very welcome, and should if possible be communicated to me by email. Contributions to the cost of this advertisement are also welcome."



 


Notes


[1] Philip Matthews, "In Denial: The continuing story of why a New Zealand university refuses to dishonour thesis denying the Nazi Holocaust" Listener (2-8 November 2002), pp. 26-30.
[2]
"We do not endorse or in any way condone Holocaustrtism...," Daryl LeGrew, letter to university staff, 20 April 2000 and "Audit pans thesis on Holocaust" The Press (21 December 2000).
[3]
Tania Hinehou Butcher, "Relentless persecution of a respected academic" Manawatu Evening Standard (2 November 2002), p. 8.
[4]
Dov Bing, Professor of Political Science at Waikato University, raised the alarm as early as 14 December 1999 in an email to Vincent Orange. More specifically, The New Zealand Jewish Chronicle 56 (April 2000), pp. 1, 6. The New Zealand Jewish Council subsequently obtained official university documents that enabled it to make a formal submission on the thesis. David Zwartz made a formal request to Alan Hayward, University Registrar (and no relation to Joel Hayward), under provisions of the Official Information Act 1982 on 4 April 2000. In reply, Alan Hayward declined to release some materials. Acting on a request from the New Zealand Jewish Council, the Office of the Ombudsmen twice contacted Vincent Orange about the same materials on 19 June and 14 July. Orange declined to make public the requested documents. However, in his reply of 17 July 2000, Orange wanted to know how David Zwartz had knowledge of a letter dated 21 April that Orange had sent to the University Chancellor. Request for documents was again raised by the law firm of Macfarlane, Dougall, & Stringer, in a letter to Gerald Orchard, 9 August 2000, pp. 1-2.
[5]
The New Zealand Jewish Chronicle 56 (No. 6, 2000), p. 6; Sunday Star-Times (28 May 2000); The Press (31 May 2000); letter to the University of Canterbury Working Party, 25 September 2000, 29pp, passim;Listener (24 June 2000), pp. 5-6; Listener (9 November 2002), p. 8; Report by the Joel Hayward Working Party (University of Canterbury, December 2000), p. 34.
[6]
Dame Phyllis Guthardt, Chancellor of Canterbury University, letter to university staff, 20 April 2000; "Holocaust thesis investigated" The Press (27 April 2000); "Former High Court judge to chair Holocaust thesis inquiry" The Press (16 May 2000).
[7]
Barker: Chancellor of Auckland University from 1991 to 1999 and former Senior Puisne Judge of the High Court of New Zealand; Trotter: Emeritus Professor of History at the University of Otago; and Macintyre: Professor of History at the University of Melbourne. Suggestions were made that the Working Party permit observers at its proceedings, but they were held in private.
[8]
Report by the Joel Hayward Working Party, p. 86.
[9]
Some of that negative reporting is referred to in the notes of this essay. Telephone calls have caused Hayward several times to have his home telephone number changed and at times has received threatening or abusive email on a daily basis. Vincent Orange, letter to Miles Fairburn, 10 February, 2001, p.3.
[10]
Detailed in various documents and correspondence. For example, Joel Hayward, letter to Vincent Orange, 22 April 2000, pp. 1-2; W. David McIntyre, letter to Ian Barker, undated [2000], p. 2; W. David McIntyre, letter to Alan Hayward, 25 May 1992, p. 1; Kingsley McFarlane, letter to Alan Hayward, 5 May 1992, pp. 1-2; McFarlane, letter to Alan Hayward, 9 September 1992, p. 1; Ian Catanach, letter to Vincent Orange, 30 December 2000, p.3; and Report by the Joel Hayward Working Party, pp.17-19, 73.
[11]
The head of the History department at that time refused to consider the matter. W. David McIntyre, letter to Alan Hayward, 25 May 1992 wherein McIntyre stated "the interference they have attempted is intolerable."
[12]
Joel Hayward, Letter to the University of Canterbury Working Party, 25 September 2000, p. 3.
[13]
"Submission to the University of Canterbury Working Party on the Joel Hayward MA Thesis," by the New Zealand Jewish Council, undated, paragraph 40, p. 8.
[14]
L.L. Stevens, QC, "Memorandum for Members of the Working Party,"15 September 2000, p. 15.
[15]
Part XIV of the Education Act 1989 underscores the essential principles of academic freedom. Section 161(2) (a) states that students and academics have the freedom, within the law, to query and test received wisdom, to advance new ideas and to state unpopular or controversial opinions. Reprinted Statues of New Zealand (Wellington: New Zealand Government, 1996), volume 34, p. 167. Other relevant canons include the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, Section 14. Grant Huscroft and Paul Rishworth, eds, Rights and Freedoms: The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 and the Human Rights Act 1993 (Wellington: Brooker"s, 1995), pp. 500-4 at p. 501.
[16]
Statement adopted by the Council of the New Zealand Library Association, 15 May 1980. http://www.lianza.org.nz/censorship.htm and commented upon favorably by library personnel. For example, John Redmayne, letter to Daryl LeGrew, 20 April 2000.
[17]
Noam Chomsky, "The Faurisson Affair: His Right to Say It" Nation (28 February 1991), p.231. Chomsky is a prominent Jewish intellectual.
[18]
Quoted in D. D. Guttenplan, The Holocaust on Trial: History, Justice and the David Irving Libel Case, (London: Granta Books, 2001), p. 302. Hilberg is a well-respected Jewish historian.
[19]
These principles are urged for example by Frank Haden, "Holocaust denier should have freedom to upset" Sunday Star-Times (21 May 2000) and Tim Darlington, "Politics has no place in thesis arguments"Sunday Star Times (4 June 2000). After the Working Party Report was released supportive letters to the editor were published in The Press (21 December 2000) and (26 December 2000). Hayward"s students likewise expressed their support for him. "Backing for controversial ex-lecturer" Evening Standard (31 October 2002).
[20]
There are academics who oppose this. For example, Chris Connolly, "Submission on Joel Hayward"s Thesis," [undated, ca. July 2000] p. 4 where he states, "We have no business trying to "neuter" history at the postgraduate level, turning out students who shrink from controversy."
[21]
"Submission to the University of Canterbury Working Party on the Joel Hayward MA Thesis" by the New Zealand Jewish Council, undated, paragraph 23, p.5.
[22]
Elie Wiesel, "Words from a Witness," Conservative Judaism 21 (Spring 1967), p. 43.
[23]
David Cohen, "Rev-isionist history casts campus shadow" The National Business Review (22 November 2002), p. 4.
[24]
An irrefutable historical, social and political phenomenon. See for example the thorough and dispassionate treatment in Peter Novick, The Holocaust in American Life (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1999) and Norman G. Finkelstein, The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering, (London: Verso, 2000).
[25]
J.S.A. Hayward, "The Fate of Jews in German Hands: An Historical Enquiry into the Development and Significance of Holocaust rev-isionism," unpublished MA thesis, University of Canterbury, 1993, 360 pp.
[26]
Hayward, "The Fate of Jews in German Hands," passim but especially pp. 143-260.
[27]
See Christian Leitz, "Holocaust Research: The Current Position,"History Now 6 (1) May 2000, p. 28: "the search for a written order from Hitler will continue as long as there are still files of the Third Reich hidden away in the archives of Russia and elsewhere."
[28]
Hayward, "The Fate of Jews in German Hands," p. 336.
[29]
Israel Gutman, ed., Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, 4 volumes (New York: Macmillan, 1990), vol. 4, pp. 1797-1802 projects a figure between 5.6 million and 5.9 million while stating the figures are "estimates," Estimated total deaths during and as a result of the Second World War are commonly estimated at between 50 and 60 million.
[30]
Yehuda Bauer, "Don't resist: A Critique of Phillip Lopate," Tikkun 4 (May-June 1989) p.67.
[31]
Cited in Barbara Amouyal, "Doubts over Evidence of Camp Survivors"Jerusalem Post (17 August 1986), p. 1.
[32]
A standard reference work, however, lists Neuengamme, Sachsenhausen and Ravensbrück as German camps where gas was used, but does not mention camps such as Dachau and Buchenwald which were formerly thought to have been primarily extermination centres. Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, vol. 2, pp. 539-41.
[33]
Hayward, "The Fate of Jews in German Hands," p. 336 and Appendix to the thesis, p. 2.
[34]
Hayward's discussion of gas chambers has sometimes been presented as concluding that no gas chambers existed at all. "POW angry over thesis" The Press (20 December 2000); "Audit pans thesis on Holocaust" The Press (21 December 2000) and "MP wants choice of tutor probed" The Press (9 January 2001).
[35]
Jean-Michel Chaumont, La Concurrence des Victims. (Paris: Editions le Doucouverte, 1997), pp. 137, 148-49, 156.
[36]
As argued by Elie Wiesel. See Irving Abraham, ed. Against Silence: The Voice and Vision of Elie Wiesel, 3 vols. (Washington: Holocaust Library, 1995). Others argue the uniqueness doctrine amounts to "intellectual sleight-of-hand", fetish and cult characteristics (Peter Novick, The Holocaust in American Life, pp. 9, 198) just plain silly (Jacob Neusner, The Public Side of Learning (Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1985), p. 128) or "sterile" (Finkelstein, The Holocaust Industry, p. 47). The most systematic treatment of the doctrine of uniqueness is Steven T. Katz, The Holocaust in Historical Context, vol. 1. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994) esp. pp. 28, 58, 60.
[37]
A reference to the outrage prompted by Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (London: Faber, 1963). It is noteworthy that "almost all scholars have come to accept Arendt's thesis," Novick, The Holocaust in American Life, p. 137.
[38]
Goldhagen says institutionalised hatred of Jews among Germans produced the holocaust. Daniel Goldhagen, Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust (London: Little, Brown & Co. 1996). For a robust critique see Miles Fairburn, Social History: Problems, Strategies and Methods (London: Macmillan, 1999), pp. 263-80 and Raul Hilberg, "La Phénomène Goldhagen," Les Temps Modernes 592 (Feb-Mar. 1997), pp. 1-10. On the other hand, Stanley Milgram, a Yale psychologist, in the early 1960s carried out experiments which suggested that ordinary moral people under dictatorial influence could easily engage in atrocities. Stanley Milgram,Obedience to Authority: an Experimental View (London: Tavistock, 1974).
[39]
For example, "Hayward lacks the integrity necessary to hold a position of trust in the academic world," Comment by David Zwartz cited in "Thesis supervision angers Jewish group," The Press (3 March 2001), p. 1.
[40]
Hayward was criticised for having disseminated his thesis, while others condemned him for having embargoed it. It is true that Hayward did give copies of his thesis to two or three individuals. That does not constitute academic publication. While he has been criticized for this there is nothing unusual in it. Whether or not he was naive is hardly relevant. It is a common practice for people assisting research scholars with information to expect or even require a copy of the thesis in return for their cooperation. Hayward gave copies in this manner. "But I expressly forbade any use or publication of the thesis, in part or in whole, and even attached a clearly worded statement to the inside cover, which read: Copyright 1993 J.S.A. Hayward All Rights Reserved No reproduction, copy or transmission of any part of this MA thesis may be made without written permission from the author," Hayward goes on to say that as far as he was aware only Frederick Töben of the Adelaide Institute made any effort to further "holocaust denial" by using his thesis. As soon as this came to Hayward"s attention he "took immediate and successful steps... to prevent any mischievous or harmful use of my thesis being made by that man," Joel Hayward, letter to the University of Canterbury Working Party, 25 September 2000, pp. 3-4. It came to wider attention only after a copy apparently was removed from the Canterbury University library, illegally photocopied and distributed. This act of theft was apparently never investigated by the authorities.
[41]
David Zwartz, president of the New Zealand Jewish Council put it bluntly: "We lay full responsibility on the experienced professional historians at the university whose job was to guide and assess his [Hayward's] work," "Making History" The Press (20 May 2000), p. 2. Astonishment later was expressed that Orange had been appointed convener of the History department Research Committee which oversees all thesis proposals. "Historian in thesis post" The Press (10 June 2000), p. 8. Elsewhere, Orange's resignation was called for. "Shonky thesis a dire scandal" Sunday Star-Times (14 January 2001), p. A8. See also the New Zealand Jewish Chronicle 56 (No. 6, 2000), pp.1, 6, 7-8.
[42]
Lyall Lukey, letter to the editor of the Sunday Star-Times (19 January 2001).
[43]
Frank Jones, "Rabid Attack" Sunday Star-Times (21 January 2001).
[44]
Report by the Joel Hayward Working Party is 89 pages in length but also includes over two hundred pages of supporting materials.
[45]
A news media report claimed "amid tight security" the University Council "debated for two hours the findings...," The Press (19 December 2000). According to the Vice Chancellor, "At its meeting on Monday 18 December 2000 the Council adopted the... Report from the Working Party and approved its public release," Daryl LeGrew, letter to Vincent Orange, 19 December 2000.
[46]
For example, Ian Catanach and Marie Peters to Vincent Orange, 30 December 2000. A dozen other scholars from around the country expressed their disapproval, some in strident terms.
[47]
Vincent Orange, letter to the Working Party, 18 October 2000, 7pp and Orange, letter to Miles Fairburn, 10 February 2001, 18pp.
[48]
"A tale [...] full of sound and fury, signifying nothing!" "Comments by Professor (retired) John H. Jensen on 'Submission to the University of Canterbury Working Party on the Joel Hayward thesis' by the New Zealand Jewish Council and 'Report' by Professor Richard J. Evans," undated, 5pp.
[49]
For example, Martin Lally, Victoria University, letter to Daryl LeGrew, 1 February 2001, p. 3 but passim. On legal advice, L.L. Stevens, QC, letter to Ian Barker, 10 October 2000, pp. 1-2.
[50]
http://www.hist.canterbury.ac.nz/news/index.htm
[51]
Minutes of Special Departmental Meeting, 21 February 2001, p. 2.
[52]
At least three New Zealand academics (outside Canterbury) publicly calling for Hayward's disgrace admitted not having read the thesis. Certain individuals appeared on national television decrying the thesis but only afterwards read it. Elsewhere, "I have no hesitation in endorsing the New Zealand Jewish Council's condemnation of [Hayward's] University of Canterbury MA thesis," Greg Ryan, letter to the editor, The Press (5 May 2000), p. 4. A month later (6 June), Ryan, a lecturer at Lincoln University, admitted to a member of the Canterbury History department he had not read the Hayward thesis. See also Chris Connolly, "Submission on Joel Hayward's Thesis," p. 5.
[53]
Miles Fairburn, memorandum to History Department, 8 February 2001 and Vincent Orange, letter to Miles Fairburn, 10 February 2001, pp. 2-16. The dossier assembled formally by Orange in February 2001 consists of approximately 144 pages.
[54]
Vincent Orange, letter to Ann Trotter, 25 May 2000, pp. 1-2 referring to many of the documents eventually included in the dossier and attaches copies in advance of his own meeting on 26 July. Receipt of the documents also acknowledged by Stuart Macintyre, letter to Vincent Orange, 12 June 2000, p. 1. The documents again are referred to in some detail in Orange"s letter to "Ian Barker and Colleagues" on 16 July 2000, pp. 1-4.
[55]
Report by the Joel Hayward Working Party, p. 86 and Daryl LeGrew, letter to the academic community, 21 December 2000.
[56]
The materials evidently were placed in the University archives. Chancellor Phyllis Guthardt, letter to Vincent Orange, 30 April 2001.
[57]
"We feel that the Department should be 'closed lip' if approached by any media. Also we should wait until we have heard from the VC [vice chancellor], as to what we should say to the media," Judy Robertson (on behalf of Miles Fairburn, head of the department of history), letter to all history staff, 20 April 2000. This was the basis for Orange declining to appear in a proposed segment of the 60 Minutes television programme. Vincent Orange, letter to Melanie Jones, 5 August 2000. A similar communiqué was circulated throughout the History Department on 2 February 2001 and again on 23 October 2002: "We are to give 'no comment' and if anyone is persistent refer them to... the Registry."
[58]
Evans was supplied with the examiners' reports on Hayward's thesis as well as Vincent Orange's letter to the Canterbury Chancellor (21 April 2000) by Macfarlane, Dougall, Stringer, barristers and solicitors, and asked by David Zwartz to examine and comment on them. Richard J. Evans, letter to David Zwartz, 19 September 2000, p. 1. Evans concluded that all three documents are problematic, essentially repeating his arguments detailed in his report on the thesis.
[59]
"Submission to the University of Canterbury Working Party on the Joel Hayward MA Thesis," (undated) consisting of seventy statements.
[60]
There is some dispute over this last point. "Holocaust thesis investigated" The Press (27 April 2000) stated the Jewish Council wanted the thesis removed from the library but Mike Regan of the New Zealand Jewish Council denied it (Canta 3 May 2000), as did David Zwartz. "Flawed arguments" Sunday Star-Times (28 May 2000) and in his letter to Chancellor Phyllis Guthardt, 4 April 2000, p. 2.
[61]
Gerald Orchard, "To the Working Party inquiry into JSA Hayward"s MA Thesis," 13 October 2000, 4pp.
[62]
See Report by the Joel Hayward Working Party, pp. 36-37.
[63]
L.L. Stevens, QC, "Memorandum for Members of the Working Party," 15 September 2000, p. 21.
[64]
Journal of Social History 32 (No. 4, 1999), pp. 941-2; History and Theory 39 (No. 2, 2000), pp. 218-29; The Times Literary Supplement no. 4935 (31 October 1997), p. 10; History - Reviews in History (October 1999), and others.
[65]
Richard J. Evans, In Defence of History (London: Granta Books, 1997), pp. 121, 123.
[66]
Richard J. Evans, Lying About Hitler: History, Holocaust, and the David Irving Trial (New York: Basic Books, 2001), p. 248.
[67]
Report by the Joel Hayward Working Party, pp.3, 57, 70 and 86.
[68]
"An odious decision" The New Zealand Jewish Chronicle 57 (No. 3, 2000 [sic]), pp. 1, 7.
[69]
Comment by David Zwartz in Sunday Star Times (28 January 2001).
[70]
The cost of the enquiry has been reported at $200,000. "Thesis casts shadow" The Press (20 December 2000). Also in Daryl LeGrew, letter to Vincent Orange, 19 December 2000, p. 2 estimated at between $150,000 and $200,000 and in "An open letter to our community from the University of Canterbury", 22 December 2000.
[71]
"Varsity leader defends historian" The New Zealand Herald (15-16 April 2000) wherein Pro Vice Chancellor Barrie Macdonald of Massey University affirmed the high regard the university had for Hayward.
[72]
Joel Hayward, letter to Vincent Orange, 9 May 2000, p.1 wherein he refers to specific treatment by a physician. In 2002 Hayward again referred to continuing care.
[73]
Joel Hayward, letter, 6 December 2002, read publicly at Orange's retirement function at Canterbury University on the same day. The letter was an expression of gratitude and congratulations to Orange who devoted forty years to Canterbury.
[74]
"Second Holocaust thesis controversy" The Press (24 October 2002) and "Essay was rev-isionist" Waikato Times (23 October 2002). The suggestion was advanced by Dov Bing. Ironically, an editorial shortly thereafter dismissed Bing"s suggestions as "Trivial to-do" The Press (29 October 2002). One wonders why editors of a leading newspaper permitted a "trivial" matter to appear on the front page or composed an editorial on the same "trivial" subject?
[75]
Glyn Harper and Joel Hayward, eds, Born to Lead: New Zealand Military Commanders and their Style of Command.
[76]
Tony Fisk, letter to Joel Hayward, 29 November 2002. Fisk is the managing director of HarperCollins in New Zealand.
[77]
Joel Hayward, letter to Vincent Orange, 4 December 2002.
[78]
Joel Hayward, letter to Vincent Orange, 5 February 2003.
[79]
John H. Jensen, submission to the Working Party, p. 8; Hayward, letter to the University of Canterbury Working Party, p. 25 and Hayward, letter to Melanie Jones, 6 October 2000 declining to participate in the proposed 60 Minutes programme.
[80]
Alan Hayward, letter to Vincent Orange, 17 October 2002.
[81]
Vincent Orange, letter to Alan Hayward, 7 May 2000, p. 4.
[82]
Charles Liebman, "What should have been done?" Jerusalem Report 2 (9 January 1992), p. 37.
[83]
All of these are considered constituent aspects of holocaust denial in Deborah E. Lipstadt, Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory (New York: The Free Press, 1993). On what basis can these criteria be considered binding?
[84]
Elie Wiesel, "Trivializing the Holocaust," New York Times (16 April 1978), p. 2:1; Harry J. Cargas, "An interview with Elie Wiesel,"Holocaust and Genocide Studies 1 (1986), p. 5.
[85]
Neither Joel Hayward nor Vincent Orange has been associated with the preparation of this article and neither has seen it prior to publication.

IHR The 'Holocaust' Put in Perspective By Austin J. App   top
The 'Holocaust' Put in Perspective By Austin J. App I am highly gratified -- and I am sure all the other speakers are too -- that the Institute for Historical Review had the inspiration and the courage to organize this 1979 rev-isionist Convention. It is badly needed and long overdue. Every major war is conducted on tidal waves of propaganda, fair and foul. World War II, because it involved almost the whole world, and because the victors insisted on Unconditional Surrender, and because their side included the two most vengeful and vindictive ideologies in the world, Bolshevism and Zionism, also was guilty of the most shameless and unscrupulous propaganda so far on record. In part because of the never-forget -- never-forgive mentality, World War II Allied atrocity propaganda has not ebbed down but kept in high tide, as with the recent phony documentary the NBC-TV Holocaust. Therefore Historical rev-isionism is more important than after any other war: the more atrocity -- and hate-mongering vitiate the terms of peace, as at Yalta and Potsdam, the more rev-isionism is needed to heal the wounds. The Institute for Historical Review does a vital service both to historical scholarship and also to basic values. Since 1946, when mostly from small back-page items in brave little publications, I soon was sickened by mountains of evidence of the bestialities of the victors, especially the Soviet-Russians. In anger I published Ravishing the Women of Conquered Europe. The subtitle was: "The Big Three Liberators at Work Having a Wonderful Time Raping and Debauching the Women of Germany, Austria and Hungary; Re-Educating Them to Become Good Christians." I followed this with History's Most Terrifying Peace. I got thousands and thousands of grateful letters. But I also discovered what hatred and recriminations historical truth provokes among the vindictive vipers in public affairs and in the press! For me it feels good after thirteen years to see California again. In June 1966 I spoke at the San Diego Mann Jr. High School on "Police Brutality a Phony Cry." But even farther back, in 1923-24 I spent a year in San Francisco, which climaxed with my taking a national scholarship examination (at St. Mary's College). What I won was a Knights of Columbus four-year full Fellowship to the Catholic University of America, in D.C., a milestone in my career. Being here today unrolls the kaleidoscope of a lifetime before me. More
  EUSTACE MULLINS: THE SECRET HOLOCAUST
EUSTACE MULLINS: THE SECRET HOLOCAUST Eustace Mullins Posted July 8, 2009 Eustace Mullins is a veteran of the United States Air Force, with thirty-eight months of active service during World War II. A native Virginian, he was educated at Washington and Lee University, New York University, Ohio University, the University of North Dakota, the Escuelas des Bellas Artes, San Miguel de Allende, Mexico, and the Institute of Contemporary Arts, Washington, D.C. THE SECRET HOLOCAUST The devastation of civilization to date by the rapacious hordes of Godless Communism, as well as their planned annihilation of all non-Jewish societies and political organizations, began to ravage the world in the nineteenth century. It has resulted in incredible suffering and death for many millions of Christian victims in many parts of the world. Yet as these Christian victims lie in their graves, unmourned and unknown, a new class of international citizens, (the creators of Marxist terrorism), profess to be the only "victims" who have endured suffering in the past one hundred and fifty years. They command the world to weep for them, because they control the world. These harbingers of terror claim to be "refugees", since they had no nation of their own, but infested the civilized societies in every part of the world for two thousand years, bringing with them, in every instance, disease and death. They have emerged from one shattered nation after another, not as refugees, but as the final victors, bearing away their loot, and scurrying through ports which they have created and which they alone know how to follow, until they come to another host nation. With them they bring, like the medieval Bubonic Plagues, (an infection which they were accused of spreading), a terrible contamination, an infestation which quickly spreads through the new host country, and fells all who become its victims. This plague is world Communism, and its known carriers, the furry scavengers who have found their way through the sewers into every civilized place, are the international Jews. P. D. . We are asked to weep only for the Jews, and to ignore the many millions    of actual victims of world terrorism in the past one hundred and fifty years, a chronicle of such horror that one scarcely can bear to put down this bloodstained record, not merely in fear that the world might put away its business in order to mourn these countless victims of international Communist terrorism, but that the tragic fate of these innocents, most of them women and children, is one of such pathos that one's heart could break from the full impact of its terrifying implications for everyone alive today. One of the first victims of the international financiers, shortly after publication of the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx in 1848, was the Southern civilization of the United States. White immigrants had wrested from a hostile territory the means to create a gracious culture, one which the ruder and more unlettered sections of the new Republic could only gape at in admiration, an admiration, however, which soon turned to envy and then hatred. This hatred brought armies into the American South, bearing the terrorists who, unknown at that time, were the first Communist totalitarians determined to wreak their hatred and policies of annihilation on all civilized people. M JO Mtfa-n American Jewry and the Civil War Bertram W. Korn Introduction by Allan Nevlns with a raw chapter by ths author
Iron Light Is Elie Wiesel an impostor?

On 3 March 2009, a Hungarian website published an article entitled Még mindig kísérti a haláltábor (The extermination camp is still tempting)[2] and outlining important revelations by Miklós Grüner, a former deportee to Auschwitz. The article was translated and appeared the following day under the title Auschwitz Survivor Claims Elie Wiesel is an Impostor[3]. The text reads as follows:

In May 1944 , when Miklos Gruner was 15, he was deported from Hungary to Auschwitz-Birkenau with his mother and father as well as both a younger and an elder brother. He says that his mother and his younger brother were immediately gassed after their arrival in the camp. Then he, his elder brother and their father had an inmate number tattooed on their arms and were sent to perform hard work in a synthetic fuel factory linked to IG Farben where the father died six months later. After that, the elder brother was sent to Mauthausen and, as the young Miklos was then alone, two elder Jewish inmates who were also Hungarians and friends with his late father took him under their protection. These two protectors of the young Miklos were the Lazar and Abraham Wiesel brothers.

In the following months, Miklos Gruner and the Wiesel brothers became good friends. Lazar Wiesel was 31 years old in 1944. Miklos never forgot the number Lazar was tattooed with by the Nazis: A-7713. In January 1945, as the Russian army was coming, the inmates were transferred to Buchenwald. During the ten days this transfer took, partly by foot, partly by train, more than half of the inmates died and amongst them was Abraham, the elder brother of Lazar Wiesel. In April 8, 1945, the US army liberated Buchenwald. Miklos and Lazar were amongst the survivors of the camp. As Miklos had tuberculosis, he was sent in a Swiss clinic and therefore was separated from Lazar. After recovering, Miklos emigrated to Australia while his elder brother, who also survived the war, established himself in Sweden.

Years later, in 1986, Miklos was contacted by the Swedish journal Sydsvenska Dagbladet in Malmo and invited to meet “an old friend” named Elie Wiesel… As Miklos answered that he doesn’t know anyone with this name, he was told Elie Wiesel was the same person Miklos knew in the Nazi camps under the name Lazar Wiesel and with the inmate number A-7713… Miklos still remembered that number and he was therefore convinced at that point that he was going to meet his old friend Lazar and happily accepted the invitation to meet him at the Savoj Hotel in Stockholm on December 14, 1986. Miklos recalls:

“I was very happy at the idea of meeting Lazar but when I confronted the so-called ‘Elie Wiesel’, I was stunned to see a man I didn’t recognize at all, who didn’t even speak Hungarian or Yiddish and instead he was speaking English in a strong French accent. Therefore our meeting was over in about ten minutes. As a goodbye gift, the man gave me his book entitled ‘Night’ of which he claimed to be the author. I accepted the book I didn’t know at that time but told everyone there that this man was not the person he pretended to be!”

Miklos recalls that during this strange meeting, Elie Wiesel refused to show him the tattooed number on his arm, saying he didn’t want to exhibit his body. Miklos adds that Elie Wiesel showed his tattooed number afterward to an Israeli journalist who Miklos met and this journalist told Miklos that he didn’t have time to identify the number but… was certain it wasn’t a tattoo. Miklos says:

“After that meeting with Elie Wiesel, I spent twenty years of research and found out that the man calling himself Elie Wiesel has never been in a Nazi concentration camp since he was not included in any official list of detainees”.

Miklos also found out that the book Elie Wiesel gave him in 1986 as something he has written himself was in fact written in Hungarian in 1955 by Miklos’ old friend Lazar Wiesel and published in Paris under the title “Un di Velt hot Gesvigen”, meaning approximately “The World Kept Silent”. The book was then shortened and rewritten in French as well as in English in order to be published under the author’s name Elie Wiesel in 1958, under the french title “La Nuit” and the English title “Night”. Ten million copies of the book were sold in the world by Elie Wiesel who even received a Nobel Peace prize for it in 1986 while – says Miklos – the real author Lazar Wiesel was mysteriously missing…

“Elie Wiesel never wanted to meet me again”, says Miklos. “He became very successful; he takes 25 thousand dollars for a 45 minutes speech on the Holocaust. I have officially reported to the FBI in Los Angeles. I have also complained to governments and media, in the US and Sweden with no result.

I have received anonymous calls telling me I could be shot if I don`t shut up but I am not afraid of death any more. I have deposited the whole dossier in four different countries and, if I died suddenly, they would be made public. The world must know that Elie Wiesel is an impostor and I am going to tell it, I am going to publish the truth in a book called “Stolen Identity A7713”.

Miklós Grüner’s declarations have been repeated many times, but have not caused any major research effort. We will thus scrutinize them critically but soberly.

First of all, some biographical data on Elie Wiesel:

Born on 30 September 1928 at Sighet in Romania, the son of Shlomo and Sarah Frig, the daughter of Dodye Feig, deported to Birkenau on 16 May 1944.[4]

The most important point to be verified is the reliability of the accuser. What can be considered established on the subject of Miklós Grüner is the fact that he was at Buchenwald in May of 1945. In a “Concentration Camp Inmates Questionnaire” of the Military Government of Germany, we have an entry giving his name, and the date of his birth – 6 April 1928 – also conforms. The ID number is handwritten in the upper left hand corner: 120762.[5] More Coincidentally, this fall marked the 75th anniversary of the Mercury Theater of the Air’s broadcast of “War of The Worlds,” when Orson Welles and his talented players used the conventions of the new-ish medium of radio to fool at least some unsuspecting Americans into believing their Halloween broadcast was actually a Martian invasion.[1]

 

 
Wikipedia Raul Hilberg ... Raul Hilberg ...Destruction of European Jews ...  Droemer Knaur ... decided against publication, due to the work's documentation of certain episodes of cooperation by Jewish authorities with the executors of the Holocaust — material which the editors said would only play into the hands of the antisemitic right wing in Germany. Hilberg dismissed this fear as "nonsense". ... finally came out in German edition in 1982... Hillberg was raised Polish Jewish but became an atheist, family, Anschluss, Austria, Cuba, WWII to escape Hitler, encounter with Stephen Wise, Columbia University, more interested in perpetrators of holocaust than victims, President Carter's Commission on the Holocaust, holocaust scholar, Geschwister-Scholl-Preis award. Hilberg not religious, attended Ohavi Zedek, "Jews are the conscience of the world"... interviewd by Claude Lanzmann's Shoah, a strong supporter of Norman Finkelstein's Holocaust Industry, made posthumous appearance in American Radical: The Trials of Norman Finkelstein, died of lung cancer, a life long Republican,
 
YouTube The General's Son. Miko Peled is a peace activist who dares to say in public what others still choose to deny. Born in Jerusalem in 1961 into a well known Zionist family, his grandfather, Dr. Avraham Katsnelson was a Zionist leader and signer of the Israeli Declaration of Independence. His Father, Matti Peled, was a young officer in the war of 1948 and a general in the war of 1967 when Israel conquered the West Bank, Gaza, Golan Heights and Sinai. Miko's unlikely opinions reflect his father's legacy. General Peled was a war hero turned peacemaker. Miko grew up in Jerusalem, a multi-ethnic city, but had to leave Israel before he made his first Palestinian friend, the result of his participation in a dialogue group in California. He was 39. On September 4, 1997 the beloved Smadar, 13, the daughter of Miko's sister Nurit and her husband Rami Elhanan was killed in a suicide attack. Peled insists that Israel/Palestine is one state—the separation wall notwithstanding, massive investment in infrastructure, towns and highways that bisect and connect settlements on the West Bank, have destroyed the possibility for a viable Palestinian state. The result, Peled says is that Israelis and Palestinians are governed by the same government but live under different sets of laws. At the heart of Peled's conclusion lies the realization that Israelis and Palestinians can live in peace as equals in their shared homeland. All rights-Alternate Focus under educational learning aid.
 
InsideHigherEducation Academic Freedom and Holocaust Denial ... A Pennsylvania English professor whose anti-Israel rhetoric and denial of the Holocaust as a historic certainty have ignited controversy is citing academic freedom as his defense. Kaukab Siddique, associate professor of English and journalism at Lincoln University of Pennsylvania, appeared last month at a pro-Palestinian rally in Washington, where he called the state of Israel illegitimate. “I say to the Muslims, ‘Dear brothers and sisters, unite and rise up against this hydra-headed monster which calls itself Zionism,’ ” he said at a rally on Sept. 3. “Each one of us is their target and we must stand united to defeat, to destroy, to dismantle Israel -- if possible by peaceful means,” he added. Read more: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/10/26/siddique#ixzz2rE6YbBN4 Inside Higher Ed search terms: anti-Israel rhetoric, Holocaust was a hoax, example of a questing mind asking tough questions, freedom of expression, fire bombing, Hiroshima, Nagazaki, moral ambiguity of war, look at both sides, part of being a professor, avoid topic in classes, Siddique's comments and conservative Christians, CBN, Pat Robertson, Siddique's positions similar to Carter's, extreme right wing defense of Israel, death threats, dumbing down of discourse, expressed views do not represent Lincoln University, a black college,
 
Metapedia Anti-Semitism (also spelled antisemitism) is a term and contemporary epithet which has been used in a variety of contexts by different people and organisations, though it was originally invented in 1860 by a liberal Jew named Moritz Steinschneider, the son of a Talmudist born in Moravia. In its initial coining, it was applied in a criticism of Ernest Renan's contrast of Semites and Indo-Europeans, though at this stage was in a wider more general context than just opposition to Jewishness. It was the socialist Wilhelm Marr who popularised the term in the 1870s with his League of Anti-Semites, applying it to himself in a positive sense primarily in his attacks on Jewish finance, but also in regard to their non-assimilationism in wider society. The earliest self-identifying "anti-semites" or those figures whom the term was applied to, were generally non-Marxian socialists who came to regard Jewishness and its values system, as the most anti-social form of the unrestrained bourgeoisie following the Industrial Revolution. This had coincided with the ascent of various monopolistic Jewish financial dynasties in Europe and soon North America following their "emancipation". For a time, the phrase was adopted by certain integral nationalists, especially in France such as Action Française. The phrase had its critics from the start and was regarded as inaccurate by people such as Eugen Dühring and largely fell out of use as a self-identifying term by the 1920s. "Anti-anti-semitism" has led to mass murder on an industrial scale; following the Jewish coup d'etat in Russia in 1917 for instance, so-called "anti-semitism" was a "crime" punishable by death, often by shooting in the back of the head. Today the thought police continue their war against people who criticise the legion of Jewish crimes against humanity by throwing "anti-semites" into modern gulags (ie - prisons) in many parts of Europe or bring them to ruin financially. While in other parts of the world, particularly the United States, social ostracism is enforced. Because Jews believe they are a race "chosen" by God above the rest of humanity, they believe they can commit atrocities with impunity and the mere goyim have no business asking them to limit or take account of their grotesque behavior.
 
Lulu  Dr. Herman Greife Jewish-Run Concentration Camps in the Soviet Union ...An anti-Communist book from 1937 which revealed that Communist Jews were the commandants of 11 out of the 12 main Stalinist-era Gulags, or concentration camps, including the camp system directors Matvei Berman and Hershel Jehuda. Ultimately, some 14 million people would be detained in the 53 camps which operated from 1934 to 1953. According to official Soviet data, some 1,053,829 people died in the camps from various causes. The modern-day Russian industrial cities of the Arctic, such as Norilsk, Vorkuta, and Magadan, were originally Gulags. Contents Introduction to the 2011 edition by Francis Dupont ; Introduction to the 1999 Edition by Dr. E.R. Fields; About This Book; Foreword to the 1937 Edition; Preface to the 1937 Edition; Chapter One: The Jewish Terror Grips Russia; Chapter Two: The Origin of the Compulsion Workers; Chapter Three: The Cry for Redemption of the Exiles; Chapter Four: The Division of the Compulsion Workers; Chapter Five: The Construction of the Stalin White Sea Canal; ...
and Wikipedia Berman was the son of a Jewish brickyard owner. He joined the Russian army and entered the military school in Irkutsk. He then became a cadet of the 25th Reserve infantry regiment. Berman joined the Bolsheviks in June 1917. In 1918 he joined the Red Army and was stationed in Tomsk and in June was working in a propaganda unit. In August 1918 he joined the Cheka and was named chief of state security in the city of Glazov. From 1923 to 1924 he was People's Commissar for State Security in the Buryat-Mongol Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. He then led the OGPU in Central Asia. From February 1927 to October 1927 he was the chairman of the OGPU in the Uzbek Soviet Socialist Republic. In November 1929 he helped develop the GULAG system of camps and became deputy chief of the GULAG in 1930. From June 9, 1932 to August 17, 1937 he was head of the GULAG.[1] He was awarded the Order of Lenin on August 4, 1933, soon after the completion of the White Sea – Baltic Canal. By 1935, by his own count, Berman was in charge of over 740,000 prisoners working on 15 major projects in the GULAG. After the fall of Genrikh Yagoda, Berman continued to rise in the hierarchy of the NKVD and he held the offices of head construction of the Moscow-Volga Canal and Deputy head of the NKVD in 1936-1937. In August 1937, Berman's fall began in the time of the Great Terror. On August 17, 1937, he lost his position as head of the GULAG and was appointed People's Commissar of Posts and Telecommunications (Russian: Наркомпочтель). On December 23, 1938, he was expelled from the Soviet Communist Party, arrested the next day in the office of Georgi Malenkov, and sent to prison at Lubyanka. He was found guilty by the Military Collegium of the Supreme Court of the USSR of belonging to a "terrorist and sabotage organization" and shot on March 7, 1939 at Kommunarka. On October 17, 1957 Berman was legally rehabilitated. Matvei's younger brother, Boris, also worked for the NKVD and the GULAG in supervisory positions. Boris was awarded the Order of Lenin on December 19, 1937, arrested on September 24, 1938 and executed on February 22, 1939. He was not rehabilitated.
 
JFK Assassination and Academic Freedom Articles   top
VeteransToday The JFK War: CBS endorses “magic bullet” absurdity ... by James Fetzer
“Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth”–Sherlock Holmes The latest defense of the “magic bullet” absurdity comes from CBS, which featured a father and son combination who claim to have used “new forensic technology” to demonstrate that The Warren Report((1964) had it right when it posited the “magic bullet” scenario, where one bullet passes through JFK’s neck and exits his throat to enter the back of Texas Gov. John Connally.   The distinctive feature of this “reenactment” may be its emphasis on the three feet between JFK and Connally as though what happened from the time it hit the back of his neck and exited his throat did not matter.  But the fact of the matter is that the “magic bullet” scenario is a fantasy:  the hit to JFK’s back was 5.5″ below the collar to the right of the spinal column, as J. Thorton Boswell’s autopsy diagram (above) displays.  And if a bullet had hit at the base of the back of his neck, it could not possibly have transited his neck without hitting any bony structures, because cervical vertebrea intervene.   The “magic bullet” theory is not even anatomically possible.  So when we follow Sherlock’s maxim, then we are going to have to look elsewhere, because once we have eliminate the impossible, the theory is no longer tenable–no matter how many times it is reasserted.    ... MORE
HiddenMysteries  The Bronfmans and the JFK Assassination ...   a ban on 'Final Judgment"

A ban on `Final Judgment'
Michael Piper's book on JFK's assassination creates a huge controversy on campus
MICHAEL PIPER
Michael Piper was one of the scheduled speakers at a seminar that was cancelled at the South Orange County Community College District. Piper is the author of "Final Judgment."
Speakers on the JFK assassination have been popular on American campuses for 30 years. Yet, the thesis of my book - "Final Judgment" - is one that some don't want students to even hear: that Israel's spy agency, the Mossad, played a role with the CIA and the Meyer Lansky crime syndicate in the murder of President Kennedy.
My book is not yet "banned in Boston," but it is banned in Orange County, so it seems. The very week the American Library Association and the National Association of College Stores sponsored "Banned Books Week," controversy raged in Orange County because some were upset that Steve Frogue, president of the South Orange County Community College District (SOCCD) trustees, had invited me to discuss "Final Judgment" at an SOCCD seminar on the JFK assassination.
Although heavy-handed lobbying forced cancellation of the seminar, there's now a drive to remove Frogue from office for believing in our Constitution's guarantee that Americans have the right to express differing points of view.
Israeli diplomat Uri Palti says "Final Judgment" is "nonsense." Yet, contradictorily, critics still declare my discoveries "dangerous" - that my findings shouldn't be heard by "impressionable" kids.
Unfortunately, because of what critics allege, many people believe I "deny the Holocaust," which is not true. However, for the record, my book does not discuss the Holocaust.
Here is what "Final Judgment" contends:
In 1963, JFK was embroiled in a bitter (then secret) conflict with Israeli leader David Ben-Gurion over Israel's drive to build the atomic bomb; that Ben-Gurion resigned in disgust, having told JFK that because of JFK's policies, Israel's "existence [was] in danger." Upon JFK's assassination, U.S. policy toward Israel began an immediate 180-degree turnaround.
This is all documented by Pulitzer Prize winner Seymour Hersh in "The Samson Option," by Andrew Cockburn in "Dangerous Liaison," and by Stephen Green in "Taking Sides" - each a respected historian. Where, then, is the "Israeli connection" to the assassination? The fact is that when New Orleans DA Jim Garrison prosecuted Clay Shaw with conspiracy in the JFK assassination, Garrison stumbled upon the Mossad link.

test
WMR JFK visited grave of another murdered U.S. leader six months before his own assassination   December 4-5, 2013 --   top


The 50th anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy brought to light another infamous assassination: the defenestration killing of America's first Secretary of Defense, James V. Forrestal, on May 22, 1949. 

Shortly after his discharge from the U.S. Navy following the end of World War II, Kennedy became a special assistant to Forrestal, was serving as Secretary of the Navy. Just a few months after Germany's surrender, Kennedy accompanied Forrestal to Berlin. 

Forrestal shared many of his thoughts with Kennedy, including how he was opposed to President Harry Truman's decision to reject peace feelers from Japan for a semi-conditional surrender and opt to drop atomic bombs on the devastated country. 

Some of Japan's peace feelers were extended to the West via the Vatican's Apostolic Nuncio in Tokyo. Forrestal and Kennedy had something else in common: both were devout Roman Catholics who not only believed the Japanese peace feelers directed through the Pope should have been accepted by Truman, but who felt that Japan would agree to a partial unconditional surrender, with the only provision being that Emperor Hirohito, who Americans had been programmed to hate during the war, would remain as spiritual leader. The plan envisaged Hirohito taking his orders from the Allied occupation authorities. In fact, that is exactly what occurred, even with the dropping of the A-bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Ironically,. Kennedy's only surviving child, Caroline Kennedy, now serves as the U.S. ambassador to Japan.

Today, President Obama is the first U.S. president to engage in a bitter feud with an Israeli Prime Minister (over the Iranian nuclear deal) since President Kennedy, in a series of letters to Israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion, scolded Israel for trying to obtain the materials to develop nuclear weapons. 

On May 18, 1963, Kennedy sent the following letter to Ben Gurion on the issue of Israel's secretive operations at the Dimona nuclear facility in the Negev:

I have received from Ambassador Barbour a report of his conversation with you on May 14 regarding the arrangements for visiting the Dimona reactor. I should like to add some personal comments on that subject.
I am sure you will agree that there is no more urgent business for the whole world than the control of nuclear weapons. We both recognized this when we talked together two years ago, and I emphasized it again when I met with Mrs. Meir just after Christmas. The dangers in the proliferation of national nuclear weapons systems are so obvious that I am sure I need not repeat them here.
"It is because of our preoccupation with this problem that my Government has sought to arrange with you for periodic visits to Dimona. When we spoke together in May 1961 you said that we might make whatever use we wished of the information resulting from the first visit of American scientists to Dimona and that you would agree to further visits by neutrals as well. I had assumed from Mrs. Meir's comment that there would be no problem between us on this.
"We are concerned with the disturbing effects on world stability which would accompany the development of a nuclear weapons capability by Israel. I cannot imagine that the Arabs would refrain from turning to the Soviet Union for assistance if Israel were to develop a nuclear weapons capability--with all the consequences this would hold. But the problem is much larger than its impact on the Middle East. Development of a nuclear weapons capability by Israel would almost certainly lead other larger countries, that have so far refrained from such development, to feel that they must follow suit.
From 1945 to 1948, Kennedy and his old friend Forrestal shared something else in common beyond their opposition to Truman's atomic bombing of Japan, opposition to the United Nations plan for the division of the British mandate in Palestine between a Jewish and an Arab state. Forrestal, who had the backing of Secretary of State George Marshall and more quietly, General Dwight Eisenhower, believed that Palestine should become independent as a federal state having no sectarian affiliations. A federal Palestine with special rights for Christians, Jews, and Muslims was also the goal of the Vatican, which wanted to ensure protection for Christian sites in Jerusalem and the rest of Palestine. General George S. Patton was also known to be opposed to the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine. He died on December 21, 1945 in Heidelberg, Germany after suffering injuries from a suspicious vehicle crash on December 8, 1945 involving his staff car and a truck. Patton, who was paralyzed, was not permitted any outside visitors other than his wife. 
Patton may have met with Forrestal and Kennedy during their summer visit to Germany and had discussions on the Palestine "problem" during a time frame when hundreds of thousands of European Jewish survivors of the war were embarking on ships to Palestine and threatening to unleash a cascading effect of turmoil with the Arab nations of the region.
Forrestal in Berlin, summer of 1945. In the rear, second from the right is U.S. congressional candidate and Forrestal confidante John F. Kennedy.
Truman's old Army friend and haberdasher business partner, Edward Jacobson, pressured Truman to support the creation of Israel. Truman cast aside the protests from his Secretaries of State and Defense and caved to Jacobson's pressure and agreed to acceded to Zionist demands. When Truman was wavering on support for Israel, Jacobson told Truman, "Your hero is Andrew Jackson. I have a hero too. He's the greatest Jew alive. I'm talking about Chaim Weizmann. He's an old man and very sick, and he has traveled thousands of miles to see you. And now you're putting him off. This isn't like you, Harry." After Truman met Weizmann, he decided to support Palestinian partition and recognize Israel in 1948. It was later discovered that the Jewish Palestinian terrorist group, the Stern Gang, sent letter bombs to the White House in an attempt to kill Truman. The Secret Service successfully defused all the bombs. Apparently, between Jacobson's soft glove approach and the Stern Gang's hard punches, Truman got the message.
The move by Truman to support the creation of Israel infuriated Forrestal. He held a series of meetings with Truman's Republican opponent for the presidency Governor Tom Dewey of New York. Dewey apparently agreed with Forrestal's opposition to Israel and promised that if he was elected in 1948, as everyone expected he would be, Forrestal would remain as Secretary of Defense and relations with Israel would be minimized. Ben Gurion declared Israel and independent state on May 14, 1948. 
After word leaked out about the Forrestal-Dewey meetings, mostly because "Washington Merry-Go-Round" columnist Drew Pearson and gossip columnist Walter Winchell succumbed to pressure from Zionist elements within the media, especially Pearson's United Features syndication network and Winchell's American Broadcasting Company radio network, Truman pressured Forrestal to resign as Secretary of Defense on March 28, 1949. 
When Zionist interests discovered that Dewey and Forrestal were conspiring against Israel's interests, Jewish donors who had pledged their support to Dewey pulled it and threw their money behind Truman. It was that move, more than anything else, that saw truman come from behind to defeat Dewey, notwithstanding the Chicago Daily Tribune's famous November 3, 1948 headline, "Dewey Defeats Truman."
Kennedy was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1946 and continued to remain a close confidante of Forrestal. Forrestal reportedly went into some sort of  state of severe depression and was flown to the private Hobe Sound, Florida estate of Undersecretary of State Robert Lovett, who was also a close friend of the Kennedys. 
A few days after his trip to Florida, Forrestal was admitted to Bethesda Naval Hospital in Maryland. On May 22, 1949, Forrestal's body was found on the third floor roof of the hospital. Navy officials immediately reported that Forrestal had committed suicide by jumping from a 16th floor window of a kitchen directly across the hall from his hospital room. 
Forrestal was branded in the media as a paranoid and crazed individuals who believed "Zionist agents" were out to get him after his criticism of U.S. support for the creation  of israel. In subsequent years, authors and journalists who investigated Forrestal's death as an assassination were branded "conspiracy theorists" in the same manner those who questioned the Warren Commission's conclusions about the death of Kennedy were similarly libeled and slandered.
Evidence surfaced in later years that Forrestal was being shadowed by agents of international Zionism, including the tailing of his official limousine in 1947 and 1948 by two men, masquerading as news photographers, who possibly had ties to the Jewish terrorist group Irgun Zvai Leumi, of which Menachem Begin, a later Israeli Prime Minister who was a headache for President Jimmy Carter, was a leader. British intelligence documents revealed that the Irgun had targeted two British Foreign Secretaries, both opposed to Palestinian partition and forced population transfers, for assassination. They were Anthony Eden and Ernest Bevin.
In 1956, President Eisenhower also broke with the Israelis over the Israeli-French-British invasion of Egypt and the occupation of the Sinai peninsula and Suez Canal.
As with Patton, Forrestal's visitation list at Bethesda was highly restricted. Only his wife and sons were allowed to visit him, along with people he despised and wouldn't have wanted to have seen under any circumstances: Harry Truman; his replacement as Secretary of Defense, Louis Johnson; U.S. intelligence chief Admiral Sidney Sours; and someone he hardly knew, Texas U.S. Representative Lyndon Johnson, who was a major supporter of the Israeli cause. After President Kennedy banned the sale or transfer of nuclear materials to Israel, one of Lyndon Johnson's first acts as president was to lift the ban and allow for the "approved theft" of uranium and plutonium from U.S. nuclear fuel caches.
On May 22, 1963, just four days after Kennedy sent the "cease and desist" letter to Ben Gurion, demanding Israel halt its development of nuclear weapons, the President paid a visit to Arlington National Cemetery and the grave site of Forrestal on the 14th anniversary of the "defenestration of Bethesda." It is odd that the President of the United States would have made a pilgrimage to the grave site during a time when suicide and its causes was still a verboten subject in the media. Also, suicide was and still is considered a sinful act by the Catholic Church, of which Kennedy was a devout communicant. Henry Forrestal, James's brother, stated, in no uncertain terms, that his brother would never have committed suicide. One of the Catholic priests who arrived at Bethesda after Forrestal's death also suspected murder. 
Kennedy's visit to the Forrestal grave can only be explained by his belief that Forrestal was assassinated and did not take his own life. Kennedy's problems with Ben Gurion also likely reminded him of Forrestal's protestations that U.S. support for Israel would only bring about calamity for the world.
A haunting image: President John F. Kennedy at the Arlington grave site of former Secretary of Defense James Forrestal on May 22, 1963. Exactly six months later, Kennedy would be assassinated in Dallas and three days after that he'd be laid to rest near Forrestal. What secrets, especially about Israel, did these leaders take to their graves?
Exactly six months after Kennedy's visit to Forrestal's grave, the young president would be cut down by gunfire in Dallas. Two well-known Zionists would figure into the events surrounding the president's assassination: Abraham Zapruder, who "documented the event" with his Bell and Howell Zoomatic camera and who was a business associate of George deMohrenschildt, the accused assassin's "handler," and Jacob Rubenstein, aka Jack Ruby, who would easily and without police interference assassinate the alleged "lone nut gunman" Lee Harvey Oswald before he could come to trial.
------
Postscript: President Barack Obama has engendered bitter hatred from Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu. The last time an Israeli Prime Minister was so vehemently opposed to a U.S. President was David Ben-Gurion and his opposition to John F. Kennedy's ban on nuclear cooperation with Israel. Now, the issue with Israel remains nuclear weapons but it is an agreement to halt Iran's nuclear program over the objections of the Israelis. Barack Obama is the President of the United States and Americans of every stripe should support our President in any principled showdown with any foreign leader, especially someone of the ilk of Netanyahu. Whatever our differences with the President on other issues, he deserves the support of every American vis a vis Israel. And we should all pray for the President's security and safety because Israel will have no problem striking out at America's leaders in the future in the same manner as it has done in the past.

Jim Fetzer, VeteransToday ...JFK, the CIA and The New York Times ...Umbrella Man interview

“The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media.” — William Colby, former CIA Director

In 1977, Carl Bernstein, who would subsequently co-author All the President’s Men (1994)  with Bob Woodward, one of the most celebrated books in American political history, published “The CIA and the Media”Rolling Stone (October 20, 1977), reporting that, with respect to its infiltration of the American media, “By far the most valuable of these associations, according to CIA officials, have been with the New York Times, CBS and Time Inc.” Those who lent their cooperation to the agency were  Williarn Paley of the CBS, Henry Luce of Time Inc., Arthur Hays Sulzberger of The New York Times, Barry Bingham Sr. of the LouisviIle Courier‑Journal, and James Copley of the Copley News Service. Other organizations which cooperated with the CIA included ABC, NBC, the AP, the UPI, Reuters, Hearst Newspapers, Scripps‑Howard, Newsweek, the Mutual Broadcasting System, the Miami Herald and the old Saturday Evening Post and New York Herald‑Tribune.  It was therefore fascinating to discover that The New York Times, which has a history of suppressing research on the assassination of JFK, was publishing “The Umbrella Man: A video interview with the author of SIX SECONDS IN DALLAS (1967)”, widely regarded as a classic of conspiracy research on the assassination of JFK.

Its author, Josiah Thompson (whose nickname is “Tink”), was at one time a professor of philosophy at Haverford College and, when I returned from 13 months in the Far East with the 1st Battalion, 12th Marines, 3rd Marine Division, where we had been anchored out in Kauschung Harbor in Formosa (now Taichung Harbor, Taiwan), where I had been awakened at 3:30 AM by the officer of the deck who told me that JFK had been shot and, then again, an hour later that they had caught the guy who had done it, who was a communist, which I thought at the time was “pretty fast work”, I obtained a copy of his book while stationed at the USMC Recruit Depot in San Diego as a series commander, supervising 15 DIs and 300 recruits going through the training cycle, which I read with great interest, especially because I had earned my A.B. at Princeton in philosophy and, like myself, Tink had served in the Navy (in the UDT rather than the Marine Corps) and was doing research on JFK, which was attracting my interest as well. MORE

Countering Criticism of the Warren Report ... 1 April 1967 SlideShare, Namebase

JFK 01, p.1

Chiefs, Certain Stations and Bases
Document Number 1035-960
for FOIA Review on Sep 1976

SUBJECT: Countering Criticism of the Warren Report

For Oswald file! 2 copies
This was pulled together by ... in close conjunction with.... We furnished most of the source material, proposed many of the themes, and provided general "expertise" on the case. The Spectator article was written 23 Jan 1967

PSYCH

1. Our Concern. From the day of President Kennedy's assassination on, there has been speculation about the responsibility for his murder. Although this was stemmed for a time by the Warren Commission report (which appeared at the end of September 1964), various writers have now had time to scan the Commission's published report and documents for new pretexts for questioning, and there has been a new wave of books and articles criticizing the Commission's findings. In most cases the critics have speculated as to the existence of some kind of conspiracy, and often they have implied that the Commission itself was involved. Presumably as a result of the increasing challenge to the Warren Commission's Report, a public opinion poll recently indicated that 46% of the American public did not think that Oswald acted alone, while more than half of those polled thought that the Commission had left some questions unresolved. Doubtless polls abroad would show similar, or possibly more adverse, results.

2. This trend of opinion is a matter of concern to the U.S. government, including our organization. The members of the Warren Commission were naturally chosen for their integrity, experience, and prominence. They represented both major parties, and they and their staff were deliberately drawn from all sections of the country. Just because of the standing of the Commissioners, efforts to impugn their rectitude and wisdom tend to cast doubt on the whole leadership of American society. Moreover, there seems to be an increasing tendency to hint that President Johnson himself, as the one person who might be said to have benefited, was in some way responsible for the assassination. Innuendo of such seriousness affects not only the individual concerned, but also the whole reputation of the American government. Our organization itself is directly involved: among other facts, we contributed information to the investigation. Conspiracy theories have frequently thrown suspicion on our organization, for example by falsely alleging that Lee Harvey Oswald worked for us. The aim of this dispatch is to provide material for countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists, so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries. Background information is supplied in a classified section and in a number of unclassified attachments.

3. Action. We do not recommend that discussion of the assassination question be initiated where it is not already taking place. Where discussion is active, however, addressees are requested:

CS COPY
9 attachments h/w
DATE 4/1/67
1- Satts
8-Unclassified
DESTROY WHEN NO LONGER NEEDED

JFK 01, p.2

a. To discuss the publicity problem with liaison and friendly elite contacts (especially politicians and editors), pointing out that the Warren Commission made as thorough an investigation as humanly possible, that the charges of the critics are without serious foundation, and that further speculative discussion only plays into the hands of the opposition. Point out also that parts of the conspiracy talk appear to be deliberately generated by Communist propagandists. Urge them to use their influence to discourage unfounded and irresponsible speculation.

b. To employ propaganda assets to answer and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose. The unclassified attachments to this guidance should provide useful background material for passage to assets. Our play should point out, as applicable, that the critics are (i) wedded to theories adopted before the evidence was in, (ii) politically interested, (iii) financially interested, (iv) hasty and inaccurate in their research, or (v) infatuated with their own theories. In the course of discussions of the whole phenomenon of criticism, a useful strategy may be to single out Epstein's theory for attack, using the attached Fletcher Knebel article and Spectator piece for background. (Although Mark Lane's book is much less convincing than Epstein's and comes off badly where contested by knowledgeable critics, it is also much more difficult to answer as a whole, as one becomes lost in a morass of unrelated details.)

4. In private or media discussion not directed at any particular writer, or in attacking publications which may be yet forthcoming, the following arguments should be useful:

a. No significant new evidence has emerged which the Commission did not consider. The assassination is sometimes compared (e.g., by Joachim Joesten and Bertrand Russell) with the Dreyfus case; however, unlike that case, the attacks on the Warren Commission have produced no new evidence, no new culprits have been convincingly identified, and there is no agreement among the critics. (A better parallel, though an imperfect one, might be with the Reichstag fire of 1933, which some competent historians (Fritz Tobias, A.J.P. Taylor, D.C. Watt) now believe was set by Van der Lubbe on his own initiative, without acting for either Nazis or Communists; the Nazis tried to pin the blame on the Communists, but the latter have been much more successful in convincing the world that the Nazis were to blame.)

b. Critics usually overvalue particular items and ignore others. They tend to place more emphasis on the recollections of individual eyewitnesses (which are less reliable and more divergent -- and hence offer more hand-holds for criticism) and less on ballistic, autopsy, and photographic evidence. A close examination of the Commission's records will usually show that the conflicting eyewitness accounts are quoted out of context, or were discarded by the commission for good and sufficient reason.

JFK 01, p.3

c. Conspiracy on the large scale often suggested would be impossible to conceal in the United States, esp. since informants could expect to receive large royalties, etc. Note that Robert Kennedy, Attorney General at the time and John F. Kennedy's brother, would be the last man to overlook or conceal any conspiracy. And as one reviewer pointed out, Congressman Gerald R. Ford would hardly have held his tongue for the sake of the Democratic administration, and Senator Russell would have had every political interest in exposing any misdeeds on the part of Chief Justice Warren. A conspirator moreover would hardly choose a location for a shooting where so much depended on conditions beyond his control: the route, the speed of the cars, the moving target, the risk that the assassin would be discovered. A group of wealthy conspirators could have arranged much more secure conditions.

d. Critics have often been enticed by a form of intellectual pride: they light on some theory and fall in love with it; they also scoff at the Commission because it did not always answer every question with a flat decision one way or the other. Actually, the make-up of the Commission and its staff was an excellent safeguard against over-commitment to any one theory; or against the illicit transformation of probabilities into certainties.

JFK 01, p.4

e. Oswald would not have been any sensible person's choice for a co-conspirator. He was a "loner," mixed-up, of questionable reliability and an unknown quantity to any professional intelligence service.

f. As to charges that the Commission's report was a rush job, it emerged three months after the deadline originally set. But to the degree that the Commission tried to speed up its reporting, this was largely due to the pressure of irresponsible speculation already appearing, in some cases coming from the same critics who, refusing to admit their errors, are now putting out new criticisms.

g. Such vague accusations as that "more than ten people have died mysteriously" can always be explained in some more natural way: e.g., the individuals concerned have for the most part died of natural causes; the Commission staff questioned 418 witnesses (the FBI interviewed far more people, conducting 25,000 interviews and reinterviews), and in such a large group, a certain number of deaths are to be expected. (When Penn Jones, one of the originators of the "ten mysterious deaths" line, appeared on television, it emerged that two of the deaths on his list were from heart attacks, one from cancer, one was from a head-on collision on a bridge, and one occurred when a driver drifted into a bridge abutment.)

5. Where possible, counter speculation by encouraging reference to the Commission's Report itself. Open-minded foreign readers should still be impressed by the care, thoroughness, objectivity and speed with which the Commission worked. Reviewers of other books might be encouraged to add to their account the idea that, checking back with the Report itself, they found it far superior to the work of its critics.

Michael Collins Piper Meltdown  VeteransToday ... James Fetzer ...  The Ugly Truth about Michael Collins Piper, Cass Sunstein and Sandy Hook

VeteransToday Jan 2014, Given the extraordinary attention that has been devoted to dissecting the sensational events in Tucson, Aurora, Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing, I would have thought that those who deny that they were “false flag” or staged events orchestrated by elements within the federal, state and local governments are either unfamiliar with the evidence or cognitively impaired.
Imagine my astonishment to discover a new book, False Flags: Template for Terror (2013)–featuring images of Lee Harvey Oswald, Osama bin Laden, Timothy McVeigh, Adam Lanza and Dzhokhar Tsamaev on its cover–in which Michael Collins Piper argues instead that those who believe Sandy Hook andthe Boston bombing were false flag events are not simply wrong about the facts of the matter but are implementing the program of “cognitive infiltration” advanced by Cass Sunstein as tools of the government.
I have done research of my own on most of these subjects, including Cass Sunstein in “Birds of a Feather: Subverting the Constitution at Harvard Law“, which was first published and available at OpEdNewsuntil its editor, Rob Kall, made it unavailable, apparently because I was submitting articles about 9/11 implicating Israel in the plot.  Since no lesser an inside authority than Steve Pieczenik has confirmed that Sandy Hook was a false flag event, I was floored by Piper’s stance. MORE

 

9/11 Truth and Academic Freedom articles   top

 
YUFA  Conference Report CAUT Academic Freedom Conference:  “Academic Freedom and the Plight of Our Universities:  Fact or Fancy?” A critical review of the Conference on Academic Freedom  By Benjamin Lowinsky, Ph.D  The unfettered quest for the truth, the unconditional right to question and challenge prevailing norms, beliefs and established orthodoxies are often proclaimed as sacred and inviolable by our universities the world over.  Yet, it is precisely the practice of questioning and defying the canons of our traditional faith, of our conventional ideas and routines, that lands our courageous, idealistic, and dissenting colleagues in trouble both in the sciences and in the liberal arts.  History is replete with examples thereof in Canada, the US, and other countries in Europe and the developing world.  Nowhere, however, is the litany of violations of academic freedom more egregious and hypocritical than in those so called “democratic” countries like the US, Canada, and Great Britain where the discrepancy between word and action is often more pronounced than elsewhere. Cataclysmic crises such as World War I, the Bolshevik Revolution, the Cold War, the War in Vietnam, 9/11, and the onset of the War on Terror are critical turning points in worsening the climate of repression within which academic freedom is curtailed.  One such critical juncture has been the 9/11 crisis and its consequences for academic freedom in universities in the US, Canada, and Great Britain--the theme of a dynamic, critical, and informative conference that took place in Toronto in October of 2005, sponsored by the Harry Crowe Foundation. The conference drew a host of academic speakers, faculty members, and faculty associations primarily from Canada, but also from the U.S. and Europe.  The opening plenary set a framework and historical context for the current problems relating to academic freedom.  The speaker, Howard Pawley, president of the Harry Crowe Foundation and former NDP Premier of Manitoba, reminded us of how indispensable academic freedom was and is to the very nature and composition of the university, calling it the glue that holds together our fragile institutions while tracing its history from Socrates to Harry Crowe and into the present.  At the same time, he warned us of the university’s vulnerability, as governments in Canada, the US, and Great Britain pursue security through draconian measures which pose a threat to academic freedom everywhere.
FIRE  GMU Disinvites Moore Speech, $35,000 Fee Drew Criticism   ... George Mason University canceled a scheduled speaking engagement by liberal filmmaker Michael Moore yesterday after two conservative state legislators and others complained that public money should not support an overtly political event. Moore, the outspoken director of the movie "Fahrenheit 9/11," was to have received about $35,000 for his Oct. 28 speech at the Patriot Center on the Fairfax campus -- an event that university officials had arranged a week ago and had not begun to publicize. Word spread quickly, and after complaints from the legislators and some members of the community reached the office of President Alan G. Merten this week, the school announced that the event, coming so close to the presidential election, would be "an inappropriate use of state resources  IS MICHAEL MOORE A 9/11 TRUTH GATEKEEPER? ... MOORE'S AGENT IS ALI EMANUEL, BROTHER OF RAHM EMANUEL, ULTRA JEWISH POLITICAL KINGPIN, MAYOR OF CHICAGO ... see  JewishJournal  Rahm Emanuel’s brother, Ari Emanuel, is a Hollywood superagent ...  Representing the likes of Michael Moore and Martin Scorsese, Emanuel is among the best-connected in the business, and is known for leveraging his influence for public advocacy. After Mel Gibson's anti-Semitic tirade in July 2006, Emanuel publicly castigated the actor/director and called upon Hollywood to blacklist him. Politically, Ari Emanuel and Endeavor frequently host Democratic fundraisers, which have included a $2,300-a-plate dinner for Barack Obama, at Emanuel's home. With the appointment of his brother to White House chief of staff, Hollywood and Washington just got a lot closer. 

YouTube 9/11 video Pentagon
 
Media and Academic Freedom Articles   top
 
MemoryHoleBlog ... Witnessing Boston’s Mass Casualty Event ...  “For the most part we do not first see, and then define,” Walter Lippmann observed in 1921, “we define first and then see. In the great blooming, buzzing confusion of the outer world we pick out what our culture has already defined for us, and we tend to perceive that which we have picked out in the form stereotyped for us by our culture.”  and ... a veteran hypnotherapist and mind control expert interviewed in 2001 by investigative journalist Jon Rappoport observes, The media gives you the illusion that you are seeing something. That’s the billion‐dollar key to mind control … 90% of all the mind control in the world is done by the media, and it is all based on the viewer or the reader never seeing anything really beyond the surface of what is presented.”  and  ...   As with previous terrorist bombings, one must ask whether the ordnance described by police is in fact capable of wreaking the havoc that it purportedly caused. In 9/11 and Oklahoma City, for example, subsequent investigation indicated that jet engine fuel and a sizable ANFO bomb by themselves could not have caused the structural damage to the World Trade Center Towers and Murrah Federal Building respectively.
   
 
Academic Freedom Articles   top
NoLiesRadio Jan 2013  “THE KEVIN BARRETT SHOW”  EXCLUSIVE LIVE BROADCAST: Academic witch-hunt target Nick Kollerstrom returns ” Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom, a history of science Ph.D. with a specialty in chemistry, is the author of the best book on the 7/7 London bombings, Terror on the Tube. (Watch the 7/7 video Kollerstrom and Farrell Are Dead.) Today, Nick presents what he says is breakthrough evidence supporting his contention that the claim that Nazi gas chambers were used for mass executions with Zyclon-B (cyanide gas) are not true. According to mainstream historians as well as rev-isionists, Zyclon B was indisputably used in de-lousing chambers in German concentration camps to prevent outbreaks of insect-borne typhus. Nick and other rev-isionist argue that what they call the myth of mass-execution gas chambers stems from these de-lousing chambers, which ironically were used to keep the inmates alive, not to kill them. (Yes, very large numbers of inmates died, and some were killed, in other ways.) READ MORE HERE………………. Nick is the principal behind the new website http://www.whatreallyhappened.info/ Is Nick right? I don’t know…but what I do know is that the people who fired him from his job at the University of London had better contact me and come on my show to explain, using logic and evidence, why he is not just wrong, but so egregiously and obviously wrong that he deserved to lose his academic position. Nicholas Kollerstrom, PhD, has two history of science degrees, one from Cambridge 1968, plus a PhD from London, 1995. He was an honorary member of staff of University College, London for 11 years. He co-edited The Case Against War (Spokesman, comprising the CND legal arguments against the Iraq war) and then co-organised the Belgrano Inqury in 1986, publishing The Unnecessary War as its proceedings in 1998. Nick risked his reputation as a first-rate historian of science, and got kicked out of University College, London, by researching the evidence for Nazi gassings in WWII death camps – and finding that evidence underwhelming. His findings are illegal in many European countries. Check out Kevin’s new book: Questioning the War on Terror: A Primer for Obama Voters. The Kevin Barrett Show is independently produced and hosted by Kevin Barrett and these shows are externally produced content. All externally produced content broadcast on No Lies Radio is the sole responsibility of the program-content producer and is not the responsibility of NoLiesRadio.org. Any questions or concerns should be directed to the content producer.  more
Kevin Barrett case top
Peterson-Overton, Kristopher     top
 Peterson-Overton, Kristopher  There is something particularly poisonous about the kind of political opportunism on display at Brooklyn College right now. Unfortunately, it’s all déjà vu for me and my former colleagues in the political science department. The Brooklyn College chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) recently organized a panel discussion on the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement (BDS) featuring noted Palestinian activist Omar Barghouti and internationally renowned philosopher Judith Butler. It promises to be an exciting evening, but not everyone shares my enthusiasm. Harvard law professor (and Brooklyn College alumnus) Alan Dershowitz and New York State Assemblyman Dov Hikind successfully canvassed support from a number of politicians, and managed to transform a standard panel discussion on a controversial issue into a cause for pious outrage. The discussion is scheduled to take place tomorrow and, thanks to a massive backlash against such unwarranted political pressure, it will take place tomorrow. Yet, the rapid manufacture of a national controversy in this case reveals, once again, the tenuous state of academic freedom on our campuses and the ease with which extra-academic influence stifles free debate.
 June Sheldon top
TheFire  Victory for Academic Freedom: 'Human Heredity' Professor Receives $100,000 Settlement ...

SAN JOSÉ, Calif., July 26, 2010—Nearly three years after terminating her over her protected classroom speech, the San José/Evergreen Community College District (SJCCD) has agreed to pay adjunct professor June Sheldon $100,000 in lost earnings in exchange for dismissal of her First Amendment lawsuit. In 2007, Sheldon had led a brief discussion about the nature/nurture debate regarding sexual orientation in her Human Heredity course. After she was fired due to a student complaint, she turned to the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) for help.
"This welcome settlement demonstrates that colleges cannot get away with punishing a professor for teaching relevant class material, even if a student finds it offensive," said FIRE President Greg Lukianoff. "Professor Sheldon is finally able to put this ordeal behind her, but the district's ignorance of academic freedom and the First Amendment has left the taxpayers of California on the hook for over $100,000."
Sheldon's trouble began in the summer of 2007 when, in her Human Heredity course at San José City College, she led a brief discussion on sexual orientation. The topic was covered in the course readings. When a student asked her to comment on the nature/nurture debate regarding sexual orientation, Sheldon noted the complexity of the issue, citing examples from the textbook as well as relevant research findings. A student complained a month later that the material was "offensive and unscientific."  More

 
MemoryHoleBlog ..Adnan Zuberi
Originally received January 22, 2013) Dear Dr. Heather Coltman and Dr. Diane Alperin, I have examined Professor James Tracy’s writings regarding the Newtown, Conn., massacre and I am briefly presenting a case-study to you on how a university can deal with this situation. I was awarded by the University of Toronto for my documentary entitled 9/11 in the Academic Community which examines how academia treats critical perspectives of media or governmental narratives. I documented what happened to John McMurtry, a Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the University of Guelph and Fellow of the Canadian Royal Society. When McMurtry questioned the official narrative just three months after 9/11, academics flooded his university with e-mails, from its president to his department chair, demanding that he be fired. His colleagues at Harvard notified McMurtry that they are reporting to the FBI and CIA. The university maintained his professorship on grounds of academic freedom. Although McMurtry engaged in a topic far more controversial than what Tracy has engaged in, University of Guelph succeeded in overcoming the pressures by simply defending the foundations of institutions of research and critical thinking, which is academic freedom. More

YouTube Rising Censorship in Israel A few months ago I signed my name as co-defendant to a possible legal action threatened by an Israeli law firm, Shurat HaDin, targeting two Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies (CPACS) academics - Professors Jake Lynch and Stuart Rees for publically refusing to co-operate with Israel's Hebrew university. Almost two thousand Australian and international academics, writers, human rights activists and other members of civil society have since joined this unprecedented historic act of solidarity signing as co-defendants along with the two targeted professors. Jake Lynch was practicing a basic democratic right when he made a moral and ethical decision to refuse to collaborate with an academic representing Hebrew university. Part of Hebrew university campus and dormitories were built on illegally annexed Palestinian land in contravention of the four Geneva Conventions. The university also sponsors the archeological digs in the Occupied Territories , appropriating Palestinian historical artifacts, preventing Palestinians from accessing those sites and displacing them from there - an act considered to be plundering under International Humanitarian Law. There is a long list of other violations by Hebrew university such as its links to Elbit systems - one of Israel's largest military security and surveillance companies that monitors and maintains Israel's continued illegal occupation of Palestinian land. But this story is not just about Jake Lynch or Hebrew University, it is a story about how democracy functions. Defending the rights of academics to express their views on controversial issues is a basic tenant of democracy. Given that democracies are a work in progress, it is up to us as citizens within democratic nations to use our voice to protect our civil liberties. Part of this means we have to empower those who have been disempowered and stripped of their basic human rights, both at home and abroad. This does not bode well for Israel - a state criticised by UN bodies and reputable human rights organisations for its flagrant human rights violations. Israel's supporters react to criticism in two ways. The first is by intimidating and slandering critics claiming they are anti-Semitic and/or terrorist sympathisers. The second is by attacking and eroding our democratic rights thus destroying the tools by which we are able to expose its abuses and war crimes. Academic freedom is hindered when governments interfere with their citizens' right to form and express independent political views. In this case, Israel's network of supporters has launched all the fire power at their disposal, slandering the academics while pressuring the Australian government to erode our democratic right to dissent. CPACS is now faced with the real threat of losing federal government funding for programs unrelated to the campaign "Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions" (BDS), solely on the basis of the political views held by the Centre's director Jake Lynch. Academic freedom is hindered when governments interfere with their citizens' right to form and express independent political views. Last year following lobbying by the National Tertiary Education Union, the former Gillard government introduced a proposal to reform the objectives of the Higher Education Support Act making it a condition of funding that higher education institutions uphold academic freedom. Jeannie Rea, the National Tertiary Education Union president told Sydney Morning Herald, ''these changes...are an explicit acknowledgment that university staff has a right and a responsibility to exercise free intellectual inquiry, including the right to expression of controversial or unpopular opinions without being disadvantaged or discriminated against.'' The significance of this reform was lost on Australia's new government. Before winning the elections, the now Australian foreign minister Julie Bishop promised to deny funding for projects by all academics who voice support for boycotting Israel regardless of whether or not these projects are related to the Palestine/Israel conflict. But make no mistake about it, this policy of repression will not only target pro-Palestine supporters or critics of Israel, it will impact all sectors in Australian civil society. PM Tony Abbott has plans to re-prioritise about $900m in annual Australian Research Council (ARC) grants ensuring that only projects that are deemed worthy by the Liberal government and in line with their ideological beliefs will receive funding. The National Tertiary Education Union was amongst the first to criticise this infringement on democracy. Other condemnations followed from many peak bodies in the sector including the Deans of Arts, the Council for Humanities Arts and Social Sciences (CHASS), Science and Technology Australia (STA), Social Sciences and Humanities, the Council of Australian Postgraduate Associations (CAPA) and Universities Australia.

 

AAUP, The mission of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) is to advance academic freedom and shared governance; to define fundamental professional values and standards for higher education; to promote the economic security of faculty, academic professionals, graduate students, post‐doctoral fellows, and all those engaged in teaching and research in higher education; to help the higher education community organize to make our goals a reality; and to ensure higher education's contribution to the common good. Founded in 1915, the AAUP has helped to shape American higher education by developing the standards and procedures that maintain quality in education and academic freedom in this country's colleges and universities. search terms: tenure, academic due process, professional employment practices, campus, amicus briefs, Supreme Court, Federal and State, court decisions, faculty members, rights violated, higher education legislation, college presidents, policy statements, procedural guidelines, distance education, intellectual property, graduate student education, family policy. search terms: faculty compensation survey, benefits, non-tenure-track faculty, workloads, state intervention, accredited, Executive committee. InsideHigherEducation

 
NewEconomicPerspectives  December 18, 2013, the Kansas Board of Regents drastically curtailed tenure and academic freedom.  The state attorney general aided this action.  The Regents decided that when university faculty use common forms of modern communication (“social media”) they no longer have the protections of tenure and academic freedom.  The Regents’ policy change does not even mention tenure or academic freedom.  The Regents acted without consulting the faculty and without any open debate. The Regent’s policy begins with a broad definition of “social media” that includes the primary means that many faculty members engage in academic discourse, such as “blogs” and videos of lectures, interviews, and congressional testimony posted on line, but also “any” “online publication.”  Academics frequently publish their research “online” and even when they publish in print they often publish a version of the paper “online” (see, for example, my SSRN page) so that other academics can easily read it. more
 
Bay Area Indymedia Feb 2014 Unconstitutional Protect Academic Freedom Act by Stephen Lendman On February 6, Rep. Peter Roskam's (R. IL) press release headlined "Roskam, Lipinski Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Protect Academic Freedom by Preventing Academic Boycott of Israel." On February 6, HR 4009 was introduced. It was referred to committee. No further action so far was taken. It's an outrageous anti-academic freedom measure. It's unconstitutional. It targets the American Studies Association (ASA). It's the nation's oldest and largest organization involved in the interdisciplinary study of US culture and history. Its members represent numerous academic fields. They include academics, researchers, librarians, as well as public officials and administrators. Last December, they acted responsibly. They overwhelmingly endorsed an academic boycott of Israel. They oppose anti-Semitism, other forms of racism, discrimination of all kinds, and xenophobia. They acted in "solidarity with aggrieved people in the United States and in the world." They said America "plays a significant role in enabling" Israel's occupation, its "illegal settlements and (its) Wall in violation of international law..." They oppose "systematic discrimination against Palestinians." It's had a "devastating impact on (their) well-being..." Their fundamental rights are denied. Palestinian academic freedom is spurned. ASA "is dedicated to the rights of students and scholars to pursue education and research without undue state interference, repression, and military violence" everywhere. It "resolved (to) honor the call of Palestinian civil society for a boycott of Israeli academic institutions." It's justified, it said, for the following reasons: • US military and other support for Israel; • Israel's systematic violation of international laws and UN resolutions; • its longstanding occupation harshness; • "the extent to which Israeli institutions of higher education are a party to state policies that violate human rights," and • strong ASA member support. Their resolution remains binding until Israel stops violating fundamental international laws. It bars official collaboration with Israeli academic institutions. It doesn't apply to Israeli scholars. ASA supports their academic and related rights. Its boycott followed Association for Asian American Studies (AAAS) members unanimously approving their own resolution last April. It was the first scholarly organization to do so.
 
sdf
Reference   (articles)  top
links
  • 22Nov1963 What Does Noam Chomsky Say About the JFK Assassination? he considers it not to be a significant political event. His opinion of the JFK assassination follows from his conclusion that there was no substantial change in policy between the Kennedy and Johnson administrations:
  • American Thinker . In a recent article, I quoted Professor Richard Landes who, in a very profound and insightful sentence, articulated his theory that American Jews "are subtly engaged in a proxy honor killing of Israel." Prof. Landes was describing the apathetic, progressive, and politically correct Jews who have enabled others to destroy the Jewish state for them - "people...who are embarrassed by Israel are enabling and abetting its destruction." Sadly, the term "people" can now be replaced by "institutions," as claims of academic freedom, First Amendment rights, and other liberal values permeate the foundations of Jewish culture and infect the very core of American Jewish identity replacing the common sense, Biblical teaching, and basic human morality that has
  • AAUP The policies published in the AUP’s Policy Documents and Reports, also known as the "Redbook," and see 1940, search terms: American Association of University Professors, Association of American Colleges, Association of American Colleges and Universities, 1925 Conference Statement on Academic Freedom and Tenure, 1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure, The purpose of this statement is to promote public understanding and support of academic freedom and tenure and agreement upon procedures to ensure them in colleges and universities.
  • BriansandBerg Wordpress Academic Freedom ... Many researchers and authors, including myself, are excited about the possibilities of open access publishing. Open access models have the potential to increase accessibility to new research, to facilitate the dissemination of new ideas, to expand audiences for publications, and to enhance scholarly exchanges.
  • CBSLocal NEW YORK (CBSNewYork/AP) – Mayor Michael Bloomberg is speaking up for the cause of academic freedom amid controversy over an upcoming event at Brooklyn College. The BDS Movement, a pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel group which has called for boycotts and sanctions against Israel, was invited to speak at the school’s student center on Thursday, Feb. 7. Bloomberg said Wednesday he “couldn’t disagree more violently” with their viewpoint.
  • Chronicle Canceled Conference Revives Concerns About Academic Freedom in the Persian Gulf
  • InsideHigherEd After the Arab Spring, new opportunites and threats after Arab Spring, organized by Scholars at Risk Network, Center for Dialogues, University of Manouba, Tunisia, targeted by Islamist militants, dean on trial for assaulting two veiled students who came into his office, constitution does not protect institutional autonomy but does protect academic freedom,
  • JFK Library Education and Public Welfare; but we were defeated on the floor of the Senate by that same coalition of viewpoints that looks with suspicion upon any advancement in the principle of academic freedom.
  • Nation (softball on JFK assassination) Not for everyone though. Kennedy continued the cold war policies of his predecessor. The Bay of Pigs, his ill-fated attempt to overthrow Fidel Castro, was a disaster that resonates in our foreign policy today, as does his escalation of hostilities in Vietnam. Kennedy also moved slowly in aiding the nascent civil rights movement. Domestically, the civil rights bill later promoted by his successor, Lyndon Johnson, was a much stronger bill than Kennedy's.
  • Patheos Ohio Supreme Court Will Hear Case from Creationist Teacher Wanting ‘Academic Freedom’ in Science Class ... “This Court must intervene if students and teachers in America’s public schools are to remain free to engage in open, respectful dialogue about competing academic theories and their respective merits. Nowhere is such freedom more crucial than in a science classroom, where the asking and answering of questions is the very basis of the universally acknowledged “scientific method,” Freshwater’s attorney, R. Kelly Hamilton argued in his request for the court to hear the case.
  • Society for US Intellectual History Conspiracy culture, theories, course. ... Teaching a course on conspiracy theories is always interesting in the Age of Obama, but this fall has been an especially propitious time to guide an intellectual tour through American political paranoia. One of the hallmarks of the class is demonstrating how conspiracy thinking was “baked right into the cake” that is our republic, from colonial witch-hunters to patriot paranoids, money cranks, crusaders against the Slave Power, UFOlogists and, of course, presidential assassins. My course is not meant to glorify this type of thinking, but to teach students to recognize it, how it changed over time, and (here’s the secret ingredient, to continue with my baking metaphor) to interrogate conspiracy theories with a special vigor and skepticism.
  • SXU Kennedy assassination ... Indeed, the baton was passed to L.B.J. after the Kennedy killing in Dallas who merely escalated the war to more murderous heights and mayhem.

  • SXU Opponents of academic freedom frequently embrace the notion of American exceptionalism and reject criticism of the violent and even racist projection of power that accompanies our imperial overstretch. Many, but certainly not all, are supporters of Israel which is a key component of their political religion. For them Israel, unlike other nation-states, should not be criticised; its wars and use of cluster bombs, blockades, settlements, separation walls and targeted assassinations against the Palestinians or other Islamic peoples should be immune from ethical or moral challenges and the remarkable assumption of an American-Israeli identical identity of interests never challenged. However, their resistance to modernity includes distorting reality to advance their own perceived interests which may not be compatible with the national interest as their wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have all too starkly revealed.
  • UofI HR Academic Freedom .. (Article X: Section 2 of Board of Trustees Statutes) University policy which grants faculty members the right to exercise full academic freedom of inquiry, discourse, teaching, research and publication without institutional censorship or discipline. Provides protection to academic staff against influences which would restrict the member's right to exercise these freedoms and includes information about the staff member’s entitlement to a hearing when he or she believes that they do not enjoy these freedoms. statutes
  • VDare Harvard Students Denounce Academic Freedom .. Harvard students, outraged over a doctoral dissertation arguing that Hispanic immigrants lack “raw cognitive ability or intelligence,” this week urged the university to investigate how the thesis came to be approved and to ban future research on racial superiority.
  • enabled the Jewish people's survival over millennia
  • WhiteOliphant Academic Freedom and the Challenges of Going Global: LSE (London School of Economics, Rothschild bankster school) Cancels Conference in UAE.
  • Wikipedia Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed ... The film contends that the mainstream science establishment suppresses academics who believe they see evidence of intelligent design in nature and who criticize evidence supporting Darwinian evolution and the modern evolutionary synthesis as a "scientific conspiracy to keep God out of the nation's laboratories and classrooms.
  • YnetNews That academics so carelessly throw about politically-loaded, and inaccurate, terms when discussing Israel and sanctifying the Palestinian cause—words like “apartheid,” “occupation,” and “racism”— indicates exactly why a boycott that seeks to make absolute moral judgments is bound to be perilous—especially for academics who give the pretense of standing for values of academic freedom, scholarly inquiry, a respect for history and law, and open debate over a complex geopolitical problem.
 
Wikipedia Academic freedom is the belief that the freedom of inquiry by faculty members is essential to the mission of the academy as well as the principles of academia, and that scholars should have freedom to teach or communicate ideas or facts (including those that are inconvenient to external political groups or to authorities) without being targeted for repression, job loss, or imprisonment. Academic freedom is a contested issue and, therefore, has limitations in practice. In the United States, for example, according to the widely recognized "1940 Statement on Academic Freedom and Tenure",[1] teachers should be careful to avoid controversial matter that is unrelated to the subject. When they speak or write in public, they are free to express their opinions without fear from institutional censorship or discipline, but they should show restraint and clearly indicate that they are not speaking for their institution.[citation needed] Academic tenure protects academic freedom by ensuring that teachers can be fired only for causes such as gross professional incompetence or behavior that evokes condemnation from the academic community itself.[citation needed] Contents [show] Rationale[edit] Proponents of academic freedom believe the freedom of inquiry by students and faculty members is essential to the mission of the academy. They argue that academic communities are repeatedly targeted for repression due to their ability to shape and control the flow of information. When scholars attempt to teach or communicate ideas or facts that are inconvenient to external political groups or to authorities, they may find themselves targeted for public vilification, job loss, imprisonment, or even death. For example, in North Africa, a professor of public health discovered that his country's infant mortality rate was higher than government figures indicated. He lost his job and was imprisoned.[2][3] The fate of biology in the Soviet Union is also cited[citation needed] as a reason why society has an interest in protecting academic freedom.[who?] A Soviet biologist named Trofim Lysenko rejected Western science—then focused primarily on making advances in theoretical genetics, based on research with the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) -- and proposed a more socially relevant approach to farming that was based on the collectivist principles of dialectical materialism. (Lysenko called this "Michurinism", but it is more popularly known today as Lysenkoism.) Lysenko's ideas proved appealing to the Soviet leadership, in part because of their value as propaganda, and he was ultimately made director of the Soviet Academy of Agricultural Sciences; subsequently, Lysenko directed a purge of scientists who professed "harmful ideas," resulting in the expulsion, imprisonment, or death of hundreds of Soviet scientists. Lysenko's ideas were then implemented on collectivised farms in the Soviet Union and China. Famines that resulted partly from Lysenko's influence are believed to have killed 30 million people in China alone.[4] AFAF (Academics For Academic Freedom) of the United Kingdom[5] is a campaign for lecturers, academic staff and researchers who want to make a public statement in favour of free enquiry and free expression. Their statement of Academic Freedom has two main principles: that academics, both inside and outside the classroom, have unrestricted liberty to question and test received wisdom and to put forward controversial and unpopular opinions, whether or not these are deemed offensive, and that academic institutions have no right to curb the exercise of this freedom by members of their staff, or to use it as grounds for disciplinary action or dismissal.' AFAF and those who are part of the campaign believe that it is important for academics to be able to express their opinions - not just full stop, but to put them to scrutiny and to open further debate. They are against the idea of telling the public Platonic 'noble lies' and believe that people should not be protected from radical views. Academic freedom for professors[edit] The concept of academic freedom as a right of faculty members is an established part of most legal systems. Different from the United States, where academic freedom is derived from the guarantee of free speech under the First Amendment, constitutions of other countries (and particularly of civil law jurisdictions) typically grant a separate right to free learning, teaching, and research. zxcv
Gilad Atzmon: "I am happy i circulated" Holocaust denial propaganda Submitted by david gehrig on January 24, 2008 - 12:02pm UCIMC Independent Media Center, Champaign-Urbana, Illinois
Gilad Atzmon: "I am happy i circulated" Holocaust denial propaganda Submitted by gehrig on January 24, 2008 - 12:02pm Global News Racism Gilad Atzmon has distributed -- and defended in general terms -- an essay by Paul Eisen designed to promote Holocaust denial. The Eisen essay, titled "Holocaust Wars," claims among other things that the gas chambers of Auschwitz are fraudulent and couldn't work. It "backs up" this claim using the same lies used by the leading lights (such as they are) of the Holocaust denial movement -- people like David Irving, the self-described "Hitler-lover" Ernst Zündel, and the faux engineer Fred Leuchter. When you defend Paul Eisen's essay, you're defending the very same lies promulgated by the "Hitler-lover" Zündel, his flunky Leuchter, and his admirer David Irving. Yet this is what Gilad Atzmon does. Now, if you think I'm exaggerating by calling Paul Eisen's essay "Holocaust denial propaganda," you might want to skip to the last section of the post, in which I document exactly that. For now, it suffices to say that Eisen has said "... the evidence for the use of homicidal gas-chambers [at Auschwitz] is not good at all. The evidence against it is much, much stronger." http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thecutter/117192641046077827/ And the following paragraph from the essay Atzmon circulated gives little room for doubt on where Eisen stands: "Many will take the view that Holocaust rev-isionism [the boilerplate euphemism for the Holocaust denial movement] is but pernicious nonsense motivated only by a hatred of Jews and a desire to rehabilitate Hitler and National Socialism specifically, and fascism in general, and therefore not even worthy of scrutiny. I don't agree, and those with sufficient curiosity to wish to research the subject can visit the website of the premier rev-isionist think tank, the [fascist-founded, though Eisen doesn't mention that] Institute for Historical Review, locate the Journal of Historical Review and its archive of articles and papers and start reading." I'll describe the "Institute for Historical Review" in a little more detail below. You can find the Eisen essay itself, the one Gilad Atzmon thought was so brilliant, by googling "Eisen 'Holocaust wars'"; you'll pull it up on a number of "Poor Hitler was misunderstood" sites like Ernst Zündel's. What was Gilad Atzmon's reaction recently when he was challenged over having distributed a stack of standard-issue Holocaust denier lies? "I am happy i circulated Eisen and he is indeed a friend of mine." http://www.haloscan.com/comments/thecutter/8761647492477468265/ Is Atzmon an open Holocaust denier, as Tony Greenstein claims? Not quite; he's got too much to lose to go around saying openly what Eisen does. But Atzmon clearly has no serious problem with circulating pro-denial essays or praising Holocaust deniers, as shown by his decision to distribute Eisen's essay, a decision he's "happy" about. And when challenged about the propriety of spreading the lies of Nazi apologists, Atzmon resorts to the same line of patter I describe in the next section. -- Some notes on the Holocaust denial movement. One of the favorite lines of patter of the Holocaust denial movement is that nothing should be taboo when it comes to studying history. They're right -- or at least they're right if by "studying" you mean studying, not "making up lies about." Unfortunately, they mean the latter. It helps to remember some facts about the Holocaust denial movement. And the first thing to notice is that the Holocaust denial movement is and has been for thirty years a product of the racist right, the brownshirt right. Ernst Zündel -- the guy who paid for the Leuchter report I'll discuss below -- let us know exactly where he stands politically when he wrote the book, "The Hitler We Loved and Why." The Holocaust denial movement in America was also a product of the racist right; the "Institute for Historical Review" -- for decades the leading Holocaust denial organization in the US -- was funded by Willis Carto, a former Bircher who led it for more than a decade. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willis_Carto And, of course, David Irving -- well, nobody's about to argue that *he's* in any way a political progressive, right? His racism was completely exposed in the Lipstadt trial, but so was his tendency to speak to neo-Nazi organizations. Like any crackpot organization, Holocaust deniers have two core ideas. One is that the Holocaust was vastly exaggerated by the greedy Jews. The second -- common ground for all crackpot organizations -- is that they are being censored and persecuted for their ground-breaking views. (Name a crackpot who doesn't claim he's being persecuted for his ideas. It's part of the syndrome.) When legitimate historians refuse to debate Holocaust deniers -- for exactly the same reason that legitimate astronomers don't debate flat-earthers -- Holocaust deniers do the "nothing should be taboo in historical study" dance. Which sounds pretty good, if you've removed it from context. The context, though, is this: the Holocaust *has* been very widely studied and will continue to be very widely studied. And from the very beginning these studies have shown that Holocaust deniers are full of shit. (I'll give a specific example below.) They're like -- although considerably nastier than -- the "intelligent design" folks, who start from an absolutist religious position but try to dress it up as if it were a scientific position. Scientists see right through "intelligent design," just like historians see right through Holocaust denial, which is antisemitism trying to pass for historical inquiry. The Holocaust denial movement starts from the stance, "the brownshirts weren't as bad as they say, and The Jews are lying," and then tries, through pseudo-scholarship, to make that seem like it might be a legitimate historical stance, rather than an expression of basic antisemitism. -- a note on law A key difference, of course, is that spreading Intelligent Design isn't illegal, while several countries have included Holocaust denial as part of their laws against hate speech. These countries -- all but two, last time I checked, either having been part of the Reich or having been occupied by the Reich -- aren't wrong to consider Holocaust denial a form of hate speech. I think these are bad laws, not because they somehow mischaracterize Holocaust denial (they don't), but because I don't think there should be laws against hate speech as such, except when that speech is used to incite to violence. Of course, Holocaust deniers -- and their defenders -- natter on about "thought police throwing people into prison" and such, never mentioning that Holocaust denial is only one of many forms of hate speech such laws prohibit. Having said that, let me repeat that I don't agree with such laws. I think the best way to confront Holocaust denial is simply to show how ridiculous its claims are, when unwrapped from their lies and rhetorical flourishes. But let's be clear: if you start saying things like "why is investigating the Holocaust taboo" you have bought into the Holocaust denier frame, which is wrong for two reasons. One is that investigating the Holocaust is not taboo; the second is what Holocaust deniers are doing isn't "investigating" but lying. -- the repackaging of Holocaust denial for leftist consumption And let's be clear about something else: there are some folks on the left starting to repackage classic, by-the-book Holocaust denial in "anti-Zionist" garb, hoping to spread it over here. Paul Eisen is one, and Gilad Atzmon is self-admittedly "happy" to help him do it. In the new version, tailored for the left, the culprit is not the Jews -- heaven forfend, no! -- but "the Zionists." Same lies, same reliance on Zündel and Leuchter and Faurisson and Irving and the rest of that jackboot lot, new false "anti-Zionist" moustache. There was an interesting example of this in the US just a few years ago. The nation's oldest regular publication, a progressive magazine called The Nation, ran an ad for a book by Roger Garaudy called "The Founding Myths of Modern Israel." The ad ran for one issue only before it was discovered to be a work of Holocaust denial and pulled. The placing of the ad was a clear and conscious decision by Holocaust deniers to repackage their lies for the left by making the villains not the Jews but "the Zionists" -- even though the ad was placed by the same "Institute for Historical Review" I mentioned above, a group just as happy to blame the Jews. This -- the antisemitic pile of lies called Holocaust denial -- is what Eisen wants to bring to leftist discourse, and his friend Atzmon is happy to help. Anything that makes you hate "Zionists" is fair game, apparently, even when it's repackaged Nazoid horseshit like Holocaust denial. They're hoping you'll be useful idiots. But you can't be a useful idiot if you're not an idiot, and the best way not to be an idiot is to educate yourself. So let's take a look at the real sources of Paul Eisen's Holocaust denial. -- Paul Eisen's essay Let me start out by saying that I've been following the Holocaust denial movement for over a decade, and that related to the David Irving trial I've probably read, all told, somewhere around three thousand pages of reports, submissions, transcripts, etc. I'm not going to footnote every last thing I write in this section, but be assured that I can, and feel free to ask me for details about the source(s) of any particular fact. I am *so* not making this up. Here is an example of what Eisen wrote and Gilad Atzmon was so "happy" to have distributed: "Nothing seems to fit about the gassing story. The numbers of victims crammed into the space, the design and construction of the gassing facilities, the lack of protection for the attendants, the implausibility surrounding the rate of cremation, the huge errors, omissions and disparities in eye-witness accounts -- all these and more, when added to the near total absence of hard affirmative evidence, makes one wonder why anyone believed such a story in the first place..." Let's just take the very first issue, "the numbers of victims crammed into the space." If you followed the Irving trial in any detail, you already know that this is one of the standard gambits of the Holocaust deniers, and has been for decades. Goes like this: "There simply wasn't enough capacity in the supposed gas chambers of Auschwitz to hold all the Jews who were allegedly murdered there, not even enough room to cram them all in." Where does this claim come from? It comes from a guy named Fred Leuchter, the twit Ernst "The Hitler We Loved" Zündel paid $35,000 dollars to in the 1980s to produce a bogus "scientific" refutation of the gas chambers at Auschwitz. Zündel wanted to prove in Canadian court that the Holocaust didn't happen, and he thought that throwing down a bullshit "engineering report" about the gas chambers would help his case. It didn't. But that document, the "Leuchter Report," has the grim historical hallmark of having been the work that made David Irving decide to become a Holocaust denier himself; Irving published it in the UK under his own imprint and repeatedly referred to it in his talks as an irrefutable blow to the Auschwitz "myth." I'm not going to link to the Leuchter report; you can find it at your nearest swastika-kissing site. A detailed demolition of the Leuchter report can be found here: http://hdot.org/trial/defense/van/ix. This is a chapter of the expert report submitted by Auschwitz historian Robert Jan van Pelt as part of the Irving v. Lipstadt trial, and it chops the Leuchter Report into bits. Well, say what you want about whether or not Leuchter is an antisemite, but he's certainly an idiot, and his "Report" is full of appalling idiocies, many of which have been taken up by Paul Eisen and spread, in turn, by Gilad Atzmon. Leuchter made his calculation of the gas chamber capacity at Auschwitz and concluded that there just wasn't enough. His calculation is, as van Pelt shows, full of all sorts of stupid assumptions and errors -- Leuchter vastly overestimated fatal HCN concentration levels, he ignored the presense of a ventilation system Leuchter didn't notice, vastly overestimated the minimum possible time between gassings, etc., etc. But maybe the single dumbest factor of Leuchter's calculation is this: he assumes that -- despite eyewitness accounts of how packed the "showers" were -- that each person, required *nine* square feet of standing room within the gas chamber, man, woman, or child. Why such a ridiculously large figure? Because he wasn't trying to get at the facts; he wasn't "studying" the chambers; he was instead trying to force his numbers to fit his pre-ordained conclusion, as bought and paid for by Ernst "The Hitler We Loved and Why" Zündel. So he lied. And Ernst Zündel picked up that lie ("not enough floor space") and ran with it. Why not? He paid for it. And then David Irving picked it up as well, when he started selling copies of the Leuchter report in the UK. And the lie wound its way through the Holocaust denial movement as a standard part of the "gas chambers wouldn't work" saga. And it is as part of that saga that the Holocaust denier Paul Eisen picked it up -- without mentioning its source -- and put it into his love letter to Ernst Zündel, the very same "Holocaust Wars" essay Gilad Atzmon was so "happy" he circulated for his "good friend."
 
PJMedia What are the limits to academic discourse? Are lies and calumnies from academics protected speech outside the classroom, as well as inside? Does “protected” mean immune from criticism or from direct consequences? Are there distinctions between statements made within one’s “field of expertise” and those made outside? When do such distinctions become hairsplitting rationalizations or mere defensiveness, as opposed to valuable exercises in reasoning and in defense of a noble enterprise? search terms: Professor of literature and communications at Lincoln University, Philidelphia, Jews have taken over America by devious and immoral means, offensive views, look at both sides, part of being a professor, moral certainty, juncture, Cary Nelson, Holocaust denial merits a hearing before a committee of his peers. Is his professional fitness at issue? ... a deluded idealogue, extracurricular remarks, line that must not be crossed, Holocaust denial raises the question of a faculty member’s] overall professional competence — the capacity to weigh evidence, to undertake rational analysis, to perform academic responsibilities reliably. MORE
 
ABC News Holocaust survivor and historian Randolph L. Braham said Sunday he is returning a high state award to Hungary to protest what he says are government efforts to rewrite history and exonerate the country from its role in the Holocaust. Braham also asked the Holocaust Memorial Center in Budapest to remove his name from the BrahamTheque Information Center, which collects his research results and publications. His two-volume "The Politics of Genocide: The Holocaust in Hungary," from 1981, is considered one of the most important books about the subject. He received the Medium Cross of the Order of Merit of the Hungarian Republic in 2011. Braham, Professor Emeritus at the Center for Jewish Studies at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, said in an open letter addressed to executives of the memorial center that the "straw that broke the camel's back" leading to his decision was the government plan to erect a memorial commemorating the March 1944 invasion of Hungary by the Nazis. Braham said the memorial was "a cowardly attempt to detract attention from the Horthy regime's involvement in the destruction of the Jews and to homogenize the Holocaust with the 'suffering' of the Hungarians — a German occupation, as the record clearly shows, was not only unopposed but generally applauded." Miklos Horthy was Hungary's autocratic leader from the 1920s through most of World War II. Prime Minister Viktor Orban's government has also been criticized by Jewish groups for tolerating statues of Horthy being set up by far-right groups in several places. MORE
 
 
Duke, David Duke  Amazon By Dr. David Duke, incorporating the writings of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Frank Britton and others. The single most important work on the ethnic origins of the Russian Revolution and the greatest Holocaust in the history of mankind: Soviet Communism and its tentacles which spread out all over the world. This book rips aside the curtain which to expose the dedicated, fanatic and murderous ethnic group which founded and controlled this "worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization" (as Churchill called it): Jewish Supremacists. Read how Jewish Supremacists created the Communist movement, from its germination, to the "Russian" Revolution, the seizure of Eastern Europe, America, Britain, South Africa and even in early Communist China. Contents Introduction 1 Communism with the Mask Off 2 The Ethnic War On the Russian People 3 Communism & Zionism 4 Bloody Sunday & the 1905 Revolution 5 The First World War 6 The March 1917 Revolution 7 The Origins of the Bolshevists 8 The Ground is Prepared 9 The Sixth Party Congress 10 Trotsky to Power 11 Encyclopedia Judaica on the "Russian Revolution" 12 Winston Churchill 13 American Intelligence 14 The London Times 15 The Executioners of the Red Terror 16 Exporting the Revolution 17 Trotsky in Decline 18 Lazar Kaganovich & the Holodomor 19 The "Soviet Zion" and Plans for a Jewish Homeland 20 The Greatest Mass Murderers in all of Human History 21 Iron Curtain Dictators 22 Russians Rise & Zionism Surges 23 Jews Come to America 24 The U.S. Communist Party 25 A Communist Defector in America Spills the Beans 26 Spies, Spies and more Spies in America 27 Atomic Treason 28 The Tribal Shift: Spying Now for Israel 29 Communism in Hollywood 30 A Tribal Media 31 The Communist Origins of Neoconservatism 32 The Communist Movement in Britain 33 South African Marxism: The Usual Suspects 34 Spreading of Communism to China 35 The Key to Communism: Jewish Tribalism 36 Final Words from Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Behind Communism, Frank L. Britton excerpt from Iamawitness

To understand the total problem of Communism it is necessary that we trace the course of the movement from it’s beginning down to the present. We must understand who it’s originators were, and what they were, and we must gain some idea as to the forces which influenced and shaped their philosophy.
Unfortunately, any deep-down discussion of Communism and Marxism involves the Jewish question. We cannot honestly discuss the subject without revealing—and commenting on—the fact that the founders of Russian Communism were Jewish. Neither can we ignore the fact that all but a few of the top leadership of the American Communism party—including the recently convicted spies— are of the same race. These are facts of history over which we have no control. But we are faced with the very serious problem of how to reveal these facts without being labeled—and treated—as "anti-Semites."
The main reason why so little is known concerning the true nature of Communism stems from this problem. Historical writers have been understandably reluctant to hold forth on the subject for fear of marking themselves as "race haters" and "bigots." For this reason the entire subject has been placed beyond the pale of discussion. One simply does not use the word "Jew" and "Communism" together.
The result is, of course, censorship. In this work we have decided to breach the wall of silence at whatever the cost, and to treat the subject as fairly and as honestly as we know how. No attempt is made to single out individuals because they happened to be born to a certain race: neither have we exempted anyone from criticism for that reason. It was decided that since Communism and Judaism are so irretrievably bound one to the other, a history of the Jewish people would contribute substantially to an understanding of the present communist menace.
NOTE [BY FRANK BRITTON]:  
Encyclopedia Britannica is used as a reference source because of its ready availability to the average reader. It is not an "anti-Semitic" publication. In fact, the Encyclopedia Britannica Corporation was purchased by the (Jewish) Julius Rosenwald interests in 1920, and since then all material pertaining to the Jewish question his been re-written to conform to the Jewish outlook.
The Funk & Wagnall's Jewish Encyclopedia is uniformly referred to throughout this work as the "Jewish Encyclopedia." Consisting of 12 volumes, it is available in all major libraries. It should not be confused with the 10 volume "Universal Jewish Encyclopedia," published by Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Inc., New York, 1939. Both, however, are authoritative Jewish publications, compiled by and for Jews.
Valentine's Jewish Encyclopedia, Shapiro Valentine Co., London - 1938. England.
Outline of History, third edition, by H. G. Wells.
THE PERSECUTION MYTH
With Shrill Insistence
We cannot undertake even this brief history of the modern Jew without taking note of a phenomenon which has confounded gentile societies for twenty centuries. This is the ability of the Jewish people to collectively retain their identity despite centuries of exposure to Christian civilization. To any student of Judaism, or to the Jews themselves, this phenomenon is partly explained by the fact that Judaism is neither mainly a religion nor mainly a racial matter, nor yet is it simply a matter of nationality. Rather it is all three; it is a kind of trinity. Judaism is best described as a nationality built on the twin pillars of race and religion.
All this is closely related to another aspect of Judaism, namely, the persecution myth. Since first appearing in history we find the Jews propagating the idea that they are an abused and persecuted people, and this idea is, and has always been, central in Jewish thinking. The myth of persecution is the adhesive and cement of Judaism; without it Jews would have long since ceased to exist, their racial-religious nationality notwithstanding.
Jews do not always agree among themselves, and it is only in the presence of their enemies—real or imagined—that Jewish thinking crystallizes into unanimity. In this respect they differ not at all from other peoples: Adolph Hitler solidified German opinion around the idea that Germany was wronged at Versailles, that the German people were abused and victimized by the Allies, and that only by holding together could they prevail against the overwhelming might of their enemies ...
For twenty-five centuries the Jewish mind has been conditioned by the same appeal. Through all Jewish thinking and all Jewish history the refrain of persecution has sounded with shrill insistence. Thus we find every accident of fortune being chronicled, enhanced, and passed on to succeeding generations as another example of gentile cruelty to the chosen race. And almost inevitably we find opposition to Jewish aspirations and ambitions being translated into these same terms of persecution, and all Jewish shortcomings being excused on the same basis.
Now it is a fact that the Jewish people have suffered numerous hardships in the course of their history, but this is true of other peoples too. The chief difference is that the Jews have kept score—they have made a tradition of persecution. A casual slaughter of Christians is remembered by no one in 50 years, but a disability visited upon a few Jews is preserved forever in Jewish histories. And they tell their woes not only to themselves, but to a sympathetic world as well ...
THE JEW IN EUROPE
Even The Coins Were Jewish
We find the first Jews filtering into Europe some time before the Christian era, particularly in the region of Greece. The ancient Greeks spoke of these Asiatic invaders with considerable bitterness. Very quickly they spread throughout the Roman Empire and into Europe proper. The Jewish merchant, artisan, and slave trader appear on the Roman scene with increasing frequency after the second century A.D. and there can be no doubt that their position in the Roman world was one of growing importance even as the Empire drifted to destruction. Under Justinian, says the Jewish Encyclopedia,
"They enjoyed full religious liberty, in return for which they assumed all a citizen's duty toward the state; minor offices were also open to them. Only the synagogues were exempt from the duty of quartering soldiers. The trade in slaves constituted the main source of livelihood for the Roman Jews, and decrees against this traffic were issued in 335, 336, 339, 384, etc."
[Funk & Wagnall's Jewish Encyclopedia, page 460, vol. 10]
Seneca, in his writings, bitterly assailed the Romans of his day for aping the Jews, and some historians (notably Gibbon in his monumental Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire) have ascribed the downfall of Rome to their corrupting influence. Nero's wife, Poppaea, was a converted Jewess. As Rome reeled into decline and final collapse, and as the Dark Ages descended over Western civilization, we find the Jew taking a strangle-hold over what remained of European commerce. Says Encyclopedia Britannica:
". . . there was an inevitable tendency for him to specialize in commerce, for which his acumen and ubiquity gave him special qualifications. In the dark ages the commerce of western Europe was largely in his hands, in particular the slave trade, and in Carolingian cartularies Jew and merchant are used as almost interchangeable terms."
[Encyclopedia Britannica, page 57, vol. 13—1947.]
This hold over European commerce finally became so utterly complete that few gentiles engaged in trade at all; it had become almost entirely a Jewish monopoly. In Poland and Hungary, the coins bore Jewish inscriptions ...
Throughout the Medieval period, ["Dark Ages," "Medieval Period," and "Middle Ages" are synonymous terms used to describe the period of decline which characterized western civilization between 500-1300 A.D.] which lasted from 500 A.D. to 1300 A.D., the Jew merchant was dominant all over Europe (except Scandinavia, where he was never permitted to enter) and this dominance included control over the eastern trade routes to the Levant. There was to be no relief from this situation until the Jews were evicted from Europe in the century directly preceding the Renaissance.
In 1215 the Catholic Church, at the Fourth Lateran Council, broke the back of European Jewry with a set of restrictions designed to curb their commercial monopoly. These decrees restricted Jews to residence in their own communities, prohibited absolutely their hiring of Christian employees and prohibited them from engaging in many types of commercial activity.
Expelled
The Fourth Lateran Council restricted Jewish commercial advantage but it did not end the Jewish problem. Beginning in the latter part of the 13th century, one European country after another expelled its Jewish population as the only final solution to the problem. First to take the step was England which banned them in 1290. Fifteen years later in 1306 the French followed suit. In steady succession the various states of Europe emulated this example with Spain being one of the last to enforce the ban in 1492. The situation in Spain is worth noting. Says Encyclopedia Britannica: [page 57, vol. 13 - 1947]:
"... The 14th century was the golden age of their history in Spain. In 1391 the preaching of a priest of Seville, Fernando Martenez, led to the first general massacre of the Jews who were envied for their prosperity and hated because they were the king's tax collectors."
Ferdinand and Isabella, after uniting Spain and driving out the Moors turned their attention to the Jewish problem, with the result that they were evicted completely in 1492. In 1498 Portugal evicted its Jewish population also.
The Exploiters
A great deal has been said about the "persecution" of the Jews in Europe and elsewhere, and they have pretty well convinced the world (or at least Americans) that these hardships were inflicted on an innocent people. But these rich Spanish Jews we see being evicted in 1492 were not down-trodden folk. They were the wealthy, the privileged, the exploiters: they were the well-fed merchants and the gouging tax collectors ...
So it was in Portugal; in that country we find that the deportation of the Jews ...
"deprived Portugal of its middle class and its most scientific traders and financiers."
[Encyclopedia Britannica, page 279, vol. 18 - 1947.]
Undeniably this class of traders and financiers was put to hardship by this banishment, but it does not follow that they were victims of discrimination in the accepted sense, nor were they underprivileged in any way. Rather we see a wealthy merchant group being ousted from its seat of vested privilege by a thoroughly outraged, and a thoroughly exploited Christian society ...
The situation in England was similar. The Jews had come to England in the wake of the Norman conquest and had quickly gained a position of wealth and prosperity. SaysValentine's Jewish Encyclopedia of this period:
"Their numbers and prosperity increased, Aaron of Lincoln being the wealthiest man in England in his time ... his financial transactions covering the whole country and concerning many of the leading nobles and churchmen ... On his death his property passed to the crown and a special branch of the exchequer had to be created to deal with it."
 England
England, ironically enough, was the last country to be invaded by the Jews and the first to evict them. After the Fourth Lateran Council the Jews had become increasingly difficult to deal with and there were a number of anti-Jewish riots. Perplexed by the problem posed by this alien minority which seemed well on its way to corralling the kingdom's wealth, and failing in an attempt to force its assimilation. Edward I confiscated all Jewish wealth and evicted them permanently in 1290. Not until 1655 was a Jew legally permitted to re-enter England. Britain thus established the precedent for the later eviction which soon followed on the continent.
 France
In France too the Jews were dominant in trade and finance and had been since before Charlemagne's time. Under Philip the Fair (1285-1314) one of the last, and certainly one of the greatest of the Capetian line, France had become the greatest power in Europe. It was Philip's need for money which led him to seize Jewish wealth and drive them from the country. He had already before 1306 taken desperate measures to raise money, which was in short supply, by forbidding the export of gold and silver from France. The same need for money brought him into conflict with the Templars, whose wealth he also seized. But it was the Jews who controlled the greatest supply of floating wealth. In 1306 Philip solved his financial problem—and France's Jewish problem—by expropriating their wealth and evicting them. Thus ended the centuries-long commercial dominance of the Jew in France. Later a few were permitted to return and these were in turn ejected in 1394.
RETURN TO THE EAST
The Evictions
Space does not permit a detailed discussion of the other evictions which followed and which resulted in the banishment of the Jews from virtually every country in Western Europe in the succeeding centuries but here in chronological order is a list of the evictions:
ENGLAND: Jews expelled in 1290 by Edward I. Not permitted to re-enter till 1655.
FRANCE: Expelled in 1306 by Philip the Fair. A few were permitted to return but were again evicted in 1394. Jewish settlements remained in Bordeaux, Avignon, Marseilles, (from where they were evicted in 1682) and in the northern province of Alsace.
SAXONY: Expelled in 1349.
HUNGARY: By 1092 the Jews were in control of Hungary's tax collections. In 1360 they were expelled but later returned. In 1582 they were again expelled from the Christian part of Hungary.
BELGIUM: Expelled in 1370. A few settled there again in 1450, but no large numbers came till 1700.
SLOVAKIA: Ousted from Prague in 1380. Many settled there again after 1562. In 1744 Marie Theresa expelled them again.
AUSTRIA: Expelled in 1420 by Albrecht V.
NETHERLANDS: Expelled from Utrecht in 1444.
SPAIN: Expelled in 1492.
LITHUANIA: Expelled in 1495 by Grand Duke Alexander. They later returned.
PORTUGAL: Expelled in 1498.
PRUSSIA: Expelled in 1510.
ITALY: Expelled from Kingdom of Naples and Sardinia in 1540.
BAVARIA: Banned permanently in 1551.
Jews were not permitted to enter Sweden until 1782. None were permitted to enter Denmark before the 17th century and they were not allowed in Norway after 1814. Today only a handful reside in all Scandinavia.
 Back to Poland
By 1500 all of Western Europe except northern Italy, parts of Germany, and the Papal possessions around Avignon, had been rid of the Jewish invasion. For a while, at least, Europe was free of the Jews; not until 1650 did they return in any numbers. SaysEncyclopedia Britannica: [page 57-58, vol. 13 - 1947.]
"The great mass of the Jewish people were thus to be found once more in the East, in the Polish and Turkish empires . . The few communities suffered to remain in western Europe were meanwhile subjected at last to all the restrictions which earlier ages had usually allowed to remain as an ideal; so that in a sense, the Jewish dark ages may be said to begin with the Renaissance."
THE RENAISSANCE
As the Jew Departed ...
The period marked by the evictions—1300 to 1650—also marks the period of the Renaissance which broke over Europe as the Jews departed. Starting at first in the trading cities of northern Italy in about 1300, there began a great rebirth of culture and learning which at first was based almost entirely on the writings of the ancient Greeks and Romans. Very quickly this renascent culture spread over Europe and when the age had ended, in about 1650, Europe was by comparison with her former status, enlightened and civilized. Quite obviously all this could not have taken place had it not been for a great upsurge of commercial activity which occurred simultaneously with, and as an adjunct of, the Renaissance. Not until the nations of Europe had wrested commercial control from the ghetto did this rebirth of western civilization occur.
The Ghettos
"Wherever Jews have settled, since the beginning of the Diaspora, they have proceeded to create their own communal organizations. Various factors of an internal character—religious, cultural, social, and economic—as well as external factors, have contributed to this factor"
(Page 201, The Jewish People, Past and Present, by the Central Yiddish Culture Organization (CYCO), New York).
It is virtually impossible to comprehend the character of Judaism without some knowledge of the nature of the Medieval Jewish community. (Kahal; Ghetto). Probably one of the commonest fallacies extant today concerns the true origin of the ghetto. Most history books defer to Jewish sensibilities by giving the Jewish version, namely that the Jewish people were for centuries forced to reside in a special quarter of the city as a result of the bigotry and intolerance of the Christian majority. This is not true, and no scholar of Judaism believes it to be.
Valentine's Jewish Encyclopedia describes the origin of the ghetto as follows:
"At any rate the word became general for a Jew's quarter. Already in antiquity the Jews voluntarily occupied special quarters; In the Middle Ages, Jew's streets or Jewries were to be found from the end of the 11th century, but the motive of their concentration was no longer religious or social: trade caused them to settle near the market, or danger made them seek the protection of the reigning prince, the protector also wishing to have them together for the easier collection of taxes. It was not until the 13th century that the Jew's quarter was turned into a compulsory Ghetto. ... The concentration of Jews in Ghettos, although unintended, had its good result. It preserved the communal feeling and the traditional Jewish culture."
As a point of fact these ghetto-communities existed only because the Jews wanted them to exist—they represented a desire on the part of Jewry to remain aloof and exclusive of Christian Society. Says Valentine's Jewish Encyclopedia [p 589]:
"There were as a rule officially recognized authorities in the Jewish communities in Europe during the Middle Ages to regulate their own affairs and to treat as a body with the civil government. Even with no other incentive but that of living up to the requirements of Judaism the Jews of a locality were compelled to organize themselves into a community (Kahal; Kehilla), in order to regulate ritual, educational and charitable institutions. Courts of law were also a necessity, since Jewish litigants were expected to obey the civil code of the Talmud."
The ghetto was not merely a place of residence; it was in the fullest sense a community within a community. Here the Jews maintained their culture, their religion, and their tradition of solidarity. Here they nursed their age-long hatred for Christian civilization. Says Encyclopedia Britannica [p 59, vol. 13 - 1947.]:
"All these activities necessitated a great deal of legislation and in this the autonomous Jewish community was granted the widest latitude. Ordinances were enacted by Jews governing every phase of life: business, synagogue attendance, social morals, policing, prescriptions for dress, and a detailed regimentation of amusements ... The characteristic common to the medieval Jewish community were: self imposed discipline, the considering of all religious, philanthropic, educational, and self defense problems as common concerns, and a strong sense of solidarity fortified by a uniform way of life."
For ten centuries preceding the great evictions, in virtually every Christian nation of Europe (and in Mohammedan Spain, Africa, and Asia Minor) these Jews settled into these parasitic ghetto-communities and here they nurtured and maintained a culture which was quite a thing apart from the culture of the European. When finally they were driven from Western Europe in the centuries preceding the Renaissance, we find them settling and establishing ghetto-communities in Poland and Russia which have lasted down to the present day. The Medieval ghetto did not disappear with the ending of the Dark Ages—it was transferred, unimpaired, to Eastern Europe, where the majority of the world's Jews settled.
The institution of the ghetto has enabled two basically different cultures and peoples to remain side by side—one Asiatic and Judaic, the other European and Christian—without becoming integrated. It is primarily for this reason that the Jew has remained an alien in spite of centuries of exposure to Christian civilization. And that is why the Spanish Jew remained a Jew first and a Spaniard second, and why the Polish Jew, the Russian Jew, and the German Jew, have given their first allegiance to Judah and rendered a sort of second-hand loyalty to the country of their abode.
The Chazars
The modern Jew is descended from a mixture of Asiatic peoples, largely Semitic in origin, but not Hebraic. This map is based on Britton's reproduction from Funk & Wagnall, itself based on Atlas de Géographie Historique by Schrader. Shading showed Roman Catholics, Greek Catholics, Mohammedans, Jews, and Pagans. I've indicated the boundaries, on the same map, of the Khazars, the Pale, and Russia; and emphasized where Ukraine is. The rectangle corresponds to the maps of Poland, below.
The modern Jew with his Yiddish culture and rapacious financial traditions should not be confused with the biblical Hebrews, who were mainly a pastoral people. The international Jew of modern times is indeed the bastardized product of a bastardized past. He does not truly worship the Bible, but the Talmud; he does not speak Hebrew, but Yiddish; he is not descended from Israel, but from the scum of the eastern Mediterranean. This is vividly illustrated by H. G. Wells in his great Outline of History:
"The Jewish idea was and is a curious combination of theological breadth and an intense racial patriotism. The Jews looked for a special saviour, a Messiah, who was to redeem mankind by the agreeable process of restoring the fabulous glories of David and Solomon, and bringing the whole world it last under the benevolent but firm Jewish heel. As the political power of the peoples declined as Carthage followed Tyre into the darkness and Spain became a Roman province, this dream grew and spread. There can be little doubt that the scattered Phoenicians in Spain and Africa and throughout the Mediterranean, speaking as they did a language closely akin to Hebrew and being deprived of their authentic political rights, became proselytes to Judaism. For phases of vigorous proselytism alternated with phases of exclusive jealousy in Jewish history. On one occasion the Idumeans, being conquered, were all forcibly made Jews. (Josephus). There were Arab tribes who were Jews in the time of Muhammad, and a Turkish people who were mainly Jews in South Russia in the ninth century. Judaism is indeed the reconstructed political ideal of many shattered peoples—mainly Semitic. It is to the Phoenician contingent and to Aramean accessions in Babylon that the financial and commercial tradition of the Jews is to be ascribed. But as a result of these coalescences and assimilations, almost everywhere in the towns throughout the Roman Empire, and far beyond it in the east, Jewish communities traded and flourished, and were kept in touch through the Bible, and through a religious and educational organization. The main part of Jewry never was in Judea and had never come out of Judea."
[Outline of History page 493-494, third edition, by H. G. Wells. Section 'Christianity and Islam', with a footnote recommending the Cambridge Medieval History.]
The "Turkish" people whom Wells mentions were the Chazars [Chazar=Khazar], who built an empire in south Russia in the 9th century A. D. This Chazar empire was infiltrated by large numbers of Byzantine Jews. By process of intermarriage and conversion these Chazars became identified as Jews and in all Jewish histories and encyclopedias the words "Chazar" and "Jew" are used interchangeably. In the tenth century a succession of invasions destroyed the Chazar empire and large numbers of these Chazar-Jews settled in the area of what is now Poland. Others found their way to western Europe and Spain, where they mingled with the already bastardized conglomeration of European Jewry.
Poland's Fate
These Jews we find settling in Poland in the early 14th century came there at the invitation of Casimir I, who seems to have been under strong Jewish influence. As early as the 10th century the Jews (chiefly of Khazar origin) were influential in Poland, and by the 12th century they were well enough entrenched to monopolize the coinage of Poland's money. Says the Jewish Encyclopedia: [Funk & Wagnall's Jewish Encyclopedia, page 56, vol. 10]
"Coins unearthed in 1812 in the Great Polish village of Glenbok show conclusively that in the reigns of Mieczyslauw III (1173-1209), Casimir, and Leshek (1194-1205), the Jews were, as stated above, in charge of the coinage of Great and Little Poland."
It is interesting to note that these coins bore Jewish as well as Polish inscriptions.
The history of Poland for the next 3 centuries revolves around the struggle for supremacy between the native Polish people and the Jews. During the greater part of that time Poland was more or less dominated by the Jews—a situation most beneficial to all, according to Jewish history books. But when, as occasionally happened, there was a lapse in Jewish fortunes, these same histories are replete with accounts of gentile cruelty and bestiality to the chosen race. And because these laments have been repeated often enough and loudly enough there is a widely held belief that Poland has been a land of oppression for Jewry ...
It has been the unhappy fate of Poland to be saddled for the greater part of its history with a large proportion of the world's Jewish population. This, more than anything else, accounts for the tragic disunity which has kept Poland from taking its place among the great nations of the earth.
In 1793 (third partition) Poland was divided between Prussia and Russia and thus ceased to exist as a nation. Russia thus fell heir to a full fledged Jewish problem.
 Russia
The third partition of Poland was an event of paramount significance in Russian history because as a by-product of the partition she acquired the world's largest Jewish population. From this moment on Russia's history became hopelessly intertwined with the Jewish problem, and eventually, as we shall relate, the Jews brought about the downfall of Imperial Russia.
No one can possibly understand the nature of present day communism, nor of Zionism, without some knowledge of the situation existing in Russia in the century preceding the October revolution of 1917. We have already noted the presence of Khazar Jews in Poland in the 10th century, and these same Khazar Jews are to be found in Russia from that time on. But whereas Poland had invited the evicted Jews of western Europe to settle in vast numbers within its boundaries in the 13th, 14th, and 15th centuries, the Imperial Russian government had permitted no such immigrations, and had in fact sealed its borders to them. As would be expected, therefore, the Imperial government was something less than enthusiastic over this sudden acquisition of Poland's teeming masses of Jews. 
Pale of Settlement
 
The Pale of Settlement extended from the Crimea to the Baltic Sea, encompassing an area half as great as western Europe. By 1917, seven million Jews resided there, comprising perhaps half the world's total Jewish population. It was within the Pale of Settlement that the twin philosophies of Communism and Zionism flourished. Both movements grew out of Jewish hatred of Christian civilization (persecutor of the "chosen race"), and both movements have spread wherever Jews have emigrated. The Pale of Settlement has been the reservoir from which the world-wide forces of communism have flowed. It is worth noting that half of the world's Jewish population now resides in the U.S., and that all but a handful of these are from the Pale, or are descendants of emigrants from the Pale.
From the very beginning the Tsarist government imposed a set of restrictions designed to protect Russia's economy and culture from the inroads of the Jew. It was decreed (in 1772) that Jews could settle in Greater Russia, but only in certain areas. Within this "Pale of Settlement" Jews were more or less free to conduct their affairs as they pleased. But travel or residence beyond the Pale was rigidly restricted, so that in 1897 (date of Russia's 1st census) 93.9% of Russia's Jewish population lived within its boundaries, and only 6% of the total resided in other parts of the Empire. To prevent smuggling, no Jew was permitted to reside within 50 versts of the border.
From the standpoint of Jewish history, the Pale of Settlement ranks as one of the most significant factors of modern times. Here within. a single and contiguous area the greater part of Jewry had gathered, and was to remain, for something like 125 years. For the first time Jewry was subjected to a common environment and a common ground of experience. Out of this common experience and environment there evolved the Yiddish speaking Jew of the 20th century. Here too were born the great movements of Zionism and Communism.
The Kahal
We have already remarked upon the habit of Jewry from ancient times of establishing and maintaining their own tribal community (kahal) within the framework of Christian society. We have noted also that as the Jew was driven from Western Europe, he brought with him to Poland this ancient custom. The Kahal was an established institution in Poland, and as the Jews settled within the Pale they set up these autonomous communities here too.
At first the Imperial government recognized the autonomous Kahal organization permitting them to raise taxes and set up courts of law, where only Jewish litigants were concerned. In addition to the individual communities, there were district Kahal organizations which at first were permitted to assess local Jewish communities with taxes. In 1786 these privileges were drastically curtailed and Jews were there after obliged to appear before ordinary courts of law and the Kahal organization was restricted to matters of religious and social nature. Although Jewish propagandists have complained long and loudly of being oppressed by the Imperial government, it is a fact that up until 1881 they prospered beyond all expectation. Jewry settled in the Russian economy like a swarm of locusts in a field of new corn. Very quickly they achieved a monopoly over Russia's liquor, tobacco, and retail industries. Later they dominated the professions as well. Under the reign of Alexander I many of the restrictions against residence beyond the Pale of Settlement were relaxed, especially for the artisan and professional classes. A determined effort was made to establish Jews in agriculture and the government encouraged at every opportunity the assimilation of Jews into Russian national life.
Nicholas I
Alexander's successor, Nicholas I, was less inclined to favor Jewry, and in fact viewed their inroads into the Russian economy with alarm. He was much hated by the Jews. Prior to his reign, Alexander I had allowed any male Jew the privilege of escaping compulsory military duty by paying a special draft-exemption tax. In 1827 Nicholas abolished the custom, with the result that Jews were for the first time taken into the Imperial armies ...
In 1844 Nicholas I further antagonized Jewry by abolishing the institution of the Kahal, and in that same year he prohibited by law the traditional Jewish garb, specifying that all Jews should, except on ceremonial occasions, dress in conformity with Russian standards. These measures, and many others like them, were aimed at facilitating the assimilation of Jewry into Russian life. The Tsarist government was much concerned by the Jew's failure to become Russianized, and viewed with extreme hostility the ancient Jewish custom of maintaining a separate culture, language, mode of dress, etc.—all of which contributed to keep the Jew an alien in the land of his residence. It is to this determination to "Russianize" and "civilize" the Jew that we can ascribe the unusual efforts made by the Imperial government to provide free education to its Jews. In 1804 all schools were thrown open to Jews and attendance for Jewish children was made compulsory. Compulsory education was not only a novelty in Russia, but in any country in the early 19th century. In Russia education was generally reserved for a privileged few, and even as late as 1914 only 55% of her gentile population had been inside a school. The net result of the Imperial government's assimilation program was that Russian Jewry became the best educated segment in Russia. This eventually worked to the destruction of the Tsarist government ...
The reign of Alexander II marked the apex of Jewish fortunes in Tsarist Russia. By 1880 they were becoming dominant in the professions, in many trades and industries, and were beginning to filter into government in increasing numbers. As early as 1861 Alexander II had permitted Jewish university graduates to settle and hold governmental positions in greater Russia, and by 1879 apothecaries, nurses, midwives dentists, distillers, and skilled craftsmen were permitted to work and reside throughout the empire.
Nevertheless Russia's Jews were increasingly rebellious over the remaining restraints which still bound the greater part of Russian Jewry to the Pale of Settlement, and which, to some extent at least, restricted their commercial activities. Herein lay the dilemma; the Imperial government could retain certain of the restrictions against the Jews, and by doing so incur their undying hostility, or it could remove all restraints and thus pave the way for Jewish domination over every phase of Russian life. Certainly Alexander viewed this problem with increasing concern as time went on. Actually it was a problem capable of being solved. [sic]
Alexander II lost a considerable amount of his enthusiasm for liberal causes after an attempt was made to assassinate him in 1866. He dismissed his "liberal" advisors and from that time on displayed an inclination toward conservatism. This is not to say he became anti-Jewish, but he did show more firmness in dealing with them. In 1879 there was another attempt on his life, and another in the following year when his winter palace was blown up. In 1881 a plot hatched in the home of the Jewess, Hesia Helfman, was successful. Alexander II was blown up and so ended an era.
The New Policy
The reaction to the assassination of Alexander II was instantaneous and far reaching. There was a widespread belief in and out of the government, that if the Jews were dissatisfied with the rule of Alexander II—whom the crypto-Jew, D'Israeli, had described as "the most benevolent prince that ever ruled Russia"—then they would be satisfied with nothing less than outright domination of Russia.
Up to 1881 Russian policy had consistently been directed in an attempt to "Russianize" the Jew, preparatory to accepting him into full citizenship. In line with this policy, free and compulsory education for Jews had been introduced, repeated attempts had been made to encourage them to settle on farms, and special efforts had been made to encourage them to engage in the crafts. Now Russian policy was reversed. Hereafter it became the policy of the Imperial government to prevent the further exploitation of the Russian people by the Jews. Thus began the death struggle between Tsar and Jew.
All through 1881 there was widespread anti-Jewish rioting all over the empire. Large numbers of Jews who had been permitted to settle beyond the Pale of Settlement were evicted. In May of 1882 the May Laws (Provisional Rules of May 3, 1882) were imposed, thus implementing the new governmental policy.
The May Laws shook the empire to its foundations. The following passage is taken fromEncyclopedia Britannica [page 76, volume 2, 1947]:
"The Russian May Laws were the most conspicuous legislative monument achieved by modern anti-Semitism ... Their immediate results was a ruinous commercial depression which was felt all over the empire and which profoundly affected the national credit. The Russian minister was at his wit's end for money. Negotiations for a large loan were entered upon with the house of Rothschild and a preliminary contract was signed, when ... the finance minister was informed that unless the persecutions of the Jews were stopped the great banking house would be compelled to withdraw from the operation ... In this way anti-Semitism, which had already so profoundly influenced the domestic policies of Europe, set its mark on the international relations of the powers, for it was the urgent need of the Russian treasury quite as much as the termination of Prince Bismarck's secret treaty of mutual neutrality which brought about the Franco-Russian alliance."
Thus, within a period of 92 years (from the 3rd partition to 1882) the Jews, although constituting only 4.2% of the population, had been able to entrench themselves so well in the Russian economy that the nation was almost bankrupted in the attempt to dislodge them. And, as we have seen, the nation's international credit was also affected.
After 1881 events served increasingly to sharpen the enmity of Jewry toward Tsarism. The May Laws had not only restricted Jewish economic activity, but had attempted—unsuccessfully, as we shall see—to preserve Russia's cultural integrity. Hereafter Jews were permitted to attend state-supported schools and universities, but only in ratio to their population. This was not unreasonable since Russia's schools were flooded with Jewish students while large numbers of her gentile population were illiterate, but to the Jews this represented another bitter "persecution," and all the world was acquainted with the enormity of this new crime against Jewry ...
On May 23rd a delegation of Jews headed by Baron Gunzberg called on the new Tsar (Alexander III) to protest the May Laws and the alleged discrimination against Jewry. As a result of the investigation which followed, Tsar Alexander issued an edict the following Sept. 3rd, a part of which is given here:
"For some time the government has given its attention to the Jews and to their relations to the rest of the inhabitants of the empire, with a view of ascertaining the sad condition of the Christian inhabitants brought about by the conduct of the Jews in business matters ...
During the last twenty years the Jews have gradually possessed themselves of not only every trade and business in all its branches, but also of a great part of the land by buying or farming it. With few exceptions, they have as a body devoted their attention, not to enriching or benefiting the country, but to defrauding by their wiles its inhabitants, and particularly its poor inhabitants. This conduct of theirs has called forth protests on the part of the people, as manifested in acts of violence and robbery. The government, while on the one hand doing its best to put down the disturbances, and to deliver the Jews from oppression and slaughter, have also, on the other hand, thought it a matter of urgency and justice to adopt stringent measures in order to put an end to the oppression practised by the Jews on the inhabitants, and to free the country from their malpractices, which were, as is known, the cause of the agitations."
[Russia and Turkey in the 19th Century by E. W. Latimer, page 332. A. C. McClury & Co., 1895.]
It was in this atmosphere that the twin movements of Marxism and Zionism began to take hold and dominate the mass of Russian Jewry. Ironically, both Zionism and Marxism were first promulgated by westernized German Jews. Zionism, whose chief advocate was Theodore Herzl, took root in Russia in the 1880s in competition with Marxism, whose high priest was Karl Marx, grandson of a rabbi ... Eventually every Russian Jew came to identify himself with either one or the other of these movements.
THE TERROR SECTION
Six Assassinated
As an outgrowth of this political fermentation, there appeared at the beginning of the century one of the most remarkable terroristic organizations ever recorded in the annals of history. This was the Jewish dominated Social Revolutionary Party, which between 1901 and 1906 was responsible for the assassination of no less than six first ranking leaders of the Imperial government, including Minister of Education Bogolepov (1901); Minister of Interior Sipyagin (1902); Governor of Ufa, Bogdanovich (1903); Premier Viachelav von Plehve (1904); Grand Duke Sergei, uncle of the Tsar (1905); and General Dubrassov, who had suppressed the Moscow insurrection (1906).
Chief architect of these terroristic activities was the Jew, Gershuni, who headed the "terror section" of the Social Revolutionary Party. In charge of the "fighting section" was Yevno Azev, son of a Jewish tailor, and one of the principal founders of the party.
Azev later plotted, but was unable to carry out, the assassination of Tsar Nicholas II. He was executed in 1909 and Gershuni was sentenced to life imprisonment. This marked the end of the terroristic activities of the party, but the effect of these political murders was far reaching. Never again was the royal family, or its ministers free from the fear of assassination. Soon another prime minister would be shot down—this time in the very presence of the Tsar. This was the backdrop for the revolution of 1905.

Wikipedia Semitic ... In linguistics and ethnology, Semitic (from the Biblical "Shem", Hebrew: שם‎, translated as "name", Arabic: ساميّ‎) was first used to refer to a language family of West Asian origin, now called the Semitic languages. This family includes the ancient and modern forms ofAhlamu, Akkadian (Assyrian-Babylonian), Amharic, Ammonite, Amorite, Arabic, Aramaic/Syriac, Canaanite/Phoenician/Carthaginian,Chaldean, Eblaite, Edomite Ge'ez, Hebrew, Maltese, Mandaic, Moabite, Sutean, Tigre and Tigrinya, and Ugaritic, among others. As language studies are interwoven with cultural studies, the term also came to describe the extended cultures and ethnicities, as well as the history of these varied peoples as associated by close geographic and linguistic distribution ... The word "Semite" and most uses of the word "Semitic" relate to any people whose native tongue is, or was historically, a member of the associated language family.[31][32] The term "anti-Semite", however, came by a circuitous route to refer most commonly to one hostile or discriminatory towards Jews in particular.[33] Anthropologists of the 19th century such as Ernst Renan readily aligned linguistic groupings with ethnicity and culture, appealing to anecdote, science and folklore in their efforts to define racial character. Moritz Steinschneider, in his periodical of Jewish letters Hamaskir (3 (Berlin 1860), 16), discusses an article by Heymann Steinthal[34] criticising Renan's article "New Considerations on the General Character of the Semitic Peoples, In Particular Their Tendency to Monotheism".[35] Renan had acknowledged the importance of the ancient civilisations of Mesopotamia, Israel etc. but called the Semitic races inferior to the Aryan for their monotheism, which he held to arise from their supposed lustful, violent, unscrupulous and selfish racial instincts. Steinthal summed up these predispositions as "Semitism", and so Steinschneider characterised Renan's ideas as "anti-Semitic prejudice".[36] In 1879 the German journalist Wilhelm Marr, in a pamphlet called Der Weg zum Siege des Germanenthums über das Judenthum ("The Way to Victory of Germanicism over Judaism") began the politicisation of the term by speaking of a struggle between Jews and Germans. He accused them of being liberals, a people without roots who had Judaized Germans beyond salvation. In 1879 Marr's adherents founded the "League for Anti-Semitism"[37] which concerned itself entirely with anti-Jewish political action. However, Antisemitism can also apply to other Semitic peoples also. In Iran, the minorities of Assyrians and Arabs in the country, as well as Jews, have suffered varying degrees of Antisemitism.[38] It is not just the bearded extremists of Chabad that have such supremacist sentiments, many of the publicly acknowledged, most influential Jews of the United States. A perfect example is Stephen Steinlight. He served for five years as the Director of National Affairs for the largest and most powerful Jewish organization in the United States, the American Jewish Committee. He made the following remarks in an article on immigration in a national Jewish magazine in October of 2001: I’ll confess it, at least, like thousands of other typical Jewish kids of my generation, I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a quasi-separatist. Every summer for two months for 10 formative years during my childhood and adolescence I attended Jewish summer camp. There, each morning, I saluted a foreign flag, dressed in a uniform reflecting its colors, sang a foreign national anthem, learned a foreign language, learned foreign folk songs and dances, and was taught that Israel was the true homeland. Emigration to Israel was considered the highest virtue, and, like many other Jewish teens of my generation, I spent two summers working in Israel on a collective farm while I contemplated that possibility. More tacitly and subconsciously, I was taught the superiority of my people to the gentiles who had oppressed us. We were taught to view non-Jews as untrustworthy outsiders, people from whom sudden gusts of hatred might be anticipated, people less sensitive, intelligent, and moral than ourselves. We were also taught that the lesson of our dark history is that we could rely on no one. …[6]

Islamic Awakening on on Chabad Lubvitch ... Steven Steinlight, If any Gentile politician dared to say that “typical Jewish kids” are deliberately taught that their real loyalty is not to America but to Israel; and that Jews say they are superior to Gentiles in intelligence and morals, he would be mercilessly condemned by the media and hounded out of politics as an anti-Semite. Yet, this stark admission is by the former head of National Affairs for the American Jewish Committee. It should be emphasized that Steinlight’s words are not from an off-handed or careless conversation, but are his carefully chosen words from a major article he wrote for Jewish consumption, called “The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demographics.” I’ll confess it, at least, like thousands of other typical Jewish kids of my generation, I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a quasi-separatist. Every summer for two months for 10 formative years during my childhood and adolescence I attended Jewish summer camp. There, each morning, I saluted a foreign flag, dressed in a uniform reflecting its colors, sang a foreign national anthem, learned a foreign language, learned foreign folk songs and dances, and was taught that Israel was the true homeland. Emigration to Israel was considered the highest virtue, and, like many other Jewish teens of my generation, I spent two summers working in Israel on a collective farm while I contemplated that possibility. More tacitly and subconsciously, I was taught the superiority of my people to the gentiles who had oppressed us. We were taught to view non-Jews as untrustworthy outsiders, people from whom sudden gusts of hatred might be anticipated, people less sensitive, intelligent, and moral than ourselves. We were also taught that the lesson of our dark history is that we could rely on no one. …[6]

 
Supposed terrorist prosecutions since 2003, compiled by Heritage.org... names only ... vast majority contain no violent acts, are probably illegal stings, and entrapment...Richard Reid—2. Jose Padilla—May 2002. 3. Lackawanna Six—4. Uzair and Saifullah Paracha—5. Iyman Faris—May 2003.6. Ahmed Omar Abu Ali—June 2003. 7. Virginia Jihad Network—June 2003.8. Nuradin M. Abdi—November 2003.9. Dhiren Barot—August 2004. 10. James Elshafay and Shahawar Matin Siraj—August 2004. 11. Yassin Aref and Mohammad Hossain—August 2004. 12. Hamid Hayat—June 2005. 13. Levar Haley Washington, Gregory Vernon Patterson, Hammad Riaz Samana, and Kevin James—August 2005. 14. Michael C. Reynolds—December 2005.15. Mohammad Zaki Amawi, Marwan Othman El-Hindi, and Zand Wassim Mazloum—February 2006. 16. Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar—March 2006. 17. Syed Haris Ahmed and Ehsanul Islam Sadequee—April 2006. 18. Narseal Batiste, Patrick Abraham, Stanley Grant Phanor, Naudimar Herrera, Burson Augustin, Lyglenson Lemorin, and Rotschild Augustine—June 2006. 19. Assem Hammoud—July 2006. 20. Liquid Explosives Plot—August 2006. 21. Derrick Shareef—December 2006. 22. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed—March 2007. 23. Fort Dix Plot—May 2007. 24. JFK Airport Plot—June 2007. 25. Hassan Abujihaad—March 2008. 26. Christopher Paul—June 2008. 27. Bryant Neal Vinas—November 2008. 28. Synagogue Terror Plot—May 2009. 29. Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad—June 2009.30. Raleigh Jihad Group—July 2009.
31. Najibullah Zazi—September 2009. Najibullah Zazi,32. Maher Husein Smadi—September 2009. 33. Michael Finton—September 2009. 34. Tarek Mehanna and Ahmad Abousamra—October 2009. 35. Major Nidal Malik Hasan—November 2009. 36. The Christmas Day Bomber—December 2009. Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab,37. Raja Lahrasib Khan—March 2010. 38. Faisal Shahzad—May 2010. 40. Farooque Ahmed—October 2010. 41. Air Cargo Bomb Plot—October 2010. 42. Mohamed Osman Mohamud—November 2010. 43. Antonio Martinez—
44. Khalid Ali-M Aldawsari—February 2011. 45. Ahmed Ferhani and Mohamed Mamdouh—May 2011. 46. Yonathan Melaku—June 2011. 47. Abu Khalid Abdul-Latif and Walli Mujahidh—June 2011.48. Ulugbek Kodirov—July 2011. Ulugbek Kodirov, 49. Emerson Winfield Begolly—August 2011. Begolly, 50. Rezwan Ferdaus—September 2011. 51. Iranian Terror Plot—October 2011.
52. Jose Pimentel—November 2011. 53. Sami Osmakac—January 2012. 54. Amine El Khalifi—February 2012. 55. AQAP Plane Bomb PlotMay 2012. 56. Adel Daoud—September 2012.
57. Quazi Mohammad Rezwanul Ahsan Nafis—October 2012.58. Qazi Brothers’ Plot—November 2012. 59. Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev—April 2013. Tamerlan Tsarnaev, 26, and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 19, calmly walked through the crowd of spectators at the annual Boston Marathon on the afternoon of April 15, 2013.
Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth Peter H. Allen, Representative from Cheshire, New Hampshire State House of Representatives, 2000-present; member, Environment and Agriculture Committee. Brae Antcliffe BA LLB, Elected Alderman to the Council of The City of Sydney, Australia, early 1980s for 3.5 years Berit Ås, former member of Parliament, Norway (Charter Member of PL911Truth) Shirley Bianchi, 1999-2007 District Two San Luis Obispo County Supervisor, California (Retired) Click here to see statement Michael E. J. Blastos, Mayor of Keene, NH, USA, 2000-2008; City Councilor, Keene, NH, 1976-1999. Eric Booth, elected Former Islands Trustee, Salt Spring Island Local Trust Committee (Local Government), 2002-2005 Click here to see statement Dr. Robert M. Bowman, former Director of Advanced Space Programs Development for the U.S. Air Force in the Ford and Carter administrations (Charter Member of PL911Truth) Click here to see statement Andreas von Bülow, former State Secretary in the Federal Ministry of Defense, West Germany; former Minister of Research and Technology; former member of the German Parliament (Charter Member of PL911Truth) Donald R. Bustion, former Assistant Attorney General of Texas Giulietto Chiesa, Italian member of the European Parliament; vice chairman, Committee on International Trade; member, Committee on Security and Defense(Charter Member of PL911Truth) Gerard Chevrot, Municipal Councilor, Saint-Sixt, France Matt Cole, Board of Trustees, Town of Alma; Alma, Colorado, USA Wolfram Elsner, PhD, former head of the Planning Division of the Ministry of Economic Affairs of the State of Bremen; director of the Bremen State Economic Research Institute; and Bremen State Official for Industrial Defense Conversion, 1989 - 2001(Charter Member of PL911Truth) Peter S. Espiefs, Member from Keene, New Hampshire (USA) House of Representatives, 2000-2008; former Judge of the Cheshire Country Probate Court, 1979-1999; former member Keene City Council. Douglas Nixon Everingham, Member, House of Representatives, Australia, 1967-75 and 1977-84, Minister for Health 1972-75, a Vice-President, World Health Assembly 1975, Parliamentary Adviser, UN delegation. Click here to see statement Jeanette Fitzsimons, Co-leader of the New Zealand Green Party since 1995, and member of the House of Representatives since 1999. Click here to see statement Constance Fogal, Canadian Action Party Leader, 2004-2008 (Charter Member of PL911Truth) Yukihisa Fujita, member of the House of Councilors, National Diet of Japan; Chairman, Special Committee on North Korean Abduction Issue and Related Matters; former member of the House of Representatives (Charter Member of PL911Truth) Ole Gerstrom, Member of Parliament, Denmark, 1973-1975. Click here to see statement Bill Goodacre, Smithers, BC, Town Council (12 years); elected Member of the British Columbia (Canada) Legislature, 1996-2001 Click here to see statement Honorable Art Goodtimes, fourth term County Commissioner for San Miguel, Colorado, USA San Miguel, Colorado, USA Click here to see statement Senator Mike Gravel, United States Senator (1969 - 1981) (Charter Member of PL911Truth) Roland Gustafson, Municipal Council, Haninge Municipality, Sweden, 2006-- Click here to see statement Betty B. Hall, New Hampshire State House of Representatives, 1978-2002, 2004-present School Board Member, Hollis/Brookline School Board (COOP), 2003 Chair, Brookline School Board, 1963-1971. Dan Hamburg, former Californian member of the US House of Representatives(Charter Member of PL911Truth) Steve Hickey, Representative (R), South Dakota Legislature, 9th District, 2010~. Mr. Hickey serves on the Health and Human Services and on the Transportation Committees. Click here to see statement Joel S. Hirschhorn, Senior Staff Member, Congressional Office of Technology Assessment 1978-1990 (Charter Member of PL911Truth)Click here to see statement Barbara Honegger, former White House Policy Analyst and Special Assistant to the Assistant to President Ronald Reagan (1981 - 1983) (Charter Member of PL911Truth) Ferdinando Imposimato, elected Italian Senator, 1987-1992, and 1994-1996. Elected to the Chamber of Deputies (Parliament), 1992-1994 Click here to see statement Tadashi Inuzuka, member of the House of Councilors, National Diet of Japan (Charter Member of PL911Truth) Karen S. Johnson, former member of the Senate of the State of Arizona, where she was chair of the Family Services Committee (Charter Member of PL911Truth) Scott Kennedy, former Mayor and City Council Member (12 years), Santa Cruz, California Senator Prof. Muhammad Ibrahim Khan, member of Pakistan's Senate since 2006; member of Standing committee on Education and Science and Technology; member of Standing Committee on Law, Justice and Human Rights and Parliamentary Affairs; Vice President of Jamaat e Islami (Pakistan) Click here to see statement Dr. Sergey Ivanovic Kolesnikov, Member of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly (Parliament) of the Russian Federation. He is vice president of the Duma Commitee for Eco Defense. Former Deputy Director of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences (RAMN). Paul Lannoye, former Belgian member of the European Parliament, where he was vice chair of the Committee on Energy, Research, and Technology (Charter Member of PL911Truth) Kira Lukiyanova, Member of the Parliament of the Russian Federation (Duma). Vice-Chairman of the Investment Committee of the Duma. Jon Paul McClellan, chief election judge (appointed), Eastside Precinct, Orange County, North Carolina; former elected chair of the precinct organization. Click here to see statement Cynthia McKinney, former Georgian member of the US House of Representatives, where she was a member of the Armed Services Committee and the International Relations Committee (Charter Member of PL911Truth) Michael Meacher, Minister of the British Parliament; former Minister of the Environment; former Undersecretary for Industry (Charter Member of PL911Truth) Per Mohn, deputy representative to the Norwegian Parliament from Akershus, 1989–1993 Dr. Andrew J. Moulden, Leader of the Canadian Action Party(Charter Member of PL911Truth) David Nelson, Hate Crimes Working Group (appointed advisory commission), U.S. Department of Justice, Utah, 1997-2001 Click here to see statement Art, Olivier, '98-'99 Mayor of Bellflower, CA Click here to see statement Marty B. O'Malley, elected Democratic member of Council, Forest Hills, PA Click here to see statement Walter Pitman, Member of the Canadian House of Commons, 1960-1962, member of the Ontario Legislature, 1967-1971. Order of Canada, Order of Ontario Click here to see statement Bruce Randall, elected Longmeadow (Massachusetts) Water & Sewer Commissioner, 2002-2003, then Chairman, 2003-2004 Click here to see statement Barbara Hull Richardson, State of New Hampshire, House of Representatives, 1992- . Vice Chairman, Children and Family Law Committee Senator Fernando Rossi, member of the Italian Parliament (Senato), 2006-2008 Click here to see statement Val Scott, founding member of Canada's New Democratic Party; former Trustee and Vice Chairman of North York Board of Education, Ontario, Canada (Charter Member of PL911Truth) Click here to see statement Prof. David C. Smith, former Town Councillor, Mont Saint Aignan, Normandy, France Simon C. Smith, elected to Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council, Great Bridge Electoral Division, United Kingdom Joel Tyner, third term county legislator for Clinton and Rhinebeck, Dutchess County, New York State; Environmental Committee Chair for Duchess County Legislature. Gianni Vattimo, member of European Parliament, 1999 - 2004 (Italy); Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs; Committee on Employment and Social Affairs; Committee on Culture, Youth, Education, the Media and Sport(Charter Member of PL911Truth) Jesse Ventura, former Governor of Minnesota (Charter Member of PL911Truth) Bruno Vézina, elected Mayor of Irlande, Quebec, Canada, 2003 Terry Wachniak, elected to City Council, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, from 1986 to Suzi Wizowaty, Representative for Chittenden 3-5, Vermont Legislature, USA. Click here to see statement Charles R. Weed, State of New Hampshire House of Representatives, Member for Keene, NH, 2000- . Member, Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services Committee. Professor of Political Science, Keene State College. Click here to see statement Victor Zvagelsky, Member of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly (Parliament) of the Russian Federation, and the head of the subcommittee of economic relations.
 
The 1001 Club: A Nature Trust is a trust that helps fund the World Wide Fund for Nature. It was established in 1970 by the then head of the WWF, Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, with help from Anton Rupert, a South African entrepreneur. They persuaded 1001 individuals to join the club, where each member would contribute US $10,000 to the trust. The resulting $10 million fund helps to towards the WWF's basic costs of administration. The membership of the 1001 Club largely consists of managers of banks and multinationals from around the world. Examples from past and present include Sir Eric Drake of British Petroleum, Sir Val Duncan of Rio Tinto, Harry Frederick Oppenheimer and Sidney Spiro of Anglo-American Corporation, the British and French Rothschilds, Michel David-Weill of Lazard, Laurance and David Rockefeller, Henry Ford II, Baron Hans Heinrich Thyssen-Bornemisza, Peter von Siemens, and Berthold Beitz of Krupp. Among the more remarkable members have been Salem bin Laden, Osama bin Laden's older half-brother; Mobutu Sese Seko, the dictator of Zaire; BCCI founder and president Agha Hasan Abedi; Louis Bloomfield and Tibor Rosembaum; and the controversial businessman Nelson Bunker Hunt.
 

Halliburton Is Houston's
`Greater Hermann Göring Werke'

by John Hoefle

In his farewell address to the nation in 1961, President Dwight Eisenhower warned about the dangers of "the acquisition of unwarranted influence" by the "military-industrial complex," noting that "the potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes."

As supreme commander of Allied military forces in Europe during World War II, Ike played a key role in the battle not only against fascism, but against the international Synarchist cabal which orchestrated the rise to power of Hitler and Mussolini. During his two terms as President (1953-61), Ike was also well positioned to see this Synarchist cabal's tentacles into the United States, and how they were attempting to use the Cold War to solidify their power. In warning about the military-industrial complex, Ike meant to warn us about the fascists within our own midst.[1]

Events soon proved him right. In 1962 came the Cuban missile crisis; in 1963 the assassination of President John F. Kennedy at the hands of the Synarchist Permindex assassination bureau; the escalation of the Vietnam War in the wake of the phony Tonkin Gulf "attacks" in 1964. These events strengthened the hand of the Synarchists, who have seized power in Washington in the wake of 9/11, and under the guise of fighting terrorism have launched an assault on both the Constitution and the public purse.

Cheney and Halliburton

Chief among the Synarchists in Washington is Vice President Dick Cheney, whose relationship with Halliburton exemplifies the military-industrial relationships of which Ike warned. In 1991, while he was Secretary of Defense in the first Bush Administration, Cheney secretly hired Halliburton's Brown & Root subsidiary to do a study on the privatization of military logistics operations. This study established the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program, which gave its first general contract to—Brown & Root.

At the time, Cheney and his Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, Paul Wolfowitz, were pushing for wars against smaller, resource-rich nations, including the use of "low-yield" nuclear weapons. When George H.W. Bush left office in January 1993, Cheney spent some time at the neo-conservative American Enterprise Institute, and then in 1995, joined Halliburton as president and chief executive. Cheney added chairman to his titles in 1996, and ran the company until August 2000, when he stepped down to run for Vice President. And during that 1995-2000 period, one dollar of every seven spent by the Pentagon, passed through what is now Kellogg Brown & Root!

At the time Cheney hired Halliburton to do the privatization study, Halliburton was hardly a disinterested party. The company was already a major defense contractor through Brown & Root and had significant military and intelligence connections. There were also, as we shall see, reports of much darker activities.

With its flurry of construction contracts in Iraq, Halliburton is in many respects depending upon Dick Cheney for its survival; but Cheney may not last long either, given his abysmal policy failures and the spotlight put on those failures by Lyndon LaRouche. LaRouche has dubbed Halliburton "The Greater Hermann Göring Werke of Houston." It has been clear for some time that Vice President Cheney has been acting as an agent for the international Synarchist movement, which was founded as the oligarchy's counterattack to the American Revolution and the principles upon which America was founded. Cheney and Halliburton have been rightly attacked for the company's war profiteering, but the reality of their corruption runs much deeper.

The Vice President and his neo-con allies such as Defense Secretary Donald Rumseld, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, et al., are agents of a power which is committed to eliminating the principles espoused in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, in favor of a global bankers' dictatorship. This same oligarchic power, acting through merchant banks like Lazard Frères and Rothschild and other financial institutions, controls a large swath of Wall Street and corporate America, including Halliburton. Halliburton's power does not flow from Cheney, but from Cheney's backers, the Synarchist bankers. Cheney's policy toward the people of Iraq is the same as Halliburton's policy toward its asbestos claimants, and the same as Göring's policy toward the people in the Nazi work camps.

Arbeit Macht Frei (Work Makes You Free) read the sign over the entrance to Auschwitz. It was an example of Göring's "big lie" tactic in action. The Cheney cabal's pronouncements that we must accept police-state tactics in our own nation and pre-emptive strikes against other nations in the name of freedom, rings just as false. Hermann Göring would be proud.

Company History

Halliburton traces its roots to Erle P. Halliburton, a pioneer in the techniques of cementing well bores, who founded the company in 1919. In 1924, Halliburton was incorporated, with significant investments by seven major oil companies, and Halliburton trucks became common sights in the oil patch. In 1961, after a series of acquisitions, the company moved its headquarters from Duncan, Oklahoma, to Dallas, Texas.

In 1962, Halliburton bought Brown & Root, the giant Houston-based construction company. Brown & Root had also been founded in 1919, by Herman Brown and Dan Root, with Herman's brother George Brown coming in a few years later. Brown & Root started out paving roads and building bridges in rural Texas, and in 1940 got the contract to build the Corpus Christi Naval Air Station. It built pipelines and ships during World War II, and in 1961 won the planning contract for the Manned Space Center in Houston. When Herman Brown died in 1962, George Brown sold the company to Halliburton to avoid a hostile takeover, though he remained as company chairman. He died in 1983.

Both Herman and George Brown were important figures in the internationally dominated Houston business world. Herman Brown was a director of the Rothschild-linked First City National Bank and pipeline operator Texas Eastern, which he and George founded to buy the "Big Inch" and "Little Inch" pipelines after World War II. George Brown served as chairman of the politically important Rice University for 15 of his 25 years on its board, and served on commissions for Presidents Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson, as well as on Texas State commissions from the 1930s through the 1970s.

In 1998, Halliburton made another major purchase, acquiring Dresser Industries for some $7.7 billion. Dresser had been founded by Solomon Dresser in 1880, and taken over in 1928 by W.H. Harriman & Company, the investment bank owned by the descendants of railroad magnate E.H. Harriman, himself a front for the British Royal Family. Under Averell and Roland Harriman, Dresser was a Skull & Bones shop, whose board included Bonesman and presidential father and grandfather Prescott Bush. Both Roland Harriman and Prescott Bush were directors of Union Banking Corp. when it was raided by Federal agents in 1942, under the Trading With the Enemy Act, for its dealings on behalf of Nazi Germany.

The Dresser deal smells like some sort of Skull & Bones rescue operation since, with Dresser, Halliburton acquired several billions of dollars in asbestos-claim lawsuit liabilities. Dick Cheney, who made the deal, is not a Bonesman himself, having dropped out of Yale in his sophomore year, but the Skull & Bones roster contains at least nine Cheneys, more than nearly any other family.

Also with Dresser came construction company M.W. Kellogg, which was merged into Brown & Root to form Kellogg, Brown & Root.

Military-Industrial Complex

In many respects, Halliburton seems to be an "American" version of Schlumberger. The mostly obvious parallel is in the oilfield services field, where Schlumberger is Halliburton's chief rival, but there is also a strong undercurrent of spookery. Both companies operate worldwide, wherever the oil business goes; Brown & Root goes wherever U.S. troops go, and reportedly provides corporate cover for intelligence operations.

Schlumberger is an arm of one of Europe's most important banking and intelligence operations. Banque de Neuflize, Schlumberger, Mallet, Demachy, now a unit of ABN AMRO, is one of those small but important merchant banks which specializes in shaping world events. The families behind the bank have a long history of molding the Synarchist movement as an assault-force against the United States, from the spying of Major André in 1780 to the assassination of JFK. Today, as an indication of its continuing intelligence activities, Schlumberger's board includes former CIA Director John Deutch.

Schlumberger also helped bring Fidel Castro to power by helping overthrow the Batista regime. It was involved in the assassination of Kennedy through company president Jean de Menil, the White Russian husband of Schlumberger heiress Dominique Schlumberger de Menil, acting through the New Orleans office of the Swiss-based company Permindex. Permindex had also organized several attempts on the life of French President Charles de Gaulle.

There are indications that both Halliburton and Brown & Root were also involved in Permindex. According to the Nomenclature of an Assassination Cabal manuscript written under the nom de plume "William Torbitt," both Halliburton and George and Herman Brown were among the principal financiers of Permindex, along with Jean de Menil, mob lawyer Roy Cohn, Dallas oilman H.L. Hunt, and others.

Over the years, EIR has confirmed many aspects of the Torbitt manuscript and finds these claims credible, and if the claims about Halliburton and the Browns are true, then it puts Halliburton and Brown & Root firmly in the Synarchy camp, before their merger, and some three decades before Dick Cheney took over the company. It would also confirm the Schlumberger link and suggest that, rather than being a rival, Halliburton is more of a clone and junior partner of Schlumberger.

Halliburton and Brown & Root do have direct links to two of the most important merchant banks in the world, Lazard and Rothschild, both of which serve as controllers of the Synarchist movement. Lazard banker James Glanville sat on the Halliburton board in the 1980s, as did Lord Polwarth of the Royal Bank of Scotland; another British lord, Lord Clitheroe, has been on the Halliburton board since 1987. Brown & Root was one of the companies centered around First City Bancorp. of Houston and the Vinson & Elkins law firm. First City, which was founded by Vinson & Elkins founder James Elkins, was identified by 1976 House Banking Committee report as part of the Rothschild banking network. Vinson & Elkins was the outside counsel for Enron, whose board included Lord John Wakeham, the former British Energy Minister who joined the board of N.M. Rothschild after he left government service. Enron's accountant, Arthur Andersen, also handled Halliburton, and there have been suggestions that Halliburton engaged in some Enronesque accounting of its own under Cheney.

Halliburton also has strong intelligence ties, notably through the presence on its board from 1977 through 2000 of the King Ranch's Anne Armstrong, who chaired the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB) from 1981 until 1990, in addition to a stint as U.S. Ambassador to Great Britain, and her long-standing role as chairman of the executive committee at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a powerful Washington think-tank.

Armstrong's successor as Halliburton's top spook is Ray Hunt, one of five Dresser directors to join the Halliburton board. Hunt, the son of reputed Permindex funder H.L. Hunt, was appointed to the PFIAB by President George W. Bush in October 2001. Oilman Hunt is also a trustee of the CSIS and a director of the King Ranch, suggesting that Hunt is taking the retiring Armstrong's spot in a long-standing Texas intelligence network. Hunt is also a trustee of the George Bush Presidential Library and a former chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

Another of the directors who came over from Dresser was Lawrence Eagleburger, the former U.S. Secretary of State and president of Kissinger Associates.

 

http://pascasher.blogspot.com/2013/11/les-rothschild-et-lassassinat-de-jfk.html
Rothschild and JFK: links of the lawyer "Montreal" Bloomfield (head of Permindex) with the Rothschild clan documented by a Québec author
Contrary to what the author Jim Marrs and many others claim there are no Nazi connection to the JFK assassination. In fact there is rather an anti-Nazi and even fiercely pro-Jewish connection!

According to the Israeli-American author AJ Weberman - which is not likely to be suspected of anti-Semitism - none other than the famous Jim Garrison himself had written a novel manuscript in which he clearly identified the Mossad ( Israel's secret service) as ultimately responsible for the assassination of JFK.

 

AMERICAN FREE PRESS
http://americanfreepress.net/?p=13765
ROTHSCHILD LINK TO JFK
• World's Richest banking dynasty HAD intimate tie to assassination conspirators
By Michael Collins Piper
http://www.americanfreepress.net/Issue_fronts/2013_AFP_Issue_46_1.pdf Dozens of new books and reports from diverse sources purporting to bring-out "the truth at last" about the John F. Kennedy assassination is icts 50th anniversary are ignoring the very real suspiciously Rothschild connection to the JFK conspiracy.
Right now the big push is to pin blame for the assassination we train Vice President Lyndon Johnson. The "LBJ Killed JFK" theme is rampant, Even in the self-styled "alternative" media.
HOWEVER, AMERICAN FREE PRESS is Pleased To Be The first publication ever to report on the Findings of Maurice Philipps -an Otherwise unheralded researcher -who uncovered the never-before-Rothschild banking dynasty Revealed connection to a key player linked to the JFK conspiracy. Here's the story, one qui shoulds JFK Researchers strength-at least the honest ones-to take a new look at the Whole death of the president.
Today, ALTHOUGH the JFK assassination is the focus of a media frenzy, Many writers AVOID Delving Into (or Even mentioning) New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison's unsuccessful 1969 prosecution of trade executive Clay Shaw for involvement in the JFK conspiracy, Knowing Garrison HAD turned up In Some leads pointing uncomfortable and controversial directions.
In fact, When Garrison lancé His investigation of Shaw HAD he unwittingly unearthed the "Rothschild connection" to the JFK conspiracy, ALTHOUGH Garrison himself Apparently not Realize About did it at first.
This Explains why There Was Such a concerted efforts coming from The Highest-levels-to derail and destroy the hard-driving prosecutor.
While Many first heard of Garrison's prosecution of Shaw through Oliver Stone's film "JFK" -which presented the JFK conspiracy as the work of LBJ and the military brass, aided by rogue CIA operatives-That There Was much more Stone left out.
This week-on pages 14-15-AFP Provides an annotated overview of the astounding revelations by Canadian writer Philipps Whose work Heretofore HAS-been suppressed.
ALTHOUGH Phillips's book, From Dallas to Montreal, is available only in French, Philipps HAS written in English de son research On His well-Documented website. *
Once you learn of what Philipps HAS uncovered, You'll Understand why so Many truth seekers are so Determined to suppress His Findings.
- * Http: //somesecretsforyou.blogspot.com/2010/06/permindex-papers-iii.html

 

 

 

AMERICAN FREE PRESS
Rothschild-Israeli Ties to JFK
• Researcher HAS found the mother of all connections entre Israel and the JFK assassination
By Michael Collins Piper
Oliver Stone's 1991 drama "JFK" focused on New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison's prosecution of trade executive in 1969 (and longtime CIA asset) Clay Shaw for involvement in the JFK assassination conspiracy.
Stone goal diverted focus away from Shaw's link to a key appears in the overall operations of the Rothschild banking dynasty.
While Stone referenced-in passing-Shaw's membership on the board of a Rome-based corporate shell Known As Permindex, subsidiary of Reviews another entity, the World Centro Commerciale, qui Stone portrayed as a CIA front, he Provided only a sliver of the much bigger picture.
Documents unearthed by Canadian author Maurice Philipps Demonstrate beyond questions That Shaw's associate on the board of Permindex (its chief executive officer and primary shareholder), L ouis Bloomfield of Montreal, Was a longtime attorney for the Rothschild dynasty, PARTICULARLY for Baron Edmund de Rothschild of London, going back as far as World War II.
Having Studied Bloomfield's private files, qui Bloomfield Donated to the Canada National Archives, Philipps found what he Describes as "many documents" revealing the Rothschild connection qui HAS Heretofore Remained unknown except to Those Who Explored Philipps's website.
Today, AMERICAN FREE PRESS Becomes the first publication to report Philipps's Findings.

 

ALTHOUGH Bloomfield (who died in 1984) Donated His papers to the archives contingent upon Them being white Kept under wraps up to 20 Years After His Death, Bloomfield's widow Sought to extend the restriction up to 25 Years After her death. This Philipps Prompted to file following the result of qui Was That in 2006 the Federal Court of Canada ordered the files released.
Documents indicate indication Bloomfield Was So close to Rothschild That he (Bloomfield) incorporated (in Canada) -and Was a shareholder of Tri Continental Pipe Line Ltd. (Described by Phillips as "a major Rothschild company") to Israel qui Granted 49-year exclusive right on use of a 16-inch pipeline entre the Red Sea and Haifa in Israel.
The Israeli connection is no surprise. The Rothschilds-have-been Israel's Foremost bosses. In addition, Bloomfield and Montreal liquor baron Sam Bronfman-the head of the World Jewish Congress, with Whom Bloomfield Was aussi étroitement-associated -were Among a clique of money kings who, in the 1950s, bankrolled Israel's secret nuclear arms program. Selon Israeli author Michael Karpin, Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion Referred To Those Donors as "consecrators," Suggesting, as Karpin Noted, "in Ben Gurion's eyes, the nuclear project Was holy."
While Philipps HAS never suggéré Bloomfield Was Involved in Any Way in the JFK assassination, Pointed Out That He Has Bloomfield's Rothschild connection has-beens Otherwise ignored.
Philipps's Findings on the Rothschild-Bloomfield link aussi put to rest the rumor That Permindex Was proof of "Nazi" involvement in the JFK conspiracy, is patently ridiculous theme propounded by one Mae Brussell Whose father, Rabbi Edgar Magnin, Was spiritual leader of the Jewish movie moguls in Hollywood.
In this realm Sami, Philipps HAS uncovered records indicating indication That, in Bloomfield's words, "the guiding genius" behind Permindex Was Rome-based Giorgio Mantello -Born George Mandel, a Romanian Jew - Whom Bloomfield Described as a "33rd degree Mason with the to closest connections in the Highest diplomatic circles. "
Mantello Was Clearly no Nazi. In 1989, then-Rep. Charles Schumer (DN.Y.) - A Jewish leader in Congress-Introduced a bill to award a congressional gold medal to Mantello Describing Him as "truly one of the great unsung heroes of the World War II era. . . one of the Most Outstanding examples we-have of a single individual. . . Mobilizing the world Against the atrocities of Nazi Germany. "
Declaring Mantello "Nearly 30,000 Jews saved from sure death Almost in the Holocaust, and Perhaps Hundreds of milliers more," Schumer hailed Him as responsible for Disclosing the "Auschwitz Protocol," vaunted as the first publicized claim of mass murder of Jews at the Auschwitz Labor camp in Poland.
(That the Auschwitz Protocol Was a fraud has-been proven by a host of historians Whose writings are available from THE BARNES REVIEW.)
Schumer aussi Said, "Mantello was extremely Useful to Both the American and British intelligence services. . . [HAVING] Slipped millions of dollars of Swiss That Were Necessary technical instruments for the war efforts out of Axis-Surrounded Switzerland and Into Allied hands. "
How and why Clay Shaw of New Orleans ended up in association with the Permindex operation is no longer a mystery.
Shaw's to closest friends, Who Provided the funds for His Defense Against The Powerful Garrison- Stern family, leaders of the Jewish community New Orleans-were primary Shareholders in the Apollo, Pennsylvania-based NUMEC nuclear facility from American nuclear material qui Was illicitly channeled to Israel with the cooperation of CIA chief of counter-intelligence, James Jesus Angleton, a Devoted ally of Israel as head of the CIA's Mossad desk.
Though Avoiding the Mossad connection, Many Researchers now say Angleton Was the key CIA appears in the JFK conspiracy.
The Sterns aussi WDSU owned radio and television, qui hyped Lee Harvey Oswald as a "pro-Castro agitator" at the time PRECISELY Shaw Was acting as a handler for Oswald in the summer of 1963 while Oswald Was in New Orleans as the set-up being white "patsy" in the JFK conspiracy.
So Shaw's Rothschild-and-Mossad connection via Permindex Was solidified by the Stern link to Israel's nuclear weapons program we now know JFK Was So Determined to stop, Reviews another item ignored by writers MOST JFK.
All told, a Variety of evidence Indicates Permindex fronted for a Mossad operation funding Israel's drive to assemble the atomic bomb.
A primary Permindex shareholder and the chief depository for funds ict-the Banque De Credit International [BCI] of Geneva-was the fiefdom of Tibor Rosenbaum, a Mossad arms procurement official Referred to as one of Israel's "founding fathers."
Was BCI chief également money laundry for the crime syndicate of Israeli loyalist Meyer Lansky, business partner of the aforementioned Sam Bronfman, associate of the Rothschilds and Louis Bloomfield.
In fact, Israeli Lansky's biographers notes That "after Israel est devenu a state, Almost 90% of purchases Single icts of arms abroad Was channeled through Rosenbaum's bank. The financing of; many of Israel's Most daring secret operations Was the carried out through the funds in [BCI]. "
We Understand now why Oliver Stone thing not to Pursue thesis avenues When He made "JFK."
The man who bankrolled Stone's film, Israeli arms dealer Arnon Milchan -listed as "executive producer" -was a primary player in Israel's nuclear program. Head of a global empire in weapons, chemicals, electronics, aerospace and plastics-operating in the sphere Rothschild -Milchan (Perhaps now the biggest mover in Hollywood) has-been Described as "Mr. Israel, "as" secretive yet famous, only goal Among famous people, "and is a close friend and business partner of Rothschild-sponsored media baron Rupert Murdoch.
ALTHOUGH Milchan-partnered with the interconnecting Rothschild-controlled media conglomerates Havas and StudioCanal in financing Stone's extravaganza-paid author Jim Marrs has reported about $ 200,000 for rights to His book Crossfire (a partial foundation for Stone's film), Jim Garrison's family Had to go to court promis to claim Proceeds from "JFK" after the blockbuster Claimed Milchan turned a loss. We procedural technicality, a federal court for Milchan Ruled Against the Garrisons.
Well-known writer JFK, AJ Weberman-a dual US-Israeli citizen-says Garrison ounce Showed Him an unpublished novel written Garrison HAD qui Weberman says was "a fictional Work That Placed the blame for John Kennedy's death on the Mossad."
ALTHOUGH Garrison JFK About did publish a novel, The Star-Spangled Contract, it About did not allude to Mossad involvement. Purpose if Weberman is To Be Believed, Garrison HAD ultimately figured out the Rothschild-Israeli connection to the JFK conspiracy.
And That says much about what; many of today's JFK Researchers are choosing to ignore.
-
Michael Collins Piper is a world-renowned author Who has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, and Canada .. He is the author of Final Judgment, The New Jerusalem, The High Priests of War, Dirty Secrets, The New Babylon, The New Jerusalem, Huey Long vs. Wall Street and others. Call toll free 1-888-699-6397 to load Any of These books and for Shipping and Handling rates inside the US Outside the United States shop@americanfreepress.net email for Shipping and Handling rates.

(Note: AJ Weberman is a source connected to Extreme Elements of the jewish community, SUCH AS the JDL.)

As Eric Jon Phelps bit serious, some tried to put on the back of the Nazis the JFK assassination. Mae Brussell had a great impact sour John Judge and Dave Emory, as well as a large part of the movement "patriot", because of the influence of Alex Jones and other freaks "big Nazi plot". She was born into a wealthy Jewish family in Beverly Hills owner of a large chain of stores (I. Magnin Dept. Store). His father was the most influential rabbi of the Jewish community in Hollywood. In his article "The Nazi Connection to the John F. Kennedy Assassination: Evidence of link entre Nazis still in operation After World War II to the still unsolved murder of John F. Kennedy," Reinhard Gehlen identifies as one of the Nazis was subsequently hired by the United States to work for the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), which is the forerunner of the CIA. But the fact is that Reinhard Gehlen was an agent of the Israeli secret services! Because of its position within the OSS, he helped establish many bridges with Israel. Its role went in the same direction rather than tracking down a little Nazi refugees around the world. Far from bringing Nazis to the US government, he helped by its links with Israel in the hunt for Nazis, serving American institutions of all Nazi sympathizers who were there, contributing more than anyone to the full Zionization the government and the US intelligence apparatus. Thus the OSS became a veritable nest of Zionist spies. How might then accuse the CIA of being a haven for Nazis?

The Piper Report November 25, 2013

Download Here
THANK YOU FOR ASSISTING WITH THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROGRAM PRODUCING

 

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/512ni7oKXbL._SL500_AA300_.jpg
http://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/the-letters-of-john-f-kennedy-9781408830451
JFK 50 years after: a reference book has just been published colligeant correspondence of JFK, and the editor acknowledges that the thesis of the book by Michael Collins Piper "Final Judgment" , that is to say, the central involvement of Israel in the assassination of JFK's "most intriguing" "Final Judgment" is the only conspiracy book mentioned in this book Sandler. The author can not be suspected of anti-Semitism or bias against Israel is a Jewish historian and respected publishing house that distributes the book is one of the most prestigious publishing house. This will probably not prevent the LICRA to require redaction of the passage in which the author only subtly endorses the thesis of Piper!
"I'll tell you one thing: I found articles - not tripped in publications but in very sophisticated publications - saying," Forget Lyndon Johnson, the CIA forget, forget Fidel Castro-- Mossad killed JFK because they were upset by what he had done to Ben-Gurion. "So you see, we drop a few bombs like this in this book, unproven ..." (Historian Martin W. Sandler reading at the JFK Museum, November 16, 2013, CSPAN2 | BookTV @ 51 min: 21 sec )

Excerpt from the new book containing the correspondence of John F. Kennedy:
In March 1992, Representative Paul Findley of Illinois, wrote in the Washington Report on Middle Eastern Affairs, "It is interesting. . . . to notice That in all the words written and uttered about the Kennedy assassination, Israel's intelligence agency, the Mossad, HAS never beens Mentioned. "Two years later In His book Final Judgment, author Michael Collins Piper Actually accusé Israel of the crime. Of all the conspiracy theories, it Remains one of the MOST intriguing.

What is indisputable is That, ALTHOUGH It Was Kept out of the eye of Both the Press and the Public, a bitter quarrel HAD developped entre Israeli prime minister David Ben-Gurion Who Believed That His nation's survival depended on it Attaining nuclear capability and Kennedy Who Was vehemently Opposed to it. In May 1963, Kennedy wrote to Ben-Gurion explaining why Convinced That He Was Israel's pursuit of nuclear weapons capability Was a serious threat to world peace. (...)

"As I wrote Mr Ben-Gurion, this government's [USA] commitment to and Support of Israel Could Be gravement jeopardized if it Should Be Thought Abebooks web Were Unable to obtenir reliable information was subject as vital to peace as the issue of Israel's efforts in the nuclear field. " [SOURCE: JFK letter to Ben-Gurion's successor ]

Kennedy left no doubt as to what the US response Would Be if "We Were Unable to obtenir reliable information" about the intent of the Dimona project [ie Israel's nuclear program], a Threat That selon l'une conspiracy theory lead to Israel's role in Kennedy's assassination.

 

From the JFK assassination to solicitor-client privilege
(...) Louis M. Bloomfield died in 1984. Now, several years before his death, unusual rumors had begun to circulate about him: because of the significant shareholder position it would have occupied in society Italian Permindex, some associate it with the assassination of John F. Kennedy.
According to conspiracy theorists, indeed, Permindex served as a front for the CIA to orchestrate the famous attack. This thesis is similar to that of Jim Garrison, Attorney in New Orleans in which the investigation was told in 1991 by director Oliver Stone in the movie JFK. Note that the film does not mention Bloomfield Me. (...)
The theory on the involvement of Louis M. Bloomfield in the assassination of John F. Kennedy was still making its way. No wonder, then, that 20 years almost to the day after his death, an enthusiast of the record has made a formal request for access to the Bloomfield fund. The plaintiff, Maurice Phillips is the author of From Dallas to Montreal, Montreal-based industries in the JFK assassination. However, this request for access to the fund is denied in 2004. The reason given is that the widow's lawyer, to protect his privacy and safeguard the reputation of her husband, asked LAC does not make these public documents for 10 years after his own death.
Disagree, Maurice Philipps challenging that decision in court. The legal saga that followed lasted five years, during which he represented himself. His latest efforts have failed in March 2010, when three judges of the Federal Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the government.
But his efforts have not been entirely in vain. First, the pattern based on the will of the widow of Mr. Bloomfield was deemed invalid. LAC has therefore decided to make a majority of public documents, except those affected by professional secrecy, which were subjected to restriction of 50 years from the date of their creation.
So far, Maurice Philipps will have consulted almost 75% of the fund. (...)
He said the documents he could see far show that "the party Bloomfield describes as" the architect of the assassination "is a false conclusion, based on incomplete," he said.
But he believes that the Fund Louis M. Bloomfield still has many secrets to reveal.
"Only a minority of documents related to Permindex are now available to the public, namely those from before 1960 and have more than 50 years, he notes. The records after 1961 are kept secret by LAC and particularly those of 1962 and 1963. "

 

 

 

KEVIN BARRETT - MARTIN Sandler

 

JIM LAWRENCE GUYENOT- MARRS
Some Who-have Recently Acknowledged the theory of Israeli involvement in the JFK assassination.

What Is the Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy?
• More and more top-notch Researchers acknowledge the Israeli connection
• It's time to forget about extinct dinosaurs Those like LBJ and focus on the real monster, qui Has Its tentacles wrapped around the planet today
By Michael Collins Piper

Amidst the cacophony from the repetitive-controlled media echoed Even in the "alternative" media-that Lyndon Johnson Was the mastermind behind the murder of John F. Kennedy, A Growing number of independent voices Otherwise Dared to say.

They Openly endorsed the thesis-first put forth in this author's out-of-print book, Final Judgment, first published in 1994-that Israel Was a frontline player Alongside the CIA in the JFK assassination conspiracy as a consequence of JFK's Determined efforts to prevent prevention Israel from building nuclear weapons, The Strategic cornerstone of the Jewish state's national security policy.

ALTHOUGH media giant Alex Jones-sponsored by Sirius, a Jewish-controlled satellite conglomerate-continuous radio to insisted LBJwas behind JFK's assassination, Even endorsing the work of author BarrMcClellanwhomakes the ridiculous, long-discredited claim That JFK assassination patsy Lee Harvey Oswald Was one of the gunmen were firing Kennedy from the Texas School Book Depository in Dallas-none-Jones keeps under wraps a lot of significant people believe are differently.

For example, popular commentator Dr. Kevin Barrett, an American academic, in a piece published on Iran's English-language website, "PressTV," wrote That Final Judgment "Makes a strong case Israel That Was a leading forces behind the assassination of JFK. "

Barrett 'cited French scholar and longstanding JFK assassination researcher, Dr. Laurent Guyenot, Who has endorsed the thesis of Final Judgment.

Guyenot admis That he HAD, until, Recently, refrained from reading Final Judgment, Having been, in His words , "Warned Against the book's bad reputation Among MOST JFK Researchers." Purpose Guyenot now says Final Judgment is "a book qui est in a category by itself "in all of the vast literature on the topic and The One That presents" really the 'unspeakable' "piece of the JFK assassination puzzle.

Another independent analyst, Don Fox-writing via Dr. Jim Fetzer's column at the website VeteransToday.com-has' cited Final Judgment and critiqued JFK writer James DiEugenio who, Fox Pointed out , "never mentions Israel or the Mossad're Having a motive to kill Kennedy. "

In fact, DiEugenio HAS Often vigorously Denounced the book's thesis.

Purpose now even "mainstream" media are being white Elements forced to acknowledge That There does exist a theory implicating Israel in the assassination.

On Nov. 16, The Dallas Morning News listed "ten popular conspiracy theories" about the assassination, Including: "The Israelis theory: JFK About did not supporting Israel's drive to build nuclear weapons. The Israelis Believed Joe Kennedy, the president's father, anti-Semitic and Was wielded influences over His Son. LBJ reversed US policy on Israeli nuclear arms once he est devenu president. "

Adding to the mix Was the publication of the first-ever book of JFK's correspondence, The Letters of John F. Kennedy , edited by Martin W. Sandler respecté historian.

Featuring contentious correspondence entre JFK and Israeli leader David Ben-Gurion over Israel's nuclear weapons program, Sandler referenced Final Judgment (the only book on the assassination hementions) and ASSERTS of ict thesis That "of all the conspiracy theories, it Remains one of the MOST intriguing. "

For daring to air the thesis, Sandler has-been attacked This by pro-Israel voices in the United States Such As National Review and The Washington Free Beacon , edited by the son-in-law of Zionist power broker William Kristol. And in Britain, Jewish historian Simon Schama, reviewing Sandler's book for London's Financial Times, complained que la book "bizarrely Gives space to the notion that [the] Mossadmight HAD-have a hand in the death" of JFK.

Then, in a presentation on Nov. 16 at the John F. Kennedy Hyannis Museum in, Mass. ( broadcast on CSPAN-2 ), Sandler Noted There Were Saying voices now, in Sandler's words: "Forget Lyndon Johnson. Forget the CIA. Forget Fidel Castro. Mossad killed Kennedy Because They were so upset over what he About did to Ben-Gurion. "

Responding to the surprise Obvious de son hearing Sandler commented That There Were "a few little bombshells we throw in [the book]" - Adding They Were "not proven," a remark program prompting the moderator to laugh and say, "I hear you. "

Even Jim Marrs, author of Crossfire -once called Expired "the big daddy of the conspiracy books on the JFK assassination" -was forced Into Including a passing reference (just one sentence) to the thesis of Final Judgment (goal notmentioning the book) in the revised edition de son book, noting, "There is the argument aussi That Was Kennedy Opposed to Israel's development of nuclearweapons andwas Demanding inspections of Israel's Dimona nuclear plant , has alienated That position Powerful Zionists. "

Marrs About did mention Final Judgment in the revised bibliography of Crossfire , ALTHOUGH That Was bibliography published only on the Internet-not in the book-in order, selon Marrs, "to save space."

In recent years Marrs HAD-been under fire from critics Who Revealed he HAD received Some $ 200,000 from Israeli arms dealer Arnon Milchan (a key player in Israel's nuclear weapons program) for the rights to Crossfire When Milchan bankrolled Oliver Stone's film "JFK," which Avoided mentioning JFK's secret war with Israel over nuclear weapons and the parts of multiple Alleged JFK conspirators to Israel and Its nuclear agenda Preferring to suggest the events in Dallas Were an "inside job."

No, the JFK assassination, just like 9-11 and the Oklahoma City bombing (and the attack on the USS Liberty) -was an "outside job."

It's time to forget about extinct dinosaurs Those like LBJ and focus on the real monster, qui Has Its tentacles wrapped around the planet today.
-
Michael Collins Piper is a world-renowned author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He Has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and, of course, the United States. He is the author of Final Judgment, The New Jerusalem, The High Priests of War, Dirty Secrets, My First Days in the White House, The New Babylon, Share the Wealth: Huey Long vs. Wall Street, The Judas Goats: The Enemy Within , Target: Traficant, The Golem: Israel's Nuclear Hell Bomb and False Flags. You can order Any of These books with a credit card by calling AFP / FAB toll free at 1-888-699-6397 or calling directly at 202-547-5585 to inquire FAB about pricing and Shipping and Handling fees.

JFK Assassination: Israel taboo suspect
December 10, 2013 0 h 03 min ⋅ Leave a comment
US President John F. Kennedy was assassinated during a visit in Dallas November 22, 1963 in order to prepare his re-election in the 1964 presidential election.
The murder scene was filmed by no journalist certainly because of technical resources did not allow it at the time. These stood further behind the motorcade.
But a man in the audience during the passage of the limousine JFK, a Abraham Zapruder, filmed the scene with his small camera. This video will travel around the world and will remain as the largest amateur video ever.
Soon a man named Lee Harvey Oswald, an employee of the School Book Depository located in the district of Dealey Plaza, where the attack occurred, is suspected and arrested in a cinema in the city first for murder a police officer Tippit then to that of JFK.
A gun was found on the fifth floor of the book depository with three sockets behind a pile of cardboard boxes.
Lee Harvey Oswald denies the charges against him and said to be a "pigeon" (Patsy).
Vice President Lyndon Johnson is sworn in and automatically become President as is the US constitution.
November 24, 1963, after a long interrogation during which Oswald continues to maintain his innocence during his transfer from the police station in Dallas in prison and under the eyes of millions of viewers, an armed man named Jack Ruby appears and kills Oswald of a bullet.
Jack Ruby is said to have revenge and to avoid Jacky Keenedy, wife of the assassinated president, having to face the face of the murderer of her husband. Therefore, no trial will take place ...
At the request of Lyndon Johnson and to reassure the US, a commission of inquiry is set up managed in order to establish the truth about the assassination. It is chaired by the President of Earl Warren the Supreme Court. The commission issued its report in 1964 in which Lee Harvey Oswald is declared only culprit.
The report would have fired three shots from the fifth floor of the book depository with the gun found: first passed through the neck and throat JFK before reaching the Governor Connally, the second would have missed its target and the third is the one who has broken the skull of JFK.
He acted only for political reasons as a communist.
Critics of the report of this commission have made numerous: the witnesses who heard shots from the grassy knoll (80% of control) and right in front of the limo are not heard, photographs of the head of JFK during his autopsy were rigged, the path of the magic bullet that hit JFK and Connally, Oswald was killed before his trial ...
Shortly after the attorney of New Orleans Jim Garrison leads his own secret investigation that lead to the arrest of a Clay Shaw he accused of being a member of the CIA complicity in the assassination. It will be acquitted at trial despite suspicions about it.
A new commission was established in 1976 by the House of Representatives (HSCA) to shed light on the death of JFK and Martin Luther King assassinated in 1968.
The report of this commission differs little from that of the Committee Warrent but admits the existence of a conspiracy with at least a second shooter.
For the 50th anniversary of the assassination of JFK, numerous documentaries, books published in Media various theories: Lee Harvey Oswald was the only culprit, others claim that there was a conspiracy and lists the possible suspects: Lyndon Johnson, the CIA, Fidel Castro, the Mafia ...
However another suspect is never mentioned: Israel.
In his book Final Judgement, Michael Collins Piper says that JFK was assassinated by Israel because of his refusal to see this country to acquire nuclear weapons.

A few months before his assassination, Kennedy sent a stern letter to David Ben-Gurion, Israel's prime minister to ask for explanations about its nuclear program.
Ben Gurion decided to resign.
After the assassination of JFK, the policy United States toward Israel has experienced a 180 degree rotation. Lyndon Johnson not require any guarantee of Israel on the nature of its nuclear program and a pact to be renewed by his successors with Israel for their secretly ensure the right to nuclear weapons.
According to Michael Collins Piper, at least the CIA, the mafia is involved in the conspiracy with the head of Israel conspiracy.
Clay Shaw, Guy Banister, David Banister are related to Permandex company under the direction of Tibor Rosenbaum who financed Mayer Lansky who was head of the Jewish Mafia in the United UNite we also called the Yiddish Connection or Kosher Nostra.
Tibor Rosenbaum was known to lend money and provide arms to the Mossad, the Israeli secret service.
The film JFK Oliver Stone released in 1991 this all suspects possible ... except one: Israel
Strange? Not if we note that its producer is none other than Arnon Milchan "the biggest seller of weapons of Israel."
One can also add that Abraham Zapruder was the only filming the attack and that Jack Ruby s' actually called Jacob Leon Rubenstein and killed Oswald were both Jews.
Abraham Zapruder was there at the right place at the right time and Jack Ruby killed Oswald has certainly not revenge but to prevent him from speaking.
The American pilot John Lear accuses David Ben-Gurion to have given the order to assassinate Kennedy before he resigned to avoid being accused as Bassam Abu Sharif adviser Yasser Arafat.
The Washington Jewish Week newspaper of 9 October 1997 mentions a troubling phrase may be linked to the JFK assassination: "Israel should not apologize for the killing of those who seek to destroy it. The first order of business for all countries is to protect its people. »
Mordechai Vanunu, the Israeli nuclear technician working in 1986 revealed nuclear program of his country when he was supposed to remain secret. Disclosure of this information was worth being imprisoned him. He also said that Israel was complicit in the assassination of JFK.

 

The media never speak of Israel as a possible suspect even possible culprit in the light of all these elements.
None of the books that have come out recently speak of Israel and the dishonesty of Laurent Joffrin Nouvel Observateur is evident when making a Video accusing Oswald and rule out any other track despite having certainly a scapegoat.
ReOpen911, known association to demand a new investigation into the attacks of 11 September 2001, decided to refer the killing JFK particularly through the interview with James W.Douglass author of JFK and the unspeakable. In it a suspect departed ex ... Israel "JD: I have found no convincing indication that Israel is involved in the Kennedy assassination. The story I wrote is about the reasons for his death. For Israel to be included in this story, it would have Kennedy resistance to Israel's nuclear weapons program is linked to plot against his life.
»
And if journalists and ReOpen911 were linked to the murderers?
How the killer of US President can remain quietly in a cinema watching a movie?
Murder is signed by Abraham Zapruder, Jack Ruby and Arnon Milchan!
Israel had the means and the motive to kill Kennedy.
More than ever, Israel is the number one suspect in the assassination of JFK if this is the real culprit!
Links:
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassinat_de_John_F._Kennedy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mordechai_Vanunu
http://www.alterinfo.net/Mossad-et-l-assassinat-de-JFK_a54813.html
http://www.reopen911.info/11-septembre/interview-de-james-w-douglass-auteur-de-jfk-et-l-indicible-pourquoi-kennedy-a-ete-assassine/
Posted in: Uncategorized ⋅ Keywords: JFK assassination , Ben Gurion , nuclear bomb , Israel

 

Bloomfield .... Ardent Canadian zionist. Joined the British military and served in Palestine as an Intelligence Officer under general Charles Wingate. Involved in training the Jewish army in Haganah from 1936 to 1939. Worked for the British SOE (competitor of MI6; role taken over by the SAS). Recruited in the OSS in 1942, and was given the rank of major. The OSS became the CIA in 1947, and Bloomfield continued doing contract work for the new organization. Member of the FBI's Division Five. Regularly visited Israel and met with David Ben-Gurion in 1949. Member Sonneborn "institute", part of the post-WWII Haganah network (Abe Feinberg was involved). November 29, 1951, New York Times, '[Louis Bloomfield] Elected as President Of Credit Suisse Unit'. President of Heineken's Brewers, Ltd. Successful lawyer with Phillips and Vineberg in Montreal. Personal consultant and good friend to FBI head J. Edgar Hoover and has been considered the same to the Bronfmans. Bloomfield and J. Edgar Hoover have both been described as homosexuals. Knight of St. John of Jerusalem and a member of the 1001 Club.

Incorporated Permindex in 1958, became a major stockholder, and was president of Permindex's Canadian department. Permindex counted numerous controversial people on its board. Garrison suspected that Permindex coordinated the 1963 Kennedy assassination. The company was also suspected of coordinating the failed assassinations on Charles de Gaulle (1890-1970). Permindex was the parent company of Centro Mondiale Commerciale, the world trade center in Rome, which was exposed as a CIA front. CMC apparently funded various political parties and right wing groups and that's the reason Permindex was expelled from Italy.

LOUIS' BROTHER BERNARD:

September 1, 1984, The Globe and Mail (Canada), 'Bernard Bloomfield Jewish philanthropist, Montreal businessman': "A prominent member of Montreal's Jewish community, who was also president and director of the Canadian Manufacturers Sales Co. Ltd. and the Israel Continental Oil Co., has died. ... Mr. Bloomfield led a Canadian trade mission to Israel in 1962 and was a delegate to the prime minister's economic conference in Israel in 1968. He also served with the Eldee Foundation, a charitable organization, the Jewish National Fund of Canada, the Canada-Israel Chamber of Commerce in Israel, the United Israel Appeal, the Jewish People's Schools and the State of Israel Bonds Association. While visiting Israel in the late 1940s and the early 1950s, he wrote letters to his wife, Neri, about his impressions of the conditions in Israel. They were later published under the title Israel Diary. Mr. Bloomfield was born in Montreal and attended McGill University, graduating with a bachelor of commerce degree in 1927. He later attended the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. ... Mrs. Bloomfield is president of the Canadian Zionist Federation. Mr. Bloomfield received numerous honorary degrees and the Queen Elizabeth Medal and Grand Commander of the Star of Africa. He was honored by the Queen with the Order of the Knight of Justice and the Most Venerable Order of the Hospital of St. John of Jerusalem."

BERNARD'S SON, HARRY:

October 9, 2002, national Post (Canada), 'Leading Montreal lawyer facing fraud charges: Harry Bloomfield: Accused of aiding in US$17M 'pump and dump' scheme': "A prominent Montreal lawyer and philanthropist, who served on the board of the Business Development Bank of Canada, is on trial in New York on 22 counts of criminal conspiracy. Authorities in the United States allege Harry Bloomfield, 58, helped organize a complex international stock fraud that used dummy offshore companies to bilk unsuspecting investors out of US$17 million. Mr. Bloomfield's trial in the Supreme Court of the state of New York began last week, and is scheduled to continue to the middle of this month. If convicted, he faces up to 15 years in jail. ... He holds many titles, including Knight of Justice of the Hospital of St. John of Jerusalem and Queen's Counsel. He is also the former national vice-president of B'nai B'rith Canada, and Canada's current consul general to Liberia, a position formerly held by his late uncle, Louis Mortimer Bloomfield."

October 26, 2002, National Post (Canada), 'The trouble with Harry: Bloomfield in the dock: Montreal society lawyer on trial in N.Y. over alleged part in giant swindle':"The son of a legendary Montreal lawyer and philanthropist, Bloomfield is an intimate of the Bronfmans and the Mulroneys [of Power Corp. and J. P. Morgan Chase; close to Desmarais family]. A few years ago, the former prime minister and his wife attended the bar mitzvah of Bloomfield's youngest son. It was Brian Mulroney who appointed Bloomfield to the Business Development Bank of Canada; Bloomfield eventually became chairman of the bank's audit committee. He is also the former vice-president of B'nai B'rith Canada, a Queen's Counsel and a Knight in the Most Venerable Order of the Hospital of St. John of Jerusalem."

ADDITIONAL:

March 24, 2009, New York Post, 'Missing Roy' (friends remember Roy Cohn): "POWERFUL lawyer Roy Cohn died in 1986, but his tentacles still reach deep. Looking around the Four Seasons restaurant the other day, one wag observed, "Wouldn't Roy be astonished that his childhood pal, Barbara Walters, is still on national TV?" A tablemate responded, "Roy might be even more shocked that Robert Morgenthau [who disbarred Cohn] is still district attorney." Both were lunching in the Bar Room along with Jack Rudin, Edgar Bronfman Sr.... "

--

Sharon toured the United States in 1980, lining up financing for a massive real estate grab. But first, Sharon launched a campaign of terror against the Palestinians in the West Bank, to literally scare them into leaving their land. In the Spring of 1982, Sharon hosted a planning meeting at his Negev desert ranch, which had been purchased for him by Riklis. Riklis, Henry Kissinger, Louis Mortimer Bloomfield, Rafi Eytan, General Ze'evi, Arieh Genger, Herbert Brin, and Eli Landau attended the session, according to an eyewitness account. Within days of the meeting, Gush Emunim and JDL terrorists began attacks on Palestinians in the West Bank. "Landscam" was under way.

 

Final Judgment 
The missing link in the JFK assassination conspiracy

a book by Michael Collins Piper

Wolfe Press, 1995, paperback

Final Judgment documents how Israel's leaders, the Mossad, the Meyer Lansky-run organized crime syndicate, and a pro-Zionist faction of the CIA colluded to assassinate President ,John F. Kennedy. The general pattern of the JFK covert operation, to include the skillful use of "limited hang-outs," "patsies," and "false flags," has very likely been repeated in various later forms such as in the assassination of Bobby Kennedy, the murder of Martin Luther King, the mysterious death of former CIA Director William Colby, the very suspicious Oklahoma City bombing, and the Mossad-linked "controlled demolition" of World Trade Center towers on September 11, 2001. More recently, we have seen how the "High Priests of War" have flexed raw Israeli-lobby power by pushing American interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq and by promoting saber-rattling at Iran and Syria. 

JFK planned a military strike to prevent an Israeli-Red Chinese scientific partnership from building the first atomic bombs for China and Israel. He sought to thwart the CIA-Mossad-Meyer Lansky partnership that controlled the heroin trade stemming from the Golden Triangle by pulling U.S. troops out of Vietnam. JFK even transferred control of Cold War espionage operations from the CIA to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Through his support of Algerian independence and an "even-handedness" policy towards other Arab nations, JFK infuriated the French Secret Army Organization (OAS) and its Mossad supporters who had sent professional assassins against French President Charles DeGaulle. JFK's brother Bobby, as Attorney General, moved aggressively against the lower levels of Meyer Lansky-dominated organized crime in America. Lastly, the Kennedy family quietly talked about shutting down America's privately owned Federal Reserve banking cartel that has provided vital fiat money financing for Zionist projects.

The Kennedy brothers definitely made enemies who had not only the resources to carry out an assassination, but also had the web of allies in the controlled national media necessary to sustain a long term cover up. JFK entered office as a liberal playboy and ended up martyring himself in resonance with the ancient Celtic tune The Minstrel Boy. Final Judgment suggests that behind the scenes, JFK fought for the American national interest and lived up to the heroic imagery contained in his book Profiles in Courage and in the 1963 movie PT 109 about his WWII exploits.

For most Americans, Final Judgment is a high drama in another way. It is like Hamlet seeing the ghost. It addresses all the right "hard questions" about what has been done to America that are rarely addressed in so-called "mainstream" conservative literature.

This is our final judgment: the government of Israel, through its secret spy agency, the Mossad, orchestrated the conspiracy that ended the life of John F. Kennedy.  Through its own vast resources and through its international contacts in the intelligence community and in organized crime, Israel had the means, it had the motive, and it had the opportunity to carry out the crime of the century - and did.

pxix
PREFACE

THE UNSPOKEN TRUTH: ISRAEL'S CENTRAL ROLE IN THE JFK ASSASSINATION

Where in the world could anyone come up with the idea that Israel's Mossad had a hand in the assassination of John F. Kennedy? Well, there's more to the story than meets the eye. All of the information which, taken together, proves this contention has already been committed to print. This book, Final Judgment, brings all of these facts together for the first time in a frightening scenario that makes sense.

Considering all of the theories about the assassination of John F. Kennedy that have been circulating for years, how could anyone ever suggest that Israel's Mossad was involved?

This was the reaction of more than a few people when apprised of the thesis presented in the pages of this book. Yet, I believe, that when you read this volume you will reach the same conclusion: that Israel and its spy agency, the Mossad, did indeed play a critical role in the JFK assassination conspiracy and its cover-up. The evidence, you shall see, is there.

It was several years ago that I first stumbled upon a hint that this was indeed the case. I came across a strange reference in the pages of a controversial work about the JFK assassination which alleged that rogue CIA operatives had been behind the president's murder, A. J. Weberman and Michael Canfield's Coup d'Etat in America, first published in 1975. The reference, simple as it was, appearing on page 41, read as follows:

"After the assassination, an informer for the Secret Service and the FBI who had infiltrated a Cuban exile group and was in the process of selling them machine guns, reported that on November 21, 1963 he was told, 'We now have plenty of money-our new backers are the Jews-as soon as they take care of JFK.' This man had furnished reliable information in the past."

I barely noticed the reference, but it did intrigue me. Who did this source mean when he referred to "the Jews"? This was the question I needed to answer. My immediate conclusion was this: the source meant Jewish gangsters-such as Meyer Lansky-who had a stake in reviving their Cuban gambling interests that they lost when Fidel Castro came to power. This was the logical answer.

Frankly, I laid the reference aside. It was just one lone remark out of perhaps millions of words written about the JFK assassination. It was nearly a year that went by before I came across the quotation again-while re-reading the same book. I pondered the quote for a moment, thinking, "This is interesting."

However, I once again cast those thoughts aside. I had already reached my own conclusions about the JFK assassination long before: The CIA was primarily responsible, working hand-in-hand with certain elements in "the Mafia" and also in the anti-Castro Cuban movement.

However, in the subsequent year that followed, I began to stumble across some interesting information.

In David Scheim's book, Contract on America, which contends that "the Mafia" was solely responsible for the JFK assassination, I saw a variation of the same quote referenced in the Weberman and Canfield book.

However, Scheim's rendition of the quote had deleted the reference to the alleged Jewish backers of the Cuban plotters. I began to think that there might be something more to the story after all, whatever the accuracy of the story allegedly told to the federal authorities.

THE LANSKY CONNECTION

It was around this time that I learned that a new biography of organized crime figure Meyer Lansky had been released. It was entitled Little Man:

Meyer Lansky and the Gangster Life. The book-prepared in cooperation with Lansky's family-was little more than a puff piece for the deceased thug. Gossipy, full of inside information, and even entertaining at times, the book still somehow seemed to be missing a lot.

It was then that I returned to my library and pulled a book off the shelf that I hadn't re-read in perhaps fifteen years. It was Hank Messick's biography of Lansky. Re-reading this important book I began to see that Meyer Lansky was not just another gangster. He was "the chairman of the board" of organized crime.

All of the Mafia figures that had been repeatedly implicated in the JFK assassination were, in fact, Lansky's front-men-his subordinates, his underlings. In short, if "the Mafia" had a hand in the killing of JFK, then Lansky had to have been one of the key players.

Yet, as I quickly began to see in reviewing many of the works which allege that "The Mafia Killed JFK," Lansky's preeminent role was being ignored or otherwise under-played.

I was aware of Lansky's close ties to Israel. After all, Lansky fled to Israel when the heat was on in the United States. But how deeply did the Lansky-Israeli connection go?

My research into that question began to turn up some interesting facts relating to an Israeli connection to the assassination 2f John F. Kennedy.

THE ISRAELI CONNECTION

Why would Israel have an interest in participating in the JFK assassination conspiracy? That was the burning question.

It was just about the time that I had begun to take a second look at the Lansky connection to the Kennedy assassination that several new works about the covert relationship between the United States and Israel were released providing never-before revealed information.

These books, cited extensively in Final Judgment, made it all too clear that John F. Kennedy-before his death-was in a pitched battle with Israel. In fact, Kennedy was at war.

This was something that long-time JFK assassination researchers had no reason to know about. Much of the material had long been classified. It was a secret-a deep, dark secret.

Some of JFK's communications with then-Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion are still classified. Not even top-level intelligence officials with special security clearance have been allowed access to these potentially explosive documents.

This discovery made me realize that there was a lot more to the Kennedy relationship with Israel and a lot more about the JFK assassination than we had ever been told.

ISRAEL, LANSKY & THE CIA

The long and close relationship between Israel and JFK's foes at the CIA is something which is becoming more and more known to the general public. JFK's own war with the CIA is common knowledge.

At the time of the president's assassination, however, the depth and breadth of the CIA's relationship with Israel's Mossad, however, was not so commonly known.

What's more, as I began to discover, Israel's allies in the Lansky Syndicate had much deeper relations with the CIA than most researchers have realized.

And while the stories of CIA-Organized Crime assassination plots against Castro have been told time and again, the evidence I began to discover told an even bigger story.

The pieces of the puzzle were all there. They simply needed to be put together. As the research continued, I repeatedly found myself stumbling upon new facts and information that continued to verify what was initially in my mind just a theory, but which I now believe to be the truth.

THE PERMINDEX CONNECTION

It is the little-discussed Permindex connection to the JFK assassination which is the tie that binds-the final proof that Israel's Mossad was at the center of the assassination conspiracy.

In the Permindex connection we find all of the critical elements which tie Israel's Mossad, the CIA and organized crime together in close-knit intrigue linked directly to the murder of President Kennedy.

Although researchers, over the years, have devoted much time and energy to pursuing a wide variety of questions relating to the JFK assassination controversy (focusing on controversies that will never be resolved) they have steered clear of the Permindex connection.

Those who have made any reference to Permindex have described it as some sort of "neo-Nazi" entity-even a remnant of Hitler's SS-but, as we shall see, nothing could be further from the truth.

To understand the forces behind the Permindex connection, which we examine in detail in this volume, is to understand the answer to the biggest mystery of this century: the question of who killed John F. Kennedy.

INSIDERS AGREE

Just before I began the book I mentioned my theory to a rather well-known former United States congressman. He surprised me when he said, "I think you are on to something. I've believed for years that the Mossad was involved in the Kennedy assassination, but I never really took the time to look into it. I'm glad you're doing it, though. It will be an important book. It's a book I would have liked to have written myself."

Then, just after I finished the book, I sent a copy of the manuscript to another former U.S. congressman, thinking that he might have some interest in the subject. His response was perhaps a bit astonishing.

After the former congressman received the manuscript he wrote me a surprising letter in which he said, "I will tell you this. A retired Western European diplomat and intelligence officer with whom I've been in correspondence (and who has had disastrous experiences with Israel and the Mossad) has been urging me for the last four years to write the book that you have written."

He passed the manuscript on to the Frenchman who in turn wrote me a fascinating letter providing further information confirming my thesis.

ONE COMPLETE PICTURE

The fruits of my labor appear in this book. I owe so much to all of those JFK assassination researchers who made this book possible. Their pioneering efforts laid the foundation for the construction of a framework which I firmly believe proves Mossad complicity in the assassination of John F. Kennedy.

All of those who sought the truth-and sometimes risked their reputations (and even perhaps their lives) doing it-cleared the way for a final judgment:

Israel was the driving force behind the conspiracy that resulted in the assassination of John F. Kennedy. It is the Israeli connection that pulls all of the pieces of the puzzle together into one complete picture. The role of 'j Israel in the JFK assassination is, indeed, the until-now "missing link."

 

pxxiii
A WHO'S WHO OF THE JFK ASSASSINATION CONSPIRACY AND COVER-UP

While the following selection of names in this special "who's who" is by no means complete, it does provide the reader of Final Judgment with a brief overview of the facts relating to the involvement of the individuals in question with the circumstances surrounding not only the JFK assassination itself, but also the efforts to not only uncover the truth about the assassination-and also to bury it.

Following each name and description are references to the particular chapters in Final Judgment where details about that individual appear in pertinent part. The inclusion of any name in particular is by no means intended to suggest that the individual-unless specifically stated-had foreknowledge that the murder of President Kennedy was being planned.

As we note in these pages, there were many people who were brought into the JFK assassination conspiracy and the subsequent cover-up who had no idea of the actual role that they were playing.

The following "who's who"-if read in this context-provides the reader a quick glance at the key individuals who ultimately prove central to a complete understanding of the entirety of the conspiracy that resulted in the assassination of President Kennedy.

AT PERMINDEX

Clay Shaw - If New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison had been permitted to carry out an unimpeded investigation and prosecution of Shaw, a CIA contract operative and a former director of the International Trade Mart in New Orleans implicated in involvement with Lee Harvey Oswald, David Ferrie, Guy Banister and other figures central to the JFK assassination conspiracy, Garrison would have divined Shaw's connections - through a shadowy corporation known as Permindex - to not only the Israeli Mossad, but also the international crime syndicate of Israeli loyalist Meyer Lansky.

Louis M. Bloomfield - Based in Montreal, Bloomfield was a long-time intelligence operative and a front man for the powerful Bronfman family interests. The Bronfmans were not only key international backers of Israel but also long-time figures in the Lansky crime syndicate. Bloomfield, one of the foremost figures in the Israeli lobby in Canada and one of Israel's leading international operatives, not only served as the chief shareholder in the Permindex Corporation on whose board of directors Clay Shaw served, but also had intimate ties to American intelligence.

Tibor Rosenbaum - One of the "godfathers" of the state of Israel and the first director for finance and supply for Israel's intelligence agency, the Mossad, Rosenbaum was a prime financial angel behind the Permindex corporation. His Swiss banking concern, the Banque De Credit International, also served as the chief European money laundry or the global crime syndicate of Miami-based crime chief Meyer Lansky.

John King - A close business associate of Tibor Rosenbaum's protégé and sometime front man, Bernard Cornfeld, King showed up in New Orleans in the early stages of Jim Garrison's investigation-before Clay Shaw's name had come up-and sought to persuade Garrison (through a bribery attempt) to give up the inquiry. Fortunately he failed in his scheme.

THE MOSSAD CONNECTION

David Ben-Gurion - Prime Minister of Israel; resigned his post in disgust with JFK's stance toward Israel. in April of 1963; Said JFK's position threatened Israel's very survival.

Yitzhak Shamir - A long-time Mossad officer (based largely at the Mossad's chief European office in Paris), Shamir headed the Mossad's assassination squad at the time of the JFK assassination. A former French intelligence officer has charged that Shamir himself arranged the hiring of JFK's actual assassins through a close ally in French intelligence.

Menachem Begin - In 1963, Begin (later prime minister of Israel) was a roving Israeli diplomat; prior to JFK's assassination he was overheard conspiring with Meyer Lansky's California henchman, Mickey Cohen, in a conversation that suggested hostile intentions by Israel against the American president.

Luis Kutner - Although known largely as a "mob lawyer," (who was long and closely associated with Jack Ruby, a sometime-client) Kutner also doubled as an international intelligence operative and functioned as an advisor to an ad hoc pro-Israel lobby group in the United States.

A. L. Botnick - Head of the New Orleans office of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B'nai B'rith, an intelligence and propaganda arm for Israel's Mossad; a close associate of New Orleans-based CIA contract operative Guy Banister who helped create Lee Harvey Oswald's preassassination profile as a "pro-Castro" agitator. Evidence suggests that Banister's manipulation of Oswald may have been carried out under the guise of an ADL "fact-finding" operation.

Arnon Milchan - Israel's biggest arms dealer, Milchan was "executive producer" (i.e. chief financial angel) of Oliver Stone's Hollywood fantasy about the JFK assassination-a fact which may explain Stone's aversion to exploring the Israeli connection to the affair.

Maurice Tempeisman - The international diamond merchant and Mossad operative who became the lover of Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis and used his connections to double-perhaps triple-her substantial fortune, thereby co-opting the Kennedy family forever.

THE CIA CONNECTION

Rudolph Hecht - An owner of the CIA-linked Standard Fruit concern, Hecht was a prominent figure in the New Orleans Jewish community and as chairman of the board of directors of the International Trade Mart was Permindex board member Clay Shaw's primary sponsor.

James Jesus Angleton - Angleton, the CIA's long-time chief of counterintelligence, was the CIA's primary high-level conspirator in the murder of President Kennedy and the subsequent cover-up. Angleton, who had been co-opted by and was totally loyal to the Israeli Mossad, played a major role in the effort to frame Lee Harvey Oswald. Final Judgment is the first JFK assassination study to delve into Angleton's role in the conspiracy.

David Atlee Phillips - A long-time high-level CIA official, Phillips was the CIA station chief in Mexico City at the time a strange effort was underway to implicate Lee Harvey Oswald as a Soviet KGB collaborator. If anyone in the CIA knew the truth about Oswald, it was Phillips. He confessed publicly that the story about Oswald being in Mexico City was not precisely what the CIA had long claimed.

E. Howard Hunt - Long-time CIA officer and liaison to the anti-Castro Cuban exiles. Testimony by ex-CIA contract operative Marita Lorenz placed Hunt in Dallas, Texas the day before the president's assassination. The full truth about Hunt's actual involvement in the affair may never be known, but there is no question that Hunt was deeply involved in the intrigue surrounding the president's murder. Evidence does indeed indicate that there was a conscious effort to frame Hunt for involvement in the crime.

Guy Banister -The former FBI agent-turned-CIA contract operative whose New Orleans office was a central point for international intrigue involving the CIA, the anti-Castro Cuban exiles and the anti-DeGaulle forces in the French Secret Army Organization (OAS). Under Banister's direction, Lee Harvey Oswald established a public profile for himself as a "pro-Castro" agitator in the streets of New Orleans.

David Ferrie - An enigmatic adventurer and CIA contract operative, Ferrie was closely involved with Lee Harvey Oswald during Oswald's stay in New Orleans in the summer of 1963, working alongside Oswald out of Banister's headquarters. The investigation of Ferrie by New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison ultimately led to Garrison's discovery of Permindex board member Clay Shaw's ties to both Ferrie and Oswald.

Marita Lorenz - A former CIA contract operative, she testified under oath that one day prior to the assassination of President Kennedy she arrived in Dallas in an armed caravan of CIA-backed Cuban exiles who were met by not only Jack Ruby, who later killed Lee Harvey Oswald, but also CIA official E. Howard Hunt.

Guillermo & Ignacio Novo - Two brothers, veterans of the CIA-backed Cuban exile wars against Fidel Castro. According to Marita Lorenz, the Novo brothers were part of the armed caravan that arrived in Dallas one day before the assassination of President Kennedy. Many years after Dallas, the Novos were later convicted of participating in the murder of a Chilean dissident in collaboration with international adventurer Michael Townley who himself had ties to high-level figures implicated in the JFK conspiracy.

John Tower - In 1963 Tower was a newly-elected Republican U.S. Senator from Texas with close ties to the CIA. Shortly after the assassination he told associates of his own inside knowledge of the bizarre story of what really happened in Dealey Plaza. The story told by Tower suggests strongly that there were many unseen forces at work, manipulating many of the key players in the JFK assassination conspiracy. It was not until the release of Final Judgment that Tower's name was ever connected to the mystery surrounding the JFK assassination.

Victor Marchetti - A high-ranking CIA official who left the agency in disgust, Marchetti later made a career writing about the CIA. In a 1978 article he charged that the CIA was about to frame its long-time operative, E. Howard Hunt, with involvement in the JFK assassination. A libel suit resulting as a consequence of Marchetti's article resulted in a climactic finding by a jury that the CIA had been involved in the assassination of the president.

Robin Moore - A journalist with long-standing close ties to the CIA, Moore co-authored former CIA man Hugh McDonald's book, LBJ and the JFK Conspiracy which promoted James Jesus Angleton's false claim that the KGB was behind the president's murder-another of the disinformation stories that emerged following the assassination.

THE LANSKY SYNDICATE

Meyer Lansky - Chief executive officer and de facto "treasurer" of the international crime syndicate; active in gun-running on behalf of the Israeli underground; collaborated closely with American intelligence on a number of fronts; later settled in Israel. Researchers who have claimed that "the Mafia Killed JFK" have pointedly refused to acknowledge Lansky's preeminent positioning in the underworld.

Carlos Marcello - The head of the Mafia in New Orleans, Marcello owed his status to Meyer Lansky who was his chief sponsor in the crime syndicate. Marcello could not have orchestrated the JFK assassination-as some suggest-without Lansky's explicit approval.

Seymour Weiss - Meyer Lansky's chief bagman and liaison with the political establishment in Louisiana, he later served as a director of the CIA-linked Standard Fruit company and may actually have been a high-ranking CIA contract operative in New Orleans at the time of the JFK assassination.

Sam Giancana - The Mafia boss of Chicago, Giancana was a player in the CIA-Mafia plots against Castro; later murdered, probably at the behest of Santo Trafficante, Jr. His family says that Giancana admitted having been involved in the planning of the JFK assassination.

Santo Trafficante, Jr. - Although best known as the head of the Mafia in Tampa, Trafficante actually functioned as Meyer Lansky's chief lieutenant in the crime syndicate and as Lansky's liaison with the CIA in the Castro assassination plots.

Johnny Rosselli - A roving "ambassador" for the Mafia, Rosselli was the primary conduit between the CIA and the mob in the plots against Fidel Castro; may have arranged the murder of Sam Giancana for Trafficante and was later murdered himself.

Mickey Cohen - Meyer Lansky's West Coast henchman; Jack Ruby's role model and a gun-runner for the Israeli underground, Cohen collaborated closely with Israeli diplomat Menachem Begin prior to the JFK assassination;. Cohen arranged for John F. Kennedy to meet actress Marilyn Monroe who was assigned the task of finding out JFK's private views and intentions toward Israel.

Jack Ruby - A long-time functionary for the Lansky syndicate, Ruby was the Lansky connection man in Dallas and also engaged in CIA-linked gunrunning to the anti-Castro Cuban exiles. Evidence suggests there is more to Ruby's sudden "death" than meets the eye.

Jim Braden - A veteran personal courier for Meyer Lansky, Braden was almost assuredly in contact in Dallas with Jack Ruby prior to the JFK assassination. He was briefly detained in Dealey Plaza minutes after the president's murder, but those JFK assassination researchers who have mentioned Braden prefer to cast him as a "Mafia" figure rather than as Lansky's man on the scene in Dallas.

Al Gruber - A henchman of Meyer Lansky's West Coast operative, Mickey Cohen, Gruber and Ruby spoke by telephone just shortly before Ruby killed Lee Harvey Oswald. It is believed that Gruber gave Ruby the contract on Oswald on behalf of his superiors.

THE FRENCH CONNECTION

Charles DeGaulle - Repeatedly targeted for assassination by Israeli-allied forces in French intelligence and in the Secret Army Organization (OAS) who were angry that DeGaulle had granted independence to Arab Algeria. The Mossad-sponsored Permindex operation that also had a hand in the murder of JFK, laundered money used in the assassination attempts on DeGaulle.

Georges deLannurien - High ranking official in the SDECE, the French intelligence agency; pinpointed by a former French intelligence officer as the individual who (at the best of Mossad assassinations chief Yitzhak Shamir) contracted the hit team who killed JFK in Dallas.

Michael Mertz - A former French SDECE officer and the Paris connection for the Lansky-Trafficante heroin syndicate; alleged to have been one of the actual gunmen in Dallas on November 22, 1963. Said by some to be the legendary CIA contract killer, QJ/WIN.

Jean Soutre - A liaison for the French OAS with the CIA's E. Howard Hunt, Soutre maintained contact with Guy Banister's CIA- and mob-linked gun-running headquarters in New Orleans. Soutre may have been in Dallas at the time of the JFK assassination. There is evidence linking Soutre to James Jesus Angleton's intrigue inside the CIA that affected French intelligence in a dramatic way.

Thomas Eli Davis III - A world-traveling mercenary with apparent links to both Jack Ruby and Lee Harvey Oswald, Davis was taken into custody by the Algerian government for his subversive activities alongside Israeli agents in supplying weapons to the French OAS just prior to the JFK assassination. It is said that CIA operative QJJWIN (possibly Michael Mertz, one of the reputed assassins of President Kennedy) helped secure Davis's release from prison.

Geoffrey Bocca - A former propagandist for the OAS, Bocca later co-authored former CIA contract agent Hugh McDonald's book, Appointment in Dallas, which pointed the blame for the JFK assassination away from those who were actually responsible-the first of two suspect books put out by McDonald.

Christian David - A French Corsican criminal associated with reputed JFK assassin Michael Mertz, David has claimed knowledge of a French hit team involved in the JFK assassination. David himself was the chief suspect in the murder of a Moroccan dissident, Mehdi Ben-Barka, whose killing was orchestrated by the Israeli Mossad through anti-DeGaulle forces in French intelligence.

TRUTH SEEKERS

Mark Lane - Retained by Lee Harvey Oswald's mother to represent her son's interests before the Warren Commission, Lane's book Rush to Judgment was the first major critique of the Warren Commission Report. In a libel suit filed against The Spotlight newspaper by former CIA operative E. Howard Hunt, Lane proved to the satisfaction of a jury that the CIA had indeed been involved in the JFK assassination. His best-selling book Plausible Denial outlined the circumstances of that libel suit and its ultimate conclusion.

Gary Wean - A former detective on the Hollywood beat of the Los Angeles Police Department, Wean discovered how Meyer Lansky's West Coast henchman, Mickey Cohen, was conspiring against John F. Kennedy on behalf of the Israelis. In a meeting with the former sheriff of Dallas County, Bill Decker, Wean learned a portion of the truth about what really happened in Dallas.

NEWS TWISTERS

Edgar & Edith Stern - Close friends of Clay Shaw, major financial backers of the pro-Israel Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B'nai B'rith, and owners of the WDSU media empire in New Orleans that not only played a major role in giving vast publicity to Lee Harvey Oswald's preassassination profile as a "pro-Castro agitator" but later sought to undermine Jim Garrison's investigation of Clay Shaw.

Johann Rush - As a young WDSU cameraman, Rush was on the scene to record Oswald's "pro-Castro" activities. He emerged-many years later-as the brains behind a "computer-enhanced" version of the famous Zapruder film of the JFK assassination that author Gerald Posner cited as "proof' that Oswald acted alone in the president's murder.

Drew Pearson - Accused by his own mother-in-law of being a "mouthpiece" for the pro-Israel ADL, Pearson had close ties to not only the Israeli lobby, but also the CIA and to President Lyndon Johnson and his cronies. It was Pearson who floated an unlikely story that Fidel Castro was behind the JFK assassination and who also played a major influence in shaping Earl Warren's perceptions of the tragedy.

Jack Anderson - As protégé of Drew Pearson, Jack Anderson likewise had strange connections that might have biased his own reportage on the JFK affair. Since 1963 Anderson has promoted a number of conflicting versions about "who really killed JFK" ranging from "the Mafia" to Fidel Castro or a combination of both.

Jack Newfield - A liberal columnist and some-time JFK assassination buff, Newfield has been a likewise long-standing devotee of Israel. He made a big splash with a highly fantastic story that missing Teamster boss Jimmy Hoffa had "ordered" two Mafia figures to arrange the killing of President Kennedy. Not surprisingly, Newfield's ridiculous story was given wide play in the Establishment media.

THEORISTS AND/OR PROPAGANDISTS?

Oliver Stone - His Hollywood extravaganza, JFK, gave the public a fullblown, full-color, gory-in-every-detail conspiracy theory on the JFK assassination. Yet, Stone's presentation of the conspiracy was far from complete and failed to reach any firm conclusions. He deliberately suppressed the "French connection" which, in turn, was the long-hidden Israeli connection. Not only was Stone's chief financial backer Israel's leading arms dealer but also his film distribution company had its origins in the Lansky crime syndicate. What's more, one of the chief shareholders in the film company was none other than Bernard Cornfeld, long-time associate of Permindex figure Tibor Rosenbaum

Frank Mankiewicz - This former publicist for the Israeli Mossad-linked Anti-Defamation League had a peculiar part in the events that took place prior to the murder of Robert F. Kennedy. Then when Oliver Stone began promoting his film JFK, Mankiewicz popped up as his key public relations man.

Anthony Summers - Author of one book hinting that the Kennedy family were responsible for the death-maybe the murder-of actress Marilyn Monroe, Summers wrote another book on the JFK conspiracy. In neither book did Summers reveal explosive information (of which he was aware) that could have helped point the direction of those same forces which played a part in both crimes.

Robert Morrow - A former CIA contract operative who played a major role in activities on the periphery of the JFK assassination conspiracy, Morrow's book on his experiences is rife with detail, yet suspect in the eyes of many who had looked into his claims. Morrow's book absolves the key CIA conspirator, James J. Angleton, of involvement in the JFK conspiracy and portrays him as being "out of the loop" when, in fact, precisely the opposite was true. Is it a coincidence that Morrow's book publisher is an American affiliate of an Israeli publishing company?

G. Robert Blakey - An unlikely choice to serve as director of the House Select Committee on Assassinations, Blakey had, just two years previously, served as a character witness for a long-time close associate of crime boss Meyer Lansky. When it came time to point the blame in the JFK assassination, Blakey targeted Lansky's protégé, New Orleans Mafia boss, Carlos Marcello, but looked no further. Blakey, likewise, found no role by the CIA-or any other intelligence agency-in the JFK assassination.

David Scheim - The author of a book that pins the murder of President Kennedy on "the Mafia," Scheim refuses to acknowledge Permindex board member Clay Shaw's intelligence connections and paints Israeli loyalist Meyer Lansky as a low-level syndicate figure with no influence of substance. Scheim's book was published by the American front for an Israeli publishing company.

Richard Billings - A journalist with close ties to the CIA, Billings played a major role in the media's campaign to undermine New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison's investigation of Clay Shaw. Billings emerged as the prime promoter of the outlandish theory that Garrison was a Mafia front man trying to take the focus off the Mafia and direct the attention toward the intelligence community.

James DiEugenio - Although a deep admirer of both John F. Kennedy and New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison, DiEugenio has tread lightly when inquiring into the ties between Clay Shaw and the Permindex operation with its multiple links to the Israeli Mossad and the crime syndicate.

Peter Dale Scott - His years of in-depth research on the JFK assassination have led him directly to the doorstep of the CIA, the Mossad and the Lansky Crime Syndicate, yet he has never been prepared to name names or point in the direction of those very forces, preferring to sidestep the issue.

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Assassinations_page/Final_Judgment.html

comment

“After a criminal odyssey that began on Wall Street, Mr. Vesco fled the United States in 1971, along the way repeatedly demonstrating the power of money to overcome any ideology. His associates and protectors included democratically elected presidents in Costa Rica, the left-wing Sandinistas in Nicaragua, the cocaine barons of Colombia, the terrorism-tainted government in Libya, and, finally, the Communist government of Fidel Castro…”http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/03/world/americas/03vesco.html
Vesco allegedly stole the assets of a fund corporation called Investors Overseas Services, noted in the obituary of Bernie Cornfeld: “In 1969, [Cornfeld’s] worth was estimated at $300 million when he decided to go public by selling shares in his Swiss-based Investors Overseas Services… IOS employed a sales staff of 25,000 in 100 countries and had nearly $3 billion..under management… In 1970, Cornfeld was pushed aside by Robert Vesco, who stole the remaining IOS assets and took them on the lam.” http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/1995/03/01/1995-03-01_mogul_bernie_cornfeld__ex-ca.html
Cornfeld and Vesco’s activities may overlap not only with Soros, but Permindex [and “Swiss banker” Tibor Rosenbaum] and Agora Inc. There are deep ties in here: “Within the Israeli government, Michael Tzur was a highly regarded financial expert… most recently managing director of the Israel Corp… Last week, however, after six months of investigation, a district court in Tel Aviv indicted Tzur… The accusations are the latest developments in a complex contretemps that involves, besides the state of Israel, a Baron de Rothschild, a shady Swiss bank with a record of ties to the Mafia, secret Liechtenstein trust accounts, a hero of the World War II Hungarian underground and scores of millions in missing funds. Between 1970 and 1974… Tzur illegally transferred about 16.2 million from the Israel Corp and two of its subsidiaries to a Liechtenstein credit trust..controlled by Tibor Rosenbaum, president of the International Credit Bank (ICB) in Geneva… Baron Edmond de Rothschild, chairman of the Israel Corp, ordered an investigation…” http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,917348-4,00.html
So, how do these people connect? –I only have suggestions at this point, but Soros and Rosenbaum have a commonality in being Nazi collaborators: Rosenbaum, ostensibly leading a gang “impersonating” Nazi thugs, who authenicated his brutal charade by actually beating and snatching Hungarian Jews from their homes in order to, as he related, harbor and deliver them for escape. Their properties, then, would be subject to plunder.
The Time article continues: “Rosenbaum, the key figure in the complex saga, founded ICB in 1959… His bank had the reputation of taking money from anyplace… ICB was singled out by LIFE [magazine] in 1967 as one of the Swiss banks that accepted funds that the Mafia skimmed from casinos in the U.S. and the Bahamas, then recycled into Mob-controlled American businesses. At the same time, Rosenbaum, who played a major role in rescuing many of his fellow Jews..of his native Hungary, developed close relations with Israeli leaders. ICB financed oil deals and huge, hushed arms transactions for Israel. ..until February [1975] he was treasurer of the World Jewish Congress.”

This link stitches together relationships of Permindex, Rosenbaum, BCI, Mossad, Cornfeld, Rothschilds, Bronfmans and others in the context of planning the JFK assassination: http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=7789, but curiously, Dr. Paul himself is a prominent cohort in the circles of Agora Inc. Paul’s Texas district includes the former Freeport Sulphur Co. (Freeport-McMoRan), world’s largest goldmining outfit (Kissinger was on the board) and its longtime executive and chairman Benno Schmidt was a leading “war on cancer” philanthropist. So, who prepares Ron Paul’s War Room research –Agora? By association, is Soros involved in that too? –seems like they share an interest in currency-proof gold, a market controlled by whom? Rothschilds?

Excerpts from the Final Judgement Michael Collins Piper

THE LANSKY CONNECTION

It was around this time that I learned that a new biography of organized crime figure Meyer Lansky had been released. It was entitled Little Man:

Meyer Lansky and the Gangster Life. The book-prepared in cooperation with Lansky's family-was little more than a puff piece for the deceased thug. Gossipy, full of inside information, and even entertaining at times, the book still somehow seemed to be missing a lot.

It was then that I returned to my library and pulled a book off the shelf that I hadn't re-read in perhaps fifteen years. It was Hank Messick's biography of Lansky. Re-reading this important book I began to see that Meyer Lansky was not just another gangster. He was "the chairman of the board" of organized crime.

All of the Mafia figures that had been repeatedly implicated in the JFK assassination were, in fact, Lansky's front-men-his subordinates, his underlings. In short, if "the Mafia" had a hand in the killing of JFK, then Lansky had to have been one of the key players.

Yet, as I quickly began to see in reviewing many of the works which allege that "The Mafia Killed JFK," Lansky's preeminent role was being ignored or otherwise under-played.

I was aware of Lansky's close ties to Israel. After all, Lansky fled to Israel when the heat was on in the United States. But how deeply did the Lansky-Israeli connection go?

My research into that question began to turn up some interesting facts relating to an Israeli connection to the assassination 2f John F. Kennedy.

THE ISRAELI CONNECTION

Why would Israel have an interest in participating in the JFK assassination conspiracy? That was the burning question.

It was just about the time that I had begun to take a second look at the Lansky connection to the Kennedy assassination that several new works about the covert relationship between the United States and Israel were released providing never-before revealed information.

These books, cited extensively in Final Judgment, made it all too clear that John F. Kennedy-before his death-was in a pitched battle with Israel. In fact, Kennedy was at war.

This was something that long-time JFK assassination researchers had no reason to know about. Much of the material had long been classified. It was a secret-a deep, dark secret.

Some of JFK's communications with then-Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion are still classified. Not even top-level intelligence officials with special security clearance have been allowed access to these potentially explosive documents.

This discovery made me realize that there was a lot more to the Kennedy relationship with Israel and a lot more about the JFK assassination than we had ever been told.

ISRAEL, LANSKY & THE CIA

The long and close relationship between Israel and JFK's foes at the CIA is something which is becoming more and more known to the general public. JFK's own war with the CIA is common knowledge.

At the time of the president's assassination, however, the depth and breadth of the CIA's relationship with Israel's Mossad, however, was not so commonly known.

What's more, as I began to discover, Israel's allies in the Lansky Syndicate had much deeper relations with the CIA than most researchers have realized.

And while the stories of CIA-Organized Crime assassination plots against Castro have been told time and again, the evidence I began to discover told an even bigger story.

The pieces of the puzzle were all there. They simply needed to be put together. As the research continued, I repeatedly found myself stumbling upon new facts and information that continued to verify what was initially in my mind just a theory, but which I now believe to be the truth.

THE PERMINDEX CONNECTION

It is the little-discussed Permindex connection to the JFK assassination which is the tie that binds-the final proof that Israel's Mossad was at the center of the assassination conspiracy.

In the Permindex connection we find all of the critical elements which tie Israel's Mossad, the CIA and organized crime together in close-knit intrigue linked directly to the murder of President Kennedy.

Although researchers, over the years, have devoted much time and energy to pursuing a wide variety of questions relating to the JFK assassination controversy (focusing on controversies that will never be resolved) they have steered clear of the Permindex connection.

Those who have made any reference to Permindex have described it as some sort of "neo-Nazi" entity-even a remnant of Hitler's SS-but, as we shall see, nothing could be further from the truth.

To understand the forces behind the Permindex connection, which we examine in detail in this volume, is to understand the answer to the biggest mystery of this century: the question of who killed John F. Kennedy.

INSIDERS AGREE

Just before I began the book I mentioned my theory to a rather well-known former United States congressman. He surprised me when he said, "I think you are on to something. I've believed for years that the Mossad was involved in the Kennedy assassination, but I never really took the time to look into it. I'm glad you're doing it, though. It will be an important book. It's a book I would have liked to have written myself."

Then, just after I finished the book, I sent a copy of the manuscript to another former U.S. congressman, thinking that he might have some interest in the subject. His response was perhaps a bit astonishing.

After the former congressman received the manuscript he wrote me a surprising letter in which he said, "I will tell you this. A retired Western European diplomat and intelligence officer with whom I've been in correspondence (and who has had disastrous experiences with Israel and the Mossad) has been urging me for the last four years to write the book that you have written."

He passed the manuscript on to the Frenchman who in turn wrote me a fascinating letter providing further information confirming my thesis.

ONE COMPLETE PICTURE

The fruits of my labor appear in this book. I owe so much to all of those JFK assassination researchers who made this book possible. Their pioneering efforts laid the foundation for the construction of a framework which I firmly believe proves Mossad complicity in the assassination of John F. Kennedy.

All of those who sought the truth-and sometimes risked their reputations (and even perhaps their lives) doing it-cleared the way for a final judgment:

Israel was the driving force behind the conspiracy that resulted in the assassination of John F. Kennedy. It is the Israeli connection that pulls all of the pieces of the puzzle together into one complete picture. The role of 'j Israel in the JFK assassination is, indeed, the until-now "missing link."

 

pxxiii
A WHO'S WHO OF THE JFK ASSASSINATION CONSPIRACY AND COVER-UP

While the following selection of names in this special "who's who" is by no means complete, it does provide the reader of Final Judgment with a brief overview of the facts relating to the involvement of the individuals in question with the circumstances surrounding not only the JFK assassination itself, but also the efforts to not only uncover the truth about the assassination-and also to bury it.

Following each name and description are references to the particular chapters in Final Judgment where details about that individual appear in pertinent part. The inclusion of any name in particular is by no means intended to suggest that the individual-unless specifically stated-had foreknowledge that the murder of President Kennedy was being planned.

As we note in these pages, there were many people who were brought into the JFK assassination conspiracy and the subsequent cover-up who had no idea of the actual role that they were playing.

The following "who's who"-if read in this context-provides the reader a quick glance at the key individuals who ultimately prove central to a complete understanding of the entirety of the conspiracy that resulted in the assassination of President Kennedy.

AT PERMINDEX

Clay Shaw - If New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison had been permitted to carry out an unimpeded investigation and prosecution of Shaw, a CIA contract operative and a former director of the International Trade Mart in New Orleans implicated in involvement with Lee Harvey Oswald, David Ferrie, Guy Banister and other figures central to the JFK assassination conspiracy, Garrison would have divined Shaw's connections - through a shadowy corporation known as Permindex - to not only the Israeli Mossad, but also the international crime syndicate of Israeli loyalist Meyer Lansky.

Louis M. Bloomfield - Based in Montreal, Bloomfield was a long-time intelligence operative and a front man for the powerful Bronfman family interests. The Bronfmans were not only key international backers of Israel but also long-time figures in the Lansky crime syndicate. Bloomfield, one of the foremost figures in the Israeli lobby in Canada and one of Israel's leading international operatives, not only served as the chief shareholder in the Permindex Corporation on whose board of directors Clay Shaw served, but also had intimate ties to American intelligence.

Tibor Rosenbaum - One of the "godfathers" of the state of Israel and the first director for finance and supply for Israel's intelligence agency, the Mossad, Rosenbaum was a prime financial angel behind the Permindex corporation. His Swiss banking concern, the Banque De Credit International, also served as the chief European money laundry or the global crime syndicate of Miami-based crime chief Meyer Lansky.

John King - A close business associate of Tibor Rosenbaum's protégé and sometime front man, Bernard Cornfeld, King showed up in New Orleans in the early stages of Jim Garrison's investigation-before Clay Shaw's name had come up-and sought to persuade Garrison (through a bribery attempt) to give up the inquiry. Fortunately he failed in his scheme.

THE MOSSAD CONNECTION

David Ben-Gurion - Prime Minister of Israel; resigned his post in disgust with JFK's stance toward Israel. in April of 1963; Said JFK's position threatened Israel's very survival.

Yitzhak Shamir - A long-time Mossad officer (based largely at the Mossad's chief European office in Paris), Shamir headed the Mossad's assassination squad at the time of the JFK assassination. A former French intelligence officer has charged that Shamir himself arranged the hiring of JFK's actual assassins through a close ally in French intelligence.

Menachem Begin - In 1963, Begin (later prime minister of Israel) was a roving Israeli diplomat; prior to JFK's assassination he was overheard conspiring with Meyer Lansky's California henchman, Mickey Cohen, in a conversation that suggested hostile intentions by Israel against the American president.

Luis Kutner - Although known largely as a "mob lawyer," (who was long and closely associated with Jack Ruby, a sometime-client) Kutner also doubled as an international intelligence operative and functioned as an advisor to an ad hoc pro-Israel lobby group in the United States.

A. L. Botnick - Head of the New Orleans office of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B'nai B'rith, an intelligence and propaganda arm for Israel's Mossad; a close associate of New Orleans-based CIA contract operative Guy Banister who helped create Lee Harvey Oswald's preassassination profile as a "pro-Castro" agitator. Evidence suggests that Banister's manipulation of Oswald may have been carried out under the guise of an ADL "fact-finding" operation.

Arnon Milchan - Israel's biggest arms dealer, Milchan was "executive producer" (i.e. chief financial angel) of Oliver Stone's Hollywood fantasy about the JFK assassination-a fact which may explain Stone's aversion to exploring the Israeli connection to the affair.

Maurice Tempeisman - The international diamond merchant and Mossad operative who became the lover of Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis and used his connections to double-perhaps triple-her substantial fortune, thereby co-opting the Kennedy family forever.

THE CIA CONNECTION

Rudolph Hecht - An owner of the CIA-linked Standard Fruit concern, Hecht was a prominent figure in the New Orleans Jewish community and as chairman of the board of directors of the International Trade Mart was Permindex board member Clay Shaw's primary sponsor.

James Jesus Angleton - Angleton, the CIA's long-time chief of counterintelligence, was the CIA's primary high-level conspirator in the murder of President Kennedy and the subsequent cover-up. Angleton, who had been co-opted by and was totally loyal to the Israeli Mossad, played a major role in the effort to frame Lee Harvey Oswald. Final Judgment is the first JFK assassination study to delve into Angleton's role in the conspiracy.

David Atlee Phillips - A long-time high-level CIA official, Phillips was the CIA station chief in Mexico City at the time a strange effort was underway to implicate Lee Harvey Oswald as a Soviet KGB collaborator. If anyone in the CIA knew the truth about Oswald, it was Phillips. He confessed publicly that the story about Oswald being in Mexico City was not precisely what the CIA had long claimed.

E. Howard Hunt - Long-time CIA officer and liaison to the anti-Castro Cuban exiles. Testimony by ex-CIA contract operative Marita Lorenz placed Hunt in Dallas, Texas the day before the president's assassination. The full truth about Hunt's actual involvement in the affair may never be known, but there is no question that Hunt was deeply involved in the intrigue surrounding the president's murder. Evidence does indeed indicate that there was a conscious effort to frame Hunt for involvement in the crime.

Guy Banister -The former FBI agent-turned-CIA contract operative whose New Orleans office was a central point for international intrigue involving the CIA, the anti-Castro Cuban exiles and the anti-DeGaulle forces in the French Secret Army Organization (OAS). Under Banister's direction, Lee Harvey Oswald established a public profile for himself as a "pro-Castro" agitator in the streets of New Orleans.

David Ferrie - An enigmatic adventurer and CIA contract operative, Ferrie was closely involved with Lee Harvey Oswald during Oswald's stay in New Orleans in the summer of 1963, working alongside Oswald out of Banister's headquarters. The investigation of Ferrie by New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison ultimately led to Garrison's discovery of Permindex board member Clay Shaw's ties to both Ferrie and Oswald.

Marita Lorenz - A former CIA contract operative, she testified under oath that one day prior to the assassination of President Kennedy she arrived in Dallas in an armed caravan of CIA-backed Cuban exiles who were met by not only Jack Ruby, who later killed Lee Harvey Oswald, but also CIA official E. Howard Hunt.

Guillermo & Ignacio Novo - Two brothers, veterans of the CIA-backed Cuban exile wars against Fidel Castro. According to Marita Lorenz, the Novo brothers were part of the armed caravan that arrived in Dallas one day before the assassination of President Kennedy. Many years after Dallas, the Novos were later convicted of participating in the murder of a Chilean dissident in collaboration with international adventurer Michael Townley who himself had ties to high-level figures implicated in the JFK conspiracy.

John Tower - In 1963 Tower was a newly-elected Republican U.S. Senator from Texas with close ties to the CIA. Shortly after the assassination he told associates of his own inside knowledge of the bizarre story of what really happened in Dealey Plaza. The story told by Tower suggests strongly that there were many unseen forces at work, manipulating many of the key players in the JFK assassination conspiracy. It was not until the release of Final Judgment that Tower's name was ever connected to the mystery surrounding the JFK assassination.

Victor Marchetti - A high-ranking CIA official who left the agency in disgust, Marchetti later made a career writing about the CIA. In a 1978 article he charged that the CIA was about to frame its long-time operative, E. Howard Hunt, with involvement in the JFK assassination. A libel suit resulting as a consequence of Marchetti's article resulted in a climactic finding by a jury that the CIA had been involved in the assassination of the president.

Robin Moore - A journalist with long-standing close ties to the CIA, Moore co-authored former CIA man Hugh McDonald's book, LBJ and the JFK Conspiracy which promoted James Jesus Angleton's false claim that the KGB was behind the president's murder-another of the disinformation stories that emerged following the assassination.

THE LANSKY SYNDICATE

Meyer Lansky - Chief executive officer and de facto "treasurer" of the international crime syndicate; active in gun-running on behalf of the Israeli underground; collaborated closely with American intelligence on a number of fronts; later settled in Israel. Researchers who have claimed that "the Mafia Killed JFK" have pointedly refused to acknowledge Lansky's preeminent positioning in the underworld.

Carlos Marcello - The head of the Mafia in New Orleans, Marcello owed his status to Meyer Lansky who was his chief sponsor in the crime syndicate. Marcello could not have orchestrated the JFK assassination-as some suggest-without Lansky's explicit approval.

Seymour Weiss - Meyer Lansky's chief bagman and liaison with the political establishment in Louisiana, he later served as a director of the CIA-linked Standard Fruit company and may actually have been a high-ranking CIA contract operative in New Orleans at the time of the JFK assassination.

Sam Giancana - The Mafia boss of Chicago, Giancana was a player in the CIA-Mafia plots against Castro; later murdered, probably at the behest of Santo Trafficante, Jr. His family says that Giancana admitted having been involved in the planning of the JFK assassination.

Santo Trafficante, Jr. - Although best known as the head of the Mafia in Tampa, Trafficante actually functioned as Meyer Lansky's chief lieutenant in the crime syndicate and as Lansky's liaison with the CIA in the Castro assassination plots.

Johnny Rosselli - A roving "ambassador" for the Mafia, Rosselli was the primary conduit between the CIA and the mob in the plots against Fidel Castro; may have arranged the murder of Sam Giancana for Trafficante and was later murdered himself.

Mickey Cohen - Meyer Lansky's West Coast henchman; Jack Ruby's role model and a gun-runner for the Israeli underground, Cohen collaborated closely with Israeli diplomat Menachem Begin prior to the JFK assassination;. Cohen arranged for John F. Kennedy to meet actress Marilyn Monroe who was assigned the task of finding out JFK's private views and intentions toward Israel.

Jack Ruby - A long-time functionary for the Lansky syndicate, Ruby was the Lansky connection man in Dallas and also engaged in CIA-linked gunrunning to the anti-Castro Cuban exiles. Evidence suggests there is more to Ruby's sudden "death" than meets the eye.

Jim Braden - A veteran personal courier for Meyer Lansky, Braden was almost assuredly in contact in Dallas with Jack Ruby prior to the JFK assassination. He was briefly detained in Dealey Plaza minutes after the president's murder, but those JFK assassination researchers who have mentioned Braden prefer to cast him as a "Mafia" figure rather than as Lansky's man on the scene in Dallas.

Al Gruber - A henchman of Meyer Lansky's West Coast operative, Mickey Cohen, Gruber and Ruby spoke by telephone just shortly before Ruby killed Lee Harvey Oswald. It is believed that Gruber gave Ruby the contract on Oswald on behalf of his superiors.

THE FRENCH CONNECTION

Charles DeGaulle - Repeatedly targeted for assassination by Israeli-allied forces in French intelligence and in the Secret Army Organization (OAS) who were angry that DeGaulle had granted independence to Arab Algeria. The Mossad-sponsored Permindex operation that also had a hand in the murder of JFK, laundered money used in the assassination attempts on DeGaulle.

Georges deLannurien - High ranking official in the SDECE, the French intelligence agency; pinpointed by a former French intelligence officer as the individual who (at the best of Mossad assassinations chief Yitzhak Shamir) contracted the hit team who killed JFK in Dallas.

Michael Mertz - A former French SDECE officer and the Paris connection for the Lansky-Trafficante heroin syndicate; alleged to have been one of the actual gunmen in Dallas on November 22, 1963. Said by some to be the legendary CIA contract killer, QJ/WIN.

Jean Soutre - A liaison for the French OAS with the CIA's E. Howard Hunt, Soutre maintained contact with Guy Banister's CIA- and mob-linked gun-running headquarters in New Orleans. Soutre may have been in Dallas at the time of the JFK assassination. There is evidence linking Soutre to James Jesus Angleton's intrigue inside the CIA that affected French intelligence in a dramatic way.

Thomas Eli Davis III - A world-traveling mercenary with apparent links to both Jack Ruby and Lee Harvey Oswald, Davis was taken into custody by the Algerian government for his subversive activities alongside Israeli agents in supplying weapons to the French OAS just prior to the JFK assassination. It is said that CIA operative QJJWIN (possibly Michael Mertz, one of the reputed assassins of President Kennedy) helped secure Davis's release from prison.

Geoffrey Bocca - A former propagandist for the OAS, Bocca later co-authored former CIA contract agent Hugh McDonald's book, Appointment in Dallas, which pointed the blame for the JFK assassination away from those who were actually responsible-the first of two suspect books put out by McDonald.

Christian David - A French Corsican criminal associated with reputed JFK assassin Michael Mertz, David has claimed knowledge of a French hit team involved in the JFK assassination. David himself was the chief suspect in the murder of a Moroccan dissident, Mehdi Ben-Barka, whose killing was orchestrated by the Israeli Mossad through anti-DeGaulle forces in French intelligence.

TRUTH SEEKERS

Mark Lane - Retained by Lee Harvey Oswald's mother to represent her son's interests before the Warren Commission, Lane's book Rush to Judgment was the first major critique of the Warren Commission Report. In a libel suit filed against The Spotlight newspaper by former CIA operative E. Howard Hunt, Lane proved to the satisfaction of a jury that the CIA had indeed been involved in the JFK assassination. His best-selling book Plausible Denial outlined the circumstances of that libel suit and its ultimate conclusion.

Gary Wean - A former detective on the Hollywood beat of the Los Angeles Police Department, Wean discovered how Meyer Lansky's West Coast henchman, Mickey Cohen, was conspiring against John F. Kennedy on behalf of the Israelis. In a meeting with the former sheriff of Dallas County, Bill Decker, Wean learned a portion of the truth about what really happened in Dallas.

NEWS TWISTERS

Edgar & Edith Stern - Close friends of Clay Shaw, major financial backers of the pro-Israel Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B'nai B'rith, and owners of the WDSU media empire in New Orleans that not only played a major role in giving vast publicity to Lee Harvey Oswald's preassassination profile as a "pro-Castro agitator" but later sought to undermine Jim Garrison's investigation of Clay Shaw.

Johann Rush - As a young WDSU cameraman, Rush was on the scene to record Oswald's "pro-Castro" activities. He emerged-many years later-as the brains behind a "computer-enhanced" version of the famous Zapruder film of the JFK assassination that author Gerald Posner cited as "proof' that Oswald acted alone in the president's murder.

Drew Pearson - Accused by his own mother-in-law of being a "mouthpiece" for the pro-Israel ADL, Pearson had close ties to not only the Israeli lobby, but also the CIA and to President Lyndon Johnson and his cronies. It was Pearson who floated an unlikely story that Fidel Castro was behind the JFK assassination and who also played a major influence in shaping Earl Warren's perceptions of the tragedy.

Jack Anderson - As protégé of Drew Pearson, Jack Anderson likewise had strange connections that might have biased his own reportage on the JFK affair. Since 1963 Anderson has promoted a number of conflicting versions about "who really killed JFK" ranging from "the Mafia" to Fidel Castro or a combination of both.

Jack Newfield - A liberal columnist and some-time JFK assassination buff, Newfield has been a likewise long-standing devotee of Israel. He made a big splash with a highly fantastic story that missing Teamster boss Jimmy Hoffa had "ordered" two Mafia figures to arrange the killing of President Kennedy. Not surprisingly, Newfield's ridiculous story was given wide play in the Establishment media.

THEORISTS AND/OR PROPAGANDISTS?

Oliver Stone - His Hollywood extravaganza, JFK, gave the public a fullblown, full-color, gory-in-every-detail conspiracy theory on the JFK assassination. Yet, Stone's presentation of the conspiracy was far from complete and failed to reach any firm conclusions. He deliberately suppressed the "French connection" which, in turn, was the long-hidden Israeli connection. Not only was Stone's chief financial backer Israel's leading arms dealer but also his film distribution company had its origins in the Lansky crime syndicate. What's more, one of the chief shareholders in the film company was none other than Bernard Cornfeld, long-time associate of Permindex figure Tibor Rosenbaum

Frank Mankiewicz - This former publicist for the Israeli Mossad-linked Anti-Defamation League had a peculiar part in the events that took place prior to the murder of Robert F. Kennedy. Then when Oliver Stone began promoting his film JFK, Mankiewicz popped up as his key public relations man.

Anthony Summers - Author of one book hinting that the Kennedy family were responsible for the death-maybe the murder-of actress Marilyn Monroe, Summers wrote another book on the JFK conspiracy. In neither book did Summers reveal explosive information (of which he was aware) that could have helped point the direction of those same forces which played a part in both crimes.

Robert Morrow - A former CIA contract operative who played a major role in activities on the periphery of the JFK assassination conspiracy, Morrow's book on his experiences is rife with detail, yet suspect in the eyes of many who had looked into his claims. Morrow's book absolves the key CIA conspirator, James J. Angleton, of involvement in the JFK conspiracy and portrays him as being "out of the loop" when, in fact, precisely the opposite was true. Is it a coincidence that Morrow's book publisher is an American affiliate of an Israeli publishing company?

G. Robert Blakey - An unlikely choice to serve as director of the House Select Committee on Assassinations, Blakey had, just two years previously, served as a character witness for a long-time close associate of crime boss Meyer Lansky. When it came time to point the blame in the JFK assassination, Blakey targeted Lansky's protégé, New Orleans Mafia boss, Carlos Marcello, but looked no further. Blakey, likewise, found no role by the CIA-or any other intelligence agency-in the JFK assassination.

David Scheim - The author of a book that pins the murder of President Kennedy on "the Mafia," Scheim refuses to acknowledge Permindex board member Clay Shaw's intelligence connections and paints Israeli loyalist Meyer Lansky as a low-level syndicate figure with no influence of substance. Scheim's book was published by the American front for an Israeli publishing company.

Richard Billings - A journalist with close ties to the CIA, Billings played a major role in the media's campaign to undermine New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison's investigation of Clay Shaw. Billings emerged as the prime promoter of the outlandish theory that Garrison was a Mafia front man trying to take the focus off the Mafia and direct the attention toward the intelligence community.

James DiEugenio - Although a deep admirer of both John F. Kennedy and New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison, DiEugenio has tread lightly when inquiring into the ties between Clay Shaw and the Permindex operation with its multiple links to the Israeli Mossad and the crime syndicate.

Peter Dale Scott - His years of in-depth research on the JFK assassination have led him directly to the doorstep of the CIA, the Mossad and the Lansky Crime Syndicate, yet he has never been prepared to name names or point in the direction of those very forces, preferring to sidestep the issue.


 

Mossad ran 9/11 Arab “hijacker” terrorist operation

By  on December 23, 2011

Wayne Madsen – via Opinion Maker January 27, 2011

British intelligence reported in February 2002 that the Israeli Mossad ran the Arab hijacker cells that were later blamed by the U.S. government’s 9/11 Commission for carrying out the aerial attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. WMR has received details of the British intelligence report which was suppressed by the government of then-Prime Minister Tony Blair.
A Mossad unit consisting of six Egyptian- and Yemeni-born Jews infiltrated “Al Qaeda” cells in Hamburg (the Atta-Mamoun Darkanzali cell), south Florida, and Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates in the months before 9/11. The Mossad not only infiltrated cells but began to run them and give them specific orders that would eventually culminate in their being on board four regularly-scheduled flights originating in Boston, Washington Dulles, and Newark, New Jersey on 9/11.
The Mossad infiltration team comprised six Israelis, comprising two cells of three agents, who all received special training at a Mossad base in the Negev Desert in their future control and handling of the “Al Qaeda” cells. One Mossad cell traveled to Amsterdam where they submitted to the operational control of the Mossad’s Europe Station, which operates from the El Al complex at Schiphol International Airport. The three-man Mossad unit then traveled to Hamburg where it made contact with Mohammed Atta, who believed they were sent by Osama Bin Laden. In fact, they were sent by Ephraim Halevy, the chief of Mossad.
The second three-man Mossad team flew to New York and then to southern Florida where they began to direct the “Al Qaeda” cells operating from Hollywood, Miami, Vero Beach,  Delray Beach, and West Palm Beach. Israeli “art students,” already under investigation by the Drug Enforcement Administration for casing the offices and homes of federal law enforcement officers, had been living among and conducting surveillance of the activities, including flight school training, of the future Arab “hijacker” cells, particularly in Hollywood and Vero Beach.
In August 2001, the first Mossad team flew with Atta and other Hamburg “Al Qaeda” members to Boston. Logan International Airport’s security was contracted to Huntleigh USA, a firm owned by an Israeli airport security firm closely connected to Mossad — International Consultants on Targeted Security – ICTS. ICTS’s owners were politically connected to the Likud Party, particularly the Netanyahu faction and then-Jerusalem mayor and future Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. It was Olmert who personally interceded with New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani to have released from prison five Urban Moving Systems employees, identified by the CIA and FBI agents as Mossad agents. The Israelis were the only suspects arrested anywhere in the United States on 9/11 who were thought to have been involved in the 9/11 attacks.
The two Mossad teams sent regular coded reports on the progress of the 9/11 operation to Tel Aviv via the Israeli embassy in Washington, DC. WMR has learned from a Pentagon source that leading Americans tied to the media effort to pin 9/11 on Arab hijackers, Osama Bin Laden, and the Taliban were present in the Israeli embassy on September 10, 2001, to coordinate their media blitz for the subsequent days and weeks following the attacks. It is more than likely that FBI counter-intelligence agents who conduct surveillance of the Israeli embassy have proof on the presence of the Americans present at the embassy on September 10. Some of the Americans are well-known to U.S. cable news television audiences.
In mid-August, the Mossad team running the Hamburg cell in Boston reported to Tel Aviv that the final plans for 9/11 were set. The Florida-based Mossad cell reported that the documented “presence” of the Arab cell members at Florida flight schools had been established.
The two Mossad cells studiously avoided any mention of the World Trade Center or targets in Washington, DC in their coded messages to Tel Aviv. Halevy covered his tracks by reporting to the CIA of a “general threat” by an attack by Arab terrorists on a nuclear plant somewhere on the East Coast of the United States. CIA director George Tenet dismissed the Halevy warning as “too non-specific.” The FBI, under soon-to-be-departed director Louis Freeh, received the “non-specific” warning about an attack on a nuclear power plant and sent out the information in its routine bulletins to field agents but no high alert was ordered.
The lack of a paper trail pointing to “Al Qaeda” as the masterminds on 9/11, which could then be linked to Al Qaeda’s Mossad handlers, threw off the FBI. On April 19, 2002, FBI director Robert Mueller, in a speech to San Francisco’s Commonwealth Club, stated: “In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper — either here in the United States, or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere — that mentioned any aspect of the September 11 plot.”
  The two Mossad “Al Qaeda” infiltration and control teams had also helped set up safe houses for the quick exfiltration of Mossad agents from the United States. Last March, WMR reported: “WMR has learned from two El Al sources who worked for the Israeli airline at New York’s John F. Kennedy airport that on 9/11, hours after the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) grounded all civilian domestic and international incoming and outgoing flights to and from the United States, a full El Al Boeing 747 took off from JFK bound for Tel Aviv’s Ben Gurion International Airport. The two El Al employee sources are not Israeli nationals but legal immigrants from Ecuador who were working in the United States for the airline. The flight departed JFK at 4:11 pm and its departure was, according to the El Al sources, authorized by the direct intervention of the U.S. Department of Defense. U.S. military officials were on the scene at JFK and were personally involved with the airport and air traffic control authorities to clear the flight for take-off. According to the 9/11 Commission report, Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta ordered all civilian flights to be grounded at 9:45 am on September 11.” WMR has learned from British intelligence sources that the six-man Mossad team was listed on the El Al flight manifest as El Al employees
WMR previously reported that the Mossad cell operating in the Jersey City-Weehawken area of New Jersey through Urban Moving Systems was suspected by some in the FBI and CIA of being involved in moving explosives into the World Trade Center as well as staging “false flag” demonstrations at least two locations in north Jersey: Liberty State Park and an apartment complex in Jersey City as the first plane hit the World Trade Center’s North Tower. One team of Urban Moving Systems Mossad agents was arrested later on September 11 and jailed for five months at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. Some of their names turned up in a joint CIA-FBI database as known Mossad agents, along with the owner of Urban Moving Systems, Dominik Suter, whose name also appeared on a “Law Enforcement Sensitive” FBI 9/11 suspects list, along with the names of key “hijackers,” including Mohammed Atta and Hani Hanjour, as well as the so-called “20th hijacker,” Zacarias Moussaoui.
Suter was allowed to escape the United States after the FBI made initial contact with him at the Urban Moving Systems warehouse in Weehawken, New Jersey, following the 9/11 attacks. Suter was later permitted to return to the United States where he was involved in the aircraft parts supply business in southern Florida, according to an informe3d source who contacted WMR. Suter later filed for bankruptcy in Florida for Urban Moving Systems and other businesses he operated: Suburban Moving & Storage Inc.; Max Movers, Inc.; Invsupport; Woodflooring Warehouse Corp.; One Stop Cleaning LLC; and City Carpet Upholstery, Inc. At the time of the bankruptcy filing in Florida, Suter listed his address as 1867 Fox Court, Wellington, FL 33414, with a phone number of 561 204-2359.
From the list of creditors  it can be determined that Suter had been operating in the United States since 1993, the year of the first attack on the World Trade Center. In 1993, Suter began racking up American Express credit card charges totaling $21,913.97. Suter also maintained credit card accounts with HSBC Bank and Orchard Bank c/o HSBC Card Services of Salinas, California, among other banks. Suter also did business with the Jewish Community Center of Greater Palm Beach in Florida and Ryder Trucks in Miami. Miami and southern Florida were major operating areas for cells of Israeli Mossad agents masquerading as “art students,” who were living and working near some of the identified future Arab “hijackers” in the months preceding 9/11.
ABC’s 20/20 correspondent John Miller ensured that the Israeli connection to “Al Qaeda’s” Arab hijackers was buried in an “investigation” of the movers’ activities on 9/11. Anchor Barbara Walters helped Miller in putting a lid on the story about the movers and Suter aired on June 21, 2002. Miller then went on to become the FBI public affairs spokesman to ensure that Mueller and other FBI officials kept to the “Al Qaeda” script as determined by the Bush administration and the future 9/11 Commission. But former CIA chief of counter-terrorism Vince Cannistraro let slip to ABC an important clue to the operations of the Mossad movers in New Jersey when he stated that the Mossad agents “set up or exploited for the purpose of launching an intelligence operation against radical Islamists in the area, particularly in the New Jersey-New York area.” The “intelligence operation” turned out to have been the actual 9/11 attacks. And it was no coincidence that it was ABC’s John Miller who conducted a May 1998 rare interview of Osama Bin Laden at his camp in Afghanistan. Bin Laden played his part well for future scenes in the fictional “made-for-TV” drama known as 9/11.
WMR has also learned from Italian intelligence sources that Mossad’s running of “Al Qaeda” operatives did not end with running the “hijacking” teams in the United States and Hamburg. Other Arab “Al Qaeda” operatives, run by Mossad, were infiltrated into Syria but arrested by Syrian intelligence. Syria was unsuccessful in turning them to participate in intelligence operations in Lebanon. Detailed information on Bin Laden’s support team was offered to the Bush administration, up to days prior to 9/11, by Gutbi al-Mahdi, the head of the Sudanese Mukhabarat intelligence service. The intelligence was rejected by the Biush White House. It was later reported that Sudanese members of “Al Qaeda’s” support network were double agents for Mossad who had also established close contacts with Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh and operated in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Eritrea, as well as Sudan. The Mossad connection to Al Qaeda in Sudan was likely known by the Sudanese Mukhabarat, a reason for the rejection of its intelligence on “Al Qaeda” by the thoroughly-Mossad penetrated Bush White House. Yemen had also identified “Al Qaeda” members who were also Mossad agents. A former chief of Mossad revealed to this editor in 2002 that Yemeni-born Mossad “deep insertion” commandos spotted Bin Laden in the Hadhramaut region of eastern Yemen after his escape from Tora Bora in Afghanistan, following the U.S. invasion.
French intelligence determined that other Egyptian- and Yemeni-born Jewish Mossad agents were infiltrated into Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates as radical members of the Muslim Brotherhood. However, the “Muslim Brotherhood” agents actually were involved in providing covert Israeli funding for “Al Qaeda” activities. On February 21, 2006, WMR reported on the U.S. Treasury Secretary’s firing by President Bush over information discovered on the shady “Al Qaeda” accounts in the United Arab Emirates: “Banking insiders in Dubai report that in March 2002, U.S. Secretary of Treasury Paul O’Neill visited Dubai and asked for documents on a $109,500 money transfer from Dubai to a joint account held by hijackers Mohammed Atta and Marwan al Shehhi at Sun Trust Bank in Florida. O’Neill also asked UAE authorities to close down accounts used by Al Qaeda .  . . . The UAE complained about O’Neill’s demands to the Bush administration. O’Neill’s pressure on the UAE and Saudis contributed to Bush firing him as Treasury Secretary in December 2002 ” O’Neill may have also stumbled on the “Muslim Brotherhood” Mossad operatives operating in the emirates who were directing funds to “Al Qaeda.”
After the collapse of the Soviet Union and the rise to power of the Taliban in Afghanistan, Sharjah’s ruler, Sultan bin Mohammed al-Qasimi, who survived a palace coup attempt in 1987, opened his potentate to Russian businessmen like Viktor Bout, as well as to financiers of radical Muslim groups, including the Taliban and “Al Qaeda.”
Moreover, this Israeli support for “Al Qaeda” was fully known to Saudi intelligence, which approved of it in order to avoid compromising Riyadh. The joint Israeli-Saudi support for “Al Qaeda” was well-known to the Sharjah and Ras al Khaimah-based aviation network of the now-imprisoned Russian, Viktor Bout, jailed in New York on terrorism charges. The presence of Bout in New York, a hotbed of Israeli intelligence control of U.S. federal prosecutors, judges, as well as the news media, is no accident: Bout knows enough about the Mossad activities in Sharjah in support of the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, where Bout also had aviation and logistics contracts, to expose Mossad as the actual mastermind behind 9/11. Bout’s aviation empire also extended to Miami and Dallas, two areas that were nexuses for the Mossad control operations for the “Al Qaeda” flight training operations of the Arab cell members in the months prior to 9/11.
 Bout’s path also crossed with “Al Qaeda’s” support network at the same bank in Sharjah, HSBC. Mossad’s phony Muslim Brotherhood members from Egypt and Yemen controlled financing for “Al Qaeda” through the HSBC accounts in Sharjah. Mossad’s Dominik Suter also dealt with HSBC in the United States. The FBI’s chief counter-terrorism agent investigating Al Qaeda, John O’Neill, became aware of the “unique” funding mechanisms for Al Qaeda. It was no mistake that O’Neill was given the job as director of security for the World Trade Center on the eve of the attack. O’Neill perished in the collapse of the complex.Mossad uses a number of Jews born in Arab countries to masquerade as Arabs. They often carry forged or stolen passports from Arab countries or nations in Europe that have large Arab immigrant populations, particularly Germany, France, Britain, Denmark, Sweden, and the Netherlands.
For Mossad, the successful 9/11 terrorist “false flag” operation was a success beyond expectations. The Bush administration, backed by the Blair government, attacked and occupied Iraq, deposing Saddam Hussein, and turned up pressure on Israel’s other adversaries, including Iran, Syria, Pakistan, Hamas, and Lebanese Hezbollah. The Israelis also saw the U.S., Britain, and the UN begin to crack down on the Lebanese Shi’a diamond business in Democratic Republic of Congo and West Africa, and with it, the logistics support provided by Bout’s aviation companies, which resulted in a free hand for Tel Aviv to move in on Lebanese diamond deals in central and west Africa.
Then-Israeli Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu commented on the 9/11 attacks on U.S. television shortly after they occurred. Netanyahu said: “It is very good!” It now appears that Netanyahu, in his zeal, blew Mossad’s cover as the masterminds of 9/11.
 

February 11, 2009 -- Henry Kissinger: Obama's envoy to Moscow was suspected of being a spy for Nazi Germany WMR

On February 6, 2009, the Daily Telegraph of the UK featured a story that 85-year old former Nixon and Ford Secretary of State Henry Kissinger served as then-President-elect Barack Obama's special envoy to Moscow in December to secretly discuss mutual nuclear arms reductions. The choice of Kissinger to act as Obama's envoy shocked many in the progressive community who view Kissinger as a war criminal. Even President Ronald Reagan, suspicious of Kissinger's long-time ties to the Rockefellers, studiously kept Kissinger away from his administration. Kissinger withdrew his name from consideration as President George W. Bush's nominee to be chairman of the 9/11 Commission after widespread protests over his conflict-of-interests.

The Telegraphalso revealed that Obama forged close ties to Kissinger during the presidential campaign and quotes Kissinger as saying Obama could bring about a "new world order" after the Bush administration. Kissinger seemed to be implying that Obama could repair the damage caused by the neocons who infiltrated the Bush administration, yet it is Kissinger who is the granddaddy of all neocons - an individual whose bloody fingerprints are found throughout the world through his overt and covert support for all sorts of nasty fascists and corrupt and murderous dictators. Kissinger's association with Obama during the presidential campaign is even more troubling considering that Kissinger publicly endorsed John McCain for president.

For Obama to choose as his envoy to Moscow an individual who has outstanding bench warrants for his arrest in Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, and France for his role in not only supporting, bit directing "Operation Condor," which saw thousands of leftists and progressives, incluidng U.S. citizens, "disappeared" by fascist regimes in South America during the 1970s is a slap in the face of every decent American who hoped that with the end of the Bush regime would come a change in U.S. relations with the rest of the world. Sadly, Obama, in choosing Kissinger to represent him, is not much better than Bush when it comes to shoving fascism in the face of the American people.

Kissinger's bloody past has involved the slaughter of millions in Cambodia, Vietnam, Laos, East Pakistan/Bangladesh, East Timor, Cyprus, South America, southern Africa, and elsewhere.

Some ten years ago, this editor was contacted by two top investigative journalists for one of Germany's top news magazines who were looking into a story that Henry Kissinger was planted as a refugee by German Abwehr military intelligence in the United States to spy on the German Jewish refugee community that was arriving in increasing numbers in the United States after Adolf Hitler's rise to power. They said documentation was sketchy since it was believed that Reinhard Gehlen, a former German military intelligence Major General, had incriminating evidence against Kissinger either destroyed or hidden after he became the head of the post-war German Federal Intelligence Service, the Bundesnachrichtendienstor BND. Kissinger was very close to one of Gehlen's top agents, Eberhard Blum, who served as the BND's station chief in London for four years and Washington for twelve years. Blum, a Brigadier in Nazi Germany's Abwehr, was recruited personally by Gehlen.

I told the two journalists that I had not heard of the story before and was rather floored by the notion that Kissinger, who is Jewish, could have been a spy for the Nazis.

Kissinger arrived with his parents from Germany in 1938. His parents, Louis and Paula Stern Kissinger, changed Henry's name from "Heinz" to "Henry" because they felt "Heinz Kissinger" sounded "too German." In 1943, the former Heinz Kissinger was drafted into the U.S. Army and was assigned to the 970th Counterintelligence Corps (CIC) as a German translator earning the rank of Sergeant. Kissinger had access to the Army's most sensitive codes used to  encrypt classified military communications. After the war, Kissinger was sent to Germany where he was an instructor at the European Command Intelligence School, a position from which he could re-establish any pre-war and war links with former Nazi intelligence officers who had then working for the Americans. 

According to America's Secret Army by Ian Sayer and Douglas Botting, Kissinger, a mere Staff Sergeant, managed to evict a German from his villa and supposedly sought out Gestapo and SS officers for arrest. However, the CIC made exceptions, for example, in recruiting "Butcher of Lyons" Klaus Barbie who killed hundreds of French citizens and who was a wanted Nazi war criminal, as an agent for United States intelligence.

According to Sayer and Botting, in Germany, Staff Sergeant Kissinger had a German cook, a German housekeeper, a German secretary, and a German girlfriend. And Kissinger drove around in a Mercedes Benz.

Kissinger returned to the United States from Germany in 1947. 

With documentation on Kissinger's alleged Nazi past either destroyed or hidden, there was a seeming dead end to the story of America's most diabolical and dastardly foreign policy official. Until a trip to London's Foyle's bookstore and the discovery of a book titled Hitler's Jewish Spy: The Most Extraordinary True Spy Story of World War II, written in 1985 by Israeli author Michael Bar-Zohar, who also wrote an acclaimed biography of Israel's first Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion.

The book describes the exploits of decorated World War I veteran Paul Fackenheim, a German Jew who was an old wartime friend of Hermann Goring but who was interned as Prisoner Number 26,336 at the Dachau concentration camp. Fackenheim was ordered released from Dachau by the Abwehr to be trained as a spy for the Nazis and be parachuted into Palestine to learn about British military preparations to stop Field Marshal Erwin Rommel's Afrika Korps from seizing the Suez Canal.

The Abwehr gave Fackenheim a new identity -- Paul Koch -- and trained him how to use German military intelligence code books and radio transmitters as a training center in Brussels. After being transported through Sofia, Bulgaria and Athens, Fackenheim/Koch was parachuted into Palestine on October 10, 1941. He was then captured by the British and imprisoned as a German spy in Haifa.

Fackenheim was disturbed by the British treatment of Jewish immigrants in Palestine, even equating it to the Nazi treatment of the Jews in Germany. The British intelligence headquarters in Cairo was convinced that Fackenheim was only pretending to be Jewish after he was arrested by the British. The British were convinced that they had captured an SS agent in Lebanon and Syria named Paula Koch. Others within British Staff Intelligence Middle East (SIME) were aware of a German intelligence colonel operating a spy network in Lebanon and Syria. Ironically, his last name was Falkenheim, very close to Fackenheim.

The British Information Services circulated pamphlets and other material in the United States claiming that illegal Jewish immigration into Palestine was being run by the Gestapo. Bar-Zohar's book quotes one such British circular: "Many of the German immigrants are disguised Nazis who intend to establish espionage networks in the Middle East." Bar-Zohar, although finding the claim revolting, admits that "Fackenheim seemed to be living proof that it wasn't totally false."

In 1940, the British government rounded up 30,000 German Jewish refugees suspected of being German agents and shipped them to an internment camp on the Isle of Man. Many of these were later shipped to Canada and Australia. MI-5 discovered that one German Jewish refugee, Hans Arnheim, was sending intelligence reports to German intelligence agents in the Netherlands. The New Zealand government also believed that many German Jews entering that country as refugees were Nazi spies. The New Zealand Returned Services Association, the chief veterans group, launched a campaign against spies in the ranks of the Jewish refugees from Germany.

In wartime South Africa, a number of Jews collaborated with the right-wing National Party, which advocated apartheid. The Nationalists supported the aims of Nazi Germany.

After the war, Fackenheim was prosecuted at Nuremberg. Another concentration camp inmate, Josef Jakobs, a Luxemburgish Jew, was freed from his camp, trained as an agent, and parachuted into Huntingdonshire, England in 1941 with espionage gear. Like Fackenheim, Jakobs proclaimed that he was coerced into being a Nazi agent. Jakobs was sentenced to death and shot in the Tower of London in August 1941.

Dr. Ivar Lissner, who was half Jewish, was a valued Abwehr agent. Lissner was a correspondent for the German newspaper Vuelkischer Beobachterbut was actually an Abwehr agent who established a Nazi intelligence network in Manchuria from his bases in Shanghai and Harbin. Lissner was made a member of the Nazi Party and he later claimed he was the Gestapo chief in Japanese-occupied Manchukuo. Hans Mosberg was another German of Jewish origin who worked for the Abwehr station in Shanghai.

On March 2, 2007, WMR reported on a Kissinger connection to an intelligence agent for the Japanese during World War II: "Israeli multi-billionaire tycoon Shaul Eisenberg began supplying weapons to Cambodia's genocidal Khmer Rouge regime in the 1970s. Eisenberg, a close business partner of China's military, was also an early arms supplier to Khmer Rouge leader Pol Pot. Eisenberg was active with Asia's Jewish community during World War II, not as an compatriot of the Allies but as a close intelligence and business  partner of Japan's Imperial government, which was allied with Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy in the Axis Alliance. Escaping Nazi-controlled Europe, Eisenberg settled in the Far East, making his primary bases of operation Japanese-occupied Shanghai and Japan itself. In Shanghai, Eisenberg, along with Imperial Japanese military intelligence units, formed units of future Jewish terrorist groups -- the Irgun and the Shanghai Betar (Betar was founded in the 1930s by the Polish Zionist Yakob Jabotinsky, a supporter of Italian Fascist leader Benito Mussolini, to battle the British for control of Palestine and the ideological godfather of later neoconservative oracle Leo Strauss). The Japanese taught the Jewish paramilitary forces in Shanghai, including some who escaped from Joseph Stalin's Jewish Autonomous Region creation in the Soviet Far East on the Chinese border, how to disrupt colonial occupiers' logistics and command and control elements, strategies that had been successful against the British, Dutch, French, and American colonial authorities in Asia. The Irgun and Betar gangs would eventually use the knowledge gained from the Japanese in their terror campaign against British and Arab forces in Palestine following World War II. Eventually, Irgun and Betar veterans would form the present-day Likud Party, now headed by Binyamin Netanyahu, a noted extreme right-winger . . . As the United States faced imminent defeat in the Indochina War at the hands of the Vietnamese, Laotian, and Cambodian communist-nationalist forces, Eisenberg wasted no time in cashing in on America's defeat and the new power alignments in Southeast Asia. He began selling weapons from his new business partner - China - to the Cambodian forces of Khmer Rouge leader Pol Pot. After the defeat of the U.S.-backed military government of General Lon Nol, installed after Richard Nixon's National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger, a close friend of Eisenberg, ordered the CIA to overthrow Cambodian head of state Prince Norodom Sihanouk, Cambodia fell victim to a bloody civil war between Vietnamese troops backing Pol Pot's one-time ally Hun Sen and the Chinese-backed 'Democratic Kampuchea' government of Khmer Rouge leader Pol Pot.It was no mistake that the Gerald Ford administration and Secretary of State Kissinger backed the Khmer Rouge. Kissinger and Ford's long-time Michigan financial backer, industrialist Max Fisher were both financially and ideologically linked to Eisenberg. Ford's supposed "grand moment" -- the repatriation in 1975 of the crew of the U.S. 'merchant' (spy) ship, the SS Mayaguez, from Khmer Rouge forces was a Kissinger- and Eisenberg-designed ruse designed to build up Ford's support in the face of the American military defeat in Southeast Asia. That ruse came at the cost of 41 Marines and countless Cambodian military forces and civilians.

Obama White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel's father, Benjamin Emanuel, fought with the Irgun terrorists during the British mandate in Palestine.

However, just proving that one of Hitler's spies was Jewish is not proof, in itself, that Kissinger could also have been a Nazi agent. That perception changed, however, when Bryan Mark Rigg, a Marine Corps officer who served in the Israeli army but who is not Jewish, wroteHitler’s Jewish Soldiers,published in 2002. The book describes the history of the "mischlinge," literally translated as "mongrels," 1200 German soldiers of Jewish descent, including two Field Marshals, including Goring's Luftwaffe deputy Erhard Milch, a war criminal, and 15 generals. Hitler, himself, approved special waivers for hundreds of Jewish officers under Germany's racial purity laws by certifying them as "Aryan," to the utter dismay of racial purists like SS chief Heinrich Himmler. Goring defended Jewish officers in his Luftwaffe and once berated the SS, which did not wish to see such a policy, by declaring, "I decide who is a Jew."

But even Himmler's SS was not averse to using Jews as their own agents. In 1944, the SS used two Jewish agents, Joel Brand and Bandi Grosz, to cut a deal with the Americans and British to exchange 1 million Jews for 10,000 trucks and other supplies. The negotiationd were condcuted without Hitler's knolwedge. In 1943, Jewish leaders in Slovakia, including Zionists, conducted secret negotiations with Gestapo agent Dieter Wisliceny on exchanging imprisoned Jews for money. Wisliceny was a close friend of Adolf Eichmann, later captured by Israeli agents in Argentina and convicted and hanged in Israel.

And there were German Jews who actually supported the Nazi cause, including Max Naumann who led the "Organization of National-German Jews," which welcomed the establishment of Nazi rule in Germany and Arthur Trebitsch, who supported the Austrian Nazis and welcomed the Nazi union of Germany and Austria.

With the question now settled that Kissinger's religion would not have barred him from being recruited as an agent for the Third Reich, the nascent investigation by the two German journalists on Kissinger's alleged past espionage activities appears to have had some merit.

With that in mind, President Obama had a choice between to very different representatives of the American people as his special envoy to Moscow: Kissinger, who may have been an agent for the Nazis who ravaged Soviet Russia, or former President Jimmy Carter, who best reflects the true policies of America enshrined by our nation's founders. Kissinger is at home in the neocons' "homeland" of America while Carter represents the democratic republic of the United States.

Shame on Obama for making the wrong choice.

EIR ... How WWII started

So, the larger picture is this: Go back to the 1920s and 1930s. Go back to the time of the heirs that the Versailles Treaty, were on the road to establishing fascism as a system throughout Europe. In the early phases, up through the middle of the 1930s, in particular, Britain was in on it. People like Beaverbrook were a key part of this operation, which was moving toward a British United Kingdom accommodation with the Nazi regime of Adolf Hitler. Some of the fellows, such as the head of the Bank of England Montagu Norman, during the relevant period—and his friends in New York City, including Harriman, including du Pont, including Morgan, and so forth—were all in this project, which, from the early 1930s had intended to put Adolf Hitler into power in Germany.

And what their master plan was, as some of you, or your parents may recall, at that point the initial plan was, that Hitler would be backed. He was backed, by actually Hjalmar Schacht, who was one of the conspirators in this thing; he was an agent of Montagu Norman. And they initially had the German forces attacking the Soviet Union.

At that point, the crowd in London which were backing Hitler, were confident that the attack on the Soviet Union by Hitler would be the start of the war. And once the Hitler forces were deeply engaged in the depths of Russia, at that point, the French and British would attack the Germans at the rear—which is not a sexual act, but it has the same implications.

In the middle of the 1930s, it was discovered that Stalin, who at that point was aware of the intention of European and British conspirators of this thing, Stalin made an overture to Hitler; or the Hitler government, which became known as the Hitler-Stalin Pact, at a certain point, otherwise known as the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.

Now, as this pact was coming into view, even before it was formally installed, certain elements of the British government and establishment recognized that the original plan, in which they intended to exclude the United States from this little, private war in Eurasia, that this plan wouldn't work. Because Hitler would move against the west first, in which case, the situation in London and in Paris, was rather precarious. And particularly after the case of Chamberlain's MÂf®nchen negotiations with Hitler, it was perfectly clear that this was the situation.

So, in this process, the British establishment dumped Edward VIII, who had been, shall we say, too close, to the pro-Hitler side of this earlier plan, and went with a change. Now, many people, including Beaverbrook and Lord Halifax and so forth, up into May of 1940, were still about to cut a deal with Hitler. Churchill, who had been opposed to this for some time, represented a group in the United Kingdom, and particularly in what is called the British Commonwealth today, who were opposed to the idea of the British Empire, or the British Commonwealth, being sucked into the property of Adolf Hitler on the continent of Europe.

And so, for that reason, Churchill had been rather opposed to this friendly approach to Hitler from people like Beaverbrook, Halifax and so forth. Notable, remember, that Beaverbrook and Halifax were key figures in World War II during the British alliance with the United States. But they had a rather bad record, prior to that point.

So, in the critical point, Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt struck up an agreement, and this agreement frustrated forever, very quickly, the possibility that Adolf Hitler's empire would conquer the world. But, it did not eliminate the problem of a very bad war, which would continue for some time. And that was that war.

Now, at the end of the war, the financier interests, after the death of Roosevelt, the financier interests called the Synarchist International, or sometimes the cartel, which had actually been the financial power behind this Nazi operation, was protected. A certain number of the Nazis, who were prominent figures were put on the chopping block, as a matter of politics, a matter of discretion.

But, many of the elements of the Nazi system were protected. Including the assets of most of the chief financial conspirators, who were not Germans, essentially, but who actually owned the assets of the Nazi system, such as the Goeringwerke, which was one of the big properties under the Nazis. This was owned by foreigners through various cartel arrangements. And these cartel arrangements were left essentially intact, and exist still today .

So, the fellows who put Hitler into power, at the top level, on the financial level, were able to back off , from the Hitler project, before Hitler went down. And as part of the system, under Truman and Churchill and so forth, they were brought into the Western system, the Anglo-American system. At that point, under the pretext of being the best anti-Communists.

So, what has happened, is the same apparatus, deeply embedded in the trans-Atlantic financial cartel interests—the same group, including du Pont, Morgan, the former Harriman interests, and so forth—these guys were the backers of the Nazis, and they are backers of this kind of project today.

Soros Rothschild link

George Soros has never acted alone in its operations, knowing that his primary interest has always been to hold its own against its sponsors. A decade before launching the Open Society Fund, Soros left his post at Arnhold and S. Blechroeder Inc., who offers him the seed money to create the Quantum Fund NV, an offshore fund that manages in 2001 between 11 and 14 billion. The Quantum Fund and Soros Fund Management are used as sources of funding for international projects cited above. Soros has chosen to create its funds in the Netherlands Antilles, a protectorate of the monarchy of the Netherlands, and to exclude any American Board and bottom of the investments in order to escape the eyes of American authorities, as well as regulations and US taxes. While calling for transparency in others, of course. Soros is so sought to circumvent US laws he does not even sits on the Board of his own, but officially serves as the "Investment Advisor" through the Soros Fund Management, based in New York.By cons, investors and the Quantum Fund Board abound in UK financial, Italy and Switzerland, Queen Elizabeth II holds a special position on the client list. Richard Katz is also on the bank's board of NM Rothschild Sons of London and directs Rothschild Italia SpA. Nils O. Taube is director of St. James Palace, an investment group in London and major Lord Rothschild partner. George Karlweiss just Banca Privata Switzerland Edmond de Rothschild. According to various interviews and publications, Karlweiss contributed also to provide capital for the launch of the Quantum Fund. One member of the Quantum Fund Board, Edgar de Picciotto, a Swiss financier, is involved in the late 80s in attacks against the European organization of Lyndon LaRouche, while he was in transit money through the Swiss Institute of Geo-Pol Laurent Murawiec, currently a member of the neoconservative Hudson Institute. De Picciotto himself is president of Union Bancaire Privée, born of a merger with Trade Development Bank of Edmund Safra, whose name is mentioned several times in the Iran-Contra affair.

According to former intelligence officers, familiar with the case Soros Quantum Fund amassed his billions from a "silent investor" as Marc Rich, corrupt businessman, and through Mossad operators like Shaul Eisenberg and Rafi Eytan.

Upon the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Marc Rich played a significant role in commodity trade. He convinces corrupt and desperate Russian and Soviet leaders to sell off the country's wealth in world markets. The money is then invested in offshore accounts. Rich, wanted by the US justice since 1984, organized the looting from offices in London, where he helped his Russian contacts sell the goods normally intended for Russian domestic consumption. For 17 years, Rich has taken refuge in London, accused of tax evasion, fraud and conspiracy with the enemy (Iran). If providing protection at the highest level, Rich took as a lawyer, who later became chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney Lewis Libby. In 2001, in the last hours of the presidential term of Bill Clinton, Al Gore convinced the president to grant pardon to Marc Rich. In later testimony before Congress, Lewis Libby admitted having been pardoned in collaboration with the former chief of staff of Al Gore, Jack Quinn.

End.

By Leandra Bernstein and ML. Mekong

 

Nazi Era Timeline

 

Clinton 9/11 Truth Timeline

 

 

 

 

 

http://newsfollowup.com/id/rotate/speakers.jpg

free hit counter javascript

........

Google Analytics