Jew World Order, Rockeller, Rothschild, Gates Pandem Fraud

Rockefeller Associates

By Richard Sanders, Editor, Press for Conversion!

The Rockefellers were heavy financial backers of the American Liberty League.

John Davison Rockefeller (1839-1937), the world’s first billionaire, was America’s most generous philanthropist, fascist financier and Nazi collaborator.

Although Rockefeller’s wealth was based largely on a near global control of oil refining, he also had large interests in other monoplies. As Anthony Sutton notes, Rockefeller

“controlled the copper trust, the smelters trust and the gigantic tobacco trust, in addition to having influence in some Morgan properties such as the U.S. Steel Corporation as well as in hundreds of smaller industrial trusts, public service operations, railroads and banking institutions. National City Bank was the largest of the banks influenced by Standard Oil-Rockefeller, but financial control extended to the U.S. Trust Co. and Hanover National Bank [and] major life insurance companies – Equitable Life and Mutual of New York” (Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, 1981).

His incredible rags-to-riches success story owes much to what he learned from his father’s attitudes towards business and respect for the public good. Descended from hardworking German immigrants, his father William Avery Rockefeller was a travelling, snake oil salesman. “Big Bill” excelled as a quack doctor, or pitch man, conning the sick and desperate into buying expensive remedies that were either useless or downright dangerous. “He would be gone for months and come back with a great roll of money…. He would go to small towns and put up handbills advertising himself as ‘The Celebrated Dr. Levingston.’ He advertised to cure anything, but made a specialty of cancer and kidney troubles” (MacDonald, “Double Life,” New York World, February 2, 1908). But these were not “Doc’s” only crimes. He was indicted for rape, but was not arrested or tried. He fled the area with family and escaped neighbours who accused him of horse thieving, burglary, arson and counterfeiting. He had two wives, simultaneously, and was a bigamist for 34 years. He met his second wife in Norwich, Ontario, where he sold lumber in 1853, calling himself William Levingston.

William’s example provided ample life lessons to his sons about the business values of duplicity, deceit, and a blatant disregard for public health. John dropped out of high school in 1855 to take a business course. He worked as a bookkeeper and then teamed up with a friend to start a grain commission business. In 1863, the Civil War propelled him into the oil business. That year, he – like J.P. Morgan and other rising stars – paid $300 to avoid conscription. It was a small price for them, but unattainable for the thousands who would die. At first, he sold whiskey at inflated rates to Federal soldiers. Then, he invested his profits in oil refineries. The South had been supplying turpentine to the North for camphene-fueled lights. When the war cut off the North’s access to this fuel, kerosene from Pennsylvania oil quickly took over as the lamp fuel of choice and stimulated his oil business.

In 1865, Rockefeller bought out his partners in the kerosene business for $72,500. In 1870, he and a few others, organized The Standard Oil Company, with capital of $1 million. He built his company by buying out competitors, price cutting and controlling secondary businesses related to pipelines, trains, oil terminals and barrel making. By 1880, his monopoly controlled the refining of 95% of America’s oil. In 1885, 70% of Standard Oil’s sales were overseas, largely to northern Europe and Russia. All of its properties were merged into the Standard Oil Trust with an initial capitalization of $70 million, and by 1900 Rockefeller controlled about two-thirds of the entire world’s oil supply. He was also a director of the U.S. Steel Corp when it formed in 1901.

In the 1880s, an oil boom was brewing in Tsarist Russia, around the Caspian Sea town of Baku. Robert Nobel, the son of Alfred Nobel (originator of Sweden’s peace prize and the inventor of dynamite), was soon competing with the Parisian Rothschilds for control of Central Asia oil treasure. Their exports threatened Rockefeller’s near global oil monopoly, especially when Marcus Samuel, future founder of Shell Oil, developed tankers to carry the Rothchild’s oil to Europe and Asia. In 1903, Rockefeller made a deal with the Tsarist government to lease and then buy the Baku oil fields. Besides selling vast quantities of American oil to pre-Soviet Russia, Rockefeller also had millions invested there. Thereafter, seeing an inevitable revolution looming on the horizon, Rockefeller also invested in anti-Tzarist forces to protect this branch of his empire. The Soviets did expropriate the Caspian oil fields from the Nobels and Rothschilds. Rockefeller’s National City Bank also lost assets, thanks to the revolution. Its lawyer, Joseph Proskauer, fought a legal battle to get Rockefeller’s money back. In 1926, Walter Teagle, the president of Standard Oil of New Jersey, successfully negotiated oil concessions in the Soviet Union.

By that time though, Standard Oil’s near global monopoly had been broken up. In 1911, the U.S. Supreme Court decided it was violating anti-trust laws and dissolved it into about three dozen companies. Many of these are now household names like Chevron (Standard Oil California), Amoco (Standard Oil Indiana), Mobil (Standard Oil New Jersey) and Exxon, previously called Esso (Standard Oil New Jersey).

When the U.S. was debating whether to join WWI, a group of so-called “War Hawks,” calling themselves the National Security League, knew that this war would be a major boon to profits. This League of bankers and industrialists, including Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan, Coleman du Pont and H.H. Rodgers of Standard Oil, promoted increases in arms production and universal military training. By 1917, they had helped build war hysteria to a fever pitch. But not all Americans were on their side. The Woman’s Peace Party, many suffragists and others, strongly opposed America’s entry into WWI. However, the League was successful and the War Hawks’ profits skyrocketed.

Soon after WWI and the Russian revolution, many among America’s wealthy elite felt threatened by rising radicalism, particularly among unions. In April 1919, letter bombs, destined for John D. Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan and others, were supposedly discovered in the U.S. postal system. The media quickly stirred up a massive Red Scare by blaming unions, communists, anarchists and foreign agitators. John Spivak says: “Trade unions were openly disbelieving and denounced with anger the so-called discoveries as a deliberate frame-up to provide excuses for more raids against organized labour” (A Man in His Time, 1967). This incident and others were used as pretexts for the Palmer Raids, during which the government rounded up more than ten thousand activists across the country.

Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, while the persecution of leftists continued, corporate leaders on the extreme right, continued their criminal rampages in pursuit of profit. Although Rockefeller’s many links to Nazism are too numerous to list here, a few examples are worth noting. In the 1920s, Exxon entered into partnerships with Germany’s top chemical cartel members, BASF and I.G. Farben. The Bank for International Settlements, which helped fund the Nazis before and during WWII, was created in 1930 by the world’s central banks, including the Federal Reserve Bank of NY. Its creation was inspired by the Nazi government and its bankers. Its first president was Gates McGarrah, a Rockefeller banker formerly of Chase National Bank and the “Fed.”

In 1932, Chevron struck oil in Bahrain and was soon operating in Saudi Arabia. In 1933, when Hitler seized power, Standard Oil New Jersey supplied Germany with the patents it required for tetraethyl lead aviation fuel. In 1936, the company Schroder, Rockefeller Investment Bankers, included board directors linked to the Gestapo and several European, Nazi-linked banks. It’s lawyers were John Foster Dulles and Allan Dulles, leading Wall Street fascists who drummed up American investments in Germany and elsewhere. The Dulles law firm represented I.G. Farben and Fritz Thyssen. Thyssen was Hitler’s biggest German financier. The Dulles brothers later became Secretary of State and CIA Director, respectively.

In 1937, John D. Rockefeller died, but his legacy of using oil money to grease the wheels of fascism continued. That year, as the Spanish Civil War raged, Texas Co. (later called Texaco) fueled Franco’s fascists. (In 1936, Texas Co. and Standard Oil California formed California Texas Oil (later Caltex) to combine Texas Co’s marketing network in the Middle East with Standard’s operations there.) Texas Co. also continued shipping oil to Germany during WWII. In 1938, Brown Brothers, Harriman, the Wall Street investment firm (with senior partners Prescott Bush and George Herbert Walker) was involved in funding the supply of leaded gas for the Nazi Luftwaffe. Chevron and Texas Co. created Aramco in 1939, to pump Saudi oil for the Nazi war machine. In 1940, Texaco provided an office, in their Chrysler Building, for a Nazi intelligence officer, Dr. Gerhardt Westrick. Executives of Standard Oil’s German subsidiary were “Prominent figures of Himmler’s Circle of Friends of the Gestapo – its chief financiers – and close friends and colleagues of the Baron von Schroder” a leading Gesatpo officer and financier (Charles Higham, Trading with the Enemy). Just before WWII, the Rockefeller’s Chase Bank collaborated with the Nazi’s Schroder Bank to raise $25 million for Germany’s war economy. They also supplied the German government with names and background information on 10,000 fascist sympathizers in America. Throughout WWII, Rockefeller’s Chase Bank stayed open in Nazi-occupied Paris, providing services for Germany’s embassy and its businesses.

In 1943, Roosevelt’s government took control of Rockefeller’s Aramco. It also seized assets of the Union Banking Corp., which Harriman, Bush and Walker had built up by collaborating with Nazi companies that used slave labour. This money was later returned and it launched the Bushes in oil and politics.

In 1953, after an elected upstart named Dr. Mohammed Mossadegh nationalized Iran’s oil business, a UK/U.S.-backed coup returned the Shah to power. CIA Director Allan Dulles and his brother, Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, were instrumental in this coup. Previously, Iran’s oil had been controlled by the Anglo-Persian Oil Co. (i.e., British Petroleum, BP) but after the U.S. role in this coup, U.S. companies got a 40% share and the top beneficiary was Standard Oil of New Jersey.

The next year, the Dulles boys were at it again orchestrating a coup in Guatemala. This one ushered in decades of fascist military governments that killed hundreds of thousands of innocents. But, it brought great profits for Rockefeller’s United Fruit Co., in which the Dulles were invested. Allen had also been on its Board of Trustees.

John D. Rockefeller would be happy to see the re-merging of his great monopoly. In 1988, Standard Oil merged with British Petroleum. Since then, other mergers have reunited many of his original oil companies. Exxon and Mobil reunited in 1999, to become the world’s top oil business. They made profits of $17.7 billion the next year. BP, merging with Amoco and Standard Oil Ohio, was number two that year and made profits of $12 billion.

J.D. Rockefeller’s philanthropy has been much lauded. Even as a student, he reportedly gave donations to his Baptist church and to foreign Sunday schools. By 1900, he offered to buy a whole church for Baptist preacher Thomas Dixon, a former, southern politician who was then flogging his white supremacist gospel in New York. But from the pulpit, Dixon’s fiery tirades against “creeping negroidism” didn’t reach enough people, so he took up writing respectable, romantic novels about the KKK. He churned out two dozen books. The Clansman, his race-baiting best seller, extolled the Klan’s role in redeeming the South. In 1915, it was made into a movie, called The Birth of a Nation. Endorsed by President Wilson, the film helped revive this dreaded terrorist organization.

Rockefeller’s great generosity was aimed largely at medical education, perhaps because of his father’s career and its peculiar contributions to medicine. J.D.Rockefeller, being a high school dropout, was not well-suited to his new role as godfather of the country’s centres for higher learning. His philanthropy was permeated with extremely racist views. In 1901, the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research was created. In 1902, the General Education Board (GEB) began four decades of tremendously controversial influence over American schools and universities.

That same year, J.D. Rockefeller and Averell Harriman, a business partner of Prescott Bush and George Herbert Walker in Brown Brothers Harriman, gave $11 million to create the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Built on Manhattan property owned by the Dulles brothers, it spawned America’s ground-breaking “eugenics” research and the world’s first “racial hygiene” laws. By 1907, Rockefeller funding was heavily influencing America’s medical institutions. The Rockefeller Institute created the first genetics lab in 1909. The following year, the Eugenics Research Association and the Eugenics Records Office were founded near Cold Spring Harbor, New York, on land donated by the widow of Averell Harriman. In 1911, John Foster Dulles summed up eugenics, saying that by eliminating “the weakest members of the population” a purer race could be created.

In 1928, Germany’s Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Eugenics, Anthropology and Human Heredity was created. Run by Ernst Rudin, Hitler’s foremost “racial hygienist,” the institute’s main financing came from Rockefeller. Ironically, by 1936 an early psychiatrist at that institute, the half Jewish Dr. Franz Kallmann, had fled Nazism to America. According to Anton Chaitkin, Kallman’s experiments on 1,000 schizophrenics, published by the Freemasons, was used in 1939 to justify the Nazi’s mass murder of “mental patients and various ‘defective’ people.” Meanwhile, other Nazi doctors conducted incredibly cruel and vicious experiments on live, captive human subjects. Their body parts “were delivered to [Josef] Mengele, [Otmar] Verschuer and the other Rockefeller-linked contingent at the Wilhelm Institute.”



Illuminati, Nazis & The Illegal State of Israel
Posted on 09/20/2014 | 32 Comments
South America 2008 (159)If we wish to end the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, we need to know who created Israel and why. In 1917 British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour penned a letter to Zionist Second Lord Lionel Walter Rothschild in which he expressed support for a Jewish homeland on Palestinian-controlled lands in the Middle East.

This Balfour Declaration justified the brutal seizure of Palestinian lands for the post-WWII establishment of Israel.  Israel would serve, not as some high-minded “Jewish homeland”, but as lynchpin in Rothschild/Eight Families control over the world’s oil supply.  Baron Edmond de Rothschild built the first oil pipeline from the Red Sea to the Mediterranean to bring BP Iranian oil to Israel.  He founded Israeli General Bank and Paz Oil and is considered the father of modern Israel.

The Rothschilds are the planet’s wealthiest clan, worth an estimated $100 trillion. They control Royal Dutch/Shell, BP, Anglo-American, BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto, Bank of America and scores of other global corporations and banks. They are the largest shareholders in the Bank of England, the Federal Reserve and most every private central bank in the world. They needed a footprint in the Middle East to protect their new oil concessions, which they procured through Four Horsemen fronts like the Iranian Consortium, Iraqi Petroleum Company and Saudi ARAMCO.

Rothschild’s Shell and BP formed these cartels with the Rockefeller half of the Four Horsemen- Exxon Mobil and Chevron Texaco. This new alliance required a “special relationship” between Great Britain and the US, which still exists today. Rothschild and other wealthy European shareholders could now utilize the United States military as a Hessianized mercenary force, deployed to protect their oil interests and paid for by US taxpayers. Israel would serve the same purpose in closer proximity to the oilfields. The Israeli Mossad is less a national intelligence agency than it is a Rothschild/Rockefeller family security force.

The Rothschilds exert political control through the secretive Business Roundtable, which they created in 1909 with the help of Lord Alfred Milner and Cecil Rhodes- whose Rhodes Scholarship is granted by Cambridge University, out of which oil industry propagandist Cambridge Energy Research Associates operates.  Rhodes founded De Beers and Standard Chartered Bank.

The Roundtable takes its name from the legendary knight King Arthur, whose tale of the Holy Grail is synonymous with the Illuminati notion that the Eight Families possess Sangreal or holy blood- a justification for their lording over the people and resources of the planet.

According to former British Intelligence officer John Coleman, who wrote Committee of 300, “Round Tablers armed with immense wealth from gold, diamond and drug monopolies fanned out throughout the world to take control of fiscal and monetary policies and political leadership in all countries where they operated.”

Rhodes and Oppenheimer deployed to South Africa to launch the Anglo-American conglomerate. Kuhn and Loeb were off to re-colonize America with Morgan and Rockefeller.  Rudyard Kipling was sent to India. Schiff and Warburg manhandled Russia. Rothschild, Lazard and Israel Moses Seif pushed into the Middle East.  At Princeton, the Round Table founded the Institute for Advanced Study (IAS) as partner to its All Souls College at Oxford.  IAS was funded by the Rockefeller’s General Education Board. IAS members Robert Oppenheimer, Neils Bohr and Albert Einstein created the atomic bomb.

In 1919 Rothschild’s Business Roundtable spawned the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) in London.  The RIIA sponsored sister organizations around the globe, including the US Council on Foreign Relations. The RIIA is a registered charity of the Queen and, according to its annual reports, is funded largely by the Four Horsemen.  Former British Foreign Secretary and Kissinger Associates co-founder Lord Carrington is president of both the RIIA and the Bilderbergers. The inner circle at RIIA is dominated by Knights of St. John Jerusalem, Knights of Malta, Knights Templar and 33rd Degree Scottish Rite Freemasons.

The Knights of St. John were founded in 1070 and answer directly to the British House of Windsor.  Their leading bloodline is the Villiers dynasty, which the Hong Kong Matheson family- owners of the HSBC opium laundry- married into. The Lytton family also married into the Villiers gang.

Colonel Edward Bulwer-Lytton led the English Rosicrucian secret society, which Shakespeare opaquely referred to as Rosencranz, while the Freemasons were symbolized by Guildenstern.  Lytton was spiritual father of both the RIIA and Nazi fascism.  In 1871 he penned a novel titled, Vril: The Power of the Coming Race.  Seventy years later the Vril Society received ample mention in Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf.  Lytton’s son became Viceroy to India in 1876 just before opium production spiked in that country.  His good friend Rudyard Kipling introduced the swastika to India and later worked under Lord Beaverbrook as Propaganda Minister, alongside Sir Charles Hambro of the Hambros banking dynasty.

Children of the Roundtable elite are members of a Dionysian cult known as Children of the Sun.  Initiates include Aldous Huxley, T. S. Eliot, D. H. Lawrence and H. G. Wells.  Wells headed British intelligence during WWI. His books speak of a “one-world brain” and “a police of the mind”.  William Butler Yeats, another Sun member, was a pal of Aleister Crowley.  The two formed an Isis Cult based on a Madam Blavatsky manuscript, which called on the British aristocracy to organize itself into an Aryan priesthood. Blavatsky’s Theosophical Society and Bulwer-Lytton’s Rosicrucians joined forces to form the Thule Society, out of which the Nazis emerged.

Rothschild, Rockefeller and the rest of the Illuminati bankers backed the Nazis.  Max and Paul Warburg sat on I. G. Farben’s board, as did H. A. Metz, who was director at the Warburg Bank of Manhattan- later Chase Manhattan.  Bank of Manhattan director and Federal Reserve Board member C. E. Mitchell sat on the board of I. G. Farben’s US branch.  In 1936 Avery Rockefeller set up a combination with the German Schroeder family, who served as Hitler’s personal bankers.  Time magazine called the new Schroeder, Rockefeller & Company “the economic booster of the Rome-Berlin Axis”.  Morgan Guaranty Trust and Union Banking Corporation (UBC) also funded the Nazis.  UBC board member Prescott Bush is W’s grandfather.

In 1933 at the home of banker Baron Kurt von Schroeder, a deal was cut to bring Hitler to power.  Attending the meeting were brothers John Foster and Allen Dulles- Rockefeller cousins and partners at law firm Sullivan & Cromwell, which represented Schroeder Bank.  Schroeder, managing director T. C. Tiarks, was a director at the Rothschild-controlled Bank of England. In the spring of 1934 Bank of England Chairman Montagu Norman convened a meeting of London bankers who decided to covertly fund Hitler.

Royal Dutch/Shell Chairman Sir Henri Deterding helped in this effort.  Even after the US went to war with Germany, Exxon Chairman Walter Teagle remained on the board of I. G. Chemical- the US I. G. Farben subsidiary.  Exxon was integral in supplying the Nazis with tetraethyl lead, an important component of aviation fuel.  Only Exxon, Du Pont and GM made the stuff.  Teagle also supplied the Japanese with his product.

Exxon and I. G. Farben were such close business associates that by 1942 Thurman Arnold- head of the US Justice Department’s Anti-Trust Division- produced documents that showed, “Standard and Farben in Germany had literally carved up the world markets, with oil and chemical monopolies established all over the map.”

In 1912 railroad magnate Edward Harriman’s widow joined John D. Rockefeller in funding a eugenics research lab at Cold Spring Harbor, NY.  That same year the First International Congress of Eugenics was convened in London with Winston Churchill presiding.  In 1932 the conference was held in New York.  Hamburg-Amerika Shipping Line, owned by George Walker and Prescott Bush, brought the German contingent to the gene-fest.  One member of the German delegation was Dr. Ernst Rudin of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Genealogy in Berlin. He was unanimously elected president for his work in founding the German Society of Race Hygiene- a forerunner to Hitler’s race institutes.

As of 1998 there were still scores of lawsuits pending against Ford, Chase Manhattan, J.P. Morgan, Deutsche Bank, Allianz AG and several Swiss banks for their dealings with the Nazis.

At the heart of Hitler’s inner circle were the secret societies Germanordern (brothers of Yale’s Skull & Bones), the Thule Society, and Vril.  The concepts “Great Masters”, “Adepts” and the “Great White Brotherhood”, which the Nazis used to justify their idea of Aryan superiority, were ancient ideas carried forth from the Egyptian Mystery Schools by the Teutonic Knights, the Illuminati, and Hebrew Cabalists.  These same concepts can be found in today’s New Age Movement, whose New Age magazine was first published by the Grand Orient Masonic Lodge of Washington, DC. Henry Kissinger was an early supporter.

Nazi occultists believed ancient German tribes were the true keepers of the Ancient Mysteries which had their origin in Atlantis, when seven races of God-men were introduced to Earth.  Thule was a Teutonic Atlantis believed by the Nazis to house these long-vanquished races, who lost their godly Annunaki powers by interbreeding with humans.  At the inner core of the Thule Society were Satanists who practiced black magic.

Hitler was once described as a “child of Illuminism”.

According to Dr. Walter Langer, who did a war-time psychoanalysis of Hitler for the CIA-predecessor OSS, Hitler was also a Rothschild.  Langer uncovered an Austrian police report proving Hitler’s father was an illegitimate son of a peasant cook named Maria Anna Schicklgruber, who at the time of her conception was a servant in the Vienna home of Baron Rothschild.

In May 1941 Rudolf Hess parachuted into the estate of the Duke of Hamilton, saying a supernatural force told him to negotiate with the British.  Hitler was ostensibly visited by this same apparition and suddenly turned vehemently against occultism.  He ordered a crackdown against Freemasons, Templars and the Theosophical Society.  Suddenly the international banker crowd pulled the plug on Hitler’s finances and began to denounce him.  Six months later the Hessianized US military entered WWII.

Hitler’s fate was no different than that of Saddam Hussein or Manuel Noriega. The Illuminati bankers’ modus operandi is to use men of low integrity to do their dirty work, before conveniently discarding and distancing themselves from them.

The horrific Holocaust that ensued assured sympathy for the already-planned state of Israel. Towards the end of WWII, the murderous Haganah and Stern Gangs were deployed by the Rothschild bankers to terrorize Palestinians and steal their land. Jews who escaped Hitler’s gas chambers were those of means who bought into Zionism. For a fee of $1,000- lots of money at that time- these right-wingers bought passage to Israel and escaped the fate of the poor Jews, Serbs, communists and gypsies. The whole bloody affair was a massive eugenics project. It had more to do with culling the herd along class lines, than it did with ethnicity or religion.

The key to this historic puzzle is to understand that the Rothschild/Rockefeller sangreal international bankers supported both the rise of the Nazis and the creation of Israel. None of this has anything to do with religion. It has everything to do with oil, arms, drugs, money and power. The Rothschilds say they are Jewish. The Rockefellers claim to be Christian. These are irrelevant smokescreens. Any demagogue- who blames injustice a religion or race of people- is sadly misinformed. Throughout history the Illuminati Satanists have sacrificed people of all race and religion to further their agenda of total planetary control.

Israel is not a “Jewish homeland”. It is an oil monopoly lynchpin. Its citizens are being put in harms way- used by the Four Horsemen and their Eight Families-owners as geopolitical pawns in an international resource grab. No peaceful solution is possible until the stolen land is returned to its rightful Palestinian owners.

Israel is an illegal entity. Viva Palestine!

Dean Henderson is the author of five books: Big Oil & Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families & Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics & Terror Network, The Grateful Unrich: Revolution in 50 Countries,Das Kartell der Federal Reserve, Stickin’ it to the Matrix & The Federal Reserve Cartel.  You can subscribe free to his weekly Left Hook column


J. Henry Schroder Banking Company is listed as Number 2 in capitalization in Capital City62 on the list of the seventeen merchant bankers who make up the exclusive Accepting Houses Committee in London. Although it is almost unknown in the United States, it has played a large part in our history. Like the others on this list, it had first to be approved by the Bank of England. And, like the Warburg family, the von Schroders began their banking operations in Hamburg, Germany. At the turn of the century, in 1900, Baron Bruno von Schroder established the London branch of the firm. He was soon joined by Frank Cyril Tiarks, in 1902. Tiarks married Emma Franziska of Hamburg, and was a director of the Bank of England from 1912 to 1945.

During World War I, J. Henry Schroder Banking Company played an important role behind the scenes. No historian has a reasonable explanation of how World War I started. Archduke Ferdinand was assassinated at Sarajevo by Gavril Princeps, Austria demanded an apology from Serbia, and Serbia sent the note of apology. Despite this, Austria declared war, and soon the other nations of Europe joined the fray. Once the war had gotten started, it was found that it wasn’t easy to keep it going. The principal problem was that Germany was desperately short of food and coal, and without Germany, the war could not go on. John Hamill in The Strange Career of Mr. Hoover63 explains how the problem was solved.* He quotes from Nordeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, March 4, 1915, "Justice, however, demands that publicity should be given to the preeminent part taken by the German authorities in Belgium in the solution of this problem. The initiative came from them and it was only due to their continuous relations with the American Relief Committee that the provisioning question was solved." Hamill points out "That is what the Belgian Relief Committee was organized for--to keep Germany in food."

The Belgian Relief Commission was organized by Emile Francqui, director of a large Belgian bank, Societe Generale, and a London mining


62 McRae and Cairncross, Capital City, Eyre Methuen, London, 1963

63 John Hamill, The Strange Career of Mr. Hoover, William Faro, New York, 1931

* Copies of Hamill’s book were systematically located and destroyed by government agents, because it was published on the eve of President Hoover’s re-election campaign.

promoter, an American named Herbert Hoover, who had been associated with Francqui in a number of scandals which had become celebrated court cases, notably the Kaiping Coal Company scandal in China, said to have set off the Boxer Rebellion, which had as its goal the expulsion of all foreign businessmen from China. Hoover had been barred from dealing on the London Stock Exchange because of one judgement against him, and his associate, Stanley Rowe, had been sent to prison for ten years. With this background, Hoover was called an ideal choice for a career in humanitarian work.

Although his name is unknown in the United States, Emile Francqui was the guiding spirit behind Herbert Hoover’s rise to fortune. Hamill (on page 156) identifies Francqui as the director of many atrocities committed against natives in the Congo. "For every cartridge they spent, they had to bring in a man’s hand". Francqui’s frightful record may have been the source for the charge later leveled against German soldiers in Belgium, that they chopped off the hands of women and children, a claim which proved to be groundless. Hamill also says that Francqui "tricked the Americans out of the Hankow-Canton railroad concession in China in 1901, and at the same time had ‘stood by’ in case Hoover needed any further help in the ‘taking’ of the Kaiping coal mines. This is the humanitarian who had sole charge of the distribution of the Belgian ‘relief’ during the World War, for which Hoover did the buying and shipping. Francqui was a director with Hoover, in the Chinese Engineering and Mining Company (the Kaiping mines), through which Hoover transported 200,000 Chinese slave workers to the Congo to work Francqui’s copper mines."

Hamill says on page 311 that "Francqui opened the offices of the Belgian Relief in his bank, Societe Generale, as a one-man show, with a letter of permission from the German Governor General von der Goltz dated October 16, 1914.

The New York Herald Tribune of February 18, 1930, quoted by Congressman Louis McFadden in the House on February 26, 1930, said, "One of Belgium’s two directors on the Bank for International Settlements will be Emile Francqui of the Societe Generale, a member of both the Young and Dawes Plan Committees. The board of directors of the international bank will have no more colorful character than Emile Francqui, former Minister of Finance, veteran of the Congo and China . . . he is rated as the richest man in Belgium, and among the twelve richest men in Europe."

Despite his prominence, The New York Times Index mentions Francqui only a few times during two decades before his death. On October 3, 1931, The New York Times quoted Le Peuple of Brussels that Francqui would visit the United States. "As a friend of President Hoover, Monsieur Francqui will not fail to pay a visit to the President."

On October 30, 1931, The New York Times reported this visit with the headline, "Hoover-Francqui Talk was Unofficial". "It was stated that Mr. Francqui spent Tuesday night as a personal guest of the President, and that they talked of world financial problems in general, strictly unofficial. Mr. Francqui was an associate of President Hoover during the latters ministrations in Belgium during the war. Their visit had no official significance. Mr. Francqui is a private citizen and not engaged in any official mission."

No reference is made to the Hoover-Francqui business associations which were the subject of huge lawsuits in London. The Francqui visit probably involved Hoover’s Moratorium on German War Debts, which stunned the financial world. On December 15, 1931, Chairman McFadden informed the House of a dispatch in the Public Ledger of Philadelphia, October 24, 1931, "GERMAN REVEALS HOOVER’S SECRET. The American President was in intimate negotiations with the German government regarding a year’s debt holiday as early as December, 1930." McFadden continued, "Behind the Hoover announcement there were many months of hurried and furtive preparations both in Germany and in Wall Street offices of German bankers. Germany, like a sponge, had to be saturated with American money. Mr. Hoover himself had to be elected, because this scheme began before he became President. If the German international bankers of Wall Street--that is Kuhn Loeb Company, J. & W. Seligman, Paul Warburg, J. Henry Schroder--and their satellites had not had this job waiting to be done, Herbert Hoover would never have been elected President of the United States. The election of Mr. Hoover to the Presidency was through the influence of the Warburg Brothers, directors of the great bank of Kuhn Loeb Company, who carried the cost of his election. In exchange for this collaboration Mr. Hoover promised to impose the moratorium of German debts. Hoover sought to exempt Kreuger’s loan to Germany of $125 million from the operation of the Hoover Moratorium. The nature of Kreuger’s swindle was known here in January when he visited his friend, Mr. Hoover, in the White House."

Not only did Hoover entertain Francqui in the White House, but also Ivar Kreuger, the most famous swindler of the twentieth century.

When Francqui died on November 13, 1935, The New York Times memorialized him as "the copper king of the Congo . . . Mr. Francqui, last year having gained dictatorial powers over the belga, maintained it on the gold standard during a crisis. In 1891 he led an expedition into the Congo and gained it for King Leopold. A man of great wealth, rated among the twelve richest men in Europe, he secured enormous copper deposits. He was Minister of State in 1926 and Minister of Finance in 1934. It was his pride that he never accepted a centime of remuneration for his services to the government. While consul general at Shanghai, he secured valuable concessions, notably the Kaiping coal mines and the railway concession for the Tientsin Railroad. He was governor of the Societe Generale de Belgique, Lloyd Royal Belge, and regent of La Banque Nationale de Belgique."

The Times does not mention Francqui’s business partnerships with Hoover. Like Francqui, Hoover also refused remuneration for "government service", and as Secretary of Commerce and as President of the United States, he turned his salary back to the government.

On December 13, 1932, Chairman McFadden introduced a resolution of impeachment against President Hoover for high crimes and misdemeanors, which covers many pages, including violation of contracts, unlawful dissipation of the financial resources of the United States, and his appointment of Eugene Meyer to the Federal Reserve Board. The resolution was tabled and never acted upon by the House.

In criticizing Hoover’s Moratorium of German War Debts, McFadden had referred to Hoover’s "German" backers. Although all of the principals of "the London Connection" did originate in Germany, most of them in Frankfurt, at the time they sponsored Hoover’s candidacy for the Presidency of the United States, they were operating from London, as Hoover himself had done for most of his career.

Also, the Hoover Moratorium was not intended to "help" Germany, as Hoover had never been "pro-German". The Moratorium on Germany’s war debts was necessary so that Germany would have funds for rearming. In 1931, the truly forward-looking diplomats were anticipating the Second World War, and there could be no war without an "aggressor".

Hoover had also carried out a number of mining promotions in various parts of the world as a secret agent for the Rothschilds, and had been rewarded with a directorship in one of the principal Rothschild enterprises, the Rio Tinto Mines in Spain and Bolivia. Francqui and Hoover threw themselves into the seemingly impossible task of provisioning Germany during the First World War. Their success was noted in Nordeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, March 13, 1915, which noted that large quantities of food were now arriving from Belgium by rail. Schmoller’s Yearbook for Legislation, Administration and Political Economy for 1916, shows that one billion pounds of meat, one and a half billion pounds of potatoes, one and a half billion pounds of bread, and one hundred twenty-one millions pounds of butter had been shipped from Belgium to Germany in that year. A patriotic British woman who had operated a small hospital in Belgium for several years, Edith Cavell, wrote to the Nursing Mirror in London, April 15, 1915, complaining that the "Belgian Relief" supplies were being shipped to Germany to feed the German army. The Germans considered Miss Cavell to be of no importance, and paid no attention to her, but the British Intelligence Service in London was appalled by Miss Cavell’s discovery, and demanded that the Germans arrest her as a spy.

Sir William Wiseman, head of British Intelligence, and partner of Kuhn Loeb Company, feared that the continuance of the war was at stake, and secretly notified the Germans that Miss Cavell must be executed. The Germans reluctantly arrested her and charged her with aiding prisoners of war to escape. The usual penalty for this offense was three months imprisonment, but the Germans bowed to Sir William Wiseman’s demands, and shot Edith Cavell, thus creating one of the principal martyrs of the First World War.

With Edith Cavell out of the way, the "Belgian Relief" operation continued, although in 1916, German emissaries again approached London officials with the information that they did not believe Germany could continue military operations, not only because of food shortages, but because of financial problems. More "emergency relief" was sent, and Germany continued in the war until November, 1918. Two of Hoover’s principal assistants were a former lumber shipping clerk from the West Coast, Prentiss Gray, and Julius H. Barnes, a grain salesman from Duluth. Both men became partners in J. Henry Schroder Banking Corporation in New York after the war, and amassed large fortunes, principally in grain and sugar.

With the entry of the United States into the war, Barnes and Gray were given important posts in the newly created U.S. Food Administration, which also was placed under Herbert Hoover’s direction. Barnes became President of the Grain Corporation of the U.S. Food Administration from 1917 to 1918, and Gray was chief of Marine Transportation. Another J. Henry Schroder partner, G. A. Zabriskie, was named head of the U.S. Sugar Equalization Board. Thus the London Connection controlled all food in the United States through its grain and sugar "Czars" during the First World War. Despite many complaints of corruption and scandal in the U.S. Food Administration, no one was ever indicted. After the war, the partners of J. Henry Schroder Company found that they now owned most of Cuba’s sugar industry. One partner, M.E. Rionda, was president of Cuba Cane Corporation, and director of Manati Sugar Company, American British and Continental Corporation, and other firms. Baron Bruno von Schroder, senior partner of the firm, was a director of North British and Mercantile Insurance Company. His father, Baron Rudolph von Schroder of Hamburg, was a director of Sao Paulo Coffee Ltd., one of the largest Brazilian coffee companies, with F.C. Tiarks, also of the Schroder firm.*


* The New York Times noted on October 11, 1923: "Frank C. Tiarks, Governor of the Bank of England, will spend two weeks here to set up the opening of the banking house branch of J. Henry Schroder of London."

After the war, Zabriskie, who had been sugar Czar of the United States by presiding over the U.S. Sugar Equalization Board, became the president of several of the largest baking corporations in the United States: Empire Biscuit, Southern Baking Corporation, Columbia Baking, and other firms.

As his principal assistant in the U.S. Food Administration, Hoover chose Lewis Lichtenstein Strauss, who was soon to become a partner in Kuhn Loeb Company, marrying the daughter of Jerome Hanauer of Kuhn Loeb. Throughout his distinguished humanitarian service with the Belgian Relief Commission, the U.S. Food Administration, and, after the war, the American Relief Administration, Hoover’s closest associate was one Edgar Rickard, born in Pontgibaud, France. In Who’s Who, he states that he was "World War administrative assistant to Herbert Hoover in all war and post-war organizations including the Commission For Relief in Belgium. He also served on the U.S. Food Administration from 1914-1924." He remained one of Hoover’s closest friends, and usually the Rickards and Hoovers took their vacations together. After Hoover became Secretary of Commerce under Coolidge, Hamill tells us that Hoover awarded his friend the Hazeltine Radio patents, which paid him one million dollars a year in royalties.

In 1928, "the London Connection" decided to run Herbert Hoover for president of the United States. There was only one problem; although Herbert Hoover had been born in the United States, and was thus eligible for the office of the presidency, according to the Constitution, he had never had a business address or a home address in the United States, as he had gone abroad just after completing college at Stanford. The result was that during his campaign for the presidency, Herbert Hoover listed as his American address Suite 2000, 42 Broadway, New York, which was the office of Edgar Rickard. Suite 2000 was also shared by the grain tycoon and partner of J. Henry Schroder Banking Corporation, Julius H. Barnes.

After Herbert Hoover was elected president of the United States, he insisted on appointing one of the old London crowd, Eugene Meyer, as Governor of the Federal Reserve Board. Meyer’s father had been one of the partners of Lazard Freres of Paris, and Lazard Brothers of London. Meyer, with Baruch, had been one of the most powerful men in the United States during World War I, a member of the famous Triumvirate which exercised unequalled power; Meyer as Chairman of the War Finance Corporation, Bernard Baruch as Chairman of the War Industries Board, and Paul Warburg as Governor of the Federal Reserve System.

A longtime critic of Eugene Meyer, Chairman Louis McFadden of the House Banking and Currency Committee, was quoted in The New York Times, December 17, 1930, as having made a speech on the floor of the House attacking Hoover’s appointment of Meyer, and charging that "He represents the Rothschild interest and is liaison officer between the French Government and J.P. Morgan." On December 18, The Times reported that "Herbert Hoover is deeply concerned" and that McFadden’s speech was "an unfortunate occurrence." On December 20, The Times commented on the editorial page, under the headline, "McFadden Again", "The speech ought to insure the Senate ratification of Mr. Meyer as head of the Federal Reserve. The speech was incoherent, as Mr. McFadden’s speeches usually are." As The Times predicted, Meyer was duly approved by the Senate.

Not content with having a friend in the White House, J. Henry Schroder Corporation was soon embarked on further international adventures, nothing less than a plan to set up World War II. This was to be done by providing, at a crucial juncture, the financing for Adolf Hitler’s assumption of power in Germany. Although any number of magnates have been given credit for the financing of Hitler, including Fritz Thyssen, Henry Ford, and J.P. Morgan, they, as well as others, did provide millions of dollars for his political campaigns during the 1920s, just as they did for others who also had a chance of winning, but who disappeared and were never heard from again. In December of 1932, it seemed inevitable to many observers of the German scene that Hitler was also ready for a toboggan slide into oblivion. Despite the fact that he had done well in national campaigns, he had spent all the money from his usual sources and now faced heavy debts. In his book Aggression, Otto Lehmann-Russbeldt tells us that "Hitler was invited to a meeting at the Schroder Bank in Berlin on January 4, 1933. The leading industrialists and bankers of Germany tided Hitler over his financial difficulties and enabled him to meet the enormous debt he had incurred in connection with the maintenance of his private army. In return, he promised to break the power of the trade unions. On May 2, 1933, he fulfilled his promise."64

Present at the January 4, 1933 meeting were the Dulles brothers, John Foster Dulles and Allen W. Dulles of the New York law firm, Sullivan and Cromwell, which represented the Schroder Bank. The Dulles brothers often turned up at important meetings. They had represented the United States at the Paris Peace Conference (1919); John Foster Dulles would die in harness as Eisenhower’s Secretary of State, while Allen Dulles headed the Central Intelligence Agency for many years. Their apologists have seldom attempted to defend the Dulles brothers appearance at the meeting which installed Hitler as the Chancellor of Germany, preferring to pretend that it never happened. Obliquely, one biographer Leonard Mosley, bypasses it in Dulles when he states,


64 Otto Lehmann-Russbeldt, Aggression, Hutchinson & Co., Ltd., London, 1934, p. 44

"Both brothers had spent large amounts of time in Germany, where Sullivan and Cromwell had considerable interest during the early 1930’s, having represented several provincial governments, some large industrial combines, a number of big American companies with interests in the Reich, and some rich individuals."65

Allen Dulles later became a director of J. Henry Schroder Company. Neither he nor J. Henry Schroder were to be suspected of being pro-Nazi or pro-Hitler; the inescapable fact was that if Hitler did not become Chancellor of Germany, there was little likelihood of getting a Second World War going, the war which would double their profits.*

The Great Soviet Encyclopaedia states "The banking house Schroder Bros. (it was Hitler’s banker) was established in 1846; its partners today are the barons von Schroeder, related to branches in the United States and England."66**

The financial editor of "The Daily Herald" of London wrote on Sept. 30, 1933 of "Mr. Norman’s decision to give the Nazis the backing of the Bank (of England.)" John Hargrave, in his biography of Montagu Norman says,

"It is quite certain that Norman did all he could to assist Hitlerism to gain and maintain political power, operating on the financial plane from his stronghold in Threadneedle Street." [i.e. Bank of England.--Ed.]

Baron Wilhelm de Ropp, a journalist whose closest friend was Major F.W. Winterbotham, chief of Air Intelligence of the British Secret Service, brought the Nazi philosopher, Alfred Rosenberg, to London and introduced him to Lord Hailsham, Secretary for War, Geoffrey Dawson, editor of The Times, and Norman, Governor of the Bank of England. After talking with Norman, Rosenberg met with the representative of the Schroder Bank of London. The managing director of the Schroder Bank, F.C. Tiarks, was also a director of the Bank of England. Hargrave says (p. 217), "Early in 1934 a select group of City financiers gathered in Norman’s room behind the windowless walls, Sir Robert Kindersley, partner of Lazard Brothers, Charles Hambro, F.C.  Tiarks, Sir Josiah Stamp, (also a director of the Bank of England). Governor Norman spoke of the political situation in Europe. A new power had established itself, a great ‘stabilizing


65 Leonard Mosley, Dulles, Dial Publishing Co., New York 1978, p. 88

* Ezra Pound, in an April 18, 1943 broadcast over Radio Rome stated, ". . .and men in America, not content with this war are already aiming at the next one. The time to object is now."

66 The Great Soviet Encyclopaedia, Macmillan, London, 1973, v.2, p. 620

** The New York Times noted on October 11, 1944: "Senator Claude Pepper criticized John Foster Dulles, Gov. Dewey’s foreign relations advisor for his connection with the law firm of Sullivan and Cromwell and having aided Hitler financially in 1933. Pepper described the January 4, 1933 meeting of Franz von Papen and Hitler in Baron Schroder’s home in Cologne, and from that time on the Nazis were able to continue their march to power."

force’, namely, Nazi Germany. Norman advised his co-workers to include Hitler in their plans for financing Europe. There was no opposition."

In Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, Antony C. Sutton writes "The Nazi Baron Kurt von Schroeder acted as the conduit for I.T.T. money funneled to Heinrich Himmler’s S.S. organization in 1944, while World War II was in progress, and the United States was at war with Germany."67 Kurt von Schroeder, born in 1889, was partner in the Cologne Bankhaus, J.H. Stein & Co., which had been founded in 1788. After the Nazis gained power in 1933, Schroeder was appointed the German representative at the Bank of International Settlements. The Kilgore Committee in 1940 stated that Schroeder’s influence with the Hitler Administration was so great that he had Pierre Laval appointed head of the French Government during the Nazi Occupation. The Kilgore Committee listed more than a dozen important titles held by Kurt von Schroeder in the 1940’s, including President of Deutsche Reichsbahn, Reich Board of Economic Affairs, SS Senior Group Leader, Council of Reich Post Office, Deutsche Reichsbank and other leading banks and industrial groups. Schroeder served on the board of all International Telephone and Telegraph subsidiaries in Germany.

In 1938, the London Schroder Bank became the German financial agent in Great Britain. The New York branch of Schroder had been merged in 1936 with the Rockefellers, as Schroder, Rockefeller, Inc. at 48 Wall Street. Carlton P. Fuller of Schroder was president of this firm, and Avery Rockefeller was vice-president. He had been a behind the scenes partner of J. Henry Schroder for years, and had set up the construction firm of Bechtel Corporation, whose employees (on leave) now play a leading role in the Reagan Administration, as Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State.

Ladislas Farago, in The Game of the Foxes,68 reported that Baron William de Ropp, a double agent, had penetrated the highest echelons in pre-World War II days, and Hitler relied upon de Ropp as his confidential consultant about British affairs. It was de Ropp’s advice which Hitler followed when he refused to invade England.

Victor Perlo writes, in The Empire of High Finance:

"The Hitler government made the London Schroder Bank their financial agent in Britain and America. Hitler’s personal banking account was with J.M. Stein Bankhaus, the German subsidiary of the Schroder Bank. F.C. Tiarks of the British J. Henry Schroder Company


67 Antony C. Sutton, WALL STREET AND THE RISE OF HITLER, 76 Press, Seal Beach, California, 1976, p. 79

68 Ladislas Farago, The Game of the Foxes, 1973

was a member of the Anglo-German Fellowship with two other partners as members, and a corporate membership."69

The story goes much further than Perlo suspects. J. Henry Schroder WAS the Anglo-German Fellowship, the English equivalent of the America First movement, and also attracting patriots who did not wish to see their nation involved in a needless war with Germany. During the 1930’s, until the outbreak of World War II, the Schroders poured money into the Anglo-German Fellowship, with the result that Hitler was convinced he had a large pro-German fifth column in England composed of many prominent politicians and financiers. The two divergent political groups in the 1930’s in England were the War Party, led by Winston Churchill, who furiously demanded that England go to war against Germany, and the Appeasement Party, led by Neville Chamberlain. After Munich, Hitler believed the Chamberlain group to be the dominant party in England, and Churchill a minor rabble-rouser. Because of his own financial backers, the Schroders, were sponsoring the Appeasement Party, Hitler believed there would be no war. He did not suspect that the backers of the Appeasement Party, now that Chamberlain had served his purpose in duping Hitler, would cast Chamberlain aside and make Churchill the Prime Minister. It was not only Chamberlain, but also Hitler, who came away from Munich believing that it would be "Peace in our time."

The success of the Schroders in duping Hitler into this belief explains several of the most puzzling questions of World War II. Why did Hitler allow the British Army to decamp from Dunkirk and return home, when he could have wiped them out? Against the frantic advice of his generals, who wished to deliver the coup de grace to the English Army, Hitler held back because he did not wish to alienate his supposed vast following in England. For the same reason, he refused to invade England during a period when he had military superiority, believing that it would not be necessary, as the Anglo-German Fellowship group was ready to make peace with him. The Rudolf Hess flight to England was an attempt to confirm that the Schroder group was ready to make peace and form a common bond against the Soviets. Rudolf Hess continues to languish in prison today, many years after the war, because he would, if released,


69 Victor Perlo, The Empire of High Finance, International Publishers, 1957, p. 177

testify that he had gone to England to contact the members of the Anglo-German Fellowship, that is, the Schroder group, about ending the war.*

If anyone supposes this is all ancient history, with no application to the present political scene, we introduce the name of John Lowery Simpson of Sacramento, California. Although he appears for the first time in Who’s Who in America for 1952, Mr. Simpson states that he served under Herbert Hoover on the Commission for Relief in Belgium from 1915 to 1917; U.S. Food Administration, 1917 to 1918, American Relief Commission, 1919, and with P.N. Gray Company, Vienna, 1919 to 1921. Gray was the Chief of Maritime Transportation for the U.S. Food Administration, which enabled him to set up his own shipping company after the war. Like other Hoover humanitarians, Simpson also joined the J. Henry Schroder Banking Company (Adolf Hitler’s personal bankers) and the J. Henry Schroder Trust Company. He also became a partner of Schroder-Rockefeller Company when that investment trust backed a construction company which became the world’s largest, the firm of Bechtel Incorporated. Simpson was chairman of the finance committee of Bechtel Company, Bechtel International, and Canadian Bechtel. Simpson states he was consultant to the Bechtel-McCone interests in war production during World War II. He served on the Allied Control Commission in Italy 1943-44. He married Margaret Mandell, of the merchant family for whom Col. Edward Mandell House was named, and he backed a California personality, first for Governor, then for President. As a result, Simpson and J. Henry Schroder Company now have serving them as Secretary of Defense, former Bechtel employee Caspar Weinberger. As Secretary of State they have serving them George Pratt Schultz, also a Bechtel employee, who happens to be a Standard Oil heir, reaffirming the Schroder-Rockefeller company ties. Thus the "conservative" Reagan Administration has a Secretary of Defense from Schroder Company, a Secretary of State from Schroder-Rockefeller, and a vice president whose father was senior partner of Brown Brothers Harriman.


* The following accounts are from The New York Times: October 21, 1945, "A broadcast over the Luxembourg radio said tonight that Baron Kurt von Schroder, former banker who helped finance the rise of the Nazi party, had been recognized in an American prison camp and arrested." November 1, 1945, "British Army Headquarters: Baron Kurt von Schroder, 55 year old banker and friend of Heinrich Himmler is being held in Dusseldorf pending decision on his indictment as a war criminal, the Military Government official announcement said today." February 29, 1948, "An immediate investigation was demanded yesterday by the Society for the Prevention of World War III as to why the German Nazi banker, Kurt von Schroder, was not tried as a war criminal by an allied military tribunal. Noting that von Schroder was sentenced last November to three months imprisonment and fined 1500 Reichsmarks by a German denazification court in Bielefeld, in the British Zone, C. Monteith Gilpin, secretary for the society said the question should be asked why von Schroder was allowed to escape allied justice, and why our own officials have not demanded that von Schroder be tried by an Allied military tribunal. ‘Von Schroder is as guilty as Hitler or Goering.’"

The Heritage Foundation has also been an important factor in the policy-making of the Reagan Administration. Now we find that the Heritage Foundation is part of the Tavistock Institute network, directed by British Intelligence. The financial decisions are still made at the Bank of England, and who is head of the Bank of England? Sir Gordon Richardson, chairman of J. Henry Schroder Co. of London and New York from 1962 to 1972, when he became Governor of the Bank of England. The "London Connection" has never been more firmly in the saddle of the United States Government.

On July 3, 1983, The New York Times announced that Gordon Richardson, Governor of the Bank of England for the past ten years, had been replaced by Robert Leigh-Pemberton, Chairman of the National Westminster Bank. The list of directors of National Westminster Bank reads like a Who’s Who of the British ruling class. They include the Chairman, Lord Aldenham, who is also Chairman of Antony Gibbs & Son, merchant bankers, one of the seventeen privileged firms chartered by the Bank of England; Sir Walter Barrie, Chairman of the British Broadcasting System; F.E. Harmer, Governor of the London School of Economics, the training school for the international bankers, and chairman of New Zealand Shipping Company; Sir E.C. Mieville, private secretary to the King of England 1937-45; Marquess of Salisbury, Lord Cecil, Lord Privy Seal (the Cecils have been considered one of England’s three ruling families since the Middle Ages); Lord Leathers, Baron of Purfleet, Minister of War Transport 1941-45, chairman of William Cory group of companies; Sir W.H. Coates and W.J. Worboys of Imperial Chemical Industries (the English DuPont); Earl of Dudley, chairman British Iron & Steel, Sir W. Benton Jones, chairman United Steel and many other steel companies; Sir G.E. Schuster, Bank of New Zealand; East India Coal Company; A. d’A. Willis, Ashanti Goldfields and many banks, tea companies and other firms; V.W. Yorke, chairman of Mexican Railways Ltd.

Richardson, former chairman of Schroders with a New York subsidiary holding Federal Reserve Bank of New York stock, was replaced by the chairman of National Westminster, with a subsidiary in New York holding Federal Reserve Bank of New York stock. Robert Leigh Pemberton, a director of Equitable Life Assurance Society (J.P. Morgan), married the daughter of the Marchioness of Exeter, (the Cecil Burghley family). Thereby, the control of the London Connection remains constantly in effect.

The list of the present directors of J. Henry Schroder Bank and Trust shows the continuing international influence since the First World War. George A. Braga is also director of Czarnikow-Rionda Company, vice-president of Francisco Sugar Company, president of Manati Sugar Company, and vice-president of New Tuinicui Sugar Company. His relative, Rionda B. Braga, is president of Francisco Sugar Company and vice-president of Manati Sugar Company. The Schroder control of sugar goes back to the U.S. Food Administration under Herbert Hoover and Lewis L. Strauss of Kuhn, Loeb, Company during World War I. Schroder’s attorneys are the firm of Sullivan and Cromwell. John Foster Dulles of this firm was present during the historic agreement to finance Hitler, and was later Secretary of State in the Eisenhower administration. Alfred Jaretzki, Jr., of Sullivan and Cromwell is also a director of Manati Sugar Company and Francisco Sugar Company.

Another director of J. Henry Schroder is Norris Darrell, Jr., born in Berlin, Germany, partner of Sullivan and Cromwell, and a director of Schroder Trust Company. Bayless Manning, partner of the Wall Street law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind and Wharton, is also a director of J. Henry Schroder. He was president of the Council on Foreign Relations from 1971-1977, and is editor in chief of the Yale Law Review.

Paul H. Nitze, the prominent "disarmament negotiator" for the United States government, is a director of Schroder’s Inc. He married Phyllis Pratt, of the Standard Oil fortune, whose father gave the Pratt family mansion as the building which houses the Council on Foreign Relations.

In Gates’ Hands even Italian Military Artificial Intelligence. Leonardo-Microsoft Deal and Dems intrigues through 007 and Pandemic
Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio 8 Agosto 2021 0  CONSPIRACY - FREEMASONRY, European Union, GEOPOLITICS - ECONOMY, Italy, LIFE - BIOETHICS, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, Weapons Lobby
In Gates’ Hands even Italian Military Artificial Intelligence. Leonardo-Microsoft Deal and Dems intrigues through 007 and Pandemic
On the cover, the brand of the Italian military technology company Leonardo spa, the Italian president Sergio Mattarella, Bill Gates, owner of Microsoft, and the American president Joseph Biden

by Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio

Versione originale in Italiano

All links to Italian reports can read in English with simultaneous machine translating

When the key sectors of a nation – and consequently of a society – are locked up within long-term international agreements, the political orientation of that country becomes in fact secondary. Well, Italy sees two areas of primary importance such as health and defense now controlled by Big Pharma and Big Tech which are always headed by Bill Gates as usual.

The agreement signed a few weeks ago (at the end of May) between the American IT guru’s Microsoft Corporation and Leonardo spa, the weapons corporation controlled by the Italian government but participated by foreign funds including the infamous Black Rock, follows the path of a political project between Rome and Washington of complete Democratic origin. Behind which transpires the callous direction of the President of the Italian Republic Sergio Mattarella (former PD deputy) and the President of the United States of America Joseph Biden, in an intertwining of strong powers of the so-called Deep State that aim at the consolidation of the New World Order.

But what is worse, it appears to have been born in the shadow of the intrigues between pandemic prophecies and US intelligence because the call for greater use of Artificial Intelligence in the military field came precisely from North America in autumn 2020, before the controversial elections that ousted Republican President Donald Trump, t was launched by a dossier written by lawyer Avril Haines that readers of WuhanGates reports on the pandemic and the laboratory-built SARS-Cov-2 virus are well aware of.

Haines, Democrat since she was Joseph Biden’s assistant in Congress, in fact, not only in 2018 in a conference in Camdem prophesied a catastrophic CoronaVirus epidemic that could only be faced by a new “world order”, but she was also the protagonist of the suspected exercise on “Event 201”, held in mid-October 2019 thanks to funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum by Klaus Schan, the Great Reset theorist.

This tangle of intrigue has resulted in billion-dollar vaccine contracts from Gates-controlled Big Pharma: thanks to direct funding to Moderna and Biontech and its key role in GlaxoSmithKline-GSK which controls Pfizer’s commercial network but also through the immunization plan World Health Organization for Poor Countries called COVAX, managed by Gates’ Ngo GAVi and administered by a former GSK manager…


All of this appears even more relevant in the Leonardo-Microsoft deal when you consider that Emma Walmsley, CEO of GSK is also a non-executive director of Microsoft Corporation. The circle of the noose destined to strangle the freedom of choice of Italians in the medical and military fields closes perfectly.

Not by chance. For a specific political will aimed at enhancing cybersecurity also in the Public Administration which will in fact share with the company controlled by Gates (in which, however, he is no longer administrator since 2014) all the access codes of public PCs as well as military Artificial Intelligence.

It should be remembered that the American President Joseph Biden, sponsored in the election campaign by Pfizer with whom he immediately repaid through donations to the Covax fund, on the day of his inauguration appointed the lawyer Haines, former vice Director of the Central Intelligence Agency and then Deputy National Security Advisor to the White House during the Obama-Biden administration, as well as a biological weapons expert for NTI (Nuclear Threat Initiative), a US NGO founded by Senator Dem Sam Nunn and financed by Warren Buffet, from 2006 to June 2021 major financier of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation with 41.5 billion dollars through its Berkshire Hathaway fund.

Perhaps just by coincidence the experiments on recombinant chimeric superviruses (infected with HIV) during Avril Haines’ time at the CIA were conducted in the Chapel Hill laboratories of North Carolina University thanks to the advice of scientists from the Wuhan Institute of Virology?


But now readers should be reminded who are the leading men of Leonardo spa. The managing director is Alessandro Profumo, former manager of the multinational management company McKinsey, financed for years by Gates and engaged in the restructuring of US intelligence executives: from the CIA to the NSA).

Leonardo’s CEO Alessandro Profumo
Profumo, former president of Unicredit and MPS, was also involved in a bad legal matter. On 28 April 2018, the GUP (judge for preliminary hearing) of Milan indicted Profumo and the manager Fabrizio Viola with the accusations of manipulation and false accounting for the accounting in the consolidated financial statements of the derivatives Santorini contract with Deutsche Bank, and of Alexandria with the Japanese Bank Nomura, despite the Milan Public Prosecutor’s Office requesting the acquittal of both on 6 April 2018, as already in September 2016. On 15 October 2020 the Milan court sentenced Profumo and Viola in first instance to six years of imprisonment and payment a fine of 2.5 million euros each (source Wikipedia).

His appointment was proposed by the Italian Ministry of the Treasury, the majority shareholder, during the government of Paolo Gentiloni, also known for having passed the Lorenzin Decree to impose the 12 compulsory school-age vaccines according to a global immunization plan promoted by President Barack Obama and by his megadonor Gates, which allowed GSK to do a great business.

More mysterious, for the layman, is the president of Leonardo: Luciano Carta. As former director of AISE, the Italian counter-espionage, he also became famous to the general public for his latest operation from 007: the liberation of the Milanese aid worker Silvia Romano, kidnapped in Kenya in 2018 by some wingmen of the terrorist group Al Shabaab, rib of Al Qaeda in Somalia.

The liberation, which took place on May 9, 2020, was completed by Italian intelligence thanks to the fundamental contribution of the Turkish colleagues of MIT (Millî İstihbarat Teşkilâtı), the powerful secret services of Ankara, as proof of an axis of excellent collaboration between the Italian governments of the Democratic Party and the Muslim Brotherhood, built thanks to the business between Italy and Turkey through Leonardo spa.

The esteemed retired general Carta, also known for the extradition of the terrorist Cesare Battisti captured in Bolivia in 2019, can well be considered a trusted man of the President of the Republic Sergio Mattarella who played a key role during the Libyan civil war by visiting to the Emir of Qatar, suspected of financing the Jihadists sent to Tripoli from Turkey with the unofficial approval of NATO.

L’ex generale Luciano Carta, già direttore del controspionaggio italiano AISE ed ora presidente della Leonardo spa
«Born in Carbonia in 1957, classical studies, multi-degree and” very Sardinian “, as those who know him well say, greets the Aise, the foreign secret services with the rescue of Silvia Romano to take a role that with the intelligence and international relations still has a lot to do, for example on the subject of armaments – he wrote on 11 May 2020 Open – A long paper was the public face of the Finance Police, head of the press office for a substantial period, about 7 years, from 1995 to 2002. Until then, his career had first been in his beloved Sardinia, then in Genoa and Livorno. And, above all, in Milan: in the years of Tangentopoli, Luciano Carta was the head of operations of the Tax Police Unit of the Yellow Flames and therefore plays a decisive role».


«Then (Carta) he is called to Rome by a commander general, Rolando Mosca Moschini who – according to some – is also one of the keys to explain the closeness with President Sergio Mattarella (Mosca Moschini is secretary of the Supreme Defense Council and is military adviser to the Quirinale)» adds Open.

But the “dangerous relationships” that lurk behind the future of Italian cyber security do not end here. “The Minister for Innovation and Digital Transition Vittorio Colao has, on behalf of the government of Mario Draghi, established the operational and strategic priorities of the new security architecture, considered fundamental to increase Italy’s sovereignty over the data generated in the national territory, protecting the privacy and security of citizens and including Rome in the matches for continental strategic autonomy» reported InsideOver, the pro-NATO online geopolitics space of Il Giornale, on 6 July.

To secure the system of the nearly 11,000 “machine rooms” of the PA, guaranteeing cost savings of between 40 and 50% per year, the NRR has allocated almost one billion euros; according to rumors reported by Il Messaggero, Cassa Depositi e Prestiti will obtain 51% of the shares in the company that will have to manage the Italian cloud. Partners of the public bank in Via Goito will instead be Tim and Leonardo, who will share the remaining amount of the shares.

«The partners involved in the project alongside Cdp are guarantors of an Atlantic orientation. Leonardo, reinvigorated by the self-defense of Alessandro Profumo on the board of directors and despite some questionable attacks on his business from the stars and stripes printing sectors, leads the Euro-Atlantic defense consortiums, independently develops projects on the cloud, AI, supercomputer , cutting-edge technologies; Tim, on the other hand, was in the last session of the board of directors that ended in February, the scene of the axis between the CDP and US finance, embodied by the Elliott fund, and boasts non-secondary relationships with the stars and stripes players» writes the economic analyst Andrea Muratore.

Elliott himself recently made a huge investment in Big Pharma Pfizer, adding to Black Rock and accentuating the Zionist connotation of speculators who profit from vaccine revenues: the founders of both investment funds, Paul Singer and Larry Fink, in fact, they are known to support the political positions of the Zionist Movement in the States.

«Relying on US technologies on the cloud, right now, may not be the preferred choice for Italian operators. But it appears inevitable, given the starting conditions. Only from the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic until today have US projects in Italy intensified. Microsoft in May 2020 announced a 1.5 billion euro plan for cloud, AI, digitalization in Italy and is a partner for Leonardo’s strategy», concludes the reporter.

Before looking at the agreement between Leonardo and Microsoft in detail, it should be remembered that Italian minister Colao, a member of the Bilderberg committee, comes from McKinsey herself (today heavily influenced by Gates’ investments) and was also the director of Vodafone when the company telephone born from the Italian success of Omnitel (founded by Carlo De Benedetti, card no. 1 of Democratic Party in Italy) signed a sponsorship agreement with GAVI of Gates on global immunization (the NGO that today manages the COVAX antiCovid plan).

McKinsey was also entrusted with the task of preparing the EU NEXT Generation Plan, better known as the Recovery Plan, for the management of the country’s relaunch funds allocated by the European Union for the pandemic emergency.

Meanwhile, last August 3, the Senate Chamber definitively approved the Cybersecurity Law Decree already approved by the Chamber with 204 yes, 3 no and 23 abstentions. The provision defines, in particular, the national cybersecurity architecture and establishes the National Cybersecurity Agency, amending, among other things, the 2019 decree law which defined the national cyber security perimeter.


«A collaboration is underway to guarantee the cyber protection of data and services for the country’s strategic assets linked to the future National Strategic Pole (PSN). Leonardo is a candidate for the role of System Integrator and Cyber ​​Security manager for the digital transformation and consolidation of Public Administration data centers. Microsoft will provide advanced productivity, security, cloud and process automation technologies and services to enable digital acceleration of public administration and Italian companies. ” Thus begins the press release published by Microsoft on its official website on May 26, 2021.

“Leonardo and Microsoft join forces and skills to contribute to the digital development of the country in the name of cyber security and technological innovation – the two corporations write again in a joint note – Cooperation, based on a Memorandum of Understanding signed by the two parts that will evolve according to agreements aimed at specific initiatives, provides for the design and implementation of the elements necessary for the creation of the National Strategic Pole (PSN) which will manage the technological assets capable of enabling the most sensitive services in the country. On the basis of future governmental requirements, the joint initiative will therefore be able to extend to all Italian ‘critical’ infrastructures. Ultimately, on the one hand, Leonardo’s many years of experience as a national champion for Cyber ​​Security and partner of the Public Administration will be shared. and, on the other hand, the great skills and the wide diffusion of advanced technologies and solutions in the cloud in the public and private sectors that characterize the offer of Microsoft products and services».

The collaboration also includes activities both in “HPC on cloud” solutions and in application or architectural solutions «and is particularly oriented towards the digital transformation program of national healthcare». A phrase that recalls not only the Immune App proposed by the then commissioner for the relaunch Vittorio Colao (now minister) but also the Green Pass, the microchip to detect Covid being tested at the Pentagon and finally the one for financial exchanges with cryptocurrencies patented by Microsoft.

«Leonardo, through its Be Tomorrow 2030 Strategic Plan, has identified presiding over the frontier of digital innovation as one of the main growth assets over the next ten years, according to a vision of sustainable development, with the aim of generating new technologies and applications . At the forefront of the company’s assets is davinci-1, a High Performance Computer equipped with an architecture that integrates the flexibility of the cloud with supercomputing capabilities to enhance the advanced Big Data and Artificial Intelligence solutions for strategic sectors of the Village».

So here is the reference to AI in the field of military technology. In future projection this may mean that the day will come when computers and algorithms will decide when and who to shoot. A disturbing eventuality in consideration of the fact that Leonardo (already overwhelmed by various judicial investigations to the point of abandoning the old name Finmeccanica), according to the ICAN 2019 report, is engaged in nuclear weapons through the MBDA joint venture, the main European consortium builder of missiles and defense technologies.

«Microsoft launched a five-year investment plan for Italy in May 2020, confirming its commitment to support innovation and growth in the country, with the launch of the first Microsoft Region Data Center in Italy, in Milan. The new “Ambition Italy #DigitalRestart” plan creates new opportunities to grow people and organizations and support economic development, through access to local cloud services, digital training programs and support for smart working. The initiative promotes the development and adoption of Artificial Intelligence solutions by companies with the “AI Hub” project and supports the issues of digital transition with an Alliance for Sustainability which aims to create an ecosystem of open innovation on green themes» concludes the press release.

As mentioned at the beginning, the first to foresee the need for an enhancement of Artificial Intelligence in the military field was the lawyer Avril Haines, who later became the first woman to lead the entire US Intelligence Community by the will of Biden.

The former CIA deputy director, in fact, is part of WestExec Advisors, a think-tank of the Dem area that includes important national security personalities such as the two founders, Blinken himself and Michèle Flournoy, former Undersecretary of Defense for politics with Obama. from 2009 to 2012.

After announcing in June his intention to suspend his activity for WestExec Advisors during the election campaign for Biden, in reality Haines has maintained solid ties that have materialized with the publication of a dossier on AI, developed together with Flournoy, which he seemed to indicate to the Pentagon the strategies to be pursued by the Democratic candidate for the White House.

«This moment is taking place in the context of a technological revolution that exacerbates the challenges we face while simultaneously offering potential solutions, providing breakthroughs in climate, medicine, communications, transportation, intelligence, and many other fields. Many of these breakthroughs will come through the exploitation of artificial intelligence (AI) and its related technologies—chief among them machine learning (ML). These advances will likely shape the economic and military balance of power among nations and the future of work, wealth, and inequality within them» the two authors write in the introduction of the study called “Building Trust through Testing. Adapting DOD’s Test & Evaluation, Validation & Verification (TEVV) Enterprise for Machine Learning Systems, including Deep Learning Systems».

The dossier made by Avril Haines on AI for WestExec Advisors
«Innovations in ML have the potential to transform fundamentally how the U.S. military fights, and how the Department of Defense (DOD) operates. Machine learning applications can increase the speed and quality of human decision-making on the battlefield, enable human-machine teaming to maximize performance and minimize the risk to soldiers, and greatly improve the accuracy and speed of analysis that relies on very large data sets. ML can also strengthen the United States’ ability to defend its networks against cyberattacks at machine speeds and has the power to automate critical components of labor-intensive enterprise functions, such as predictive maintenance and personnel management…».

Haines also wrote that, now, from the control room of Direction of National Intelligence, the most powerful  in the world, he can really configure scenarios far worse than those narrated in 1984 by George Orwell. Also thanks to the strategic complicity of Microsoft of his “friend” Gates and Leonardo, listed on the Milan Stock Exchange and since 2010 in the Dow Jones Sustainability Indices (DJSI), which in 2020 was confirmed as Industry leader in the Aerospace & Defense sector for second consecutive year.
Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
no reproduction without authorization










Jew World Order Exposed

Jew World Order Exposed

The Jew
World Order
by Brandon
The former
author of
THE RULE OF the Talmudic Jew in modern times is nearly one of an absolute monarch of a country. The
Jews, through their complete domination of world f inance and banking — through their malignant monopoly
of the mass media of America, Britain, France, Canada and other Western powers — through their
inf luential and vast network of subversive “lobby groups” — through their dominion over the courts and law
prof ession in general — not to mention their pernicious presence inside the highest levels of government
of the most powerf ul countries — have thus taken f ull control of the entire planet, as was f oretold in
ancient Jewish religious texts.
As the f ormer Malaysian Prime Minister, Dr. Mahathir Mohamed, explained: “The Jews rule this world by
proxy, they get others to fight and die for them… They have now gained control of the most
powerful countries … This tiny community have become a world power.” Dr. Mahathir spoke the truth,
and the reality of his words couldn’t be clearer; all one has to do is look around you and observe the
terrible power of the treacherous Jews.The Jewish-Zionist terrorist leader Ze’ev Jabotinsky (f ounder of
the Jewish terror group Irgun Zevai Leumi) proudly proclaimed: “There is only one power which really
counts. The power of political pressure. We Jews are the most powerful people on earth, because
we have this power, and we know how to apply it.” (Jewish Daily Bulletin, July 27, 1935) The f act that
the vicious crimes of this disgusting criminal’s insidious terrorist organization — such as the King David
Hotel bombing and Deir Yassin Massacre — are not mentioned in Western history texts or at all covered in
High School and University history classes, is a testament to the veracity of his exultant statement.
Co mmunism is Je wish, Fre e maso nry is Je wish — Ge ntile co mmunists and
fre e maso ns are no thing mo re than the cat’s p aw o f the Inte rnatio nal Je wish
Mo ne y Po we r.
Jewish power is supremely epitomized by the f act that criticism of Christianity, Islam, or any other major
religion or ethnic group is f ully permissible in our societies, but criticism of Jews and Judaism, on the other
hand, is taboo, of f-limits as well as socially and politically dangerous.As the saying goes, if you want to
know where the power lies ask whom you cannot criticize.
It’s quite interesting to note that the researchers of the “New World Order” who endeavor to def lect
attention away from the Jews — such as Alex Jones, Jim Marrs, Alan Watt, Mark Dice, etc — are not
silenced or suppressed, but in f act promoted by the Jewish controlled press. These purported critics of the
New World Order and Illuminati who employ vague terms like “elites”/”globalists”/”the establishment”/”the
military industrial complex”, and who regularly invoke a conf using deluge of elusive entities and kosher
poltergeists (everything from Satanists, Occultists, Freemasons, Jesuits, Nazis, Fascists, Knights Templar,
WASPs, British Royalists, Reptilians, Space Aliens, etc) are free to promote their theories and ideas on
radio, television, the internet and in books, uninhibited. Their radio shows are not being cancelled, their
books are not being taken of f the shelves or blocked from publication, their videos are not being censored
or expunged from video sharing websites, their websites and blogs are not being shut down on a whim,
they are not being f ined or thrown in prison f or “hate speech.” On the contrary, we can f ind these kosher
clowns being highlighted on mainstream Jewish propaganda television networks, like the History Channel,
and making appearances on MSM talk shows, like The View. Critics of Jewish power, Zionism and the
Jewish criminal network couldn’t even dream of achieving that level of notoriety. I wonder why?
Freemasons are of ten talked about
by these people, but what they
deliberately conceal from their
audiences is the f act that the masons
are subordinate and beholden to the
Jews, which is admitted in the
masons’ own books. On page 249 of
“Duncan’s Ritual and Monitor” it
states that Masonry is subservient to
Judaism, noting that a recipient of the
Royal Arch Degree pledges himself
“For the good of Masonry,
generally, but the Jewish nation in
particular.” The undeniable f act that
Freemasonry itself is based on the
rites and rituals of the Jewish religion
and the mysticism of the Jewish
Cabala, is also purposef ully glossed
over by these deceivers.
The Protocols of Zion make clear this intention to use subservient Gentiles (shabbas goyim) as
“GENTILE masonry blindly serves as a screen for us and our objects, but the plan of action of
our force, even its very abiding-place, remains for the whole people an unknown mystery.” (The
Protocols of Zion, 4:2)
Those of us who name Jews as the prime mover behind the New World Order — which we have dubbed the
“Jew World Order” — are ruthlessly suppressed, censored, harassed, terrorized, arrested, imprisoned, and
in some extreme cases even killed. There is no “Jesuit Internet Def ense League” that goes around trying to
censor YouTube videos that are critical of the Jesuit Order and the Vatican; but there is a “Jewish Internet
Def ense Force”, a predatory gang of scheming Jews who relentlessly go around sabotaging blogs and
websites critical of Jews, Israel or Zionism, and who are responsible f or the removal of thousands of
videos as well as the banishment of thousands of YouTube channels and users of other video sharing
websites. The Vatican doesn’t have a paid army of internet trolls who roam around popular websites like
YouTube, Facebook and Twitter, posting comments glorif ying the Vatican and smearing all critics of the
Vatican as “anti-Catholic bigots”. But the Israeli government — and its vast network of Zionist lobby
organizations like the World Jewish Congress, Anti-Def amation League and B’nai B’rith — has on its payroll
thousands of Jew zealots called “Hasbara” roaming the net spewing pro-Zionist propaganda, attacking
anyone critical of anything Jewish, Israeli or Zionist, as an “antisemite” and “f ascist nazi”. It’s not Catholic
Jesuits who are training their pupils to manipulate Wikipedia to f avor their causes and ambitions, it’s Zionist
Jews who are doing that. Doesn’t that tell you something? Only criminals attempting to evade exposure and
censure would have to resort to such depraved, bottom-f eeding behavior.
Look at all of the prominent people over the years whose careers have been ruined simply f or expressing
an opinion or stating a f act that the Jews don’t want the public to hear. For instance, Helen Thomas, a f if ty
year veteran of the White House Press Corps, was recently pressured to resign af ter she was recorded on
videotape telling the Israeli Jews to “get the hell out of Palestine.” Shortly af ter the video surf aced
Organized Jewry went on a rampage and witch-hunt, unleashing a barrage of hate against the honorable
Helen Thomas f or her brave remarks, even calling on journalism schools and groups to revoke any honors
given to her in previous years. Ref lecting on the debacle, Thomas told an interviewer, “You can’t criticize
Israel in this country and survive.” In a speech Thomas f urther remarked,
“We are owned by propagandists against the Arabs. There’s no question about that.
Congress, the White House, and Hollywood, Wall Street, are owned by the Zionists. No
question in my opinion. They put their money where their mouth is…We’re being pushed
into a wrong direction in every way.”
Then there was the incident involving Rick Sanchez, a veteran CNN news anchor with his own show called
“Rick’s List”. Sanchez was promptly f ired from his position at CNN af ter he insinuated that the American
mass media is controlled by Jews in a radio interview. (“Rick Sanchez: Jon Stewart A ‘Bigot,’ Jews Run CNN
& All Media.” The Huffington Post. 10/1/2010) Why is it that Rick Sanchez — being a Gentile — is not
permitted to state the obvious f act that Jews own and control the media when a Jewish reporter from the
LA Times, Joel Stein, can freely — without any repercussions — write an article entitled “How Jewish Is
Hollywood?” in which he arrogantly brags about Jewish control of Hollywood, the news media, government
and f inance, stating:
“Jews totally run Hollywood. … As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our
accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. … I don’t care if Americans think we’re
running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we
get to keep running them.”
Conservative journalist and writer Joe Sobran, a long-time syndicated columnist f or the National Review
until he was predictably f ired f or “antisemitism,” eloquently explained the bef uddling nature of Jewish
power. Sobran opined that if you want to make it in American politics you have to know all about it, but, at
the same time, can’t ever ref er to it openly, f or f ear of the Jews:
“Talking about American politics without mentioning the Jews is a little like talking about the NBA
without mentioning the Chicago Bulls. Not that the Jews are all-powerful, let alone all bad. But
they are successful, and therefore powerful enough: and their power is unique in being off-limits
to normal criticism even when it’s highly visible. They themselves behave as if their success
were a guilty secret, and they panic, and resort to accusations, as soon as the subject is raised.
Jewish control of the major media in the media age makes the enforced silence both
paradoxical and paralyzing. Survival in public life requires that you know all about it, but never
refer to it. A hypocritical etiquette forces us to pretend that the Jews are powerless victims; and if
you don’t respect their victimhood, they’ll destroy you. It’s a phenomenal display not of
wickedness, really, but of fierce ethnocentrism, a sort of furtive racial superpatriotism.”
In an essay reprinted in the May 27, 1996, issue of the New York Times Ari Shavit, an Israeli columnist,
ref lected on the Israeli slaughter of more than a hundred Lebanese civilians the month bef ore: “We killed
them out of a certain naive hubris. Believing with absolute certitude that now, with the White
House, the Senate, and much of the American media in our hands, the lives of others do not count
as much as our own….” This Israeli simply conf irmed what many Americans already knew and had known
f or decades, which is that the Jewish/Israeli lobby — not Jesuits, Occultists, Satanists or shape-shif ting
Reptilians — control the White House, Congress and the Senate, like a marionette. Well-known political
commentator, and f ormer presidential candidate, Pat Buchanan, once declared: “Capitol Hill is Israeli
occupied territory.” Former US congressman Paul Findley documented the reality of Buchanan’s
statement in a book called, “They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel’s Lobby”. On
page 161 of Findley’s book, he quotes Admiral Thomas Moorer, f ormer Chairman of the US Joint Chief s of
Staf f , who, with blunt vexation at the Jewish-Israeli hold on the United States, said:
“I’ve never seen a President — I don’t care who he is — stand up to them [the Israelis]. It
just boggles the mind. They always get what they want. The Israelis know what is going
on all the time. I got to the point where I wasn’t writing anything down. If the American
people understood what a grip those people have got on our government, they would
rise up in arms. Our citizens certainly don’t have any idea what goes on.”
British MP, Tom Dalyell, echoed these sentiments when he proclaimed, “A Jewish cabal have taken over
the government in the United States and formed an unholy alliance with fundamentalist
Christians.” Former US congresswoman Cynthia McKinney has come out and blamed the pro-Israel Lobby
in America (AIPAC, ADL, AJC, ZOA, etc) f or ruining her political career. While in congress McKinney ref used
to sign the pro-Israel pledge and took a pro-Palestinian stance. Because of this, McKinney said “war was
declared” on her by the Jewish lobby who eventually ousted her from Congress by f unding and supporting
her political opponents. In 2009 she told an interviewer that “more than 99% of Congress work for Pro
Zionist Israeli interests.” Former US congressman, Jim Traf f icant, was also targeted and then destroyed
by the Jewish lobby f or not being a groveling pro-Israel stooge, and f or helping out a f alsely accused socalled “Nazi war criminal” named John Demjanjuk who the Jews attempted to crucif y f or “war crimes” that
never happened. (See: Collins, Michael Piper. Target Trafficant.American Free Press, 2005) Af ter serving a
seven year prison sentence on trumped-up corruption charges, he f earlessly came out swinging stating in a
television interview that,
“…Israel has a powerful stranglehold on the American government. They [the Jews]
control both members of the House, and the Senate. They have us involved in wars in
which we have little or no interest. Our children are coming back in body bags. Our
nation is bankrupt over these wars. And if you open your mouth, you get targeted. And if
they don’t beat you at the poll, they’ll put you in prison [...] They’re controlling much of
our foreign policy. They’re influencing much of our domestic policy. Wolfowitz as
undersecretary of defense manipulated President Bush number two back into Iraq.
They’ve pushed definitely, definitely to try to get Bush before he left to move into Iran.
We’re conducting the expansionist policy of Israel and everybody’s afraid to say it. They
control much of the media, they control much of the commerce of the country, and they
control powerfully both bodies of the Congress. They own the Congress.”
University of Chicago Prof essor, John Mersheimer, and Harvard academic Stephen Walt, f elt the perilous
wrath of the Jew lobby.A vicious smear campaign was launched against them af ter they published a study
exposing the insidious inf luence of Israeli lobby groups — principally the American-Israel Public Affairs
Committee — entitled, “The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy”. Fox News reporter Carl Cameron
conf irmed the capability of the Jewish-Israeli lobby to silence and extirpate anyone they don’t like. In his
censored f our part series on Israeli espionage against the United States, Cameron stated, “Investigators
within the DEA, INS and FBI have all told Fox News that to pursue or even suggest Israeli spying … is
considered career suicide.”
The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations lists on its board of members f if tyone of America’s most powerf ul Zionist hate organizations that wield tremendous inf luence in American
political lif e. Jewish author J.J. Goldberg, in his book “Jewish Power: Inside the America Jewish
Establishment” (pp. 38-39), noted that there are approximately 300 national Jewish organizations in
the United States with a combined budget estimated in the range of $6 billion — a sum greater
than the gross national product of half the members of the United Nations. (cited in MacDonald,
Kevin. The Culture of Critique, Chapter 7) And that doesn’t even take into account the inf luence of individual
wealthy Jews, Jewish f amilies and Jewish Wall Street banking houses like Goldman Sachs, who mete out
billions of dollars in campaign contributions to both the Democrat and Republican parties. (See: Collins,
Michael Piper. The New Babylon: Those Who Reign Supreme.American Free Press, 2009) Henry L. Feingold,
writing in his book “Jewish Power in America: Myth and Reality”, stated that “Over 60 percent of campaign
funds collected by the Democratic party and a respectable percentage of Republican campaign
funds stem from Jewish sources.” Jews are quite candid about their attempt to manipulate the US
political process to their benef it — the New Yorker reported that at a conf erence, the Jewish supremacist
Haim Saban (an Israeli-American multibillionaire media mogul) outlined several ways in which Jews can be
inf luential in American politics: “make donations to political parties, establish think tanks, and control
media outlets.” Couple all that with the Jewish death-grip on the mass media and Hollywood, in
conjunction with the Jewish stranglehold on world f inance and you have total Jewish ethnic domination of
America, a virtual slave society reminiscent of the Soviet Union.
This phenomena of Jewish targeting of political opponents is not limited to America, it’s also quite apparent
in Canada, Europe, Australia, and in pretty much all nations where Jews live. The ravenous Canadian Jewish
Congress had a Liberal Party candidate named Leslie Hughes removed by her party f or writing a 2003 article
suggesting Israel had f oreknowledge of 9/11 (not only did Israel have f oreknowledge, they did it). Many
Canadian patriots such as Ernst Zundel, Paul Fromm, Terry Tremaine, Arthur Topham, Marc Lemire, and
others, have been prosecuted by the tyrannical Canadian government — at the behest of evil Jewish lobby
groups like the CJC, B’nai B’rith, Simon Wiesenthal Center, etc — f or their internet writings criticizing Jews,
Zionism or Israel.
In 2009 an Australian anti-Zionist activist named Brendon O’Connell was arrested and charged under
Australia’s Orwellian “racial vilif ication” law af ter an altercation he had with two Zionist Jews who
photographed him and other pro-Palestine activists at a rally without asking permission. For calling the two
Zionist spies “racist, homicidal maniacs” and describing Judaism as a “racist, homicidal cult” (statements
totally congruent with the f acts), the righteous patriot O’Connell was handed down a hef ty three year jail
sentence! If the Vatican and the Jesuits — instead of Jews/Israel — were the object of O’Connell’s criticism
do you think he would be in prison right now? Of course not.
The brilliant Douglas Reed, Britain’s preeminent WWII correspondent f or the London Times, went from
being a celebrated, revered author, playwright and journalist with an army of f ans, to a non-person scorned
in the press and whose books publishers wouldn’t touch with a f if ty f oot poll. Why? Because he started
writing about the Jewish Question, Zionism, and the long-term Jewish conspiracy to impose a world
government on an enslaved humanity. (See: The Controversy of Zion)
Alexander Solzhenitsyn was the once-f amous Russian dissident, a survivor of a Soviet Gulag
concentration camp who authored several books about the horrif ic experiences he, and his Russian
countrymen, endured during the communist hell of Soviet Russia (See: The Gulag Archipelago I & II). Then
he stopped being f amous and now he is a non-person (now deceased). It happened because he told truths
about the predominant Jewish role in the Bolshevik revolution and the Soviet Regime. (See: 200 Years
Together) So the Jews in the media wrote him out of history — he disappeared quicker than the people that
Stalin did not like vanished.
Another strong indication of the menacing Jewish stranglehold on the West is the wicked Stalinist-style
State repression of Holocaust Revisionists. In a well-organized censorship campaign, International Jewish
Supremacist groups — principally the World Jewish Congress — have successf ully lobbied over a dozen
European governments to criminalize holocaust revisionist research.All around the world holocaust
revisionist scholars and ordinary people who dare question any aspect of the f arcical holocaust™ dogma
have been harassed, vilif ied, smeared, slandered, f ined heavily, jailed, physically assaulted, terrorized, and
in one instance murdered. Courageous and esteemed revisionist scholars such as Arthur Butz, Mark Weber,
Germar Rudolf , Robert Faurisson, Ernst Zundel, Fredrick Toben, Juergen Graf , Carlo Mattogno, David Cole,
Ditlieb Felderer, Carlos Porter, and many others, have suf f ered tremendous hardships because of their
brilliant work debunking the holocaust™ myth.
Taking into account these simple observations, we can conf idently assert that International Jewry are the
cap of the pyramid of world power and inf luence. Everything else serves as a distraction and convenient
smokescreen f or this f undamental reality.
Imperium Judaica — Bolshevism and Zionism As Instruments of Jewish Intrigue
Zio nism and Co mmunism are b ut two arms o f the Je wish Wo rld Swind le .
Jews have long been in control of the
world, and continue to rule it today.
This is revealed to us simply by
observing the actions and words of the
leaders of World Zionism and World
Communism, the twin vehicles of global
Jewish subversion.
With the advent of Communism in the
early 19th century, we saw the world
plunge into a brutal chaos of social
cataclysm and economic decay. Indeed,
the goal of International Communism
was never to “free the workers” from
capitalist oppression, but rather to
f urther enslave them to a small cadre
of self-declared and self-perpetuating
elite vanguards who ruled their subjects
with an iron f ist. From its inception,
Communism and Socialism was a
Jewish endeavor to usurp the remaining Gentile nations free from Jewish control, plunder their wealth, and
enslave and murder the best of their people!
Communism’s Talmudic Jewish roots couldn’t be more apparent. The Jew Karl Marx, a descendant of a long
line of Talmudic rabbis, is widely viewed as the principal progenitor of the ideology of Communism. Less
known, however, was Communism’s true prophet — the Jewish supremacist, Talmudist, and racist Zionist
Moses Hess, whom Marx called the “Red Rabbi.” (See: Avineri, Shlomo. Moses Hess: Prophet of Communism
and Zionism. NYU Press, 1987) Hess was Marx’s guide and teacher, and converted both Karl Marx and
Friedrich Engels to Communism. These two sordid snakes — Marx and Engels — went on to author “The
Communist Manif esto”, “Das Kapital”, and other works, which crystallized this wretched brain-trust of
sanguinary scoundrels and their grandiose dreams of a one-world global communist dictatorship.
In 1920, Winston Churchill — who later sold out to the Jews and became their tool — ominously warned the
world of the menacing movement that was Jewish Bolshevism. Writing in the Illustrated Sunday Herald,
February 8, 1920, page 5, Churchill opined:
“This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus — Weishaupt to those
of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany),
and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization
and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious
malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer,
Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French
Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth
Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the
great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads
and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire…
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and an the actual
bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical
Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception
of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and
driving power comes from the Jewish leaders.”
Many misinf ormed patriots have been led to believe Churchill’s “Zionism versus Bolshevism:A Struggle f or
the Soul of the Jewish People” article (quoted above) was somehow a courageous anti-Zionist statement
— it was not. In f act, in the concluding paragraph of the article Churchill gave a ringing endorsement of
Zionism, encouraging Jews to f ollow the course of Zionism rather than Bolshevism:
“Zionism has already become a factor in the political convulsions of Russia, as a powerful
competing influence in Bolshevik circles with the international communistic system. Nothing
could be more significant than the fury with which Trotsky has attacked the Zionists generally,
and Dr. Weissmann in particular. The cruel penetration of his mind leaves him in no doubt that
his schemes of a world-wide communistic State under Jewish domination are directly thwarted
and hindered by this new ideal, which directs the energies and the hopes of Jews in every land
towards a simpler, a truer, and a far more attainable goal. The struggle which is now beginning
between the Zionist and Bolshevik Jews is little less than a struggle for the soul of the Jewish
Churchill was, by his own admission, a radical Zionist who — as Prime Minister of Britain during WWII —
hypocritically went on to collaborate with Bolshevism, establishing a cozy relationship with Josef Stalin’s
genocidal Soviet Bolshevik Regime. Churchill’s abhorrence of Bolshevism disappeared as rapidly as his
reservations about International Jewry as soon as it suited his personal ambitions. Even his “Zionism
versus Bolshevism” article was disingenuous in the sense that he of f ered the world a Hobson’s choice of
“Zionism or Bolshevism”, a f alse dilemma in that both options produced the exact same result: a World
Government under Jewish domination as f oretold in the Hebrew Old Testament. Churchill knowingly f ailed
to inf orm his readers that ideologies to Jews are like the many arms of Vishnu. They all emanate from the
same place with the same goal: the desire f or a New World Order under Jewish rule!Apparent conf licts
among Jews are more about tactics than disputes about ultimate goals. Zionism and Communism are but
two tentacles of the same Talmudic monster — cut and f ashioned out of the same Jewish cloth!
History’s most f amous critic of Jewry, Adolf Hitler, eloquently explained this Jewish trick in his book, Mein
“The Jew’s domination in the state seems so assured that now not only can he call himself a
Jew again, but he ruthlessly admits his ultimate national and political designs. A section of his
race openly owns itself to be a foreign people, yet even here they lie. For while the Zionists
try to make the rest of the world believe that the national consciousness of the Jew
finds its satisfaction in the creation of a Palestinian state, the Jews again slyly dupe the
dumb Goyim. It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for
the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization for their international
world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the
intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for
budding crooks.” (A. Hitler, English translation by Ralph Manheim, Mein Kampf, Houghton
Mifflin, Boston, New York, (1971), pp. 324-325.)
The mischievous and cruel doctrines of Marx and Hess were zealously adopted by the world’s Jews who
saw in it an opportunity to crush the Gentiles once and f or all.A Jew named Baruch Levy, in a letter to Karl
Marx, stated that Communism was — af ter all — merely a way to transf er all the wealth of the world into
Jewish hands and so f ulf ill the messianic vision of the treacherous Talmud:
“The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by
the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and
by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege
of citizenship. In this new world order the Children of Israel will furnish all the leaders
without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the
world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible
for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, and everywhere to make use of the resources
of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when
the Messianic time is come the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their
hands.” (Baruch Levy, Letter to Karl Marx, La Revue de Paris, p. 54, June 1, 1928)
Jewish author Bernard Lazare tells us that Karl Marx was indeed a Talmudist:
“He had that clear Talmudic mind which does not falter at the petty difficulties of fact. He was a
Talmudist devoted to sociology and applying his native power of exegesis to the criticism of
economic theory. He was inspired by that ancient Hebraic materialism, which, rejecting as too
distant and doubtful the hope of an Eden after death, never ceased to dream of Paradise
realized on earth. But Marx was not merely a logician, he was also a rebel, an agitator, an acrid
controversialist, and he derived his gift for sarcasm and invective, as Heine did, from his Jewish
ancestry.” (Lazare, Bernard. “Antisemitism, Its History and Causes”, p. 129)
In its article on “Messianic Movements”, the Encyclopaedia Judaica writes: “In his letters to Leopold Zunz
referred many times to the European revolution of 1848 as ‘the Messiah.’ Even many Jews who left
the faith tended to invest secular liberation movements with a messianic glow.”
The Jewish supremacist rabbi, Harry Waton, conf essed that not only is Communism Jewish, but that it is
simply a mechanism f or Jewish world dominion and the subjugation of all non-Jews — a f ulf illment of the
megalomaniacal messianic vision of the Torah and the Talmud. In his 1939 book, “A Program f or The Jews
and An Answer To All Anti-Semites:A Program f or Humanity”, the racist rabbi wrote:
“It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism, and it is not an accident that the
Jews readily took up Marxism; all this was in perfect accord with the progress of Judaism and
the Jews. The Jews should realize that Jehovah no longer dwells in heaven, but he dwells
in us right here on earth; we must no longer look up to Jehovah as above us and outside
of us, but we must see him right within us,” (p. 148)
“Since the Jews are the highest and most cultured people on earth, the Jews have a right to
subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters over the whole
earth. Now, indeed, this is the historic destiny of the Jews,” (p. 99)
“Judaism is communism, internationalism, the universal brotherhood of man, the
emancipation of the working class and the human society. It is with these spiritual weapons that
the Jews will conquer the world and the human race.” (p. 100)
Peculiar isn’t it that the supposed arch anti-capitalist, Karl Marx, never spoke a negative word about the
Jewish banking dynasty, the Rothschilds, the richest of the world’s capitalist f inanciers, war prof iteers and
exploiters of the working class. This isn’t so puzzling when you understand that Marx was working f or the
Rothschilds all along. (See: Red Symphony) Mikael Bakunin, the prominent anarcho-syndicalist thinker and
rival of Karl Marx, assailed Jewish control of the World Revolution, blasting Marx and his phony liberation
ideology (Marxism) as a Rothschild-backed con f or the Jewish f inancial oligarchy to undermine, loot and
pillage the wealth of Gentile nations. Bakunin said,
“Himself a Jew, Marx has around him, in London and France, but especially in Germany,
a multitude of more or less clever, intriguing, mobile, speculating Jews, such as Jews are
every where: commercial or banking agents, writers, politicians, correspondents for newspapers
of all shades, with one foot in the bank, the other in the socialist movement, and with their
behinds sitting on the German daily press — they have taken possession of all the newspapers
— and you can imagine what kind of sickening literature they produce. Now, this entire Jewish
world, which forms a single profiteering sect, a people of bloodsuckers, a single
gluttonous parasite, closely and intimately united not only across national borders but
across all differences of political opinion — this Jewish world today stands for the most
part at the disposal of Marx and at the same time at the disposal of Rothschild. I am
certain that Rothschild for his part greatly values the merits of Marx, and that Marx for
his part feels instinctive attraction and great respect for Rothschild. This may seem
strange. What can there be in common between Communism and the large banks? Oh! The
Communism of Marx seeks enormous centralization in the state, and where such exists,
there must inevitably be a central state bank, and where such a bank exists, the
parasitic Jewish nation, which, speculates on the work of the people, will always find a
way to prevail ….” (Michael Bakunin, Polémique contres les Juifs, 1869)
Benjamin Disraeli, the Jewish Prime Minister of England from 1874-1880, repeatedly warned about the
machinations of his trouble-making kinsmen. In his novel, Conigsby, Disraeli made one of his characters
“I had on my arrival (at St. Petersburg) an interview with the Russian Minister of Finance, Count
Canerin; I beheld the son of a Lithuanian Jew…. I had an audience on my arrival at Madrid with
the Spanish minister; I beheld one like myself, the son of a Nuovo Christiano, a Jew of Aragon.
In consequence of that transpired at Madrid I went straight to consult the President of the
French Council; I beheld the son of a French Jew…. We fixed on Prussia…. Count Arnim
entered the cabinet, and I beheld a Prussian Jew. So you see, my dear Coningsby, that the
world is governed by very different personages to what is imagined by those who are
not behind the scenes.“
Then, f our years af ter the Jewish-engineered outbreaks of 1848, Disraeli returned to the subject in his
book Lord George Bentinck, stating,
“The influence of the Jews may be traced in the last outbreak of the destructive principle
in Europe. An insurrection takes place against tradition and aristocracy, against religion and
property… The natural equality of men and the abrogation of property are proclaimed by the
secret societies who form provisional governments and men of Jewish race are found at
the head of every one of them.“
Chaim Weizmann, the 20th century’s preeminent Zionist inf luence-peddler, architect of the ‘Balf our
Declaration’, and f irst president of Israel, is quoted as saying: “A beneficent protection which God has
instituted in the life of the Jew is that He has dispersed him all over the world.” (JEWISH
GUARDIAN, Oct. 8, 1920.) Now compare this with the last clause of Protocol No. 11, of The Protocols of
Zion: “God has granted to us, His Chosen People, the gift of dispersion, and from this, which
appears to all eyes to be our weakness, has come forth all our strength, which has now brought us
to the threshold of sovereignty over all the world.” The remarkable similarity between Weizmann’s
pronouncement and the passage from the Protocols proves that the Jewish Learned Elders exist,
Weizmann chief among them.
This Hidden Hand of Jews was subtly identif ied by Walter Rathenau (1867-1922), a German-Jewish
industrialist, writer, and statesman who served as Germany’s Foreign Minister during the Weimar Republic.
Writing in the Wiener Freie Presse, December 24, 1912, he said: “Three hundred men, each of whom
knows all the others, govern the fate of the European continent, and they elect their successors from
their entourage.” This reality was conf irmed by Jean Izoulet, a Jewish prof essor at the College of France
and a member of the Jewish-Masonic secret society Alliance Israelite Universelle. Writing in his 1926 book
“Paris Capital of Religions”, Izoulet said: “I certainly do not want to relinquish their Magisterium
temporal the three hundred bankers who, at the moment, dominate the world.”
At the Zionist congress held in Basel in 1898, Dr. Mandelstam, a prof essor at the University of Kiev,
proclaimed: “The Jews energetically reject the idea of fusion with the other nationalities and cling
firmly to their historical hope of world empire.” (Chamberlain, Houston Stewart. “Foundations of the
Nineteenth Century“, p. 335) The Talmudic Jew David Wolf f sohn was Theordore Herzl’s successor as
leader of World Zionism and chairman of the World Zionist Organization (WZO). He presided over the
Zionist Congress at the Hague in 1907 and gave the opening and closing speeches. The New York Times
tells us that in his closing address Wolf f sohn pleaded f or more unity among the Jews and said that Jewry
eventually must conquer the world! (“ZIONIST LEADER DIES. – David Wolf sohn Was Once Chairman of
International Committee.” The New York Times. 17 Sept. 1914.)
In 1922 at a Zionist conf erence in Carlsbad, Calif ornia, Zionist leader Nahum Sokolow boastf ully gloated
that the League of Nations (predecessor of the United Nations) was a Jewish construct and tool, and that
Jerusalem will one day be capital of the world upon the realization of their dark plans:
“The League of Nations is a Jewish idea, and Jerusalem some day will become the
capital of the world’s peace. We Jews throughout the world will make the League’s
struggle our own and will not rest until there is ultimate victory.” (“SAYS JEWS OF
WORLD WILL BACK LEAGUE – Dr. Sokolow Tells Zionist Congress Jerusalem Will Be
International Peace Capital.” The New York Times. 28 Aug. 1922.)
Theodore Newman Kauf man was an American Jew who published a book in 1941 calling f or the
extermination of the entire German race and nation in a “f inal solution” of sterilization. (See: Kauf man,
Theodore N. Germany Must Perish! Newark, NJ:Argyle Press, 1941) In the same year of his book’s
publication, this devilish Jew gave an interview to The Canadian Jewish Chronicle in which he f ervently
articulated his desire not only f or the annihilation of all German Gentiles, but also f or Jewish World
Government, stating:
“I believe that the Jews have a mission in life. They must see to it that the nations of the
world get together in one vast confederation. ‘Union Now’ is the beginning of this.
Slowly but surely the world will develop into paradise. We will have perpetual peace. And
the Jews will do the most to bring about this confederation, because they have the most
to gain.”
Kauf man’s call f or “Union Now” was strangely similar to a proclamation made by Adolph Crémieux, a
prominent French-Jewish lawyer and statesman who f ounded the Jewish Masonic order “Alliance Israelite
Universelle” in Paris in 1860.At an Alliance meeting Crémieux declared in true ‘Protocols’ style: “The
Alliance is not limited to our cult; it voices its appeal to all cults and wants to penetrate in all
religions, as it has penetrated into all countries. Let us endeavor boldly to bring about the union
of all cults under one flag of “Union and Progress”: such is the motto of humanity.” Crémieux and
his secretive Jewish order were named as the prime conspirators in the f ormulation of The Protocols of
Zion, in an enlightening essay entitled, “The Protocols of the Ruf f le Crested Kikes of Zion”.
In 1940, Arthur Greenwood — the Deputy Leader of the British Labour Party and member of the British War
Cabinet — made a vocal pledge to American Jewry that upon the def eat of the Axis Powers in WWII he
would do his utmost to help realize the f ormation of a “New World Order” in the world, led and dominated
by the Jews. The groveling Zionist stooge proclaimed,
“When we have achieved victory, as we assuredly shall, the nations will have the
opportunity of establishing a new world order … In such a world it is our confident hope
that the conscience of civilized humanity would demand that the wrongs suffered by the
Jewish people in so many countries should be righted.”
He added,
“In the rebuilding of civilized society after the war, there should and will be a real
opportunity for Jews everywhere to make a distinctive and constructive contribution.”
(See this facsimile of the New York Times article)
In 1946, the US government put to Stalin a proposal f or World Government, penned by two Globalist Jews
— Bernard Baruch and David Lilienthal. Baruch was a wealthy Jewish Wall Street tycoon, and inf luential
adviser to f ive American presidents. In World War I he was Woodrow Wilson’s chief adviser on national
def ense and was appointed chairman of the War Industries Board (1918-1919), thus bringing the American
war machine under the heel of Jewish f inanciers. Baruch, and a contingent of his kinsmen, helped frame the
economic provisions of the Versailles Treaty of 1919 which carved Germany into pieces af ter WWI. In his
address to the United Nations Atomic Energy Commission on the 14th of June, 1946, Baruch made the
f ollowing “Protocolist”, One-Worldist pronouncement:
“Behind the black portent of the new atomic age lies a hope which, seized upon with
faith, can work out salvation … Let us not deceive ourselves: we must elect world peace
or world destruction. … Peace is never long preserved by weight of metal or by an
armament race. Peace can be made tranquil and secure only by understanding and
agreement fortified by sanctions. We must embrace international cooperation or
international disintegration.”
Baruch also predicted the “Cold War” between the US and the USSR. In 1948, during a speech bef ore the
Senate’s Special Committee Investigating the National Def ense Program, he said,
“Although the shooting war is over, we are in the midst of a cold war which is getting
Fellow Zionist kingpin, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, peculiarly predicted the ascendancy of Woodrow Wilson to
the presidency, and in his autobiography, “Challenging Years,” (p. 161) boasted “that an immensely
influential hidden power” — with which he was intimately acquainted — “had chosen Wilson as a major
pawn in their political game” even bef ore the president of Princeton University had entered into politics.
Wise would go on to become one of Wilson’s chief advisers who was instrumental in persuading Wilson to
support the ‘Balf our Declaration’. Wilson, of course, was the “poodle on a string” of the conniving
Protocolist Jews, having signed into law two of the most important planks of their Communist Manif esto —
Plank #2, “A heavy progressive or graduated income tax,” and Plank #5, the creation of a central bank, “with
exclusive monopoly.”
Perhaps in a f it of rebelliousness against his masters, Woodrow Wilson made this ominous remark about
the secret f orces controlling the United States government from behind the scenes,
“…we have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled
and dominated, governments in the civilized world — no longer a government by free
opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a
government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men.” (Woodrow,
Wilson. New Freedom: a Call for the Emancipation of the Generous Energies of a People. [S.l.]:
Indypublish Com, 2007, p. 201)
Further clarif ication and conf irmation of this ongoing Jewish World Government project was provided by
Israel’s f irst prime minister — the Jewish supremacist, Talmudist, Zionist terrorist and Bolshevist
internationalist — David Ben-Gurion. In 1962, Ben-Gurion predicted the end of the Cold War in the late
1980s, and went on to express a burning desire f or world governance, led by the Jewish nation:
“The image of the world in 1987 as traced in my imagination: the Cold War will be a thing of the
past. Internal pressure of the constantly growing intelligensia in Russia for more freedom and
the pressure of the masses for raising their living standards may lead to a gradual
democratization of the Soviet Union. On the other hand, the increasing influence of the workers
and farmers, and rising political importance of men of science, may transform the United States
into a welfare state with a planned economy. Western and Eastern Europe will become a
federation of autonomous states having a Socialist and democratic regime. With the exception
of the USSR as a federated Eurasian state, all other continents will become united in a world
alliance, at whose disposal will be an international police force. All armies will be abolished, and
there will be no more wars. In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will
build a shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be
the scene of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the
federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah.” (Gurion, David Ben & Duchovny, Amram.
David Ben-Gurion, In His Own Words. Fleet Press Corp., 1969, p. 116; also quoted in Look
Magazine, January 16, 1962, p. 20)
Ben-Gurion reiterated his ostentatious dreams of a Jewish Utopia when he said: “Jerusalem is not the
capital of Israel and world Jewry, it aspires to become the spiritual center of the world.” The Israeli
prime minister was a chauvinistic Jewish supremacist who stated his rotten aims openly. He spilled the
blood of tens of thousands of Palestinians and was responsible f or the uprooting and beheading of their
nation. He, along with his clique of f erocious Zionist bandits, gangsters and thugs, masterminded “the
Nakba” which has been described as “the mass deportation of a million Palestinians from their cities
and villages, massacres of civilians, and the razing to the ground of hundreds of Palestinian
Flaunting his Jewish pride and arrogantly mocking his victims by f alsely claiming to be a victim, Ben-Gurion
sanctimoniously said:
“We would not have taken on this war merely for the purpose of enjoying this tiny state.
There have been only two great people: the Greeks and the Jews. Perhaps the Greeks
were even greater than the Jews, but now I can see no sign of that old greatness in the
modern Greeks. Maybe when the present process is finished we too will degenerate, but I see
no sign of degeneration at present. [...] Suffering makes a people greater, and we have
suffered much. We had a message to give the world, but we were overwhelmed, and the
message was cut off in the middle. In time there will be millions of us — becoming stronger and
stronger — and we will complete the message. [...] Our policy must be the unity of the human
race. The world is divided into two blocs. We consider that the United Nations’ ideal is a
Jewish ideal.“
Ben-Gurion believed Jews to be living gods on earth, superior to Gentiles in every way, stating:
“My concept of the messianic ideal and vision is not a metaphysical one but a socio-culturalmoral one … I believe in our moral and intellectual superiority, in our capacity to serve as
a model for the redemption of the human race. This belief of mine is based on my
knowledge of the Jewish people, not some mystical faith; the glory of the divine
presence is within us, in our hearts, and not outside of us.” (Hertzberg, Arthur. The Zionist
State. Jewish Publication Society, 1997, p. 94)
Ben-Gurion’s “prophesy” of an earthly Jewish kingdom ruled from Jerusalem was similarly expressed by the
Temple Mount Faithf ul organization newsletter (2000), which says:
“The real “United Nations Organization” will be the Kingdom of G-d which will soon be
established in Jerusalem, based on the holy laws of G-d. The Temple will again be the
heart, soul and focus of Israel and the nations. Mashiach ben David will come and will be
the king of Israel and the world. He will come to Jerusalem and rule from there and
establish the Kingdom of G-d over all the world. Jerusalem instead of New York will be the
center of the this godly “United Nations Organization” and a new era of justice, spiritual holiness,
a real law based on the word of G-d in the Torah and a real peace will open and will be
established in Jerusalem exactly as Isaiah prophesied: “The word that Isaiah the son of
Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem. And it shall come to pass in the last days,
that the mountain of the Lord’s house shall be established on the top of the mountains,
and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow to it. And many people
shall go and say, Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of
the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths; for
from Zion shall go forth Torah, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. And he shall
judge among the nations, and shall decide for many people; and they shall beat their
swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up
sword against nation, nor shall they learn war any more. O house of Jacob, come, and
let us walk in the light of the Lord.” (Isaiah 2:1-5)”
As demonstrated by the Jewish supremacist group “Temple Mount Faithf ul,” the ancient Jewish plan f or
world ownership is prophesied in the Jewish Old Testament book of Isaiah. This book, among others,
exemplif ies the Jewish supremacist mentality. For example, in Isaiah 60:16, it says: “Thou shalt also suck
the milk of the Gentiles, and shalt suck the breast of kings: and thou shalt know that I the LORD am
thy Saviour and thy Redeemer, the mighty One of Jacob.” Isaiah 61:5 reiterates this concept of Gentile
servitude to the Jews, stating: “And strangers [non-Jews] shall stand and feed your flocks, and the
sons of the alien [non-Jews] shall be your plowmen and your vinedressers.” Isaiah 60:5 and Isaiah 61:6
prophesied that the Jews will come to possess all the wealth of the world: “the wealth of the nations [the
Goyim] shall come unto thee [the Jews]. … You will feed on the wealth of nations, and in their riches
you will boast.”
When Ben-Gurion ref erred to “everybody” in his Protocolist Prophecy he was most likely only ref erring to
Jews, since the Zohar states: “’living soul’ refers to Israel, who have holy living souls from above, and
“cattle and creeping thing and beast of the earth” to the other peoples who are not ‘living soul’.”
This view is corroborated by the crazed ravings of many prominent Jewish rabbis, including many of
Judaism’s most revered sages. Take f or instance, Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi (1745-1812), the f ounder
of the extremist Jewish sect “Chabad” who cursed Gentiles, claiming we possess evil souls: “Gentile souls
are of a completely different and inferior order. They are totally evil, with no redeeming qualities
whatsoever… All Jews are innately good, all Gentiles are innately evil.” (quoted in Foxbrunner, A.
Roman. Habad: the Hasidism of R. Shneur Zalman of Lyady. University of Alabama Press, 1992, p. 108)
Rabbi Kook the Elder, the revered f ather of the messianic tendency of Jewish f undamentalism, said, “The
difference between a Jewish soul and souls of non-Jews—all of them in all different levels—is
greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle.” (quoted in
Shahak, Israel & Mezvinsky, Norman. Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel. London: Pluto Press, 1999, p. 176)
The late, highly revered Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the “Lubavitcher Rebbe” who headed the
Chabad movement and wielded great inf luence in Israel as well as in the U.S., explained that, “The
difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish person stems from the common expression: ‘Let
us differentiate.’ Thus, we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a
superior level. Rather, we have a case of ‘let us differentiate’ between totally different species.
This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different
quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world…A non-Jew’s entire reality is only
vanity. It is written, ‘And the strangers shall guard and feed your flocks’ (Isaiah 61:5). The entire
creation [of a non-Jew] exists only for the sake of the Jews…” (Ibid., p. 59)
An immigrant to Israel from the U.S., Rabbi Ginsburgh speaks freely of his belief in the Jews’ genetic-based,
spiritual superiority over non-Jews: “If you saw two people drowning, a Jew and a non-Jew, the Torah
says you save the Jewish life first. … If every simple cell in a Jewish body entails divinity, is a part
of God, then every strand of DNA is part of God. Therefore, something is special about Jewish
DNA…If a Jew needs a liver, can you take the liver of an innocent non-Jew passing by to save him?
The Torah would probably permit that. Jewish life has an infinite value.” (Ibid., p. 62)
Rabbi Ovadia Yosef , the head of Shas’s Council of Torah Sages, declared that Gentiles exist solely to
serve the Jews as slaves.According to the rabbi: “Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that,
they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel.” (Mandel, Jonah. “Yosef :
Gentiles Exist Only To Serve Jews.” The Jerusalem Post. 10/18/2010) And these are just the statements
Jews have made aloud. Just imagine how they talk when they know Gentiles aren’t listening.
Another cardinal proof of the Zionist World Conspiracy was the incredible f oresight displayed by Zionist
leader Simon Maximilian Südfeld (alias Max Nordau), Theodore Herzl’s close conf idant who convinced
him to organize the f irst Zionist conf erence in Basel, Switzerland in 1897.At the sixth Zionist Congress in
1903 — eleven years bef ore World War I commenced and f orty-f ive years bef ore Israel was established —
Nordau spoke of a coming “World War” resulting in the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine, which
England would help to procure f or them:
“Let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading
upward and upward: Herzl, the Zionist Congress, the English Uganda proposition, the future
world war, the peace conference where, with the help of England, a free and Jewish
Palestine will be created.” (quoted in Rosenthal, Litman. “A Prophet Speaks”, American Jewish
News, New York, Vol. 4, No. 2, September 19, 1919. p. 464; also quoted in Stevens, Richard P.
Zionism and Palestine Before the Mandate. Institute for Palestine Studies, 1972, p. 153)
Strange and incredible — is it not? — that a leading Zionist Jew was able to predict the course of events of
the next several decades. It appears Max Nordau was not the only Jew with an uncanny gif t of f oresight.
Leading communist ideologue and co-author of “The Communist Manif esto”, crypto-Jew Friedrich
Engels, made it clear that he and his f ellow communist comrades were comf ortable with human sacrif ices
amounting to the loss of tens of millions of lives, in order to pave the way f or revolution and a global
communist imperium. In 1887, Engels somehow knew a “World War” was on the horizon and would soon
arrive on the shores of Europe, laying waste to Europe’s empires and thus leaving the continent vulnerable
to communist revolution, upheaval and subversion:
“No other war is now possible for Prussia-Germany than a world war, and indeed a world
war of hitherto unimagined sweep and violence. Eight to ten millions soldiers will
mutually kill each other off and in the process devour Europe barer than any swarm of
locusts ever did. The desolation of the Thirty Years War compressed in three or four years
and spread over the entire continent: famine, plague, general savagery, taking possession both
of the armies and of the masses of the people, as a result of universal want; hopeless
demoralization of our complex institutions of trade industry and credit, ending in universal
bankruptcy; collapse of the old states and their traditional statecraft, so that crowns will
roll over the pavements by the dozens and no one to be found to pick them up; absolute
impossibility of foreseeing where this will end, or who will emerge victor from the general
struggle. Only one result is absolutely sure: general exhaustion and the creation of the
conditions for the final victory of the working class.” (quoted in Wolfe, David Bertram.
Marxism, One Hundred Years In The Life of a Doctrine. Dial Press, (1965), p. 67)
Another who predicted the impending doom of a grand European conf lict was Jan Gotlib Bloch, a Polish
crypto-Jew, banker/f inancier, Zionist activist, “campaigner against Russian antisemitism“, and acquaintance
of Theodore Herzl. In 1899, Bloch published a book about military warf are titled, “Is War Now Possible?”,
within which he envisioned a “long war”, a “great war of entrenchments”, which would involve some ten
million men. Bloch asserted that economic f actors would be “the dominant and decisive element in the
matter” and that the f uture of war was not f ighting but f amine, resulting in the bankruptcy of nations and
the break-up of social organization of societies. (Ferguson, Niall. “The Pity of War”, p. 9)
It is clear that International Jews f oresaw the First World War. Did they do nothing but f oresee it? The f acts
do not stop at f oresight, but run on to provocation. Perhaps prominent Zionist Jews and Communist Jews
were cognizant of the eventual outbreak of a World War because they strove to bring it to fruition utilizing
their unmatched money, media and political clout?
The Protocols of Zion gives us insight into this question,
“We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbors of that
country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbors should also venture to stand
collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war.” (The
Protocols of Zion, 7:3)
Zionist Jew kingpin, Chaim Weizmann, admitted as much in a letter to Winston Churchill. Historian David
Irving documented Weizmann’s venture to persuade Churchill to help the Zionists create a Jewish Fighting
Force — an army of Jewish terrorists to be used as a battering ram to f orcef ully overtake Palestine and
wantonly genocide the Arabs living there — in exchange f or the Jews’ dragging America into WWII on
England’s side. The arrogant and conceited Jew, Weizmann, couldn’t help but boast about how his f ellow
Jews “did it in the last war and are keen to do it again”:
“On September 10, 1941 Weizmann therefore wrote an outspoken letter to the prime minister in
which he recalled how the Jews of the United States had pulled their country into war before; he
promised that they could do it again – provided that Britain toed the line over Palestine. Two
years had passed since the Jewish Agency had offered the support of the Jews throughout the
world – the Jewish ‘declaration of war’ on Germany; a whole year had passed, he added, since
the P.M. had personally approved his offer to recruit Jews in Palestine for service in the Middle
East or elsewhere. For two years the Agency had met only humiliation. Ten thousand
Palestinian Jews had fought in Libya, Abyssinia, Greece, Crete, and Syria, he claimed, but this
was never mentioned.
‘Tortured by Hitler as no nation has ever been in modern times,’ Weizmann continued, ‘and
advertised by him as his foremost enemy, we are refused by those who fight him the chance of
seeing our name and our flag appear among those arrayed against him.’Artfully associating
anti-Zionists with the other enemies populating Churchill’s mind, Weizmann assured him that he
knew this was not of his doing – it was the work of those responsible for Munich and the 1939
White Paper on Palestine. ‘We were sacrificed, in order to win over the Mufti of Jerusalem and
his friends who were serving Hitler in the Middle East.’
“Then Weizmann came to his real sales-pitch: ‘There is only one big ethnic group [in the USA]
which is willing to stand, to a man, for Great Britain, and a policy of “all-out aid” for her: the five
million Jews. From Secretary Morgenthau, Governor [of New York State] Lehmann, Justice
[Felix] Frankfurter, down to the simplest Jewish workman or trader, they are conscious of all that
this struggle against Hitler implies.’ British statesmen, he reminded Churchill, had often
acknowledged that it was these Jews who had brought the United States into the war in 1917.
‘They are keen to do it – and may do it – again.’All that he and the Jews of the United States
were asking for, therefore, was the formation now of a Jewish Fighting Force.” (Irving, David.
Churchill’s War: Triumph in Adversity Vol. 2. Focal Point Publications, 2001, Pp. 76-77; also see
this facsimile of Weizmann’s letter to Churchill)
The “godf ather of Zionism”, Theodore Herzl, was not shy about admitting that the Jews do indeed
possess the necessary power to bring about world wars and revolutions, stating: “The wealthy Jews
control the world…In their hands lies the fate of government and nations. They (the Jews) set
governments one against the other and by their decree governments make peace. When the
wealthy Jews play, the nations and the rulers dance.”
In his book “Jewish State”, Herzl spoke of the Jews’ “terrible power of the purse”:
“Every point which arises in the relations between nations is a question of might. I do not here
surrender any portion of our prescriptive right when I make this statement. In the world as it now
is and will probably remain, might precedes right. For us to be loyal patriots as were the
Huguenots who were forced to emigrate is therefore useless. … The Jews must acquire
economic power sufficiently great to overcome prejudice against them. When we sink,
we become a revolutionary proletariat, but when we rise, there rises also our terrible
power of the purse.”
The desolate reality of Jewish warmongering was elucidated in the August 1877 issue of Frank Leslie’s
“Popular Monthly”, later known as “The American Magazine”, which reported:
“To-day, the great Jewish bankers, such as the Rothschilds, may almost be said to hold
in their hands the peace of Europe. They are creditors of most of the Governments of the
world and there are few nations willing to risk the dangers and losses of war unless they have
assurance from these potent capitalists of such monetary aid as may be necessary for carrying
on a campaign. In the present European war, one of the combatants, having nothing to lose, is
reckless of the consequence to her already bankrupt treasury, and the other, while yet the
conflict has scarcely begun, has been compelled to seek the aid of Jewish bankers to secure
means for its prosecution.”
In 1881 the prestigious banking journal, Rhodes’ Journal, inf ormed us that Jewish international bankers held
the keys to peace and war in Europe (of ten instigating the latter f or monetary gain, evidently):
“It must be admitted that the Jewish people control the financial markets of Europe,
possessing a much greater influence than in this country. The Emperor of Russia found that he
could not place a loan in the Continental markets, because Rothschild did not view such a loan
as favorable to the interests of England. A few Jewish bankers are therefore really the
arbitrators of peace and war in Europe.”
The internet blogger known as the Black Rabbit of Inlé compiled numerous quotes on the immense
inf luence of the Rothschild f amily on his page “King of The Jews,” some of which I will reproduce below:
The Rothschilds’ of f icial biographer, Niall Ferguson, explained the “quasi-royal status” of this Jewish
banking dynasty and how their wealth is believed by some Jews to be “for a higher purpose… to avenge
the wrongs of Israel”:
“To poorer Jews throughout Europe, Nathan Rothschild’s extraordinary rise to riches had an
almost mystical significance—hence the legend of the “Hebrew talisman,” the magical source of
his good luck, which became associated with him in Jewish lore. This extraordinary story—a
version of which was published by an anonymous author in London just four years after Nathan
Rothschild’s death (1836)—imagined that the source of Nathan’s financial success was his
possession of a magical talisman. His wealth was in fact intended for a higher purpose: “to
avenge the wrongs of Israel” by securing “the re-establishment of Judah’s kingdom—then
rebuilding of thy towers, Oh! Jerusalem!” and “the restoration of Judea to out ancient race.”
(Ferguson, Niall. The House of Rothschild: Volume 1: Money’s Prophets: 1798-1848, Viking,
(1999), pp. 21/22)
Ferguson added that,
“… because of their wealth, other Jews looked to them for leadership in their pursuit of
equal civil and political rights. As we shall see, this leadership was forthcoming from a
remarkably early stage… acquiring quasi-royal status in the eyes of other Jews.” (Ibid., p.
The Niles’ National Register published in 1828 states:
“… the house of Rothschild certainly stands preeminent at the recent death of one, who
was thought the richest banker in Europe.”
The Niles’ National Register published on Sept 19, 1835, says:
“The ROTHSCHILDS are the wonders of modern banking … we see the descendants of
Judah, after a persecution of two thousand years, peering above kings, rising higher
than emperors, and holding a whole continent in the hollow of their hands. The
Rothschild govern a Christian world. Not a cabinet moves without their advice. They
stretch their hand, with equal ease, from Petersburgh to Vienna, from Vienna to Paris,
from Paris to London, from London to Washington. Baron Rothschild, the head of the
house, is the true king of Judah, the prince of the captivity, the Messiah so long looked
for by this extraordinary people. He holds the keys of peace or war, blessing or cursing.”
The Bankers Magazine printed in 1847 states:
“The five brothers (Anselm, Solomon, Nathan, Charles & James) have taken part in most of the
great financial affairs of Austria, of France, of England, and of almost every country. They have
formed among themselves an invincible phalanx. By themselves, or by their agents, they
have exercised a great control over the principal places in Europe, and, faithful to their
habit, never to undertake anything separately and to concert all their operations, they
have followed one unvaried and identical system. Their power was such, that at one
time they were free to make either peace or war.“
The Ladies’ Repository published in 1863 states :
“Baron Lionel Rothschild, the first Jew ever admitted into the English Parliament, and
the wealthiest man, it is believed, now residing on our planet.”
The Cyclopaedia of Commercial & Business Anecdotes printed in 1865, writes:
“The Rothschilds, Wealthiest Bankers in the World. The house of Rothschild is the
impersonation of that money power which governs the world.”
The Review of Reviews printed in 1890 opined:
“The change in the position of the Jew within the last half of the century is one of the
most remarkable character. Fifty years ago the Jew was inert and imbecile. Now he
exercises a power greater than in the days of David or Solomon. The Jews to-day
influence more people, control more bullion, and exercise more legislative power than
they did when they had their temple their land, and their sceptre.”
Printed in 1905, Jewish Literature & Other Essays says:
“The palaces of the Rothschilds, the richest family in the world, harbor many a warm
heart, whose pulsations are quickened by the thought of Israel’s history and poetic
heritage. Wealth has not abated a jot of their enthusiasm and loyal love for the faith.”
Printed between 1901 and 1906 The Jewish Encyclopedia asserted:
“It is a somewhat curious sequel to the attempt to set up a Catholic competitor to the
Rothschilds that at the present time the latter are the guardians of the papal treasure.”
British economist J.A. Hobson’s seminal book, “Imperialism”, published in 1902, states:
“Does anyone seriously suppose that a great war could be undertaken by any European
State, or a great State loan subscribed, if the house of Rothschild and its connections
set their face against it?”
The Missionary Review of the World, Volume 29, printed in 1906 disclosed:
“The Possession of Wealth: One Jewish banking house is estimated to control
$30,000,000,000. The Rothschilds in ten years loaned $482,000,000. Nearly one-half of
the gold coined, of the entire world, is said to be in Jewish hands.”
In 1909, seven years bef ore becoming British Prime Minister, David Lloyd George stated in a speech:
“I should really like to know, is Lord Rothschild the dictator of this country? Are we
really to have all the ways of reform, financial and social, blocked simply by a
noticeboard, ‘No thoroughfare. By order of Nathaniel Rothschild’?”
Another of the f amily biographers, Derek Wilson, conceded that critics of the Rothschilds have legitimate
reasons f or anxiety, af f irming:
“The House of Rothschild is immensely more powerful than any financial empire that
has ever preceded it, and it is able to control governments behind the scenes, secretly.”
Dutch economist Ad Broere, in his 2010 book “Ending The Global Casino,” inf orms us that,
“The 19th century became known as the age of the Rothschilds when it was estimated
they controlled half of the world’s wealth. While their wealth continues to increase
today, they have managed to blend into the background, giving an impression that their
power has waned. They only apply the Rothschild name to a small fraction of the
companies they actually control.”
Jewish leader, Louis Marshall, subtly conf essed that the schemes of Zionism were a long-term plan f or
Jewish power-grabbing, stating: “Zionism is but an incident of a far-reaching plan: it is merely a
convenient peg on which to hang a powerful weapon.” This Jewish World Plot is not a new
phenomena by any means, and most likely originated with the advent of Judaism itself over 3000 years ago.
A shocking clue to its existence was lef t behind in 1492 by the Grand Sanhedrin which resided in
“In 1492, Chemor, chief Rabbi of Spain, wrote to the Grand Sanhedrin, which had its seat in
Constantinople, for advice, when a Spanish law threatened expulsion. This was the reply:
Beloved brethren in Moses, we have received your letter in which you tell us of the anxieties and
misfortunes which you are enduring. We are pierced by as great pain to hear it as yourselves.
The advice of the Grand Satraps and Rabbis is the following:
1. As for what you say that the King of Spain 3 obliges you to become Christians: do it, since you
cannot do otherwise.
2. As for what you say about the command to despoil you of your property: make your sons
merchants that they may despoil, little by little, the Christians of theirs.
3. As for what you say about making attempts on your lives: make your sons doctors and
apothecaries, that they may take away Christians’ lives.
4. As for what you say of their destroying your synagogues: make your sons canons and clerics
in order that they may destroy their churches.
5. As for the many other vexations you complain of: arrange that your sons become advocates
and lawyers, and see that they always mix in affairs of State, that by putting Christians under
your yoke you may dominate the world and be avenged on them.
6. Do not swerve from this order that we give you, because you will find by experience that,
humiliated as you are, you will reach the actuality of power.
(Signed) PRINCE OF THE JEWS OF CONSTANTINOPLE.” (L. Fry, Waters Flowing Eastward:
The War Against the Kingship of Christ. TBR Books, Washington, D. C., (2000), pp. 51-52; also
see these facsimiles of this letter, one & two)
The Jews hide behind a bogus veneer of victimhood in order to deceive naive Gentiles about their sinister
agenda and carnivorous quest f or World Governance. This guilt and sympathy peddling charade is
laughably transparent. Zionist kingpin, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise (1874-1949) — the co-f ounder of the World
Jewish Congress and other subversive groups — frantically howled that the whole of Christendom owes
the Jews a homeland in Palestine f or perceived wrongs done to the Jews. Wise annoyingly squawked: “The
rebuilding of Zion will be the reparation of all Christendom for all the wrongs done to the Jews.” In
1900 Rabbi Wise let slip the premeditated hoax of holocaustianity when he spoke of “6,000,000 living,
bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism.” That was one of dozens upon dozens of
ref erences and invocations of the cabalistic f able of “6,000,000 persecuted, dead or dying Jews” from
1900 through 1945, leading up to the creation of the state of Israel on the back of this deceptive, yet
obvious hoax, in 1948. (See: Heddesheimer, Don. The First Holocaust: Jewish Fund Raising Campaigns with
Holocaust Claims during and after World War One. Chicago, IL: Theses & Dissertations, 2003; see also: The
“Six Million” Myth)
United States Federal Judge, Julian Mack (1866-1943), chaired a plethora of Zionist organizations and
worked vocif erously to establish a Zionist state on stolen Palestinian land. In true Jewish supremacist
f ashion, this rabid nutcase demanded money from Christians to f und the heinous Zionist colonial project in
Palestine, saying that this must be done “in appreciation of the debt which all the world owes to the
Jews.” Believing the world owes them, these pompous, supremacist Jews don’t just demand Palestine —
they want the entire planet handed over to them on a silver platter along with all of its valuables and
These damning f acts, quotes and pronouncements — taken together — are extremely signif icant bits of
evidence bearing on the existence of the Jewish World Plot and the authenticity of the Protocols of Zion.
Many of these astonishing statements are completely mimetic of what is outlined in the Protocols — a oneworld tyrannical state governed by Jews upon which a Jewish World Tyrant, whom they ref er to as the “King
Despot of the Blood of Zion” (a descendant of the House of David), will be crowned king and rule the
“Ever since that time we have been leading the peoples from one disenchantment to another, so
that in the end they should turn also from us in favor of that KING-DESPOT OF THE BLOOD OF
ZION, WHOM WE ARE PREPARING FOR THE WORLD.” (The Protocols of Zion, 3:15)
“The recognition of our despot … will come when the peoples, utterly wearied by the
irregularities and incompetence – a matter which we shall arrange for – of their rulers, will
clamor: “Away with them and give us one king over all the earth who will unite us and annihilate
the causes of disorders – frontiers, nationalities, religions, State debts – who will give us peace
and quiet which we cannot find under our rulers and representatives.” (The Protocols of Zion ,
“When the King of Israel sets upon his sacred head the crown offered him by Europe he will
become patriarch of the world.” (The Protocols of Zion, 15:23)
Bo lshe vism is Talmud ic Jud aism in d isg uise .
Much of this was af f irmed by a man named Benjamin Freedman, a f ormer Zionist and f ormer Jew who
converted to Christianity and became an outspoken critic of Zionism and international Jewish intrigue.
Freedman was a successf ul New York businessman who had been f or many years on a f irst name basis
with many leading Zionist power-brokers as well as several American presidents. Thus he had intimate f irsthand knowledge of international politics, the role Jews played in it and inf luence they wielded over it. He
wrote a book called “The Hidden Tyranny” and, in 1961, gave a very illuminating speech at The Willard Hotel,
Washington, D.C., primarily exposing the role of Zionist Jewry in bringing America into World War I in return
f or British support f or the Zionist ambition to seize and colonize Palestine at the war’s end.
In light of the f acts and inf ormation illustrated herein, the grim reality of this global Jewish conspiracy thus
cannot logically be denied by any reasonable person. Only those who are partisan, or otherwise
sympathetic, to Jewry will deny the existence of this cold-blooded conspiracy against Gentiles.
Club Death Judaica — Bolshevist Bloodletting
As previously noted, Communism — also known as
Bolshevism — is a Jewish conf idence trick — a swindle to
establish Jewish control over Gentile nations that were not
compliant with the aims of International Finance Jewry. The
so-called “Russian Revolution” of 1917 was not a Russian
phenomenon at all, but rather a well-organized and
executed Jewish coup d’etat. The f irst communist-led
upheaval of 1905 was also the work of plotting Jewish
agitators and radicals. These are well established f acts,
not spurious claims as the lying Jews would have you
The Jewish controlled press, Hollywood movie industry and
intellectual domain of most Western countries, have
endeavored to not only downplay the role of Jews in
Bolshevism, but also to whitewash Bolshevik atrocities.A
conspiracy of silence regarding the monstrous crimes of
Communism continues even today, whilst we are pummeled
from every direction with ridiculous and nonsensical Zionist
propaganda about an impossible “holocaust of six million
Jews”. Snake-like liars masquerading as “journalists”,
“prof essors” and “historians” even strive to glorif y or
romanticize Communism and murderous Marxist
revolutionaries. These sleazy, scum-ridden shills not only
never criticize anything having to do with Communism, but
always describe it as a sincere and timely experiment with
the greatest of social advantages.
At the time, Jews openly bragged that the “Russian”
revolution was their making. They were the f inanciers, the revolutionaries and the bloodthirsty horde of
murderous “Cheka” secret police of f icers (later known as the NKVD, OGPU, KGB, etc) who were
responsible f or liquidating untold millions of Russians and Eastern Europeans. Now Jews say, “Who, us?
No, Jews had nothing to do with it! You’re just antisemitic!” Even those Jews who might still be alive and
who took part in the massacres now deny that Jews were involved in these crimes. Even though antiSemitism became a capital crime punishable by death af ter the revolution of 1917 (as you shall see),
Jews now ludicrously assert that they were “persecuted.” Even though the Christian churches burned
while the synagogues were left untouched, Jews now f oolishly deny that they were protected. Even
though Christian priests and nuns were tortured, executed en masse and f orced to sweep the streets —
while Jews and rabbis lived high on the hog — Jews now comically claim they were victims of Bolshevism!
This is the tried and true victim strategy that Jewish criminals have employed f or millennium to evade and
escape justice f or their hideous crimes.
The Jews had harbored tremendous enmity f or the Russian Czars, f irstly because they were Christian, and
secondly because the Czars kept the Jews marginalized and in check by restricting them to their own areas
(the so-called “Jewish Pale”), and reined them in when they got out of line. For those reasons, among
others, f anatical Russian and Eastern European Jews mobilized revolutionary terror brigades to depose
and assassinate the Czars. In 1881, Czar Alexander II was assassinated by Jews. Heir to the throne was
Czar Nicholas II, the Jews’ next target.
The f irst communist-inspired, Talmudic upheaval in Christian Russia occurred in 1905, led by the Masonic
Jews Leon Deustch, Vladimir Lenin, Leiba Bronstein (alias Leon Trotsky) and Trotsky’s guide and mentor
Israel Helphand (alias Alexander Parvus) — the multimillionaire f inancier who was also a political adviser of
the “Young Turks” (i.e. crypto-Jews who sparked a revolution in Ottoman Turkey in 1908, to f acilitate
Zionist ambitions). Parvus raked in millions in prof its from the sale of weapons and f oodstuf f s to the
Turkish Army, who — under the captainship of the crypto-Jewish “Young Turks” — carried out the Armenian
massacres of 1915, slaying 1.5 million Christians. (See: Bjerknes, Christopher Jon. The Jewish Genocide of
Armenian Christians, 2006)
Jews boastf ully claimed responsibility f or the 1905 revolutionary uprising. For example, The Maccabean of
London wrote in an article entitled “A Jewish Revolution” in November of 1905:
“The revolution in Russia is a Jewish revolution, a crisis in Jewish history. It is a Jewish
revolution because Russia is the home of about half the Jews of the world, and an
overturning of its despotic government must have a very important influence on the
destinies of the millions living there and on the many thousands who have recently
emigrated to other countries. But the revolution in Russia is a Jewish revolution also
because Jews are the most active revolutionists in the Tsar’s empire.” (quoted in: L. Fry,
Waters Flowing Eastward: The War Against the Kingship of Christ. TBR Books, Washington, D.
C., (2000), p. 40.)
Bolshevist undertakings, like Zionist ones, were subsidized by wealthy Jewish loan-sharks. In preparation
f or the 1905 revolution, Jewish bankers manuf actured a war between Russia and Japan. They had long
been conducting a perf idious economic war against Russia by sabotaging Russia’s ability to secure
Western loans and by f inancing Russia’s enemies. This was done in a malicious ef f ort to weaken Russia
economically and physically, thus making it ripe f or revolution, communist subversion and Jewish plundering.
Prominent Jewish banker and “philanthropist”, Jacob Henry Schif f — the Rothschild emissary in America
who headed the powerhouse Kuhn, Loeb & Co. bank in New York — f inanced the Japanese war ef f ort
against Russia by f loating them a loan of $200,000,000 USD. (See also: “Genocidal Jewish Supremacist
Jacob H. Schif f” & “Jewish Bankers Again Target Russia f or Revolution” f or a plethora of sources
documenting Schif f ’s schemes against Russia)
The Jewish Communal Register of New York City 1917-1918 wrote of Jacob Schif f ,
“The firm of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., floated the large Japanese War loans of 1904-05, thus
making possible the Japanese victory over Russia. [...] Mr. Schiff has always used his
wealth and his influence in the best interests of his people. He financed the enemies of
autocratic Russia and used his financial influence to keep Russia from the money
market of the United States.”
Not only did the raging Russophobe Jacob Schif f f inance Russia’s enemies to attack her, but he also
f inanced the distribution of revolutionary propaganda to Russian POWs being held in Japanese prison
camps during the 1904-1905 Japanese-Russo war. He had hoped that this propaganda would poison their
minds against the Czar and upon their return to Russia at the war’s end they would commit mutiny and help
install the Jewish communists into power.
Although the attempted revolution of 1905 f ailed to bring down the Russian Czarist government, the
Marxist Jews had caused a great deal of carnage. The murderous bloodletting of the Jews was noted by
William Eleroy Curtis, in a speech he delivered to the National Geographic Society on 14 December, 1906:
Perhaps these reforms are the cause of the present tranquility, because the
revolutionary leaders nearly all belong to the Jewish race and the most effective
revolutionary agency is the Jewish Bund, which has its headquarters at Bialystok, where
the massacre occurred last June. The government has suffered more from that race than
from all of its other subjects combined. Whenever a desperate deed is committed it is
always done by a Jew, and there is scarcely one loyal member of that race in the entire
Empire. The great strike which paralyzed the Empire and compelled the Czar to grant a
constitution and a parliament was ordered and managed by a Jew named Krustaleff, president
of the workingmen’s council, a young man only thirty years old. He was sent to the penitentiary
for life, and had not been behind the bars more than three weeks when he organized and
conducted a successful strike of the prison employees.
Maxim, who organized and conducted the revolution in the Baltic provinces, is a Jew of
marvelous ability. Last fall he came over here lecturing and collecting money to carry on the
revolutionary campaign, but for some reason has vanished and nobody seems to know what
has become of him.
Gerschunin, the most resourceful leader of the terrorists, who was condemned to life
imprisonment in the silver mines on the Mongolian frontier, has recently escaped in a water
cask, and is supposed to be in San Francisco. He is a Polish Jew only twenty-seven years old. I
might enumerate a hundred other revolutionary leaders and every one of them would be a Jew.
Wherever you read of an assassination or of the explosion of a bomb you will notice in the
newspaper dispatches that the man was a Jew. The most sensational and dramatic episode that
has occurred since the mutinies was on October 27, when, in the very center of Saint
Petersburg, at the entrance of Kazan Cathedral, four Jews held up a treasury wagon and
captured $270,000. They passed the package to a woman, who instantly vanished, and no
trace of her has ever been found; but they were all arrested and were promptly punished. On
the 8th of November a few Jewish revolutionaries entered a treasury car near Ragow, in Poland,
got $850,000 and disappeared.
Every deed of that kind is done by Jews, and the massacres that have shocked the
universe, and occurred so frequently that the name ‘pogrom’ was invented to describe
them, were organized and managed by the exasperated police authorities in retaliation
for crimes committed by the Jewish revolutionists.” (W. E. Curtis, “The Revolution in
Russia”, The National Geographic Magazine, Volume 18, Number 5, (May, 1907), pp. 302-316,
at 313-314.)
Author Juri Lina, on page 141 of his book “Under the Sign of the Scorpion”, described the unbridled terror
inf licted by the Marxist Jews:
“20 000 people were killed or crippled as a result of the terrorist actions in the years
1905-06, according to the film director Stanislav Govorukhin. Novoye Vremya put the
total figure at 50 000 in March 1911. Both Parvus and Trotsky began to understand that all
these sporadic terrorist actions would not be enough to support and decisively change the
outcome of the coup attempts in October (when the all-out political strike was organized and
terrorist actions were staged), December 1905, and in January 1906, when the last, desperate
attempt to overthrow the Tsar’s regime was made. Lenin, who sceptically followed the events in
Russia from his exile, came to the same conclusion. Mass terror was needed for a victory.
The “revolutionaries” dreamed of civil war.“
The Masonic Jews f umed with anger upon realizing the utter f ailure of their putrid plans to overthrow the
Czar and establish a Jewish tyranny; but their homicidal dreams and desires lived on. They immediately
began plotting another revolution, which manif est in the year 1917.
These mealy-mouthed Marxist Jews slyly preached against capitalism by day, whilst hobnobbing with the
richest of America’s and Europe’s Jewish capitalist bankers by night, who had been covertly subsidizing
their banef ul Bolshevist agitation activities f or quite some time. This f arcical Hebraic ruse couldn’t have
been more transparent. For example, the Jewish Marxist revolutionary, Leon Trotsky, socialized and played
chess with über “bourgeois” Zionist Jew banker, Baron Rothschild, in Vienna. (Nedava, Joseph. “Trotsky
and the Jews”, Jewish Publication Society of America, (1972), p. 36) In 1916, the mischievous, lying Jew
Trotsky was summoned to the United States by the af orementioned Jewish mega-banker Jacob Schif f , and
was given the task of recruiting and training Russian-Jewish immigrants from the Lower East Side of New
York City as Marxist terrorist radicals f or the Bolshevik revolution.
On March 27, 1917, Trotsky and his 300 well-trained Jewish communists from Manhattan’s Lower East Side,
boarded the Norwegian steamer “Kristianiaf jord” f or a journey that brought them to St. Petersburg in
Russia. Bef ore departing, Jacob Schif f gave Trotsky and his congregation of cabalist conspirators
$20,000,000. Simultaneously, Lenin and his Jewish comrades — f acilitated by the German government —
boarded a sealed train car which took them from Scandinavia to Petrograd, sitting on ten million dollars in
gold supplied by Germany’s richest Jewish banker, Max Warburg (whose brother Paul, strangely enough,
was the chief architect of the Federal Reserve System, the Rothschild-controlled central bank of the United
Henry Wickham Steed, the chief editor of The Times, discerned that this f inancial aid went beyond the
Kerensky regime, stating that,
“the prime movers [of the Bolshevik revolution] were Jacob Schiff, Warburg, and other
international financiers, who wished above all to bolster up the Jewish Bolshevists in
order to secure a field for German and Jewish exploitation of Russia.” (Steed, Henry
Wickham. Through thirty years, 1892-1922: a personal narrative, Volume 2. Doubleday, Page &
Company, 1924. p. 302)
In “Czarism and Revolution,” Omni Publications, Hawthorne, Calif ornia, (1962), pp. 231-232, we learn of the
tidal wave of Jewish money f looding into the Bolshevist cause,
“In an excerpt from a secret report, dated New York, 15 February, 1916, (quoted from Boris
Brazol, “The World At the Crossroads”, 1921, Boston, Small, Maynard and Co., Publ, p. 19) we
read: “The Russian Revolutionary Party in America has decided upon a policy of overt action.
Risings and disturbances may, therefore, be expected at any moment. The first secret meeting,
marking the commencement of this new period of violence was held on the East Side in the
evening of February 14th and was attended by 62 delegates of whom 50 were veterans of
1905, while the remaining 12 were newly joined members. The majority consisted of Jewish
intellectuals, some of whom were professional revolutionaries. The discussions at this meeting
were mainly centered around the opportunities offered and the means available for staging a
revolution on a grand scale in Russia, the present time being considered extremely propitious.
As previously reported, the party had just received from Russia secret information to the effect
that all the necessary preliminaries for an immediate rising had been concluded. The only
question of concern to the meeting was that of a possible shortage of funds; however, as soon
as it arose, several members announced that no fears should be entertained on that subject as,
at the appropriate time, the necessary money would be supplied by the sympathizers. In this
connection the name of Jacob Schiff was repeatedly mentioned.”
A copy, dated September 23rd, 1919, of “To Moscow,” published in Rostov, contains further
interesting facts about the part played by Jacob Schiff in the 1917 revolution. According to this
paper, the information is based on a document originating from the French High Commissioner
in Washington. The authenticity of this document cannot be contested as it was extracted from
the archives of one of the high French government offices. Later it was quoted by Gen.
Nechvolodov in his book, previously mentioned (pp. 97-104). Nechvolodov claims that it was
drafted by official branches of the American Services and handed by them to the French High
Commissioner. I present a few quotations:
“In February 1916, it was learnt that a revolution was being fomented in Russia and that the
following persons and business concerns were engaged in this destructive enterprise: 1) Jacob
Schiff; 2) Kuhn, Loeb & Co. (Directors: Jacob Schiff, Felix Warburg, Otto Kahn, Mortimer Schiff,
Jerome H. Hanauer); 3) Guggenheim; 4) Max Breitung.
“It would therefore appear that the revolution in Russia, which broke out one year after this
information was first reported, was sustained by Jewish interests.
“In April 1917, Jacob Schiff publicly declared that it was thanks to his financial support that the
revolution in Russia had succeeded.
“In the Spring of the same year, Schiff commenced to subsidize Trotsky, who also received a
contribution from ‘Forward’, a Jewish publication of New York.
“Simultaneously, Trotsky and Co. were also being subsidized by Max Warburg and Olaf
Aschberg of the Nye Bank in Stockholm, another Jewish concern, the Rhine-Westphalian
Syndicate and Jivotovsky, a wealthy Jew whose daughter later married Trotsky. Relations were
thus established between multi-millionaire and proletarian Jewry.”
There follows a list of names drawing attention to the predominance of the Jewish element in
the first Soviets. This document, after stressing the ties linking Kuhn, Loeb & Co. and other
Jewish financial establishments, expresses the opinion “that the Bolshevik movement to a
certain degree is the expression of a more general Jewish movement and that certain Jewish
banking houses are interested in its furtherance.”
Jacob Schif f did indeed publicly boast that “thanks are due to the Jew” that the revolution in Russia had
succeeded. Juri Lina documented in similar terms how Jewish loan-sharks from America and Western
Europe were throwing money at the Bolsheviks:
“It was above all Jacob and Mortimer Schiff, Felix Warburg, Otto H. Kahn, Max Warburg,
Jerome J. Hanauer, Alfred Milner and the copper family Guggenheim who financed the
Bolsheviks, according to the Jewish historian David Shub.
A document (861.00/5339) in the archives of the U.S. State Department confirms this. Two
further names are mentioned in this document: Max Breitung and Isaac Seligman. All
those people were Jews and freemasons. According to the same document, plans to depose
the Tsar were made in February 1916. There are always some people who make money out of
wars and revolutions. We must not forget this when we seek to understand history.
The Zionist banker and freemason Max Warburg played an important role in funding the
Communist propaganda in Russia. He saw to it that the industrialist Hugo Stinnes agreed to
give two million roubles to the Bolsheviks’ publishing activity on the 12th of August 1916.
(Zeman, “Germany and the Revolution in Russia, 1915-18. Documents from the Archives of the
German Foreign Ministry”, London, 1958, p. 92.) Thus there are documents extant which
show that Max Warburg and other super-wealthy Jews supported Communism. These
statements are not just made up, as certain know-it-alls have claimed.” (Under the Sign of the
Scorpion, p. 180)
Of course, the Jew bankers got a great return on their investment. The Jew Bolsheviks methodically
despoiled the wealth and valuables of Russia and the Czar, shipping boat loads of gold back to the vaults
of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. in America, Warburg banks in Germany, and their own private bank accounts in various
“The banker Jacob Schiff had given Leon Trotsky 20 million dollars to organise a Bolshevik takeover. That gamble certainly paid off. 600 million roubles in gold were transferred to the
United States of America between 1918 and 1922, according to the historian Gary Allen. In
the first half of 1921 alone, the banking house of Kuhn, Loeb and Co. made a profit of
102 290 000 dollars on the wealth the Bolsheviks had robbed, according to the New York
Times, August 23rd, 1921. Multiply that sum by one hundred and you have the present-day
value of that money. The Russian historian Dmitri Volkogonov revealed after findings in the
Communist Party archives that “just the Tsarina’s private reserves amounted to 475 million
roubles in gold (plus 7 million for the crown jewels)”. (Dagens Nyheter, 31st of August 1992.)
The Bolshevik financial department Goskhran confiscated all of this. Some Swedish journalists
(including Staffan Skott) have, in accord with the prevailing myth, tried to explain that most of
this wealth was handed over to the Communist parties in other countries, while millions of
Russians died of starvation. That is not entirely accurate. According to the historian Igor Bunich,
Lenin and Trotsky took care of this money personally. The gold, meanwhile, was smuggled
out of Russia and deposited into personal bank accounts around the world. (30 tons of
gold per year were produced in the Tsarist era in Russia.)” (Under the Sign of the Scorpion, p.
Immediately upon their arrival in Russia, the bloody banditry of Jewry commenced, unleashing a carnivorous
crusade of destruction never bef ore seen or heard of . The revolutionary turmoil of 1917 — led by the
name-changing crypto-Jews Vladimir Ulyanov (alias Lenin), Leiba Bronstein (alias Leon Trotsky), Jacob
Sverdlov, Moisei Uritsky, Lev Rosenf eld (alias Kamenev), Grigory Radomylsky (alias Zinoviev), Lazar
Moiseyevich Kaganovich, Karl Sobelsohn (alias Radek), Israel Helphand (alias Alexander Parvus), Rosalina
Zalkind, Aaron Kuhn (alias Bela Kun), and a thousand and one other Jew Bolsheviks — wrought the stench
of death upon the Russland, converting Russia into a temple of evil. When Lenin’s Bolsheviks seized the
State in October of 1917, the Russians had become sacrif icial lambs to be sent to the slaughterhouse by
the new kosher communist butchers who ruled the country with an iron f ist.
One of the f irst acts of brutality that set the stage f or the f ollowing seventy years of bloodshed, f amine,
poverty and death, was the cold-blooded assassination of the Russian Imperial f amily, the Romanov’s —
Czar Nicholas II, his wif e, daughters and son — by a death squad of Jewish Bolshevik brigands. On orders
of Jacob Schif f , the Romanov’s were shot and bayoneted in the Ipatiev House in Ekaterinburg where they
had sought ref uge, by a coterie of homicidal Jewish assassins: Jacob Sverdlov (f irst president of the
Soviets), Yankel Yurovsky (Cheka general, known as an avid reader of the Talmud), Goloshchekin, Saf arov,
Voikov, and Syromolotov. The members of the Imperial f amily in closest succession to the throne were
assassinated the f ollowing night.
In “The Last Days of the Romanovs” (p. 393), Robert Wilton, on assignment f or The London Times in
Russia f or 17 years, summed up the “Russian Revolution” in these words:
“The whole record of the Bolshevism in Russia is indelibly impressed with the stamp of
alien invasion. The murder of the Tsar, deliberately planned by the Jew Sverdlov and
carried out by the Jews Goloshekin, Syromolotov, Safarov, Voikov, and Yurvsky, is the
act, not of the Russian people, but of this hostile invader.
The Jewish domination in Russia is supported by certain Russians: the “burgess”
Ulyanov alias Lenin, the “noble” Chicherin, the “dissenter” Bonch-Bruevich. They are all
mere screens or dummies behind which the Sverdlovs and the thousand and one Jews
of Sovepedia continue their work of destruction; having wrecked and plundered Russia
by appealing to the ignorance of the working folk, they are now using their dupes to set
up a new tyranny worse than any that the world has known.
Sovietdom has consecrated three heroes to whom monuments have been erected: to
Karl Marx, to Judas Iscariot, and to Leo Tolstoi, the three names that are associated with
the Revolution, Apostasy and Anarchism; two of them Jews.”
This “stamp of alien invasion”, as Robert Wilton put it, was unmistakably Jewish and Talmudic.Anti-Zionist
author Douglas Reed explained the ethnic clues lef t behind by the Judaist killers of the Romanov f amily,
and its incredible meaning:
“The chief reason for recounting the details of the pogrom of the Romanoffs is to point to the
“fingerprint” which was left in the room where it was done. One of the assassins, presumably
their leader, stayed to exult and put a significant signature on the wall, which was
covered with obscene or mocking inscriptions in Hebrew, Magyar and German. Among
them was a couplet which deliberately related the deed to the Law of the Torah-Talmud
and thus offered it to posterity as an example of the fulfilment of that law, and of Jewish
vengeance as understood by the Levites. It was written in German by someone who
parodied the Jewish poet, Heinrich Heine’s lines on the death of Belshazzar, the
imaginary potentate whose murder is portrayed in Daniel as God’s punishment for an
affront offered to Judah:
Belsazar ward aber in selbiger Nacht
Von selbigen Knechten umgebracht.
The parodist, sardonically surveying the shambles, adapted these lines to what he had just
Belsatsar ward in selbiger Nacht Von seinen Knechten umgebracht.
No clearer clue to motive and identity was ever left behind.” (The Controversy of Zion, p. 195)
As Douglas Reed aptly noted, the mocking inscription lef t on the wall of the Ipatiev House where the
Romanovs were butchered were lines adapted from a poem by German-Jewish poet, Heinrich Heine, which
alluded to the death of a Gentile ruler (Belshazzar, cleverly spelled Belsatsar) in the well-known Old
Testament story, who saw “the writing on the wall” f oretelling his destruction (Daniel 5), and was killed as
punishment f or his “of f enses” against the Jews’ bloodthirsty deity. The intended symbolism was obviously
that another Gentile king, the Tsar, was killed as an act of Jewish retribution. (See also: Waters Flowing
Eastward, Chapter: “The Writing on the Wall”, f or the cabalistic signif icance of these inscriptions)
Interestingly, the wealth of the Rothschild f amily — which can be credited with bringing these Jew
communists to power in Russia — is believed by some Jews to be “for a higher purpose… to avenge
the wrongs of Israel.” Also of great relevance to this story is the f act that poet Heinrich Heine was a
friend of Karl Marx, and had once subtly remarked that most Gentiles had no idea about Jewish schemes or
worldly ambitions, but that we would f ind out only af ter becoming their slaves! Heine said,
“The deeds of the Jews are as little known to the world as their true nature. Some think
they know the Jews because they have seen their beards — but that’s all that appeared of
them. In the Middle Ages and in modern times too the Jews are a walking mystery. This mystery
will be resolved, perhaps, and all will be revealed, on the day which the prophet has
foretold: when there will be only one shepherd and one flock, and when the righteous
who suffered for the salvation of mankind will receive recognition and glory.” (Prawer,
Siegbert Salomon. Heine’s Jewish Comedy: A Study of His Portraits of Jews and Judaism.
Oxford: Clarendon, 1983. p. 622)
The Jewishness of Communism/Bolshevism and the Soviet Regime was attested to not only by the
Russian people, but also by American, British, and other government of f icials and commissions, intrepid
journalists who witnessed the 1917 Bolshevik coup f irst hand, and even some braggadocious Jews
Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, one of the top Jewish maf ia kingpins in the world (when alive), once declared:
“Some call it Marxism — I call it Judaism!” (The American Bulletin, Rabbi S. Wise, May 5, 1935)
The Jewish Chronicle of London, April 4, 1914, boasted that Bolshevism is Judaism, stating:
“There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many Jews are
Bolshevists, in the fact that the ideals of Bolshevism at many points are consonant with
the finest ideals of Judaism.”
The September 10, 1920, edition of American Hebrew Magazine pompously bragged:
“The Bolshevist revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish
dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a new order in the world.
What was performed in so excellent a way in Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and
because of Jewish dissatisfaction, and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the
same Jewish mental and physical forces, become a reality all over the world.”
On the 12th of April, 1919, the newspaper Kommunist (Kharkov) published comrade M. Kohan’s article “The
Jews’ Services to the Working Class”, where he wrote the f ollowing:
“It can be said without exaggeration that the Great Socialist October Revolution was
brought about through the hands of the Jews . . . the red five-pointed star, which was
known as a Judaic symbol in ancient times, has now been taken over by the Russian
proletariat . . . Jewish commissars as leaders of committees and soviet [council-kahal]
organisations lead the Russian proletariat to victory . . . Could the dark and oppressed
masses of Russian workers and peasants throw off the yoke of the bourgeoisie themselves?
No, it was the Jews from beginning to end who showed the Russian proletariat the way
to the rosy dawn of internationalism and who to this day rule Soviet Russia. The
proletariat can feel secure in the hands of the Jews. We can be calm while comrade Trotsky
commands the Red Army.” (quoted in “Under the Sign of the Scorpion”, p. 133)
The 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia’s article on “Socialism” tells us: “While in Germany socialism has
attracted individual Jews, in Russia it has become a movement of the Jewish masses.”
In 1906, The New York Times reported on a gathering of anti-Russian, pro-communist Jews in Berlin,
Germany. Dr. Paul Nathan, a well-known Jewish publicist, called f or Russia’s destruction:
“Dr. Nathan read to the meeting a circular (from the Russian Czarist government)
addressed to the (Russian) garrison of Odessa, calling upon the soldiers to “rise and
crush the traitors who are plotting to upset the holy Government of the Czar and
substitute for it a Jewish empire.” He concluded with an appeal to the Jewish money
powers of the world to arrest Russia’s career as a borrower. The financiers of the world
should call a halt to Russia, not only for humanitarian reasons, but for practical reasons.
Russia’s bankruptcy is an established fact, he added.”
The Encyclopedia Judaica’s article on Communism substantiates much of what so-called “anti-Semites”
have long been saying about Communism and the Soviet experiment’s Jewish origins, motives and
character. It conf esses,
“The Communist movement and ideology played an important part in Jewish life,
particularly in the 1920s, 1930s, and during and after World War II. [...] Individual Jews
played an important role in the early stages of Bolshevism and the Soviet Regime. [...] In
some countries Jews became the leading element in the legal and illegal Communist
parties and in some cases were even instructed by the Communist International to
change their Jewish-sounding names and pose as non-Jews, in order not to confirm
right wing propaganda that presented Communism as an alien, Jewish conspiracy. [...]
The Bolshevik faction contained a number of Jews mainly in the field of organization
and propaganda … They included such people as Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), M. Liadov
(Mandelshtam), Grigory Shklovsky, A. Soltz, S. Guzev (Drabkin), Grigory Zinoviev
(Radomyslsky), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld), Rozaliya Zemliachka (Zalkind), Helena
Rosmirovich, Yemeli Yaroslavsky (Gubelman), Serafimer Gopner, G. Sokolnikov, I.
Platnitsky, Jacob Sverdlov, M. Vladimirov, P. Zalutsky, A. Lozovsky, Y. Yaklovlev
(Epstein), Lazar Kaganovich, D. Shvartzman, Simon Dimanstein … Trotsky [Bronstein],
M. Uritsky, M. Volodarsky, J. Sleklov, Adolf Joffee, David Riazanov (Goldenbach), Yuri
Larin and Karl Radek (Sobelsohn).” (see this facsimile of the Encyclopedia Judaica’s article)
Ted Pike, in his article “Jewish Activists Created Communism,” provides the f ollowing commentary
concerning the Encyclopedia Judaica’s revealing article on Jews and Communism:
“It [the Encyclopedia Judaica's article on "Communism"] continues by admitting that the “antiSemitic” counteroffensive of the White Russian armies in 1918 “drove the bulk of Russian
Jewish youth into the ranks of the Bolshevik regime.” This means that the majority of all
young Soviet Jews were communists. Jews, it says, found great opportunity within Bolshevism,
“occupying many responsible positions in all branches of the party and state machinery
at the central and local seats of power.” (p. 791) The highly disproportionate amount of Jews
in the Party hierarchy is also admitted in the Encyclopedia Judaica’s article:
“During the Revolution Jews played a prominent part in the party organs. The politburo elected
on Oct. 23, 1917 had four Jews among its seven members. The Military Revolutionary
Committee, appointed to prepare the coup, was headed by Trotsky and had two Jews among its
five members. In the early years of the Soviet regime, Jews were in many leading positions in
the government and party machinery…” (page 797, 98)
The Encyclopedia Judaica goes on to inadvertently clarify why the native Russians were so bent
on “anti-Semitic” activities. When the Russian people heroically attempted to regain their
freedom from the communists, the Judaica says “compact Jewish masses in these areas
[were utilized] as a counterweight, which would swing the balance in the centralist
regime’s favor.” (p. 798) In other words, “the bulk of Jewish youth” in every outlying hamlet of
Russia became the “compact Jewish masses” whose task it was to forcibly impose and maintain
communist slavery upon freedom-loving peoples. Jews and the Russian populace were locked
in a death struggle for survival and the future of Russia. Is it any wonder that the White
Russians rose up in rage, even to the point of liquidating their oppressors? Who would not have
done the same?”
In “The Jewish Experience” (1996, p. 364), Jewish author Norman Cantor freely admits and proudly boasts
of the Jewish cast that comprised the Bolshevik hierarchy in Russia, stating,
“The Bolshevik Revolution and some of its aftermath represented, from one perspective,
Jewish revenge. . . . During the heyday of the Cold War, American Jewish publicists
spent a lot of time denying that—as 1930s anti-Semites claimed—Jews played a
disproportionately important role in Soviet and world Communism. The truth is until the
early 1950s Jews did play such a role, and there is nothing to be ashamed of. In time
Jews will learn to take pride in the record of the Jewish Communists in the Soviet Union
and elsewhere. It was a species of striking back.”
Author Edward Schoonmaker, writing in “Democracy and World Dominion” (1939, p. 211), conf irms Cantors
rhetoric and elaborated on how Jewish synagogues were lef t untouched by the Bolsheviks, while the
Christian churches were all burned to the ground:
“Fifteen years after the Bolshevist Revolution was launched to carry out the Marxist
program, the editor of the American Hebrew could write: “According to such information
[as] the writer could secure while in Russia a few weeks ago, not one Jewish synagogue
has been torn down, as have hundreds—perhaps thousands—of the Greek Catholic
churches. . . .” (American Hebrew, Nov. 18, 1932, p. 12.) Apostate Jews, leading a
revolution that was to destroy religion as the “opiate of the people,” had somehow
spared the synagogues of Russia.”
Another Jewish writer, Sever Plocker, also lent credence to much of what “the anti-Semites” say about Jews
and Communism, in an article published on entitled, “Stalin’s Jews”. He rightly reminded us
that “some of the greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish.”
British and American intelligence reports relayed inf ormation about the Jewishness of Bolshevism and the
new Soviet regime, describing the Bolshevik leadership as being as much as 90 percent Jewish. Robert
Wilton, the previously mentioned correspondent of The London Times on assignment in Russia during the
communist revolution of 1917, outlined the ethnic make-up of the Bolshevik State as such:
“According to the data furnished by the Soviet press, out of 556 important functionaries
of the Bolshevik State there were in 1918-1919: 17 Russians, 2 Ukrainians, 11 Armenians,
35 Lets, 15 Germans, 1 Hungarian, 10 Georgians, 2 Poles, 2 Finns, 1 Karaim, 457 Jews.
As the decades past by—after the fateful year 1917—Judaized Khazars kept a firm hand
on the helm of the government in the occupied land of Russia. In due time they built a
bureaucracy to their heart’s desire.”
In a report of the American Expeditionary f orces to Siberia, March 1, 1919, compiled by Captain Montgomery
Schyler — speaking of events f ollowing the decline of the First Provisional Government — it reads:
“These hopes were frustrated by the gradual gains in power of the more irresponsible and
socialistic elements of the population, guided by the Jews and other anti-Russian races. A table
made in April 1918 by Robert Wilton, the correspondent of the London Times in Russia, shows
that at that time there were 384 “commissars” including 2 Negroes, 13 Russians, 15
Chinamen, 22 Armenians and more than 300 Jews. Of the latter number, 264 had come to
Russia from the United States since the downfall of the Imperial government.”
Schyler frankly described the Bolshevik movement as being “guided and controlled by Russian Jews of
the greasiest type,” from the outset. Reverend George E. Simons, the Superintendent of the Methodist
Episcopal Church in Petrograd from 1907 to 1918, was an eyewitness to the Bolshevik Revolution. He
testif ied bef ore the United States Senate, and stated that most of the Bolshevist leaders were Jews from
the Lower East Side of New York City:
“Out of 388 members of the new Russian government, only 16 happened to be Russians.
One was an American Black. All the rest, 371, were Jews. Of these 371 Jewish Bolshevik
leaders, no less than 265 of them were from the Lower East Side of New York City.”
In 1919, the US Senate held a subcommittee inquiry into “Bolshevik propaganda”.An American teacher
named R. B. Dennis who had worked as a teacher in Russia during the revolution said that the Bolshevik
leaders were all “Russian Hebrews” who had previously lived in America “anywhere from 3 to 12
years.”An American banker named William Welsh who had worked in Russia between July 1916 and
September 1918 told the committee: “It might be well to explain a little the general fact that most of
the Bolshevik leaders are Jews, in order to avoid misunderstanding. In Russia it is well known that
three-fourths of the Bolshevik leaders are Jewish.”
Shortly af ter the Bolshevik Revolution, the U.S. ambassador in Russia sent a dispatch to Washington
conf irming that most of the Bolshevik leaders were Jews who had been previously exiled f or revolutionary
“The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are
returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and
they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution.” (see this image of the appropriate
Mr. Summers, US Consul General in Moscow on May 2, 1918, sent a telegram to the Secretary of State in
Washington DC saying in part:
“Jew predominant in local Soviet government, anti-Jewish feeling growing among
population which tends to regard oncoming Germans as deliverers.”
In 1919 the British parliament compiled a White Paper on Bolshevism titled, “Russia No. 1 A Collection of
Reports on Bolshevism in Russia“. In it we f ind that Bolshevism is portrayed as a movement carried on by
the Jews and despised by the Russian people.An overview of the relevant portions of this document
relating to the Jewish hand in Bolshevism in Russia, is as f ollows:
“The relevant pages concerning Jews and Bolshevism are pp. 6, 23, 28, 32, 33, 41, 57, 65, 68,
78 – on p.6 (of the document, not the pdf) we find a telegram from Sir M. Findlay to Mr. Balfour
relaying a report by the Netherlands Minister at Petrograd, which contains the following
“I consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue now
before the world, not even excluding the war which is still raging, and unless, as above
stated, Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form
or another over Europe and the whole world, as it is organized and worked by Jews who
have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing
order of things.”
p. 23 signifies that the Jews had preferential treatment, as they were allowed to engage in illicit
trading, while all other trade was at a standstill, it also contains documentation to the effect that
Bolshevism was despised by the Russians, but carried out by Jews;
p. 28 says: “The Bolsheviks can no longer be described as a political party holding extreme
communistic view. They form relatively small privileged class which is able to terrorise the rest of
the population because it has a monopoly both of arms and of food supplies. This class consists
chiefly of workmen and soldiers, and included a large non-Russian element, such as Letts and
Esthonians and Jews; the latter are specially numerous in higher posts. Members of this class
are allowed complete licence, and commit crime against other sections of society.”;
p. 32 states “The Bolsheviks comprised chiefly Jews and Germans, who were exceedingly
active and enterprising. The Russians were largely anti-Bolshevik, but were for the most part
dreamers, incapable of any sustained action, who now, more than ever before, were unable to
throw off the yoke of their oppressors. Night after night the counterrevolutionary Societies held
secret meetings to plot against the Bolsheviks, but never once was a serious attempt made to
carry through the conspiracy. The starving condition of the people quite paralysed their willpower.”;
p.33. document # 33 says: “From examination of several labourer and peasant witnesses I have
evidence to the effect that very smallest percentage of this district were pro-Bolshevik, majority
of labourers sympathising with summoning of Constituent Assembly. Witnesses further stated
that Bolshevik leaders did not represent Russian working classes, most of them being Jews.”;
p. 41, document # 38, reveals that the party responsible for the murder of the Romanovs
consisted entirely of Jews
p. 56 document # 56, says again that Bolshevism was a movement led by Jews,
p. 57, The Results, says that after the Revolution, Jews became the possessors of most of the
business houses, it states: “All business became paralysed, shops were closed, Jews became
possessors of most of the business houses, and horrible scenes of starvation became common
in the country districts. The peasants put their children to death rather than see them starve. In
a village on the Dvina, not far from Schlusselberg, a. mother hanged three of her children. I was
conducting a funeral in a mortuary of a lunatic asylum at Oudelnaia, near Petrograd, and saw
the bodies of a mother and her five children whose throats had been cut by the father because
he could not see them suffer.”
p. 65, “The Terror”, notes the persecution of Russians for thought crimes, and the fact that
people had to pay intermediaries, who were mostly Jewish, before they could obtain their
p. 68 shows that the food supply committees were entirely in the hands of Jews, and that antiSemitism was rampant because of the extreme misery that ensued after the Jews had obtained
control;” (summary provided by Blissentia)
In November of 1917, the Foreign Minister of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, Count Ottokar von Czernin,
“I have during the last few days received reliable information about the Bolsheviks.
Their leaders are almost all of them Jews with altogether fantastic ideas, and I do not
envy the country that is governed by them.”
Sir Paul Dykes was an MI6 espionage agent working undercover in Bolshevik Russia f or the f irst f ew years
af ter the revolution. Upon his return home to Britian, he published a book about his experiences called “Red
Dusk and the Morrow” (1922). In it he relates an interesting conversation he had with a Lithuanian who told
him about overhearing a Bolshevik f igure say:
“Our power is based on three things: first, on Jewish brains; secondly, on Lettish and
Chinese bayonets; and thirdly on the crass stupidity of the Russian people.” (Red Dusk
and the Morrow, p. 316)
Overzealous Jews of tentimes inadvertently give themselves away by tacitly admitting to things that they
would otherwise try to deny. Two New York Jewish publications, “Jewish Lif e” and “Jewish Voice”, tacitly
conf essed that Communism is Judaism when they told their readers,
“anti-communism is anti-Semitism! … Scratch a professional anti-communist and you’ll
find an anti-Semite!”
Besides being a Bolshevik mass murderer, Leon Trotsky-Bronstein was also a crypto-Zionist who had
attended the sixth Zionist congress in Basel in 1903. In a 1937 interview in the New York Jewish newspaper,
Daily Forward, Trotsky hinted at the real motives behind his revolutionary activities when he pathetically
crowed: “The longer the rotten bourgeoisie society lives, the more and more barbaric will antiSemitism become everywhere.” ‘Bourgeoisie’ was clearly a Judeo-Bolshevik code-word f or Gentile.
Lenin’s Jewish roots was a state secret, but was f inally revealed by declassif ied KGB f iles and put on
display in Moscow’s State Historical Museum in 2011. Lenin couldn’t have made it more obvious that he was
a crypto-Jew, seeing as he had nothing but glowing esteem f or the Jews and immediately decreed
“antisemitism” a crime punishable by execution! The human-devil, Lenin, praised the Jews as the best
revolutionaries, saying: “The clever Russian is almost always a Jew or has Jewish blood in him.”
(Dmitri Volkogonov, Lenin: A New Biography, p. 112). He was surely ref erring to himself .
Lenin heaped accolade and adulation on the Jews, revealing that not only was he a Jew, but a chauvinistic
Jewish supremacist. He once said,
“There the great universally progressive features of Jewish culture have made themselves
clearly felt: its internationalism, its responsiveness of the advanced movements of our times (the
percentage of Jews in democratic and proletarian movements is everywhere higher than the
percentage of Jews in the general population.) …Those Jewish Marxists who join up in the
international Marxist organizations with the Russian, Lithuanian, Ukrainian and other workers,
adding their might (both in Russian and in Jewish) to the creation of an international culture of
the working class movement, are continuing the best traditions of Jewry.” (quoted in: Gould,
Allan. What Did They Think of the Jews? Jason Aronson Inc., 1991, p. 241; Baron, Joseph L.
Stars and Sand: Jewish Notes by Non-Jewish Notables. Jewish Publication Society of America,
1944, p. 175)
The two-f aced cheat Lenin — the so-called “man of the people”, “champion of the workers” — even
def ended parasitic Jewish usury and loan-sharking,
“And those gentlemen on the right benches talk about the Jews exploiting the
peasants, about Jewish usury! But thousands of Jewish merchants would not skin the
Russian muzhik in the way the true Russian, Christian landlords do! The interest
claimed by the worst usurer is not to be compared with that claimed by the true Russian
land lord, who hires the a muzhik in the winter for summer work or who forces him to pay
for a dessiatine of land in labour, money, eggs, chickens, and God alone knows what
else!” (V.I. Lenin, Draft for a Speech on the Agrarian Question in the Second State Duma,
Lenin, the monstrous criminal, excitedly advocated every manner of deception, barbarity and wickedness.
He encouraged lies and deceit, stating, “We must utilise all possible cunning and illegal methods,
deny and conceal the truth,” noting that, “A lie told often enough becomes the truth.”
Deceitf ul Jewish propagandists have duped the world into believing that German Nazi leaders Joseph
Goebbels and Adolf Hitler invented and utilized the “big lie” technique as a method to f ool the German
masses. This is f alse and nothing more than psychological projection. In reality, Goebbels stressed that
good propaganda must be accurate and truthf ul, stating that,
“Good propaganda does not need to lie, indeed it may not lie. It has no reason to fear
the truth. It is a mistake to believe that people cannot take the truth. They can. It is only
a matter of presenting the truth to people in a way that they will be able to understand. A
propaganda that lies proves that it has a bad cause. It cannot be successful in the long
run.” (Weber, Mark. “Fraudulent Nazi Quotations.” Institute for Historical Review.)
In 1941, Goebbels published an article in which he charged British propagandists with adopting the “big lie”
technique, stating, “The English follow the principle that when one lies, one should lie big, and stick
to it. They keep up their lies, even at the risk of looking ridiculous.” (Goebbels, Joseph. “Churchill’s
Lie Factory,” 1941) Adolf Hitler, in Mein Kampf, identif ied and condemned the “big lie” technique as an
invention and tactic of the Jews:
“In this they [the Jews] proceeded on the sound principle that the magnitude of a lie
always contains a certain factor of credibility, since the great masses of the people in
the very bottom of their hearts tend to be corrupted rather than consciously and
purposely evil, and that, therefore, in view of the primitive simplicity of their minds, they
more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a little one, since they themselves lie in little
things, but would be ashamed of lies that were too big. Such a falsehood will never
enter their heads, and they will not be able to believe in the possibility of such
monstrous effrontery and infamous misrepresentation in others.…” (Mein Kampf, p. 231
of the Manheim translation)
Upon his assumption of power, the repulsive crypto-Jew Lenin decried “antisemitism” in the harshest
possible terms. He chastised “antisemitism” as a “counter-revolutionary” act, and thus it was punishable by
death. Even “anti-Semitic” speech constituted the death penalty, or lif e imprisonment, in the Jew-hell of
Soviet Russia. If being against Jews was “counter-revolutionary” than that must have meant that all the
“revolutionaries” were Jewish. In July of 1918, Lenin signed an order of the Council of People’s Commissars
which declared antisemitism and pogroms a “mortal danger to the revolution [i.e. the Jewish takeover]“:
“The Council of People’s Commissars declares that the anti-Semitic movement and
pogroms against the Jews are fatal to the interests of the workers’ and peasants’
revolution and calls upon the toiling people to fight this evil with all the means at their disposal.
National hostility weakens the ranks of our revolutionaries, disrupts the united front of the
toilers without distinctions of nationality and helps only our enemies.
The Council of People’s Commissars instructs all Soviet Deputies to take uncompromising
measures to tear the anti-Semitic movement out by the roots. Pogromists and pogromagitators are to be placed outside the law.” (Baron, Salo Wittmayer. The Russian Jew Under
Tsars and Soviets, Macmillan, (1976), p. 180; Strauss, Herbert A. Hostages of Modernization,
Walter De Gruyter, (1993), p. 1324)
A. Nelson Field remarked in Appendix B of his book, All These Things : “Lenin was married to a Jewess,
spoke Yiddish in his family circle, and Dr. Chaim Weizmann, Jewish Zionist leader, was quoted in
the London Jewish Chronicle of December 16th, 1932, as saying that Lenin had taken part in
Jewish student meetings in Switzerland thirty-five years before. He is generally regarded as a
Russian, but there is doubt.”
Lenin’s love af f air with Jewry undoubtedly stemmed from his own Jewish roots and being in love with
himself , since he was an egomaniac. In an asinine attempt to cover over their blood-stained tracks, Jewish
apologists today of ten go around claiming that Josef Stalin was a big “anti-Semite” who hated and
persecuted Jews. This idiotic canard has no basis in reality; on the contrary, Stalin was an instrument of the
Jews, a “shabbas goy.”
Let’s just look at what Stalin himself said about anti-Semitism,
“National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs characteristic of the
period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most
dangerous vestige of cannibalism.
Anti-semitism is of advantage to the exploiters as a lightning conductor that deflects the blows
aimed by the working people at capitalism. Anti-semitism is dangerous for the working people as
being a false path that leads them off the right road and lands them in the jungle. Hence
Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable, sworn
enemies of anti-semitism.
In the U.S.S.R. anti-semitism is punishable with the utmost severity of the law as a
phenomenon deeply hostile to the Soviet system. Under U.S.S.R. law active anti-semites
are liable to the death penalty.” (Josef Stalin, Works Vol. 13)
So, Stalin compared anti-Semitism to cannibalism and upheld the anti-antisemitism law decreed by Lenin in
1918, restating that anti-Semitic Russian patriots were “liable to the death penalty”! Some Jew hater, eh?
Furthermore, at the 1945 Yalta conf erence — a meeting of the Allied leaders and policy-makers during WWII
— we f ind that Stalin proclaimed himself to be a Zionist. (“Stalin Called Himself a Zionist — Picture of Red
Leader Unf olded.” The New York Times. 17 Mar. 1955.) Prof essor Kevin MacDonald, in his review of Juri
Slezkine’s book “The Jewish Century”, inf orms us that not only was Stalin not “anti-Semitic” but, on the
contrary, had launched a massive campaign to combat anti-Semitism:
“From 1927 to 1932 Stalin established an ambitious public campaign to combat antiSemitism that included fifty-six books published by the government and an onslaught
of speeches, mass rallies, newspaper articles, and show trials ‘aimed at eradicating the
evil.’” (MacDonald, Kevin. “Stalin’s Willing Executioners: Jews as a Hostile Elite in the USSR”, p.
Jewish journalist Sever Plocker tells us: “Jewish historian Sebag Montefiore has written that during
the darkest period of terror, when the Communist killing machine worked in full force, Stalin was
surrounded by beautiful, young Jewish women.” Sebag Montef iore, writing in “Stalin: The Court of the
Red Tsar” (p. 267), noted that, “Stalin was surrounded by Jewesses – from Polina Molotova and
Maria Svanidze to Poskrebysheva and Yezhova. Beria’s son, reliable on gossip, dubious on politics,
recalled that his father gleefully listed Stalin’s affairs with Jewesses.” The “Wolf of the Kremlin“, pp.
169-71 (1987), alleges that Stalin was married at one point to the Jewess Rosa Kaganovich, Lazar
Kaganovich’s sister.
Despite all the spin and sophistry of Jewish gatekeepers, Stalin was surrounded by Jews throughout the
entirety of his brutal reign, with the f erocious Jew Lazar Kaganovich at his right hand side. In his 1939 book
“European Jungle”, Major Francis Charles Yeats-Brown — a British war hero and award winning writer —
gives us a synopsis of the clique of Jews encircling Stalin, still dominating the Soviet Union during and af ter
the “Great Purges” of the late 1930s:
“The population of Russia was then (in 1918) 158,400,000, of whom 7,800,000 were Jews. The
present population is about 170,000,000, and probably the same proportion — say 5 per cent
— are Jews. Yet in 1935, in the Central Committee of the Communist Party, consisting of
59 members, 95 per cent were Jews — i.e., 56 members — while the other three members
were married to Jewesses: Stalin, Lobov, and Ossinsky.
Among the Ambassadors and Ministers of the U.S.S.R. in 1935 the following were believed to be
In Berlin: M. Suritz.
In Paris : M. Louritz.
In Rome : M. Stein.
In Tokyo : M. Yureneff .
In Ankara : M. Karakhan.
In Brussels : M. Rubinin.
In Oslo : M. Yakoubowich.
In Stockholm : Mme. Kallontai.
In Bucharest : M. Ostrovski.
In Riga: M. Brodovsky.
In Tallin: M. Karski.
In Helsingfors : M. Asmous.
In the same year (1935) the League of Nations Delegation consisted of one Georgian, M.
Swanidze, and seven Jews, MM. Litvinov, Rosenberg, Stein, Markus, Brenners, Hirschfeld,
At present, with the purges in progress, it is impossible to give the Semitic percentages in the
Russian Government. Certain it is that they are very much higher than the percentage of Jews
to the population, both in the lower and upper grades of the State service, which means, in
Russia, of practically all employment.
During his travels along the border districts of the U.S.S.R., M. Jean Fontenoy found that 90 per
cent of the directors and secretaries of the collective farms he visited were Jews. Field
workers received a maximum of 27 days’ pay a month: the president and secretary 80 to 90
days’ pay a month. The words Communist and Jew were synonymous with the peasants: they
thought that the Jews were the rulers of the land.
In Kremlin circles the two brothers-in-law of Stalin, Lazarus and Moses Kaganovitch, are
Ministers of Transport and Heavy Industry respectively; the guard of the Kremlin is confided to
the Jewish Colonel Jacob Rappoport; while the concentration camps, with their population of
7,000,000 Russians, are in charge of a Jew, Mendel Kermann, aided by Lazarus Kaman and
Semen-Firkin, both Jews. The prisons of the country are governed by the Jew Kairn Apeter.
Foreign policy is almost wholly in Jewish hands, beginning with that man of many aliases, M.
Meyer Moses Polyanski, alias Enock Finkelstein, alias Gustav Graf, alias Buchmann, Harrison,
Maximovitch, Wallach, Berr, and Litvinov, the Foreign Minister of the Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics, at whose breakfast-table Mr. Eden found pats of butter stamped with the slogan,
“Peace is indivisible.” What peace, M. Litvinov may sometimes ask himself, will Russian Jews
have in the days to come?”
An article appearing in the Russian International News Agency, dated June 5th, 2005, admitted that almost
no Jews served on the front lines as rank and f ile of f icers in the Red Army, but were appointed by Stalin as
chief s and commanders, directing the “Russian goyim” from relative saf ety — in the war against their Nazi
nemesis — and how genocide-yearning Jews like Ilya Ehrenburg were instrumental in war-time propaganda
ef f orts:
“There were a number of outstanding Jewish military commanders: M. Katukov, Marshal
of Armored Troops; Y. Smushkevich, Commander-in-Chief of the Air Force; and General
M. Shmelev, Chief of Staff of Long-Range Aviation. In addition there were 92 Jewish
generals and 9 army and flotilla commanders. In total, there were 270 Jewish generals
and marshals.
Furthermore, Stalin’s inner circle included four Jewish ministers (people’s commissars):
Lazar Kaganovich, Boris Vannikov, Semyon Ginzburg and Isaak Zaltsman. These men
were responsible for the railroads, ammunition, military construction and the tank industry.
Jews were also instrumental in shaping the ideology that would underpin the Soviet role
in the war. Initially the Soviet people did not know what to make of the Nazi attack. Firstly, the
Soviet Union once considered Germany an enemy but more recently had viewed it as a
potential ally against Britain and the U.S. Secondly, the Soviet people, brought up to believe in
internationalism, had thought that the German soldiers, i.e. German workers and peasants,
would refuse to attack a socialist state and instead would join with the Russians to fight the
oppressors, German capitalists.
This myth had to be urgently dispelled.
A Jewish intellectual, Ilya Erenburg, played a key role in this. He had traveled extensively
and was perhaps the only Jew in the USSR who was aware of the racist motivations for the war.
He was a military correspondent in Spain during the Spanish civil war, and his world outlook was
informed by this experience. Six International Brigades had fought on the side of the
Republicans in that war, and these units had included 6,000 Jewish volunteers.
By the time the Germans attacked, Erenburg was resolutely opposed to fascism. He had all the
main national newspapers, Pravda, Izvestia and Krasnaya Zvezda at his disposal, as well as the
national radio stations. He emphatically rejected the internationalist dogma and called on
the nation to, “Kill the Germans!”"
Even well into the 1950s Jews ruled over the USSR.Although Jews comprised a tiny 1.25 to 1.75 percent of
the Soviet population, they constituted over 50 percent of the staf f of various governmental departments,
according to the Soviet politician Ekaterina Furtseva. (See: The Soviet Government and the Jews 1948-
1967) While millions of Russian Gentiles languished in the Gulag slave camps succumbing to starvation,
disease, exhaustion and the bitter cold climate, Soviet Jewry lived in a lap of luxury:
“Slezkine describes the life of the largely Jewish elite in Moscow and Leningrad, where
they attended the theater, sent their children to the best schools, had peasant women
for nannies, spent weekends at pleasant dachas, and vacationed at the Black Sea.”
(MacDonald, Kevin. “Stalin’s Willing Executioners: Jews as a Hostile Elite in the USSR”, p. 24)
Many Jews around the world saw the Soviet Union as essentially the f irst Zionist State — their beloved
“Israel”. This reality was supremely elucidated in the f ollowing astonishing quotation, which is attributed to
the “Central Committee of the Petersburg Branch of the Israelite International League”:
“Sons of Israel! The hour of our ultimate victory is near. We stand on the threshold to the
command of the world. That which we could only dream of before us is about to be realized.
Only quite recently feeble and powerless, we can now, thanks to the world’s catastrophe, raise
our heads with pride. We must, however, be careful. It can surely be prophesied that, after we
have marched over ruined and broken altars and thrones, we shall advance further on the same
indicated path. The authority of the, to us, alien religions and doctrines of faith we have through
very successful propaganda, subject to a merciless criticism and mockery. We have brought the
culture, civilization, traditions and thrones of the Christian Nations to stagger. We have done
everything to bring the Russian people under the yoke of the Jewish power, and ultimately
compelled them to fall on their knees before us.
We have nearly completed all this but we must all the same be very cautious, because the
oppressed Russia is our arch-enemy. The victory over Russia, gained through our intellectual
superiority, may in the future, in a new generation, turn against us. Russia is conquered and
brought to the ground. Russia is in the agony of death under our heel, but do not forget, not
even for a moment, that we must be careful! The holy care for our safety does not allow us to
show either pity or mercy. At last we have been allowed to behold the bitter need of the Russian
people, and to see it in tears! By taking from them their property, their gold, we have reduced
this people to helpless slaves. Be cautious and silent! We ought to have no mercy for our
enemy. We must make an end of the best and leading elements of the Russian people, so that
the vanquished Russia may not find any leader! Thereby every possibility will vanish for them to
resist our power. We must excite hatred and disputes between workers and peasants. War and
the class-struggle will destroy all treasures and culture created by the Christian people. But be
cautious, sons of Israel! Our victory is near, because our political and economic power and
influence upon the masses are in rapid progress. We buy up Government loans and gold, and
thereby we have controlling power over the world’s exchanges. The power is in our hands, but
be careful, place no faith in traitorous shady powers!
Bronstein (Trotsky), Apfelbaum (Zinovieff), Rosenfeld (Kamaneff), Steinberg, all of them are like
unto thousands of other true sons of Israel. Our power in Russia is unlimited. In the towns, the
Commissariats and Commissions of Food, House Commissions, etc., are dominated by our
people. But do not let victory intoxicate you. Be careful, cautious, because no one except
yourselves will protect us! Remember we cannot rely on the Red Army, which one day may turn
its warfare on ourselves. Sons of Israel! The hour for our long-cherished victory over Russia is
near; close up solid your ranks! Make known our people’s national policy! Fight for eternal
ideals! Keep holy the old laws, which history has bequeathed to us! May our intellect, our
genius, protect and lead us!”
The origin of this extraordinary tract was described by Juri Lina (on page 157 of “Under the Sign of the
Scorpion”) in the f ollowing way:
“On the night before the 9th (22nd) of December 1919, during the Estonian war of liberation
against the Bolsheviks, a Jewish battalion commander, Shunderev, fell in a battle against
Estonian troops. Among his papers there was a secret circular containing an appeal to all
Jewish chiefs for the forming of a secret Zionist society. The letter was written in Russian by the
central committee at the Israeli World Union’s department in Petrograd on the 18th March 1918.
The entire text was published in two Estonian newspapers.”
When the Soviet Red Army invaded and brutally occupied Eastern Poland, the Baltic States, Finland, and
other parts of Eastern Europe in late 1939/early 1940, large percentages of the Jewish populations of
those countries collaborated with their Soviet communist conquerors. These Jews voluntarily led the
NKVD death squads to hunt down and execute so-called “class enemies” (patriots, nationalists, anticommunist resistors, etc), and f orcibly led the round-up and deportation via cattle cars of millions of
Eastern European civilians to the Soviet Gulags where they met grisly deaths.Author Mark Paul, writing in
“Neighbours on the Eve of the Holocaust: Polish-Jewish Relations in Soviet-Occupied Eastern Poland,
1939-1945“, documented the treacherous perf idy of Poland’s Jews and its cover-up by Western “scholars”:
“This state of affairs played into the hands of Holocaust historians who, preoccupied with Jewish
victimization under the Nazi regime, ignored, glossed over or simply denied the fact of Jewish
collaboration with the Soviet invaders of Poland both, in 1939-1941 and again, from 1944
onward. Indeed, in recent years we have witnessed a concerted effort to relegate Jewish
misconduct to the realm of unfounded perception on the part of the Poles that has no, or little,
basis in fact. Thus a serious void or, worse still, denial about these thorny issues
permeates Western scholarship – at most we find apologetics. The most recent, and
disturbing, trend in that scholarship has been to focus on the German invasion of the
Soviet Union in June 1941 and play down to the point of dismissing or obscuring the
brutal Soviet occupation that preceded that event.
Even compelling reports of Jewish collaboration with the Soviet occupiers, found in key
documents from that period, are ignored or discounted out of hand, such as the charge levelled
by the legendary Polish courier, Jan Karski, who was made an Honorary Citizen of Israel for his
role in warning the West about the Holocaust and cannot be accused of harbouring hostility
toward the Jews. Writing in early 1940, at a time when the mass deportations of Poles were not
yet underway, Karski reported:
“… The Jews have taken over the majority of the political and administrative positions.
But what is worse, they are denouncing Poles, especially students and politicians (to
the secret police), are directing the work of the (communist) militia from behind the
scenes, are unjustly denigrating conditions in Poland before the war. Unfortunately, one
must say that these incidents are very frequent, and more common than incidents which
demonstrate loyalty toward Poles or sentiment toward Poland.”
A Jewish woman from Wilno concurred with that assessment, when she wrote during the war:
“… Under Bolshevik rule an anti-Jewish current grew significantly. In large measure, the
Jews themselves were responsible for this… . At every turn they mocked Poles, yelled
out that their Poland was no more… The Jewish communists dallied with the patriotic
sentiments of Poles, denounced their illegal conversations, pointed out Polish officers
and former government officials, freely worked for the NKVD, and took part in arrests. …
The Bolsheviks on the whole treated Jews favourably, had complete faith in them and
were confident of their devoted sympathy and trust. For that reason they put Jews in all
of the leading and influential positions which they would not entrust to Poles, who
formerly occupied them.”
Soon thereafter Jewish collaborators, in their positions as local officials, police, and
NKVD agents, played a key role in populating the Gulag with their Polish neighbours.
They identified them and put them on lists of “class enemies”; they arrested them and
evicted them from their homes; and they helped to dispatch them by cattle car to the far
reaches of the Soviet Union. While certainly not universal, this was by no means a marginal
phenomenon, and, given the lack of condemnation of such activities by Jewish leaders, Poles
were entitled to assume that in fact it reflected a widespread attitude.”
Unf ortunately, that study by Mark Paul — although still very usef ul — completely overlooked the sublime
research of Holocaust Revisionists, as it contains a f air bit of f alse ‘holocaust’ propaganda. Nonetheless,
it demonstrates candidly what provoked so many Poles (and Ukrainians, Latvians, Estonians, Lithuanians,
Romanians and Hungarians f or that matter) to collaborate with the Germans when the German Wehrmacht
launched an of f ensive against the Soviets in 1941, driving them out of Eastern Europe and the Baltic
States. These patriots saw the Nazis as liberators from Soviet-Communist oppression, which was in
actuality Jewish oppression.
Communism was spearheaded by Jews not only in Russia, but everywhere in the world where Jews lived
including Western & Eastern Europe, America, Canada, Australia and South Africa. (See: Hof f man II, Michael
A. “Judaic Communists: The Documentary Record”, Revisionist History, 2006; Britton, Frank L. Behind
Communism, 1953; Leese, Arnold Spencer. Bolshevism Is Jewish! London, England: Imperial Fascist League,
1939; Ehrt, Adolf . Communism in Germany: the Truth about the Communist Conspiracy on the Eve of the
National Revolution. Berlin: Eckart-verlag, 1933; “Jews and Communism: The South African Experience”,
author unknown) The communist regimes imposed on Eastern and Western Europe during and f ollowing
the Second World War — principally in Ukraine, Poland, Romania, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, East Germany,
and the Baltic States — were just as Jewish-dominated as the Soviet Union. (See: David, Tref or. The Bloody
Red Streak. London, England: Britons Pub. Society, 1951.)
The bloodiest butchers of the 1917 Bolshevik revolution, and the f ollowing decades of communist rule,
were the Marxist-Masonic Jews Vladimir Lenin (f irst dictator of the USSR), Leon Trotsky-Bronstein
(f ounder/commander of the Red Army), Lazar Kaganovich (Stalin’s right hand man f or his entire reign),
Moisei Uritsky (Cheka chief in Petrograd), Jacob Sverdlov (f irst president of the Soviets), Grigory Zinoviev,
Lev Kamenev, Yankel Yurovsky (Cheka terrorist), Genrikh Yagoda (NKVD chief), Laverenti Beria (NKVD
chief), Bela Kun (Lenin’s chief terrorist in the Crimea, also the dictator of Hungary’s short-lived communist
regime in 1918), Rosalina Zalkind, Leonid Reichman (NKVD chief), and the overseers of the vast and
harrowing Soviet Gulag slave labor/death camp apparatus: Aaron Soltz, Naftali Frenkel (a Turkish Jew),
Yakov Berman, Sergei Zhuk, Yakov Rapoport, Nakhimson, Yakov Moroz, Abramson, Pliner, Matvei
Berman, Samuil Kogan, Samuil Firin, Biskon, Finkelstein, Serpukhovsky — all Jews. The murderous
tyrant Josef Stalin, although not a Jew, was simply f ollowing in the blood-stained f ootsteps of Lenin and
obeying the dictates of his Jewish overlords.
Words cannot do justice in describing the merciless bloodlust of these Marxist Jews. Many of the leading
Jewish rulers of Russia f orthrightly announced their murderous desires and genocidal ambitions.All the
Jewish Bolshevik leaders were teeming with an implacable hatred f or everything Russian and sought to
exterminate the very concept of race, nationality and culture.
De ath and d e structio n — the le g acy o f Je wish Co mmunism!
Despite the sugar-coated f ables of Bolshevist
apologists, the Masonic Jew Trotsky was a
merciless monster who organized the genocide of
millions of Russians, leading the “Red Terror”
alongside Lenin in the early and most savage
years of the Soviet regime. In Under the Sign of the
Scorpion, p. 149, Juri Lina captured the true
sadism and despotism of Trotsky, who had an
insatiable appetite f or terror:
“After coming to power, Trotsky became
Lenin’s right-hand man. It was actually
Trotsky who ruled Russia during Lenin’s
illness. He mercilessly caused the people
suffering of a magnitude the world had
never seen before. In the beginning
Trotsky wanted to use the guillotine to
execute people, but was scolded for this
He was a cynic and a sadist of the worst sort. He often executed his victims personally.
He murdered his hostages in the cruellest manner and even ordered children killed. He
ordered disciplinary executions. There are plenty of documents about these cruelties
preserved in the archives of the Communist Party.”
Jewish-Soviet Commissar, Grigory Zinoviev, was a human demon, if there is such a thing. This homicidal
maniac would regularly scream f or genocide. In a speech he delivered in 1918, Zinoviev announced
Bolshevist plans f or the annihilation of 10,000,000 Russians, stating emphatically,
“To overcome our enemies we must have our own Socialist Militarism. We must win over
to our side, 90 millions out of the 100 millions of population of Russia under the Soviets.
As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them; they must be annihilated.” (A Collection
of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia. Great Britain: Foreign Office, (1919), p. 99)
He also malevolently howled,
“The bourgeoisie kill separate individuals; but we kill whole classes!”
His partner in crime, Lenin, made similar blood-curdling decrees. In 1908, Lenin made it perf ectly clear what
he intended to do once in power, stating: “real, nation-wide terror, which reinvigorates the country.”
Lenin said that he was happy to see 90 percent of the population of Russia perish, so long as the
remaining people believed in him and his communist system, stating,
“What does it matter if 90 percent of the Russian people perish, provided the surviving
10 percent bring about a World Revolution?” (quoted in: The Kokomo Daily Tribune –
September 27, 1924 – page 4; Time Magazine – February 11, 1924; Impressions of Soviet
Russia (1924) By Charles Sarolea, p. 84; Stillborn Crusade: the Tragic Failure of Western
Intervention in the Russian Civil War, 1918-1920, (1996), by Ilya Somin, p. 4; The Communist
Shakes His Fist by Bruce Reynolds, (1931), p. 171)
Lenin was f ond of exterminating people. He ordered Russian Orthodox Christian priests to be shot on
sight, slaughtered like cattle! This isn’t so surprising, since killing Christians is not considered murder, or a
sin, in Judaism. Lenin and the Marxists used f amine as a weapon of mass annihilation.Author Harun Yahya,
writing in “Communism in Ambush”, pp. 45-48, outlined Lenin’s deliberate policy of utilizing man-made
f amines as an instrument of genocide:
“Famine, Lenin explained, “in destroying the outdated peasant economy, would bring about the
next stage more rapidly, and usher in socialism, the stage that necessarily followed capitalism.
Famine would also destroy faith not only in the Tsar, but in God too.” Lenin told the Politburo, “In
fact the present moment favors us far more than it does them. We are almost 99 percent sure
that we can strike a mortal blow against them [our enemies] and consolidate the central position
that we are going to need to occupy for several decades to come. With the help of all those
starving people who are starting to eat each other, who are dying by the millions, and
whose bodies litter the roadside all over the country, it is now and only now that we canand therefore must-confiscate all church property with all the ruthless energy we can
still muster… All evidence suggests that we could not do this at any other moment, because
our only hope is the despair engendered in the masses by the famine, which will cause
them to look at us in a favorable light or, at the very least, with indifference.“
Lenin devilishly proclaimed that anyone who did not give up their grain to the government were to be killed:
“Begin a merciless campaign of terror and a war against the farmers and other bourgeois
elements who are hiding an excess of grain.” Lenin and Trotsky’s “Red Terror” crusade against Gentiles
was carried out by the most ruthless, savage and f eared secret police agency ever to exist — the Cheka
(later known as the NKVD, OGPU and KGB). The word “Cheka” is not simply an acronym in Russian f or
“Special Commission f or Fighting Counter-Revolution.” According to Brother Nathanael Kapner (a f ormer
Jew who converted to Christianity and is now an outspoken critic of Jewry) “Cheka” is a play on the Hebrew
expression f or animal slaughter, “Shechita“. Makes perf ect sense.
Felix Dzerzhinsky, the f irst chief of the Cheka, explained the modus operandi of his death-dealing
organization, emphatically stating,
“We stand for organized terror. The Cheka is obligated to defend the revolution and
conquer the enemy even if its sword does by chance sometimes fall upon the heads of
the innocent.”
A Jewish Chekist named Martin Latsis, declared:
“We are exterminating the bourgeoisie as a class!”
The brutish Cheka was a thoroughly Jewish institution not only at the higher levels, but even amidst rankand-f ile of f icers. W. Bruce Lincoln, an American prof essor of Russian history, stated that in Ukraine, “Jews
made up 80% of the rank-and-file officers of the Cheka.” Jewish historian Leonard Shapiro tells us
that, “Anyone who had the misfortune to fall into the hands of the Cheka stood a very good
chance of finding himself confronted with, and possibly shot by, a Jewish investigator.” (Russian
Studies, 1988, p. 286)
In late 1922, the New York Times rep
In late 1922, the New York Times reported that there were some hostilities toward Jews in the Ukraine, but
that this was being stamped out violently with the help of a “Jewish army” of allegedly 500,000 soldiers.
This Zionist army was mobolized on behalf of their Jewish-Bolshevik brethren in Moscow to inf lict terror
and enf orce a grain tax on Ukrainian Gentiles. The Jewish-owned New York Times, being a repulsive Zionist
and Bolshevist mouthpiece, absurdly depicted this essential part of the Red Terror as heroic, justif ied
Jewish self-def ense; but it let slip some revealing f acts nonetheless. (See this f acsimile of the NYT article)
These slaughterous policies established by Lenin and Trotsky continued under Stalin’s reign. In 1932, Stalin
ordered his Jewish deputies to coordinate a man-made f amine-genocide in the Ukraine to weaken the
nationalist spirit of the proud Ukrainian people who sought independence from communist tyranny. Lazar
Kaganovich, Lavrenti Beria, Genrikh Yagoda, among other bloodthirsty Jewish Chekist/NKVDist hoodlums,
pleasurably implemented Stalin’s collectivization orders with a Talmudic f ervor, wiping out seven million
Ukrainian men, women and children, in a few short years in an unprecedented ‘holocaust’ of
human life. (See: Moroz, Valentyn. Nationalism and Genocide: The Origin of the Artificial Famine of 1932-
1933 in Ukraine. The Institute f or Historical Review, 1985) Canadian journalist, Eric Margolis, keenly
summarized the barbarity of this tragedy as such:
“As Britain’s socialist government cleared the way for a gaudy show trial of that Great Satan of
the left, Chile’s Gen. Augusto Pinochet, the 65th anniversary of this century’s bloodiest crime
was utterly ignored. Leftists now baying for Pinochet’s head don’t want to be reminded of the
Unknown Holocaust. In 1932, Soviet leader Josef Stalin unleashed genocide in Ukraine. Stalin
determined to force Ukraine’s millions of independent farmers – called kulaks – into collectivized
Soviet agriculture, and to crush Ukraine’s growing spirit of nationalism. Faced by resistance to
collectivization, Stalin unleashed terror and dispatched 25,000 fanatical young party
militants from Moscow – earlier versions of Mao’s Red Guards – to force 10 million
Ukrainian peasants into collective farms. Secret police units of OGPU began selective
executions of recalcitrant farmers. When Stalin’s red guards failed to make a dent in this
immense number, OGPU was ordered to begin mass executions. But there were simply
not enough Chekists (secret police) to kill so many people, so Stalin decided to replace
bullets with a much cheaper medium of death – mass starvation. All seed stocks, grain,
silage and farm animals were confiscated from Ukraine’s farms. [...]
OGPU agents and Red Army troops sealed all roads and rail lines. Nothing came in or out of
Ukraine. Farms were searched and looted of food and fuel. Ukrainians quickly began to die of
hunger, cold and sickness. When OGPU failed to meet weekly execution quotas, Stalin sent
henchman Lazar Kaganovitch to destroy Ukrainian resistance. Kaganovitch, the Soviet
Eichmann, made quota, shooting 10,000 Ukrainians weekly. Eighty percent of all
Ukrainian intellectuals were executed. A Ukrainian party member named Nikita Khruschchev
helped supervise the slaughter. During the bitter winter of 1932-33, mass starvation created by
Kaganovitch and OGPU hit full force. Ukrainians ate their pets, boots and belts, plus bark and
roots. Some parents even ate infant children. The precise number of Ukrainians murdered by
Stalin’s custom-made famine and Cheka firing squads remains unknown to this day. The KGB’s
archives, and recent work by Russian historians, show at least seven million died.
Ukrainian historians put the figure at nine million, or higher. Twenty-five percent of
Ukraine’s population was exterminated. [...]
Kaganovitch and many senior OGPU officers (later, NKVD) were Jewish. The
predominance of Jews among Bolshevik leaders, and the frightful crimes and cruelty
inflicted by Stalin’s Cheka on Ukraine, the Baltic states and Poland, led the victims of
Red Terror to blame the Jewish people for both communism and their suffering. As a
direct result, during the subsequent Nazi occupation of Eastern Europe, the region’s innocent
Jews became the target of ferocious revenge by Ukrainians, Balts and Poles. [...]
Stalin’s murder of millions was simply denied, or concealed by a left-wing conspiracy of silence
that continues to this day. … Socialist luminaries like Bernard Shaw, Beatrice and Sidney Webb
and PM Edouard Herriot of France, toured Ukraine during 1932-33 and proclaimed reports of
famine were false. Shaw announced: “I did not see one under-nourished person in Russia.”
New York Times correspondent Walter Duranty, who won a Pulitzer Prize for his Russian
reporting, wrote claims of famine were “malignant propaganda.” Seven million people were
dying around them, yet these fools saw nothing. The New York Times has never repudiated
Duranty’s lies. [...]
Western historians delicately skirt the sordid fact that the governments of Britain, the United
States and Canada were fully aware of the Ukrainian genocide and Stalin’s other monstrous
crimes. Yet they eagerly welcomed him as an ally during World War II. … None of the Soviet
mass murderers who committed genocide were ever brought to justice. Lazar Kaganovitch died
peacefully in Moscow a few years ago, still wearing his Order of the Soviet Union, and enjoying
a generous state pension.” (Toronto Sun, “Remembering Ukraine’s Unknown Holocaust,”
December 13, 1998)
In a sickening display of Talmudic insolence, Aleksandr Feldman — the leader of the Ukrainian Jewish
Committee — sought to undermine a Ukrainian government motion to prosecute a case against the Soviet
criminals who orchestrated the Holodomor genocide, f or the predictable reason that all of the names on
the published list of conspirators were Jewish:
“KIEV, Ukraine (JTA) — A Jewish group in Ukraine is objecting to a criminal case brought over
the “Great Famine” committed in the 1930s. The nation’s security service is pressing the case
against a list of former Soviet officials accused of committing the Holodomor, which caused the
deaths of millions in Ukraine in 1932-33. Most of the names on the list were Jewish.
Ukrainian lawmaker Aleksandr Feldman, leader of the Ukrainian Jewish Committee, said last
week that it was “a farce” to press the case. “All organizers of the Great Famine are dead,” he
said. Last July, the Ukrainian Security Service released a list of high-ranking Soviet state
and Communist Party officials — as well as officials from NKVD, the police force of
Soviet Russia — that essentially blamed Jews and Latvians responsible for perpetrating
and executing the famine because most of the names on the list were Jewish. The
Ukrainian Jewish Committee called on the secret service to revise the list, which incited
interethnic hatred, in order to clear up the “inaccuracy.”” (JTA, “Jewish Group Objects To ‘Great
Famine’ Case,” June 15, 2009)
To add insult to injury, on a state visit to Ukraine the vile war criminal — Israeli president Shimon Peres —
told the Ukrainians to “forget history”, stating in true Orwellian newspeak,
“If I were asked what advice Ukraine, I would say: forget history, history is not important
at all. … You will not be able to not repeat the mistakes of the past, you just, make new.”
(BBC World, “Israeli President Advises Ukrainians to Forget History,” November 25, 2010)
Sheer chutzpah!As they malevolently and hypocritically endeavor to censor and suppress open discussion
of their countless crimes against humanity and command Gentiles just “f orget history” (history that isn’t
f avorable to Jews, that is), demonic Jews are still — almost 70 years af ter WWII — continuously
spearheading psychotic witch-hunts against elderly German WWII vets accused of committing crimes
against Jews that, in all likelihood, never even occurred! (See: YnetNews, “90 Year Old Nazi Hit Man Jailed,”
The litany of torturous, blood-curdling atrocities committed by the Marxist Jews against the long-suf f ering
Russians (and other European peoples: Ukrainians, Belarussians, Poles, Hungarians, etc) are calculatingly
listed by author Juri Lina, in his monumental work “Under the Sign of the Scorpion“. One should approach
the f ollowing text on an empty stomach, as the blunt descriptions of these grotesque, satanically-inspired
misdeeds is simply nauseating:
“Lenin and his accomplices did not arrest just anyone. They executed those most active in
society, the independent thinkers. Lenin gave orders to kill as many students as possible in
several towns. The Chekists arrested every youth wearing a school cap. They were liquidated
because Lenin believed the coming Russian intellectuals would be a threat to the Soviet regime.
(Vladimir Soloukhin, “In the Light of Day”, Moscow 1992, p. 40.)
The role of the Russian intellectuals in society was taken over by the Jews.
Many students (for example in Yaroslavl) learned quickly and hid their school caps. Afterwards,
the Chekists stopped all suspect youths and searched their hair for the stripe of the school cap.
If the stripe was found, the youth was killed on the spot.
The author Vladimir Soloukhin revealed that the Chekists were especially interested in
handsome boys and pretty girls. These were the first to be killed. It was believed that there
would be more intellectuals among attractive people. Attractive youths were therefore killed as a
danger to society. No crime as terrible as this has hitherto been described in the history of the
The terror was co-ordinated by the Chekist functionary Joseph Unschlicht. How did they go
about the murders? The Jewish Chekists flavoured murder with various torture methods.
In his documentary “The Russia We Lost”, the director Stanislav Govorukhin told how
the priesthood in Kherson were crucified. The archbishop Andronnikov in Perm was
tortured: his eyes were poked out, his ears and nose were cut off. In Kharkov the priest
Dmitri was undressed. When he tried to make the sign of the cross, a Chekist cut off his
right hand.
Several sources tell how the Chekists in Kharkov placed the victims in a row and nailed
their hands to a table, cut around their wrists with a knife, poured boiling water over the
hands and pulled the skin off. This was called “pulling off the glove”. In other places,
the victim’s head was placed on an anvil and slowly crushed with a steam hammer.
Those due to undergo the same punishment the next day were forced to watch. The
eyes of church dignitaries were poked out, their tongues were cut off and they were
buried alive. There were Chekists who used to cut open the stomachs of their victims,
following which they pulled out a length of the small intestine and nailed it to a
telegraph pole and, with a whip, forced the unlucky victim to run circles around the pole
until the whole intestine had been unravelled and the victim died. The bishop of
Voronezh was boiled alive in a big pot, after which the monks, with revolvers aimed at
their heads, were forced to drink this soup.
Other Chekists crushed the heads of their victims with special headscrews, or drilled
them through with dental tools. The upper part of the skull was sawn off and the nearest
in line was forced to eat the brain, following which the procedure would be repeated to
the end of the line.
The Chekists often arrested whole families and tortured the children before the eyes of their
parents, and the wives before their husbands. Mikhail Voslensky, a former Soviet functionary,
described some of the cruel methods used by the Chekists in his book “Nomenklatura” /
“Nomenclature” (Stockholm, 1982, p. 321): “In Kharkov, people were scalped. In Voronezh,
the torture victims were placed in barrels into which nails were hammered so that they
stuck out on the inside, upon which the barrels were set rolling. A pentacle (usually a
five-pointed star formerly used in magic) was burned into the foreheads of the victims.
In Tsaritsyn and Kamyshin, the hands of victims were amputated with a saw. In Poltava
and Kremenchug, the victims were impaled. In Odessa, they were roasted alive in ovens
or ripped to pieces. In Kiev, the victims were placed in coffins with a decomposing body
and buried alive, only to be dug up again after half an hour.”
Lenin was dissatisfied with these reports and demanded: “Put more force into the
terror!” All of this happened in the provinces. The reader can try to imagine how people were
executed in Moscow. The Russian- Jewish newspaper Yevreyskaya Tribuna stated on the 24th
of August 1922 that Lenin had asked the rabbis if they were satisfied with the particularly
cruel executions.
The Russian people remember with horror their Jewish executioners, all of whom had
their own methods for getting rid of their enemies. Ashikin in Simferopol made his
victims march stark naked before him whereupon he hacked off their arms and ears with
his sword before he personally pressed out their eyes and cut off their heads. The chief
executioner in Nikolaiev, Bogbender, had his victims walled in alive. Deutsch and
Wichman worked in Odessa. They claimed to have no appetite until they had killed
several hundred goys. The Chekists in Voronezh committed ritual murders. Among other
things, they used to boil their victims alive. That was a common method of getting rid of
goys and Jewish renegades. Nearly all the inhabitants of Pyatigorsk were exterminated. All this
information was published in the Russian newspaper Russkoye Vosskresenye, No. 3, 1991.
It is impossible, for lack of space, to describe all the butchers and their crimes. I shall just
mention some numbers. During a single year in power, the Bolsheviks exterminated 320
000 clergymen (Molodaya Gvardiya, No. 6, 1989). A total of 10 180 000 “class enemies”
were murdered between 1918 and 1920. Another 15 million people died during the civil
war. During the famine of 1921-22, another 5 053 000 people perished. The Bolsheviks,
headed by Lenin, managed to destroy over 30 million people during their first four years
in power.
In 1917, 143.5 million people lived in the part of Imperial Russia, which later became Soviet
Russia. Russia had lost more than 20 per cent of her population by 1922. Only 131 million
lived there in 1923. It has been calculated that Russia’s population, under normal
circumstances, should have increased to 343 million by the middle of the 1950s, that is, if the
development had continued as it had begun in the Tsarist era. 165 million people disappeared.
Who in the West mourns for them? There were 178 million left.
Kaganovich and his cronies brought about this genocide by the introduction of confiscatory
taxation on those peasants who remained after the extermination of the “kulaks”. Meanwhile, he
sent out new gangs of fanatical activists who commanded enforcement patrols, especially in the
Ukraine, where the borders to the other Soviet republics had been closed off. The political
activists took away every grain of corn and every egg, every vegetable and every fruit of the
farms’ produce. Convoys of trucks carried all the food away. Each piece of bread, which should
have been brought to the starving, was confiscated at the border. Every Ukrainian, who might
be suspected of the least, often invented, attempt at lessening the full impact of the famine or of
hiding foodstuffs from the authorities, was shot or sent to the labour camps. (Robert Conquest,
“The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collektivization and the Terror-Famine”, Alberta, 1986.)
Each morning, wagons drove about to collect the dead in the Ukraine and southern Russia.
Bodies lined the roads in Central Asia too. Cannibalism became increasingly common in the
Ukraine in 1934. Several sources show that the famine even brought forth actual
slaughterhouses for orphaned children, whose meat was later sold.
The systematic killing of large numbers of children began as early as 1934. After all, they cost
money… In Moscow, the murders were carried out in the prison dungeons of the Lubyanka, the
Butyrka and the Lefortovo. Stalin and Kaganovich had their most famous victims cremated at
night, following which they had the ash smuggled out and buried in a mass grave in the
Donskoye graveyard. This seemed the safest way to complete the total elimination of their
important victims.
Far from all of those killed in the jails of Moscow during the 1930s, the 1940s and the beginning
of the 1950s were cremated. Most of them were thrown into various mass graves in Moscow.
One of those hitherto unknown mass graves was found in the Kalitinsky graveyard in southern
Moscow. The NKVD used it as a dumping site for bodies for several years in the 1930s.
The covered lorries arrived at around five in the afternoon, every single day for seven years
between 1934 an 1941. They drove up to the far end of a ravine, turned around and reversed
up to the edge. The trucks were painted blue-green and lacked side-windows. Instead, large
letters on the sides of the truck announced SAUSAGES or MEAT and sometimes CAKES. When
the truck had backed up to the edge and stopped, a hatch was opened at the back and two
officers wearing NKVD uniforms, rubber boots, long rubber aprons in black and gold and elbowlength rubber gloves seized the corpses by the heads and legs and threw them down into the
ravine. Two other soldiers waited down below with shovels and threw some earth on the bodies.
The corpses were always naked. They all had bullet holes in their heads; a small entry hole in
the back of the neck and large exit hole in front. They had been shot from behind. The
executioners had an unlimited supply of alcohol. They were usually drunk, sometimes
The KGB admitted in July 1990 that there were also mass graves in the Donskoye and
Vagankovskoye cemeteries in Moscow. A large execution site has now been found in
Kuropaty, six miles from Minsk, the capital of Byelorussia. At least 102 000 people were
murdered there, including many women. Witnesses have related that the executions began
in the evenings and continued through the nights. The executioners wore NKVD uniforms. The
witness Mikolai Karpovich saw how people stood lined up by a mass grave. They were gagged
and blindfolded. To save bullets, the executioners usually tried to shoot two people with
each shot. Executions took place there every day between 1937 and June 1941.
The people who lived near the Kuropaty forest could hear salvoes of shots and prisoners
begging and screaming for their lives. There were at least five such execution sites around
Minsk, where the butchers worked in shifts. Uniformed NKVD men used to take part in the
dance in the village of Kuropaty at around 11 o’clock on Saturday evenings. (Expressen, 18th of
October 1988.)
About fifty mass graves in this area have later been opened. Prisoners who were taken to
Kuropaty in the winter were forced to step out of the carriages in the severe cold, whereupon
they were showered in icy water and ordered to return to the carriages. Not many survived until
the following morning. The heads were cut off from all the frozen corpses. The survivors were
killed at the edge of the mass grave, into which all the victims were thrown.
Moscow Television related on the 12th of September 1989 that nearly 300 000 victims
had been found in an abandoned goldmine near Chelyabinsk. This was the largest mass
grave. The Communists killed up to 250 000 “enemies of the people” in the forest of
Bykovnya near Kiev between 1937 and 1941. Most were shot in the neck, but a few had
also been poisoned by smoke (Dagens Nyheter, 25th of March 1989). That place had
earlier been called the grave of the victims of fascism. The bodies of many Jews were
supposed to have been hidden there, but this lie was exposed after the fall of
From 1943, the Chekists managed to collect two million children per year. Beria became a
dreadful executioner during the Second World War, since he was able to conceal his
crimes as the work of the Nazis. He had nearly 20 million people captured and sent to
slave camps. According to the latest estimates, the Soviet Union lost at least 32 million,
possibly 45 million, citizens during the Second World War. The historian Nikolai Tolstoy
claims that most of them (presumably 20 million) were killed by order of Lavrenti Beria.
All those deaths were blamed on the Germans.
Stalin, Kaganovich and Beria had 25 700 Polish citizens executed in April 1940. The
murder of more than 4000 Polish officers (including many of Jewish blood) in Katyn was
brought to light by the Germans. It was Ivan Krivozhertsev who informed the Germans about
the mass graves in the Katyn forest. No one wanted to listen to the Nazis’ claim that it had been
the work of the Bolsheviks, since the Soviet Union had blamed the Germans.
It was only on the 14th of October 1992 that a copy of the decision signed by Stalin and passed
by Molotov, Kaganovich, Kalinin and others, was handed over to the Polish President Lech
Walesa by the Russian government. It was not really so strange that Jewish Chekists had also
executed Jewish officers (including Abram Engel, Samuel Rosen, Isaak Gutman, Isaak Feinkel
and others) who had served in the Polish army. They were regarded as traitors!
The President of the United States of America Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and the British
Prime Minister Anthony Eden, prohibited all publicity about this mass murder. Roosevelt
officially asserted that the events in Katyn were a German plot. Winston Churchill
warned his ministers: “The whole subject must be avoided!” At the same time, he
assured Stalin that he would do all he could to silence the Polish exile newspapers in
Voice of America was not, even in the 1970s, allowed to relate that the Bolsheviks had killed the
Polish officers. Hans Holzapfel, the Jewish chief of the European section, was responsible for
the censorship.
It is now known exactly what happened. The mass murders began in April 1940. The Polish
officers, wearing winter uniforms, were brought in small groups – 30-40 at a time – to the
execution site. They were then shot in the neck, one at a time, whilst standing by the edge of
the mass grave.
The NKVD continued working every day for nearly six weeks. A total of 4143 officer’s bodies
were found. 4421 people were killed in the Katyn forest, according to the documents. All the
identified bodies proved to be former prisoners from Kozielsk. The prisoners who had been
incarcerated in the Starobielsk (near Kharkov) and Ostashkov (near Kalinin) camps were
murdered elsewhere. The latter amounted to 10 131 (3820 + 6311) people. Another 7305 Polish
citizens were murdered in Byelorussia and the Ukraine. The pertaining documents were
marked: “Must never be opened!”
Kaganovich founded actual slave camps, where the inmates worked in chains. Of the
most important Jewish camp commanders (Aaron Soltz, Naftali Frenkel – a Turkish Jew -,
Yakov Berman, Sergei Zhuk, Yakov Rapoport, Nakhimson, Yakov Moroz, Abramson,
Pliner, Matvei Berman, Samuil Kogan, Samuil Firin, Biskon, Finkelstein, Serpukhovsky).
Lazar Kogan was picked out as insufficiently effective. He was executed in 1938 and
replaced by another Jew.“
As Juri Lina has conclusively shown, in the hectic, war-ravaged period between 1939-1945 Soviet butchers
Stalin, Kaganovich and Beria cunningly concealed their colossal war crimes by blaming them on the Nazis.
Acting as de f acto propaganda publicists f or Bolshevism, the Jewish-controlled press of Western Europe
and the United States made easy work of scapegoating the Nazis f or Jewish-Communist malf easance. In
his 1982 book “Stalin’s Secret War,” the Russian historian Nikolai Tolstoy exposes as a fraud the of f icial
Soviet claim, widely parroted by the Western media, that 20 million Soviet citizens were killed by the Axis
Forces during the Second World War. Tolstoy demonstrates that most of those 20 million were actually
victims of the Soviet regime itself !All of those deaths were f alsely blamed on the Nazis. (See: Charles
Lutton’s review of “Stalin’s Secret War”) Russian historian Anton Antonov-Ovseyenko estimates, in “ The
Time of Stalin — Portrait of a Tyranny,” that the Soviet rulers had killed more than eighty million of
their own people to keep themselves in power!
tre ache ro us
te rro r
o f
Zio n
p e rme ate s
g lo b e !
Moreover, the Zionist propaganda myth of ‘The Holocaust’ has been steadily unraveling over the past f our
decades. Leading Jews have conf essed that the “5,000,000 non-Jews” supposedly killed in the so-called
‘Holocaust’ is a complete f abrication — an invention of the pathologically lying Jew, Simon Wiesenthal.
Zionists Deborah Lipstadt, Peter Novick and Yehuda Bauer — three prominent promoters of the of f icial
Holocaust narrative and liars in their own right — have all denounced Wiesenthal’s larcenous lie about the
imaginary “f ive million non-Jewish” victims of the Nazis that he conjured out of thin air as a marketing ploy
to elicit interest in the holocaust genre from non-Jews. If Jews are willing to make up f ive million Gentile
deaths and attribute it to the Nazis, how many Jewish deaths do you suppose they’d be willing to
f abricate?
Of course, f olks f amiliar with revisionist research already understand that no more than 200,000 Jews died
in Nazi concentration camps.And none of those deaths were from gassing (nor by electrocution, steaming,
or any of the other mountains of outrageously f alse propaganda claims), but mostly by natural causes —
disease and starvation — mainly as a result of the inhuman Allied policy of saturation bombing of
Germany’s supply lines which caused a stand-still in shipments of f oodstuf f s, medicine and other supplies
to the camps. (See: VHO, CODOH, IHR, Holocaust Denial Videos, The “Six Million” Myth, Winston Smith
Ministry of Truth)
The Jewish Terror Reigns Supreme
Where in the world did the Jewish Bolshevists get the inspiration f or such malevolence, hatred and
homicidal bloodlust? Look no f urther than the religion of Judaism itself :
"And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and
utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor show mercy unto
them." (Deuteronomy 7:2)
“But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give thee for an
inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth.” (Deuteronomy 20:16-18)
“You shall wipe out the memory of Amalek from under the heavens; you shall not forget.”
(Deuteronomy 25:19)
“… And now, go and smite Amalek and destroy everything that is theirs; do not have
mercy on them, but kill every man and woman, child and infant, ox, sheep, camel and
donkey.” (Samuel I 15:3)
“The best among the Gentiles deserves to be killed.” (Talmud: Soferim, Chapter 15, Rule
These ultra violent Judaist dictates were reiterated in the Protocols of Zion,
“We are interested in just the opposite—in the diminution, the KILLING OUT OF THE
GOYIM.” (Protocols of Zion, 3:7)
“…our kingdom will be distinguished by a despotism of such magnificent proportions
as to be at any moment and in every place in a position to WIPE OUT ANY GOYIM WHO
OPPOSE US BY DEED OR WORD.” (Protocols of Zion, 5:1)
The Jews have, f or thousands of years, taught their own to mass murder the best non-Jews. They believe
it is their racial mission to do so. Judaism, of course, is no mere “religion.” It is in actuality a criminal
conspiracy: a license to lie, cheat, steal, murder, rape, pillage, plunder and swindle the inf erior “Goyim.”
(See: Hof f man, Michael. Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship,
Superstition and Deceit. Independent History and Research, 2008)
Regardless of one’s view of Christianity (I personally am irreligious), it should be noted that its holiest days
celebrate lif e (Christmas — the birth of the Christ child, Easter — the resurrection of Christ) or
reconciliation to their Deity (Good Friday). The holiest days in Judaism, on the other hand, celebrate military
victories and the mass slaughter of Jewish enemies (Passover, Purim, Hanukkah). (See: David Duke’s
“Christmas versus Hanukkah Peace and Love vs War and Hate,” “The Purim Celebration of Hate” & “Purim II
Promoting Genocide“) Whenever varying Gentile groups proved to be an obstacle to Jewish economic
domination or Jewish political ambitions, many Jews called f or and worked f everishly to carry out — either
directly or by proxy — the mass extermination of said group.
When — in the late 1800s and early 1900s — the Russians proved resilient to Jewish revolutionary banditry,
this is what manif est from the Jew’s lips:
“To overcome our enemies we must have our own Socialist Militarism. We must win over
to our side, 90 millions out of the 100 millions of population of Russia under the Soviets.
As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them; they must be annihilated!” — Jewish
Communist leader Grigory Zinoviev
When — in the 1930s and 1940s — the Germans proved resilient to Jewish domination, subversion and
swindles, this is what manif est from the Jew’s lips:
“A final solution… Thus we find that there is no middle course; no act of mediation, no
compromise to be compounded, no political or economic sharing to be considered.
There is, in fine, no other solution except one: That Germany must perish forever from
this earth!” — Jew Theodore N. Kaufman (Germany Must Perish! Newark, NJ: Argyle Press,
When — in recent times — the Arab and Muslim peoples proved resilient to Jewish thieving of their land and
despoiling of their resources, this is what manif est from the Jew’s lips:
“It is forbidden to be merciful to them. You must send missiles to them and annihilate
them… The Lord shall return the Arabs’ deeds on their own heads, waste their seed and
exterminate them, devastate them and vanish them from this world!” — Rabbi Ovadia
Yosef (quoted by BBC News, “Rabbi Calls for Annihilation of Arabs,” April 10, 2001 )
The iconic leader of the Protestant Ref ormation, Martin Luther, pinned the tail on the donkey back in 1543
when he wrote,
“They (the Jews) are real liars and bloodhounds [...] Their heart’s most ardent sighing
and yearning and hoping is set on the day on which they can deal with us Gentiles as
they did with the Gentiles in Persia at the time of Esther. Oh, how fond they are of the
book of Esther, which is so beautifully attuned to their bloodthirsty, vengeful,
murderous yearning and hope. The sun has never shone on a more bloodthirsty and
vengeful people than they are who imagine that they are God’s people who have been
commissioned and commanded to murder and to slay the Gentiles.” (On The Jews and
Their Lies, 1543)
The legendary author and truth hero, Eustace Mullins, eloquently explicated the origins of this miserable
tribe of bandits and brigands:
“Hebrew means “one who is from across the river.” Rivers were often the boundaries of
ancient nations, and one from across the river meant, simply, an alien. In every country
of the ancient world, the Hebrews were known as aliens. The word also, in popular
usage, meant “one who should not be trusted until he has identified himself.” Hebrew in
all ancient literature was written as “Habiru”. This word appears frequently in the Bible
and in Egyptian literature. In the Bible, Habiru is used interchangeably with “sa-gaz”,
meaning “cutthroat”. In all of Egyptian literature, wherever the word Habiru appears, it is
written with the word “sa-gaz” written beside it. Thus the Egyptians always wrote of the
Jews as “the cutthroat bandits from across the river”. For five thousand years, the
Egyptian scribes identified the Jews in this manner.” (Mullins’ New History of the Jews.
Staunton, VA: International Institute of Jewish Studies, 1978, p.26)
Knowing what they think of Gentiles, knowing what they have done to Gentiles, knowing what they will
continue to do to Gentiles if we let them — how does any sane Gentile not f eel outrage and indignation at
this lot of f earsome beasts and bloodsuckers? It is hardly surprising that there exists widespread dislike of
Jews. But what is surprising is that there are so f ew patriots in America, Canada, Europe and Australia,
willing to express their outrage against the Jews, not only f or what they did to the Russians and Eastern
Europeans under Communism, or what they’re doing to the Palestinians and other Arabs under the f lagship
of Zionism, but f or what they have done and continue to do to those of us in North America and Western
Europe — lying to us, deceiving our people, and using us to wage their wars for them. You might
remember some of the unf lattering f acts about the Jews outlined in this treatise the next time you hear a
Jew dishonestly whining about how badly their kind have been treated throughout history.
The End

� 2018 All Rights Reserved. All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. We are not responsible for content written by and hosted on third-party websites. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. We assume no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners. .......Tags: "israel nuked wtc" 9-11 Truth jfk assassination "cultural marxism" "holocaust hoax" "fake news" "fake history" fed censorship "mind control" tavistock holohoax auschwitz deep state kabbalah talmud bush obama clinton trump russiagate spygate israel britain saudi arabia middle east rothschild cold war comey brennan clapper yellow vests populism nuclear demolition communism marxism socialism pedophiliacontact: