What Does A
Rothschild, A Goldman Sachs Top Lawyer And A CIA Agent
Have In Common?
2ND SMARTEST GUY IN THE WORLD
APR 30, 2023
Aside from rigging the stock market, sucking the life out of
the debt-slave tax mules, dismantling Main Street,
destroying society, perpetrating PSYOP-19, and all of the
various other Crimes Against Humanity…they also happened to
have all been in on Epstein’s child sex trafficking program.
Jeffrey Epstein, center, and clockwise from top right:
Ariane de Rothschild, William Burns, Joshua Cooper Ramo,
Noam Chomsky, Kathryn Ruemmler and Leon Botstein.
Epstein was in bed with Ruemmler and Ariane de Rothschild,
current CEO of the Swiss private bank Edmond de Rothschild
Group.
According to the Wall Street Journal, De Rothschild met with
Epstein over a dozen times:
In September 2013, Epstein asked Mrs. de Rothschild in an
email for help finding a new assistant,
“female…multilingual, organized.”
“I’ll ask around,” Mrs. de Rothschild emailed back.
She bought nearly $1 million worth of auction items on
Epstein’s behalf in 2014 and 2015, the documents show.
Mrs. de Rothschild was named chairwoman of the bank in
January 2015. That October, she and Epstein negotiated a $25
million contract for Epstein’s Southern Trust Co. to provide
“risk analysis and the application and use of certain
algorithms” for the bank, according to a proposal reviewed
by the Journal.
In 2019, after Epstein was arrested, the bank said that Mrs.
de Rothschild never met with Epstein and it had no business
links with him.
The Rothschild dynastic banking family makes the top 100
Forbes “richest” people in the world look like paupers, and
that is with their combined wealth multiplied by a hundred.
Of course, this family had direct ties with a pedophile
running one of the Intelligence Industrial Complex’s largest
blackmail nodes. Rest assured, this is certainly not the
first time in this family’s dark history that they have
engaged in such deviant operations.
One of the most important Rockefeller assets that backed
Klaus Schwab and was for all intents and purposes the actual
creator of the WEF is Henry Kissinger. It is no wonder then
that Joshua Cooper Ramo, co-chief executive of Henry
Kissinger’s corporate consulting firm, was also aiding and
abetting Epstein.
CIA creation and Manchurian Candidate extraordinaire Barack
Hussein Obama, married to a transsexual, aficionado of
walnut sauces and other pedo code terms disguised as pizza
and hotdog toppings as per the FBI, whose mother also
happened to be a prostitute and CIA asset as well as his
actual Marxist father Frank Marshall Davis, is also
indirectly — for now — tied into the Epstein network
vis-à-vis his White House attorney Kathryn Ruemmler. During
her tenure with the radical community disorganizer and
installed president, Kathryn Ruemmler had dozens of meetings
with Epstein.
As a reward for her crimes, Kathryn Ruemmler was gifted a
job by the banksters at the Vampire Squid financial
institution, which also happens to be one of the owners of
the Federal Reserve “bank:”
As a top lawyer at Goldman Sachs, Kathryn Ruemmler was very
close with Epstein:
He asked for avocado sushi rolls to be on hand when meeting
with Ms. Ruemmler, according to the documents. He visited
apartments she was considering buying. In October 2014,
Epstein knew her travel plans and told an assistant to look
into her flight. “See if there is a first class seat,” he
wrote, “if so upgrade her.”
As a reminder, all these friendly business interactions were
after Epstein’s 2006 pedo conviction.
But Kathryn Ruemmler is now exceedingly contrite, stating:
I regret ever knowing Jeffrey Epstein.
In 2014, when current CIA director William Burns was Obama’s
deputy secretary of state he partook in three meetings with
Epstein.
Mr. Burns, 67 years old, a career diplomat and former
ambassador to Russia, had meetings with Epstein in 2014 when
Mr. Burns was deputy secretary of state.
A lunch was planned that August at the office of law firm
Steptoe & Johnson in Washington. Epstein scheduled two
evening appointments that September with Mr. Burns at his
townhouse, the documents show. After one of the scheduled
meetings, Epstein planned for his driver to take Mr. Burns
to the airport.
Mr. Burns recalls being introduced in Washington by a mutual
friend, and meeting Epstein once briefly in New York, said
Ms. Thorp. “The director does not recall any further
contact, including receiving a ride to the airport,” she
said.
One month after meeting with Epstein, Burns stepped down
from the his government position to serve as president of
the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace think tank.
The Carnegie crime syndicate is partners with the
Rockefeller and Rothschild crime syndicates who in turn work
closely with the unconstitutional CIA.
Thus, it makes perfect sense that a careerist gov grifter
and pedo enabler like Burns was in early 2021 nominated to
serve as CIA director by the installed senile diaper
soiling, ice cream licking, pedo criminal puppet Biden;
which, for all intents and purposes, is Obama’s third term.
And what does the CIA director’s spokeswoman have say about
his relationship with Epstein post factum?
"The director did not know anything about him, other than
that he was introduced as an expert in the financial
services sector and offered general advice on transition to
the private sector," she said, adding "They had no
relationship."
Of course, the government has less than zero business
meddling in the private sector, but we digress.
Thanks to researcher Whitney Webb’s work, we also now know
that Epstein was an important member of the shadowy Mega
Group:
“The Jeffrey Epstein Scandal: Too Big to Fail,” have focused
on the widespread nature of sexual blackmail operations in
recent American history and their ties to the heights of
American political power and the U.S. intelligence
community, one key aspect of Epstein’s own sex-trafficking
and blackmail operation that warrants examination is
Epstein’s ties to Israeli intelligence and his ties to the
“informal” pro-Israel philanthropist faction known as “the
Mega Group.”
[…]
The Mega Group — a secretive group of billionaires to which
Lauder belongs — was formed in 1991 by Charles Bronfman and
Leslie Wexner, the latter of whom has received considerable
media scrutiny following the July arrest of his former
protege Jeffrey Epstein. Media profiles of the group paint
it as “a loosely organized club of 20 of the nation’s
wealthiest and most influential Jewish businessmen” focused
on “philanthropy and Jewishness,” with membership dues
upwards of $30,000 per year. Yet several of its most
prominent members have ties to organized crime.
Mega Group members founded and/or are closely associated
with some of the most well-known pro-Israel organizations.
For instance, members Charles Bronfman and Michael
Steinhardt formed Birthright Taglit with the backing of
then- and current Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Steinhardt, an atheist, has stated that his motivation in
helping to found the group was to advance his own belief
that devotion to and faith in the state of Israel should
serve as “a substitute for [Jewish] theology.”
Other well-known groups associated with the Mega Group
include the World Jewish Congress — whose past president,
Edgar Bronfman, and current president, Ronald Lauder, are
both Mega Group members — and B’nai B’rith, particularly its
spin-off known as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). The
Bronfman brothers were major donors to the ADL, with Edgar
Bronfman serving as the ADL’s honorary national vice-chair
for several years.
Source: MEGA GROUP, MAXWELLS AND MOSSAD: THE SPY STORY AT
THE HEART OF THE JEFFREY EPSTEIN SCANDAL
Is it also any wonder that the WSJ article referenced former
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak?:
Mr. Ramo also was invited to a breakfast at the townhouse in
September 2013 with former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud
Barak, another regular guest, the documents show.
To recap, a Mossad agent masquerading as Prime Minister,
Kissinger’s right hand man Ramo, a Rothschild, various
Carnegie and Rockefeller operatives, the CIA, Obama, and his
various coconspirators were all in on the child sex
trafficking scheme.
Mr. Barak also met Epstein in 2015 with Mr. Chomsky, now 94,
a linguistics professor and political activist who has been
critical of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy.
Mr. Chomsky said Epstein arranged the meeting with Mr. Barak
for them to discuss “Israel’s policies with regard to
Palestinian issues and the international arena.”
Mr. Barak said he often met with Epstein on trips to New
York and was introduced to people such as Mr. Ramo and Mr.
Chomsky to discuss geopolitics or other topics. “He often
brought other interesting persons, from art or culture, law
or science, finance, diplomacy or philanthropy,” Mr. Barak
said.
Let’s not even get into Chomsky, who is nothing more than a
hypocrite Marxist himself.
Given that Joe Biden is a lifelong pedophile as evidenced by
his own daughter’s damning diary entries as well as
innumerable CSPAN snippets of inappropriate hair sniffing
and touching of children, and that domestic terrorist and
CIA operator Bill Ayer’s protégé Barack Hussein Obama was
for a brief time a gay gigolo working Washington, DC, is
married to a man, and whose mother and father led sexually
deviant lives, and that so many high-ranking government
positions are filled with sexually compromised perverts, one
may easily conclude that the illegitimate Federal government
along with its unconstitutional agencies, their bankster
partners in crime, and criminal orgs like the UN, WEF, WHO,
CFR, et al. are all comprised of compromised sickos.
Which is also why mentally ill gov apparatchiks like health
secretary and no op tranny Rachel Levin are pushing for the
mutilation and sterilization of America’s children; this
posthuman technocommunist agenda is all by design, dating
all the way back to the Fabian Society.
Warning: Graphic Images.
And if for whatever reason you had any doubts about any of
the above claims, here are leaked CIA images of Obama’s
mother in her element:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The Jewish Betrayal of
Germany and the Cause of World War II
By LARRY ROMANOFF – October 14, 2020
The true origins of the two World Wars form a crucial part
of our modern history, the truths of which have been deleted
from all our history books and replaced with mythology
blaming Germany. This article is a minor attempt to set
straight part of the record. From the Introduction to the
article 'The Anger Campaign Against China' (which should be
read as a companion piece to this article):
"It shouldn’t be a secret, though it still seems to be, that
neither of the two World Wars were started (or desired) by
Germany, but were the creation of a group of European
Zionist Jews with the stated intent of the total destruction
of Germany. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) The main purpose of
this essay is to demonstrate not only that ‘history repeats
itself’ but that the history being repeated today is a mass
grooming of the Western world’s people (but most especially
Americans) in preparation for World War III – which I
believe is now imminent."
For one, it involves the treachery of the Zionist Jews
in betraying Germany - which had been a rather happy home
for the Jews - and scheming to obtain Palestine in trade for
that betrayal. For another, few people seem aware that the
Jews openly declared a worldwide war on Germany, well before
the Second World War, the economic consequences of which
were quite severe. The stated intention, by organising a
worldwide boycott of all German goods, was to destroy
Germany's economy and starve to death one-third of Germany's
population - as punishment for refusing to bow to a Jewish
ultimatum to fire Hitler (Germany's Chancellor) and to
reinstate all Jews to their former government positions.
Jews cannot escape the accusation that they themselves were
responsible for the resentment within Germany against their
own people.
March 1938 Headline: UK Newspaper Boss Writes that Jewish
Influence may Drive Britain into War with Germany
Lord Beaverbrook was the most prominent newspaper
magnate in the UK, and his Daily Express was at the time the
most widely read newspaper in the world. In a private letter
written in 1938, Lord Beaverbrook voiced concern over
powerful Jewish influences that were determined to push
England into a war with Germany. In that letter, Beaverbrook
wrote:
"There are 20,000 German Jews in England – in the
professions, pursuing research. They all work against an
accommodation with Germany." In a subsequent letter he
stated further that "The Jews have got a big position in the
press here. . . At last I am shaken. The Jews may drive us
into war." (8) (9)
•The Betrayal
We offer here some quotes from a speech made by Benjamin
Freedman, a Jew who was high in the US structure and was
personally present at all these events. You can read here
his Speech that outlines in much detail the events that led
to not only the Balfour Declaration but Germany's defeat in
the First War. (10) (11)
Briefly, Germany was offering England a negotiated
peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That
means: "Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it
was before the war started." England, in the summer of 1916,
had no choice. It was either accept this negotiated peace
that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on
with the war and being totally defeated. (12) (13)
While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who
represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the
British War Cabinet and said: "Look here. You can yet win
this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to
accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany.
You can win this war if the United States will come in as
your ally." In other words, they made this deal: "We will
get the United States into this war as your ally. The price
you must pay is Palestine after you have won the war and
defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey." Now England
had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the
United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any
reason whatsoever.
It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain, that never
had any connection or any interest or any right in what is
known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to
pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the
war. However, they did make that promise, in October of
1916. And shortly after that - I don't know how many here
remember it - the United States, which was almost totally
pro-German, entered the war as Britain's ally.
The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up
Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations who
claimed a right to a certain part of European territory,
said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for
the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour
Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized why
the United States came into the war." The Germans for the
first time realized that they had been defeated and suffered
the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them,
because the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to
get it at any cost.
Mr. Freedman tells us that "Up to that time, the Jews had
never been better off in any country in the world than they
had been in Germany", but you can imagine that when the
Germans realized what had happened, how they had been set up
and betrayed, they naturally resented it. This would be one
reason Germans might have felt some antipathy for the Jews.
The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want
the world to really understand that they had sold out
Germany, and that the Germans resented that. The Germans
then took discriminatory action against the Jews, and
shunned them. The same way that we would shun the Chinese,
or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country
who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our
defeat.
After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting
in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended
this meeting in July 1933. And they said to Germany: "You
fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former
position, whether he was a Communist or no matter what he
was. You can't treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the
world, are serving an ultimatum upon you." You can imagine
what the Germans told them. So what did the Jews do?
•The Jews Declare War on Germany
All the world's Jews declare war on Germany, with mass
demonstrations, boycotts and more. It may be one of
the biggest secrets of World War II that just before the war
began, the leadership of the World Jewish Community formally
declared war on Germany. This was above and beyond the
ongoing 6-year-long economic boycott launched by the
worldwide Jewish community when the Nazi party came to power
in 1933. As a consequence of this formal declaration of war,
Germany thus deemed Jews to be potential enemy agents. (14)
Chaim Weizmann, who was the president of both the
International Jewish Agency and the World Zionist
Organisation, and later Israel's first President, told
British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain (in a letter
later published in the London Times on Sept. 6, 1939:
"I wish to confirm, in the most explicit manner, the
declarations which I and my colleagues have made during the
last month . . . that the Jews stand behind Great Britain .
. .Our urgent desire is to give effect to these declarations
(against Germany). . . We are going to starve them into
surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against
them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon
their export business." (15) (16) (17) (18)
And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food
supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported
with the proceeds of what they exported. So if Germany could
not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to
starve. This Jewish boycott of Germany and German goods was
so effective that soon no German goods could be found in
shops anywhere, given that Jews controlled so much of the
importing, wholesale and retail, and also advertising
businesses. An executive of the Woolworth Company claimed
they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and
dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted if
anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany,"
they were picketed with signs saying "Hitler", "murderer,"
and so forth.
The Jews organised street protests, in one case involving
some 40,000 of them parading in New York, urging everyone to
boycott all German goods because the Germans were murderers,
cutting the hands off babies, and so on. There is no
evidence that any of their claims were true, nor any
evidence that up to that point that either Germany or Hitler
had persecuted the Jews.
•Rewriting History
Wikipedia puts a typical spin on this astonishing
event: "The Anti-Nazi Boycott of 1933 was a boycott of
German products by foreign critics of the Nazi Party in
response to 'anti-Semitism' in Nazi Germany." But in fact
the boycott began long before German Jews experienced any
unpleasantness. In fact, it was their boycott and economic
war that finally prompted the backlash.
For his part, Hitler placed the blame for Germany’s
condition upon a Global conspiracy of Marxists and
Capitalists. While FDR was implementing all of the
Globalists' economic and foreign policy plans, Hitler was
openly defying the architects of The New World Order. The
Globalists had lost control of Germany, and wanted their
revenge because by this time, Germany's unemployment had
dropped from 30% to 5% and was rapidly becoming the
strongest economy in Europe. According to Hitler, this
global conspiracy, directed by Jewish bankers, engineered
Germany's loss of The Great War (World War I), the Russian
revolution, the Versailles Treaty, and the resulting
hyperinflation that devastated Germany. He accused the elite
Marxist Jews of Germany of controlling newspapers and
banking, fomenting wars, and corrupting the art, culture and
morality of Europe. And it wasn't only Hitler making these
allegations; the feelings were the same in all countries
where the Jews attempted similar revolutions.
After rising to power, Hitler implemented the
following policies:
•Pulled Germany out of the League of Nations
•Banned the Communist Party and arrested its leaders
•Replaced the national Marxist Trade Unions with company
unions.
•Established NSDAP as Germany's only political Party
•Refused to make any more reparations payments from the
Versailles Treaty/Dawes Plan
•Took control of Germany's Reichsbank away from
Warburg/Rothschild bankers and issued German debt-free
currency
•Restricted Jewish ownership of radio and newspapers
•Cut taxes and provided tax incentives for mothers to stay
at home and raise their children
•Rebuilt German infrastructure and initiated projects like
the Autobahn Highway system
A Brief Review of Germany
According to Benjamin Freedman, the Jews had been
treated quite well in Germany until immediately prior to the
Second World War - which was also true of Austria, by the
way - and it was primarily the combined actions by the Jews
during the preceding two decades that turned the country -
and Hitler - so firmly against them.
To review, it was only at the meetings for the Treaty
of Versailles when Germany discovered to its great surprise
that it had been betrayed by the Jews and was defeated by
the US entry to the war, only because the Zionists had made
a deal with England to get Palestine. It would be naive to
assume this discovery promoted friendship.
Next, in the aftermath of the war and the
impossibility of making reparations payments, Germany's
economy crashed with devastating results, including the
severe hyperinflation. Germany blamed the Jews in part for
its economic distress because prior to the war the economy
had been an outstanding success - and would have continued
so, if not for the war - which was not Germany's fault.
Next, at the crisis point of the economy, many rich Jewish
bankers and families took advantage of Germany's plight by
buying up a great deal of the economy for pennies. That
didn't win many friends either, considering that Germans
justifiably blamed the Jews' betrayal for their economic
plight.
Then, the Jews presented an ultimatum to Germany to
replace Hitler as Chancellor and reinstate all Jews to their
former positions in government and elsewhere - or else. It
isn't difficult to understand that Germany, like any country
would not take kindly to such an ultimatum. When Germany
refused to cooperate, the International Jewry organised and
forced a worldwide boycott of all German goods in an openly
declared attempt to destroy Germany's economy. In fact, the
Jews worldwide declared economic war on Germany. Once again,
that move would not be expected to earn many friends.
And lastly, Germany and Hitler were not unaware of the
events that had transpired in Russia, Hungary, Austria, in
Germany itself, with respect to the Jewish Communist
Revolutions and the actions of the Bolsheviks once in power.
And certainly Germans generally could be expected to be
aware of the attack on Christianity and the church, and of
Bela Kun's outrageous attempts to destroy the morals and
family values in his attempt to "destroy society".
It has been said that in Hitler’s mind, the Second war
was not only between countries but was a fight to the death
between Communism and Christianity. Whatever else Hitler and
the Germans may have been, they were still firm Christians
and saw Communism as the destruction of every value that
country held dear. And, to repeat, most Communists were
Jews. From all this, it isn't difficult to understand that a
great deal of resentment must have existed against the Jews
by the start of World War II. Pipes (1993, 258) links the
Holocaust ultimately to the German perception that the
Bolshevik revolution was dominated by Jews and was part of a
plan for Jewish world supremacy: "The Jewish Holocaust thus
turned out to be one of the many unanticipated and
unintended consequences of the Russian Revolution." (19)
(20) (21)
It's Even Worse than you Might Think - The Lusitania
Edward Mandell House, the US President's Jewish
"advisor", believed that if the Germans could be baited into
sinking a British ship with Americans on board, the US would
be drawn into the war. Unknown to its passengers, the luxury
liner Lusitania was being used to ship war munitions to
England.
Prior to departure from New York City, the Lusitania
was loaded with 600 tons of explosives, 6 million pounds of
ammunition, 1,200 cases of shrapnel shells, and about 2,000
passengers. The German Embassy in Washington was made aware
of the Lusitania's military cargo and made significant
efforts to warn American travelers, embassy officials
attempting to place ads in all major US newspapers, ads
which were refused by the Jewish-owned media. (22) (23)
As the Lusitania approached the Irish coast, it was ordered
to reduce speed, cease its zigzag defensive course and steam
straight ahead - and its military escort vessel, Juno, was
ordered to withdraw. (24) Churchill knew German U-Boats were
in the vicinity, but purposely slowed the Lusitania and
called off the Juno, leaving the Lusitania and many of his
own countrymen, as sitting ducks. A German torpedo ignited
the munitions, causing a secondary explosion which sank the
massive liner in about 15 minutes. About 1200 of its nearly
2,000 passengers were killed. The Jewish media of course
took advantage of this to vilify Germany, but made no
mention of the illegal munitions which actually sank the
Lusitania and Germany's efforts to warn civilians of the
danger were totally suppressed.
This wasn't quite the end of the story. After the war,
the British and their Jewish collaborators lived in fear the
wreckage of the Lusitania might one day be located and the
real truth discovered, so the UK military launched a secret
expedition to find the remains of the Lusitania and destroy
it beyond recognition to prevent the truth from escaping
containment. They did locate the wreckage and dropped
hundreds of tons of explosives but failed in their attempt.
In 2015, Jim Jarrat, a member of the Tritonia Corporation of
Glasgow, discovered the location of the Lusitania and during
the next several years explored the remains and brought up
many items from the wreckage. One of his discoveries was a
large number of unexploded munitions surrounding the
wreckage, full evidence of the attempted destruction years
earlier. Further, his team found lockers labeled "butter" or
"cheese" that were still full of munitions being transported
by the Lusitania. (25) (26) (27)
In summary, the truth of the matter is that the US
government deliberately loaded a passenger liner with
thousands of tons of munitions and explosives meant for use
against Germany, while taking pains to ensure the Germans
were aware of this military cargo, and thus making the
Lusitania a legal military target. The German government
made great efforts to warn Americans to not sail on this
ship, but the Jewish-owned media refused to publish the
warnings. The US then boarded the vessel with around 2,000
unwitting passengers and sent them deliberately to their
death. To ensure this outcome, the captain of the Lusitania
was ordered to reduce speed and travel in a straight line
very near the coast where German U-boats would be waiting,
and further ordered the Lusitania's military escort to
withdraw, leaving the ship openly vulnerable to attack and
helpless. The sinking of the Lusitania was then used as the
pretext for entry into the war.
This was neither the first nor the last time the US
government willingly sacrificed the lives of its own
citizens and military personnel to obtain justification for
a declaration of war that had no justification. The US
military destroyed the USS Maine in Havana Harbor, killing
hundreds of its own men, as an excuse to blame the Cubans
and declare war on Spain. For many decades the official
explanation was that the source of the explosion was
“unknown”, but eventually the truth emerged. The Japanese
attack on Pearl Harbor was essentially the same. The US had
complete intelligence on the Japanese fleet and knew
precisely its location and the expected time of attack, but
refused to warn its base in Pearl Harbor and sacrificed
thousands of American lives for the sake of having an excuse
to enter World War II on behalf of the Jewish Zionists in
Europe. And once again, for many decades the truth was
suppressed, but finally today there is undeniable confirmed
evidence the US sacrificed thousands of its own citizens as
an excuse to declare another war.
Notes
(1) https://hofs.online/david-irving-churchills-war/
(2)
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2020/01/13/germanys-war-chapter-4-the-allied-conspiracy-to-instigate-prolong-wwii/
(3)
https://thegreateststorynevertold.tv/the-war-criminal-churchill/
(4)
https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/schul05.htm
(5) “Germany is getting too strong. We’ve got to smash her.”
– Winston Churchill speaking during a private lunch in 1936.
Reminiscenses in 1961 of General Robert E. Wood. World War
II. By Carl J. Schneider, Dorothy Schneider. Page 15.
https://www.gettextbooks.com/author/Dorothy_Schneider
(6) “We will force this war upon Hitler, if he wants it or
not.” – Winston Churchill (1936 broadcast). “This war is an
English war and its goal is the destruction of Germany.” –
Winston Churchill (Autumn 1939 broadcast)
https://winstonchurchill.org/the-life-of-churchill/wilderness-years/1935-1939/autumn-1939-age-65/
(7) “You must understand that this war is not against Hitler
or National Socialism, but against the strength of the
German people, which is to be smashed once and for all,
regardless of whether it is in the hands of Hitler or a
Jesuit priest.” – Winston Churchill [1940]; Emrys Hughes,
Winston Churchill, His Career in War and Peace p. 45); This
book was published in Great Britain in 1950 under the title
“Winston Churchill in war and peace.” The American version
titled “Winston Churchill: British bulldog :
https://www.worldcat.org/title/winston-churchill-british-bulldog-his-career-in-war-and-peace/oclc/560251297
(8) [Video] A Last Appeal To Reason - Hitler's peace
Proposal; https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=12662
https://www.bitchute.com/video/0LmAeUHZzAV5/
(9)
http://historyreviewed.best/index.php/jews-started-ww2-it-took-6-years-to-drive-whites-into-ww2-also-jfks-father-spain/
http://tomatobubble.com/id587.html
(10) Benjamin Freedman's Speech
https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/10/jewish-responsibility-for-both-world.html
(11) Hidden Tyranny.pdf
https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/10/zionism-hidden-tiranny-by-benjamin-h.html
(12) Zionism and World Wars: When the British War Cabinet
decided to accept Germany's peace offer, the World Zionist
Organization offered to railroad the United States into the
war in Europe as Great Britain's ally if Great Britain
promised the Talmudists of the world Palestine as
compensation after Germany's defeat with the United States
as an ally. https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t941885-3/
(13) The Jewish Hand in the World Wars, Part 1. Having been
goaded into war in 1939 by Roosevelt and his Jewish
advisors, the British were becoming desperate once again to
draw in the Americans. As David Irving reports, it was in
late 1941 that Weizmann and his fellow British Zionists
began "promising to use their influence in Washington to
bring the United States into the war". (2001: 73).
http://themillenniumreport.com/2019/08/the-jewish-hand-in-the-world-wars-part-1/
(14) Jewish 1933 Economic Boycott: The Jewish Declaration of
War on Germany
(15) The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany: The
Economic Boycott of 1933
https://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html
(16) Treason by German Jews – Jews declare war on Germany
shortly after Adolf Hitler came to power and well before any
official German government sanctions or reprisals against
Jews were carried out. The March 24, 1933 issue of The Daily
Express of London.
https://www.germanvictims.com/2019/03/treason-by-german-jews-jews-declare-war-on-germany-march-24-1933/
(17) WORLD WAR 2 - What Is The Real Truth? The Jewish
Declaration of War on Nazi Germany The Economic Boycott of
1933 Long before the Hitler government began restricting the
rights of the German Jews, the leaders of the worldwide
Jewish community formally declared war on the "New Germany"
at a time when the U.S. government and even the Jewish
leaders in Germany were urging caution in dealing with the
new Hitler
regime.https://www.nairaland.com/1880135/world-war-2-what-real
(18) The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany - The
Economic Boycott of 1933; Article from The Barnes Review,
Jan./Feb. 2001, pp. 41-45. TBR, 645 Pennsylvania Ave SE,
Suite 100, Washington D.C. 20003, USA. By M. Raphael
Johnson, Ph.D., assistant editor of TBR; published here with
kind permission from TBR. This digitized version © 2002-2019
by The Scriptorium.
https://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html
(19) https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=42072
(20)
https://www.amazon.com/Russia-Under-Bolshevik-Regime-Richard/dp/0679761845
(21)
https://alphahistory.com/russianrevolution/historian-richard-pipes/
(22)
https://www.amazon.com/Lusitania-Finally-Startling-Fateful-Disasters/dp/0316791784
(23)
http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2008/08/lusitania-world-war-i.html
(24)
https://alethonews.com/2014/05/08/sinking-the-lusitania-an-act-of-mass-murder-by-the-banksters/
(25) https://www.pbs.org/lostliners/lusitania.html
(26) https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t553951/
(27)
https://archive.archaeology.org/0901/trenches/lusitania.html
*
Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and
businessman. He has held senior executive positions in
international consulting firms, and owned an international
import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at
Shanghai's Fudan University, presenting case studies in
international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff
lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten
books generally related to China and the West. He can be
contacted at: 2186604556@qq.com.
Larry Romanoff is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia
McKinney's new COVID-19 anthology ''When China Sneezes''.
Larry Fink and His
BlackRock Team Poised to Take Over Hellary Clinton's
Treasury Department
The Intercept
BlackRock is the world's largest asset management firm,
and Fink has assembled a veritable shadow government full
of former Treasury Department officials there.
David Dayen
March 2 2016, 2:58 p.m.
Goldman Sachs paid Hillary Clinton $675,000 for three
speeches, but an even bigger Wall Street player stands
ready to mold and enact her economic and financial policy
if she becomes president.
BlackRock is far from a household name, but it is the
largest asset management firm in the world, controlling
$4.6 trillion in investor funds — about a trillion dollars
more than the annual federal budget, and five times the
assets of Goldman Sachs. And Larry Fink, BlackRock’s CEO,
has assembled a veritable shadow government full of former
Treasury Department officials at his company.
Fink has made clear his desire to become treasury
secretary someday. The Obama administration had him on the
short list to replace Timothy Geithner. When that
didn’t materialize, he pulled several members of prior
Treasury Departments into high-level positions at the
firm, which may improve the prospects of realizing his
dream in a future Clinton administration.
And his priorities appear to be so in sync with Clinton’s
that it’s not entirely clear who shares whose agenda.
Clinton, for her part, has refused to rule out a treasury
secretary drawn from Wall Street.
Fink’s ready-made team available for a move from Wall
Street to Washington includes:
Christopher Meade, former general counsel at the Treasury
Department, who now serves in a similar capacity at
BlackRock. Meade spent 2010 to 2015 at Treasury, with the
last three years as general counsel.
Katheryn Rosen, a managing director at BlackRock, who cut
her teeth in government as a senior policy adviser to
Barney Frank on the House Financial Services Committee,
helping to write Dodd-Frank. Frank is an adviser to the
Clinton campaign. Rosen went from Frank’s office to a
deputy assistant secretary position at Treasury in
February 2011, working to build the Financial Stability
Oversight Council, the Treasury-led super-regulator
monitoring systemic risk. Prior to government work, Rosen
spent 14 years as a managing director with JPMorgan Chase.
Kendrick Wilson, a vice chairman at BlackRock since
2010 who has ties to Goldman Sachs, Lazard, and the
Treasury Department. He advised Treasury while it managed
the financial crisis and its fallout in 2008 and
2009, before coming to BlackRock. At Treasury, Wilson
brought his experience advising financial
institutions to carry out hastily arranged crisis-era
deals, like the merger of Bank of America and failed
subprime lender Countrywide.
Michael Pyle, who was a senior adviser to Lael
Brainard when she served as undersecretary to the Treasury
for international affairs; he also worked at the White
House for the National Economic Council and the Office of
Management and Budget. He worked as a director at
BlackRock until at least October 2015 , though he
apparently is now an economic policy adviser to the
Clinton campaign.
Fink’s most telling hire, however, is Cheryl Mills,
arguably Clinton’s most trusted confidante. Mills was
Clinton’s chief of staff at the State Department, was
deputy White House counsel in the Bill Clinton
administration, and is on the board of directors of the
Clinton Foundation . Fink hired Mills for the BlackRock
board of directors in October 2013, in what observers
mused was a ploy to insinuate himself into the
Clinton inner circle.
Among other BlackRock officials with ties to Clinton:
Senior Managing Director Matthew Mallow is a
“Hillblazer ” who has helped raise $100,000 or more in
donations. Clinton held a fundraiser earlier this month at
Mallow’s New York City home. There is no indication
of Fink himself contributing financially to the Clinton
campaign.
It’s worth considering how Fink’s recent experiences might
inform his approach at Treasury. Asset management firms
invest pools of money into securities on behalf of their
clients, which in BlackRock’s case include 94 of the
Fortune 100. They don’t issue securities themselves; they
just buy stuff.
Asset managers don’t package and sell dodgy financial
products like investment banks, and don’t trade with
borrowed money like hedge funds, so they are typically
viewed as more restrained and less averse to regulation
than their colleagues in those related industries.
But they are embedded in the broader financial system as
voracious buyers of securities. For example, BlackRock
holds major share amounts in nearly every mega-bank, takes
funds from scores of Wall Street investors, and manages a
majority of the federal government’s bailout programs .
They may not create the risk, but they own a lot of it.
Fink, who co-created the mortgage-backed security while a
trader at First Boston in the 1980s, is a longtime
respected figure on Wall Street; Geithner reportedly used
him as a conduit between Treasury and the financial
industry.
He also knows how to work the levers of power to achieve
his ends.
Whether buy-side firms like BlackRock represent a systemic
risk to the financial system is the subject of some debate
. Some believe asset managers could trigger problems by
failing to pay off counter-parties, or being forced into a
fire sale of their assets.
But Fink and BlackRock pushed hard to successfully resist
the designationof asset managers as systemically important
financial institutions (or SIFIs), which would be subject
to additional regulation like larger capital requirements.
Fink also opposes efforts to reinstitute the
Glass-Steagall firewall between investment and commercial
banks, as does Clinton.
In fact, Fink’s views on Wall Street are so similar to
Clinton’s that it’s hard to see that as a coincidence.
Most notably, Clinton’s financial reform plan is mute when
it comes to regulating asset management firms as SIFIs.
Fink has in recent months stressed an end to
“short-termism ” in the financial markets. For example, he
wants to limit share buybacks that pump up stock
prices, and encourage investors to hold stock longer, to
focus on long-term corporate performance. Clinton has
mirrored this language to such a degree that the New
York Times’ Andrew Ross Sorkin suggested that
Clinton “could have been channeling Laurence D. Fink.”
While the call to end short-termism is in some ways
laudable, in Fink’s case it certainly reflects his
self-interest. Clinton’s tax plan, for example, would keep
capital gains rates higher for short-term holdings and
decrease the rate for investors who hold assets over five
years. Because BlackRock buys and holds most of its
investments, any policy favoring long-term strategies in
the markets would improve the firm’s bottom line.
Victor Fleischer, a leading tax lawyer and professor at
the University of San Diego, questioned Clinton’s
embrace of the short-termism argument in the New
York Times earlier this month, saying it would “do little
to address top-end income inequality,” since plenty of
wealthy people buy and hold. And Fleischer explicitly
worries that the short-termism idea originated from Fink.
“I find it hard to shake the feeling that at the end of
the day, in a Clinton administration, it would be Larry
Fink, not the technocrats, calling the shots,” Fleischer
wrote.
Fink has also promoted the privatization of Social
Security, while mocking the idea of retiring at 65, which
is easy for a business executive who sits at a desk all
day to say, rather than working on an assembly line or as
a waiter. Fink owes his initial backing at BlackRock to Pete Peterson , the former commerce
secretary who has been at the forefront of the campaign to
cut or privatize Social Security. He sat on the steering
committee of the Campaign to Fix the Debt, a
stalking horse for Peterson’s ideas.
While Clinton has adamantly pledged not to cut or
privatize Social Security benefits, Fink’s track record
would cause concern among advocates, were he to obtain a
cabinet post. And having a ready-made team of trusted
advisers who know their way around the Treasury building
and the players in a potential Clinton West Wing can only
help Fink in that campaign.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mint Press on
United Against Nuclear Iran, yet another neocon advocacy
group.
January 19, 2024/0 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald
Mint Press dissects United Against Nuclear Iran, a neocon
advocacy group that clearly wants to destroy Iran because
of its hostility toward Israel. These are excerpts. As
usual with neocon groups, the money and most of the work
is performed by Jews but they recruit a lot of sympathetic
non-Jews, like Jeb Bush, in order to diffuse the reality
that it is a pro-Israel organization. The entire article
is well worth reading.
By Alan McLeod
CONFLICTS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
For such a large, well-financed, and influential
organization filled with senior officials, United Against
Nuclear [UANI] Iran keeps its funding sources very quiet.
However, in 2015, Clifton was able to obtain a UANI donor
list for the 2013 financial year. By far and away, the
largest funders were billionaire New York-based investor
Thomas Kaplan and multibillionaire Israeli-American casino
mogul Sheldon Adelson.
Kaplan, whose $843,000 donation supplied around half the
group’s 2013 funding, is a venture capitalist investor
concentrating on metals, particularly gold. He is the
chairman of Tigris Financial and the Electrum Group LLC.
Both of Kaplan’s firms employ UANI CEO Mark Wallace as CEO
and COO, respectively.
A 2010 Wall Street Journal article titled “Tigris
Financial Goes All-in on Gold” noted that the company had
bet billions of dollars on the price of gold rising, more
than the reserves of the Brazilian central bank. As
Clifton has noted, both Kaplan and Wallace have marketed
gold to clients as the perfect commodity to hold if there
is increased instability in the Middle East. Therefore,
both Kaplan and Wallace stand to make massive sums if the
U.S. or Israel were to attack Iran, making their UANI
warmongering a gigantic and potentially profitable
conflict of interest.
Adelson provided the majority of the rest of UANI’s
funding. The world’s 18th-richest individual at the time
of his 2021 death, the tycoon turned his economic empire
into a political one, supporting ultraconservative causes
in both the United States and Israel. Between 2010 and
2020, he and his wife donated more than $500 million to
the Republican Party, becoming GOP kingmakers in the
process. He would often vet Republican presidential
candidates at his casino in Las Vegas, and it was often
said that this “Adelson Primary” was almost as important
as the public one.
An ardent Zionist, Adelson bankrolled numerous pro-Israel
lobby projects, such as AIPAC, One Jerusalem and Taglit
Birthright. He also owned Israel Hayom, the country’s
most-read newspaper, with 31% of the national share.
Relentlessly pro-Netanyahu, it was said that the Israeli
prime minister asked his friend Adelson to set up a
newspaper to help his political career.
Adelson and his influence have been one of the driving
forces of American hostility towards Iran. In 2013, during
a conversation with Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, he called for
the United States to stop negotiating and drop a nuclear
bomb on Iran to show that “we mean business.”
A potential third, even more controversial, source of
funding is the Gulf monarchies of Saudi Arabia and the
UAE. Leaked emails show UANI officials soliciting support
from the Emirati royal family. Both Mark Wallace and
Frances Townsend, for example, emailed the Emirati
Ambassador to the U.S. detailing cost estimates for
upcoming events and inquiring about support from the UAE.
Thomas Kaplan himself is extraordinarily close to the
nation. “The country and the leadership of the UAE, I
would say, are my closest partners in more facets of my
life than anyone else other than my wife,” he told the
Emirati outlet, The National News, which also detailed his
friendship with Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, Sheikh Mohamed
bin Zayed.
Thomas Kaplan chats with UAE monarch Sheikh Mohamed bin
Zayed
Thomas Kaplan chats with UAE monarch Sheikh Mohamed bin
Zayed. Credit | Brunswick PR
PUTTING IRAN IN THE CROSSHAIRS
One of United Against Nuclear Iran’s primary activities,
Iranian political commenter Ali Alizadeh told MintPress,
is to create a worldwide “culture of fear and anxiety for
investing in Iran.” The group attempts to persuade
businesses to divest from the Islamic Republic and sign
their certification pledge, which reads as follows:
The undersigned [Name], the [Title] of [Company] (the
“Company”), does hereby certify on behalf of the Company
that until the Iranian regime verifiably abandons its
drive for nuclear weapons, support for terrorism, routine
human rights violations, hostage-taking, and rampant
anti-Americanism as state policy, that neither the Company
nor any subsidiary or affiliate of the Company, directly
or through an agent, representative or intermediary.”
One corporation that UANI targeted was the industrial
machinery firm Caterpillar. UANI hectored the firm, even
erecting a roadside billboard outside its headquarters in
Peoria, IL, insinuating that they were aiding Iran in
constructing a nuclear weapon. Caterpillar quickly ordered
its Iran projects terminated. Wallace took heart from his
group’s victory and warned that other businesses would be
targeted.
United Against Nuclear Iran
A billboard erected by United Against Nuclear Iran near
Caterpillar’s Illinois headquarters. Photo | United
Against Nuclear Iran
These have included French companies such as Airbus and
Peugeot-Citroen, who were threatened with legal action.
In 2019, UANI earned an official rebuke from the Russian
Foreign Ministry for attempting to intimidate Russian
corporations trading with Tehran. “We think such actions
are unacceptable and deeply concerning,” said Foreign
Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova. “Attempts to
pressure and threaten Russian business … are a follow-up
on the dishonorable anti-Iranian cause by the U.S.
administration,” she added, hinting at collusion between
the government and the supposedly non-governmental
organization.
Some of UANI’s campaigns have been markedly petty,
including pressuring New York City hotels to cancel
bookings with Iranian officials (including then-President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad) visiting the city on United Nations
business. Others, however, have been devastating to the
Iranian economy, such as the SWIFT international money
transfer terminating its relationship with Tehran, cutting
the country off from the global banking system.
On UANI’s actions against businesses, Freeman said: “It’s
effective, and (in some cases, at least) it’s to the
detriment of the people of Iran; it’s to the detriment of
these companies; and it’s to the detriment of peace in the
region.”
While the group presents itself as against a nuclear Iran,
UANI was strangely opposed to the Joint Comprehensive Plan
of Action (JCPOA) — the deal between Iran and the West
that limited the former’s nuclear technology research in
exchange for sanctions relief from the latter. [Not so
strange. UANI et al. want Iran destroyed.] As MintPress
reported at the time, UANI spent millions on T.V.
advertisements trashing the agreement. As Wallace noted,
“We have a multi-million-dollar budget, and we are in it
for the long haul. Money continues to pour in.”
After the JCPOA was signed, UANI hosted a summit
attended by senior Israeli, Emirati, and Bahraini
officials, touting its failures. Once UANI’s John Bolton
was named Donald Trump’s National Security Advisor, he
persuaded the president to withdraw entirely from the
deal. Bolton has deep connections to the Mojahedin-e-Khalq
(MEK), an exiled Iranian political group widely identified
as a terrorist organization. He has, for some time,
considered them a government in waiting after the U.S.
overthrows the current administration. “Before 2019, we
will celebrate in Tehran,” he told the group in 2018,
predicting that, with him at the helm, the Trump
administration would soon cause the downfall of the
Iranian government.
Bolton has long been a hardliner on regime change. “To
stop Iran’s bomb, bomb Iran,” read the title of his 2015
New York Times op-ed. Yet this appears to be the dominant
position at UANI. In March, Ross published an article in
The Atlantic headlined “Iran needs to believe America’s
threat,” which demanded that the U.S. “take forceful
action to check Tehran’s progress toward a nuclear bomb.”
Failure to do so, Ross claimed, would provoke Israel to do
so itself – a “much more dangerous scenario,” according to
him. Yet only two years previously, Ross called on the
U.S. to “give Israel a big bomb” to “deter Iran,” noting
that the “best way” to stop the Iranian nuclear program
was to supply Israel with its own nukes, thereby taken as
a given that Iran was indeed pursuing nuclear weapons
itself (a highly questionable claim at the time) and
ignoring Israel’s already existing 200+ stockpile of
nuclear missiles.
“It doesn’t seem like UANI ever really took seriously the
possibility of a diplomatic means to constrain Iran from
continuing to increase its enrichment levels and moving
towards a nuclear weapon,” Clifton told MintPress. “As a
matter of fact, they generally fought tooth and nail
against the JCPOA. They are eager to push the United
States toward confrontation with Iran using the
possibility of Iranian nuclear weapons as a reason,” he
added.
…
UANI’s funders certainly also have extensive connections
to Israel. Kaplan is the son-in-law of Israeli billionaire
Leon Recanati and is said to be close with Prime Ministers
Naftali Bennet and Yair Lapid. He has also employed a
number of Israeli officials at his businesses. An example
of this is Olivia Blechner, who, in 2007, left her role as
the Director of Academic Affairs at the Israeli Consulate
General in New York to become Executive Vice-President of
Investor Relations and Research at Kaplan’s Electrum Group
– a rather perplexing career move.
Adelson, meanwhile, was given what amounted to an official
state funeral in Israel, one that even Prime Minister
Netanyahu attended. He was buried on the Mount of Olives
in Jerusalem – one of the holiest sites in Judaism and an
honor that very few figures receive.
A NETWORK OF REGIME CHANGE GROUPS
While United Against Nuclear Iran is already a notable
enough organization, it is actually merely part of a large
group of shadowy non-governmental groups working to cause
unrest and, ultimately, regime change in Iran. These
groups all share overlapping goals, funders and key
individuals.
One example of this is the Counter Extremism Project
(CEP), a non-profit that purports to exist to “combat the
growing threat posed by extremist ideologies.” Yet the
group focuses largely on Islamist extremism – and only
those groups that are enemies of the U.S., Israel and the
Gulf Monarchies (about whose extremism and violence the
CEP has nothing to say). Ten members of the CEP’s
leadership council are also on UANI’s board, including
Wallace, who is CEO of both organizations.
Another group headed by Wallace is the Jewish Committee to
Support Women Life Freedom in Iran. This organization
claims to be focused on improving women’s rights in Iran.
It very quickly, however, divulges that this is a vehicle
for regime change. On its homepage, for example, it
writes:
These freedom fighters continue with no sign of relenting
on their calls for regime change. Calls for “Woman Life
Freedom” and the removal of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali
Khamenei echo from rooftops, down street corridors, across
campus hallways, and on government billboards. These brave
Iranians have expressed their hatred for the ruling
clerics not only in their words, but in their actions.”
Seven members of the Jewish Committee to Support Women
Life Freedom in Iran’s steering group – including Wallace
and Kaplan – also lead UANI.
…
Kaplan is well-known as a conservationist. However, his
group, Panthera, which works to preserve the world’s 40
known species of big cats, has also been accused of being
a secret regime change operation. Panthera has a number of
UANI officials on its board or conservation council,
including Wallace and Lamb (the ex-director of U.K.
Special Forces and Commander of the British Army). Also on
the council are Itzhak Dar, former Director of the Israeli
Secret Service, Shin Bet, and General David Petraeus,
former CIA Director and Commander of the U.S. invasion of
Afghanistan.
In 2018, Iranian authorities arrested eight individuals
working with Panthera inside the country. All eight were
convicted of spying on behalf of the U.S. and Israel.
While many in the West decried the trials as politically
motivated, any organization led by these figures is bound
to cause suspicions.
This is especially the case as Wallace is also a founder
of PaykanArtCar, an organization that attempts to use art
to, in its words, “advocate for the restoration of human
rights and dignity for all in Iran.” All three team
members of PaykanArtCar also work at UANI.
The final group in this Iran regime change network is the
International Convention for the Future of Iran. Set up by
Wallace himself, the organization’s website explains that
it exists to “end the repression of the regime and bring
true change to Iran.” Further purposes are to “connect the
Iranian opposition in exile [i.e., the MEK] with
policymakers in the United States and internationally” and
to “offer program grants and technical support” to groups
working to overthrow the government. However, judging by
the lack of updates and the group’s Twitter profile having
only 31 followers, it appears that it has not had much
success achieving its goals.
In short, then, there exists a network of American NGOs
with the mission statements of helping Iran, opposing
Iran, preserving Iran, and bombing Iran, all staffed by
largely the same ex-U.S. government officials.
…
But United Against Nuclear Iran is eager to escalate the
situation to a vastly greater level [than the present
sanctions regime], urging Washington to attack a
well-armed country of nearly 90 million people,
erroneously claiming that Iran is behind every Hamas or
Hezbollah action. “This is not a nuclear non-proliferation
organization” Clifton said, noting that there are plenty
of genuine already existing peace and environmental groups
worried about nuclear weapons that either supported the
JCPOA or said it did not go far enough. “Their focus is
more on working towards regime change in Iran rather than
actually supporting efforts that might prevent Iranian
nuclear weapons,” he added.
IF UANI gets its way, a conflict with Iran might spark a
Third World War. And yet they are receiving virtually no
pushback to their ultra-hawkish pronouncements, largely
because they operate in the shadows and receive virtually
no public scrutiny. It is, therefore, imperative for all
those who value peace to quickly change that and expose
the organization for what it is.
Alan MacLeod is Senior Staff Writer for MintPress News.
After completing his PhD in 2017, he published two books,
Bad News From Venezuela: Twenty Years of Fake News and
Misreporting and Propaganda in the Information Age: Still
Manufacturing Consent, as well as a number of academic
articles. He has also contributed to FAIR.org, The
Guardian, Salon, The Grayzone, Jacobin Magazine, and
Common Dreams.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
British and Mossad Crazies Behind the ‘Bomb Iran’ Trigger
for World War III
RICHARD FREEMAN
EIR
October 24, 2023 . 9:33 PM 4 min read
We republish here Richard Freeman’s research from his slug
of Oct. 13 on the “United Against a Nuclear Iran” crazies.
Sen. Lindsey Graham’s recent and dangerous rants on the
central necessity to bomb Iran to solve the Israel-Gaza
crisis serves as the excuse to revisit this research.
UANI Calls for Missile Strikes on Iran that Would Push the
World ‘Off the Charts,’ Toward Nuclear War
Oct. 13, 2023 (EIRNS)—The United Against a Nuclear Iran
(UANI), which may be the leading international organization
calling for an all-out war on Iran, issued a statement Oct.
9, calling for the United States, along with Israel, and its
allies, to launch strikes against military and intelligence
targets in Iran, including those of the Islamic
Revolutionary Guard Corps. The IRGC is a branch of the
Iranian armed forces.
On Oct. 11, Helga Zepp-LaRouche told an international
webcast, that with respect to the Israeli-Hamas
confrontation, “the danger now is that a very bloody
conflict will play out with the potential of going beyond
the region, leading to world war, because if it involves
Iran, I think we are off the charts.”
UANI, created in 2008, is dominated by an Advisory Board,
which is led by an alliance of British intelligence and
British Special Forces (including SAS) and directors of the
Mossad, Israel’s national intelligence agency. It also
includes American neocons, such as former National Security
Advisor John Bolton.
UANI interfaces closely with the Mojahedin-e-Khalq (MEK),
about which the Aug. 7, 2023 Tehran Times reported, “the MEK
continues to perpetrate terrorist actions in Iran for the
overthrow of the Islamic Republic.”
UANI released a press statement Oct. 9, through its
chairman, former U.S. Sen. Joseph Lieberman:
“Without Iran’s support, there would be no Hamas. Without
Iran’s support, Hamas could not have attacked Israel the way
it has. Without Iran’s support, Russia would not be killing
as many Ukrainians as they are. Without Iran’s support,
missiles and drones would not have fallen on our allies in
the Arab world….
“It is time to hold Iran accountable. While Israel must act
to punish, weaken, and ultimately destroy Hamas, the
critical military targets that enabled the horrific events
in Israel are in Iran.
“We call on our government in Washington, together with
Israel, and our allies around the world to launch strikes
against military and intelligence targets in Iran, including
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) sites, and missile
and drone bases, where Iran’s proxy and partner network is
trained.”
A look at its Advisory Board shows the dominating role of
the British and Israelis, who dominate UANI’s thinking and
policy.
Some of the members of the UANI Advisory Board from Britain:
Lord Charles Guthrie: Guthrie served, from 2000-2011, as
Colonel Commandant (director) of the Special Air Service
(SAS), a special forces unit of the British Army (like, but
more extensive than the Green Berets). The SAS is notorious
for covert surveillance, close-combat fighting, and dirty
operations that can be used to destabilize and overthrow
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This
is why the Zio-Anglo-American Axis is so determined to
wage war against Russia.
STRATFOR
Founder/CEO George Friedman Leaves Private Intelligence
Agency After Giving Bombshell Presentation on Russia
State
of the Nation
On
February 3, 2015, STRATFOR Founder
and CEO George Friedman made an egregious and fatal
mistake…in public!
While
speaking before the Chicago
Council on Global Affairs, Friedman revealed what
no Intel operative has ever exposed. The quite
telling title of his speech was “Europe:
Destined for Conflict?”.
Throughout
the course of his nearly 2-hour talk and Q&A,
Friedman divulged highly privileged information about
the secret strategies routinely employed by the
leadership of the Zio-Anglo-American Axis in order to
maintain global hegemony.
The
stunning disclosures made by the STRATFOR Chief
Intelligence Officer were as unprecedented as they were
astonishing. Truly, Friedman’s unparalleled
release of what really amounts to highly classified
information (read: radioactive)
was a defining moment in modern history.
Here’s
a video which captures the most important parts of
Friedman’s utterly reprehensible presentation: Former
Stratfor CEO George Friedman really lost it during his
speech on “Europe: Destined for Conflict?”
(Video).
Resignation
tendered shortly after Chicago fiasco
What
follows is a screenshot from the Chicago
Council on Global Affairs website
indicating the Tuesday 02/03/15 date
that he gave his fateful talk.
The
screenshot posted below was taken from George Friedman’s Wikipedia
page. It indicates that he resigned (some
say forced to resign) in May of 2015 as CEO and Chief
Intelligence Officer of STRATFOR, the private
intelligence firm that he founded (see 3rd paragraph
below).
Although
many commentators have offered various theories as to
why such a monumental blunder was made, there’s no
question that Friedman was NOT in his right mind.
However, one perceptive armchair political analyst made
the following insightful observation.
“If
you have read the Protocols
of the Elders of Zion this
Friedman
“faux-pas” could fall under the heading of “Shouting
the Zionist Goals
from the Roof Tops”. It is a tactic of legitimizing
their snake-like evil by announcing it beforehand in
order to paralyze the rabbit before
devouring it.”
— JPW
While
this theory may have some validity, it’s more likely
that old George simply lost it that evening—totally
lost it! Having been lulled into
his apparent grandiosity through decades of CIA
propagandizing about Pax
Americana, he appeared to believe that he was
completely immune to any blowback. It was that
false sense of being insulated, along with the hubris of
American exceptionalism, that set up “Chicago’s
night of infamy” and his subsequent
dismissal.
In
order to better understand the profundity of Friedman’s
extraordinary errors in judgment, the following analysis
provides an excellent breakdown.
The
preceding exposé makes it crystal clear “why
the Anglo-American Axis is so determined to wage war
against Russia”. For those
initiated into the Great
Game, however, there’s a much more important back
story which must also be understood. As
follows: What’s
really behind all the fabricated anti-Russia hysteria?
The
global geopolitical chessboard is currently being played
out on many levels, some call it 5D chess, but in
reality it’s beyond 12D. In point of fact, what
the whole world is now witnessing is the final battle
between the forces of light and the forces of darkness.
The
following 13-part series only scratches the surface of
this “War of the Titans” currently being waged across
the planet.
Part
I — The
Latest and Biggest Battle Between East and West
Converges in the Ukraine
Part
II — Locus
Of Global Power Shifts From The West To The East
Part
III — Vladimir
Putin’s Russia: Perfect Foil To The Anglo-American
Axis And Their New World ‘Order’
Part
IV — Anglo-American
Axis Wages Financial/Economic War Against Russia
Part
V — WORLD
WAR III: Anglo-American Axis vs. BRICS Alliance
Part
VI — Putin’s
Russia: Nemesis of the New World Order
Part
VII — The
USA: Military Arm Of The New World Order
Part
VIII — STRATFOR
Chief Reveals Zio-Anglo-American Plot For World
Domination
Part
IX — Prometheism:
The Backbone of the NWO Strategy to Isolate and
Conquer Russia
Part
X — Putin
Goes Ballistic In Syria, Obliterates The USA’s
Secret ‘Mideast Strategy’
Part
XI — Putin’s
Russia Relentlessly Attacked By Deep
State
Part
XII — It
wasn’t Russia that tried to fix the 2016 U.S.
presidential election; it was the British.
Part
XIII — What’s
really behind all the fabricated anti-Russia
hysteria?
Part
IX — RUSSOPHOBIA:
The Zio-Anglo-American Conspiracy to Conquer Russia
Unravels in Real Time
The
more educated and enlightened about these crucial
matters, the more able patriots everywhere are to
address them successfully.
The
bottom line is that it really does all come down to
Russia, just as world-renowned psychic and modern-day
prophet Edgar Cayce accurately pointed out.
Through
Russia, Cayce said “comes the hope of the world. Not
in respect to what is sometimes termed Communism or
Bolshevism — no! But freedom — freedom! That each
man will live for his fellow man. The principle has
been born there. It will take years for it to be
crystallized; yet out of Russia comes again the hope
of the world.”
(Source: PROPHETIC:
Edgar Cayce – ‘Russia – The Hope Of The World’)
|