Rockefeller Associates
By Richard Sanders, Editor, Press for Conversion!
The Rockefellers were heavy financial backers of the
American Liberty League.
John Davison Rockefeller (1839-1937), the world’s first
billionaire, was America’s most generous philanthropist,
fascist financier and Nazi collaborator.
Although Rockefeller’s wealth was based largely on a near
global control of oil refining, he also had large interests
in other monoplies. As Anthony Sutton notes, Rockefeller
“controlled the copper trust, the smelters trust and the
gigantic tobacco trust, in addition to having influence in
some Morgan properties such as the U.S. Steel Corporation as
well as in hundreds of smaller industrial trusts, public
service operations, railroads and banking institutions.
National City Bank was the largest of the banks influenced
by Standard Oil-Rockefeller, but financial control extended
to the U.S. Trust Co. and Hanover National Bank [and] major
life insurance companies – Equitable Life and Mutual of New
York” (Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, 1981).
His incredible rags-to-riches success story owes much to
what he learned from his father’s attitudes towards business
and respect for the public good. Descended from hardworking
German immigrants, his father William Avery Rockefeller was
a travelling, snake oil salesman. “Big Bill” excelled as a
quack doctor, or pitch man, conning the sick and desperate
into buying expensive remedies that were either useless or
downright dangerous. “He would be gone for months and come
back with a great roll of money…. He would go to small towns
and put up handbills advertising himself as ‘The Celebrated
Dr. Levingston.’ He advertised to cure anything, but made a
specialty of cancer and kidney troubles” (MacDonald, “Double
Life,” New York World, February 2, 1908). But these were not
“Doc’s” only crimes. He was indicted for rape, but was not
arrested or tried. He fled the area with family and escaped
neighbours who accused him of horse thieving, burglary,
arson and counterfeiting. He had two wives, simultaneously,
and was a bigamist for 34 years. He met his second wife in
Norwich, Ontario, where he sold lumber in 1853, calling
himself William Levingston.
William’s example provided ample life lessons to his sons
about the business values of duplicity, deceit, and a
blatant disregard for public health. John dropped out of
high school in 1855 to take a business course. He worked as
a bookkeeper and then teamed up with a friend to start a
grain commission business. In 1863, the Civil War propelled
him into the oil business. That year, he – like J.P. Morgan
and other rising stars – paid $300 to avoid conscription. It
was a small price for them, but unattainable for the
thousands who would die. At first, he sold whiskey at
inflated rates to Federal soldiers. Then, he invested his
profits in oil refineries. The South had been supplying
turpentine to the North for camphene-fueled lights. When the
war cut off the North’s access to this fuel, kerosene from
Pennsylvania oil quickly took over as the lamp fuel of
choice and stimulated his oil business.
In 1865, Rockefeller bought out his partners in the kerosene
business for $72,500. In 1870, he and a few others,
organized The Standard Oil Company, with capital of $1
million. He built his company by buying out competitors,
price cutting and controlling secondary businesses related
to pipelines, trains, oil terminals and barrel making. By
1880, his monopoly controlled the refining of 95% of
America’s oil. In 1885, 70% of Standard Oil’s sales were
overseas, largely to northern Europe and Russia. All of its
properties were merged into the Standard Oil Trust with an
initial capitalization of $70 million, and by 1900
Rockefeller controlled about two-thirds of the entire
world’s oil supply. He was also a director of the U.S. Steel
Corp when it formed in 1901.
In the 1880s, an oil boom was brewing in Tsarist Russia,
around the Caspian Sea town of Baku. Robert Nobel, the son
of Alfred Nobel (originator of Sweden’s peace prize and the
inventor of dynamite), was soon competing with the Parisian
Rothschilds for control of Central Asia oil treasure. Their
exports threatened Rockefeller’s near global oil monopoly,
especially when Marcus Samuel, future founder of Shell Oil,
developed tankers to carry the Rothchild’s oil to Europe and
Asia. In 1903, Rockefeller made a deal with the Tsarist
government to lease and then buy the Baku oil fields.
Besides selling vast quantities of American oil to
pre-Soviet Russia, Rockefeller also had millions invested
there. Thereafter, seeing an inevitable revolution looming
on the horizon, Rockefeller also invested in anti-Tzarist
forces to protect this branch of his empire. The Soviets did
expropriate the Caspian oil fields from the Nobels and
Rothschilds. Rockefeller’s National City Bank also lost
assets, thanks to the revolution. Its lawyer, Joseph
Proskauer, fought a legal battle to get Rockefeller’s money
back. In 1926, Walter Teagle, the president of Standard Oil
of New Jersey, successfully negotiated oil concessions in
the Soviet Union.
By that time though, Standard Oil’s near global monopoly had
been broken up. In 1911, the U.S. Supreme Court decided it
was violating anti-trust laws and dissolved it into about
three dozen companies. Many of these are now household names
like Chevron (Standard Oil California), Amoco (Standard Oil
Indiana), Mobil (Standard Oil New Jersey) and Exxon,
previously called Esso (Standard Oil New Jersey).
When the U.S. was debating whether to join WWI, a group of
so-called “War Hawks,” calling themselves the National
Security League, knew that this war would be a major boon to
profits. This League of bankers and industrialists,
including Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan, Coleman du Pont and H.H.
Rodgers of Standard Oil, promoted increases in arms
production and universal military training. By 1917, they
had helped build war hysteria to a fever pitch. But not all
Americans were on their side. The Woman’s Peace Party, many
suffragists and others, strongly opposed America’s entry
into WWI. However, the League was successful and the War
Hawks’ profits skyrocketed.
Soon after WWI and the Russian revolution, many among
America’s wealthy elite felt threatened by rising
radicalism, particularly among unions. In April 1919, letter
bombs, destined for John D. Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan and
others, were supposedly discovered in the U.S. postal
system. The media quickly stirred up a massive Red Scare by
blaming unions, communists, anarchists and foreign
agitators. John Spivak says: “Trade unions were openly
disbelieving and denounced with anger the so-called
discoveries as a deliberate frame-up to provide excuses for
more raids against organized labour” (A Man in His Time,
1967). This incident and others were used as pretexts for
the Palmer Raids, during which the government rounded up
more than ten thousand activists across the country.
Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, while the persecution of
leftists continued, corporate leaders on the extreme right,
continued their criminal rampages in pursuit of profit.
Although Rockefeller’s many links to Nazism are too numerous
to list here, a few examples are worth noting. In the 1920s,
Exxon entered into partnerships with Germany’s top chemical
cartel members, BASF and I.G. Farben. The Bank for
International Settlements, which helped fund the Nazis
before and during WWII, was created in 1930 by the world’s
central banks, including the Federal Reserve Bank of NY. Its
creation was inspired by the Nazi government and its
bankers. Its first president was Gates McGarrah, a
Rockefeller banker formerly of Chase National Bank and the
“Fed.”
In 1932, Chevron struck oil in Bahrain and was soon
operating in Saudi Arabia. In 1933, when Hitler seized
power, Standard Oil New Jersey supplied Germany with the
patents it required for tetraethyl lead aviation fuel. In
1936, the company Schroder, Rockefeller Investment Bankers,
included board directors linked to the Gestapo and several
European, Nazi-linked banks. It’s lawyers were John Foster
Dulles and Allan Dulles, leading Wall Street fascists who
drummed up American investments in Germany and elsewhere.
The Dulles law firm represented I.G. Farben and Fritz
Thyssen. Thyssen was Hitler’s biggest German financier. The
Dulles brothers later became Secretary of State and CIA
Director, respectively.
In 1937, John D. Rockefeller died, but his legacy of using
oil money to grease the wheels of fascism continued. That
year, as the Spanish Civil War raged, Texas Co. (later
called Texaco) fueled Franco’s fascists. (In 1936, Texas Co.
and Standard Oil California formed California Texas Oil
(later Caltex) to combine Texas Co’s marketing network in
the Middle East with Standard’s operations there.) Texas Co.
also continued shipping oil to Germany during WWII. In 1938,
Brown Brothers, Harriman, the Wall Street investment firm
(with senior partners Prescott Bush and George Herbert
Walker) was involved in funding the supply of leaded gas for
the Nazi Luftwaffe. Chevron and Texas Co. created Aramco in
1939, to pump Saudi oil for the Nazi war machine. In 1940,
Texaco provided an office, in their Chrysler Building, for a
Nazi intelligence officer, Dr. Gerhardt Westrick. Executives
of Standard Oil’s German subsidiary were “Prominent figures
of Himmler’s Circle of Friends of the Gestapo – its chief
financiers – and close friends and colleagues of the Baron
von Schroder” a leading Gesatpo officer and financier
(Charles Higham, Trading with the Enemy). Just before WWII,
the Rockefeller’s Chase Bank collaborated with the Nazi’s
Schroder Bank to raise $25 million for Germany’s war
economy. They also supplied the German government with names
and background information on 10,000 fascist sympathizers in
America. Throughout WWII, Rockefeller’s Chase Bank stayed
open in Nazi-occupied Paris, providing services for
Germany’s embassy and its businesses.
In 1943, Roosevelt’s government took control of
Rockefeller’s Aramco. It also seized assets of the Union
Banking Corp., which Harriman, Bush and Walker had built up
by collaborating with Nazi companies that used slave labour.
This money was later returned and it launched the Bushes in
oil and politics.
In 1953, after an elected upstart named Dr. Mohammed
Mossadegh nationalized Iran’s oil business, a UK/U.S.-backed
coup returned the Shah to power. CIA Director Allan Dulles
and his brother, Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, were
instrumental in this coup. Previously, Iran’s oil had been
controlled by the Anglo-Persian Oil Co. (i.e., British
Petroleum, BP) but after the U.S. role in this coup, U.S.
companies got a 40% share and the top beneficiary was
Standard Oil of New Jersey.
The next year, the Dulles boys were at it again
orchestrating a coup in Guatemala. This one ushered in
decades of fascist military governments that killed hundreds
of thousands of innocents. But, it brought great profits for
Rockefeller’s United Fruit Co., in which the Dulles were
invested. Allen had also been on its Board of Trustees.
John D. Rockefeller would be happy to see the re-merging of
his great monopoly. In 1988, Standard Oil merged with
British Petroleum. Since then, other mergers have reunited
many of his original oil companies. Exxon and Mobil reunited
in 1999, to become the world’s top oil business. They made
profits of $17.7 billion the next year. BP, merging with
Amoco and Standard Oil Ohio, was number two that year and
made profits of $12 billion.
J.D. Rockefeller’s philanthropy has been much lauded. Even
as a student, he reportedly gave donations to his Baptist
church and to foreign Sunday schools. By 1900, he offered to
buy a whole church for Baptist preacher Thomas Dixon, a
former, southern politician who was then flogging his white
supremacist gospel in New York. But from the pulpit, Dixon’s
fiery tirades against “creeping negroidism” didn’t reach
enough people, so he took up writing respectable, romantic
novels about the KKK. He churned out two dozen books. The
Clansman, his race-baiting best seller, extolled the Klan’s
role in redeeming the South. In 1915, it was made into a
movie, called The Birth of a Nation. Endorsed by President
Wilson, the film helped revive this dreaded terrorist
organization.
Rockefeller’s great generosity was aimed largely at medical
education, perhaps because of his father’s career and its
peculiar contributions to medicine. J.D.Rockefeller, being a
high school dropout, was not well-suited to his new role as
godfather of the country’s centres for higher learning. His
philanthropy was permeated with extremely racist views. In
1901, the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research was
created. In 1902, the General Education Board (GEB) began
four decades of tremendously controversial influence over
American schools and universities.
That same year, J.D. Rockefeller and Averell Harriman, a
business partner of Prescott Bush and George Herbert Walker
in Brown Brothers Harriman, gave $11 million to create the
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Built on Manhattan property
owned by the Dulles brothers, it spawned America’s
ground-breaking “eugenics” research and the world’s first
“racial hygiene” laws. By 1907, Rockefeller funding was
heavily influencing America’s medical institutions. The
Rockefeller Institute created the first genetics lab in
1909. The following year, the Eugenics Research Association
and the Eugenics Records Office were founded near Cold
Spring Harbor, New York, on land donated by the widow of
Averell Harriman. In 1911, John Foster Dulles summed up
eugenics, saying that by eliminating “the weakest members of
the population” a purer race could be created.
In 1928, Germany’s Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Eugenics,
Anthropology and Human Heredity was created. Run by Ernst
Rudin, Hitler’s foremost “racial hygienist,” the institute’s
main financing came from Rockefeller. Ironically, by 1936 an
early psychiatrist at that institute, the half Jewish Dr.
Franz Kallmann, had fled Nazism to America. According to
Anton Chaitkin, Kallman’s experiments on 1,000
schizophrenics, published by the Freemasons, was used in
1939 to justify the Nazi’s mass murder of “mental patients
and various ‘defective’ people.” Meanwhile, other Nazi
doctors conducted incredibly cruel and vicious experiments
on live, captive human subjects. Their body parts “were
delivered to [Josef] Mengele, [Otmar] Verschuer and the
other Rockefeller-linked contingent at the Wilhelm
Institute.”
References:
cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc
Illuminati, Nazis & The Illegal State of Israel
Posted on 09/20/2014 | 32 Comments
South America 2008 (159)If we wish to end the
Israeli/Palestinian conflict, we need to know who created
Israel and why. In 1917 British Foreign Secretary Arthur
Balfour penned a letter to Zionist Second Lord Lionel Walter
Rothschild in which he expressed support for a Jewish
homeland on Palestinian-controlled lands in the Middle East.
This Balfour Declaration justified the brutal seizure of
Palestinian lands for the post-WWII establishment of
Israel. Israel would serve, not as some high-minded
“Jewish homeland”, but as lynchpin in Rothschild/Eight
Families control over the world’s oil supply. Baron
Edmond de Rothschild built the first oil pipeline from the
Red Sea to the Mediterranean to bring BP Iranian oil to
Israel. He founded Israeli General Bank and Paz Oil
and is considered the father of modern Israel.
The Rothschilds are the planet’s wealthiest clan, worth an
estimated $100 trillion. They control Royal Dutch/Shell, BP,
Anglo-American, BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto, Bank of America and
scores of other global corporations and banks. They are the
largest shareholders in the Bank of England, the Federal
Reserve and most every private central bank in the world.
They needed a footprint in the Middle East to protect their
new oil concessions, which they procured through Four
Horsemen fronts like the Iranian Consortium, Iraqi Petroleum
Company and Saudi ARAMCO.
Rothschild’s Shell and BP formed these cartels with the
Rockefeller half of the Four Horsemen- Exxon Mobil and
Chevron Texaco. This new alliance required a “special
relationship” between Great Britain and the US, which still
exists today. Rothschild and other wealthy European
shareholders could now utilize the United States military as
a Hessianized mercenary force, deployed to protect their oil
interests and paid for by US taxpayers. Israel would serve
the same purpose in closer proximity to the oilfields. The
Israeli Mossad is less a national intelligence agency than
it is a Rothschild/Rockefeller family security force.
The Rothschilds exert political control through the
secretive Business Roundtable, which they created in 1909
with the help of Lord Alfred Milner and Cecil Rhodes- whose
Rhodes Scholarship is granted by Cambridge University, out
of which oil industry propagandist Cambridge Energy Research
Associates operates. Rhodes founded De Beers and
Standard Chartered Bank.
The Roundtable takes its name from the legendary knight King
Arthur, whose tale of the Holy Grail is synonymous with the
Illuminati notion that the Eight Families possess Sangreal
or holy blood- a justification for their lording over the
people and resources of the planet.
According to former British Intelligence officer John
Coleman, who wrote Committee of 300, “Round Tablers armed
with immense wealth from gold, diamond and drug monopolies
fanned out throughout the world to take control of fiscal
and monetary policies and political leadership in all
countries where they operated.”
Rhodes and Oppenheimer deployed to South Africa to launch
the Anglo-American conglomerate. Kuhn and Loeb were off to
re-colonize America with Morgan and Rockefeller.
Rudyard Kipling was sent to India. Schiff and Warburg
manhandled Russia. Rothschild, Lazard and Israel Moses Seif
pushed into the Middle East. At Princeton, the Round
Table founded the Institute for Advanced Study (IAS) as
partner to its All Souls College at Oxford. IAS was
funded by the Rockefeller’s General Education Board. IAS
members Robert Oppenheimer, Neils Bohr and Albert Einstein
created the atomic bomb.
In 1919 Rothschild’s Business Roundtable spawned the Royal
Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) in London.
The RIIA sponsored sister organizations around the globe,
including the US Council on Foreign Relations. The RIIA is a
registered charity of the Queen and, according to its annual
reports, is funded largely by the Four Horsemen.
Former British Foreign Secretary and Kissinger Associates
co-founder Lord Carrington is president of both the RIIA and
the Bilderbergers. The inner circle at RIIA is dominated by
Knights of St. John Jerusalem, Knights of Malta, Knights
Templar and 33rd Degree Scottish Rite Freemasons.
The Knights of St. John were founded in 1070 and answer
directly to the British House of Windsor. Their
leading bloodline is the Villiers dynasty, which the Hong
Kong Matheson family- owners of the HSBC opium laundry-
married into. The Lytton family also married into the
Villiers gang.
Colonel Edward Bulwer-Lytton led the English Rosicrucian
secret society, which Shakespeare opaquely referred to as
Rosencranz, while the Freemasons were symbolized by
Guildenstern. Lytton was spiritual father of both the
RIIA and Nazi fascism. In 1871 he penned a novel
titled, Vril: The Power of the Coming Race. Seventy
years later the Vril Society received ample mention in Adolf
Hitler’s Mein Kampf. Lytton’s son became Viceroy to
India in 1876 just before opium production spiked in that
country. His good friend Rudyard Kipling introduced
the swastika to India and later worked under Lord
Beaverbrook as Propaganda Minister, alongside Sir Charles
Hambro of the Hambros banking dynasty.
Children of the Roundtable elite are members of a Dionysian
cult known as Children of the Sun. Initiates include
Aldous Huxley, T. S. Eliot, D. H. Lawrence and H. G.
Wells. Wells headed British intelligence during WWI.
His books speak of a “one-world brain” and “a police of the
mind”. William Butler Yeats, another Sun member, was a
pal of Aleister Crowley. The two formed an Isis Cult
based on a Madam Blavatsky manuscript, which called on the
British aristocracy to organize itself into an Aryan
priesthood. Blavatsky’s Theosophical Society and
Bulwer-Lytton’s Rosicrucians joined forces to form the Thule
Society, out of which the Nazis emerged.
Rothschild, Rockefeller and the rest of the Illuminati
bankers backed the Nazis. Max and Paul Warburg sat on
I. G. Farben’s board, as did H. A. Metz, who was director at
the Warburg Bank of Manhattan- later Chase Manhattan.
Bank of Manhattan director and Federal Reserve Board member
C. E. Mitchell sat on the board of I. G. Farben’s US
branch. In 1936 Avery Rockefeller set up a combination
with the German Schroeder family, who served as Hitler’s
personal bankers. Time magazine called the new
Schroeder, Rockefeller & Company “the economic booster
of the Rome-Berlin Axis”. Morgan Guaranty Trust and
Union Banking Corporation (UBC) also funded the Nazis.
UBC board member Prescott Bush is W’s grandfather.
In 1933 at the home of banker Baron Kurt von Schroeder, a
deal was cut to bring Hitler to power. Attending the
meeting were brothers John Foster and Allen Dulles-
Rockefeller cousins and partners at law firm Sullivan &
Cromwell, which represented Schroeder Bank. Schroeder,
managing director T. C. Tiarks, was a director at the
Rothschild-controlled Bank of England. In the spring of 1934
Bank of England Chairman Montagu Norman convened a meeting
of London bankers who decided to covertly fund Hitler.
Royal Dutch/Shell Chairman Sir Henri Deterding helped in
this effort. Even after the US went to war with
Germany, Exxon Chairman Walter Teagle remained on the board
of I. G. Chemical- the US I. G. Farben subsidiary.
Exxon was integral in supplying the Nazis with tetraethyl
lead, an important component of aviation fuel. Only
Exxon, Du Pont and GM made the stuff. Teagle also
supplied the Japanese with his product.
Exxon and I. G. Farben were such close business associates
that by 1942 Thurman Arnold- head of the US Justice
Department’s Anti-Trust Division- produced documents that
showed, “Standard and Farben in Germany had literally carved
up the world markets, with oil and chemical monopolies
established all over the map.”
In 1912 railroad magnate Edward Harriman’s widow joined John
D. Rockefeller in funding a eugenics research lab at Cold
Spring Harbor, NY. That same year the First
International Congress of Eugenics was convened in London
with Winston Churchill presiding. In 1932 the
conference was held in New York. Hamburg-Amerika
Shipping Line, owned by George Walker and Prescott Bush,
brought the German contingent to the gene-fest. One
member of the German delegation was Dr. Ernst Rudin of the
Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Genealogy in Berlin. He was
unanimously elected president for his work in founding the
German Society of Race Hygiene- a forerunner to Hitler’s
race institutes.
As of 1998 there were still scores of lawsuits pending
against Ford, Chase Manhattan, J.P. Morgan, Deutsche Bank,
Allianz AG and several Swiss banks for their dealings with
the Nazis.
At the heart of Hitler’s inner circle were the secret
societies Germanordern (brothers of Yale’s Skull &
Bones), the Thule Society, and Vril. The concepts
“Great Masters”, “Adepts” and the “Great White Brotherhood”,
which the Nazis used to justify their idea of Aryan
superiority, were ancient ideas carried forth from the
Egyptian Mystery Schools by the Teutonic Knights, the
Illuminati, and Hebrew Cabalists. These same concepts
can be found in today’s New Age Movement, whose New Age
magazine was first published by the Grand Orient Masonic
Lodge of Washington, DC. Henry Kissinger was an early
supporter.
Nazi occultists believed ancient German tribes were the true
keepers of the Ancient Mysteries which had their origin in
Atlantis, when seven races of God-men were introduced to
Earth. Thule was a Teutonic Atlantis believed by the
Nazis to house these long-vanquished races, who lost their
godly Annunaki powers by interbreeding with humans. At
the inner core of the Thule Society were Satanists who
practiced black magic.
Hitler was once described as a “child of Illuminism”.
According to Dr. Walter Langer, who did a war-time
psychoanalysis of Hitler for the CIA-predecessor OSS, Hitler
was also a Rothschild. Langer uncovered an Austrian
police report proving Hitler’s father was an illegitimate
son of a peasant cook named Maria Anna Schicklgruber, who at
the time of her conception was a servant in the Vienna home
of Baron Rothschild.
In May 1941 Rudolf Hess parachuted into the estate of the
Duke of Hamilton, saying a supernatural force told him to
negotiate with the British. Hitler was ostensibly
visited by this same apparition and suddenly turned
vehemently against occultism. He ordered a crackdown
against Freemasons, Templars and the Theosophical
Society. Suddenly the international banker crowd
pulled the plug on Hitler’s finances and began to denounce
him. Six months later the Hessianized US military
entered WWII.
Hitler’s fate was no different than that of Saddam Hussein
or Manuel Noriega. The Illuminati bankers’ modus operandi is
to use men of low integrity to do their dirty work, before
conveniently discarding and distancing themselves from them.
The horrific Holocaust that ensued assured sympathy for the
already-planned state of Israel. Towards the end of WWII,
the murderous Haganah and Stern Gangs were deployed by the
Rothschild bankers to terrorize Palestinians and steal their
land. Jews who escaped Hitler’s gas chambers were those of
means who bought into Zionism. For a fee of $1,000- lots of
money at that time- these right-wingers bought passage to
Israel and escaped the fate of the poor Jews, Serbs,
communists and gypsies. The whole bloody affair was a
massive eugenics project. It had more to do with culling the
herd along class lines, than it did with ethnicity or
religion.
The key to this historic puzzle is to understand that the
Rothschild/Rockefeller sangreal international bankers
supported both the rise of the Nazis and the creation of
Israel. None of this has anything to do with religion. It
has everything to do with oil, arms, drugs, money and power.
The Rothschilds say they are Jewish. The Rockefellers claim
to be Christian. These are irrelevant smokescreens. Any
demagogue- who blames injustice a religion or race of
people- is sadly misinformed. Throughout history the
Illuminati Satanists have sacrificed people of all race and
religion to further their agenda of total planetary control.
Israel is not a “Jewish homeland”. It is an oil monopoly
lynchpin. Its citizens are being put in harms way- used by
the Four Horsemen and their Eight Families-owners as
geopolitical pawns in an international resource grab. No
peaceful solution is possible until the stolen land is
returned to its rightful Palestinian owners.
Israel is an illegal entity. Viva Palestine!
Dean Henderson is the author of five books: Big Oil &
Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight
Families & Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics &
Terror Network, The Grateful Unrich: Revolution in 50
Countries,Das Kartell der Federal Reserve, Stickin’ it to
the Matrix & The Federal Reserve Cartel. You can
subscribe free to his weekly Left Hook column
@www.hendersonlefthook.wordpress.com
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
J. Henry Schroder Banking Company is listed as Number 2 in
capitalization in Capital City62 on the list of the
seventeen merchant bankers who make up the exclusive
Accepting Houses Committee in London. Although it is almost
unknown in the United States, it has played a large part in
our history. Like the others on this list, it had first to
be approved by the Bank of England. And, like the Warburg
family, the von Schroders began their banking operations in
Hamburg, Germany. At the turn of the century, in 1900, Baron
Bruno von Schroder established the London branch of the
firm. He was soon joined by Frank Cyril Tiarks, in 1902.
Tiarks married Emma Franziska of Hamburg, and was a director
of the Bank of England from 1912 to 1945.
During World War I, J. Henry Schroder Banking Company played
an important role behind the scenes. No historian has a
reasonable explanation of how World War I started. Archduke
Ferdinand was assassinated at Sarajevo by Gavril Princeps,
Austria demanded an apology from Serbia, and Serbia sent the
note of apology. Despite this, Austria declared war, and
soon the other nations of Europe joined the fray. Once the
war had gotten started, it was found that it wasn’t easy to
keep it going. The principal problem was that Germany was
desperately short of food and coal, and without Germany, the
war could not go on. John Hamill in The Strange Career of
Mr. Hoover63 explains how the problem was solved.* He quotes
from Nordeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, March 4, 1915,
"Justice, however, demands that publicity should be given to
the preeminent part taken by the German authorities in
Belgium in the solution of this problem. The initiative came
from them and it was only due to their continuous relations
with the American Relief Committee that the provisioning
question was solved." Hamill points out "That is what the
Belgian Relief Committee was organized for--to keep Germany
in food."
The Belgian Relief Commission was organized by Emile
Francqui, director of a large Belgian bank, Societe
Generale, and a London mining
__________________________
62 McRae and Cairncross, Capital City, Eyre Methuen, London,
1963
63 John Hamill, The Strange Career of Mr. Hoover, William
Faro, New York, 1931
* Copies of Hamill’s book were systematically located and
destroyed by government agents, because it was published on
the eve of President Hoover’s re-election campaign.
promoter, an American named Herbert Hoover, who had been
associated with Francqui in a number of scandals which had
become celebrated court cases, notably the Kaiping Coal
Company scandal in China, said to have set off the Boxer
Rebellion, which had as its goal the expulsion of all
foreign businessmen from China. Hoover had been barred from
dealing on the London Stock Exchange because of one
judgement against him, and his associate, Stanley Rowe, had
been sent to prison for ten years. With this background,
Hoover was called an ideal choice for a career in
humanitarian work.
Although his name is unknown in the United States, Emile
Francqui was the guiding spirit behind Herbert Hoover’s rise
to fortune. Hamill (on page 156) identifies Francqui as the
director of many atrocities committed against natives in the
Congo. "For every cartridge they spent, they had to bring in
a man’s hand". Francqui’s frightful record may have been the
source for the charge later leveled against German soldiers
in Belgium, that they chopped off the hands of women and
children, a claim which proved to be groundless. Hamill also
says that Francqui "tricked the Americans out of the
Hankow-Canton railroad concession in China in 1901, and at
the same time had ‘stood by’ in case Hoover needed any
further help in the ‘taking’ of the Kaiping coal mines. This
is the humanitarian who had sole charge of the distribution
of the Belgian ‘relief’ during the World War, for which
Hoover did the buying and shipping. Francqui was a director
with Hoover, in the Chinese Engineering and Mining Company
(the Kaiping mines), through which Hoover transported
200,000 Chinese slave workers to the Congo to work
Francqui’s copper mines."
Hamill says on page 311 that "Francqui opened the offices of
the Belgian Relief in his bank, Societe Generale, as a
one-man show, with a letter of permission from the German
Governor General von der Goltz dated October 16, 1914.
The New York Herald Tribune of February 18, 1930, quoted by
Congressman Louis McFadden in the House on February 26,
1930, said, "One of Belgium’s two directors on the Bank for
International Settlements will be Emile Francqui of the
Societe Generale, a member of both the Young and Dawes Plan
Committees. The board of directors of the international bank
will have no more colorful character than Emile Francqui,
former Minister of Finance, veteran of the Congo and China .
. . he is rated as the richest man in Belgium, and among the
twelve richest men in Europe."
Despite his prominence, The New York Times Index mentions
Francqui only a few times during two decades before his
death. On October 3, 1931, The New York Times quoted Le
Peuple of Brussels that Francqui would visit the United
States. "As a friend of President Hoover, Monsieur Francqui
will not fail to pay a visit to the President."
On October 30, 1931, The New York Times reported this visit
with the headline, "Hoover-Francqui Talk was Unofficial".
"It was stated that Mr. Francqui spent Tuesday night as a
personal guest of the President, and that they talked of
world financial problems in general, strictly unofficial.
Mr. Francqui was an associate of President Hoover during the
latters ministrations in Belgium during the war. Their visit
had no official significance. Mr. Francqui is a private
citizen and not engaged in any official mission."
No reference is made to the Hoover-Francqui business
associations which were the subject of huge lawsuits in
London. The Francqui visit probably involved Hoover’s
Moratorium on German War Debts, which stunned the financial
world. On December 15, 1931, Chairman McFadden informed the
House of a dispatch in the Public Ledger of Philadelphia,
October 24, 1931, "GERMAN REVEALS HOOVER’S SECRET. The
American President was in intimate negotiations with the
German government regarding a year’s debt holiday as early
as December, 1930." McFadden continued, "Behind the Hoover
announcement there were many months of hurried and furtive
preparations both in Germany and in Wall Street offices of
German bankers. Germany, like a sponge, had to be saturated
with American money. Mr. Hoover himself had to be elected,
because this scheme began before he became President. If the
German international bankers of Wall Street--that is Kuhn
Loeb Company, J. & W. Seligman, Paul Warburg, J. Henry
Schroder--and their satellites had not had this job waiting
to be done, Herbert Hoover would never have been elected
President of the United States. The election of Mr. Hoover
to the Presidency was through the influence of the Warburg
Brothers, directors of the great bank of Kuhn Loeb Company,
who carried the cost of his election. In exchange for this
collaboration Mr. Hoover promised to impose the moratorium
of German debts. Hoover sought to exempt Kreuger’s loan to
Germany of $125 million from the operation of the Hoover
Moratorium. The nature of Kreuger’s swindle was known here
in January when he visited his friend, Mr. Hoover, in the
White House."
Not only did Hoover entertain Francqui in the White House,
but also Ivar Kreuger, the most famous swindler of the
twentieth century.
When Francqui died on November 13, 1935, The New York Times
memorialized him as "the copper king of the Congo . . . Mr.
Francqui, last year having gained dictatorial powers over
the belga, maintained it on the gold standard during a
crisis. In 1891 he led an expedition into the Congo and
gained it for King Leopold. A man of great wealth, rated
among the twelve richest men in Europe, he secured enormous
copper deposits. He was Minister of State in 1926 and
Minister of Finance in 1934. It was his pride that he never
accepted a centime of remuneration for his services to the
government. While consul general at Shanghai, he secured
valuable concessions, notably the Kaiping coal mines and the
railway concession for the Tientsin Railroad. He was
governor of the Societe Generale de Belgique, Lloyd Royal
Belge, and regent of La Banque Nationale de Belgique."
The Times does not mention Francqui’s business partnerships
with Hoover. Like Francqui, Hoover also refused remuneration
for "government service", and as Secretary of Commerce and
as President of the United States, he turned his salary back
to the government.
On December 13, 1932, Chairman McFadden introduced a
resolution of impeachment against President Hoover for high
crimes and misdemeanors, which covers many pages, including
violation of contracts, unlawful dissipation of the
financial resources of the United States, and his
appointment of Eugene Meyer to the Federal Reserve Board.
The resolution was tabled and never acted upon by the House.
In criticizing Hoover’s Moratorium of German War Debts,
McFadden had referred to Hoover’s "German" backers. Although
all of the principals of "the London Connection" did
originate in Germany, most of them in Frankfurt, at the time
they sponsored Hoover’s candidacy for the Presidency of the
United States, they were operating from London, as Hoover
himself had done for most of his career.
Also, the Hoover Moratorium was not intended to "help"
Germany, as Hoover had never been "pro-German". The
Moratorium on Germany’s war debts was necessary so that
Germany would have funds for rearming. In 1931, the truly
forward-looking diplomats were anticipating the Second World
War, and there could be no war without an "aggressor".
Hoover had also carried out a number of mining promotions in
various parts of the world as a secret agent for the
Rothschilds, and had been rewarded with a directorship in
one of the principal Rothschild enterprises, the Rio Tinto
Mines in Spain and Bolivia. Francqui and Hoover threw
themselves into the seemingly impossible task of
provisioning Germany during the First World War. Their
success was noted in Nordeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, March
13, 1915, which noted that large quantities of food were now
arriving from Belgium by rail. Schmoller’s Yearbook for
Legislation, Administration and Political Economy for 1916,
shows that one billion pounds of meat, one and a half
billion pounds of potatoes, one and a half billion pounds of
bread, and one hundred twenty-one millions pounds of butter
had been shipped from Belgium to Germany in that year. A
patriotic British woman who had operated a small hospital in
Belgium for several years, Edith Cavell, wrote to the
Nursing Mirror in London, April 15, 1915, complaining that
the "Belgian Relief" supplies were being shipped to Germany
to feed the German army. The Germans considered Miss Cavell
to be of no importance, and paid no attention to her, but
the British Intelligence Service in London was appalled by
Miss Cavell’s discovery, and demanded that the Germans
arrest her as a spy.
Sir William Wiseman, head of British Intelligence, and
partner of Kuhn Loeb Company, feared that the continuance of
the war was at stake, and secretly notified the Germans that
Miss Cavell must be executed. The Germans reluctantly
arrested her and charged her with aiding prisoners of war to
escape. The usual penalty for this offense was three months
imprisonment, but the Germans bowed to Sir William Wiseman’s
demands, and shot Edith Cavell, thus creating one of the
principal martyrs of the First World War.
With Edith Cavell out of the way, the "Belgian Relief"
operation continued, although in 1916, German emissaries
again approached London officials with the information that
they did not believe Germany could continue military
operations, not only because of food shortages, but because
of financial problems. More "emergency relief" was sent, and
Germany continued in the war until November, 1918. Two of
Hoover’s principal assistants were a former lumber shipping
clerk from the West Coast, Prentiss Gray, and Julius H.
Barnes, a grain salesman from Duluth. Both men became
partners in J. Henry Schroder Banking Corporation in New
York after the war, and amassed large fortunes, principally
in grain and sugar.
With the entry of the United States into the war, Barnes and
Gray were given important posts in the newly created U.S.
Food Administration, which also was placed under Herbert
Hoover’s direction. Barnes became President of the Grain
Corporation of the U.S. Food Administration from 1917 to
1918, and Gray was chief of Marine Transportation. Another
J. Henry Schroder partner, G. A. Zabriskie, was named head
of the U.S. Sugar Equalization Board. Thus the London
Connection controlled all food in the United States through
its grain and sugar "Czars" during the First World War.
Despite many complaints of corruption and scandal in the
U.S. Food Administration, no one was ever indicted. After
the war, the partners of J. Henry Schroder Company found
that they now owned most of Cuba’s sugar industry. One
partner, M.E. Rionda, was president of Cuba Cane
Corporation, and director of Manati Sugar Company, American
British and Continental Corporation, and other firms. Baron
Bruno von Schroder, senior partner of the firm, was a
director of North British and Mercantile Insurance Company.
His father, Baron Rudolph von Schroder of Hamburg, was a
director of Sao Paulo Coffee Ltd., one of the largest
Brazilian coffee companies, with F.C. Tiarks, also of the
Schroder firm.*
__________________________
* The New York Times noted on October 11, 1923: "Frank C.
Tiarks, Governor of the Bank of England, will spend two
weeks here to set up the opening of the banking house branch
of J. Henry Schroder of London."
After the war, Zabriskie, who had been sugar Czar of the
United States by presiding over the U.S. Sugar Equalization
Board, became the president of several of the largest baking
corporations in the United States: Empire Biscuit, Southern
Baking Corporation, Columbia Baking, and other firms.
As his principal assistant in the U.S. Food Administration,
Hoover chose Lewis Lichtenstein Strauss, who was soon to
become a partner in Kuhn Loeb Company, marrying the daughter
of Jerome Hanauer of Kuhn Loeb. Throughout his distinguished
humanitarian service with the Belgian Relief Commission, the
U.S. Food Administration, and, after the war, the American
Relief Administration, Hoover’s closest associate was one
Edgar Rickard, born in Pontgibaud, France. In Who’s Who, he
states that he was "World War administrative assistant to
Herbert Hoover in all war and post-war organizations
including the Commission For Relief in Belgium. He also
served on the U.S. Food Administration from 1914-1924." He
remained one of Hoover’s closest friends, and usually the
Rickards and Hoovers took their vacations together. After
Hoover became Secretary of Commerce under Coolidge, Hamill
tells us that Hoover awarded his friend the Hazeltine Radio
patents, which paid him one million dollars a year in
royalties.
In 1928, "the London Connection" decided to run Herbert
Hoover for president of the United States. There was only
one problem; although Herbert Hoover had been born in the
United States, and was thus eligible for the office of the
presidency, according to the Constitution, he had never had
a business address or a home address in the United States,
as he had gone abroad just after completing college at
Stanford. The result was that during his campaign for the
presidency, Herbert Hoover listed as his American address
Suite 2000, 42 Broadway, New York, which was the office of
Edgar Rickard. Suite 2000 was also shared by the grain
tycoon and partner of J. Henry Schroder Banking Corporation,
Julius H. Barnes.
After Herbert Hoover was elected president of the United
States, he insisted on appointing one of the old London
crowd, Eugene Meyer, as Governor of the Federal Reserve
Board. Meyer’s father had been one of the partners of Lazard
Freres of Paris, and Lazard Brothers of London. Meyer, with
Baruch, had been one of the most powerful men in the United
States during World War I, a member of the famous
Triumvirate which exercised unequalled power; Meyer as
Chairman of the War Finance Corporation, Bernard Baruch as
Chairman of the War Industries Board, and Paul Warburg as
Governor of the Federal Reserve System.
A longtime critic of Eugene Meyer, Chairman Louis McFadden
of the House Banking and Currency Committee, was quoted in
The New York Times, December 17, 1930, as having made a
speech on the floor of the House attacking Hoover’s
appointment of Meyer, and charging that "He represents the
Rothschild interest and is liaison officer between the
French Government and J.P. Morgan." On December 18, The
Times reported that "Herbert Hoover is deeply concerned" and
that McFadden’s speech was "an unfortunate occurrence." On
December 20, The Times commented on the editorial page,
under the headline, "McFadden Again", "The speech ought to
insure the Senate ratification of Mr. Meyer as head of the
Federal Reserve. The speech was incoherent, as Mr.
McFadden’s speeches usually are." As The Times predicted,
Meyer was duly approved by the Senate.
Not content with having a friend in the White House, J.
Henry Schroder Corporation was soon embarked on further
international adventures, nothing less than a plan to set up
World War II. This was to be done by providing, at a crucial
juncture, the financing for Adolf Hitler’s assumption of
power in Germany. Although any number of magnates have been
given credit for the financing of Hitler, including Fritz
Thyssen, Henry Ford, and J.P. Morgan, they, as well as
others, did provide millions of dollars for his political
campaigns during the 1920s, just as they did for others who
also had a chance of winning, but who disappeared and were
never heard from again. In December of 1932, it seemed
inevitable to many observers of the German scene that Hitler
was also ready for a toboggan slide into oblivion. Despite
the fact that he had done well in national campaigns, he had
spent all the money from his usual sources and now faced
heavy debts. In his book Aggression, Otto Lehmann-Russbeldt
tells us that "Hitler was invited to a meeting at the
Schroder Bank in Berlin on January 4, 1933. The leading
industrialists and bankers of Germany tided Hitler over his
financial difficulties and enabled him to meet the enormous
debt he had incurred in connection with the maintenance of
his private army. In return, he promised to break the power
of the trade unions. On May 2, 1933, he fulfilled his
promise."64
Present at the January 4, 1933 meeting were the Dulles
brothers, John Foster Dulles and Allen W. Dulles of the New
York law firm, Sullivan and Cromwell, which represented the
Schroder Bank. The Dulles brothers often turned up at
important meetings. They had represented the United States
at the Paris Peace Conference (1919); John Foster Dulles
would die in harness as Eisenhower’s Secretary of State,
while Allen Dulles headed the Central Intelligence Agency
for many years. Their apologists have seldom attempted to
defend the Dulles brothers appearance at the meeting which
installed Hitler as the Chancellor of Germany, preferring to
pretend that it never happened. Obliquely, one biographer
Leonard Mosley, bypasses it in Dulles when he states,
__________________________
64 Otto Lehmann-Russbeldt, Aggression, Hutchinson & Co.,
Ltd., London, 1934, p. 44
"Both brothers had spent large amounts of time in Germany,
where Sullivan and Cromwell had considerable interest during
the early 1930’s, having represented several provincial
governments, some large industrial combines, a number of big
American companies with interests in the Reich, and some
rich individuals."65
Allen Dulles later became a director of J. Henry Schroder
Company. Neither he nor J. Henry Schroder were to be
suspected of being pro-Nazi or pro-Hitler; the inescapable
fact was that if Hitler did not become Chancellor of
Germany, there was little likelihood of getting a Second
World War going, the war which would double their profits.*
The Great Soviet Encyclopaedia states "The banking house
Schroder Bros. (it was Hitler’s banker) was established in
1846; its partners today are the barons von Schroeder,
related to branches in the United States and England."66**
The financial editor of "The Daily Herald" of London wrote
on Sept. 30, 1933 of "Mr. Norman’s decision to give the
Nazis the backing of the Bank (of England.)" John Hargrave,
in his biography of Montagu Norman says,
"It is quite certain that Norman did all he could to assist
Hitlerism to gain and maintain political power, operating on
the financial plane from his stronghold in Threadneedle
Street." [i.e. Bank of England.--Ed.]
Baron Wilhelm de Ropp, a journalist whose closest friend was
Major F.W. Winterbotham, chief of Air Intelligence of the
British Secret Service, brought the Nazi philosopher, Alfred
Rosenberg, to London and introduced him to Lord Hailsham,
Secretary for War, Geoffrey Dawson, editor of The Times, and
Norman, Governor of the Bank of England. After talking with
Norman, Rosenberg met with the representative of the
Schroder Bank of London. The managing director of the
Schroder Bank, F.C. Tiarks, was also a director of the Bank
of England. Hargrave says (p. 217), "Early in 1934 a select
group of City financiers gathered in Norman’s room behind
the windowless walls, Sir Robert Kindersley, partner of
Lazard Brothers, Charles Hambro, F.C. Tiarks, Sir
Josiah Stamp, (also a director of the Bank of England).
Governor Norman spoke of the political situation in Europe.
A new power had established itself, a great ‘stabilizing
__________________________
65 Leonard Mosley, Dulles, Dial Publishing Co., New York
1978, p. 88
* Ezra Pound, in an April 18, 1943 broadcast over Radio Rome
stated, ". . .and men in America, not content with this war
are already aiming at the next one. The time to object is
now."
66 The Great Soviet Encyclopaedia, Macmillan, London, 1973,
v.2, p. 620
** The New York Times noted on October 11, 1944: "Senator
Claude Pepper criticized John Foster Dulles, Gov. Dewey’s
foreign relations advisor for his connection with the law
firm of Sullivan and Cromwell and having aided Hitler
financially in 1933. Pepper described the January 4, 1933
meeting of Franz von Papen and Hitler in Baron Schroder’s
home in Cologne, and from that time on the Nazis were able
to continue their march to power."
force’, namely, Nazi Germany. Norman advised his co-workers
to include Hitler in their plans for financing Europe. There
was no opposition."
In Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, Antony C. Sutton
writes "The Nazi Baron Kurt von Schroeder acted as the
conduit for I.T.T. money funneled to Heinrich Himmler’s S.S.
organization in 1944, while World War II was in progress,
and the United States was at war with Germany."67 Kurt von
Schroeder, born in 1889, was partner in the Cologne
Bankhaus, J.H. Stein & Co., which had been founded in
1788. After the Nazis gained power in 1933, Schroeder was
appointed the German representative at the Bank of
International Settlements. The Kilgore Committee in 1940
stated that Schroeder’s influence with the Hitler
Administration was so great that he had Pierre Laval
appointed head of the French Government during the Nazi
Occupation. The Kilgore Committee listed more than a dozen
important titles held by Kurt von Schroeder in the 1940’s,
including President of Deutsche Reichsbahn, Reich Board of
Economic Affairs, SS Senior Group Leader, Council of Reich
Post Office, Deutsche Reichsbank and other leading banks and
industrial groups. Schroeder served on the board of all
International Telephone and Telegraph subsidiaries in
Germany.
In 1938, the London Schroder Bank became the German
financial agent in Great Britain. The New York branch of
Schroder had been merged in 1936 with the Rockefellers, as
Schroder, Rockefeller, Inc. at 48 Wall Street. Carlton P.
Fuller of Schroder was president of this firm, and Avery
Rockefeller was vice-president. He had been a behind the
scenes partner of J. Henry Schroder for years, and had set
up the construction firm of Bechtel Corporation, whose
employees (on leave) now play a leading role in the Reagan
Administration, as Secretary of Defense and Secretary of
State.
Ladislas Farago, in The Game of the Foxes,68 reported that
Baron William de Ropp, a double agent, had penetrated the
highest echelons in pre-World War II days, and Hitler relied
upon de Ropp as his confidential consultant about British
affairs. It was de Ropp’s advice which Hitler followed when
he refused to invade England.
Victor Perlo writes, in The Empire of High Finance:
"The Hitler government made the London Schroder Bank their
financial agent in Britain and America. Hitler’s personal
banking account was with J.M. Stein Bankhaus, the German
subsidiary of the Schroder Bank. F.C. Tiarks of the British
J. Henry Schroder Company
__________________________
67 Antony C. Sutton, WALL STREET AND THE RISE OF HITLER, 76
Press, Seal Beach, California, 1976, p. 79
68 Ladislas Farago, The Game of the Foxes, 1973
was a member of the Anglo-German Fellowship with two other
partners as members, and a corporate membership."69
The story goes much further than Perlo suspects. J. Henry
Schroder WAS the Anglo-German Fellowship, the English
equivalent of the America First movement, and also
attracting patriots who did not wish to see their nation
involved in a needless war with Germany. During the 1930’s,
until the outbreak of World War II, the Schroders poured
money into the Anglo-German Fellowship, with the result that
Hitler was convinced he had a large pro-German fifth column
in England composed of many prominent politicians and
financiers. The two divergent political groups in the 1930’s
in England were the War Party, led by Winston Churchill, who
furiously demanded that England go to war against Germany,
and the Appeasement Party, led by Neville Chamberlain. After
Munich, Hitler believed the Chamberlain group to be the
dominant party in England, and Churchill a minor
rabble-rouser. Because of his own financial backers, the
Schroders, were sponsoring the Appeasement Party, Hitler
believed there would be no war. He did not suspect that the
backers of the Appeasement Party, now that Chamberlain had
served his purpose in duping Hitler, would cast Chamberlain
aside and make Churchill the Prime Minister. It was not only
Chamberlain, but also Hitler, who came away from Munich
believing that it would be "Peace in our time."
The success of the Schroders in duping Hitler into this
belief explains several of the most puzzling questions of
World War II. Why did Hitler allow the British Army to
decamp from Dunkirk and return home, when he could have
wiped them out? Against the frantic advice of his generals,
who wished to deliver the coup de grace to the English Army,
Hitler held back because he did not wish to alienate his
supposed vast following in England. For the same reason, he
refused to invade England during a period when he had
military superiority, believing that it would not be
necessary, as the Anglo-German Fellowship group was ready to
make peace with him. The Rudolf Hess flight to England was
an attempt to confirm that the Schroder group was ready to
make peace and form a common bond against the Soviets.
Rudolf Hess continues to languish in prison today, many
years after the war, because he would, if released,
__________________________
69 Victor Perlo, The Empire of High Finance, International
Publishers, 1957, p. 177
testify that he had gone to England to contact the members
of the Anglo-German Fellowship, that is, the Schroder group,
about ending the war.*
If anyone supposes this is all ancient history, with no
application to the present political scene, we introduce the
name of John Lowery Simpson of Sacramento, California.
Although he appears for the first time in Who’s Who in
America for 1952, Mr. Simpson states that he served under
Herbert Hoover on the Commission for Relief in Belgium from
1915 to 1917; U.S. Food Administration, 1917 to 1918,
American Relief Commission, 1919, and with P.N. Gray
Company, Vienna, 1919 to 1921. Gray was the Chief of
Maritime Transportation for the U.S. Food Administration,
which enabled him to set up his own shipping company after
the war. Like other Hoover humanitarians, Simpson also
joined the J. Henry Schroder Banking Company (Adolf Hitler’s
personal bankers) and the J. Henry Schroder Trust Company.
He also became a partner of Schroder-Rockefeller Company
when that investment trust backed a construction company
which became the world’s largest, the firm of Bechtel
Incorporated. Simpson was chairman of the finance committee
of Bechtel Company, Bechtel International, and Canadian
Bechtel. Simpson states he was consultant to the
Bechtel-McCone interests in war production during World War
II. He served on the Allied Control Commission in Italy
1943-44. He married Margaret Mandell, of the merchant family
for whom Col. Edward Mandell House was named, and he backed
a California personality, first for Governor, then for
President. As a result, Simpson and J. Henry Schroder
Company now have serving them as Secretary of Defense,
former Bechtel employee Caspar Weinberger. As Secretary of
State they have serving them George Pratt Schultz, also a
Bechtel employee, who happens to be a Standard Oil heir,
reaffirming the Schroder-Rockefeller company ties. Thus the
"conservative" Reagan Administration has a Secretary of
Defense from Schroder Company, a Secretary of State from
Schroder-Rockefeller, and a vice president whose father was
senior partner of Brown Brothers Harriman.
__________________________
* The following accounts are from The New York Times:
October 21, 1945, "A broadcast over the Luxembourg radio
said tonight that Baron Kurt von Schroder, former banker who
helped finance the rise of the Nazi party, had been
recognized in an American prison camp and arrested."
November 1, 1945, "British Army Headquarters: Baron Kurt von
Schroder, 55 year old banker and friend of Heinrich Himmler
is being held in Dusseldorf pending decision on his
indictment as a war criminal, the Military Government
official announcement said today." February 29, 1948, "An
immediate investigation was demanded yesterday by the
Society for the Prevention of World War III as to why the
German Nazi banker, Kurt von Schroder, was not tried as a
war criminal by an allied military tribunal. Noting that von
Schroder was sentenced last November to three months
imprisonment and fined 1500 Reichsmarks by a German
denazification court in Bielefeld, in the British Zone, C.
Monteith Gilpin, secretary for the society said the question
should be asked why von Schroder was allowed to escape
allied justice, and why our own officials have not demanded
that von Schroder be tried by an Allied military tribunal.
‘Von Schroder is as guilty as Hitler or Goering.’"
The Heritage Foundation has also been an important factor in
the policy-making of the Reagan Administration. Now we find
that the Heritage Foundation is part of the Tavistock
Institute network, directed by British Intelligence. The
financial decisions are still made at the Bank of England,
and who is head of the Bank of England? Sir Gordon
Richardson, chairman of J. Henry Schroder Co. of London and
New York from 1962 to 1972, when he became Governor of the
Bank of England. The "London Connection" has never been more
firmly in the saddle of the United States Government.
On July 3, 1983, The New York Times announced that Gordon
Richardson, Governor of the Bank of England for the past ten
years, had been replaced by Robert Leigh-Pemberton, Chairman
of the National Westminster Bank. The list of directors of
National Westminster Bank reads like a Who’s Who of the
British ruling class. They include the Chairman, Lord
Aldenham, who is also Chairman of Antony Gibbs & Son,
merchant bankers, one of the seventeen privileged firms
chartered by the Bank of England; Sir Walter Barrie,
Chairman of the British Broadcasting System; F.E. Harmer,
Governor of the London School of Economics, the training
school for the international bankers, and chairman of New
Zealand Shipping Company; Sir E.C. Mieville, private
secretary to the King of England 1937-45; Marquess of
Salisbury, Lord Cecil, Lord Privy Seal (the Cecils have been
considered one of England’s three ruling families since the
Middle Ages); Lord Leathers, Baron of Purfleet, Minister of
War Transport 1941-45, chairman of William Cory group of
companies; Sir W.H. Coates and W.J. Worboys of Imperial
Chemical Industries (the English DuPont); Earl of Dudley,
chairman British Iron & Steel, Sir W. Benton Jones,
chairman United Steel and many other steel companies; Sir
G.E. Schuster, Bank of New Zealand; East India Coal Company;
A. d’A. Willis, Ashanti Goldfields and many banks, tea
companies and other firms; V.W. Yorke, chairman of Mexican
Railways Ltd.
Richardson, former chairman of Schroders with a New York
subsidiary holding Federal Reserve Bank of New York stock,
was replaced by the chairman of National Westminster, with a
subsidiary in New York holding Federal Reserve Bank of New
York stock. Robert Leigh Pemberton, a director of Equitable
Life Assurance Society (J.P. Morgan), married the daughter
of the Marchioness of Exeter, (the Cecil Burghley family).
Thereby, the control of the London Connection remains
constantly in effect.
The list of the present directors of J. Henry Schroder Bank
and Trust shows the continuing international influence since
the First World War. George A. Braga is also director of
Czarnikow-Rionda Company, vice-president of Francisco Sugar
Company, president of Manati Sugar Company, and
vice-president of New Tuinicui Sugar Company. His relative,
Rionda B. Braga, is president of Francisco Sugar Company and
vice-president of Manati Sugar Company. The Schroder control
of sugar goes back to the U.S. Food Administration under
Herbert Hoover and Lewis L. Strauss of Kuhn, Loeb, Company
during World War I. Schroder’s attorneys are the firm of
Sullivan and Cromwell. John Foster Dulles of this firm was
present during the historic agreement to finance Hitler, and
was later Secretary of State in the Eisenhower
administration. Alfred Jaretzki, Jr., of Sullivan and
Cromwell is also a director of Manati Sugar Company and
Francisco Sugar Company.
Another director of J. Henry Schroder is Norris Darrell,
Jr., born in Berlin, Germany, partner of Sullivan and
Cromwell, and a director of Schroder Trust Company. Bayless
Manning, partner of the Wall Street law firm of Paul, Weiss,
Rifkind and Wharton, is also a director of J. Henry
Schroder. He was president of the Council on Foreign
Relations from 1971-1977, and is editor in chief of the Yale
Law Review.
Paul H. Nitze, the prominent "disarmament negotiator" for
the United States government, is a director of Schroder’s
Inc. He married Phyllis Pratt, of the Standard Oil fortune,
whose father gave the Pratt family mansion as the building
which houses the Council on Foreign Relations.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In Gates’ Hands even Italian
Military Artificial Intelligence. Leonardo-Microsoft Deal
and Dems intrigues through 007 and Pandemic
Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio 8 Agosto 2021 0
CONSPIRACY - FREEMASONRY, European Union, GEOPOLITICS -
ECONOMY, Italy, LIFE - BIOETHICS, Turkey, United Kingdom,
United States, Weapons Lobby
In Gates’ Hands even Italian Military Artificial
Intelligence. Leonardo-Microsoft Deal and Dems intrigues
through 007 and Pandemic
FacebookTwitterWhatsAppEmailLinkedInTelegramShare
407 Views
On the cover, the brand of the Italian military technology
company Leonardo spa, the Italian president Sergio
Mattarella, Bill Gates, owner of Microsoft, and the American
president Joseph Biden
by Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
Versione originale in Italiano
x
All links to Italian reports can read in English with
simultaneous machine translating
When the key sectors of a nation – and consequently of a
society – are locked up within long-term international
agreements, the political orientation of that country
becomes in fact secondary. Well, Italy sees two areas of
primary importance such as health and defense now controlled
by Big Pharma and Big Tech which are always headed by Bill
Gates as usual.
The agreement signed a few weeks ago (at the end of May)
between the American IT guru’s Microsoft Corporation and
Leonardo spa, the weapons corporation controlled by the
Italian government but participated by foreign funds
including the infamous Black Rock, follows the path of a
political project between Rome and Washington of complete
Democratic origin. Behind which transpires the callous
direction of the President of the Italian Republic Sergio
Mattarella (former PD deputy) and the President of the
United States of America Joseph Biden, in an intertwining of
strong powers of the so-called Deep State that aim at the
consolidation of the New World Order.
x
INTRIGUES AMONG PANDEMICS, BIG PHARMA AND MICROSOFT
But what is worse, it appears to have been born in the
shadow of the intrigues between pandemic prophecies and US
intelligence because the call for greater use of Artificial
Intelligence in the military field came precisely from North
America in autumn 2020, before the controversial elections
that ousted Republican President Donald Trump, t was
launched by a dossier written by lawyer Avril Haines that
readers of WuhanGates reports on the pandemic and the
laboratory-built SARS-Cov-2 virus are well aware of.
Haines, Democrat since she was Joseph Biden’s assistant in
Congress, in fact, not only in 2018 in a conference in
Camdem prophesied a catastrophic CoronaVirus epidemic that
could only be faced by a new “world order”, but she was also
the protagonist of the suspected exercise on “Event 201”,
held in mid-October 2019 thanks to funding from the Bill
& Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum
by Klaus Schan, the Great Reset theorist.
This tangle of intrigue has resulted in billion-dollar
vaccine contracts from Gates-controlled Big Pharma: thanks
to direct funding to Moderna and Biontech and its key role
in GlaxoSmithKline-GSK which controls Pfizer’s commercial
network but also through the immunization plan World Health
Organization for Poor Countries called COVAX, managed by
Gates’ Ngo GAVi and administered by a former GSK manager…
x
All of this appears even more relevant in the
Leonardo-Microsoft deal when you consider that Emma
Walmsley, CEO of GSK is also a non-executive director of
Microsoft Corporation. The circle of the noose destined to
strangle the freedom of choice of Italians in the medical
and military fields closes perfectly.
Not by chance. For a specific political will aimed at
enhancing cybersecurity also in the Public Administration
which will in fact share with the company controlled by
Gates (in which, however, he is no longer administrator
since 2014) all the access codes of public PCs as well as
military Artificial Intelligence.
It should be remembered that the American President Joseph
Biden, sponsored in the election campaign by Pfizer with
whom he immediately repaid through donations to the Covax
fund, on the day of his inauguration appointed the lawyer
Haines, former vice Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency and then Deputy National Security Advisor to the
White House during the Obama-Biden administration, as well
as a biological weapons expert for NTI (Nuclear Threat
Initiative), a US NGO founded by Senator Dem Sam Nunn and
financed by Warren Buffet, from 2006 to June 2021 major
financier of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation with
41.5 billion dollars through its Berkshire Hathaway fund.
Perhaps just by coincidence the experiments on recombinant
chimeric superviruses (infected with HIV) during Avril
Haines’ time at the CIA were conducted in the Chapel Hill
laboratories of North Carolina University thanks to the
advice of scientists from the Wuhan Institute of Virology?
EX 007 TRUSTED BY MATTARELLA AT THE PRESIDENCY OF LEONARDO
SPA
But now readers should be reminded who are the leading men
of Leonardo spa. The managing director is Alessandro
Profumo, former manager of the multinational management
company McKinsey, financed for years by Gates and engaged in
the restructuring of US intelligence executives: from the
CIA to the NSA).
Leonardo’s CEO Alessandro Profumo
Profumo, former president of Unicredit and MPS, was also
involved in a bad legal matter. On 28 April 2018, the GUP
(judge for preliminary hearing) of Milan indicted Profumo
and the manager Fabrizio Viola with the accusations of
manipulation and false accounting for the accounting in the
consolidated financial statements of the derivatives
Santorini contract with Deutsche Bank, and of Alexandria
with the Japanese Bank Nomura, despite the Milan Public
Prosecutor’s Office requesting the acquittal of both on 6
April 2018, as already in September 2016. On 15 October 2020
the Milan court sentenced Profumo and Viola in first
instance to six years of imprisonment and payment a fine of
2.5 million euros each (source Wikipedia).
x
His appointment was proposed by the Italian Ministry of the
Treasury, the majority shareholder, during the government of
Paolo Gentiloni, also known for having passed the Lorenzin
Decree to impose the 12 compulsory school-age vaccines
according to a global immunization plan promoted by
President Barack Obama and by his megadonor Gates, which
allowed GSK to do a great business.
More mysterious, for the layman, is the president of
Leonardo: Luciano Carta. As former director of AISE, the
Italian counter-espionage, he also became famous to the
general public for his latest operation from 007: the
liberation of the Milanese aid worker Silvia Romano,
kidnapped in Kenya in 2018 by some wingmen of the terrorist
group Al Shabaab, rib of Al Qaeda in Somalia.
The liberation, which took place on May 9, 2020, was
completed by Italian intelligence thanks to the fundamental
contribution of the Turkish colleagues of MIT (Millî
İstihbarat Teşkilâtı), the powerful secret services of
Ankara, as proof of an axis of excellent collaboration
between the Italian governments of the Democratic Party and
the Muslim Brotherhood, built thanks to the business between
Italy and Turkey through Leonardo spa.
The esteemed retired general Carta, also known for the
extradition of the terrorist Cesare Battisti captured in
Bolivia in 2019, can well be considered a trusted man of the
President of the Republic Sergio Mattarella who played a key
role during the Libyan civil war by visiting to the Emir of
Qatar, suspected of financing the Jihadists sent to Tripoli
from Turkey with the unofficial approval of NATO.
L’ex generale Luciano Carta, già direttore del
controspionaggio italiano AISE ed ora presidente della
Leonardo spa
«Born in Carbonia in 1957, classical studies, multi-degree
and” very Sardinian “, as those who know him well say,
greets the Aise, the foreign secret services with the rescue
of Silvia Romano to take a role that with the intelligence
and international relations still has a lot to do, for
example on the subject of armaments – he wrote on 11 May
2020 Open – A long paper was the public face of the Finance
Police, head of the press office for a substantial period,
about 7 years, from 1995 to 2002. Until then, his career had
first been in his beloved Sardinia, then in Genoa and
Livorno. And, above all, in Milan: in the years of
Tangentopoli, Luciano Carta was the head of operations of
the Tax Police Unit of the Yellow Flames and therefore plays
a decisive role».
x
«Then (Carta) he is called to Rome by a commander general,
Rolando Mosca Moschini who – according to some – is also one
of the keys to explain the closeness with President Sergio
Mattarella (Mosca Moschini is secretary of the Supreme
Defense Council and is military adviser to the Quirinale)»
adds Open.
COLAO, MCKINSEY AND THE ELLIOTT FUND
But the “dangerous relationships” that lurk behind the
future of Italian cyber security do not end here. “The
Minister for Innovation and Digital Transition Vittorio
Colao has, on behalf of the government of Mario Draghi,
established the operational and strategic priorities of the
new security architecture, considered fundamental to
increase Italy’s sovereignty over the data generated in the
national territory, protecting the privacy and security of
citizens and including Rome in the matches for continental
strategic autonomy» reported InsideOver, the pro-NATO online
geopolitics space of Il Giornale, on 6 July.
To secure the system of the nearly 11,000 “machine rooms” of
the PA, guaranteeing cost savings of between 40 and 50% per
year, the NRR has allocated almost one billion euros;
according to rumors reported by Il Messaggero, Cassa
Depositi e Prestiti will obtain 51% of the shares in the
company that will have to manage the Italian cloud. Partners
of the public bank in Via Goito will instead be Tim and
Leonardo, who will share the remaining amount of the shares.
«The partners involved in the project alongside Cdp are
guarantors of an Atlantic orientation. Leonardo,
reinvigorated by the self-defense of Alessandro Profumo on
the board of directors and despite some questionable attacks
on his business from the stars and stripes printing sectors,
leads the Euro-Atlantic defense consortiums, independently
develops projects on the cloud, AI, supercomputer ,
cutting-edge technologies; Tim, on the other hand, was in
the last session of the board of directors that ended in
February, the scene of the axis between the CDP and US
finance, embodied by the Elliott fund, and boasts
non-secondary relationships with the stars and stripes
players» writes the economic analyst Andrea Muratore.
Elliott himself recently made a huge investment in Big
Pharma Pfizer, adding to Black Rock and accentuating the
Zionist connotation of speculators who profit from vaccine
revenues: the founders of both investment funds, Paul Singer
and Larry Fink, in fact, they are known to support the
political positions of the Zionist Movement in the States.
«Relying on US technologies on the cloud, right now, may not
be the preferred choice for Italian operators. But it
appears inevitable, given the starting conditions. Only from
the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic until today have US
projects in Italy intensified. Microsoft in May 2020
announced a 1.5 billion euro plan for cloud, AI,
digitalization in Italy and is a partner for Leonardo’s
strategy», concludes the reporter.
Before looking at the agreement between Leonardo and
Microsoft in detail, it should be remembered that Italian
minister Colao, a member of the Bilderberg committee, comes
from McKinsey herself (today heavily influenced by Gates’
investments) and was also the director of Vodafone when the
company telephone born from the Italian success of Omnitel
(founded by Carlo De Benedetti, card no. 1 of Democratic
Party in Italy) signed a sponsorship agreement with GAVI of
Gates on global immunization (the NGO that today manages the
COVAX antiCovid plan).
McKinsey was also entrusted with the task of preparing the
EU NEXT Generation Plan, better known as the Recovery Plan,
for the management of the country’s relaunch funds allocated
by the European Union for the pandemic emergency.
x
Meanwhile, last August 3, the Senate Chamber definitively
approved the Cybersecurity Law Decree already approved by
the Chamber with 204 yes, 3 no and 23 abstentions. The
provision defines, in particular, the national cybersecurity
architecture and establishes the National Cybersecurity
Agency, amending, among other things, the 2019 decree law
which defined the national cyber security perimeter.
FROM CYBER SECURITY TO MILITARY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
«A collaboration is underway to guarantee the cyber
protection of data and services for the country’s strategic
assets linked to the future National Strategic Pole (PSN).
Leonardo is a candidate for the role of System Integrator
and Cyber Security manager for the digital transformation
and consolidation of Public Administration data centers.
Microsoft will provide advanced productivity, security,
cloud and process automation technologies and services to
enable digital acceleration of public administration and
Italian companies. ” Thus begins the press release published
by Microsoft on its official website on May 26, 2021.
“Leonardo and Microsoft join forces and skills to contribute
to the digital development of the country in the name of
cyber security and technological innovation – the two
corporations write again in a joint note – Cooperation,
based on a Memorandum of Understanding signed by the two
parts that will evolve according to agreements aimed at
specific initiatives, provides for the design and
implementation of the elements necessary for the creation of
the National Strategic Pole (PSN) which will manage the
technological assets capable of enabling the most sensitive
services in the country. On the basis of future governmental
requirements, the joint initiative will therefore be able to
extend to all Italian ‘critical’ infrastructures.
Ultimately, on the one hand, Leonardo’s many years of
experience as a national champion for Cyber Security and
partner of the Public Administration will be shared. and, on
the other hand, the great skills and the wide diffusion of
advanced technologies and solutions in the cloud in the
public and private sectors that characterize the offer of
Microsoft products and services».
The collaboration also includes activities both in “HPC on
cloud” solutions and in application or architectural
solutions «and is particularly oriented towards the digital
transformation program of national healthcare». A phrase
that recalls not only the Immune App proposed by the then
commissioner for the relaunch Vittorio Colao (now minister)
but also the Green Pass, the microchip to detect Covid being
tested at the Pentagon and finally the one for financial
exchanges with cryptocurrencies patented by Microsoft.
x
«Leonardo, through its Be Tomorrow 2030 Strategic Plan, has
identified presiding over the frontier of digital innovation
as one of the main growth assets over the next ten years,
according to a vision of sustainable development, with the
aim of generating new technologies and applications . At the
forefront of the company’s assets is davinci-1, a High
Performance Computer equipped with an architecture that
integrates the flexibility of the cloud with supercomputing
capabilities to enhance the advanced Big Data and Artificial
Intelligence solutions for strategic sectors of the
Village».
So here is the reference to AI in the field of military
technology. In future projection this may mean that the day
will come when computers and algorithms will decide when and
who to shoot. A disturbing eventuality in consideration of
the fact that Leonardo (already overwhelmed by various
judicial investigations to the point of abandoning the old
name Finmeccanica), according to the ICAN 2019 report, is
engaged in nuclear weapons through the MBDA joint venture,
the main European consortium builder of missiles and defense
technologies.
«Microsoft launched a five-year investment plan for Italy in
May 2020, confirming its commitment to support innovation
and growth in the country, with the launch of the first
Microsoft Region Data Center in Italy, in Milan. The new
“Ambition Italy #DigitalRestart” plan creates new
opportunities to grow people and organizations and support
economic development, through access to local cloud
services, digital training programs and support for smart
working. The initiative promotes the development and
adoption of Artificial Intelligence solutions by companies
with the “AI Hub” project and supports the issues of digital
transition with an Alliance for Sustainability which aims to
create an ecosystem of open innovation on green themes»
concludes the press release.
THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DOSSIER FOR THE US ARMY
As mentioned at the beginning, the first to foresee the need
for an enhancement of Artificial Intelligence in the
military field was the lawyer Avril Haines, who later became
the first woman to lead the entire US Intelligence Community
by the will of Biden.
The former CIA deputy director, in fact, is part of WestExec
Advisors, a think-tank of the Dem area that includes
important national security personalities such as the two
founders, Blinken himself and Michèle Flournoy, former
Undersecretary of Defense for politics with Obama. from 2009
to 2012.
After announcing in June his intention to suspend his
activity for WestExec Advisors during the election campaign
for Biden, in reality Haines has maintained solid ties that
have materialized with the publication of a dossier on AI,
developed together with Flournoy, which he seemed to
indicate to the Pentagon the strategies to be pursued by the
Democratic candidate for the White House.
«This moment is taking place in the context of a
technological revolution that exacerbates the challenges we
face while simultaneously offering potential solutions,
providing breakthroughs in climate, medicine,
communications, transportation, intelligence, and many other
fields. Many of these breakthroughs will come through the
exploitation of artificial intelligence (AI) and its related
technologies—chief among them machine learning (ML). These
advances will likely shape the economic and military balance
of power among nations and the future of work, wealth, and
inequality within them» the two authors write in the
introduction of the study called “Building Trust through
Testing. Adapting DOD’s Test & Evaluation, Validation
& Verification (TEVV) Enterprise for Machine Learning
Systems, including Deep Learning Systems».
The dossier made by Avril Haines on AI for WestExec Advisors
«Innovations in ML have the potential to transform
fundamentally how the U.S. military fights, and how the
Department of Defense (DOD) operates. Machine learning
applications can increase the speed and quality of human
decision-making on the battlefield, enable human-machine
teaming to maximize performance and minimize the risk to
soldiers, and greatly improve the accuracy and speed of
analysis that relies on very large data sets. ML can also
strengthen the United States’ ability to defend its networks
against cyberattacks at machine speeds and has the power to
automate critical components of labor-intensive enterprise
functions, such as predictive maintenance and personnel
management…».
Haines also wrote that, now, from the control room of
Direction of National Intelligence, the most powerful
in the world, he can really configure scenarios far worse
than those narrated in 1984 by George Orwell. Also thanks to
the strategic complicity of Microsoft of his “friend” Gates
and Leonardo, listed on the Milan Stock Exchange and since
2010 in the Dow Jones Sustainability Indices (DJSI), which
in 2020 was confirmed as Industry leader in the Aerospace
& Defense sector for second consecutive year.
Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
© COPYRIGHT GOSPA NEWS
no reproduction without authorization
MAIN SOURCES
GOSPA NEWS – WUHAN.GATES REPORTS
GOSPA NEWS – WEAPONS’ LOBBY INVESTIGATIONS
RAI NEWS – VIA LIBERA DEL SENATO AL DL CYBERSICUREZZA
INSIDE OVER – IL CLOUD NAZIONALE DI DRAGHI GUARDA AGLI USA
OPEN ONLINE – CHI E’ IL DIRETTORE AISE DEL CASO SILVIA
ROMANO
IL SOLE 24ORE – BUFFETT DIVORZIA DALLA FONDAZIONE GATES
MICROSOFT ITALIA – ACCORDO CON LEONARDO PER CYBERSICUREZZA E
AI
WESTEXEC – AI DOSSIER BY HAINES
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jew World Order Exposed
Jew World Order Exposed
The Jew
World Order
Unmasked
by Brandon
The former
author of
http://www.zioncrimefactory.com/
THE RULE OF the Talmudic Jew in modern times is nearly one
of an absolute monarch of a country. The
Jews, through their complete domination of world f inance
and banking — through their malignant monopoly
of the mass media of America, Britain, France, Canada and
other Western powers — through their
inf luential and vast network of subversive “lobby groups” —
through their dominion over the courts and law
prof ession in general — not to mention their pernicious
presence inside the highest levels of government
of the most powerf ul countries — have thus taken f ull
control of the entire planet, as was f oretold in
ancient Jewish religious texts.
As the f ormer Malaysian Prime Minister, Dr. Mahathir
Mohamed, explained: “The Jews rule this world by
proxy, they get others to fight and die for them… They have
now gained control of the most
powerful countries … This tiny community have become a world
power.” Dr. Mahathir spoke the truth,
and the reality of his words couldn’t be clearer; all one
has to do is look around you and observe the
terrible power of the treacherous Jews.The Jewish-Zionist
terrorist leader Ze’ev Jabotinsky (f ounder of
the Jewish terror group Irgun Zevai Leumi) proudly
proclaimed: “There is only one power which really
counts. The power of political pressure. We Jews are the
most powerful people on earth, because
we have this power, and we know how to apply it.” (Jewish
Daily Bulletin, July 27, 1935) The f act that
the vicious crimes of this disgusting criminal’s insidious
terrorist organization — such as the King David
Hotel bombing and Deir Yassin Massacre — are not mentioned
in Western history texts or at all covered in
High School and University history classes, is a testament
to the veracity of his exultant statement.
Co mmunism is Je wish, Fre e maso nry is Je wish — Ge ntile
co mmunists and
fre e maso ns are no thing mo re than the cat’s p aw o f the
Inte rnatio nal Je wish
Mo ne y Po we r.
Jewish power is supremely epitomized by the f act that
criticism of Christianity, Islam, or any other major
religion or ethnic group is f ully permissible in our
societies, but criticism of Jews and Judaism, on the other
hand, is taboo, of f-limits as well as socially and
politically dangerous.As the saying goes, if you want to
know where the power lies ask whom you cannot criticize.
It’s quite interesting to note that the researchers of the
“New World Order” who endeavor to def lect
attention away from the Jews — such as Alex Jones, Jim
Marrs, Alan Watt, Mark Dice, etc — are not
silenced or suppressed, but in f act promoted by the Jewish
controlled press. These purported critics of the
New World Order and Illuminati who employ vague terms like
“elites”/”globalists”/”the establishment”/”the
military industrial complex”, and who regularly invoke a
conf using deluge of elusive entities and kosher
poltergeists (everything from Satanists, Occultists,
Freemasons, Jesuits, Nazis, Fascists, Knights Templar,
WASPs, British Royalists, Reptilians, Space Aliens, etc) are
free to promote their theories and ideas on
radio, television, the internet and in books, uninhibited.
Their radio shows are not being cancelled, their
books are not being taken of f the shelves or blocked from
publication, their videos are not being censored
or expunged from video sharing websites, their websites and
blogs are not being shut down on a whim,
they are not being f ined or thrown in prison f or “hate
speech.” On the contrary, we can f ind these kosher
clowns being highlighted on mainstream Jewish propaganda
television networks, like the History Channel,
and making appearances on MSM talk shows, like The View.
Critics of Jewish power, Zionism and the
Jewish criminal network couldn’t even dream of achieving
that level of notoriety. I wonder why?
Freemasons are of ten talked about
by these people, but what they
deliberately conceal from their
audiences is the f act that the masons
are subordinate and beholden to the
Jews, which is admitted in the
masons’ own books. On page 249 of
“Duncan’s Ritual and Monitor” it
states that Masonry is subservient to
Judaism, noting that a recipient of the
Royal Arch Degree pledges himself
“For the good of Masonry,
generally, but the Jewish nation in
particular.” The undeniable f act that
Freemasonry itself is based on the
rites and rituals of the Jewish religion
and the mysticism of the Jewish
Cabala, is also purposef ully glossed
over by these deceivers.
The Protocols of Zion make clear this intention to use
subservient Gentiles (shabbas goyim) as
scapegoats,
“GENTILE masonry blindly serves as a screen for us and our
objects, but the plan of action of
our force, even its very abiding-place, remains for the
whole people an unknown mystery.” (The
Protocols of Zion, 4:2)
Those of us who name Jews as the prime mover behind the New
World Order — which we have dubbed the
“Jew World Order” — are ruthlessly suppressed, censored,
harassed, terrorized, arrested, imprisoned, and
in some extreme cases even killed. There is no “Jesuit
Internet Def ense League” that goes around trying to
censor YouTube videos that are critical of the Jesuit Order
and the Vatican; but there is a “Jewish Internet
Def ense Force”, a predatory gang of scheming Jews who
relentlessly go around sabotaging blogs and
websites critical of Jews, Israel or Zionism, and who are
responsible f or the removal of thousands of
videos as well as the banishment of thousands of YouTube
channels and users of other video sharing
websites. The Vatican doesn’t have a paid army of internet
trolls who roam around popular websites like
YouTube, Facebook and Twitter, posting comments glorif ying
the Vatican and smearing all critics of the
Vatican as “anti-Catholic bigots”. But the Israeli
government — and its vast network of Zionist lobby
organizations like the World Jewish Congress, Anti-Def
amation League and B’nai B’rith — has on its payroll
thousands of Jew zealots called “Hasbara” roaming the net
spewing pro-Zionist propaganda, attacking
anyone critical of anything Jewish, Israeli or Zionist, as
an “antisemite” and “f ascist nazi”. It’s not Catholic
Jesuits who are training their pupils to manipulate
Wikipedia to f avor their causes and ambitions, it’s Zionist
Jews who are doing that. Doesn’t that tell you something?
Only criminals attempting to evade exposure and
censure would have to resort to such depraved, bottom-f
eeding behavior.
Look at all of the prominent people over the years whose
careers have been ruined simply f or expressing
an opinion or stating a f act that the Jews don’t want the
public to hear. For instance, Helen Thomas, a f if ty
year veteran of the White House Press Corps, was recently
pressured to resign af ter she was recorded on
videotape telling the Israeli Jews to “get the hell out of
Palestine.” Shortly af ter the video surf aced
Organized Jewry went on a rampage and witch-hunt, unleashing
a barrage of hate against the honorable
Helen Thomas f or her brave remarks, even calling on
journalism schools and groups to revoke any honors
given to her in previous years. Ref lecting on the debacle,
Thomas told an interviewer, “You can’t criticize
Israel in this country and survive.” In a speech Thomas f
urther remarked,
“We are owned by propagandists against the Arabs. There’s no
question about that.
Congress, the White House, and Hollywood, Wall Street, are
owned by the Zionists. No
question in my opinion. They put their money where their
mouth is…We’re being pushed
into a wrong direction in every way.”
Then there was the incident involving Rick Sanchez, a
veteran CNN news anchor with his own show called
“Rick’s List”. Sanchez was promptly f ired from his position
at CNN af ter he insinuated that the American
mass media is controlled by Jews in a radio interview.
(“Rick Sanchez: Jon Stewart A ‘Bigot,’ Jews Run CNN
& All Media.” The Huffington Post. 10/1/2010) Why is it
that Rick Sanchez — being a Gentile — is not
permitted to state the obvious f act that Jews own and
control the media when a Jewish reporter from the
LA Times, Joel Stein, can freely — without any repercussions
— write an article entitled “How Jewish Is
Hollywood?” in which he arrogantly brags about Jewish
control of Hollywood, the news media, government
and f inance, stating:
“Jews totally run Hollywood. … As a proud Jew, I want
America to know about our
accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. … I don’t care if
Americans think we’re
running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the
government. I just care that we
get to keep running them.”
Conservative journalist and writer Joe Sobran, a long-time
syndicated columnist f or the National Review
until he was predictably f ired f or “antisemitism,”
eloquently explained the bef uddling nature of Jewish
power. Sobran opined that if you want to make it in American
politics you have to know all about it, but, at
the same time, can’t ever ref er to it openly, f or f ear of
the Jews:
“Talking about American politics without mentioning the Jews
is a little like talking about the NBA
without mentioning the Chicago Bulls. Not that the Jews are
all-powerful, let alone all bad. But
they are successful, and therefore powerful enough: and
their power is unique in being off-limits
to normal criticism even when it’s highly visible. They
themselves behave as if their success
were a guilty secret, and they panic, and resort to
accusations, as soon as the subject is raised.
Jewish control of the major media in the media age makes the
enforced silence both
paradoxical and paralyzing. Survival in public life requires
that you know all about it, but never
refer to it. A hypocritical etiquette forces us to pretend
that the Jews are powerless victims; and if
you don’t respect their victimhood, they’ll destroy you.
It’s a phenomenal display not of
wickedness, really, but of fierce ethnocentrism, a sort of
furtive racial superpatriotism.”
In an essay reprinted in the May 27, 1996, issue of the New
York Times Ari Shavit, an Israeli columnist,
ref lected on the Israeli slaughter of more than a hundred
Lebanese civilians the month bef ore: “We killed
them out of a certain naive hubris. Believing with absolute
certitude that now, with the White
House, the Senate, and much of the American media in our
hands, the lives of others do not count
as much as our own….” This Israeli simply conf irmed what
many Americans already knew and had known
f or decades, which is that the Jewish/Israeli lobby — not
Jesuits, Occultists, Satanists or shape-shif ting
Reptilians — control the White House, Congress and the
Senate, like a marionette. Well-known political
commentator, and f ormer presidential candidate, Pat
Buchanan, once declared: “Capitol Hill is Israeli
occupied territory.” Former US congressman Paul Findley
documented the reality of Buchanan’s
statement in a book called, “They Dare to Speak Out: People
and Institutions Confront Israel’s Lobby”. On
page 161 of Findley’s book, he quotes Admiral Thomas Moorer,
f ormer Chairman of the US Joint Chief s of
Staf f , who, with blunt vexation at the Jewish-Israeli hold
on the United States, said:
“I’ve never seen a President — I don’t care who he is —
stand up to them [the Israelis]. It
just boggles the mind. They always get what they want. The
Israelis know what is going
on all the time. I got to the point where I wasn’t writing
anything down. If the American
people understood what a grip those people have got on our
government, they would
rise up in arms. Our citizens certainly don’t have any idea
what goes on.”
British MP, Tom Dalyell, echoed these sentiments when he
proclaimed, “A Jewish cabal have taken over
the government in the United States and formed an unholy
alliance with fundamentalist
Christians.” Former US congresswoman Cynthia McKinney has
come out and blamed the pro-Israel Lobby
in America (AIPAC, ADL, AJC, ZOA, etc) f or ruining her
political career. While in congress McKinney ref used
to sign the pro-Israel pledge and took a pro-Palestinian
stance. Because of this, McKinney said “war was
declared” on her by the Jewish lobby who eventually ousted
her from Congress by f unding and supporting
her political opponents. In 2009 she told an interviewer
that “more than 99% of Congress work for Pro
Zionist Israeli interests.” Former US congressman, Jim Traf
f icant, was also targeted and then destroyed
by the Jewish lobby f or not being a groveling pro-Israel
stooge, and f or helping out a f alsely accused socalled
“Nazi war criminal” named John Demjanjuk who the Jews
attempted to crucif y f or “war crimes” that
never happened. (See: Collins, Michael Piper. Target
Trafficant.American Free Press, 2005) Af ter serving a
seven year prison sentence on trumped-up corruption charges,
he f earlessly came out swinging stating in a
television interview that,
“…Israel has a powerful stranglehold on the American
government. They [the Jews]
control both members of the House, and the Senate. They have
us involved in wars in
which we have little or no interest. Our children are coming
back in body bags. Our
nation is bankrupt over these wars. And if you open your
mouth, you get targeted. And if
they don’t beat you at the poll, they’ll put you in prison
[...] They’re controlling much of
our foreign policy. They’re influencing much of our domestic
policy. Wolfowitz as
undersecretary of defense manipulated President Bush number
two back into Iraq.
They’ve pushed definitely, definitely to try to get Bush
before he left to move into Iran.
We’re conducting the expansionist policy of Israel and
everybody’s afraid to say it. They
control much of the media, they control much of the commerce
of the country, and they
control powerfully both bodies of the Congress. They own the
Congress.”
University of Chicago Prof essor, John Mersheimer, and
Harvard academic Stephen Walt, f elt the perilous
wrath of the Jew lobby.A vicious smear campaign was launched
against them af ter they published a study
exposing the insidious inf luence of Israeli lobby groups —
principally the American-Israel Public Affairs
Committee — entitled, “The Israel Lobby and US Foreign
Policy”. Fox News reporter Carl Cameron
conf irmed the capability of the Jewish-Israeli lobby to
silence and extirpate anyone they don’t like. In his
censored f our part series on Israeli espionage against the
United States, Cameron stated, “Investigators
within the DEA, INS and FBI have all told Fox News that to
pursue or even suggest Israeli spying … is
considered career suicide.”
The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish
Organizations lists on its board of members f if tyone of
America’s most powerf ul Zionist hate organizations that
wield tremendous inf luence in American
political lif e. Jewish author J.J. Goldberg, in his book
“Jewish Power: Inside the America Jewish
Establishment” (pp. 38-39), noted that there are
approximately 300 national Jewish organizations in
the United States with a combined budget estimated in the
range of $6 billion — a sum greater
than the gross national product of half the members of the
United Nations. (cited in MacDonald,
Kevin. The Culture of Critique, Chapter 7) And that doesn’t
even take into account the inf luence of individual
wealthy Jews, Jewish f amilies and Jewish Wall Street
banking houses like Goldman Sachs, who mete out
billions of dollars in campaign contributions to both the
Democrat and Republican parties. (See: Collins,
Michael Piper. The New Babylon: Those Who Reign
Supreme.American Free Press, 2009) Henry L. Feingold,
writing in his book “Jewish Power in America: Myth and
Reality”, stated that “Over 60 percent of campaign
funds collected by the Democratic party and a respectable
percentage of Republican campaign
funds stem from Jewish sources.” Jews are quite candid about
their attempt to manipulate the US
political process to their benef it — the New Yorker
reported that at a conf erence, the Jewish supremacist
Haim Saban (an Israeli-American multibillionaire media
mogul) outlined several ways in which Jews can be
inf luential in American politics: “make donations to
political parties, establish think tanks, and control
media outlets.” Couple all that with the Jewish death-grip
on the mass media and Hollywood, in
conjunction with the Jewish stranglehold on world f inance
and you have total Jewish ethnic domination of
America, a virtual slave society reminiscent of the Soviet
Union.
This phenomena of Jewish targeting of political opponents is
not limited to America, it’s also quite apparent
in Canada, Europe, Australia, and in pretty much all nations
where Jews live. The ravenous Canadian Jewish
Congress had a Liberal Party candidate named Leslie Hughes
removed by her party f or writing a 2003 article
suggesting Israel had f oreknowledge of 9/11 (not only did
Israel have f oreknowledge, they did it). Many
Canadian patriots such as Ernst Zundel, Paul Fromm, Terry
Tremaine, Arthur Topham, Marc Lemire, and
others, have been prosecuted by the tyrannical Canadian
government — at the behest of evil Jewish lobby
groups like the CJC, B’nai B’rith, Simon Wiesenthal Center,
etc — f or their internet writings criticizing Jews,
Zionism or Israel.
In 2009 an Australian anti-Zionist activist named Brendon
O’Connell was arrested and charged under
Australia’s Orwellian “racial vilif ication” law af ter an
altercation he had with two Zionist Jews who
photographed him and other pro-Palestine activists at a
rally without asking permission. For calling the two
Zionist spies “racist, homicidal maniacs” and describing
Judaism as a “racist, homicidal cult” (statements
totally congruent with the f acts), the righteous patriot
O’Connell was handed down a hef ty three year jail
sentence! If the Vatican and the Jesuits — instead of
Jews/Israel — were the object of O’Connell’s criticism
do you think he would be in prison right now? Of course not.
The brilliant Douglas Reed, Britain’s preeminent WWII
correspondent f or the London Times, went from
being a celebrated, revered author, playwright and
journalist with an army of f ans, to a non-person scorned
in the press and whose books publishers wouldn’t touch with
a f if ty f oot poll. Why? Because he started
writing about the Jewish Question, Zionism, and the
long-term Jewish conspiracy to impose a world
government on an enslaved humanity. (See: The Controversy of
Zion)
Alexander Solzhenitsyn was the once-f amous Russian
dissident, a survivor of a Soviet Gulag
concentration camp who authored several books about the
horrif ic experiences he, and his Russian
countrymen, endured during the communist hell of Soviet
Russia (See: The Gulag Archipelago I & II). Then
he stopped being f amous and now he is a non-person (now
deceased). It happened because he told truths
about the predominant Jewish role in the Bolshevik
revolution and the Soviet Regime. (See: 200 Years
Together) So the Jews in the media wrote him out of history
— he disappeared quicker than the people that
Stalin did not like vanished.
Another strong indication of the menacing Jewish
stranglehold on the West is the wicked Stalinist-style
State repression of Holocaust Revisionists. In a
well-organized censorship campaign, International Jewish
Supremacist groups — principally the World Jewish Congress —
have successf ully lobbied over a dozen
European governments to criminalize holocaust revisionist
research.All around the world holocaust
revisionist scholars and ordinary people who dare question
any aspect of the f arcical holocaust™ dogma
have been harassed, vilif ied, smeared, slandered, f ined
heavily, jailed, physically assaulted, terrorized, and
in one instance murdered. Courageous and esteemed
revisionist scholars such as Arthur Butz, Mark Weber,
Germar Rudolf , Robert Faurisson, Ernst Zundel, Fredrick
Toben, Juergen Graf , Carlo Mattogno, David Cole,
Ditlieb Felderer, Carlos Porter, and many others, have suf f
ered tremendous hardships because of their
brilliant work debunking the holocaust™ myth.
Taking into account these simple observations, we can conf
idently assert that International Jewry are the
cap of the pyramid of world power and inf luence. Everything
else serves as a distraction and convenient
smokescreen f or this f undamental reality.
Imperium Judaica — Bolshevism and Zionism As Instruments of
Jewish Intrigue
Zio nism and Co mmunism are b ut two arms o f the Je wish Wo
rld Swind le .
Jews have long been in control of the
world, and continue to rule it today.
This is revealed to us simply by
observing the actions and words of the
leaders of World Zionism and World
Communism, the twin vehicles of global
Jewish subversion.
With the advent of Communism in the
early 19th century, we saw the world
plunge into a brutal chaos of social
cataclysm and economic decay. Indeed,
the goal of International Communism
was never to “free the workers” from
capitalist oppression, but rather to
f urther enslave them to a small cadre
of self-declared and self-perpetuating
elite vanguards who ruled their subjects
with an iron f ist. From its inception,
Communism and Socialism was a
Jewish endeavor to usurp the remaining Gentile nations free
from Jewish control, plunder their wealth, and
enslave and murder the best of their people!
Communism’s Talmudic Jewish roots couldn’t be more apparent.
The Jew Karl Marx, a descendant of a long
line of Talmudic rabbis, is widely viewed as the principal
progenitor of the ideology of Communism. Less
known, however, was Communism’s true prophet — the Jewish
supremacist, Talmudist, and racist Zionist
Moses Hess, whom Marx called the “Red Rabbi.” (See: Avineri,
Shlomo. Moses Hess: Prophet of Communism
and Zionism. NYU Press, 1987) Hess was Marx’s guide and
teacher, and converted both Karl Marx and
Friedrich Engels to Communism. These two sordid snakes —
Marx and Engels — went on to author “The
Communist Manif esto”, “Das Kapital”, and other works, which
crystallized this wretched brain-trust of
sanguinary scoundrels and their grandiose dreams of a
one-world global communist dictatorship.
In 1920, Winston Churchill — who later sold out to the Jews
and became their tool — ominously warned the
world of the menacing movement that was Jewish Bolshevism.
Writing in the Illustrated Sunday Herald,
February 8, 1920, page 5, Churchill opined:
“This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of
Spartacus — Weishaupt to those
of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun
(Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany),
and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy
for the overthrow of civilization
and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of
arrested development, of envious
malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily
growing. It played, as a modern writer,
Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable
part in the tragedy of the French
Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive
movement during the Nineteenth
Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary
personalities from the underworld of the
great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian
people by the hair of their heads
and have become practically the undisputed masters of that
enormous empire…
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the
creation of Bolshevism and an the actual
bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these
international and for the most part atheistical
Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably
outweighs all others. With the notable exception
of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews.
Moreover, the principal inspiration and
driving power comes from the Jewish leaders.”
Many misinf ormed patriots have been led to believe
Churchill’s “Zionism versus Bolshevism:A Struggle f or
the Soul of the Jewish People” article (quoted above) was
somehow a courageous anti-Zionist statement
— it was not. In f act, in the concluding paragraph of the
article Churchill gave a ringing endorsement of
Zionism, encouraging Jews to f ollow the course of Zionism
rather than Bolshevism:
“Zionism has already become a factor in the political
convulsions of Russia, as a powerful
competing influence in Bolshevik circles with the
international communistic system. Nothing
could be more significant than the fury with which Trotsky
has attacked the Zionists generally,
and Dr. Weissmann in particular. The cruel penetration of
his mind leaves him in no doubt that
his schemes of a world-wide communistic State under Jewish
domination are directly thwarted
and hindered by this new ideal, which directs the energies
and the hopes of Jews in every land
towards a simpler, a truer, and a far more attainable goal.
The struggle which is now beginning
between the Zionist and Bolshevik Jews is little less than a
struggle for the soul of the Jewish
people.”
Churchill was, by his own admission, a radical Zionist who —
as Prime Minister of Britain during WWII —
hypocritically went on to collaborate with Bolshevism,
establishing a cozy relationship with Josef Stalin’s
genocidal Soviet Bolshevik Regime. Churchill’s abhorrence of
Bolshevism disappeared as rapidly as his
reservations about International Jewry as soon as it suited
his personal ambitions. Even his “Zionism
versus Bolshevism” article was disingenuous in the sense
that he of f ered the world a Hobson’s choice of
“Zionism or Bolshevism”, a f alse dilemma in that both
options produced the exact same result: a World
Government under Jewish domination as f oretold in the
Hebrew Old Testament. Churchill knowingly f ailed
to inf orm his readers that ideologies to Jews are like the
many arms of Vishnu. They all emanate from the
same place with the same goal: the desire f or a New World
Order under Jewish rule!Apparent conf licts
among Jews are more about tactics than disputes about
ultimate goals. Zionism and Communism are but
two tentacles of the same Talmudic monster — cut and f
ashioned out of the same Jewish cloth!
History’s most f amous critic of Jewry, Adolf Hitler,
eloquently explained this Jewish trick in his book, Mein
Kampf,
“The Jew’s domination in the state seems so assured that now
not only can he call himself a
Jew again, but he ruthlessly admits his ultimate national
and political designs. A section of his
race openly owns itself to be a foreign people, yet even
here they lie. For while the Zionists
try to make the rest of the world believe that the national
consciousness of the Jew
finds its satisfaction in the creation of a Palestinian
state, the Jews again slyly dupe the
dumb Goyim. It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a
Jewish state in Palestine for
the purpose of living there; all they want is a central
organization for their international
world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and
removed from the
intervention of other states: a haven for convicted
scoundrels and a university for
budding crooks.” (A. Hitler, English translation by Ralph
Manheim, Mein Kampf, Houghton
Mifflin, Boston, New York, (1971), pp. 324-325.)
The mischievous and cruel doctrines of Marx and Hess were
zealously adopted by the world’s Jews who
saw in it an opportunity to crush the Gentiles once and f or
all.A Jew named Baruch Levy, in a letter to Karl
Marx, stated that Communism was — af ter all — merely a way
to transf er all the wealth of the world into
Jewish hands and so f ulf ill the messianic vision of the
treacherous Talmud:
“The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It
will attain world dominion by
the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of
frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and
by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews
will everywhere exercise the privilege
of citizenship. In this new world order the Children of
Israel will furnish all the leaders
without encountering opposition. The Governments of the
different peoples forming the
world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands
of the Jews. It will then be possible
for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, and
everywhere to make use of the resources
of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be
fulfilled, in which is said that when
the Messianic time is come the Jews will have all the
property of the whole world in their
hands.” (Baruch Levy, Letter to Karl Marx, La Revue de
Paris, p. 54, June 1, 1928)
Jewish author Bernard Lazare tells us that Karl Marx was
indeed a Talmudist:
“He had that clear Talmudic mind which does not falter at
the petty difficulties of fact. He was a
Talmudist devoted to sociology and applying his native power
of exegesis to the criticism of
economic theory. He was inspired by that ancient Hebraic
materialism, which, rejecting as too
distant and doubtful the hope of an Eden after death, never
ceased to dream of Paradise
realized on earth. But Marx was not merely a logician, he
was also a rebel, an agitator, an acrid
controversialist, and he derived his gift for sarcasm and
invective, as Heine did, from his Jewish
ancestry.” (Lazare, Bernard. “Antisemitism, Its History and
Causes”, p. 129)
In its article on “Messianic Movements”, the Encyclopaedia
Judaica writes: “In his letters to Leopold Zunz
referred many times to the European revolution of 1848 as
‘the Messiah.’ Even many Jews who left
the faith tended to invest secular liberation movements with
a messianic glow.”
The Jewish supremacist rabbi, Harry Waton, conf essed that
not only is Communism Jewish, but that it is
simply a mechanism f or Jewish world dominion and the
subjugation of all non-Jews — a f ulf illment of the
megalomaniacal messianic vision of the Torah and the Talmud.
In his 1939 book, “A Program f or The Jews
and An Answer To All Anti-Semites:A Program f or Humanity”,
the racist rabbi wrote:
“It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism,
and it is not an accident that the
Jews readily took up Marxism; all this was in perfect accord
with the progress of Judaism and
the Jews. The Jews should realize that Jehovah no longer
dwells in heaven, but he dwells
in us right here on earth; we must no longer look up to
Jehovah as above us and outside
of us, but we must see him right within us,” (p. 148)
“Since the Jews are the highest and most cultured people on
earth, the Jews have a right to
subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the
masters over the whole
earth. Now, indeed, this is the historic destiny of the
Jews,” (p. 99)
“Judaism is communism, internationalism, the universal
brotherhood of man, the
emancipation of the working class and the human society. It
is with these spiritual weapons that
the Jews will conquer the world and the human race.” (p.
100)
Peculiar isn’t it that the supposed arch anti-capitalist,
Karl Marx, never spoke a negative word about the
Jewish banking dynasty, the Rothschilds, the richest of the
world’s capitalist f inanciers, war prof iteers and
exploiters of the working class. This isn’t so puzzling when
you understand that Marx was working f or the
Rothschilds all along. (See: Red Symphony) Mikael Bakunin,
the prominent anarcho-syndicalist thinker and
rival of Karl Marx, assailed Jewish control of the World
Revolution, blasting Marx and his phony liberation
ideology (Marxism) as a Rothschild-backed con f or the
Jewish f inancial oligarchy to undermine, loot and
pillage the wealth of Gentile nations. Bakunin said,
“Himself a Jew, Marx has around him, in London and France,
but especially in Germany,
a multitude of more or less clever, intriguing, mobile,
speculating Jews, such as Jews are
every where: commercial or banking agents, writers,
politicians, correspondents for newspapers
of all shades, with one foot in the bank, the other in the
socialist movement, and with their
behinds sitting on the German daily press — they have taken
possession of all the newspapers
— and you can imagine what kind of sickening literature they
produce. Now, this entire Jewish
world, which forms a single profiteering sect, a people of
bloodsuckers, a single
gluttonous parasite, closely and intimately united not only
across national borders but
across all differences of political opinion — this Jewish
world today stands for the most
part at the disposal of Marx and at the same time at the
disposal of Rothschild. I am
certain that Rothschild for his part greatly values the
merits of Marx, and that Marx for
his part feels instinctive attraction and great respect for
Rothschild. This may seem
strange. What can there be in common between Communism and
the large banks? Oh! The
Communism of Marx seeks enormous centralization in the
state, and where such exists,
there must inevitably be a central state bank, and where
such a bank exists, the
parasitic Jewish nation, which, speculates on the work of
the people, will always find a
way to prevail ….” (Michael Bakunin, Polémique contres les
Juifs, 1869)
Benjamin Disraeli, the Jewish Prime Minister of England from
1874-1880, repeatedly warned about the
machinations of his trouble-making kinsmen. In his novel,
Conigsby, Disraeli made one of his characters
say,
“I had on my arrival (at St. Petersburg) an interview with
the Russian Minister of Finance, Count
Canerin; I beheld the son of a Lithuanian Jew…. I had an
audience on my arrival at Madrid with
the Spanish minister; I beheld one like myself, the son of a
Nuovo Christiano, a Jew of Aragon.
In consequence of that transpired at Madrid I went straight
to consult the President of the
French Council; I beheld the son of a French Jew…. We fixed
on Prussia…. Count Arnim
entered the cabinet, and I beheld a Prussian Jew. So you
see, my dear Coningsby, that the
world is governed by very different personages to what is
imagined by those who are
not behind the scenes.“
Then, f our years af ter the Jewish-engineered outbreaks of
1848, Disraeli returned to the subject in his
book Lord George Bentinck, stating,
“The influence of the Jews may be traced in the last
outbreak of the destructive principle
in Europe. An insurrection takes place against tradition and
aristocracy, against religion and
property… The natural equality of men and the abrogation of
property are proclaimed by the
secret societies who form provisional governments and men of
Jewish race are found at
the head of every one of them.“
Chaim Weizmann, the 20th century’s preeminent Zionist inf
luence-peddler, architect of the ‘Balf our
Declaration’, and f irst president of Israel, is quoted as
saying: “A beneficent protection which God has
instituted in the life of the Jew is that He has dispersed
him all over the world.” (JEWISH
GUARDIAN, Oct. 8, 1920.) Now compare this with the last
clause of Protocol No. 11, of The Protocols of
Zion: “God has granted to us, His Chosen People, the gift of
dispersion, and from this, which
appears to all eyes to be our weakness, has come forth all
our strength, which has now brought us
to the threshold of sovereignty over all the world.” The
remarkable similarity between Weizmann’s
pronouncement and the passage from the Protocols proves that
the Jewish Learned Elders exist,
Weizmann chief among them.
This Hidden Hand of Jews was subtly identif ied by Walter
Rathenau (1867-1922), a German-Jewish
industrialist, writer, and statesman who served as Germany’s
Foreign Minister during the Weimar Republic.
Writing in the Wiener Freie Presse, December 24, 1912, he
said: “Three hundred men, each of whom
knows all the others, govern the fate of the European
continent, and they elect their successors from
their entourage.” This reality was conf irmed by Jean
Izoulet, a Jewish prof essor at the College of France
and a member of the Jewish-Masonic secret society Alliance
Israelite Universelle. Writing in his 1926 book
“Paris Capital of Religions”, Izoulet said: “I certainly do
not want to relinquish their Magisterium
temporal the three hundred bankers who, at the moment,
dominate the world.”
At the Zionist congress held in Basel in 1898, Dr.
Mandelstam, a prof essor at the University of Kiev,
proclaimed: “The Jews energetically reject the idea of
fusion with the other nationalities and cling
firmly to their historical hope of world empire.”
(Chamberlain, Houston Stewart. “Foundations of the
Nineteenth Century“, p. 335) The Talmudic Jew David Wolf f
sohn was Theordore Herzl’s successor as
leader of World Zionism and chairman of the World Zionist
Organization (WZO). He presided over the
Zionist Congress at the Hague in 1907 and gave the opening
and closing speeches. The New York Times
tells us that in his closing address Wolf f sohn pleaded f
or more unity among the Jews and said that Jewry
eventually must conquer the world! (“ZIONIST LEADER DIES. –
David Wolf sohn Was Once Chairman of
International Committee.” The New York Times. 17 Sept.
1914.)
In 1922 at a Zionist conf erence in Carlsbad, Calif ornia,
Zionist leader Nahum Sokolow boastf ully gloated
that the League of Nations (predecessor of the United
Nations) was a Jewish construct and tool, and that
Jerusalem will one day be capital of the world upon the
realization of their dark plans:
“The League of Nations is a Jewish idea, and Jerusalem some
day will become the
capital of the world’s peace. We Jews throughout the world
will make the League’s
struggle our own and will not rest until there is ultimate
victory.” (“SAYS JEWS OF
WORLD WILL BACK LEAGUE – Dr. Sokolow Tells Zionist Congress
Jerusalem Will Be
International Peace Capital.” The New York Times. 28 Aug.
1922.)
Theodore Newman Kauf man was an American Jew who published a
book in 1941 calling f or the
extermination of the entire German race and nation in a “f
inal solution” of sterilization. (See: Kauf man,
Theodore N. Germany Must Perish! Newark, NJ:Argyle Press,
1941) In the same year of his book’s
publication, this devilish Jew gave an interview to The
Canadian Jewish Chronicle in which he f ervently
articulated his desire not only f or the annihilation of all
German Gentiles, but also f or Jewish World
Government, stating:
“I believe that the Jews have a mission in life. They must
see to it that the nations of the
world get together in one vast confederation. ‘Union Now’ is
the beginning of this.
Slowly but surely the world will develop into paradise. We
will have perpetual peace. And
the Jews will do the most to bring about this confederation,
because they have the most
to gain.”
Kauf man’s call f or “Union Now” was strangely similar to a
proclamation made by Adolph Crémieux, a
prominent French-Jewish lawyer and statesman who f ounded
the Jewish Masonic order “Alliance Israelite
Universelle” in Paris in 1860.At an Alliance meeting
Crémieux declared in true ‘Protocols’ style: “The
Alliance is not limited to our cult; it voices its appeal to
all cults and wants to penetrate in all
religions, as it has penetrated into all countries. Let us
endeavor boldly to bring about the union
of all cults under one flag of “Union and Progress”: such is
the motto of humanity.” Crémieux and
his secretive Jewish order were named as the prime
conspirators in the f ormulation of The Protocols of
Zion, in an enlightening essay entitled, “The Protocols of
the Ruf f le Crested Kikes of Zion”.
In 1940, Arthur Greenwood — the Deputy Leader of the British
Labour Party and member of the British War
Cabinet — made a vocal pledge to American Jewry that upon
the def eat of the Axis Powers in WWII he
would do his utmost to help realize the f ormation of a “New
World Order” in the world, led and dominated
by the Jews. The groveling Zionist stooge proclaimed,
“When we have achieved victory, as we assuredly shall, the
nations will have the
opportunity of establishing a new world order … In such a
world it is our confident hope
that the conscience of civilized humanity would demand that
the wrongs suffered by the
Jewish people in so many countries should be righted.”
He added,
“In the rebuilding of civilized society after the war, there
should and will be a real
opportunity for Jews everywhere to make a distinctive and
constructive contribution.”
(See this facsimile of the New York Times article)
In 1946, the US government put to Stalin a proposal f or
World Government, penned by two Globalist Jews
— Bernard Baruch and David Lilienthal. Baruch was a wealthy
Jewish Wall Street tycoon, and inf luential
adviser to f ive American presidents. In World War I he was
Woodrow Wilson’s chief adviser on national
def ense and was appointed chairman of the War Industries
Board (1918-1919), thus bringing the American
war machine under the heel of Jewish f inanciers. Baruch,
and a contingent of his kinsmen, helped frame the
economic provisions of the Versailles Treaty of 1919 which
carved Germany into pieces af ter WWI. In his
address to the United Nations Atomic Energy Commission on
the 14th of June, 1946, Baruch made the
f ollowing “Protocolist”, One-Worldist pronouncement:
“Behind the black portent of the new atomic age lies a hope
which, seized upon with
faith, can work out salvation … Let us not deceive
ourselves: we must elect world peace
or world destruction. … Peace is never long preserved by
weight of metal or by an
armament race. Peace can be made tranquil and secure only by
understanding and
agreement fortified by sanctions. We must embrace
international cooperation or
international disintegration.”
Baruch also predicted the “Cold War” between the US and the
USSR. In 1948, during a speech bef ore the
Senate’s Special Committee Investigating the National Def
ense Program, he said,
“Although the shooting war is over, we are in the midst of a
cold war which is getting
warmer.”
Fellow Zionist kingpin, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, peculiarly
predicted the ascendancy of Woodrow Wilson to
the presidency, and in his autobiography, “Challenging
Years,” (p. 161) boasted “that an immensely
influential hidden power” — with which he was intimately
acquainted — “had chosen Wilson as a major
pawn in their political game” even bef ore the president of
Princeton University had entered into politics.
Wise would go on to become one of Wilson’s chief advisers
who was instrumental in persuading Wilson to
support the ‘Balf our Declaration’. Wilson, of course, was
the “poodle on a string” of the conniving
Protocolist Jews, having signed into law two of the most
important planks of their Communist Manif esto —
Plank #2, “A heavy progressive or graduated income tax,” and
Plank #5, the creation of a central bank, “with
exclusive monopoly.”
Perhaps in a f it of rebelliousness against his masters,
Woodrow Wilson made this ominous remark about
the secret f orces controlling the United States government
from behind the scenes,
“…we have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most
completely controlled
and dominated, governments in the civilized world — no
longer a government by free
opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote
of the majority, but a
government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of
dominant men.” (Woodrow,
Wilson. New Freedom: a Call for the Emancipation of the
Generous Energies of a People. [S.l.]:
Indypublish Com, 2007, p. 201)
Further clarif ication and conf irmation of this ongoing
Jewish World Government project was provided by
Israel’s f irst prime minister — the Jewish supremacist,
Talmudist, Zionist terrorist and Bolshevist
internationalist — David Ben-Gurion. In 1962, Ben-Gurion
predicted the end of the Cold War in the late
1980s, and went on to express a burning desire f or world
governance, led by the Jewish nation:
“The image of the world in 1987 as traced in my imagination:
the Cold War will be a thing of the
past. Internal pressure of the constantly growing
intelligensia in Russia for more freedom and
the pressure of the masses for raising their living
standards may lead to a gradual
democratization of the Soviet Union. On the other hand, the
increasing influence of the workers
and farmers, and rising political importance of men of
science, may transform the United States
into a welfare state with a planned economy. Western and
Eastern Europe will become a
federation of autonomous states having a Socialist and
democratic regime. With the exception
of the USSR as a federated Eurasian state, all other
continents will become united in a world
alliance, at whose disposal will be an international police
force. All armies will be abolished, and
there will be no more wars. In Jerusalem, the United Nations
(a truly United Nations) will
build a shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union
of all continents; this will be
the scene of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all
controversies among the
federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah.” (Gurion,
David Ben & Duchovny, Amram.
David Ben-Gurion, In His Own Words. Fleet Press Corp., 1969,
p. 116; also quoted in Look
Magazine, January 16, 1962, p. 20)
Ben-Gurion reiterated his ostentatious dreams of a Jewish
Utopia when he said: “Jerusalem is not the
capital of Israel and world Jewry, it aspires to become the
spiritual center of the world.” The Israeli
prime minister was a chauvinistic Jewish supremacist who
stated his rotten aims openly. He spilled the
blood of tens of thousands of Palestinians and was
responsible f or the uprooting and beheading of their
nation. He, along with his clique of f erocious Zionist
bandits, gangsters and thugs, masterminded “the
Nakba” which has been described as “the mass deportation of
a million Palestinians from their cities
and villages, massacres of civilians, and the razing to the
ground of hundreds of Palestinian
villages.”
Flaunting his Jewish pride and arrogantly mocking his
victims by f alsely claiming to be a victim, Ben-Gurion
sanctimoniously said:
“We would not have taken on this war merely for the purpose
of enjoying this tiny state.
There have been only two great people: the Greeks and the
Jews. Perhaps the Greeks
were even greater than the Jews, but now I can see no sign
of that old greatness in the
modern Greeks. Maybe when the present process is finished we
too will degenerate, but I see
no sign of degeneration at present. [...] Suffering makes a
people greater, and we have
suffered much. We had a message to give the world, but we
were overwhelmed, and the
message was cut off in the middle. In time there will be
millions of us — becoming stronger and
stronger — and we will complete the message. [...] Our
policy must be the unity of the human
race. The world is divided into two blocs. We consider that
the United Nations’ ideal is a
Jewish ideal.“
Ben-Gurion believed Jews to be living gods on earth,
superior to Gentiles in every way, stating:
“My concept of the messianic ideal and vision is not a
metaphysical one but a socio-culturalmoral one … I believe
in our moral and intellectual superiority, in our capacity
to serve as
a model for the redemption of the human race. This belief of
mine is based on my
knowledge of the Jewish people, not some mystical faith; the
glory of the divine
presence is within us, in our hearts, and not outside of
us.” (Hertzberg, Arthur. The Zionist
State. Jewish Publication Society, 1997, p. 94)
Ben-Gurion’s “prophesy” of an earthly Jewish kingdom ruled
from Jerusalem was similarly expressed by the
Temple Mount Faithf ul organization newsletter (2000), which
says:
“The real “United Nations Organization” will be the Kingdom
of G-d which will soon be
established in Jerusalem, based on the holy laws of G-d. The
Temple will again be the
heart, soul and focus of Israel and the nations. Mashiach
ben David will come and will be
the king of Israel and the world. He will come to Jerusalem
and rule from there and
establish the Kingdom of G-d over all the world. Jerusalem
instead of New York will be the
center of the this godly “United Nations Organization” and a
new era of justice, spiritual holiness,
a real law based on the word of G-d in the Torah and a real
peace will open and will be
established in Jerusalem exactly as Isaiah prophesied: “The
word that Isaiah the son of
Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem. And it shall come
to pass in the last days,
that the mountain of the Lord’s house shall be established
on the top of the mountains,
and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall
flow to it. And many people
shall go and say, Come, and let us go up to the mountain of
the Lord, to the house of
the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we
will walk in his paths; for
from Zion shall go forth Torah, and the word of the Lord
from Jerusalem. And he shall
judge among the nations, and shall decide for many people;
and they shall beat their
swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks;
nation shall not lift up
sword against nation, nor shall they learn war any more. O
house of Jacob, come, and
let us walk in the light of the Lord.” (Isaiah 2:1-5)”
As demonstrated by the Jewish supremacist group “Temple
Mount Faithf ul,” the ancient Jewish plan f or
world ownership is prophesied in the Jewish Old Testament
book of Isaiah. This book, among others,
exemplif ies the Jewish supremacist mentality. For example,
in Isaiah 60:16, it says: “Thou shalt also suck
the milk of the Gentiles, and shalt suck the breast of
kings: and thou shalt know that I the LORD am
thy Saviour and thy Redeemer, the mighty One of Jacob.”
Isaiah 61:5 reiterates this concept of Gentile
servitude to the Jews, stating: “And strangers [non-Jews]
shall stand and feed your flocks, and the
sons of the alien [non-Jews] shall be your plowmen and your
vinedressers.” Isaiah 60:5 and Isaiah 61:6
prophesied that the Jews will come to possess all the wealth
of the world: “the wealth of the nations [the
Goyim] shall come unto thee [the Jews]. … You will feed on
the wealth of nations, and in their riches
you will boast.”
When Ben-Gurion ref erred to “everybody” in his Protocolist
Prophecy he was most likely only ref erring to
Jews, since the Zohar states: “’living soul’ refers to
Israel, who have holy living souls from above, and
“cattle and creeping thing and beast of the earth” to the
other peoples who are not ‘living soul’.”
This view is corroborated by the crazed ravings of many
prominent Jewish rabbis, including many of
Judaism’s most revered sages. Take f or instance, Rabbi
Shneur Zalman of Liadi (1745-1812), the f ounder
of the extremist Jewish sect “Chabad” who cursed Gentiles,
claiming we possess evil souls: “Gentile souls
are of a completely different and inferior order. They are
totally evil, with no redeeming qualities
whatsoever… All Jews are innately good, all Gentiles are
innately evil.” (quoted in Foxbrunner, A.
Roman. Habad: the Hasidism of R. Shneur Zalman of Lyady.
University of Alabama Press, 1992, p. 108)
Rabbi Kook the Elder, the revered f ather of the messianic
tendency of Jewish f undamentalism, said, “The
difference between a Jewish soul and souls of non-Jews—all
of them in all different levels—is
greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul
and the souls of cattle.” (quoted in
Shahak, Israel & Mezvinsky, Norman. Jewish
Fundamentalism in Israel. London: Pluto Press, 1999, p. 176)
The late, highly revered Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson,
the “Lubavitcher Rebbe” who headed the
Chabad movement and wielded great inf luence in Israel as
well as in the U.S., explained that, “The
difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish person stems
from the common expression: ‘Let
us differentiate.’ Thus, we do not have a case of profound
change in which a person is merely on a
superior level. Rather, we have a case of ‘let us
differentiate’ between totally different species.
This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a
Jewish person is of a totally different
quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the
world…A non-Jew’s entire reality is only
vanity. It is written, ‘And the strangers shall guard and
feed your flocks’ (Isaiah 61:5). The entire
creation [of a non-Jew] exists only for the sake of the
Jews…” (Ibid., p. 59)
An immigrant to Israel from the U.S., Rabbi Ginsburgh speaks
freely of his belief in the Jews’ genetic-based,
spiritual superiority over non-Jews: “If you saw two people
drowning, a Jew and a non-Jew, the Torah
says you save the Jewish life first. … If every simple cell
in a Jewish body entails divinity, is a part
of God, then every strand of DNA is part of God. Therefore,
something is special about Jewish
DNA…If a Jew needs a liver, can you take the liver of an
innocent non-Jew passing by to save him?
The Torah would probably permit that. Jewish life has an
infinite value.” (Ibid., p. 62)
Rabbi Ovadia Yosef , the head of Shas’s Council of Torah
Sages, declared that Gentiles exist solely to
serve the Jews as slaves.According to the rabbi: “Goyim were
born only to serve us. Without that,
they have no place in the world – only to serve the People
of Israel.” (Mandel, Jonah. “Yosef :
Gentiles Exist Only To Serve Jews.” The Jerusalem Post.
10/18/2010) And these are just the statements
Jews have made aloud. Just imagine how they talk when they
know Gentiles aren’t listening.
Another cardinal proof of the Zionist World Conspiracy was
the incredible f oresight displayed by Zionist
leader Simon Maximilian Südfeld (alias Max Nordau), Theodore
Herzl’s close conf idant who convinced
him to organize the f irst Zionist conf erence in Basel,
Switzerland in 1897.At the sixth Zionist Congress in
1903 — eleven years bef ore World War I commenced and f
orty-f ive years bef ore Israel was established —
Nordau spoke of a coming “World War” resulting in the
creation of a Jewish state in Palestine, which
England would help to procure f or them:
“Let me tell you the following words as if I were showing
you the rungs of a ladder leading
upward and upward: Herzl, the Zionist Congress, the English
Uganda proposition, the future
world war, the peace conference where, with the help of
England, a free and Jewish
Palestine will be created.” (quoted in Rosenthal, Litman. “A
Prophet Speaks”, American Jewish
News, New York, Vol. 4, No. 2, September 19, 1919. p. 464;
also quoted in Stevens, Richard P.
Zionism and Palestine Before the Mandate. Institute for
Palestine Studies, 1972, p. 153)
Strange and incredible — is it not? — that a leading Zionist
Jew was able to predict the course of events of
the next several decades. It appears Max Nordau was not the
only Jew with an uncanny gif t of f oresight.
Leading communist ideologue and co-author of “The Communist
Manif esto”, crypto-Jew Friedrich
Engels, made it clear that he and his f ellow communist
comrades were comf ortable with human sacrif ices
amounting to the loss of tens of millions of lives, in order
to pave the way f or revolution and a global
communist imperium. In 1887, Engels somehow knew a “World
War” was on the horizon and would soon
arrive on the shores of Europe, laying waste to Europe’s
empires and thus leaving the continent vulnerable
to communist revolution, upheaval and subversion:
“No other war is now possible for Prussia-Germany than a
world war, and indeed a world
war of hitherto unimagined sweep and violence. Eight to ten
millions soldiers will
mutually kill each other off and in the process devour
Europe barer than any swarm of
locusts ever did. The desolation of the Thirty Years War
compressed in three or four years
and spread over the entire continent: famine, plague,
general savagery, taking possession both
of the armies and of the masses of the people, as a result
of universal want; hopeless
demoralization of our complex institutions of trade industry
and credit, ending in universal
bankruptcy; collapse of the old states and their traditional
statecraft, so that crowns will
roll over the pavements by the dozens and no one to be found
to pick them up; absolute
impossibility of foreseeing where this will end, or who will
emerge victor from the general
struggle. Only one result is absolutely sure: general
exhaustion and the creation of the
conditions for the final victory of the working class.”
(quoted in Wolfe, David Bertram.
Marxism, One Hundred Years In The Life of a Doctrine. Dial
Press, (1965), p. 67)
Another who predicted the impending doom of a grand European
conf lict was Jan Gotlib Bloch, a Polish
crypto-Jew, banker/f inancier, Zionist activist, “campaigner
against Russian antisemitism“, and acquaintance
of Theodore Herzl. In 1899, Bloch published a book about
military warf are titled, “Is War Now Possible?”,
within which he envisioned a “long war”, a “great war of
entrenchments”, which would involve some ten
million men. Bloch asserted that economic f actors would be
“the dominant and decisive element in the
matter” and that the f uture of war was not f ighting but f
amine, resulting in the bankruptcy of nations and
the break-up of social organization of societies. (Ferguson,
Niall. “The Pity of War”, p. 9)
It is clear that International Jews f oresaw the First World
War. Did they do nothing but f oresee it? The f acts
do not stop at f oresight, but run on to provocation.
Perhaps prominent Zionist Jews and Communist Jews
were cognizant of the eventual outbreak of a World War
because they strove to bring it to fruition utilizing
their unmatched money, media and political clout?
The Protocols of Zion gives us insight into this question,
“We must be in a position to respond to every act of
opposition by war with the neighbors of that
country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbors
should also venture to stand
collectively together against us, then we must offer
resistance by a universal war.” (The
Protocols of Zion, 7:3)
Zionist Jew kingpin, Chaim Weizmann, admitted as much in a
letter to Winston Churchill. Historian David
Irving documented Weizmann’s venture to persuade Churchill
to help the Zionists create a Jewish Fighting
Force — an army of Jewish terrorists to be used as a
battering ram to f orcef ully overtake Palestine and
wantonly genocide the Arabs living there — in exchange f or
the Jews’ dragging America into WWII on
England’s side. The arrogant and conceited Jew, Weizmann,
couldn’t help but boast about how his f ellow
Jews “did it in the last war and are keen to do it again”:
“On September 10, 1941 Weizmann therefore wrote an outspoken
letter to the prime minister in
which he recalled how the Jews of the United States had
pulled their country into war before; he
promised that they could do it again – provided that Britain
toed the line over Palestine. Two
years had passed since the Jewish Agency had offered the
support of the Jews throughout the
world – the Jewish ‘declaration of war’ on Germany; a whole
year had passed, he added, since
the P.M. had personally approved his offer to recruit Jews
in Palestine for service in the Middle
East or elsewhere. For two years the Agency had met only
humiliation. Ten thousand
Palestinian Jews had fought in Libya, Abyssinia, Greece,
Crete, and Syria, he claimed, but this
was never mentioned.
‘Tortured by Hitler as no nation has ever been in modern
times,’ Weizmann continued, ‘and
advertised by him as his foremost enemy, we are refused by
those who fight him the chance of
seeing our name and our flag appear among those arrayed
against him.’Artfully associating
anti-Zionists with the other enemies populating Churchill’s
mind, Weizmann assured him that he
knew this was not of his doing – it was the work of those
responsible for Munich and the 1939
White Paper on Palestine. ‘We were sacrificed, in order to
win over the Mufti of Jerusalem and
his friends who were serving Hitler in the Middle East.’
“Then Weizmann came to his real sales-pitch: ‘There is only
one big ethnic group [in the USA]
which is willing to stand, to a man, for Great Britain, and
a policy of “all-out aid” for her: the five
million Jews. From Secretary Morgenthau, Governor [of New
York State] Lehmann, Justice
[Felix] Frankfurter, down to the simplest Jewish workman or
trader, they are conscious of all that
this struggle against Hitler implies.’ British statesmen, he
reminded Churchill, had often
acknowledged that it was these Jews who had brought the
United States into the war in 1917.
‘They are keen to do it – and may do it – again.’All that he
and the Jews of the United States
were asking for, therefore, was the formation now of a
Jewish Fighting Force.” (Irving, David.
Churchill’s War: Triumph in Adversity Vol. 2. Focal Point
Publications, 2001, Pp. 76-77; also see
this facsimile of Weizmann’s letter to Churchill)
The “godf ather of Zionism”, Theodore Herzl, was not shy
about admitting that the Jews do indeed
possess the necessary power to bring about world wars and
revolutions, stating: “The wealthy Jews
control the world…In their hands lies the fate of government
and nations. They (the Jews) set
governments one against the other and by their decree
governments make peace. When the
wealthy Jews play, the nations and the rulers dance.”
In his book “Jewish State”, Herzl spoke of the Jews’
“terrible power of the purse”:
“Every point which arises in the relations between nations
is a question of might. I do not here
surrender any portion of our prescriptive right when I make
this statement. In the world as it now
is and will probably remain, might precedes right. For us to
be loyal patriots as were the
Huguenots who were forced to emigrate is therefore useless.
… The Jews must acquire
economic power sufficiently great to overcome prejudice
against them. When we sink,
we become a revolutionary proletariat, but when we rise,
there rises also our terrible
power of the purse.”
The desolate reality of Jewish warmongering was elucidated
in the August 1877 issue of Frank Leslie’s
“Popular Monthly”, later known as “The American Magazine”,
which reported:
“To-day, the great Jewish bankers, such as the Rothschilds,
may almost be said to hold
in their hands the peace of Europe. They are creditors of
most of the Governments of the
world and there are few nations willing to risk the dangers
and losses of war unless they have
assurance from these potent capitalists of such monetary aid
as may be necessary for carrying
on a campaign. In the present European war, one of the
combatants, having nothing to lose, is
reckless of the consequence to her already bankrupt
treasury, and the other, while yet the
conflict has scarcely begun, has been compelled to seek the
aid of Jewish bankers to secure
means for its prosecution.”
In 1881 the prestigious banking journal, Rhodes’ Journal,
inf ormed us that Jewish international bankers held
the keys to peace and war in Europe (of ten instigating the
latter f or monetary gain, evidently):
“It must be admitted that the Jewish people control the
financial markets of Europe,
possessing a much greater influence than in this country.
The Emperor of Russia found that he
could not place a loan in the Continental markets, because
Rothschild did not view such a loan
as favorable to the interests of England. A few Jewish
bankers are therefore really the
arbitrators of peace and war in Europe.”
The internet blogger known as the Black Rabbit of Inlé
compiled numerous quotes on the immense
inf luence of the Rothschild f amily on his page “King of
The Jews,” some of which I will reproduce below:
The Rothschilds’ of f icial biographer, Niall Ferguson,
explained the “quasi-royal status” of this Jewish
banking dynasty and how their wealth is believed by some
Jews to be “for a higher purpose… to avenge
the wrongs of Israel”:
“To poorer Jews throughout Europe, Nathan Rothschild’s
extraordinary rise to riches had an
almost mystical significance—hence the legend of the “Hebrew
talisman,” the magical source of
his good luck, which became associated with him in Jewish
lore. This extraordinary story—a
version of which was published by an anonymous author in
London just four years after Nathan
Rothschild’s death (1836)—imagined that the source of
Nathan’s financial success was his
possession of a magical talisman. His wealth was in fact
intended for a higher purpose: “to
avenge the wrongs of Israel” by securing “the
re-establishment of Judah’s kingdom—then
rebuilding of thy towers, Oh! Jerusalem!” and “the
restoration of Judea to out ancient race.”
(Ferguson, Niall. The House of Rothschild: Volume 1: Money’s
Prophets: 1798-1848, Viking,
(1999), pp. 21/22)
Ferguson added that,
“… because of their wealth, other Jews looked to them for
leadership in their pursuit of
equal civil and political rights. As we shall see, this
leadership was forthcoming from a
remarkably early stage… acquiring quasi-royal status in the
eyes of other Jews.” (Ibid., p.
22)
The Niles’ National Register published in 1828 states:
“… the house of Rothschild certainly stands preeminent at
the recent death of one, who
was thought the richest banker in Europe.”
The Niles’ National Register published on Sept 19, 1835,
says:
“The ROTHSCHILDS are the wonders of modern banking … we see
the descendants of
Judah, after a persecution of two thousand years, peering
above kings, rising higher
than emperors, and holding a whole continent in the hollow
of their hands. The
Rothschild govern a Christian world. Not a cabinet moves
without their advice. They
stretch their hand, with equal ease, from Petersburgh to
Vienna, from Vienna to Paris,
from Paris to London, from London to Washington. Baron
Rothschild, the head of the
house, is the true king of Judah, the prince of the
captivity, the Messiah so long looked
for by this extraordinary people. He holds the keys of peace
or war, blessing or cursing.”
The Bankers Magazine printed in 1847 states:
“The five brothers (Anselm, Solomon, Nathan, Charles &
James) have taken part in most of the
great financial affairs of Austria, of France, of England,
and of almost every country. They have
formed among themselves an invincible phalanx. By
themselves, or by their agents, they
have exercised a great control over the principal places in
Europe, and, faithful to their
habit, never to undertake anything separately and to concert
all their operations, they
have followed one unvaried and identical system. Their power
was such, that at one
time they were free to make either peace or war.“
The Ladies’ Repository published in 1863 states :
“Baron Lionel Rothschild, the first Jew ever admitted into
the English Parliament, and
the wealthiest man, it is believed, now residing on our
planet.”
The Cyclopaedia of Commercial & Business Anecdotes
printed in 1865, writes:
“The Rothschilds, Wealthiest Bankers in the World. The house
of Rothschild is the
impersonation of that money power which governs the world.”
The Review of Reviews printed in 1890 opined:
“The change in the position of the Jew within the last half
of the century is one of the
most remarkable character. Fifty years ago the Jew was inert
and imbecile. Now he
exercises a power greater than in the days of David or
Solomon. The Jews to-day
influence more people, control more bullion, and exercise
more legislative power than
they did when they had their temple their land, and their
sceptre.”
Printed in 1905, Jewish Literature & Other Essays says:
“The palaces of the Rothschilds, the richest family in the
world, harbor many a warm
heart, whose pulsations are quickened by the thought of
Israel’s history and poetic
heritage. Wealth has not abated a jot of their enthusiasm
and loyal love for the faith.”
Printed between 1901 and 1906 The Jewish Encyclopedia
asserted:
“It is a somewhat curious sequel to the attempt to set up a
Catholic competitor to the
Rothschilds that at the present time the latter are the
guardians of the papal treasure.”
British economist J.A. Hobson’s seminal book, “Imperialism”,
published in 1902, states:
“Does anyone seriously suppose that a great war could be
undertaken by any European
State, or a great State loan subscribed, if the house of
Rothschild and its connections
set their face against it?”
The Missionary Review of the World, Volume 29, printed in
1906 disclosed:
“The Possession of Wealth: One Jewish banking house is
estimated to control
$30,000,000,000. The Rothschilds in ten years loaned
$482,000,000. Nearly one-half of
the gold coined, of the entire world, is said to be in
Jewish hands.”
In 1909, seven years bef ore becoming British Prime
Minister, David Lloyd George stated in a speech:
“I should really like to know, is Lord Rothschild the
dictator of this country? Are we
really to have all the ways of reform, financial and social,
blocked simply by a
noticeboard, ‘No thoroughfare. By order of Nathaniel
Rothschild’?”
Another of the f amily biographers, Derek Wilson, conceded
that critics of the Rothschilds have legitimate
reasons f or anxiety, af f irming:
“The House of Rothschild is immensely more powerful than any
financial empire that
has ever preceded it, and it is able to control governments
behind the scenes, secretly.”
Dutch economist Ad Broere, in his 2010 book “Ending The
Global Casino,” inf orms us that,
“The 19th century became known as the age of the Rothschilds
when it was estimated
they controlled half of the world’s wealth. While their
wealth continues to increase
today, they have managed to blend into the background,
giving an impression that their
power has waned. They only apply the Rothschild name to a
small fraction of the
companies they actually control.”
Jewish leader, Louis Marshall, subtly conf essed that the
schemes of Zionism were a long-term plan f or
Jewish power-grabbing, stating: “Zionism is but an incident
of a far-reaching plan: it is merely a
convenient peg on which to hang a powerful weapon.” This
Jewish World Plot is not a new
phenomena by any means, and most likely originated with the
advent of Judaism itself over 3000 years ago.
A shocking clue to its existence was lef t behind in 1492 by
the Grand Sanhedrin which resided in
Constantinople,
“In 1492, Chemor, chief Rabbi of Spain, wrote to the Grand
Sanhedrin, which had its seat in
Constantinople, for advice, when a Spanish law threatened
expulsion. This was the reply:
Beloved brethren in Moses, we have received your letter in
which you tell us of the anxieties and
misfortunes which you are enduring. We are pierced by as
great pain to hear it as yourselves.
The advice of the Grand Satraps and Rabbis is the following:
1. As for what you say that the King of Spain 3 obliges you
to become Christians: do it, since you
cannot do otherwise.
2. As for what you say about the command to despoil you of
your property: make your sons
merchants that they may despoil, little by little, the
Christians of theirs.
3. As for what you say about making attempts on your lives:
make your sons doctors and
apothecaries, that they may take away Christians’ lives.
4. As for what you say of their destroying your synagogues:
make your sons canons and clerics
in order that they may destroy their churches.
5. As for the many other vexations you complain of: arrange
that your sons become advocates
and lawyers, and see that they always mix in affairs of
State, that by putting Christians under
your yoke you may dominate the world and be avenged on them.
6. Do not swerve from this order that we give you, because
you will find by experience that,
humiliated as you are, you will reach the actuality of
power.
(Signed) PRINCE OF THE JEWS OF CONSTANTINOPLE.” (L. Fry,
Waters Flowing Eastward:
The War Against the Kingship of Christ. TBR Books,
Washington, D. C., (2000), pp. 51-52; also
see these facsimiles of this letter, one & two)
The Jews hide behind a bogus veneer of victimhood in order
to deceive naive Gentiles about their sinister
agenda and carnivorous quest f or World Governance. This
guilt and sympathy peddling charade is
laughably transparent. Zionist kingpin, Rabbi Stephen S.
Wise (1874-1949) — the co-f ounder of the World
Jewish Congress and other subversive groups — frantically
howled that the whole of Christendom owes
the Jews a homeland in Palestine f or perceived wrongs done
to the Jews. Wise annoyingly squawked: “The
rebuilding of Zion will be the reparation of all Christendom
for all the wrongs done to the Jews.” In
1900 Rabbi Wise let slip the premeditated hoax of
holocaustianity when he spoke of “6,000,000 living,
bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism.” That was
one of dozens upon dozens of
ref erences and invocations of the cabalistic f able of
“6,000,000 persecuted, dead or dying Jews” from
1900 through 1945, leading up to the creation of the state
of Israel on the back of this deceptive, yet
obvious hoax, in 1948. (See: Heddesheimer, Don. The First
Holocaust: Jewish Fund Raising Campaigns with
Holocaust Claims during and after World War One. Chicago,
IL: Theses & Dissertations, 2003; see also: The
“Six Million” Myth)
United States Federal Judge, Julian Mack (1866-1943),
chaired a plethora of Zionist organizations and
worked vocif erously to establish a Zionist state on stolen
Palestinian land. In true Jewish supremacist
f ashion, this rabid nutcase demanded money from Christians
to f und the heinous Zionist colonial project in
Palestine, saying that this must be done “in appreciation of
the debt which all the world owes to the
Jews.” Believing the world owes them, these pompous,
supremacist Jews don’t just demand Palestine —
they want the entire planet handed over to them on a silver
platter along with all of its valuables and
treasures!
These damning f acts, quotes and pronouncements — taken
together — are extremely signif icant bits of
evidence bearing on the existence of the Jewish World Plot
and the authenticity of the Protocols of Zion.
Many of these astonishing statements are completely mimetic
of what is outlined in the Protocols — a oneworld tyrannical
state governed by Jews upon which a Jewish World Tyrant,
whom they ref er to as the “King
Despot of the Blood of Zion” (a descendant of the House of
David), will be crowned king and rule the
earth:
“Ever since that time we have been leading the peoples from
one disenchantment to another, so
that in the end they should turn also from us in favor of
that KING-DESPOT OF THE BLOOD OF
ZION, WHOM WE ARE PREPARING FOR THE WORLD.” (The Protocols
of Zion, 3:15)
“The recognition of our despot … will come when the peoples,
utterly wearied by the
irregularities and incompetence – a matter which we shall
arrange for – of their rulers, will
clamor: “Away with them and give us one king over all the
earth who will unite us and annihilate
the causes of disorders – frontiers, nationalities,
religions, State debts – who will give us peace
and quiet which we cannot find under our rulers and
representatives.” (The Protocols of Zion ,
10:18)
“When the King of Israel sets upon his sacred head the crown
offered him by Europe he will
become patriarch of the world.” (The Protocols of Zion,
15:23)
Bo lshe vism is Talmud ic Jud aism in d isg uise .
Much of this was af f irmed by a man named Benjamin
Freedman, a f ormer Zionist and f ormer Jew who
converted to Christianity and became an outspoken critic of
Zionism and international Jewish intrigue.
Freedman was a successf ul New York businessman who had been
f or many years on a f irst name basis
with many leading Zionist power-brokers as well as several
American presidents. Thus he had intimate f irsthand
knowledge of international politics, the role Jews played in
it and inf luence they wielded over it. He
wrote a book called “The Hidden Tyranny” and, in 1961, gave
a very illuminating speech at The Willard Hotel,
Washington, D.C., primarily exposing the role of Zionist
Jewry in bringing America into World War I in return
f or British support f or the Zionist ambition to seize and
colonize Palestine at the war’s end.
In light of the f acts and inf ormation illustrated herein,
the grim reality of this global Jewish conspiracy thus
cannot logically be denied by any reasonable person. Only
those who are partisan, or otherwise
sympathetic, to Jewry will deny the existence of this
cold-blooded conspiracy against Gentiles.
Club Death Judaica — Bolshevist Bloodletting
As previously noted, Communism — also known as
Bolshevism — is a Jewish conf idence trick — a swindle to
establish Jewish control over Gentile nations that were not
compliant with the aims of International Finance Jewry. The
so-called “Russian Revolution” of 1917 was not a Russian
phenomenon at all, but rather a well-organized and
executed Jewish coup d’etat. The f irst communist-led
upheaval of 1905 was also the work of plotting Jewish
agitators and radicals. These are well established f acts,
not spurious claims as the lying Jews would have you
believe.
The Jewish controlled press, Hollywood movie industry and
intellectual domain of most Western countries, have
endeavored to not only downplay the role of Jews in
Bolshevism, but also to whitewash Bolshevik atrocities.A
conspiracy of silence regarding the monstrous crimes of
Communism continues even today, whilst we are pummeled
from every direction with ridiculous and nonsensical Zionist
propaganda about an impossible “holocaust of six million
Jews”. Snake-like liars masquerading as “journalists”,
“prof essors” and “historians” even strive to glorif y or
romanticize Communism and murderous Marxist
revolutionaries. These sleazy, scum-ridden shills not only
never criticize anything having to do with Communism, but
always describe it as a sincere and timely experiment with
the greatest of social advantages.
At the time, Jews openly bragged that the “Russian”
revolution was their making. They were the f inanciers, the
revolutionaries and the bloodthirsty horde of
murderous “Cheka” secret police of f icers (later known as
the NKVD, OGPU, KGB, etc) who were
responsible f or liquidating untold millions of Russians and
Eastern Europeans. Now Jews say, “Who, us?
No, Jews had nothing to do with it! You’re just
antisemitic!” Even those Jews who might still be alive and
who took part in the massacres now deny that Jews were
involved in these crimes. Even though antiSemitism became a
capital crime punishable by death af ter the revolution of
1917 (as you shall see),
Jews now ludicrously assert that they were “persecuted.”
Even though the Christian churches burned
while the synagogues were left untouched, Jews now f
oolishly deny that they were protected. Even
though Christian priests and nuns were tortured, executed en
masse and f orced to sweep the streets —
while Jews and rabbis lived high on the hog — Jews now
comically claim they were victims of Bolshevism!
This is the tried and true victim strategy that Jewish
criminals have employed f or millennium to evade and
escape justice f or their hideous crimes.
The Jews had harbored tremendous enmity f or the Russian
Czars, f irstly because they were Christian, and
secondly because the Czars kept the Jews marginalized and in
check by restricting them to their own areas
(the so-called “Jewish Pale”), and reined them in when they
got out of line. For those reasons, among
others, f anatical Russian and Eastern European Jews
mobilized revolutionary terror brigades to depose
and assassinate the Czars. In 1881, Czar Alexander II was
assassinated by Jews. Heir to the throne was
Czar Nicholas II, the Jews’ next target.
The f irst communist-inspired, Talmudic upheaval in
Christian Russia occurred in 1905, led by the Masonic
Jews Leon Deustch, Vladimir Lenin, Leiba Bronstein (alias
Leon Trotsky) and Trotsky’s guide and mentor
Israel Helphand (alias Alexander Parvus) — the
multimillionaire f inancier who was also a political adviser
of
the “Young Turks” (i.e. crypto-Jews who sparked a revolution
in Ottoman Turkey in 1908, to f acilitate
Zionist ambitions). Parvus raked in millions in prof its
from the sale of weapons and f oodstuf f s to the
Turkish Army, who — under the captainship of the
crypto-Jewish “Young Turks” — carried out the Armenian
massacres of 1915, slaying 1.5 million Christians. (See:
Bjerknes, Christopher Jon. The Jewish Genocide of
Armenian Christians, 2006)
Jews boastf ully claimed responsibility f or the 1905
revolutionary uprising. For example, The Maccabean of
London wrote in an article entitled “A Jewish Revolution” in
November of 1905:
“The revolution in Russia is a Jewish revolution, a crisis
in Jewish history. It is a Jewish
revolution because Russia is the home of about half the Jews
of the world, and an
overturning of its despotic government must have a very
important influence on the
destinies of the millions living there and on the many
thousands who have recently
emigrated to other countries. But the revolution in Russia
is a Jewish revolution also
because Jews are the most active revolutionists in the
Tsar’s empire.” (quoted in: L. Fry,
Waters Flowing Eastward: The War Against the Kingship of
Christ. TBR Books, Washington, D.
C., (2000), p. 40.)
Bolshevist undertakings, like Zionist ones, were subsidized
by wealthy Jewish loan-sharks. In preparation
f or the 1905 revolution, Jewish bankers manuf actured a war
between Russia and Japan. They had long
been conducting a perf idious economic war against Russia by
sabotaging Russia’s ability to secure
Western loans and by f inancing Russia’s enemies. This was
done in a malicious ef f ort to weaken Russia
economically and physically, thus making it ripe f or
revolution, communist subversion and Jewish plundering.
Prominent Jewish banker and “philanthropist”, Jacob Henry
Schif f — the Rothschild emissary in America
who headed the powerhouse Kuhn, Loeb & Co. bank in New
York — f inanced the Japanese war ef f ort
against Russia by f loating them a loan of $200,000,000 USD.
(See also: “Genocidal Jewish Supremacist
Jacob H. Schif f” & “Jewish Bankers Again Target Russia
f or Revolution” f or a plethora of sources
documenting Schif f ’s schemes against Russia)
The Jewish Communal Register of New York City 1917-1918
wrote of Jacob Schif f ,
“The firm of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., floated the large
Japanese War loans of 1904-05, thus
making possible the Japanese victory over Russia. [...] Mr.
Schiff has always used his
wealth and his influence in the best interests of his
people. He financed the enemies of
autocratic Russia and used his financial influence to keep
Russia from the money
market of the United States.”
Not only did the raging Russophobe Jacob Schif f f inance
Russia’s enemies to attack her, but he also
f inanced the distribution of revolutionary propaganda to
Russian POWs being held in Japanese prison
camps during the 1904-1905 Japanese-Russo war. He had hoped
that this propaganda would poison their
minds against the Czar and upon their return to Russia at
the war’s end they would commit mutiny and help
install the Jewish communists into power.
Although the attempted revolution of 1905 f ailed to bring
down the Russian Czarist government, the
Marxist Jews had caused a great deal of carnage. The
murderous bloodletting of the Jews was noted by
William Eleroy Curtis, in a speech he delivered to the
National Geographic Society on 14 December, 1906:
“THE VENGEANCE OF THE JEWS
Perhaps these reforms are the cause of the present
tranquility, because the
revolutionary leaders nearly all belong to the Jewish race
and the most effective
revolutionary agency is the Jewish Bund, which has its
headquarters at Bialystok, where
the massacre occurred last June. The government has suffered
more from that race than
from all of its other subjects combined. Whenever a
desperate deed is committed it is
always done by a Jew, and there is scarcely one loyal member
of that race in the entire
Empire. The great strike which paralyzed the Empire and
compelled the Czar to grant a
constitution and a parliament was ordered and managed by a
Jew named Krustaleff, president
of the workingmen’s council, a young man only thirty years
old. He was sent to the penitentiary
for life, and had not been behind the bars more than three
weeks when he organized and
conducted a successful strike of the prison employees.
Maxim, who organized and conducted the revolution in the
Baltic provinces, is a Jew of
marvelous ability. Last fall he came over here lecturing and
collecting money to carry on the
revolutionary campaign, but for some reason has vanished and
nobody seems to know what
has become of him.
Gerschunin, the most resourceful leader of the terrorists,
who was condemned to life
imprisonment in the silver mines on the Mongolian frontier,
has recently escaped in a water
cask, and is supposed to be in San Francisco. He is a Polish
Jew only twenty-seven years old. I
might enumerate a hundred other revolutionary leaders and
every one of them would be a Jew.
Wherever you read of an assassination or of the explosion of
a bomb you will notice in the
newspaper dispatches that the man was a Jew. The most
sensational and dramatic episode that
has occurred since the mutinies was on October 27, when, in
the very center of Saint
Petersburg, at the entrance of Kazan Cathedral, four Jews
held up a treasury wagon and
captured $270,000. They passed the package to a woman, who
instantly vanished, and no
trace of her has ever been found; but they were all arrested
and were promptly punished. On
the 8th of November a few Jewish revolutionaries entered a
treasury car near Ragow, in Poland,
got $850,000 and disappeared.
Every deed of that kind is done by Jews, and the massacres
that have shocked the
universe, and occurred so frequently that the name ‘pogrom’
was invented to describe
them, were organized and managed by the exasperated police
authorities in retaliation
for crimes committed by the Jewish revolutionists.” (W. E.
Curtis, “The Revolution in
Russia”, The National Geographic Magazine, Volume 18, Number
5, (May, 1907), pp. 302-316,
at 313-314.)
Author Juri Lina, on page 141 of his book “Under the Sign of
the Scorpion”, described the unbridled terror
inf licted by the Marxist Jews:
“20 000 people were killed or crippled as a result of the
terrorist actions in the years
1905-06, according to the film director Stanislav
Govorukhin. Novoye Vremya put the
total figure at 50 000 in March 1911. Both Parvus and
Trotsky began to understand that all
these sporadic terrorist actions would not be enough to
support and decisively change the
outcome of the coup attempts in October (when the all-out
political strike was organized and
terrorist actions were staged), December 1905, and in
January 1906, when the last, desperate
attempt to overthrow the Tsar’s regime was made. Lenin, who
sceptically followed the events in
Russia from his exile, came to the same conclusion. Mass
terror was needed for a victory.
The “revolutionaries” dreamed of civil war.“
The Masonic Jews f umed with anger upon realizing the utter
f ailure of their putrid plans to overthrow the
Czar and establish a Jewish tyranny; but their homicidal
dreams and desires lived on. They immediately
began plotting another revolution, which manif est in the
year 1917.
These mealy-mouthed Marxist Jews slyly preached against
capitalism by day, whilst hobnobbing with the
richest of America’s and Europe’s Jewish capitalist bankers
by night, who had been covertly subsidizing
their banef ul Bolshevist agitation activities f or quite
some time. This f arcical Hebraic ruse couldn’t have
been more transparent. For example, the Jewish Marxist
revolutionary, Leon Trotsky, socialized and played
chess with über “bourgeois” Zionist Jew banker, Baron
Rothschild, in Vienna. (Nedava, Joseph. “Trotsky
and the Jews”, Jewish Publication Society of America,
(1972), p. 36) In 1916, the mischievous, lying Jew
Trotsky was summoned to the United States by the af
orementioned Jewish mega-banker Jacob Schif f , and
was given the task of recruiting and training Russian-Jewish
immigrants from the Lower East Side of New
York City as Marxist terrorist radicals f or the Bolshevik
revolution.
On March 27, 1917, Trotsky and his 300 well-trained Jewish
communists from Manhattan’s Lower East Side,
boarded the Norwegian steamer “Kristianiaf jord” f or a
journey that brought them to St. Petersburg in
Russia. Bef ore departing, Jacob Schif f gave Trotsky and
his congregation of cabalist conspirators
$20,000,000. Simultaneously, Lenin and his Jewish comrades —
f acilitated by the German government —
boarded a sealed train car which took them from Scandinavia
to Petrograd, sitting on ten million dollars in
gold supplied by Germany’s richest Jewish banker, Max
Warburg (whose brother Paul, strangely enough,
was the chief architect of the Federal Reserve System, the
Rothschild-controlled central bank of the United
States).
Henry Wickham Steed, the chief editor of The Times,
discerned that this f inancial aid went beyond the
Kerensky regime, stating that,
“the prime movers [of the Bolshevik revolution] were Jacob
Schiff, Warburg, and other
international financiers, who wished above all to bolster up
the Jewish Bolshevists in
order to secure a field for German and Jewish exploitation
of Russia.” (Steed, Henry
Wickham. Through thirty years, 1892-1922: a personal
narrative, Volume 2. Doubleday, Page &
Company, 1924. p. 302)
In “Czarism and Revolution,” Omni Publications, Hawthorne,
Calif ornia, (1962), pp. 231-232, we learn of the
tidal wave of Jewish money f looding into the Bolshevist
cause,
“In an excerpt from a secret report, dated New York, 15
February, 1916, (quoted from Boris
Brazol, “The World At the Crossroads”, 1921, Boston, Small,
Maynard and Co., Publ, p. 19) we
read: “The Russian Revolutionary Party in America has
decided upon a policy of overt action.
Risings and disturbances may, therefore, be expected at any
moment. The first secret meeting,
marking the commencement of this new period of violence was
held on the East Side in the
evening of February 14th and was attended by 62 delegates of
whom 50 were veterans of
1905, while the remaining 12 were newly joined members. The
majority consisted of Jewish
intellectuals, some of whom were professional
revolutionaries. The discussions at this meeting
were mainly centered around the opportunities offered and
the means available for staging a
revolution on a grand scale in Russia, the present time
being considered extremely propitious.
As previously reported, the party had just received from
Russia secret information to the effect
that all the necessary preliminaries for an immediate rising
had been concluded. The only
question of concern to the meeting was that of a possible
shortage of funds; however, as soon
as it arose, several members announced that no fears should
be entertained on that subject as,
at the appropriate time, the necessary money would be
supplied by the sympathizers. In this
connection the name of Jacob Schiff was repeatedly
mentioned.”
A copy, dated September 23rd, 1919, of “To Moscow,”
published in Rostov, contains further
interesting facts about the part played by Jacob Schiff in
the 1917 revolution. According to this
paper, the information is based on a document originating
from the French High Commissioner
in Washington. The authenticity of this document cannot be
contested as it was extracted from
the archives of one of the high French government offices.
Later it was quoted by Gen.
Nechvolodov in his book, previously mentioned (pp. 97-104).
Nechvolodov claims that it was
drafted by official branches of the American Services and
handed by them to the French High
Commissioner. I present a few quotations:
“In February 1916, it was learnt that a revolution was being
fomented in Russia and that the
following persons and business concerns were engaged in this
destructive enterprise: 1) Jacob
Schiff; 2) Kuhn, Loeb & Co. (Directors: Jacob Schiff,
Felix Warburg, Otto Kahn, Mortimer Schiff,
Jerome H. Hanauer); 3) Guggenheim; 4) Max Breitung.
“It would therefore appear that the revolution in Russia,
which broke out one year after this
information was first reported, was sustained by Jewish
interests.
“In April 1917, Jacob Schiff publicly declared that it was
thanks to his financial support that the
revolution in Russia had succeeded.
“In the Spring of the same year, Schiff commenced to
subsidize Trotsky, who also received a
contribution from ‘Forward’, a Jewish publication of New
York.
“Simultaneously, Trotsky and Co. were also being subsidized
by Max Warburg and Olaf
Aschberg of the Nye Bank in Stockholm, another Jewish
concern, the Rhine-Westphalian
Syndicate and Jivotovsky, a wealthy Jew whose daughter later
married Trotsky. Relations were
thus established between multi-millionaire and proletarian
Jewry.”
There follows a list of names drawing attention to the
predominance of the Jewish element in
the first Soviets. This document, after stressing the ties
linking Kuhn, Loeb & Co. and other
Jewish financial establishments, expresses the opinion “that
the Bolshevik movement to a
certain degree is the expression of a more general Jewish
movement and that certain Jewish
banking houses are interested in its furtherance.”
Jacob Schif f did indeed publicly boast that “thanks are due
to the Jew” that the revolution in Russia had
succeeded. Juri Lina documented in similar terms how Jewish
loan-sharks from America and Western
Europe were throwing money at the Bolsheviks:
“It was above all Jacob and Mortimer Schiff, Felix Warburg,
Otto H. Kahn, Max Warburg,
Jerome J. Hanauer, Alfred Milner and the copper family
Guggenheim who financed the
Bolsheviks, according to the Jewish historian David Shub.
A document (861.00/5339) in the archives of the U.S. State
Department confirms this. Two
further names are mentioned in this document: Max Breitung
and Isaac Seligman. All
those people were Jews and freemasons. According to the same
document, plans to depose
the Tsar were made in February 1916. There are always some
people who make money out of
wars and revolutions. We must not forget this when we seek
to understand history.
The Zionist banker and freemason Max Warburg played an
important role in funding the
Communist propaganda in Russia. He saw to it that the
industrialist Hugo Stinnes agreed to
give two million roubles to the Bolsheviks’ publishing
activity on the 12th of August 1916.
(Zeman, “Germany and the Revolution in Russia, 1915-18.
Documents from the Archives of the
German Foreign Ministry”, London, 1958, p. 92.) Thus there
are documents extant which
show that Max Warburg and other super-wealthy Jews supported
Communism. These
statements are not just made up, as certain know-it-alls
have claimed.” (Under the Sign of the
Scorpion, p. 180)
Of course, the Jew bankers got a great return on their
investment. The Jew Bolsheviks methodically
despoiled the wealth and valuables of Russia and the Czar,
shipping boat loads of gold back to the vaults
of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. in America, Warburg banks in
Germany, and their own private bank accounts in various
countries:
“The banker Jacob Schiff had given Leon Trotsky 20 million
dollars to organise a Bolshevik takeover. That gamble
certainly paid off. 600 million roubles in gold were
transferred to the
United States of America between 1918 and 1922, according to
the historian Gary Allen. In
the first half of 1921 alone, the banking house of Kuhn,
Loeb and Co. made a profit of
102 290 000 dollars on the wealth the Bolsheviks had robbed,
according to the New York
Times, August 23rd, 1921. Multiply that sum by one hundred
and you have the present-day
value of that money. The Russian historian Dmitri Volkogonov
revealed after findings in the
Communist Party archives that “just the Tsarina’s private
reserves amounted to 475 million
roubles in gold (plus 7 million for the crown jewels)”.
(Dagens Nyheter, 31st of August 1992.)
The Bolshevik financial department Goskhran confiscated all
of this. Some Swedish journalists
(including Staffan Skott) have, in accord with the
prevailing myth, tried to explain that most of
this wealth was handed over to the Communist parties in
other countries, while millions of
Russians died of starvation. That is not entirely accurate.
According to the historian Igor Bunich,
Lenin and Trotsky took care of this money personally. The
gold, meanwhile, was smuggled
out of Russia and deposited into personal bank accounts
around the world. (30 tons of
gold per year were produced in the Tsarist era in Russia.)”
(Under the Sign of the Scorpion, p.
237)
Immediately upon their arrival in Russia, the bloody
banditry of Jewry commenced, unleashing a carnivorous
crusade of destruction never bef ore seen or heard of . The
revolutionary turmoil of 1917 — led by the
name-changing crypto-Jews Vladimir Ulyanov (alias Lenin),
Leiba Bronstein (alias Leon Trotsky), Jacob
Sverdlov, Moisei Uritsky, Lev Rosenf eld (alias Kamenev),
Grigory Radomylsky (alias Zinoviev), Lazar
Moiseyevich Kaganovich, Karl Sobelsohn (alias Radek), Israel
Helphand (alias Alexander Parvus), Rosalina
Zalkind, Aaron Kuhn (alias Bela Kun), and a thousand and one
other Jew Bolsheviks — wrought the stench
of death upon the Russland, converting Russia into a temple
of evil. When Lenin’s Bolsheviks seized the
State in October of 1917, the Russians had become sacrif
icial lambs to be sent to the slaughterhouse by
the new kosher communist butchers who ruled the country with
an iron f ist.
One of the f irst acts of brutality that set the stage f or
the f ollowing seventy years of bloodshed, f amine,
poverty and death, was the cold-blooded assassination of the
Russian Imperial f amily, the Romanov’s —
Czar Nicholas II, his wif e, daughters and son — by a death
squad of Jewish Bolshevik brigands. On orders
of Jacob Schif f , the Romanov’s were shot and bayoneted in
the Ipatiev House in Ekaterinburg where they
had sought ref uge, by a coterie of homicidal Jewish
assassins: Jacob Sverdlov (f irst president of the
Soviets), Yankel Yurovsky (Cheka general, known as an avid
reader of the Talmud), Goloshchekin, Saf arov,
Voikov, and Syromolotov. The members of the Imperial f amily
in closest succession to the throne were
assassinated the f ollowing night.
In “The Last Days of the Romanovs” (p. 393), Robert Wilton,
on assignment f or The London Times in
Russia f or 17 years, summed up the “Russian Revolution” in
these words:
“The whole record of the Bolshevism in Russia is indelibly
impressed with the stamp of
alien invasion. The murder of the Tsar, deliberately planned
by the Jew Sverdlov and
carried out by the Jews Goloshekin, Syromolotov, Safarov,
Voikov, and Yurvsky, is the
act, not of the Russian people, but of this hostile invader.
The Jewish domination in Russia is supported by certain
Russians: the “burgess”
Ulyanov alias Lenin, the “noble” Chicherin, the “dissenter”
Bonch-Bruevich. They are all
mere screens or dummies behind which the Sverdlovs and the
thousand and one Jews
of Sovepedia continue their work of destruction; having
wrecked and plundered Russia
by appealing to the ignorance of the working folk, they are
now using their dupes to set
up a new tyranny worse than any that the world has known.
Sovietdom has consecrated three heroes to whom monuments
have been erected: to
Karl Marx, to Judas Iscariot, and to Leo Tolstoi, the three
names that are associated with
the Revolution, Apostasy and Anarchism; two of them Jews.”
This “stamp of alien invasion”, as Robert Wilton put it, was
unmistakably Jewish and Talmudic.Anti-Zionist
author Douglas Reed explained the ethnic clues lef t behind
by the Judaist killers of the Romanov f amily,
and its incredible meaning:
“The chief reason for recounting the details of the pogrom
of the Romanoffs is to point to the
“fingerprint” which was left in the room where it was done.
One of the assassins, presumably
their leader, stayed to exult and put a significant
signature on the wall, which was
covered with obscene or mocking inscriptions in Hebrew,
Magyar and German. Among
them was a couplet which deliberately related the deed to
the Law of the Torah-Talmud
and thus offered it to posterity as an example of the
fulfilment of that law, and of Jewish
vengeance as understood by the Levites. It was written in
German by someone who
parodied the Jewish poet, Heinrich Heine’s lines on the
death of Belshazzar, the
imaginary potentate whose murder is portrayed in Daniel as
God’s punishment for an
affront offered to Judah:
Belsazar ward aber in selbiger Nacht
Von selbigen Knechten umgebracht.
The parodist, sardonically surveying the shambles, adapted
these lines to what he had just
done:
Belsatsar ward in selbiger Nacht Von seinen Knechten
umgebracht.
No clearer clue to motive and identity was ever left
behind.” (The Controversy of Zion, p. 195)
As Douglas Reed aptly noted, the mocking inscription lef t
on the wall of the Ipatiev House where the
Romanovs were butchered were lines adapted from a poem by
German-Jewish poet, Heinrich Heine, which
alluded to the death of a Gentile ruler (Belshazzar,
cleverly spelled Belsatsar) in the well-known Old
Testament story, who saw “the writing on the wall” f
oretelling his destruction (Daniel 5), and was killed as
punishment f or his “of f enses” against the Jews’
bloodthirsty deity. The intended symbolism was obviously
that another Gentile king, the Tsar, was killed as an act of
Jewish retribution. (See also: Waters Flowing
Eastward, Chapter: “The Writing on the Wall”, f or the
cabalistic signif icance of these inscriptions)
Interestingly, the wealth of the Rothschild f amily — which
can be credited with bringing these Jew
communists to power in Russia — is believed by some Jews to
be “for a higher purpose… to avenge
the wrongs of Israel.” Also of great relevance to this story
is the f act that poet Heinrich Heine was a
friend of Karl Marx, and had once subtly remarked that most
Gentiles had no idea about Jewish schemes or
worldly ambitions, but that we would f ind out only af ter
becoming their slaves! Heine said,
“The deeds of the Jews are as little known to the world as
their true nature. Some think
they know the Jews because they have seen their beards — but
that’s all that appeared of
them. In the Middle Ages and in modern times too the Jews
are a walking mystery. This mystery
will be resolved, perhaps, and all will be revealed, on the
day which the prophet has
foretold: when there will be only one shepherd and one
flock, and when the righteous
who suffered for the salvation of mankind will receive
recognition and glory.” (Prawer,
Siegbert Salomon. Heine’s Jewish Comedy: A Study of His
Portraits of Jews and Judaism.
Oxford: Clarendon, 1983. p. 622)
The Jewishness of Communism/Bolshevism and the Soviet Regime
was attested to not only by the
Russian people, but also by American, British, and other
government of f icials and commissions, intrepid
journalists who witnessed the 1917 Bolshevik coup f irst
hand, and even some braggadocious Jews
themselves.
Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, one of the top Jewish maf ia kingpins
in the world (when alive), once declared:
“Some call it Marxism — I call it Judaism!” (The American
Bulletin, Rabbi S. Wise, May 5, 1935)
The Jewish Chronicle of London, April 4, 1914, boasted that
Bolshevism is Judaism, stating:
“There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact
that so many Jews are
Bolshevists, in the fact that the ideals of Bolshevism at
many points are consonant with
the finest ideals of Judaism.”
The September 10, 1920, edition of American Hebrew Magazine
pompously bragged:
“The Bolshevist revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish
brains, of Jewish
dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create
a new order in the world.
What was performed in so excellent a way in Russia, thanks
to Jewish brains, and
because of Jewish dissatisfaction, and by Jewish planning,
shall also, through the
same Jewish mental and physical forces, become a reality all
over the world.”
On the 12th of April, 1919, the newspaper Kommunist
(Kharkov) published comrade M. Kohan’s article “The
Jews’ Services to the Working Class”, where he wrote the f
ollowing:
“It can be said without exaggeration that the Great
Socialist October Revolution was
brought about through the hands of the Jews . . . the red
five-pointed star, which was
known as a Judaic symbol in ancient times, has now been
taken over by the Russian
proletariat . . . Jewish commissars as leaders of committees
and soviet [council-kahal]
organisations lead the Russian proletariat to victory . . .
Could the dark and oppressed
masses of Russian workers and peasants throw off the yoke of
the bourgeoisie themselves?
No, it was the Jews from beginning to end who showed the
Russian proletariat the way
to the rosy dawn of internationalism and who to this day
rule Soviet Russia. The
proletariat can feel secure in the hands of the Jews. We can
be calm while comrade Trotsky
commands the Red Army.” (quoted in “Under the Sign of the
Scorpion”, p. 133)
The 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia’s article on “Socialism” tells
us: “While in Germany socialism has
attracted individual Jews, in Russia it has become a
movement of the Jewish masses.”
In 1906, The New York Times reported on a gathering of
anti-Russian, pro-communist Jews in Berlin,
Germany. Dr. Paul Nathan, a well-known Jewish publicist,
called f or Russia’s destruction:
“Dr. Nathan read to the meeting a circular (from the Russian
Czarist government)
addressed to the (Russian) garrison of Odessa, calling upon
the soldiers to “rise and
crush the traitors who are plotting to upset the holy
Government of the Czar and
substitute for it a Jewish empire.” He concluded with an
appeal to the Jewish money
powers of the world to arrest Russia’s career as a borrower.
The financiers of the world
should call a halt to Russia, not only for humanitarian
reasons, but for practical reasons.
Russia’s bankruptcy is an established fact, he added.”
The Encyclopedia Judaica’s article on Communism
substantiates much of what so-called “anti-Semites”
have long been saying about Communism and the Soviet
experiment’s Jewish origins, motives and
character. It conf esses,
“The Communist movement and ideology played an important
part in Jewish life,
particularly in the 1920s, 1930s, and during and after World
War II. [...] Individual Jews
played an important role in the early stages of Bolshevism
and the Soviet Regime. [...] In
some countries Jews became the leading element in the legal
and illegal Communist
parties and in some cases were even instructed by the
Communist International to
change their Jewish-sounding names and pose as non-Jews, in
order not to confirm
right wing propaganda that presented Communism as an alien,
Jewish conspiracy. [...]
The Bolshevik faction contained a number of Jews mainly in
the field of organization
and propaganda … They included such people as Maxim Litvinov
(Wallach), M. Liadov
(Mandelshtam), Grigory Shklovsky, A. Soltz, S. Guzev
(Drabkin), Grigory Zinoviev
(Radomyslsky), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld), Rozaliya Zemliachka
(Zalkind), Helena
Rosmirovich, Yemeli Yaroslavsky (Gubelman), Serafimer
Gopner, G. Sokolnikov, I.
Platnitsky, Jacob Sverdlov, M. Vladimirov, P. Zalutsky, A.
Lozovsky, Y. Yaklovlev
(Epstein), Lazar Kaganovich, D. Shvartzman, Simon Dimanstein
… Trotsky [Bronstein],
M. Uritsky, M. Volodarsky, J. Sleklov, Adolf Joffee, David
Riazanov (Goldenbach), Yuri
Larin and Karl Radek (Sobelsohn).” (see this facsimile of
the Encyclopedia Judaica’s article)
Ted Pike, in his article “Jewish Activists Created
Communism,” provides the f ollowing commentary
concerning the Encyclopedia Judaica’s revealing article on
Jews and Communism:
“It [the Encyclopedia Judaica's article on "Communism"]
continues by admitting that the “antiSemitic”
counteroffensive of the White Russian armies in 1918 “drove
the bulk of Russian
Jewish youth into the ranks of the Bolshevik regime.” This
means that the majority of all
young Soviet Jews were communists. Jews, it says, found
great opportunity within Bolshevism,
“occupying many responsible positions in all branches of the
party and state machinery
at the central and local seats of power.” (p. 791) The
highly disproportionate amount of Jews
in the Party hierarchy is also admitted in the Encyclopedia
Judaica’s article:
“During the Revolution Jews played a prominent part in the
party organs. The politburo elected
on Oct. 23, 1917 had four Jews among its seven members. The
Military Revolutionary
Committee, appointed to prepare the coup, was headed by
Trotsky and had two Jews among its
five members. In the early years of the Soviet regime, Jews
were in many leading positions in
the government and party machinery…” (page 797, 98)
The Encyclopedia Judaica goes on to inadvertently clarify
why the native Russians were so bent
on “anti-Semitic” activities. When the Russian people
heroically attempted to regain their
freedom from the communists, the Judaica says “compact
Jewish masses in these areas
[were utilized] as a counterweight, which would swing the
balance in the centralist
regime’s favor.” (p. 798) In other words, “the bulk of
Jewish youth” in every outlying hamlet of
Russia became the “compact Jewish masses” whose task it was
to forcibly impose and maintain
communist slavery upon freedom-loving peoples. Jews and the
Russian populace were locked
in a death struggle for survival and the future of Russia.
Is it any wonder that the White
Russians rose up in rage, even to the point of liquidating
their oppressors? Who would not have
done the same?”
In “The Jewish Experience” (1996, p. 364), Jewish author
Norman Cantor freely admits and proudly boasts
of the Jewish cast that comprised the Bolshevik hierarchy in
Russia, stating,
“The Bolshevik Revolution and some of its aftermath
represented, from one perspective,
Jewish revenge. . . . During the heyday of the Cold War,
American Jewish publicists
spent a lot of time denying that—as 1930s anti-Semites
claimed—Jews played a
disproportionately important role in Soviet and world
Communism. The truth is until the
early 1950s Jews did play such a role, and there is nothing
to be ashamed of. In time
Jews will learn to take pride in the record of the Jewish
Communists in the Soviet Union
and elsewhere. It was a species of striking back.”
Author Edward Schoonmaker, writing in “Democracy and World
Dominion” (1939, p. 211), conf irms Cantors
rhetoric and elaborated on how Jewish synagogues were lef t
untouched by the Bolsheviks, while the
Christian churches were all burned to the ground:
“Fifteen years after the Bolshevist Revolution was launched
to carry out the Marxist
program, the editor of the American Hebrew could write:
“According to such information
[as] the writer could secure while in Russia a few weeks
ago, not one Jewish synagogue
has been torn down, as have hundreds—perhaps thousands—of
the Greek Catholic
churches. . . .” (American Hebrew, Nov. 18, 1932, p. 12.)
Apostate Jews, leading a
revolution that was to destroy religion as the “opiate of
the people,” had somehow
spared the synagogues of Russia.”
Another Jewish writer, Sever Plocker, also lent credence to
much of what “the anti-Semites” say about Jews
and Communism, in an article published on YnetNews.com
entitled, “Stalin’s Jews”. He rightly reminded us
that “some of the greatest murderers of modern times were
Jewish.”
British and American intelligence reports relayed inf
ormation about the Jewishness of Bolshevism and the
new Soviet regime, describing the Bolshevik leadership as
being as much as 90 percent Jewish. Robert
Wilton, the previously mentioned correspondent of The London
Times on assignment in Russia during the
communist revolution of 1917, outlined the ethnic make-up of
the Bolshevik State as such:
“According to the data furnished by the Soviet press, out of
556 important functionaries
of the Bolshevik State there were in 1918-1919: 17 Russians,
2 Ukrainians, 11 Armenians,
35 Lets, 15 Germans, 1 Hungarian, 10 Georgians, 2 Poles, 2
Finns, 1 Karaim, 457 Jews.
As the decades past by—after the fateful year 1917—Judaized
Khazars kept a firm hand
on the helm of the government in the occupied land of
Russia. In due time they built a
bureaucracy to their heart’s desire.”
In a report of the American Expeditionary f orces to
Siberia, March 1, 1919, compiled by Captain Montgomery
Schyler — speaking of events f ollowing the decline of the
First Provisional Government — it reads:
“These hopes were frustrated by the gradual gains in power
of the more irresponsible and
socialistic elements of the population, guided by the Jews
and other anti-Russian races. A table
made in April 1918 by Robert Wilton, the correspondent of
the London Times in Russia, shows
that at that time there were 384 “commissars” including 2
Negroes, 13 Russians, 15
Chinamen, 22 Armenians and more than 300 Jews. Of the latter
number, 264 had come to
Russia from the United States since the downfall of the
Imperial government.”
Schyler frankly described the Bolshevik movement as being
“guided and controlled by Russian Jews of
the greasiest type,” from the outset. Reverend George E.
Simons, the Superintendent of the Methodist
Episcopal Church in Petrograd from 1907 to 1918, was an
eyewitness to the Bolshevik Revolution. He
testif ied bef ore the United States Senate, and stated that
most of the Bolshevist leaders were Jews from
the Lower East Side of New York City:
“Out of 388 members of the new Russian government, only 16
happened to be Russians.
One was an American Black. All the rest, 371, were Jews. Of
these 371 Jewish Bolshevik
leaders, no less than 265 of them were from the Lower East
Side of New York City.”
In 1919, the US Senate held a subcommittee inquiry into
“Bolshevik propaganda”.An American teacher
named R. B. Dennis who had worked as a teacher in Russia
during the revolution said that the Bolshevik
leaders were all “Russian Hebrews” who had previously lived
in America “anywhere from 3 to 12
years.”An American banker named William Welsh who had worked
in Russia between July 1916 and
September 1918 told the committee: “It might be well to
explain a little the general fact that most of
the Bolshevik leaders are Jews, in order to avoid
misunderstanding. In Russia it is well known that
three-fourths of the Bolshevik leaders are Jewish.”
Shortly af ter the Bolshevik Revolution, the U.S. ambassador
in Russia sent a dispatch to Washington
conf irming that most of the Bolshevik leaders were Jews who
had been previously exiled f or revolutionary
activities:
“The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90
percent of whom are
returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country
but are internationalists and
they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution.”
(see this image of the appropriate
text)
Mr. Summers, US Consul General in Moscow on May 2, 1918,
sent a telegram to the Secretary of State in
Washington DC saying in part:
“Jew predominant in local Soviet government, anti-Jewish
feeling growing among
population which tends to regard oncoming Germans as
deliverers.”
In 1919 the British parliament compiled a White Paper on
Bolshevism titled, “Russia No. 1 A Collection of
Reports on Bolshevism in Russia“. In it we f ind that
Bolshevism is portrayed as a movement carried on by
the Jews and despised by the Russian people.An overview of
the relevant portions of this document
relating to the Jewish hand in Bolshevism in Russia, is as f
ollows:
“The relevant pages concerning Jews and Bolshevism are pp.
6, 23, 28, 32, 33, 41, 57, 65, 68,
78 – on p.6 (of the document, not the pdf) we find a
telegram from Sir M. Findlay to Mr. Balfour
relaying a report by the Netherlands Minister at Petrograd,
which contains the following
message:
“I consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is
the greatest issue now
before the world, not even excluding the war which is still
raging, and unless, as above
stated, Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is
bound to spread in one form
or another over Europe and the whole world, as it is
organized and worked by Jews who
have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for
their own ends the existing
order of things.”
p. 23 signifies that the Jews had preferential treatment, as
they were allowed to engage in illicit
trading, while all other trade was at a standstill, it also
contains documentation to the effect that
Bolshevism was despised by the Russians, but carried out by
Jews;
p. 28 says: “The Bolsheviks can no longer be described as a
political party holding extreme
communistic view. They form relatively small privileged
class which is able to terrorise the rest of
the population because it has a monopoly both of arms and of
food supplies. This class consists
chiefly of workmen and soldiers, and included a large
non-Russian element, such as Letts and
Esthonians and Jews; the latter are specially numerous in
higher posts. Members of this class
are allowed complete licence, and commit crime against other
sections of society.”;
p. 32 states “The Bolsheviks comprised chiefly Jews and
Germans, who were exceedingly
active and enterprising. The Russians were largely
anti-Bolshevik, but were for the most part
dreamers, incapable of any sustained action, who now, more
than ever before, were unable to
throw off the yoke of their oppressors. Night after night
the counterrevolutionary Societies held
secret meetings to plot against the Bolsheviks, but never
once was a serious attempt made to
carry through the conspiracy. The starving condition of the
people quite paralysed their willpower.”;
p.33. document # 33 says: “From examination of several
labourer and peasant witnesses I have
evidence to the effect that very smallest percentage of this
district were pro-Bolshevik, majority
of labourers sympathising with summoning of Constituent
Assembly. Witnesses further stated
that Bolshevik leaders did not represent Russian working
classes, most of them being Jews.”;
p. 41, document # 38, reveals that the party responsible for
the murder of the Romanovs
consisted entirely of Jews
p. 56 document # 56, says again that Bolshevism was a
movement led by Jews,
p. 57, The Results, says that after the Revolution, Jews
became the possessors of most of the
business houses, it states: “All business became paralysed,
shops were closed, Jews became
possessors of most of the business houses, and horrible
scenes of starvation became common
in the country districts. The peasants put their children to
death rather than see them starve. In
a village on the Dvina, not far from Schlusselberg, a.
mother hanged three of her children. I was
conducting a funeral in a mortuary of a lunatic asylum at
Oudelnaia, near Petrograd, and saw
the bodies of a mother and her five children whose throats
had been cut by the father because
he could not see them suffer.”
p. 65, “The Terror”, notes the persecution of Russians for
thought crimes, and the fact that
people had to pay intermediaries, who were mostly Jewish,
before they could obtain their
release;
p. 68 shows that the food supply committees were entirely in
the hands of Jews, and that antiSemitism was rampant because
of the extreme misery that ensued after the Jews had
obtained
control;” (summary provided by Blissentia)
In November of 1917, the Foreign Minister of the
Austro-Hungarian Empire, Count Ottokar von Czernin,
wrote:
“I have during the last few days received reliable
information about the Bolsheviks.
Their leaders are almost all of them Jews with altogether
fantastic ideas, and I do not
envy the country that is governed by them.”
Sir Paul Dykes was an MI6 espionage agent working undercover
in Bolshevik Russia f or the f irst f ew years
af ter the revolution. Upon his return home to Britian, he
published a book about his experiences called “Red
Dusk and the Morrow” (1922). In it he relates an interesting
conversation he had with a Lithuanian who told
him about overhearing a Bolshevik f igure say:
“Our power is based on three things: first, on Jewish
brains; secondly, on Lettish and
Chinese bayonets; and thirdly on the crass stupidity of the
Russian people.” (Red Dusk
and the Morrow, p. 316)
Overzealous Jews of tentimes inadvertently give themselves
away by tacitly admitting to things that they
would otherwise try to deny. Two New York Jewish
publications, “Jewish Lif e” and “Jewish Voice”, tacitly
conf essed that Communism is Judaism when they told their
readers,
“anti-communism is anti-Semitism! … Scratch a professional
anti-communist and you’ll
find an anti-Semite!”
Besides being a Bolshevik mass murderer, Leon
Trotsky-Bronstein was also a crypto-Zionist who had
attended the sixth Zionist congress in Basel in 1903. In a
1937 interview in the New York Jewish newspaper,
Daily Forward, Trotsky hinted at the real motives behind his
revolutionary activities when he pathetically
crowed: “The longer the rotten bourgeoisie society lives,
the more and more barbaric will antiSemitism become
everywhere.” ‘Bourgeoisie’ was clearly a Judeo-Bolshevik
code-word f or Gentile.
Lenin’s Jewish roots was a state secret, but was f inally
revealed by declassif ied KGB f iles and put on
display in Moscow’s State Historical Museum in 2011. Lenin
couldn’t have made it more obvious that he was
a crypto-Jew, seeing as he had nothing but glowing esteem f
or the Jews and immediately decreed
“antisemitism” a crime punishable by execution! The
human-devil, Lenin, praised the Jews as the best
revolutionaries, saying: “The clever Russian is almost
always a Jew or has Jewish blood in him.”
(Dmitri Volkogonov, Lenin: A New Biography, p. 112). He was
surely ref erring to himself .
Lenin heaped accolade and adulation on the Jews, revealing
that not only was he a Jew, but a chauvinistic
Jewish supremacist. He once said,
“There the great universally progressive features of Jewish
culture have made themselves
clearly felt: its internationalism, its responsiveness of
the advanced movements of our times (the
percentage of Jews in democratic and proletarian movements
is everywhere higher than the
percentage of Jews in the general population.) …Those Jewish
Marxists who join up in the
international Marxist organizations with the Russian,
Lithuanian, Ukrainian and other workers,
adding their might (both in Russian and in Jewish) to the
creation of an international culture of
the working class movement, are continuing the best
traditions of Jewry.” (quoted in: Gould,
Allan. What Did They Think of the Jews? Jason Aronson Inc.,
1991, p. 241; Baron, Joseph L.
Stars and Sand: Jewish Notes by Non-Jewish Notables. Jewish
Publication Society of America,
1944, p. 175)
The two-f aced cheat Lenin — the so-called “man of the
people”, “champion of the workers” — even
def ended parasitic Jewish usury and loan-sharking,
“And those gentlemen on the right benches talk about the
Jews exploiting the
peasants, about Jewish usury! But thousands of Jewish
merchants would not skin the
Russian muzhik in the way the true Russian, Christian
landlords do! The interest
claimed by the worst usurer is not to be compared with that
claimed by the true Russian
land lord, who hires the a muzhik in the winter for summer
work or who forces him to pay
for a dessiatine of land in labour, money, eggs, chickens,
and God alone knows what
else!” (V.I. Lenin, Draft for a Speech on the Agrarian
Question in the Second State Duma,
1907)
Lenin, the monstrous criminal, excitedly advocated every
manner of deception, barbarity and wickedness.
He encouraged lies and deceit, stating, “We must utilise all
possible cunning and illegal methods,
deny and conceal the truth,” noting that, “A lie told often
enough becomes the truth.”
Deceitf ul Jewish propagandists have duped the world into
believing that German Nazi leaders Joseph
Goebbels and Adolf Hitler invented and utilized the “big
lie” technique as a method to f ool the German
masses. This is f alse and nothing more than psychological
projection. In reality, Goebbels stressed that
good propaganda must be accurate and truthf ul, stating
that,
“Good propaganda does not need to lie, indeed it may not
lie. It has no reason to fear
the truth. It is a mistake to believe that people cannot
take the truth. They can. It is only
a matter of presenting the truth to people in a way that
they will be able to understand. A
propaganda that lies proves that it has a bad cause. It
cannot be successful in the long
run.” (Weber, Mark. “Fraudulent Nazi Quotations.” Institute
for Historical Review.)
In 1941, Goebbels published an article in which he charged
British propagandists with adopting the “big lie”
technique, stating, “The English follow the principle that
when one lies, one should lie big, and stick
to it. They keep up their lies, even at the risk of looking
ridiculous.” (Goebbels, Joseph. “Churchill’s
Lie Factory,” 1941) Adolf Hitler, in Mein Kampf, identif ied
and condemned the “big lie” technique as an
invention and tactic of the Jews:
“In this they [the Jews] proceeded on the sound principle
that the magnitude of a lie
always contains a certain factor of credibility, since the
great masses of the people in
the very bottom of their hearts tend to be corrupted rather
than consciously and
purposely evil, and that, therefore, in view of the
primitive simplicity of their minds, they
more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a little one,
since they themselves lie in little
things, but would be ashamed of lies that were too big. Such
a falsehood will never
enter their heads, and they will not be able to believe in
the possibility of such
monstrous effrontery and infamous misrepresentation in
others.…” (Mein Kampf, p. 231
of the Manheim translation)
Upon his assumption of power, the repulsive crypto-Jew Lenin
decried “antisemitism” in the harshest
possible terms. He chastised “antisemitism” as a
“counter-revolutionary” act, and thus it was punishable by
death. Even “anti-Semitic” speech constituted the death
penalty, or lif e imprisonment, in the Jew-hell of
Soviet Russia. If being against Jews was
“counter-revolutionary” than that must have meant that all
the
“revolutionaries” were Jewish. In July of 1918, Lenin signed
an order of the Council of People’s Commissars
which declared antisemitism and pogroms a “mortal danger to
the revolution [i.e. the Jewish takeover]“:
“The Council of People’s Commissars declares that the
anti-Semitic movement and
pogroms against the Jews are fatal to the interests of the
workers’ and peasants’
revolution and calls upon the toiling people to fight this
evil with all the means at their disposal.
National hostility weakens the ranks of our revolutionaries,
disrupts the united front of the
toilers without distinctions of nationality and helps only
our enemies.
The Council of People’s Commissars instructs all Soviet
Deputies to take uncompromising
measures to tear the anti-Semitic movement out by the roots.
Pogromists and pogromagitators are to be placed outside the
law.” (Baron, Salo Wittmayer. The Russian Jew Under
Tsars and Soviets, Macmillan, (1976), p. 180; Strauss,
Herbert A. Hostages of Modernization,
Walter De Gruyter, (1993), p. 1324)
A. Nelson Field remarked in Appendix B of his book, All
These Things : “Lenin was married to a Jewess,
spoke Yiddish in his family circle, and Dr. Chaim Weizmann,
Jewish Zionist leader, was quoted in
the London Jewish Chronicle of December 16th, 1932, as
saying that Lenin had taken part in
Jewish student meetings in Switzerland thirty-five years
before. He is generally regarded as a
Russian, but there is doubt.”
Lenin’s love af f air with Jewry undoubtedly stemmed from
his own Jewish roots and being in love with
himself , since he was an egomaniac. In an asinine attempt
to cover over their blood-stained tracks, Jewish
apologists today of ten go around claiming that Josef Stalin
was a big “anti-Semite” who hated and
persecuted Jews. This idiotic canard has no basis in
reality; on the contrary, Stalin was an instrument of the
Jews, a “shabbas goy.”
Let’s just look at what Stalin himself said about
anti-Semitism,
“National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the
misanthropic customs characteristic of the
period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an extreme form of
racial chauvinism, is the most
dangerous vestige of cannibalism.
Anti-semitism is of advantage to the exploiters as a
lightning conductor that deflects the blows
aimed by the working people at capitalism. Anti-semitism is
dangerous for the working people as
being a false path that leads them off the right road and
lands them in the jungle. Hence
Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be
irreconcilable, sworn
enemies of anti-semitism.
In the U.S.S.R. anti-semitism is punishable with the utmost
severity of the law as a
phenomenon deeply hostile to the Soviet system. Under
U.S.S.R. law active anti-semites
are liable to the death penalty.” (Josef Stalin, Works Vol.
13)
So, Stalin compared anti-Semitism to cannibalism and upheld
the anti-antisemitism law decreed by Lenin in
1918, restating that anti-Semitic Russian patriots were
“liable to the death penalty”! Some Jew hater, eh?
Furthermore, at the 1945 Yalta conf erence — a meeting of
the Allied leaders and policy-makers during WWII
— we f ind that Stalin proclaimed himself to be a Zionist.
(“Stalin Called Himself a Zionist — Picture of Red
Leader Unf olded.” The New York Times. 17 Mar. 1955.) Prof
essor Kevin MacDonald, in his review of Juri
Slezkine’s book “The Jewish Century”, inf orms us that not
only was Stalin not “anti-Semitic” but, on the
contrary, had launched a massive campaign to combat
anti-Semitism:
“From 1927 to 1932 Stalin established an ambitious public
campaign to combat antiSemitism that included fifty-six
books published by the government and an onslaught
of speeches, mass rallies, newspaper articles, and show
trials ‘aimed at eradicating the
evil.’” (MacDonald, Kevin. “Stalin’s Willing Executioners:
Jews as a Hostile Elite in the USSR”, p.
25)
Jewish journalist Sever Plocker tells us: “Jewish historian
Sebag Montefiore has written that during
the darkest period of terror, when the Communist killing
machine worked in full force, Stalin was
surrounded by beautiful, young Jewish women.” Sebag Montef
iore, writing in “Stalin: The Court of the
Red Tsar” (p. 267), noted that, “Stalin was surrounded by
Jewesses – from Polina Molotova and
Maria Svanidze to Poskrebysheva and Yezhova. Beria’s son,
reliable on gossip, dubious on politics,
recalled that his father gleefully listed Stalin’s affairs
with Jewesses.” The “Wolf of the Kremlin“, pp.
169-71 (1987), alleges that Stalin was married at one point
to the Jewess Rosa Kaganovich, Lazar
Kaganovich’s sister.
Despite all the spin and sophistry of Jewish gatekeepers,
Stalin was surrounded by Jews throughout the
entirety of his brutal reign, with the f erocious Jew Lazar
Kaganovich at his right hand side. In his 1939 book
“European Jungle”, Major Francis Charles Yeats-Brown — a
British war hero and award winning writer —
gives us a synopsis of the clique of Jews encircling Stalin,
still dominating the Soviet Union during and af ter
the “Great Purges” of the late 1930s:
“The population of Russia was then (in 1918) 158,400,000, of
whom 7,800,000 were Jews. The
present population is about 170,000,000, and probably the
same proportion — say 5 per cent
— are Jews. Yet in 1935, in the Central Committee of the
Communist Party, consisting of
59 members, 95 per cent were Jews — i.e., 56 members — while
the other three members
were married to Jewesses: Stalin, Lobov, and Ossinsky.
Among the Ambassadors and Ministers of the U.S.S.R. in 1935
the following were believed to be
Jews:
In Berlin: M. Suritz.
In Paris : M. Louritz.
In Rome : M. Stein.
In Tokyo : M. Yureneff .
In Ankara : M. Karakhan.
In Brussels : M. Rubinin.
In Oslo : M. Yakoubowich.
In Stockholm : Mme. Kallontai.
In Bucharest : M. Ostrovski.
In Riga: M. Brodovsky.
In Tallin: M. Karski.
In Helsingfors : M. Asmous.
In the same year (1935) the League of Nations Delegation
consisted of one Georgian, M.
Swanidze, and seven Jews, MM. Litvinov, Rosenberg, Stein,
Markus, Brenners, Hirschfeld,
Helphand.
At present, with the purges in progress, it is impossible to
give the Semitic percentages in the
Russian Government. Certain it is that they are very much
higher than the percentage of Jews
to the population, both in the lower and upper grades of the
State service, which means, in
Russia, of practically all employment.
During his travels along the border districts of the
U.S.S.R., M. Jean Fontenoy found that 90 per
cent of the directors and secretaries of the collective
farms he visited were Jews. Field
workers received a maximum of 27 days’ pay a month: the
president and secretary 80 to 90
days’ pay a month. The words Communist and Jew were
synonymous with the peasants: they
thought that the Jews were the rulers of the land.
In Kremlin circles the two brothers-in-law of Stalin,
Lazarus and Moses Kaganovitch, are
Ministers of Transport and Heavy Industry respectively; the
guard of the Kremlin is confided to
the Jewish Colonel Jacob Rappoport; while the concentration
camps, with their population of
7,000,000 Russians, are in charge of a Jew, Mendel Kermann,
aided by Lazarus Kaman and
Semen-Firkin, both Jews. The prisons of the country are
governed by the Jew Kairn Apeter.
Foreign policy is almost wholly in Jewish hands, beginning
with that man of many aliases, M.
Meyer Moses Polyanski, alias Enock Finkelstein, alias Gustav
Graf, alias Buchmann, Harrison,
Maximovitch, Wallach, Berr, and Litvinov, the Foreign
Minister of the Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics, at whose breakfast-table Mr. Eden found pats of
butter stamped with the slogan,
“Peace is indivisible.” What peace, M. Litvinov may
sometimes ask himself, will Russian Jews
have in the days to come?”
An article appearing in the Russian International News
Agency, dated June 5th, 2005, admitted that almost
no Jews served on the front lines as rank and f ile of f
icers in the Red Army, but were appointed by Stalin as
chief s and commanders, directing the “Russian goyim” from
relative saf ety — in the war against their Nazi
nemesis — and how genocide-yearning Jews like Ilya Ehrenburg
were instrumental in war-time propaganda
ef f orts:
“There were a number of outstanding Jewish military
commanders: M. Katukov, Marshal
of Armored Troops; Y. Smushkevich, Commander-in-Chief of the
Air Force; and General
M. Shmelev, Chief of Staff of Long-Range Aviation. In
addition there were 92 Jewish
generals and 9 army and flotilla commanders. In total, there
were 270 Jewish generals
and marshals.
Furthermore, Stalin’s inner circle included four Jewish
ministers (people’s commissars):
Lazar Kaganovich, Boris Vannikov, Semyon Ginzburg and Isaak
Zaltsman. These men
were responsible for the railroads, ammunition, military
construction and the tank industry.
Jews were also instrumental in shaping the ideology that
would underpin the Soviet role
in the war. Initially the Soviet people did not know what to
make of the Nazi attack. Firstly, the
Soviet Union once considered Germany an enemy but more
recently had viewed it as a
potential ally against Britain and the U.S. Secondly, the
Soviet people, brought up to believe in
internationalism, had thought that the German soldiers, i.e.
German workers and peasants,
would refuse to attack a socialist state and instead would
join with the Russians to fight the
oppressors, German capitalists.
This myth had to be urgently dispelled.
A Jewish intellectual, Ilya Erenburg, played a key role in
this. He had traveled extensively
and was perhaps the only Jew in the USSR who was aware of
the racist motivations for the war.
He was a military correspondent in Spain during the Spanish
civil war, and his world outlook was
informed by this experience. Six International Brigades had
fought on the side of the
Republicans in that war, and these units had included 6,000
Jewish volunteers.
By the time the Germans attacked, Erenburg was resolutely
opposed to fascism. He had all the
main national newspapers, Pravda, Izvestia and Krasnaya
Zvezda at his disposal, as well as the
national radio stations. He emphatically rejected the
internationalist dogma and called on
the nation to, “Kill the Germans!”"
Even well into the 1950s Jews ruled over the USSR.Although
Jews comprised a tiny 1.25 to 1.75 percent of
the Soviet population, they constituted over 50 percent of
the staf f of various governmental departments,
according to the Soviet politician Ekaterina Furtseva. (See:
The Soviet Government and the Jews 1948-
1967) While millions of Russian Gentiles languished in the
Gulag slave camps succumbing to starvation,
disease, exhaustion and the bitter cold climate, Soviet
Jewry lived in a lap of luxury:
“Slezkine describes the life of the largely Jewish elite in
Moscow and Leningrad, where
they attended the theater, sent their children to the best
schools, had peasant women
for nannies, spent weekends at pleasant dachas, and
vacationed at the Black Sea.”
(MacDonald, Kevin. “Stalin’s Willing Executioners: Jews as a
Hostile Elite in the USSR”, p. 24)
Many Jews around the world saw the Soviet Union as
essentially the f irst Zionist State — their beloved
“Israel”. This reality was supremely elucidated in the f
ollowing astonishing quotation, which is attributed to
the “Central Committee of the Petersburg Branch of the
Israelite International League”:
“Sons of Israel! The hour of our ultimate victory is near.
We stand on the threshold to the
command of the world. That which we could only dream of
before us is about to be realized.
Only quite recently feeble and powerless, we can now, thanks
to the world’s catastrophe, raise
our heads with pride. We must, however, be careful. It can
surely be prophesied that, after we
have marched over ruined and broken altars and thrones, we
shall advance further on the same
indicated path. The authority of the, to us, alien religions
and doctrines of faith we have through
very successful propaganda, subject to a merciless criticism
and mockery. We have brought the
culture, civilization, traditions and thrones of the
Christian Nations to stagger. We have done
everything to bring the Russian people under the yoke of the
Jewish power, and ultimately
compelled them to fall on their knees before us.
We have nearly completed all this but we must all the same
be very cautious, because the
oppressed Russia is our arch-enemy. The victory over Russia,
gained through our intellectual
superiority, may in the future, in a new generation, turn
against us. Russia is conquered and
brought to the ground. Russia is in the agony of death under
our heel, but do not forget, not
even for a moment, that we must be careful! The holy care
for our safety does not allow us to
show either pity or mercy. At last we have been allowed to
behold the bitter need of the Russian
people, and to see it in tears! By taking from them their
property, their gold, we have reduced
this people to helpless slaves. Be cautious and silent! We
ought to have no mercy for our
enemy. We must make an end of the best and leading elements
of the Russian people, so that
the vanquished Russia may not find any leader! Thereby every
possibility will vanish for them to
resist our power. We must excite hatred and disputes between
workers and peasants. War and
the class-struggle will destroy all treasures and culture
created by the Christian people. But be
cautious, sons of Israel! Our victory is near, because our
political and economic power and
influence upon the masses are in rapid progress. We buy up
Government loans and gold, and
thereby we have controlling power over the world’s
exchanges. The power is in our hands, but
be careful, place no faith in traitorous shady powers!
Bronstein (Trotsky), Apfelbaum (Zinovieff), Rosenfeld
(Kamaneff), Steinberg, all of them are like
unto thousands of other true sons of Israel. Our power in
Russia is unlimited. In the towns, the
Commissariats and Commissions of Food, House Commissions,
etc., are dominated by our
people. But do not let victory intoxicate you. Be careful,
cautious, because no one except
yourselves will protect us! Remember we cannot rely on the
Red Army, which one day may turn
its warfare on ourselves. Sons of Israel! The hour for our
long-cherished victory over Russia is
near; close up solid your ranks! Make known our people’s
national policy! Fight for eternal
ideals! Keep holy the old laws, which history has bequeathed
to us! May our intellect, our
genius, protect and lead us!”
The origin of this extraordinary tract was described by Juri
Lina (on page 157 of “Under the Sign of the
Scorpion”) in the f ollowing way:
“On the night before the 9th (22nd) of December 1919, during
the Estonian war of liberation
against the Bolsheviks, a Jewish battalion commander,
Shunderev, fell in a battle against
Estonian troops. Among his papers there was a secret
circular containing an appeal to all
Jewish chiefs for the forming of a secret Zionist society.
The letter was written in Russian by the
central committee at the Israeli World Union’s department in
Petrograd on the 18th March 1918.
The entire text was published in two Estonian newspapers.”
When the Soviet Red Army invaded and brutally occupied
Eastern Poland, the Baltic States, Finland, and
other parts of Eastern Europe in late 1939/early 1940, large
percentages of the Jewish populations of
those countries collaborated with their Soviet communist
conquerors. These Jews voluntarily led the
NKVD death squads to hunt down and execute so-called “class
enemies” (patriots, nationalists, anticommunist resistors,
etc), and f orcibly led the round-up and deportation via
cattle cars of millions of
Eastern European civilians to the Soviet Gulags where they
met grisly deaths.Author Mark Paul, writing in
“Neighbours on the Eve of the Holocaust: Polish-Jewish
Relations in Soviet-Occupied Eastern Poland,
1939-1945“, documented the treacherous perf idy of Poland’s
Jews and its cover-up by Western “scholars”:
“This state of affairs played into the hands of Holocaust
historians who, preoccupied with Jewish
victimization under the Nazi regime, ignored, glossed over
or simply denied the fact of Jewish
collaboration with the Soviet invaders of Poland both, in
1939-1941 and again, from 1944
onward. Indeed, in recent years we have witnessed a
concerted effort to relegate Jewish
misconduct to the realm of unfounded perception on the part
of the Poles that has no, or little,
basis in fact. Thus a serious void or, worse still, denial
about these thorny issues
permeates Western scholarship – at most we find apologetics.
The most recent, and
disturbing, trend in that scholarship has been to focus on
the German invasion of the
Soviet Union in June 1941 and play down to the point of
dismissing or obscuring the
brutal Soviet occupation that preceded that event.
Even compelling reports of Jewish collaboration with the
Soviet occupiers, found in key
documents from that period, are ignored or discounted out of
hand, such as the charge levelled
by the legendary Polish courier, Jan Karski, who was made an
Honorary Citizen of Israel for his
role in warning the West about the Holocaust and cannot be
accused of harbouring hostility
toward the Jews. Writing in early 1940, at a time when the
mass deportations of Poles were not
yet underway, Karski reported:
“… The Jews have taken over the majority of the political
and administrative positions.
But what is worse, they are denouncing Poles, especially
students and politicians (to
the secret police), are directing the work of the
(communist) militia from behind the
scenes, are unjustly denigrating conditions in Poland before
the war. Unfortunately, one
must say that these incidents are very frequent, and more
common than incidents which
demonstrate loyalty toward Poles or sentiment toward
Poland.”
A Jewish woman from Wilno concurred with that assessment,
when she wrote during the war:
“… Under Bolshevik rule an anti-Jewish current grew
significantly. In large measure, the
Jews themselves were responsible for this… . At every turn
they mocked Poles, yelled
out that their Poland was no more… The Jewish communists
dallied with the patriotic
sentiments of Poles, denounced their illegal conversations,
pointed out Polish officers
and former government officials, freely worked for the NKVD,
and took part in arrests. …
The Bolsheviks on the whole treated Jews favourably, had
complete faith in them and
were confident of their devoted sympathy and trust. For that
reason they put Jews in all
of the leading and influential positions which they would
not entrust to Poles, who
formerly occupied them.”
Soon thereafter Jewish collaborators, in their positions as
local officials, police, and
NKVD agents, played a key role in populating the Gulag with
their Polish neighbours.
They identified them and put them on lists of “class
enemies”; they arrested them and
evicted them from their homes; and they helped to dispatch
them by cattle car to the far
reaches of the Soviet Union. While certainly not universal,
this was by no means a marginal
phenomenon, and, given the lack of condemnation of such
activities by Jewish leaders, Poles
were entitled to assume that in fact it reflected a
widespread attitude.”
Unf ortunately, that study by Mark Paul — although still
very usef ul — completely overlooked the sublime
research of Holocaust Revisionists, as it contains a f air
bit of f alse ‘holocaust’ propaganda. Nonetheless,
it demonstrates candidly what provoked so many Poles (and
Ukrainians, Latvians, Estonians, Lithuanians,
Romanians and Hungarians f or that matter) to collaborate
with the Germans when the German Wehrmacht
launched an of f ensive against the Soviets in 1941, driving
them out of Eastern Europe and the Baltic
States. These patriots saw the Nazis as liberators from
Soviet-Communist oppression, which was in
actuality Jewish oppression.
Communism was spearheaded by Jews not only in Russia, but
everywhere in the world where Jews lived
including Western & Eastern Europe, America, Canada,
Australia and South Africa. (See: Hof f man II, Michael
A. “Judaic Communists: The Documentary Record”, Revisionist
History, 2006; Britton, Frank L. Behind
Communism, 1953; Leese, Arnold Spencer. Bolshevism Is
Jewish! London, England: Imperial Fascist League,
1939; Ehrt, Adolf . Communism in Germany: the Truth about
the Communist Conspiracy on the Eve of the
National Revolution. Berlin: Eckart-verlag, 1933; “Jews and
Communism: The South African Experience”,
author unknown) The communist regimes imposed on Eastern and
Western Europe during and f ollowing
the Second World War — principally in Ukraine, Poland,
Romania, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, East Germany,
and the Baltic States — were just as Jewish-dominated as the
Soviet Union. (See: David, Tref or. The Bloody
Red Streak. London, England: Britons Pub. Society, 1951.)
The bloodiest butchers of the 1917 Bolshevik revolution, and
the f ollowing decades of communist rule,
were the Marxist-Masonic Jews Vladimir Lenin (f irst
dictator of the USSR), Leon Trotsky-Bronstein
(f ounder/commander of the Red Army), Lazar Kaganovich
(Stalin’s right hand man f or his entire reign),
Moisei Uritsky (Cheka chief in Petrograd), Jacob Sverdlov (f
irst president of the Soviets), Grigory Zinoviev,
Lev Kamenev, Yankel Yurovsky (Cheka terrorist), Genrikh
Yagoda (NKVD chief), Laverenti Beria (NKVD
chief), Bela Kun (Lenin’s chief terrorist in the Crimea,
also the dictator of Hungary’s short-lived communist
regime in 1918), Rosalina Zalkind, Leonid Reichman (NKVD
chief), and the overseers of the vast and
harrowing Soviet Gulag slave labor/death camp apparatus:
Aaron Soltz, Naftali Frenkel (a Turkish Jew),
Yakov Berman, Sergei Zhuk, Yakov Rapoport, Nakhimson, Yakov
Moroz, Abramson, Pliner, Matvei
Berman, Samuil Kogan, Samuil Firin, Biskon, Finkelstein,
Serpukhovsky — all Jews. The murderous
tyrant Josef Stalin, although not a Jew, was simply f
ollowing in the blood-stained f ootsteps of Lenin and
obeying the dictates of his Jewish overlords.
Words cannot do justice in describing the merciless
bloodlust of these Marxist Jews. Many of the leading
Jewish rulers of Russia f orthrightly announced their
murderous desires and genocidal ambitions.All the
Jewish Bolshevik leaders were teeming with an implacable
hatred f or everything Russian and sought to
exterminate the very concept of race, nationality and
culture.
De ath and d e structio n — the le g acy o f Je wish Co
mmunism!
Despite the sugar-coated f ables of Bolshevist
apologists, the Masonic Jew Trotsky was a
merciless monster who organized the genocide of
millions of Russians, leading the “Red Terror”
alongside Lenin in the early and most savage
years of the Soviet regime. In Under the Sign of the
Scorpion, p. 149, Juri Lina captured the true
sadism and despotism of Trotsky, who had an
insatiable appetite f or terror:
“After coming to power, Trotsky became
Lenin’s right-hand man. It was actually
Trotsky who ruled Russia during Lenin’s
illness. He mercilessly caused the people
suffering of a magnitude the world had
never seen before. In the beginning
Trotsky wanted to use the guillotine to
execute people, but was scolded for this
idea.
He was a cynic and a sadist of the worst sort. He often
executed his victims personally.
He murdered his hostages in the cruellest manner and even
ordered children killed. He
ordered disciplinary executions. There are plenty of
documents about these cruelties
preserved in the archives of the Communist Party.”
Jewish-Soviet Commissar, Grigory Zinoviev, was a human
demon, if there is such a thing. This homicidal
maniac would regularly scream f or genocide. In a speech he
delivered in 1918, Zinoviev announced
Bolshevist plans f or the annihilation of 10,000,000
Russians, stating emphatically,
“To overcome our enemies we must have our own Socialist
Militarism. We must win over
to our side, 90 millions out of the 100 millions of
population of Russia under the Soviets.
As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them; they must
be annihilated.” (A Collection
of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia. Great Britain: Foreign
Office, (1919), p. 99)
He also malevolently howled,
“The bourgeoisie kill separate individuals; but we kill
whole classes!”
His partner in crime, Lenin, made similar blood-curdling
decrees. In 1908, Lenin made it perf ectly clear what
he intended to do once in power, stating: “real, nation-wide
terror, which reinvigorates the country.”
Lenin said that he was happy to see 90 percent of the
population of Russia perish, so long as the
remaining people believed in him and his communist system,
stating,
“What does it matter if 90 percent of the Russian people
perish, provided the surviving
10 percent bring about a World Revolution?” (quoted in: The
Kokomo Daily Tribune –
September 27, 1924 – page 4; Time Magazine – February 11,
1924; Impressions of Soviet
Russia (1924) By Charles Sarolea, p. 84; Stillborn Crusade:
the Tragic Failure of Western
Intervention in the Russian Civil War, 1918-1920, (1996), by
Ilya Somin, p. 4; The Communist
Shakes His Fist by Bruce Reynolds, (1931), p. 171)
Lenin was f ond of exterminating people. He ordered Russian
Orthodox Christian priests to be shot on
sight, slaughtered like cattle! This isn’t so surprising,
since killing Christians is not considered murder, or a
sin, in Judaism. Lenin and the Marxists used f amine as a
weapon of mass annihilation.Author Harun Yahya,
writing in “Communism in Ambush”, pp. 45-48, outlined
Lenin’s deliberate policy of utilizing man-made
f amines as an instrument of genocide:
“Famine, Lenin explained, “in destroying the outdated
peasant economy, would bring about the
next stage more rapidly, and usher in socialism, the stage
that necessarily followed capitalism.
Famine would also destroy faith not only in the Tsar, but in
God too.” Lenin told the Politburo, “In
fact the present moment favors us far more than it does
them. We are almost 99 percent sure
that we can strike a mortal blow against them [our enemies]
and consolidate the central position
that we are going to need to occupy for several decades to
come. With the help of all those
starving people who are starting to eat each other, who are
dying by the millions, and
whose bodies litter the roadside all over the country, it is
now and only now that we canand therefore must-confiscate
all church property with all the ruthless energy we can
still muster… All evidence suggests that we could not do
this at any other moment, because
our only hope is the despair engendered in the masses by the
famine, which will cause
them to look at us in a favorable light or, at the very
least, with indifference.“
Lenin devilishly proclaimed that anyone who did not give up
their grain to the government were to be killed:
“Begin a merciless campaign of terror and a war against the
farmers and other bourgeois
elements who are hiding an excess of grain.” Lenin and
Trotsky’s “Red Terror” crusade against Gentiles
was carried out by the most ruthless, savage and f eared
secret police agency ever to exist — the Cheka
(later known as the NKVD, OGPU and KGB). The word “Cheka” is
not simply an acronym in Russian f or
“Special Commission f or Fighting Counter-Revolution.”
According to Brother Nathanael Kapner (a f ormer
Jew who converted to Christianity and is now an outspoken
critic of Jewry) “Cheka” is a play on the Hebrew
expression f or animal slaughter, “Shechita“. Makes perf ect
sense.
Felix Dzerzhinsky, the f irst chief of the Cheka, explained
the modus operandi of his death-dealing
organization, emphatically stating,
“We stand for organized terror. The Cheka is obligated to
defend the revolution and
conquer the enemy even if its sword does by chance sometimes
fall upon the heads of
the innocent.”
A Jewish Chekist named Martin Latsis, declared:
“We are exterminating the bourgeoisie as a class!”
The brutish Cheka was a thoroughly Jewish institution not
only at the higher levels, but even amidst rankand-f ile of
f icers. W. Bruce Lincoln, an American prof essor of Russian
history, stated that in Ukraine, “Jews
made up 80% of the rank-and-file officers of the Cheka.”
Jewish historian Leonard Shapiro tells us
that, “Anyone who had the misfortune to fall into the hands
of the Cheka stood a very good
chance of finding himself confronted with, and possibly shot
by, a Jewish investigator.” (Russian
Studies, 1988, p. 286)
In late 1922, the New York Times rep
In late 1922, the New York Times reported that there were
some hostilities toward Jews in the Ukraine, but
that this was being stamped out violently with the help of a
“Jewish army” of allegedly 500,000 soldiers.
This Zionist army was mobolized on behalf of their
Jewish-Bolshevik brethren in Moscow to inf lict terror
and enf orce a grain tax on Ukrainian Gentiles. The
Jewish-owned New York Times, being a repulsive Zionist
and Bolshevist mouthpiece, absurdly depicted this essential
part of the Red Terror as heroic, justif ied
Jewish self-def ense; but it let slip some revealing f acts
nonetheless. (See this f acsimile of the NYT article)
These slaughterous policies established by Lenin and Trotsky
continued under Stalin’s reign. In 1932, Stalin
ordered his Jewish deputies to coordinate a man-made f
amine-genocide in the Ukraine to weaken the
nationalist spirit of the proud Ukrainian people who sought
independence from communist tyranny. Lazar
Kaganovich, Lavrenti Beria, Genrikh Yagoda, among other
bloodthirsty Jewish Chekist/NKVDist hoodlums,
pleasurably implemented Stalin’s collectivization orders
with a Talmudic f ervor, wiping out seven million
Ukrainian men, women and children, in a few short years in
an unprecedented ‘holocaust’ of
human life. (See: Moroz, Valentyn. Nationalism and Genocide:
The Origin of the Artificial Famine of 1932-
1933 in Ukraine. The Institute f or Historical Review, 1985)
Canadian journalist, Eric Margolis, keenly
summarized the barbarity of this tragedy as such:
“As Britain’s socialist government cleared the way for a
gaudy show trial of that Great Satan of
the left, Chile’s Gen. Augusto Pinochet, the 65th
anniversary of this century’s bloodiest crime
was utterly ignored. Leftists now baying for Pinochet’s head
don’t want to be reminded of the
Unknown Holocaust. In 1932, Soviet leader Josef Stalin
unleashed genocide in Ukraine. Stalin
determined to force Ukraine’s millions of independent
farmers – called kulaks – into collectivized
Soviet agriculture, and to crush Ukraine’s growing spirit of
nationalism. Faced by resistance to
collectivization, Stalin unleashed terror and dispatched
25,000 fanatical young party
militants from Moscow – earlier versions of Mao’s Red Guards
– to force 10 million
Ukrainian peasants into collective farms. Secret police
units of OGPU began selective
executions of recalcitrant farmers. When Stalin’s red guards
failed to make a dent in this
immense number, OGPU was ordered to begin mass executions.
But there were simply
not enough Chekists (secret police) to kill so many people,
so Stalin decided to replace
bullets with a much cheaper medium of death – mass
starvation. All seed stocks, grain,
silage and farm animals were confiscated from Ukraine’s
farms. [...]
OGPU agents and Red Army troops sealed all roads and rail
lines. Nothing came in or out of
Ukraine. Farms were searched and looted of food and fuel.
Ukrainians quickly began to die of
hunger, cold and sickness. When OGPU failed to meet weekly
execution quotas, Stalin sent
henchman Lazar Kaganovitch to destroy Ukrainian resistance.
Kaganovitch, the Soviet
Eichmann, made quota, shooting 10,000 Ukrainians weekly.
Eighty percent of all
Ukrainian intellectuals were executed. A Ukrainian party
member named Nikita Khruschchev
helped supervise the slaughter. During the bitter winter of
1932-33, mass starvation created by
Kaganovitch and OGPU hit full force. Ukrainians ate their
pets, boots and belts, plus bark and
roots. Some parents even ate infant children. The precise
number of Ukrainians murdered by
Stalin’s custom-made famine and Cheka firing squads remains
unknown to this day. The KGB’s
archives, and recent work by Russian historians, show at
least seven million died.
Ukrainian historians put the figure at nine million, or
higher. Twenty-five percent of
Ukraine’s population was exterminated. [...]
Kaganovitch and many senior OGPU officers (later, NKVD) were
Jewish. The
predominance of Jews among Bolshevik leaders, and the
frightful crimes and cruelty
inflicted by Stalin’s Cheka on Ukraine, the Baltic states
and Poland, led the victims of
Red Terror to blame the Jewish people for both communism and
their suffering. As a
direct result, during the subsequent Nazi occupation of
Eastern Europe, the region’s innocent
Jews became the target of ferocious revenge by Ukrainians,
Balts and Poles. [...]
Stalin’s murder of millions was simply denied, or concealed
by a left-wing conspiracy of silence
that continues to this day. … Socialist luminaries like
Bernard Shaw, Beatrice and Sidney Webb
and PM Edouard Herriot of France, toured Ukraine during
1932-33 and proclaimed reports of
famine were false. Shaw announced: “I did not see one
under-nourished person in Russia.”
New York Times correspondent Walter Duranty, who won a
Pulitzer Prize for his Russian
reporting, wrote claims of famine were “malignant
propaganda.” Seven million people were
dying around them, yet these fools saw nothing. The New York
Times has never repudiated
Duranty’s lies. [...]
Western historians delicately skirt the sordid fact that the
governments of Britain, the United
States and Canada were fully aware of the Ukrainian genocide
and Stalin’s other monstrous
crimes. Yet they eagerly welcomed him as an ally during
World War II. … None of the Soviet
mass murderers who committed genocide were ever brought to
justice. Lazar Kaganovitch died
peacefully in Moscow a few years ago, still wearing his
Order of the Soviet Union, and enjoying
a generous state pension.” (Toronto Sun, “Remembering
Ukraine’s Unknown Holocaust,”
December 13, 1998)
In a sickening display of Talmudic insolence, Aleksandr
Feldman — the leader of the Ukrainian Jewish
Committee — sought to undermine a Ukrainian government
motion to prosecute a case against the Soviet
criminals who orchestrated the Holodomor genocide, f or the
predictable reason that all of the names on
the published list of conspirators were Jewish:
“KIEV, Ukraine (JTA) — A Jewish group in Ukraine is
objecting to a criminal case brought over
the “Great Famine” committed in the 1930s. The nation’s
security service is pressing the case
against a list of former Soviet officials accused of
committing the Holodomor, which caused the
deaths of millions in Ukraine in 1932-33. Most of the names
on the list were Jewish.
Ukrainian lawmaker Aleksandr Feldman, leader of the
Ukrainian Jewish Committee, said last
week that it was “a farce” to press the case. “All
organizers of the Great Famine are dead,” he
said. Last July, the Ukrainian Security Service released a
list of high-ranking Soviet state
and Communist Party officials — as well as officials from
NKVD, the police force of
Soviet Russia — that essentially blamed Jews and Latvians
responsible for perpetrating
and executing the famine because most of the names on the
list were Jewish. The
Ukrainian Jewish Committee called on the secret service to
revise the list, which incited
interethnic hatred, in order to clear up the “inaccuracy.””
(JTA, “Jewish Group Objects To ‘Great
Famine’ Case,” June 15, 2009)
To add insult to injury, on a state visit to Ukraine the
vile war criminal — Israeli president Shimon Peres —
told the Ukrainians to “forget history”, stating in true
Orwellian newspeak,
“If I were asked what advice Ukraine, I would say: forget
history, history is not important
at all. … You will not be able to not repeat the mistakes of
the past, you just, make new.”
(BBC World, “Israeli President Advises Ukrainians to Forget
History,” November 25, 2010)
Sheer chutzpah!As they malevolently and hypocritically
endeavor to censor and suppress open discussion
of their countless crimes against humanity and command
Gentiles just “f orget history” (history that isn’t
f avorable to Jews, that is), demonic Jews are still —
almost 70 years af ter WWII — continuously
spearheading psychotic witch-hunts against elderly German
WWII vets accused of committing crimes
against Jews that, in all likelihood, never even occurred!
(See: YnetNews, “90 Year Old Nazi Hit Man Jailed,”
12/15/2011)
The litany of torturous, blood-curdling atrocities committed
by the Marxist Jews against the long-suf f ering
Russians (and other European peoples: Ukrainians,
Belarussians, Poles, Hungarians, etc) are calculatingly
listed by author Juri Lina, in his monumental work “Under
the Sign of the Scorpion“. One should approach
the f ollowing text on an empty stomach, as the blunt
descriptions of these grotesque, satanically-inspired
misdeeds is simply nauseating:
“Lenin and his accomplices did not arrest just anyone. They
executed those most active in
society, the independent thinkers. Lenin gave orders to kill
as many students as possible in
several towns. The Chekists arrested every youth wearing a
school cap. They were liquidated
because Lenin believed the coming Russian intellectuals
would be a threat to the Soviet regime.
(Vladimir Soloukhin, “In the Light of Day”, Moscow 1992, p.
40.)
The role of the Russian intellectuals in society was taken
over by the Jews.
Many students (for example in Yaroslavl) learned quickly and
hid their school caps. Afterwards,
the Chekists stopped all suspect youths and searched their
hair for the stripe of the school cap.
If the stripe was found, the youth was killed on the spot.
The author Vladimir Soloukhin revealed that the Chekists
were especially interested in
handsome boys and pretty girls. These were the first to be
killed. It was believed that there
would be more intellectuals among attractive people.
Attractive youths were therefore killed as a
danger to society. No crime as terrible as this has hitherto
been described in the history of the
world.
The terror was co-ordinated by the Chekist functionary
Joseph Unschlicht. How did they go
about the murders? The Jewish Chekists flavoured murder with
various torture methods.
In his documentary “The Russia We Lost”, the director
Stanislav Govorukhin told how
the priesthood in Kherson were crucified. The archbishop
Andronnikov in Perm was
tortured: his eyes were poked out, his ears and nose were
cut off. In Kharkov the priest
Dmitri was undressed. When he tried to make the sign of the
cross, a Chekist cut off his
right hand.
Several sources tell how the Chekists in Kharkov placed the
victims in a row and nailed
their hands to a table, cut around their wrists with a
knife, poured boiling water over the
hands and pulled the skin off. This was called “pulling off
the glove”. In other places,
the victim’s head was placed on an anvil and slowly crushed
with a steam hammer.
Those due to undergo the same punishment the next day were
forced to watch. The
eyes of church dignitaries were poked out, their tongues
were cut off and they were
buried alive. There were Chekists who used to cut open the
stomachs of their victims,
following which they pulled out a length of the small
intestine and nailed it to a
telegraph pole and, with a whip, forced the unlucky victim
to run circles around the pole
until the whole intestine had been unravelled and the victim
died. The bishop of
Voronezh was boiled alive in a big pot, after which the
monks, with revolvers aimed at
their heads, were forced to drink this soup.
Other Chekists crushed the heads of their victims with
special headscrews, or drilled
them through with dental tools. The upper part of the skull
was sawn off and the nearest
in line was forced to eat the brain, following which the
procedure would be repeated to
the end of the line.
The Chekists often arrested whole families and tortured the
children before the eyes of their
parents, and the wives before their husbands. Mikhail
Voslensky, a former Soviet functionary,
described some of the cruel methods used by the Chekists in
his book “Nomenklatura” /
“Nomenclature” (Stockholm, 1982, p. 321): “In Kharkov,
people were scalped. In Voronezh,
the torture victims were placed in barrels into which nails
were hammered so that they
stuck out on the inside, upon which the barrels were set
rolling. A pentacle (usually a
five-pointed star formerly used in magic) was burned into
the foreheads of the victims.
In Tsaritsyn and Kamyshin, the hands of victims were
amputated with a saw. In Poltava
and Kremenchug, the victims were impaled. In Odessa, they
were roasted alive in ovens
or ripped to pieces. In Kiev, the victims were placed in
coffins with a decomposing body
and buried alive, only to be dug up again after half an
hour.”
Lenin was dissatisfied with these reports and demanded: “Put
more force into the
terror!” All of this happened in the provinces. The reader
can try to imagine how people were
executed in Moscow. The Russian- Jewish newspaper
Yevreyskaya Tribuna stated on the 24th
of August 1922 that Lenin had asked the rabbis if they were
satisfied with the particularly
cruel executions.
The Russian people remember with horror their Jewish
executioners, all of whom had
their own methods for getting rid of their enemies. Ashikin
in Simferopol made his
victims march stark naked before him whereupon he hacked off
their arms and ears with
his sword before he personally pressed out their eyes and
cut off their heads. The chief
executioner in Nikolaiev, Bogbender, had his victims walled
in alive. Deutsch and
Wichman worked in Odessa. They claimed to have no appetite
until they had killed
several hundred goys. The Chekists in Voronezh committed
ritual murders. Among other
things, they used to boil their victims alive. That was a
common method of getting rid of
goys and Jewish renegades. Nearly all the inhabitants of
Pyatigorsk were exterminated. All this
information was published in the Russian newspaper Russkoye
Vosskresenye, No. 3, 1991.
It is impossible, for lack of space, to describe all the
butchers and their crimes. I shall just
mention some numbers. During a single year in power, the
Bolsheviks exterminated 320
000 clergymen (Molodaya Gvardiya, No. 6, 1989). A total of
10 180 000 “class enemies”
were murdered between 1918 and 1920. Another 15 million
people died during the civil
war. During the famine of 1921-22, another 5 053 000 people
perished. The Bolsheviks,
headed by Lenin, managed to destroy over 30 million people
during their first four years
in power.
In 1917, 143.5 million people lived in the part of Imperial
Russia, which later became Soviet
Russia. Russia had lost more than 20 per cent of her
population by 1922. Only 131 million
lived there in 1923. It has been calculated that Russia’s
population, under normal
circumstances, should have increased to 343 million by the
middle of the 1950s, that is, if the
development had continued as it had begun in the Tsarist
era. 165 million people disappeared.
Who in the West mourns for them? There were 178 million
left.
Kaganovich and his cronies brought about this genocide by
the introduction of confiscatory
taxation on those peasants who remained after the
extermination of the “kulaks”. Meanwhile, he
sent out new gangs of fanatical activists who commanded
enforcement patrols, especially in the
Ukraine, where the borders to the other Soviet republics had
been closed off. The political
activists took away every grain of corn and every egg, every
vegetable and every fruit of the
farms’ produce. Convoys of trucks carried all the food away.
Each piece of bread, which should
have been brought to the starving, was confiscated at the
border. Every Ukrainian, who might
be suspected of the least, often invented, attempt at
lessening the full impact of the famine or of
hiding foodstuffs from the authorities, was shot or sent to
the labour camps. (Robert Conquest,
“The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collektivization and the
Terror-Famine”, Alberta, 1986.)
Each morning, wagons drove about to collect the dead in the
Ukraine and southern Russia.
Bodies lined the roads in Central Asia too. Cannibalism
became increasingly common in the
Ukraine in 1934. Several sources show that the famine even
brought forth actual
slaughterhouses for orphaned children, whose meat was later
sold.
The systematic killing of large numbers of children began as
early as 1934. After all, they cost
money… In Moscow, the murders were carried out in the prison
dungeons of the Lubyanka, the
Butyrka and the Lefortovo. Stalin and Kaganovich had their
most famous victims cremated at
night, following which they had the ash smuggled out and
buried in a mass grave in the
Donskoye graveyard. This seemed the safest way to complete
the total elimination of their
important victims.
Far from all of those killed in the jails of Moscow during
the 1930s, the 1940s and the beginning
of the 1950s were cremated. Most of them were thrown into
various mass graves in Moscow.
One of those hitherto unknown mass graves was found in the
Kalitinsky graveyard in southern
Moscow. The NKVD used it as a dumping site for bodies for
several years in the 1930s.
The covered lorries arrived at around five in the afternoon,
every single day for seven years
between 1934 an 1941. They drove up to the far end of a
ravine, turned around and reversed
up to the edge. The trucks were painted blue-green and
lacked side-windows. Instead, large
letters on the sides of the truck announced SAUSAGES or MEAT
and sometimes CAKES. When
the truck had backed up to the edge and stopped, a hatch was
opened at the back and two
officers wearing NKVD uniforms, rubber boots, long rubber
aprons in black and gold and elbowlength rubber gloves
seized the corpses by the heads and legs and threw them down
into the
ravine. Two other soldiers waited down below with shovels
and threw some earth on the bodies.
The corpses were always naked. They all had bullet holes in
their heads; a small entry hole in
the back of the neck and large exit hole in front. They had
been shot from behind. The
executioners had an unlimited supply of alcohol. They were
usually drunk, sometimes
extremely.
The KGB admitted in July 1990 that there were also mass
graves in the Donskoye and
Vagankovskoye cemeteries in Moscow. A large execution site
has now been found in
Kuropaty, six miles from Minsk, the capital of Byelorussia.
At least 102 000 people were
murdered there, including many women. Witnesses have related
that the executions began
in the evenings and continued through the nights. The
executioners wore NKVD uniforms. The
witness Mikolai Karpovich saw how people stood lined up by a
mass grave. They were gagged
and blindfolded. To save bullets, the executioners usually
tried to shoot two people with
each shot. Executions took place there every day between
1937 and June 1941.
The people who lived near the Kuropaty forest could hear
salvoes of shots and prisoners
begging and screaming for their lives. There were at least
five such execution sites around
Minsk, where the butchers worked in shifts. Uniformed NKVD
men used to take part in the
dance in the village of Kuropaty at around 11 o’clock on
Saturday evenings. (Expressen, 18th of
October 1988.)
About fifty mass graves in this area have later been opened.
Prisoners who were taken to
Kuropaty in the winter were forced to step out of the
carriages in the severe cold, whereupon
they were showered in icy water and ordered to return to the
carriages. Not many survived until
the following morning. The heads were cut off from all the
frozen corpses. The survivors were
killed at the edge of the mass grave, into which all the
victims were thrown.
Moscow Television related on the 12th of September 1989 that
nearly 300 000 victims
had been found in an abandoned goldmine near Chelyabinsk.
This was the largest mass
grave. The Communists killed up to 250 000 “enemies of the
people” in the forest of
Bykovnya near Kiev between 1937 and 1941. Most were shot in
the neck, but a few had
also been poisoned by smoke (Dagens Nyheter, 25th of March
1989). That place had
earlier been called the grave of the victims of fascism. The
bodies of many Jews were
supposed to have been hidden there, but this lie was exposed
after the fall of
Communism.
From 1943, the Chekists managed to collect two million
children per year. Beria became a
dreadful executioner during the Second World War, since he
was able to conceal his
crimes as the work of the Nazis. He had nearly 20 million
people captured and sent to
slave camps. According to the latest estimates, the Soviet
Union lost at least 32 million,
possibly 45 million, citizens during the Second World War.
The historian Nikolai Tolstoy
claims that most of them (presumably 20 million) were killed
by order of Lavrenti Beria.
All those deaths were blamed on the Germans.
Stalin, Kaganovich and Beria had 25 700 Polish citizens
executed in April 1940. The
murder of more than 4000 Polish officers (including many of
Jewish blood) in Katyn was
brought to light by the Germans. It was Ivan Krivozhertsev
who informed the Germans about
the mass graves in the Katyn forest. No one wanted to listen
to the Nazis’ claim that it had been
the work of the Bolsheviks, since the Soviet Union had
blamed the Germans.
It was only on the 14th of October 1992 that a copy of the
decision signed by Stalin and passed
by Molotov, Kaganovich, Kalinin and others, was handed over
to the Polish President Lech
Walesa by the Russian government. It was not really so
strange that Jewish Chekists had also
executed Jewish officers (including Abram Engel, Samuel
Rosen, Isaak Gutman, Isaak Feinkel
and others) who had served in the Polish army. They were
regarded as traitors!
The President of the United States of America Franklin
Delano Roosevelt, and the British
Prime Minister Anthony Eden, prohibited all publicity about
this mass murder. Roosevelt
officially asserted that the events in Katyn were a German
plot. Winston Churchill
warned his ministers: “The whole subject must be avoided!”
At the same time, he
assured Stalin that he would do all he could to silence the
Polish exile newspapers in
London.
Voice of America was not, even in the 1970s, allowed to
relate that the Bolsheviks had killed the
Polish officers. Hans Holzapfel, the Jewish chief of the
European section, was responsible for
the censorship.
It is now known exactly what happened. The mass murders
began in April 1940. The Polish
officers, wearing winter uniforms, were brought in small
groups – 30-40 at a time – to the
execution site. They were then shot in the neck, one at a
time, whilst standing by the edge of
the mass grave.
The NKVD continued working every day for nearly six weeks. A
total of 4143 officer’s bodies
were found. 4421 people were killed in the Katyn forest,
according to the documents. All the
identified bodies proved to be former prisoners from
Kozielsk. The prisoners who had been
incarcerated in the Starobielsk (near Kharkov) and Ostashkov
(near Kalinin) camps were
murdered elsewhere. The latter amounted to 10 131 (3820 +
6311) people. Another 7305 Polish
citizens were murdered in Byelorussia and the Ukraine. The
pertaining documents were
marked: “Must never be opened!”
Kaganovich founded actual slave camps, where the inmates
worked in chains. Of the
most important Jewish camp commanders (Aaron Soltz, Naftali
Frenkel – a Turkish Jew -,
Yakov Berman, Sergei Zhuk, Yakov Rapoport, Nakhimson, Yakov
Moroz, Abramson,
Pliner, Matvei Berman, Samuil Kogan, Samuil Firin, Biskon,
Finkelstein, Serpukhovsky).
Lazar Kogan was picked out as insufficiently effective. He
was executed in 1938 and
replaced by another Jew.“
As Juri Lina has conclusively shown, in the hectic,
war-ravaged period between 1939-1945 Soviet butchers
Stalin, Kaganovich and Beria cunningly concealed their
colossal war crimes by blaming them on the Nazis.
Acting as de f acto propaganda publicists f or Bolshevism,
the Jewish-controlled press of Western Europe
and the United States made easy work of scapegoating the
Nazis f or Jewish-Communist malf easance. In
his 1982 book “Stalin’s Secret War,” the Russian historian
Nikolai Tolstoy exposes as a fraud the of f icial
Soviet claim, widely parroted by the Western media, that 20
million Soviet citizens were killed by the Axis
Forces during the Second World War. Tolstoy demonstrates
that most of those 20 million were actually
victims of the Soviet regime itself !All of those deaths
were f alsely blamed on the Nazis. (See: Charles
Lutton’s review of “Stalin’s Secret War”) Russian historian
Anton Antonov-Ovseyenko estimates, in “ The
Time of Stalin — Portrait of a Tyranny,” that the Soviet
rulers had killed more than eighty million of
their own people to keep themselves in power!
The
tre ache ro us
te rro r
o f
Zio n
p e rme ate s
the
g lo b e !
Moreover, the Zionist propaganda myth of ‘The Holocaust’ has
been steadily unraveling over the past f our
decades. Leading Jews have conf essed that the “5,000,000
non-Jews” supposedly killed in the so-called
‘Holocaust’ is a complete f abrication — an invention of the
pathologically lying Jew, Simon Wiesenthal.
Zionists Deborah Lipstadt, Peter Novick and Yehuda Bauer —
three prominent promoters of the of f icial
Holocaust narrative and liars in their own right — have all
denounced Wiesenthal’s larcenous lie about the
imaginary “f ive million non-Jewish” victims of the Nazis
that he conjured out of thin air as a marketing ploy
to elicit interest in the holocaust genre from non-Jews. If
Jews are willing to make up f ive million Gentile
deaths and attribute it to the Nazis, how many Jewish deaths
do you suppose they’d be willing to
f abricate?
Of course, f olks f amiliar with revisionist research
already understand that no more than 200,000 Jews died
in Nazi concentration camps.And none of those deaths were
from gassing (nor by electrocution, steaming,
or any of the other mountains of outrageously f alse
propaganda claims), but mostly by natural causes —
disease and starvation — mainly as a result of the inhuman
Allied policy of saturation bombing of
Germany’s supply lines which caused a stand-still in
shipments of f oodstuf f s, medicine and other supplies
to the camps. (See: VHO, CODOH, IHR, Holocaust Denial
Videos, The “Six Million” Myth, Winston Smith
Ministry of Truth)
The Jewish Terror Reigns Supreme
Where in the world did the Jewish Bolshevists get the
inspiration f or such malevolence, hatred and
homicidal bloodlust? Look no f urther than the religion of
Judaism itself :
"And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them before thee;
thou shalt smite them, and
utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them,
nor show mercy unto
them." (Deuteronomy 7:2)
“But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God
doth give thee for an
inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth.”
(Deuteronomy 20:16-18)
“You shall wipe out the memory of Amalek from under the
heavens; you shall not forget.”
(Deuteronomy 25:19)
“… And now, go and smite Amalek and destroy everything that
is theirs; do not have
mercy on them, but kill every man and woman, child and
infant, ox, sheep, camel and
donkey.” (Samuel I 15:3)
“The best among the Gentiles deserves to be killed.”
(Talmud: Soferim, Chapter 15, Rule
10)
These ultra violent Judaist dictates were reiterated in the
Protocols of Zion,
“We are interested in just the opposite—in the diminution,
the KILLING OUT OF THE
GOYIM.” (Protocols of Zion, 3:7)
“…our kingdom will be distinguished by a despotism of such
magnificent proportions
as to be at any moment and in every place in a position to
WIPE OUT ANY GOYIM WHO
OPPOSE US BY DEED OR WORD.” (Protocols of Zion, 5:1)
The Jews have, f or thousands of years, taught their own to
mass murder the best non-Jews. They believe
it is their racial mission to do so. Judaism, of course, is
no mere “religion.” It is in actuality a criminal
conspiracy: a license to lie, cheat, steal, murder, rape,
pillage, plunder and swindle the inf erior “Goyim.”
(See: Hof f man, Michael. Judaism Discovered: A Study of the
Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship,
Superstition and Deceit. Independent History and Research,
2008)
Regardless of one’s view of Christianity (I personally am
irreligious), it should be noted that its holiest days
celebrate lif e (Christmas — the birth of the Christ child,
Easter — the resurrection of Christ) or
reconciliation to their Deity (Good Friday). The holiest
days in Judaism, on the other hand, celebrate military
victories and the mass slaughter of Jewish enemies
(Passover, Purim, Hanukkah). (See: David Duke’s
“Christmas versus Hanukkah Peace and Love vs War and Hate,”
“The Purim Celebration of Hate” & “Purim II
Promoting Genocide“) Whenever varying Gentile groups proved
to be an obstacle to Jewish economic
domination or Jewish political ambitions, many Jews called f
or and worked f everishly to carry out — either
directly or by proxy — the mass extermination of said group.
When — in the late 1800s and early 1900s — the Russians
proved resilient to Jewish revolutionary banditry,
this is what manif est from the Jew’s lips:
“To overcome our enemies we must have our own Socialist
Militarism. We must win over
to our side, 90 millions out of the 100 millions of
population of Russia under the Soviets.
As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them; they must
be annihilated!” — Jewish
Communist leader Grigory Zinoviev
When — in the 1930s and 1940s — the Germans proved resilient
to Jewish domination, subversion and
swindles, this is what manif est from the Jew’s lips:
“A final solution… Thus we find that there is no middle
course; no act of mediation, no
compromise to be compounded, no political or economic
sharing to be considered.
There is, in fine, no other solution except one: That
Germany must perish forever from
this earth!” — Jew Theodore N. Kaufman (Germany Must Perish!
Newark, NJ: Argyle Press,
1941)
When — in recent times — the Arab and Muslim peoples proved
resilient to Jewish thieving of their land and
despoiling of their resources, this is what manif est from
the Jew’s lips:
“It is forbidden to be merciful to them. You must send
missiles to them and annihilate
them… The Lord shall return the Arabs’ deeds on their own
heads, waste their seed and
exterminate them, devastate them and vanish them from this
world!” — Rabbi Ovadia
Yosef (quoted by BBC News, “Rabbi Calls for Annihilation of
Arabs,” April 10, 2001 )
The iconic leader of the Protestant Ref ormation, Martin
Luther, pinned the tail on the donkey back in 1543
when he wrote,
“They (the Jews) are real liars and bloodhounds [...] Their
heart’s most ardent sighing
and yearning and hoping is set on the day on which they can
deal with us Gentiles as
they did with the Gentiles in Persia at the time of Esther.
Oh, how fond they are of the
book of Esther, which is so beautifully attuned to their
bloodthirsty, vengeful,
murderous yearning and hope. The sun has never shone on a
more bloodthirsty and
vengeful people than they are who imagine that they are
God’s people who have been
commissioned and commanded to murder and to slay the
Gentiles.” (On The Jews and
Their Lies, 1543)
The legendary author and truth hero, Eustace Mullins,
eloquently explicated the origins of this miserable
tribe of bandits and brigands:
“Hebrew means “one who is from across the river.” Rivers
were often the boundaries of
ancient nations, and one from across the river meant,
simply, an alien. In every country
of the ancient world, the Hebrews were known as aliens. The
word also, in popular
usage, meant “one who should not be trusted until he has
identified himself.” Hebrew in
all ancient literature was written as “Habiru”. This word
appears frequently in the Bible
and in Egyptian literature. In the Bible, Habiru is used
interchangeably with “sa-gaz”,
meaning “cutthroat”. In all of Egyptian literature, wherever
the word Habiru appears, it is
written with the word “sa-gaz” written beside it. Thus the
Egyptians always wrote of the
Jews as “the cutthroat bandits from across the river”. For
five thousand years, the
Egyptian scribes identified the Jews in this manner.”
(Mullins’ New History of the Jews.
Staunton, VA: International Institute of Jewish Studies,
1978, p.26)
Knowing what they think of Gentiles, knowing what they have
done to Gentiles, knowing what they will
continue to do to Gentiles if we let them — how does any
sane Gentile not f eel outrage and indignation at
this lot of f earsome beasts and bloodsuckers? It is hardly
surprising that there exists widespread dislike of
Jews. But what is surprising is that there are so f ew
patriots in America, Canada, Europe and Australia,
willing to express their outrage against the Jews, not only
f or what they did to the Russians and Eastern
Europeans under Communism, or what they’re doing to the
Palestinians and other Arabs under the f lagship
of Zionism, but f or what they have done and continue to do
to those of us in North America and Western
Europe — lying to us, deceiving our people, and using us to
wage their wars for them. You might
remember some of the unf lattering f acts about the Jews
outlined in this treatise the next time you hear a
Jew dishonestly whining about how badly their kind have been
treated throughout history.
The End
|