StateoftheNation.co
Fig. 1—Sir
Klaus Martin Schwab, KCMG (British Knight Commander
[of the Order] of St Michael and St George, 2006). Founder
and only chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF) that
first met Feb. 04-07, 1971 in Davos, Switzerland. It’s
original name was the European Management Forum until 1987.
It was founded under the “supervision of the Swiss Federal
Department of the Interior” by Klaus and the soon-to-be Mrs.
(Hilde) Schwab (née Stoll). They were married within weeks
of that first conference.Since inception WEF has been a
British-American Pilgrims Society new world order League of
Nations cum United Nations cum Marshall Plan hustle, under
the direction of Rockefeller Foundation operatives Otto von
Habsburg, IBM, Henry Alfred Kissinger, John Kenneth
Galbraith, Paul Adolph Volcker and other “new world order”
globalist hucksters from Harvard, Yale, Oxford, Cambridge
and the London School of Economics (communism central).Sir
Klaus Martin Schwab. (Compiled Feb. 15, 2021). Biography and
Timeline. Anonymous Patriots. communists
A barker is a person who stands in front of a theater,
sideshow, etc., and calls out to passersby to attract
customers
In 1971, Klaus Schwab, under British Pilgrims Society
direction, chose Otto von Habsburg, the would-be Fourth
Reich king, to keynote the first World Economic Forum (then
named the European Management Forum)
Schwab’s hometown—Ravensburg, Germany—was the first German
city to practice eugenics (killing “useless eaters”)
Ravensburg was a transport hub for stolen Nazi gold to the
Swiss Bank for International Settlements run by Pilgrims
Society spies Allan W. Dulles (later C.I.A. director,
1953-61), Edwin W. Pauley (Allied reparations) and William
J. Donovan, director of the OSS (MI6-controlled precursor to
the C.I.A.—Dulles’ boss)
Until 2003, the British Pilgrims Society in America operated
under Donovan’s New York non-profit. Henry Kissinger and
Paul Volcker became Pilgrims Society vice-presidents 2007-09
during the “bank bailout”
Schwab’s family company, Escher Wyss, exploited slave labor
and Allied POWs, manufactured key nuclear bomb-making
technologies for Adolf Hitler and South Africa, sold Swiss
flame throwers to the Nazis, and was named a National
Socialist Model Company by Adolf Hitler
Schwab’s Escher Wyss company was protected not only by
Hitler, but by Switzerland, Britain and America—making
Schwab a criminal foreign meddler in every sense
Bookmark: #world-economic-forum-uncovered |
https://tinyurl.com/7apxdzfh
Fig. 2—Douglas Gabriel, Michael McKibben. (Mar. 10, 2021).
Klaus Schwab and the Fourth Reich. America Intelligence
Media, Americans for Innovation. | (Raw *.mp4 video file).
Mar. 15, 2021—To read his voluminous public biographies and
books, Klaus Schwab is a boy scout. We have discovered that
the opposite is the truth. He is a deceiving, evil man, we
believe.
Schwab’s World Economic Forum byline is “Committed to
Improving the State of the World.”
As strategized by whom?
Well, by Klaus Schwab of course, as well as his family and
his murder of Pilgrims Society 1%-ers. They are now pressing
to replace human liberty with a pagan, techno-economic
enslavement. They decided this for you while you were at
work paying off the debt they have saddled you with.
Case in point, Klaus’ daughter Nicole (who has never had a
real job) is promoting climate-change neo paganism and “a
spiritual parable of Earth-centered wisdom.” As an
individual, she is free to explore, but as a well-funded
child of the great reset, her immaturity is a toxic brew.
KLAUS PROMOTES “QUEERIOUS CONVERSATIONS” IN INDIA
The well-funded Schwab “reset” agenda has gotten so absurd
that in 2011 they partnered with the World Health
Organization to pitch “Queerious Conversations in India . .
. to promote LGBTQ+ visibility in the Rajasthan region” of
India.
Evidently, the Schwab agenda is to destroy sexual morality
and replace it with hedonism as a way to undermine
humanity’s pursuit of God’s Wisdom and one’s higher self
that is made in the image and after the likeness of God. The
Book of Genesis 1:26.
KLAUS-HILDE PILGRIMS SWISS-GERMAN INTERLOCKS
Klaus married Hilde Stoll in Feb. 1971—just weeks after the
first Davos conference. This marriage cemented interlocking
Swiss-German corporate families that were a murder of Swiss
banking and engineering industries, among them Escher-Wyss,
Sulzer, Andritz, Stoll, Festo, Bank for International
Settlements, MI6, CIA, Rahn and Bodmer.
The Schwab-Stoll families were steeped in the Jesuit,
Habsburg and Merovingian controversies about blood lineage
(“divine right of kings”) and papal control of banking, the
Templars and the Knights of Malta.
The satanist British Pilgrims Society finally gained control
of Europe by funding two world wars and a Bolshevik
“Revolution” to subdue or destroy the monarchies of Russia,
Germany, Austria (Hapsburg), Japan, Italy, France and Spain,
to be replaced by their corporatist new world order in which
Stalin and Hitler cooperated in their experiments at
societal reconstruction through a satanic communist
corporatism.
PILGRIM LENIN’S BEDFELLOWS
Indeed, in 1917 Vladimir Lenin lived in Zurich, Switzerland
just a ten minute taxi ride from Escher-Wyss’s manufacturing
campus before he was packed up in a train bound for St.
Petersburg and the so-called Bolshevik “Revolution.”
Today those Bolsheviks are repackaged as ANIFA and Black
Lives Matter. Note that Klaus’ Escher-Wyss father Eugen
Wilhelm’s second wife, Erika Epprecht, also lived 10-min.
from the Escher-Wyss manufacturing campus in Zurich.
As we have exposed previously, the British Pilgrims Society
trained Lenin and Stalin in London starting shortly after
the Pilgrims’ formation in 1902.
* * *
WEF IS A INSIDER TRADING FRAUD CIRCUS BARKED BY SCHWAB
Our discoveries about Klaus Schwab should prove beyond
question that WEF is utterly fraudulent and an enemy of all
humanity.
WEF meets every year in early February in Davos, Switzerland
to map out their dystopic plans. We will show below that
they are criminal, inhuman frauds. We will also show that
Klaus Schwab is a sociopath with pathological mommy issues.
We have learned with these corruptocrat biographies that the
information they hide is always highly instructive to their
true
KLAUS’ HIDDEN NAZI PAST
Klaus’ mainstream media and academia propagandists have
hidden his Nazi past in a blizzard of awards, WEF programs,
ghost-written books, speeches, interviews, honorary
professorships and doctorates from all over the world.
AFI researchers have dubbed Klaus “old sourpuss” because he
almost never smiles. Now we know why. He knows he is a
fraud—a circus barker who grew up with a silver spoon in his
mouth whose heart has nothing good to share with the world.
Klaus also hides that his biological mother was Jewish.
In his just-published propaganda Stakeholder Capitalism
(Wiley, NY: 2021), Klaus wrote on the dedication page that
his mother was Erika Epprecht. (“To my parents, Eugen
Wilhelm Schwab and Erika Epprecht who taught me firsthand
the value of education, collaboration, and the stakeholder
principle”). This is a boldface lie.
KLAUS’S BIRTH MOTHER WAS JEWESS EMMA GISELA TEKELIUS SCHWAB
(NÉE KILIAN)
Klaus and his older brother, Hans Ernst, were born to Eugen
Wilhelm Schwab and Emma Gisela Tekelius Schwab (née Kilian)
in Ravensburg (Mar. 30, 1938) and Karlsruhe (Oct. 13, 1927)
respectively.
Hans Ernst did not disown their Jewish mother Emma like his
brother Klaus has. On Dec. 09, 1938, Emma Schwab emigrated
to the United States as Gisela Schwab, leaving her suckling
infant Klaus, presumably forever. Was she fleeing Hitler’s
Jewish persecution? Possibly. Was Klaus’ 50% Jewish blood
being buried and replaced by a pure Aryan persona? Probably,
especially considering his and his father’s life-long
silence about her.
By contrast, wife Erika was of sturdy Aryan stock—acceptable
to the Nazis. She was from Zurich, born Dec. 31, 1906, and
like Vladimir Lenin, Erika lived just a ten-minute taxi ride
from the Escher-Wyss turbine manufacturing campus in Zurich,
according to the 1935 city directory.
Klaus’ pretend-mother Erika worked in personnel recruiting
in Zurich. Ravensburg registry officials were unhelpful with
birth, marriage and divorce records for Eugen Wilhelm
Schwab, so no records of a divorce from Emma or re-marriage
to Erika were discovered.
However, we do see Eugen and Erika traveling to Brazil in
1960, presumably to visit Hans Ernst and Escher-Wyss that
Hans managed. Escher-Wyss, now Sulzer AG and Andritz AG, as
well as Hilde’s Festo AG, all have large footprints in
Brazilian industry, then and today.
Since Klaus hides his Jewish mother Emma—never speaking of
her—we can only surmise that he suffers deep-seated
abandonment issues, even now. This begs the question how
this life-long maternal abandonment has affected his moral
and spiritual priorities. Evidently badly.
EUGEN W. SCHWAB WAS A NUCLEAR-HAWKING RAVENSBURG CITY FATHER
Klaus’ father, Eugen Wilhelm Schwab, was the managing
director of Escher-Wyss & Co. in 1938 when Klaus was
born in Ravensburg, Germany, and continued with the company
as President Emeritus until his death in 1982.
Escher-Wyss was founded in 1805, and developed unique
engineering, manufacturing and high-strength materials
capabilities focused on gas turbines, compressors, power
generation, heat pumps, hydraulics, ships, thermal and
hydroelectric power, and related automation controls.
Klaus has hidden Escher-Wyss Nazi sins his entire career.
They are only now emerging. A few other researchers seem to
have unearthed this evidence just recently as well. Much of
it has been suppressed behind Top Secret archives in
Switzerland, Germany, Britain and the United States—only
recently released after 90+ years of in-human, diabolical
suppression.
First, at the time of Klaus’ birth in 1938, Escher-Wyss had
already been helping the German government build
compressors, turbines and other critical elements for an
emerging nuclear industry (since 1929). So, it stands to
reason that as Hitler came to power, he coddled Escher-Wyss
and the Schwabs.
The British 1965 propaganda film The Heroes of Telemark is
about the Nazi heavy water manufacturing plant in Norway.
That plant was built by Escher-Wyss.
Second, as Klaus grew into the Escher-Wyss Schwab family
business, he watched his father Eugen make top secret deals
with South Africa to supply key components for a nuclear
bomb.
Then, when Klaus graduated from university in Zurich, funded
by Escher-Wyss, he was immediately assigned to handle a
10,000-employee merger between Escher-Wyss and Sulzer AG.
The merged company continued to supply nuclear bomb
capabilities to South Africa with Klaus leading the effort,
right up to 1971 when he started the European Management,
and very probably afterwards.
FINALLY, THE BILL CLINTON PARDON OF MARC RICH ON JAN. 20,
2001 & HILLARY’S URANIUM ONE (2009) COME INTO FOCUS:
RICH WAS BUSTING NUCLEAR SANCTIONS FOR KLAUS SCHWAB’S WORLD
ECONOMIC FORUM CRONIES
South Africa was busting U.S. nuclear armament sanctions
(clearly a ruse to fool the world public) for
Sulzer-Escher-Wyss using Marc Rich, the notorious Swiss
fugitive who was famously pardoned by Bill Clinton on Jan.
20, 2001. This fact alone places Klaus Schwab on the list of
aiding and abetting convicted criminals like Marc Rich.
KLAUS SCHWAB: A TRIPLE AGENT DRIVING HUMANITY HELTER SKELTER
INTO A GREAT RESET OF EVIL?
C.I.A. archive documents show that Escher-Wyss and Sulzer
were being directed by the U.S. Department of Energy and the
State Department. This would logically mean that Klaus
Schwab was a triple-agent, working simultaneously for: (1)
the CIA-MI6-UN British-Americans Pilgrims Society, (2) Nazis
(now Germany) and (3) Switzerland.
Do we really want a triple-agent lying spy running the
“Great Reset” and “Build Back Better?”
Third, Escher-Wyss was one of the largest employers in
Ravensburg, Germany.
Fourth, Escher-Wyss was the first city in Nazi German to
practice eugenics principles to murder “useless eaters”
emerging from the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute (something like
the National Institute of Health in the US, or Tavistock
Institute in the UK).
Fifth, contrary to the propaganda stories about Ravensburg’s
lack of war-making industries (as the reason why the Allies
did not bomb the city and its Escher-Wyss industry), we
discovered many Ravensburg unconfessed sins surrounding the
Schwab’s and Escher-Wyss.
Besides parts for ships, airplanes, submarines and power
plants, Escher-Wyss brokered flame throwers built in their
Zurich plant and sold to the Nazis. This information comes
from the U.S. Archives. This would have been handled by
Eugen Schwab with a then about 5-year old Klaus at his side.
They also supplied turbines, compressors and propellers for
Nazi ships and submarines, as well as gas turbines for
powering the war machine, in addition to their nuclear
technology.
Escher-Wyss exploited slave labor (Jewish, Russian, Gypsy,
homosexual, Hungarian, Romanian, Polish ), as well as Allied
POWs. Being a National Socialists Model Company, this would
certainly have included Dr. Josef Mengele’s biological war
crimes (“The Angel of Death”).
KLAUS & HILDE’S INTERLOCKING COMPANIES EMPLOY OVER
50,000 TODAY—ALL FED BY WEF INSIDER TRADING
Escher Wyss today operates under numerous re branded names
including Andritz AG and Sulzer AG. These companies are
poised to profit enormously from the priorities reflected in
Klaus Schwab’s so-called “Great Reset,” including
hydropower, plasma turbines, nuclear power, materials
science, nuclear weapons, oil and gas, coal, bio fuel,
paper, food, robotics, artificial intelligence, financing,
patents, pharmaceuticals and more.
Historically, the first (IBM) punch card machine readers,
sometimes called Hollerith machines, were first manufactured
by companies like Escher-Wyss and Sulzer who specialized in
textile machines in the 1880s. Punched cards were used to
created different patters on textile machines, as well as in
player pianos. Other names in this business were Semyon
Korsakov (ca. 1805); Charles Babbage (ca. 1855); Herman
Hollerith (ca. 1880); The Tabulating Machine Company (ca.
1910), including Dehomag (Deutsche Hollerith-Maschinen GmbH,
IBM Germany); and Computing-Tabulating-Recording
Company (1911, renamed IBM).
Note: IBM International president Jacques G. Maisongroung
was a feature speaker at Klaus M. Schwab’s first European
Management Forum on Feb. 04-07, 1971, along with the black
monarch and Fourth Reich heir apparent Otto von Habsburg.
Klaus’s married Hilde Stoll in the weeks following the first
Forum in 1971. This was an evident corporate marriage.
Hilde’s family, to this day, owns an engineering, robotics,
artificial intelligence and process controls manufacturer
name FESTO with over 20,000 employees.
It should be noted that the Escher and Sulzer families are
interlocked with the Stolls, Schwabs and Bodmar families.
The Bodmar family property in Cologny, Geneva Canton,
Switzerland is the current site of The World Economic Forum
headquarters as well as the Schwab residence—like a ritzy
WACO-like compound.
The Bodmar family is a 15th-century silk manufacturing
family who purchased the WEF land from Fanny Moser-Sulzer
(Sulzer AG). Hans von Schulthess-Bodmar was a director of
Escher-Wyss & Co. and those interlocked engineering
firms and exclusive private banks are still in operation
today (Escher & Rahn renamed Rahn Bodmer).
Indeed, none of these family businesses have lack funding.
Given their close proximity to untold amounts of stolen
Nazi-Japanese gold at the Bank for International
Settlements, their “success” comes into focus. In fact, it
was during the Marshall Plan that the British Pilgrims
Society took control of these Second-Reich family corporate
empires to serve their secular new world order scheme.
Martin Bodmar was born the same year as Klaus’ father Eugen
(1899). Martin was a vice-president of the International Red
Cross (1940-71). Klaus is believed to have attended grade
school in the Au suburb of Zurich (1945-47, ages 7-9) and
lived in Bodmar castle during that posh primary schooling.
PILGRIMS INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CREATED A
GOLD-LAUNDERING BEACHHEAD IN RAVENSBURG & FUNDED
ESCHER-WYSS, SULZER, STOLL AND FESTO PERPETUALLY
Klaus had all of his schooling bankrolled by Escher-Wyss
financiers in Zurich just as his father Eugen Schwab, as
managing director of Escher-Wyss & Cie. (Co.) in
Ravensburg was forming the Ravensburg Chamber of Commerce
and Industry as vice-president (1945-46).
Eugen formed the Ravensburg Chamber of Commerce at the
behest of Sir Winthrop W. Aldrich (Rockefeller, Henry
Kissinger’s and Paul Volcker’s boss), Allan W. Dulles
(OSS/CIA Bern, Switzerland), and the Bank for International
Settlements set up by MI6 and the CIA.
The British Pilgrims Society had already begun to funnel
dirty Marshall Plan funds to insider companies like
Escher-Wyss and Festo and their interlocked private Swiss
banking family companies, even before the war ended, in
exchange for Ravensburg’s help in transporting the Nazi gold
to Bill J. Donovan, Allan W. Dulles and Edwin Pauley (OSS
cum MI6—the rogue C.I.A.), the British Pilgrims Society
required Schwab fealty to the new world order being fronted
by their newly-forming United Nations.
Note: Lord Mark Malloch-Brown, the current Pilgrims Society
chairman of SGO Smartmatic (with its masked OpTech ballot
scanning software running in Dominion, ES&S, Hart
InterCivic, Sequoia, Diebold, Premier), has served in almost
every senior post at the United Nations: United Nations High
Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in Thailand, Africa,
Central America and Geneva; Reform of UN communications; UN
Development Program (UNDP); London International Model UN;
UN Millennium Summit; and Deputy Secretary-General.
Note also: Sir Nigel Graham Knowles is Malloch-Brown’s
fellow Pilgrim in SGO Smartmatic where he is director, chief
trustee of Prince’s Trust America, and employed Kamala
Harris newly-minted husband Doug Emhoff at DLA Piper LLP
law.
Starting even before the Germans surrendered on May 07,
1945—just two weeks after the famous “Link-Up” (Apr. 25,
1945) of the American 69th Infantry Division with the Soviet
58th Guards in Torgau—Ravensburg was a staging ground for
shipping stolen Nazi gold to Switzerland. It has also
been a processing hub for Allied POWs as evident cover for
Ravensburg duplicities discussed herein.
The looted Nazi gold was routed through Ravensburg, near the
Swiss-Lichtenstein border, and sent to the Bank for
International Settlements in Basel, Bern and Zurich. Allen
W. Dulles was the OSS spy director in Bern in charge of the
Nazi gold for the Allies (Read: Pilgrims Society).
After the war, Dulles became the first director of the
C.I.A. and was the man who later covered up the Kennedy
Assassination in the Warren Commission, after, many believe,
he ordered President Kennedy’s assassination to protect his
emerging Pilgrims Society global enterprise founded on the
stolen Nazi and Japanese gold—the banking system that
operates today, still named the Bank for International
Settlements, Zurich that handles inter banking special
drawing rights.
President Kennedy was assassinated not long after he told a
colleague: “I will splinter the CIA [Dulles’ creature]
into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds.” (New
York Times, Apr. 25, 1966).
A particular Scripture comes to mind when considering the
depraved moral foundations of the Bank for International
Settlements:
THE WISE AND FOOLISH BUILDERS
THE PILGRIMS SOCIETY EVIL OF THE MARSHALL PLAN
President Kennedy, as did President Eisenhower, surely knew
about the criminal Pilgrims Society banking of fascist
industries paying their tribute behind the smokescreen of
the Marshall Plan “helping” Europe recover… from a war that
these bâtards just funded! (Please excuse the French.)
Escher-Wyss hosted numerous Sir Winthrop’s Chamber meetings
in Zurich and Ravensburg sponsored by their father-son city
fathers team of Eugen and Klaus Schwab.
As the Escher-Wyss managing director, Eugen was a man whose
favor was sought in both Germany, Switzerland, and the
Pilgrims Society, and who was grooming son Klaus to take
over their Escher-Wyss dynasty, now 216 years old.
ELECTION RIGGING LEADERSHIP EMERGES FROM WEF & THEIR
PILGRIMS SOCIETY OVERLORDS
Today, Klaus Schwab’s Andritz AG auditor is KPMG who also
audits SERCO (controlled by the British Crown) and SGO
Smartmatic (aka Dominion etc.) Voting Systems (controlled by
Lord Mark Malloch-Brown and Sir Nigel Knowles, Kamala
Harris’ British handler.
Klaus received a bachelor and PhD in engineering from Swiss
Federal Institute of Technology, ETH Zürich, Switzerland,
co-founded by Alfred Escher (1855).
Klaus also received overlapping masters and PhD degrees from
the Jesuit University of Fribourg, Switzerland (1962-67).
These Jesuits boast numerous Pilgrims Society globalists
like British Zionist Chaim Azriel Weizmann; Basil Hume,
archbishop of Canterbury; and, Juan Carlos, King of Spain.
Weizmann developed acetone used in cordite explosives for
the British war industry in WWI, along with fellow British
Zionist Sir Alfred M. Mond, chairman of Imperial Chemical
Industries (ICI) and gunpowder—a founding member of the
Pilgrims Society (1902). He also founded the Weizmann
Institute, funded by Lord Victor Rothschild, that
coordinated biological research closely tied to the
Coronavirus patent developer (U.S. Pat. No. No. 10,130,701,
awarded Nov. 20, 2018)—The Pirbright Institute (UK). In
fact, Pirbright tested many of biotechnology trials in
Israel, according to newly-released Dr. Sydney Brenner
Victor Rothschild correspondence.
In 1966-67, Klaus was shuffled off to Boston for his Harvard
grooming. He received a master’s in public administration
from the John F. Kennedy School of Government. There he
admits collaborating with Pilgrims Society inner circle
gadabouts Henry Kissinger and John K. Galbraith. Galbraith
and Kissinger came to play leading rolls in the World
Economic Forum strategies and tactics.
On the wings of Kissinger’s Pilgrims Society instructions,
Klaus Schwab was assigned to organize the Europe Management
Forum starting in 1971.
Starting in 1965, the U.S. Department of Energy began
funding the development of nuclear weapons capability in
apartheid South Africa (read: British-controlled).
Newly-discovered information for this most top secret
program reveal that Sulzer-Escher-Wyss supplied critical
components to the enrichment of triggering of a nuclear
bomb, ostensibly for the South Africans. Apparently their
prized elephant herds needed protecting.
NUCLEAR WARMONGERS (KLAUS SCHWAB & HIS GOLD-DIGGING
INTERLOCKED FAMILIES) ARE RUNNING THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM
Klaus’s first job after university was managing a
10,000-employee merger of Escher-Wyss AG and Sulzer AG. Now
we know that these companies and their families were
interlocked and this was merely window dressing. This
occurred just as Sulzer was shipping specialize compressor
and turbine seals to South Africa. Later, Swiss fugitive
Marc Rich ran sanctions against South Africa for this secret
Pilgrims Society nuclear cabal.
SOCIAL NETWORKING WAS STOLEN TO HELP WEF INSIDERS COORDINATE
GLOBALLY
Nuclear sanctions-buster Marc Rich was pardoned by Bill
Clinton as he left office on Jan. 20, 2001. Notably, at the
same time, Clinton pardoned his former C.I.A. Director John
M. Deutch (1995-96), and appointed Leader Technologies’
patent attorney Professor James P. Chandler, III and
Microsoft’s Bill Gates to an organization euphemistically
named “National Infrastructure Assurance Council (NIAC)”
that still exists to this day and is overseeing the
weaponization of patents for the DoD Office of Net
Assessment.
For those of you who follow this blog, Leader Technologies,
Inc. is the patent holder of the invention of social
networking. James P. Chandler, III was their patent attorney
who secreted a copy of Leader’s invaluable source code and
gave it to a newly-forming IBM Eclipse Foundation on Nov.
29, 2001, just after the 9/11 false flag diversion that
drove Congress to approve sweeping sacrifices of liberty,
privacy and security, ironically in the name of security.
Leader Technologies has filed a lien on the U.S. Government
and wants its shareholders paid for the risks they took and
the government stole.
Bono obsequiously promotes the World Economic Forum, Klaus
Schwab and George Soros. Evidently acting on insider tips in
2009, he “invested” $56 million in Facebook private stock
sold corruptly by Goldman Sachs.* Those shares rose to $1
billion at the Facebook IPO on May 18, 2012, along with
other Pilgrims/WEF insiders, including James W. Breyer,
Accel Partners, Peter A. Thiel, Mark Zuckerberg, Yuri
Milner, Goldman Sachs, Microsoft and Meritech Management
(Ann Huntress Lamont) who cashed in $13.26 billion on Day 3,
much to the outrage of CNBC’s Jim Cramer.
* Bono corruptly invested in Facebook during the Leader v.
Facebook social networking patent infringement trial
2008-2010. He invested concurrently with Hillary Clinton’s
secret State Department contract with Facebook to build “an
election winning template” to rig elections. Hillary’s
contract was blatant obstruction of justice, not to mention
criminal conspiracy, espionage, treason and sedition.
And yet, she walks free.
For now.
CRIMINAL WEF SYCHOPANT SIRS—DO YOU THINK BONO KNOWS KLAUS IS
A NUCLEAR NAZI WHOSE COMPANIES CAN MAKE A CINDER OUT OF
PLANET EARTH?
Fig. 5—Sir Klaus Martin Schwab, KCMG, and Sir Bono, KBE
(Paul David Hewson) relish the psycophantic adulation of
their self-anointed fellow insider trading criminals at the
2016 World Economic Forum, Davos, Switzerland. Photo: World
Economic Forum.
CONCLUSION
There is a reason that Klaus Schwab has been the only leader
of the World Economic Forum since 1971—50 years.
He is doing the bidding of his masters at the British
Pilgrims Society. His children Nicole and Olivier have
joined him and Hilde to carry on the fascist thefts into the
next generation of their carefully crafted criminal
enterprise.
Klaus Schwab’s perfidy demands that he and the World
Economic Forum cease operations.
WEF is nothing more than a organized crime guild for the
Pilgrims Society. They have co opted the deposed monarchies
of Europe to support the “Great Reset.” In return, those
deposed monarchs get insider financial trading information
so that they can continue to fund their lavish lifestyles.
Klaus uses Jesuit tactics of secrecy, just like Cecil J.
Rhodes dictated some 118 years earlier, to keep the average
citizen ignorant of their criminal doings.
They use the media to tell lies to fool and pacify the
public, as well as haughtily “create public opinion.”
Klaus’s Fourth Reich will invigorate many of the deposed
royal families with new life.
The difference this time is that they will be taking orders
from the corporate and banking criminals of the British
Pilgrims Society, while the Pilgrims in turn hide their
organized crime behind the fascination of a naive public
with royalty, while these bureaucrats interlock into the
closed loop of a 1%-ers club, like Escher-Wyss’ closed-cycle
gas turbines that can run on any kind of fuel, including
nuclear.
The insider trading of the WEF members, including his
Escher-Wyss-Sulzer-Andritz-Stoll-Festo interlocking criminal
enterprises, must be dismantled so that a free market can
emerge, for the first time in human history.
The “Great Reset” insider trading criminal syndicate that is
the World Economic Forum must be dismantled and their
conspirators prosecuted worldwide for the great harm they
have done to human civilization.
SHUT DOWN THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM
DEFUND THE INSIDER TRADERS
SHIP THEM TO GITMO & PROSECUTE THEIR CRIMES AGAINST
HUMANITY
(See 18 U.S. Code § 2381. Treason and 10 U.S. Code § 894 –
Art. 94. Mutiny or sedition.)
Footnote
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
THE STORY OF THE COMMITTEE OF
300 by Dr. John Coleman
FROM THE CIA LIBRARY
CONSPIRATORS’ HIERARCHY: THE STORY OF THE COMMITTEE OF 300
by Dr. John Coleman
Page 12: “The Committee of 300 looks to social
convulsions on a global scale, followed by depressions, as
a softening-up technique for bigger things to come, as its
principal method of creating masses of people all over the
world who will become its “welfare” recipients of the
future. The committee appears to base much of its
important decisions affecting mankind on the philosophy of
Polish aristocrat, Felix Dzerzinski, who regarded mankind
as being slightly above the level of cattle. As a close
friend of British intelligence agent Sydney Reilly (Reilly
was actually Dzerzinski’s controller during the Bolshevik
Revolution’s formative years), he often con- fided in
Reilly during his drinking bouts. Dzerzinski was, of
course, the beast who ran the Red Terror apparatus. He
once told Reilly, while the two were on a drinking binge,
that “Man is of no importance. Look at what happens when
you starve him. He begins to eat his dead companions to
stay alive. Man is only interested in his own survival.
That is all that counts. All the Spinoza stuff is a lot of
rubbish.”
THE GLOBAL 2000 REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT – ENTERING THE
TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY
Gus Speth, The Global 2000 Report to the President, 8 B.C.
Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 695 (1980)
Global 2000 Study Statement on the Report to the
President. (July 24,1980)
Response to the Global 2000 report by Pres., Jimmy Carter
Klaus Schwab, Covid-19, Tavistock Inst., Great Reset &
4th Reich
The Crown, Tavistock Institute and Control of Facebook
This graphic is found on the last page of the PDF version
available on the CIA website . Of special interest is (1)
“HAARP” listed under “The Star Group” (High Tech) in the
bottom rh corner. (2) British Tavistock Institute
Propaganda and Media mind-control has long been inserted
into American Universities.
This is an eyeball overview of how a committee of 300 can
exercise control over multiple industries, science and
technology, universities, US military and mainstream
mockingbird news agencies to inflict mass public hypnosis
over events like the Kennedy Assassination, the staged
Apollo Mission, 9/11 False Flag, staged mass shootings and
now the COVID-19 plandemic.
______________________________________________________________
(1) HAARP – The “High Frequency Active Auroral Research
Program” technology is covered under US Patent 4,686,605
on the “Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the
Earth’s Atmosphere, Ionosphere, and/or Magnetosphere.”
angelsdontplaythishaarp.jpg“Angels Don’t Play This
HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology”
HAARP is an advanced Tesla technology capable of creating
changes in the weather to make the atmosphere warmer or
cooler. In recent decades a network of facilities
modeled after the original HAARP facility in Gakona,
AK are now in operation. High frequency radio waves
focused into high regions of upper atmosphere can alter
jet streams and control major high and low pressure
weather systems. Coordination of these stations can
heat the atmosphere to be conveniently blamed on carbon
dioxide to promote the Global Warming deception.
Despite it’s amazing capability to control the weather,
HAARP technology seems to have never been deployed
to weaken, re-direct or stop Hurricane formation. Despite
a technology capable of doing good for humanity, we seem
to be witnessing more intense warming, stronger hurricanes
and more destructive tornadoes.
“Angels Don’t Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla
Technology” is a book written by Nick Begich in
1995. Begich is the eldest son of the late United
States Congressman from Alaska, Nick Begich Sr., and
political activist Pegge Begich. He is well known in
Alaska for his own political activities. He was twice
elected President of both the Alaska Federation of
Teachers and the Anchorage Council of Education. He has
been pursuing independent research in the sciences and
politics for most of his adult life. Begich received
Doctor of Medicine (Medicina Alternitiva), honoris causa,
for independent work in health and political science, from
The Open International University for Complementary
Medicines, Colombo, Sri Lanka, in November 1994.
The inside glap of his book reads: “This is a book
about non-lethal weapons, mind control, weather warfare
and the government’s plan to control the environment, or
maybe even destroy it in the name of national defense.”
VIDEO – HAARP – Angels Still Don’t Play This Harp – Nick
Begich
________________________________________________________
tavistockinstitute.jpg“Tavistock Institute: Social
Engineering the Masses” by Daniel Estulin, PhD (2015)
(2) The Tavistock Institute, in Sussex, England, was
founded after WWII, in 1947. It describes itself as a
nonprofit charity that applies social science to
contemporary issues and problems. But this book posits
that it is the world’s center for mass brainwashing and
social engineering activities. It grew from a somewhat
crude beginning at Wellington House into a sophisticated
organization that was to shape the destiny of the entire
planet, and in the process, change the paradigm of modern
society. In this eye-opening work, both the Tavistock
network and the methods of brainwashing and psychological
warfare are uncovered. With connections to U.S. research
institutes, think tanks, and the drug industry, the
Tavistock has a large reach, and Tavistock Institute (the
Book) attempts to show that the conspiracy is real, who is
behind it, what its final long term objectives are, and
how we the people can stop them.
Tavistock Institutions in the United States (Coleman)
___
https://justpaste.it/7qdbn
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Klaus Schwab’s Three
Main Mentors Revealed
UnlimitedHangout
Dr. Klaus Schwab or: How the CFR Taught Me to Stop
Worrying and Love the Bomb
The World Economic Forum wasn’t simply the brainchild of
Klaus Schwab, but was actually born out of a CIA-funded
Harvard program headed by Henry Kissinger and pushed to
fruition by John Kenneth Galbraith and the “real” Dr.
Strangelove, Herman Kahn. This is the amazing story behind
the real men who recruited Klaus Schwab, who helped him
create the World Economic Forum, and who taught him to
stop worrying and love the bomb.
BY JOHNNY VEDMORE
Unlimited Hangout
The World Economic Forum’s recorded history has been
manufactured to appear as though the organisation was a
strictly European creation, but this isn’t so. In fact,
Klaus Schwab had an elite American political team working
in the shadows that aided him in creating the
European-based globalist organisation. If you have a
decent knowledge of Klaus Schwab’s history, you will know
that he attended Harvard in the 1960s where he would meet
then-Professor Henry A. Kissinger, a man with whom Schwab
would form a lifelong friendship. But, as with most
information from the annals of the World Economic Forum’s
history books, what you’ve been told is not the full
story. In fact, Kissinger would recruit Schwab at the
International seminar at Harvard, which had been funded by
the US’ Central Intelligence Agency. Although this funding
was exposed the year in which Klaus Schwab left Harvard,
the connection has gone largely unnoticed – until now.
My research indicates that the World Economic Forum is not
a European creation. In reality, it is instead an
operation which emanates from the public policy grandees
of the Kennedy, Johnson and Nixonian eras of American
politics; all of whom had ties to the Council on Foreign
Relations and the associated “Round Table” Movement, with
a supporting role played by the Central Intelligence
Agency.
There were three extremely powerful and influential men,
Kissinger among them, who would lead Klaus Schwab towards
their ultimate goal of complete American Empire-aligned
global domination via the creation of social and economic
policies. In addition, two of the men were at the core of
manufacturing the ever present threat of global
thermonuclear war. By examining these men through the
wider context of the geopolitics of the period, I will
show how their paths would cross and coalesce during the
1960s, how they recruited Klaus Schwab through a
CIA-funded program, and how they were the real driving
force behind the creation of the World Economic Forum.
Henry A. Kissinger
Heinz Alfred Kissinger was born in Bavaria, Germany, on 27
May 1923 to Paula and Louis Kissinger. The family had been
one of many Jewish families fleeing the persecution in
Germany to arrive in America in 1938. Kissinger would
change his first name to Henry at 15 years old when
arriving in America by way of a brief emigration to
London. His family would initially settle in Upper
Manhattan with the young Henry Kissinger attending George
Washington High School. In 1942, Kissinger would enroll in
the City College of New York, but, in early 1943, was
drafted into the US Army. On 19 June 1943, Kissinger would
become a naturalised US citizen. He would soon be assigned
to the 84th Infantry Division where he would be recruited
by the legendary Fritz Kraemer to work in the military
intelligence unit of the division. Kraemer would fight
along Kissinger during the Battle of the Bulge and would
later become extremely influential in American politics
during the postwar era, influencing future politicians
such as Donald Rumsfeld. Henry Kissinger would describe
Kraemer as being “the greatest single influence on my
formative years”, in a New Yorker article entitled, The
Myth of Henry Kissinger, written in 2020.
The writer of that article, Thomas Meaney, describes
Kraemer as:
“A Nietzschean firebrand to the point of self-parody—he
wore a monocle in his good eye to make his weak eye work
harder—Kraemer claimed to have spent the late Weimar years
fighting both Communists and Nazi Brown Shirts in the
streets. He had doctorates in political science and
international law, and pursued a promising career at the
League of Nations before fleeing to the US in 1939. He
warned Kissinger not to emulate “cleverling” intellectuals
and their bloodless cost-benefit analyses. Believing
Kissinger to be “musically attuned to history,” he told
him, “Only if you do not ‘calculate’ will you really have
the freedom which distinguishes you from the little
people.””
Henry Kissinger, Klaus Schwab and Ted Heath at the 1980
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting
During World War II, whilst Kissinger was serving in the
U.S. Counter-Intelligence Corps, he would be promoted to
the rank of sergeant and would go on to serve in the
Military Intelligence Reserve for many years after peace
was declared. During that period, Kissinger would take
charge of a team hunting down Gestapo officers and other
Nazi officials who had been labeled as “saboteurs”. After
the war, in 1946, Kissinger would be reassigned to teach
at the European Command Intelligence School, a position he
would continue to work in as a civilian after officially
leaving the army.
In 1950, Kissinger would graduate from Harvard with a
degree in political science where he would study under
William Yandell Elliott, who would eventually be a
political advisor to six US presidents and would also
serve as a mentor to Zbigniew Brzezinski and Pierre
Trudeau, among others. Yandell Elliott, along with many of
his star pupils, would serve as the key connectors between
the American national security establishment and the
British “Round Table” movement, embodied by organisations
such as Chatham House in the UK and the Council on Foreign
Relations in the United States. They would also seek to
impose global power structures shared by Big Business, the
political elite and academia. Kissinger would continue to
study at Harvard, gaining his MA and PhD degrees at the
prestigious university, but he was also already trying to
forge a career path in intelligence, reportedly seeking
recruitment as an FBI spy during this period.
In 1951, Kissinger would be employed as a consultant for
the Army’s Operations Research Office, where he would be
trained in various forms of psychological warfare. This
awareness of psyops was reflected in his doctoral work
during the period. His work on the Congress of Vienna and
its consequences invoked thermonuclear weapons as its
opening gambit, which also made an otherwise dull piece of
work a little more interesting. By 1954, Kissinger was
hoping to become a junior professor at Harvard but,
instead, the dean of Harvard at the time, McGeorge Bundy –
another pupil of William Yandell Elliott, recommended
Kissinger to the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). At
the CFR, Kissinger would start managing a study group on
nuclear weapons. From 1956 to 1958, Kissinger also became
the Director of Special Studies for the Rockefeller
Brothers Fund (David Rockefeller was vice-president of the
CFR during this period), as well as going on to direct
multiple panels to produce reports on national defense,
which would gain international attention. In 1957,
Kissinger would seal his place as a leading Establishment
figure on thermonuclear war after publishing, Nuclear
Weapons and Foreign Policy, a book published for the
Council on Foreign Relations by Harper & Brothers.
In December of 1966, The Assistant Secretary of State for
European Affairs, John M Leddy, announced the formation of
a 22-man panel of advisors to help “shape European
policy”. The five most prominent actors of this panel of
advisors included: Henry A Kissinger representing Harvard,
Robert Osgood of the Washington Center of Foreign Policy
Research (funded by Ford, Rockefeller and Carnegie money),
Melvin Conant of Rockefeller’s Standard Oil, Warner R
Schilling of Columbia University, and Raymond Vernon who
was also of Harvard. The other people on the panel
included four members of the Council on Foreign Relations,
Shepard Stone of the Ford Foundation, with the rest being
a mix of representatives from leading American
universities. The forming of this panel could be
considered the laying of the proverbial foundation stone
marking the American branch of the “Round Table”
establishment’s intent to create an organisation such as
the World Economic Forum, whereby Anglo-American
imperialists would mold European policies as they saw fit.
Post-war Europe was at a vital stage of its development
and the powerful American Empire was beginning to see
opportunities in the rebirth of Europe and the emerging
identity of its younger generation. In late December of
1966, Kissinger would be one of the twenty-nine “American
authorities on Germany” to sign a statement declaring that
“recent state elections in West Germany do not indicate a
rebirth of Nazism”. The document, also signed by the likes
of Dwight Eisenhower, was meant to signal that Europe was
starting afresh and was meant to begin putting the horrors
of European wars in the past. Some of the people involved
in creating the aforementioned document were those who had
already been externally influencing European policy from
abroad. Notably, one of the signatures alongside Kissinger
and Eisenhower was Prof. Hans J Morgenthau who was also
representing the Council on Foreign Relations at the time.
Morgenthau had famously written a paper entitled,
Scientific Man versus Power Politics, and argued against
an “overreliance on science and technology as solutions to
political and social problems”.
In February 1967, Henry Kissinger would target European
policy making as having been the reason for a century of
war and political turmoil on the continent. In a piece
entitled, Fuller Investigation, printed in the New York
Times, Kissinger would state that a work by Raymond Aron,
Peace and War. A Theory of International Relations, had
remedied some of these issues.
In this article, Kissinger would write:
“In the United States the national style is pragmatic; the
tradition until World War II was largely isolationist; the
approach to peace and war tended to be absolute and
legalistic. American writing on foreign policy has
generally tended to fall into three categories: analyses
of specific cases or historical episodes, exhortations
justifying or resisting greater participation in
international affairs, and investigations of the legal
bases of world order.”
It was clear that Prof Henry A Kissinger had identified
American involvement in European policy creation as being
vital in the future peace and stability of the world. At
this time, Kissinger was based at Harvard University in
Cambridge, Massachusetts. Here, the future founder of the
World Economic Forum, a young Klaus Schwab, would catch
the eye of Henry A Kissinger.
Kissinger was the executive director of the International
seminar, which Schwab often mentions when recollecting his
time spent at Harvard. On 16 April 1967, it would be
reported that various Harvard programs had been receiving
funding from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). This
included $135,000 of funding for Henry Kissinger’s
International Seminar, funding which Kissinger claimed he
was unaware had come from the US intelligence agency. The
CIA’s involvement in funding Kissinger’s international
seminar was exposed in a report by Humphrey Doermann, the
assistant to Franklin L Ford, who was dean of the Faculty
of Arts and Science. Humphrey Doermann’s report, written
in 1967, only centred on the CIA funding from between 1961
to 1966, but Kissinger’s International seminar, which had
received the most funding out of all the CIA-funded
Harvard programs, would still run through 1967. Klaus
Schwab arrived at Harvard in 1965.
On 15 April 1967, The Harvard Crimson would publish an
article, attributed to no author, concerning Doermann’s
report that stated, “There were no strings attached to the
aid, so the government could not directly influence
research or prevent its results from being published.” The
dismissive article, entitled, CIA Financial Links,
nonchalantly closes out by stating,”In any case, were the
University to refuse to accept CIA research grants, the
shadowy agency would have little trouble channeling its
offers through another agrecy.” (agrecy being a pun
meaning a form of intelligence).
The evidence points to Klaus Schwab having been recruited
by Kissinger into his circle of “Round Table” imperialists
via a CIA funded program at Harvard University. In
addition, the year he graduated would also be the year in
which it was revealed to have been a CIA-funded program.
This CIA-funded seminar would introduce Schwab to the
extremely well-connected American policy-makers who would
help him create what would become the most powerful
European public policy institute, the World Economic
Forum.
By 1969, Kissinger would be sitting as the head of the US
National Security Council, of which the sitting president,
Richard Nixon would “enhance the importance of” during his
administration. Kissinger was Assistant to the President
for National Security Affairs between 2 December 1968 to 3
November 1975, serving concurrently as Richard Nixon’s
Secretary of State from 22 September 1973. Kissinger would
dominate the making of US foreign policy during the Nixon
era and the system he would bring to the National Security
Council would seek to combine features of the systems
previously implemented by Eisenhower and Johnson.
Henry Kissinger, who had been one of the people to
manufacture tensions between thermonuclear powers over the
previous two decades, was now to act as “peacemaker”
during the Nixon period. He would turn his focus to the
European stand-off and would seek to relax the tensions
between the West and Russia. He negotiated the Strategic
Arms Limitation Talks (culminating in the SALT I treaty)
and the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. Kissinger was
attempting to rebrand himself as a trusted statesman and
diplomat.
In the second term of President Richard Nixon’s
administration, their attention would turn to relations
with Western Europe. Richard Nixon would describe 1973 as
being the “Year of Europe”. The United States’ focus would
be on supporting the states of the European Economic
Community (EEC) which had become economic rivals to the US
by the early 1970s. Kissinger grasped the “Year of Europe”
concept and pushed an agenda, not only of economic reform,
but also arguing to strengthen and revitalise what he
considered to be the “decaying force”, the North Atlantic
Treaty Organisation (NATO). Throughout this period,
Kissinger would also promote global governance.
Years later, Henry Kissinger would make the opening
address of the World Economic Forum’s 1980 conference,
telling the elites at Davos: “For the first time in
history, foreign policy is truly global”.
John K. Galbraith
John Kenneth Galbraith (often referred to as Ken
Galbraith) was a Canadian-American economist, diplomat,
public policy maker, and Harvard intellectual. His impact
on American history is extraordinary and the consequences
of his actions in the late 1960s alone are still being
felt around the world today. In September 1934, Galbraith
would initially join the faculty at Harvard University as
an instructor with a salary of $2,400 per year. In 1935,
he would be appointed a tutor at John Winthrop House
(commonly known as Winthrop House) which is one of twelve
undergraduate residential houses at Harvard University. In
that same year, one of his first students would be Joseph
P. Kennedy Jr, with John F. Kennedy arriving two years
later, in 1937. Soon after, the Canadian Galbraith would
become naturalised as a US citizen on 14 September 1937.
Three days later, he would marry his partner, Catherine
Merriam Atwater, a woman who, a few years before, had been
studying at the University of Munich. There, she had lived
in the same rooming house-dormitory as Unity Mitford,
whose boyfriend was Adolf Hitler. After marrying,
Galbraith would travel extensively in Eastern Europe,
Scandinavia, Italy, France, but also Germany. Galbraith
had been due to spend a year as a research fellow at the
University of Cambridge under famed economist John Maynard
Keynes, but Keynes’ sudden heart attack would see
Galbraith’s new wife persuade him to study in Germany
instead. During the summer of 1938, Galbraith would study
German land policies under Hitler’s government.
The following year, Galbraith found himself involved in
what was termed at the time, “the Walsh-Sweezy affair” – a
US national scandal involving two radical instructors who
had been terminated from Harvard. Galbraith’s connections
with the affair would result in his appointment at Harvard
not being renewed.
Still from Galbraith’s interview with Charlie Rose
Galbraith would take a demotion to work at Princeton,
where he would soon after accept an invitation from the
National Resource Planning Board to be part of a review
panel into New Deal spending and employment programs. It
is this project which would see him first meet Franklin D.
Roosevelt. In 1940, as France fell to Nazi forces,
Galbraith would join the staff of the National Defense
Advisory Committee, at the request of FDR’s economic
advisor, Lauchlin Curry. Although that committee would be
swiftly dissolved, Galbraith soon found himself appointed
to the Office of Price Administration (OPA), heading up
the division tasked with price control. He would be
dismissed from the OPA on 31 May 1943. Fortune Magazine
had already been trying to headhunt Galbraith since as
early as 1941, and would soon scoop him up to join their
staff as a writer.
The biggest shift in focus for Galbraith happened in 1945,
the day after the death of Roosevelt. Galbraith would
leave New York for Washington, where he would be duly sent
to London to assume a division directorship of the United
States Strategic Bombing Survey, tasked with evaluating
the overall economic effects of the wartime bombing. By
the time he had arrived at Flensburg, Germany had already
formally surrendered to the Allied forces and Galbraith’s
initial task would change. He would accompany George Ball
and be part of the interrogation of Albert Speer. In this
one move, Galbraith had gone from being a policy advisor
dealing with statistics and projections concerned with
pricing, to the co-interrogator of a high-ranking Nazi war
criminal. Speer had been in various important positions
during the war, including as the Reich Minister of
Armaments and War Production, one of the key men behind
the organisation, maintenance and arming of every part of
the Nazi Wermacht.
Soon after, Galbraith would be sent to Hiroshima and
Nagasaki to evaluate the effects of the bombing. In
January 1946, John Kenneth Galbraith was involved in one
of the defining moments of American economic history. He
would take part in the American Economic Association
meetings in Cleveland, where, alongside Edward Chamberlin
of Harvard and Clarence Ayres of Texas, he would debate
Frank Knight and other leading proponents of classical
economics. This event marked the coming-out of Keynesian
economics, which would come to dominate post-war America.
In February 1946, Galbraith would return to Washington,
where he would be appointed director of the Office of
Economic Security Policy. It is here, in September of
1946, where Galbraith was tasked with drafting a speech
for the Secretary of State, William Byrnes, outlining
American policy towards German reconstruction,
democratisation, and eventual admission into the United
Nations. Galbraith, who opposed the group of politicians
at the time referred to as “the Cold Warriors”, would
resign from his position in October of 1946, returning to
Fortune Magazine. He would also be awarded the
Presidential Medal of Freedom that same year. In 1947,
Galbraith would co-found the organisation, Americans for
Democratic Action, alongside others including Eleanor
Roosevelt, Arthur Schlesinger Jr., and Ronald Reagan. In
1948, Galbraith would return to Harvard as a lecturer in
Agricultural Forestry and Land-Use Policy. Soon after, he
would be installed as a Professor at Harvard.
By 1957, Galbraith was beginning to form a closer
relationship with his former student John F. Kennedy, who
was by then junior senator for Massachusetts. The
following year, JFK would publicly declare Galbraith as
the “Phileas Fogg of the academic world” after receiving a
copy of Galbraith’s book, A Journey to Poland and
Yugoslavia, where he examined socialist planning up close.
It is also in 1958 where Galbraith published “The Affluent
Society” to critical acclaim, where he coined terms such
as “conventional wisdom” and the “dependence effect”. It
is around this time when Galbraith became the Paul M.
Warburg Chair in economics at Harvard. This is the same
position he would hold when he would first be introduced
to a young Klaus Schwab.
By 1960, John Kenneth Galbraith had become an economic
advisor to the Kennedy campaign. After Kennedy was elected
President, Galbraith began staffing the new
administration, famously being the man who recommended
Robert S. McNamara for Secretary of Defense. In 1961,
Kennedy would name Galbraith as ambassador to India and,
later in the year, Galbraith would travel to Vietnam, at
the behest of the President, to give a second opinion on
the Taylor-Rostow report. On Galbraith’s advice, Kennedy
would begin to withdraw troops from Vietnam.
In 1963, Galbraith would return to the United States,
refusing an offer from Kennedy to take up an
ambassadorship in Moscow, so as to return to Harvard. On
the day Kennedy was assassinated, Galbraith was in New
York with the publisher of the Washington Post, Katharine
Graham. Galbraith would go straight to Washington and
would be the man who drafted the original version of the
new President’s speech to the joint session of congress.
The year following JFK’s assassination, Galbraith would
return to Harvard to develop a famous and highly popular
course in Social Science that he would go on to teach for
the following decade. He would still retain his position
as an advisor to President Johnson, but would spend the
rest of the year writing his final academic journals
exclusively in economics.
By 1965, Galbraith had become increasingly louder in his
opposition to the war in Vietnam, writing speeches and
letters to the President. This rift would persist between
Galbraith and Johnson, with Galbraith finally assuming the
presidency of Americans for Democratic Action and going on
to launch a national campaign against the Vietnam War
entitled, “Negotiations Now!” In 1967, the rift between
Galbraith and Johnson would only become wider when Senator
Eugene McCarthy was persuaded by Galbraith to run against
Johnson in the coming primary elections. Robert F. Kennedy
was also hoping to recruit Galbraith to his own campaign
but, although Galbraith had formed a close bond with the
late JFK, he had not been so keen on Robert F. Kennedy’s
distinctive style.
By the late 1960s, John K. Galbraith and Henry A.
Kissinger were both considered to be two of the foremost
lecturers, authors and educators in America. They were
also both grandees at Harvard, Galbraith as the Paul M.
Warburg Professor of Economics, and Kissinger as a
Professor of Government, and the two men were focused on
the creation of foreign policy for both America and the
emerging new Europe. It was announced on 20 March 1968
that Kissinger and Galbraith would be the first speakers
of the spring session of what was referred to as the
“Mandeville Lectures series”, due to take place at the
University of California, San Diego. Galbraith’s speech
would be entitled, “Foreign Policy: The Cool Dissent”,
whilst Kissinger’s speech was called “America and Europe:
A New Relationship”.
Kissinger would introduce Klaus Schwab to John Kenneth
Galbraith at Harvard and, as the 1960’s came to a close,
Galbraith would help Schwab make the World Economic Forum
a reality. Galbraith would fly over to Europe, along with
Herman Kahn, to help Schwab convince the European elite to
back the project. At the first European Management
Symposium/Forum (the original name/s of the WEF), John
Kenneth Galbraith would be the keynote speaker.
Herman Kahn
Herman Kahn was born in Bayonne, New Jersey on 15 February
1922 to Yetta and Abraham Kahn. He was brought up in the
Bronx with a Jewish upbringing, but would later become
atheistic in his beliefs. Throughout the 1950s, Khan would
write various reports at the Hudson Institute on the
concept and practicality of nuclear deterrence, which
would subsequently become official military policy. He
would also compile reports for official hearings, such as
the Subcommittee on Radiation. It is in the primordial
hysteria of the earliest years of the Cold War where Kahn
would be given the intellectual, and some may say ethical
and moral, space to “think the unthinkable”. Khan would
apply game theory – the study of mathematical models of
strategic interactions among rational agents – to wargame
potential scenarios and outcomes concerning thermonuclear
war.
In 1960, Kahn would publish, The Nature and Feasibility of
War and Deterrence, which studied the risks and subsequent
impact of a thermonuclear war. The Rand Corporation sums
up the kinds of deterrents discussed in Kahn’s work as:
the deterrence of a direct attack, the use of strategic
threats to deter an enemy from engaging in very
provocative acts other than a direct attack on the United
States, and, lastly, the acts that are deterred because
the potential aggressor is afraid that the defender or
others will take limited actions, military or
non-military, to make the aggression unprofitable.
Herman Kahn (left) with Gerald Ford and Donald Rumsfeld
The following year, Princeton University Press would first
publish Herman Kahn’s seminal work, On Thermonuclear War.
This book would have an enormous impact on the near and
distant future of global politics and would drive American
Establishment politicians to create foreign policy
specifically designed to counter the potential worst case
thermonuclear scenario. On the release of Kahn’s
terrifying work, the Israeli-American sociologist and
“communitarian”, Amitai Etzioni, would be quoted as
saying, “Kahn does for nuclear arms what free-love
advocates did for sex: he speaks candidly of acts about
which others whisper behind closed doors”.
Khan’s complex theories have often been erroneously
paraphrased, with most of his work being impossible to sum
up in just a sentence or two, and this is emblematic of
his ideas concerning thermonuclear war. Kahn’s research
team were studying a multitude of different scenarios, a
constantly evolving, dynamic, multipolar world, and many
unknowns.
On Thermonuclear War had an instant and lasting impact,
not only on geopolitics, but also on culture, expressed
within a few years by a very famous movie. 1964 saw the
release of the Stanley Kubrick classic, Dr Strangelove,
and from the moment of its release, and ever since, Khan
has been referred to as the real Dr. Strangelove. When
quizzed about the comparison, Khan would tell Newsweek,
“Kubrick is a friend of mine. He told me Dr. Strangelove
wasn’t supposed to be me.” But others would point out the
many affinities between Stanley Kubrick’s classic
character and the real life Herman Kahn.
In an essay written for the Council on Foreign Relations
in July 1966, entitled, Our Alternatives in Europe, Kahn
states:
“Existing U.S. policy has generally been directed to the
political and economic as well as the military integration
or unification of Western Europe as a means to European
security. Some have seen unification as a step toward the
political unity of the West as a whole, or even of the
world. Thus, the achievement of some more qualified form
of integration or federation of Europe, and of Europe with
America, has also been held to be an intrinsically
desirable goal, especially as national rivalries in Europe
have been seen as a fundamentally disruptive force in
modern history; hence their suppression, or accommodation
in a larger political framework, is indispensable to the
future stability of the world.”
This statement suggests that the preferred solution for
future European/American relations would be the creation
of a European union. Even more preferable to Kahn was the
idea of creating a unified American and European
superstate.
In 1967, Herman Kahn would write one of the most important
futurist works of the 20th century, The Year 2000: A
Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty-Three Years.
In this book, co-authored by Anthony J Wiener, Khan and
company predicted where we would be technologically at the
end of the millennium. But there was another document
released soon after Kahn’s The Year 2000, which had been
written simultaneously. That document entitled, Ancillary
Pilot Study for the Educational Policy Research Program:
Final Report, was to map out how to achieve the future
society Kahn’s work in The Year 2000 had envisaged.
Under a section titled “Special Educational Needs of
Decision-Makers”, the paper states: “The desirability of
explicitly educated decision-makers so that they are
better able, in effect, to plan the destiny of the nation,
or to carry out the plans formulated through a more
democratic process, should be very seriously considered.
One facet of this procedure would be the creation of a
shared set of concepts, shared language, shared analogies,
shared references…” He goes on to state in the same
section that: “Universal re-teaching in the spirit of the
humanistic tradition of Europe – at least for its
comprehensive leadership group – might be useful in many
ways.”
When you study the previously mentioned rhetoric and
decipher what it means, in this document Herman Kahn
suggests subverting democracy by training only a certain
group in society as potential leaders, with those
pre-selected few who are groomed for power being able to
define what our shared values as a society should be.
Maybe Herman Kahn would agree with the World Economic
Forum’s Young Global Leader scheme, which is the exact
manifestation of his original suggestion.
In 1968, Herman Kahn would be asked by a reporter what
they do at the Hudson Institute. He would say, “We take
God’s view. The President’s view. Big. Aerial. Global.
Galactic. Ethereal. Spatial. Overall. Megalomania is the
standard occupational hazard.” This was reportedly
followed by Herman Kahn rising out of his chair, pointing
his finger towards the sky and suddenly shouting out:
‘Megalomania, zoom!’”
In 1970, Kahn would travel to Europe with Galbraith to
support Klaus Schwab’s recruitment drive for the first
European Management Symposium. In 1971, Kahn would be
sitting centre stage to watch John Kenneth Galbraith’s
keynote speech at the historic first session of the policy
making organisation which would eventually become the
World Economic Forum.
In 1972, the Club of Rome published “The Limits to
Growth”, which cautioned that the needs of the global
population would exceed available resources by the year
2000. Kahn spent much of his final decade arguing against
this idea. In 1976, Khan would publish a more optimistic
view of the future, The Next 200 Years, which claimed that
the potentials of capitalism, science, technology, human
reason, and self-discipline were boundless. The Next 200
Years would also dismiss pernicious Malthusian ideology by
predicting that the planet’s resources set no limits to
economic growth, but rather, human beings would “create
such societies everywhere in the solar system and perhaps
to the stars as well.”
Schwab’s Three Mentors
Kahn, Kissinger and Galbraith had become three of the most
influential people in America with regards to
thermonuclear deterrence, foreign policy creation, and
public policy making, respectively. Most of the focus
throughout these men’s career had been on Europe and the
Cold War. However, their varying roles in other important
events of the period all have the potential to easily
distract researchers from other more subversive and well
hidden events.
These three powerful Americans were all linked with each
other in various ways, but one interesting and notable
thread in particular ties these men together during the
period between 1966, with the creation of the
Kissinger-led 22 man panel of advisors to help “shape
European policy”, through to 1971, and the founding of the
World Economic Forum. All three men were members of the
Council on Foreign Relations, the American branch of the
Anglo-American imperialist “Round Table” movement.
Kissinger already had deep ties to the CFR, having been
recruited by them straight after graduation. Galbraith had
reportedly resigned his membership of the CFR in a “highly
public way” in 1972, stating that the CFR was boring and
telling a journalist, “Most of the proceedings involve a
level of banality so deep that the only question they
raise is whether one should sit through them.” Although
there is no public date of when Galbraith became a member
of the CFR, he had written for their publications from as
early as July 1958 with “Rival Economic Theories in
India,” being printed in Foreign Affairs, the official CFR
journal/magazine. Khan could also be found publishing some
of his essays through the CFR, writing the piece “Our
Alternatives in Europe” in July 1966, and “If Negotiations
Fail” in July 1968, both whilst working as an official
advisor to the State Department.
Before the 1960s, these three extremely influential
American intellectuals had each been deeply involved in
trying to understand the problems of a postwar Europe, and
mapping out the future of the war-stricken continent.
Galbraith had traveled extensively throughout Europe,
including studying policies in Germany during the Third
Reich, and, after the collapse of Hitler’s Germany,
Galbraith would go on to study the Soviet systems in much
the same way. Galbraith’s influence over the future
president, John F. Kennedy, from a very early age cannot
be understated, and Galbraith was powerful enough to see
JFK begin withdrawing troops from Vietnam on his
recommendation. When Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas,
Galbraith would be the man to draft the incoming
president’s initial address to the nation, but Galbraith
was soon to be pushed off to the sidelines. During the
turmoil of the 1960s, Galbraith would be close with Henry
Kissinger, both men being Harvard Professors, members of
the CFR, and both men having the same goal of making
Europe stable so that the Continent was well defended
against any potential Soviet aggression.
To Galbraith and Kissinger, and also to the wider American
political Establishment, Europe was the main threat to not
only global stability, but also to the prevailing American
hegemony in general. The relative stability in Europe
during the postwar period was perceived as being due to
the thermonuclear stand-off, and, from very early-on,
Kissinger identified this dynamic and began to manipulate
the situation for the benefit of American supremacy. Henry
Kissinger was not alone in trying to understand the
complex dynamics at play in relation to thermonuclear
deterrence and how it affected policy making. Herman Kahn
was the leading figure on thermonuclear strategic planning
during the same period and Kissinger’s work concerning the
same subject matter from the mid-50s onwards would see him
cross paths with Kahn on many occasions.
Kahn offered Kissinger something which all politicians and
policy makers crave, the ability to predict future events
with relative accuracy. Kahn was a veritable prophet
concerning the technological advancements of the
not-so-distant future, and his work, although often stoic
and bereft of human emotion, has stood up very well to the
test of time. Kahn and Kissinger’s goals would overlap
during the mid and late 1960s, and as the threat
assessments Kahn made during this period became more
optimistic, Kissinger would see Kahn’s work as being
fundamental in offering a new future to the people of the
world.
However, Henry Kissinger’s vision of the future was not of
a free and fair society advancing into a “brave new world”
together, but rather, Kissinger intended to create an
image of the world which had been skewed by his own
CFR-driven Establishment perspective. Although he would
attempt to rebrand himself as a true statesman, Kissinger
would continue to subvert not only foreign democratic
processes, but also to undermine the American system for
the eventual benefit of a globalist agenda. When Schwab
was first recognised by Kissinger as a potential future
globalist leader, the relatively young German would soon
be introduced to Galbraith and Kahn. This would coincide
with Kahn’s work identifying the need to specifically
train individuals with leadership potential separately
from those who attend the prevailing standard educational
models.
Klaus Schwab speaking at the inaugural meeting of the
World Economic Forum, 1971
In the year Klaus Schwab left Harvard, he was approached
by Peter Schmidheiny, who had just sold Escher Wyss to the
Sulzer Group. Escher Wyss’ Ravensberg factory during World
War II had been managed by Schwab’s father, Eugen Schwab,
and had been involved in making heavy water turbines for
the secretive Nazi atomic bomb effort. Schwab speaks in
one interview about the moment Schmidheiny called him up,
saying, “You come from Harvard now and know modern
management methods, help to make the integration a
success”. What Klaus wouldn’t mention in that interview is
that he would help Sulzer and Escher Wyss to merge,
resulting in a new company called Sulzer AG. That company,
where Schwab would serve as director, which would go on to
break international law by aiding the South African
apartheid regime in its illegal thermonuclear bomb
program.
Klaus Schwab had only just left the sphere of influence of
some of the most significant experts in thermonuclear war,
and within the same year as leaving Harvard, he would head
up the merger of a company dealing in the propagation
thermonuclear bomb technology to despotic regimes.
For many of us who don’t map out terrifying extinction
scenarios, we may be left believing that apartheid South
Africa gaining the nuke at this point in history would be
one of the worst things that could’ve happened. But,
Herman Kahn’s thermonuclear disaster scenarios had led the
rotund genius to believe that, barring a disaster,
sabotage, or an accident, no major nuclear power would
dare fire a thermonuclear weapon as an act of aggression
for the foreseeable future. In fact, the Establishment
thinking had changed significantly, to the point where
Herman Kahn and others were advising that, in certain
scenarios, making a country such as France a nuclear power
could have significant benefits to security both
regionally and globally, whilst also helping to reduce US
defence spending.
Thermonuclear war was no longer the be all and end all of
strategic defence policy, and it was in the dying embers
of the 1960s where the same people who had caused all of
the fear of a thermonuclear apocalypse, really did stop
worrying and learnt to love the bomb.
Caution: Fallible Humans Ahead
Is Klaus Schwab the real brains behind the formation of
the World Economic Forum? What are we to make of the CIA
involvement in the seminar Kissinger used to recruit
Schwab? Were the powers that lurk behind organisations
like the CFR the real founders of the globalist policy
making organisation? Was the World Economic Forum meant to
simply unite Europe? Or was it then actually meant to go
on to unite Europe with America, followed by the remaining
superstates, into a New World Order designed by powerful
CFR grandees like Kissinger, Khan and Galbraith?
These three powerful men each saw in Schwab a reflection
of their own intellectual desires. Klaus had been born in
the latter half of the same decade in which the
technocratic movement had begun and he would come from the
first generation to have their formative years in a
post-war world. Khan’s predictions for the future had not
only been an exercise in human wonder, it had also been a
project to make these predictions a reality as quickly as
possible and regardless of the consequences.
In 1964, Klaus Schwab would be trying to decide what he
was going to do with his career. He was 26 years old and
looking for direction and he would find that direction
from a familial source. His father, Eugen Schwab, had been
on the wrong side of history during World War II, and had
been involved in the Nazi atomic bomb effort. Eugen Schwab
would tell his son that it will only be at Harvard where
he’d truly be able to flourish. In a divided postwar
Germany, the intense fear which came from the ever
impending and well dramatised threat of thermonuclear war
had become an everyday part of people’s psyche. Harvard
was well known at the time for playing a central role in
Cold War policy-making targeting European affairs and
Klaus Schwab would put himself right in amongst the main
movers and shakers on the thermonuclear disaster scene.
Whilst at Harvard, Schwab would attend Kissinger’s
“International seminar” which was funded by the CIA via a
known conduit. Through this process, Klaus Schwab would be
introduced to a group of men who were actively trying to
influence European public policy by any and all methods,
including using the fear of impending nuclear doom. They
would recognise his potential straight away, so much so
that they would be there for Schwab all through the
founding of the World Economic Forum, with Kahn, Kissinger
and Galbraith bringing perceived credibility to the
project. It was not easy for Schwab alone to explain to
European elites what he intended to do, so he would bring
Kahn and Galbraith to Europe to persuade other important
players to become part of the project. Galbraith would be
the first Keynote Speaker at the forum, with Kahn’s
presence also drawing significant interest, but the second
World Economic Forum would stall without the presence of
the bigger names and Klaus Schwab knew he would need
something to draw in the crowds for the third installment
of his forum’s annual meeting.
In 1972, the Club of Rome’s founder Aurelio Peccei had
published his controversial book “The Limits to Growth”, a
book that had been commissioned by the Club of Rome and
which took a Malthusian approach to overpopulation. The
book would call into question the sustainability of global
economic growth and Peccei would be invited by Schwab to
make the keynote speech at the 1973 World Economic Forum.
This risqué public relations strategy paid dividends for
Schwab and his organisation. From that point on, the forum
would grow in size, scale and power. But it all began with
a CIA-funded course run by Henry Kissinger at Harvard.
Aurelio Peccei (far right) at a 1975 Club of Rome meeting
in Paris
Schwab has become more than just a technocrat. He has been
very vocal on his intention to fuse his physical and
biological identities with future technology. He has
become a living caricature of an evil bond-like villain,
conducting secretive meetings with the elites, high up in
the mountain-top chalets of Switzerland. I do not think
that the image we have of Schwab is an accident. In the
postwar years, something very unique happened in Western
culture, when the government began using mainstream media
as a tool to target the public with military grade
psychological operations. The ruling Establishment would
discover that marrying the drama of conflict scenarios
with media such as film would be extremely useful, almost
akin to creating self-propagating propaganda in some
cases. Films like Stanley Kubrick’s Dr Strangelove were
fantastic vehicles for people to understand the absurdity
of thermonuclear disaster scenario planning.
If people perceive you as an all powerful evil villain
then you may not gain the support of the common man, but
you will gain the attention from those who seek power and
wealth, or, how Klaus Schwab would refer to them, the
“stakeholders” in society. This is very important to
understand – the projection of extreme wealth and power
will attract and bring the “stakeholders” of society to
the World Economic Forum’s table. With those
“stakeholders” on board, Klaus Schwab’s main ideological
product, “stakeholder capitalism”, will see the transfer
of power away from true democratic processes and onto a
system of governance by a small preselected leadership
group, who will be trained to continue the agenda set for
them by the previous generation, as predicted by Herman
Kahn. They will hold all the cards, whilst the common
people will be left with just illusory pseudo-democratic
processes, poverty, and constant absurd psychological
operations to distract us all constantly. Klaus Schwab
would soon become everything Herman Kahn had feared during
his most pessimistic predictions. When the Club of Rome
produced “The Limits to Growth” report, Herman Kahn would
refute its findings and rally against its pessimism,
whilst, at the same time, Klaus Schwab would make it
central to his machinations and have their founder be the
keynote speaker at his forum in Davos.
Our current geopolitical situation is seemingly regressing
back towards the East vs West dynamic of the Cold War era.
Again, with recent events in Ukraine, the mainstream media
is regurgitating nuclear talking points which are
completely paralleled to those of 60 to 70 years ago. I
believe that there is a very obvious reason for our return
to Cold War rhetoric – it’s a very obvious sign that Klaus
Schwab and his backers are out of ideas. They appear to be
returning to a geopolitical paradigm in which they feel
safer and, most importantly, which will cause mass fear of
thermonuclear war. This rinse and repeat cycle will always
happen once an ideological movement is running out of
original ideas. Since the late 1960s, Klaus Schwab has
been trying to create the world which Herman Kahn
predicted. But Kahn’s vision of the future, even though
pretty accurate, is over half a century old. Schwab’s
technocratic movement depends on the successful
development of innovative technologies which will advance
us towards a vision largely manufactured in 1967. Just by
studying a more refined list of Kahn’s predictions, you
can see every idea which Schwab promotes is almost
entirely based on Kahn’s “Year 2000” and that documents
vision of what our future may look like, predictions
dating back to the late 60’s. But, what Schwab appears to
ignore, whilst forcing this futuristic agenda on us all,
is that many of Kahn’s predictions were also combined with
warnings of the dangers which will be created from future
technological advancements.
As Schwab reaches the end of his life, he appears to be
desperate to push forward a radical futurist agenda with
the obvious potential for global disaster. I believe that
the World Economic Forum is reaching its maximum level of
expansion before its inevitable collapse, because
eventually those people who love their own national
identities will stand up against the immediate threat to
their specific cultures and they will fight back against
the globalist rule. Quite simply, you cannot make everyone
a globalist, no matter how much brainwashing is applied.
There is a natural contradiction between national freedom
and globalist rule, which make the two completely
incompatible.
As a very pertinent final thought, Herman Kahn would write
something extremely significant during the same year in
which Schwab would leave Harvard. In the aforementioned
Hudson Institute document of 1967 entitled, Ancillary
Pilot Study for the Educational Policy Research Program:
Final Report, Khan writes:
“It has become increasingly clear that our technological
and even our economic achievements are mixed blessings.
Through progress issues arise such as the accumulation,
augmentation, and proliferation of weapons of mass
destruction; the loss of privacy and solitude; the
Increase of governmental and/or private power over
individuals; the loss of human scale and perspective and
the dehumanization of social life or even of the
psychobiological self; the growth of dangerously,
vulnerable, deceptive, or degradable centralizations of
administrative or technological systems; the creation of
other new capabilities, so inherently dangerous as to
seriously risk disastrous abuse; and the acceleration of
changes that are too rapid or cataclysmic to permit
successful adjustment. Perhaps most crucial, choices are
posed that are too large, complex, important, uncertain,
or comprehensive to be safely left to fallible humans.”
___
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2022/03/investigative-reports/dr-klaus-schwab-or-how-the-cfr-taught-me-to-stop-worrying-and-love-the-bomb/
|