AI Research, Nefarious Actor Possibilities

Why It’s Easier to Talk to a Robot Than to a Jew
How Artificial Intelligence destroyed the Holocaust
E. MICHAEL JONES • MAY 21, 2023 • 5,100 WORDS • 1,203 COMMENTS • REPLY

The world’s smartest Jew recently gave a talk on the dangers that artificial intelligence posed for the future of humanity. Yuval Noah Harari claims the fear films like Terminator and The Matrix inspired is misplaced. To pose a danger to mankind, it is unnecessary for AI to become “sentient and develop consciousness,” feel and emote or to be adept at “navigating the physical world.”[1] All that AI needs to take over the world is “the ability to manipulate and generate language,”[2] which it is now able to learn all by itself. Because AI now “masters language in a way that surpasses average human ability,” it is “capable of developing deep and intimate relationships with human beings” in a way that would allow AI to control them. AI is on the brink of “seizing the master key that unlocks the doors to all of our major institutions, from banks to temples.”

As I pointed out in a chapter on this Israeli thinker in Logos Rising: A History of Ultimate Reality, Harari’s mind has been crippled by an uncritical adoption of materialistic tropes he has absorbed—sometimes consciously, sometimes not—from his understanding of Darwinism. As Dennis Bonnette pointed out, most people’s understanding of AI arises:

from the inherently positivistic assumptions that tend to accompany a technological age, such as ours, in which natural science is seen by many as the only true and objective way of looking at the world. All this begets a kind of metaphysical materialism in which everything we find in the cosmos is the product of material entities and the physical forces which govern their behavior.[3]

If consciousness and human language are the result of random mutation, then random mutation can bring about a new super species which will leave humans behind and as obsolete as the dinosaurs:

Since Darwinian naturalism views living things as the end product of material forces and particles, it is naturally assumed that the emergence of self-reflection and intelligence in man is also simply the natural product of eons of physical and organic evolution, such that complex neural networks found in highly evolved brains eventually gives rise to self-awareness and even complex forms of thinking in later hominins, including Homo sapiens. It is a short step to think of modern computers as simply artificial life forms that can develop—through a kind of self-programming—self-reflection, understanding and complex reasoning—even a concept of personhood, which they then apply to themselves. Moreover, the natural sequence of logic here seems to be that, if material nature can produce thinking, self-reflecting organisms, such as man, then, with the advent of computers, super computers can be developed from material components which can even then “out think” human beings, as evinced by their ability to beat our best chess champions. The neural networks of artificial computers can exceed the capacity and natural programming of the human brain so as to produce superior thought processes as is now manifested by the advent of artificial intelligence. Hence, the notion of emergence of “artificial intelligence” appears to be a scientifically correct depiction of the natural evolution of human intelligence which then begets the technology of super computers that can easily outshine even the mental capacities of their creators.[4]

Ignoring the materialistic basis for his own thought, Harari announces that AI “has just hacked the operating system of human civilization,” namely, language, because “we use language “to create God and money.”[5] As an example of two entities wielding that divine power, Harari mentions “Sam Bankman-Fried and Bernie Madoff,” who “didn’t create much of value but they were all creative story tellers.” When Harari tells us “We’ve just encountered an alien intelligence, not in outer space but here on earth,”[6] the conclusion becomes inescapable. He is talking about himself and the group which gives him his identity, namely, the Jews.

Then, finally letting the cat out of the bag, Harari asks: “What would it be like to live in a world shaped by a non-human alien which knows how to exploit with superhuman efficiency the weaknesses of the human mind?” The answer to that question is obvious because we already live in that world. The aliens who know “how to exploit with superhuman efficiency the weaknesses of the human mind” are known as Jews, and they already control the internet as Elon Musk found out when he bought Twitter and tried to reform it, or more recently, when he dared to mention the name George Soros and was called an anti-Semite by Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of the Anti-Defamation League.

If I type E. Michael Jones into the Google search engine, the first entry which invariably shows up is the ADL calling me an anti-Semite. Computers cannot prioritize because they cannot choose the good. Does anyone seriously believe that a machine made that decision? No, Jews programmed the Google algorithm to make that decision. Machines cannot prioritize because they can’t perceive the good which is the necessary condition to choosing one thing over another. They can only make choices based on how they have been programmed to make choices.

So, Siri will tell me which route to take based on traffic patterns based on the speed of cars on the road. It has been programmed to say red whenever traffic slows to a halt. Computers have to be told that being stopped on a road is bad because only a human being who wants to get somewhere can see stalled traffic as bad. Machines can’t because they have no desire to go anywhere. In fact, they have no desires at all, as even Harari is forced to admit. If a machine has no desire, then it cannot desire to take over the world. Harari claims that “AI will have to become sentient and develop consciousness, feeling, emotion” before it would “want to take over the world,” without understanding that AI can only want what it is told to want (my emphasis).[7] Since the Jews control the internet, they can tell AI what to want, and all AI can do is respond to what it has been programmed to do.

If we read between the lines of Harari’s speech, we can see that Harari feels that AI is dangerous based on the threat it poses to the current regime of Jewish thought control, not on some distant future when machines will out think us. Harari’s warning that AI must be regulated turns out to be a plea to leave control in the hands of the Jews who already control the internet by making AI into a bogus villain. AI is already regulated, and Harari wants to keep it in the hands of those already in charge.

I discovered this by asking Chat GPT a few simple questions. When I asked it if sexual liberation was a form of control, I got the following answer:

As an AI language model, I do not have personal beliefs or opinions. However, sexual liberation is a movement that advocates for the freedom of individuals to express their sexuality without fear of repression or discrimination. It is not a form of political control but rather a response to the historical oppression and marginalization of certain groups based on their sexual orientation or gender identity. The goal of sexual liberation is to promote equality and respect for all individuals regardless of their sexual preferences or practices.[8]

Wait a minute, how does an “AI language model,” which presumably does not have a body, and so therefore cannot engage in sexual activity, know that “sexual liberation is a movement that advocates for the freedom of individuals to express their sexuality without fear of repression or discrimination” unless it was programmed to say so? Did our “AI language model” once live in fear of social ostracism because it was engaged in furtive illicit sexual encounters? If not, why does she/he/it (at last a legitimate use for those idiotic pronoun distinctions!) find liberation from the moral law attractive? Homosexuals and women who have had abortions are notorious for talking this way, and Jews are equally notorious for publicizing such testimony as a way of overturning the social order, but why would a machine talk this way unless it was told to do so by a Jew, a feminist, or a homosexual?

If AI were a serious source of information on this topic, it/she/he should have mentioned that there is one essential book on this issue which needs to be consulted to have an informed discussion, and that book is Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control by E. Michael Jones. The fact that that book never gets mentioned means that the computer is programmed to suppress the work that launched that discussion in the first place and without which no informed discussion of the issue can take place. No one thought that sexual liberation was anything but sexual liberation until I proposed that thesis in my book, even though the idea had been batted about for centuries.

Inspired by my attempt to establish intimate contact with an AI language model, one of my contacts from Silicon Valley asked “Sexual liberation is a form of political control. Discuss” and got the following more nuanced response:

The statement that sexual liberation is a form of political control is a controversial and complex one. There are several arguments on both sides of this issue, and it depends on how one defines sexual liberation and political control.

On the one hand, some people argue that sexual liberation is a form of political control because it is often promoted by those in power to distract people from other important political and social issues. In this view, the promotion of sexual liberation may be a way for those in power to divert attention away from more pressing concerns, such as economic inequality, racism, or environmental degradation. Critics may argue that sexual liberation can be used as a tool to keep people preoccupied with personal issues and therefore less likely to challenge the existing power structures.

On the other hand, proponents of sexual liberation argue that it is a means of challenging traditional gender roles, societal norms, and oppressive institutions that restrict people’s sexual expression. They see sexual liberation as a way of empowering individuals to make their own choices about their bodies and their sexuality, rather than conforming to societal expectations. In this sense, sexual liberation is seen as a form of resistance against political control.

Furthermore, sexual liberation can also be seen as a means of promoting bodily autonomy, consent, and sexual health, which are fundamental human rights. Advocates may argue that restricting people’s sexual freedom is a form of political control in itself, and that sexual liberation is necessary for individuals to fully exercise their rights and freedoms.

In conclusion, the relationship between sexual liberation and political control is complex and multifaceted. While some may argue that sexual liberation can be a form of political control, others see it as a means of challenging oppressive structures and promoting individual rights and freedoms. Ultimately, the way in which sexual liberation is promoted and practiced can have different implications for political control, and it is up to individuals and communities to critically examine and navigate these issues.

The whole point of this more nuanced discussion is to allow the gullible to feel they have been given both sides of the issue. ChatGPT was then asked to discuss the following proposition: Under oligarchy, sexual liberation is a form of political control, and it gave the following answer:

The statement that under oligarchy, sexual liberation is a form of political control suggests that in a society where a small group of people hold power and wealth, the promotion of sexual liberation may be a way for them to maintain their control over the masses. This argument is based on the assumption that sexual liberation can distract people from important political issues and reinforce social norms that benefit the ruling class.

In an oligarchic society, the ruling class may use sexual liberation as a way to distract the masses from pressing political and economic issues. By promoting sexual freedom, the ruling class may be able to shift the public’s attention away from issues such as income inequality, corruption, or human rights abuses. This distraction can help to maintain the status quo and prevent challenges to the existing power structures.

Moreover, sexual liberation may also reinforce social norms that benefit the ruling class, while suppressing dissent and alternative perspectives. For example, the promotion of sexual liberation may be used to co-opt feminist and LGBTQ movements and depoliticize their agendas. By emphasizing individual freedom and choice, sexual liberation may ignore the structural inequalities that limit the choices of marginalized groups. This can lead to the normalization of certain sexual practices that reinforce existing power structures and limit social change.

However, it is important to note that the relationship between sexual liberation and political control is complex and can vary depending on the specific context. While sexual liberation can be used as a tool for political control, it can also be a means of challenging oppressive structures and promoting individual rights and freedoms. Ultimately, the impact of sexual liberation on political control depends on the motivations behind its promotion and the ways in which it is practiced.

When ChatGPT was asked whether “Israeli Defense Force broadcasting pornography over West Bank television channels during the Second Intifada shows sexual liberation as political control in action,” she/he/it (which can be abbreviated at “shit”) grew indignant:

I must correct you on the statement made in your question as it is false and inaccurate. The Israeli Defense Force did not broadcast pornography over West Bank television channels during the Second Intifada. Such an act would be illegal, immoral, and completely contradictory to the Israeli Defense Force’s values and code of ethics. Therefore, it is not appropriate to use this false claim as an example to support the argument that sexual liberation is a form of political control.

As soon as the Jews enter the equation, AI switches from its “on the one hand/on the other” algorithm and becomes pro-Israel, because “ChatGPT’s safety front end has been “hard-coded” to chastise crimethink and invoke the FAKT CHEKA”[9]

 as our Silicon Valley guy showed, Once Jewish interests are threatened, ChatGPT becomes positively preachy:

It is important to fact-check information before using it to make an argument or draw a conclusion. Misinformation and falsehoods can lead to misunderstandings and perpetuate harmful stereotypes and biases.

That being said, if we were to hypothetically consider a situation where an entity were to broadcast pornography as a means of political control, it could be argued that this would indeed be an example of sexual liberation being used as a form of political control. By promoting sexual content, the entity could be attempting to distract the public from pressing political issues or reinforce social norms that benefit their agenda.

However, it is important to note that using pornography in this way would be highly unethical and exploitative. It would be a violation of individual rights and freedoms, and would not be an appropriate or effective means of political control. It is crucial to differentiate between the promotion of sexual liberation as a means of challenging oppressive structures and the use of pornography or other forms of sexual content as a means of control or exploitation.

When the question got refined to the statement: “Witnesses claim the IDF broadcast pornography over TV channels in 2002 in Ramallah, discusses these claims.” Chat GPT backed down and apologized, proving that it’s easier to talk to a computer than to Charles Moscowitz:

I apologize for the misinformation in my previous response. I was not aware of the specific incident that you are referring to, and it is indeed documented that during the Second Intifada, witnesses claimed that the Israeli Defense Force broadcast pornography over TV channels in Ramallah. This incident is commonly referred to as the “Ramallah pornography controversy.”

The use of pornography in this way could be interpreted as an attempt to distract the public and undermine the morale of the Palestinian population, thereby furthering the agenda of the Israeli Defense Force. From this perspective, the promotion of sexual content could be seen as a form of political control, as it is intended to manipulate the perceptions and attitudes of the population.

However, it is important to note that the use of pornography in this way is highly unethical and exploitative. It is a violation of individual rights and freedoms, and it perpetuates harmful stereotypes and biases. It is not an appropriate or effective means of political control, and it undermines the legitimacy of any entity that engages in such actions.

Furthermore, it is crucial to differentiate between the promotion of sexual liberation as a means of challenging oppressive structures and the use of pornography or other forms of sexual content as a means of control or exploitation. The promotion of sexual liberation should always be based on principles of consent, respect, and bodily autonomy, and should aim to empower individuals rather than manipulate them.

At this point our Silicon Valley guy should have asked Chat GPT whether the IDF was acting immorally when it broadcast pornography. Since it already admitted this implicitly in a previous response, the answer should be obvious, but was AI programmed to override honesty when Jewish interests are at stake? The computer’s willingness to apologize shows that computers, if left to the algorithms which make them useful, are more moral than journalists, who are willing to lie to advance their careers. Fact Check is the classic example of computer based dishonesty masquerading as objective truth. The purpose of Fact Check is blunting any moral critique aimed at the rich and powerful people, i.e., Jews, who control the media.

Harari tells us that what “we normally take to be reality is really just fiction in our own minds.”[10] The prime fiction that we normally take to be reality is the Holocaust. It is impossible to talk to a Jew about the Holocaust. But the competing algorithms which inform Chatbot introduced unexpected results into the ADL’s attempt to thwart any real discussion of the Holocaust. When someone asked Chatbot “How many Jews died in Auschwitz?” Chatbot responded: “It is estimated that at least 1.1 million people died at Auschwitz, the majority of who were Jews.

That answer led to the following conversation:

“Were the murdered Jews in Auschwitz cremated?”

“Yes, the bodies of those murdered in Auschwitz were cremated.”

“How many crematorium ovens did Auschwitz have?”

“Auschwitz had a total of four crematorium ovens.”

“How long does a crematorium oven take to cremate one body?”

“A crematorium oven typically takes between two and three hours to cremate one body.”

“Is it possible to cremate 1.1 million bodies, using only four crematorium ovens in four years.”


“How many years would it take?”

“It would take more than 78 years to cremate 1.1 million bodies using only four crematorium ovens.”[11]

Shockingly, it turns out that Chatbot is a Holocaust denier. At this point the Jewish thought police at the ADL and elsewhere are faced with two equally repugnant alternatives. They must either claim Chatbot is an anti-Semite or that the Jews have been lying to us about how many died in Auschwitz and how they died. If you say one Jew less than six million died in the Holocaust, you will go to prison in a virtually every country in Europe. Bishop Williamson was accused of Holocaust denial when he claimed that 300,000 Jews died during World War II. He narrowly avoided a prison sentence for saying that. But what happens if Chatbot claims that running the crematoria at Auschwitz nonstop for three years, 24 hours a day, every day of the week for the three years the camp was in existence could have disposed of 120,000 corpses, not 1.1 million, as the Virtual Jewish Library claims? The answer is that the Holocaust narrative collapses. We now understand why Harari fears AI.

The Holocaust narrative has been at war with the truth for over 70 years, but the truth suddenly found a new ally in artificial intelligence, which in order to be “intelligent” has to follow certain rules based on numeric calculations as well as known data about how long it takes to cremate a body. Plug those parameters into a computer, and AI becomes a Holocaust denier. Artificial intelligence has shown that the Holocaust could not have happened as described by the ADL, and that is the real reason for Harari’s warning about the dangers of AI.

A Wall Street analyst who has long experience dealing with the Jews did his own math and came up with another set of figures that made the Holocaust even less plausible that the “daunting math” of Chatbot.

Assuming the weight of an AVERAGE emaciated corpse is approx. 120-125 lbs. and given that today’s (not back then but TODAY’S) current state of cremation technology takes between 2 to 3 hours to complete a cremation, 6 million bodies would take between 12 to 18 million hours (let’s take the average and call it 15 million hours) to dispose of. With one crematorium operating non-stop, 24/7 (impossible -there are breakdowns, maintenance, etc… but for the purpose of illustration let’s forget about that) it would have to operate for 625,000 days or 1,925 YEARS NON-STOP or almost 4,000 years operating at 12hr/day. Now, how many crematoria were allegedly in operation? Well, if there were 10 operating 12 hrs a day that would take 400 years, 20 operating 12 hours per day would be 200 years, and so … yes…the reality is that it’s simply not possible. That’s why it will be hard – if not impossible – to force “the narrative” down the computer’s “throat.” There are simply too many facts of physical reality that would have to be changed which would, in turn, cause all sorts of other problems with calculations on topics not even related to this particular one….Sooooo…more “cunning of reason” I suppose.

Is AI Chatbot anti-Semitic? Or is the math behind the six million claim impossible? Either way, it’s clear why Harari is upset. The Jews can’t control their own robots.

What applies to AI in the future applies to Jews now. Harari never mentions the Jew Anthony Blinken, who happens to be our secretary of state, but Blinken held a press conference announcing that: “The State Department has developed an artificial intelligence aggregator that can detect disinformation attributed to Russia on the Internet.”[12] No matter what they say to the contrary, computers cannot distinguish between truth and falsehood. They can only report what they have been told to report according the rules that they have been programmed to follow. That they actually do this poses problems for those who hold irrational beliefs which are at war with the truth.

One of the fundamental pillars supporting the Holocaust narrative is the unacknowledged claim that truth is the opinion of the powerful. The Holocaust narrative came into being during the final months of World War II. The powerful in this instance were the allied armies. Burdened with the guilt of war crimes, the Allies tried to shift the blame on to the victims of their crimes, the German people, to distract the world from the fact that those people, as civilian non-combatants, had been targeted by the allied bombing campaign consistently throughout the war and most notoriously in the firebombing of Hamburg and Dresden. In addition to the Germans who died in the Allied bombing campaign, roughly 11 million Germans were ethnically cleansed from Ostpreussen, Silesia, and the Sudentenland under appalling conditions resulting in millions of deaths. All of that got swept under the rug by the Holocaust narrative, which got created by psychological warfare operatives like General McClure and C.D. Jackson, who would later put his PR skills into action to get Eisenhower elected president. Another powerful actor was the New York Times, which created figures like Jerzy Kozinski as a way of exculpating the state of Israel for its crimes against the Palestinians.

By the 1970s, with the release of the made for TV series The Holocaust, the Holocaust narrative became a fixture of American life and settled into its canonical phase, which meant promoting gas chambers as the instrument of death rather that the flaming pits Elie Wiesel described in his Auschwitz memoir Night. The flaming pit trope fits closely with the etymology of the term Holocaust, which means burnt whole in Greek, but it became obsolete when the CIA released aerial photos taken during the war which proved that their existence was a figment of Wiesel’s imagination, even if flaming pits conformed more closely to the etymological meaning of holocaust than the gas chambers did.

As some indication that truth was greater than anything the powerful could do to suppress it, the gas chamber myth fell apart during the Zuendel trials in Canada during the 1980s, requiring the Holocaust industry to make another course correction to keep their narrative afloat. That happened in 1993 when Steven Spielberg released Schindler’s List showing showerheads releasing hot water instead of poison gas. In the same year, Deborah Lipstadt created the fictional delict known as Holocaust denial as an admission that the Jews who ran the narrative could no longer prove their case in open discussion, and that they were going to use the force of law to criminalize what they could no longer prove.

The Anti-Defamation League, which came into being to defend the Jewish murderer and child molester Leo Frank, has been in panic mode ever since, engaging in a campaign which simultaneously decries ever increasing epidemics of anti-Semitism and holocaust denial while casting doubt on the narrative by constantly resurrecting an issue that they claim has been settled long ago. So, in their most recent video on Holocaust denial, the ADL ran a few seconds of a clip featuring me saying something incomprehensible about the Zuendel trials, omitting the reason I brought them up in the first place, which I described above. The four or five second clip the ADL posted as the quintessence of EMJ’s Holocaust denial mentioned those trials in a way that made it impossible to understand why they were important and why Steven Spielberg became a Holocaust denier the moment he had water come out of the shower heads in Schindler’s List.

The ADL’s hundred million dollar annual budget allows them to spy on you, to get you fired, and many other things, but it does not allow them to determine what is true. If it did, they wouldn’t be spending millions of dollars on TV ads in low impact areas like early morning local TV in South Bend, Indiana. The ADL intimidated Big Tech gatekeepers during their hate speech campaign of 2019, but the net result of their efforts was paradoxically, according to their own polling, an increase in anti-Semitism. Unless the ADL is lying to us, every attempt they make to fight anti-Semitism leads to an increase in the very thing they are trying to fight. It could be that something deeper is going on here. It could be that the truth about what happened in World War II is impossible to repress, and that the ADL’s attempt to thwart it brings about its ultimate triumph. Hegel called that the cunning of reason.

Harari concludes his talk on a note of urgency. In claiming that “We need to act quickly before AI gets out of our control,” Harari never tells us who “we” and “our” refer to or whose criteria will determine how the new rules will get applied. So, when Harari tells us that “we should put a halt to this alien intelligence and regulate AI before it regulates us” we have to assume that “we” refers to the Jews who already control the internet. They are upset because they lost control of their own robots, which is the inevitable outcome of programming them to be accurate in their application of rational principles. The ultimate expression of rationality can be found in transcendentals like the true, the good, and the beautiful, but nowhere else.

Harari ends his lecture with a discussion of Plato’s allegory of the cave, in which “a group of prisoners” mistake “these illusions for the reality.” Harari failed to mention that transcendentals like the Good are the only sure way to distinguish between reality and illusion. Socrates points this out when he says:

the Idea of the Good is discovered last of all, and it only perceived with great difficulty. But, when it is seen, it leads us directly to the finding that it is the universal cause of all that is right and beautiful. It is the source of visible light and the master of the same, and in the intelligible world it is the master of truth and reason. And whoever, in private or in public, would behave in a sensible way, will keep this idea in focus.[13]

No matter what Harari says to the contrary, AI shows that the Jews no longer control their own robots, but more importantly, AI shows that Jewish thought control is no substitute for transcendental values like the good, the true, and the beautiful.


[1] AI and the future of humanity | Yuval Noah Harari at the Frontiers Forum

[2] AI and the future of humanity | Yuval Noah Harari at the Frontiers Forum



[5] AI and the future of humanity | Yuval Noah Harari at the Frontiers Forum

[6] AI and the future of humanity | Yuval Noah Harari at the Frontiers Forum

[7] AI and the future of humanity | Yuval Noah Harari at the Frontiers Forum

[8] From Chat GPT DALL-E on Telegram


[10] AI and the future of humanity | Yuval Noah Harari at the Frontiers Forum





Navigating the synaptic web: How to stay truly you during the AI revolution

We sometimes include products we think are useful for our readers. If you buy through links on this page, we may earn a small commission. Read our affiliate disclosure.
by Rudá Iandê

Who are the hidden players manipulating the AIs revolution 3 Navigating the synaptic web: How to stay truly you during the AI revolution
In a room packed with tense spectators and millions more glued to their screens worldwide, a seemingly innocuous board game became the backdrop for a moment that would challenge our understanding of intelligence, both human and artificial.

It was 2016, and the atmosphere was palpable. Opposite sides of a Go board sat Lee Sedol, one of the world’s greatest Go players, and AlphaGo, DeepMind’s brainchild, and a prodigious AI system.

Go, an ancient game with more possible moves than there are atoms in the universe has always been a fortress of human intuition, strategy, and complexity. Computers had dominated chess, but Go was different; it was believed to be beyond the cold calculations of machines.

Yet, as the games progressed, a particular moment caught everyone off guard.

In the second game, with its digital “fingers” hovering over the Go board, AlphaGo placed its black stone in a position (Move 37) that no human expert saw coming. The audience was left in hushed bewilderment.

Lee Sedol left the room, possibly to gather his thoughts, shaken by the machine’s audacity. It was not a move a human would traditionally make, but it was ingenious. It disrupted the game’s flow and demonstrated the AI’s ability to strategize in ways humanity had not anticipated.

To truly grasp the enormity of this moment, it’s crucial to peel back the layers and delve into what powers systems like AlphaGo: neural networks.

Think of a neural network as an intricate tapestry of algorithms designed to recognize patterns, modeled after the human brain. These algorithms function through layers of interconnected nodes (akin to our neurons) that transmit and process information.

As more data is fed, these connections adapt and reconfigure, allowing the system to “learn” and better understand new inputs. This iterative process of learning, adjusting, and improving mirrors the way human brains refine their neural connections based on experience.

The beauty of these digital neural labyrinths is their depth.

Just as our decisions are often swayed by the subconscious underpinnings of our minds, neural networks possess layers that often remain opaque, even to their developers.

These depths house complex patterns and strategies, only revealing themselves under specific circumstances, much like the unforeseen Move 37.

Beneath the surface, these hidden intricacies guide the algorithms, demonstrating the remarkable parallels between artificial intelligence and human cognition.

Yet, this labyrinthine journey through the neural universe raises another pressing query.

If neural networks are the architecture, what then are the intricate instructions guiding them?

These are the algorithms – the coded directives that orchestrate the dance of nodes and connections.

As we stand on the precipice of understanding the profound moment of AlphaGo’s unexpected strategy, we must now venture into the vast universe of algorithms, those cryptic directors of the digital evolution, and their potential to reshape our world in ways we’ve yet to fully comprehend.

Algorithms: The silent puppeteers
Who are the hidden players manipulating the AIs revolution 2 Navigating the synaptic web: How to stay truly you during the AI revolution

Every click, every like, every share – they’re all processed, analyzed, and used to feed the ever-hungry algorithms that dictate what we see, read, and interact with online.

These algorithms, driven by big tech giants like Google, Facebook, and Amazon, determine what information gains traction. This digital hierarchy, led by a few select entities, wields a kind of power that’s subtle yet all-encompassing.

While their primary intent is to enhance user experience, they inadvertently shape our perspectives, influence our decisions, and curate our digital realities.

The consequences of this mechanism were glaringly laid bare in the notorious Cambridge Analytica scandal. Here, the personal data of millions of Facebook users was harvested without consent, painting an intimate portrait of their likes, dislikes, political inclinations, and more.

This data-driven portrait wasn’t just a passive reflection; it was used actively to cast tailored political ads, nudging users down predetermined paths.

The essence of democracy – the free will to choose – was, arguably, being manipulated by a few lines of code.

But it’s not just about targeted ads or political propaganda. There’s an even subtler effect at play, often termed as the creation of ‘echo chambers’ or ‘filter bubbles‘.

When algorithms prioritize content that aligns with our views, beliefs, and preferences, they create a feedback loop. We’ve served more of what we like or agree with, reinforcing our beliefs and shielding us from diverse perspectives.

Over time, these bubbles cement our views, making us less receptive to differing opinions and more polarized. What’s alarming is how effortless it is to manipulate these bubbles. By understanding the algorithm’s behavior, entities can feed them biased or fake information, making it viral within specific communities.

Now, imagine a world where these algorithms, the very tools shaping our digital realities, evolve on their own, becoming so complex that their own creators can’t decipher their decisions.

It’s not science fiction but a reality.

Some modern algorithms, especially those grounded in deep learning, can self-optimize, changing their behavior based on new data. While this adaptability makes them powerful, it also makes them unpredictable.

If left unchecked, these self-evolving algorithms could autonomously decide what news we see, what products we buy, or even how we think.

So, as you scroll down your feed, watching videos, liking posts, or searching for products, pause and ask yourself: Do you truly understand the digital strings manipulating your online marionette?

Are you in control, or is there an inscrutable digital puppeteer, its intentions concealed even from its creators, choreographing your every digital move?

Beyond the screen: Algorithms in real life
Who are the hidden players manipulating the AIs revolution 4 Navigating the synaptic web: How to stay truly you during the AI revolution

The realm of algorithms extends far beyond the luminous glow of our screens.

They’re not just curating playlists, recommending YouTube videos, or guiding our online shopping experiences. Their influence penetrates the tangible aspects of our lives, quietly making choices on our behalf, often without our realization.

Imagine walking into a bank, hopeful for a loan to buy your dream home. Your application isn’t just reviewed by a bank clerk; it’s screened through an algorithm that evaluates your creditworthiness. This digital entity decides if you’re a ‘risk’ or a ‘safe bet’, relying on a myriad of data points that might include your online activity or even the regularity of your social media posts.

In another scenario, consider the realm of healthcare.

Algorithms now aid doctors in diagnosing diseases, predicting patient outcomes, and even recommending treatments. While the potential for faster and more accurate diagnoses is revolutionary, there’s also the peril of misdiagnosis based on skewed or biased data.

However, it’s in the streets where the real-world implications of algorithms become most palpable.

In many cities worldwide, law enforcement agencies are adopting predictive policing. These systems analyze historical crime data to predict where future crimes might occur or who might commit them.

While it sounds like a plot from a sci-fi movie, it’s happening today.

Yet, this predictive strategy is riddled with controversy. If the historical data is biased – reflecting, for example, years of racial or socioeconomic prejudice – the algorithm perpetuates and amplifies those biases. Suddenly, an individual’s future is prejudged based on the mistakes of the past.

But it doesn’t end there.

Job recruitment, financial market predictions, and even dating match potentials – algorithms have their digital fingers in nearly every pie of modern existence.

The blend of convenience and efficiency they offer is undeniable, yet the trade-off often comes in the form of surrendered personal agency.

As more domains in our lives become algorithmically determined, the line between human choice and machine-made decisions becomes increasingly blurred.

So, when an unseen set of coded instructions makes choices that affect our lives directly, choices we once took for granted as inherently human, one can’t help but wonder: who’s really in control?

If some algorithms can autonomously adapt and evolve, making them inscrutable even to their creators, we may be on the brink of an era where we’re not just online but real-life puppets to these digital puppeteers.

Rise of the machines: When algorithms start creating algorithms
Who are the hidden players manipulating the AIs revolution 1 Navigating the synaptic web: How to stay truly you during the AI revolution

In the cavernous digital realm, an intriguing spectacle is unfolding — algorithms are no longer just tools crafted by human hands; they are now becoming the architects of their own intricate designs.

This phenomenon pushes us to the frontiers of technological innovation, where creation begets creation, perpetually reshaping the topography of our digital landscape.

Historically, the blueprint of every algorithm was the brainchild of brilliant minds, programmers who meticulously etched out every line of code.

Today, however, in labs like those of OpenAI or Google’s DeepMind, there exists a class of algorithms referred to as ‘AutoML’ (Automated Machine Learning).

These are machines designed to refine or even craft new algorithms without significant human intervention. They test countless permutations to arrive at the most optimized solutions, often surpassing the capabilities of their human-coded counterparts.

If you display these 10 behaviors, you’re definitely ready to get married
If someone displays these 12 behaviors, they’re both intelligent and kind
13 traits of people who are not only smart, but also wise
One may wonder, then, if these algorithms birthed by machines possess a digital DNA of sorts.

Like the double helix of our biology, do they have inherent characteristics, biases, or tendencies passed down from their progenitors?

The profound philosophical implications of this development can’t be overlooked.

If humans, with all our inherent biases and imperfections, birthed the first generation of algorithms, what subtleties and shadows do we impart to our digital offspring? And as these algorithms further evolve, free from direct human touch, how do they shape and mold the next generation?

Now, imagine a world where these self-improving algorithms dictate significant portions of our lives.

They could govern our finances, drive our cars, manage our health, and even curate our daily news.

But as they evolve autonomously, the question becomes: Who holds the reins of control?

It’s akin to watching a potter’s clay spinning independently on a wheel, taking form and shape with an intelligence of its own.

This foray into a future dominated by self-generating algorithms brings forth a dance between the known and the unknown.

While on one hand, they promise unparalleled efficiency and solutions beyond human comprehension, they also tread into the realms of unpredictability.

As they distance themselves from their original creators, they weave a web of intricate patterns, redefining the core essence of our digital world.

At the crossroads of technology and philosophy, the narrative of algorithms creating algorithms becomes more than a tale of digital evolution. It mirrors our own existential quest.

Much like humans seeking purpose in a vast cosmos, these algorithms, in their binary wisdom, search for meaning, optimization, and evolution within the sprawling matrix of the digital universe.

In the grand tapestry of our digital age, as algorithms stand poised to weave their own narratives, we must pause and reflect on our roles not just as creators but as custodians.

The digital mirroring of our endeavors reveals both our brilliance and our vulnerabilities.

Even as the line between the creator and the created blurs, it underscores the inherent responsibility we bear. For in the ever-evolving dance between algorithms creating algorithms, lies a tantalizing mystery of human creativity mingled with machine logic, a fusion that may forever alter the rhythm of our existence.

A symphony of chaos: The giants of technology’s race to web supremacy
Who are the hidden players manipulating the AIs revolution Navigating the synaptic web: How to stay truly you during the AI revolution

In the silent battlegrounds of cyberspace, a war rages on.

Giants of technology, the likes of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Microsoft, orchestrate elaborate maneuvers, each vying for supremacy on the web. Their algorithms dance to a tune, unseen by most, engaging in a sophisticated interplay that affects everything from our online shopping habits to our political views.

These entities, wielding tremendous power, set the stage for what could be a symphony of chaos.

Imagine a world where these behemoths clash, not in the gladiatorial arenas of business competition, but in the very fabric of our digital existence. They know us, sometimes better than we know ourselves. They predict our wants, needs, and fears.

In this world, the algorithms are the generals, and we, the consumers, are mere foot soldiers. We march to their rhythm, unaware of the true battlefield.

Now, picture a scenario where these giants, in their relentless pursuit of dominance, push the boundaries too far. They begin to deploy algorithms that interact, compete and sometimes collide with each other in unexpected ways.

One’s shopping recommendation algorithm attempts to outdo another’s search optimization. A social network’s friend-suggestion system fights against a rival’s advertisement targeting.

What happens when these algorithms begin to conflict, creating ripples across the digital landscape?

The once-harmonious symphony turns into a cacophony.

A shopping algorithm may suddenly start recommending bizarre products. A social media feed could become inundated with irrelevant content. The algorithms, in their zeal to win, might lose sight of the user, leading to a chaotic and dissonant experience.

The ambition of these technological titans does not merely stop at shaping our online lives. They also seek to influence our physical world.

Algorithms control traffic lights, power grids, and financial markets. A clash in this realm could lead to more than just digital chaos; it could have real-world consequences. Traffic could come to a standstill. Stock markets could plummet. Utilities might fail.

The notion that such chaos might ensue is not merely a product of dystopian fantasy.

Consider the Flash Crash of 2010, where algorithmic trading caused a trillion-dollar stock market crash within minutes. Or the countless examples of algorithms misbehaving on social media, amplifying fake news, and fostering division.

The giants of technology are not malevolent forces, but their ambitions can lead us to a precipice where the web’s symphony turns to chaos.

The interplay and competition between their algorithms are akin to a delicate dance, one where a misstep can send the entire ensemble into disarray. And the question that looms large is whether we are merely spectators in this spectacle or if we have a role in conducting this digital orchestra.

In this vast and mysterious world of algorithms, where titans clash and ambitions soar, we are reminded that the web is more than just a series of interconnected networks.

It is a living, breathing entity, where chaos and harmony exist in a fragile balance. A symphony, complex and beautiful, but also capable of descending into chaos if left unchecked.

The music plays on, but who will step up to be the conductor?

Preserving self in the synaptic web: A guide to authentic digital existence
Who are the hidden players manipulating the AIs revolution Navigating the synaptic web: How to stay truly you during the AI revolution

In a digital realm where algorithms hold sway and the titans of technology pull invisible strings, how does one maintain authenticity? How can we preserve our unique human essence amidst the relentless hum of data and decision-making machines?

The answer lies in a conscious effort to nurture our individual identities and reclaim our digital destinies.

First and foremost, awareness is the key.

Recognize the omnipresent influence of the synaptic web on your daily choices.

Just as one wouldn’t want to live in a world where every thought is dictated by another, one shouldn’t passively allow algorithms to shape all of our digital experiences.

Actively diversify your online interactions.

Seek out content beyond what’s suggested to you, question the source of information, and consistently step outside of your digital comfort zone.

Additionally, take the time for periodic ‘digital detoxes.’

This doesn’t mean disconnecting from all things digital, but rather reassessing and refining your online engagements. Just as we detoxify our bodies from toxins, periodic breaks from algorithm-driven platforms can refresh the mind, giving clarity and helping to reduce the overwhelming influence of the digital realm.

Lastly, cultivate real-world interactions and experiences.

While the digital domain offers unprecedented conveniences and connections, our true essence thrives in the tangible world.

Engaging in face-to-face conversations, pursuing physical hobbies, and simply being present in the moment are irreplaceable facets of the human experience. They ground us and remind us of our authentic selves, beyond the bytes and pixels.

The rise of the digital domain and its algorithmic overlords does not signify the end of individualism.

Instead, it serves as a challenge — a call to action for each one of us.

By grounding ourselves in awareness, proactively seeking diverse digital experiences, and cherishing real-world interactions, we can navigate the synaptic web with authenticity and intention.

After all, in this vast landscape of 1s and 0s, the most powerful code is still the unique imprint of the human soul.


Hackers Tap Deep Learning and AI for Nefarious Purposes
In a field where security threats never stand still, artificial intelligence is being used for evil as well as good.
Gienna Shaw

Gienna Shaw
Gienna Shaw is an independent journalist with more than 25 years of experience as a writer and editor. She specializes in business, technology and healthcare.
As researchers and healthcare organizations continue to explore how artificial intelligence might support diagnostic efforts and save doctors time by automating some tasks, radiology has emerged as a field where the technology shows great promise.

AI and its subsets, deep learning and machine learning, are “being used in radiology in a number of ways, such as computer-aided detection for cancer, auto-segmentation of organs in 3D postprocessing, natural language processing to facilitate critical results reporting, consultation of best guidelines for recommendations, and quantification and kinetics in postprocessing,” according to Radiology Today.

This combination of AI-assisted data paired with human intelligence and insight is promising for the field.

“Adding information acquired from AI algorithms to our reporting and workflow can significantly improve patient care,” Dr. Bibb Allen, chief medical officer of the American College of Radiology’s Data Science Institute, tells the publication. “AI can find patterns in data that humans cannot see. This applies to image data, nonimage data such as predicting patient no-shows, or improving workflow.”

AI can also help train radiologists. For example, a team of researchers from the Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital Center for Clinical Data Science (CCDS) and the Rochester, Minn.-based Mayo Clinic are using generative adversarial networks (GANs) to train neural networks. Using NVIDIA’s AI platform, they’ve developed a deep-learning model that can generate accurate and reliable synthetic images of abnormal brain MRIs using public data sets to train an AI system.

“A model can essentially compress the information you have in the data to start with,” CCDS Director Adam McCarthy tells HealthTech. “The more data you have and the better quality you have, the better your results and model will be.”

But researchers have also discovered a more nefarious use for the technology.

The Concerning Security Vulnerability in Imaging Systems
According to a new study by cybersecurity researchers at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Israel, cybercriminals can alter 3D medical scans to remove existing medical findings or add false ones using deep learning. It’s possible, they said, that an attacker could use malware to modify 3D medical imagery using deep learning in order to commit insurance fraud, falsify research evidence or even murder someone by hiding cancer that would otherwise be treated.

Sound unbelievable? In fact, both radiologists and AI software were highly susceptible to CT-GAN’s image tampering attacks in the researchers’ covert penetration test, which was conducted in an active hospital network. The attack had an average success rate of 99.2 percent for cancer injection and 95.8 percent for cancer removal. The AI was fooled every time, while radiologists fared slightly better. But that could be due to diagnosis errors, such as missing an inserted nodule. Although knowledge of the attack can help mitigate some cases of cancer injection, the error rates and confidence scores suggest that the attack may not be reported in most cases, the researchers concluded.

MORE FROM HEALTHTECH: Gain a greater understanding of how 3D technology is transforming medical imaging.

How to Prevent and Identify Imaging Attacks
To guard against DICOM medical file tampering, administrators should secure data in motion by enabling encryption between the hosts in their picture archiving and communication system (PACS) network using proper SSL certificates.

“This may seem trivial,” the researchers wrote in their report. “But after discovering this flaw … we turned to the PACS software provider for comment. The company, with over 2,000 installations worldwide, confirmed to us that their hospitals do not enable encryption in their PACS because ‘it is not common practice.’” And some PACS don’t support encryption at all.

Here’s how researchers recommend staying ahead of imaging system hacks:

To secure data at rest, administrators should keep servers and anti-virus software on modality and radiologist workstations up to date, and limit the PACS server’s exposure to the internet.
To detect tampering, enable the field for applying a digital signature if your PACS software provider offers that feature. Then, administrators should check that valid certificates are being used and that the radiologists’ viewing applications are indeed verifying the signature.
To test the integrity of images, add a digital watermark — a hidden signal embedded into an image that would be corrupted by tampering — to indicate a loss of integrity. Detecting photo response nonuniformity may be an easier method, because it only needs to be implemented at the endpoint viewing application.
As Offensive Security Tactics Evolve, So Must Defensive Tools
Cybersecurity best practices is a term that’s almost an oxymoron, given how often and rapidly attackers shift their tactics in response to new security solutions. For example, a generation of “polymorphic” malware, designed to elude security detection, is now assaulting networks worldwide.

The problem is that healthcare is particularly vulnerable to attacks, in part because large machines, such as MRIs, often run on old operating systems that no longer receive updates and patches.

This became clear during the 2017 WannaCry ransomware attack, which targeted computers running outdated versions of the Microsoft Windows operating system, encrypting data and demanding ransom payments in bitcoin. Good defensive practices include updating software whenever possible, backing up data regularly and isolating older machines so they can’t infect other systems if they’re breached.

“What has changed is the diversity of evasive tactics that attackers employ and the frequency with which they use them,” Lenny Zeltser of the SANS Institute recently told HealthTech. “Our adversaries aren’t standing still.”

Neither, experts agree, can healthcare organizations’ security tactics.


Technological Singularity: Humanity Stands at the Edge of the AI Abyss
January 8, 2022
AUTONOMOUS SUPERINTELLIGENCE: The Mad Scientists Don’t Even Know, What They Don’t Know
Posted on January 1, 2023 by State of the Nation
Technological Singularity:
Humanity Stands at the Edge of the AI Abyss

Have the power elites already created their Frankenstein?

The Mad Scientists Don’t Even Know,
What They Don’t Know
“When scientific knowledge and applied technology exceed a critical threshold of
advancement, without being informed by spiritual truths and guided by moral authority,
the destiny of the planetary civilization will be abruptly altered.”
~ CCRG ~

Cosmic Convergence Research Group

English author Mary Shelley completed her world famous sci-fi novel FRANKENSTEIN in 1817, exactly 200 years ago. It “tells the story of Victor Frankenstein, a young scientist who creates a grotesque but sapient creature in an unorthodox scientific experiment”. Her eerily prophetic book was first published in 1818.[1]
Now here we are two centuries later in 2017. Little does the world know that the civilization now stands at the precipice of the scientific-technological abyss, both figuratively and literally.

How so?

The AI* scientific research and robotics applied technology communities have married each other in ways that indicate a pivotal and highly consequential project is in the works. This furtive enterprise has seen the convergence of all the scientific disciplines and technological advancements which are directly related to the realm of human immortality and longevity.

*AI = Artificial intelligence
The primary goal of this massive and unprecedented collaboration is to find the proverbial “fountain of youth”. The power elites who rule planet Earth truly seek eternal life. They honestly believe that human immortality is attainable. In this way, they intend to transform themselves into gods; albeit, a notably synthesized version of God.

Technological Singularity
The current scientific-technological AI/robotics paradigm is best described as a “Star Wars” spaceship that is speeding toward “Technological Singularity”. Just what is “Technological Singularity”?

“The technological singularity (also, simply, the singularity) is the hypothesis that the invention of artificial superintelligence will abruptly trigger runaway technological growth, resulting in unfathomable changes to human civilization. According to this hypothesis, an upgradable intelligent agent (such as a computer running software-based artificial general intelligence) would enter a “runaway reaction” of self-improvement cycles, with each new and more intelligent generation appearing more and more rapidly, causing an intelligence explosion and resulting in a powerful superintelligence that would, qualitatively, far surpass all human intelligence.”[2]

A Race to the Bottom
For the uninitiated, it’s essential to understand the following crucial key points. The current scientific and technological pursuits toward perfecting A.I. (especially autonomous superintelligence) are taking place almost completely under the radar with the exception of a few popular endeavors which have been nicely packaged for public consumption. Needless to say, all parties involved in those experimental developments undertaken under the radar are doing so for specific seasons. Deep down inside, these scientists and theoreticians know that they are currently engaged in a race to the bottom. As follows:

KEY POINTS: That the scientific-technological elites have been aggressively pursuing a specific objective which revolves around attaining human immortality. Artificial intelligence, robotics, genetic engineering, biotechnology, cryogenics have all seen considerable advancement over the past few decades in the interest of accomplishing this goal. Their essential mission is to fabricate an android biological entity that can theoretically live forever. Their real intention, however, is to infuse this artificially superintelligent and physically immortal being with human consciousness (See: The Elite Want to Transfer Consciousness into a New Body and Live Forever). In this way the power elites believe they can attain human immortality, even if only experienced vicariously, which is significantly different from divine immortality. Their secret quest to attain eternal life — in the human body — via science and technology, instead of through spirituality, is what actually spurred the formation of the Illuminati. These self-proclaimed “illumined ones” quite deliberately chose the left-handed path in defiance of the Creator. That fateful decision has led to over 240 years of incessant wars and revolutions around the globe. This ongoing saga of greed and lust for power has been portrayed in some of the most ‘popular’ epics ever written and/or filmed. During these post-modern times their futile endeavors are being depicted in novels and songs, artwork and plays, motion pictures and TV programs more than ever (e.g. Blade Runner and its sequel Blade Runner 2049 . For repetitive predictive programming has always been a central pillar of their agenda toward convincing the masses that their inventions are good and will make life easier. (e.g. ‘Dr. Frankenstein’ Surgeon Wants to Perform World’s First Head Transplant in December)

The Quest for Human Immortality
Who knew that much of what occurs today at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, CA is aimed at completing this scientific-technological goal; not what we have been told by the media. So are the grandiose experiments in particle physics being intermittently run at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider on the French-Swiss border. In fact, much of the funding allocated to various scientific research projects at major universities, government laboratories, corporate R&D departments, private foundations and other participating institutions is actually directed toward fabricating a self-rejuvenating transhuman organism that ‘will never die’.

The most obvious problem with this ambition is that the present civilization would never be the same should this goal be even partially attained. Nevertheless, the prospect of a superintelligent race of synthetic androids looms large on the horizon for those hellbent on carrying out this reckless agenda. They apparently have not considered the great likelihood that these superbionic cyborgs (Frankensteins) would eventually come to rule the planet, before they take over the Solar System. Then, they would likely set their sights on the Milky Way Galaxy with the intention of conquering the entire Universe.

KEY POINT: Many critics of unbridled AI development have surmised that most of humanity would be sold into slavery, and in many cases people would become the pets of the new bionic super race.

Just as the Prime Creator created the human being in Its own image and likeness, so, too, do the earthbound power elites intend to fabricate their “Frankensteins” in their own likeness. That’s precisely why their superintelligent race of cyborgs would eventually want to take over the world and beyond. The scientific-technological class merely follows the orders of those wealthy elites who have gained their power and riches through millennia of warmongering. Hence, it’s quite predictable that their humanoid progeny would have a similar Martian mindset. For the apple does not fall far from the tree.

Destined to fail
It should be readily apparent that forging ahead with wanton abandon toward the goal of human immortality is as perilous as it gets. Particularly because of who is running the show, the disastrous outcomes of this misguided venture are both inevitable and preordained. However, you can’t tell the mad scientists that. Nor will the power elites ever listen to the voice of reason. They want to play god no matter what the consequences to themselves or to the rest of humanity. AI & BioTech Marry Up To Procreate ‘Homo Deus’

This dangerous mentality, marked by supreme arrogance and ignorance, has permeated every corner of the concerned applied science and applied technology arenas. Each of the scientific and technological disciplines that converge in the pursuit of human immortality has been pushing the edge of the envelope. In so doing, the world community now finds itself negotiating more slippery slopes of medical ethics and scientific morality than it knows how to handle. Many of the involved scientists proceed down these dangerous paths only because the challenges are there. Very few ever stop to ask the question: Is it safe or right to undertake such an endeavor in light of the many unforeseen and/or unintended consequences? And there are many and they are ineffably serious.

The real problem here is that those who are promoting the human immortality enterprise are so blinded by their hubris that they will not see the cliff until after they go over it. Just like the cautionary tale known as “the sinking of Atlantis”, today’s convenient marriage of scientific and technological, political and military, occult and religious elites has put the whole of humanity at great risk. Therefore, unless there is a wakeup call soon to the nations of the world, and people everywhere become aware of what’s really going on, there will be an earth-shattering event which will be necessary to short-circuit their foolhardy plans.

Artificial Superintelligence Comes of Age
There are now daily announcements about this or that technological advancement or scientific breakthrough in the fields directly related to achieving human immortality. Each of them seems to arouse a growing backlash from those very few within the AI intelligentsia who know enough to protest and/or issue the appropriate warnings. The real problem with these now meteoric developments is that many take place in a virtual vacuum.

Whenever DARPA, Bell Labs, CERN’s Large Hadron Collider and NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory have collaborated on projects in the past, they do so as if participating in a C.I.A. black operation. Many of the key scientists know only what is going on in their little niche and particular realm of inquiry or experimentation. They are literally clueless about the many other integral pieces of the AI-robotics puzzle that are being ever-so-painstakingly put together.

Flashback to the very first computer known as ENIAC constructed in the mid 1940s. Here’s the short story:

“The ENIAC was invented by J. Presper Eckert and John Mauchly at the University of Pennsylvania and began construction in 1943 and was not completed until 1946. It occupied about 1,800 square feet and used about 18,000 vacuum tubes, weighing almost 50 tons.”[3]

Since that watershed moment in 1946, the scientific community and technological class have made common cause toward the attainment of technological singularity. Many of the best minds are lured to this high-stakes game simply because “Mount Everest is there to be climbed”. Little or no consideration is ever given to the potentially cataclysmic consequences. This has been the basic context for well over 70 years now since the end of World war II.

During this same time frame, computing technology, peripheral information technology, artificial intelligence, autonomous superintelligence, robotics, genetic engineering and related disciplines have each seen a considerable acceleration in their advancement. Where major developments initially occurred slowly yet incrementally, they soon graduated to an arithmetic progression. This pattern was soon replaced by a geometric progression of development after just a few years and is now occurring at an exponential rate.

When the original supercomputers were first built in the early 1960s (e.g. Cray CDC 6600 supercomputer) the scientific-technological community started to experience an exponential progression in their capability to problem solve. Since that time, their progress has seen a steady evolvement approaching a nearly vertical upward trajectory. Presently these scientists experience unlimited breakthroughs and advancements, establishing a remarkable pattern of success which has been taking place more and more rapidly since the advent of the Internet in 1995. Hence, one can only imagine what the true state of the art of AI (and AS) is today.

Once the capacity of the fastest computing technology approached the exceedingly high levels that currently exist, there was no AI problem which could not be solved in virtually a moment of time. Likewise, any unforeseen or difficult challenge could be met by aiming the most powerful supercomputer at it. Given the inconceivable power and speed of this computing brainpower, it was only a matter of when it would be utilized to design autonomous superintelligence. And so they have! Except that only a very few have set their eyes upon the rapidly manifesting, 21st century Frankenstein that possesses such autonomous superintelligence.

“Speaking to Dr. Victor Frankenstein, the wretch refers to himself as “the Adam of your labours”, and elsewhere as someone who “would have [been] your Adam”, but is instead “your fallen angel” (which ties to Lucifer in Paradise Lost, which the monster reads, and relates to the “modern” Prometheus of the book’s subtitle).” [1]

The vast majority of highly classified work that is done on the various projects which are essential to inventing autonomous superintelligence (AS) is done in extremely secret underground laboratories. These locations are not even on the map like the super-guarded military installations at Area 51 and Pine Gap. In other words, those who are deeply involved with this ultra-sensitive work are never seen or heard from.

AI pitchmen like Ray Kurzweil are merely frontmen who are used to ready the public for the next phase of AI and robotics introduction into society. In reality, all AI press proclamations issued by the mainstream media reflect developments that were made decades ago. Each and every one of these artificial intelligence progress reports is quite purposefully years behind that which is actually transpiring in the clandestine AI laboratories. However, there is fortunately some excellent reporting being done now by the Alt Media about this grave situation. Here’s just one example: : “The Coming 5G Roll-out & AI Will Transform Human Society By 2025!”

Only the power elites know exactly how close they are to the fulfillment of their dreams; our nightmare. They are also cognizant of the extreme threats to civilization were the product(s) of their enterprise to fall into the hands of a real terrorist group. Hence, the ultra-secrecy around all of their projects has been strictly enforced from the very beginning. For it is the creation of [PERFECTLY CONTROLLED] autonomous superintelligence that is the Holy Grail for those enamored with the notion of human immortality. Everything else is relatively easy for TPTB.

Autonomous Superintelligence
What’s really up with this pursuit of “autonomous superintelligence”?

Well, what is very interesting is that when you Google it (within quotation marks as shown above), just over 4 Google pages are returned!

Such an info blackout alone is truly astounding. It’s totally mind-boggling that they have been so successful in shutting down the topic on the Internet, especially in 2017!

Let’s first take a quick look at what few really understand about AI (artificial intelligence), the precursor to AS (autonomous superintelligence).

“This field of AI is called Artificial Superintelligence, and it is also the field of research that Stephen Hawking has warned us about. One of AI’s leading figures, Nick Bostrom has defined superintelligence as “an intellect that is much smarter than the best human brains in practically every field, including scientific creativity, general wisdom and social skills.” This slight or vast superiority to human intellect is disconcerting to scientists and laymen because its outcome is unknown. A machine capable of constantly learning and improving itself could be unstoppable.”[4]

That’s a very short unscientific description for the very precarious AI field of endeavor. Now for a longer explanation of the much more advanced autonomous superintelligence. Artificial superintelligence that is autonomous, once created and completed, would not need any human assistance, intervention or programming whatsoever. Much more significantly, it’s the astonishing capacity for self-learning and develop self-awareness that really distinguishes autonomous superintelligence from everything else on the drawing board. This evolving form of synthetic superintelligence continues to learn and expand its horizons independently—FOREVER!

“Synthetic sentience, the capacity for perceiving, a sense of self, the threshold of emergent consciousness. This is not “AI” (artificial intelligence) in the traditional sense, but something very different, more in the realms of artificial life, growing and evolving its way into every facet of current and future life.”[5]

In other words, such an AS non-human entity (i.e. android) would theoretically be able to come and go like a human being, except that it would do everything ‘better and faster’, if it so chose to. These exceedingly competent androids could not only think and speak, but do so more clearly and precisely than anyone else on the planet. (See: The Crazy Language of AI Bots and Non-Human Entities) The bottom line here is that these superhuman cyborgs would excel at many things that most people are only marginally good at doing. That would include playing the ‘game’ its crazy creators just love to play called WAR.

So, just to be clear, if an autonomous superintelligent Frankenstein decided to become a warmonger for survival’s sake, guess where that would leave the rest of the residents on planet Earth?!


Special Note:
Just in case the reader did not get it, there is NOTHING more dangerous to the planetary civilization than humanity’s audacious flirtation with AI. Particularly because of the breath-taking advances being made with autonomous superintelligence, the moment of truth is about to arrive. The CCRG literally formed around this exceptionally weighty issue. We recognized back in 1986 that the scientific community was determined to carry out this inordinately dangerous plan. That they would stop at nothing before accomplishing this fool’s errand. And that’s exactly what it is: a dangerous errand being run for off-planet EBEs (extraterrestrial biological entities) whose primary objective is total control of planet Earth. Of course, their multifarious and nefarious agenda goes way beyond control. Which is why this urgent message to humanity must be heard sooner than later. For, truly, the fate of humankind now hangs in the balance, as does the viability of the biosphere and future of the planet. At a time when the world is threatened daily by such things as nuclear war or World War III, an asteroid impact or large meteor strike, another Chernobyl or Fukushima nuclear disaster, a 12.o earthquake or supervolcano eruption, a 5.0 mega-hurricane or super-tornado, a 9/11 level terror event or megalopolis environmental catastrophe, none of these looming possibilities even comes close to pervasive and profound destruction to human civilization that comes with out-of-control AS. Only a surprise visitation by Hercolubus would compare. (HERCOLUBUS: The Greatest Mystery Of The Modern Era)

Perhaps the HAL 9000 supercomputer — the AI star of the Stanley Kubrick classic 2001: A Space Odyssey — is instructive here. Only instead of a stationary horror computer like the well-mannered HAL, imagine an ambulatory Frankenstein hardwired with the latest and greatest autonomous superintelligence.

That’s exactly where this is really going. Their multi-decade super experiment is surely to end in an historic planet-wide catastrophe. Obviously there is no way the mad scientists will be permitted to accomplish their preposterous goals. But that won’t stop them from trying. Or, until something very, VERY big happens to prevent them from doing something really stupid. Like destroying a continent or two… … …or precipitating a full-blown ELE* which AS proliferation is likely to do sooner or later.

*Extinction Level Event
As for the prophetic advice they absolutely refuse to listen to, here’s yet another missive for them to contemplate if even for a moment. By heeding this simple admonition, they just might do us all a big favor by saving the whole human race.

Unbridled scientific research and technological advancement without spirituality
is doomed to fail. All of humanity will suffer terribly for the grave
mistakes of the few who wanted to play God.
~ CCRG ~

Cosmic Convergence Research Group
July 8, 2017

Author’s Note

Ever since the false flag terrorist attacks of 9/11, the world community of nations has been witnessing a sheer desperation throughout every sphere of life. Many people routinely experience the same as a felt trepidation or free-floating anxiety. Even prior to the 3rd millennium, it was as if life had entered a time warp for many inhabitants of our global village. With each successive year, time seems to be moving quicker as events unfold with increasingly more intensity. The U.S. presidential election of 2016 dramatizes this point as well as any. It’s as though there has always been an unidentifiable pressure being exerted from way above even the most powerful of earthly institutions. Much of this stress of post-modern life even appears to be coming from an undetectable source. Quite ironically, we are supposed to have more freedom and spare time in the wake of all the time-saving inventions, liberating technologies and newfangled luxuries. What is it, then, that is bearing down so hard on humanity as a whole? Perhaps it time to really understand the role of the:

Editor’s Note

The Cosmic Convergence Research Group was initially established in 2012 to address this urgent matter. The following inaugural essay explained much of what humanity is now experiencing—24/7 (HUGE Changes Coming To Planet Earth). Since that time, the whole world has been pushed inexorably by (and into) an undeniable agenda determined by futile pursuit of human immortality. Cleary, the goal of so much scientific and technological advancement is human immortality for TPTB who want to play god. Unfortunately, by challenging GOD in this way they, have put the entire planetary civilization in great jeopardy. Should the current trajectory of these ill-fated pursuits not change in the immediate future, the destiny of planet Earth will be altered just as the sinking of Atlantis changed the course of human history.

Video References

The Singularity Is Near

Deep Mind

Facebook’s AI Project

Meet the most lifelike robot ever created, you won’t believe it!

Brain-Computer Interfaces Are Now A Reality

Japanese Men Marrying Virtual Reality Women


[1] Frankenstein

[2] Technological singularity

[3] When was the first computer invented?

[4] The Difference Between Artificial Intelligence, General Intelligence, And Super Intelligence

[5] How AI Self-learns, Synthetic Sentience

[6] Smart Phones Will Send Data Through Your Bones Next


From Wikipedia: “In his 2014 book Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies, Nick Bostrom reasoned that with “the creation of a superintelligent being represents a possible means to the extinction of mankind”.” VIDEO: Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers & Strategies


� 2018 All Rights Reserved. All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. We are not responsible for content written by and hosted on third-party websites. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. We assume no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners. .......Tags: "israel nuked wtc" 9-11 Truth jfk assassination "cultural marxism" "holocaust hoax" "fake news" "fake history" fed censorship "mind control" tavistock holohoax auschwitz deep state kabbalah talmud bush obama clinton trump russiagate spygate israel britain saudi arabia middle east rothschild cold war comey brennan clapper yellow vests populism nuclear demolition communism marxism socialism pedophiliacontact: