home Go back to Transhumanism Research Page 1
China/Israel-led Transhumanism ...Research


His ideas to resurrect all the dead people paved the way for the modern exploration of space

Dr. Paul Kindlon Tue, Jul 12, 2016 | 600 words 3,385 42
This post first appeared on Russia Insider

The author is Professor of Humanities – Moscow University Touro.

Nikolai Fyodorovich Fyodorov. Most inhabitants of planet earth have never heard of the man, but they will eventually.

A polymath and deeply spiritual, this Russian philosopher and resident librarian at the Rumyantsev library had advanced cutting-edge knowledge in many of the hard sciences. Known for his humility and ascetic life-style (he mostly ate dark bread, drank only tea with an occasional slice of cheese and slept on an old chest instead of a bed), Fyodorov was practically idolized by some of the leading minds of the late 19thcentury. Dostoevsky, Soloviev, Berdyaev and Tolstoy were in awe of this visionary. And rightfully so.

Fyodorov “walked the walk”, living his philosophy of life 24/7. Intentionally choosing poverty and chastity so he could focus entirely on knowledge acquisition, his words and actions were consistent, harmonious and always life-affirming.

Death, he said, is the true enemy and must be overcome. We should live forever. We should follow in Christ’s footsteps and defeat death so that all of mankind will live in a heaven on earth. Movements such as “futurism” and “cosmism” were directly influenced by Fyodorov’s ideas.

For quite some time, of course, almost all scientists thought he was – well... bonkers. His reputation, however, is beginning to get a make-over because of wide-spread interest in the medical community on the hot topic of immortality.

After Fyodorov’s death, a number of his followers gathered his notes and published a book entitled “The Resurrection Project”. Here’s a look at some of his main ideas…

Palingenesis: there is a genetic signature that remains in our bodies long after we die. We must - as a global community of loving souls - figure out a way to scientifically “resurrect” the bodies of our fathers, grandfathers and so on. Considered an absurd notion for more than a hundred years, some futurists are now enthusiastically working on this dream with serious research and experimentation.

On evolution: humankind evolved by force of will. We are bi-pedal not because our ancestors needed to “free up their hands” as Darwin believed, but because we “willed” ourselves to stand up-right. Anthropology has discredited Darwin’s theory on bi-pedalism incidentally. Our being, Fyodorov said, involves self-evolution as well as creating new external realities. Nature may have determined our biological make-up in the distant past, but now we are able to determine our own nature and create a new Nature. This notion foreshadowed the current transhumanist movement by more than half a century.

Leo Tolstoy introduced Fyodorov to a very bright young man while at the library. Impressed by the boy’s keen intellect, Fyodorov decided to take him on as a private student. The older scholar imbued and saturated the pupil’s mind with ideas such as: we humans are spiritually repulsed by the harshness, baseness and violence of nature and seek to overcome that which pulls us down towards this baseness. Our aspiration as a species is to rise above the dirt and mud, away from the earth. This is why we willed ourselves to stand up-right and walk on two feet. This is why we build tall skyscrapers - proof of our constant striving to rise above nature and its blind forces. In fact, if we could choose an image of humankind that expresses our true character, it would be a man standing on his toes reaching towards the stars.

By the way… the name of Fyodorov’s private student? It was Konstantin Tsiolkovsky – the father of Soviet rocketry.


Jewish Russian Revolution

RussiaInsider Apr 2019

Pre-WW2 Jewish Media Celebrating the Jewish Nature of the Russian Revolution (30 Examples)
Michael Hess Thu, Apr 4, 2019 | 1200 words 4,707 51
This post first appeared on Russia Insider

This list suggests there was nothing 'Russian' about the 'Russian Revolution', yet this fact is mostly obscured by contemporary historians.

“Some call it Marxism, I call it Judaism.” – Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, in the American Bulletin of May 15, 1935.

“The revolution in Russia is a Jewish revolution” – The Maccabean (New York), Nov. 1905, p, 250.

“Jewry is the mother of Marxism.” – Le Droit de Vivre, May 12, 1936.“Judaism is Marxism, communism” – Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 64.

“The communist soul is the soul of Judaism.” – Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 143.

“We Jews cannot be called upon to denounce Communism.” -The American Hebrew (New York), February 3, 1939, p. 11“The picture which the Soviet Union presents today is one that should bring rejoicing to world Jewry.” – The Youngstown Jewish Times, Sept. 18, 1936, page 51.

“It would be absurd to deny the intensity of the Jewish participation in the Russian revolutionary movement.” – Leon Dennen, in The Menorah Journal (New York) July-September 1932, p. 106.

“That achievement – the Russian-Jewish revolution – destined to figure in history as the overshadowing result of World War, was largely the outcome of Jewish thinking, of Jewish discontent, of Jewish effort to reconstruct.” – The American Hebrew, September 10, 1920.

“The Bolshevik Government of Russia is the key-stone of the arch of the proof of the Jewish conspiracy for radicalism and world-domination.” – William Hard, The Great Jewish Conspiracy (New York: American Jewish Book Company, 1920), p. 31.

“The Jewish elements provide the driving forces for communism” – Dr. Oscar Levy, in George Pitt-Rivers, The World Significance of the Russian Revolution (Oxford, 1920), p. ix.

“The Jews have been furnishing for the Bolsheviks the majority of their leaders” – The Jewish World (London), April 16, 1919, p. 11.

“Russian Jews have taken a prominent part in the Bolshevist movement” – The American Hebrew (New York), November 18, 1927, p. 20.

“Jewry has come to wield a considerable power in the Communist Party.” – Dr. Avrahm Yarmolinsky, in The Menorah Journal (New York), July 1928, p. 37.

“The East-Side Jew [Trotsky] that Conquered Europe” – The Liberator (New York), March 1920, pp. 26-27.

“The real East Sider [New York Jew Trotsky] is at the head of things in Russia.” – M. L. Larkin, in The Public (New York), November 23, 1918, p. 1433.

“It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism, and it is not an accident that the Jews readily took up Marxism; all this is in perfect accord with the progress of Judaism and the Jews.” – Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 148

“Karl Marx, who came from an old family of rabbis and brilliant Talmudic scholars, was to point the path of victory for the proletariat.” – L. Rennap, Anti-Semitism and the Jewish Question (London, 1942), p. 31.

“Among his [Karl Marx’s] ancestors were Rabbis and Talmudists, men of learning and keen intellect.” – Henry Wickham Steed, in The American Hebrew (New York), December 9, 1927, p. 206 “The peculiarly Jewish logic of his [Karl Marx’s] mind” – Henry Wickham Steed, in The American Hebrew (New York), December 9, 1927, p. 206.

“Mr. Wickham Steed lays the rise of Bolshevism at the doors of Jewry.” – The Jewish Guardian (London), November 28, 1924, p. 4.“The Bolshevik Revolution has emancipated the Jews as individuals” – Dr. Avrahm Yarmolinsky, in The Menorah Journal (New York), July 1928, p. 33.

“There are many Bolshevik leaders of Jewish extraction” – D. L. Sandelsan, in The Jewish Chronicle (London), February 20, 1920, p. 22.

“There is no Jew who does not hope with all his heart that the Soviet Union will survive and be victorious” – Zionist Review (London: Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland), September 26, 1941, p. 7.

“Communism and internationalism are in truth and in fact great virtues. Judaism may be justly proud of these virtues” – Harry Watan, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 80.

“If the tide of history does not turn toward Communist internationalism … then the Jewish race is doomed.” – George Marlen, Stalin, Trotsky, or Lenin (New York, 1937), p. 414 “The [Jewish] Commissaries were formerly political exiles. They had been dreaming of revolution for years in their exile in Paris, in London, in New York, in Berlin, everywhere and anywhere. They saw in the Bolshevist Movement an opportunity of realizing the extreme ideas of Communism and internationalism to which their fate had compelled them.” – Dr. D. S. Pazmanik, in The Jewish Chronicle (London), September 5, 1919, p. 14.

“The Jewish people will never forget that the Soviet Union was the first country – and as yet the only country in the world – in which anti-Semitism is a crime.” – Jewish Voice (New York: National Council of Jewish Communists), January 1942, p. 16.

“Anti-Semitism was classed [by the Soviet Government] as counter-revolution and the severe punishments meted out for acts of anti-Semitism were the means by which the existing order protected its own safety” – The Congress Bulletin, (New York: American Jewish Congress), January 5, 1940, p. 2.

“There is no official anti-Semitism in Russia; anti-Semitism in Russia is a crime against the State.” – Dr. Chalm Weizmann, The Jewish People and Palestine (London: Zionist Organization, 1939), p. 7.

“Anti-Communism is anti-Semitism.” – Jewish Voice (New York: National Council of Jewish Communists), July-August 1941, p. 23.“The part which Jews play in the [Communist] Government of the country [Russia] does not appear to be declining” – Harry Sacher, in The Jewish Review (London), June-August 1932, p. 43.

“The Jews have a right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters over the whole earth. This is the historic destiny of the Jews” – Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), pp. 99-100.

“We Jews, we the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do, will meet our needs and demands. We will destroy because we need a world of our own.” – Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, page 155.

“The Russian intelligentsia . . . saw in the philosophy of Judaism the germs of Bolshevism – the struggle of … Judaism versus Christianity.” – Leon Dennen, in The Menorah Journal (New York, July-September 1932, p. 105.

“Soviet Russia has declared war on Christianity, and on those who profess this faith. In the Russian villages today Bolsheviks and Herbert H. Lehman . . . were called the ‘secret government of the United States’ and were linked with ‘world communism.’” – Dr. Louis Harap, in Jewish Life (New York), June 1951, p. 20.


nanoparticle air pollution The super rich elite is slowly destroying all life on earth by nanoparticle air-pollution. They use fossil fuels and the money-system to buy every (environmental) organization to reach that goal. The reason why they do it, is that this way they can stay in power and can continue their dirty business. We the people can not allow this to happen. If we reverse this we can stop chronic diseases, cancer and the wars. We need to understand that the multinationals have bought the politicians so they can poison all of us. Regulation of ultrafine and nano particles can stop de poisoning and will stop the oil and gas wars. We must all join together so we can kick the corrupt politicians out and change the laws so it protects us against this poisoning. Than the industry is forced to come up with solutions. All solutions already exist. The multinationals have been buying the patents to eliminate competition, so the solutions are not available for humanity. To raise awareness we must force our governments to implement ultrafine particle monitors into the air-quality monitoring systems worldwide. Educating everybody with what is going on, this will be the beginning of a new heaven and a new earth.


Communist China was created by the Jews and serves their interests.


October 1 1949, Mao Tse Tsung declared the founding of the People's Republic of China in Tiananmen Square, Beijing. He was funded by Rothschild created Communism in Russia and also the following Rothschild agents: Solomon Adler, a former United States Treasury official who was a Soviet Spy; Israel Epstein, the son of a Jewish Bolshevik imprisoned by the Tsar in Russia for trying to ferment a revolution there; and Frank Coe, a leading official of the Rothschild owned IMF. Jews were behind the rise to power of Mao Tse Tung, the communist dictator of China, who tortured and murdered tens of millions of Chinese (mostly Christians) during his brutal reign. Sidney Shapiro, an American Jew, was in charge of China’s propaganda organ. Another Jew, Israel Epstein, was Mao’s Minister of Appropriations (Finance).

Mao would murder sixty million innocent Chinese people under his rule mainly to destroy traditional Chinese culture in order to gain total control. As with Christianity, any practitioners of spiritual systems where outlawed, killed, and thrown into gulags, to die a slow death through slave labor, starvation and torture. The Communistic systems became the new culture of control. With China under their flag, Tibet was next on the list as being the last bastion of spiritual and historical knowledge. All the Jewish systems seek to remove spiritual knowledge from Gentiles and keep it in the hands of the Jewish elite. This is a major part of their indoctrination program. There has been a major Jewish population in China for over a thousand years such as the Jews of Kaifeng.


China has been built up into the biggest global superpower by the Jewish financial elite and every valuable Western technology has been shipped there. This was identical to what the Jews did with their USSR, turning it into a massive super state of military superpower, to wage conquest upon the rest of the earth, which they did. The only reason they were halted was the second war monkey wrenched their plans globally and led to the stagnation and fall of the USSR. There are reports that the America tactical silos are contracted to Israeli firms for certain electronics' functions, they also have their agents all over the Pentagon and other key Western military and government networks.

The covert Jewish control of Mao and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) explains why convicted Jewish spy Jonathan Pollard, found guilty of stealing thousands of classified documents from the Defense Department where he worked, gave these materials to his masters, the Israeli Mossad operating in the U.S.A. The Israelis, in turn, transferred these valuable military secrets straight to Red Chinese dictators in Beijing. Pollard, a Jew born in Galveston, Texas, sits in a federal prison today. Recently, when Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu came to America, he visited Pollard in prison and assured the despicable turncoat Israeli spy that the Israeli government was working behind-the-scenes with Obama’s White House to pardon the convicted spy. Meanwhile, Pollard is a national hero in Israel—honored for stealing America’s most precious military secrets which Israel gave to Communist China.

Even now according to official statistics Communist China again carried out more executions than the rest of the world put together. Amnesty International believes thousands are executed and sentenced to death there every year, but with numbers kept a state secret the true figure is impossible to determine.


‘Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history’.– David Rockefeller.

Soft Power.

The most under reported, however is the “Soft Power” tactic currently being implemented by the Peoples Republic of China in the United States.

It was America that showed the world how to mass produce everything from automobiles to televisions to airplanes. It was the great American manufacturing base that crushed Germany and Japan in World War II. But now we are witnessing the deindustrialization of America. Thanks to Jewish control over government, thousands of factories have left the United States and move to China in the past decade alone. Millions upon millions of manufacturing jobs have been lost in the same time period. The United States has become a nation that consumes everything in sight and yet produces increasingly little.

The United States has become bloated and spoiled and our economy is now just a shadow of what it once was. Once upon a time America could literally outproduce the rest of the world combined. Today that is no longer true, but Americans sure do consume more than anyone else in the world.

The Economic Policy Institute in Washington, D.C., estimates that America. lost 2.7 million jobs as a result of the U.S.-China trade deficit between 2001 and 2011, 2.1 million of them in manufacturing. Wages of American workers have also suffered due to the competition with cheap Chinese labor, EPI says. A typical two-earner household loses around $2,500 per year from this dynamic.

Manufacturing was the hardest-hit industry, with fabrication of high-tech goods like semiconductors and electronics suffering the most, accounting for more than half of the $217.5 billion increase in the trade deficit between 2001 and 2011.

Most of the jobs lost or displaced by trade with China between 2001 and 2011 were in manufacturing industries (more than 2.1 million jobs, or 76.9 percent). Within manufacturing, rapidly growing imports of computer and electronic products (including computers, parts, semiconductors, and audio-video equipment) accounted for 54.9 percent of the $217.5 billion increase in the U.S. trade deficit with China between 2001 and 2011. The growth of this deficit contributed to the elimination of 1,064,800 U.S. jobs in computer and electronic products in this period. Indeed, in 2011, the total U.S. trade deficit with China was $301.6 billion—$139.3 billion of which was in computer and electronic products.

Thanks to the suicidal manufacturing policy in US, China GDP has risen from $350 billion in 1990 to $20 trillion (PPP) and surpassed the US in terms of GDP based on purchasing power parity (PPP). United States of America was the largest but International Monetary Fund and World Bank rank China since as the world’s largest economy. The US has been the global economic leader since overtaking the UK in 1872. Most economists previously thought China would pull ahead in 2019.


So if the United States continues to allow its manufacturing base to erode at a staggering pace how in the world can the U.S. continue to consider itself to be a great nation? We have created the biggest debt bubble in the history of the world in an effort to maintain a very high standard of living, but the current state of affairs is not anywhere close to sustainable. As of June 30, 2012, China held a total of $3.24 trillion in foreign exchange reserves (Bloomberg News 2012), about 70 percent of which were held in U.S. dollars. Every single month America does into more debt to communist China and every single month America gets poorer.

The deindustrialization and debt of the United States should be a top concern for every man, woman and child in the country. It is not that hard to understan what happens when the debt bubble pops. But sadly, most Americans do not have any idea what is going on around them.

Because America’s debt is exploding to unmanageable proportions, the United States finds itself financially dependent on China as one of its main creditors. Americans owe The Peoples Republic well over a trillion dollars and are going further into debt, but the Communist ruling elite in Beijing are not satisfied with having the U.S. as a virtual debtor client state. China’s political elite are also using their financial power to manipulate how Americans think — or don’t think — about China. Along with computers, electronics, and house wares, a new kind of Political Correctness is also being manufactured in China.

The Communist elite which controls China wants Hollywood to portray the Peoples Republic in a favorable light to American audiences, while rewarding the hard Left U.S. film industry with hefty profits for their cooperation.

These are dangerous events which directly threaten the United States. The threats offered by an increasing powerful Communist China are already all but ignored by the zionist mass media in US, both on the Right as well as on the Left. Beijing’s elite, however, are taking no chances. Ignoring the China threat is not enough, the American people must be made to love the Peoples Republic and all its works.


From looking at things, the Syrian conflict could be a smaller warm up to a planned global conflict. Russia has already participated in 2013 in a mass joint war games exercise with China on Eastern European soil with thousands of Red Chinese troops. They where training specifically for war against Western forces, this was kept out of the mainstream of course. This is what America and Western Europe have been prepped for over the decades, and how they planned to take Germany down into Communism during the First war, which they manipulated into existence for the sole purpose of taking all of Europe down into Communism, and they nearly did. It is a repeating set of tactics they are using.

The West is past the demoralization point and has entered into the destabilization phase. The Protest Wall St was organized by Jewish agents of Rothschild to be the start of a Communist movement, which is part of the subversion of decades of indoctrination of students into Communist ideals. At this point, one way or another, Zionists are seeking to take the West down should they start a full out Communist revolution, civil war or open war. One way or another, it seems Red Chinese troops will be on Western Soil "Liberating" us from the Fascist oppressors. This is what the Jews did with the Red Army rolling over Europe and the East, enslaving the many for the Jews.


Transgenderism is not Transhumanism

Unz July 2019

Both futurist progressives and right-wing obscurantists (such as Dreher and Dugin) often regard transgenderism as a subset of transhumanism.

This gets it 100% backwards.

At current tech levels, gender reassignment surgery is just glorified mutilation. Transhumanism is about human augmentation, not incapacitation.

You don’t augment yourself in any way whatsoever by transitioning towards an ersatz version of the other sex. You become infertile and develop many hormonal and psychological problems. Actively pushing people into it, especially children, as seems to be increasingly happening in many Western countries, is evil.

Most techs that might be considered to be transhumanist are currently prospective, if not speculative. That said, things such as pacemakers and contact lenses should quality. Maybe even spectacles – the Renaissance Italian invention that allowed many scholars to effectively double their working lives. After all, affixing a thin screen of chemically and thermally processed sand in front of your eyes isn’t entirely natural.


“Human On A Chip” For Drug Testing ... Jan 2020

Israeli and US researchers published two groundbreaking studies on Monday about an Organ-on-a-Chip platform – nine mini human Organs-on-a-Chip that can be connected to form a mini “Human-on-a-Chip” for pharmacologists to test drugs in lieu of “real” humans.

Organs-on-a-chip, which were first developed at Harvard in 2010, are cells from specific organs placed in a plastic cartridge (the chip) the size of a USB flash drive through tissue engineering techniques. The word chip does not refer to microchips and has no relation to computers.

The new development is the “Human-on-a-Chip” that was formed after the researchers figured out how to link the nine Organs-on-a-Chip to mimic a human being. They connected the Heart-on-a-Chip, the Brain-on-a-Chip, the Kidney-on-a-Chip, etc. to form a mini “Human-on-a-Chip” and they proved that it reacts to drugs just like human organs do in a clinical trial, said Dr. Ben Maoz of Tel Aviv University’s Department of Biomedical Engineering and Sagol School of Neuroscience in an interview with The Times of Israel. The individual “Organ Chips” are linked in a way that mimics blood flow between organs in a human body.

The unique invention is aimed at solving the difficulties of adequately testing new drugs to ensure they are safe and effective for humans. Maoz said that researchers usually test drugs on rodents and if the tests are successful they test them on humans. The problem is that 60%-90% of the drugs that passed the test for rodents fail in humans, making the drug development process a lengthy and expensive one.

The expedient process would be to test drugs from the get-go on humans but until now there was no ethical or safe way to do so. But with the trailblazing “Human-on-a-Chip” there is “a functioning comprehensive multi Organ-on-a-Chip (Organ Chip) platform” that reacts to drugs just like humans and allows in-vitro-to-in-vivo translation (IVIVT) of human drug pharmacology.

The two studies, led by Dr. Maoz of Tel Aviv University and Prof. Donald Ingber of Harvard University were published in Nature Biomedical Engineering on Monday.


Microchipping ...a tough sell


Experts admit that, so far, getting humans to adopt microchip implants has been a tough sell. Many Christians reject them because of concern they could be a prelude to "the mark of the Beast" which Revelation chapter 13 says will be "a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads."

But the marketing "tipping point" for implantable chips, writes The Atlantic, will come "when they become so useful they're hard to refuse; when their benefits outweigh our anxieties about them. It could happen sooner than you think."

Right now, thousands of people in countries like Germany and Sweden have already opted to get chipped for easier financial transactions. Sven Becker, head of "I am Robot," tells Euronews that 2,000 to 3,500 people in Germany have implanted a microchip under their skin "as a substitute for key cards to the gym, office, and house."

Why Thousands of Swedes Have Inserted Microchips Under Their Skin

But some believe medical and health monitoring features will be what takes implanted chips mainstream.

Kayla Heffernan, a researcher in the department of computing and information systems at the University of Melbourne's School of Engineering, told The Atlantic people are already used to putting devices in their bodies.

"Pacemakers are routine surgery. Plastic surgery is less taboo now," Heffernan said. "Hundreds of thousands of American bodies now contain cochlear implants, IUDs, nerve stimulators, artificial joints, implantable birth-control rods, and beyond. So as we've become more comfortable with this, 'insertables' become more acceptable."

In Sweden, a pioneer in what's known as "biohacking (adding cybernetic devices to living things)", as many as 4,000 people have implanted microchips, usually for convenience features, essentially turning their hands into contact-less credit cards, key cards, and even railcards. The microchips are injected into the back of the hand between the thumb and index finger.

But more people than just Christians oppose the biohacking trend. The website Futurism calls it a "digital security nightmare."

Besides being vulnerable to hackers, a chip implanted in your body means, "They could track where you are, how long you take for lunch every day, or how many times you went to the bathroom if the chip were scanned by a reader," Futurism writes. "And opting out of this kind of data collection is a lot more convoluted when you've got a chip implanted in your bodily tissues. If you want to go off the grid in even the smallest way, you can leave your wallet at home, but removing a microchip requires a bit more, uh, effort."


Nanochips and Smart Dust: The Dangerous New Face of the Transhumanist Agenda

October 25, 2017 Pam Barker GOVERNMENT, HEALTH, Spotlight, TECHNOLOGY, Tyranny 0

Nanochips and Smart Dust: The Dangerous New Face of the Human Microchipping Agenda
nanochips microchips smart dust

The human microchipping agenda has a new face: Nanochips & Smart Dust. What are they? Are you being set up to be a node on the grid? What can you do?
Nanochips and Smart Dust are the new technological means for the advancement of the human microchipping agenda. Due to their incredibly tiny size, both nanochips and Smart Dust have the capacity to infiltrate the human body, become lodged within, and begin to set up a synthetic network on the inside which can be remotely controlled from the outside. Needless to say, this has grave freedom, privacy and health implications because it means the New World Order would be moving from controlling the outside world (environment/society) to controlling the inside world (your body). This article explores what the advent of nanochips and Smart dust could mean for you.

Different Forms of Control
Humanity’s history is filled with examples of societies where the people were sharply divided into 2 categories: rulers and slaves. In the distant past, the slaves have usually been kept in place because the rulers had access to and control over the resources, such as money, food, water, weapons or other necessities of life (control of the environment). In our more recent history, control was implemented not only by monopolizing resources but also via propaganda (control of the mind). This has manifested itself in many ways, e.g. the caste system in India (you must remain in your position on the hierarchical ladder for life), the royal bloodlines in Rome, the Middle East and Europe (who claimed an inherent and divine “right to rule”), the centralization of power in Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia during the 1930s (where a single autocrat or a small committee decided the fate of millions), and finally in the West (especially in the US) with the advent of specialized PR and mind control techniques that were refined by the CIA. Projects like MKUltra gave the NWO controllers unheard of power to remotely and subconsciously influence people without them ever knowing, including the ability to create sex slaves and sleeper assassins.

Control of the Mind-Emotion Nexus
Project MKUltra was at its height 60+ years ago, and things have moved on a lot since then. We are now entering an era where technological advancements are giving the NWO conspirators influence over a new realm – control of the emotions, or more accurately, control over the entire mind-emotion nexus in the human body. I am talking about microchips, tiny electronic devices which can be embedded under your skin, and which receive and transmit information. Although microchips have been around awhile, they are now outdated. What we are facing is something much tinier than a microchip, and therefore more of a threat: nanochips and smart dust.

The components of a Smart dust sensor or mote. Image credit:

The components of a Smart dust sensor or mote. Image credit:

What is a Nanochip?
So what is nanochip? The word “nano” is 3 orders of magnitude smaller than “micro”. Nano means “one billionth” while micro means “one millionth”. While microchips are about the size of a grain of rice and measured in millimeters, nanochips are completely invisible to the human eye. Some of the nanochips are far smaller than human hair (e.g. the μ-chip that is 0.4 x 0.4 mm). In 2015, IBM announced that they had developed functional nanochips measuring just 7 nm or nanometers (7 billionths of 1 meter). In comparison, a strand of human DNA is about 2.5 nm and the diameter of a single red blood cell is about 7500 nm! These nanochips power themselves from their environment (they don’t need batteries) and have a 100 year life span. They are slated to be rolled out first on products (so the corporatocracy can have total knowledge of consumer behavior in real time) before they can be used inside people’s bodies. Did you know that nerve cells grow onto/meld with the chip?

In this Leak Project video, the presenter claims that the NWO aim to introduce 100 trillion nanochips into the world, so that literally every single thing in the world is tagged, including you. He includes many patents and other docs as proof of this agenda. He singles out the company HP (Hewlett Packard) as being the executor of the plan to construct a central nervous system for the Earth – linking all resources and people in real time.

Smart dust. Image credit: Waking Times

Smart dust. Image credit: Waking Times

What is Smart Dust?
You may already be familiar with the “Smart” agenda or better put the Smart Deception. For those new to this, the Smart agenda is to create a giant electromagnetic grid or network that encompasses the entire Earth. Everything that moves is to be made or injected with some kind of sensor or mote that connects it to the grid – including household products, appliances, food/drink items, animals, plants and humans too. Smart dust is another name for these motes which will act as mini computers, broadcasting and receiving. They are small wireless microelectromechanical sensors (MEMS). As of 2013, a mote was about the size of a grain of rice, but with technology advancing all the time, these will keep on reducing in size. Motes can be ingested through food (as will be discussed below).

The Smart agenda is basically synonymous with the UN Agenda 21 or Agenda 2030, and the Smart grid is synonymous with the IoT (Internet of Things) which is also going to use the new 5G network to achieve its desired saturation levels.

While this kind of technology can be used for the benefit of mankind, like many things today, it has been weaponized. The existence of smart dust forms a massive threat against the sovereignty of every human being alive. What we are up against is nothing less than the attempted technological possession of humanity.

Delivery Systems for Nanochips and Smart Dust
In a fundamental way, vaccines, GMOs, bioengineered food and geoengineering/chemtrails are all connected, as they are delivery systems whereby this miniature technology of nanochips and Smart dust is planned to be inserted into our bodies. Some chemtrails contain Smart dust motes which readily infiltrate the body, communicate with other motes in your body, set up their own network and which can, unfortunately, be remotely controlled. Even if you are fastidious about what you eat and what you expose yourself to, it is difficult to see how you can avoid breathing in a mote of smart dust that was dropped on you by a plane spraying chemtrails.

With nanochips and motes inside your body, the NWO criminals can combine the IoT smart grid with brain mapping and other technological information in their attempt to pull off their ultimate endgame: to remotely influence and control an entire population by overriding (and programming) the thoughts, feelings and actions of the masses.

(The rabbit hole definitely does not stop at nanochips and Smart dust. An entire new category of lifeforms are being forged via synthetic biology. Morgellons fibers are self-aware, self-replicating and are likely assisting the dark agenda to remotely control the thoughts, feelings and bodily functions of the entire population. This will be explored in other articles.)

New Technology Always Pushed as Being Cool, Efficient and Convenient
Naturally, the full scope and goal of this agenda will not be revealed to the public as the technology is rolled out. Instead, we will continue to be told how wonderful, cool, trendy and efficient it all is. Note especially how all of this will be promoted under the banner of speed and convenience (while people unwittingly flush their freedom, health and privacy down the toilet). Yes, being surrounded by fields of manmade EM radiation everywhere you go will be disastrous for your health too.

The nanochips will also be pushed using peer pressure, encouraging people to get in the game out of social conformity. Like many governmental programs, the chips may initially be voluntary before they become mandatory. There is already a segment of society that is willingly chipping itself using tattoo ink. Recently, a company in Wisconsin (Three Square Market or 32M) introduced such an internal system and began encouraging its employees to get chipped. Although it was not mandatory, reportedly about half of them (41 out of 85) stepped forward and chose to get chipped!

Solutions: How to Remove a Chip
So what can you do about this? Firstly, get informed and make sure you understand the true nature and danger of nanochip and smart technology. Secondly, make sure you never acquiesce to getting chipped, no matter what reason you’re given. Doing so is tantamount to opening yourself to being remotely controlled without your knowledge. Thirdly, if you do discover a chip inside your body, get it removed. There are various ways to do. Some people crudely cut the chips out if they are large enough (i.e. a microchip instead of a nanochip). Other people claim you can used magnets such as neodymium magnets to render the nano chips useless. Hopefully, there will be intelligent inventors to step forward with new technologies that we can use to deactivate, disable and remove nanochips inside of our bodies.

Final Thoughts
The human microchipping agenda is really the same thing as the transhumanist agenda – to turn mankind into machine which will ultimately mean becoming not superhuman but subhuman.

We need to be very careful and think critically as we go forward into a world of fantastic technology. Like the surgeon’s knife, it can heal or it can kill. Given everything we know, it would be naïve to believe that nanochips will only be used for good. If we’re not aware, this technology will be used by the power-hungry to enslave us by tricking us with promises of utopia. Nanobots are already being used in Western medicine for all sorts of diseases. Once the smart grid is established, how will you avoid being monitored, tracked and influenced 24/7 every day of the year?

No matter how good the technology becomes, it can never replace the spirit of consciousness inside of you, which is your true power.


Original article
ER recommends other articles by The Freedom Articles

Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative news / independent media site The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at (FaceBook here), writing on many aspects of truth and freedom, from exposing aspects of the worldwide conspiracy to suggesting solutions for how humanity can create a new system of peace and abundance.













Chinese scientists give monkeys human brain genes in 'morally risky' experiment

The monkeys didn't grow bigger brains, but they do have better short-term memory and faster reaction times compared to monkeys without human brain genes



Their brains may not be bigger than normal, but monkeys created with human brain genes are exhibiting cognitive changes that suggest they might be smarter — and the experiments have ethicists shuddering.

In the wake of the genetically modified human babies scandal, Chinese scientists are drawing fresh condemnation from philosophers and ethicists, this time over the announcement they’ve created transgenic monkeys with elements of a human brain.

A team led by scientists at the Kunming Institute of Zoology at the Chinese Academy of Sciences say they generated 11 transgenic rhesus monkeys carrying human copies of a gene known as MCPH1, which they describe as an important gene for brain development and brain evolution.

The gene is involved in a process known as neoteny — the delaying or slowing of the development of an organism. As a baby’s brain develops after birth, MCPH1 is expressed in abundance, but less so in nonhuman primates.

The monkey’s brains developed along the same timeline as a human brain.

Six of the monkeys died, however the five survivors “exhibited better short-term memory and shorter reaction time” compared to their wild-type controls, the researchers report in the journal National Science Review.

According to the researchers, the experiments represent the first attempt to study the genetic basis of human brain origin using transgenic monkeys. The findings, they insist, “have the potential to provide important — and potentially unique — insights into basic questions of what actually makes humans unique.”

For others, the work provokes a profoundly moral and visceral uneasiness. Even one of the collaborators — University of North Carolina computer scientist Martin Styner — told MIT Technology Review he considered removing his name from the paper, which he said was unable to find a publisher in the West.

“Now we have created this animal which is different than it is supposed to be,” Styner said. “When we do experiments, we have to have a good understanding of what we are trying to learn, to help society, and that is not the case here.”

Why a Chinese gene editing experiment is causing a firestorm of controversy
U.S. scientists create human-pig chimera embryos to grow human cells: ‘This required a tour de force’
In an email to the National Post, Styner said he has an expertise in medical image analysis and was approached by the researchers back in 2011. He said he had no input on the science in the project, beyond how to best do the analysis of their MRI data. “At the time, I did not think deeply enough about the ethical consideration.”

He eventually grew more and more uncomfortable with the generation of transgenic monkeys, “or even worse, transgenic apes,” for studying brain development.

“So, yes, it’s morally risky to move towards humanizing primates, particularly when we are talking about the brain,” Styner said.

Styner’s co-authors, however, said the traditional mouse or rat models were “less ideal” than monkeys because of the vast dissimilarities in brain size and structure between humans and rodents.

When it comes to the scientific use of nonhuman primates, ethicists say the moral compass is skewed in cases like this.

Given the kind of beings monkeys are, “I certainly would have thought you would have had to have a reasonable expectation of high benefit to human beings to justify the harms that you are going to have for intensely social, cognitively complex, emotional animals like monkeys,” said Letitia Meynell, an associate professor in the department of philosophy at Dalhousie University in Halifax.

“It’s not clear that this kind of research has any reasonable expectation of having any useful application for human beings,” she said.

The science itself is also highly dubious and fundamentally flawed in its logic, she said.

“If you took Einstein as a baby and you raised him in the lab he wouldn’t turn out to be Einstein,” Meynell said. “If you’re actually interested in studying the cognitive complexity of these animals, you’re not going to get a good representation of that by raising them in labs, because they can’t develop the kind of cognitive and social skills they would in their normal environment.”

The Chinese said the MCPH1 gene is one of the strongest candidates for human brain evolution. But looking at a single gene is just bad genetics, Meynell said. Multiple genes and their interactions affect the vast majority of traits.

The researchers had expected their transgenic monkeys would have developed a bigger than normal brain, which wasn’t the case. The monkeys “did not manifest an enlarged brain size,” they reported — again underscoring that a single gene has limited effect on brain development.

One of the lead authors, Bing Su, told MIT that he’s testing other genes involved in brain evolution, including one dubbed the “humanity switch” for its presumed role in human intelligence. As Vox reports, Su told the journal Nature in 2016 that he was also keen to experiment with FOXP2 a gene that expresses a protein required for the proper development of speech and language. “I don’t think the monkey will all of a sudden start speaking, but will have some behavioural change,” Su said.

Monkeys have all of the morally relevant traits that we have “that would make it wrong to do this kind of random, ‘gee, let’s see what happens’ research on humans,” Meynell said — research, of course, that’s now been done in China with the birth of genetically modified twin girls. Last November, He Jiankui announced that he had edited the DNA of human embryos so that the babies would be resistant to HIV.

In the monkey experiments, the researchers introduced the human MCPH1 copies into the rhesus monkey genome by injecting a virus containing the gene into monkey embryos.

The University of Alberta’s Timothy Caulfield has warned that the more we humanize animals, the more it raises profoundly sticky moral questions, including the remote but not impossible risk animals could somehow develop human consciousness.

Two years ago, American researchers succeeded in creating human-pig chimera embryos with the ultimate goal of one day growing human organs in animals for transplant


Who's Who in Transhumanism Nanotech list...

Akhlesh Lakhtakia , Alan H Goldstein, Alan Harvey Guth, Alastair Reynolds, Alex Zettl - Nanotechnology, Alexander Randall 5th, Alison Cawsey, Allen M Steele, Andy Clark, Angela Belcher, Anne Foerst, Anne McCaffrey, Anne Perry, Arno Karlen, Arthur C Clarke, Arthur ten Wolde, Barbara Graves, BC Crandall - Nanotechnology, Ben Bova, Ben N Venzke, Bill Joy, Bob Frankston, Boris Kordemsky, Brad Templeton, Brian Wang, Bruce Damer, Bruce Sterling, Bryan Bergeron - Bioinformatics, Cees Dekker - Molecular Biophysics, Charles Gallenkamp, Charles Lieber, Charles M. Lieber - Nanocomputing, Charles Ostman, Charles Sheffield, China Mieville, Chip Walter, Chris Meyer, Chris Phoenix - Nanotechnology, Christine Peterson, CJ Cherryh, CJ Peters, Clinton W. Kelly, Connie Willis, Cory Doctorow, Damien Broderick - Futurist, Dan Chaon, Dan Simmons, Daniel C Dennett - Cognitive Science, Danny Belkin - Futurist, Darren H Tanke, David B Fogel, David Brin - Scientist and author, David Britz, David Chalmers, David Dalrymple, David Farland, David G. Stork, David Gelernter, David Gemmell, David W Zimmerly, David Weber, Deborah Osborne, Diana Walczak, Don Eigler - Physics, Don Maclurcan, Don Ross, Don Winslow, Donald F Glut, Douglas Mulhall, Douglas Palmer, Douglas R Hofstadter - Cognitive Science, Dr RE Volting, Ed Regis, Edward Feigenbaum, Eliezer S. Yudkowsky, Eric S Nylund, Ernest Nagel, Erwin Müller - invented the field ion microscope, and the atom probe., F Alexander Brejcha, Fernando Moreno-Herrero - Molecular NanoBioPhysics, Francine Pascal, Frank J Cilluffo, Frank Ryan, Frank Schirrmacher, Frank W. Sudia, Fritz Allhoff - Nanoethics, Gabriel Mesta, Gary A Linderer, Gary F. Marcus, Gene Wolfe, George A. Miller, George B Dyson - Futurist, George Gilder, Gerald M Edelman, Gerd Binnig - co-inventor of the scanning tunneling microscope, Gerd Gigerenzer, Ghim Wei Ho - Nanotechnology, Giulio Prisco, Glenn Fishbine, Glenn Harlan Reynolds, Graham Priest, Greg Bear, Greg Egan, Gregory Benford, Gregory S Paul, Gregory Stock, Gregory Timp - Electrical Engineering, Hal Finney, Hans Peter Brondmo, Harold Cohen, Harry Harrison, Harry Kroto - Nanochemistry, Harry Turtledove, Heinrich Rohrer - co-inventor of the scanning tunneling microscope, HG Wells, Hisanori Shinohara - Material Science, Hongjie Dai - Chemistry and Physics, Howard Gardner, Hugo de Garis, Iain Banks, Ian Stewart, Isaac Asimov, J. Storrs Hall - Molecular Manufacturing, J.C.R. Licklider, Jack Dann, Jack Dann, Jack M Bickham, Jack McDevitt, James Alan Gardner, James Clemens, James Hendler, James Luceno, James N. Gardner, James Schmitz, Jaron Lanier, Jay W. Richards, JE Pournelle, Jeff Grubb, Jeff Kleiser, Jerome C. Glenn, JM Balkin, Joan Slonczewski, Joe Haldeman, Joel Garreau, John Haugeland, John McCarthy, John Petersen, John R Horner, John Randall - Nanotechnology, John Searle, John Shirley, John Smart, Jonathan B Tucker, Jonathan Carroll, Joshua Lederberg, JRR Tolkien, Juan Enriquez, Juan Enriquez, Judith Miller, Julian Barbour - Quantum cosmology, Justin Heimberg, Kage Baker, Kate Wilhelm, Kathleen Sindell, Kay Kenyon, Keith Devlin, Ken Alibek, Ken Macleod, Kenneth Carpenter, Kevin Kelly, Kurt Godel, KW Jeter, Larry Niven, Laurie Garrett, Lee Smolin, Leonard A Cole, Luis V Rey, Mae-Wan Ho, Maggy Thomas, Marc D. Hauser, Margaret A. Boden - Philosophy, Marion Zimmer Bradley, Mark Juergensmeyer, Mark Welland - Nanotechnology, Martin Gardner, Matt Ruff, Max More, Michael Denton, Michael Gross, Michael J Benton, Michael J Novacek, Michael Vassar, Michio Kaku, Miguel José Yacamán, Mike Resnick, Mike Treder - Nanotechnology, Mike Weiner, Mind and Machine, Mitch Kapor, Mitchell Waldrop, Molly Gloss, Nancy Kress, Naomi Halas, Natasha Vita-More, Neal L Asher, Neal Stephenson, Neil Gaiman, Neil Gaiman, Neil Gershenfeld, Nick Bostrom - Futurist, Nova Spivack, Orson Scott Card, P. M. Ajayan - Nanoengineering, Pat Cadigan, Patricia B Seybold, Patrick Lin, Patrick Lynch, Pattie Maes, Paul Barrett, Paul Greenberg, Paul J. Steinhardt, Paul Levinson, Paul McEuen - Nanophysics, Paul Weiss - Chemistry and Physics, Peter B. Lloyd, Peter Norvig, Peter Plantec, Peter Voss, Petr Paucek - Biophysics, Phaedon Avouris, Phil Bowermaster - Speculist, Philip C Jackson, Poul Anderson, Pulickel Ajayan - Materials Engineering, Push Singh, RA Salvatore, Raj Reddy, Ray Kurzweil - Artificial Intelligence, Richard Dawkins, Richard Eckersley, Richard Feynman (deceased) - Physics, Richard Preston, Richard Smalley (deceased) - Nanotechnology, Robert Aunger, Robert Bradbury - Speculist, Robert Charles Wilson, Robert J. Sawyer, Robert Moog, Robert Morris, Robert Silverberg, Robert Taylor, Robert Wright, Robin Hanson, Robin Marantz Henig, Rodney Brooks - Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Roger Penrose, Roger Schank, Ron Zemke, Ryoo Ryong - Nanomaterial Chemistry, Sander Olson, Sarah Zettel, Scott Aaronson - Quantum computing, Scott Ciencin, Sergey Edward Lyshevski - Microsystems Engineering, Seth Lloyd, Seymour Papert, Sheldon H Harris, Sherry Turkle, Simon Reeve, Sohail Inayatullah, Spider Robinson, Stan Franklin - Artificial Intelligence, Stan Rapp, Stephen Baxter, Stephen Bury, Stephen King, Stephen L Burns, Stephen M. Kosslyn, Stephen Wolfram, Steve Kirsch, Steve T. Jurvetson, Steven Johnson, Steven Pinker, Stewart Brand , Stuart Hameroff, Stuart Kauffman, Sumio Iijima - Nanotechnology, Susan Blackmore, Swami Vivekananda, Ted Kaczynski, Terrence Sejnowski, Terry Bisson, Terry Brooks, Terry Grossman, Tess Gerritsen, Theodore J. Gordon, Theodore Sturgeon, Thom Holmes, Thomas J. Cowper, Thomas Ray, Tim Haines, Tom Craver , Tomaso Poggio , Vernor Vinge, W. Daniel Hillis, Wil McCarthy , William A. Dembski , William Gibson, Yahachi Saito -, Zhonglin Wang ,