Fascism in America, Blackrock, Collusion Dems/Corporations
NewsFollowup.com Home

Fascism Research, Collusion Between Democratic Party and Big Corporate America

What Does A Rothschild, A Goldman Sachs Top Lawyer And A CIA Agent Have In Common?

APR 30, 2023
Aside from rigging the stock market, sucking the life out of the debt-slave tax mules, dismantling Main Street, destroying society, perpetrating PSYOP-19, and all of the various other Crimes Against Humanity…they also happened to have all been in on Epstein’s child sex trafficking program.

Jeffrey Epstein, center, and clockwise from top right: Ariane de Rothschild, William Burns, Joshua Cooper Ramo, Noam Chomsky, Kathryn Ruemmler and Leon Botstein.
Epstein was in bed with Ruemmler and Ariane de Rothschild, current CEO of the Swiss private bank Edmond de Rothschild Group.

According to the Wall Street Journal, De Rothschild met with Epstein over a dozen times:

In September 2013, Epstein asked Mrs. de Rothschild in an email for help finding a new assistant, “female…multilingual, organized.”

“I’ll ask around,” Mrs. de Rothschild emailed back.

She bought nearly $1 million worth of auction items on Epstein’s behalf in 2014 and 2015, the documents show.

Mrs. de Rothschild was named chairwoman of the bank in January 2015. That October, she and Epstein negotiated a $25 million contract for Epstein’s Southern Trust Co. to provide “risk analysis and the application and use of certain algorithms” for the bank, according to a proposal reviewed by the Journal.

In 2019, after Epstein was arrested, the bank said that Mrs. de Rothschild never met with Epstein and it had no business links with him.

The Rothschild dynastic banking family makes the top 100 Forbes “richest” people in the world look like paupers, and that is with their combined wealth multiplied by a hundred. Of course, this family had direct ties with a pedophile running one of the Intelligence Industrial Complex’s largest blackmail nodes. Rest assured, this is certainly not the first time in this family’s dark history that they have engaged in such deviant operations.

One of the most important Rockefeller assets that backed Klaus Schwab and was for all intents and purposes the actual creator of the WEF is Henry Kissinger. It is no wonder then that Joshua Cooper Ramo, co-chief executive of Henry Kissinger’s corporate consulting firm, was also aiding and abetting Epstein.

CIA creation and Manchurian Candidate extraordinaire Barack Hussein Obama, married to a transsexual, aficionado of walnut sauces and other pedo code terms disguised as pizza and hotdog toppings as per the FBI, whose mother also happened to be a prostitute and CIA asset as well as his actual Marxist father Frank Marshall Davis, is also indirectly — for now — tied into the Epstein network vis-à-vis his White House attorney Kathryn Ruemmler. During her tenure with the radical community disorganizer and installed president, Kathryn Ruemmler had dozens of meetings with Epstein.

As a reward for her crimes, Kathryn Ruemmler was gifted a job by the banksters at the Vampire Squid financial institution, which also happens to be one of the owners of the Federal Reserve “bank:”

As a top lawyer at Goldman Sachs, Kathryn Ruemmler was very close with Epstein:

He asked for avocado sushi rolls to be on hand when meeting with Ms. Ruemmler, according to the documents. He visited apartments she was considering buying. In October 2014, Epstein knew her travel plans and told an assistant to look into her flight. “See if there is a first class seat,” he wrote, “if so upgrade her.”

As a reminder, all these friendly business interactions were after Epstein’s 2006 pedo conviction.

But Kathryn Ruemmler is now exceedingly contrite, stating:

I regret ever knowing Jeffrey Epstein.

In 2014, when current CIA director William Burns was Obama’s deputy secretary of state he partook in three meetings with Epstein.

Mr. Burns, 67 years old, a career diplomat and former ambassador to Russia, had meetings with Epstein in 2014 when Mr. Burns was deputy secretary of state.

A lunch was planned that August at the office of law firm Steptoe & Johnson in Washington. Epstein scheduled two evening appointments that September with Mr. Burns at his townhouse, the documents show. After one of the scheduled meetings, Epstein planned for his driver to take Mr. Burns to the airport.

Mr. Burns recalls being introduced in Washington by a mutual friend, and meeting Epstein once briefly in New York, said Ms. Thorp. “The director does not recall any further contact, including receiving a ride to the airport,” she said.

One month after meeting with Epstein, Burns stepped down from the his government position to serve as president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace think tank. The Carnegie crime syndicate is partners with the Rockefeller and Rothschild crime syndicates who in turn work closely with the unconstitutional CIA.

Thus, it makes perfect sense that a careerist gov grifter and pedo enabler like Burns was in early 2021 nominated to serve as CIA director by the installed senile diaper soiling, ice cream licking, pedo criminal puppet Biden; which, for all intents and purposes, is Obama’s third term.

And what does the CIA director’s spokeswoman have say about his relationship with Epstein post factum?

"The director did not know anything about him, other than that he was introduced as an expert in the financial services sector and offered general advice on transition to the private sector," she said, adding "They had no relationship."

Of course, the government has less than zero business meddling in the private sector, but we digress.

Thanks to researcher Whitney Webb’s work, we also now know that Epstein was an important member of the shadowy Mega Group:

“The Jeffrey Epstein Scandal: Too Big to Fail,” have focused on the widespread nature of sexual blackmail operations in recent American history and their ties to the heights of American political power and the U.S. intelligence community, one key aspect of Epstein’s own sex-trafficking and blackmail operation that warrants examination is Epstein’s ties to Israeli intelligence and his ties to the “informal” pro-Israel philanthropist faction known as “the Mega Group.”


The Mega Group — a secretive group of billionaires to which Lauder belongs — was formed in 1991 by Charles Bronfman and Leslie Wexner, the latter of whom has received considerable media scrutiny following the July arrest of his former protege Jeffrey Epstein. Media profiles of the group paint it as “a loosely organized club of 20 of the nation’s wealthiest and most influential Jewish businessmen” focused on “philanthropy and Jewishness,” with membership dues upwards of $30,000 per year. Yet several of its most prominent members have ties to organized crime.

Mega Group members founded and/or are closely associated with some of the most well-known pro-Israel organizations. For instance, members Charles Bronfman and Michael Steinhardt formed Birthright Taglit with the backing of then- and current Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Steinhardt, an atheist, has stated that his motivation in helping to found the group was to advance his own belief that devotion to and faith in the state of Israel should serve as “a substitute for [Jewish] theology.”

Other well-known groups associated with the Mega Group include the World Jewish Congress — whose past president, Edgar Bronfman, and current president, Ronald Lauder, are both Mega Group members — and B’nai B’rith, particularly its spin-off known as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). The Bronfman brothers were major donors to the ADL, with Edgar Bronfman serving as the ADL’s honorary national vice-chair for several years.


Is it also any wonder that the WSJ article referenced former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak?:

Mr. Ramo also was invited to a breakfast at the townhouse in September 2013 with former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, another regular guest, the documents show.

To recap, a Mossad agent masquerading as Prime Minister, Kissinger’s right hand man Ramo, a Rothschild, various Carnegie and Rockefeller operatives, the CIA, Obama, and his various coconspirators were all in on the child sex trafficking scheme.

Mr. Barak also met Epstein in 2015 with Mr. Chomsky, now 94, a linguistics professor and political activist who has been critical of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy.

Mr. Chomsky said Epstein arranged the meeting with Mr. Barak for them to discuss “Israel’s policies with regard to Palestinian issues and the international arena.”

Mr. Barak said he often met with Epstein on trips to New York and was introduced to people such as Mr. Ramo and Mr. Chomsky to discuss geopolitics or other topics. “He often brought other interesting persons, from art or culture, law or science, finance, diplomacy or philanthropy,” Mr. Barak said.

Let’s not even get into Chomsky, who is nothing more than a hypocrite Marxist himself.

Given that Joe Biden is a lifelong pedophile as evidenced by his own daughter’s damning diary entries as well as innumerable CSPAN snippets of inappropriate hair sniffing and touching of children, and that domestic terrorist and CIA operator Bill Ayer’s protégé Barack Hussein Obama was for a brief time a gay gigolo working Washington, DC, is married to a man, and whose mother and father led sexually deviant lives, and that so many high-ranking government positions are filled with sexually compromised perverts, one may easily conclude that the illegitimate Federal government along with its unconstitutional agencies, their bankster partners in crime, and criminal orgs like the UN, WEF, WHO, CFR, et al. are all comprised of compromised sickos.

Which is also why mentally ill gov apparatchiks like health secretary and no op tranny Rachel Levin are pushing for the mutilation and sterilization of America’s children; this posthuman technocommunist agenda is all by design, dating all the way back to the Fabian Society.

Warning: Graphic Images.

And if for whatever reason you had any doubts about any of the above claims, here are leaked CIA images of Obama’s mother in her element:


The Jewish Betrayal of Germany and the Cause of World War II

 By LARRY ROMANOFF – October 14, 2020

The true origins of the two World Wars form a crucial part of our modern history, the truths of which have been deleted from all our history books and replaced with mythology blaming Germany. This article is a minor attempt to set straight part of the record. From the Introduction to the article 'The Anger Campaign Against China' (which should be read as a companion piece to this article):


"It shouldn’t be a secret, though it still seems to be, that neither of the two World Wars were started (or desired) by Germany, but were the creation of a group of European Zionist Jews with the stated intent of the total destruction of Germany. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) The main purpose of this essay is to demonstrate not only that ‘history repeats itself’ but that the history being repeated today is a mass grooming of the Western world’s people (but most especially Americans) in preparation for World War III – which I believe is now imminent."


 For one, it involves the treachery of the Zionist Jews in betraying Germany - which had been a rather happy home for the Jews - and scheming to obtain Palestine in trade for that betrayal. For another, few people seem aware that the Jews openly declared a worldwide war on Germany, well before the Second World War, the economic consequences of which were quite severe. The stated intention, by organising a worldwide boycott of all German goods, was to destroy Germany's economy and starve to death one-third of Germany's population - as punishment for refusing to bow to a Jewish ultimatum to fire Hitler (Germany's Chancellor) and to reinstate all Jews to their former government positions. Jews cannot escape the accusation that they themselves were responsible for the resentment within Germany against their own people.


March 1938 Headline: UK Newspaper Boss Writes that Jewish Influence may Drive Britain into War with Germany

 Lord Beaverbrook was the most prominent newspaper magnate in the UK, and his Daily Express was at the time the most widely read newspaper in the world. In a private letter written in 1938, Lord Beaverbrook voiced concern over powerful Jewish influences that were determined to push England into a war with Germany. In that letter, Beaverbrook wrote:

"There are 20,000 German Jews in England – in the professions, pursuing research. They all work against an accommodation with Germany." In a subsequent letter he stated further that "The Jews have got a big position in the press here. . . At last I am shaken. The Jews may drive us into war." (8) (9)


•The Betrayal


We offer here some quotes from a speech made by Benjamin Freedman, a Jew who was high in the US structure and was personally present at all these events. You can read here his Speech that outlines in much detail the events that led to not only the Balfour Declaration but Germany's defeat in the First War. (10) (11)


 Briefly, Germany was offering England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: "Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started." England, in the summer of 1916, had no choice. It was either accept this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated.  (12) (13)


While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and said: "Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally." In other words, they made this deal: "We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey." Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever.


 It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain, that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war. However, they did make that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that - I don't know how many here remember it - the United States, which was almost totally pro-German, entered the war as Britain's ally.


The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized why the United States came into the war." The Germans for the first time realized that they had been defeated and suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost.


Mr. Freedman tells us that "Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany", but you can imagine that when the Germans realized what had happened, how they had been set up and betrayed, they naturally resented it. This would be one reason Germans might have felt some antipathy for the Jews. The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that. The Germans then took discriminatory action against the Jews, and shunned them. The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.


 After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933. And they said to Germany: "You fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was. You can't treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you." You can imagine what the Germans told them. So what did the Jews do?


•The Jews Declare War on Germany

All the world's Jews declare war on Germany, with mass demonstrations, boycotts and more.  It may be one of the biggest secrets of World War II that just before the war began, the leadership of the World Jewish Community formally declared war on Germany. This was above and beyond the ongoing 6-year-long economic boycott launched by the worldwide Jewish community when the Nazi party came to power in 1933. As a consequence of this formal declaration of war, Germany thus deemed Jews to be potential enemy agents. (14)

Chaim Weizmann, who was the president of both the International Jewish Agency and the World Zionist Organisation, and later Israel's first President, told British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain (in a letter later published in the London Times on Sept. 6, 1939:


 "I wish to confirm, in the most explicit manner, the declarations which I and my colleagues have made during the last month . . . that the Jews stand behind Great Britain . . .Our urgent desire is to give effect to these declarations (against Germany). . . We are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business."  (15) (16) (17) (18)


 And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. This Jewish boycott of Germany and German goods was so effective that soon no German goods could be found in shops anywhere, given that Jews controlled so much of the importing, wholesale and retail, and also advertising businesses. An executive of the Woolworth Company claimed they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted if anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they were picketed with signs saying "Hitler", "murderer," and so forth.

The Jews organised street protests, in one case involving some 40,000 of them parading in New York, urging everyone to boycott all German goods because the Germans were murderers, cutting the hands off babies, and so on. There is no evidence that any of their claims were true, nor any evidence that up to that point that either Germany or Hitler had persecuted the Jews.


•Rewriting History


 Wikipedia puts a typical spin on this astonishing event: "The Anti-Nazi Boycott of 1933 was a boycott of German products by foreign critics of the Nazi Party in response to 'anti-Semitism' in Nazi Germany." But in fact the boycott began long before German Jews experienced any unpleasantness. In fact, it was their boycott and economic war that finally prompted the backlash.


 For his part, Hitler placed the blame for Germany’s condition upon a Global conspiracy of Marxists and Capitalists. While FDR was implementing all of the Globalists' economic and foreign policy plans, Hitler was openly defying the architects of The New World Order. The Globalists had lost control of Germany, and wanted their revenge because by this time, Germany's unemployment had dropped from 30% to 5% and was rapidly becoming the strongest economy in Europe. According to Hitler, this global conspiracy, directed by Jewish bankers, engineered Germany's loss of The Great War (World War I), the Russian revolution, the Versailles Treaty, and the resulting hyperinflation that devastated Germany. He accused the elite Marxist Jews of Germany of controlling newspapers and banking, fomenting wars, and corrupting the art, culture and morality of Europe. And it wasn't only Hitler making these allegations; the feelings were the same in all countries where the Jews attempted similar revolutions.


 After rising to power, Hitler implemented the following policies:


•Pulled Germany out of the League of Nations

•Banned the Communist Party and arrested its leaders

•Replaced the national Marxist Trade Unions with company unions.

•Established NSDAP as Germany's only political Party

•Refused to make any more reparations payments from the Versailles Treaty/Dawes Plan

•Took control of Germany's Reichsbank away from Warburg/Rothschild bankers and issued German debt-free currency

•Restricted Jewish ownership of radio and newspapers

•Cut taxes and provided tax incentives for mothers to stay at home and raise their children

•Rebuilt German infrastructure and initiated projects like the Autobahn Highway system


A Brief Review of Germany


 According to Benjamin Freedman, the Jews had been treated quite well in Germany until immediately prior to the Second World War - which was also true of Austria, by the way - and it was primarily the combined actions by the Jews during the preceding two decades that turned the country - and Hitler - so firmly against them.


 To review, it was only at the meetings for the Treaty of Versailles when Germany discovered to its great surprise that it had been betrayed by the Jews and was defeated by the US entry to the war, only because the Zionists had made a deal with England to get Palestine. It would be naive to assume this discovery promoted friendship.


 Next, in the aftermath of the war and the impossibility of making reparations payments, Germany's economy crashed with devastating results, including the severe hyperinflation. Germany blamed the Jews in part for its economic distress because prior to the war the economy had been an outstanding success - and would have continued so, if not for the war - which was not Germany's fault. Next, at the crisis point of the economy, many rich Jewish bankers and families took advantage of Germany's plight by buying up a great deal of the economy for pennies. That didn't win many friends either, considering that Germans justifiably blamed the Jews' betrayal for their economic plight.


 Then, the Jews presented an ultimatum to Germany to replace Hitler as Chancellor and reinstate all Jews to their former positions in government and elsewhere - or else. It isn't difficult to understand that Germany, like any country would not take kindly to such an ultimatum. When Germany refused to cooperate, the International Jewry organised and forced a worldwide boycott of all German goods in an openly declared attempt to destroy Germany's economy. In fact, the Jews worldwide declared economic war on Germany. Once again, that move would not be expected to earn many friends.


 And lastly, Germany and Hitler were not unaware of the events that had transpired in Russia, Hungary, Austria, in Germany itself, with respect to the Jewish Communist Revolutions and the actions of the Bolsheviks once in power. And certainly Germans generally could be expected to be aware of the attack on Christianity and the church, and of Bela Kun's outrageous attempts to destroy the morals and family values in his attempt to "destroy society".


 It has been said that in Hitler’s mind, the Second war was not only between countries but was a fight to the death between Communism and Christianity. Whatever else Hitler and the Germans may have been, they were still firm Christians and saw Communism as the destruction of every value that country held dear. And, to repeat, most Communists were Jews. From all this, it isn't difficult to understand that a great deal of resentment must have existed against the Jews by the start of World War II. Pipes (1993, 258) links the Holocaust ultimately to the German perception that the Bolshevik revolution was dominated by Jews and was part of a plan for Jewish world supremacy: "The Jewish Holocaust thus turned out to be one of the many unanticipated and unintended consequences of the Russian Revolution." (19) (20) (21)


It's Even Worse than you Might Think - The Lusitania


 Edward Mandell House, the US President's Jewish "advisor", believed that if the Germans could be baited into sinking a British ship with Americans on board, the US would be drawn into the war. Unknown to its passengers, the luxury liner Lusitania was being used to ship war munitions to England.


 Prior to departure from New York City, the Lusitania was loaded with 600 tons of explosives, 6 million pounds of ammunition, 1,200 cases of shrapnel shells, and about 2,000 passengers. The German Embassy in Washington was made aware of the Lusitania's military cargo and made significant efforts to warn American travelers, embassy officials attempting to place ads in all major US newspapers, ads which were refused by the Jewish-owned media. (22) (23)


As the Lusitania approached the Irish coast, it was ordered to reduce speed, cease its zigzag defensive course and steam straight ahead - and its military escort vessel, Juno, was ordered to withdraw. (24) Churchill knew German U-Boats were in the vicinity, but purposely slowed the Lusitania and called off the Juno, leaving the Lusitania and many of his own countrymen, as sitting ducks. A German torpedo ignited the munitions, causing a secondary explosion which sank the massive liner in about 15 minutes. About 1200 of its nearly 2,000 passengers were killed. The Jewish media of course took advantage of this to vilify Germany, but made no mention of the illegal munitions which actually sank the Lusitania and Germany's efforts to warn civilians of the danger were totally suppressed.


 This wasn't quite the end of the story. After the war, the British and their Jewish collaborators lived in fear the wreckage of the Lusitania might one day be located and the real truth discovered, so the UK military launched a secret expedition to find the remains of the Lusitania and destroy it beyond recognition to prevent the truth from escaping containment. They did locate the wreckage and dropped hundreds of tons of explosives but failed in their attempt. In 2015, Jim Jarrat, a member of the Tritonia Corporation of Glasgow, discovered the location of the Lusitania and during the next several years explored the remains and brought up many items from the wreckage. One of his discoveries was a large number of unexploded munitions surrounding the wreckage, full evidence of the attempted destruction years earlier. Further, his team found lockers labeled "butter" or "cheese" that were still full of munitions being transported by the Lusitania. (25) (26) (27)

In summary, the truth of the matter is that the US government deliberately loaded a passenger liner with thousands of tons of munitions and explosives meant for use against Germany, while taking pains to ensure the Germans were aware of this military cargo, and thus making the Lusitania a legal military target. The German government made great efforts to warn Americans to not sail on this ship, but the Jewish-owned media refused to publish the warnings. The US then boarded the vessel with around 2,000 unwitting passengers and sent them deliberately to their death. To ensure this outcome, the captain of the Lusitania was ordered to reduce speed and travel in a straight line very near the coast where German U-boats would be waiting, and further ordered the Lusitania's military escort to withdraw, leaving the ship openly vulnerable to attack and helpless. The sinking of the Lusitania was then used as the pretext for entry into the war.


 This was neither the first nor the last time the US government willingly sacrificed the lives of its own citizens and military personnel to obtain justification for a declaration of war that had no justification. The US military destroyed the USS Maine in Havana Harbor, killing hundreds of its own men, as an excuse to blame the Cubans and declare war on Spain. For many decades the official explanation was that the source of the explosion was “unknown”, but eventually the truth emerged. The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was essentially the same. The US had complete intelligence on the Japanese fleet and knew precisely its location and the expected time of attack, but refused to warn its base in Pearl Harbor and sacrificed thousands of American lives for the sake of having an excuse to enter World War II on behalf of the Jewish Zionists in Europe. And once again, for many decades the truth was suppressed, but finally today there is undeniable confirmed evidence the US sacrificed thousands of its own citizens as an excuse to declare another war.




(1) https://hofs.online/david-irving-churchills-war/

(2) https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2020/01/13/germanys-war-chapter-4-the-allied-conspiracy-to-instigate-prolong-wwii/

(3) https://thegreateststorynevertold.tv/the-war-criminal-churchill/

(4) https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/schul05.htm

(5) “Germany is getting too strong. We’ve got to smash her.” – Winston Churchill speaking during a private lunch in 1936. Reminiscenses in 1961 of General Robert E. Wood. World War II. By Carl J. Schneider, Dorothy Schneider. Page 15.


(6) “We will force this war upon Hitler, if he wants it or not.” – Winston Churchill (1936 broadcast). “This war is an English war and its goal is the destruction of Germany.” – Winston Churchill (Autumn 1939 broadcast)


(7) “You must understand that this war is not against Hitler or National Socialism, but against the strength of the German people, which is to be smashed once and for all, regardless of whether it is in the hands of Hitler or a Jesuit priest.” – Winston Churchill [1940]; Emrys Hughes, Winston Churchill, His Career in War and Peace p. 45); This book was published in Great Britain in 1950 under the title “Winston Churchill in war and peace.” The American version titled “Winston Churchill: British bulldog :


(8) [Video] A Last Appeal To Reason - Hitler's peace Proposal; https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=12662


(9) http://historyreviewed.best/index.php/jews-started-ww2-it-took-6-years-to-drive-whites-into-ww2-also-jfks-father-spain/


(10) Benjamin Freedman's Speech


(11) Hidden Tyranny.pdf


(12) Zionism and World Wars: When the British War Cabinet decided to accept Germany's peace offer, the World Zionist Organization offered to railroad the United States into the war in Europe as Great Britain's ally if Great Britain promised the Talmudists of the world Palestine as compensation after Germany's defeat with the United States as an ally. https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t941885-3/

(13) The Jewish Hand in the World Wars, Part 1. Having been goaded into war in 1939 by Roosevelt and his Jewish advisors, the British were becoming desperate once again to draw in the Americans. As David Irving reports, it was in late 1941 that Weizmann and his fellow British Zionists began "promising to use their influence in Washington to bring the United States into the war". (2001: 73).


(14) Jewish 1933 Economic Boycott: The Jewish Declaration of War on Germany

(15) The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany: The Economic Boycott of 1933


(16) Treason by German Jews – Jews declare war on Germany shortly after Adolf Hitler came to power and well before any official German government sanctions or reprisals against Jews were carried out. The March 24, 1933 issue of The Daily Express of London.


(17) WORLD WAR 2 - What Is The Real Truth? The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany The Economic Boycott of 1933 Long before the Hitler government began restricting the rights of the German Jews, the leaders of the worldwide Jewish community formally declared war on the "New Germany" at a time when the U.S. government and even the Jewish leaders in Germany were urging caution in dealing with the new Hitler regime.https://www.nairaland.com/1880135/world-war-2-what-real

(18) The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany - The Economic Boycott of 1933; Article from The Barnes Review, Jan./Feb. 2001, pp. 41-45. TBR, 645 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Suite 100, Washington D.C. 20003, USA. By M. Raphael Johnson, Ph.D., assistant editor of TBR; published here with kind permission from TBR. This digitized version © 2002-2019 by The Scriptorium.


(19) https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=42072

(20) https://www.amazon.com/Russia-Under-Bolshevik-Regime-Richard/dp/0679761845

(21) https://alphahistory.com/russianrevolution/historian-richard-pipes/

(22) https://www.amazon.com/Lusitania-Finally-Startling-Fateful-Disasters/dp/0316791784

(23) http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2008/08/lusitania-world-war-i.html

(24) https://alethonews.com/2014/05/08/sinking-the-lusitania-an-act-of-mass-murder-by-the-banksters/

(25) https://www.pbs.org/lostliners/lusitania.html

(26) https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t553951/

(27) https://archive.archaeology.org/0901/trenches/lusitania.html


Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai's Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He can be contacted at: 2186604556@qq.com.

Larry Romanoff is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney's new COVID-19 anthology ''When China Sneezes''.

Larry Fink and His BlackRock Team Poised to Take Over Hellary Clinton's Treasury Department

The Intercept

BlackRock is the world's largest asset management firm, and Fink has assembled a veritable shadow government full of former Treasury Department officials there.

David Dayen
March 2 2016, 2:58 p.m.
Goldman Sachs paid Hillary Clinton $675,000 for three speeches, but an even bigger Wall Street player stands ready to mold and enact her economic and financial policy if she becomes president.

BlackRock is far from a household name, but it is the largest asset management firm in the world, controlling $4.6 trillion in investor funds — about a trillion dollars more than the annual federal budget, and five times the assets of Goldman Sachs. And Larry Fink, BlackRock’s CEO, has assembled a veritable shadow government full of former Treasury Department officials at his company.

Fink has made clear his desire to become treasury secretary someday. The Obama administration had him on the short list  to replace Timothy Geithner. When that didn’t materialize, he pulled several members of prior Treasury Departments into high-level positions at the firm, which may improve the prospects of realizing his dream  in a future Clinton administration.

And his priorities appear to be so in sync with Clinton’s that it’s not entirely clear who shares whose agenda.

Clinton, for her part, has refused to rule out a treasury secretary drawn from Wall Street.

Fink’s ready-made team available for a move from Wall Street to Washington includes:

Christopher Meade, former general counsel at the Treasury Department, who now serves in a similar capacity  at BlackRock. Meade spent 2010 to 2015 at Treasury, with the last three years as general counsel.
Katheryn Rosen, a managing director at BlackRock, who cut her teeth in government as a senior policy adviser to Barney Frank on the House Financial Services Committee, helping to write Dodd-Frank. Frank is an adviser to the Clinton campaign. Rosen went from Frank’s office to a deputy assistant secretary position at Treasury in February 2011, working to build the Financial Stability Oversight Council, the Treasury-led super-regulator monitoring systemic risk. Prior to government work, Rosen spent 14 years as a managing director with JPMorgan Chase.
Kendrick Wilson, a vice chairman at BlackRock  since 2010 who has ties to Goldman Sachs, Lazard, and the Treasury Department. He advised Treasury while it managed the financial crisis and its fallout  in 2008 and 2009, before coming to BlackRock. At Treasury, Wilson brought his experience  advising financial institutions to carry out hastily arranged crisis-era deals, like the merger of Bank of America and failed subprime lender Countrywide.
Michael Pyle, who was a senior adviser  to Lael Brainard when she served as undersecretary to the Treasury for international affairs; he also worked at the White House for the National Economic Council and the Office of Management and Budget. He worked as a director at BlackRock  until at least October 2015 , though he apparently is now an economic policy adviser  to the Clinton campaign.
Fink’s most telling hire, however, is Cheryl Mills, arguably Clinton’s most trusted confidante. Mills was Clinton’s chief of staff at the State Department, was deputy White House counsel in the Bill Clinton administration, and is on the board of directors of the Clinton Foundation . Fink hired Mills for the BlackRock board of directors in October 2013, in what observers mused was a ploy to insinuate himself  into the Clinton inner circle.

Among other BlackRock officials with ties to Clinton: Senior Managing Director Matthew Mallow  is a “Hillblazer ” who has helped raise $100,000 or more in donations. Clinton held a fundraiser earlier this month at Mallow’s New York City home. There is no indication  of Fink himself contributing financially to the Clinton campaign.

It’s worth considering how Fink’s recent experiences might inform his approach at Treasury. Asset management firms invest pools of money into securities on behalf of their clients, which in BlackRock’s case include 94 of the Fortune 100. They don’t issue securities themselves; they just buy stuff.

Asset managers don’t package and sell dodgy financial products like investment banks, and don’t trade with borrowed money like hedge funds, so they are typically viewed as more restrained and less averse to regulation than their colleagues in those related industries.

But they are embedded in the broader financial system as voracious buyers of securities. For example, BlackRock holds major share amounts in nearly every mega-bank, takes funds from scores of Wall Street investors, and manages a majority of the federal government’s bailout programs . They may not create the risk, but they own a lot of it. Fink, who co-created the mortgage-backed security while a trader at First Boston in the 1980s, is a longtime respected figure on Wall Street; Geithner reportedly used him  as a conduit between Treasury and the financial industry.

He also knows how to work the levers of power to achieve his ends.

Whether buy-side firms like BlackRock represent a systemic risk to the financial system is the subject of some debate . Some believe asset managers could trigger problems by failing to pay off counter-parties, or being forced into a fire sale of their assets.

But Fink and BlackRock pushed hard to successfully resist the designationof asset managers as systemically important financial institutions (or SIFIs), which would be subject to additional regulation like larger capital requirements.

Fink also opposes efforts  to reinstitute the Glass-Steagall firewall between investment and commercial banks, as does Clinton.

In fact, Fink’s views on Wall Street are so similar to Clinton’s that it’s hard to see that as a coincidence. Most notably, Clinton’s financial reform plan is mute when it comes to regulating asset management firms as SIFIs.

Fink has in recent months stressed an end to “short-termism ” in the financial markets. For example, he wants to limit share buybacks  that pump up stock prices, and encourage investors to hold stock longer, to focus on long-term corporate performance. Clinton has mirrored this language  to such a degree that the New York Times’ Andrew Ross Sorkin suggested  that Clinton “could have been channeling Laurence D. Fink.”

While the call to end short-termism is in some ways laudable, in Fink’s case it certainly reflects his self-interest. Clinton’s tax plan, for example, would keep capital gains rates higher for short-term holdings and decrease the rate for investors who hold assets over five years. Because BlackRock buys and holds most of its investments, any policy favoring long-term strategies in the markets would improve the firm’s bottom line.

Victor Fleischer, a leading tax lawyer and professor at the University of San Diego, questioned Clinton’s embrace  of the short-termism argument in the New York Times earlier this month, saying it would “do little to address top-end income inequality,” since plenty of wealthy people buy and hold. And Fleischer explicitly worries that the short-termism idea originated from Fink. “I find it hard to shake the feeling that at the end of the day, in a Clinton administration, it would be Larry Fink, not the technocrats, calling the shots,” Fleischer wrote.

Fink has also promoted the privatization  of Social Security, while mocking the idea of retiring at 65, which is easy for a business executive who sits at a desk all day to say, rather than working on an assembly line or as a waiter. Fink owes his initial backing at BlackRock to Pete Peterson , the former commerce secretary who has been at the forefront of the campaign to cut or privatize Social Security. He sat on the steering committee  of the Campaign to Fix the Debt, a stalking horse for Peterson’s ideas.

While Clinton has adamantly pledged not to cut or privatize Social Security benefits, Fink’s track record would cause concern among advocates, were he to obtain a cabinet post. And having a ready-made team of trusted advisers who know their way around the Treasury building and the players in a potential Clinton West Wing can only help Fink in that campaign.


Mint Press on United Against Nuclear Iran, yet another neocon advocacy group.

January 19, 2024/0 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald
Mint Press dissects United Against Nuclear Iran, a neocon advocacy group that clearly wants to destroy Iran because of its hostility toward Israel. These are excerpts. As usual with neocon groups, the money and most of the work is performed by Jews but they recruit a lot of sympathetic non-Jews, like Jeb Bush, in order to diffuse the reality that it is a pro-Israel organization. The entire article is well worth reading.

By Alan McLeod


For such a large, well-financed, and influential organization filled with senior officials, United Against Nuclear [UANI] Iran keeps its funding sources very quiet. However, in 2015, Clifton was able to obtain a UANI donor list for the 2013 financial year. By far and away, the largest funders were billionaire New York-based investor Thomas Kaplan and multibillionaire Israeli-American casino mogul Sheldon Adelson.

Kaplan, whose $843,000 donation supplied around half the group’s 2013 funding, is a venture capitalist investor concentrating on metals, particularly gold. He is the chairman of Tigris Financial and the Electrum Group LLC. Both of Kaplan’s firms employ UANI CEO Mark Wallace as CEO and COO, respectively.

A 2010 Wall Street Journal article titled “Tigris Financial Goes All-in on Gold” noted that the company had bet billions of dollars on the price of gold rising, more than the reserves of the Brazilian central bank. As Clifton has noted, both Kaplan and Wallace have marketed gold to clients as the perfect commodity to hold if there is increased instability in the Middle East. Therefore, both Kaplan and Wallace stand to make massive sums if the U.S. or Israel were to attack Iran, making their UANI warmongering a gigantic and potentially profitable conflict of interest.

Adelson provided the majority of the rest of UANI’s funding. The world’s 18th-richest individual at the time of his 2021 death, the tycoon turned his economic empire into a political one, supporting ultraconservative causes in both the United States and Israel. Between 2010 and 2020, he and his wife donated more than $500 million to the Republican Party, becoming GOP kingmakers in the process. He would often vet Republican presidential candidates at his casino in Las Vegas, and it was often said that this “Adelson Primary” was almost as important as the public one.

An ardent Zionist, Adelson bankrolled numerous pro-Israel lobby projects, such as AIPAC, One Jerusalem and Taglit Birthright. He also owned Israel Hayom, the country’s most-read newspaper, with 31% of the national share. Relentlessly pro-Netanyahu, it was said that the Israeli prime minister asked his friend Adelson to set up a newspaper to help his political career.

Adelson and his influence have been one of the driving forces of American hostility towards Iran. In 2013, during a conversation with Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, he called for the United States to stop negotiating and drop a nuclear bomb on Iran to show that “we mean business.”

A potential third, even more controversial, source of funding is the Gulf monarchies of Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Leaked emails show UANI officials soliciting support from the Emirati royal family. Both Mark Wallace and Frances Townsend, for example, emailed the Emirati Ambassador to the U.S. detailing cost estimates for upcoming events and inquiring about support from the UAE.

Thomas Kaplan himself is extraordinarily close to the nation. “The country and the leadership of the UAE, I would say, are my closest partners in more facets of my life than anyone else other than my wife,” he told the Emirati outlet, The National News, which also detailed his friendship with Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed.

Thomas Kaplan chats with UAE monarch Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed
Thomas Kaplan chats with UAE monarch Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed. Credit | Brunswick PR
One of United Against Nuclear Iran’s primary activities, Iranian political commenter Ali Alizadeh told MintPress, is to create a worldwide “culture of fear and anxiety for investing in Iran.” The group attempts to persuade businesses to divest from the Islamic Republic and sign their certification pledge, which reads as follows:

The undersigned [Name], the [Title] of [Company] (the “Company”), does hereby certify on behalf of the Company that until the Iranian regime verifiably abandons its drive for nuclear weapons, support for terrorism, routine human rights violations, hostage-taking, and rampant anti-Americanism as state policy, that neither the Company nor any subsidiary or affiliate of the Company, directly or through an agent, representative or intermediary.”

One corporation that UANI targeted was the industrial machinery firm Caterpillar. UANI hectored the firm, even erecting a roadside billboard outside its headquarters in Peoria, IL, insinuating that they were aiding Iran in constructing a nuclear weapon. Caterpillar quickly ordered its Iran projects terminated. Wallace took heart from his group’s victory and warned that other businesses would be targeted.

United Against Nuclear Iran
A billboard erected by United Against Nuclear Iran near Caterpillar’s Illinois headquarters. Photo | United Against Nuclear Iran
These have included French companies such as Airbus and ​​Peugeot-Citroen, who were threatened with legal action. In 2019, UANI earned an official rebuke from the Russian Foreign Ministry for attempting to intimidate Russian corporations trading with Tehran. “We think such actions are unacceptable and deeply concerning,” said Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova. “Attempts to pressure and threaten Russian business … are a follow-up on the dishonorable anti-Iranian cause by the U.S. administration,” she added, hinting at collusion between the government and the supposedly non-governmental organization.

Some of UANI’s campaigns have been markedly petty, including pressuring New York City hotels to cancel bookings with Iranian officials (including then-President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad) visiting the city on United Nations business. Others, however, have been devastating to the Iranian economy, such as the SWIFT international money transfer terminating its relationship with Tehran, cutting the country off from the global banking system.

On UANI’s actions against businesses, Freeman said: “It’s effective, and (in some cases, at least) it’s to the detriment of the people of Iran; it’s to the detriment of these companies; and it’s to the detriment of peace in the region.”

While the group presents itself as against a nuclear Iran, UANI was strangely opposed to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) — the deal between Iran and the West that limited the former’s nuclear technology research in exchange for sanctions relief from the latter. [Not so strange. UANI et al. want Iran destroyed.] As MintPress reported at the time, UANI spent millions on T.V. advertisements trashing the agreement. As Wallace noted, “We have a multi-million-dollar budget, and we are in it for the long haul. Money continues to pour in.”

 After the JCPOA was signed, UANI hosted a summit attended by senior Israeli, Emirati, and Bahraini officials, touting its failures. Once UANI’s John Bolton was named Donald Trump’s National Security Advisor, he persuaded the president to withdraw entirely from the deal. Bolton has deep connections to the Mojahedin-e-Khalq (MEK), an exiled Iranian political group widely identified as a terrorist organization. He has, for some time, considered them a government in waiting after the U.S. overthrows the current administration. “Before 2019, we will celebrate in Tehran,” he told the group in 2018, predicting that, with him at the helm, the Trump administration would soon cause the downfall of the Iranian government.
Bolton has long been a hardliner on regime change. “To stop Iran’s bomb, bomb Iran,” read the title of his 2015 New York Times op-ed. Yet this appears to be the dominant position at UANI. In March, Ross published an article in The Atlantic headlined “Iran needs to believe America’s threat,” which demanded that the U.S. “take forceful action to check Tehran’s progress toward a nuclear bomb.” Failure to do so, Ross claimed, would provoke Israel to do so itself – a “much more dangerous scenario,” according to him. Yet only two years previously, Ross called on the U.S. to “give Israel a big bomb” to “deter Iran,” noting that the “best way” to stop the Iranian nuclear program was to supply Israel with its own nukes, thereby taken as a given that Iran was indeed pursuing nuclear weapons itself (a highly questionable claim at the time) and ignoring Israel’s already existing 200+ stockpile of nuclear missiles.

“It doesn’t seem like UANI ever really took seriously the possibility of a diplomatic means to constrain Iran from continuing to increase its enrichment levels and moving towards a nuclear weapon,” Clifton told MintPress. “As a matter of fact, they generally fought tooth and nail against the JCPOA. They are eager to push the United States toward confrontation with Iran using the possibility of Iranian nuclear weapons as a reason,” he added.

UANI’s funders certainly also have extensive connections to Israel. Kaplan is the son-in-law of Israeli billionaire Leon Recanati and is said to be close with Prime Ministers Naftali Bennet and Yair Lapid. He has also employed a number of Israeli officials at his businesses. An example of this is Olivia Blechner, who, in 2007, left her role as the Director of Academic Affairs at the Israeli Consulate General in New York to become Executive Vice-President of Investor Relations and Research at Kaplan’s Electrum Group – a rather perplexing career move.

Adelson, meanwhile, was given what amounted to an official state funeral in Israel, one that even Prime Minister Netanyahu attended. He was buried on the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem – one of the holiest sites in Judaism and an honor that very few figures receive.


While United Against Nuclear Iran is already a notable enough organization, it is actually merely part of a large group of shadowy non-governmental groups working to cause unrest and, ultimately, regime change in Iran. These groups all share overlapping goals, funders and key individuals.

One example of this is the Counter Extremism Project (CEP), a non-profit that purports to exist to “combat the growing threat posed by extremist ideologies.” Yet the group focuses largely on Islamist extremism – and only those groups that are enemies of the U.S., Israel and the Gulf Monarchies (about whose extremism and violence the CEP has nothing to say). Ten members of the CEP’s leadership council are also on UANI’s board, including Wallace, who is CEO of both organizations.

Another group headed by Wallace is the Jewish Committee to Support Women Life Freedom in Iran. This organization claims to be focused on improving women’s rights in Iran. It very quickly, however, divulges that this is a vehicle for regime change. On its homepage, for example, it writes:

These freedom fighters continue with no sign of relenting on their calls for regime change. Calls for “Woman Life Freedom” and the removal of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei echo from rooftops, down street corridors, across campus hallways, and on government billboards. These brave Iranians have expressed their hatred for the ruling clerics not only in their words, but in their actions.”

Seven members of the Jewish Committee to Support Women Life Freedom in Iran’s steering group – including Wallace and Kaplan – also lead UANI.

Kaplan is well-known as a conservationist. However, his group, Panthera, which works to preserve the world’s 40 known species of big cats, has also been accused of being a secret regime change operation. Panthera has a number of UANI officials on its board or conservation council, including Wallace and Lamb (the ex-director of U.K. Special Forces and Commander of the British Army). Also on the council are Itzhak Dar, former Director of the Israeli Secret Service, Shin Bet, and General David Petraeus, former CIA Director and Commander of the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan.

In 2018, Iranian authorities arrested eight individuals working with Panthera inside the country. All eight were convicted of spying on behalf of the U.S. and Israel. While many in the West decried the trials as politically motivated, any organization led by these figures is bound to cause suspicions.

This is especially the case as Wallace is also a founder of PaykanArtCar, an organization that attempts to use art to, in its words, “advocate for the restoration of human rights and dignity for all in Iran.” All three team members of PaykanArtCar also work at UANI.

The final group in this Iran regime change network is the International Convention for the Future of Iran. Set up by Wallace himself, the organization’s website explains that it exists to “end the repression of the regime and bring true change to Iran.” Further purposes are to “connect the Iranian opposition in exile [i.e., the MEK] with policymakers in the United States and internationally” and to “offer program grants and technical support” to groups working to overthrow the government. However, judging by the lack of updates and the group’s Twitter profile having only 31 followers, it appears that it has not had much success achieving its goals.

In short, then, there exists a network of American NGOs with the mission statements of helping Iran, opposing Iran, preserving Iran, and bombing Iran, all staffed by largely the same ex-U.S. government officials.

But United Against Nuclear Iran is eager to escalate the situation to a vastly greater level [than the present sanctions regime], urging Washington to attack a well-armed country of nearly 90 million people, erroneously claiming that Iran is behind every Hamas or Hezbollah action. “This is not a nuclear non-proliferation organization” Clifton said, noting that there are plenty of genuine already existing peace and environmental groups worried about nuclear weapons that either supported the JCPOA or said it did not go far enough. “Their focus is more on working towards regime change in Iran rather than actually supporting efforts that might prevent Iranian nuclear weapons,” he added.

IF UANI gets its way, a conflict with Iran might spark a Third World War. And yet they are receiving virtually no pushback to their ultra-hawkish pronouncements, largely because they operate in the shadows and receive virtually no public scrutiny. It is, therefore, imperative for all those who value peace to quickly change that and expose the organization for what it is.

Alan MacLeod is Senior Staff Writer for MintPress News. After completing his PhD in 2017, he published two books, Bad News From Venezuela: Twenty Years of Fake News and Misreporting and Propaganda in the Information Age: Still Manufacturing Consent, as well as a number of academic articles. He has also contributed to FAIR.org, The Guardian, Salon, The Grayzone, Jacobin Magazine, and Common Dreams.


British and Mossad Crazies Behind the ‘Bomb Iran’ Trigger for World War III
October 24, 2023 . 9:33 PM  4 min read

We republish here Richard Freeman’s research from his slug of Oct. 13 on the “United Against a Nuclear Iran” crazies. Sen. Lindsey Graham’s recent and dangerous rants on the central necessity to bomb Iran to solve the Israel-Gaza crisis serves as the excuse to revisit this research.

UANI Calls for Missile Strikes on Iran that Would Push the World ‘Off the Charts,’ Toward Nuclear War

Oct. 13, 2023 (EIRNS)—The United Against a Nuclear Iran (UANI), which may be the leading international organization calling for an all-out war on Iran, issued a statement Oct. 9, calling for the United States, along with Israel, and its allies, to launch strikes against military and intelligence targets in Iran, including those of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The IRGC is a branch of the Iranian armed forces.

On Oct. 11, Helga Zepp-LaRouche told an international webcast, that with respect to the Israeli-Hamas confrontation, “the danger now is that a very bloody conflict will play out with the potential of going beyond the region, leading to world war, because if it involves Iran, I think we are off the charts.”

UANI, created in 2008, is dominated by an Advisory Board, which is led by an alliance of British intelligence and British Special Forces (including SAS) and directors of the Mossad, Israel’s national intelligence agency. It also includes American neocons, such as former National Security Advisor John Bolton.

UANI interfaces closely with the Mojahedin-e-Khalq (MEK), about which the Aug. 7, 2023 Tehran Times reported, “the MEK continues to perpetrate terrorist actions in Iran for the overthrow of the Islamic Republic.”

UANI released a press statement Oct. 9, through its chairman, former U.S. Sen. Joseph Lieberman:

“Without Iran’s support, there would be no Hamas. Without Iran’s support, Hamas could not have attacked Israel the way it has. Without Iran’s support, Russia would not be killing as many Ukrainians as they are. Without Iran’s support, missiles and drones would not have fallen on our allies in the Arab world….

“It is time to hold Iran accountable. While Israel must act to punish, weaken, and ultimately destroy Hamas, the critical military targets that enabled the horrific events in Israel are in Iran.

“We call on our government in Washington, together with Israel, and our allies around the world to launch strikes against military and intelligence targets in Iran, including Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) sites, and missile and drone bases, where Iran’s proxy and partner network is trained.”

A look at its Advisory Board shows the dominating role of the British and Israelis, who dominate UANI’s thinking and policy.

Some of the members of the UANI Advisory Board from Britain:

Lord Charles Guthrie: Guthrie served, from 2000-2011, as Colonel Commandant (director) of the Special Air Service (SAS), a special forces unit of the British Army (like, but more extensive than the Green Berets). The SAS is notorious for covert surveillance, close-combat fighting, and dirty operations that can be used to destabilize and overthrow


This is why the Zio-Anglo-American Axis is so determined to wage war against Russia.

STRATFOR Founder/CEO George Friedman Leaves Private Intelligence Agency After Giving Bombshell Presentation on Russia

State of the Nation

On February 3, 2015, STRATFOR Founder and CEO George Friedman made an egregious and fatal mistake…in public!

While speaking before the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, Friedman revealed what no Intel operative has ever exposed.  The quite telling title of his speech was “Europe: Destined for Conflict?”.

Throughout the course of his nearly 2-hour talk and Q&A, Friedman divulged highly privileged information about the secret strategies routinely employed by the leadership of the Zio-Anglo-American Axis in order to maintain global hegemony.

The stunning disclosures made by the STRATFOR Chief Intelligence Officer were as unprecedented as they were astonishing.  Truly, Friedman’s unparalleled release of what really amounts to highly classified information (read: radioactive) was a defining moment in modern history.

Here’s a video which captures the most important parts of Friedman’s utterly reprehensible presentation: Former Stratfor CEO George Friedman really lost it during his speech on “Europe: Destined for Conflict?” (Video).

Resignation tendered shortly after Chicago fiasco

What follows is a screenshot from the Chicago Council on Global Affairs website indicating the Tuesday 02/03/15 date that he gave his fateful talk.

The screenshot posted below was taken from George Friedman’s Wikipedia page.  It indicates that he resigned (some say forced to resign) in May of 2015 as CEO and Chief Intelligence Officer of STRATFOR, the private intelligence firm that he founded (see 3rd paragraph below).

Although many commentators have offered various theories as to why such a monumental blunder was made, there’s no question that Friedman was NOT in his right mind.  However, one perceptive armchair political analyst made the following insightful observation.

“If you have read the Protocols of the Elders of Zion this Friedman
“faux-pas” could fall under the heading of “Shouting the Zionist Goals
from the Roof Tops”. It is a tactic of legitimizing their snake-like evil by announcing it beforehand in order to paralyze the rabbit before
devouring it.”              

While this theory may have some validity, it’s more likely that old George simply lost it that evening—totally lost it!   Having been lulled into his apparent grandiosity through decades of CIA propagandizing about Pax Americana, he appeared to believe that he was completely immune to any blowback.  It was that false sense of being insulated, along with the hubris of American exceptionalism, that set up “Chicago’s night of infamy” and his subsequent dismissal.

In order to better understand the profundity of Friedman’s extraordinary errors in judgment, the following analysis provides an excellent breakdown.

STRATFOR Chief Reveals Zio-Anglo-American Plot For World Domination

The preceding exposé makes it crystal clear “why the Anglo-American Axis is so determined to wage war against Russia”.  For those initiated into the Great Game, however, there’s a much more important back story which must also be understood.  As follows: What’s really behind all the fabricated anti-Russia hysteria?

The global geopolitical chessboard is currently being played out on many levels, some call it 5D chess, but in reality it’s beyond 12D.  In point of fact, what the whole world is now witnessing is the final battle between the forces of light and the forces of darkness.

The following 13-part series only scratches the surface of this “War of the Titans” currently being waged across the planet.

Part I — The Latest and Biggest Battle Between East and West Converges in the Ukraine

Part II — Locus Of Global Power Shifts From The West To The East

Part III — Vladimir Putin’s Russia: Perfect Foil To The Anglo-American Axis And Their New World ‘Order’ 

Part IV — Anglo-American Axis Wages Financial/Economic War Against Russia

Part V — WORLD WAR III: Anglo-American Axis vs. BRICS Alliance

Part VI — Putin’s Russia: Nemesis of the New World Order

Part VII —  The USA: Military Arm Of The New World Order

Part VIII — STRATFOR Chief Reveals Zio-Anglo-American Plot For World Domination

Part IX — Prometheism: The Backbone of the NWO Strategy to Isolate and Conquer Russia

Part X — Putin Goes Ballistic In Syria, Obliterates The USA’s Secret ‘Mideast Strategy’

Part XI  Putin’s Russia Relentlessly Attacked By Deep State

Part XII — It wasn’t Russia that tried to fix the 2016 U.S. presidential election; it was the British.

Part XIII — What’s really behind all the fabricated anti-Russia hysteria? 

Part IX — RUSSOPHOBIA: The Zio-Anglo-American Conspiracy to Conquer Russia Unravels in Real Time

The more educated and enlightened about these crucial matters, the more able patriots everywhere are to address them successfully.

The bottom line is that it really does all come down to Russia, just as world-renowned psychic and modern-day prophet Edgar Cayce accurately pointed out.

Through Russia, Cayce said “comes the hope of the world. Not in respect to what is sometimes termed Communism or Bolshevism — no! But freedom — freedom! That each man will live for his fellow man. The principle has been born there. It will take years for it to be crystallized; yet out of Russia comes again the hope of the world.”
(Source: PROPHETIC: Edgar Cayce – ‘Russia – The Hope Of The World’)

� 2018 All Rights Reserved. All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. We are not responsible for content written by and hosted on third-party websites. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. We assume no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners. .......Tags: "israel nuked wtc" 9-11 Truth jfk assassination "cultural marxism" "holocaust hoax" "fake news" "fake history" fed censorship "mind control" tavistock holohoax auschwitz deep state kabbalah talmud bush obama clinton trump russiagate spygate israel britain saudi arabia middle east rothschild cold war comey brennan clapper yellow vests populism nuclear demolition communism marxism socialism pedophiliacontact: info@newsfollowup.com